abal - dtic · fayetteville, nc organizational maint 473 c shop bismarck, nd aviation, c-12 hanger...

AbAl

4r

PI2$TAVAILABIýE Cp~3-~i9"C3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD

PAGE NO.

STATE LIST OF PROJECTS i - iv

MISSION LISTING v - vi

LANGUAGE vii

PROGRAM AND FINANCE SCHEDULE viii - ix

OBJECT CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE x

SPECIAL PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS xi - xii

PROJECT JUSTIFICATION DOCUMENTS 1 - 118

ARMORY UNIT STORAGE BUILDING DOCUMENT 105

INDOOR RANGE MODERNIZATION DOCUMENT 107

PROJECTS COSTED AT $400,00 AND UNDER 119 - 120

PLANNING AND DESIGN JUSTIFICATION DOCUMENT 121

MINOR CONSTRUCTION JUSTIFICATION DOCUMENT 123

"Accesion ForNTIS CR-A&IDTIC li AB

By. - . . .B y ....... ............................... ....

Avollab,!,1) Cxn.c

AvalIDist Swa

(

SUMMARY PROJECT LISTMAJOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION ARMY NATIONAL GUARD

FISCAL YEAR 1994(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

DD FORMAUTH APPROP 1391

STATE INSTALLATION AND PROJECT A AMOUNT PAGE

INSIDE THE UNITED STATES

ALABAMA EGLIN AFB (FLORIDA)MULTIPURPOSE RANGECOMPLEX (MPRC), UPGRADE 3,825 3,825 3

MOBILEORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE

SHOP ADDITION 502 502 11

STATE TOTAL 4,327 4,327

ARKANSAS CAMP ROBINSON (NORTH LJ.TTLE ROCK)TRAINING SITE UTILITIES

RENOVATION 1,275 1,275 15ARMORY 3,205 3,205 19SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT 4,223 4,223 25MODIFIED RECORD FIRE RANGE 907 907 29

STATE TOTAL 9,610' 9,610

HAWAII KAUAIKNOWN DISTANCE RANGE

UPGRADE 334 334 120

STATE TOTAL 334 334

IDAHO GOWEN FIELD (BOISE)COMBAT VEHICLE TRANSITION

COMPLEX 5,044 5,044 33USPFO ADMIN OFFICE

& WAREHOUSE ADD 1,391 1,391 37HOMEDALE

ARMORY 1,157 1,157 43


,4


STATE INSTALLATION AND PROJECT AMUNT AMOUNT PAGE

INDIANA ATTERBURY RESERVE FORCESTRAINING AREA (EDINBURGH)

INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLECOURSE (RETS) 1,156 1,156 47

MODIFIED RECORD FIRERANGE (RETS), UPGRADE 654 654 51


MAINE NORWAYARMORY EXPANSION/REHAB 1.380 1,380 55


MARYLAND TOWSON

ARMORY ALTER/ADDITION 2,823 2,823 61


MINNESOTA CAMP RIPLEY (LITTLE FALLS)MULTI PURPOSE RANGE

COMPLEX (HEAVY) (RETS) 3,185 3,185 65ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE

SHOPS 2,625 2,625 73


MISSOURI FORT CROWDERTROOP MEDICAL TRAINING

FACILITY 386 386 120

STATE TOTAL 386 386

MONTANA FORT HARRISON (HELENA)MEDICAL UNIT TRAINING

FACILITY 501 501 77

STATE TOTAL 501 501

'F)

ti


STATE INSTALLATION AND PROJECT A AMOUNT PAGE

NORTH CAROLINA FAYETTEVILLEORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE

SHOP 473 473 81

STATE TOTAL 473 473

NORTH DAKOTA BISMARCKAVIATION C-12 HANGAR 1,297 1,297 85

CAMP GRAFTON (DEVILS LAKE)MODIFIED RECORD FIRE RANGE

(RETS) 1,038 1,038 89HEATING PLANT ADDITION 1.826 1,826 93


UTAH CAMP WILLIAMS (LEHI)INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE

COURSE (RETS) 1,066 1,066 99MILITARY OPERATIONS IN

URBANIZED TERRAIN(MOUT) ASSAULT COURSE 850 850 103


VARIOUS VARIOUS/WORLDWIDE LOCATIONSARMORY UNIT STORAGE BUILDINGS 750 750 105INDOOR RANGE MODERNIZATION 637 637 107


VERMONT CAMP JOHNSON (COLCHESTER)ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE

SHOP 1,002 1,002 113ETHAN ALLEN

TRAINING SITE, SUPPORTFACILITY 304 304 120


iii


STATE INSTALLATION AND PROJECT AUTPAGE

WASHINGTON YAKIMA TRAINING CENTER (YAKIMA)MODIFIED MACHINE GUN RIFLE/

RANGE (RETS) 1 1,527 117


TOTAL MAJOR CONSTRUCTION 45,343 45,343

SUPPORT:

PLANNING AND DESIGN 522 522 121MINOR CONSTRUCTION 5,000 5,000 123

SUBTOTAL SUPPORT 5,522 5,522

1'GRAND TOTAL AUTHORIZATION/APPROPRIATIONS 50,865 50,865

iv

oC

NEW MISSION / CURRENT MISSIONFISCAL YEAR 1994

Cost New/Location Project MOO) Current

Eglin AFB Multipurpose Range 3,825 C(Florida), AL Complex (MPRC) Upgrade

Mobile, AL Organizational 502 CMaintenance Shop Add

Camp Robinson Training Site, Utilities 1,275 C(N. Little Renovation

Rock), AR Armory 3,205 NSanitary Sewer Improv 4,223 CModified Record Fire Range 907 C

Kauai, HI Known Distance Range Upg 334 CGowen Field, Combat Vehicle Trans Cmplx 5,044 N

(Boise), ID USPFO Admin Ofc & Whse Add 1,391 CHomedale, ID Armory 1,157 CAtterbury ARFTA, Infantry Squad Battle 1,156 C

(Edinburgh), IN Course (RETS)Modified Record Fire 654 C

Range (RETS) UpgradeNorway, ME Armory Expan/Rehab 1,380 CTowson, MD Armory Alt/Add 2,823 NCamp Ripley Multi Purpose Range 3,185 C(Little Falls), MN Complex (Heavy) (RETS)

OMSs 2,625 CFort Crowder, MO Troop Medical Tng Facil 386 CFort Harrison Medical Unit Tng Facil 501 C

(Helena), MTFayetteville, NC Organizational Maint 473 C

ShopBismarck, ND Aviation, C-12 Hanger 1,297 NCamp Grafton Modified Record Fire 1,038 C

(Devils Lake), ND Range (RETS)Heating Plant Addition 1,826 C

Camp Williams Infantry Squad Battle Crse 1,066 C(Lehi), UT MOUT Assault Course 850 C

Camp Johnson Organizational Maint 1,002 C(Colchester), VT Shop

Ethan Allen, VT Train Site, Support Facil 304 CYakima Tng Ctr Modified Machine Gun / 1,527 C

(Yakima), WA Rifle/Range (RETS)

(v

Recapitulation:

Total New Mission 12,369Total Current Mission 31,587Total Various Locations (Armory Unit Storage Buildings) 750Total Various Locations (Indoor Range Modernization) 637Total Planning & Design 522Total Minor Construction 5,000

Grand Total 50,865

vi

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES FOR 1994

APPROPRIATION LANGUAGE

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD

For construction, acquisition, expansion, rehabilitation,and conversion of facilities for the training and administrationof the Army National Guard, as authorized by Chapter 133 of Title10, United States Code, as amended, and the Reserve ForcesFacilities Act $ 50,865,000 ($214,989,000) (1)(2) to remainavailable until 30 September 1998 (30 September 1997).

Section 2 - EXPLANATION OF LANGUAGE

(1) Insertion of the FY 94 budget request.(2) Deletion of the FY.93 appropriation.

vii

-- . i i l I l I ii." =•

ae

0

A ) 4 In I

c- in. co ' m go.

a. 0 OI -I

I 4 I m (P 0)0

toin in I

*Co.4 C* WOO .W .WI.

w O uIU ino'1 11l

O~~i in.~ ni ~*t0 C4,lfl 0 0 in -

C44~. Nd (4 CIO (4

a c o'

z I.- I I

0 Ice- I0

I~1 CI CL L~ C (4

0' I I

0 I1 io 19

L1 I I1'- ) '

0 41

>C L 0 >0LX0

I L0~L

05 0 0

LI u 0 a o a . 1 10 X 4'

0.1 L. - 0 '.I 4'~CL FL.0L 0 0 L

* ~ ~ ~~ 0- 00 0 -- >C

I I0 - I0 0 0 0

I ~~ ~ I. +12 a *2 o

I QI

in' 00 0 0 ~ C S Q i C

- -- '- ---'---------'

01

In aIWnr n C40 t

o~ ~ ~ ~C 00) , I -7 ~ 5CdI(4

t- ccI - t- 0 goI

0 0If I I I

0L CD, 'CI C-14 0 4 0 (0 V0) CD.

0Y v0O0'dO 0) CIn r- 0(D) C4C'4 ~~ ~ e M 'i) ( t-a m sI ( cl C.) O

I- ~ ~ C I-1 C' mC' VC)C) Ntd 0'C4C) IC7

c0 N C4 04 to In00 L C

CIO 00-' '0 C')4 m' Grle' o n()C

0' ' ('4 '(4 (' I C C.) CII 'C4 C'4 It'd

Qi I.-

; I- CE. I

0

0 , 10 w. +

L . I a

CL'

LC 0- CDI,0 . I )

L ~ I

in 4 CL 4-4C

- 0I OxL I

U' . - .- .0)' - :: 2 04

I 0 41 4.I

0U' .0 cg 0 c a

LI L ow~oi I3 4 L 4

11 2 4- *L).L 4-30 !L! 0:0-' LI 10 .- 9 U.l

T; n z 0a 4 -00

L 0

C4-

0- C! 0!4

88 8jf ;LLC- - :~

* 4-0 C Ux

C440 I

C-o

0

toCI(~ I-i 'C

42 C!C-~'

'0' *1 . I

:10. )

10 I OI0I

0 0i

>1 c

c

01 - 11) Iu) u0 ' 1 0(4 11

_ 'O L 'I') I

oo

0 L

cc I

cc I :

0- is 0#Aul-

SPECIAL PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS

POLLUTION ABATEMENT: The military construction projects proposedin the program will be designed to meet environmental standards.Military construction projects proposed primarily for abatementof existing pollution programs at installations have beenreviewed to ensure that corrective design is accomplished inaccordance with specific standards and criteria.ENERGY CONSERVATION: Military construction projects specificallyfor energy conservation at installations have been developed,reviewed, and selected with prioritization by energy savings perinvestment cost. Projects include improvements to existingfacilities and utility systems to upgrade design, eliminatewaste, and install energy savings devices. Projects are designedfor minimum energy consumption.FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT AND WETLANDS PROTECTION: Proposed landacquisition disposition, and installation construction projectshave been planned to allow the proper management of flood plainsand the protection of wetlands by avoiding long and short-termadverse impacts, reducing the risk of flood losses, andminimizing the loss or degradation of wetlanas. Project planningis in accordance with the requirements of Executive Order No.11988 and 11990.DESTGN FOR ACCESSIBILITY OF PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED PERSONNEL:In accordance with Public Law 90-480, provisions for physicallyhandicapped personnel will be provided for, where appropriate, inthe design of facilities included in this program.PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL SITES AND STRUCTURES: Facilitiesincluded in this program do not directly or indirectly affect adistrict, site, building, structure, object, or setting listed inthe National Register of. Historic Places except as noted onDD Form 1391.USE OF EXCESS SCHOOLS AND OTHER BUILDINGS: Considerations weremade to utilize available commercial or academic buildings butnone were found suitable.ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION: In accordance with Section 102(2)(c)of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (PL 91-190), theenvironmental impact analysis process has been completed or isactively underway for all projects in the Military ConstructionProgram.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS: Economics are an inherent aspect of projectdevelopment and design of military construction projects.Therefore, all projects included in this program represent themost economical use of resources.

xi

NON-MILCON CONSTRUCTION: $71.0 Million in the FY 94 RealProperty Operations and Maintenance program will maintain27,969,546 SF in 4,962 logistical support buildings. Further-more, it supports 263 training sites (12,423 buildings totaling36,268,171 SF) in the 54 states, territories and commonwealthsused by the ARNG, and other DOD component forces. The funding isdedicated to Annual Recurring Requirements of $69.2 Million androutine or emergency maintenance and repair projects of approxi-mately $36.8 Million. No funding is dedicated to the containmentand reduction of Backlog of Maintenance and Repair (BMAR). BMARwill grow from $113.1 Million in FY 93 to a projected $153.9Million in FY 94.LONG-TERM FACILITIES CONTRACTS: The National Guard does not haveany long-term facilities contracts.CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA: Unless otherwise noted, the projectscomply with the scope and design criteria prescribed in Part IIof Military Handbook 1190, "Facility Planning and Design Guide."AREA COST FACTOR: Area Cost Factor (ACF) indexes displayed foreach appropriate area were developed from State and historicalconstruction cost records and may not directly collate withspecific cost factors developed by the U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers for Service-wide use.RESERVE MANPOWER POTENTIAL: The Reserve manpower potential tomeet and maintain authorized strengths of all Reserve units inthe areas where units are to be located has been reviewed inaccordance with the procedures described in DoD Directive 1225.7.It has been determined, in coordination with the other Military|Departments having Reserve units in the area, that the number ofReserve Components presently located in the area, and those unitshaving been allocated to this area for future activation, is notand shall not be larger than the number that reasonably may bemaintained at authorized-strength.RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION PROPERTY: Requested constructionprojects have been reviewed, consistent to the Senate ArmedServices Committee Report on the National Defense AuthorizationAct for FY 1991, for cost effective utilization of properties tobe disposed of by the Resolution Trust Corporation (Trust). Itwas determined that weapons firing ranges, troop supportfacilities and expansions to facilities on existing State orFederal troop training sites would not be compatible with thetypes of available Trust owned facilities and therefore notconsidered as a cost effective investment. Similarly, expansionsrequired to existing State owned facilities would not be amenableto a program of acquiring Trust owned buildings because of theadditional costs involved to both the State and Federalgovernments for relocating the assigned units or militaryfunction. Requirements for replacement facilities non-collatedon an active training site have been studied in detail anddetermined that either no Trust owned facilities are available inthe community or acquisition would not be cost effective comparedto the requested construction.

xii

FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2. DATEARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. AREA CONSTRCOST INDEX

EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE (FLORIDA). ALABAMA 83.9 I

5, FREQUENCY AND TYPE UTILIZATION

EGLIN TRAINING SITE IS APPROVED FOR YEAR ROUND USE, IDT AND ANNUALTRAINING SUPPORTING THE ARNG OF ALABAM4A AND PROPOSED NUMEROUS OTHER

STATES. THIS FACILITY IS UTILIZED FOR ANNUAL TRAINING AND IDT TRAININGEVERY YEAR.

6. OTHER ACTIVEJGUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS

THIS TRAINING SITE IS LOCATED ON RANGE B-75, EGLIN AFB, FLORIDA ANDTHERE ARE NO OTHER LIKE FACILITIES WITHIN A 25 MILE RADIUS.

7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM

CATEGORY COST DESIGN STATUSCODE PROJECT TITLE SCOPE ($000) START COMPLETE

179 MULTIPURPOSE 2 LANES 3,825 06/88 08/92RANGE COMPLEX(MPRC), UPGRADE

i STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION 7 OCT 92FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THESTATE RESERVE FORCES COMPONENT FACILITY BOARD FOR POSSIBLEJOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDEND UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED 0

(Numb.r of Acres)

10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS

NONE

"A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR

CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED".

DD Form 1390S/1, MAY 79 1201215 Pag I of a

I. COMPONIENT 2. DATEFY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2

,pI4Q MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE (FLORIDA), ALABAMA

i1. PERSONNU STRENGTH AS OF 30 SEP 92

PERMANENT GUARDjRESERVETOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CMUAJN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHORIZE 20 20 5755

ACTUAL 20 20 5597

12. RESERVE UNIT DATASTRENGTH

UNIT DESIGNATION AUTHORIZED ACTUAL

ARMOR, INFANTRY, ENGINEER AND SPECIAL 5755 5597FORCES UNITS

I

13. MAJOR E(UPMENT AND AIRCRAFT

TYPE AUTHORIZED ACTUAL

N/A

14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES(0000)

A. AIR POLLUTION NONE

B. WATER POLLUTION NONE

C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH NONE

DO Form 1390S12, MAY 7B fi5AGs oo FORM13E WEC- fwt4 W OeN6OBETE Pg" 2 of 2

i. COMPONENT 2. DATE

j ARNG FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA :

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE

EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE (FLORIDA). MULTIPURPOSE RANGE COMPLEXALABAMA (MPRC), UPGRADE

&PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY COOE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 1. PRO.JECTCOST ($00)

0505896A 179 010088 3,825

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT COST COST

PRIMARY FACILITY ........................... 2,655RANGE (TWO LANES) ........................ LS - - (2,655)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 916SITE PREPARATION ......................... AC 185 375.00 ( 69)FINE GRADING & SEEDING ................... AC 74 1200.00 ( 89)LANE/SAFETY MARKERS ...................... LS - - ( 3)BRIEFING/INST BUILDING/LATRINE ........... SF 992 45.00 ( 45)AMMO HANDLING FACILITY/CONCRETE SLAB ..... LS - - ( 58)UTILITIES: COMMUNICATIONS/WATER MAIN ..... LS - - ( 19)ROADS/TURNING PAD/TANK TRAILS............ LS - -633)

SUBTOTAL .................................. 3,571CONTINGENCY (5%) ........ 179SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD.(2.00%) ....... 75TOTAL REQUEST .............................. 3,825EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPR..NON ADD (1,645)

10. DESCRVPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIONConstruct a permanent standard design, multipurpose range complexconsisting of an upgrade from one lane Remoted Target System (RETS) tothree full firing lanes with range support facilities. Each lane of therange complex will have two tank trail, four armor moving targets, 20stationary armor, 45 stationary personnel targets, 15 moving personneltargets, 10 defilade firing positions, power and data distribution system.Range support facilities will include site preparation, fine grading andseeding, utilities, ammo building concrete slab, access and service roads.Air Conditionings 2 tons for control tower11. REQUIREMENT: 1 ADEQUATEt N/A SUBSTANDARD% N/APROJECT: This range allows the Training Site to more effectively supportthe inactive duty training (IDT) and annual training (AT) needs of theAlabama ARNG and other states who utilize the site. (Current Mission)REQUTREUi' This Multipurpose Range Complex is required by ARNG unitsto perform Tank Gunnery Qualification requirements as established byForces Command (FORSCOM) Regulation 350-2. This proposal will provide forintermediate and advanced qualifications at the Crew, Section, and Platoonlevels. This range will have a full RETS installed for Armor and Infantryuse. It will be constructed as an upgrade, resulting in a full MPRC uponcompletion.CURRENT SITUATION, Existing facilities do not provide ranges thatadequately conform to current weapons standards for gunnery Tank Tables.

(

DDInom 1391 w•PAN 00

i. COMPONEN7 2. DATE

ARNG FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA ;


EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE (FLORIDA),ALABAMA

4. PROJIECT TITLE .5. PFKOJECT NUMBER

MULTIPURPOSE RANGE COMPLEX 010088(MPR.C), UPGRADE

11. REQUIREMENT (Continued)

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: The existing range is not capable of providingcurrent Tank Tables VIII through XII Gunnery requirements. This trainingshortfall requires movement of three Armor battalions and one CavalrySquadron out of state, at high cost, to a Gunnery complex that can fulfillthe annual FORSCOM requirement to qualify platoons in Tank Gunnery. Thisrange will meet the requirements for the M-60A3 and M-1 issued to the ALARNG.

440D . 1391CDPAOE NO


SJ ARNG FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA ' .3


EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE (FLORIDA),,ALABAMA ..

4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMKER

MULTIPURPOSE RANGE COMPLEX 008_(MPRC), UPGRADE 00m

12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:

a. ESTIMATED DESIGN DATA:

(1) STATUS:(a) Date Design Started ..........................(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 1993 ........(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete ......(d) Date Design Completed ........................

(2) BASIS:(a) Standard or Definitive Design - Yes .2L No(b) Where was Design Previously Used? HNDM 1110-1-6

(3) COST (TOTAL) = (c) - (a)+(b) or (d)4(e) ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications ..... (_0_)(b) All Other Design Costs ...................... (___)(c) Total ...................................... ( 266)(d) Contract ...................................(e) In-House ................................... (. 0

(4) CONSTRUCTION START .............................. 6/94

b. Equipment associated with this project which will be providedfrom other federal appropriations:

Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNomenclature ARnropriation or Requested ("01

Remoted Target OPA 94 1,645System (RETS)

(

DOl', ISNOc5

I

1. COMPONENT FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2. DATE

ARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 2.i : D IAj


MOBILE, ALABAMA .87

5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE UTILIZATION

NORMAL ADMINISTRATION 5 DAYS PER WEEK WITH MULTIPLE 2-DAY TRAININGASSEMBLIES PER MONTH.

