a turningpoint for student feedback
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 2: A TurningPoint for student feedback](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022022202/5879b5541a28ab6b2c8b6841/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Have you used TurningPoint in one of your sessions?
1. Yes
2. No
![Page 3: A TurningPoint for student feedback](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022022202/5879b5541a28ab6b2c8b6841/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Just One Thing…
• Trialled TurningPoint to collect student feedback
• Three modules – one from each Level
– MST1001; MST2012; MST3019/3095/3096/3099
![Page 4: A TurningPoint for student feedback](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022022202/5879b5541a28ab6b2c8b6841/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Or via Blackboard
![Page 5: A TurningPoint for student feedback](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022022202/5879b5541a28ab6b2c8b6841/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: A TurningPoint for student feedback](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022022202/5879b5541a28ab6b2c8b6841/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Disadvantages
• Low response from students
• Lack of dialogue between students and staff
• Time consuming for Module Leader
• Students not clear if/how feedback used
CLOSE THE FEEDBACK LOOP
![Page 7: A TurningPoint for student feedback](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022022202/5879b5541a28ab6b2c8b6841/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
MST1001 Biodiversity of Marine Animals
![Page 8: A TurningPoint for student feedback](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022022202/5879b5541a28ab6b2c8b6841/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
MST3019/3095/3096/3099 Research Project modules
• Oral feedback from students noted during session and discussed at that time
• Formal written response generated by teaching team
• All feedback put on Blackboard and in Module Boxes
![Page 9: A TurningPoint for student feedback](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022022202/5879b5541a28ab6b2c8b6841/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
How do you rate using TurningPoint for collecting module feedback?
• Not quicker
• Good method but used at wrong time
• Good to see response - shows that staff look at and respond to answers/comments
12.5%3.1% 6.2%
3.1%
75%
Poor Average High
Level 4 - 32 responses47 registered students - 68% return
0% 4.8% 4.8% 9.5%
81%
Poor Average High
Level 5 - 21 responses48 registered students - 44% return
37.5%
12.5%30%
10%10%
Poor Average High
Level 6 - 40 responses43 registered students - 93% return
![Page 10: A TurningPoint for student feedback](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022022202/5879b5541a28ab6b2c8b6841/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Do you prefer the paper form or this interactive method?
Level 4 - 33 responses47 registered students
Level 5 - 21 responses48 registered students
Level 6 - 39 responses43 registered students
9.1%
90.9%
Paper form TurningPoint
14.3%
85.7%
Paper form TurningPoint
61.5%
38.5%
Paper form TurningPoint
• Prefer not to see responses as bar chart – uncomfortable that answers were visible to everyone
![Page 11: A TurningPoint for student feedback](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022022202/5879b5541a28ab6b2c8b6841/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Evaluation
Problems• Timing of feedback sessions
• Testing handsets at start of session
• Students submitting the ‘wrong’ response
• Not all students answered every question
Improvements• Longer, dedicated feedback session
• Fully explain benefits of using TurningPoint to students
• Amend/reduce questions asked
![Page 12: A TurningPoint for student feedback](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022022202/5879b5541a28ab6b2c8b6841/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
• Overall positive response from students
• Staff believe trials were successful
20.4%
7.5%
16.1%
7.5%
48.4%
Poor Average High32.3%
67.7%
Paper form TurningPoint
How do you rate using TurningPoint for collecting module feedback?
Do you prefer the paper form or this interactive method?
![Page 13: A TurningPoint for student feedback](https://reader031.vdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022022202/5879b5541a28ab6b2c8b6841/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Acknowledgments
• QuILT for providing funding through their ‘Just One Thing’ project
• Dr Ben Wigham (Module Leader for MST2012)
• Prof Matt Bentley (Module Leader for MST3019/3095/3096/3099)
Thank you for listening
Any questions?