!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!

!

!!!Accelerator Division !!!!!!!!!!

Steve Peggs and Karin Rathsman

ESS-2010 Baseline Parameters – A Snapshot

29 December 2010

ESS AD Technical Note ESS/AD/0007

!

ESS/AD/0007December 29, 2010

ESS-2010 Baseline parameters - a snapshot

Steve Peggs and Karin Rathsman

Contents

1 Introduction 2

1.1 Table owner, parameter validator, and status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.2 Future evolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

2 Parameter Tables 3

2.1 High Level Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32.2 Lattice and Accelerator Science . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42.3 Ion Source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52.4 Low Energy Beam Transport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52.5 Radio Frequency Quadrupole . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52.6 Medium Energy Beam Transport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62.7 Drift Tube Linac . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62.8 Spoke resonators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72.9 Elliptical cavity linac . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

2.9.1 Low beta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82.9.2 High beta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

2.10 High Energy Beam Transport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102.11 Target . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102.12 Infrastructure Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

2.12.1 Electrical systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112.12.2 Vacuum systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132.12.3 HVAC systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142.12.4 Auxiliary systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142.12.5 Cooling system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152.12.6 Cryogenics systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

2.13 RF Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

1

1 Introduction

This note contains a snapshot of the parameters of the ESS-2010 Baseline that was released at the end of 2010.Some of the parameters are very solid and well established, such as the proton beam power on target (5 MW,

according to the “High Level Parameters” table). Other parameters, such as the total length of the linac (∼420 maccording to “Lattice and Accelerator Science”), are still subject to modest evolutionary change. Still other pa-rameters, such as the beam diagnostics count, are not yet present in the parameter tables. Although it is as yetincomplete, and is incompletely frozen, nonetheless the ESS-2010 Baseline parameters are available as a coherentwhole for inspection and discussion, as a base from which to develop the Technical Design Report parameters. “Live”parameter tables are currently maintained on-line at http://esss.se/linac/Parameters.html

Parameter tables are not appropriate for the maintenance of accelerator optics or layout geometry models. Theseare maintained in the BLED relational database system that is also already in place, but which is also underdevelopment in parallel to the parameter table system. Nevertheless, parameter tables are a useful repository (forexample) for RF parameters and for other systems that depend on the layout geometry alone. Other derivedparameters – such as power consumption or radiation levels – will also be recorded in parameter tables, in the future.

1.1 Table owner, parameter validator, and status

Each of the many parameter tables encompasses a single common topic, which could correspond (for example) toa section of the linac, to a work package in an accelerator project, or to any other way that a set of parametersnaturally belong together. Each table has an owner, who is identified in the table header along with the last date ofany table revision. More topics and owners will be identified as the accelerator projects proceed, and so more tableswill be added. New owners may be identified by ESS line management or by accelerator project management, ornew owners may identify themselves and request that new tables be added.

Each row in a table associates the name of a validator with the name, value and other attributes of a parameter.Table owners and parameter validators work together to ensure the integrity and accuracy of each parameter. Themanner in which to perform this mutual act is still under discussion and development.

Both the individual tables, and also the individual rows in each table, have the status of Draft, Active, or Obsolete.A newly introduced parameter (for example in a new table), or a newly modified parameter, will be Draft until thevalidator (and implicitly the table owner) are ready to vouch for it. Similarly, the table owner and the parameterlist administrators (currently the authors of this note) must vouch for a table before it moves from Draft to Active

status. Table owners and administrators must ensure that a parameter has an appropriate date attached, if it is tobe declared Active. If the value of a parameter is changed, but the parameter is to remain Active, the date must alsochange. A parameter may become no longer relevant, and/or is not to be used, rather than simply changes in value.In the case that such a parameter must remain visible, even though it is no longer valid, then it becomes Obsolete.

1.2 Future evolution

The parameter table system primarily serves as a tool to propose and validate agreed parameters and their values.It can also be used as a repository for accelerator parameters in general, and as a source to find certified acceleratorparameters. This requires that the parameter lists are regularly updated (are live) and are easy to administer andaccess. The present approach of distributing XLS source files for editing and return has the advantage of beingsimple and broadly accessible. Nevertheless, this system will become difficult to handle as the number of tables andparameters increases. Further, the validation chain process needs to better defined, and needs to be embedded in amore formal tool, such as EDMS.

In the near future an enhanced parameter table system will be proposed, based on relational database structuresand tools. By maintaining and developing the parameters in a robust database, and by providing import/exportrecords via a convenient web interface, the parameter list administrators will be able to continue to provide conve-nient and efficient parameter access, at the same time as assuring appropriately minimised formal validation chainenforcement.

2

2 Parameter Tables

2.1 High Level Parameters

1(1)

HIGH LEVEL PARAMETERS (M. Lindroos) 12-Oct-10Parameter Unit Value Status Date Validator CommentAverage beam power MW 5 Active 12-Oct-10 M. LindroosNumber of instruments C. CarlileReliability % 95 Active 12-Oct-10 M. LindroosAverage beam loss along linac W/m 1 Active 12-Oct-10 M. Lindroos MaximumProton kinetic energy on target MeV 2500 Active 12-Oct-10 M. LindroosAverage macro-pulse current mA 50 Active 12-Oct-10 M. LindroosMacro-pulse length ms 2 Active 12-Oct-10 M. LindroosPulse repetition rate Hz 20 Active 12-Oct-10 M. LindroosDuty factor % 4 Active 12-Oct-10 M. LindroosAnnual operating period h 5200 Draft M. Lindroos Including start up and development. Full power.