6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS

ARNG: MOBILE ( 1 MILES) ARMORY 31,500 SF 1974ARNG: MOBILE ( I MILES) ARMORY 27,800 SF 1937ARNG: MOBILE ( 7 MILES) ARMORY 11,725 SF 1957ARNG: MOBILE ( 9 MILES) ARMORY 11,725 SF 1958



214 ORGANIZATIONAL 8,286 SF $502 09/90 05/91MAINTENACE SHOP(OMS) ADDITION

6. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION 07 OCT 92FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY THE 07oCT9STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINTUSE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.

9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED 0

NONE (Numb,, ot Acre.)


NONE

"A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FORCONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED"

DD Form 13900/1, MAY 78 120t21s Pap I of 2

1. COMPONENT 2. DATE

FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE .D .

ARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

MOBILE. ALABAMA

11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 30 SEP 92

PERMAENT GUARDRESERVETOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CMUAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHORZE 27 27 1539 187 1352

ACTUAL 21 21 1573 180 1393



226TH AREA SUPPORT GROUP 143 136UIC WTAQAATPSN 31116

HHD 16 1ST MEDICAL BATTALION 39 46UIC WP9BAATPSN 32708

129TH MEDICAL COMPANY 127 135UIC WP96AATSPN 32752

1127TH MEDICAL COMPANY 13 14UIC WTWJAATSPN 37782

CONTINUED ON PAGE 313. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT


VEHICLES 393 393

TRAILERS "1 1907

TOTAL VEHICLES 500 500

14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES

($000)



C C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH NONE

DO Form 13008/2, MAY76 REPLACEUDDFO W M13N DECT 9C I HSO SOLETE P a2 o f2 77

4

COMPONENT FY 19AILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. DATE

A RNG


MOBILE, ALABAMA

4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER

ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP 010068(OMS) ADDITION

12. RESERVE UNIT DATA (CONTINUED)UNIT DESIGNATION STRENGTH

AUTHORIZED ACTUAL

COMPANY B, 1/20TH SPECIAL FORCES 60 70UIC: WTPCBOTSPN: 25320

DET 1 1151ST ENGINEER DET 24 33UIC: WVGEA1TSPN: 31600

640TH ORDNANCE COMPANY 152 152UIC WVRYAATSPN 33903

DETACHMENT 1 540TH ORDNANCE 69 69UIC WVRYAITSPN 33903

HHC 711TH SIGNAL BATTALION 143 143UIC WQF110TSPN 35024

COMPANY A 711TH SIGNAL COMPANY 162 162UIC WQFIAOTSPN 35204

COMPANY B 711TH SIGNAL COMPANY 101 108UIC WQFIBOTSPN 35204

DETACHMENT I COMPANY B 711TH 61 67UIC WQFIB1TSPN 35204

COMPANY C 711TH SIGNAL COMPANY 100 107UIC WQF1COTSPN 35204

859TH SIGNAL COMPANY 166 144UIC WVROAATSPN 35933

1133RD MEDICAL COMPANY 117 125UIC WVGEAATSPN 32752

445TH AVIATION DETACHMENT 31 31UIC WZEKAATSPN 30644

8c 1 ,6 1391c PAGE NO


ARNG FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA ,, :


MOBILE, ALABAMA

4. PROJECT TITLE' 5. PROJECT' NUIMBER

ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP 006(OMS) ADDITION 006

12. RESERVE UNIT DATA (CONTINUED) STRENGTHUNIT DESIGNATION AUHIH ZE ACTUAL

446TH AVIATION DETACHMENT _31 _ 1iUIC WZELAATSPN 30644

TOTAL 1539 1573

DD IDEC,? 1391c 9DEC 76PAG NO

h. ....

)

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

1

Y -

f. COMPONENT 2. DATE

ARNG FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAI ARNG


MOBILE, ALABAMA ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP(OMS) ADDITION

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6 CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER & PROJECT COST ($000)

0505896A 214 010068 502

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT COST COST($000)

PRIMARY FACILITY ........................... 327OMS ADDITION ................................ SF 5,066 50.00 ( 253)OMS ALTERATION ............................. SF 1,220 20.00 ( 24)UNHEATED COVERED STORAGE ................... SF 2,000 25.00 ( 50)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 143SITE PREPARATION ........................... LS - - ( 10)GRADING & DRAINAGE ......................... LS - - ( 6)RELOCATION OF LUBE RACK .................... LS - - ( 6)PAVING: FLEXIBLE .......................... SY 1,656 11.00 ( 18)PAVING: RIGID ............................. SY 378 20.00 ( 8)FUEL STORAGE AND DISPENSING SYSTEM ....... LS - - ( 75)UTILITIES ................................... LS - -20)

SUBTOTAL ........................... .............. 470CONTINGENCY (5%) ........................... 24SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD.(1.60%) ....... 8TOTAL REQUEST ........................ ......... .. 502EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPR..NON ADD ( 7)

10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION

This proposed construction is an addition to the existing OrganizationalMaintenance Shops Number 28 and 29. This project involves theconstruction of additional workbays, covered storage, tool room,Commo/Electronics repair section, and added supply areas. The additionwill be of masonry type construction with a built-up roof and concretefoundation and flooring.Air conditioning: 2 tons

11. REQUIREMENT: 17,336 SF ADEQUATE: 9,050 SF SUBSTANDARD: 8,286 SFPROJECT: An addition is requested for this OMS to perform organizationallevel maintenance on supported units Modified Table of Equipment (MTOE).(Current Mission)REQUIR : An addition is requested to allow theperformance of organizational level maintenance on supported units MTOEequipment.CURRENT SITUATION: The existing maintenance shops were constructed in1978 and contain 9.050 SF of covered area. The existing shops have fourworkbays, office space, male latrine, supply, and break areas. These OMSshave a shortage of space for OMSs supporting these types and amounts ofequipment. The most severe deficiencies exist in work areas, toolstorage. Comm/Elect repair and female latrine.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED Continued use of these inadequate facilitieswill have an adverse effect upon the performance of organizational levelmaintenance on supported unit's MTOE equipment. The shortage of spaceinterfere with attainment of SLALe and Federal maintenance objectives andthe utilization of work hours at the shop. In addition, the lack of botha tool room and Comm/Elec repair area causes a problem in the security ofgovernment property.

DDIo 1391AO D , DEC761391PACE N


FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA ..ARNG


MOBILE, ALABAMA

4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PECT NUMER

ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP 010068(OMS) ADDITION



(1) STATUS:(a) Date Design Started ......................(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 93 ....... IM(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete.. 3/91(d) Date Design Completed .................... 5/1

(2) BASIS:(a) Standard or Definitive Design - Yes __ No XL(b) Where was Design Previously Used? H/A

(3) COST (TOTAL) (c) = (a)+(b) or (d)+(e): ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications... (._0)Q._j(b) All Other Design Costs .................... (__.. _)(c) Total .................................... 2( 4.)(d) Contract ................................... ( 24)(e) In-House ................................. _

(4) CONSTRUCTION START ............................ 10/93

b. Equipment associated with this project which will be providedfrom other appropriations:

Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated Cost

Nomenclature Anoropriation or Reguested ($000)

JSIIDS AMSCO 5212.000 FY 94 2

Telephone Equip AMSCO 529895.10 FY 94 2

Furnishings AMSCO 519891.30 FY 94 3

12 DDi 06c 76 1391c PAG NO

1. COMPONIINT FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2 DAlE IARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION "

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. AREA CONSIRCOST INDEX

CAMP ROBINSON (NORTH LITTLE ROCK), AR 83.6


FACILITY IS USED FOR TRAINING A MINIMUM OF 48 WEEKS PER YEAR IN SUPPORTOF AR ARNG UNITS, THE PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION CENTER AND THE l1B BATTLESKILLS COURSE. ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES ARE ACCOMMODATED ON A SPACEAVAILABLE BASIS.


ARNG, CAMP ROBINSON (1.0 MILES) BN TRP COMPLEX 102848 SF 1979CAMP ROBINSON (3.0 MILES) AVN ARMORY 29210 SF 1978CAMP ROBINSON (0.5 MILES) PHILLIPS ARMORY 19967 SF 1974

USARs N. LITTLE ROCK(0.5 MILES) RESERVE/NAV CTR 128206 SF 1979ARNG, N. LITTLE ROCK(5.0 MILES) FISHER ARMORY 24960 SF 1959


CATEGORY COST DESIGN STATUS

CODE PROJECT TITLE SCOPE ME000) START COMPLETE

171 TRAINING SITE LS $1,275 01/90 06/93UTILITIESRENOVATION

8. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION 2 2 OCT 9 2FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY THESTATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINTEXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.

9. LAND ACOUISITION REQUIRED 0

NONE (Numbeo of Acres)


PROJECT FY COST ($000)

MOUT COMPLEX 96 1,400

ARMORY 100 PERSON 96 2,580

AASF 97 6,363

"A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FORCONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED*

DD Form 13908/1, MAY 78 120/21S poo ,2,

1. COMPONENi .DTFY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2. DATE


CAMP ROBINSON (N. LITTLE ROCK), ARKANSAS


PERMANENT GUARDiRESERVETOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CIVILIAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHORIZE 9475 1010 8465

ACTUAL 9323 991 8332



ALL ARKANSAS ARMY NATIONAL GUARD UNITS 9475 9323

t

13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND MAICRAFT


N/A N/A N/A


($000)




14 D0 Form 1390/12, MAY 7* FWA oM DF M10EC 7.0 IoETE Pqp 2 of a2

w1

1. COMPONNT 12. DATE

FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA


CAMP ROBINSON (NORTH LITTLE ROCK), TRAINING SITE UTILITIESARKANSAS IRENOVATION

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. POET COST ($00)

0505896A 171 050074 1,275

9. COST ESTIMATES


PRIMARY FACILITY ...........................NATURAL GAS SYSTEM RENOVATION .............. 532

DIST MAINS & SERVICE LINES ............... LS - - ( 417)ROAD BORES & REFURBISHING ................ LS - - ( 60)PAVEMENT REPAIRS ........................... SY 330 23.50 ( 6)NEW REGULATORS & VALVES ................... LS ( 40)MOVE METERING STATION ...................... EA 1 )360.00 ( 9)

PRIMARY ELECTRICAL SYSTEM UPGRADE.......... LS 665LOOPS .................................... LS - - ( 502)RADIALS ..................................... LS - - ( 112)DEMOLITION .................................. LS - -5)

SUBTOTAL ......................... .................. 1,197CONTINGENCY (51) ........................... 60SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (1.42%) ....... 18TOTAL REQUEST ......................................... 1.275EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER APPR ..... NON ADD ( 0)


Specially designed project to upgrade the existing primary electrical andnatural gas distribution systems. Proposed renovations are intendedp-rovide for a safe, modern, dependable utility systems. Improvement willinclude all necessary safety devices to assure maximum safety.Air Conditioninz: NONE11. REQUIREMENT: N/A ADEQUATE: N/A SUBSTANDARDs N/APROJECT, To provide an adequate gas and electrical utility system.Consists of the installation of new gas main lines, service lines andmeters. The electrical renovations consist of the conversion of theantiquated 4.160 volt to a 13,800 volt distribution system with relatedprotective devices. (Current Mission)REQUIREN: The gas and electrical renovations will replace thepresent undersized, unsafe and costly systems. Estimates currentlyindicate that as much as $160,000 per year In gas is lost due to theleakage.CURRENT SITUATION: The present facilities were constructed late 1930'sand early 1940's. Due to the age of the systems, leakage is occurring.The electrical system has been outgrown and the requirements have beenexpanded to the maximum. Recent requirements have necessitated theconversion to a 13,800 volt distribution system.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED, The monetary loss due to gas system leakagewill continue to increase and the possibility of explosion and/or fire isever present. The danger to personnel due to inadequate safety devices onthe electrical system presents another opportunity for disaster.

DDO,` 1391=.PN NJ 5


ARNG FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA . lu


CAMP ROBINSON (NORTH LITTLE ROCK),ARKANSAS

4.'PROJECT TITLE S. PROJ1ECT NMW

TRAINING SITE UTILITIES 050074RENOVATION



(1) STATUS:(a) Date Design Started ...................... 1/90(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 93 ...... All(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete.. 1/92(d) Date Design Completed .................... 6/93

(2) BASIS:(a) Standard or Definitive Design - Yes - No X(b) Where was Design Previously Used? N/A

(3) COST (TOTAL) (c) - (a)+(b) or (d)+(e): ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications... (___)(b) All Other Design Costs .................... (-_ )(c) Total .................................... 55(d) Contract ................................. 55(e) In-House ................................. 0



Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNomnms lat~.Ur.g -Aporopriation orRegugsted L#QQDI

NONE

DD 1.0M.1391C16 PAN Nosl [ I


ARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION ... '-I3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. AREA CONSTR

COST INDEXCAMP ROBINSON (N. LITTLE ROCK) ARKANSAS 83.6


NORMAL ADMINISTRATION FIVE DAYS PER WEEK WITH FOUR (4) TWO DAY TRAININGASSEMBLIES PER MONTH.

6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARDPRESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUSARNG: CAMP ROBINSON (1.0 MILES) BN TRP COMPLEX 102848 SF 1979

NGPEC (3.0 MILES) SCHOOL COMPLEX 216834 SF 1977CAMP ROBINSON (0.5 MILES) PHILLIPS ARMORY 19967 SF 1974N. LITTLE ROCK (5.0 MILES) FISHER ARMORY 24960 SF 1959

USAR: N. LITTLE ROCK (0.5 MILES) RESERVE CENTER 128026 SF 19797. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM


171 ARMORY 74,649 SF 3.205 8/90 6/93

8. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION

FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY THE 22 OCT 92

STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT (08l0)

EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED 0

NONE (Number of Acres)


PROJECT FY ($000)

MOUT-CTF RANGE (CAMP ROBINSON) 96 2,580

AASF/AVN (CAMP ROBINSON) 97 6,363

ARMORY (SEARCY) 97 1,752


DD Form 1S39091, MAY 73 1201216 PqpI



CAMP ROBINSON (N. LITTLE ROCK) ARKANSAS

11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH ASOF 30 SEP 92

PERMANENT GUARDIfRESERVETOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CIVILIAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHORIZE 30 8 22 652 174 478

ACTUAL 27 7 20 625 168 457


UNIT DESIGNATION AUTHORIZE ACTUAL

INSTALLATION SUPPORT UNIT 203 191UIC W7VJAATSPN 46755

DET 1 STARC (TROOP COMMAND) 138 123UIC WSAXAITPSN 56751

DET 1 109TH COMBAT SURGICAL HOSPITAL 180 180UIC WP9JAOTSPN 32742

5-206 FA FIRE SPT SECT 131 131UIC WQNZTO

'TSPN 13039TOTAL 652 625

13. MAJOR EUIMPMENT AND AIRCRAFT

TYPE AUTHORIM ACTUAL

WHEELED VEHICLES 105 105

TRAILERS 33 33

TRACKED VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT OVER 30 FT LONG 31 31

14,. OUTSTAND•o PLUTION AM SFTY DEFCENCIES

($000)




18 DO Form 13500/2, MAY 78 MAAM 00 FORM DWEC n "4wIsCMOomo Pegs o2 2

II ,-• + . . . -.. p •, ml..,,+a

0505896A171.0502..3,20 .. COMPONENT C2. DATE

FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARNG


CAMP ROBINSON (NORTH LITTLE ROCK)Y ARMORYARKANSASI

PROGRAMMELEMENT 6. CATEGORY COLE 7NPROJECTGNUMBR .PROJECTSCOST 31)

0505896A 171 050022 3,205

9 SPRI FALTS5

S P A0 SUT QUANTITY . COST 0 0 (02)

PRIMARY FACILITY ........................... 3,528ARMORY BUILDING .......................... SF 74,264 47.34 (3,516)FLAMMABLE MATERIAL BUILDING .............. SF 385 30.00 ( 2)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 506SITE PREPARATION (O00% STATE) ............... AC 7 .000.00 ( 21)GRADING, SEEDING & PLANTING .............. LS - - 26)PARKING: MILITATY, OFF STREET AND ACCESS. ;SY 24,138 12.40 (299)RIGID CONCRETE/WASH PLATFORM ............. LS - - ( 60)FLAGPOLE/SIDEWALKS/FENCING ............... LS - - ( 25)UTILITIES: WATER/SEWER/GAS/ELEC .......... LS - - 75)

SUBTOTAL ................................... 4,034CONTINGENCY (5%) ........................... 202SUPERVISION, INSF & OVERHEAD (1.37%) ....... 58

FEDERAL SHARE ............................ 3,205STATE SHARE ....................... NON ADD (1,089)

TOTAL REQUEST .............................. 3,205EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPR..NON ADD ( 64)

10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSD CONSTRUCTIONA specially designed one story armory of permanent masonry typeconstruction with built-up roof and concrete floors. Project to includemechanical and electrical systems, grading, seeding, fencing andmilitary/civilian parking areas.Air CondiLtioning: 81 tons11. REQUIREMENT: 74,649 SF ADEQUATE: 0 SF SUBSTANDARD: 26,436 SFPROJEC:i A new facility is requested to serve the peacetime mission ofthese units. The facility will provide an adequate area that will enhancethe craining and administration for all personnel of the units assigned.Peacetime unit readiness objectives will be accomplished and sustained byproviding the units with adequate facilities located at Camp Robinsonwhich also has the training land/areas available for their use.(New Mission)R, This facility is required to support the following unitsof the AR ARNGt Installation Support Unit, 148th Evacuation Hospital andthe 119th Personnel Services Company. These units are presently utilizingtheir existing facilities to the maximum extent possible due to recentreorganization and/or new organization of all three units.CURRiNT SITUATION: At the present time the Installation Support Unit islocated in a State owned facility that was constructed in 1940. Theexisting building currently being utilized will be returned to the Stateafter the new facility has been occupied. The 148th Evacuation Hospitaland the 119th Personnel Services Company are presently located in aninadequate commercial lease facility, which does not enhance the overalltraining, administration, supply/storage and, combat readiness that isrequired of them.

DDIF 1391 PPAX W 1


ARNG FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA )




ARMORY 050022

11. REQUIREMENT (CONTINUED)

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED Assigned units are required to use substandardfacilities that do not provide the units with an atmosphere conductive tomilitary operations. The sustandard facilites will continue to have anadverse affect on the readiness postures to include the retention andrecruiting of members for the units.

I

I / I I I I I I I I I • '- - L ,


SARNG FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA


CAMP ROBINSON (NORTH LITTLE ROCK),ARKANSAS'4. PROJECT TITLE 5.• PROJECT NUMBER

ARMORY 050022

12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

a. ESTIMATED DESIGN DATA:(1) STATUS:

(a) Date Design Started .......................... 8/90(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 1993 ........ 90%(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete ...... 12/(d) Date Design Completed ........................ 6/93

(2) BASISt(a) Standard of definitive Design - Yes __ No X(b) Where was Design Previously Used? NLA

(3) COST (TOTAL) - (c) - (a)+(b) and (d)+(e) ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications ..... (_0_)(b) All other design costs ..................... (___)(c) Total ....................................... (Ai 2 )

A (d) Contract .................................... (. 13 )(e) In-House ................................... ( .0

(4) CONSTRUCTION START .................................. j10/9

b. Equipment associated with this project which will be providedfrom other appropriation:


Nomenclature Aporooriation or Reouested

Kitchen Equip ANSCO 522811.00 94 52

J-SIIDS AMSCO 5212.000 94 12

f

D0 11" 1391€ c S21 NO


4II

21)

I COMPONFNT •I FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2. DAIE

ARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. AREA CONSTR

COST INDEX

CAMP ROBINSON (N. LITTLE ROCK). ARKANSAS 83.6


UTILIZED 365 DAYS PER YEAR BY ALL CAMP ROBINSON TENANTS, lIB NGBBATTLESKILLS, NGB PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION CENTER, STATE OCS & NCOMILITARY ACADEMIES, AR ARNG UNITS CONDUCTING ANNUAL TRAINING ANDINACTIVE DUTY TRAINING.

6& OTHER ACTIVEIGUARDiRESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS

ARNG: CAMP ROBINSON (1.0 MILES) BN TRP COMPLEX 102848 SF 1979CAMP ROBINSON (3.0 MILES) AVN ARMORY 29210 SF 1978CAMP ROBINSON (0.5 MILES) PHILLIPS ARMORY 19967 SF 1974

USAR: N. LITTLE ROCK(O.5 MILES) RESERVE/NAV CTR 128206 SF 1979ARNG: N. LITTLE ROCK(5.0 MILES) FISHER ARMORY 24960 SF 1959



171 SANITARY SEWER LS $4,223 09/92 06/93IMPROVEMENT

.8. STATE RESERVE FOPCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION 22 OCT 92FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY THESTATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT

EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED 0

NONE (Numbr of Acres)




ARMORY 96 2,580

AASF 97 6,363


DO Form 1390S/1, MAY 78 120/21S Pa"e of 2

iL _ ......

1. COMPONENT 2 AEFY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2. DAtE

ARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION


CAMP ROBINSON (N. LITTLE ROCK), ARKANSAS


PERMANENT GUARD/RESERVETOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CIVILIAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHORIZE 9475 1047 8428

ACTUAL 9233 1031 8202

12. RESERVE UNIT DATA

STRENGTH


ALL ARKANSAS ARMY NATIONAL GUARD UNITS 9,475 9,233

13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT

TYPE AU I MHIZED ACTUAL

N/A N/A N/A


($000)


B. WATER POLLUTION 4,424


2 4 DD Form 1390Sl2, MAY 79 REPLACE$ 6RM o3 DEC 7&,WHCH oSOXT6 Pag 2 of 2

S.

