acarbose
TRANSCRIPT
Acarbose
An update
Way Back When!!
• 1980 –one oral med for Type 2 DM - few animal derived insulins
• No published standards of care• No home glucose monitors• The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study
(UKPDS) was years away• Primary objective was to prevent hyperosmolar coma and
diabetic ketoacidosis• Today several classes of oral medications• Home glucose monitors, insulin pumps, some with built in
glucose monitors• Most importantly “Standards of Care”
Diabetes a Challenging Disease
• Complex challenge with use of various meds• Complex challenge with the psyche of each individual
patient• My patients are experimental models and they are told that• Patients are told we will work together to find the right
combination of meds, exercise and diet to control their sugars
• Patients lifestyle has to be considered:– Activity level– Hours of work– Timing of meals
Today’s agenda
• Understanding diabetes criteria
• Understanding carbohydrate metabolism
• Understanding acarbose
• Studies with Acarbose
• Competitors
• Summary
ADA DM Criteria using FBG (2003)
DIABETES MELLITUSDIABETES MELLITUS
IMPAIRED FASTING IMPAIRED FASTING GLUCOSEGLUCOSE
NORMALNORMAL
FBGFBG *
126126 ( or 2-hr PG 200; or random BG 200 + symptoms)
100-125100-125
<100<100
(* Diagnosis of DM or IFG needs confirmation on another day)
1998 WHO Criteria for DM and Impaired 1998 WHO Criteria for DM and Impaired Glucose Tolerance using FBG and 2-hr PG Glucose Tolerance using FBG and 2-hr PG
((Diabetes Med 15: 539, 1998)FBG (mg/dL) 2-hr PG (mg/dL)
126 OROR 200
<126 ANDAND 140-199
<126 ANDAND <140IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; PG, postprandial glucose
(Diagnosis of DM or IGT needs confirmation on another day)
DMDM
IGTIGT
NORMALNORMAL
Glucose intolerance
Normal Impaired glucose tolerance Type 2 diabetes
T i m e
IGT and CV outcomes
• IGT but not FPG predicted later CV disease in Japan (1999, Diabetes Care)
• 2-hr PG but not FPG predicted mortality in DECODE study (1999, Lancet)
• 2-hr PG predicted CV outcomes better than FPG in Framingham study (2002, Diabetes Care)
• 2-hr PG had greater predictive value for coronary events and overall CV mortality than FPG in Finland (2002, Euro Heart J)
• Conclusion: Postprandial glucose, reflecting glucose intolerance, is more predictive of CV risk and mortality than FPG.
IGT and Risk of Vascular Disease
Macrovascularcoronary disease, etc.
Microvascular
retinopathy, nephropathy
Marked increased risk
No increased risk
Fate of Absorbed Glucose
GGlycogenesis
Glycolysis Muscle Cells 50 %
GGlycolysis
Lipogenesis
GGlycogenesis
Glycolysis
Liver Cells 30 %
Fat Cells 5 %
Glucose Ingestion/Absorption
• Dietary intake of complex or simple carbs- mono-, di-, or polysaccharides
• Rapid transit from mouth through esophagus to stomach– Gastric emptying, regulated by duodenal osmoreceptors and
inhibitory GI hormones and peptides• Intestinal digestion to monosaccharides by amylases and
intestinal disaccharidases– Rapid intestinal glucose uptake (sodium-coupled)
• Entry into portal blood with delivery to liver (first) and then peripheral blood (glucose “excursions”)
• Disposal of glucose (rapid=glucose tolerance; slow=glucose intolerance)
Some Ways to Blunt Glucose Excursions into Blood
• Reduce total caloric intake per day and per meal• Reduce % of calories as carbs (low carb)• Eat/drink slower• Slow gastric emptying ( in early type 2 DM)• Increase fiber composition of the diet• Block enzymatic digestion of complex carbohydrate
to monosaccharide – acarbose (PrecoseR) or meglitol (GlysetR)
Fate today
• There is an increasing preference for antidiabetic treatments to regulate post-meal blood glucose.
What are alpha-glucosidase inhibitors?
Understanding Acarbose
The α-Glucosidase Inhibitors:Basic Characteristics of Acarbose & Miglitol
• Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors are saccharides that act as competitive inhibitors– of enzymes needed to digest carbohydrates: specifically
alpha-glucosidase enzymes – in the brush border of the small intestines.
• The membrane-bound intestinal alpha-glucosidases hydrolyze oligosaccharides, trisaccharides, and disaccharides to glucose and other monosaccharides in the small intestine.
The α-Glucosidase Inhibitors:Basic Characteristics of Acarbose & Miglitol
• Acarbose also blocks pancreatic alpha-amylase in addition to inhibiting membrane-bound alpha-glucosidases.
