rolt0/L9

BEFORE THE MAH ARASHTRA RFAI FSTATF

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL/ MUMBAI

Execution Application No. 114/19

Appeal No. ATOO6000OOOO10883

M/s. Balkrishna Constructionsv/s.

Mr. AmolJadhav

(Mr. Makarand Raut, Advocate for Applicant.Mr. Rahul Rawal, Advocate for Non-Applicant.)

CORAM II

In

IN DIRA JAIN J,,CHAIRPERSONSUMANT KOLHE, MEMBER (J)S.S, SANDHU. MEMBER(A)

10th ocroBER, 2019.DATE

Called.

Mr. Makarand Raut submits that he has instructions toappear on behalf of Applicant and seeks time to fileVakalatnama with no objection of the previousCounsel.

Learned Counsel for Applicant seeks time to file properaffidavit in support of application for condonation ofdelay.

Heard Learned Counsel for the parties. LearnedCounsel for Applicant submits that delay of 72 days inpreferring the appeal has been caused in view of thereasons mentioned in the application.

As the reasons in the application have not beencontroverted by Non-Applicant, the application isallowed. Delay of 72 days is condoned.

No costs.

LolLo/19

AT006000000010883

Appeal No. AT0060OO00OO10883

Shri Rahul Rawal, Learned Counsel waives notice and

submits that reply to appeal memo has been already

tendered.

Copy is served on Appellant.

Parties to take note that appeal is likely to be heard

and decided on merits at the stage of admission, ifotherwise found to be convenient to the Tribunal.

Stand over to l8th November, 2019.

(su LHE)"Xt|*o

(rNDK JAIN J)ed(14).