1. CO•MPONLNT 2. DATE



CAMP ROBINSON (NORTH LITTLE ROCK), SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTARKANSAS

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000)

0505896A 171 050105 4.223

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM UJM QUANTITY UNIT COST COST

PRIMARY FACILITY ........................ .... 3,858COLLECTION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS ........... LS - - (2,776)TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS ............. LS - - ( 311)STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS .................. LS - - ( 529)CONTROLS & INSTRUMENTATION ............... LS - - ( 242)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 110SITE IMPROVEMENTS .......................... LS - - ( 80)DEMOLITION .................................. LS - - ( 0)

SUBTOTAL ...................................... 3,968CONTINGENCY (5%) ........................... 198SUPERVISION. INSP & OVERHEAD (1.37%) ....... 57TOTAL REQUEST ..................... ................. 4,223EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPR. NON ADD ( 0)

1o. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION

The renovation/installation of the existing sanitary sewer collectionsystem with a specially designed system (slip-lining) to reduce the amountof inflow and Infiltration from surface/subsurface water into the system.Repair and replacement of existing manholes.Air Conditioning, NONElt. REQUIREMENT: 1 ADEQUATE: 0 EACH SUBSTANDARD: 73,223 LFPROJECT: To provide an adequate sanitary sever collection system for thecollection and treatment of wastewater at Camp Robinson. (Current Mission)REU E.H: The existing wastewater treatment plant is required to bein compliance with federal and state laws. Renovation of the collectionsystem is required to conform to the 1972 Water Pollution Control Act(P.L. 92-500, 33 U.S.C. et seq).CURRENT SITUATION: The existing collection system built in 1940's has ahigh volume of infiltration and inflow of rainwater. This developsuncontrollable flow rates in the wastewater treatment plant that is notable to comply with the permit criteria. The state has directed the ARNGto correct this situation and the ARNG has received numerousnon-compliance letters.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: If this project is not funded, a Notice ofViolation (NOV) will be issued to the AR ARNG and possibly shut down theWastewater Treatment Plant. Numerous activities are conducted on a fulltime basis that would be detrimental to training and degrade readiness.The AR ARNG is under a Consent Administrative Order to bring theWastewater Treatment Plant Facility and Collection System into compliance.

DDiorFO 1391

s


ARNG FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA



4. PROJECTTITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBER

SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT 050105



(1) STATUS:(a) Date Design Started ......................... 9/92(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 93 ...... 35%(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete.. 12/92(d) Date Design Completed .................... 6/93

(2) BASIS:(a) Standard or Definitive Design - Yes __ No X(b) Where was Design Previously Used? J/A

(3) COST (TOTAL) (c) - (a)+(b) or (d)+(e): ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications... )(b) All Other Design Costs ................... ( O )(c) Total .................................... ( 59 _)(d) Contract .................................. ( 59 )(e) In-House ................................. 0

(4) CONSTRUCTION START ............................


Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostSAppropriation or Requested ($000)

NONE

$

I DDo, 1391cI EC7

FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2 DATE


COST INDEXCAMP ROBINSON (N. LITTLE ROCK), ARKANSAS 83.6

S. FREQUENCY AND TYPE UTILIZATION

UTILIZED 48 IDT WEEKENDS ANNUALLY AND BY ALL AR ARNG UNITS CONDUCTINGANNUAL TRAINING AND INACTIVE DUTY TRAINING. ALSO UTILIZED BY 11B NGBBATTLE SKILLS COURSE, STATE OCS AND NCO MILITARY ACADEMIES. FACILITY ISUTILIZED FOR WEAPONS QUALIFICATION AS REQUIRED BY DA PAM 350-38.

6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUSARNG, Cr ROBINSON (1.0 MILES) BN TRP COMPLEX 102848 SF 1979

CP ROBINSON (3.0 MILES) AVN ARMORY 29210 SF 1978CP ROBINSON (0.5 MILES) PHILLIPS ARMORY 19967 SF 1974

USAR: N. LITTLE ROCK(O.5 MILES) RESERVE/NAV CTR 128206 SF 1979ARNG: N. LITTLE ROCK(5.0 MILES) FISHER ARMORY 24960 SF 1959



179 MODIFIED RECORD 16 LANES 907 08/90 10/91FIRE RANGE (RETS)

8. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION 2 2 OCT 9 2FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THESTATE RESERVE FORCES COMPONENT FACILITY BOARD FOR POSSIBLEJOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDEND UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.


(Number of Acres)10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS

PROJECT FY COST (SOOO)


"A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FORCONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED".

00 Form 13908/1, MAY 78 1201215 Pae I of I2.6

T

1.COMPONENT" 2.DTCFY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2 DATE



CAMP ROBINSON(NORTH LITTLE ROCK) ,ARKANSAS


PERMANENT GUARESERVETOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CMLIAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHORIZE 9475 1047 8428

ACTUAL 9233 1031 8202



ALL ARKANSAS ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 9,475 9,233

I



NIA


(8000)


B. VATER POLLUTION NONE


DDForm 1s012, MAY 78 "EPLACES A OIFORM! 'IS. OEC 7% WH11HISO L0O8TE PaUse I.o328__ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _




CAMP ROBINSON (NORTH LITTLE ROCK) MODIFIED RECORD FIRE RANGEARKANSAS (RETS)

s. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER . PROJECT COST ($000)

0505896A 179 050055 907

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM UU QUANTITY UNIT COST COST

PRIMARY FACILITY ........................... 671SIXTEEN LANE RANGE ....................... LS - - ( 635)CONTROL TOWER ............................ SF 121 300.00 ( 36)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 180PAVING ................................... SY 1550 10.00 ( 15)TARGET STORAGE, REPAIR AND AMMO .......... SF 920 55.00 ( 51)LATRINE (MALE AND FEMALE) ................ SF 200 65.00 ( 13)MESS SHELTER ............................. SF 800 45.00 ( 36)BLEACHER ENCLOSURE ........................ SF 544 50.00 ( 27)RANGE LIGHTING, FLAGPOLE ................. LS - - ( 18)UTILITIES (ELECTRICAL AND WATER) ......... LS - 20)

SUBTOTAL ................................... 851CONTIGENCY (5%) ............................ 43SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (1.47%) ....... 13TOTAL REQUEST .............................. 907EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPR..NON ADD ( 367)

10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCT*N

The construction of a 16 lane Modified Record Fire Range. Supportingfacilities will include control tower, bleacher enclosure, target storageand repair building, ammunition breakdown point, latrine, mess shelter,flag pole, range lighting, and other utilities as required.Air Conditioning: 1 ton for control tower11. REQUIREMENT: 1 ADEQUATE; N/A SUBSTANDARD: N/APLOE: This project will provide Modified Record Fire Range for M16Rifle markmanship training and qualification for all soldiers of the ARARNG. NOB Battle Skills Course, State OCS and NCO Academies and otherreserve personnel utilizing Camp Robinson. (Current Kission)REKUT IME: This range will enable all units/schools to qualify,annually their personnel in accordance with DA Pam 350-38, Standards inWeapons Training.CURRENT SITUATION: At the present time Camp Robinson has two AutomatedRecord Fire Ranges. These ranges are not sufficient to qualify the numberof personnel that will be required to conduct this training on an inactiveduty for training (IDT) weekend. Units must complete their weaponsqualification on one IDT weekend due to the cost of travel and trainingtime expended to conduct the required training.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED, Units will be hampered in attaining requiredweapons qualification standards. Training time utilized for otherrequirements will be lost due to units having to return to Camp Robinsonto complete weapons qualification. Funds programed for other trainingrequirements may have to be used for the return trip to Camp Robinson.

DD4O0" 1391

KC 74PAW j

1. COMOENT 2. DATE



CAMP ROBINSON (NORTH LITTLE ROCK)ARKANSAS

MODIFIED RECORD FIRE RANGE(RETS)050055


a.ESTIMATED DESIGN DATA:

(1) STATUS:

(a) Date Design Started .......................... IM(b) Percent complete as of I January 1993 ........ 1IM(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete ...... J/9(d) Date Design Completed ....................... 10/91

(2) BASIS-(a) Standard of definitive Design - Yes .X No(b) Where was Design Previously Used? HNDM 1110-1-5

(3) COST (TOTAL) = (c) - (a)+(b) and (d)+(e) ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications ..... 0(b) All other design costs ..................... (__Q_)(c) Total ...................................... ( 40)(d) Contract ................................... ( 40)(e) In-House ................................... ( 0




Nomencature ApproRriati Reaguested 1$0001

Remoted Control OPA 94 367Target System(RETS)

..A DDr' %1391cPAM NO


ARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. AREA CONSTRCAXT INDEX

GOWEN FIELD, BOISE, IDAHO 91.6& FREOUENCY AND TYPE UTILIZATION

THIS FACILITY WILL BE USED YEAR-ROUND, ON A CYCLIC BASIS. THE COMBATVEHICLE TRANSITION TRAINING TEAM (CVT3) HAS A 3-WEEK DURATION, WITH ANEW CYCLE STARTING EVERY FOUR WEEKS OR APPROXIMATELY 45 WEEKS PER YEAR.

6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARDRESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS

MOUNTAIN HOME AFB 50 MILESHILL AFB 390 MILESFAIRCHILD AFB 400 MILES



171 COMBAT VEHICLE 60,143 SF $5,044 03/91 03/93TRANSITIONCOMPLEX

"& STATE RESERVE FORCES FACIUTlES BOAiD RECOMENDATICON

FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY THE 6 OCT 92STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT

USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.9. LAND ACQUISITION REQIREDM 0

NONE (Nwnbw of Acr)

10. PROTS PLANND IN NEXT FOUR YEARS4


CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED'

01) Form ,15WS1, MAY 7. 120,,16 ftp "

'S •,... -1

COMPONENT FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2.) DT



GOVEN FIELD. BOISE, IDAHO

II. PERSONNELSTRENGTH AS OF 30 SEP 92

PERMANENT GUIIRESEWNETOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CIVILIAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHOM 108 5 103 117 N/A N/A

ACTUAL 107 4 103 116 NIA N/A

12. RESERVE UNIT DATASTPENGTH

UNIT DESIGNATION AUTIORAZED ACTUAL

COMBAT VEHICLE TRANSITION 117 116TRAINING TEAM

UIC, V7TQAATSPNt 36576

+I

14. OUTSTAI0NDM POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIECIES

(0000)


E Yc::: AHOAAFT - ACTUAL

T. WATER POLLUTION NONE

C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HA• R NONE

2 00 Form 1800/2, MAY 78 o D FORM 130 DE 7% WSW I O) Elp a o 2* .a..-I-

I i Mi l i ,




GOWEN FIELD. BOISE, IDAHO COMBAT VEHICLE TRANSITIONCOMPLEX

S. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER IL PROJECT COST (6000)

0505896A 171 160052 5,044

9. COST ES'iMATES _

ITEM UIM QUANTITY UNIT COST COS

PRIMARY FACILITY ........................... 4,410VEHICLE TRAINING BUILDING ................ SF 59843 73.50 (4,398)FLAMMABLE MATERIALS STORAGE BUILDING ..... SF 300 40.00 ( 12)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 329SITE PREPARATION, GRADING. SEEDING .......SIDEWALK/FENCING ......................... LS - - ( 16)FLEXIBLE PAVING .......................... SY 5360 11.00 ( 59)MILITARY PARKING (HARDSTAND) ............. SY 7200 8.00 ( 58)UTILITIES: ELEC, GAS, WATER, SEWER ...... LS - - ( 11)RIGID PAVING ............................. SF 32640 5.35 ( 175)STORAGE COMPOUND ......................... LS - - ( 10)

SUBTOTAL ................................... 4,739CONTINGENCY (5%) ........................... 237

SSUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (1.37%) ....... 68TOTAL REQUEST .............................. 5.044EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPR. NON ADD ( 120)

10. DESCRIPTION O PROPOSED CoNSUCTIONConstruction of a training facility with classrooms, staff andadministrative offices, and supply rooms with arms vault. The facilitywill be a single-story construction, with concrete floors and foundation.The structure will be constructed to allow for future expansion. Projectwill include landscaping, roads and parking areas, and all utilities.Air Conditionint: 52 tons11. REQUIREMENT: 60,143 SF ADEQUATE: 0 SF SUBSTANDARD: 0 SFPO : A 60,143 SF facility to support the training of tank crews andorganizational mechanics in all Reserve Components. (New Mission)ROUTEENT: A professional Armor Training facility of 57,526 SF. toallow the Combat Vehicle Transition Training Team (CVT3) for ReserveComponents to perform its assigned mission. The complex will provide asingle facility, adequate to conduct required training on all types ofCombat Vehicles.CURRENT SITUATION: There is no existing facility to accommodate the CVT3for the Reserve Components. Currently the teams are using inadequatefacilities: tents, separate classroom, and admin/supply buildings whichare shared with troop units performing weekend or two-week annualtraining. The additional impact of the CVT3 staff and students seriouslyovertaxes these existing facilities.

,q IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED, Adverse working conditions and learningenvironment vill continue to degrade the training of all ReserveComponents tankers and organizational mechanics. An important mission,performed 345 days annually, will continue to suffer from substandardfacilities. During winter months, training will continue to be conductedin tents, with chemical toilets for latrine facilities. The quality ofinstruction and the morale of the soldiers being trained will continue tobe seriously impaired.

DDFM 1391

D i e PPM $110



GOWEN FIELD, BOISE, IDAHO


COMBAT VEHICLE TRANSITION 160052COMPLEX



(1) STATUS:(a) Date Design Started ......................(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 93 ......(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete.. 7/91(d) Date Design Completed .................... 3/93

(2) BASIS:(a) Standard or Definitive Design - Yes - No X._(b) Where was Design Previously Used? NLA

(3) COST (TOTAL) (c) - (a)+(b) or (d)+(e): ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications...( 0 )(b) All Other Design Costs ................... )(c) Total .................................... aQ0 ) I(d) Contract .................................. (. 06)(e) In-House ................................. ( 0



Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNomnlature Ap•ropriation or Requested ($0001

JSIIDS AMSCO 5212.000 94 15

Telecom ANSCO 519891.10 94 20

Furniture ANSCO 519891.30 94 85

34 DO,.1391c P NO

I COMPONENT FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2. DATE

ARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION ".3, INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. AREA CONSTRICOST INDEX

GOWEN FIELD, BOISE, IDAHO 91.6

s. FREQUENCY AND TYPE UTILIZATION

DAILY USE FOR USPFO ADMINISTRATION FUNCTIONS 5 DAYS PER WEEK WITH DRILLWEEKENDS AND ANNUAL TRAINING.

6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARDIRESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS

MOUNTAIN HOME AFB, MOUNTAIN HOME, IDAHO 50 MILESHILL AFB, OGDEN, UTAH 400 MILESFAIRCHILD AFB, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 400 MILES



CODE PROJECT TITLE SCOPE ($000) START COMPLETE

610 UNITED STATES 15,226 SF $1,391 04/90 03/93PROPERTY ANDFISCAL OFFICER(USPFO)ADMINISTRATIONOFFICEAND WAREHOUSEADDITION

L STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION

FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY THE 6 QCT 92

STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT (Date)

USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.9. LAND ACOQUESfTON REOUIRED 0

NONE (Number of Acre)


NONE

"A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR, CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED"

r7DOForm 1390911, MAY 78 P~oot 014, -.




GOVEN FIELD, BOISE, IDAHO


PERMANENT GUARD/IRESERVETOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CMIAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHORIZE 87 5 4 78 3682 474 3208

ACTUAL 74 1 4 69 3572 470 3102

12. RESERVE UNIT DATASTfENGTH

UNIT DESIGNATION AUTHORI- ACTUAL

ALL IDAHO ARMY NATIONAL GUARD UNITS 3682 3572

I& MAJOR ECIUlIWET AND AIRCRAFT

NOPE AUTHORIZED ACTUALNONE

14. OUTSTANDICN0 POLUTIO AM SAFET DOEICIINlES($000)




,. -, DO Form 139012, MAY ?8 r tOORM 3 DEC 7& C WOW" oSSOLT I,4O


FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA ..ARNG ..


GOWEN FIELD, BOISE, IDAHO USPFO ADMINISTRATION OFFICE ANDWAREHOUSE ADDITION

SPROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COST ($000)

0505896A 610 160022 1.391

9. COST ESTIMATES


PRIMARY FACILITY ........................... 1,019ADMINISTRATION ............................. SF 11100 77.00 ( 854)WAREHOUSE ................................... SF 4126 40.00 ( 165)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 288SITE PREPARATION, GRADING, SEEDING ....... LS ( 22)PAVEMENT FLEXIBLE .......................... SY 2273 15.00 ( 35)PAVEMENT RIGID ............................. SY 320 15.00 ( 5)FENCING ..................................... LF 230 14.00 ( 3)LOADING DOCK & DEMOLITION ................. LS - - ( 20)ASBESTOS REMOVAL SERVICES ................. LS - - ( 60)SIDEWALKS ................................... SF 1362 2.00 ( 3)AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLING SYSTEM ......... LS - - ( 100)UTILITIES: WATER/GAS/SEWER & ELEC ........ LS 40)

SUBTOTAL ......................... ................. . 1,307CONTINGENCY (5%) ........................... 65SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (1.42%) ....... 19TOTAL REQUEST .............................. 1391EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPR. NON ADD234)

10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIONThis project is a specially designed facility of permanent conciete,concrete block, and brick with a composition roof and concrete floors. T'e

-facility is equipped with mechanical and electrical equt.ment. Supportfacilities include: a loading dock with canopy, access roads, a serviceapron for the loading dock, and sidewalks.Air Conditionina: 51 tons11. REQUIREMENT: 48,266 SF ADEQUATE: 33,040 SF SUBSTANDARD: 0 SFPROJECT: An addition to the existing facility is requested to meet theexpanded mission of the USPFO. (Current Mission)EQUIREMENT: This request is for an additional 11,100 SF of

administration office space and 4,126 SF of warehouse space. Existingoffice space is inadequate and permanent personnel are overcrowded in thisspace. Warehouse space is also insufficient due to the additional unitssupported by the USPFO of Idaho. The expanded facility would provide theoperational and administrative area that is required to enable thepersonnel to attain and maintain the desired high degree of readiness inthe event of mobilization, and to support the pre-mobilization training.supply and fiscal requirements of other units.CURRENT SITUATION: The administration, fiscal, and supply functions arepresently being performed in a structure built in 1968. The facility hashad two additions, in 1973, 1,702 SF of administration area was added; andin 1983, 1,920 SF of ADP area was added. The present facilities andfunctions are severely overcrowded, limiting the USPFO's ability toperform its mission. There are no classrooms or conference rooms in the"building. Consequently, when there is a need to conduct training, holdconferences with contractors, or for the directorate to hold confidentialfiscal reviews, the department chief must use other facilities. Thisoften creates conflicts with other activities on the installation.

DD,•1 191 P Ntq139PAGENO 7


SARNG FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA



4. PROJECT TITLE S. PROJECT NUMBER

USPFO ADMINISTRATION OFFICE ANDWAREHOUSE ADDITION 160022

it. RE IR (CONTINUED)

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED= The USPFO will continue to work at reducedefficiency because of substandard conditions. The lack of adequate spacewill continue to degrade the USPFO's readiness, and their ability toprovide the maximum support for the National Guard, Army and other ser-icemembers that train on this installation. Troop morale, recruiting andretention will all suffer because the USPFO personnel are required tooperate in an inadequate facility.

4I

I

-, 10, 1391c

I, COMPONENT 9 DATE




4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJ"T NUMBER

SUSPFO ADMINISTRATION OFFICE AND 160022WAREHOUSE ADDITION



(1) STATUS:(a) Date Design Started ...................... 4/90(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 93 ...... 95%(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete.. 7/90(d) Date Design Completed .................... 3/93

(2) BASIS:(a) Standard or Definitive Design - Yes - No X(b) Where was Design Previously Used? N/A

(3) COST (TOTAL) (c) - (a)+(b) or (d)+(e): ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications... (_0_)(b) All Other Design Costs .................. (_0-)(c) Total ..................................... (.. 88 )(d) Contract ................................. ( HI 8 )(e) In-House ................................. 0



Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNomenclature Appropriation or Requested 1000)

Telecom AMSCO 519891.10 94 5

Furniture AMSCO 519891.30 94 229

DDO"m' 1391c

'THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

1.

I

i


ARNG I MILITARY CONSTRUCTION .•


HOMEDALE, IDAHO 91.6


NORMAL ADMINISTRATION FIVE (5) DAYS PER WEEK WITH ONE (1) WEEKENDTRAINING ASSEMBLY PER MONTH, PLUS SPECIAL ASSEMBLIES AS DIRECTED BYHIGHER HEADQUARTERS.


ARNG: CALDWELL (16 MILES) ARMORY 24,053 SF 1963NAMPA (33 MILES) ARMORY 13,240 SF 1957PAYETTE (36 MILES) ARMORY 8,492 SF 1971



CODE PROJECT TITLE SCOPE (mO00) START COMPLETE

171 ARMORY 20,214 SF 1,157 04/89 09/91

a. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION 6 OCT 9 2FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY THESTATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINTEXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.


