The Askey-scheme of hypergeometric orthogonal polynomialsand its q-analogueRoelof Koekoek Ren�e F. SwarttouwFebruary 20, 1996

AbstractWe list the so-called Askey-scheme of hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials. In chapter 1 wegive the de�nition, the orthogonality relation, the three term recurrence relation and generatingfunctions of all classes of orthogonal polynomials in this scheme. In chapter 2 we give all limitrelations between di�erent classes of orthogonal polynomials listed in the Askey-scheme.In chapter 3 we list the q-analogues of the polynomials in the Askey-scheme. We give theirde�nition, orthogonality relation, three term recurrence relation and generating functions. Inchapter 4 we give the limit relations between those basic hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials.Finally, in chapter 5 we point out how the `classical' hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials ofthe Askey-scheme can be obtained from their q-analogues.

AcknowledgementWe would like to thank Professor Tom H. Koornwinder who suggested us to write a report likethis. He also helped us solving many problems we encountered during the research and providedus with several references.

ContentsPreface 5De�nitions and miscellaneous formulas 70.1 Introduction : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 70.2 The q-shifted factorials : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 80.3 The q-gamma function and the q-binomial coe�cient : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 100.4 Hypergeometric and basic hypergeometric functions : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 120.5 The q-binomial theorem and other summation formulas : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 140.6 Transformation formulas : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 160.7 Some special functions and their q-analogues : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 180.8 The q-derivative and the q-integral : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 20ASKEY-SCHEME 221 Hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials 231.1 Wilson : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 231.2 Racah : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 251.3 Continuous dual Hahn : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 271.4 Continuous Hahn : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 281.5 Hahn : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 291.6 Dual Hahn : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 311.7 Meixner-Pollaczek : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 321.8 Jacobi : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 331.8.1 Gegenbauer / Ultraspherical : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 341.8.2 Chebyshev : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 351.8.3 Legendre / Spherical : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 371.9 Meixner : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 381.10 Krawtchouk : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 381.11 Laguerre : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 391.12 Charlier : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 401.13 Hermite : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 412 Limit relations between hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials 432.1 Wilson! Continuous dual Hahn : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 432.2 Wilson! Continuous Hahn : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 432.3 Wilson! Jacobi : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 432.4 Racah ! Hahn : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 432.5 Racah ! Dual Hahn : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 442.6 Continuous dual Hahn ! Meixner-Pollaczek : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 442.7 Continuous Hahn ! Meixner-Pollaczek : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 442.8 Continuous Hahn ! Jacobi : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 442.9 Hahn ! Jacobi : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 451

2.10 Hahn ! Meixner : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 452.11 Hahn ! Krawtchouk : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 452.12 Dual Hahn ! Meixner : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 452.13 Dual Hahn ! Krawtchouk : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 452.14 Meixner-Pollaczek ! Laguerre : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 452.15 Meixner-Pollaczek ! Hermite : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 452.16 Jacobi ! Laguerre : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 462.17 Jacobi ! Hermite : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 462.18 Meixner ! Laguerre : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 462.19 Meixner ! Charlier : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 462.20 Krawtchouk ! Charlier : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 462.21 Krawtchouk ! Hermite : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 462.22 Laguerre ! Hermite : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 472.23 Charlier ! Hermite : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 47q-SCHEME 483 Basic hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials 503.1 Askey-Wilson : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 503.2 q-Racah : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 523.3 Continuous dual q-Hahn : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 543.4 Continuous q-Hahn : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 553.5 Big q-Jacobi : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 573.5.1 Big q-Legendre : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 583.6 q-Hahn : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 593.7 Dual q-Hahn : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 603.8 Al-Salam-Chihara : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 623.9 q-Meixner-Pollaczek : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 643.10 Continuous q-Jacobi : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 653.10.1 Continuous q-ultraspherical / Rogers : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 683.10.2 Continuous q-Legendre : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 703.11 Big q-Laguerre : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 723.12 Little q-Jacobi : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 733.12.1 Little q-Legendre : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 743.13 q-Meixner : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 753.14 Quantum q-Krawtchouk : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 763.15 q-Krawtchouk : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 773.16 A�ne q-Krawtchouk : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 783.17 Dual q-Krawtchouk : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 793.18 Continuous big q-Hermite : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 803.19 Continuous q-Laguerre : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 823.20 Little q-Laguerre / Wall : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 843.21 q-Laguerre : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 843.22 Alternative q-Charlier : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 853.23 q-Charlier : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 873.24 Al-Salam-Carlitz I : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 873.25 Al-Salam-Carlitz II : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 883.26 Continuous q-Hermite : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 893.27 Stieltjes-Wigert : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 903.28 Discrete q-Hermite I : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 903.29 Discrete q-Hermite II : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 912

4 Limit relations between basic hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials 924.1 Askey-Wilson ! Continuous dual q-Hahn : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 924.2 Askey-Wilson ! Continuous q-Hahn : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 924.3 Askey-Wilson ! Big q-Jacobi : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 924.4 Askey-Wilson ! Continuous q-Jacobi : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 924.5 Askey-Wilson ! Continuous q-ultraspherical / Rogers : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 934.6 q-Racah ! Big q-Jacobi : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 934.7 q-Racah ! q-Hahn : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 934.8 q-Racah ! Dual q-Hahn : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 944.9 q-Racah ! q-Krawtchouk : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 944.10 q-Racah ! Dual q-Krawtchouk : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 944.11 Continuous dual q-Hahn ! Al-Salam-Chihara : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 944.12 Continuous q-Hahn ! q-Meixner-Pollaczek : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 954.13 Big q-Jacobi ! Big q-Laguerre : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 954.14 Big q-Jacobi ! Little q-Jacobi : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 954.15 Big q-Jacobi ! q-Meixner : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 954.16 q-Hahn ! Little q-Jacobi : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 954.17 q-Hahn ! q-Meixner : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 954.18 q-Hahn ! Quantum q-Krawtchouk : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 954.19 q-Hahn ! q-Krawtchouk : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 964.20 q-Hahn ! A�ne q-Krawtchouk : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 964.21 Dual q-Hahn ! A�ne q-Krawtchouk : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 964.22 Dual q-Hahn ! Dual q-Krawtchouk : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 964.23 Al-Salam-Chihara! Continuous big q-Hermite : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 964.24 Al-Salam-Chihara! Continuous q-Laguerre : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 964.25 q-Meixner-Pollaczek ! Continuous q-ultraspherical / Rogers : : : : : : : : : : : : 964.26 Continuous q-Jacobi ! Continuous q-Laguerre : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 974.27 Continuous q-ultraspherical / Rogers ! Continuous q-Hermite : : : : : : : : : : : 974.28 Big q-Laguerre ! Little q-Laguerre / Wall : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 974.29 Big q-Laguerre ! Al-Salam-Carlitz I : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 974.30 Little q-Jacobi ! Little q-Laguerre / Wall : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 974.31 Little q-Jacobi ! q-Laguerre : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 974.32 Little q-Jacobi ! Alternative q-Charlier : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 984.33 q-Meixner ! q-Laguerre : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 984.34 q-Meixner ! q-Charlier : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 984.35 q-Meixner ! Al-Salam-Carlitz II : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 984.36 Quantum q-Krawtchouk ! Al-Salam-Carlitz II : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 984.37 q-Krawtchouk ! Alternative q-Charlier : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 984.38 q-Krawtchouk ! q-Charlier : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 984.39 A�ne q-Krawtchouk ! Little q-Laguerre / Wall : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 994.40 Dual q-Krawtchouk ! Al-Salam-Carlitz I : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 994.41 Continuous big q-Hermite ! Continuous q-Hermite : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 994.42 Continuous q-Laguerre ! Continuous q-Hermite : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 994.43 q-Laguerre ! Stieltjes-Wigert : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 994.44 Alternative q-Charlier ! Stieltjes-Wigert : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 994.45 q-Charlier ! Stieltjes-Wigert : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 994.46 Al-Salam-Carlitz I ! Discrete q-Hermite I : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1004.47 Al-Salam-Carlitz II ! Discrete q-Hermite II : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1003

5 From basic to classical hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials 1015.1 Askey-Wilson ! Wilson : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1015.2 q-Racah ! Racah : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1015.3 Continuous dual q-Hahn ! Continuous dual Hahn : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1015.4 Continuous q-Hahn ! Continuous Hahn : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1015.5 Big q-Jacobi ! Jacobi : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1025.5.1 Big q-Legendre ! Legendre / Spherical : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1025.6 q-Hahn ! Hahn : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1025.7 Dual q-Hahn ! Dual Hahn : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1025.8 Al-Salam-Chihara! Meixner-Pollaczek : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1025.9 q-Meixner-Pollaczek ! Meixner-Pollaczek : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1035.10 Continuous q-Jacobi ! Jacobi : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1035.10.1 Continuous q-ultraspherical / Rogers ! Gegenbauer / Ultra-spherical : : : 1035.10.2 Continuous q-Legendre ! Legendre / Spherical : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1035.11 Big q-Laguerre ! Laguerre : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1035.12 Little q-Jacobi ! Jacobi : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1035.12.1 Little q-Legendre ! Legendre / Spherical : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1045.12.2 Little q-Jacobi ! Laguerre : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1045.13 q-Meixner ! Meixner : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1045.14 Quantum q-Krawtchouk ! Krawtchouk : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1045.15 q-Krawtchouk ! Krawtchouk : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1045.16 A�ne q-Krawtchouk ! Krawtchouk : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1045.17 Dual q-Krawtchouk ! Krawtchouk : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1045.18 Continuous big q-Hermite ! Hermite : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1055.19 Continuous q-Laguerre ! Laguerre : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1055.20 Little q-Laguerre / Wall! Laguerre : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1055.20.1 Little q-Laguerre / Wall! Charlier : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1055.21 q-Laguerre ! Laguerre : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1055.21.1 q-Laguerre ! Charlier : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1065.22 Alternative q-Charlier ! Charlier : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1065.23 q-Charlier ! Charlier : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1065.24 Al-Salam-Carlitz I ! Charlier : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1065.24.1 Al-Salam-Carlitz I ! Hermite : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1065.25 Al-Salam-Carlitz II ! Charlier : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1065.25.1 Al-Salam-Carlitz II ! Hermite : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1075.26 Continuous q-Hermite ! Hermite : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1075.27 Stieltjes-Wigert ! Hermite : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1075.28 Discrete q-Hermite I ! Hermite : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 1075.29 Discrete q-Hermite II ! Hermite : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 107Bibliography 108Index 1214

PrefaceThis report deals with orthogonal polynomials appearing in the so-called Askey-scheme of hyper-geometric orthogonal polynomials and their q-analogues. Most formulas listed in this report canbe found somewhere in the literature, but a handbook containing all these formulas did not exist.We collected known formulas for these hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials and we arrangedthem into the Askey-scheme and into a q-analogue of this scheme which we called the q-scheme.This q-scheme was not completely documented in the literature. So we �lled in some gaps in orderto get some sort of `complete' scheme of q-hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials.In chapter 0 we give some general de�nitions and formulas which can be used to transformseveral formulas into di�erent forms of the same formula. In the other chapters we used the mostcommon notations, but sometimes we had to change some notations in order to be consistent.For each family of orthogonal polynomials listed in this report we give the conditions onthe parameters for which the corresponding weight function is positive. These conditions arementioned in the orthogonality relations. We remark that many of these orthogonal polynomialsare still polynomials for other values of the parameters and that they can be de�ned for othervalues as well. That is why we gave no restrictions in the de�nitions. As pointed out in chapter 0some de�nitions can be transformed into di�erent forms so that they are valid for some values ofthe parameters for which the given form has no meaning. Other formulas, such as the generatingfunctions, are only valid for some special values of parameters and arguments. These conditionsare left out in this report.We are aware of the fact that this report is by no means a full description of all that is knownabout (basic) hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials. More on each listed family of orthogonalpolynomials can be found in the articles and books to which we refer.In later versions of this report we want to add recurrence relations for the monic polynomialsin each case, id est for the polynomials with leading coe�cient equal to 1. We also hope to includemore formulas containing quadratic transformations and we want to pay more attention to thetransformation q $ q�1.Comments on this version of the report and suggestions for improvement are most welcome.If you �nd errors or gaps or if you have suggestions for inclusion of more formulas on (basic)hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials, please contact us and let us know.Roelof Koekoek and Ren�e F. Swarttouw.Roelof Koekoek Ren�e F. SwarttouwDelft University of Technology Free University of AmsterdamFaculty of Technical Mathematics and Informatics Faculty of Mathematics and InformaticsMekelweg 4 De Boelelaan 10812628 CD Delft 1081 HV AmsterdamThe Netherlands The Netherlandskoekoek@twi.tudelft.nl rene@cs.vu.nl5

6

De�nitions and miscellaneousformulas0.1 IntroductionIn this report we will list all known sets of orthogonal polynomials which can be de�ned interms of a hypergeometric function or a basic hypergeometric function.In the �rst part of the report we give a description of all classical hypergeometric orthogonalpolynomials which appear in the so-called Askey-scheme. We give de�nitions, orthogonality rela-tions, three term recurrence relations, di�erential or di�erence equations and generating functionsfor all families of orthogonal polynomials listed in this Askey-scheme of hypergeometric orthogonalpolynomials.In the second part we obtain a q-analogue of this scheme. We give de�nitions, orthogonalityrelations, three term recurrence relations, di�erence equations and generating functions for allknown q-analogues of the hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials listed in the Askey-scheme.Further we give limit relations between di�erent families of orthogonal polynomials in bothschemes and we point out how to obtain the classical hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials fromtheir q-analogues.The theory of q-analogues or q-extensions of classical formulas and functions is based on theobservation that limq!1 1� q�1� q = �:Therefore the number (1� q�)=(1� q) is sometimes called the basic number [�].Now we can give a q-analogue of the Pochhammer-symbol (a)k which is de�ned by(a)0 := 1 and (a)k := a(a+ 1)(a+ 2) � � � (a+ k � 1); k = 1; 2; 3; : : ::This q-extension is given by(a; q)0 := 1 and (a; q)k := (1� a)(1 � aq)(1� aq2) � � � (1� aqk�1); k = 1; 2; 3; : : : :It is clear that limq!1 (q�; q)k(1 � q)k = (�)k:In this report we will always assume that 0 < q < 1.For more details concerning the q-theory the reader is referred to the book [114] by G. Gasperand M. Rahman.Since many formulas given in this report can be reformulated in many di�erent ways we willgive a selection of formulas , which can be used to obtain other forms of de�nitions, orthogonalityrelations and generating functions.Most of these formulas given in this chapter can be found in [114].We remark that in orthogonality relations we often have to add some condition(s) on theparameters of the orthogonal polynomials involved in order to have positive weight functions. By7

using the famous theorem of Favard these conditions can also be obtained from the three termrecurrence relation.In some cases, however, some conditions on the parameters may be needed in other formulastoo. For instance, the de�nition (1.11.1) of the Laguerre polynomials has no meaning for negativeinteger values of the parameter �. But in fact the Laguerre polynomials are also polynomials inthe parameter �. This can be seen by writingL(�)n (x) = 1n! nXk=0 (�n)kk! (�+ k + 1)n�kxk:In this way the Laguerre polynomials are de�ned for all values of the parameter �.A similar remark holds for the Jacobi polynomials given by (1.8.1). We may also write (seesection 0.4 for the de�nition of the hypergeometric function 2F1)P (�;�)n (x) = (�1)n (� + 1)nn! 2F1� �n; n+ �+ � + 1� + 1 ���� 1 + x2 � ;which implies the well-known symmetry relationP (�;�)n (x) = (�1)nP (�;�)n (�x):Even more general we haveP (�;�)n (x) = 1n! nXk=0 (�n)kk! (n + �+ � + 1)k(�+ k + 1)n�k�1� x2 �k :From this form it is clear that the Jacobi polynomials can be de�ned for all values of the parameters� and � although the de�nition (1.8.1) is not valid for negative integer values of the parameter �.We will not indicate these di�culties in each formula.Finally, we remark that in each recurrence relation listed in this report, except for (1.8.24) forthe Chebyshev polynomials of the �rst kind, we may use P�1(x) = 0 and P0(x) = 1 as initialconditions.0.2 The q-shifted factorialsThe symbols (a; q)k de�ned in the preceding section are called q-shifted factorials. They canalso be de�ned for negative values of k as(a; q)k := 1(1� aq�1)(1� aq�2) � � � (1� aqk) ; a 6= q; q2; q3; : : : ; q�k; k = �1;�2;�3; : : : : (0.2.1)Now we have (a; q)�n = 1(aq�n; q)n = (�qa�1)n(qa�1; q)n q(n2); n = 0; 1; 2; : : :; (0.2.2)where �n2� = 12n(n� 1):We can also de�ne (a; q)1 = 1Yk=0(1� aqk):This implies that (a; q)n = (a; q)1(aqn; q)1 ; (0.2.3)8

and, for any complex number �, (a; q)� = (a; q)1(aq�; q)1 ; (0.2.4)where the principal value of q� is taken.If we change q by q�1 we obtain(a; q�1)n = (a�1; q)n(�a)nq�(n2); a 6= 0: (0.2.5)This formula can be used, for instance, to prove the following transformation formula betweenthe little q-Laguerre (or Wall) polynomials given by (3.20.1) and the q-Laguerre polynomialsde�ned by (3.21.1) : pn(x; q��jq�1) = (q; q)n(q�+1; q)nL(�)n (�x; q)or equivalently L(�)n (x; q�1) = (q�+1; q)n(q; q)nqn� pn(�x; q�jq):By using (0.2.5) it is not very di�cult to verify the following general transformation formulafor 4�3 polynomials (see section 0.4 for the de�nition of the basic hypergeometric function 4�3) :4�3� qn; a; b; cd; e; f ���� q�1; q�1� = 4�3� q�n; a�1; b�1; c�1d�1; e�1; f�1 ���� q; abcqndef � ;where a limit is needed when one of the parameters is equal to zero. Other transformation formulascan be obtained from this one by applying limits as discussed in section 0.4.Finally, we list a number of transformation formulas for the q-shifted factorials, where k andn are nonnegative integers : (a; q)n+k = (a; q)n(aqn; q)k: (0.2.6)(aqn; q)k(aqk; q)n = (a; q)k(a; q)n : (0.2.7)(aqk; q)n�k = (a; q)n(a; q)k ; k = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; n: (0.2.8)(a; q)n = (a�1q1�n; q)n(�a)nq(n2); a 6= 0: (0.2.9)(aq�n; q)n = (a�1q; q)n(�a)nq�n�(n2); a 6= 0: (0.2.10)(aq�n; q)n(bq�n; q)n = (a�1q; q)n(b�1q; q)n �ab�n ; a 6= 0; b 6= 0: (0.2.11)(a; q)n�k = (a; q)n(a�1q1�n; q)k �� qa�k q(k2)�nk; a 6= 0; k = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; n: (0.2.12)(a; q)n�k(b; q)n�k = (a; q)n(b; q)n (b�1q1�n; q)k(a�1q1�n; q)k � ba�k ; a 6= 0; b 6= 0; k = 0; 1; 2; : : :; n: (0.2.13)(q�n; q)k = (q; q)n(q; q)n�k (�1)kq(k2)�nk; k = 0; 1; 2; : : :; n: (0.2.14)(aq�n; q)k = (a�1q; q)n(a�1q1�k; q)n (a; q)kq�nk; a 6= 0: (0.2.15)(aq�n; q)n�k = (a�1q; q)n(a�1q; q)k ��aq�n�k q(k2)�(n2); a 6= 0; k = 0; 1; 2; : : :; n: (0.2.16)(a; q)2n = (a; q2)n(aq; q2)n: (0.2.17)9

(a2; q2)n = (a; q)n(�a; q)n: (0.2.18)(a; q)1 = (a; q2)1(aq; q2)1: (0.2.19)(a2; q2)1 = (a; q)1(�a; q)1: (0.2.20)Formula (0.2.18) can be used, for instance, to show that the generating function (3.10.29)for the continuous q-Legendre polynomials is a q-analogue of the generating function (1.8.44)for the Legendre polynomials. In fact we obtain (see section 0.4 for the de�nition of the basichypergeometric functions r�s)2�1 q 12 ei�;�q 12 ei��q ����� q; e�i�t! 2�1 q 12 e�i�;�q 12 e�i��q ����� q; ei�t!= 1�0� qe2i�� ���� q2; e�i�t� 1�0� qe�2i�� ���� q2; ei�t� :Now we use the q-binomial theorem (0.5.2) to show that this equals(qei�t; q2)1(qe�i�t; q2)1(ei�t; q2)1(e�i�t; q2)1 = 1�0� q� ���� q2; ei�t� 1�0� q� ���� q2; e�i�t� :If we let q tend to one we now �nd by using the binomial theorem (0.5.1)1F0� 12� ���� ei�t� 1F0� 12� ���� e�i�t� = (1� ei�t)� 12 (1� e�i�t)� 12 = 1p1� 2xt+ t2 ; x = cos �;which equals (1.8.44).0.3 The q-gamma function and the q-binomial coe�cientThe q-gamma function is de�ned by�q(x) := (q; q)1(qx; q)1 (1� q)1�x: (0.3.1)This is a q-analogue of the well-known gamma function since we havelimq"1 �q(x) = �(x):Note that the q-gamma function satis�es the functional equation�q(z + 1) = 1� qz1� q �q(z); �q(1) = 1;which is a q-extension of the well-known functional equation�(z + 1) = z�(z); �(1) = 1for the ordinary gamma function. For nonintegral values of z this ordinary gamma function alsosatis�es the relation �(z)�(1� z) = �sin�z ;which can be used to show thatlim�!k(1� q��+k)�(��)�(� + 1) = (�1)k+1 ln q; k = 0; 1; 2; : : : :10

This limit can be used to show that the orthogonality relation (3.27.2) for the Stieltjes-Wigertpolynomials follows from the orthogonality relation (3.21.2) for the q-Laguerre polynomials.The q-binomial coe�cient is de�ned byhnk iq = � nn� k�q := (q; q)n(q; q)k(q; q)n�k ; k = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; n; (0.3.2)where n denotes a nonnegative integer.This de�nition can be generalized in the following way. For arbitrary complex � we haveh�k iq := (q��; q)k(q; q)k (�1)kqk��(k2): (0.3.3)Or more general for all complex � and � we have��� �q := �q(�+ 1)�q(� + 1)�q(�� � + 1) = (q�+1; q)1(q���+1; q)1(q; q)1(q�+1; q)1 : (0.3.4)For instance this implies that (q�+1; q)n(q; q)n = �n+ �n �q :Note that limq"1 ��� �q = ���� = �(�+ 1)�(� + 1)�(�� � + 1) :For integer values of the parameter � we have��k� = (��)kk! (�1)k; k = 0; 1; 2; : : :and when the parameter � is an integer too we may write�nk� = n!k!(n� k)! ; k = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; n; n = 0; 1; 2; : : ::This latter formula can be used to show that�2nn � = �12�nn! 4n; n = 0; 1; 2; : : ::This can be used to write the generating functions (1.8.29) and (1.8.35) for the Chebyshev poly-nomials of the �rst and the second kind in the following form :R�1r12(1 +R� xt) = 1Xn=0�2nn �Tn(x)� t4�n ; R =p1� 2xt+ t2and 4Rp2(1 +R� xt) = 1Xn=0�2n+ 2n + 1 �Un(x)� t4�n ; R =p1� 2xt+ t2respectively.Finally we remark that (a; q)n = nXk=0hnk iq q(k2)(�a)k: (0.3.5)11

0.4 Hypergeometric and basic hypergeometric functionsThe hypergeometric series rFs is de�ned byrFs� a1; : : : ; arb1; : : : ; bs ���� z� := 1Xk=0 (a1; : : : ; ar)k(b1; : : : ; bs)k zkk! ; (0.4.1)where (a1; : : : ; ar)k := (a1)k � � � (ar)k:Of course, the parameters must be such that the denominator factors in the terms of the seriesare never zero. When one of the numerator parameters ai equals �n where n is a nonnegativeinteger this hypergeometric series is a polynomial in z. Otherwise the radius of convergence � ofthe hypergeometric series is given by� = 8>>>><>>>>: 1 if r < s + 11 if r = s + 10 if r > s + 1:A hypergeometric series of the form (0.4.1) is called balanced (or Saalsch�utzian) if r = s + 1,z = 1 and a1 + a2 + : : :+ as+1 + 1 = b1 + b2 + : : :+ bs.The basic hypergeometric series (or q-hypergeometric series) r�s is de�ned byr�s� a1; : : : ; arb1; : : : ; bs ���� q; z� := 1Xk=0 (a1; : : : ; ar; q)k(b1; : : : ; bs; q)k (�1)(1+s�r)kq(1+s�r)(k2) zk(q; q)k ; (0.4.2)where (a1; : : : ; ar; q)k := (a1; q)k � � � (ar ; q)k:Again, we assume that the parameters are such that the denominator factors in the terms of theseries are never zero. If one of the numerator parameters ai equals q�n where n is a nonnegativeinteger this basic hypergeometric series is a polynomial in z. Otherwise the radius of convergence� of the basic hypergeometric series is given by� = 8>>>><>>>>: 1 if r < s + 11 if r = s + 10 if r > s + 1:The special case r = s + 1 readss+1�s� a1; : : : ; as+1b1; : : : ; bs ���� q; z� = 1Xk=0 (a1; : : : ; as+1; q)k(b1; : : : ; bs; q)k zk(q; q)k :This basic hypergeometric series was �rst introduced by Heine in 1846. Therefore it is some-times called Heine's series. A basic hypergeometric series of this form is called balanced (orSaalsch�utzian) if z = q and a1a2 � � �as+1q = b1b2 � � � bs.The q-hypergeometric series is a q-analogue of the hypergeometric series de�ned by (0.4.1)since limq"1 r�s� qa1 ; : : : ; qarqb1 ; : : : ; qbs ���� q; (q � 1)1+s�rz� = rFs� a1; : : : ; arb1; : : : ; bs ���� z� :This limit will be used frequently in chapter 5. 12

We remark that limar!1 r�s� a1; : : : ; arb1; : : : ; bs ���� q; zar� = r�1�s� a1; : : : ; ar�1b1; : : : ; bs ���� q; z� :In fact, this is the reason for the factors (�1)(1+s�r)kq(1+s�r)(k2) in the de�nition (0.4.2) of thebasic hypergeometric series.The limit relations between hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials listed in chapter 2 of thisreport are based on the observations thatrFs� a1; : : : ; ar�1; �b1; : : : ; bs�1; � ���� z� = r�1Fs�1� a1; : : : ; ar�1b1; : : : ; bs�1 ���� z� ; (0.4.3)lim�!1 rFs� a1; : : : ; ar�1; �arb1; : : : ; bs ���� z�� = r�1Fs� a1; : : : ; ar�1b1; : : : ; bs ����arz� ; (0.4.4)lim�!1 rFs� a1; : : : ; arb1; : : : ; bs�1; �bs �����z� = rFs�1� a1; : : : ; arb1; : : : ; bs�1 ���� zbs� (0.4.5)and lim�!1 rFs� a1; : : : ; ar�1; �arb1; : : : ; bs�1; �bs ���� z� = r�1Fs�1� a1; : : : ; ar�1b1; : : : ; bs�1 ���� arzbs � : (0.4.6)The limit relations between basic hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials described in chapter4 of this report are based on the observations thatr�s� a1; : : : ; ar�1; �b1; : : : ; bs�1; � ���� q; z� = r�1�s�1� a1; : : : ; ar�1b1; : : : ; bs�1 ���� q; z� ; (0.4.7)lim�!1 r�s� a1; : : : ; ar�1; �arb1; : : : ; bs ���� q; z�� = r�1�s� a1; : : : ; ar�1b1; : : : ; bs ���� q; arz� ; (0.4.8)lim�!1 r�s� a1; : : : ; arb1; : : : ; bs�1; �bs ���� q;�z� = r�s�1� a1; : : : ; arb1; : : : ; bs�1 ���� q; zbs� ; (0.4.9)and lim�!1 r�s� a1; : : : ; ar�1; �arb1; : : : ; bs�1; �bs ���� q; z� = r�1�s�1� a1; : : : ; ar�1b1; : : : ; bs�1 ���� q; arzbs � : (0.4.10)Mostly, the left-hand sides of the formulas (0.4.3) and (0.4.7) occur as limit cases when somenumerator parameter and some denominator parameter tend to the same value.Finally, we introduce a notation for the N th partial sum of a (basic) hypergeometric series.We will use this notation in the de�nitions of the discrete orthogonal polynomials. We also use itin order to write generating functions for discrete orthogonal polynomials in a compact way. Wede�ne r ~Fs� a1; : : : ; arb1; : : : ; bs ���� z� := NXk=0 (a1; : : : ; ar)k(b1; : : : ; bs)k zkk! ; (0.4.11)where N denotes the nonnegative integer that appears in each de�nition of a family of discreteorthogonal polynomials. We also de�ner ~�s� a1; : : : ; arb1; : : : ; bs ���� q; z� := NXk=0 (a1; : : : ; ar; q)k(b1; : : : ; bs; q)k (�1)(1+s�r)kq(1+s�r)(k2) zk(q; q)k : (0.4.12)As an example of the use of these notations we remark that the de�nition (3.14.1) of the quantumq-Krawtchouk polynomials must be understood as2 ~�1� q�n; q�xq�N ���� q; pqn+1� = NXk=0 (q�n; q)k(q�x; q)k(q�N ; q)k(q; q)k �pqn+1�k :13

In cases of discrete orthogonal polynomials, like the Racah, Hahn, dual Hahn and Krawtchoukpolynomials, we need another special notation for the generating functions. In order to simplifythe notation we write the generating functions as (products of) (truncated as above) power seriesin t for which the N th partial sum equals the right-hand side. In these cases we use the notation' instead of the = sign. As an example of this notation and the one mentioned above we notethat the generating function (1.6.8) of the dual Hahn polynomials must be understood as follows.The N th partial sum ofet2 ~F2��x; x+ + � + 1 + 1;�N ����� t� = et NXk=0 (�x)k(x + + � + 1)k( + 1)k(�N )kk! (�t)kequals NXn=0 Rn(�(x); ; �;N )n! tn:0.5 The q-binomial theorem and other summation formu-lasOne of the most important summation formulas for hypergeometric series is given by thebinomial theorem : 1F0� a� ���� z� = 1Xn=0 (a)nn! zn = (1� z)�a; jzj < 1: (0.5.1)A q-analogue of this formula is called the q-binomial theorem :1�0� a� ���� q; z� = 1Xn=0 (a; q)n(q; q)n zn = (az; q)1(z; q)1 ; jzj < 1: (0.5.2)For a = q�n with n a nonnegative integer we �nd1�0� q�n� ���� q; z� = (zq�n; q)n; n = 0; 1; 2; : : :: (0.5.3)In fact this is a q-analogue of Newton's binomium1F0� �n� ���� z� = nXk=0 (�n)kk! zk = nXk=0�nk�(�z)k = (1 � z)n; n = 0; 1; 2; : : :: (0.5.4)As an example of the use of these formulas we note that the generating function (1.6.5) of thedual Hahn polynomials can also be written as :1F0��x � �� ���� t� 2 ~F1� x�N; x+ + � + 1�N ���� t� :In a similar way we �nd for the generating function (3.14.5) of the quantum q-Krawtchoukpolynomials :(q�xt; q)1(t; q)1 2�1� qx�N ; 0pq ���� q; q�xt� = 1�0� q�x� ���� q; t� 2�1� qx�N ; 0pq ���� q; q�xt� :Another example of the use of the q-binomial theorem is the proof of the fact that the generatingfunction (3.10.19) for the continuous q-ultraspherical (or Rogers) polynomials is a q-analogue of14

the generating function (1.8.14) for the Gegenbauer (or ultraspherical) polynomials. In fact wehave, after the substitution � = q� :���� (q�ei�t; q)1(ei�t; q)1 ����2 = (q�ei�t; q�e�i�t; q)1(ei�t; e�i�t; q)1 = 1�0� q�� ���� q; ei�t� 1�0� q�� ���� q; e�i�t� ;which tends to (for q " 1)1F0� �� ���� ei�t� 1F0� �� ���� e�i�t� = (1� ei�t)��(1� e�i�t)�� = (1� 2xt+ t2)��; x = cos �;which equals (1.8.14).The well-known Gauss' summation formula2F1� a; bc ���� 1� = �(c)�(c � a� b)�(c� a)�(c� b) ; Re(c� a� b) > 0 (0.5.5)and Vandermonde's summation formula2F1��n; bc ����1� = (c� b)n(c)n ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : : (0.5.6)have the following q-analogues :2�1� a; bc ���� q; cab� = (a�1c; b�1c; q)1(c; a�1b�1c; q)1 ; ��� cab ��� < 1; (0.5.7)2�1� q�n; bc ���� q; cqnb � = (b�1c; q)n(c; q)n ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : : (0.5.8)and 2�1� q�n; bc ���� q; q� = (b�1c; q)n(c; q)n bn; n = 0; 1; 2; : : :: (0.5.9)On the next level we have the summation formula3F2� �n; a; bc; 1 + a+ b� c� n ����1� = (c� a)n(c � b)n(c)n(c� a� b)n ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : : (0.5.10)which is called Saalsch�utz (or Pfa�-Saalsch�utz) summation formula. A q-analogue of this summa-tion formula is 3�2� q�n; a; bc; abc�1q1�n ���� q; q� = (a�1c; b�1c; q)n(c; a�1b�1c; q)n ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : :: (0.5.11)Finally, we have a summation formula for the 1�1 series :1�1 � ac ��� q; ca� = (a�1c; q)1(c; q)1 : (0.5.12)As an example of the use of this latter formula we remark that the q-Laguerre polynomialsde�ned by (3.21.1) have the property thatL(�)n (�1; q) = 1(q; q)n ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : ::15

0.6 Transformation formulasIn this section we list a number of transformation formulas which can be used to transformde�nitions or other formulas into equivalent but di�erent forms.First of all we have Heine's transformation formulas for the 2�1 series :2�1� a; bc ���� q; z� = (az; b; q)1(c; z; q)1 2�1� b�1c; zaz ���� q; b� (0.6.1)= (b�1c; bz; q)1(c; z; q)1 2�1� abc�1z; bbz ���� q; cb� (0.6.2)= (abc�1z; q)1(z; q)1 2�1� a�1c; b�1cc ���� q; abzc � : (0.6.3)The latter formula is a q-analogue of Euler's transformation formula :2F1� a; bc ���� z� = (1� z)c�a�b2F1� c� a; c� bc ���� z� : (0.6.4)Another transformation formula for the 2F1 series which is also due to Euler is :2F1� a; bc ���� z� = (1� z)�b2F1� c� a; bc ���� zz � 1� : (0.6.5)This transformation formula is also known as the Pfa�-Kummer transformation formula.As a limit case of this one we have Kummer's transformation formula for the con uent hyper-geometric series : 1F1 � ac ��� z� = ez1F1� c� ac ����� z� : (0.6.6)Limit cases of Heine's transformation formulas are2�1� 0; 0c ���� q; z� = 1(c; z; q)1 1�1 � z0 ��� q; c� (0.6.7)= 1(z; q)1 0�1� �c ���� q; cz� ; (0.6.8)2�1� a; 0c ���� q; z� = (az; q)1(c; z; q)1 1�1 � zaz ��� q; c� (0.6.9)= 1(z; q)1 1�1� a�1cc ���� q; az� ; (0.6.10)1�1 � ac ��� q; z� = (a; z; q)1(c; q)1 2�1� a�1c; 0z ���� q; a� (0.6.11)= (ac�1z; q)1 � 2�1� a�1c; 0c ���� q; azc � (0.6.12)and 2�1� a; b0 ���� q; z� = (az; b; q)1(z; q)1 2�1� z; 0az ���� q; b� (0.6.13)= (bz; q)1(z; q)1 1�1� bbz ���� q; az� : (0.6.14)16

