absolute human rights and the right to life (article 3)

20
Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

Upload: moris-watts

Post on 19-Jan-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Should people who commit crimes be treated differently to those who do not? Stand Up = YES Sit Down = NO To what extent should they be treated differently? Can we go too far?

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

Page 2: Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

Should they be treated the same?

http://cosmo.lv/forums/topic/131039-arzemju-skaistules/ http://arthuride.wordpress.com/2011/08/07/bill-oreilly-christian-terrorists-and-knights-templar/

Kate Mountbatten-Windsor (Middleton)

Duchess of Cambridge

Anders Breivik

Mass murderer (killed 77)

Page 3: Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

Should people who commit crimes be treated differently to those who

do not?

Stand Up = YESSit Down = NO

To what extent should they be treated differently? Can we go too far?

Page 4: Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

What form of punishment has been illegal in the UK since a legal Act was passed in 1965? It is currently still legal in many

countries across the world.

What is it?

Page 5: Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

Capital PunishmentCapital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is

the execution of a person by the state as punishment for a crime.

Is this a step too far?Should we kill criminals for their crimes?

Key QuestionDoes the right to life apply to everyone everywhere

all of the time?

Page 6: Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

Context for EvaluatingThe Right to Life (UDHR Article 3)

No-one can take away your life

UK Lawcapital punishment is currently illegal

UK Public Opinion51% want capital punishment legalised in cases of murder

In cases where a child or police officer is murdered this goes up to over 60% (with child murder being seen as the

most necessary)

Source: http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/3802

Page 7: Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

Opinion Lines

We are going to see over this unit if your opinion about capital punishment changes

or not.

Mark your initial opinion (write “1st opinion”) on the bottom of the sheet and briefly write

why.

Page 8: Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

Brainstorm

In your book, write down as many types of capital punishment as you can think of.

Capital Punishment

Page 9: Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

Burning at the stake

Page 10: Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

Crucifying

Page 11: Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

Beheading

Page 12: Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

Stoning – used as part of Shariah Law in some Muslim nations

Page 13: Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

Hanging – used in 2 US States.

Page 14: Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

Firing squad – used in 2 States.

Page 15: Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

Guillotine

Page 16: Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

Gas chamber

– used in 5 States.

Page 17: Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

Lethal injection – used in 37 States.

Page 18: Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

Article 3 – the Right to Lifehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNOD2Dnyt2k

97 countries have abolished capital punishment because of human rights and the UN. There is

increasing pressure for more countries to follow. Article 3 is said to be one of the major reasons

why. So we need to decide if capital punishment

undermines article 3 or not.

Page 19: Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

lkdjfss

Criminals have lost their right to life by

destroying the life of someone else

All humans deserve the right to life no

matter what they have done

We should never give up hope that people can change – killing

them means we have given up

Human rights should not apply to people

that act in an inhuman way

OTHER

Page 20: Absolute Human Rights and the Right to Life (Article 3)

Evaluation

Mark on the sheet where your opinion is now (write “2nd opinion”) – has it

changed? Why?

Are there any other arguments you would add now to either side of the debate?

Write these onto the sheet