NONE (Number of Acre)

10 PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS

NONE

"A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FORCONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT THE ESTIMATED COST IhDICATED"

DD Form 1390811, MAY 78 120/215 Ps i of 2

I. CO MO N Eo N T 2 . ,D A E )CO NFY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE



HOMEDALE, IDAHO

11. PERSONNELSTRENGTHASOF 30 SEP 92

PERMANENT GUARD/RESERVETOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CMLIAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHORIZE 2 2 60 2 58

ACTUAL 1 53 2 51

"12. RESERVE UNIT DATASTRENGTH


DET I C CO (-) 116TH ENGR BN 60 53UIC WP06C1TSPN 21353

I

'13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT



TRAILERS 10 10

V TRACKED VEHICLES 2 2

I


($000)

p A. AIR POLLUTION NONE



DD Form 13908/2, MAY 78 RPLACES 00 FORM 13•S. DEC 7&, WHICH IS OSSOLETS Pa g of 2

1, COPNN 2.ATI ARNG FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA '

1 3 INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 14. PROJECT TITLE

': HOMEDALE, IDAHO ARMORY

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER G. PROJECT COST ($000)

0505896A 171 160013 1,157

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT COST ($000)

PRIMARY FACILITY ........................ .... 1.313ARMORY BUILDING ............................ SF 20,214 64.95 (1,313)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES .............................. - - 175SITE PREPARATION (100% STATE) ............ LS - - ( 20)FINE GRADING, SEEDING & PLANTING ......... LS - - ( 37)FENCING .................................. LF 533 13.00 ( 7)PARKING- MIL/OFF STREET/ACCESS/TURN PADS. LS - - ( 55)FLAGPOLE & WASH PLATFORM W/FUEL DISP ..... LS - - ( 29)UTILITIES: WATER/SEWER/GAS/ELECT ......... LS - - ( 22)SIDEWALK .................................... SF 1,800 3.00 (5)

SUBTOTAL .................. .................... 1,488CONTINGENCY (5%) ........................... 74SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (1.4%) ........ 22

FEDERAL SHARE .................................................... 1,157STATE SHARE .................... NON ADD... ( 427)

TOTAL REQUEST ....................... ....... . 1,157EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPR..NON ADD ( 30)


The proposed building is a specially designed facility of permanentmasonry type construction, brick and concrete block unit, with a built-upr oof and concrete floors. It is a one story structure complete withmechanical and electrical equipment. Outside supporting facilities£include a wash platform and fuel dispensing facilities.AJ.._Conditioning: 9 tons11. hEiUIREMENT: 20,214 SF ADEQUATEj 0 SF SUBSTANDARD% 7,639 SFPROJECT: A new facility is requested to serve the peacetime mission ofthis unit. The space will permit all personnel to perform the necessarytasks that will improve their readiness posture for support in combatobjectives. The existing armory cannot be adequately remodeled orexpanded. (Current Mission)R R : This facility is required to house Det 1, C Company 116thEngr Bn, consisting of 60 personnel. This armory will provide thenecessary administration and indoor training areas, area for storage ofequipment for proper security, space to achieve the proficiency inrequired training in order to accomplish the assigned readinessobjectives. A 7.0 acre state owned site is available for construction ofthis facility.CURRENT SITUATION: The existing armory was constructed in 1956. Thesoil has a high alkaline content and it Is coming up through the concretefloors. Attempts to seal the concrete have been fruitless. The presentarmory consists of 7,639 SF reflecting a shortage of 12,575 SF. Theexisting facility does not lend itself to remodel or reconstructionbecause of property restrictions.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED The assigned unit will be required to continueto use the overcrowded, inadequate facility with a deficiency of 12.575 SFin supply, training, food preparation areas and security.

DDFoc, 1391 D C7 PA ME NO 4

I. COMPONENT 2. DATE



HOMEDALE, IDAHO

S4. PROJECT TITLE 5. PROJECT NUMBERI ARMORYA R160013



(a) Date Design Started ..........................(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 1993 ........ A100%(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete ...... 5/91(d) Date Design Completed ......................... 9/91

(2) BASIS:(a) Standard of definitive Design - Yes No(b) Where was Design Previously Used? •--

(3) COST (TOTAL) - (c) = (a)+lb) and (d)+(e) (#000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications ..... (.0.)(b) All other design costs..................... )(c) Total .................................... 49(d) Contract ................................... 49(e) In-House ................................... 0


Sb. Equipment associated with this project which will be providedfrom other appropriation:

Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostSNoMenclature Agtprai or Reguested ($agg)

Kitchen Equip AMSCO 522811.00 94 20

J-SIIDS AMSCO 5212.00 94 10

44 DD 1391C PAME NO

I. COMPONENT FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2 DATE


COST INDEX

ATTERBURY (ARFTA) (EDINBURGH), INDIANA 974


TRAINING SITE USED FOR WEEKEND TRAINING 44 WEEKENDS PER YEAR BY 22BATTALIONS AND 50 COMPANY-SIZE UNITS. TRAINING SITE WILL BE USED FORANNUAL TRAINING 12 WEEKS PER YEAR BY 5 BRIGADE-SIZE UNITS.

6. OTHER ACTIVEIGUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS

ARNG: COLUMBUS (15 MILES) ARMORY 16855 SF 1979EDINBURGH (0 MILES) ARMORY 67081 SF 1987

USAR: CP ATTERBURY (0 MILES) ARMORY 1974



CODE PROJECT TITLE SCOPE ($000) START COMPLETE

179 INFANTRY SQUAD LS 1,156 03/92 01/93BATTLE COURSE

(RETS)

6, Si ATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION 1 8 FE B 9.3FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE (Date)STATE RESERVE FORCES COMPONENT FACILITY BOARD FOR POSSIBLEJOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDEND UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.


(Number of Acres)



TRAINING SITE FACILITIES PHASE VI 96 6,692

MILITARY EDUCATION FACILITY 96 4,634

TANK TABLE VI/VIII RANGE 97 400


DO Form 1390S/1, MAY 71 120121S Pop I of 2

45

j ". COMPONENT FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2. DATE

S~~~ARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION" ''-9


ATTERBURY (ARFTA) (EDINBURGH). INDIANA

1 11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH ASOF 30 SEP 92

PERMANENT GUAR/RESERVETOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CMLIAN TOTAL OFFICER EMISTED

AUTHORIZE 14,023 1287 12,736

ACTUAL 1A.4.-053 1285 12.7 8



ALL INDIANA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 14,023 14,053

ARNG UNITS FROM OHIO, KENTUCKY, ILLINOIS,AND MISSOURI.

USAR UNITS FROM OHIO, KENTUCKY, ILLINOISAND INDIANA.

t ~



N/A


($000)




DD Form 1390S12, MAY78 REPLACS' 00 FORM 13, , DEC 71 WMCH IS OSOLETE Pap 2 of 2

FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA O ($000)ARNGt .INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITL

ATTERBUR¥ RESERVE FORCES TRAINING INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSEAREA (EDINBURGH, INDIANA I(RETS)PP>PAIM ELEMENT CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECTNUMER L'•AIECTCOS6T $OM)

0505896A 179 180036 1,156

9. COST ESTIMATESCOST

ITEM U/M OJANTITY UNIT COST S000)

PRIMARY FACILITY ........................... 661BATTLE COURSE RANGE ...................... LS - - ( 661)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ............... 418SITE PREPARATION ......................... LS - - ( 204)OPERATIONS/STORAGE/INSTRUCTION BLDGS ..... SF 1600 60.00 ( 96)LATRINE/AMNO BLDG ........................ SF 440 65.90 ( 29)ELECT SERVICE ............................ LS - - ( 20)MILITARY PARKING ......................... SY 650 8.00 ( 5)ACCESS/SVC ROAD .......................... SY 7800 7.00 ( 55)FLAG POLE/PA POLES & WIRING .............. LS - - ( 4)COMMUNICATIONS ........................... LS - -)

SUBTOTAL ................................... 1,079CONTIGENCY (5%) ............................ 54SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (2.00%) ....... 23TOTAL REQUEST ........................... ... 1,156EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPR..NON ADD ( 451)

10. oDECRPTION OPF PAO16= CONSTAICT•O•

Construct an Infantry Squad Battle Course to provide both offensive and/ordefensive live fire following the Army Training & Evaluation Plan (ARTEP)objectives for a reinforced, dismounted, infantry rifle squad. Primaryfacilities include all construction within the perimeter of the rangecomplex and a control tower. Range support facilities includeadmin/instruction building, ammo breakdown building, latrine,access/service roads, parking area, utilities, communications and siteimprovements.Air Conditionings 2 tons for control tower11. REQUIREMENT: I ADEQUATE: N/A SUBSTANDARD: N/APROJECT, A live fire Infantry Squad Battle Course with both offensiveand defensive scenarios for ARTEP Standard Training and Evaluation. Thisproject covers 210 acres of federally owned land licensed to the State ofIndiana. (Current Mission)RQUZKINI' This range is required to provide ARTEP standard

collective live fire training and evaluation for all infantry rifle squadsin the Indiana ARNG.CURRENT SITUATION, There is no Infantry Squad Battle Course orequivalent range available on the installation, anywhere in the State ofIndiana or within reasonable commuting distance.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDEDs If this project is not provided, units will notbe able to conduct required ARTEP squad level training or evaluation. Asignificant. adverse impact on the proficiency, readiness anddeployability of units will exist. Combat weapons live fire training andevaluation requirements will not be met and overall readiness will bedegraded.

DD,"• 13917

DE 76 P9" 4 7 mm


FY 194 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 'ARNG POETDT .R1i


ATTERBURY RESERVE FORCES TRAININGAREA (EDINBURGH), INDIANA

4. PROJECT TITLE S. PROJECT NIJMER

INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSE 180036(RETS)



(1) STATUS:(a) Date Design Started .......................... 2(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 1993 ........(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete ...... 6/92(d) Date Design Completed ........................ 1IM9

(2) BASISt(a) Standard of definitive Design - Yes _X. No(b) Where was Design Previously Used? HNDM 1110-1-19

(3) COST (TOTAL) - (c) - (a)+(b) and (d)÷(e) (SOOO)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications ..... 0

(b) All other design costs .................... 0(c) Total ...................................... ( 81)(d) Contract ................................... (-. 1)(e) In-House ................................... ( 0



Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostN m n l t r Ap~rogriation or Requested ($000)

Remoted Target OPA 94 444System (RETS)

J-SIIDS OPA 94 7

I

DD4,"¶ 1391cj77--EN

FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2. DATESARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION


ATTERBURY (ARFTA) (EDINBURGH), INDIANA 97.4


TRAINING SITE USED FOR WEEKEND TRAINING 44 WEEKENDS PER YEAR BY 22BATTALIONS AND 50 COMPANY-SIZE UNITS. TRAINING SITE WILL BE USED FORANNUAL TRAINING 12 WEEKS PER YEAR BY 5 BRIGADE-SIZE UNITS.

6. OTHER ACTIVEIGUARDIRESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS

ARNG: COLUMBUS (15 MILES) ARMORY 16855 SF 1979EDINBURGH (0 MILES) ARMORY 67081 SF 1987

USAR: CP ATTERBURY (0 MILES) ARMORY 1974



179 MODIFIED RECORD 16 LANES 654 05/90 08/91FIRE RANGE (RETS)UPGRADE

""8 STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION 18 FEB 93FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THESTATE RESERVE FORCES COMPONENT FACILITY BOARD FOR POSSIBLEJOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDEND UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.

9. LAND ACOUSITION REQUIRED 0

(Nummr of Ac•,•)10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS


TRAINING SITE FACILITIES PHASE VI 96 6,692

MILITARY EDUCATION FACILITY 96 4,634

TANK TABLE VI/VIII RANGE 97 400


CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED".

DD Form 1390/11, MAY 75 12I2 .of 2

1. COMONEN12. DATE1. COMPONLJNI FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE



ATTERBURY (ARFTA) (EDINBURGH), INDIANA


PERIWANENT GUARDIRESERVETOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CMLIAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHORIZE 14.,023 1287 12,736

ACTUAL 14,053 1285 12,768

12, RESERVE UNIT DATASTRENGTH


ALL INDIANA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 14,023 14,053

ARNG UNITS FROM OHIO, KENTUCKY, ILLINOIS,AND MISSOURI.

USAR UNITS FROM OHIO, KENTUCKY, ILLINOISAND INDIANA.

13. MA" EWUPMNT AD AIRCRAFT

TYPE AUTHORIMD ACTUAL

N/A

14. OUTSTANWING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICENCI

($000)



C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH NONE U

DO Form 13901S2, MAY ? PLiE8ODFORM i=&DEC 71oL- WIHM 18OUCLM Paa2 of2

COMPONENT 2. DATE



ATTERBURY RESERVE FORCES TRAINING MODIFIED RECORD FIRE RANGEAREA (EDINBURGH), INDIANA (RETS), UPGRADE

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY COOE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECT COGT ($000)

0505896A 179 180041 654

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM UIM QUANTITY UNIT COST COST

PRIMARY FACILITY ........................... 574RANGE UPGRADE ............................ LS - ( 551)MODIFIED CONTROL TOWER ................... LS - ( 23)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 39SITE PREPARATION ......................... LS - - ( 15)TARGET STORAGE BLDG ADDITION ............. SF 323 30.00 ( 10)PA SYSTEM WIRING ......................... LS - - ( 4)GRADING & SEEDING........................ AC 5 2000.00 ( 10)

SUBTOTAL ................................... 613CONTINGENCY (5%) ........................... 31SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (1.52%) ....... 10TOTAL REQUEST .............................. 654EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPR..NON ADD ( 448)


This project will upgrade a 16 lane Record Fire Range constructed in FY 88into a Modified Record Fire Range (RETS).Air Conditioning: 1 ton for control tower11. REQUIREMENT: 1 ADEQUATE: N/A SUBSTANDARD: N/APROJECT: This project consists of upgrading an existing 16 lane RecordFire Range to provide a Modified Record Fire (RETS) Range. The upgradefollows criteria established for such ranges as outlined in the Corps ofEngineers design manual. This project covers 23 acres of Federal landlicensed to the state of Indiana. (Current Mission)REQUIEME: The proposed range upgrade will require the addition oftwo target bunkers per lane and additional electrical power and controlwiring. A range control computer system and air condition system arerequired in the control tower. Wiring and speaker mounts for a publicsystem will be added. An addition to the existing target storage buildingis also required.CURRENT SITUATION: Camp Atterbury has one 16 lane Record Fire Rangewhich was built in FY 88. It is manually operated and has no field firingcapability.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Due to inadequate existing range facilities.individual weapons training objectives will be delayed. The developmentand maintaining of combat skills needed to deploy rapidly is essential asthe number of National Guard units with early missions increase.

nn FoW 1391

DEC 76 PAI NoUI~ll •II i


SARNG FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA )3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

ATTERBURY RESERVE FORCES TRAININGAREA (EDINBURGH). INDIANA

4, PRJET TITE L PROJECT NUMBER

MODIFIED RECORD FIRE RANGE 180041

(RETS), UPGRADE12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:


(1) STATUS:(a) Date Design Started ...................... 5/90(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 93 ....... I=(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete.. 8/90(d) Date Design Completed .................... 8/L9

(2) BASISt(a) Standard or Definitive Design - Yes I No(b) Where was Design Previously Used? HNDM 1110-1-l

(3) COST (TOTAL) (c) = (a)+(b) or (d)+(e), ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications...(0 )(b) All Other Design Costs .................. (0 )(c) Total .................................... 30(d) Contract ................................ 30(e) In-House ................................. 0




mnclature Apropriation or Requested ($000)

Remote Target OPA 94 448System (RETS)

q

DDno" 1391CWC• 7 PAGE dNO

i i COMONT FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2. DATEiARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. AREA CONSTR

COST INDEXNORWAY, MAINE 88.0

,F FREQUENCY AND TYPE UTILIZATION

NORMAL ADMINISTRATION FIVE (5) DAYS PER WEEK WITH A TWO DAY TRAININGASSEMBLY ONE WEEKEND PER MONTH.

6. OTHER ACTIVEJGUARDIRESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUSARNG: AUBURN (22 MILES) OMS 4,960 SF 1961

LEWISTON (25 MILES) ARMORY 24,019 SF 1974 JOINT USE WITHUSAR

USAR: AUBURN (22 MILES) ARMORY

7. PROJECTS REOUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM


171 ARMORY 23,630 SF 1,380 12/88 02/93EXPANSION/REHABILITATION

4, STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITiES BOARD PECOMMENDATION 14 OCT 92FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY THESTATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINTEXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.

9. LAND ACOUISITION REQUIRED 1NONE (Number of Acres)


NONE


DD Form 1390S/1, MAY 76 120121S Papi "P3

i COMPONENT i DFY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2 DATE



NORWAY, MAINE

iI. PERSONNEL STRENGTH ASOF 30 SEP 92

PERMANENT GUARDIRESERVETOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CILIAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHORIZE 161 5 156

ACTUAL 154 6 148



CO C, 133D ENGINEER BATTALION 161 154UIC WQQNCOTSPN 21364

I




TRAILERS 23 21

TRACKED VEHICLES 3 2


($o0o)




DD Form 1390S12, MAY 78 REPLACE4S W FOAMh 1iMS DEC 4 WNCH 9 OSbOETE Pap 2 of 2

-- ~~~~~ 4 -n ... .ri l l fIilII•IlIi...... " -


FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA ,,,.; .j


NORWAY, MAINE ARMORY EXPANSION/REHABILITATION

5 PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUM*R 8. PROCT COST ($000)

0505896A 171 230002 1,380

9. %=T ESTIMATES

ITEM UIM CUANTITY UINIT COST COST fPRIMARY FACILITY ........................... 1,432

ARMORY ADDITION .......................... SF 13,107 79.65 (1,044)REHABILITATION ........................... SF 10,523 36.87 ( 388)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 378SITE PREPARATION (100% STATE) ............ LS -( 88)DEMOLITION, WASH RACK, FUEL DSIP SYS..... LS -( 102)FINE GRADING, SEEDING & PLANTING ......... LS - - 17)FENCING, CONCRETE PAVING, WALKS .......... LS - - ( 33)PARKING & PAVING: MIL, OFF STREET/ACCESS SY 9,530 13.22 ( 125)UTILITIES: WATER/SEWER & TELCOM .......... LS - -13)

SUBTOTAL ................................... 1,810CONTINGENCY (5%) ........................... 91SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (1.40%) ....... 27

FEDERAL SHARE ............................ .1,380STATE SHARE ....................... NON ADD ( 548)

TOTAL REQUEST .............................. 1,380

10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIONA specially designed two story facility of permanent construction.Consisting of concrete block with brick on a concrete foundation andfloor. The existing armory will undergo rehabilitaiton in conjunctionwith this addition to provide an energy efficient structure with adequatespace for the assigned unit. Upgrading of the heating and ventilationsystem, power and lighting system and demolition work.Air Conditionina: NONE11. REQUIREMENT: 33,644 SF ADEQUATE: 10,014 SF SUBSTANDARD: 10, 523 SFPROJECT: This project will provide a modern and efficient armory tomeet administrative & training requirements of the assigned unit. (CurrentMission)B.OUIE1EI: This facility is required to provide functional areas forCompany D, 262nd Engineer Battalion (Cbt) (Corps) with a required strengthof 160 personnel as well as their assigned equipment. This armory willprovide the necessary administrative, indoor training areas, equipmenttraining and storage areas to achieve the proficiency is required trainingand to accomplish the assigned readiness objectives.CURRENT SITUATION: The current Norway Armory was constructed In 1941.This facility has deteriorated from aging and is extremely energyinefficient and poorly configured. Company D, 262nd Engineer Bn wasformerly a split unit with a detachment in Rumford, ME. In 1984 the unitwas consolidated in the Norway Armory. The current building is severelylacking space for administration, food service and training (classroom,

001,"5 1391MN


FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA .4?k 10:•ARNG V.4,


NORWAY, MAINE

4. PROJECT TITLE &. PROJECT NME

ARMORY EXPANS ION/REHABILITATION 230002

11. REQUIREMENT (CONTINUED)CURRENT SITUATION: library, learning center, training aid and audiovisual storage, and unit maintenance training areas). The existingfacility is currently situated on a 6.3 acre State owned site.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: The assigned unit will be required to utilizetheir existing undersized and substandard facility. These conditions havea detrimental effect upon the unit's morale and readiness. The State willcontinue to waste thousands of dollars to operate this inadequatefacility.

I

"DDO,• 1_91_


ARNG FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA sA3t ARNG

3 INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

NORWAY, MAINE

4. PP4:6T TITLE 5.PFMOJEWT NM

ARMORY EXPANSION/REHABILITATION 230002



(a) Date Design Started .......................... 12/88(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 1993 ........ 65%(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete ...... 9/91(d) Date Design Completed ........................ 2/93

(2) BASIS:(a) Standard of definitive Design - Yes-- No .L(b) Where was Design Previously Used? IiA

(3) COST (TOTAL) - (c) a (a)+(b) and (d)+(e) ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications ..... ( 0 )(b) All other design costs ..................... ( 0 )(c) Total ...................................... ( 58)(d) Contract ................................... 58)(e) In-House ................................... 0


b. Equipment associated with this project which will be providedfrom other appropriation:

Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated C921

NomeunclatuaLare Asaronriatio or 2LRegL1uese (OO

Kitchen Equip AMSCO 522811.00 94 20

Telephone AMSCO 529895.10 94 3

001'"" 1391C W7DD1 c 76~ p~.