If we reverse the order of summation in a terminating 1F1 series we obtain a 2F0 series, in factwe have 1F1��na ����x� = (�x)n(a)n 2F0� �n;�a� n+ 1� ����� 1x� ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : : : (0.6.15)If we apply this technique to a terminating 2F1 series we �nd2F1��n; bc ����x� = (b)n(c)n (�x)n2F1��n;�c� n+ 1�b � n+ 1 ���� 1x� ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : : : (0.6.16)The q-analogues of these formulas are1�1� q�na ���� q; z� = (q�1z)n(a; q)n 2�1� q�n; a�1q1�n0 ���� q; aqn+1z � ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : : (0.6.17)and 2�1� q�n; bc ���� q; z�= (b; q)n(c; q)n q�n�(n2)(�z)n2�1� q�n; c�1q1�nb�1q1�n ���� q; cqn+1bz � ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : :: (0.6.18)A limit case of the latter formula is2�0� q�n; b� ���� q; zqn� = (b; q)nzn2�1� q�n; 0b�1q1�n ���� q; qbz� ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : :: (0.6.19)The next transformation formula is due to Jackson :2�1� q�n; bc ���� q; z� = (bc�1q�nz; q)1(bc�1z; q)1 3�2� q�n; b�1c; 0c; b�1cqz�1 ���� q; q� ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : :: (0.6.20)Equivalently we have3�2� q�n; a; 0b; c ���� q; q� = (b�1q; q)1(b�1q1�n; q)1 2�1� q�n; a�1cc ���� q; aqb � ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : : : (0.6.21)Other transformation formulas of this kind are given by :2�1� q�n; bc ���� q; z�= (b�1c; q)n(c; q)n �bzq �n 3�2� q�n; qz�1; c�1q1�nbc�1q1�n; 0 ���� q; q� (0.6.22)= (b�1c; q)n(c; q)n 3�2� q�n; b; bc�1q�nzbc�1q1�n; 0 ���� q; q� ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : :; (0.6.23)or equivalently3�2� q�n; a; bc; 0 ���� q; q� = (b; q)n(c; q)nan2�1� q�n; b�1cb�1q1�n ���� q; qa� (0.6.24)= (a�1c; q)n(c; q)n an2�1� q�n; aac�1q1�n ���� q; bqc � ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : : : (0.6.25)Limit cases of these formulas are2�0� q�n; b� ���� q; z� = b�n3�2� q�n; b; bzq�n0; 0 ���� q; q� ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : :; (0.6.26)17

or equivalently3�2� q�n; a; b0; 0 ���� q; q� = (b; q)nan2�1� q�n; 0b�1q1�n ���� q; qa� (0.6.27)= an2�0� q�n; a� ���� q; bqna � ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : : : (0.6.28)On the next level we have Sears' transformation formula for a terminating balanced 4�3 series :4�3� q�n; a; b; cd; e; f ���� q; q�= (a�1e; a�1f ; q)n(e; f ; q)n an4�3� q�n; a; b�1d; c�1dd; ae�1q1�n; af�1q1�n ���� q; q� (0.6.29)= (a; a�1b�1ef; a�1c�1ef ; q)n(e; f; a�1b�1c�1ef ; q)n �4�3� q�n; a�1e; a�1f; a�1b�1c�1efa�1b�1ef; a�1c�1ef; a�1q1�n ���� q; q� ; def = abcq1�n: (0.6.30)Sears' transformation formula is a q-analogue of Whipple's transformation formula for a ter-minating balanced 4F3 series :4F3� �n; a; b; cd; e; f ���� 1� = (e � a)n(f � a)n(e)n(f)n �4F3� �n; a; d� b; d� cd; a� e � n + 1; a� f � n + 1 ���� 1� ; a+ b+ c+ 1 = d+ e + f + n: (0.6.31)Whipple's formula can be used to show that the Wilson polynomials de�ned by (1.1.1) aresymmetric in their parameters in the sense that the following 24 di�erent forms are all equal :Wn(x2; a; b; c; d) =Wn(x2; a; b; d; c) = Wn(x2; a; c; b; d) = � � � = Wn(x2; d; c; b; a):Sears' transformation formula can be used to derive similar symmetry relations for the Askey-Wilson polynomials de�ned by (3.1.1) :pn(x; a; b; c; d) = pn(x; a; b; d; c) = pn(x; a; c; b; d) = � � � = pn(x; d; c; b; a):Finally, we mention a quadratic transformation formula which is due to Singh :4�3� a2; b2; c; dabq 12 ;�abq 12 ;�cd ���� q; q� = 4�3� a2; b2; c2; d2a2b2q;�cd;�cdq ���� q2; q2� ; (0.6.32)which is valid when both sides terminate.If we apply Singh's formula (0.6.32) to the continuous q-Jacobi polynomials de�ned by (3.10.1)and (3.10.2) and use Sears' transformation formula (0.6.29), formula (0.2.10) twice and also formula(0.2.18), then we �nd the quadratic transformationP (�;�)n (xjq2) = (�q; q)n(�q�+�+1; q)n qn�P (�;�)n (x; q):0.7 Some special functions and their q-analoguesThe classical exponential function exp(z) and the trigonometric functions sin(z) and cos(z)can be expressed in terms of hypergeometric functions asexp(z) = ez = 0F0��� ���� z� ; (0.7.1)18

sin(z) = z 0F1� �32 ����� z24 � (0.7.2)and cos(z) = 0F1��12 ����� z24 � : (0.7.3)Further we have the well-known Bessel function J�(z) which can be de�ned byJ�(z) := � z2���(� + 1)0F1� �� + 1 ����� z24 � : (0.7.4)Applying this formula to the generating function (1.11.6) of the Laguerre polynomials weobtain : (xt)��2 etJ�(2pxt) = 1�(�+ 1) 1Xn=0 L(�)n (x)(�+ 1)n tn:These functions all have several q-analogues. The exponential function for instance has twodi�erent natural q-extensions, denoted by eq(z) and Eq(z) de�ned byeq(z) := 1�0� 0� ���� q; z� = 1Xn=0 zn(q; q)n (0.7.5)and Eq(z) := 0�0� �� ���� q;�z� = 1Xn=0 q(n2)(q; q)n zn: (0.7.6)These q-analogues of the exponential function are related byeq(z)Eq(�z) = 1:They are q-extensions of the exponential function sincelimq"1 eq((1� q)z) = limq"1 Eq((1� q)z) = ez:If we set a = 0 in the q-binomial theorem we �nd for the q-exponential functions :eq(z) = 1�0� 0� ���� q; z� = 1(z; q)1 ; jzj < 1: (0.7.7)Further we have Eq(z) = 0�0��� ���� q;�z� = (�z; q)1: (0.7.8)For instance, these formulas can be used to obtain other versions of a generating function forseveral sets of orthogonal polynomials mentioned in this report.If we assume that jzj < 1 we may de�nesinq(z) := eq(iz) � eq(�iz)2i = 1Xn=0 (�1)nz2n+1(q; q)2n+1 (0.7.9)and cosq(z) := eq(iz) + eq(�iz)2 = 1Xn=0 (�1)nz2n(q; q)2n : (0.7.10)These are q-analogues of the trigonometric functions sin(z) and cos(z). On the other hand wemay de�ne Sinq(z) := Eq(iz) � Eq(�iz)2i (0.7.11)19

and Cosq(z) := Eq(iz) + Eq(�iz)2 : (0.7.12)Then it is not very di�cult to verify thateq(iz) = cosq(z) + i sinq(z) and Eq(iz) = Cosq(z) + i Sinq(z):Further we have 8<: sinq(z)Sinq(z) + cosq(z)Cosq(z) = 1sinq(z)Cosq(z)� Sinq(z) cosq(z) = 0:The q-analogues of the trigonometric functions can be used to �nd di�erent forms of formulasappearing in this report, although we will not use them.Some q-analogues of the Bessel functions are given byJ (1)� (z; q) := (q�+1; q)1(q; q)1 �z2�� 2�1� 0; 0q�+1 ���� q;�z24 � (0.7.13)and J (2)� (z; q) := (q�+1; q)1(q; q)1 �z2�� 0�1� �q�+1 ���� q;�q�+1z24 � : (0.7.14)These q-Bessel functions are connected byJ (2)� (z; q) = (�z24 ; q)1 � J (1)� (z; q); jzj < 2:They are q-analogues of the Bessel function sincelimq"1 J (k)� ((1 � q)z; q) = J�(z); k = 1; 2:These q-Bessel functions were introduced by F.H. Jackson in 1905. They are therefore referredto as Jackson q-Bessel functions. Other q-analogues of the Bessel function are the so-called Hahn-Exton q-Bessel functions.As an example we remark that the generating function (3.20.5) for the little q-Laguerre (orWall) polynomials can also be written as(�t; q)1(q; q)1(q�+1; q)1 (xt)��2 J (1)� (2pxt; q) = 1Xn=0 q(n2)(q; q)n pn(x; q�jq)tnor as (q; q)1(q�+1; q)1 (xt)��2 Eq(t)J (1)� (2pxt; q) = 1Xn=0 q(n2)(q; q)npn(x; q�jq)tn:0.8 The q-derivative and the q-integralThe q-derivative operator Dq is de�ned byDqf(z) := 8>><>>: f(z) � f(qz)(1� q)z ; z 6= 0f 0(0); z = 0: (0.8.1)Further we de�ne D0qf := f and Dnq f := Dq �Dn�1q f� ; n = 1; 2; 3; : : :: (0.8.2)20

It is not very di�cult to see that limq"1 Dqf(z) = f 0(z)if the function f is di�erentiable at z.An easy consequence of this de�nition isDq [f( x)] = (Dqf) ( x) (0.8.3)for all real or more generalDnq [f( x)] = n �Dnq f� ( x); n = 0; 1; 2; : : :: (0.8.4)Further we have Dq [f(x)g(x)] = f(qx)Dqg(x) + g(x)Dqf(x) (0.8.5)which is often referred to as the q-product rule. This can be generalized to a q-analogue of Leibniz'rule : Dnq [f(x)g(x)] = nXk=0hnkiq �Dn�kq f� (qkx) �Dkq g� (x); n = 0; 1; 2; : : : : (0.8.6)As an example we note that the q-di�erence equation (3.21.5) of the q-Laguerre polynomialscan also be written in terms of this q-derivative operator as(1�q)2xD2qy(x)+(1�q) �1� q�+1 � q�+2x� (Dqy) (qx)+(1�qn)q�+1y(qx) = 0; y(x) = L(�)n (x; q):The q-integral is de�ned byZ z0 f(t)dqt := z(1 � q) 1Xn=0 f(zqn)qn: (0.8.7)This de�nition is due to J. Thomae and F.H. Jackson. Jackson also de�ned a q-integral on (0;1)by Z 10 f(t)dqt := (1� q) 1Xn=�1 f(qn)qn: (0.8.8)If the function f is continuous on [0; z] we havelimq"1 Z z0 f(t)dqt = Z z0 f(t)dt:For instance, the orthogonality relation (3.12.2) for the little q-Jacobi polynomials can also bewritten in terms of a q-integral as :1Z0 (qx; q)1(q�+1x; q)1x�pm(x; q�; q�jq)pn(x; q�; q�jq)dqx= (1� q) (q; q�+�+2; q)1(q�+1; q�+1; q)1 (1� q�+�+1)(1� q2n+�+�+1) (q; q�+1; q)n(q�+1; q�+�+1; q)n qn(�+1)�mn; � > �1; � > �1:21

ASKEY-SCHEMEOFHYPERGEOMETRICORTHOGONAL POLYNOMIALS4F3(4)3F2(3)2F1(2)1F1(1)=2F0(1)2F0(0)

Wilson RacahContinuousdual Hahn ContinuousHahn Hahn Dual HahnMeixner-Pollaczek Jacobi Meixner KrawtchoukLaguerre CharlierHermite22

Chapter 1Hypergeometric orthogonalpolynomials1.1 WilsonDe�nition.Wn(x2; a; b; c; d)(a+ b)n(a + c)n(a+ d)n = 4F3� �n; n+ a+ b+ c+ d� 1; a+ ix; a� ixa+ b; a+ c; a+ d ���� 1� : (1.1.1)Orthogonality. When Re(a; b; c; d) > 0 and non-real parameters occur in conjugate pairs,then 12� 1Z0 �����(a + ix)�(b+ ix)�(c+ ix)�(d+ ix)�(2ix) ����2Wm(x2; a; b; c; d)Wn(x2; a; b; c; d)dx= (n + a+ b+ c + d� 1)nn!�(n+ a+ b) � � ��(n+ c+ d)�(2n+ a+ b+ c + d) �mn; (1.1.2)where �(n + a+ b) � � ��(n+ c+ d)= �(n + a+ b)�(n+ a + c)�(n+ a+ d)�(n+ b+ c)�(n+ b + d)�(n+ c+ d):If a < 0 and a + b, a + c, a + d are positive or a pair of complex conjugates occur with positivereal parts, then12� 1Z0 �����(a+ ix)�(b + ix)�(c + ix)�(d+ ix)�(2ix) ����2Wm(x2; a; b; c; d)Wn(x2; a; b; c; d)dx++ �(a+ b)�(a + c)�(a + d)�(b� a)�(c � a)�(d� a)�(�2a) �� Xk=0;1;2:::a+k<0 (2a)k(a+ 1)k(a+ b)k(a+ c)k(a + d)k(k!)(a)k(a � b+ 1)k(a� c+ 1)k(a� d+ 1)kWm(�(a + k)2)Wn(�(a + k)2)= (n+ a + b+ c+ d� 1)nn!�(n+ a + b) � � ��(n + c+ d)�(2n+ a + b+ c+ d) �mn; (1.1.3)23

where Wm(�(a+ k)2)Wn(�(a+ k)2) = Wm(�(a + k)2; a; b; c; d)Wn(�(a + k)2; a; b; c; d):Recurrence relation.� �a2 + x2� ~Wn(x2) = An ~Wn+1(x2)� (An +Cn) ~Wn(x2) + Cn ~Wn�1(x2); (1.1.4)where ~Wn(x2) := ~Wn(x2; a; b; c; d) = Wn(x2; a; b; c; d)(a + b)n(a+ c)n(a + d)nand 8>>>><>>>>: An = (n+ a + b+ c+ d� 1)(n+ a + b)(n+ a+ c)(n+ a + d)(2n+ a+ b+ c+ d� 1)(2n+ a+ b+ c+ d)Cn = n(n+ b+ c� 1)(n+ b + d� 1)(n + c+ d� 1)(2n+ a+ b+ c+ d� 2)(2n+ a + b+ c+ d� 1) :Di�erence equation.n(n+ a+ b+ c+ d� 1)y(x) = B(x)y(x + i) � [B(x) +D(x)] y(x) +D(x)y(x � i); (1.1.5)where y(x) = Wn(x2; a; b; c; d)and 8>>>><>>>>: B(x) = (a� ix)(b� ix)(c� ix)(d� ix)2ix(2ix� 1)D(x) = (a+ ix)(b+ ix)(c+ ix)(d+ ix)2ix(2ix+ 1) :Generating functions.2F1� a + ix; b+ ixa+ b ���� t� 2F1� c� ix; d� ixc+ d ���� t� = 1Xn=0 Wn(x2; a; b; c; d)tn(a + b)n(c+ d)nn! : (1.1.6)2F1� a + ix; c+ ixa+ c ���� t� 2F1� b� ix; d� ixb+ d ���� t� = 1Xn=0 Wn(x2; a; b; c; d)tn(a + c)n(b+ d)nn! : (1.1.7)2F1� a + ix; d+ ixa+ d ���� t� 2F1� b� ix; c� ixb+ c ���� t� = 1Xn=0 Wn(x2; a; b; c; d)tn(a + d)n(b+ c)nn! : (1.1.8)(1 � t)1�a�b�c�d4F3� 12(a + b+ c+ d� 1); 12 (a+ b+ c+ d); a+ ix; a� ixa+ b; a+ c; a+ d ����� 4t(1� t)2�= 1Xn=0 (a+ b+ c+ d� 1)n(a + b)n(a+ c)n(a + d)nn!Wn(x2; a; b; c; d)tn: (1.1.9)Remark. If we set a = 12( + � + 1) ; b = 12(2�� � � + 1)c = 12(2� � + � + 1) ; d = 12( � � + 1)and ix! x+ 12( + � + 1)24

in ~Wn(x2; a; b; c; d) = Wn(x2; a; b; c; d)(a+ b)n(a + c)n(a+ d)n ;de�ned by (1.1.1) and take�+ 1 = �N or � + � + 1 = �N or + 1 = �N; with N a nonnegative integerwe obtain the Racah polynomials de�ned by (1.2.1).References. [31], [44], [45], [132], [133], [155], [156], [171], [175], [227], [228].1.2 RacahDe�nition.Rn(�(x);�; �; ; �) = 4 ~F3��n; n+ �+ � + 1;�x; x+ + � + 1�+ 1; � + � + 1; + 1 ���� 1� ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; N; (1.2.1)where �(x) = x(x+ + � + 1)and �+ 1 = �N or � + � + 1 = �N or + 1 = �N; with N a nonnegative integer.Orthogonality.NXx=0 ( + � + 1)x(( + � + 3)=2)x(�+ 1)x(� + � + 1)x( + 1)x(x!)(( + � + 1)=2)x( + � � �+ 1)x( � � + 1)x(� + 1)x Rm(�(x))Rn(�(x))= M (n+ �+ � + 1)n(� + 1)n(�� � + 1)n(�+ � � + 1)nn!(�+ � + 2)2n(�+ 1)n(� + � + 1)n( + 1)n �mn; (1.2.2)where Rn(�(x)) := Rn(�(x);�; �; ; �)and M = 8>>>>>>>>><>>>>>>>>>: ( + � + 2)N (��)N( � � + 1)N (� + 1)N if �+ 1 = �N( + � + 2)N (� � �)N( + � � �+ 1)N (� + 1)N if � + � + 1 = �N(��)N (�+ � + 2)N(�� � + 1)N (� + 1)N if + 1 = �N:Recurrence relation.�(x)Rn(�(x)) = AnRn+1(�(x))� (An + Cn)Rn(�(x)) +CnRn�1(�(x)); (1.2.3)where Rn(�(x)) := Rn(�(x);�; �; ; �)and 8>>>><>>>>: An = (n+ �+ � + 1)(n+ �+ 1)(n+ � + � + 1)(n+ + 1)(2n+ �+ � + 1)(2n+ �+ � + 2)Cn = n(n + �)(n + �+ � � )(n + �� �)(2n+ �+ �)(2n+ �+ � + 1) ;25

hence An = 8>>>>>>>>><>>>>>>>>>: (n + � � N )(n�N )(n + � + � + 1)(n + + 1)(2n+ � �N )(2n+ � �N + 1) if �+ 1 = �N(n + �+ � + 1)(n+ �+ 1)(n� N )(n+ + 1)(2n+ �+ � + 1)(2n+ �+ � + 2) if � + � + 1 = �N(n + �+ � + 1)(n+ �+ 1)(n+ � + � + 1)(n� N )(2n+ �+ � + 1)(2n+ �+ � + 2) if + 1 = �Nand Cn = 8>>>>>>>>><>>>>>>>>>: n(n+ �)(n + � � �N � 1)(n� � � N � 1)(2n+ � � N � 1)(2n+ � �N ) if �+ 1 = �Nn(n+ �)(n + �+ � � )(n + �+ � + N + 1)(2n+ �+ �)(2n + �+ � + 1) if � + � + 1 = �Nn(n+ �)(n + �+ � +N + 1)(n+ �� �)(2n+ �+ �)(2n + �+ � + 1) if + 1 = �N:Di�erence equation.n(n+ �+ � + 1)y(x) = B(x)y(x + 1)� [B(x) +D(x)] y(x) +D(x)y(x � 1); (1.2.4)where y(x) = Rn(�(x);�; �; ; �)and 8>>>><>>>>: B(x) = (x + �+ 1)(x+ � + � + 1)(x+ + 1)(x+ + � + 1)(2x+ + � + 1)(2x+ + � + 2)D(x) = x(x+ �)(x� � + )(x � �+ + �)(2x+ + �)(2x+ + � + 1) :Generating functions.2 ~F1� x+ �+ 1; x+ + � + 1�+ 1 ���� t� 2F1� �x+ � � ;�x� �� + 1 ���� t�' NXn=0 (� + � + 1)n( + 1)n(� + 1)nn! Rn(�(x);�; �; ; �)tn: (1.2.5)2 ~F1� x+ � + � + 1; x+ + � + 1� + � + 1 ���� t� 2F1� �x+ �� � �;�x� ��� � + 1 ���� t�' NXn=0 (�+ 1)n( + 1)n(�� � + 1)nn! Rn(�(x);�; �; ; �)tn: (1.2.6)2 ~F1� x+ + 1; x+ + � + 1 + 1 ���� t� 2F1� �x+ �� � �;�x + � � �+ � � + 1 ���� t�' NXn=0 (�+ 1)n(� + � + 1)n(�+ � � + 1)nn! Rn(�(x);�; �; ; �)tn: (1.2.7)26

(1� t)�����14 ~F3� 12 (�+ � + 1); 12 (�+ � + 2);�x; x+ + � + 1�+ 1; � + � + 1; + 1 ����� 4t(1� t)2�' NXn=0 (�+ � + 1)nn! Rn(�(x);�; �; ; �)tn: (1.2.8)Remark. If we set � = a+ b � 1, � = c + d� 1, = a + d� 1, � = a � d and x ! �a + ixin the de�nition (1.2.1) of the Racah polynomials we obtain the Wilson polynomials de�ned by(1.1.1) : Rn(�(�a + ix); a+ b� 1; c+ d� 1; a+ d� 1; a� d)= ~Wn(x2; a; b; c; d) = Wn(x2; a; b; c; d)(a+ b)n(a + c)n(a+ d)n :References. [31], [43], [45], [47], [90], [156], [180], [183], [192], [194], [227].1.3 Continuous dual HahnDe�nition. Sn(x2; a; b; c)(a+ b)n(a + c)n = 3F2� �n; a+ ix; a� ixa+ b; a+ c ���� 1� : (1.3.1)Orthogonality. When a,b and c are positive except possibly for a pair of complex conjugateswith positive real parts, then12� 1Z0 �����(a+ ix)�(b + ix)�(c + ix)�(2ix) ����2 Sm(x2; a; b; c)Sn(x2; a; b; c)dx= �(n + a+ b)�(n+ a+ c)�(n + b+ c)n!�mn: (1.3.2)If a < 0 and a+ b, a+ c are positive or a pair of complex conjugates with positive real parts, then12� 1Z0 �����(a+ ix)�(b+ ix)�(c + ix)�(2ix) ����2 Sm(x2; a; b; c)Sn(x2; a; b; c)dx++ �(a+ b)�(a+ c)�(b� a)�(c� a)�(�2a) �� Xk=0;1;2:::a+k<0 (2a)k(a+ 1)k(a+ b)k(a + c)k(k!)(a)k(a� b+ 1)k(a � c+ 1)k (�1)kSm(�(a + k)2)Sn(�(a + k)2)= �(n+ a+ b)�(n+ a+ c)�(n+ b+ c)n!�mn; (1.3.3)where Sm(�(a+ k)2)Sn(�(a+ k)2) = Sm(�(a + k)2; a; b; c)Sn(�(a + k)2; a; b; c):Recurrence relation.� �a2 + x2� ~Sn(x2) = An ~Sn+1(x2) � (An + Cn) ~Sn(x2) + Cn ~Sn�1(x2); (1.3.4)where ~Sn(x2) := ~Sn(x2; a; b; c) = Sn(x2; a; b; c)(a+ b)n(a+ c)n27

and 8<: An = (n + a+ b)(n+ a + c)Cn = n(n+ b + c� 1):Di�erence equation.ny(x) = B(x)y(x + i) � [B(x) +D(x)] y(x) +D(x)y(x � i); y(x) = Sn(x2; a; b; c); (1.3.5)where 8>>>><>>>>: B(x) = (a � ix)(b � ix)(c � ix)2ix(2ix� 1)D(x) = (a + ix)(b + ix)(c + ix)2ix(2ix+ 1) :Generating functions.(1 � t)�c+ix2F1� a + ix; b+ ixa+ b ���� t� = 1Xn=0 Sn(x2; a; b; c)(a + b)nn! tn: (1.3.6)(1 � t)�b+ix2F1� a+ ix; c+ ixa+ c ���� t� = 1Xn=0 Sn(x2; a; b; c)(a+ c)nn! tn: (1.3.7)(1� t)�a+ix2F1� b+ ix; c+ ixb+ c ���� t� = 1Xn=0 Sn(x2; a; b; c)(b+ c)nn! tn: (1.3.8)et2F2� a+ ix; a� ixa+ b; a+ c ����� t� = 1Xn=0 Sn(x2; a; b; c)(a+ b)n(a+ c)nn! tn: (1.3.9)References. [45], [130], [155], [156], [168], [169].1.4 Continuous HahnDe�nition.pn(x; a; b; c; d) = in (a + c)n(a+ d)nn! 3F2��n; n+ a+ b+ c+ d� 1; a+ ixa + c; a+ d ���� 1� : (1.4.1)Orthogonality.12� 1Z�1 �(a+ ix)�(b+ ix)�(c � ix)�(d� ix)pm(x; a; b; c; d)pn(x; a; b; c; d)dx= �(n+ a+ c)�(n+ a + d)�(n+ b+ c)�(n+ b+ d)(2n+ a+ b+ c+ d� 1)�(n+ a+ b+ c+ d� 1)n!�mn; (1.4.2)where Re(a; b; c; d)> 0; c = �a and d = �b:Recurrence relation.(a + ix)~pn(x) = An~pn+1(x) � (An + Cn) ~pn(x) +Cn~pn�1(x); (1.4.3)where ~pn(x) := ~pn(x; a; b; c; d) = n!in(a + c)n(a+ d)npn(x; a; b; c; d)28

and 8>>>><>>>>: An = � (n + a+ b+ c+ d� 1)(n + a+ c)(n+ a+ d)(2n+ a+ b+ c+ d� 1)(2n+ a + b+ c+ d)Cn = n(n+ b+ c� 1)(n+ b+ d� 1)(2n+ a+ b+ c+ d� 2)(2n+ a+ b + c+ d� 1) :Di�erence equation.n(n+ a+ b+ c+ d� 1)y(x) = B(x)y(x + i) � [B(x) +D(x)] y(x) +D(x)y(x � i); (1.4.4)where y(x) = pn(x; a; b; c; d)and 8<: B(x) = (c� ix)(d� ix)D(x) = (a+ ix)(b+ ix):Generating functions.2F0� a+ ix; b+ ix� ����� it� 2F0� c� ix; d� ix� ���� it� � 1Xn=0 pn(x; a; b; c; d)tn: (1.4.5)1F1� a+ ixa+ c ����� it� 1F1� d� ixb+ d ���� it� = 1Xn=0 pn(x; a; b; c; d)(a+ c)n(b+ d)n tn: (1.4.6)1F1� a + ixa+ d ����� it� 1F1� c� ixb+ c ���� it� = 1Xn=0 pn(x; a; b; c; d)(a+ d)n(b+ c)n tn: (1.4.7)(1� t)1�a�b�c�d3F2� 12 (a+ b+ c+ d� 1); 12(a+ b+ c + d); a+ ixa+ c; a+ d ����� 4t(1� t)2�= 1Xn=0 (a+ b+ c + d� 1)n(a+ c)n(a+ d)nin pn(x; a; b; c; d)tn: (1.4.8)Remark. Since the generating function (1.4.5) is divergent this relation must be seen as anequality in terms of formal power series.References. [29], [31], [46], [51], [120], [156].1.5 HahnDe�nition.Qn(x;�; �;N ) = 3 ~F2� �n; n+ �+ � + 1;�x�+ 1;�N ���� 1� ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : :; N: (1.5.1)Orthogonality. NXx=0��+ xx ��N + � � xN � x �Qm(x;�; �;N )Qn(x;�; �;N )= (�1)nn!(� + 1)n(n+ �+ � + 1)N+1(N !)(2n+ �+ � + 1)(�N )n(� + 1)n �mn: (1.5.2)29

Recurrence relation.� xQn(x) = AnQn+1(x)� (An + Cn)Qn(x) +CnQn�1(x); (1.5.3)where Qn(x) := Qn(x;�; �;N )and 8>>>><>>>>: An = (n + �+ � + 1)(n+ �+ 1)(N � n)(2n+ �+ � + 1)(2n+ �+ � + 2)Cn = n(n+ �)(n + �+ � + N + 1)(2n+ �+ �)(2n + �+ � + 1) :Di�erence equation.n(n+ �+ � + 1)y(x) = B(x)y(x + 1)� [B(x) +D(x)] y(x) +D(x)y(x � 1); (1.5.4)where y(x) = Qn(x;�; �;N )and 8<: B(x) = (x�N )(x + �+ 1)D(x) = x(x� � � N � 1):Generating functions.1F1� x�N� + 1 ���� t� 1F1� �x�+ 1 ����� t� ' NXn=0 (�N )n(� + 1)nn!Qn(x;�; �;N )tn: (1.5.5)1 ~F1� x� N�N ���� t� 1F1� N � x+ � + 1�+ � +N + 2����� t� ' NXn=0 (�+ 1)n(�+ � +N + 2)nn!Qn(x;�; �;N )tn: (1.5.6)(1 � t)�����13 ~F2� 12(� + � + 1); 12(�+ � + 2);�x�+ 1;�N ����� 4t(1� t)2�' NXn=0 (�+ � + 1)nn! Qn(x;�; �;N )tn: (1.5.7)Remarks. If we interchange the role of x and n in (1.5.1) we obtain the dual Hahn polynomialsde�ned by (1.6.1).Since Qn(x;�; �;N ) = Rx(�(n);�; �;N )we obtain the dual orthogonality relation for the Hahn polynomials from the orthogonality relation(1.6.2) of the dual Hahn polynomials :NXn=0 (N !)(�N )n(�+ 1)n(2n+ �+ � + 1)(�1)nn!(� + 1)n(n+ �+ � + 1)N+1 Qn(x;�; �;N )Qn(y;�; �;N )= �xy��+ xx ��N + � � xN � x � ; x; y 2 f0; 1; 2; : : :; Ng:For x = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; N the generating function (1.5.5) can also be written as :1F1� x�N� + 1 ���� t� 1F1� �x�+ 1 ����� t� = NXn=0 (�N )n(� + 1)nn!Qn(x;�; �;N )tn:References. [10], [25], [27], [31], [45], [47], [77], [80], [82], [87], [89], [104], [105], [124], [144],[153], [156], [165], [167], [180], [187], [189], [190], [195], [217], [218], [227].30

1.6 Dual HahnDe�nition.Rn(�(x); ; �;N ) = 3 ~F2� �n;�x; x+ + � + 1 + 1;�N ���� 1� ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : :; N; (1.6.1)where �(x) = x(x+ + � + 1):Orthogonality.NXx=0 (N !)(�N )x( + 1)x(2x+ + � + 1)(�1)x(x!)(� + 1)x(x+ + � + 1)N+1Rm(�(x); ; �;N )Rn(�(x); ; �;N )= �mn� + nn ��N + � � nN � n � : (1.6.2)Recurrence relation.�(x)Rn(�(x)) = AnRn+1(�(x))� (An + Cn)Rn(�(x)) +CnRn�1(�(x)); (1.6.3)where Rn(�(x)) := Rn(�(x); ; �;N )and 8<: An = (n �N )(n+ + 1)Cn = n(n� � �N � 1):Di�erence equation.� ny(x) = B(x)y(x + 1)� [B(x) +D(x)] y(x) +D(x)y(x � 1); y(x) = Rn(�(x); ; �;N ); (1.6.4)where 8>>>><>>>>: B(x) = (x+ + � + 1)(x+ + 1)(N � x)(2x+ + � + 1)(2x+ + � + 2)D(x) = x(x+ �)(x+ + � +N + 1)(2x+ + �)(2x+ + � + 1) :Generating functions.(1� t)x+�2 ~F1� x�N; x+ + � + 1�N ���� t� ' NXn=0 ( + 1)nn! Rn(�(x); ; �;N )tn: (1.6.5)(1� t)N�x2F1��x;�x� � + 1 ���� t� ' NXn=0 (�N )nn! Rn(�(x); ; �;N )tn: (1.6.6)(1� t)x2F1� x�N; x+ + 1�� � N ���� t� ' NXn=0 (�N )n( + 1)n(�� � N )nn! Rn(�(x); ; �;N )tn: (1.6.7)et2 ~F2��x; x+ + � + 1 + 1;�N ����� t� ' NXn=0 Rn(�(x); ; �;N )n! tn: (1.6.8)31

Remarks. If we interchange the role of x and n in the de�nition (1.6.1) of the dual Hahnpolynomials we obtain the Hahn polynomials de�ned by (1.5.1).Since Rn(�(x); ; �;N ) = Qx(n; ; �;N )we obtain the dual orthogonality relation for the dual Hahn polynomials from the orthogonalityrelation (1.5.2) for the Hahn polynomials :NXn=0� + nn ��N + � � nN � n �Rn(�(x); ; �;N )Rn(�(y); ; �;N )= (�1)x(x!)(� + 1)x(x+ + � + 1)N+1(N !)(�N )x( + 1)x(2x+ + � + 1) �xy; x; y 2 f0; 1; 2; : : : ; Ng:For x = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; N the generating function (1.6.6) can also be written as :(1� t)N�x2F1��x;�x� � + 1 ���� t� = NXn=0 (�N )nn! Rn(�(x); ; �;N )tn:For x = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; N the generating function (1.6.7) can also be written as :(1� t)x2F1� x�N; x+ + 1�� �N ���� t� = NXn=0 (�N )n( + 1)n(�� � N )nn! Rn(�(x); ; �;N )tn:References. [45], [47], [144], [153], [156], [180], [194], [217], [227].1.7 Meixner-PollaczekDe�nition. P (�)n (x;�) = (2�)nn! ein�2F1� �n; �+ ix2� ���� 1� e�2i�� : (1.7.1)Orthogonality. 12� 1Z�1 e(2���)x j�(�+ ix)j2 P (�)m (x;�)P (�)n (x;�)dx= �(n+ 2�)(2 sin�)2�n!�mn; � > 0 and 0 < � < �: (1.7.2)Recurrence relation.(n+ 1)P (�)n+1(x;�)� 2 [x sin�+ (n+ �) cos �]P (�)n (x;�) + (n+ 2�� 1)P (�)n�1(x;�) = 0: (1.7.3)Di�erence equation.ei�(�� ix)y(x + i) + 2i [x cos�� (n+ �) sin�]y(x) � e�i�(� + ix)y(x � i) = 0; (1.7.4)where y(x) = P (�)n (x;�):Generating functions.(1� ei�t)��+ix(1 � e�i�t)���ix = 1Xn=0P (�)n (x;�)tn: (1.7.5)et1F1� � + ix2� ���� (e�2i� � 1)t� = 1Xn=0 P (�)n (x;�)(2�)nein� tn: (1.7.6)References. [10], [15], [25], [31], [45], [47], [72], [77], [126], [156], [174], [180], [189], [227],[230]. 32

