about me · likelihood method switched to likelihood method to avoid the bias introduced by...
TRANSCRIPT
About meGabriel Gallardo
The University of Hong Kong — BSc, Sep 2012 - Jun 2016
First Class HonorsMajor: PhysicsMinor: Computer Science
Member of the HK Cluster at ATLAS since June 2015
Attended CERN Summer School 2015Collaborating with University of Michigan on search for electroweakSUSY in same-sign dilepton channelsMeasure electron charge misidentification
1 / 16
Contents
Current analysis
Electron charge misidentificationWhat is charge misID?Tag-and-probe methodLikelihood methodClosure tests in MCpT correction for charge flipped electronsSystematic uncertainties
Public speaking
MiscellaneousHonors and fellowshipsSkills
2 / 16
Current analysis
χ±1
χ02
˜/ν˜/ν
p
p
ν/`
`/ν
χ01
`/ν
`/ν
χ01
χ±1
χ02
W
Zp
p
χ01
`
ν
χ01
`
`
Signal: two same-sign lepton with missing transverse momentumI Missing transverse momentum from χ0
1 and νI Two leptons: for the case where one of the three leptons cannot be
identified because it is very softI Same sign two leptons: for smaller Standard Model backgroundI Potentially more sensitive for small mass splitting
(χ±1 [χ0
2]− χ01 . 50GeV)
3 / 16
Backgrounds to SS2L channel
Preliminary estimate of background inthe same-sign two electron channel. March 2016
By Dongliang Zhang (UMichigan)
OS electron pairs with one charge misID electron is a majorbackground
Need to have a reliable estimate of this contribution
4 / 16
What is charge misID?
Bremsstrahlung Track mis-reconstruction
1. Electrons interact with detectormaterial to produce bremsstrahlungphoton
2. The photon undergoes pairproduction
3. The conversion electron ismistakenly identified as the primaryelectron
Direction of curvaturedifficult to determine fornear-straight tracks ofpT > 150 GeV electrons
Figures from Giulia Gonella, Albert-Ludwigs-Universitat Freiburg, ATLAS5 / 16
Tag-and-probe method
Initially tried the tag-and-probe method from Run 1 1
On Z → e−e+ eventsI Must produce opposite sign pairs!
Select dielectron events where the invariant mass is within the Z-masswindow
Impose tight conditions on a tag electron to minimize the probabilityof its charge being misidentified
Assuming the charge of the tag electron is correct, we look at thecharge of the probe electron to determine the rate of charge misID:
εT&P =Number of same-sign probes
Total number of probes
1The ATLAS Collaboration. “Electron reconstruction and identification efficiency measurements with the ATLAS detector
using the 2011 LHC proton-proton collision data.” In: The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields 74.7 (Jan. 2014),p. 2941
6 / 16
Tag-and-probe results
hEtaMediumErrorEntries 2150Mean 1.797RMS 0.4702
|η|0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
hEtaMediumErrorEntries 2150Mean 1.797RMS 0.4702
(on medium cut)ηCharge misidentification as a function
—— From tag-and-probe—— MC Truth
September 2015, on a Z → ee MC sample7 / 16
Likelihood method
Switched to likelihood method to avoid the bias introduced by assumingthe tag electron has correct charge
Z → e+e− events used: each e falls into a binI p = P(e1correct)P(e2wrong) + P(e2correct)P(e1wrong)I p = (1− εi )εj + (1− εj )εi
I P(bothwrong) term ignored because ε ∼ 10−3 � ε2 ∼ 10−6
NexpSS = np
Binomial distribution of seeing nss same-sign eventsCn
nsspnss(1− p)n−nss
As n is large, p is small, we can approximate by Poisson distribution:
L(εi , εj ) ≡ P(nss|εi , εj ) =(Nexp
SS )nss e−N
expSS
nss!
For likelihood across all bins:L =
∏i ,j L(εi , εj )
To find ε: minimize −ln(L)
8 / 16
MisID rates from likelihood method
|η|0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
mis
ID r
ate
4−10
3−10
2−10
1−10
< 30 (GeV)T
p≤20
Data
MC LH
MC truth
|η|0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
mis
ID r
ate
4−10
3−10
2−10
1−10
< 40 (GeV)T
p≤30
Data
MC LH
MC truth
|η|0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
mis
ID r
ate
4−10
3−10
2−10
1−10
< 50 (GeV)T
p≤40
Data
MC LH
MC truth
|η|0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
mis
ID r
ate
4−10
3−10
2−10
1−10
< 60 (GeV)T
p≤50
Data
MC LH
MC truth
|η|0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
mis
ID r
ate
4−10
3−10
2−10
1−10
< 80 (GeV)T
p≤60
Data
MC LH
MC truth
|η|0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
mis
ID r
ate
4−10
3−10
2−10
1−10
< 120 (GeV)T
p≤80
Data
MC LH
MC truth
April 2016, on Z → ee MC sample and 3.2/fb of 2015 ATLAS data9 / 16
Closure tests in MC
Get number of opposite sign (OS) events and weight them with ascale factor dependent on chargeMisId rate to obtain a prediction ofsame sign (SS) events.
pss =εi (1− εj ) + εj (1− εi )
w =pss
1− pss
Plot the prediction against the number of observed SS events.