____________________________________

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK!

SI

:3

1. COMPONENT FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2 DATE

ARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION .;,


TOWSON, MARYLAND 97.5

& FREQUENCY AND TYPE UTILIZATION

NORMAL ADMINISTRATION FIVE (5) DAYS PER WEEK WITH A MAXIMUM OF ONE (1)WEEKEND ASSEMBLY PER MONTH.

6. OTHER ACTIVEIGUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUSARNG: TOWSON (OLD) (3 MILES) 200 PERSON-ARMORY 26,401 SF 1933

PARKVILLE (8 MILES) 300 PERSON-ARMORY 36,366 SF 1964PIKESVILLE (9 MILES) 600 PERSON-ARMORY 96,455 SF 1903


CATEGORY COST DES STATUSCODE PROJECT TITLE SCOPE ($000) START COMPLETE

171 ARMORY 62,584 SF 2,823 08/88 04/93ALTERATION/ADDITION

E STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION 08 APR 92"

FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY THE - aPR9STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT

EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.9. LAND ACQUSTInON REQIRE 0

NONE (NwnbW of A-".)

10. PROJECTS PLANMNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS

NONE


DO Form 1390S11, MAY 75 '12012S pop 1 Of-t.,3

.O EFY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE

ARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION .


TOWSON, MARYLAND

11. PEFwSONEsTRENTHASOF 30 SEP 92

PERMANENT UAAWIETOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CILIAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

ArTHOMz 47 12 33 2 344 49 295

ACTUAL 45 10 33 2 380 43 337

12. EERVE UNIT DATAj ~STAEGTSUNIT DESIGNATION AUTHOE ACTUAL

HHC/MKC SPT CMD, 29TH INF DIV (L) 134 215UIC WA6XAATSPN 0702935

CO B, 2ND BN, 175TH INF. 29TH INF DIV (L) 130 104UIC WPHVBOTSPN 0702947

CO A (-DET 1&2) 129TH SIG BN, 29TH INF DIV (L) 80 61UIC WV62AOTPSN 0702904

TOTAL 344 380

l3. MAJOR EAUIPMENT AMN MWCAFT

TYPE M'THOPtAZD ACTUAL

NONE

1~

14. OUTITANDINS POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICiNCIES(0000)




F I390 /2FormlSO052, MAY i78 AWLAC5 o FORMINK06074 MGM OBSOLETE p Ifae

it -


ARNO FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA tS~ARNG

I INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE

TOWSON, MARYLAND ARMORY ALTERATION/ADDITION

.PROGRAM ELEMENT 6CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMER 8. PROJECT COST ($000)

0505896A 171 240016 2,823

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITE U WANTITY UNT COST COST

PRIMARY FACILITY ........................... 2,566ARMORY ALTERATIONS ....................... SF 35,877 11.87 ( 426)ARMORY ADDITION .......................... SF 26,707 80.13 (2,140)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 86UTILITY CONNECTIONS ...................... LS - - ( 15)POV PARKING .............................. LS - - ( 10)SITE PREPARATIONS ........................ LS - - ( 55)GRADING AND SEEDING ...................... LS - - ( 5)SIDEWALKS ................................ SF 1,000 1.25 ( 1 )

SUBTOTAL ................................... 2,652CONTINGENCY (5%) ........................... 133SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (1.37%) ....... 38TOTAL REQUEST.............................. 2,823EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPR..NON ADD ( 15)

10. DESCRIPTI OF PROPOSED CONSTRCTION

Alterations and an addition to the existing building to provide forauthorized space for current criteria for the activities to be housed. Toprovide the authorized accommodations it viii be necessary to construct anaddition to the existing building, complete with all utilities.Air Conditionings 60 tons11. REQUIREMENTs 62,584 SF ADEQUATE: 0 SF SUBSTANDARD, 35,877 SFPROJECTs Alterations and an addition are necessary to provideaccommodation for the assigned units. The increase space will enable allpersonnel to perform military tasks that will enhance and improve theirreadiness posture. (Current Mission)RElU.IJI. The armory requires many adjustments in size of functionalareas in order to provide accommodations of sufficient size to houseadministration, storage, indoor training areas and similar activities toenhance proficiency in readiness objectives. This project is needed toprovide adequate facilities for these units.CURRENT SITUATION: The existing armory consists of 35.877 gross SF andwas constructed in 1980 with 75% Federal and 25% State funds. Asdesigned. the facility was house two company sized units.IMPACT IF NOT PROVTIDE There would be insufficient space to accommodatethe three assigned units. The inadequate size of functional areas andlack of space would continue to have an adverse on the ability of theunits to achieve and maintain their required readiness posture.

DOl"M 1391 -AG late• To "N '


ARNG FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA • j3


TOWSON, MARYLAND


ARMORY ALTERATION/ADDITION 240016


a. ESTIMATED DESIGN DATA,(1) STATUS:

(a) Date Design Started .......................... 8/88(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 1993 ........ 65%(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete ...... 5/90(d) Date Design Completed........................ 4/93

(2) BASIS:(a) Standard of definitive Design - Yes No _X_(b) Where was Design Previously Used?

(3) COST (TOTAL) a (c) - (a)+(b) and (d)+(e) ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications ..... (0)(b) All other design costs ..................... ( _ )(c) Total ...................................... (_I1 ?)(d) Contract ................................... ( 117 )(e) In-House ................................... ( _ )


b. Equipment associated with this project which will be providedfrom other appropriation;

Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated Cos1

Nomenc.slature Appropriation o ReI*guested ($000

Kitchen Equip ANSCO 522811.00 94 15

Ii

G2w DD 7¶13 PAG NO

I,

FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2. DATE

ARNGc MILITARY CONSTRUCTION -. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. AREA CONSTR

COST INDEXCAMP RIPLEY (LITTLE FALLS), MINNESOTA 100.0

S. FREXUENCY AND TYPE UTIUZATION

TO BE USED 48 OF 52 WEEKENDS ANNUALLY FOR INACTIVE DUTY TRAINING AND 42WEEKS PER YEAR FOR UNITS CONDUCTING ANNUAL TRAINING.

& OTHER ACTIVE/GUARDIRESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUSBRAINERD (23 MILES) ARMORY 37311 SF 1988LONG PRAIRIE (33 MILES) ARMORY 15790 SF 1920ST. CLOUD (37 MILES) ARMORY 26447 SF 1960



179 MULTI PURPOSE LS 3,185 01/92 04/93RANGE COMPLEX(RETS)

S. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILTIES BOARD RTION 3 FEB 93FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THESTATE RESERVE FORCES COMPONENT FACILITY BOARD FOR POSSIBLEJOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDEND UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.9. LAD ACCUSITION REGQIRED 0

(Numbew of Aar")10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS


OnS #11/12/19 94 2625

MODIFIED RECORD FIRE RANGE 95 500

INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSE (RETS) 96 700

"A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOMCONSTRUCTION OF THE PROOSID PROJECT AT THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED".

DD Form 1390/1, MAY 78 Pop I o

w ,m~m• ,

i f



aINSTALLATION AND LOCATION

CAMP RIPLEY (LITTLE FALLS), MINNESOTA


pERMANENT GUAMIRDRE-SUIETOTAL OFFICER ENISTED CMLIAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHORIZE -I

ACTUAL - - - -

12. RESERVE UNIT DATASTREGTH

UNIT DESIGNATION AUTHIE ACTUAL

ARNG/USAR ARMOR, INFANTRY, AVIATION AND N/A N/AENGINEER UNITS FROM MINNESOTA, NORTH/SOUTH DAXOTA, IOWA, ILLINOIS ANDWISCONSIN

13. MAJ EQUIPMENT AN AIRCRAFT

TYPE AUTHOftZED ACTUAL

N/A

14. OUTSTANDIN POL.LUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENMiE

(o000)




D OFoim 1900/2, MAY ?S MACI fDPm MIN 1 0 .7% w"M 4 U 0L1 of.4t

- ---, ,,,b, -




CAMP RIPLEY (LITTLE FALLS) MULTI PURPOSE RANGE COMPLEXMINNESOTA HEAVY (RETS)

6. PROGRAM ELEMENT CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER PRIOJECT COST ($000)

0505896A 179 270001 3,185

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUIANTITY UNIT COST COST

PRIMARY FACILITY .......................... 2,462ONE LANE ............................... LS - - (1,402)BUILDING, BERMS, TRACK BEDS .............. LS - - ( 960)CONTROL TOWER ........................... SF 256 91.00 ( 100)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ..................... 530CLEARING, GRUBBING, GRADING & SEEDING... LS - - ( 140)LATRINE/MESS/CONCURRENT TRAINING BLDG... SF 2816 65.00 ( 183)TARGET STORAGE BUILDINGS ................ SF 800 35.00 ( 28)COVERED MAINTENANCE AREA ................ SF 2075 25.00 ( 52)COVERED AMMO LOADING DOCK ............... SF 760 50.00 ( 38)ACCESS ROAD AND PARKING ................. SY 3000 5.00 ( 15)UTILITIES/FLAG POLE ..................... LS - - ( 74)

SUBTOTAL .................................. 2,992CONTINGENCY (5%) .......................... 150SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (1.37%) ...... 43TOTAL REQUEST ............................. 3,185EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPR..NON ADD ( 970)


New construction of a year-round use, Multi Purpose Range Complex withRemoted Electronic Target System (RETS). Supporting facilities include a"•ess/latrine/concurrent training building with associated coveredmaintenance and covered ammo issue point. This facility is to be amasonry building with concrete floor, truss roof, plywood interior walls.insulation and heating, well and septic system, winterized control tower,flag pole, gravel surfaced access road and parking area, and targetstorage shed.Air Conditioning: 2 tons at control tower11. REQUIREMENT: I ADEQUATE: N/A SUBSTANDARD: N/APROJECT: A multipurpose range complex to support current trainingmissions of armor/infantry vehicles at crew, platoon and company levels.(Current Mission)REQIREMET: This range/training facility is required to support MNARNGunits performing the gunnery qualification requirements of Forces Command,(FORSCOM). This proposal will provide the means to accomplishqualification on the following ranges: full scale and 1/2 scaled,Tank/Bradley Ranges through Table VIII, Infantry Platoon Battle Course,Aerial Gunnery, Missile Tracking, will support combined Arms Live Fireexercises and all targets are Multiple Integrated Laser Equipment System(MILES) capable. The range will be on State owned land.CURRENT SITUATIONt At present there are no existing or programedranges at the Camp Ripley Training Site that vill accommodate all of thecrew served weapons live fire training requirements of the MNARNG.

DDIM"M 1391


FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA j ,, A>•,3


CAMP RIPLEY (LITTLE FALLS)MINNESOTA

S4. PROJECT TITLE &PR•OJECT MME

IMULTI PURPOSE RANGE COMPLEX 200HEAVY (RETS) 200

11. R.1iIREUZI. ' (Continued)

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED, Lack of an adequate range vithin the state toaccommodate gunnery qualification requirements vill create a serioustraining deficiency for the affected INARNG units. These units viii berequired to deploy biannually to out-of-state locations to meet FORSCOKtraining requirements. Out-of-state deployment is extremely expensive andwould seriously restrict the ability of these units to accomplish theirreadiness training requirements.

i

I1

DD..., 7 1591c

4a i I • i ml~ m m • . .• " , ..

i. COMPONENT 2. DATE1. CARPONGNT FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2 DATE


CAMP RIPLEY (LITTLE FALLS)MINNESOTA

4( PROJECT c TLE asT NUM1.. R

SMULTI PURPOSE RANGE COMPLEX 270001HEAVY (RETS)


a. ESTIMATED DESIGN DATAi

(1) STATUS:(a) Date Design Started ..... . . . .. . . . ...... 19(b) Percent complete as of I January 1993 .......... 75M

(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete ....... 322.(d) Date Design Completed ......................... LAM

(2) BASIS:(a) Standard of definitive Design - Yes XL No(b) Where was Design Previously Used? HNDM 1110-1-l

(3) COST (TOTAL) - (c) - (a)+(b) and (d)+(e) ($OOO)(a) Producticn of Plans and Specifications ..... ( 0 )(b) All other design costs ..................... ( 0 )(C) Total ...................................... (l32 )(d) Contract ................................... (112 )(e) In-House ................................... ( 0

(4) CONSTRUCTION START ............................... 4/94


Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNomfnclature Anorooriation LhRequested (StQO)


(-

DO 1"w 1391c

O9. 76k w

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK1

tF

L

i. COMPONENT FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2. DATE


COST INDEXCAMP RIPLEY (LITTLE FALLS), MINNESOTA 94.2


NORMAL ADMINISTRATION FIVE (5) DAYS A WEEK WITH ONE (1) WEEKEND TRAININGASSEMBLY PER MONTH.


ARNG: BRAINERD (23 MILES) ARMORY 37,211 SF 1988LONG PRAIRIE (33 MILES) ARMORY 15,790 SF 1920ST. CLOUD (37 MILES) ARMORY 26,447 SF 1960



214 ORGANIZATIONAL 29,772 SF 2,625 01/90 04/92MAINTENANCESHOPS

& STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION 3 FE B 93FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY THESTATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINTUSE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.


NONE (Numbe, of Actr)


PROJECT FY COST (#000)

TRAINING SITE FACILITIES, PHASE I, TROOP AREA 7,CAMP RIPLEY 96 2,600

BATTLE SIMULATION FACILITY. CAMP RIPLEY 97 1,200

TRAINING SITE, RUNWAY LIGHTING 97 350


DD Form 139os/1,. MAY 78 120/215 Poo

i. COMPONENT 2. DATES~FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE

ARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION -J


CAMP RIPLEY (LITTLE FALLS), MINNESOTA


PEUANENT SRVE

TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CILIAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHORZE 28 2 26 1692 161 1531

ACTUAL 17 2 15 1641 150 1491

12. RESERVE UNIT DATASTENGTH


OHS 11HEADQUARTERS/LIGHT MAINTENANCE COMPANY 205 168747TH MAINTENANCE BATTALIONUIC: WPU8AATPSN: 28143

COMPANY D. 747TH MAINTENANCE BATTALION 129 121UICs WPU8DOTPSN: 0304737

COMPANY F. 747TH MAINTENANCE BATTAL1CN 237 210UIC, WPUGFOTPSN: 0304737

CONTINUED ON PAGE 3

I&3 MAJOR ECIUIPMENT ANM AIRCRAFT

TYPE AUTHOIRED ACI UAL

WHEELED VEHICLES 307 274TRACKED VEHICLES 2 2TRAILERS 159 140*INCLUDES VEHICLES STORED AT MATES

14. OUTSTANOG PoLLUTON AM SFETY DEFCENCI(OO0)




j C iIIIlDO Form 1$90512, MAY 76 RFW.,cM DO FOmI tWM KC 7r MICH .0111ATE Pap* 0 2___




CAMP RIPLEY (LITTLE FALLS),MINNESOTA

4. PROJ-GTTITLE S. PROJECT NUMB•ER

ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOPS 270088

12. RESERVE UNIT DATA (CONTINUED)UNIT DESIGNATION STRENGHT

OMS 11COMPANY G (-)747TH MAINTENANCE BATTALIONUIC: WPU8GOTSPN: 0304737 74 82

723 ORDNANCE COMPANY, DETACHMENT 1747TH MAINTENANCE BATTALIONUIC: WVHGAATPSN: 34024 2 2

HEADQUARTERS, HEADQUARTERS DETACHMENT47TH SUPPLY AND TRANSPORTATION BATTALIONUIC: WPUMAATPSNs 0304736 44 54

COMPANY A. DETACHMENT 147TH SUPPLY AND TRANSPORTATION BATTALION

f UICz WPUKAOTPSN: 0304736 132 103

823 740QMS 12HEADQUARTERS, IST SQUADRON, 194TH CAVALRYUIC: WPU4AATPSN: 0304707 15 15

HEADQUARTERS, HEADQUARTERS TROOP (-)1ST SQUADRON, 194TH CAVALRYUIC: WPU4TOTPSN, 0304797 103 104

HEADQUARTERS, HEADQUARTERS TROOP. DETACHMENT 11ST SQUADRON, 195TH CAVALRYUICi WPU4T1TPSN: 0304707 39 35

A TROOP 1ST SQUADRON.194TH CAVALRYUIC. WPU4A1TPSNz 0304707 138 149

4COMPANY C, 142ND ENGINEER BATTALION, HEAVYUIC, WA44COTPSN& 21364 Iii 1h7

456 470

DD 1 ii 1391c

1. COMPONENT Z . DATE, ARNG I ~ ~FYt 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA •,!;L


CAMP RIPLEY (LITTLE FALLS),MINNESOTA4. PROJECT TITLE &. PROJECT MSE


12. RESERVE UNIT DATA (CONTINUED) STRENGTHUNIT DESIGNATION AUTHORZEDl ACTUAL

OHS 19INSTALLATION SUPPORT UNITUIC: W7Q5AATPSN: 46755 205 211

813TH MEDICAL DETACHMENT, 47TH AVIATION BRIGADEUIC: TVXSAATPSN: 32744 53 60

256TH MEDICAL DETACHMENTUIC: WVGNAATPSN: 32858 10 13

112TH HEALTH SERVICES LIAISON DETACHMENTUIC: TWJT9DTPSNz 46751 15 15

STATE AREA COMMAND, DETACHMENT 1UIC: V8AEA2TPSN: 46751 45 44

STATE AREA COMMAND, DETACHMENT 2UIC: V8AEA2T.PSNt 46751 72 75

REGIONAL TRAINING SITE-MAINTENANCEUIC: W7XHAATPSNs 46751 13 13

413 431

4 4 1qI

DD4 wID , 1391cPWND•

i. C lOMPONEN Zl DATE


3 INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TTLE

SCAMP RIPLEY (LITTLE FALLS), ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOPSMINNESOTA

5PROGRAM ELIEMENT & CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NIMBER & PROJECT COST ($0)

0505896A 214 270088 2,625

9. COST ESTIMATES

COSTITEM UN ,UANTITY LN COST poooj

PRIMARY FACILITY (OMS 11 & 19) ........... 1,868ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP .......... SF 22550 70.00 (1,579)COVERED UNHEATED STORAGE .................. SF 3150 35.00 ( 110)CONTROLLED WASTE HANDLING FACILITY (CVHF) SF 600 65.00 ( 39)FLAMMABLE MATERIALS BUILDING,.............. I, 597 65.00 ( 39)ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING OMS .............. SF 2875 35.00 ( 101)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES .................. 599SITE PREPARATION AND PLANTING ............ LS -( 69)GRADING AND DRAINAGE..................... LS - - ( 70)FENCING ..................................... LF 1586 15.00 ( 24)PAVING (FLEXIBLE) .......................... SY 455 15.00 ( 7)PAVING (RIGID) .............................. SY 8956 30.00 ( 269)WASH RACKS (2) AND LUBE/INSP. RACKS (2).. LS - - ( 120)UTILITIES: WATER, SEWER, GAS,ELECTRICAL.. LS -( 40)

SUBTOTAL ........................................ 2,467CONTINGENCY (5%) ........................ 123SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (1.37Z) ... 35TOTAL REQUEST ...................................... 2,625EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPR. NON ADD ( 45)

S10. DESCRI)N OF POPOSEDCONSTRUCTION(The now OS 11 and 19 facility consists of a specially designated

maintenance building with thirteen vorkbays, three special work bays andadministrative work area, constructed of masonry, with a built-up roof andconcrete floors. Partitions to consist of masonry block. Supportingfacilities include flexible and rigid paving, security lighting andfencing. The existing 0NS 11 and 12 facility will undergo minormodifications and alterations to adequately accommodate OHS 12.Air Conditioninas 5 tons11. REQUIREMENTi 32,482 SF ADEQUATE: 2710 SF SUBSTANDARD: 27,062 SFPROJECTs A specially designed facility in which to provide requiredorganizational maintenance for the vehicles and equipment supported by OHS11 and 19 and modifications to an existing OHS building in which toprovide organizational maintenance for vehicles and equipment supported byOHS 12. (Current Mission)REUIRIENIs A facility requirement of 29,772 SF is necessary to enableorganizational level maintenance to be performed on vehicles and equipmentauthotized by the Table of Organization and Equipment for the supportedunits.CURRENT SITUATION: The two existing OHS shops contain 9,012 SF. OHS 19,constructed in 1931 as a 12,000 S? unheated storage facility, is seriouslydeteriorated and totally inadequate as an OHS facility. The combined OHS11 and 12 was constructed in 1979 as a 9012 SF OHS facility. This facilityis of inadequate size to accommodate both OHS 11 and OHS 12 but with minormodification/alterations will be of adequate size to support OHS 12. Theproposed now facility will house OHS 11 and OHS 19.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDEs Unit readiness will be degraded and the qualityof work will continue to decrease due to deficicent work and storage areasin which to perform required maintenance and administrative duties.