1.8 JacobiDe�nition. P (�;�)n (x) = (�+ 1)nn! 2F1��n; n+ �+ � + 1�+ 1 ���� 1� x2 � : (1.8.1)Orthogonality.1Z�1 (1� x)�(1 + x)�P (�;�)m (x)P (�;�)n (x)dx= 2�+�+12n+ �+ � + 1 �(n + �+ 1)�(n+ � + 1)n!�(n+ �+ � + 1) �mn; � > �1 and � > �1: (1.8.2)Recurrence relation.xP (�;�)n (x) = 2(n+ 1)(n+ �+ � + 1)(2n+ �+ � + 1)(2n+ �+ � + 2)P (�;�)n+1 (x) ++ �2 � �2(2n+ �+ �)(2n + �+ � + 2)P (�;�)n (x) + 2(n+ �)(n+ �)(2n+ �+ �)(2n + �+ � + 1)P (�;�)n�1 (x): (1.8.3)Di�erential equation.(1�x2)y00(x)+[� � �� (�+ � + 2)x]y0(x)+n(n+�+�+1)y(x) = 0; y(x) = P (�;�)n (x): (1.8.4)Generating functions.2�+�R(1 +R� t)�(1 +R+ t)� = 1Xn=0P (�;�)n (x)tn; R =p1� 2xt+ t2: (1.8.5)0F1� ��+ 1 ���� (x� 1)t2 � 0F1� �� + 1���� (x+ 1)t2 � = 1Xn=0 P (�;�)n (x)(�+ 1)n(� + 1)n tn: (1.8.6)(1� t)�����12F1� 12 (�+ � + 1); 12 (�+ � + 2)�+ 1 ���� 2(x� 1)t(1� t)2 �= 1Xn=0 (�+ � + 1)n(�+ 1)n P (�;�)n (x)tn: (1.8.7)(1 + t)�����12F1� 12 (�+ � + 1); 12 (�+ � + 2)� + 1 ���� 2(x+ 1)t(1 + t)2 �= 1Xn=0 (�+ � + 1)n(� + 1)n P (�;�)n (x)tn: (1.8.8)2F1� ; �+ � + 1� �+ 1 ���� 1� R� t2 � 2F1� ; �+ � + 1� � + 1 ���� 1� R+ t2 �= 1Xn=0 ( )n(�+ � + 1� )n(�+ 1)n(� + 1)n P (�;�)n (x)tn; R =p1� 2xt+ t2; arbitrary: (1.8.9)Remarks. The Jacobi polynomials de�ned by (1.8.1) and the Meixner polynomials given by(1.9.1) are related in the following way :(�)nn! Mn(x; �; c) = P (��1;�n���x)n �2� cc � :33

The Jacobi polynomials are also related to the Gegenbauer (or ultraspherical) polynomialsde�ned by (1.8.10) by the quadratic transformations :C(�)2n (x) = (�)n(12 )nP (��12 ;� 12 )n (2x2 � 1)and C(�)2n+1(x) = (�)n+1(12)n+1xP (��12 ; 12 )n (2x2 � 1):References. [2], [3], [7], [9], [14], [25], [26], [27], [28], [31], [33], [34], [35], [42], [45], [50], [55],[61], [68], [69], [77], [80], [82], [90], [93], [94], [98], [99], [100], [101], [102], [103], [104], [105], [106],[115], [119], [122], [123], [124], [134], [146], [147], [148], [149], [151], [152], [155], [156], [165], [170],[173], [176], [178], [180], [182], [184], [185], [186], [188], [193], [203], [205], [211], [213], [214], [218],[220], [229], [232].Special cases1.8.1 Gegenbauer / UltrasphericalDe�nition. The Gegenbauer (or ultraspherical) polynomials are Jacobi polynomials with� = � = � � 12 and another normalization :C(�)n (x) = (2�)n(� + 12 )nP (��12 ;��12 )n (x) = (2�)nn! 2F1� �n; n+ 2�� + 12 ���� 1� x2 � ; � 6= 0: (1.8.10)Orthogonality.1Z�1 (1� x2)�� 12C(�)m (x)C(�)n (x)dx = ��(n + 2�)21�2�f�(�)g2 (n+ �)n!�mn; � > �12 and � 6= 0: (1.8.11)Recurrence relation.2(n+ �)xC(�)n (x) = (n+ 1)C(�)n+1(x) + (n+ 2�� 1)C(�)n�1(x): (1.8.12)Di�erential equation.(1� x2)y00(x)� (2� + 1)xy0(x) + n(n+ 2�)y(x) = 0; y(x) = C(�)n (x): (1.8.13)Generating functions. (1 � 2xt+ t2)�� = 1Xn=0C(�)n (x)tn: (1.8.14)R�1�1 + R� xt2 �12�� = 1Xn=0 (� + 12 )n(2�)n C(�)n (x)tn; R =p1� 2xt+ t2: (1.8.15)0F1� �� + 12 ���� (x� 1)t2 � 0F1� ��+ 12 ���� (x+ 1)t2 � = 1Xn=0 C(�)n (x)(2�)n(�+ 12)n tn: (1.8.16)ext0F1� �� + 12 ���� (x2 � 1)t24 � = 1Xn=0 C(�)n (x)(2�)n tn: (1.8.17)34

2F1� ; 2�� �+ 12 ���� 1� R� t2 � 2F1� ; 2� � � + 12 ���� 1�R+ t2 �= 1Xn=0 ( )n(2�� )n(2�)n(� + 12 )nC(�)n (x)tn; R =p1� 2xt+ t2; arbitrary: (1.8.18)(1� xt)� 2F1 12 ; 12 + 12�+ 12 ����� (x2 � 1)t2(1� xt)2 ! = 1Xn=0 ( )n(2�)nC(�)n (x)tn; arbitrary: (1.8.19)Remarks. The case � = 0 needs another normalization. In that case we have the Chebyshevpolynomials of the �rst kind described in the next subsection.The Gegenbauer (or ultraspherical) polynomials de�ned by (1.8.10) and the Jacobi polynomialsgiven by (1.8.1) are related by the quadratic transformations :C(�)2n (x) = (�)n(12 )nP (��12 ;� 12 )n (2x2 � 1)and C(�)2n+1(x) = (�)n+1(12)n+1xP (��12 ; 12 )n (2x2 � 1):References. [2], [4], [26], [27], [31], [33], [41], [54], [55], [56], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66],[68], [77], [83], [92], [94], [103], [108], [119], [123], [156], [164], [180], [203], [205], [220], [223], [232].1.8.2 ChebyshevDe�nitions. The Chebyshev polynomials of the �rst kind can be obtained from the Jacobipolynomials by taking � = � = �12 :Tn(x) = P (�12 ;� 12 )n (x)P (� 12 ;�12 )n (1) = 2F1� �n; n12 ���� 1� x2 � (1.8.20)and the Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind can be obtained from the Jacobi polynomialsby taking � = � = 12 :Un(x) = (n+ 1)P (12 ; 12 )n (x)P ( 12 ; 12 )n (1) = (n+ 1)2F1� �n; n+ 232 ���� 1� x2 � : (1.8.21)Orthogonality. 1Z�1 (1� x2)� 12Tm(x)Tn(x)dx =8><>: �2 �mn; n 6= 0��mn; n = 0: (1.8.22)1Z�1 (1 � x2) 12Um(x)Un(x)dx = �2 �mn: (1.8.23)Recurrence relations.2xTn(x) = Tn+1(x) + Tn�1(x); T0(x) = 1 and T1(x) = x: (1.8.24)35

2xUn(x) = Un+1(x) + Un�1(x): (1.8.25)Di�erential equations.(1� x2)y00(x)� xy0(x) + n2y(x) = 0; y(x) = Tn(x): (1.8.26)(1� x2)y00(x) � 3xy0(x) + n(n+ 2)y(x) = 0; y(x) = Un(x): (1.8.27)Generating functions. 1� xt1� 2xt+ t2 = 1Xn=0Tn(x)tn: (1.8.28)R�1r12(1 + R� xt) = 1Xn=0 �12�nn! Tn(x)tn; R =p1� 2xt+ t2: (1.8.29)0F1� �12 ���� (x� 1)t2 � 0F1� �12 ���� (x+ 1)t2 � = 1Xn=0 Tn(x)�12�n n!tn: (1.8.30)ext0F1� �12 ���� (x2 � 1)t24 � = 1Xn=0 Tn(x)n! tn: (1.8.31)2F1� ;� 12 ���� 1�R� t2 � 2F1� ;� 12 ���� 1�R+ t2 �= 1Xn=0 ( )n(� )n�12�n n! Tn(x)tn; R =p1� 2xt+ t2; arbitrary: (1.8.32)(1� xt)� 2F1 12 ; 12 + 1212 ����� (x2 � 1)t2(1� xt)2 ! = 1Xn=0 ( )nn! Tn(x)tn; arbitrary: (1.8.33)11� 2xt+ t2 = 1Xn=0Un(x)tn: (1.8.34)1Rq12(1 + R� xt) = 1Xn=0 � 32�n(n+ 1)!Un(x)tn; R =p1� 2xt+ t2: (1.8.35)0F1� �32 ���� (x� 1)t2 � 0F1� �32 ���� (x+ 1)t2 � = 1Xn=0 Un(x)�32�n (n+ 1)!tn: (1.8.36)ext0F1��32 ���� (x2 � 1)t24 � = 1Xn=0 Un(x)(n+ 1)!tn: (1.8.37)2F1� ; 2 � 32 ���� 1�R� t2 � 2F1� ; 2� 32 ���� 1�R+ t2 �= 1Xn=0 ( )n(2� )n�32�n (n+ 1)!Un(x)tn; R =p1� 2xt+ t2; arbitrary: (1.8.38)(1 � xt)� 2F1 12 ; 12 + 1232 ����� (x2 � 1)t2(1� xt)2 ! = 1Xn=0 ( )n(n + 1)!Un(x)tn; arbitrary: (1.8.39)36

Remarks. The Chebyshev polynomials can also be written as :Tn(x) = cos(n arccos x)and Un(x) = sin(n + 1)�sin � ; x = cos �:Further we have Un(x) = C(1)n (x)where C(�)n (x) denotes the Gegenbauer (or ultraspherical) polynomial de�ned by (1.8.10) in thepreceding subsection.References. [2], [33], [36], [77], [83], [94], [119], [170], [180], [205], [206], [210], [220], [232].1.8.3 Legendre / SphericalDe�nition. The Legendre (or spherical) polynomials are Jacobi polynomials with � = � = 0 :Pn(x) = P (0;0)n (x) = 2F1� �n; n+ 11 ���� 1� x2 � : (1.8.40)Orthogonality. 1Z�1 Pm(x)Pn(x)dx = 22n+ 1�mn: (1.8.41)Recurrence relation.(2n+ 1)xPn(x) = (n+ 1)Pn+1(x) + nPn�1(x): (1.8.42)Di�erential equation.(1� x2)y00(x) � 2xy0(x) + n(n+ 1)y(x) = 0; y(x) = Pn(x): (1.8.43)Generating functions. 1p1� 2xt+ t2 = 1Xn=0Pn(x)tn: (1.8.44)0F1��1 ���� (x� 1)t2 � 0F1� �1 ���� (x+ 1)t2 � = 1Xn=0 Pn(x)n!2 tn: (1.8.45)ext0F1� �1 ���� (x2 � 1)t24 � = 1Xn=0 Pn(x)n! tn: (1.8.46)2F1� ; 1� 1 ���� 1� R� t2 � 2F1� ; 1� 1 ���� 1� R+ t2 �= 1Xn=0 ( )n(1� )nn!2 Pn(x)tn; R =p1� 2xt+ t2; arbitrary: (1.8.47)(1� xt)� 2F1� 12 ; 12 + 121 ���� (x2 � 1)t2(1� xt)2 � = 1Xn=0 ( )nn! Pn(x)tn; arbitrary: (1.8.48)References. [2], [5], [10], [53], [55], [77], [83], [94], [119], [180], [182], [205], [220], [232].37

1.9 MeixnerDe�nition. Mn(x; �; c) = 2F1� �n;�x� ����1� 1c� : (1.9.1)Orthogonality.1Xx=0 (�)xx! cxMm(x; �; c)Mn(x; �; c) = c�nn!(�)n(1� c)� �mn; � > 0 and 0 < c < 1: (1.9.2)Recurrence relation.(c � 1)xMn(x; �; c) = c(n+ �)Mn+1(x; �; c) +� [n+ (n+ �)c]Mn(x; �; c) + nMn�1(x; �; c): (1.9.3)Di�erence equation.n(c� 1)y(x) = c(x+ �)y(x + 1)� [x+ (x+ �)c] y(x) + xy(x� 1); y(x) = Mn(x; �; c): (1.9.4)Generating functions.�1� tc�x (1� t)�x�� = 1Xn=0 (�)nn! Mn(x; �; c)tn: (1.9.5)et1F1� �x� ���� �1� cc � t� = 1Xn=0 Mn(x; �; c)n! tn: (1.9.6)Remarks. The Meixner polynomials de�ned by (1.9.1) and the Jacobi polynomials given by(1.8.1) are related in the following way :(�)nn! Mn(x; �; c) = P (��1;�n���x)n �2� cc � :The Meixner polynomials are also related to the Krawtchouk polynomials de�ned by (1.10.1)in the following way : Kn(x; p;N ) = Mn�x;�N; pp � 1� :References. [7], [10], [15], [17], [25], [27], [31], [36], [45], [47], [77], [82], [94], [97], [104], [105],[129], [135], [143], [156], [174], [180], [189], [222], [233].1.10 KrawtchoukDe�nition. Kn(x; p;N ) = 2 ~F1��n;�x�N ���� 1p� ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : :; N: (1.10.1)Orthogonality.NXx=0�Nx�px(1� p)N�xKm(x; p;N )Kn(x; p;N ) = (�1)nn!(�N )n �1� pp �n �mn; 0 < p < 1: (1.10.2)38

Recurrence relation.�xKn(x; p;N ) = p(N � n)Kn+1(x; p;N ) +� [p(N � n) + n(1� p)]Kn(x; p;N ) + n(1� p)Kn�1(x; p;N ): (1.10.3)Di�erence equation.� ny(x) = p(N � x)y(x + 1) � [p(N � x) + x(1� p)] y(x) + x(1� p)y(x � 1); (1.10.4)where y(x) = Kn(x; p;N ):Generating functions.�1� (1� p)p t�x (1 + t)N�x ' NXn=0�Nn�Kn(x; p;N )tn: (1.10.5)et1 ~F1� �x�N ����� tp� ' NXn=0 Kn(x; p;N )n! tn: (1.10.6)Remarks. The Krawtchouk polynomials are self-dual, which means thatKn(x; p;N ) = Kx(n; p;N ); n; x 2 f0; 1; 2; : : : ; Ng:By using this relation we easily obtain the so-called dual orthogonality relation from the orthog-onality relation (1.10.2) :NXn=0�Nn�pn(1� p)N�nKn(x; p;N )Kn(y; p;N ) = �1� pp �x�Nx� �xy;where 0 < p < 1 and x; y 2 f0; 1; 2; : : :; Ng.The Krawtchouk polynomials are related to the Meixner polynomials de�ned by (1.9.1) in thefollowing way : Kn(x; p;N ) = Mn�x;�N; pp � 1� :For x = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; N the generating function (1.10.5) can also be written as :�1� (1� p)p t�x (1 + t)N�x = NXn=0�Nn�Kn(x; p;N )tn:References. [10], [25], [27], [31], [45], [77], [87], [90], [91], [94], [104], [105], [143], [154], [156],[167], [180], [189], [191], [217], [218], [220], [233].1.11 LaguerreDe�nition. L(�)n (x) = (�+ 1)nn! 1F1� �n�+ 1 ����x� : (1.11.1)Orthogonality. 1Z0 x�e�xL(�)m (x)L(�)n (x)dx = �(n + �+ 1)n! �mn; � > �1: (1.11.2)39

Recurrence relation.(n + 1)L(�)n+1(x)� (2n+ �+ 1� x)L(�)n (x) + (n+ �)L(�)n�1(x) = 0: (1.11.3)Di�erential equation.xy00(x) + (�+ 1� x)y0(x) + ny(x) = 0; y(x) = L(�)n (x): (1.11.4)Generating functions.(1� t)���1 exp� xtt� 1� = 1Xn=0L(�)n (x)tn: (1.11.5)et0F1� ��+ 1 ����� xt� = 1Xn=0 L(�)n (x)(�+ 1)n tn: (1.11.6)(1� t)� 1F1� �+ 1 ���� xtt� 1� = 1Xn=0 ( )n(� + 1)nL(�)n (x)tn; arbitrary: (1.11.7)Remarks. The de�nition (1.11.1) of the Laguerre polynomials can also be written as :L(�)n (x) = 1n! nXk=0 (�n)kk! (�+ k + 1)n�kxk:In this way the Laguerre polynomials can be de�ned for all �. Then we have the followingconnection with the Charlier polynomials de�ned by (1.12.1) :(�a)nn! Cn(x; a) = L(x�n)n (a):The Laguerre polynomials de�ned by (1.11.1) and the Hermite polynomials de�ned by (1.13.1)are connected by the following quadratic transformations :H2n(x) = (�1)nn!22nL(� 12 )n (x2)and H2n+1(x) = (�1)nn!22n+1xL( 12 )n (x2):In combinatorics the Laguerre polynomials with � = 0 are often called Rook polynomials.References. [1], [2], [3], [7], [9], [10], [14], [15], [25], [27], [31], [35], [36], [40], [45], [52], [55],[57], [58], [61], [65], [66], [67], [68], [70], [75], [77], [81], [82], [94], [95], [106], [116], [117], [119],[123], [124], [129], [134], [135], [139], [141], [143], [150], [152], [155], [156], [174], [180], [182], [205],[210], [211], [220], [222].1.12 CharlierDe�nition. Cn(x; a) = 2F0� �n;�x� ����� 1a� : (1.12.1)Orthogonality. 1Xx=0 axx!Cm(x; a)Cn(x; a) = n!a�nea�mn; a > 0: (1.12.2)40

Recurrence relation.� xCn(x; a) = aCn+1(x; a)� (n+ a)Cn(x; a) + nCn�1(x; a): (1.12.3)Di�erence equation.� ny(x) = ay(x + 1)� (x+ a)y(x) + xy(x � 1); y(x) = Cn(x; a): (1.12.4)Generating function. et�1� ta�x = 1Xn=0 Cn(x; a)n! tn: (1.12.5)Remark. The de�nition (1.11.1) of the Laguerre polynomials can also be written as :L(�)n (x) = 1n! nXk=0 (�n)kk! (�+ k + 1)n�kxk:In this way the Laguerre polynomials can be de�ned for all �. Then we have the followingconnection with the Charlier polynomials de�ned by (1.12.1) :(�a)nn! Cn(x; a) = L(x�n)n (a):References. [7], [10], [15], [17], [25], [27], [45], [77], [78], [87], [94], [104], [105], [129], [156],[167], [174], [180], [220], [222], [233].1.13 HermiteDe�nition. Hn(x) = (2x)n2F0� �n=2;�(n� 1)=2� ����� 1x2� : (1.13.1)Orthogonality. 1Z�1 e�x2Hm(x)Hn(x)dx = 2nn!p��mn: (1.13.2)Recurrence relation. Hn+1(x)� 2xHn(x) + 2nHn�1(x) = 0: (1.13.3)Di�erential equation.y00(x) � 2xy0(x) + 2ny(x) = 0; y(x) = Hn(x): (1.13.4)Generating functions. exp �2xt� t2� = 1Xn=0 Hn(x)n! tn: (1.13.5)8>>>>><>>>>>: et cos(2xpt) = 1Xn=0 (�1)n(2n)! H2n(x)tnetpt sin(2xpt) = 1Xn=0 (�1)n(2n+ 1)!H2n+1(x)tn: (1.13.6)41

8>>>>><>>>>>: e�t2 cosh(2xt) = 1Xn=0 H2n(x)(2n)! t2ne�t2 sinh(2xt) = 1Xn=0 H2n+1(x)(2n+ 1)! t2n+1: (1.13.7)8>>>>>><>>>>>>: (1 + t2)� 1F1� 12 ���� x2t21 + t2� = 1Xn=0 ( )n(2n)!H2n(x)t2nxtp1 + t2 1F1 + 1232 ����� x2t21 + t2! = 1Xn=0 ( + 12 )n(2n+ 1)!H2n+1(x)t2n+1: (1.13.8)1 + 2xt+ 4t2(1 + 4t2) 32 exp� 4x2t21 + 4t2� = 1Xn=0 Hn(x)[n=2]! tn; (1.13.9)where [�] denotes the largest integer smaller than or equal to �.Remarks. The Hermite polynomials can also be written as :Hn(x)n! = [n=2]Xk=0 (�1)k(2x)n�2kk!(n� 2k)! ;where [�] denotes the largest integer smaller than or equal to �.The Laguerre polynomials de�ned by (1.11.1) and the Hermite polynomials de�ned by (1.13.1)are connected by the following quadratic transformations :H2n(x) = (�1)nn!22nL(� 12 )n (x2)and H2n+1(x) = (�1)nn!22n+1xL( 12 )n (x2):References. [2], [7], [10], [14], [15], [25], [27], [31], [35], [45], [49], [55], [57], [58], [71], [77],[81], [83], [94], [118], [119], [123], [156], [174], [180], [182], [205], [210], [220], [222], [225], [231].42

Chapter 2Limit relations betweenhypergeometric orthogonalpolynomials2.1 Wilson ! Continuous dual HahnThe continuous dual Hahn polynomials can be found from the Wilson polynomials de�ned by(1.1.1) by dividing by (a+ d)n and letting d!1 :limd!1 Wn(x2; a; b; c; d)(a+ d)n = Sn(x2; a; b; c);where Sn(x2; a; b; c) is de�ned by (1.3.1).2.2 Wilson ! Continuous HahnThe continuous Hahn polynomials de�ned by (1.4.1) are obtained from the Wilson polynomialsby the substitution a! a� it, b! b� it, c! c+ it, d! d+ it and x! x+ t in the de�nition(1.1.1) of the Wilson polynomials and the limit t!1 in the following way :limt!1Wn �(x+ t)2; a� it; b� it; c+ it; d+ it�(�2t)nn! = pn(x; a; b; c; d):2.3 Wilson ! JacobiThe Jacobi polynomials given by (1.8.1) can be found from the Wilson polynomials by substitutinga = b = 12 (�+1), c = 12(�+1)+ it, d = 12 (�+1)� it and x! tq12 (1� x) in the de�nition (1.1.1)of the Wilson polynomials and taking the limit t!1. In fact we havelimt!1Wn �12 (1� x)t2; 12 (�+ 1); 12(�+ 1); 12 (� + 1) + it; 12(� + 1)� it�t2nn! = P (�;�)n (x):2.4 Racah ! HahnIf we take +1 = �N and let � !1 in the de�nition (1.2.1) of the Racah polynomials, we obtainthe Hahn polynomials de�ned by (1.5.1). Hencelim�!1Rn(�(x);�; �;�N � 1; �) = Qn(x;�; �;N ):43

The Hahn polynomials can also be obtained from the Racah polynomials by taking � = ���N�1in the de�nition (1.2.1) and letting !1 :lim !1Rn(�(x);�; �; ;�� �N � 1) = Qn(x;�; �;N ):Another way to do this is to take �+1 = �N and � ! �+ +N +1 in the de�nition (1.2.1) of theRacah polynomials and then take the limit � !1. In that case we obtain the Hahn polynomialsgiven by (1.5.1) in the following way :lim�!1Rn(�(x);�N � 1; � + +N + 1; ; �) = Qn(x; ; �;N ):2.5 Racah ! Dual HahnIf we take �+ 1 = �N and let � !1 in (1.2.1), then we obtain the dual Hahn polynomials fromthe Racah polynomials. So we havelim�!1Rn(�(x);�N � 1; �; ; �) = Rn(�(x); ; �;N ):And if we take � = �� � N � 1 and let � ! 1 in (1.2.1), then we also obtain the dual Hahnpolynomials : lim�!1Rn(�(x);�;�� � N � 1; ; �) = Rn(�(x); ; �;N ):Finally, if we take + 1 = �N and � ! � + � + N + 1 in the de�nition (1.2.1) of the Racahpolynomials and take the limit � !1 we �nd the dual Hahn polynomials given by (1.6.1) in thefollowing way : lim�!1Rn(�(x);�; �;�N � 1; �+ � + N + 1) = Rn(�(x);�; �;N ):2.6 Continuous dual Hahn ! Meixner-PollaczekThe Meixner-Pollaczek polynomials given by (1.7.1) can be obtained from the continuous dualHahn polynomials by the substitutions x ! x � t, a = � + it, b = � � it and c = t cot� in thede�nition (1.3.1) and the limit t!1 :limt!1 Sn �(x� t)2;�+ it; �� it; t cot��� tsin ��n n! = P (�)n (x;�):2.7 Continuous Hahn ! Meixner-PollaczekBy taking x ! x � t, a = � + it, c = � � it and b = d = �t tan� in the de�nition (1.4.1) ofthe continuous Hahn polynomials and taking the limit t ! 1 we obtain the Meixner-Pollaczekpolynomials de�ned by (1.7.1) :limt!1 pn (x� t;�+ it;�t tan�; �� it;�t tan�)� itcos��n in = P (�)n (x;�):2.8 Continuous Hahn ! JacobiThe Jacobi polynomials de�ned by (1.8.1) follow from the continuous Hahn polynomials by thesubstitution x!�12xt, a = 12 (�+1+ it), b = 12(�+1� it), c = 12(�+1� it) and d = 12(�+1+ it)in (1.4.1), division by (�1)ntn and the limit t!1 :limt!1 pn ��12xt; 12 (�+ 1 + it); 12 (� + 1� it); 12(� + 1� it); 12 (� + 1 + it)�(�1)ntn = P (�;�)n (x):44

2.9 Hahn ! JacobiTo �nd the Jacobi polynomials from the Hahn polynomials we take x ! Nx in (1.5.1) and letN !1: We have limN!1Qn(Nx;�; �;N ) = P (�;�)n (1� 2x)P (�;�)n (1) :2.10 Hahn ! MeixnerIf we take � = b � 1, � = N (1 � c)c�1 in the de�nition (1.5.1) of the Hahn polynomials and letN !1 we �nd the Meixner polynomials given by (1.9.1) :limN!1Qn�x; b� 1; N 1� cc ;N� = Mn(x; b; c):2.11 Hahn ! KrawtchoukIf we take � = pt and � = (1�p)t in the de�nition (1.5.1) of the Hahn polynomials and let t!1we obtain the Krawtchouk polynomials de�ned by (1.10.1) :limt!1Qn (x; pt; (1� p)t; N ) = Kn(x; p;N ):2.12 Dual Hahn ! MeixnerTo obtain the Meixner polynomials from the dual Hahn polynomials we have to take = � � 1and � = N (1� c)c�1 in the de�nition (1.6.1) of the dual Hahn polynomials and let N !1 :limN!1Rn��(x); � � 1; N 1� cc ;N� = Mn(x; �; c):2.13 Dual Hahn ! KrawtchoukIn the same way we �nd the Krawtchouk polynomials from the dual Hahn polynomials by setting = pt, � = (1� p)t in (1.6.1) and let t!1 :limt!1Rn (�(x); pt; (1� p)t; N ) = Kn(x; p;N ):2.14 Meixner-Pollaczek ! LaguerreThe Laguerre polynomials can be obtained from the Meixner-Pollaczek polynomials de�ned by(1.7.1) by the substitution � = 12 (�+ 1), x!�12��1x and letting �! 0 :lim�!0P (12�+ 12 )n �� x2� ;�� = L(�)n (x):2.15 Meixner-Pollaczek ! HermiteIf we substitute x ! (sin�)�1(xp� � � cos �) in the de�nition (1.7.1) of the Meixner-Pollaczekpolynomials and then let �!1 we obtain the Hermite polynomials :lim�!1��n2 P (�)n xp� � � cos �sin� ;�! = Hn(x)n! :45

2.16 Jacobi ! LaguerreThe Laguerre polynomials can be obtained from the Jacobi polynomials de�ned by (1.8.1) byletting x! 1� 2��1x and then � !1 :lim�!1P (�;�)n �1� 2x� � = L(�)n (x):2.17 Jacobi ! HermiteThe Hermite polynomials given by (1.13.1) follow from the Jacobi polynomials de�ned by (1.8.1)by taking � = � and letting �!1 in the following way :lim�!1��n2 P (�;�)n � x� 12 � = Hn(x)2nn! :2.18 Meixner ! LaguerreIf we take � = �+ 1 and x! (1� c)�1x in the de�nition (1.9.1) of the Meixner polynomials andlet c! 1 we obtain the Laguerre polynomials :limc!1Mn� x1� c ;�+ 1; c� = L(�)n (x)L(�)n (0) :2.19 Meixner ! CharlierIf we take c = (a + �)�1a in the de�nition (1.9.1) of the Meixner polynomials and let � !1 we�nd the Charlier polynomials : lim�!1Mn�x; �; aa+ �� = Cn(x; a):2.20 Krawtchouk ! CharlierThe Charlier polynomials given by (1.12.1) can be found from the Krawtchouk polynomials de�nedby (1.10.1) by taking p = N�1a and let N !1 :limN!1Kn �x; aN ;N� = Cn(x; a):2.21 Krawtchouk ! HermiteThe Hermite polynomials follow from the Krawtchouk polynomials de�ned by (1.10.1) by settingx! pN + xp2p(1� p)N and then letting N !1 :limN!1s�Nn�Kn �pN + xp2p(1� p)N ; p;N� = (�1)nHn(x)s2n(n!)� p1� p�n :46

2.22 Laguerre ! HermiteThe Hermite polynomials de�ned by (1.13.1) can be obtained from the Laguerre polynomials givenby (1.11.1) by taking the limit �!1 in the following way :lim�!1� 2��n2 L(�)n �(2�) 12x+ �� = (�1)nn! Hn(x):2.23 Charlier ! HermiteIf we set x ! (2a)1=2x + a in the de�nition (1.12.1) of the Charlier polynomials and let a ! 1we �nd the Hermite polynomials de�ned by (1.13.1). In fact we havelima!1(2a)n2 Cn �(2a) 12x+ a; a� = (�1)nHn(x):

47

SCHEMEOFBASIC HYPERGEOMETRICORTHOGONAL POLYNOMIALS(4)(3)(2)(1)(0)

Askey-WilsonContinuousdual q-Hahn Continuousq-Hahn Bigq-JacobiAl-Salam-Chihara q-Meixner-Pollaczek Continuousq-Jacobi Bigq-Laguerre Littleq-JacobiContinuousbig q-Hermite Continuousq-Laguerre Littleq-Laguerre q-LaguerreContinuousq-Hermite Stieltjes-Wigert48

SCHEMEOFBASIC HYPERGEOMETRICORTHOGONAL POLYNOMIALS (4)(3)(2)(1)(0)

q-RacahBigq-Jacobi q-Hahn Dual q-Hahnq-Meixner Quantumq-Krawtchouk q-Krawtchouk A�neq-Krawtchouk Dualq-KrawtchoukAlternativeq-Charlier q-Charlier Al-Salam-Carlitz I Al-Salam-Carlitz IIDiscreteq-Hermite I Discreteq-Hermite II49

Chapter 3Basic hypergeometric orthogonalpolynomials3.1 Askey-WilsonDe�nition.anpn(x; a; b; c; djq)(ab; ac; ad; q)n = 4�3� q�n; abcdqn�1; aei�; ae�i�ab; ac; ad ���� q; q� ; x = cos �: (3.1.1)The Askey-Wilson polynomials are q-analogues of the Wilson polynomials given by (1.1.1).Orthogonality. When a; b; c; d are real, or occur in complex conjugate pairs if complex, andmax(jaj; jbj; jcj; jdj)< 1, then we have the following orthogonality relation12� 1Z�1 w(x)p1� x2pm(x; a; b; c; djq)pn(x; a; b; c; djq)dx= hn�mn; (3.1.2)wherew(x) := w(x; a; b; c; djq) = ���� (e2i�; q)1(aei�; bei�; cei�; dei�; q)1 ����2 = h(x; 1)h(x;�1)h(x; q 12 )h(x;�q 12 )h(x; a)h(x; b)h(x; c)h(x; d) ;with h(x; �) := 1Yk=0 �1� 2�xqk + �2q2k� = ��ei�; �e�i�; q�1 ; x = cos �and hn = (abcdqn�1; q)n(abcdq2n; q)1(qn+1; abqn; acqn; adqn; bcqn; bdqn; cdqn; q)1 :If a > 1 and b; c; d are real or one is real and the other two are complex conjugates,max(jbj; jcj; jdj) < 1 and the pairwise products of a; b; c and d have absolute value less than one,then we have another orthogonality relation given by :12� 1Z�1 w(x)p1� x2 pm(x; a; b; c; djq)pn(x; a; b; c; djq)dx++ Xk1<aqk�a wkpm(xk; a; b; c; djq)pn(xk; a; b; c; djq) = hn�mn; (3.1.3)50

where w(x) and hn are as before, xk = aqk + �aqk��12and wk = (a�2; q)1(q; ab; ac; ad; a�1b; a�1c; a�1d; q)1 (1� a2q2k)(a2; ab; ac; ad; q)k(1� a2)(q; ab�1q; ac�1q; ad�1q; q)k � qabcd�k :Recurrence relation.2x~pn(x) = An~pn+1(x) + �a+ a�1 � (An + Cn)� ~pn(x) +Cn~pn�1(x); (3.1.4)where ~pn(x) := anpn(x; a; b; c; djq)(ab; ac; ad; q)nand 8>>>><>>>>: An = (1� abqn)(1� acqn)(1� adqn)(1� abcdqn�1)a(1� abcdq2n�1)(1� abcdq2n)Cn = a(1� qn)(1� bcqn�1)(1� bdqn�1)(1� cdqn�1)(1 � abcdq2n�2)(1� abcdq2n�1) :q-Di�erence equation.(1� q)2Dq h ~w(x; aq 12 ; bq 12 ; cq 12 ; dq 12 jq)Dqy(x)i ++ �n ~w(x; a; b; c; djq)y(x) = 0; y(x) = pn(x; a; b; c; djq); (3.1.5)where ~w(x; a; b; c; djq) := w(x; a; b; c; djq)p1� x2 ;�n = 4q�n+1(1� qn)(1� abcdqn�1)and Dqf(x) := �qf(x)�qx with �qf(ei�) = f(q 12 ei�)� f(q� 12 ei�); x = cos �:If we de�ne Pn(z) := (ab; ac; ad; q)nan 4�3� q�n; abcdqn�1; az; az�1ab; ac; ad ���� q; q�then the q-di�erence equation can also be written in the formq�n(1� qn)(1� abcdqn�1)Pn(z)= A(z)Pn(qz) � �A(z) + A(z�1)�Pn(z) + A(z�1)Pn(q�1z); (3.1.6)where A(z) = (1� az)(1� bz)(1 � cz)(1 � dz)(1� z2)(1 � qz2) :Generating functions.2�1� aei�; bei�ab ���� q; e�i�t� 2�1� ce�i�; de�i�cd ���� q; ei�t� = 1Xn=0 pn(x; a; b; c; djq)(ab; cd; q; q)n tn; x = cos �: (3.1.7)2�1� aei�; cei�ac ���� q; e�i�t� 2�1� be�i�; de�i�bd ���� q; ei�t� = 1Xn=0 pn(x; a; b; c; djq)(ac; bd; q; q)n tn; x = cos �: (3.1.8)51

