academic integrity in online learning
TRANSCRIPT
1
Best Practices for Ensuring Academic Integrity in online learning
This brief report includes effective policies and practices used by some
educational institutions for promoting academic integrity in online learning.
In May 2009, the Instructional Technology Council (ITC 2009, p. 1)
survived its memberships to invite feedback to enhance the online learning.
The survey emphasized and aimed the following areas to be responsible and
knowledgeable for maintaining the academic integrity.
• Institutional Context and Commitment
• Curriculum and Instruction
• Faculty support
• Student support
• Assessment and Evaluation
In the academic integration, the educational institutions are mostly seen
involving and informing faculty members and students about the relevant
issues. An interesting finding is that,
…. 52% students indicated that they obtained integrity information
from the institutions website while nearly 48% indicated that they did
not. 8% (Spaulding, 2009, p.195).
The University of Medicine & Dentistry (UMDN) of New Jersey in 2007
recommended 7 academic integrity practices. They are: having clear and
consistent policies and practices, educating entire community, rigorous
2
practice from top to bottom, clear approaches to academic violations,
development of academic integrity, be alert in higher technological
education, and regular assess to check the effectiveness of policy and
procedures. UMDN (2007) and WCET(2009) stressed on the similar
approaches to the academic integrity as focusing on the policies and
procedures. According to best practices in academic integration at UMDNJ,
the unique characteristics of policies and procedures are included as follows:
• Code of academic integrity,
• Honor code,
• A code of professional conduct,
• Emphasis on positive behaviors and expectations,
• Clear instruction,
• Tracking mechanism to identify students with repeated violations of
academic integrity policy
• Evaluation mechanism, orientation to students on the issues,
• Student honesty declarations on paper and exam are highly
considered.
A research conducted by Michael Spaulding of the University of Tennessee
entitled, Perceptions of Academic Honesty in Online vs. Face-to Face
Classrooms claims that the Black board features offer safeguards to help
eliminate some of the problems involving academic integrity (p. 183). The
3
safeguard process generally becomes active while using the Respondus that
locks the user’s browser and limits the Internet access to further
information. In addition, it seems that the Blackboard contains plagiarism
detection systems software what the educational institutions use.
As general practices if academic integration, Spaulding (2009)
encourages to understand the perceptions of students toward academic
dishonest that would help preserve the academic integration. So, the
findings strongly suggest that a majority of existing research in AI tends to
focus on a top-down approach!
For example, McCabe et al. (2001) claimed that most of the academic
behaviors of students are the result of the institution’s honor codes and
Academic Integrity (AI) programs. The finding also argued that a joint effort
of staffs and students helps to create and implement academic honesty
policies (2009, p.196).
In summary, educational institutions have policies and AI maintaining
strategies through different doors. The defined policies, practices and
principals established for the AI, if learned and applied together by all
subordinating people (faculty, students, and stakeholders), the inclusive
shared responsibilities would preserve the online learning AI. The AI is a
multi-pronged approach.
References:
4
http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/8.3.1.pdf http://jolt.merlot.org/vol5no2/mcnabb_0609.pdf http://www.creighton.edu/sites/www.creighton.edu/files/group-basic-page/group-basic-page-file/DistanceTeachingStandards_6_17_13_0.pdf http://www.bakersfieldcollege.edu/distance_learning/instructor/Academic_Integrity_Online_Courses_cclf.pdf http://rbhs.rutgers.edu/rwjlbweb/meg/docs/Best_Practices_AI.pdf