DDIM 1i1so

i.COP DATE

FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 73ARNG

3.STALLATION AND LOCATION

CAMP RIPLEY (LITTLE FALLS),MINNESOTA

4. PRO•JECTTIME & ROET NME


12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA,


(1) STATUS,(a) Date Design Started ......................(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 93 ......(c) Date Design Expected to be 3S% Complete.. 8/90(d) Date Design Completed .................... 4/92

(2) BASIS:(a) Standard or Definitive Design - Yes __ No _._(b) Vhere vas Design Previously Used? f/A

(3) COST (TOTAL) (c) a (a)÷(b) or (d).(e), (*000)(a) Production of Plan. and Specifications... (_..)(b) All Other Design Costs ................... (0)(c) Total .................................... ( 88.)(d) Contract ................................. (.88 )(e) In-House ................................. )

(4) CONSTRUCTION START ........................... 10/93

b. Equipment associated vith this project vhich will be providedfrom other appropriations:

Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNomenclature Aprouriatin on•, ustA, (o000)

Office Equip ANSCO 529891.30 94 14

Telephone Equip ANSCO 529895.11 94 6

Furnishings AESCO 519891.30 94 35

DDI, O,% IS19c

A SL . ... -... . . . . , . .. .. . .- .. . .. .... ..

S1. COMO.NT FY 19B4 GUARD AND RESERVEARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION


S•FORT HARRISON. HELENA, MONTANA 90.9

SFREQNCY AND TYPE UTILIZATION

FORT WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON IS A YEAR-ROUND TRAINING FACILITY, UTILIZED

APPROXIMATELY 40-45 WEEKENDS OUT OF THE 52 PER YEAR AND IS MANNED 52WEEKS OF THE YEAR BY FULL TIME PERSONNEL.

6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARDIAESERVE INSTALLATIONS ITHIN 15 MILE RADusARNG, FT HARRISON SEE #3 TRAINING SITE 1700 AC 1920

FT HARRISON ( .6 MILES) 200 ARMORY 13,000 SF 1969HELENA, MT (6.0 MILES) 250 ARMORY 30,000 SF 1939HELENA, MT (8.0 MILES) AASF & 200 ARMORY 40,000 SF 1975

USARs HELENA, MT (6.0 MILES) TRAINING SITE 15,000 SF 1970



171 MEDICAL UNIT 4,648 SF 501 11/89 05/93TRAINING FACILITY

&. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACIUTIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION

F ACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY THE 15 MAR 92

STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINTEXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.

9. LAW ACQUISITION REQ-RED 0NONE (Numwbw of Ac"")


PROJECT Fy COST (4000)

ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY (AB-64) 95 $10.756FT HARRISON

DLOG/CLASS IX 96 796

BATTALION SUPPORT COMPLEX 96 6,067

MILITARY EDUCATION CENTER 97 4,342

* FIRE STATION 97 334

"A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND TUB SITE IS SUITABLE FORCONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED"

DO Form 1390511, MAY 78 pop1 pag I ,a.

1 . CAMPON4ENT IL DATE., NFY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2. ''A


FORT HARRISON, HELENA, MONTANA11. PERSONNEL STENGTH AS OF 30 SEP 92

PENRMENT GUAFURDWERTOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CIVIIAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHOPZE 3447 418 3029

ACTUAL 3512 417 3095

12. RESERVE UNIT DATASTFIENGTH

UNIT DESIGNATION AUTHOIPZED ACTUAL

ALL MONTANA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 3447 3512

I

M. MAO E•QWMENT AND AIRRAFT

TIPE AUTHORZE ACTUAL

N/A

i.

14. OUTSTANDMN POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES

(6000)I

A. AIR POLLUTION 0NON



.3 DDForm 13120S , MAY 78 MLAM 00 INO7% mo 8 mOeOL'T P, of t

.9.. ... ......

1. COOMPONENT Z DATE

FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA ý 11ARNG


j FORT HARRISON, HELENA, MONTANA MEDICAL UNIT TRAINING FACILITY

SPROGRAM ELEMENT & CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 6 PROJECT COST ($000)

0505896A 171 300054 501

g. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM UM QUANTITY UNIT COST COST

PRIMARY FACILITY ........................... 390MEDICAL UNIT TRAINING FACILITY ........... SF 4648 84.00 ( 390)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 78SITE PREPARATION ......................... LS - - C 17)GRADING, SEEDING ......................... LS - - ( 5)PARKING: POV ............................. SY 2778 14.00 ( 39)SIDEWALKS ................................ SF 600 2.00 ( 1)UTILITIES ................................ LS - - ( 16)

SUBTOTAL ...................................CONTINGENCY (5Z) ........................... 23SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (2.00%) ....... 10TOTAL REQUEST .............................. 501EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPR. NON ADD ( 40)

"10. DESCRIPTION PROPOSED CONSTR'UCTIONA specially designed facility of permanent masonry type construction,brick and concrete block units, with built-up roof and concrete floors.Structure will be a one story building with medical and dental trainingareas, observation wards, office and administrative area.Air Conditioninf: 3.5 tons11. REQUIREMENT: 4,648 SF ADEQUATE% 0 SF SUBSTANDARD: 1,300 SFPROJECTs A now facility to serve the medical and dental unit trainingneeds of the MT ARNG Medical Units. (Current Mission)REUiIREMENI This proposed project is necessary to provide adequatemedical and dental training facilities.CURRENT SITUATION, The medical units are currently conducting trainingin a 1,300 SF concrete block building which was converted from a trainingsite orderly room.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDEDs Medical units conducting annual training orinactive duty training will continue to train in inadequate andoverclovded facilities. Troop morale and readiness will be degraded andrecruiting/retention may be adversly affected.

DDIF l.1391 "


ARNG FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA i•

SINSTALLATION AND LOCATION

FORT HARRISON, HELENA, MONTANA

14. PROJECT TIL 5. PROJECT NUMBRmMEDICAL UNIT TRAINING FACILITY 300054



(1) STATUS:(a) Date Design Started ...................... 11/89(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 93 ...... 95%(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete.. 10/90(d) Date Design Completed .................... 5/93

(2) BASIS:(a) Standard or Definitive Design - Yes __ No _J_(b) Where was Design Previously Used? N/A

(3) COST (TOTAL) (c) - (a)+(b) or (d)+(e), ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications... ( 0 )(b) All Other Design Costs ................... (__ )(c) Total .................................... ( 24 )(d) Contract ................................. ( 24 )(e) In-House ................................. ( 0 )


b. Equipment associated with this project which will be providedfrom other appropriationst

Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNomencl1ature Appropriatin or.Requested ($000)


S 3 ~DD4 •"M 1391ciiii6 3 m 76 PM N

FY 19g4 GUARD AND RESERVE z DATEARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 3

3. INSTALLATION ANM LOCATION 4. AREA CONSTRCOST INdEX

FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 79.2


NORMAL ADMINISTRATION FIVE (5) DAYS PER WEEK WITH A TWO (2) DAY TRAININGASSEMBLY PER MONTH.

. OTHER ACTIVEIGUARDIRESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUSARNGO PARKTON (17 MILES) ARMORY 16,330 SF 1985

SAINT PAULS (17 MILES) ARMORY 13,401 SF 1958

ACTIVE: FORT BRAGG (8.0 MILES) 18TH CORPS & AIRBORNE DIVISION


CATEGORY COST DESIGN STATUSCODE PROJECT TITLE SCOPE (ST) START COMPLETE

214 ORGANIZATIONAL 6,055 SF 473 04/90 09/92MAINTENANCE SHOP

8. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECoMEN[ATIONFACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY THE 09 DEC 92STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINTEXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.


NONE (Number of' Acrm)


NONE


DO Form 1539011, MAY 76 12MaS Pigs I of a

1C FY 1,94 GUARD AND RESERVE


VbINSTALLATION AND LOCATION

FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

li. PERSONNEL STRENGTH ASOF 30 SEP 92

PERLIAENTTOTAL OFFICER ENISTED CIUAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHORIZE 9 9 696 48 648

ACTUAL 7 7 731 44 687


UNlT DESIGNATION AUTHORIZED ACTUAL

1ST BATTALION, 252D ARMOR 544 592UIC WPJAATSPN 14030

TROOP E. 196TH CALVARY 152 139UIC WVGAATSPN 14030

TOTAL 696 731

13 MA"OR ECUIPMENT AND AICRAFT

TYPE AUTHORMED ACTUAL


TRACKED VEHICLES 152 139

TRAILERS 37 33

290 266

14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCE

($000)




DD Form 13908/2, MAY 78 ASM.,SoORM 13U060 7%I W1404 40OLu Page a of

*

1. COMPONENT 9 DATE



FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP

sPROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER & PROJECT COST ($M00)

0505896A 214 370030 473

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM UIM QUANTITY WIT COST COST

PRIMARY FACILITY ........................... 268ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP .......... SF 4,895 50.00 ( 245)FLAMMABLE MATERIAL STORAGE BUILDING ...... SF 110 20.00 ( 2)UNHEATED STORAGE BUILDING ................ SF 750 20.00 ( 15)CONTROLLED WASTE HANDLING FACILITY ....... SF 300 20.00 ( 6)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 176SITE PREPARATION, GRADING & DRAINAGE ..... LS - - ( 50)FUEL STORAGE & DISPENSING SYSTEM ......... LS - - ( 25)FENCING .................................. LF 475 13.00 ( 6)PAVING (FLEXIBLE) ........................ SY 2,900 12.00 ( 36)PAVING (RIGID) ........................... SY 300 28.00 ( 9)WASH RACK ................................ LS - - ( 15)LUBE & INSPECTION RACK................... LS - - ( 15)UTILITIES: WATER/SEVER/GAS/TELECOM ........ LS - -20)

SUBTOTAL ................................... 444CONTINGENCY (5%) ........................... 22SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (1.60%) ....... 7TOTAL REQUEST .............................. 473EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER APPR NON ADD ( 2)10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTONConsists of a maintenance facility with 3 work bays, plus anadministrative/work area constructed of masonry walls, a built-up orstanding seam metal root, and concrete floors. Additional featuresinclude a flammable materials storage space. fuel storage and dispensingsystem, wash platform, lube & inspection rack. Controlled Waste HandlingFacility and an unheated storage building.Air Conditioninet 1 1/2 tons11. REQUIREMENT, 6.055 SF ADEQUATE, 0 SF SUBSTANDARD, 2,490 SFPROJECT: A new maintenance shop to provide organizational maintenancefor the vehicles and equipment supported by this maintenance shop.(Current Mission)REIREMENI' A facility requirement for 6,055 SF is requested to permitmaintenance at organizational level to be performed on vehicles andequipment of the supported units.CURRENT SITUATION, The existing shop contains 2,490 SF and wasconstructed in 1941. This facility is inadequate in the following areas,administrative, rest room, locker room, and battery room. The shop doesnot have an efficient system to control waste water from the cleaning ofequipment and vehicles. The inspection and lube rack is obsolete, and theheating, lighting, and ventilation are inadequate in the existingfacility. Existing facilities will be disposed of in accordance withState Law after the neo shop has been occupied.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED, The quality of work will decrease due todeficient work and storage areas to perform administrative and maintenanceduties.

DDi •"' 1391 DEC SN

1. COMPONENT 2 DATE

FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAS~ARNG


FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

4. PROJECT TITLE &PROJECT NUM13ER

ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP 370030



(1) STATUS:(a) Date Design Started ...................... 4/90(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 93 ....... 100%(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete.. 9/91(d) Date Design Completed .................... 9/92

(2) BASIS:(a) Standard or Definitive Design - Yes_ No _X_(b) Where was Design Previously Used? l/A

(3) COST (TOTAL) (c) a (a)+(b) or (d)+(e), ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications... ( 0 )(b) All Other Design Costs ................... (___)(c) Total .................................... ( 21 )(d) Contract .................................(e) In-House ................................. ( 0 I



Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNomenclature Apurgpriatio gr Reauested ($0001

Telephone AMSCO 529895.10 94 1Equipment


DD, •M 1391C mc 76PAOE NO

N. COMPONENT FY A994 GUARD AND RESERVE O. DATE

ARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION .MO;T.63. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. AREA COISTRCOST INDEX

BISMARCK, NORTH DAKOTAS. FREQUENCY AND TYPE UTILIZATION •|.

NORMAL ADMINISTRATION AND OPERATIONS FIVE (5) DAYS PER WEEK AND A TWO(2) DAY TRAINING ASSEMBLY PER MONTH.

6. OTHER ACTIVF.IGUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS

ARNG: BISMARCK (6 MILES) 800 ARMORY 141,364 SF 1988BISMARCK (6 MILES) OMS 15,600 SF 1989BISMARCK (ON SITE) AASF & ARMORY 37,988 SF 1976

USAR: BISMARCK (4 MILES) ARMORYBISMARCK (4 MILES) AMSA


CATEGORY COST DESIGN STATUSCODE PROJECT TITLE SCOPE (000) START COMPLETE

211 AVIATION C-12 19,794 SF 1297 08/90 03/93HANGAR

S. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATIONFACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY THE 08SE*9STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINTEXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.

9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED 0NONE (Number of Acres)


PROJECT FY COST (t000)

ARMORY 96 3,193

ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY 96 478ALTERATION


DO Form 1390011, MAY 78 1291215 Pag.e

i. COPOET 2. DATEFY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE



BISMARCK, NORTH DAKOTA


PEMANENT GUARDIRESERVE

TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CVILIAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTH'ORIZE -3916 JA N/A

ACTUAL 3994 N/A N/A


UNIT DESIGNATION AUTHOFIZED ACTUAL

C-12 AIRCRAFT SUPPORTS ALL NORTH DAKOTA 3916 3994ARMY NATIONAL GUARD

13. MAJOR EQIUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT

TYPE A"HOUNZED ACTUAL

C-12 1

14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY OERCIEC1E

(0000)




DO Form 15901S2, MAY 78 MUM OWINKM O 00E I, 2 of 2 o



a INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITE

BISMARCK, NORTH DAKOTA AVIATION C-12 HANGAR

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER & PROJECT COST (000)

0505896A 211 380064 1,297

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT COST CST00)

PRIMARY FACILITY ...................... 825C-12 HANGAR .............................. SF 8,686 47.00 ( 408)OPERATIONAL STORAGE ...................... SF L1,108 37.50 ( 417)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 393SITE PREPARATION/FINE GRADE/SEEDING ...... LS - - ( 177)PLANTING ................................. LS - - ( 35)FENCING .................................. LF 300 10.00 ( 3)ACCESS APRONS ............................ SY 2,489 36.00 ( 90)FLEXIBLE PAVINGS ......................... SY 1,720 20.00 ( 35)SIDEWALKS ................................ SF 1,000 3.00 ( 3)UTILITIES: WATER\SEWER\GAS\ELEC.......... LS - -50)

SUBTOTAL ................................... 1,218CONTINGENCY (5%) ........................... 61SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (1.42%) ....... 18TOTAL REQUEST .............................. 1,297EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER APPR ..... NON ADD ( 13)

10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPO6ED CONSTRUCTIONConsists of a specially designed aviation facility of permanent masonarytype construction, brick and concrete block exterior walls, concrete blockinterior walls, single membrane roof and concrete floors. A one storystructure with all necessary mechanical and electrical equipment andoutside supporting facilities.Air Conditioninf: 2 tons11. REQUIREMENT: 42,898 SF ADEQUATE: 22,104 SF SUBSTANDARD: 0 SFPROJECT: Proposed construction consists of an aircraft hangar to provideprotection and security for a regional support C-12 aircraft. Thefacility will include administrative offices, repair and parts room. and amaintenance area. (New Mission)REQUIREMENT: A facility requirement for 42,898 SF is necessary toprovide security of aircraft parts and tools, as well as provideoperational storage of the assigned aircraft and an all weathermaintenance facility for the C-12 aircraft.CURRENT SITUATIONs The existing Army Aviation Support Facility hangar isbeing used to capacity for required maintenance of assigned aircraft andleased facilities are currently being used to house Beech AircraftServices Inc. and it's maintenance contract. There is no facilitycurrently available to provide the function that this construction wouldprovide. The current facility was constructed in 1976. is In excellentcondition.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: If not provided, proper maintenance and securityof the C-12 cannot be assured, and a substandard facility will have to beleased. This situation will degrade ongoing training support programs andincrease the costs associated with this training.

DDIF"% 1391 00 ftPNE o

I. COMPONENT '2. DAT

AFY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA :,ARNG II...1


BISMARCK, NORTH DAKOTA

4. PROJECT TTLE •PROJ ECTNUMBER

AVIATION C-12 HANGAR 380064



(1) STATUS,(a) Date Design Started ...................... 8/90(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 93 ......(c) Date Design Expected to be 35Z Complete.. 6/91(d) Date Design Completed .................... 3/93

(2) BASIS:(a) Standard or Definitive Design - Yes_ No_(b) Where was Design Previously Used?

(3) COST (TOTAL) (c) - (a)+(b) or (d)+(e): ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications... ( )(b) All Other Design Costs ................... (__ )(c) Total .................................... ( 48. )(d) Contract ................................. ( 48 )(e) In-House ................................. 0



Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNomenclsature Appropriation or Reguested (100

Telephone Equip ANSCO 529895.10 94 3

Furniture AKSCO 519891.30 94 10

D1~~

DDI • 1301c m

i. COMONEN FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2. DATEARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION•,:.

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. AREA CCN4TRCOST INDEX

CAMP GRAFTON (DEVILS LAKE). NORTH DAKOTA 88.05. FREQUENCY AND TYPE UTILIZATION

TO BE USED TWENTY (20) WEEKENDS ANNUALLY BY UNITS OF THE NORTH DAKOTAARMY NATIONAL GUARD CONDUCTING INACTIVE DUTY TRAINING AND EIGHT (8)WEEKS PER YEAR FOR UNITS CONDUCTING ANNUAL TRAINING.

6. OTHER ACTIVEJGUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUSARNG: CANDO (35 MILES) 60 PERSON ARMORY 15204 SF 1957

RUGBY (57 MILES) 60 PERSON ARMORY 18793 SF 1957CARRINGTON (57 MILES) 60 PERSON ARMORY 13634 SF 1941



179 MODIFIED 16 LANES 1,038 01/92 07/92RECORD FIRERANGE (RETS)

8.. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION

FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE 8DSePSTATE RESERVE FORCES COMPONENT FACILITY BOARD FOR POSSIBLEJOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDEND UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.

9. LAND ACQUISITION REQURED 0(Nuaber of Acr)



HEATING PLANT 94 1.826

KNOWN DISTANCE RANGE 96 482

CSMS ADDITION 96 1,800


( CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT TIE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED".

DD Form 13908/1, MAY 78 tts Pop IV

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2. DATE



CAMP GRAFTON (DEVILS LAKE), NORTH DAKOTA


PERMANENT GUADIRESERVETOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CIVLAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHOZE 3916 416 3500

ACTUAL 3994 433 3561



ALL NORTH DAKOTA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 3,916 3,994

13, MAJO EGAJPMENT AND AIRCRAFT


N/A

14. O•ITSTASNDI POLLUTICON AND SAFETY "ICIENOU

($000)




DD O 13...../. MAYl 78 MRMhhD POW13M NO 7%6OMU umT Pq 2 of "


ARNG FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 23


CAMP GRAFTON, (DEVILS LAKE), MODIFIED RECORD FIRE RANGENORTH DAKOTA (RETS)

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER S. PROJECT COST ($0003

0505896A 179 380059 1,038

9. COST ESTIMATESCOST


PRIMARY FACILITY ........................... 63816 LANE RANGE ............................ LS - - ( 164)CONTROL TOWER ............................ LS - - ( 36)DATACABI.E/WIRING HARNESS ................. LS - - ( 408)EARTHWORK ................................ LS - - ( 30)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 336SITE PREPARATION/CLEARING, GRUBBING ...... LS - - C 150)TARGET STORAGE/AMMO BUILDING ............. SF 1000 42.00 ( 42)MESS/LATRINE ............................. SF 1000 39.00 ( 39)BREAK/CONCURRENT TRAINING BLEACHERS ...... SF 576 40.00 ( 23)PARKING/ACCESS ROAD ...................... SY 2050 7.10 ( 15)UTILITIES ................................ LS - - 67)

SUBTOTAL ................................... 974CONTINGENCY (5%) ........ 49SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (1.45%) .... 15TOTAL REQUEST .............................. 1,038EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPR..NON ADD ( 341)

10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIONA 16-lane Modified Record Fire Range with the pop-up targets that simulateenemy soldiers, light vehicles and bunkers, from 50 meter to 300 meter,fully controlled and scored by a computer mounted in the control tower.The following supporting facilities are required, target storage andrepair building, ammunition breakdown building, male/female latrines, messshelter, break/concurrent training area.Air Conditioninff: 1 ton for control tower11. REQUIREMENT: 1 ADEQUATE, N/A SUBSTANDARD, N/APROJECT: A 16-lane Modified Record Fire Range for rifle qualificationand practice engagement of targets in a simulated combat environment.(Current Mission)REGUIEZNZTN This range is required for all units of the North DakotaArmy National Guard to accomplish necessary combat weapons training andqualification during inactive duty training periods, thus saving annualtraining time for collective training and maneuvers.CURRENT SITUATION: There is no Modified Record Fire Range in the state.Individual rifle qualification is being done on 25 meter basic zeroranges. These ranges do not provide the realism in training required tomeet combat training objectives. The nearest facility of the proposedtype is Camp Grayling, MI which is not practical to use for trainingNDARNG troops.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: If not provided, units will continue to trainon inadequate ranges. The combat weapons training requirements will notbe met, thus degrading overall readiness.