2�1� aei�; dei�ad ���� q; e�i�t� 2�1� be�i�; ce�i�bc ���� q; ei�t� = 1Xn=0 pn(x; a; b; c; djq)(ad; bc; q; q)n tn; x = cos �: (3.1.9)Remark. The q-Racah polynomials de�ned by (3.2.1) and the Askey-Wilson polynomialsgiven by (3.1.1) are related in the following way. If we substitute a2 = �q, b2 = �2 �1��1q,c2 = �2 �1�q, d2 = ��1q and e2i� = �q2x+1 in the de�nition (3.1.1) of the Askey-Wilsonpolynomials we �nd :Rn (�(x);�; �; ; �jq) = ( �q) 12npn(�(x); 12 � 12 q 12 ; � � 12 �� 12 q 12 ; � � 12 � 12 q 12 ; 12 �� 12 q 12 jq)(�q; ��q; q; q)n ;where �(x) = 12 12 � 12 qx+ 12 + 12 � 12 �� 12 q�x�12 :References. [10], [25], [31], [45], [47], [48], [73], [112], [114], [127], [131], [133], [134], [136],[137], [140], [162], [163], [166], [176], [179], [180], [197], [198], [200], [202], [228].3.2 q-RacahDe�nition.Rn(�(x);�; �; ; �jq) = 4 ~�3� q�n; ��qn+1; q�x; �qx+1�q; ��q; q ���� q; q� ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : :; N; (3.2.1)where �(x) := q�x + �qx+1and �q = q�N or ��q = q�N or q = q�N ; with N a nonnegative integer.Since (q�x; �qx+1; q)k = k�1Yj=0 �1� �(x)qj + �q2j+1� ;it is clear that Rn(�(x);�; �; ; �jq) is a polynomial of degree n in �(x).Orthogonality.NXx=0 ( �q; �q; ��q; q; q)x(q; ��1 �q; ��1 q; �q; q)x (1� �q2x+1)(��q)x(1� �q)Rm(�(x))Rn(�(x)) = hn�mn; (3.2.2)where Rn(�(x)) := Rn(�(x);�; �; ; �jq)and hn = ( �q2; ��1��1 ; ��1�; ��1; q)1(��1 �q; ��1 q; �q; ��1��1q�1; q)1 (1� ��q)( �q)n(1� ��q2n+1) (q; �q; ���1q; �� �1q; q)n(��q; �q; ��q; q; q)n :This implieshn =8>>>>>>>>>><>>>>>>>>>>: ( �q2; ��1; q)N(��1 q; �q; q)N (1� �q�N )( �q)n(1� �q2n�N ) (q; �q; ��1q�N ; � �1q�N ; q)n(�q�N ; q�N ; ��q; q; q)n if �q = q�N(� �1; ��q2; q)N(�� �1q; �q; q)N (1� ��q)(��1 q�N )n(1� ��q2n+1) (q; �q; ��qN+2; �� �1q; q)n(��q; �q; q�N ; q; q)n if ��q = q�N(��q2; ��1; q)N(�q; ���1q; q)N (1� ��q)(�q�N )n(1� ��q2n+1) (q; �q; ���1q; ��qN+2; q)n(��q; �q; ��q; q�N ; q)n if q = q�N :52

Recurrence relation.� �1� q�x� �1� �qx+1�Rn(�(x))= AnRn+1(�(x))� (An + Cn)Rn(�(x)) +CnRn�1(�(x)); (3.2.3)where 8>>>><>>>>: An = (1� �qn+1)(1� qn+1)(1� ��qn+1)(1� ��qn+1)(1 � ��q2n+1)(1� ��q2n+2)Cn = q(1� qn)(1 � �qn)(� � �qn)( � ��qn)(1� ��q2n)(1 � ��q2n+1) :q-Di�erence equation.�[w(x� 1)B(x� 1)�y(x� 1)] +� q�n(1� qn)(1� ��qn+1)w(x)y(x) = 0; y(x) = Rn(�(x);�; �; ; �jq); (3.2.4)where �f(x) := f(x + 1)� f(x);w(x) = ( �q; �q; ��q; q; q)x(q; ��1 �q; ��1 q; �q; q)x (1� �q2x+1)(��q)x(1 � �q)and B(x) as below. This q-di�erence equation can also be written in the formq�n(1� qn)(1� ��qn+1)y(x) = B(x)y(x + 1)� [B(x) +D(x)] y(x) +D(x)y(x � 1); (3.2.5)where y(x) = Rn(�(x);�; �; ; �jq)and 8>>>><>>>>: B(x) = (1� �qx+1)(1� ��qx+1)(1� qx+1)(1 � �qx+1)(1� �q2x+1)(1� �q2x+2)D(x) = q(1� qx)(1� �qx)(� � qx)(�� �qx)(1� �q2x)(1� �q2x+1) :Generating functions.2 ~�1� �qx+1; �qx+1�q ���� q; q�xt� 2�1� � �1q�x; ��1q�x�q ���� q; �qx+1t�' NXn=0 (��q; q; q)n(�q; q; q)n Rn(�(x);�; �; ; �jq)tn: (3.2.6)2 ~�1� ��qx+1; �qx+1��q ���� q; q�xt� 2�1� � �1��1q�x; ��1q�x���1q ���� q; �qx+1t�' NXn=0 (�q; q; q)n(���1q; q; q)nRn(�(x);�; �; ; �jq)tn: (3.2.7)2 ~�1� qx+1; �qx+1 q ���� q; q�xt� 2�1� � �1��1q�x; � �1q�x�� �1q ���� q; �qx+1t�' NXn=0 (�q; ��q; q)n(�� �1q; q; q)nRn(�(x);�; �; ; �jq)tn: (3.2.8)53

Remark. The Askey-Wilson polynomials de�ned by (3.1.1) and the q-Racah polynomials givenby (3.2.1) are related in the following way. If we substitute � = abq�1, � = cdq�1, = adq�1,� = ad�1 and qx = a�1e�i� in the de�nition (3.2.1) of the q-Racah polynomials we �nd :�(x) = 2a cos �and Rn �2a cos �; abq�1; cdq�1; adq�1; ad�1jq� = anpn(x; a; b; c; djq)(ab; ac; ad; q)n :References. [10], [22], [25], [43], [45], [111], [114], [127], [160], [180], [183], [197].3.3 Continuous dual q-HahnDe�nition. anpn(x; a; b; cjq)(ab; ac; q)n = 3�2� q�n; aei�; ae�i�ab; ac ���� q; q� ; x = cos �: (3.3.1)Orthogonality. When a; b; c are real, or one is real and the other two are complex conjugates,and max(jaj; jbj; jcj)< 1, then we have the following orthogonality relation12� 1Z�1 w(x)p1� x2pm(x; a; b; cjq)pn(x; a; b; cjq)dx= hn�mn; (3.3.2)where w(x) := w(x; a; b; cjq) = ���� (e2i�; q)1(aei�; bei�; cei�; q)1 ����2 = h(x; 1)h(x;�1)h(x; q 12 )h(x;�q 12 )h(x; a)h(x; b)h(x; c) ;with h(x; �) := 1Yk=0 �1� 2�xqk + �2q2k� = ��ei�; �e�i�; q�1 ; x = cos �and hn = 1(qn+1; abqn; acqn; bcqn; q)1 :If a > 1 and b and c are real or complex conjugates, max(jbj; jcj) < 1 and the pairwise productsof a; b and c have absolute value less than one, then we have another orthogonality relation givenby : 12� 1Z�1 w(x)p1� x2pm(x; a; b; cjq)pn(x; a; b; cjq)dx++ Xk1<aqk�a wkpm(xk; a; b; cjq)pn(xk; a; b; cjq) = hn�mn; (3.3.3)where w(x) and hn are as before, xk = aqk + �aqk��12and wk = (a�2; q)1(q; ab; ac; a�1b; a�1c; q)1 (1� a2q2k)(a2; ab; ac; q)k(1� a2)(q; ab�1q; ac�1q; q)k (�1)kq�(k2)� 1a2bc�k :54

Recurrence relation.2x~pn(x) = An~pn+1(x) + �a+ a�1 � (An + Cn)� ~pn(x) +Cn~pn�1(x); (3.3.4)where ~pn(x) := anpn(x; a; b; cjq)(ab; ac; q)nand 8<: An = a�1(1� abqn)(1� acqn)Cn = a(1� qn)(1� bcqn�1):q-Di�erence equation.(1� q)2Dq h ~w(x; aq 12 ; bq 12 ; cq 12 jq)Dqy(x)i++ 4q�n+1(1� qn) ~w(x; a; b; cjq)y(x) = 0; y(x) = pn(x; a; b; cjq); (3.3.5)where ~w(x; a; b; cjq) := w(x; a; b; cjq)p1� x2and Dqf(x) := �qf(x)�qx with �qf(ei�) = f(q 12 ei�)� f(q� 12 ei�); x = cos �:If we de�ne Pn(z) := (ab; ac; q)nan 3�2� q�n; az; az�1ab; ac ���� q; q�then the q-di�erence equation can also be written in the formq�n(1� qn)Pn(z) = A(z)Pn(qz) � �A(z) + A(z�1)�Pn(z) + A(z�1)Pn(q�1z); (3.3.6)where A(z) = (1� az)(1� bz)(1� cz)(1� z2)(1 � qz2) :Generating functions.(ct; q)1(ei�t; q)1 2�1� aei�; bei�ab ���� q; e�i�t� = 1Xn=0 pn(x; a; b; cjq)(ab; q; q)n tn; x = cos �: (3.3.7)(bt; q)1(ei�t; q)1 2�1� aei�; cei�ac ���� q; e�i�t� = 1Xn=0 pn(x; a; b; cjq)(ac; q; q)n tn; x = cos �: (3.3.8)(at; q)1(ei�t; q)1 2�1� bei�; cei�bc ���� q; e�i�t� = 1Xn=0 pn(x; a; b; cjq)(bc; q; q)n tn; x = cos �: (3.3.9)References.3.4 Continuous q-HahnDe�nition.(aei�)npn(x; a; b; c; d; q)(abe2i�; ac; ad; q)n = 4�3� q�n; abcdqn�1; aei(�+2�); ae�i�abe2i�; ac; ad ���� q; q� ; x = cos(� + �): (3.4.1)55

Orthogonality. When c = a and d = b then we have, if a and b are real and max(jaj; jbj)< 1or if b = a and jaj < 1 :14� �Z�� w(cos(� + �))pm(cos(� + �); a; b; c; d; q)pn(cos(� + �); a; b; c; d; q)d� = hn�mn; (3.4.2)where w(x) := w(x; a; b; c; d; q) = ���� (e2i(�+�); q)1(aei(�+2�); bei(�+2�); cei�; dei�; q)1 ����2= h(x; 1)h(x;�1)h(x; q 12 )h(x;�q 12 )h(x; aei�)h(x; bei�)h(x; ce�i�)h(x; de�i�) ;with h(x; �) := 1Yk=0 �1� 2�xqk + �2q2k� = ��ei(�+�); �e�i(�+�); q�1 ; x = cos(� + �)and hn = (abcdqn�1; q)n(abcdq2n; q)1(qn+1; abqne2i�; acqn; adqn; bcqn; bdqn; cdqne�2i�; q)1 :Recurrence relation.2x~pn(x) = An~pn+1(x) + �aei� + a�1e�i� � (An + Cn)� ~pn(x) + Cn~pn�1(x); (3.4.3)where ~pn(x) := (aei�)npn(x; a; b; c; d; q)(ac; ad; abe2i�; q)nand 8>>>><>>>>: An = (1 � abe2i�qn)(1� acqn)(1 � adqn)(1 � abcdqn�1)aei�(1� abcdq2n�1)(1 � abcdq2n)Cn = aei�(1� qn)(1 � bcqn�1)(1� bdqn�1)(1 � cde�2i�qn�1)(1 � abcdq2n�2)(1� abcdq2n�1) :q-Di�erence equation.(1� q)2Dq h ~w(x; aq 12 ; bq 12 ; cq 12 ; dq 12 ; q)Dqy(x)i ++ �n ~w(x; a; b; c; d; q)y(x) = 0; y(x) = pn(x; a; b; c; d; q); (3.4.4)where ~w(x; a; b; c; d; q) := w(x; a; b; c; d; q)p1� x2 ;�n = 4q�n+1(1� qn)(1� abcdqn�1)and Dqf(x) := �qf(x)�qx with �qf(ei(�+�)) = f(q 12 ei(�+�)) � f(q� 12 ei(�+�)); x = cos(� + �):Generating functions.2�1� aei(�+2�); bei(�+2�)abe2i� ���� q; e�i(�+�)t� 2�1� ce�i(�+2�); de�i(�+2�)cde�2i� ���� q; ei(�+�)t�= 1Xn=0 pn(x; a; b; c; d; q)tn(abe2i�; cde�2i�; q; q)n ; x = cos(� + �): (3.4.5)56

2�1� aei(�+2�); cei�ac ���� q; e�i(�+�)t� 2�1� be�i�; de�i(�+2�)bd ���� q; ei(�+�)t�= 1Xn=0 pn(x; a; b; c; d; q)(ac; bd; q; q)n tn; x = cos(� + �): (3.4.6)2�1� aei(�+2�); dei�ad ���� q; e�i(�+�)t� 2�1� be�i�; ce�i(�+2�)bc ���� q; ei(�+�)t�= 1Xn=0 pn(x; a; b; c; d; q)(ad; bc; q; q)n tn; x = cos(� + �): (3.4.7)References. [25], [45], [114].3.5 Big q-JacobiDe�nition. Pn(x; a; b; c; q) = 3�2� q�n; abqn+1; xaq; cq ���� q; q� : (3.5.1)Orthogonality.aqZcq (a�1x; c�1x; q)1(x; bc�1x; q)1 Pm(x; a; b; c; q)Pn(x; a; b; c; q)dqx= aq(1� q) (q; a�1c; ac�1q; abq2; q)1(aq; bq; cq; abc�1q; q)1 �� (1� abq)(1 � abq2n+1) (q; bq; abc�1q; q)n(abq; aq; cq; q)n (�acq2)nq(n2)�mn: (3.5.2)Recurrence relation.(x� 1)Pn(x; a; b; c; q)= AnPn+1(x; a; b; c; q)� (An + Cn)Pn(x; a; b; c; q)+ CnPn�1(x; a; b; c; q); (3.5.3)where 8>>>><>>>>: An = (1� aqn+1)(1� cqn+1)(1 � abqn+1)(1 � abq2n+1)(1� abq2n+2)Cn = �acqn+1 (1� qn)(1 � bqn)(1 � abc�1qn)(1� abq2n)(1� abq2n+1) :q-Di�erence equation.q�n(1� qn)(1� abqn+1)x2y(x) = B(x)y(qx) � [B(x) +D(x)] y(x) +D(x)y(q�1x); (3.5.4)where y(x) = Pn(x; a; b; c; q)and 8<: B(x) = aq(x� 1)(bx� c)D(x) = (x� aq)(x� cq):57

Generating functions.2�1� aqx�1; 0aq ���� q;xt�1�1� bc�1xbq ���� q; cqt� = 1Xn=0 (cq; q)n(bq; q; q)nPn(x; a; b; c; q)tn: (3.5.5)2�1� cqx�1; 0cq ���� q;xt� 1�1� bc�1xabc�1q ���� q; aqt� = 1Xn=0 (aq; q)n(abc�1q; q; q)nPn(x; a; b; c; q)tn: (3.5.6)Remarks. The big q-Jacobi polynomials with c = 0 and the little q-Jacobi polynomials de�nedby (3.12.1) are related in the following way :Pn(x; a; b; 0; q) = (bq; q)n(aq; q)n (�1)nanqn+(n2)pn� xaq ; b; a����q� :Sometimes the big q-Jacobi polynomials are de�ned in terms of four parameters instead ofthree. In fact the polynomials given by the de�nitionPn(x; a; b; c; d; q) = 3�2� q�n; abqn+1; ac�1qxaq;�ac�1dq ���� q; q�are orthogonal on the interval [�d; c] with respect to the weight function(c�1qx;�d�1qx; q)1(ac�1qx;�bd�1qx; q)1 dqx:These polynomials are not really di�erent from those de�ned by (3.5.1) since we havePn(x; a; b; c; d; q) = Pn(ac�1qx; a; b;�ac�1d; q)and Pn(x; a; b; c; q) = Pn(x; a; b; aq;�cq; q):References. [8], [10], [25], [114], [121], [127], [140], [142], [160], [163], [176], [180], [181], [212].Special case3.5.1 Big q-LegendreDe�nition. The big q-Legendre polynomials are big q-Jacobi polynomials with a = b = 1 :Pn(x; c; q) = 3�2� q�n; qn+1; xq; cq ���� q; q� : (3.5.7)Orthogonality.qZcq Pm(x; c; q)Pn(x; c; q)dqx = q(1� c) (1� q)(1 � q2n+1) (c�1q; q)n(cq; q)n (�cq2)nq(n2)�mn: (3.5.8)Recurrence relation.(x� 1)Pn(x; c; q) = AnPn+1(x; c; q)� (An +Cn)Pn(x; c; q) +CnPn�1(x; c; q); (3.5.9)58

where 8>>>><>>>>: An = (1� qn+1)(1� cqn+1)(1 + qn+1)(1� q2n+1)Cn = �cqn+1 (1� qn)(1 � c�1qn)(1 + qn)(1 � q2n+1) :q-Di�erence equation.q�n(1� qn)(1 � qn+1)x2y(x) = B(x)y(qx) � [B(x) +D(x)] y(x) +D(x)y(q�1x); (3.5.10)where y(x) = Pn(x; c; q)and 8<: B(x) = q(x� 1)(x� c)D(x) = (x� q)(x� cq):Generating functions.2�1� qx�1; 0q ���� q;xt� 1�1� c�1xq ���� q; cqt� = 1Xn=0 (cq; q)n(q; q; q)nPn(x; c; q)tn: (3.5.11)2�1� cqx�1; 0cq ���� q;xt� 1�1� c�1xc�1q ���� q; qt� = 1Xn=0 Pn(x; c; q)(c�1q; q)n tn: (3.5.12)References. [160].3.6 q-HahnDe�nition.Qn(q�x;�; �;N jq) = 3 ~�2� q�n; ��qn+1; q�x�q; q�N ���� q; q� ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; N: (3.6.1)Orthogonality.NXx=0 (�q; q�N ; q)x(q; ��1q�N ; q)x (��q)�xQm(q�x;�; �;N jq)Qn(q�x;�; �;N jq)= (��q2; q)N(�q; q)N (�q)N (q; �q; ��qN+2; q)n(��q; �q; q�N ; q)n (1 � ��q)(��q)n(1� ��q2n+1) q(n2)�Nn�mn: (3.6.2)Recurrence relation.� �1� q�x�Qn(q�x) = AnQn+1(q�x)� (An + Cn)Qn(q�x) +CnQn�1(q�x); (3.6.3)where Qn(q�x) := Qn(q�x;�; �;N jq)and 8>>>><>>>>: An = (1� qn�N )(1� �qn+1)(1� ��qn+1)(1 � ��q2n+1)(1� ��q2n+2)Cn = ��qn(1� qn)(1 � �qn)(q�N � ��qn+1)(1� ��q2n)(1 � ��q2n+1) :59

q-Di�erence equation.q�n(1� qn)(1� ��qn+1)y(x) = B(x)y(x + 1)� [B(x) +D(x)] y(x) +D(x)y(x � 1); (3.6.4)where y(x) = Qn(q�x;�; �;N jq)and 8<: B(x) = (1 � qx�N )(1 � �qx+1)D(x) = �q(1� qx)(� � qx�N�1):Generating functions.2�1� qx�N ; 0�q ���� q; q�xt� 1�1� q�x�q ���� q;�qt� ' NXn=0 (q�N ; q)n(�q; q; q)nQn(q�x;�; �;N jq)tn: (3.6.5)2 ~�1� qx�N ; 0q�N ���� q; q�xt� 1�1� �qN+1�x��qN+2 ���� q;�qt�' NXn=0 (�q; q)n(��qN+2; q; q)nQn(q�x;�; �;N jq)tn: (3.6.6)Remarks. The q-Hahn polynomials de�ned by (3.6.1) and the dual q-Hahn polynomials givenby (3.7.1) are related in the following way :Qn(q�x;�; �;N jq) = Rx(�(n);�; �;N jq);with �(n) = q�n + ��qn+1or Rn(�(x); ; �;N jq) = Qx(q�n; ; �;N jq);where �(x) = q�x + �qx+1:For x = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; N the generating function (3.6.5) can also be written as :2�1� qx�N ; 0�q ���� q; q�xt� 1�1� q�x�q ���� q;�qt� = NXn=0 (q�N ; q)n(�q; q; q)nQn(q�x;�; �;N jq)tn:References. [10], [25], [43], [45], [88], [111], [114], [121], [142], [145], [158], [160], [180], [197],[215], [217], [218].3.7 Dual q-HahnDe�nition.Rn(�(x); ; �;N jq) = 3 ~�2� q�n; q�x; �qx+1 q; q�N ���� q; q� ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; N; (3.7.1)where �(x) := q�x + �qx+1:60

Orthogonality.NXx=0 ( q; �q; q�N ; q)x(q; �qN+2; �q; q)x (1� �q2x+1)(1� �q)(� q)x qNx�(x2)Rm(�(x); ; �;N jq)Rn(�(x); ; �;N jq)= ( �q2; q)N(�q; q)N ( q)�N (q; ��1q�N ; q)n( q; q�N ; q)n ( �q)n�mn: (3.7.2)Recurrence relation.� �1� q�x� �1� �qx+1�Rn(�(x))= AnRn+1(�(x))� (An + Cn)Rn(�(x)) +CnRn�1(�(x)); (3.7.3)where Rn(�(x)) := Rn(�(x); ; �;N jq)and 8<: An = �1� qn�N� �1� qn+1�Cn = q (1� qn) �� � qn�N�1� :q-Di�erence equation.q�n(1 � qn)y(x) = B(x)y(x + 1)� [B(x) +D(x)] y(x) +D(x)y(x � 1); (3.7.4)where y(x) = Rn(�(x); ; �;N jq)and 8>>>><>>>>: B(x) = (1� qx+1)(1� �qx+1)(1 � qx�N )(1� �q2x+1)(1� �q2x+2)D(x) = � qx�N (1� qx)(1� �qx)(1� �qx+N+1)(1� �q2x)(1� �q2x+1) :Generating functions.( qt; q)1( �qx+1t; q)1 2 ~�1� qx�N ; �qx+1q�N ���� q; q�xt� ' NXn=0 ( q; q)n(q; q)n Rn(�(x); ; �;N jq)tn: (3.7.5)(q�N t; q)1(q�xt; q)1 2�1� q�x; ��1q�x q ���� q; �qx+1t� ' NXn=0 (q�N ; q)n(q; q)n Rn(�(x); ; �;N jq)tn: (3.7.6)( �qt; q)1( �qx+1t; q)1 2�1� qx�N ; qx+1��1q�N ���� q; q�xt� ' NXn=0 (q�N ; q; q)n(��1q�N ; q; q)nRn(�(x); ; �;N jq)tn: (3.7.7)Remarks. The dual q-Hahn polynomials de�ned by (3.7.1) and the q-Hahn polynomials givenby (3.6.1) are related in the following way :Qn(q�x;�; �;N jq) = Rx(�(n);�; �;N jq);with �(n) = q�n + ��qn+1or Rn(�(x); ; �;N jq) = Qx(q�n; ; �;N jq);61

where �(x) = q�x + �qx+1:For x = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; N the generating function (3.7.6) can also be written as :(q�N t; q)N�x � 2�1� q�x; ��1q�x q ���� q; �qx+1t� = NXn=0 (q�N ; q)n(q; q)n Rn(�(x); ; �;N jq)tn:For x = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; N the generating function (3.7.7) can also be written as :( �qt; q)x � 2�1� qx�N ; qx+1��1q�N ���� q; q�xt� = NXn=0 (q�N ; q; q)n(��1q�N ; q; q)nRn(�(x); ; �;N jq)tn:References. [25], [43], [45], [114], [145], [180], [217].3.8 Al-Salam-ChiharaDe�nition.Qn(x; a; bjq) = (ab; q)nan 3�2� q�n; aei�; ae�i�ab; 0 ���� q; q� (3.8.1)= (be�i�; q)nein�2�1� q�n; aei�b�1q1�nei� ���� q; b�1qe�i�� ; x = cos �:Orthogonality. When a and b are real or complex conjugates and max(jaj; jbj)< 1, then wehave the following orthogonality relation12� 1Z�1 w(x)p1� x2Qm(x; a; bjq)Qn(x; a; bjq)dx= �mn(qn+1; abqn; q)1 ; (3.8.2)where w(x) := w(x; a; bjq) = ���� (e2i�; q)1(aei�; bei�; q)1 ����2 = h(x; 1)h(x;�1)h(x; q 12 )h(x;�q 12 )h(x; a)h(x; b) ;with h(x; �) := 1Yk=0 �1� 2�xqk + �2q2k� = ��ei�; �e�i�; q�1 ; x = cos �:If a > 1, jbj < 1 and jabj < 1, then we have another orthogonality relation given by :12� 1Z�1 w(x)p1� x2Qm(x; a; bjq)Qn(x; a; bjq)dx++ Xk1<aqk�a wkQm(xk; a; bjq)Qn(xk; a; bjq) = �mn(qn+1; abqn; q)1 ; (3.8.3)where w(x) is as before, xk = aqk + �aqk��1262

and wk = (a�2; q)1(q; ab; a�1b; q)1 (1� a2q2k)(a2; ab; q)k(1� a2)(q; ab�1q; q)k q�k2 � 1a3b�k :Recurrence relation.2x ~Qn(x) = An ~Qn+1(x) + �a+ a�1 � (An + Cn)� ~Qn(x) +Cn ~Qn�1(x); (3.8.4)where ~Qn(x) := anQn(x; a; bjq)(ab; q)nand 8<: An = a�1(1� abqn)Cn = a(1� qn):q-Di�erence equation.(1� q)2Dq h ~w(x; aq 12 ; bq 12 jq)Dqy(x)i++ 4q�n+1(1� qn) ~w(x; a; bjq)y(x) = 0; y(x) = Qn(x; a; bjq); (3.8.5)where ~w(x; a; bjq) := w(x; a; bjq)p1� x2and Dqf(x) := �qf(x)�qx with �qf(ei�) = f(q 12 ei�)� f(q� 12 ei�); x = cos �:If we de�ne Pn(z) := (ab; q)nan 3�2� q�n; az; az�1ab; 0 ���� q; q�then the q-di�erence equation can also be written in the formq�n(1� qn)Pn(z) = A(z)Pn(qz) � �A(z) + A(z�1)�Pn(z) + A(z�1)Pn(q�1z); (3.8.6)where A(z) = (1� az)(1 � bz)(1� z2)(1 � qz2) :Generating functions.1(ei�t; q)1 2�1� aei�; bei�ab ���� q; e�i�t� = 1Xn=0 Qn(x; a; bjq)(ab; q; q)n tn; x = cos �: (3.8.7)(at; bt; q)1(ei�t; e�i�t; q)1 = 1Xn=0 Qn(x; a; bjq)(q; q)n tn; x = cos �: (3.8.8)References. [10], [15], [16], [39], [79], [84].63

3.9 q-Meixner-PollaczekDe�nition.Pn(x; ajq) = a�ne�in� (a2; q)n(q; q)n 3�2� q�n; aei(�+2�); ae�i�a2; 0 ���� q; q� (3.9.1)= (ae�i�; q)n(q; q)n ein(�+�)2�1� q�n; aei�a�1q1�nei� ���� q; qa�1e�i(�+2�)� ; x = cos(� + �):Orthogonality.12� �Z�� w(cos(� + �); ajq)Pm(cos(� + �); ajq)Pn(cos(� + �); ajq)d� = �mn(q; q)n(q; a2qn; q)1 ; (3.9.2)where 0 < a < 1and w(x; ajq) = ���� (e2i(�+�); q)1(aei(�+2�); aei�; q)1 ����2 = h(x; 1)h(x;�1)h(x; q 12 )h(x;�q 12 )h(x; aei�)h(x; ae�i�) ;with h(x; �) := 1Yk=0 �1� 2�xqk + �2q2k� = ��ei(�+�); �e�i(�+�); q�1 ; x = cos(� + �):Recurrence relation.2xPn(x; ajq) = (1� qn+1)Pn+1(x; ajq) ++ 2aqn cos�Pn(x; ajq) + (1� a2qn�1)Pn�1(x; ajq): (3.9.3)q-Di�erence equation.(1 � q)2Dq h ~w(x; aq 12 jq)Dqy(x)i+ 4q�n+1(1� qn) ~w(x; ajq)y(x) = 0; y(x) = Pn(x; ajq); (3.9.4)where ~w(x; ajq) := w(x; ajq)p1� x2and Dqf(x) := �qf(x)�qx with �qf(ei(�+�)) = f(q 12 ei(�+�)) � f(q� 12 ei(�+�)); x = cos(� + �):Generating functions.���� (aei�t; q)1(ei(�+�)t; q)1 ����2 = 1Xn=0Pn(x; ajq)tn; x = cos(� + �): (3.9.5)1(ei(�+�)t; q)1 2�1� aei(�+2�); aei�a2 ���� q; e�i(�+�)t� = 1Xn=0 Pn(x; ajq)(a2; q)n tn; x = cos(� + �): (3.9.6)References. [10], [16], [39], [45], [72], [126].64