• Pancreatic alpha-amylase hydrolyzes complex starches to oligosaccharides in the lumen of the small intestine.
• Since alpha-glucosidase inhibitors are competitive inhibitors of the digestive enzymes, they must be taken at the start of main meals to have maximal effect.
• Their effects on blood sugar levels following meals will depend on the amount of complex carbohydrates in meal.
The α-Glucosidase Inhibitors:Basic Characteristics of Acarbose & Miglitol
• Inhibition of these enzyme systems reduces the rate of digestion of carbohydrates.
• Less glucose is absorbed because the carbohydrates are not broken down into glucose molecules.
• In diabetic patients, – the short-term effect of these drugs therapies is to
decrease current blood glucose levels: – the long term effect is a small reduction in hemoglobin
A1c levels.
The α-Glucosidase Inhibitors:Basic Characteristics of Acarbose & Miglitol
• Examples of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors include:– Acarbose- Precose– Miglitol - Glyset– Voglibose
• Even though the drugs act similarly, there are subtle differences between acarbose and miglitol. – Acarbose is an oligosaccharide, whereas miglitol resembles a
monosaccharide. – Miglitol is fairly well-absorbed by the body, as opposed to
acarbose. – Moreover, acarbose inhibits pancreatic alpha-amylase in addition
to alpha-glucosidase.
The α-Glucosidase Inhibitors:Basic Characteristics of Acarbose & Miglitol
Medical Management of Type 2 Diabetes. 4th ed. Alexandria, Va: American Diabetes Association; 1998:1-139.
4-7
Mechanism of action Delays carbohydrate absorption
Depends upon Postprandial hyperglycemia
Power Decreases HbA1c 0.5% to 1%
Dosing 3 times daily
Side effects Flatulence
Main risk Liver enzyme elevation (rare)
The α-Glucosidase Inhibitors:Basic Characteristics of Acarbose & Miglitol
Medical Management of Type 2 Diabetes. 4th ed. Alexandria, Va: American Diabetes Association; 1998:1-139.
4-7
Best candidates Marked postprandial
Not recommended in Intestinal or liver disease
Starting dosage 25 mg QD for 2-4 weeks25 mg QD for 2-4 weeks25 mg BID for 2-4 weeks25 mg TID for 2-4 weeks50 mg TID, if needed
Adjust dosage Weekly, if needed and tolerated
Monitoring method SMBG, including postprandial
α - Glycosidase Inhibititor
• Acarbose– Indicated for type 2 diabetes
• In addition with diet
• In addition with other anti-diabetic therapies
• Mode of action:– Poorly absorbed 1% (act locally in G.I.T.)
– Inhibits α glucosidase, so inhibits CHO degradation
• Dose:– 50mg to 100mg 3 times daily before meals
Acarbose
• Side effects:– Flatulence (77%), Diarrhea, Abdominal pain (21%)
• Since alpha-glucosidase inhibitors prevent the degradation of complex carbohydrates into glucose, the carbohydrates will remain in the intestine.
• In the colon, bacteria will digest the complex carbohydrates, thereby causing gastrointestinal side effects such as flatulence and diarrhea.
• Since these effects are dose-related, it is generally advised to start with a low dose and gradually ↑ the dose to the desired amount.
– Decreased iron absorption
Acarbose
• Side effects:– If a patient using an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor suffers
from an episode of hypoglycemia, the patient should eat something containing monosaccharides, such as glucose tablets.
– Since the drug will prevent the digestion of polysaccharides (or non-monosaccharides), non-monosaccharide foods may not effectively reverse a hypoglycemic episode in a patient taking an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor.
Clinical studies
Acarbose
Meta-analysis of 7 long-term studies
M Hanefeld et al. Eur Heart J 25:10; 2004Acarbose reduces the risk for AMI in type 2 diabetic patients:
Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the time to develop any CV event during treatment with either acarbose/placebo
placebo
acarbose
GLUCOSE
meal snack
STOP-NIDDM trial using Acarbose
• The STOP-NIDDM Trial was done to check the effect of Acarbose on the probability of remaining free of CVD
• 1429 patients from 9 countries with IGT– Men and women equally represented; ave. BMI =
30.9– Randomized to placebo or acarbose, 100 gm tid with
meals
JL Chiasson et al. JAMA 290:486; 2003.
STOP-NIDDM trial using Acarbose
JL Chiasson et al. JAMA 290:486; 2003.
STOP-NIDDM trial using Acarbose
JL Chiasson et al. JAMA 290:486; 2003.
MAJOR CV EVENTSMAJOR CV EVENTS
HYPERTENSIONHYPERTENSION