(GeV)llm20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 2201
10
210
310
410
Observed invariant mass distribution of same sign electron pairs
Observed SS events
Predicted SS events from OS
Observed invariant mass distribution of same sign electron pairs
Exp
/Obs
0.60.8
11.21.41.61.8
2
(GeV)T
p20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 2201
10
210
310
410
Observed leading pt distribution of same sign electron pairs
Observed SS events
Predicted SS events from OS
Observed leading pt distribution of same sign electron pairs
Exp
/Obs
0.60.8
11.21.41.61.8
2
η2− 1.5− 1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
310
410
Observed eta distribution of same sign electron pairs
Observed SS events
Predicted SS events from OS
Observed eta distribution of same sign electron pairs
Exp
/Obs
0.60.8
11.21.41.61.8
2
June 2016, on a Z → ee MC sample10 / 16
pT correction for charge flipped electrons
Since electrons lose energy in bremsstrahlung, the reconstructedelectrons with misidentified charge have lower energy than those withcorrect charge
Account for this in prediction by comparing the reconstructed pT andthe pT of the original electron from Z in truth
∆pT = reconstructed pT − pT of original electron from Z
pcorrectedT = preco
T + ∆pflippedT −∆pok
T
(GeV)llm20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220
410
510
610
710
810
Observed invariant mass distribution of same sign electron pairs
Observed SS events
Predicted SS events from OS
Observed invariant mass distribution of same sign electron pairs
Exp
/Obs
0.60.8
11.21.41.61.8
2
(GeV)T
p20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220
410
510
610
710
Observed leading pt distribution of same sign electron pairs
Observed SS events
Predicted SS events from OS
Observed leading pt distribution of same sign electron pairs
Exp
/Obs
0.60.8
11.21.41.61.8
2
η2− 1.5− 1− 0.5− 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
610
710
Observed eta distribution of same sign electron pairs
Observed SS events
Predicted SS events from OS
Observed eta distribution of same sign electron pairs
Exp
/Obs
0.60.8
11.21.41.61.8
2
July 2016, on a Z → ee MC sample11 / 16
Systematic uncertainties
Method bias Variation of Z-masswindow
Rates withuncertainties
|η|0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4
mis
ID r
ate
4−10
3−10
2−10
1−10
< 60 (GeV)T
p≤50
MC LH
MC truth
LH/tr
uth
0.6
0.81
1.21.4
1.61.8
2
η0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4
4−10
3−10
2−10
< 60T
50 < pNom: 80<m<100,SB=2080<m<100,SB=080<m<100,SB=2580<m<100,SB=1575<m<100,SB=2075<m<105,SB=20
η0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4
4−10
3−10
2−10
< 60T
50 < p sys⊕Stat
systematics⊕VariationMethod bias
Difference in ratesobtained likelihood
method and MC truth
Difference due toselection criteria
All uncertaintiessummed in quadrature
12 / 16
Public speakingAt HKU, I’ve given public presentations on:
My work at ATLAS, for which I won“Best Presenter of 2014-2015” out of80 presenters at the poster presentationand research colloquium of the Facultyof Science, HKU (October 2015)
“Why study physics?”, to prospectiveundergraduates
My work at ATLAS, as a postersubmitted at the Physical Society ofHong Kong conference (June 2016)
My talk at the October 2015Research Colloquium of theFaculty of Science, HKU
At study group meetings of the HKU ATLAS team, I’ve given talks on:
The maximum likelihood method
Artificial neural networks
Electron reconstruction
13 / 16
Public speaking
Externally, I’ve spoken about:
Supersymmetry, in the heats for FameLab2
HK 2016 (video here)
Proton therapy, at the FameLab HK 2016final (video here)
My journey in studying physics, to highschool students
My experience doing research as aundergraduate, to the press whenpromoting HKU’s new “Young ScientistScheme”
Life at CERN, to visiting high schoolstudents from Hong Kong
Sing Tao Daily | Circulation / Reach: 100,000 | 2016-01-21
Newspaper | F02 | 星島教育
Keyword Matched: 港大,香港大學,理學院
港大培育科研人才 配對導師個別指導 文憑試達31分 獲二萬元獎學金
Word Count: 805words | Image No: 1/1 | Image Size: 442cm-sq(25cm x 17.7cm) | Ad-Value: HKD62,087
Source: Wisers electronic service. This content, the trademarks and logos belong to Wisers, the relevant organizations or copyright owners.All rights reserved. Any content provided by user is the responsibility of the user and Wisers is not responsible for such content, copyrightclearance or any damage/loss suffered as a result.Print out of Wisers electronic service.
My talk at the FameLab final (top). SingTao Daily’s report on HKU’s Young ScientistScheme, featuring my experience at CERN(bottom).
2FameLab is a public speaking competition organized by the British Council wherecontestants attempt to explain a scientific concept to the general public in 3 minutes.
14 / 16
Honors and fellowships
In support of my work at ATLAS, I have been given funding under:
Overseas Research Fellowship, Faculty of Science, HKU
Overseas Research Program, Department of Physics, HKU
Additionally, I have been awarded:
BSc, First Class Honors HKU June 2016Dean’s Honor List HKU 2012-2013Dean’s Honor List HKU 2013-2014Dean’s Honor List UC Irvine Fall quarter 2014Li Po Kwai Scholarships HKU 2013-2014Li Po Kwai Scholarships HKU 2014-2015HKUWW Scholarships HKU 2014-2015Reaching Out Award HKSAR Government 2014-2015
15 / 16
Skills
Programming in:I C++I JavaI PythonI ROOTI bash
Other computer-related skills:I LATEXI HTMLI MathematicaI Git, SVNI Microsoft Office
Operating systems:I Mac OS XI Linux
Languages:I Native fluency in EnglishI Working proficiency in written
Chinese and CantoneseI Conversational fluency in
Putonghua
Public speakingI My latest recorded talk:
youtu.be/mTpwQCaYqNU
16 / 16