3.10 Continuous q-JacobiDe�nitions. If we take a = q 12�+ 14 , b = q 12�+ 34 , c = �q 12�+ 14 and d = �q 12�+ 34 in the de�nition(3.1.1) of the Askey-Wilson polynomials we �nd after renormalizingP (�;�)n (xjq) = (q�+1; q)n(q; q)n 4�3 q�n; qn+�+�+1; q 12�+ 14 ei�; q 12�+ 14 e�i�q�+1;�q 12 (�+�+1);�q 12 (�+�+2) ����� q; q! ; x = cos �: (3.10.1)In [196] M. Rahman takes a = q 12 , b = q�+ 12 , c = �q�+ 12 and d = �q 12 to obtain after renormalizingP (�;�)n (x; q) = (q�+1;�q�+1; q)n(q;�q; q)n 4�3 q�n; qn+�+�+1; q 12 ei�; q 12 e�i�q�+1;�q�+1;�q ����� q; q! ; x = cos �: (3.10.2)These two q-analogues of the Jacobi polynomials are not really di�erent, since they are connectedby the quadratic transformation :P (�;�)n (xjq2) = (�q; q)n(�q�+�+1; q)n qn�P (�;�)n (x; q):Orthogonality. For � � �12 and � � �12 the orthogonality relations are respectively12� 1Z�1 w(xjq)p1� x2P (�;�)m (xjq)P (�;�)n (xjq)dx= (q 12 (�+�+2); q 12 (�+�+3); q)1(q; q�+1; q�+1;�q 12 (�+�+1);�q 12 (�+�+2); q)1 �� (1� q�+�+1)(q�+1; q�+1;�q 12 (�+�+3); q)n(1� q2n+�+�+1)(q; q�+�+1;�q 12 (�+�+1); q)n q(�+ 12 )n�mn; (3.10.3)where w(xjq) := w(x; q�; q�jq) = ���� (e2i�; q)1(q 12�+ 14 ei�; q 12�+ 34 ei�;�q 12�+ 14 ei�;�q 12�+ 34 ei�; q)1 ����2= ����� (ei�;�ei�; q 12 )1(q 12�+ 14 ei�;�q 12 �+ 14 ei�; q 12 )1 �����2= h(x; 1)h(x;�1)h(x; q 12 )h(x;�q 12 )h(x; q 12�+ 14 )h(x; q 12�+ 34 )h(x;�q 12�+ 14 )h(x;�q 12�+ 34 ) ;with h(x; �) := 1Yk=0 �1� 2�xqk + �2q2k� = ��ei�; �e�i�; q�1 ; x = cos �and 12� 1Z�1 w(x; q)p1� x2P (�;�)m (x; q)P (�;�)n (x; q)dx= (q�+�+2; q)1(q;�q; q�+1;�q�+1; q�+1;�q�+1;�q�+�+1; q)1 �� (1 � q�+�+1)(q�+1; q�+1;�q�+1;�q�+1;�q�+�+1; q)n(1� q2n+�+�+1)(q�+�+1; q;�q;�q;�q; q)n qn�mn; (3.10.4)65

wherew(x; q) := w(x; q�; q�; q) = ���� (e2i�; q)1(q�+ 12 ei�; q 12 ei�;�q�+ 12 ei�;�q 12 ei�; q)1 ����2= ���� (ei�;�ei�; q)1(q�+ 12 ei�;�q�+ 12 ei�; q)1 ����2 = h(x; 1)h(x;�1)h(x; q�+12 )h(x;�q�+ 12 ) ;with h(x; �) := 1Yk=0 �1� 2�xqk + �2q2k� = ��ei�; �e�i�; q�1 ; x = cos �:Recurrence relations.2x ~Pn(xjq) = An ~Pn+1(xjq) + hq 12�+ 14 + q�12��14 � (An + Cn)i ~Pn(xjq) +Cn ~Pn�1(xjq); (3.10.5)where ~Pn(xjq) := (q; q)n(q�+1; q)nP (�;�)n (xjq)and 8>>>><>>>>: An = (1� qn+�+1)(1 � qn+�+�+1)(1 + qn+ 12 (�+�+1))(1 + qn+ 12 (�+�+2))q 12�+ 14 (1� q2n+�+�+1)(1 � q2n+�+�+2)Cn = q 12�+ 14 (1� qn)(1� qn+�)(1 + qn+ 12 (�+�))(1 + qn+ 12 (�+�+1))(1� q2n+�+�)(1� q2n+�+�+1) :2x ~Pn(x; q) = An ~Pn+1(x; q) + hq 12 + q� 12 � (An +Cn)i ~Pn(x; q) + Cn ~Pn�1(x; q); (3.10.6)where ~Pn(x; q) := (q;�q; q)n(q�+1;�q�+1; q)nP (�;�)n (x; q)and 8>>>><>>>>: An = (1� qn+�+1)(1 � qn+�+�+1)(1 + qn+1)(1 + qn+�+1)q 12 (1� q2n+�+�+1)(1� q2n+�+�+2)Cn = q 12 (1� qn)(1� qn+�)(1 + qn+�)(1 + qn+�+�)(1 � q2n+�+�)(1� q2n+�+�+1) :q-Di�erence equations.(1� q)2Dq h ~w(x; q�+12 ; q�+ 12 jq)Dqy(x)i + �n ~w(x; q�; q�jq)y(x) = 0; y(x) = P (�;�)n (xjq); (3.10.7)where ~w(x; q�; q�jq) := w(x; q�; q�jq)p1� x2 ;�n = 4q�n+1(1� qn)(1 � qn+�+�+1)and Dqf(x) := �qf(x)�qx with �qf(ei�) = f(q 12 ei�)� f(q� 12 ei�); x = cos �:(1�q)2Dq h ~w(x; q�+ 12 ; q�+ 12 ; q)Dqy(x)i+�n ~w(x; q�; q�; q)y(x) = 0; y(x) = P (�;�)n (x; q); (3.10.8)66

where ~w(x; q�; q�; q) := w(x; q�; q�; q)p1� x2 ;�n = 4q�n+1(1� qn)(1 � qn+�+�+1)and Dqf(x) := �qf(x)�qx with �qf(ei�) = f(q 12 ei�)� f(q� 12 ei�); x = cos �:Generating functions.2�1 q 12�+ 14 ei�; q 12�+ 34 ei�q�+1 ����� q; e�i�t! 2�1 �q 12�+ 14 e�i�;�q 12�+ 34 e�i�q�+1 ����� q; ei�t!= 1Xn=0 (�q 12 (�+�+1);�q 12 (�+�+2); q)n(q�+1; q�+1; q)n P (�;�)n (xjq)q( 12�+ 14 )n tn; x = cos �: (3.10.9)2�1 q 12�+ 14 ei�;�q 12�+ 14 ei��q 12 (�+�+1) ����� q; e�i�t! 2�1 q 12�+ 34 e�i�;�q 12�+ 34 e�i��q 12 (�+�+3) ����� q; ei�t!= 1Xn=0 (�q 12 (�+�+2); q)n(�q 12 (�+�+3); q)n P (�;�)n (xjq)q( 12�+ 14 )n tn; x = cos �: (3.10.10)2�1 q 12�+ 14 ei�;�q 12�+ 34 ei��q 12 (�+�+2) ����� q; e�i�t! 2�1 q 12�+ 34 e�i�;�q 12�+ 14 e�i��q 12 (�+�+2) ����� q; ei�t!= 1Xn=0 (�q 12 (�+�+1); q)n(�q 12 (�+�+2); q)n P (�;�)n (xjq)q( 12�+ 14 )n tn; x = cos �: (3.10.11)2�1 q 12 ei�; q�+12 ei�q�+1 ����� q; e�i�t! 2�1 �q 12 e�i�;�q�+ 12 e�i�q�+1 ����� q; ei�t!= 1Xn=0 (�q;�q; q)n(q�+1; q�+1; q)n P (�;�)n (x; q)q 12n tn; x = cos �: (3.10.12)2�1 q 12 ei�;�q�+ 12 ei��q�+1 ����� q; e�i�t! 2�1 �q 12 e�i�; q�+ 12 e�i��q�+1 ����� q; ei�t!= 1Xn=0 (�q;�q; q)n(�q�+1;�q�+1; q)n P (�;�)n (x; q)q 12n tn; x = cos �: (3.10.13)2�1 q 12 ei�;�q 12 ei��q ����� q; e�i�t! 2�1 q�+ 12 e�i�;�q�+ 12 e�i��q�+�+1 ����� q; ei�t!= 1Xn=0 (�q; q)n(�q�+�+1; q)n P (�;�)n (x; q)q 12n tn; x = cos �: (3.10.14)Remark. The continuous q-Jacobi polynomials given by (3.10.2) and the continuous q-ultraspherical (or Rogers) polynomials given by (3.10.15) are connected by the quadratic trans-formations : C2n(x; q�jq) = (q�;�q; q)n(q 12 ;�q 12 ; q)n q� 12nP (��12 ;� 12 )n (2x2 � 1; q)67

and C2n+1(x; q�jq) = (q�;�1; q)n+1(q 12 ;�q 12 ; q)n+1 q� 12nxP (��12 ; 12 )n (2x2 � 1; q):References. [45], [112], [114], [136], [179], [180], [196], [198], [199].Special cases3.10.1 Continuous q-ultraspherical / RogersDe�nition. If we set a = � 12 , b = � 12 q 12 , c = �� 12 and d = �� 12 q 12 in the de�nition(3.1.1) of the Askey-Wilson polynomials and change the normalization we obtain the continuousq-ultraspherical (or Rogers) polynomials :Cn(x; �jq) = (�2; q)n(q; q)n �� 12n4�3 q�n; �2qn; � 12 ei�; � 12 e�i��q 12 ;��;��q 12 ����� q; q! (3.10.15)= (�2; q)n(q; q)n ��ne�in�3�2� q�n; �; �e2i��2; 0 ���� q; q�= (�; q)n(q; q)n ein�2�1� q�n; ���1q1�n ���� q; ��1qe�2i�� ; x = cos �:Orthogonality.12� 1Z�1 w(x)p1� x2Cm(x; �jq)Cn(x; �jq)dx = (�; �q; q)1(�2; q; q)1 (�2; q)n(q; q)n (1� �)(1� �qn)�mn; j�j < 1; (3.10.16)where w(x) := w(x; �jq) = ���� (e2i�; q)1(� 12 ei�; � 12 q 12 ei�;�� 12 ei�;�� 12 q 12 ei�; q)1 ����2 = ���� (e2i�; q)1(�e2i�; q)1 ����2= h(x; 1)h(x;�1)h(x; q 12 )h(x;�q 12 )h(x; � 12 )h(x; � 12 q 12 )h(x;�� 12 )h(x;�� 12 q 12 ) ;with h(x; �) := 1Yk=0 �1� 2�xqk + �2q2k� = ��ei�; �e�i�; q�1 ; x = cos �:Recurrence relation.2(1� �qn)xCn(x; �jq) = (1 � qn+1)Cn+1(x; �jq) + (1� �2qn�1)Cn�1(x; �jq): (3.10.17)q-Di�erence equation.(1� q)2Dq h ~w(x; �q 12 jq)Dqy(x)i + �n ~w(x; �jq)y(x) = 0; y(x) = Cn(x; �jq); (3.10.18)where ~w(x; �jq) := w(x; �jq)p1� x2 ;�n = 4q�n+1(1 � qn)(1� �2qn)and Dqf(x) := �qf(x)�qx with �qf(ei�) = f(q 12 ei�)� f(q� 12 ei�); x = cos �:68

Generating functions.(�ei�t; �e�i�t; q)1(ei�t; e�i�t; q)1 = 1Xn=0Cn(x; �jq)tn; x = cos �: (3.10.19)1(e�i�t; q)1 2�1� �; �e�2i��2 ���� q; ei�t� = 1Xn=0 Cn(x; �jq)(�2; q)n tn; x = cos �: (3.10.20)(e�i�t; q)1 � 2�1� �; �e2i��2 ���� q; e�i�t� = 1Xn=0 (�1)n�nq(n2)(�2; q)n Cn(x; �jq)tn; x = cos �: (3.10.21)2�1 � 12 ei�; � 12 q 12 ei��q 12 ����� q; e�i�t! 2�1 �� 12 e�i�;�� 12 q 12 e�i��q 12 ����� q; ei�t!= 1Xn=0 (��;��q 12 ; q)n(�2; �q 12 ; q)n Cn(x; �jq)tn; x = cos �: (3.10.22)2�1 � 12 ei�;�� 12 ei��� ����� q; e�i�t! 2�1 � 12 q 12 e�i�;�� 12 q 12 e�i���q ����� q; ei�t!= 1Xn=0 (�q 12 ;��q 12 ; q)n(�2;��q; q)n Cn(x; �jq)tn; x = cos �: (3.10.23)2�1 � 12 ei�;�� 12 q 12 ei���q 12 ����� q; e�i�t! 2�1 � 12 q 12 e�i�;�� 12 e�i���q 12 ����� q; ei�t!= 1Xn=0 (��; �q 12 ; q)n(�2;��q 12 ; q)nCn(x; �jq)tn; x = cos �: (3.10.24)Remarks. The continuous q-ultraspherical (or Rogers) polynomials can also be written as :Cn(x; �jq) = nXk=0 (�; q)k(�; q)n�k(q; q)k(q; q)n�k ei(n�2k)�; x = cos �:They can be obtained from the continuous q-Jacobi polynomials de�ned by (3.10.1) in thefollowing way. Set � = � in the de�nition (3.10.1) and change q�+ 12 by � and we �nd thecontinuous q-ultraspherical (or Rogers) polynomials with a di�erent normalization. We haveP (�;�)n (xjq) q�+ 12!��! (�q 12 ; q)n(�2; q)n � 12nCn(x; �jq):If we set � = q�+ 12 in the de�nition (3.10.15) of the q-ultraspherical (or Rogers) polynomialswe �nd the continuous q-Jacobi polynomials given by (3.10.1) with � = �. In fact we haveCn �x; q�+12 ��� q� = (q2�+1; q)n(q�+1; q)nq( 12�+ 14 )nP (�;�)n (xjq):If we change q to q�1 we �ndCn(x; �jq�1) = (�q)nCn(x; ��1jq):69

The special case � = q of the continuous q-ultraspherical (or Rogers) polynomials equals theChebyshev polynomials of the second kind de�ned by (1.8.21). In fact we haveCn(x; qjq) = sin(n+ 1)�sin � = Un(x); x = cos �:The limit case � ! 1 leads to the Chebyshev polynomials of the �rst kind given by (1.8.20) in thefollowing way :lim�!1 1� qn2(1� �)Cn(x; �jq) = cosn� = Tn(x); x = cos �; n = 1; 2; 3; : : ::The continuous q-Jacobi polynomials given by (3.10.2) and the continuous q-ultraspherical (orRogers) polynomials given by (3.10.15) are connected by the quadratic transformations :C2n(x; q�jq) = (q�;�q; q)n(q 12 ;�q 12 ; q)n q� 12nP (��12 ;� 12 )n (2x2 � 1; q)and C2n+1(x; q�jq) = (q�;�1; q)n+1(q 12 ;�q 12 ; q)n+1 q� 12nxP (��12 ; 12 )n (2x2 � 1; q):Finally we remark that the continuous q-ultraspherical (or Rogers) polynomials are related tothe continuous q-Legendre polynomials de�ned by (3.10.25) in the following way :Cn(x; qjq2) = q� 12nPn(x; q):References. [10], [11], [12], [25], [31], [32], [37], [38], [39], [41], [45], [60], [62], [63], [107], [108],[109], [110], [112], [113], [114], [127], [137], [159], [179], [180], [181], [202], [204], [207], [208], [209].3.10.2 Continuous q-LegendreDe�nition. The continuous q-Legendre polynomials are continuous q-Jacobi polynomials with� = � = 0. If we set � = � = 0 in the de�nition (3.10.2) of the continuous q-Jacobi polynomialswe obtain Pn(x; q) = 4�3 q�n; qn+1; q 12 ei�; q 12 e�i�q;�q;�q ����� q; q! ; x = cos �: (3.10.25)If we set � = � = 0 in the de�nition (3.10.1) we �ndPn(xjq) = 4�3 q�n; qn+1; q 14 ei�; q 14 e�i�q;�q 12 ;�q ����� q; q! ; x = cos �;but these are not really di�erent in view of the quadratic transformationPn(xjq2) = Pn(x; q):Orthogonality.12� 1Z�1 w(x)p1� x2Pm(x; q)Pn(x; q)dx = (q; q)2n(q2n+2; q)1qn(�q; q)41(q; q)31 �mn; (3.10.26)wherew(x) = ���� (e2i�; q)1(q 12 ei�; q 12 ei�;�q 12 ei�;�q 12 ei�; q)1 ����2 = ���� (ei�;�ei�; q)1(q 12 ei�;�q 12 ei�; q)1 ����2 = h(x; 1)h(x;�1)h(x; q 12 )h(x;�q 12 ) ;70

with h(x; �) := 1Yk=0 �1� 2�xqk + �2q2k� = ��ei�; �e�i�; q�1 ; x = cos �:Recurrence relation.2(1� q2n+1)xPn(x; q) = q� 12 (1� q2n+2)Pn+1(x; q) + q 12 (1 � q2n)Pn�1(x; q): (3.10.27)q-Di�erence equation.(1� q)2Dq [ ~w(x; q; q)Dqy(x)] + �n ~w(x; q 12 ; q)y(x) = 0; y(x) = Pn(x; q); (3.10.28)where �n = 4q�n+1(1� qn)(1� qn+1)and ~w(x; a; q) := w(x; a; q)p1� x2 ;where w(x; a; q) = ���� (e2i�; q)1(aei�; aei�;�aei�;�aei�; q)1 ����2 = h(x; 1)h(x;�1)h(x; q 12 )h(x;�q 12 )h(x; a)h(x; a)h(x;�a)h(x;�a) ;with h(x; �) := 1Yk=0 �1� 2�xqk + �2q2k� = ��ei�; �e�i�; q�1 ; x = cos �and Dqf(x) := �qf(x)�qx with �qf(ei�) = f(q 12 ei�)� f(q� 12 ei�); x = cos �:Generating functions.2�1 q 12 ei�;�q 12 ei��q ����� q; e�i�t! 2�1 q 12 e�i�;�q 12 e�i��q ����� q; ei�t!= 1Xn=0 Pn(x; q)q 12n tn; x = cos �: (3.10.29)2�1 q 12 ei�; q 12 ei�q ����� q; e�i�t! 2�1 �q 12 e�i�;�q 12 e�i�q ����� q; ei�t!= 1Xn=0 (�q;�q; q)n(q; q; q)n Pn(x; q)q 12n tn; x = cos �: (3.10.30)2�1 q 12 ei�; q 32 ei�q2 ����� q2; e�i�t! 2�1 �q 12 e�i�;�q 32 e�i�q2 ����� q2; ei�t!= 1Xn=0 (�qn+1; q)n(q; q;�q; q)n Pn(x; q)q 12n tn; x = cos �: (3.10.31)2�1 q 12 ei�;�q 12 ei��q ����� q2; e�i�t! 2�1 q 32 e�i�;�q 32 e�i��q3 ����� q2; ei�t!= 1Xn=0 (�q2; q2)n(�q3; q2)n Pn(x; q)q 12n tn; x = cos �: (3.10.32)71

2�1 q 12 ei�;�q 32 ei��q2 ����� q2; e�i�t! 2�1 q 32 e�i�;�q 12 e�i��q2 ����� q2; ei�t!= 1Xn=0 (�q; q2)n(�q2; q2)n Pn(x; q)q 12n tn; x = cos �: (3.10.33)Remarks. The continuous q-Legendre polynomials can also be written as :Pn(x; q) = q 12n nXk=0 (q; q2)k(q; q2)n�k(q2; q2)k(q2; q2)n�k ei(n�2k)�; x = cos �:They are related to the continuous q-ultraspherical (or Rogers) polynomials given by (3.10.15)in the following way : Pn(x; q) = q 12nCn(x; qjq2):References. [157], [160], [163].3.11 Big q-LaguerreDe�nition. Pn(x; a; b; q) = 3�2� q�n; 0; xaq; bq ���� q; q� (3.11.1)= 1(b�1q�n; q)n 2�1� q�n; aqx�1aq ���� q; xb� :Orthogonality. aqZbq (a�1x; b�1x; q)1(x; q)1 Pm(x; a; b; q)Pn(x; a; b; q)dqx= aq(1� q) (q; a�1b; ab�1q; q)1(aq; bq; q)1 (q; q)n(aq; bq; q)n (�abq2)nq(n2)�mn: (3.11.2)Recurrence relation.(x� 1)Pn(x; a; b; q) = AnPn+1(x; a; b; q)� (An + Cn)Pn(x; a; b; q) +CnPn�1(x; a; b; q); (3.11.3)where 8<: An = (1 � aqn+1)(1� bqn+1)Cn = �abqn+1(1� qn):q-Di�erence equation.q�n(1� qn)x2y(x) = B(x)y(qx) � [B(x) +D(x)] y(x) +D(x)y(q�1x); (3.11.4)where y(x) = Pn(x; a; b; q)and 8<: B(x) = abq(1� x)D(x) = (x� aq)(x� bq):72

Generating functions.(bqt; q)1 � 2�1� aqx�1; 0aq ���� q;xt� = 1Xn=0 (bq; q)n(q; q)n Pn(x; a; b; q)tn: (3.11.5)(t; q)1 � 3�2� 0; 0; xaq; bq ���� q; t� = 1Xn=0 (�1)nq(n2)(q; q)n Pn(x; a; b; q)tn: (3.11.6)Remark. The big q-Laguerre polynomials de�ned by (3.11.1) and the a�ne q-Krawtchoukpolynomials given by (3.16.1) are related in the following way :KAffn (q�x; p;N ; q) = Pn(q�x; p; q�N�1; q):References. [10], [23].3.12 Little q-JacobiDe�nition. pn(x; a; bjq) = 2�1� q�n; abqn+1aq ���� q; qx� : (3.12.1)Orthogonality.1Xk=0 (bq; q)k(q; q)k (aq)kpm(qk; a; bjq)pn(qk; a; bjq)= (abq2; q)1(aq; q)1 (1� abq)(aq)n(1� abq2n+1) (q; bq; q)n(aq; abq; q)n�mn; 0 < aq < 1; b < q�1: (3.12.2)Recurrence relation.� xpn(x; a; bjq) = Anpn+1(x; a; bjq)� (An +Cn) pn(x; a; bjq) +Cnpn�1(x; a; bjq); (3.12.3)where 8>>>><>>>>: An = qn (1� aqn+1)(1� abqn+1)(1� abq2n+1)(1� abq2n+2)Cn = aqn (1� qn)(1 � bqn)(1� abq2n)(1 � abq2n+1) :q-Di�erence equation.q�n(1� qn)(1� abqn+1)xy(x)= B(x)y(qx) � [B(x) +D(x)] y(x) +D(x)y(q�1x); y(x) = pn(x; a; bjq); (3.12.4)where 8<: B(x) = a(bqx� 1)D(x) = x� 1:Generating function.2�1� 0; 0aq ���� q;xt� 1�1� bqxbq ���� q; t� = 1Xn=0 (�1)nq(n2)(bq; q; q)n pn(x; a; bjq)tn: (3.12.5)73

Remarks. The little q-Jacobi polynomials de�ned by (3.12.1) and the big q-Jacobi polynomialsgiven by (3.5.1) are related in the following way :pn(x; a; bjq) = (bq; q)n(aq; q)n (�1)nb�nq�n�(n2)Pn(bqx; b; a; 0; q):The little q-Jacobi polynomials and the q-Meixner polynomials de�ned by (3.13.1) are relatedin the following way : Mn(q�x; b; c; q) = pn(�c�1qn; b; b�1q�n�x�1jq):References. [8], [10], [18], [19], [24], [25], [31], [111], [114], [121], [127], [134], [140], [145],[158], [160], [161], [163], [172], [176], [180], [197], [212], [214].Special case3.12.1 Little q-LegendreDe�nition. The little q-Legendre polynomials are little q-Jacobi polynomials with a = b = 1 :pn(xjq) = 2�1� q�n; qn+1q ���� q; qx� : (3.12.6)Orthogonality. 1Xk=0 qkpm(qkjq)pn(qkjq) = qn(1� q2n+1)�mn: (3.12.7)Recurrence relation.� xpn(xjq) = Anpn+1(xjq)� (An + Cn) pn(xjq) + Cnpn�1(xjq); (3.12.8)where 8>>>><>>>>: An = qn (1� qn+1)(1 + qn+1)(1� q2n+1)Cn = qn (1 � qn)(1 + qn)(1� q2n+1) :q-Di�erence equation.q�n(1 � qn)(1� qn+1)xy(x) = B(x)y(qx) � [B(x) +D(x)] y(x) +D(x)y(q�1x); (3.12.9)where y(x) = pn(xjq)and 8<: B(x) = qx� 1D(x) = x� 1:Generating function.2�1� 0; 0q ���� q;xt� 1�1� qxq ���� q; t� = 1Xn=0 (�1)nq(n2)(q; q; q)n pn(xjq)tn: (3.12.10)References. [160], [161], [201], [221]. 74

3.13 q-MeixnerDe�nition. Mn(q�x; b; c; q) = 2�1� q�n; q�xbq ���� q;�qn+1c � : (3.13.1)Orthogonality. 1Xx=0 (bq; q)x(q;�bcq; q)x cxq(x2)Mm(q�x; b; c; q)Mn(q�x; b; c; q)= (�c; q)1(�bcq; q)1 (q;�c�1q; q)n(bq; q)n q�n�mn; 0 < bq < 1; c > 0: (3.13.2)Recurrence relation.q2n+1(1� q�x)Mn(q�x) = c(1� bqn+1)Mn+1(q�x) +� �c(1� bqn+1) + q(1� qn)(c+ qn)�Mn(q�x) + q(1� qn)(c+ qn)Mn�1(q�x); (3.13.3)where Mn(q�x) :=Mn(q�x; b; c; q):q-Di�erence equation.� (1 � qn)y(x) = B(x)y(x + 1)� [B(x) +D(x)] y(x) +D(x)y(x � 1); (3.13.4)where y(x) = Mn(q�x; b; c; q)and 8<: B(x) = cqx(1� bqx+1)D(x) = (1� qx)(1 + bcqx):Generating functions.1(t; q)1 1�1� q�xbq ���� q;�qtc � = 1Xn=0 Mn(q�x; b; c; q)(q; q)n tn: (3.13.5)1(t; q)1 1�1� �b�1c�1q�x�c�1q ���� q; bqt� = 1Xn=0 (bq; q)n(�c�1q; q; q)nMn(q�x; b; c; q)tn: (3.13.6)Remarks. The q-Meixner polynomials de�ned by (3.13.1) and the little q-Jacobi polynomialsgiven by (3.12.1) are related in the following way :Mn(q�x; b; c; q) = pn(�c�1qn; b; b�1q�n�x�1jq):The q-Meixner polynomials and the quantum q-Krawtchouk polynomials de�ned by (3.14.1)are related in the following way :Kqtmn (q�x; p;N ; q) = Mn(q�x; q�N�1;�p�1; q):References. [10], [22], [23], [114], [121], [180].75

3.14 Quantum q-KrawtchoukDe�nition.Kqtmn (q�x; p;N ; q) = 2 ~�1� q�n; q�xq�N ���� q; pqn+1� ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; N: (3.14.1)Orthogonality.NXx=0 (pq; q)N�x(q; q)x(q; q)N�x (�1)N�xq(x2)Kqtmm (q�x; p;N ; q)Kqtmn (q�x; p;N ; q)= (�1)npN (q; q)N�n(q; pq; q)n(q; q; q)N q(N+12 )�(n+12 )+Nn�mn: (3.14.2)Recurrence relation.� pq2n+1(1� q�x)Kqtmn (q�x) = (1� qn�N )Kqtmn+1(q�x) +� �(1� qn�N ) + q(1 � qn)(1� pqn)�Kqtmn (q�x) + q(1� qn)(1� pqn)Kqtmn�1(q�x); (3.14.3)where Kqtmn (q�x) := Kqtmn (q�x; p;N ; q):q-Di�erence equation.� p(1� qn)y(x) = B(x)y(x + 1) � [B(x) +D(x)] y(x) +D(x)y(x � 1); (3.14.4)where y(x) = Kqtmn (q�x; p;N ; q)and 8<: B(x) = �qx(1 � qx�N )D(x) = (1� qx)(p� qx�N�1):Generating function.(q�xt; q)1(t; q)1 2�1� qx�N ; 0pq ���� q; q�xt� ' NXn=0 (q�N ; q)n(pq; q; q)nKqtmn (q�x; p;N ; q)tn: (3.14.5)Remarks. The quantum q-Krawtchouk polynomials de�ned by (3.14.1) and the q-Meixnerpolynomials given by (3.13.1) are related in the following way :Kqtmn (q�x; p;N ; q) = Mn(q�x; q�N�1;�p�1; q):The quantum q-Krawtchouk polynomials are related to the a�ne q-Krawtchouk polynomialsde�ned by (3.16.1) by the transformation q $ q�1 in the following way :Kqtmn (qx; p;N ; q�1) = (p�1q; q)n��pq�n q�(n2)KAffn (qx�N ; p�1; N ; q):For x = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; N the generating function (3.14.5) can also be written as :(q�xt; q)x � 2�1� qx�N ; 0pq ���� q; q�xt� = NXn=0 (q�N ; q)n(pq; q; q)nKqtmn (q�x; p;N ; q)tn:References. [114], [158], [160]. 76

3.15 q-KrawtchoukDe�nition.Kn(q�x; p;N ; q) = 3 ~�2� q�n; q�x;�pqnq�N ; 0 ���� q; q� (3.15.1)= (qx�N ; q)n(q�N ; q)nqnx 2�1� q�n; q�xqN�x�n+1 ���� q;�pqn+N+1� ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; N:Orthogonality. NXx=0 (q�N ; q)x(q; q)x (�p)�xKm(q�x; p;N ; q)Kn(q�x; p;N ; q)= (q;�pqN+1; q)n(�p; q�N ; q)n (1 + p)(1 + pq2n) �� (�pq; q)Np�Nq�(N+12 ) ��pq�N�n qn2�mn: (3.15.2)Recurrence relation.� �1� q�x�Kn(q�x) = AnKn+1(q�x)� (An +Cn)Kn(q�x) +CnKn�1(q�x); (3.15.3)where Kn(q�x) := Kn(q�x; p;N ; q)and 8>>>><>>>>: An = (1� qn�N)(1 + pqn)(1 + pq2n)(1 + pq2n+1)Cn = �pq2n�N�1 (1 + pqn+N )(1� qn)(1 + pq2n�1)(1 + pq2n) :q-Di�erence equation.q�n(1 � qn)(1 + pqn)y(x) = (1� qx�N )y(x + 1) +� �(1� qx�N )� p(1� qx)� y(x) � p(1� qx)y(x � 1); (3.15.4)where y(x) = Kn(q�x; p;N ; q):Generating functions.2�0� qx�N ; 0� ���� q;�q�xt� 1�1� q�x0 ���� q; pqt� � NXn=0 (q�N ; q)n(q; q)n q�(n2)Kn(q�x; p;N ; q)tn: (3.15.5)2 ~�1� qx�N ; 0q�N ���� q; q�xt� 0�1� ��pqN+1 ���� q;�pqN+1�xt� ' NXn=0 Kn(q�x; p;N ; q)(�pqN+1; q; q)n tn: (3.15.6)Remarks. The q-Krawtchouk polynomials de�ned by (3.15.1) and the dual q-Krawtchoukpolynomials given by (3.17.1) are related in the following way :Kn(q�x; p;N ; q) = Kx(�(n);�pqN ; N jq)with �(n) = q�n � pqn77

or Kn(�(x); c;N jq) = Kx(q�n;�cq�N ; N ; q)with �(x) = q�x + cqx�N :The generating function (3.15.5) must be seen as an equality in terms of formal power series.For x = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; N this generating function can also be written as :2�0� qx�N ; 0� ���� q;�q�xt� 1�1� q�x0 ���� q; pqt� = NXn=0 (q�N ; q)n(q; q)n q�(n2)Kn(q�x; p;N ; q)tn:References. [43], [114], [180], [181], [216], [217].3.16 A�ne q-KrawtchoukDe�nition.KAffn (q�x; p;N ; q) = 3 ~�2� q�n; 0; q�xpq; q�N ���� q; q� (3.16.1)= (�pq)nq(n2)(pq; q)n 2 ~�1� q�n; qx�Nq�N ���� q; q�xp � ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : :; N:Orthogonality. NXx=0 (pq; q)x(q; q)N(q; q)x(q; q)N�x (pq)�xKAffm (q�x; p;N ; q)KAffn (q�x; p;N ; q)= (pq)n�N (q; q)n(q; q)N�n(pq; q)n(q; q)N �mn; 0 < pq < 1: (3.16.2)Recurrence relation.� (1� q�x)KAffn (q�x) = (1� qn�N )(1� pqn+1)KAffn+1 (q�x) +� �(1� qn�N )(1� pqn+1)� pqn�N (1� qn)�KAffn (q�x) � pqn�N (1� qn)KAffn�1 (q�x); (3.16.3)where KAffn (q�x) := KAffn (q�x; p;N ; q):q-Di�erence equation.q�n(1� qn)y(x) = B(x)y(x + 1)� [B(x) +D(x)] y(x) +D(x)y(x � 1); (3.16.4)where y(x) = KAffn (q�x; p;N ; q)and 8<: B(x) = (1� qx�N )(1� pqx+1)D(x) = �p(1� qx)qx�N :Generating functions.(q�N t; q)1(q�xt; q)1 1�1� q�xpq ���� q; pqt� ' NXn=0 (q�N ; q)n(q; q)n KAffn (q�x; p;N ; q)tn: (3.16.5)78

(pqt; q)1 � 2 ~�1� qx�N ; 0q�N ���� q; q�xt� ' NXn=0 (pq; q)n(q; q)n KAffn (q�x; p;N ; q)tn: (3.16.6)Remarks. The a�ne q-Krawtchouk polynomials de�ned by (3.16.1) and the big q-Laguerrepolynomials given by (3.11.1) are related in the following way :KAffn (q�x; p;N ; q) = Pn(q�x; p; q�N�1; q):The a�ne q-Krawtchouk polynomials are related to the quantum q-Krawtchouk polynomialsde�ned by (3.14.1) by the transformation q $ q�1 in the following way :KAffn (qx; p;N ; q�1) = 1(p�1q; q)nKqtmn (qx�N ; p�1; N ; q):For x = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; N the generating function (3.16.5) can also be written as :(q�N t; q)N�x � 1�1� q�xpq ���� q; pqt� = NXn=0 (q�N ; q)n(q; q)n KAffn (q�x; p;N ; q)tn:References. [85], [86], [88], [114], [217].3.17 Dual q-KrawtchoukDe�nition.Kn(�(x); c;N jq) = 3 ~�2� q�n; q�x; cqx�Nq�N ; 0 ���� q; q� (3.17.1)= (qx�N ; q)n(q�N ; q)nqnx 2�1� q�n; q�xqN�x�n+1 ���� q; cqx+1� ; n = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; N;where �(x) := q�x + cqx�N :Orthogonality.NXx=0 (cq�N ; q�N ; q)x(q; cq; q)x (1� cq2x�N)(1� cq�N ) c�xqx(2N�x)Km(�(x))Kn(�(x))= (c�1; q)N (q; q)n(q�N ; q)n (cq�N )n�mn; (3.17.2)where Kn(�(x)) := Kn(�(x); c;N jq):Recurrence relation.� (1� q�x)(1� cqx�N )Kn(�(x)) = (1� qn�N )Kn+1(�(x)) +� �(1� qn�N ) + cq�N (1� qn)�Kn(�(x)) + cq�N (1� qn)Kn�1(�(x)); (3.17.3)where Kn(�(x)) := Kn(�(x); c;N jq):q-Di�erence equation.q�n(1� qn)y(x) = B(x)y(x + 1)� [B(x) +D(x)] y(x) +D(x)y(x � 1); (3.17.4)79

where y(x) = Kn(�(x); c;N jq)and 8>>>><>>>>: B(x) = (1� qx�N )(1� cqx�N )(1� cq2x�N )(1� cq2x�N+1)D(x) = cq2x�2N�1 (1� qx)(1� cqx)(1� cq2x�N�1)(1� cq2x�N) :Generating functions.(q�N t; cq�Nt; q)1(q�xt; cqx�N t; q)1 ' NXn=0 (q�N ; q)n(q; q)n Kn(�(x); c;N jq)tn: (3.17.5)1(q�xt; q)1 2 ~�1� q�x; c�1q�xq�N ���� q; cqx�N t� ' NXn=0 Kn(�(x); c;N jq)(q; q)n tn: (3.17.6)Remark. The dual q-Krawtchouk polynomials de�ned by (3.17.1) and the q-Krawtchoukpolynomials given by (3.15.1) are related in the following way :Kn(q�x; p;N ; q) = Kx(�(n);�pqN ; N jq)with �(n) = q�n � pqnor Kn(�(x); c;N jq) = Kx(q�n;�cq�N ; N ; q)with �(x) = q�x + cqx�N :For x = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; N the generating function (3.17.5) can also be written as :(q�N t; q)N�x � (cq�N t; q)x = NXn=0 (q�N ; q)n(q; q)n Kn(�(x); c;N jq)tn:References. [160], [163].3.18 Continuous big q-HermiteDe�nition. Hn(x; ajq) = a�n3�2� q�n; aei�; ae�i�0; 0 ���� q; q� (3.18.1)= ein�2�0� q�n; aei�� ���� q; qne�2i�� ; x = cos �:Orthogonality. When a is real and jaj < 1, then we have the following orthogonality relation12� 1Z�1 w(x)p1� x2Hm(x; ajq)Hn(x; ajq)dx = �mn(qn+1; q)1 ; (3.18.2)where w(x) := w(x; ajq) = ���� (e2i�; q)1(aei�; q)1 ����2 = h(x; 1)h(x;�1)h(x; q 12 )h(x;�q 12 )h(x; a) ;80

with h(x; �) := 1Yk=0 �1� 2�xqk + �2q2k� = ��ei�; �e�i�; q�1 ; x = cos �:If a > 1, then we have another orthogonality relation given by :12� 1Z�1 w(x)p1� x2Hm(x; ajq)Hn(x; ajq)dx++ Xk1<aqk�a wkHm(xk; ajq)Hn(xk; ajq) = �mn(qn+1; q)1 ; (3.18.3)where w(x) is as before, xk = aqk + �aqk��12and wk = (a�2; q)1(q; q)1 (1� a2q2k)(a2; q)k(1� a2)(q; q)k q� 32k2� 12k�� 1a4�k :Recurrence relation.2xHn(x; ajq) = Hn+1(x; ajq) + aqnHn(x; ajq) + (1� qn)Hn�1(x; ajq): (3.18.4)q-Di�erence equations.(1� q)2Dq h ~w(x; aq 12 jq)Dqy(x)i+ 4q�n+1(1� qn) ~w(x; ajq)y(x) = 0; y(x) = Hn(x; ajq); (3.18.5)where ~w(x; ajq) := w(x; ajq)p1� x2and Dqf(x) := �qf(x)�qx with �qf(ei�) = f(q 12 ei�)� f(q� 12 ei�); x = cos �:If we de�ne Pn(z) := a�n3�2� q�n; az; az�10; 0 ���� q; q�then the q-di�erence equation can also be written in the formq�n(1� qn)Pn(z) = A(z)Pn(qz)� �A(z) + A(z�1)�Pn(z) +A(z�1)Pn(q�1z); (3.18.6)where A(z) = (1� az)(1� z2)(1 � qz2) :Generating function. (at; q)1(ei�t; e�i�t; q)1 = 1Xn=0 Hn(x; ajq)(q; q)n tn; x = cos �: (3.18.7)References. 81