DDIOW 1391

.PA NO.

I, COMPONENT 2. DATE

FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARNG I

3, INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

CAMP GRAFTON, (DEVILS LAKE).NORTH DAKOTA

4 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUMBER

MODIFIED RECORD FIRE RANGE 380059(RETS)



(1) STATUS,(a) Date Design Started ........................... L1/9(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 1993 ......... 100=(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete ....... 32.=(d) Date Design Completed ......................... 7/92

(2) BASIS:(a) Standard of definitive Design - Yes -I-- No(b) Where vas Design Previously Used? HNDM 1110-1-5

(3) COST (TOTAL) - (c) - (a)+(b) and (d)+(e) ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications ..... (_. )(b) All other design costs ..................... ( )(c) Total ...................................... ( 45 )(d) Contract ................................... (A45L )(e) In-House .................................... 0


b. Equipment associated vLth this project vhich vill be providedfrom other appropriations,

Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CstNomenclature Appropriation or ReqLuests& (11001

Remote Target OPA 94 341System (RETS)

"DDim'1391c •.M


ARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION '

3, INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. AREA CONSTACOST INDEX



USED SEVEN (7) DAYS PER WEEK FOR NORMAL UTILITY HEATING DURING THEHEATING SEASON (APPROXIMATELY THIRTY (30) WEEKS PER YEAR)


ARNG: CANDO (35 MILES) 60 ARMORY 15,204 SF 1957RUGBY (57 MILES) 60 ARMORY 18.793 SF 1957CARRINGTON (57 MILES) 60 ARMORY 13,624 SF 1941


CATEGORY COST DESIGN STATUSCODE PROJECT TITLE SCOPE (SN0O) START COMPLETE

171 HEATING PLANT 1320 SF 1826 01/91 12/92ADDITION

8. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION

N/A (Date)


NONE (Number of Acres)


PROJECT Fy COST (SO00)

MODIFIED RECORD FIRE 94 $1,038RANGE (RETS)

KNOWN DISTANCE RANGE 96 482

COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP 96 1,800PAINT SHOP

DD Form 139OS11, MAY 78 Io213 5 Pop i of 2


FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVEARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

3 INSTALLATION AND LOCATION


1i. PERSONNEL STRENGTH ASOF 30 SEP 92

PERMANENT OUARDIRESERVTOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CMILAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHORIZE 3916 416 3500

ACTUAL 3994 433 ,)561


UNIT DESIGNATION AUTHORIM ACTUAL

ALL NORTH DAKOTA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 3,916 3,994

I


TYPE M.JTHONZI ACTUAL

N /A

14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEPICIENCM3

(SOOO)




SDO Form 13 OS /2, M A Y 7 0 m ,LE OD O F Or 13 U ON C%, W4I4Hrbo LE nE P e 2 of 2 1

%) -4



3. INSTALLATION AMD LOCATION 4. PRiOJECT TITLE

CAMP GRAFTON (DEVILS LAKE), HEATING PLANT ADDITIONNORTH DAKOTA

5PROGRAM ELEMENT 5CATEGORY COE 7. PROJET NUMBER 1. PROJECT COST ($000)

0505896A 171 380065 1,826

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM Ulm OUANTITY LIT COST COST(SM

PRIMARY FACILITY ............................ 1, 99BUILDING ADDITION ......................... SF 1.320 75.00 99)EQUIPMENT CONVERSIONS ...................... LS - - (1,400)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 216DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ........................ LF 1,500 125.00 ( 188)SITEWORK .................................... LS - - ( 5)UTILITIES ................................... LS - - ( 20)SIDEWALKS ................................... SF 1.000 3.00 (_3___,)

SUBTOTAL ......................... .................. 1,715CONTINGENCY (5%) ........................... 86SUPERVISION. INSP & OVERHEAD (1.42%) ....... 25TOTAL REQUEST ..................... ................. 1,826EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPP NON ADD ( 0

10. DESCRPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIONThis construction rill consist of a specially designed permanent masonryconstruction to match existing facility. concrete block interior vallsopen veb joint, metal deck, insulated, built-up roof system, concretefloors, and all necessary mechanical and electrical equipment. Additionalsteam distribution system and utility connections are included in thisconstruction.Air Conditionints None11. REQUIREMENT, 0 SF ADEQUATE, 0 SF SUBSTANDARDt 0 SFPQ2LCi Tvo additional coal fired boilers and supporting control roomarea to provide additional heating capability for proposed construction atCamp Grafton, North Dakota. In consonance vLth the current mission, thisproposed construction is intended to provide the additional heatingcapability to adequately support six (6) currently serviced facilities andfive (5) additional facilities identified and programed for construction.(Current Mission)RIREMEN The installation of additional boilers is requested toprovide the required heating capability for approximately 60,000 SF ofadditional functional space programed for construction. It is imperativethat this construction project be accomplished prior to a proposedaddition to the CSMS at this location. The heating capacity of thisadditional system is required to service the above mentioned project.CURRENT SITUATIONs The existing heating system is extremely efficientand is in excellent condition. It is not sized for the proposedadditional construction at Camp Grafton. Original studies indicate thatthis type of system will continue to be more efficient than Installationof individual heating plants in new construction.

DDw*M•s 1391

Y -. , ,-.,.o

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA , A

ARNG


CAMP GRAFTON (DEVILS LAKE),NORTH DAKOTA


HEATING PLANT ADDITION 380065

11. REQUIREMENT (CONTINUED)

IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: The present system is unable to serviceadditional construction, therefore, as current facilities are expanded tomeet the increasing force structure, individual facility heating plantswill be needed th,,,reby increasing costs for both installation and energy.

" 4 D 1DE 1591ci1PAW NO

i. COMPONENT L' J DATE


INSTALLATKON AND LOCATION

CAMP GRAFTON (DEVILS LAKE),NORTH DAKOTA

4. PROJECTnTLE & PAoJET NUMBER

HEATING PLANT ADDITION 380065

12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA,


(1) STATUS:(a) Date Design Started......................£12=(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 93 ......(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete.. 9/9(d) Date Design Completed .................... 12/92

(2) BASIS:(a) Standard or Definitive Design - Yes _ No _X.(b) Where was Design Previously Used? HLA

(3) COST (TOTAL) (c) - (a)+(b) or (d)+(e): ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications...( 0)(b) All Other Design Costs ................... ( 0 )(c) Total .................................... 77(d) Contract ................................. 77(e) In-House ................................. 0

(4) CONSTRUCTION START ............................ 4194


Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNoenlar Approoriation or. Rguestea (SOa0)

NONE

DD 1 ',1391c

ow 7



COST INDEXCAMP WILLIAMS (LEHI), UTAH 89.0


CAMP WILLIAMS IS A YEAR-ROUND TRAINING SITE USED BY NATIONAL GUARD. ARMYRESERVE, AND ACTIVE DUTY UNITS. WEEK-END USE AVERAGES 42-45 WEEK-ENDSPER YEAR. ANNUAL TRAINING BY RESERVE FORCES AVERAGES 15-20 WEEKS PERYEAR, AND RESERVE AND ACTIVE COMPONENTS 10-12 WEEKS PER YEAR.

6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUSARNG: AMERICAN FORK (13 MILES) ARMORY 21.458 SF 1956

LEHI (7 MILES) ARMORY 14,386 SF 1958MURRAY (16 MILES) ARMORY 19.727 SF 1955WEST JORDAN (11 MILES) ARMORY 14.822 SF 1977WEST JORDAN (11 MILES) ARMORY 36,194 SF 1977



179 INFANTRY LS 1,066 11/92 03/93SQUAD BATTLECOURSE (RETS)

I

S. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACIUTIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION 09 DEC 92FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE 0DEC 9STATE RESERVE FORCES COMPONENT FACILITY BOARD FOR POSSIBLEJOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDEND UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.


(Number o1 Acres)



MOUT ASSAULT COURSE 94 850

TISA FACILITY 97 1.174


DD Form 1390S/1, MAY 78 120/215 Pop I oft

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE


CAMP WILLIAMS (LEHI). UTAH

i1. PERSONNEL STRENGTH ASOF 30 SEP 92

PERIANENT GIRESERVETOTAL OFFMCER ENUSTED CIVILAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHORZ 5870 969 4901

ACTUAL 6171 911 5260


UNIT DESIGNATION AUTHORZED ACTUAL

ARNG/USAR INFANTRY, SPECIAL FORCES 5,870 6,171AND ENGINEER UNITS FROM UTAH,COLORADO AND CALIFORNIA

13. MA"O EOIAPMrNT AN AIRCRAFT

TYPE NJTHORIED ACTUAL

N/A

1.OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICENCIES

(11000)




DO Form 1390012, MAY 76 REPLC DO FOM 136M EC 74 WOCH IS 0o119LIM Pop 2 of 2

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK I

"INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4.- PROJECT TITLE

CAMP WILLIAMS (LEHI), UTAH INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSEI( RETS i

0505896A 179 490058 1,066

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM UIM QUANTITY UNIT COST COSTCsooo)

PRIMARY FACILITY .......... 660INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSE*............. LS - - ( 660)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 341SITE PREPARATION ......................... LS - - ( 25)CLEARING & GROUNDS ....................... AC 18 100.00 ( 38)SEEDING & EROSION CONTROL ................ AC 18 500.00 ( 27)PARKING AREA/ACCESS ROADS ................ SY 12000 4.75 ( 57)TARGET STORAGE & REPAIR .................. SF 800 45.00 ( 36)AMMO BREAKDOWN ........................... SF 120 55.00 ( 7)COVERED MESS/LATRINE ..................... SF 1000 43.00 ( 43)UTILITIES ................................ LS - - (._10 )

SUBTOTAL ................................... .. 1 001CONTINGENCY (5%) ........ 50SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (1.45%) ....... 15TOTAL REQUEST .............................. 1,066EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPR..NON ADD ( 360)

10. oESIpiON OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIONNow construction of a one lane Infantry Squad Battle Course with controltower, target storage/repair building. ammo breakdown building, coveredmass, access road/parking, latrines and utilities.Air Conditioning: I ton to control tower11. REQUIREMENT: I ADEQUATEs N/A SUBSTANDARDt N/APROEI, A one lane Infantry Squad Battle Course for live fire trainingand practice engaging targets in a simulated combat enviroment. (CurrentMission)liE2IRI•KNLs This range is needed to support the Utah National Guardand NCO Academy that presently train at the Camp Williams Training Site.CURRENT SITUATION: Thi existing ranges currently in operation don'thave simulated combat training where maneuver training with live fire canbe performed.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED, Camp Williams is the only centrally locatedarea that could support this range. Units need to receive this type oftraining under simulated combat conditions to maintain their readinessposture.

DD(m1391


ARNG FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 4


CAMP WILLIAMS (LEHI), UTAH

4. PROJECT TITLE & PROJECT NMAER

INFANTRY SQUAD BATTLE COURSE 490058(RETS)



(1) STATUS:(a) Date Design Started .......................... 11/92(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 1993 .......... 80(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete ....... 3=(d) Date Design Completed ......................... 3 9

(2) BASIS:(a) Standard of definitive Design - Yes XL No(b) Where was Design Previously Used? CEHND-1110-1-19

(3) COST (TOTAL) - (c) - (a)+(b) and (d)+(e) ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications ..... (_0.)(b) All other design costs ..................... (. 0.)(c) Total ...................................... ( L46 )(d) Contract ................................... 46 )(e) In-House ................................... 0


b. Equipment associated with this project vhich will be providedfrom other appropriations:

Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNomenfatuJi~re Anoropriation orL..ReqI3uesedj.O


-)

DD40mm1391c P~

ow 70PNE N

1r

. ,O FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2. DATE

SARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION3~INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. AREA CONSTR

COST INDEXCAMP WILLIAMS (LEHI), UTAH 89.0

& FREQUENCY AM TYPE UTILIZATION

CAMP WILLIAMS IS A YEAR-ROUND TRAINING SITE USED BY NATIONAL GUARD, ARMYRESERVE, AND ACTIVE DUTY UNITS. WEEK-END USE AVERAGES 42-45 WEEK-ENDSPER YEAR. ANNUAL TRAINING BY RESERVE FORCES AVERAGES 12-16 WEEKS PERYEAR, AND RESERVE AND ACTIVE COMPONENTS 6-10 WEEKS PER YEAR.

6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARDIRESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS

ARNG: AMERICAN FORK (13 MILES) ARMORY 21,458 SF 1956LEHI ( 7 MILES) ARMORY 14,386 SF 1958MURRAY (16 MILES) ARMORY 19,727 SF 1955WEST JORDAN (11 MILES) ARMORY 14,822 SF 1977WEST JORDAN (11 MILES) ARMORY 36,194 SF 1977



179 MILITARY 7 BLDGS 850 12/91 04/93OPERATIONS INURBANIZEDTERRAIN (MOUT)ASSAULT COURSE

S. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATIONFACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE 0DECSTATE RESERVE FORCES COMPONENT FACILITY BOARD FOR POSSIBLEJOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDEND UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.


(Nunbw of Ace.r)



INFANTRY SQD BATTLE COURSE 94 1,066

TISA FACILITY 97 1,174

"A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR"(" CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED".

DO Form 139011, MAY 7I 1202s P 1 of

Ni

1. COMPONENT 2. DATEFY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE

ARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION3 INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

CAMP WILLIAMS (LEHI), UTAH

11. PERSONNELSTRENGTH ASOF 30 SEP 92

PERMANENT GUARDNESERVETOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CIVULIAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUHRIZE 5870 969 4901

ACTUAL 6171 911 5260

12, RESERVE UNIT DATASTRENGTH


ARNG/USAR INFANTRY, SPECIAL FORCES 5,870 6,171AND ENGINEER UNITS FROM UTAH,COLORADO AND CALIFORNIA

4 ~13 MAJOR EOUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT

TYPE AUTHORIZD ACTUAL

N/A

4

14. OUSTANTA!N POLLUTION AMD SAFETY oEFICIMMS

($000)




1 2 DO Form 1390S12, MAY 78 ENLACESDODOF 1 ISDEC 7%WtCl It ONOLTI, Ppa d


ARNG FY 1394 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA .


CAMP WILLIAMS (LEHI), UTAH MILITARY OPERATIONS IN URBANIZEDTERRAIN (MOUT) ASSAULT COURSE

& PROGRAM ELEMENT & CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER .PROJECT COST ($000)

0505896A 179 490087 850

9. COST ESTIMATES


PRIMARY FACILITY ........................... 4468 STRUCTURES ............................... LS - - ( 446)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 352SITE PREPARATION AND EROSION CONTROL ..... LS - - ( 68)OBSERVATION STATIONS ..................... LS - - C 5)TARGET STORAGE/AMMO BUILDING ............. SF 1000 51.00 ( 51)COVERED MESS/LATRINE ..................... SF 1000 48.00 ( 48)ACCESS ROAD/REPAIR ....................... SY 3200 10.00 ( 32)UTILITY SYSTEM/FLAG POLE ................. LS - - ( 53)EARTH WORK............................... - - ( 90)STORM DRAINAGE............................ LS - -)

SUBTOTAL ................................... 798CONTINGENCY (5 ) ........................... 40SUPERVISION. INSP & OVERHEAD (1.50%) ....... 12TOTAL REQUEST .............................. 850EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPR..NON ADD ( 15)

10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUJCTION

New construction of a Military Operations in Urbanized Terrain (MOUT)Assault Course with an underground sever trainer, and seven otherfacilities to represent an urban setting, observation platforms. targetstorage/repair building, ammo breakdown building, covered mess, accessroad/parking, latrines and utilities.Air Conditionine: NONE11. REQUIREMENT: I ADEQUATE: N/A SUBSTANDARD: N/APROJECT: Construction of a MOUT Assault Course (MAC) for training andpractice engaging targets in a simulated combat enviroment in urbanizedareas. (Current Mission)REQUIREMEN: This range is needed to support the Utah National Guardand NCO Academy that presently train at the Camp Williams Training Site.CURRENT SITUATION: The existing ranges currently in operation are: Thepistol range, M-16 known distance range, 25 meter range, M-60/M-2 range,demolition range, hand grenade and field fire range.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED, Camp Williams is the only centrally locatedarea that could support this range. If not provided, units would have totravel to Fort Benning, Georgia to train on this range. An adverse rangesituation would exist if not provided. Units required to fire on thisrange would not be able to qualify and, therefore, not meet a readinessposture.

MCI• 1391 "Pon N



a INSTALLATION AND LOCATION

CAMP WILLIAMS (LEHI). UTAH

4. PROJECT TITLE P PRO"T NUMBER

MILITARY OPERATIONS IN URBANIZED 490087TERRAIN (MOUT) ASSAULT COURSE


a. ESTIMATED DESIGN DATA,

(1) STATUS:(a) Date Design Started .......................... 12/91(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 1993 .......... 80(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete ....... /9(d) Date Design Completed ......................... 4/93

(2) BASIS:(a) Standard of definitive Design - Yes _X_ No(b) Where was Design Previously Used? HNDM-1110-1-7

(3) COST (TOTAL) - (c) - (a)÷(b) and (d)+(e) ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications ..... ( )(b) All other design costs ..................... (__ _)(c) Total ...................................... 38(d) Contract ................................... 38(e) In-House ................................... 0



Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNomenclature Aopronriation or Reauested ($O000

Target ANSCO 518893.16 94 15Mechanisms

SDD 1F% 1391C

am fV I P .. . . N O, . . ,- . . . . •




EXISTING ARMORIES IN VARIOUS STATES ARMORY UNIT STORAGE BUILDINGS

5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER 8. PROJECTCOST (S000)

0505896A 171 999411 750

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM UJM OUANTITY UNIT COST COST($000)

PRIMARY FACILITY ........................... 550STORAGE BUILDING ............................ LS - - ( 550)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 158SITE PREPARATION ............................ LS - - ( 90)FENCING ...................................... LS - - ( 48)SECURITY LIGHTING ........................... LS - - ( 20)

SUBTOTAL ........................... .............. 708CONTINGENCY (5%) ........................... 30SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (2%) .......... 12TOTAL REQUEST ...................... ............... 750EQUIP PROVIDED FORM OTHER FED APPR..NON ADD ( 0)


An unheated pre-engineered metal, pre-cast or masonry building on aconcrete slab foundation with minimal lighting and electrical outlets, andgravity ventilation. Support facilities for this type building includesecurity lighting and security fencing.Air Conditioninf: NONE11. REQUIREMENT: N/A ADEQUATE: N/A SUBSTANDARD: N/APROJECT: The various States have identified a shortage in armory unitstorage. estimated at $6.1 million for 50 buildings of various sizes andcapacities. These warehouses, with minimal support features, will beconstructed adjacent to existing armories. This is a multi year program,with this phase acquiring approximately 10 storage buildings for variouslocations throughout the country.REGURAI: These facilities are required to supplement the existinginadequate supply rooms at armories where increases in pre-mobilizationmission has outstripped all storage capabilities.CURRENT SITUATION: Most armories do not have adequate space within theexisting building to Store and safeguard the equipment issued undercurrent Authorized Level of Organization (ALO) for mobilization.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Increase amounts of authorized supplies andequipmant must be safeguarded and be reasonably secure from the elements.Other training and administrative space will be converted into securestorage space with the adverse effects on the unit's training andreadiness mission.

DDIFO •,1391 P iA N

.. A.

)

'THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

q

i

IkI

1, COMPONENT 2. DATE


3 INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE

EXISTING ARMORIES IN VARIOUS STATES INDOOR RANGE MODERNIZATION

& PROGRAM ELEMENT & CATEGORY CODE 7. PROIECT UMBER S. PROJECT COST ($000)

0505896A 179 999914 637

9. C06T ESTIMATES

ITEM U/M QUANTITY UNIT COST (C000)

PRIMARY FACILITY ........................... 500INDOOR RANGES ............................ LS - ( 500)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 93SITE PREPARATION ......................... LS - 93)

SUBTOTAL ................................... 593CONTINGENCY (5%) ........................... 31SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (2%) .......... 13TOTAL REQUEST .............................. 637EQUIP PROVIDED FORM OTHER FED APPR..NON ADD ( 0)

10. DESCRIPON OF WPpoED CONSTRICTIONCorrect environmental conditions, remove hazardous lead particlescontamination at armory indoor rifle ranges, install ventilation systems,air exhaust systems, adequate bullet traps and acoustical treatment.Construct new ranges if necessary with these same features.Air Conditioning: NONE11. REQUIREM4ENT: N/A ADEQUATE: N/A SUBSTANDARD: N/APROJECT: Modernize or replacement of closed indoor rifle ranges arerequired for small arms and marksmanship training for members of reservecomponents assigned at various locations throughout the country. This isa multi year program to correct the deficiencies which have closed indoorranges at 100 armories. If range modernization is not cost effective,replacement indoor ranges will be constructed. Approximately '0 closedranges will be corrected during this phase of the program.EOUIRIKINT: The States have identified Indoor ranges that are closedor severely curtailed because of hazardous amounts of airborne lead andlead oxide particles, lack of ventilation, inadequate acoustics and otherhealth and safety problems. Return of these ranges to functional traininguse is required to acquire necessary individual weapons and marksmanshiptraining by assigned Army National Guard units during periods of inactiveduty training.CUR•ENT SITUATION: The Indoor ranges are closed, limited, or severelyrestricted because of health risk to military personnel.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: The lack of marksmanship familiarization andqualification practice during inactive duty training periods vill effectcombat readiness.