3.19 Continuous q-LaguerreDe�nitions. We have two kinds of continuous q-Laguerre polynomials coming from the con-tinuous q-Jacobi polynomials de�ned by (3.10.1) and (3.10.2) :P (�)n (xjq) = (q�+1; q)n(q; q)n 3�2 q�n; q 12�+ 14 ei�; q 12�+ 14 e�i�q�+1; 0 ����� q; q! (3.19.1)= (q 12�+ 34 e�i�; q)n(q; q)n q( 12�+ 14 )nein�2�1 q�n; q 12�+ 14 ei�q� 12�+ 14�nei� ����� q; q�12�+ 14 e�i�! ; x = cos �and P (�)n (x; q) = (q�+1; q)n(q; q)n 3�2 q�n; q 12 ei�; q 12 e�i�q�+1;�q ����� q; q! ; x = cos �: (3.19.2)These two q-analogues of the Laguerre polynomials are connected by the following quadratictransformation : P (�)n (xjq2) = qn�P (�)n (x; q):Orthogonality. For � � �12 the orthogonality relations are respectively12� 1Z�1 w(xjq)p1� x2P (�)m (xjq)P (�)n (xjq)dx = 1(q; q�+1; q)1 (q�+1; q)n(q; q)n q(�+ 12 )n�mn; (3.19.3)where w(xjq) := w(x; q�jq) = ���� (e2i�; q)1(q 12�+ 14 ei�; q 12�+ 34 ei�; q)1 ����2 = ����� (ei�;�ei�; q 12 )1(q 12�+ 14 ei�; q 12 )1 �����2= h(x; 1)h(x;�1)h(x; q 12 )h(x;�q 12 )h(x; q 12�+ 14 )h(x; q 12�+ 34 ) ;with h(x; �) := 1Yk=0 �1� 2�xqk + �2q2k� = ��ei�; �e�i�; q�1 ; x = cos �and 12� 1Z�1 w(x; q)p1� x2P (�)m (x; q)P (�)n (x; q)dx= 1(q;�q; q�+1;�q�+1; q)1 (q�+1;�q�+1; q)n(q;�q; q)n qn�mn; (3.19.4)wherew(x; q) := w(x; q�; q) = ���� (e2i�; q)1(q�+ 12 ei�; q 12 ei�;�q 12 ei�; q)1 ����2 = ����(ei�;�ei�; q)1(q�+ 12 ei�; q)1 ����2 = h(x; 1)h(x;�1)h(x; q�+12 ) ;with h(x; �) := 1Yk=0 �1� 2�xqk + �2q2k� = ��ei�; �e�i�; q�1 ; x = cos �:82

Recurrence relations.2xP (�)n (xjq) = q�12��14 (1� qn+1)P (�)n+1(xjq) ++ qn+ 12�+ 14 (1 + q 12 )P (�)n (xjq) + q 12�+ 14 (1� qn+�)P (�)n�1(xjq): (3.19.5)2xP (�)n (x; q) = q� 12 (1� q2n+2)P (�)n+1(x; q) ++ q2n+�+ 12 (1 + q)P (�)n (x; q) + q 12 (1� q2n+2�)P (�)n�1(x; q): (3.19.6)q-Di�erence equations.(1�q)2Dq h ~w(x; q�+ 12 jq)Dqy(x)i+4q�n+1(1�qn) ~w(x; q�jq)y(x) = 0; y(x) = P (�)n (xjq); (3.19.7)where ~w(x; q�jq) := w(x; q�jq)p1� x2and Dqf(x) := �qf(x)�qx with �qf(ei�) = f(q 12 ei�)� f(q� 12 ei�); x = cos �:(1�q)2Dq h ~w(x; q�+ 12 ; q)Dqy(x)i+4q�n+1(1�qn) ~w(x; q�; q)y(x) = 0; y(x) = P (�)n (x; q); (3.19.8)where ~w(x; q�; q) := w(x; q�; q)p1� x2and Dqf(x) := �qf(x)�qx with �qf(ei�) = f(q 12 ei�)� f(q� 12 ei�); x = cos �:Generating functions.(q�+ 12 t; q�+1t; q)1(q 12�+ 14 ei�t; q 12�+ 14 e�i�t; q)1 = 1Xn=0P (�)n (xjq)tn; x = cos �: (3.19.9)1(ei�t; q)1 2�1 q 12�+ 14 ei�; q 12�+ 34 ei�q�+1 ����� q; e�i�t! = 1Xn=0 P (�)n (xjq)tn(q�+1; q)nq( 12�+ 14 )n ; x = cos �: (3.19.10)(q�+1t; q)1(q 12 ei�t; q)1 2�1 q 12 ei�;�q 12 ei��q ����� q; q 12 e�i�t! = 1Xn=0P (�)n (x; q)tn; x = cos �: (3.19.11)(�q 12 t; q)1(ei�t; q)1 2�1 q 12 ei�; q�+12 ei�q�+1 ����� q; e�i�t! = 1Xn=0 (�q; q)n(q�+1; q)n P (�)n (x; q)q 12n tn; x = cos �: (3.19.12)(q 12 t; q)1(e�i�t; q)1 2�1 �q 12 e�i�; q�+ 12 e�i��q�+1 ����� q; ei�t!= 1Xn=0 (�q; q)n(�q�+1; q)n P (�)n (x; q)q 12n tn; x = cos �: (3.19.13)References. [45]. 83

3.20 Little q-Laguerre / WallDe�nition. pn(x; ajq) = 2�1� q�n; 0aq ���� q; qx� (3.20.1)= 1(a�1q�n; q)n 2�0� q�n; x�1� ���� q; xa� :Orthogonality.1Xk=0 (aq)k(q; q)k pm(qk; ajq)pn(qk; ajq) = (aq)n(aq; q)1 (q; q)n(aq; q)n �mn; 0 < aq < 1: (3.20.2)Recurrence relation.� xpn(x; ajq) = Anpn+1(x; ajq)� (An +Cn) pn(x; ajq) + Cnpn�1(x; ajq); (3.20.3)where 8<: An = qn(1� aqn+1)Cn = aqn(1� qn):q-Di�erence equation.� q�n(1� qn)xy(x) = ay(qx) + (x� a� 1)y(x) + (1� x)y(q�1x); y(x) = pn(x; ajq): (3.20.4)Generating function.(t; q)1 � 2�1� 0; 0aq ���� q;xt� = 1Xn=0 (�1)nq(n2)(q; q)n pn(x; ajq)tn: (3.20.5)Remark. If we set a = q� and change q to q�1 we �nd the q-Laguerre polynomials de�nedby (3.21.1) in the following way :pn(x; q��jq�1) = (q; q)n(q�+1; q)nL(�)n (�x; q):References. [10], [21], [75], [77], [78], [114], [160], [161], [180], [221], [224].3.21 q-LaguerreDe�nition. L(�)n (x; q) = (q�+1; q)n(q; q)n 1�1� q�nq�+1 ���� q;�xqn+�+1� (3.21.1)= 1(q; q)n 2�1� q�n;�x0 ���� q; qn+�+1� :Orthogonality. The q-Laguerre polynomials satisfy two kinds of orthogonality relations,an absolutely continuous one and a discrete one. These orthogonality relations are given by,respectively :1Z0 x�(�x; q)1L(�)m (x; q)L(�)n (x; q)dx = (q��; q)1(q; q)1 (q�+1; q)n(q; q)nqn �(��)�(�+ 1)�mn; � > �1 (3.21.2)84

and 1Xk=�1 qk�+k(�cqk; q)1L(�)m (cqk; q)L(�)n (cqk; q)= (q;�cq�+1;�c�1q��; q)1(q�+1;�c;�c�1q; q)1 (q�+1; q)n(q; q)nqn �mn; � > �1; c > 0: (3.21.3)Recurrence relation.�q2n+�+1xL(�)n (x; q) = (1� qn+1)L(�)n+1(x; q) +� �(1 � qn+1) + q(1� qn+�)�L(�)n (x; q) + q(1 � qn+�)L(�)n�1(x; q): (3.21.4)q-Di�erence equation.� q�(1� qn)xy(x) = q�(1 + x)y(qx) � [1 + q�(1 + x)] y(x) + y(q�1x); (3.21.5)where y(x) = L(�)n (x; q):Generating functions.(�xt; q)1(t; q)1 2�1� 0; 0q�+1 ���� q;�xt� = 1Xn=0 L(�)n (x; q)(q�+1; q)n tn: (3.21.6)1(t; q)1 1�1� �x0 ���� q; q�+1t� = 1Xn=0L(�)n (x; q)tn: (3.21.7)Remarks. The q-Laguerre polynomials are sometimes called the generalized Stieltjes-Wigertpolynomials.If we change q to q�1 we obtain the little q-Laguerre (or Wall) polynomials given by (3.20.1)in the following way : L(�)n (x; q�1) = (q�+1; q)n(q; q)nqn� pn(�x; q�jq):The q-Laguerre polynomials de�ned by (3.21.1) and the alternative q-Charlier polynomialsgiven by (3.22.1) are related in the following way :Kn(qx; a; q)(q; q)n = L(x�n)n (aqn; q):The q-Laguerre polynomials de�ned by (3.21.1) and the q-Charlier polynomials given by(3.23.1) are related in the following way :Cn(�x;�q��; q)(q; q)n = L(�)n (x; q):Since the Stieltjes and Hamburger moment problems corresponding to the q-Laguerre polyno-mials are indeterminate there exist many di�erent weight functions.References. [8], [10], [30], [31], [45], [75], [77], [78], [96], [114], [177].3.22 Alternative q-Charlier85

De�nition. Kn(x; a; q) = 2�1� q�n;�aqn0 ���� q; qx� (3.22.1)= (xq1�n; q)n � 1�1� q�nxq1�n ���� q;�axqn+1�= (�axqn)n � 2�1� q�n; x�10 ���� q;�q1�na � :Orthogonality.1Xk=0 ak(q; q)k q(k+12 )Km(qk; a; q)Kn(qk; a; q) = (q; q)n(�aqn; q)1 anq(n+12 )(1 + aq2n)�mn; a > 0: (3.22.2)Recurrence relation.� xKn(x; a; q) = AnKn+1(x; a; q)� (An + Cn)Kn(x; a; q) + CnKn�1(x; a; q); (3.22.3)where 8>>>><>>>>: An = qn (1 + aqn)(1 + aq2n)(1 + aq2n+1)Cn = aq2n�1 (1� qn)(1 + aq2n�1)(1 + aq2n) :q-Di�erence equation.� q�n(1� qn)(1 + aqn)xy(x) = axy(qx) � (ax+ 1� x)y(x) + (1� x)y(q�1x); (3.22.4)where y(x) = Kn(x; a; q):Generating functions.2�0� x�1; 0� ���� q;xt� 0�1��0 ���� q;�aqxt� � 1Xn=0 Kn(x; a; q)(q; q)n tn: (3.22.5)(t; q)1(xt; q)1 1�3� xt0; 0; t���� q;�aqxt� = 1Xn=0 (�1)nq(n2)(q; q)n Kn(x; a; q)tn: (3.22.6)Remarks. The alternative q-Charlier polynomials de�ned by (3.22.1) and the q-Laguerrepolynomials given by (3.21.1) related in the following way :Kn(qx; a; q)(q; q)n = L(x�n)n (aqn; q):The generating function (3.22.5) must be seen as an equality in terms of formal power series.For x = 0; 1; 2; : : : ; N this generating function can also be written as :2�0� q�x; 0� ���� q; qxt� 0�1� �0 ���� q;�aqx+1t� = 1Xn=0 Kn(qx; a; q)(q; q)n tn:References. 86

3.23 q-CharlierDe�nition. Cn(q�x; a; q) = 2�1� q�n; q�x0 ���� q;�qn+1a � (3.23.1)= (�a�1q; q)n � 1�1� q�n�a�1q ���� q;�qn+1�xa � :Orthogonality.1Xx=0 ax(q; q)x q(x2)Cm(q�x; a; q)Cn(q�x; a; q) = q�n(�a; q)1(�a�1q; q; q)n�mn; a > 0: (3.23.2)Recurrence relation.q2n+1(1 � q�x)Cn(q�x) = aCn+1(q�x) +� [a+ q(1� qn)(a+ qn)]Cn(q�x) + q(1� qn)(a + qn)Cn�1(q�x); (3.23.3)where Cn(q�x) := Cn(q�x; a; q):q-Di�erence equation.qny(x) = aqxy(x + 1)� qx(a � 1)y(x) + (1� qx)y(x � 1); y(x) = Cn(q�x; a; q): (3.23.4)Generating functions.1(t; q)1 1�1� q�x0 ���� q;�a�1qt� = 1Xn=0 Cn(q�x; a; q)(q; q)n tn: (3.23.5)(q�xt; q)1(t; q)1 2�1� 0; 0�a�1q ���� q; q�xt� = 1Xn=0 Cn(q�x; a; q)(�a�1q; q; q)n tn: (3.23.6)Remark. The q-Charlier polynomials de�ned by (3.23.1) and the q-Laguerre polynomialsgiven by (3.21.1) are related in the following way :Cn(�x;�q��; q)(q; q)n = L(�)n (x; q):References. [114], [121], [180].3.24 Al-Salam-Carlitz IDe�nition. U (a)n (x; q) = (�a)nq(n2)2�1� q�n; x�10 ���� q; qxa � : (3.24.1)Orthogonality. Z 1a (qx; a�1qx; q)1U (a)m (x; q)U (a)n (x; q)dqx= (�a)n(1� q)(q; q)n(q; a; a�1q; q)1q(n2)�mn; a < 0: (3.24.2)87

Recurrence relation.xU (a)n (x; q) = U (a)n+1(x; q) + (a+ 1)qnU (a)n (x; q)� aqn�1(1� qn)U (a)n�1(x; q): (3.24.3)q-Di�erence equation.(1� qn)x2y(x) = aqn�1y(qx) � �aqn�1 + qn(1� x)(a� x)� y(x) ++ qn(1� x)(a� x)y(q�1x); y(x) = U (a)n (x; q): (3.24.4)Generating function. (t; q)1(at; q)1(xt; q)1 = 1Xn=0 U (a)n (x; q)(q; q)n tn: (3.24.5)Remark. The Al-Salam-Carlitz I polynomials are related to the Al-Salam-Carlitz II polyno-mials de�ned by (3.25.1) in the following way :U (a)n (x; q�1) = V (a)n (x; q):References. [10], [13], [15], [75], [77], [84], [114], [125], [135].3.25 Al-Salam-Carlitz IIDe�nition. V (a)n (x; q) = (�a)nq�(n2)2�0� q�n; x� ���� q; qna � : (3.25.1)Orthogonality.1Xk=0 qk2ak(q; q)k(aq; q)kV (a)m (q�k; q)V (a)n (q�k; q) = (q; q)nan(aq; q)1qn2 �mn; a > 0: (3.25.2)Recurrence relation.xV (a)n (x; q) = V (a)n+1(x; q) + (a+ 1)q�nV (a)n (x; q) + aq�2n+1(1� qn)V (a)n�1(x; q): (3.25.3)q-Di�erence equation.�(1� qn)x2y(x) = (1� x)(a � x)y(qx) � [(1� x)(a� x) + aq]y(x) ++ aqy(q�1x); y(x) = V (a)n (x; q): (3.25.4)Generating functions. (xt; q)1(t; q)1(at; q)1 = 1Xn=0 (�1)nq(n2)(q; q)n V (a)n (x; q)tn: (3.25.5)(at; q)1 � 1�1 � xat ��� q; t� = 1Xn=0 q2(n2)(q; q)nV (a)n (x; q)tn: (3.25.6)Remark. The Al-Salam-Carlitz II polynomials are related to the Al-Salam-Carlitz I polyno-mials de�ned by (3.24.1) in the following way :V (a)n (x; q�1) = U (a)n (x; q):References. [10], [13], [15], [74], [75], [77], [84], [125].88

3.26 Continuous q-HermiteDe�nition. Hn(xjq) = ein�2�0� q�n; 0� ���� q; qne�2i�� ; x = cos �: (3.26.1)Orthogonality. 12� 1Z�1 w(x)p1� x2Hm(xjq)Hn(xjq)dx = �mn(qn+1; q)1 ; (3.26.2)where w(x) = ���e2i�; q�1��2 = h(x; 1)h(x;�1)h(x; q 12 )h(x;�q 12 );with h(x; �) := 1Yk=0 �1� 2�xqk + �2q2k� = ��ei�; �e�i�; q�1 ; x = cos �:Recurrence relation.2xHn(xjq) = Hn+1(xjq) + (1� qn)Hn�1(xjq): (3.26.3)q-Di�erence equation.(1 � q)2Dq [ ~w(x)Dqy(x)] + 4q�n+1(1� qn) ~w(x)y(x) = 0; y(x) = Hn(xjq); (3.26.4)where ~w(x) := w(x)p1� x2and Dqf(x) := �qf(x)�qx with �qf(ei�) = f(q 12 ei�)� f(q� 12 ei�); x = cos �:Generating functions. 1j(ei�t; q)1j2 = 1Xn=0 Hn(xjq)(q; q)n tn; x = cos �: (3.26.5)(ei�t; q)1 � 1�1� 0ei�t ���� q; e�i�t� = 1Xn=0 (�1)nq(n2)(q; q)n Hn(xjq)tn; x = cos �: (3.26.6)Remark. The continuous q-Hermite polynomials can also be written as :Hn(xjq) = nXk=0 (q; q)n(q; q)k(q; q)n�k ei(n�2k)�; x = cos �:References. [6], [10], [20], [25], [31], [32], [37], [38], [45], [59], [62], [110], [114], [128], [137],[138], [180], [207], [208], [209]. 89

3.27 Stieltjes-WigertDe�nition. Sn(x; q) = 1(q; q)n 1�1� q�n0 ���� q;�xqn+1� : (3.27.1)Orthogonality. 1Z0 Sm(x; q)Sn(x; q)(�x; q)1(�qx�1; q)1 dx = � ln qqn (q; q)1(q; q)n �mn: (3.27.2)Recurrence relation.� q2n+1xSn(x; q) = (1� qn+1)Sn+1(x; q)� [1 + q � qn+1]Sn(x; q) + qSn�1(x; q): (3.27.3)q-Di�erence equation.� x(1� qn)y(x) = xy(qx) � (x+ 1)y(x) + y(q�1x); y(x) = Sn(x; q): (3.27.4)Generating functions. 1(t; q)1 0�1��0 ���� q;�qxt� = 1Xn=0Sn(x; q)tn: (3.27.5)(t; q)1 � 0�2� �0; t ���� q;�qxt� = 1Xn=0(�1)nq(n2)Sn(x; q)tn: (3.27.6)Remark. Since the Stieltjes and Hamburger moment problems corresponding to the Stieltjes-Wigert polynomials are indeterminate there exist many di�erent weight functions. For instance,they are also orthogonal with respect to the weight functionw(x) = p� exp �� 2 ln2 x� ; x > 0; with 2 = � 12 ln q :References. [30], [31], [76], [77], [84], [180], [219], [220], [226].3.28 Discrete q-Hermite IDe�nition. The discrete q-Hermite I polynomials are Al-Salam-Carlitz I polynomials witha = �1 : hn(x; q) = U (�1)n (x; q) = q(n2)2�1� q�n; x�10 ���� q;�qx� (3.28.1)= xn2�0� q�n; q�n+1� ���� q2; q2n�1x2 � :Orthogonality.Z 1�1(qx;�qx; q)1hm(x; q)hn(x; q)dqx = (1� q)(q; q)n(q;�1;�q; q)1q(n2)�mn: (3.28.2)Recurrence relation.xhn(x; q) = hn+1(x; q) + qn�1(1� qn)hn�1(x; q): (3.28.3)90

q-Di�erence equation.� q�n+1x2y(x) = y(qx) � (1 + q)y(x) + q(1� x2)y(q�1x); y(x) = hn(x; q): (3.28.4)Generating function. (t; q)1(�t; q)1(xt; q)1 = 1Xn=0 hn(x; q)(q; q)n tn: (3.28.5)Remark. The discrete q-Hermite I polynomials are related to the discrete q-Hermite II poly-nomials de�ned by (3.29.1) in the following way :hn(ix; q�1) = in~hn(x; q):References. [10], [13], [62], [114], [121].3.29 Discrete q-Hermite IIDe�nition. The discrete q-Hermite II polynomials are Al-Salam-Carlitz II polynomials witha = �1 : ~hn(x; q) = i�nV (�1)n (ix; q) = i�nq�(n2)2�0� q�n; ix� ���� q;�qn� (3.29.1)= xn2�1� q�n; q�n+10 ���� q2;� q2x2� :Orthogonality. 1Xk=�1 h~hm(cqk; q)~hn(cqk; q) + ~hm(�cqk; q)~hn(�cqk; q)iw(cqk)qk= 2(q2;�c2q;�c�2q; q2)1(q;�c2;�c�2q2; q2)1 (q; q)nqn2 �mn; c > 0; (3.29.2)where w(x) = 1(ix; q)1(�ix; q)1 = 1(�x2; q2)1 :Recurrence relation.x~hn(x; q) = ~hn+1(x; q) + q�2n+1(1� qn)~hn�1(x; q): (3.29.3)q-Di�erence equation.� (1� qn)x2~hn(x; q) = (1 + x2)~hn(qx; q)� (1 + x2 + q)~hn(x; q) + q~hn(q�1x; q): (3.29.4)Generating functions. (�xt; q)1(�t2; q2)1 = 1Xn=0 q(n2)(q; q)n ~hn(x; q)tn: (3.29.5)(�it; q)1 � 1�1� ix�it ���� q; it� = 1Xn=0 (�1)nq2(n2)(q; q)n ~hn(x; q)tn: (3.29.6)Remark. The discrete q-Hermite II polynomials are related to the discrete q-Hermite I poly-nomials de�ned by (3.28.1) in the following way :~hn(x; q�1) = i�nhn(ix; q):References. 91

Chapter 4Limit relations between basichypergeometric orthogonalpolynomials4.1 Askey-Wilson ! Continuous dual q-HahnThe continuous dual q-Hahn polynomials de�ned by (3.3.1) simply follow from the Askey-Wilsonpolynomials given by (3.1.1) by setting d = 0 in (3.1.1) :pn(x; a; b; c; 0jq) = pn(x; a; b; cjq):4.2 Askey-Wilson ! Continuous q-HahnThe continuous q-Hahn polynomials de�ned by (3.4.1) can be obtained from the Askey-Wilsonpolynomials given by (3.1.1) by the substitutions � ! � + �, a ! aei�, b ! bei�, c ! ce�i� andd! de�i� : pn(cos(� + �); aei�; bei�; ce�i�; de�i�jq) = pn(cos(� + �); a; b; c; d; q):4.3 Askey-Wilson ! Big q-JacobiThe big q-Jacobi polynomials de�ned by (3.5.1) can be obtained from the Askey-Wilson polyno-mials by setting x! 12a�1x, b = a�1�q, c = a�1 q and d = a� �1 in~pn(x; a; b; c; djq) = anpn(x; a; b; c; djq)(ab; ac; ad; q)nde�ned by (3.1.1) and then taking the limit a! 0 :lima!0 ~pn� x2a ; a; �qa ; qa ; a� ���� q� = Pn(x;�; �; ; q):4.4 Askey-Wilson ! Continuous q-JacobiIf we take a = q 12�+ 14 , b = q 12�+ 34 , c = �q 12�+ 14 and d = �q 12�+ 34 in the de�nition (3.1.1)of the Askey-Wilson polynomials and change the normalization we �nd the continuous q-Jacobi92

polynomials given by (3.10.1) :q( 12�+ 14 )npn �x; q 12�+ 14 ; q 12�+ 34 ;�q 12�+ 14 ;�q 12�+ 34 ��� q�(q;�q 12 (�+�+1);�q 12 (�+�+2); q)n = P (�;�)n (xjq):In [196] M. Rahman takes a = q 12 , b = q�+ 12 , c = �q�+ 12 and d = �q 12 to obtain after a change ofnormalization the continuous q-Jacobi polynomials de�ned by (3.10.2) :q 12npn �x; q 12 ; q�+12 ;�q�+ 12 ;�q 12 ��� q�(q;�q;�q; q)n = P (�;�)n (x; q):As was pointed out in section 0.6 these two q-analogues of the Jacobi polynomials are not reallydi�erent, since they are connected by the quadratic transformationP (�;�)n (xjq2) = (�q; q)n(�q�+�+1; q)n qn�P (�;�)n (x; q):4.5 Askey-Wilson! Continuous q-ultraspherical / RogersIf we set a = � 12 , b = � 12 q 12 , c = �� 12 and d = �� 12 q 12 in the de�nition (3.1.1) of the Askey-Wilsonpolynomials and change the normalization we obtain the continuous q-ultraspherical (or Rogers)polynomials de�ned by (3.10.15). In fact we have :(�2; q)npn �x; � 12 ; � 12 q 12 ;�� 12 ;�� 12 q 12 ��� q�(�q 12 ;��;��q 12 ; q; q)n = Cn(x; �jq):4.6 q-Racah ! Big q-JacobiThe big q-Jacobi polynomials de�ned by (3.5.1) can be obtained from the q-Racah polynomialsby setting � = 0 in the de�nition (3.2.1) :Rn(�(x); a; b; c; 0jq) = Pn(q�x; a; b; c; q):4.7 q-Racah ! q-HahnThe q-Hahn polynomials follow from the q-Racah polynomials by the substitution � = 0 and q = q�N in the de�nition (3.2.1) of the q-Racah polynomials :Rn(�(x);�; �; q�N�1; 0jq) = Qn(q�x;�; �;N jq):Another way to obtain the q-Hahn polynomials from the q-Racah polynomials is by setting = 0and � = ��1q�N�1 in the de�nition (3.2.1) :Rn(�(x);�; �; 0; ��1q�N�1jq) = Qn(q�x;�; �;N jq):And if we take �q = q�N , � ! � qN+1 and � = 0 in the de�nition (3.2.1) of the q-Racahpolynomials we �nd the q-Hahn polynomials given by (3.6.1) in the following way :Rn(�(x); q�N�1; � qN+1; ; 0jq) = Qn(q�x; ; �;N jq):Note that �(x) = q�x in each case. 93

4.8 q-Racah ! Dual q-HahnTo obtain the dual q-Hahn polynomials from the q-Racah polynomials we have to take � = 0 and�q = q�N in (3.2.1) : Rn(�(x); q�N�1; 0; ; �jq) = Rn(�(x); ; �;N jq);with �(x) = q�x + �qx+1:We may also take � = 0 and � = ��1q�N�1 in (3.2.1) to obtain the dual q-Hahn polynomialsfrom the q-Racah polynomials :Rn(�(x); 0; ��1q�N�1; ; �jq) = Rn(�(x); ; �;N jq);with �(x) = q�x + �qx+1:And if we take q = q�N , � ! ��qN+1 and � = 0 in the de�nition (3.2.1) of the q-Racahpolynomials we �nd the dual q-Hahn polynomials given by (3.7.1) in the following way :Rn(�(x);�; 0; q�N�1; ��qN+1jq) = Rn(�(x);�; �;N jq);with �(x) = q�x + ��qx+1:4.9 q-Racah ! q-KrawtchoukThe q-Krawtchouk polynomials de�ned by (3.15.1) can be obtained from the q-Racah polyno-mials by setting �q = q�N , � = �pqN and = � = 0 in the de�nition (3.2.1) of the q-Racahpolynomials : Rn(q�x; q�N�1;�pqN ; 0; 0jq) = Kn(q�x; p;N ; q):Note that �(x) = q�x in this case.4.10 q-Racah ! Dual q-KrawtchoukThe dual q-Krawtchouk polynomials de�ned by (3.17.1) easily follow from the q-Racah polynomialsgiven by (3.2.1) by using the substitutions � = � = 0, q = q�N and � = c :Rn(�(x); 0; 0; q�N�1; cjq) = Kn(�(x); c;N jq):Note that �(x) = �(x) = q�x + cqx�N :4.11 Continuous dual q-Hahn ! Al-Salam-ChiharaThe Al-Salam-Chihara polynomials de�ned by (3.8.1) simply follow from the continuous dualq-Hahn polynomials by taking c = 0 in the de�nition (3.3.1) of the continuous dual q-Hahnpolynomials : pn(x; a; b; 0jq) = Qn(x; a; bjq):94

4.12 Continuous q-Hahn ! q-Meixner-PollaczekThe q-Meixner-Pollaczek polynomials de�ned by (3.9.1) simply follow from the continuous q-Hahnpolynomials if we set d = a and b = c = 0 in the de�nition (3.4.1) of the continuous q-Hahnpolynomials : pn(cos(� + �); a; 0; 0; a; q)(q; q)n = Pn(cos(� + �); ajq):4.13 Big q-Jacobi ! Big q-LaguerreIf we set b = 0 in the de�nition (3.5.1) of the big q-Jacobi polynomials we obtain the big q-Laguerrepolynomials given by (3.11.1) : Pn(x; a; 0; c; q) = Pn(x; a; c; q):4.14 Big q-Jacobi ! Little q-JacobiThe little q-Jacobi polynomials de�ned by (3.12.1) can be obtained from the big q-Jacobi polyno-mials by the substitution x! cqx in the de�nition (3.5.1) and then by the limit c!1 :limc!1Pn(cqx; a; b; c; q) = pn(x; a; bjq):4.15 Big q-Jacobi ! q-MeixnerIf we take the limit a ! 1 in the de�nition (3.5.1) of the big q-Jacobi polynomials we simplyobtain the q-Meixner polynomials de�ned by (3.13.1) :lima!1Pn(q�x; a; b; c; q) = Mn(q�x; c;�b�1; q):4.16 q-Hahn ! Little q-JacobiIf we set x! N �x in the de�nition (3.6.1) of the q-Hahn polynomials and take the limit N !1we �nd the little q-Jacobi polynomials :limN!1Qn(qx�N ;�; �;N jq) = pn(qx;�; �jq);where pn(qx;�; �jq) is de�ned by (3.12.1).4.17 q-Hahn ! q-MeixnerThe q-Meixner polynomials de�ned by (3.13.1) can be obtained from the q-Hahn polynomials bysetting � = b and � = �b�1c�1q�N�1 in the de�nition (3.6.1) of the q-Hahn polynomials andletting N !1 : limN!1Qn �q�x; b;�b�1c�1q�N�1; N jq� =Mn(q�x; b; c; q):4.18 q-Hahn ! Quantum q-KrawtchoukThe quantum q-Krawtchouk polynomials de�ned by (3.14.1) simply follow from the q-Hahn poly-nomials by setting � = p in the de�nition (3.6.1) of the q-Hahn polynomials and taking the limit�!1 : lim�!1Qn(q�x;�; p;N jq) = Kqtmn (q�x; p;N ; q):95

4.19 q-Hahn ! q-KrawtchoukIf we set � = ���1q�1p in the de�nition (3.6.1) of the q-Hahn polynomials and then let � ! 0we obtain the q-Krawtchouk polynomials de�ned by (3.15.1) :lim�!0Qn�q�x;�;� p�q;N ���� q� = Kn(q�x; p;N ; q):4.20 q-Hahn ! A�ne q-KrawtchoukThe a�ne q-Krawtchouk polynomials de�ned by (3.16.1) can be obtained from the q-Hahn poly-nomials by the substitution � = p and � = 0 in (3.6.1) :Qn(q�x; p; 0; N jq) = KAffn (q�x; p;N ; q):4.21 Dual q-Hahn ! A�ne q-KrawtchoukThe a�ne q-Krawtchouk polynomials de�ned by (3.16.1) can be obtained from the dual q-Hahnpolynomials by the substitution = p and � = 0 in (3.7.1) :Rn(�(x); p; 0; N jq) = KAffn (q�x; p;N ; q):Note that �(x) = q�x in this case.4.22 Dual q-Hahn ! Dual q-KrawtchoukThe dual q-Krawtchouk polynomials de�ned by (3.17.1) can be obtained from the dual q-Hahnpolynomials by setting � = c �1q�N�1 in (3.7.1) and then letting ! 0 :lim !0Rn��(x); ; c q�N�1���� q� = Kn(�(x); c;N jq):4.23 Al-Salam-Chihara ! Continuous big q-HermiteIf we take the limit b! 0 in the de�nition (3.8.1) of the Al-Salam-Chihara polynomials we simplyobtain the continuous big q-Hermite polynomials given by (3.18.1) :limb!0Qn(x; a; bjq) = Hn(x; ajq):4.24 Al-Salam-Chihara ! Continuous q-LaguerreThe continuous q-Laguerre polynomials de�ned by (3.19.1) can be obtained from the Al-Salam-Chihara polynomials given by (3.8.1) by taking a = q 12�+ 14 and b = q 12�+ 34 :Qn �x; q 12�+ 14 ; q 12�+ 34 ��� q� = (q; q)nq( 12�+ 14 )nP (�)n (xjq):4.25 q-Meixner-Pollaczek! Continuous q-ultraspherical /RogersIf we take � = 0 and a = � in the de�nition (3.9.1) of the q-Meixner-Pollaczek polynomials weobtain the continuous q-ultraspherical (or Rogers) polynomials given by (3.10.15) :Pn(cos �; �jq) = Cn(cos �; �jq):96

4.26 Continuous q-Jacobi ! Continuous q-LaguerreThe continuous q-Laguerre polynomials given by (3.19.1) and (3.19.2) follow simply from thecontinuous q-Jacobi polynomials de�ned by (3.10.1) and (3.10.2) respectively by taking the limit� !1 : lim�!1P (�;�)n (xjq) = P (�)n (xjq)and lim�!1P (�;�)n (x; q) = P (�)n (x; q)(�q; q)n :4.27 Continuous q-ultraspherical / Rogers ! Continuousq-HermiteThe continuous q-Hermite polynomials de�ned by (3.26.1) can be obtained from the continuousq-ultraspherical (or Rogers) polynomials given by (3.10.15) by taking the limit � ! 0. In fact wehave lim�!0Cn(x; �jq) = Hn(xjq)(q; q)n :4.28 Big q-Laguerre ! Little q-Laguerre / WallThe little q-Laguerre (or Wall) polynomials de�ned by (3.20.1) can be obtained from the bigq-Laguerre polynomials by taking x! bqx in (3.11.1) and then letting b!1 :limb!1Pn(bqx; a; b; q) = pn(x; ajq):4.29 Big q-Laguerre ! Al-Salam-Carlitz IIf we set x! aqx and b! ab in the de�nition (3.11.1) of the big q-Laguerre polynomials and takethe limit a! 0 we obtain the Al-Salam-Carlitz I polynomials given by (3.24.1) :lima!0 Pn(aqx; a; ab; q)an = U (b)n (x; q):4.30 Little q-Jacobi ! Little q-Laguerre / WallThe little q-Laguerre (or Wall) polynomials de�ned by (3.20.1) are little q-Jacobi polynomials withb = 0. So if we set b = 0 in the de�nition (3.12.1) of the little q-Jacobi polynomials we obtain thelittle q-Laguerre (or Wall) polynomials :pn(x; a; 0jq) = pn(x; ajq):4.31 Little q-Jacobi ! q-LaguerreIf we substitute a = q� and x!�b�1q�1x in the de�nition (3.12.1) of the little q-Jacobi polyno-mials and then let b tend to in�nity we �nd the q-Laguerre polynomials given by (3.21.1) :limb!1 pn�� xbq ; q�; b���� q� = (q; q)n(q�+1; q)nL(�)n (x; q):97

4.32 Little q-Jacobi ! Alternative q-CharlierIf we set b!�a�1q�1b in the de�nition (3.12.1) of the little q-Jacobi polynomials and then takethe limit a! 0 we obtain the alternative q-Charlier polynomials given by (3.22.1) :lima!0 pn�x; a;� baq���� q� = Kn(x; b; q):4.33 q-Meixner ! q-LaguerreThe q-Laguerre polynomials de�ned by (3.21.1) can be obtained from the q-Meixner polynomialsgiven by (3.13.1) by setting b = q� and q�x ! cq�x in the de�nition (3.13.1) of the q-Meixnerpolynomials and then taking the limit c!1 :limc!1Mn(cq�x; q�; c; q) = (q; q)n(q�+1; q)nL(�)n (x; q):4.34 q-Meixner ! q-CharlierThe q-Meixner polynomials and the q-Charlier polynomials de�ned by (3.13.1) and (3.23.1) respec-tively are simply related by the limit b! 0 in the de�nition (3.13.1) of the q-Meixner polynomials.In fact we have Mn(x; 0; a; q) = Cn(x; a; q):4.35 q-Meixner ! Al-Salam-Carlitz IIThe Al-Salam-Carlitz II polynomials de�ned by (3.25.1) can be obtained from the q-Meixnerpolynomials de�ned by (3.13.1) by setting b = �c�1a in the de�nition (3.13.1) of the q-Meixnerpolynomials and then taking the limit c # 0 :limc#0 Mn �x;�ac ; c; q� = ��1a�n q(n2)V (a)n (x; q):4.36 Quantum q-Krawtchouk ! Al-Salam-Carlitz IIIf we set p = a�1q�N�1 in the de�nition (3.14.1) of the quantum q-Krawtchouk polynomials andlet N !1 we obtain the Al-Salam-Carlitz II polynomials given by (3.25.1). In fact we havelimN!1Kqtmn (x; a�1q�N�1; N ; q) = ��1a�n q(n2)V (a)n (x; q):4.37 q-Krawtchouk ! Alternative q-CharlierIf we set x! N � x in the de�nition (3.15.1) of the q-Krawtchouk polynomials and then take thelimit N !1 we obtain the alternative q-Charlier polynomials de�ned by (3.22.1) :limN!1Kn �qx�N ; p;N ; q� = Kn(qx; p; q):4.38 q-Krawtchouk ! q-CharlierThe q-Charlier polynomials given by (3.23.1) can be obtained from the q-Krawtchouk polyno-mials de�ned by (3.15.1) by setting p = a�1q�N in the de�nition (3.15.1) of the q-Krawtchoukpolynomials and then taking the limit N !1 :limN!1Kn �q�x; a�1q�N ; N ; q� = Cn(q�x; a; q):98

4.39 A�ne q-Krawtchouk ! Little q-Laguerre / WallIf we set x! N �x in the de�nition (3.16.1) of the a�ne q-Krawtchouk polynomials and take thelimit N !1 we simply obtain the little q-Laguerre (or Wall) polynomials de�ned by (3.20.1) :limN!1KAffn (qx�N ; p;N ; q) = pn(qx; p; q):4.40 Dual q-Krawtchouk ! Al-Salam-Carlitz IIf we set c = a�1 in the de�nition (3.17.1) of the dual q-Krawtchouk polynomials and take thelimit N !1 we simply obtain the Al-Salam-Carlitz I polynomials given by (3.24.1) :limN!1Kn��(x); 1a;N ���� q� = ��1a�n q�(n2)U (a)n (qx; q):Note that �(x) = q�x + a�1qx�N .4.41 Continuous big q-Hermite ! Continuous q-HermiteThe continuous q-Hermite polynomials de�ned by (3.26.1) can easily be obtained from the con-tinuous big q-Hermite polynomials given by (3.18.1) by taking a = 0 :Hn(x; 0jq) = Hn(xjq):4.42 Continuous q-Laguerre ! Continuous q-HermiteThe continuous q-Hermite polynomials given by (3.26.1) can be obtained from the continuousq-Laguerre polynomials de�ned by (3.19.1) by taking the limit �!1 in the following way :lim�!1 P (�)n (xjq)q( 12�+ 14 )n = Hn(xjq)(q; q)n :4.43 q-Laguerre ! Stieltjes-WigertIf we set x ! xq�� in the de�nition (3.21.1) of the q-Laguerre polynomials and take the limit�!1 we simply obtain the Stieltjes-Wigert polynomials given by (3.27.1) :lim�!1L(�)n �xq��; q� = Sn(x; q):4.44 Alternative q-Charlier ! Stieltjes-WigertThe Stieltjes-Wigert polynomials de�ned by (3.27.1) can be obtained from the alternative q-Charlier polynomials by setting x ! a�1x in the de�nition (3.22.1) of the alternative q-Charlierpolynomials and then taking the limit a!1. In fact we havelima!1Kn �xa ; a; q� = (q; q)nSn(x; q):4.45 q-Charlier ! Stieltjes-WigertIf we set q�x ! ax in the de�nition (3.23.1) of the q-Charlier polynomials and take the limita!1 we obtain the Stieltjes-Wigert polynomials given by (3.27.1) in the following way :lima!1Cn(ax; a; q) = (q; q)nSn(x; q):99

4.46 Al-Salam-Carlitz I ! Discrete q-Hermite IThe discrete q-Hermite I polynomials de�ned by (3.28.1) can easily be obtained from the Al-Salam-Carlitz I polynomials given by (3.24.1) by the substitution a = �1 :U (�1)n (x; q) = hn(x; q):4.47 Al-Salam-Carlitz II ! Discrete q-Hermite IIThe discrete q-Hermite II polynomials de�ned by (3.29.1) follow from the Al-Salam-Carlitz IIpolynomials given by (3.25.1) by the substitution a = �1 in the following way :i�nV (�1)n (ix; q) = ~hn(x; q):

100

Chapter 5From basic to classicalhypergeometric orthogonalpolynomials5.1 Askey-Wilson ! WilsonTo �nd the Wilson polynomials de�ned by (1.1.1) from the Askey-Wilson polynomials we seta! qa, b! qb, c! qc, d! qd and ei� = qix (or � = ln qx) in the de�nition (3.1.1) and take thelimit q " 1 : limq"1 pn(12 �qix + q�ix� ; qa; qb; qc; qdjq)(1� q)3n = Wn(x2; a; b; c; d):5.2 q-Racah ! RacahIf we set � ! q�, � ! q� , ! q , � ! q� in the de�nition (3.2.1) of the q-Racah polynomialsand let q " 1 we easily obtain the Racah polynomials de�ned by (1.2.1) :limq"1 Rn(�(x); q�; q�; q ; q�jq) = Rn(�(x);�; �; ; �);where 8<: �(x) = q�x + qx+ +�+1�(x) = x(x+ + � + 1):5.3 Continuous dual q-Hahn ! Continuous dual HahnTo �nd the continuous dual Hahn polynomials de�ned by (1.3.1) from the continuous dual q-Hahnpolynomials we set a ! qa, b ! qb, c ! qc and ei� = qix (or � = ln qx) in the de�nition (3.3.1)and take the limit q " 1 :limq"1 pn(12 �qix + q�ix� ; qa; qb; qcjq)(1� q)2n = Sn(x2; a; b; c):5.4 Continuous q-Hahn ! Continuous HahnIf we set a ! qa, b ! qb, c ! qc, d ! qd and e�i� = qix (or � = ln q�x) in the de�nition(3.4.1) of the continuous q-Hahn polynomials and take the limit q " 1 we �nd the continuous Hahn101

polynomials given by (1.4.1) in the following way :limq"1 pn(cos(ln q�x + �); qa; qb; qc; qd; q)(1� q)n(q; q)n = (�2 sin�)npn(x; a; b; c; d):5.5 Big q-Jacobi ! JacobiIf we set c = 0, a = q� and b = q� in the de�nition (3.5.1) of the big q-Jacobi polynomials and letq " 1 we �nd the Jacobi polynomials given by (1.8.1) :limq"1 Pn(x; q�; q�; 0; q) = P (�;�)n (2x� 1)P (�;�)n (1) :If we take c = �q for arbitrary real instead of c = 0 we �ndlimq"1 Pn(x; q�; q�;�q ; q) = P (�;�)n (x)P (�;�)n (1) :5.5.1 Big q-Legendre ! Legendre / SphericalIf we set c = 0 in the de�nition (3.5.7) of the big q-Legendre polynomials and let q " 1 we simplyobtain the Legendre (or spherical) polynomials de�ned by (1.8.40) :limq"1 Pn(x; 0; q) = Pn(2x� 1):If we take c = �q for arbitrary real instead of c = 0 we �ndlimq"1 Pn(x;�q ; q) = Pn(x):5.6 q-Hahn ! HahnThe Hahn polynomials de�ned by (1.5.1) simply follow from the q-Hahn polynomials given by(3.6.1), after setting �! q� and � ! q� , in the following way :limq"1 Qn(q�x; q�; q�; N jq) = Qn(x;�; �;N ):5.7 Dual q-Hahn ! Dual HahnThe dual Hahn polynomials given by (1.6.1) follow from the dual q-Hahn polynomials by simplytaking the limit q " 1 in the de�nition (3.7.1) of the dual q-Hahn polynomials after applying thesubstitution ! q and � ! q� :limq"1 Rn(�(x); q ; q�; N jq) = Rn(�(x); ; �;N );where 8<: �(x) = q�x + qx+ +�+1�(x) = x(x+ + � + 1):5.8 Al-Salam-Chihara ! Meixner-PollaczekIf we set a = q�e�i�, b = q�ei� and ei� = qixei� in the de�nition (3.8.1) of the Al-Salam-Chiharapolynomials and take the limit q " 1 we obtain the Meixner-Pollaczek polynomials given by (1.7.1)in the following way : limq"1 Qn �cos(ln qx + �); q�ei�; q�e�i�jq�(q; q)n = P (�)n (x;�):102

5.9 q-Meixner-Pollaczek ! Meixner-PollaczekTo �nd the Meixner-Pollaczek polynomials de�ned by (1.7.1) from the q-Meixner-Pollaczek poly-nomials we substitute a = q� and ei� = q�ix(or � = ln q�x) in the de�nition (3.9.1) of theq-Meixner-Pollaczek polynomials and take the limit q " 1 to �nd :limq"1 Pn(cos(ln q�x + �); q�jq) = P (�)n (x;��):5.10 Continuous q-Jacobi ! JacobiIf we take the limit q " 1 in the de�nitions (3.10.1) and (3.10.2) of the continuous q-Jacobipolynomials we simply �nd the Jacobi polynomials de�ned by (1.8.1) :limq"1 P (�;�)n (xjq) = P (�;�)n (x)and limq"1 P (�;�)n (x; q) = P (�;�)n (x):5.10.1 Continuous q-ultraspherical / Rogers ! Gegenbauer / Ultra-sphericalIf we set � = q� in the de�nition (3.10.15) of the continuous q-ultraspherical (or Rogers) polyno-mials and let q tend to one we obtain the Gegenbauer (or ultraspherical) polynomials given by(1.8.10) : limq"1 Cn(x; q�jq) = C(�)n (x):5.10.2 Continuous q-Legendre ! Legendre / SphericalThe Legendre (or spherical) polynomials de�ned by (1.8.40) easily follow from the continuousq-Legendre polynomials given by (3.10.25) by taking the limit q " 1 :limq"1 Pn(x; q) = Pn(x):Of course, we also have limq"1 Pn(xjq) = Pn(x):5.11 Big q-Laguerre ! LaguerreThe Laguerre polynomials de�ned by (1.11.1) can be obtained from the big q-Laguerre polynomialsby the substitution a = q� and b = (1 � q)�1q� in the de�nition (3.11.1) of the big q-Laguerrepolynomials and the limit q " 1 :limq"1 Pn(x; q�; (1� q)�1q�; q) = L(�)n (x� 1)L(�)n (0) :5.12 Little q-Jacobi ! JacobiThe Jacobi polynomials de�ned by (1.8.1) simply follow from the little q-Jacobi polynomialsde�ned by (3.12.1) in the following way :limq"1 pn(x; q�; q�jq) = P (�;�)n (1 � 2x)P (�;�)n (1) :103

5.12.1 Little q-Legendre ! Legendre / SphericalIf we take the limit q " 1 in the de�nition (3.12.6) of the little q-Legendre polynomials we simply�nd the Legendre (or spherical) polynomials given by (1.8.40) :limq"1 pn(xjq) = Pn(1 � 2x):5.12.2 Little q-Jacobi ! LaguerreIf we take a = q�, b = �q� for arbitrary real � and x ! 12(1 � q)x in the de�nition (3.12.1) ofthe little q-Jacobi polynomials and then take the limit q " 1 we obtain the Laguerre polynomialsgiven by (1.11.1) : limq"1 pn� 12(1 � q)x; q�;�q����� q� = L(�)n (x)L(�)n (0) :5.13 q-Meixner ! MeixnerTo �nd the Meixner polynomials de�ned by (1.9.1) from the q-Meixner polynomials given by(3.13.1) we set b = q��1 and c! (1� c)�1c and let q " 1 :limq"1 Mn�q�x; q��1; c1� c ; q� =Mn(x; �; c):5.14 Quantum q-Krawtchouk ! KrawtchoukThe Krawtchouk polynomials given by (1.10.1) easily follow from the quantum q-Krawtchoukpolynomials de�ned by (3.14.1) in the following way :limq"1 Kqtmn (q�x; p;N ; q) = Kn(x; p�1; N ):5.15 q-Krawtchouk ! KrawtchoukIf we take the limit q " 1 in the de�nition (3.15.1) of the q-Krawtchouk polynomials we simply�nd the Krawtchouk polynomials given by (1.10.1) in the following way :limq"1 Kn(q�x; p;N ; q) = Kn�x; 1p+ 1 ; N� :5.16 A�ne q-Krawtchouk ! KrawtchoukIf we let q " 1 in the de�nition (3.16.1) of the a�ne q-Krawtchouk polynomials we obtain :limq"1KAffn (q�x; p;N jq) = Kn(x; 1� p;N );where Kn(x; 1� p;N ) is the Krawtchouk polynomial de�ned by (1.10.1).5.17 Dual q-Krawtchouk ! KrawtchoukIf we set c = 1� p�1 in the de�nition (3.17.1) of the dual q-Krawtchouk polynomials and take thelimit q " 1 we simply �nd the Krawtchouk polynomials given by (1.10.1) :limq"1 Kn��(x); 1� 1p ;N jq� = Kn(x; p;N ):104

5.18 Continuous big q-Hermite ! HermiteIf we set a = 0 and x ! xq12(1 � q) in the de�nition (3.18.1) of the continuous big q-Hermitepolynomials and let q tend to one, we obtain the Hermite polynomials given by (1.13.1) in thefollowing way : limq"1 Hn �x �1�q2 � 12 ; 0��� q��1�q2 �n2 = Hn(x):If we take a ! ap2(1� q) and x ! xq12 (1� q) in the de�nition (3.18.1) of the continuousbig q-Hermite polynomials and take the limit q " 1 we �nd the Hermite polynomials de�ned by(1.13.1) with shifted argument :limq"1 Hn �x �1�q2 � 12 ; ap2(1� q)��� q��1�q2 �n2 = Hn(x� a):5.19 Continuous q-Laguerre ! LaguerreIf we set x! qx in the de�nitions (3.19.1) and (3.19.2) of the continuous q-Laguerre polynomialsand take the limit q " 1 we �nd the Laguerre polynomials de�ned by (1.11.1). In fact we have :limq"1 P (�)n (qxjq) = L(�)n (2x)and limq"1 P (�)n (qx; q) = L(�)n (x):5.20 Little q-Laguerre / Wall ! LaguerreIf we set a = q� and x ! (1 � q)x in the de�nition (3.20.1) of the little q-Laguerre (or Wall)polynomials and let q tend to one, we obtain the Laguerre polynomials given by (1.11.1) :limq"1 pn((1� q)x; q�jq) = L(�)n (x)L(�)n (0) :5.20.1 Little q-Laguerre / Wall ! CharlierIf we set a ! (q � 1)a and x ! qx in the de�nition (3.20.1) of the little q-Laguerre (or Wall)polynomials and take the limit q " 1 we obtain the Charlier polynomials given by (1.12.1) in thefollowing way : limq"1 pn(qx; (q � 1)ajq)(1� q)n = Cn(x; a)an :5.21 q-Laguerre ! LaguerreIf we set x! (1� q)x in the de�nition (3.21.1) of the q-Laguerre polynomials and take the limitq " 1 we obtain the Laguerre polynomials given by (1.11.1) :limq"1 L(�)n ((1� q)x; q) = L(�)n (x):105

5.21.1 q-Laguerre ! CharlierIf we set x!�q�x and q� = a�1(q� 1)�1 (or � = �(ln q)�1 ln(q� 1)a) in the de�nition (3.21.1)of the q-Laguerre polynomials, multiply by (q; q)n, and take the limit q " 1 we obtain the Charlierpolynomials given by (1.12.1) :limq"1 (q; q)nL(�)n (�q�x; q) = Cn(x; a); q� = 1a(q � 1) or � = � ln(q � 1)aln q :5.22 Alternative q-Charlier ! CharlierIf we set x! qx and a! a(1�q) in the de�nition (3.22.1) of the alternative q-Charlier polynomialsand take the limit q " 1 we �nd the Charlier polynomials given by (1.12.1) :limq"1 Kn(qx; a(1� q); q)(q � 1)n = anCn(x; a):5.23 q-Charlier ! CharlierIf we set a ! a(1 � q) in the de�nition (3.23.1) of the q-Charlier polynomials and take the limitq " 1 we obtain the Charlier polynomials de�ned by (1.12.1) :limq"1 Cn(q�x; a(1� q); q) = Cn(x; a):5.24 Al-Salam-Carlitz I ! CharlierIf we set a! a(q� 1) and x! qx in the de�nition (3.24.1) of the Al-Salam-Carlitz I polynomialsand take the limit q " 1 after dividing by an(1� q)n we obtain the Charlier polynomials de�nedby (1.12.1) : limq"1 U (a(q�1))n (qx; q)(1� q)n = anCn(x; a):5.24.1 Al-Salam-Carlitz I ! HermiteIf we set x! xp1� q2 and a! ap1� q2� 1 in the de�nition (3.24.1) of the Al-Salam-Carlitz Ipolynomials, divide by (1� q2)n2 , and let q tend to one we obtain the Hermite polynomials givenby (1.13.1) with shifted argument. In fact we havelimq"1 U (ap1�q2�1)n (xp1� q2; q)(1� q2)n2 = Hn(x� a)2n :5.25 Al-Salam-Carlitz II ! CharlierIf we set a! a(1�q) and x! q�x in the de�nition (3.25.1) of the Al-Salam-Carlitz II polynomialsand taking the limit q " 1 we �ndlimq"1 V (a(1�q))n (q�x; q)(q � 1)n = anCn(x; a):106

5.25.1 Al-Salam-Carlitz II ! HermiteIf we set x! xp1� q2 and a! ap1� q2+1 in the de�nition (3.25.1) of the Al-Salam-Carlitz IIpolynomials, divide by (1� q2)n2 , and let q tend to one we obtain the Hermite polynomials givenby (1.13.1) with shifted argument. In fact we havelimq"1 V (ap1�q2+1)n (xp1� q2; q)(1 � q2)n2 = Hn(x� 2)2n :5.26 Continuous q-Hermite ! HermiteThe Hermite polynomials de�ned by (1.13.1) can be obtained from the continuous q-Hermitepolynomials given by (3.26.1) by setting x! xq12(1� q). In fact we havelimq"1 Hn �x �1�q2 � 12 ��� q��1�q2 �n2 = Hn(x):5.27 Stieltjes-Wigert ! HermiteThe Hermite polynomials de�ned by (1.13.1) can be obtained from the Stieltjes-Wigert polynomialsgiven by (3.27.1) by setting x ! q�1xp2(1� q) + 1 and taking the limit q " 1 in the followingway : limq"1 (q; q)nSn(q�1xp2(1� q) + 1; q)�1�q2 �n2 = (�1)nHn(x):5.28 Discrete q-Hermite I ! HermiteThe Hermite polynomials de�ned by (1.13.1) can be found from the discrete q-Hermite I polyno-mials given by (3.28.1) in the following way :limq"1 hn �xp1� q2; q�(1� q2)n2 = Hn(x)2n :5.29 Discrete q-Hermite II ! HermiteThe Hermite polynomials de�ned by (1.13.1) can also be found from the discrete q-Hermite IIpolynomials given by (3.29.1) in a similar way :limq"1 ~hn �xp1� q2; q�(1� q2)n2 = Hn(x)2n :107

Bibliography[1] N. Abdul-Halim & W.A. Al-Salam : A characterization of the Laguerre polynomials.Seminario Matematico della Universit�a di Padova 34, 1964, 176-179.[2] M. Abramowitz & I.A. Stegun (eds.) : Handbook of mathematical functions (withformulas, graphs, and mathematical tables). Dover Publications, New York, 1970.[3] S. Ahmed, A. Laforgia & M.E. Muldoon : On the spacing of the zeros of some classicalorthogonal polynomials. Journal of the London Mathematical Society (2) 25, 1982, 246-252.[4] S. Ahmed, M.E. Muldoon & R. Spigler : Inequalities and numerical bounds for zerosof ultraspherical polynomials. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 17, 1986, 1000-1007.[5] K. Alladi & M.L. Robinson : Legendre polynomials and irrationality. Journal f�ur dieReine und Angewandte Mathematik 318, 1980, 137-155.[6] W.R. Allaway : Some properties of the q-Hermite polynomials. Canadian Journal of Math-ematics 32, 1980, 686-694.[7] N.A. Al-Salam : Orthogonal polynomials of hypergeometric type. Duke Mathematical Jour-nal 33, 1966, 109-121.[8] N.A. Al-Salam : On some q-operators with applications. Indagationes Mathematicae 51,1989, 1-13.[9] W.A. Al-Salam : Operational representations for the Laguerre and other polynomials.Duke Mathematical Journal 31, 1964, 127-142.[10] W.A. Al-Salam : Characterization theorems for orthogonal polynomials. In : OrthogonalPolynomials : Theory and Practice (ed. P. Nevai), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,1990, 1-24.[11] W. Al-Salam, W.R. Allaway & R. Askey : A characterization of the continuous q-ultraspherical polynomials. Canadian Mathematical Bulletin 27, 1984, 329-336.[12] W. Al-Salam, W.R. Allaway & R. Askey : Sieved ultraspherical polynomials. Trans-actions of the American Mathematical Society 284, 1984, 39-55.[13] W.A. Al-Salam & L. Carlitz : Some orthogonal q-polynomials. Mathematische Nach-richten 30, 1965, 47-61.[14] W.A. Al-Salam & T.S. Chihara : Another characterization of the classical orthogonalpolynomials. SIAM Journal of Mathematical Analysis 3, 1972, 65-70.[15] W.A. Al-Salam & T.S. Chihara : Convolutions of orthogonal polynomials. SIAM Jour-nal of Mathematical Analysis 7, 1976, 16-28.[16] W.A. Al-Salam & T.S. Chihara : q-Pollaczek polynomials and a conjecture of Andrewsand Askey. SIAM Journal of Mathematical Analysis 18, 1987, 228-242.108

[17] W.A. Al-Salam & M.E.H. Ismail : Polynomials orthogonal with respect to discrete con-volution. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 55, 1976, 125-139.[18] W.A. Al-Salam & M.E.H. Ismail : Reproducing kernels for q-Jacobi polynomials. Pro-ceedings of the American Mathematical Society 67, 1977, 105-110.[19] W.A. Al-Salam & M.E.H. Ismail : Orthogonal polynomials associated with the Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction. Paci�c Journal of Mathematics 104, 1983, 269-283.[20] W.A. Al-Salam & M.E.H. Ismail : q-Beta integrals and the q-Hermite polynomials.Paci�c Journal of Mathematics 135, 1988, 209-221.[21] W.A. Al-Salam & A. Verma : On an orthogonal polynomial set. Indagationes Mathe-maticae 44, 1982, 335-340.[22] W.A. Al-Salam & A. Verma : Some remarks on q-beta integral. Proceedings of theAmerican Mathematical Society 85, 1982, 360-362.[23] W.A. Al-Salam & A. Verma : On the Geronimus polynomial sets. In : OrthogonalPolynomials and Their Applications (eds. M. Alfaro et al.). Lecture Notes in Mathematics1329, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988, 193-202.[24] G.E. Andrews & R. Askey : Enumeration of partitions : the role of Eulerian series andq-orthogonal polynomials. In : Higher Combinatorics (ed. M. Aigner), Reidel Publicatons,Boston, 1977, 3-26.[25] G.E. Andrews & R. Askey : Classical orthogonal polynomials. In : Polynomes Orthog-onaux et Applications (eds. C. Brezinski et al.). Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1171, 1985,Springer-Verlag, New York, 36-62.[26] R. Askey : Jacobi polynomials I. New proofs of Koornwinder's Laplace type integral rep-resentation and Bateman's bilinear sum. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 5, 1974,119-124.[27] R. Askey : Orthogonal polynomials and special functions. CBMS Regional ConferenceSeries, Volume 21. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 1975.[28] R. Askey : Jacobi's generating function for Jacobi polynomials. Proceedings of the Amer-ican Mathematical Society 71, 1978, 243-246.[29] R. Askey : Continuous Hahn polynomials. Journal of Physics A. Mathematical and General18, 1985, L1017-L1019.[30] R. Askey : Limits of some q-Laguerre polynomials. Journal of Approximation Theory 46,1986, 213-216.[31] R. Askey : Beta integrals and the associated orthogonal polynomials. In : Number Theory(ed. K. Alladi). Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1395, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989,84-121.[32] R. Askey : Continuous q-Hermite polynomials when q > 1. In : q-Series and Partitions (ed.D. Stanton). The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and Its Applications 18, Springer-Verlag,New York, 1989, 151-158.[33] R. Askey & J. Fitch : Integral representations for Jacobi polynomials and some applica-tions. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 26, 1969, 411-437.[34] R. Askey & G. Gasper : Linearization of the product of Jacobi polynomials III. CanadianJournal of Mathematics 23, 1971, 332-338.109

[35] R. Askey & G. Gasper : Positive Jacobi sums II. American Journal of Mathematics 98,1976, 709-737.[36] R. Askey & M.E.H. Ismail : Permutation problems and special functions. CanadianJournal of Mathematics 28, 1976, 853-874.[37] R. Askey & M.E.H. Ismail : The Rogers q-ultraspherical polynomials. In : ApproximationTheory III, Academic Press, New York, 1980, 175-182.[38] R. Askey & M.E.H. Ismail : A generalization of ultraspherical polynomials. In : Studiesin Pure Mathematics (ed. P. Erd�os), Birkh�auser, Basel, 1983, 55-78.[39] R. Askey & M.E.H. Ismail : Recurrence relations, continued fractions and orthogonalpolynomials.Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society 300, Providence, Rhode Island,1984.[40] R. Askey, M.E.H. Ismail & T. Koornwinder : Weighted permutation problems andLaguerre polynomials. Journal of Combinatorial Theory A 25, 1978, 277-287.[41] R. Askey, T.H. Koornwinder & M. Rahman : An integral of products of ultrasphericalfunctions and a q-extension. Journal of the London Mathematical Society (2) 33, 1986,133-148.[42] R. Askey & S. Wainger : A convolution structure for Jacobi series. American Journal ofMathematics 91, 1969, 463-485.[43] R. Askey & J.A. Wilson : A set of orthogonal polynomials that generalize the Racahcoe�cients or 6� j symbols. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 10, 1979, 1008-1016.[44] R. Askey & J.A. Wilson : A set of hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials. SIAM Journalon Mathematical Analysis 13, 1982, 651-655.[45] R. Askey & J.A. Wilson : Some basic hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials that gener-alize Jacobi polynomials. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society 319, Providence,Rhode Island, 1985.[46] N.M. Atakishiyev & S.K. Suslov : The Hahn and Meixner polynomials of an imaginaryargument and some of their applications. Journal of Physics A. Mathematical and General18, 1985, 1583-1596.[47] N.M. Atakishiyev & S.K. Suslov : Continuous orthogonality property for some classicalpolynomials of a discrete variable. Revista Mexicana de Fisica 34, 1988, 541-563.[48] N.M. Atakishiyev & S.K. Suslov : On the Askey-Wilson polynomials. ConstructiveApproximation 8, 1992, 363-369.[49] R. Azor, J. Gillis & J.D. Victor : Combinatorial applications of Hermite polynomials.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 13, 1982, 879-890.[50] W.N. Bailey : The generating function of Jacobi polynomials. Journal of the LondonMathematical Society 13, 1938, 8-12.[51] E. Badertscher & T.H. Koornwinder : Continuous Hahn polynomials of di�erentialoperator argument and analysis on Riemannian symmetric spaces of constant curvature.Canadian Journal of Mathematics 44, 1992, 750-773.[52] W.W. Barrett : An alternative approach to Laguerre polynomial identities in combina-torics. Canadian Journal of Mathematics 31, 1979, 312-319.110

[53] B.R. Bhonsle : On a series of Rainville involving Legendre polynomials. Proceedings ofthe American Mathematical Society 8, 1957, 10-14.[54] G.G. Bilodeau : Gegenbauer polynomials and fractional derivatives. The American Math-ematical Monthly 71, 1964, 1026-1028.[55] F. Brafman : Generating functions of Jacobi and related polynomials. Proceedings of theAmerican Mathematical Society 2, 1951, 942-949.[56] F. Brafman : An ultraspherical generating function. Paci�c Journal of Mathematics 7,1957, 1319-1323.[57] F. Brafman : Some generating functions for Laguerre and Hermite polynomials. CanadianJournal of Mathematics 9, 1957, 180-187.[58] W.C. Brenke : On generating functions of polynomial systems. The American Mathemat-ical Monthly 52, 1945, 297-301.[59] D.M. Bressoud : A simple proof of Mehler's formula for q-Hermite polynomials. IndianaUniversity Mathematical Journal 29, 1980, 577-580.[60] D.M. Bressoud : Linearization and related formulas for q-ultraspherical polynomials.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 12, 1981, 161-168.[61] J.W. Brown : New generating functions for classical polynomials. Proceedings of the Amer-ican Mathematical Society 21, 1969, 263-268.[62] J. Bustoz & M.E.H. Ismail : The associated ultraspherical polynomials and their q-analogues. Canadian Journal of Mathematics 34, 1982, 718-736.[63] J. Bustoz & M.E.H. Ismail : Tur�an inequalities for ultraspherical and continuous q-ultraspherical polynomials. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 14, 1983, 807-818.[64] J. Bustoz & M.E.H. Ismail : A positive trigonometric sum. SIAM Journal on Mathe-matical Analysis 20, 1989, 176-181.[65] J. Bustoz & N. Savage : Inequalities for ultraspherical and Laguerre polynomials. SIAMJournal on Mathematical Analysis 10, 1979, 902-912.[66] J. Bustoz & N. Savage : Inequalities for ultraspherical and Laguerre polynomials II.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 11, 1980, 876-884.[67] L. Carlitz : A note on the Laguerre polynomials. The Michigan Mathematical Journal 7,1960, 219-223.[68] L. Carlitz : Some generating functions of Weisner. Duke Mathematical Journal 28, 1961,523-529.[69] L. Carlitz : The generating function for the Jacobi polynomial. Rendiconti del SeminarioMatematico della Universit�a di Padova 38, 1967, 86-88.[70] L. Carlitz : Some generating functions for Laguerre polynomials. Duke MathematicalJournal 35, 1968, 825-827.[71] L. Carlitz & H.M. Srivastava : Some new generating functions for the Hermite poly-nomials. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 149, 1990, 513-520.[72] J.A. Charris & M.E.H. Ismail : On sieved orthogonal polynomials. V : sieved Pollaczekpolynomials. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 18, 1987, 1177-1218.111

[73] L. Chihara : On the zeros of the Askey-Wilson polynomials, with applications to codingtheory. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 18, 1987, 191-207.[74] T.S. Chihara : On indeterminate Hamburger moment problems. Paci�c Journal of Math-ematics 27, 1968, 475-484.[75] T.S. Chihara : Orthogonal polynomials with Brenke type generating functions. Duke Math-ematical Journal 35, 1968, 505-517.[76] T.S. Chihara : A characterization and a class of distribution functions for the Stieltjes-Wigert polynomials. Canadian Mathematical Bulletin 13, 1970, 529-532.[77] T.S. Chihara : An introduction to orthogonal polynomials. Gordon and Breach, New York,1978.[78] T.S. Chihara : On generalized Stieltjes-Wigert and related orthogonal polynomials. Journalof Computational and Applied Mathematics 5, 1979, 291-297.[79] T.S. Chihara & M.E.H. Ismail : Extremal measures for a system of orthogonal polyno-mials. Constructive Approximation 9, 1993, 111-119.[80] Z. Ciesielski : Explicit formula relating the Jacobi, Hahn and Bernstein polynomials. SIAMJournal on Mathematical Analysis 18, 1987, 1573-1575.[81] M.E. Cohen : Some classes of generating functions for the Laguerre and Hermite polyno-mials. Mathematics of Computation 31, 1977, 511-518.[82] R.D. Cooper, M.R. Hoare & M. Rahman : Stochastic processes and special functions :On the probabilistic origin of some positive kernels associated with classical orthogonal poly-nomials. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 61, 1977, 262-291.[83] A.E. Danese : Some identities and inequalities involving ultraspherical polynomials. DukeMathematical Journal 26, 1959, 349-359.[84] J.S. Dehesa : On a general system of orthogonal q-polynomials. Journal of Computationaland Applied Mathematics 5, 1979, 37-45.[85] P. Delsarte : Association schemes and t-designs in regular semilattices. Journal of Com-binatorial Theory A 20, 1976, 230-243.[86] P. Delsarte & J.M. Goethals : Alternating bilinear forms over GF (q). Journal ofCombinatorial Theory A 19, 1975, 26-50.[87] C.F. Dunkl : A Krawtchouk polynomial addition theorem and wreath products of symmetricgroups. Indiana University Mathematics Journal 25, 1976, 335-358.[88] C.F. Dunkl : An addition theorem for some q-Hahn polynomials. Monatshefte f�ur Mathe-matik 85, 1977, 5-37.[89] C.F. Dunkl : An addition theorem for Hahn polynomials : the spherical functions. SIAMJournal on Mathematical Analysis 9, 1978, 627-637.[90] C.F. Dunkl : Orthogonal polynomials with symmetry of order three. Canadian Journal ofMathematics 36, 1984, 685-717.[91] C.F. Dunkl & D.E. Ramirez : Krawtchouk polynomials and the symmetrization of hy-pergroups. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 5, 1974, 351-366.[92] A. Elbert & A. Laforgia : A note on the paper of Ahmed, Muldoon and Spigler. SIAMJournal on Mathematical Analysis 17, 1986, 1008-1009.112