DDOO, 1391 I'W N PAGNO ...


I

i1

- _____________ _______

1. FIOMPONENT FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 5. DATE

ARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION R.IA OS N 4. ARL CONSTR

GOST INDEX

CAMP JOHNSON (COLCHESTER)N VERMONT .886. FREQUENCY AND TYPE UTILIZATION"

THIS FACILITY IS USED BY THE FULL-TIME WORK/FORCE 5 DAYS A WEEK AND TWO

WEEKENDS PER MONTH.

6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN t5 MILE RADIUS

ARNG.. SO. BURLINGTON (2 MILES) AASF 39,744 SF 1954

WINOOSKI (2 MILES) ARMORY 12,365 SF 1955WILLISTON (6 MILES) ARMORY 12.294 SF 1958

BURLINGTON (8 MILES) ARMORY 19,630 SF 1957USAR: COLCHESTER (.5 MILES) ARMORY 21,241 SF 1984



214 ORGANIZATIONAL 10,835 SF 1002 11/88 11/90MAINTENANCE SHOP

S.. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION 1 9 FE B 92FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THESTATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITY BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDED UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.


NONE (Number at Acres)

10. PROJECTS PLANNIED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS

NONE


1D Form 13O0S/1, MAY 78 120121s Pap I of 2

-- . _ •-. . -i - .i111 I •- - I _-

FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE

ARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION 2. DATE


CAMP JOHNSON (COLCHESTER). VERMONT


PERMANENT GUARDRESERWTOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED CMLIAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHORIZE 16 1 15 739 171 568

ACTUAL 16 1 15 719 144 575

12. RESERVE UNT DATASTRENGTH

UNIT DESIGNATION AUTHORIMZE ACTUAL

HEADQUARTERS 186 FORWARD SUPPORT BATTALION 31 27UIC: WV53AATPSN, 0205035

C COMPANY/186 FORWARD SUPPORT BATTALION 82 66UIC: WW53BOTPSN: 0205035

COMPANY B (-) 186 FORWARD SUPPORT BATTALION 198 172UIC, WW53DOTPSN: 0205035

HEADQUARTERS, DETACHNANT 86TH AIR TRAFFIC 69 66CONTROL BATTALION

•UICs WVSHAATPSN: 30611

(CONTINUED ON PAGE 3)13. MAJOR EUIPMENT AN AIICRAFT



TRAILERS 103 63

TRACKED VEHICLES 0

"14. OUTSTANDG PO.LUT A SAFETY DEFICIENC

($000)




00 Form 13901/2, MAY 78 PCIBUD FM 1a3soOW C7 o CH 4ONUIO pap ' o

• Pq~m.'S

I1. COMPONENT 2. DATE



CAMP JOHNSON (COLCHESTER), VERMONT

4. PROJECT TITLE 5.PROJECT NUMBER

ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP 500009

12. RESERVE UNIT DATA (CONTINUED)UNIT DESIGNATION STRENGTH

A1JtBQRIZE AQTUAL

150 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL PLATOON/ 38 3686 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL BATTALION

UIC: WVG4AATPSN: 30613

186 AVIATION COMPANY 139 144UIC: WVF1AOTPSN: 0205003

HEADQUARTERS/STATE AREA COMMAND-VERMONT 170 196UIC: "8BFAATPSN: 46751

50 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL/86 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 12 12UIC: VVHUAATPSN: 30613

TOTAL 739 719

DDFI*" 1391c Imc• MEND

JL4


)

1

1. COMPONENT 2 DATE

FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA -ARNG

3INSTALLATM ANMD LOCATION 4. PIOJECT TITLE

CAMP JOHNSON (COLCHESTER), VERMONT ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP

SPROGRAM ELEMENT & CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJET NUMBER PROJECT COST (000)

0505896A 214 500009 1,002. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U UM CUAKTTY UMT COST COST

PRIMARY FACILITY ..................... 834ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP .......... SF 10835 77.00 ( 834)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ................ 106SITE PREPARATION ......................... LS - - ( 16)FUEL STORAGE & DISPENSING SYSTEM.......... LS - - ( 35)FENCING .................................. LS - - ( 8)PAVING (FLEXIBLE) ......................... LS - - ( 22)IN GROUND LIFTS .......................... LS - - ( 17)UTILITIES: WATER/SEWER/GAS/TELECOM ........ LS - - 8)

SUBTOTAL ................................... 940CONTINGENCY (5%)............................ 47SUPERVISION. INSP & OVERHEAD (1.471) ....... 15TOTAL REQUEST .............................. 1,002EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER APPR. NON ADD ( 6)

10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIONA maintenance facility with 8 work bays plus an administrative work areaconstructed of masonry. built-up roof and concrete floor. Supportingfacilities include fuel dispensing system, military vehicle parking. sitepreparation, and utilities.Air Conditioninu: NONE11. REQUIREMENT, 10,835 SF ADEQUATEs 0 SF SUBSTANDARD, 4.574 SFPROJECT: A new maintenance shop to provide organizational maintenancefor the vehicles and equipment supported by this maintenance shop.(Current Mission)REQUIREMENT: A facility requirement for 10,835 SF to permitorganizational level maintenance to be performed on additional and newtypes of vehicles authorized by Table of Organization and Equipment/TableDistribution & Allowances of the supported units.CURRENT SITUATION: The existing shop contains 4,574 SF and is inadequateand cannot support current authorized equipment in an efficient and costeffective manner because of insufficient vorkbay space, administrative.and storage space.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDE: The quality of work will decrease and supportedunit combat readiness will be adversely affected by inadequate maintenancesupport space.

D0D " 1391

ow_ is

1. COMPO)NENT 2. D)ATEFY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 2. DATE

ARNG

CAMP JOHNSON (COLCHESTER), VERMONT

4. PROJECT nTLE &PROJET NUMBE.RORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP 500009

12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATAs


(1) STATUS:(a) Date Design Started ...................... 11/88(b) Percent complete as of I January 93 ......(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete.. 1(d) Date Design Completed ....................

(2) BASIS,(a) Standard or Definitive Design - Yes__ No(b) Where was Design Previously Used? N/L

(3) COST (TOTAL) (c) - (a)÷(b) or (d)+(o)s ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications... (._ )(b) All Other Design Costs .................. )(c) Total ....................................(d) Contract ................................. (__jL)(e) In-House ................................. ( 0..)


b. Equipment associated vith this project vhich will be providedfrom other appropriationso

Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNomunclature Appropristlon rR.euehted .Li2

Telecommunication ANSCO 519895.10 94 3

Furniture AMSCO 515891.30 94 3

I!

, • DW •" 1391cL'* PANE No


ARNG MILITARY CONSTRUCTION4. AREA CONSTR3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION .COSTINDEX

YAKIMA TNG CENTER, (YAKIMA) WASHINGTON 102.0,5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE UTILIZATION

RANGE WILL BE USED TO SUPPORT 44 WEEKENDS OF INACTIVE DUTY TRAINING AND16 WEEKS OF ANNUAL TRAINING BY NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE COMPONENTS(USAR.USMCR) FROM WASHINGTON, IDAHO AND OREGON. THIS FACILITY WILL ALSOBE USED BY THE ACTIVE COMPONENT.

6. OTHER ACTIVFJGUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 WILE RADIUSARNG: YAKIMA TRNG CTR (0 MILES) MATES 31270 SF 1976

YAKIMA (7 MILES) ARMORY 32880 SF 1921USAR: YAKIMA TRNG CTR (0 MILES) ARF CENTER 21000 SF 1981USMCR: YAKIMA (9 MILES) ARF CENTER 35000 SF 1973



179 MODIFIED 16 LANES 1,527 03/92 04/93MACHINE GUN/RIFLE RANGE(RETS)

(

S. STATE RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION 6 APR 92FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE 16APt 9STATE RESERVE FORCES COMPONENT FACILITY BOARD FOR POSSIBLEJOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDEND UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.


NONE (Numbew of Ac,..)



MATES ADDITION/ALTERATION 97 2.628


DO Form 1390811, MAY 78 12M216 Paop I oef

I ob %I

1. COONENT FY 1994 GUARD AND RESERVE 2. DATE


YAKIMA TNG CENTER, (YAKIMA) WASHINGTON


PE•MANENT GUAFOIESERVETOTAL OFFER ENLISTE CIVLIAN TOTAL OFFICER ENLISTED

AUTHOP•ZE 7598 917 6681

ACTUAL 6947 812 6135


I OESIGNATION AUTHORIM ACTUAL

ARNG/USAR UNITS FROM THE STATE OF 7,598 6,947WASHINGTON. IDAHO. OREGON ANDMONTANA

I

13. MAJO EQUPMENT AMD AIRCRAFT

TYPE AIJTHORIME ACTUAL

N /A

14. OUTSTANDN POLLUTION AM SAFE DCICI

($000)




JL.4) DD Form lS90S/2, IMAY 70 FIFLA 00FORM tiNSK oSEC W 7 1 019L2 W 2

9..OS EOMPONENT_____ _____ _______

FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA 1*ZC DAT

ARNG3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION '" 4. PROJECT •TLE-

YAKIMA TRAINING CENTER (YAKIMA), NODIFIED MACHINE GUN RIFLE/RANGEWASHINGTON F (RETS)5."m u PRORAMELMEN 6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PRO=T NUMBER PRmOJECT COST 'iS0)

0505896A 179 1530049 1,527

9. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM UCN OUANTITrY U...COST CO(55)

PRIMARY FACILITY ........................... 973MODIFIED MACHINE GUN & RIFLE RANGE ....... LS - - 951)CONTROL TOWER ............................ SF 120 0.00 ( 22)

SUPPORTING FACILITIES ...................... 461SITE PREPARATION/EROSION CONTROL ......... LS - - ( 55)RANGE BUILDINGS ............ ...... .LS - - ( 215)ACCESS ROAD, PARKING & SERVI*CE**TRA'I*-.*... LS - - ( 80)UTILITIES. ELECTRIC, TELECOM ............ LS - - ( 95)FLAG POLE ................................ LS - - ( 2)NIGHT LIGHTING ........................... LS - - ( 14)

SUBTOTAL ................................... 1,434CONTINGENCY (5%) ........................... 72SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD (1.4%) ........ 21TOTAL REQUEST .............................. 1,527EQUIP PROVIDED FROM OTHER FED APPR..NON ADD ( 638)


This project consists of construction of a sixteen-lane modified recordfire (RETS) rifle range superimposed upon an eight-lane (RETS) machine gunrange incorporating the use of computer controlled, pop-up targets tosimulate enemy soldiers at varying, unmarked ranges from 50 to 1000meters. Supporting facilities include an ammunition breakdown building,range control tower and computer building, target storage and maintenancebuilding, latrine facility, concurrent training site, and the requiredserving utilities. Site preparation, access road and vehicle parking isincluded in the project.Air Conditionineg: ton for control tower11. REQUIREMENT: I ADEQUATE: N/A SUBSTANDARD: N/APROJEC: Construction of a sixteen-lane modified record fire riflerange superimposed upon a eight-lane machine gun range using remotedelectronic target system (RETS). (Current Mission)REQUIREMENI, This geographically centralized range is required for useby all units of the Washington Army National Guard and other ReserveComponents to accomplish the necessary weapons training and qualificationon a weapons training range which simulates realistic combat for useduring inactive duty training. The Active Component (7th Division) willalso have the need and opportunity to use this training facility.CURRENT SITUATIONs There are no modified rifle or machine gun rangesusing RETS targetry in the State of Washington that meet the minimum U.S.Army standards. Fort Lewis rifle ranges are adequate but time loss due totravel from the eastern portion of the state precludes their use byEastern Washington ARNG units.IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED. Weapons training objectives in a combatenvironment will not be adequately met thus the overall individual andunit readiness will be adversely effected.

D04~mm 1391

-Ab


FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA A: •ARNG


YAKIMA TRAINING CENTER (YAKIMA).WASHINGTON4. P0E•-OT TITLE PROJECTNU~MI

MODIFIED MACHINE GUN RIFLE/RANGE 530049(RETS) .



(1) STATUS:(a) Date Design Started ........................... 3/2(b) Percent complete as of 1 January 1993 .......... JU(c) Date Design Expected to be 35% Complete ....... L2M(d) Date Design Completed ......................... h1/9

(2) BASIS:(a) Standard of definitive Design - Yes -2- No(b) Where vas Design Previously Used? HNDM 1110-1-5

(3) COST (TOTAL) - (c) - (a)+(b) and (d)+(e) ($000)(a) Production of Plans and Specifications ..... ( )(b) All other design costs ..................... ( )(c) Total ...................................... 64 )(d) Contract ................................... ((e) In-House ................................... 64


b. Equipment associated with this project vhich will be providedfrom other appropriations:

Fiscal YearEquipment Procuring Appropriated CostNoamenclJ.atuire Apnropriatign 2._Rguested (OOO

Remoted Targetry OPA 94 610System (RETS)

Telecommunication AMSCO 529895.10 94 28

SDD 1391o

I. COPOET 2. DATE=i. PNE FY 1994 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATAARNG

&. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLE

VARIOUS. LOCATIONS PROJECTS $400,000 AND UNDER

& PROGRAM ELEMENT &. CATEGORY COOE 7. PROJECT NMIAER &. PROJECT COST (M000)

0505896A N/A N/A 1,024

t. COST ESTIMATES

ITEM UA JIATITY UNIT COST COST

PROJECTS $400,000 AND UNDER ................ 1,024

10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIONProjects having a funded cost of $400,000 or less, including construction,alteration or conversion of permanent or temporary facilities.

1,REOUIREMENT: Included are specified projects that are described andlisted an the subsequent page.

DDr ¶ 1391

III m.

- - -- J k,

1. COMPONWNT 2 DATE


WINSTALLATO AND LOCATIN

VARIOUS, LOCATIONS

4. PROJECT TTLE & PAOJECT NUMER

PROJECTS $400,000 AND UNDER N/A

Station Cat Code Title Cost(O)

Hawaii 179 Known Distance 334Kauai Range, Upgrade(PNI 150025)

This project is for the upgrade of a ten point 300 yard Known Distancerange into a 400 yard range. Supporting facilities include a targetstorage building and troop bleachers. This range vill allow units on theisland to complete training requirements in weapons qualification.(Current Mission)

Missouri 171 Troop Medical 386Ft Crowder Training Facility

(PN: 290053)

This project is for the construction of a 3,600 square feet masonrybuilding. Supporting facilities include sidewalks, parking and utilities.This facility will allow medical personnel to train in their assignedmission while providing medical support at the training site. (CurrentMission)

Vermont 171 Training Site 304Ethan Allen Support Facility(PNs 500023)

This project is for the construction of a 5,000 square feet masonrybuilding with three work bays, administrative area, parts/storage rooms,and carpentry/plumbing/electrical shops. This facility houses thepersonnel which provides maintenance support to the training sitebuildings and ranges. (Current Mission)

q

DDI'" 1391c,.W NO



3.INSTALLATONANDLOCATION 4. PROJECT TITLEVARIOUS LOCATIONS PLANNING AND DESIGN

. PROGRAMELEMENT C CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT~ NUMIBER RPROJECT COST (000)

0505896A NIA 1 999994 52291_COST ESTIMATES

ITEM U QUANTITY UNIT COST COST

PRIMARY FACILITY ..........................CONCEPT AND FINAL DESIGN ................. ( 400)FUTURE YEAR PROJECTS ..................... ( 122)

SUPPOR'ING FACILITIES ...................... 0SUBTOTAL ........................... .............. 522CONTINGENCY (0%) ........................... 0TOTAL REQUEST ..................... ................. 522

W0. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION

Items provide for concept and final design of construction for ArmyNational Guard facilities.11. REQUIREMENT: Funds requested are required for completing theoutstanding final design of Military Construction Army National Guardprojects programed for execution during FY 95 and for execution of theplanned designs of the FY 96 program. Funding for advanced concept designof critical FY 94 projects will be addressed within overall programconstraints. The requested funding permits the design of unspecified orundefined minor construction projects intended to be executed during FY94.

DDIFO 1391 .DEC n PAE NW.

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK I

i 6


FY 19MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA A 3?.ARNGAP

3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION 4. PROJECTTITLE

APPROPRIATE ARMY NATIONAL GUARD UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTIONINSTALLATIONS AS NECESSARY

s. PROGRAM ELEMENT L CATEGORY CODE 7.PECT E S PROJECT COST ($000)

0505896A N/A 999904 5.0000. COST ESATcE

9 STIMOST

ITEM U/ QUANTITY UT COST CST

PRIMARY FACILITY ........................... 4,900MINOR CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES

UNSPECIFIED LOCATIONS .................. (4,900)SUPPORTING FACILITIES ......................SUBTOTAL ................................... 4,900CONTINGENCY (0%) ........................... 0SUPERVISION, INSP & OVERHEAD .............. 100TOTAL REQUEST .............................. 5,000EQUIP PROVIDED FORM OTHER FED APPR..NON ADD ( 0)

10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSE CONSTRUCTION

Unspecified minor construction projects which have a funded cost of$400,000 or less, including construction, alteration, or conversion ofpermanent or temporary facilities or land acquisition as authorized.Air Conditioning& NONEl1.RBQIREMENT: To provide funds for the construction of projects nototherwise authorized by law when the dollar costs are less than $400.000.Such requirements are the result of recognized facilities shortfalls, orunforeseen conditions resulting from changes in mission and equipment, orto correct damage caused by severe weather or other acts of nature. Basedon prior program execution experience, the dollar costs for correctingthese identified shortfalls are such that they do not require specificauthorization in the regular Military Construction Program.

SDDO'1 % 1391 o 1z3DE 1#Aw10

NGB-ARC-P 19 April 1993

MEMORANDUM FOR RECIPIENTS OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, ARMY

NATIONAL GUARD FY 1994 BUDGET ESTIMATE FOR FISCAL YEARS 1994

SUBJECT: Errata Memorandum

1. Enclosed are errata sheets for the Operation andMaintenance, Army National Guard Justification of Estimates forFY 1994 dated April 1993. Please replace following pages: 1,11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 20, 21, 22, 23, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 92, and93 with pages of the same number which are attached to thismemorandum.

2. Points of contact for this action are Ms. Nancy Tingstrum orMs Frankie Morgan, on 607-7571.

Robert J. Vaughan, COL, GSChief, Program Budget Division

Enclosure

1~d4.~ i. ~4m

S - .2 1

if o

1tu1 Elm

>0~ b- CD-

0. a a I , i 'IIIi3W 0 c~

ISii r' p 14 nI I Ij19 '1 - 1m

WWI

0 0. ~

-~ ~ - ... ..

CU ~~

oG mE~~CY

oo C

dc> cvm 0-

LLI 0 C

0Ur

z

00

0- '

II IIL .fjILII! i j ~~Ico

w *d

00

V.4

00

'4.

CLV

U.L

CFg

CDC

'ON

CL

LU >.

IL-

0u

LL.'

0 0%

opo

.U * * *

CCD

C0%

40 40 0%

4 ý 1 0

C:LIiiDCA

@

CA

zj jiI IL Z-L

IL2..

CY C1

0

> ~ LL. c;lt'~ i-IQ

ci

0 0O

WOW 0j

R0 -

W V~

0 0

0.

0 IciLII

~I;I hI~toIL i li Ill

cli

4* 40

0 44[ft 11

z 0

CL

0o

LLLL Z . 0 06

0.. * * . . * *!

~ ~I a_

a . li. '-

PHI00

0 Wz CL-

wmw

CL. . . .~.. . . . . .iiWCOLC

E 8lHil rto a

-3 -i d-d cd dd -d E

L oj I

0 o

ciJ

0 a'LA.

w-o 0.0U. C . .

0z V. 0

0 C

ISO V001

IE -,If~

m ,IILZ

0

zCl

0 tS 1

CD'~ 0D C

um co ~o

CLC

zE w

0 .

CL=

LO

oG

z0 ~

~~4M Cc. *

w I-

LL CD

E.

CL 3

0 C0 E

iajo~Z .0

a0

00

<0-Jpa c

0 LT

0E LU ooNL

F3

d:. :.

0P~u0

U. z I

00

a U

00 0.z C

z0~ 0

:00

0 CD 010*

a..

0 :

FU(A E

I. F 2 0~ 2, 0

od dW:

iz pCLIo

z

LL. W

Li c

CD D0

ILL

00

0 O

CO

~A

.iz 0 ICL

q 0 N* Zco~

co c!O0 U N

0 IL N4

0 I

0 -13 ol

uj D to

CL 0

ww

Z E

0a

a..0 erc

a- c Lo LEa8 010I~

~~ IC~CL~i I. -

-a w -

ci- g' ?- C-

CM)

aa

_

Z -4

w 4

0 "6 0

caa

CL 0

z >

0.0

00 ijijlid i I[i

abal - dtic · fayetteville, nc organizational maint 473 c shop bismarck, nd aviation, c-12 hanger...

Documents