[93] A. Elbert & A. Laforgia : New properties of the zeros of a Jacobi polynomial in relationto their centroid. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 18, 1987, 1563-1572.[94] A. Erd�elyi et al. : Higher transcendental functions. Volume II of the BatemanManuscriptProject. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1953.[95] A. Erd�elyi : Asymptotic forms for Laguerre polynomials. Journal of the Indian Mathe-matical Society 24, 1960, 235-250.[96] H. Exton : Basic Laguerre polynomials. Pure and Applied Mathematika Sciencses 5, 1977,19-24.[97] D. Foata & J. Labelle : Mod�eles combinatoires pour les polynomes de Meixner. EuropeanJournal of Combinatorics 4, 1983, 305-311.[98] D. Foata & P. Leroux : Polynomes de Jacobi, interpr�etation combinatoire et fonctiong�en�eratrice. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 87, 1983, 47-53.[99] G. Gasper : Linearization of the product of Jacobi polynomials I. Canadian Journal ofMathematics 22, 1970, 171-175.[100] G. Gasper : Linearization of the product of Jacobi polynomials II. Canadian Journal ofMathematics 22, 1970, 582-593.[101] G. Gasper : On the extension of Turan's inequality to Jacobi polynomials. Duke Mathe-matical Journal 38, 1971, 415-428.[102] G. Gasper : Positivity and the convolution structure for Jacobi series. Annals of Mathe-matics 93, 1971, 112-118.[103] G. Gasper : Banach algebras for Jacobi series and positivity of a kernel. Annals of Math-ematics 95, 1972, 261-280.[104] G. Gasper : Nonnegativity of a discrete Poisson kernel for the Hahn polynomials. Journalof Mathematical Analysis and Applications 42, 1973, 438-451.[105] G. Gasper : Projection formulas for orthogonal polynomials of a discrete variable. Journalof Mathematical Analysis and Applications 45, 1974, 176-198.[106] G. Gasper : Positive sums of the classical orthogonal polynomials. SIAM Journal on Math-ematical Analysis 8, 1977, 423-447.[107] G. Gasper : Orthogonality of certain functions with respect to complex valued weights.Canadian Journal of Mathematics 33, 1981, 1261-1270.[108] G. Gasper : Roger's linearization formula for the continuous q-ultraspherical polynomialsand quadratic transformation formulas. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 16, 1985,1061-1071.[109] G. Gasper : q-Extensions of Clausen's formula and of the inequalities used by De Brangesin his proof of the Bieberbach, Robertson, and Milin conjectures. SIAM Journal on Mathe-matical Analysis 20, 1989, 1019-1034.[110] G. Gasper & M. Rahman : Positivity of the Poisson kernel for the continuous q-ultraspherical polynomials. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 14, 1983, 409-420.[111] G. Gasper & M. Rahman : Product formulas of Watson, Bailey and Bateman types andpositivity of the Poisson kernel for q-Racah polynomials. SIAM Journal on MathematicalAnalysis 15, 1984, 768-789. 113

[112] G. Gasper & M. Rahman : Positivity of the Poisson kernel for the continuous q-Jacobipolynomials and some quadratic transformation formulas for basic hypergeometric series.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 17, 1986, 970-999.[113] G. Gasper & M. Rahman : A nonterminating q-Clausen formula and some related productformulas. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 20, 1989, 1270-1282.[114] G. Gasper & M. Rahman : Basic Hypergeometric Series. Encyclopedia of Mathematicsand Its Applications 35, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.[115] L. Gatteschi : New inequalities for the zeros of Jacobi polynomials. SIAM Journal onMathematical Analysis 18, 1987, 1549-1562.[116] J. Gillis : Integrals of products of Laguerre polynomials. SIAM Journal on MathematicalAnalysis 6, 1975, 318-339.[117] J. Gillis, M.E.H. Ismail & T. Offer : An asymptotic problem in derangement theory.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 21, 1990, 262-269.[118] J. Gillis, J. Jedwab & D. Zeilberger : A combinatorial interpretation of the integralof the products of Legendre polynomials. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 19, 1988,1455-1461.[119] I.S. Gradshteyn & I.M. Ryzhik : Table of integrals, series, and products. Correctedand enlarged edition. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida, 1980.[120] D.P. Gupta, M.E.H. Ismail & D.R. Masson : Associated continuous Hahn polynomials.Canadian Journal of Mathematics 43, 1991, 1263-1280.[121] W. Hahn : �Uber Orthogonalpolynome, die q-Di�erenzengleichungen gen�ugen. Mathematis-che Nachrichten 2, 1949, 4-34.[122] R. Horton : Jacobi polynomials IV. A family of variation diminishing kernels. SIAMJournal on Mathematical Analysis 6, 1975, 544-550.[123] M.E.H. Ismail : On obtaining generating functions of Boas and Buck type for orthogonalpolynomials. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 5, 1974, 202-208.[124] M.E.H. Ismail : Connection relations and bilinear formulas for the classical orthogonalpolynomials. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 57, 1977, 487-496.[125] M.E.H. Ismail : A queueing model and a set of orthogonal polynomials. Journal of Math-ematical Analysis and Applications 108, 1985, 575-594.[126] M.E.H. Ismail : On sieved orthogonal polynomials, I : Symmetric Pollaczek analogues.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 16, 1985, 1093-1113.[127] M.E.H. Ismail : Asymptotics of the Askey-Wilson and q-Jacobi polynomials. SIAM Journalon Mathematical Analysis 17, 1986, 1475-1482.[128] M.E.H. Ismail : On sieved orthogonal polynomials, IV : Generating functions. Journal ofApproximation Theory 46, 1986, 284-296.[129] M.E.H. Ismail, J. Letessier & G. Valent : Linear birth and death models and associatedLaguerre and Meixner polynomials. Journal of Approximation Theory 55, 1988, 337-348.[130] M.E.H. Ismail, J. Letessier & G. Valent : Quadratic birth and death processes andassociated continuous dual Hahn polynomials. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 20,1989, 727-737. 114

[131] M.E.H. Ismail, J. Letessier, D.R. Masson & G. Valent : Birth and death processesand orthogonal polynomials. In : Orthogonal Polynomials : Theory and Practice (ed. P.Nevai), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1990, 229-255.[132] M.E.H. Ismail, J. Letessier, G. Valent & J. Wimp : Two families of associated Wilsonpolynomials. Canadian Journal of Mathematics 42, 1990, 659-695.[133] M.E.H. Ismail, J. Letessier, G. Valent & J. Wimp : Some results on associated Wilsonpolynomials. In : Orthogonal Polynomials and their Applications (eds. C. Brezinski, L. Gori& A. Ronveaux). Volume 9 of IMACS Annals on Computing and Applied Mathematics, J.C.Baltzer Scienti�c Publishing Company, Basel, 1991, 293-298.[134] M.E.H. Ismail, D.R. Masson & M. Rahman : Complex weight functions for classicalorthogonal polynomials. Canadian Journal of Mathematics 43, 1991, 1294-1308.[135] M.E.H. Ismail & M.E. Muldoon : A discrete approach to monotonicity of zeros oforthogonal polynomials. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 323, 1991, 65-78.[136] M.E.H. Ismail & M. Rahman : The associated Askey-Wilson polynomials. Transactionsof the American Mathematical Society 328, 1991, 201-237.[137] M.E.H. Ismail & D. Stanton : On the Askey-Wilson and Rogers polynomials. CanadianJournal of Mathematics 40, 1988, 1025-1045.[138] M.E.H. Ismail, D. Stanton & G. Viennot : The combinatorics of q-Hermite polyno-mials and the Askey-Wilson integral. European Journal of Combinatorics 8, 1987, 379-392.[139] M.E.H. Ismail & M.V. Tamhankar : A combinatorial approach to some positivity prob-lems. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 10, 1979, 478-485.[140] M.E.H. Ismail & J.A. Wilson : Asymptotic and generating relations for the q-Jacobi and4�3 polynomials. Journal of Approximation Theory 36, 1982, 43-54.[141] D.M. Jackson : Laguerre polynomials and derangements. Mathematical Proceedings ofthe Cambridge Philosophical Society 80, 1976, 213-214.[142] E.G. Kalnins & W. Miller Jr. : q-Series and orthogonal polynomials associated withBarnes' �rst lemma. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 19, 1988, 1216-1231.[143] S. Karlin & J. McGregor : Linear growth ; birth and death processes. Journal of Math-ematics and Mechanics 7, 1958, 643-662.[144] S. Karlin & J.L. McGregor : The Hahn polynomials, formulas and an application.Scripta Mathematicae 26, 1961, 33-46.[145] H.T. Koelink & T.H. Koornwinder : The Clebsch-Gordan coe�cients for the quantumgroup S�U (2) and q-Hahn polynomials. Indagationes Mathematicae 51, 1989, 443-456.[146] T.H. Koornwinder : The addition formula for Jacobi polynomials I. Summary of results.Indagationes Mathematicae 34, 1972, 188-191.[147] T.H. Koornwinder : The addition formula for Jacobi polynomials and spherical harmon-ics. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 25, 1973, 236-246.[148] T. Koornwinder : Jacobi polynomials II. An analytic proof of the product formula. SIAMJournal on Mathematical Analysis 5, 1974, 125-137.[149] T. Koornwinder : Jacobi polynomials III. An analytic proof of the addition formula.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 6, 1975, 533-543.115

[150] T. Koornwinder : The addition formula for Laguerre polynomials. SIAM Journal onMathematical Analysis 8, 1977, 535-540.[151] T.H. Koornwinder : Yet another proof of the addition formula for Jacobi polynomials.Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 61, 1977, 136-141.[152] T.H. Koornwinder : Positivity proofs for linearization and connection coe�cients oforthogonal polynomials satisfying an addition formula. Journal of the London MathematicalSociety (2) 18, 1978, 101-114.[153] T.H. Koornwinder : Clebsch-Gordan coe�cients for SU (2) and Hahn polynomials. NieuwArchief voor Wiskunde 29, 1981, 140-155.[154] T.H. Koornwinder : Krawtchouk polynomials, a uni�cation of two di�erent group theo-retic interpretations. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 13, 1982, 1011-1023.[155] T.H. Koornwinder : Special orthogonal polynomial systems mapped onto each other by theFourier-Jacobi transform. In : Polynomes Orthogonaux et Applications (eds. C. Brezinskiet al.). Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1171, 1985, Springer-Verlag, New York, 174-183.[156] T.H. Koornwinder : Group theoretic interpretations of Askey's scheme of hypergeometricorthogonal polynomials. In : Orthogonal Polynomials and Their Applications (eds. M. Alfaroet al.). Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1329, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988, 46-72.[157] T.H. Koornwinder : Continuous q-Legendre polynomials as spherical matrix elements ofirreducible representations of the quantum SU (2) group. C.W.I. Quarterly 2, 1989, 171-173.[158] T.H. Koornwinder : Representations of the twisted SU (2) quantum group and some q-hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials. Indagationes Mathematicae 51, 1989, 97-117.[159] T.H. Koornwinder : Jacobi functions as limit cases of q-ultraspherical polynomials. Jour-nal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 148, 1990, 44-54.[160] T.H. Koornwinder : Orthogonal polynomials in connection with quantum groups. In :Orthogonal Polynomials : Theory and Practice (ed. P. Nevai), Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990,257-292.[161] T.H. Koornwinder : The addition formula for little q-Legendre polynomials and the SU (2)quantum group. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 22, 1991, 295-301.[162] T.H. Koornwinder : Askey-Wilson polynomials for root systems of type BC. Contempo-rary Mathematics 138, 1992, 189-204.[163] T.H. Koornwinder : Askey-Wilson polynomials as zonal spherical functions on the SU (2)quantum group. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 24, 1993, 795-813.[164] A. Laforgia : A monotonic property for the zeros of ultraspherical polynomials. Proceed-ings of the American Mathematical Society 83, 1981, 757-758.[165] T.P. Laine : Projection formulas and a new proof of the addition formula for the Jacobipolynomials. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 13, 1982, 324-330.[166] D.A. Leonard : Orthogonal polynomials, duality and association schemes. SIAM Journalon Mathematical Analysis 13, 1982, 656-663.[167] P. Lesky : �Uber Polynomsysteme, die Sturm-Liouvilleschen Di�erenzengleichungen gen�u-gen. Mathematische Zeitschrift 78, 1962, 439-445.[168] J. Letessier & G. Valent : The generating function method for quadratic asymptoticallysymmetric birth and death processes. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 44, 1984,773-783. 116

[169] J. Letessier & G. Valent : Dual birth and death processes and orthogonal polynomials.SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 46, 1986, 393-405.[170] Y.L. Luke : The special functions and their approximations. Volume 1. Mathematics inScience and Engineering, Volume 53. Academic Press, New York, 1969.[171] D.R. Masson : Associated Wilson polynomials. Constructive Approximation 7, 1991, 521-534.[172] T. Masuda, K. Mimachi, Y. Nakagami, M. Noumi & K. Ueno : Representations of thequantum group SUq(2) and the little q-Jacobi polynomials. Journal of Functional Analysis99, 1991, 357-386.[173] H.G. Meijer : Asymptotic expansion of Jacobi polynomials. In : Polynomes Orthogonaux etApplications (eds. C. Brezinski et al.). Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1171, 1985, Springer-Verlag, New York, 380-389.[174] J. Meixner : Orthogonale Polynomsysteme mit einer besonderen Gestalt der erzeugendenFunktion. Journal of the London Mathematical Society 9, 1934, 6-13.[175] W. Miller Jr. : A note on Wilson polynomials. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis18, 1987, 1221-1226.[176] W. Miller Jr. : Symmetry techniques and orthogonality for q-series. In : q-Series andPartitions (ed. D. Stanton). The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and Its Applications, Volume18, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989, 191-212.[177] D.S. Moak : The q-analogue of the Laguerre polynomials. Journal of Mathematical Analysisand Applications 81, 1981, 20-47.[178] D.S. Moak, E.B. Saff & R.S. Varga : On the zeros of Jacobi polynomials P (�n;�n)n (x).Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 249, 1979, 159-162.[179] B. Nassrallah & M. Rahman : Projection formulas, a reproducing kernel and a gener-ating function for q-Wilson polynomials. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 16, 1985,186-197.[180] A.F. Nikiforov, S.K. Suslov & V.B. Uvarov : Classical orthogonal polynomials ofa discrete variable. Springer Series in Computational Physics, Springer-Verlag, New York,1991.[181] M. Noumi & K. Mimachi : Roger's q-ultraspherical polynomials on a quantum 2-sphere.Duke Mathematical Journal 63, 1991, 65-80.[182] F.W.J. Olver : Asymptotics and special functions. Computer Science and Applied Math-ematics, Academic Press, New York, 1974.[183] M. Perlstadt : A property of orthogonal polynomial families with polynomial duals. SIAMJournal on Mathematical Analysis 15, 1984, 1043-1054.[184] J. Prasad & H. Hayashi : On the uniform approximation of smooth functions by Jacobipolynomials. Canadian Journal of Mathematics 25, 1973, 216-223.[185] M. Rahman : Construction of a family of positive kernels from Jacobi polynomials. SIAMJournal on Mathematical Analysis 7, 1976, 92-116.[186] M. Rahman : A �ve-parameter family of positive kernels from Jacobi polynomials. SIAMJournal on Mathematical Analysis 7, 1976, 386-413.117

[187] M. Rahman : Some positive kernels and bilinear sums for Hahn polynomials. SIAM Journalon Mathematical Analysis 7, 1976, 414-435.[188] M. Rahman : On a generalization of the Poisson kernel for Jacobi polynomials. SIAMJournal on Mathematical Analysis 8, 1977, 1014-1031.[189] M. Rahman : A generalization of Gasper's kernel for Hahn polynomials : application toPollaczek polynomials. Canadian Journal of Mathematics 30, 1978, 133-146.[190] M. Rahman : A positive kernel for Hahn-Eberlein polynomials. SIAM Journal on Mathe-matical Analysis 9, 1978, 891-905.[191] M. Rahman : An elementary proof of Dunkl's addition theorem for Krawtchouk polynomials.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 10, 1979, 438-445.[192] M. Rahman : A product formula and a non-negative Poisson kernel for Racah-Wilsonpolynomials. Canadian Journal of Mathematics 32, 1980, 1501-1517.[193] M. Rahman : A non-negative representation of the linearization coe�cients of the productof Jacobi polynomials. Canadian Journal of Mathematics 33, 1981, 915-928.[194] M. Rahman : A stochastic matrix and bilinear sums for Racah-Wilson polynomials. SIAMJournal on Mathematical Analysis 12, 1981, 145-160.[195] M. Rahman : Families of biorthogonal rational functions in a discrete variable. SIAMJournal on Mathematical Analysis 12, 1981, 355-367.[196] M. Rahman : The linearization of the product of continuous q-Jacobi polynomials. CanadianJournal of Mathematics 33, 1981, 961-987.[197] M. Rahman : Reproducing kernels and bilinear sums for q-Racah and q-Wilson polynomials.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 273, 1982, 483-508.[198] M. Rahman : A q-extension of Feldheim's bilinear sum for Jacobi polynomials and someapplications. Canadian Journal of Mathematics 37, 1985, 551-578.[199] M. Rahman : A product formula for the continuous q-Jacobi polynomials. Journal of Math-ematical Analysis and Applications 118, 1986, 309-322.[200] M. Rahman : q-Wilson functions of the second kind. SIAM Journal on MathematicalAnalysis 17, 1986, 1280-1286.[201] M. Rahman : A simple proof of Koornwinder's addition formula for the little q-Legendrepolynomials. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 107, 1989, 373-381.[202] M. Rahman : Askey-Wilson functions of the �rst and second kinds : series and integral rep-resentations of C2n(x; �jq)+D2n(x; �jq). Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications164, 1992, 263-284.[203] M. Rahman & M.J. Shah : An in�nite series with products of Jacobi polynomials andJacobi functions of the second kind. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 16, 1985,859-875.[204] M. Rahman & A. Verma : Product and addition formulas for the continuous q-ultra-spherical polynomials. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 17, 1986, 1461-1474.[205] E.D. Rainville : Special functions. The Macmillan Company, New York, 1960.[206] T.J. Rivlin : The Chebyshev polynomials. Pure and Applied Mathematics. A Wiley Inter-science series of Texts, Monographs and Tracts. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1974.118

[207] L.J. Rogers : On the exansion of some in�nite products. Proceedings of the LondonMathematical Society 24, 1893, 337-352.[208] L.J. Rogers : Second memoir on the expansion of certain in�nite products. Proceedings ofthe London Mathematical Society 25, 1894, 318-343.[209] L.J. Rogers : Third memoir on the expansion of certain in�nite products. Proceedings ofthe London Mathematical Society 26, 1895, 15-32.[210] M. de Sainte-Catherine & G. Viennot : Combinatorial interpretation of integrals ofproducts of Hermite, Laguerre and Tchebyche� polynomials. In : Polynomes Orthogonaux etApplications (eds. C. Brezinski et al.). Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1171, 1985, Springer-Verlag, New York, 120-128.[211] H.M. Srivastava : Generating functions for Jacobi and Laguerre polynomials. Proceedingsof the American Mathematical Society 23, 1969, 590-595.[212] H.M. Srivastava & V.K. Jain : Some formulas involving q-Jacobi and related polynomi-als. Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata (4) 157, 1990, 63-75.[213] H.M. Srivastava & J.P. Singhal : New generating functions for Jacobi and relatedpolynomials. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 41, 1973, 748-752.[214] D. Stanton : A short proof of a generating function for Jacobi polynomials. Proceedingsof the American Mathematical Society 80, 1980, 398-400.[215] D. Stanton : Product formulas for q-Hahn polynomials. SIAM Journal on MathematicalAnalysis 11, 1980, 100-107.[216] D. Stanton : Some q-Krawtchouk polynomials on Chevalley groups. American Journal ofMathematics 102, 1980, 625-662.[217] D. Stanton : Orthogonal polynomials and Chevalley groups. In : Special Functions :Group Theoretical Aspects and Applications (eds. R.A. Askey et al.). D. Reidel PublishingCompany, Dordrecht, 1984, 87-128.[218] D. Stanton : An introduction to group representations and orthogonal polynomials. In :Orthogonal Polynomials : Theory and Practice (ed. P. Nevai), Kluwer Academic Publishers,Dordrecht, 1990, 419-433.[219] T.J. Stieltjes : Recherches sur les fractions continues. Annales de la Facult�e des Sciencesde Toulouse 8, 1894, J1-122 ; 9, 1895, A1-47 ; �uvres Compl�etes, Volume 2, 398-566.[220] G. Szeg�o : Orthogonal polynomials. American Mathematical Society, Colloquium Publica-tions 23, Providence, Rhode Island, Fourth edition, 1975.[221] W. Van Assche & T.H. Koornwinder : Asymptotic behaviour for Wall polynomialsand the addition formula for little q-Legendre polynomials. SIAM Journal on MathematicalAnalysis 22, 1991, 302-311.[222] G. Viennot : A combinatorial theory for general orthogonal polynomials with extensionsand applications. In : Polynomes Orthogonaux et Applications (eds. C. Brezinski et al.).Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1171, 1985, Springer-Verlag, New York, 139-157.[223] B. Viswanathan : Generating functions for ultraspherical functions. Canadian Journal ofMathematics 20, 1968, 120-134.[224] H.S. Wall : A continued fraction related to some partition formulas of Euler. The AmericanMathematical Monthly 48, 1941, 102-108.119

[225] L. Weisner : Generating functions for Hermite functions. Canadian Journal of Mathemat-ics 11, 1959, 141-147.[226] S. Wigert : Sur les polynomes orthogonaux et l'approximation des fonctions continues.Arkiv f�or Matematik, Astronomi och Fysik 17, 1923, 1-15.[227] J.A. Wilson : Some hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials. SIAM Journal on Mathemat-ical Analysis 11, 1980, 690-701.[228] J.A. Wilson : Asymptotics for the 4F3 polynomials. Journal of Approximation Theory 66,1991, 58-71.[229] J. Wimp : Explicit formulas for the associated Jacobi polynomials and some applications.Canadian Journal of Mathematics 39, 1987, 983-1000.[230] J. Wimp : Pollaczek polynomials and Pad�e approximants : some closed-form expressions.Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 32, 1990, 301-310.[231] M. Wyman : The asymptotic behaviour of the Hermite polynomials. Canadian Journal ofMathematics 15, 1963, 332-349.[232] A.I. Zayed : Jacobi polynomials as generalized Faber polynomials. Transactions of theAmerican Mathematical Society 321, 1990, 363-378.[233] J. Zeng : Lin�earisation de produits de polynomes de Meixner, Krawtchouk, et Charlier.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 21, 1990, 1349-1368.

120

IndexA�ne q-Krawtchouk polynomials, 78, 96, 99,104Al-Salam-Carlitz I polynomials, 87, 97, 99,100, 106Al-Salam-Carlitz II polynomials, 88, 98, 100,106, 107Al-Salam-Chihara polynomials, 62, 94, 96,102Alternative q-Charlier polynomials, 85, 98,99, 106Askey-scheme, 22Askey-Wilson polynomials, 50, 92, 93, 101Big q-Jacobi polynomials, 57, 92, 93, 95, 102Big q-Laguerre polynomials, 72, 95, 97, 103Big q-Legendre polynomials, 58, 102Charlier polynomials, 40, 46, 47, 105, 106Chebyshev polynomials, 35Continuous q-Hahn polynomials, 55, 92, 95,101Continuous q-Hermite polynomials, 89, 97,99, 107Continuous q-Jacobi polynomials, 65, 92, 97,103Continuous q-Laguerre polynomials, 82, 96,97, 99, 105Continuous q-Legendre polynomials, 70, 103Continuous q-ultraspherical polynomials, 68,93, 96, 97, 103Continuous big q-Hermite polynomials, 80,96, 99, 105Continuous dual q-Hahn polynomials, 54, 92,94, 101Continuous dual Hahn polynomials, 27, 43,44, 101Continuous Hahn polynomials, 28, 43, 44,101Discrete q-Hermite I polynomials, 90, 100,107Discrete q-Hermite II polynomials, 91, 100,107Dual q-Hahn polynomials, 60, 94, 96, 102Dual q-Krawtchouk polynomials, 79, 94, 96,99, 104

Dual Hahn polynomials, 31, 44, 45, 102Gegenbauer polynomials, 34, 103Hahn polynomials, 29, 43, 45, 102Hermite polynomials, 41, 45{47, 105{107Jacobi polynomials, 33, 43{46, 102, 103Krawtchouk polynomials, 38, 45, 46, 104Laguerre polynomials, 39, 45{47, 103{105Legendre polynomials, 37, 102{104Little q-Jacobi polynomials, 73, 95, 97, 98,103, 104Little q-Laguerre polynomials, 84, 97, 99, 105Little q-Legendre polynomials, 74, 104Meixner polynomials, 38, 45, 46, 104Meixner-Pollaczek polynomials, 32, 44, 45,102, 103q-Charlier polynomials, 87, 98, 99, 106q-Hahn polynomials, 59, 93, 95, 96, 102q-Krawtchouk polynomials, 77, 94, 96, 98,104q-Laguerre polynomials, 84, 97{99, 105, 106q-Meixner polynomials, 75, 95, 98, 104q-Meixner-Pollaczek polynomials, 64, 95, 96,103q-Racah polynomials, 52, 93, 94, 101q-Scheme, 48, 49Quantum q-Krawtchouk polynomials, 76, 95,98, 104Racah polynomials, 25, 43, 44, 101Rogers polynomials, 68, 93, 96, 97, 103Spherical polynomials, 37, 102{104Stieltjes-Wigert polynomials, 90, 99, 107Ultraspherical polynomials, 34, 103Wall polynomials, 84, 97, 99, 105Wilson polynomials, 23, 43, 101121

The Askey-scheme of hypergeometric orthogonal polynomialsand its q-analogueRoelof Koekoek Ren�e F. SwarttouwFebruary 20, 1996List of errata in report no. 94-05� Page 7, line 1. Replace "all sets" by "all known sets".� Page 7, line -1. Replace "positive de�nite" by "positive".� Page 12, line -2. This should readlimq"1 r�s� qa1 ; : : : ; qarqb1 ; : : : ; qbs ���� q; (q � 1)1+s�rz� = rFs� a1; : : : ; arb1; : : : ; bs ���� z� :� Page 28, formula (1.4.2). The right-hand side should read�(n+ a+ c)�(n+ a+ d)�(n+ b+ c)�(n+ b+ d)(2n+ a+ b+ c + d� 1)�(n + a+ b+ c+ d� 1)n!�mn:� Page 51, formula (3.1.5). This should read(1� q)2Dq h ~w(x; aq 12 ; bq 12 ; cq 12 ; dq 12 jq)Dqy(x)i ++ �n ~w(x; a; b; c; djq)y(x) = 0; y(x) = pn(x; a; b; c; djq);where ~w(x; a; b; c; djq) := w(x; a; b; c; djq)p1� x2 :� Page 55, formula (3.3.5). This should read(1� q)2Dq h ~w(x; aq 12 ; bq 12 ; cq 12 jq)Dqy(x)i++ 4q�n+1(1 � qn) ~w(x; a; b; cjq)y(x) = 0; y(x) = pn(x; a; b; cjq);where ~w(x; a; b; cjq) := w(x; a; b; cjq)p1� x2 :� Page 56, formula (3.4.4). This should read(1� q)2Dq h ~w(x; aq 12 ; bq 12 ; cq 12 ; dq 12 ; q)Dqy(x)i ++ �n ~w(x; a; b; c; d; q)y(x) = 0; y(x) = pn(x; a; b; c; d; q);where ~w(x; a; b; c; d; q) := w(x; a; b; c; d; q)p1� x2 :1

� Page 57, formula (3.5.2). Replace (�ac)�n by (�acq2)n.� Page 58, line 9. The weight function should read(c�1qx;�d�1qx; q)1(ac�1qx;�bd�1qx; q)1 dqx:� Page 58, formula (3.5.8). Replace (�c)�n by (�cq2)n.� Page 63, formula (3.8.5). This should read(1� q)2Dq h ~w(x; aq 12 ; bq 12 jq)Dqy(x)i ++ 4q�n+1(1� qn) ~w(x; a; bjq)y(x) = 0; y(x) = Qn(x; a; bjq);where ~w(x; a; bjq) := w(x; a; bjq)p1� x2 :� Page 64, formula (3.9.4). This should read(1� q)2Dq h ~w(x; aq 12 jq)Dqy(x)i+ 4q�n+1(1� qn) ~w(x; ajq)y(x) = 0; y(x) = Pn(x; ajq);where ~w(x; ajq) := w(x; ajq)p1� x2 :� Page 66, formula (3.10.7). This should read(1� q)2Dq h ~w(x; q�+12 ; q�+ 12 jq)Dqy(x)i + �n ~w(x; q�; q�jq)y(x) = 0; y(x) = P (�;�)n (xjq);where ~w(x; q�; q�jq) := w(x; q�; q�jq)p1� x2 :� Page 66, fomula (3.10.8). This should read(1� q)2Dq h ~w(x; q�+ 12 ; q�+ 12 ; q)Dqy(x)i+ �n ~w(x; q�; q�; q)y(x) = 0; y(x) = P (�;�)n (x; q);where ~w(x; q�; q�; q) := w(x; q�; q�; q)p1� x2 :� Page 68, formula (3.10.18). This should read(1� q)2Dq h ~w(x; �q 12 jq)Dqy(x)i+ �n ~w(x; �jq)y(x) = 0; y(x) = Cn(x; �jq);where ~w(x; �jq) := w(x; �jq)p1� x2 :� Page 70, formula (3.10.27). This can be written as2(1� q2n+1)xPn(x; q) = q� 12 (1� q2n+2)Pn+1(x; q) + q 12 (1� q2n)Pn�1(x; q):2

� Page 70, formula (3.10.28). This should read(1 � q)2Dq [ ~w(x; q; q)Dqy(x)] + �n ~w(x; q 12 ; q)y(x) = 0; y(x) = Pn(x; q);where ~w(x; a; q) := w(x; a; q)p1� x2 :� Page 71, formula (3.11.2). Replace (�ab)�n by (�abq2)n.� Page 80, formula (3.18.5). This should read(1� q)2Dq h ~w(x; aq 12 jq)Dqy(x)i+ 4q�n+1(1� qn) ~w(x; ajq)y(x) = 0; y(x) = Hn(x; ajq);where ~w(x; ajq) := w(x; ajq)p1� x2 :� Page 82, formula (3.19.5). This can also be written as2xP (�)n (xjq) = q� 12�� 14 (1� qn+1)P (�)n+1(xjq) ++ qn+ 12�+ 14 (1 + q 12 )P (�)n (xjq) + q 12�+ 14 (1� qn+�)P (�)n�1(xjq):� Page 82, formula (3.19.6). This can also be written as2xP (�)n (x; q) = q� 12 (1 � q2n+2)P (�)n+1(x; q) ++ q2n+�+ 12 (1 + q)P (�)n (x; q) + q 12 (1� q2n+2�)P (�)n�1(x; q):� Page 82, formula (3.19.7). This should read(1� q)2Dq h ~w(x; q�+12 jq)Dqy(x)i + 4q�n+1(1� qn) ~w(x; q�jq)y(x) = 0; y(x) = P (�)n (xjq);where ~w(x; q�jq) := w(x; q�jq)p1� x2 :� Page 82, formula (3.19.8). This should read(1� q)2Dq h ~w(x; q�+12 ; q)Dqy(x)i+ 4q�n+1(1� qn) ~w(x; q�; q)y(x) = 0; y(x) = P (�)n (x; q);where ~w(x; q�; q) := w(x; q�; q)p1� x2 :� Page 87, formula (3.24.4). This should read(1� qn)x2y(x) = aqn�1y(qx) � �aqn�1 + qn(1� x)(a � x)� y(x) ++ qn(1� x)(a� x)y(q�1x); y(x) = U (a)n (x; q):� Page 87, formula (3.25.4). This should read�(1 � qn)x2y(x) = (1� x)(a� x)y(qx) � [(1� x)(a� x) + aq]y(x) ++ aqy(q�1x); y(x) = V (a)n (x; q):� Page 88, formula (3.26.2). Replace d� by dx.3

� Page 88, formula (3.26.4). This should read(1� q)2Dq [ ~w(x)Dqy(x)] + 4q�n+1(1� qn) ~w(x)y(x) = 0; y(x) = Hn(xjq);where ~w(x) := w(x)p1� x2 :� Page 90, formula (3.28.4). This should read�q�n+1x2y(x) = y(qx) � (1 + q)y(x) + q(1� x2)y(q�1x); y(x) = hn(x; q):� Page 90, formula (3.29.1). This should read~hn(x; q) = i�nV (�1)n (ix; q) = i�nq�(n2)2�0� q�n; ix� ���� q;�qn�= xn2�1� q�n; q�n+10 ���� q2;� q2x2� :� Page 90, formula (3.29.2). This can be written as1Xk=�1 h~hm(cqk; q)~hn(cqk; q) + ~hm(�cqk; q)~hn(�cqk; q)iw(cqk)qk= 2(q2;�c2q;�c�2q; q2)1(q;�c2;�c�2q2; q2)1 (q; q)nqn2 �mn; c > 0;where w(x) = 1(ix; q)1(�ix; q)1 = 1(�x2; q2)1 :� Page 90, formula (3.29.4). This should read�(1� qn)x2y(x) = (1 + x2)y(qx) � (1 + x2 + q)y(x) + qy(q�1x); y(x) = ~hn(x; q):� Page 109. Reference [40] : "bf A 25" should read A 25.AcknowledgementWe thank G. Gasper, J. Koekoek, H.T. Koelink, and T.H. Koornwinder for pointing us tosome of these errata.4