3

2.2 Lattice and Accelerator Science

1(1)

LATTICE & ACCELERATOR SCIENCE (S. Peggs) 15-Dec-10Parameter Unit Value Status Date Validator CommentIon source output energy MeV 0.075 Active 23-Oct-10 M. LindroosRFQ output energy MeV 3 Active 23-Oct-10 M. LindroosDTL output energy MeV 50 Active 23-Oct-10 M. Lindroos 100 MeV has also been proposedSpoke resonator output energy MeV ~200 Active 15-Dec-10 M. EshraqiElliptical low beta output energy MeV ~500 Active 15-Dec-10 M. EshraqiElliptical high beta output energy MeV 2500 Active 23-Oct-10 M. LindroosProton kinetic energy on target MeV 2500 Active 23-Oct-10 M. Lindroos

Ion source length m 2.5 Active 15-Dec-10 S. GamminoLEBT length m 1.6 Active 15-Dec-10 S. GamminoRFQ length m 4.0 Active 15-Dec-10 S. GamminoMEBT length m 2.5 Active 15-Dec-10 S. GamminoDTL length m 19.0 Active 15-Dec-10 S. GamminoSpoke resonator section length m ~52 Active 15-Dec-10 S. BoussonElliptical low beta section length m ~57 Active 15-Dec-10 G. DevanzElliptical high beta section length m ~215 Active 15-Dec-10 G. DevanzHEBT length, to target m ~100 Active 15-Dec-10 S. Pape-MøllerLength, source-to-target m ~420 Active 15-Dec-10 M. EshraqiDepth of linac below ground level m 10 Active 15-Dec-10 S. Peggs Tech Note ESS/AD/0003

Number of accelerating gaps per spoke cavity 3 Active 15-Dec-10 R. Duperrier Double spoke resonatorNumber of cells per low beta elliptical cavity 5 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierNumber of cells per high beta elliptical cavity 5 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierSpoke resonator cavities per cryomodule 3 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierLow beta elliptical cavities per cryomodule 3 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierHigh beta elliptical cavities per cryomodule 6 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierGeometric beta, spoke resonators 0.53 Active 15-Dec-10 R. DuperrierGeometric beta, low beta elliptical cavities 0.65 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierGeometric beta, high beta elliptical cavities 0.86 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierOperational voltage, spoke resonators MV 8.5 Active 15-Dec-10 M. Eshraqi MaximumOperational voltage, low beta elliptical cavities MV M. Eshraqi MaximumOperational voltage, high beta elliptical cavities MV M. Eshraqi MaximumExpected gradient, low beta elliptical, horizontal MV/m 15 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierExpected gradient, low beta, vertical test MV/m 17 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierExpected gradient, high beta elliptical, horizontal MV/m 18 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierExpected gradient, high beta, vertical test MV/m 20 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierElliptical power coupler power, to beam MW 1.2 Draft 15-Dec-10 G. Devanz Maximum

4

2.3 Ion Source

1(1)

ION SOURCE (L. Celona) 16-Dec-10Parameter Unit Value Status Date Validator CommentPeak current mA 60 Active 16-Dec-10 M. Lindroos MaximumEnergy MeV 0.075 Active 23-Oct-10 M. LindroosLength m 2.5 Active 16-Dec-10 S. GamminoTransversal emittance ! mm mrad 0.2 Active 16-Dec-10 L. Celona (RMS norm. Emittance for Hor. and Vert. planes) 0.25 maximum expected at 90 mA.Longitudinal emittance deg MeV 0.2 Active 16-Dec-10 L. Celona

2.4 Low Energy Beam Transport

1(1)

LOW ENERGY BEAM TRANSPORT (L. Celona) 16-Dec-10Parameter Unit Value Status Date Validator CommentLength m 1.6 Active 16-Dec-10 S. GamminoTransverse acceptance ! mm mrad 0.4 Active 16-Dec-10 L. Celona RMS norm. EmittanceLongitudinal acceptance deg MeV 0.3 Active 16-Dec-10 L. CelonaVacuum mbar 1.E-05 Active 16-Dec-10 L.CelonaFocusing type Active 16-Dec-10 L. Celona two solenoid

2.5 Radio Frequency Quadrupole

1(1)

RADIO FREQUENCY QUADRUPOLE (B. Pottin) 15-Dec-10Parameter Unit Value Status Date Validator CommentOutput energy MeV 3.0 Active 23-Oct-10 M. LindroosLength m 4.88 Draft S. GamminoRF frequency MHz 352.21 Active 23-Oct-10 M. LindroosTemperature K 300 Active 23-Oct-10 M. LindroosAccelerating gradient MV/m 0.46 Draft MaximumPower at coupler kW MaximumPeak electric field on poles Kilpatricks 1.8 Active 15-Dec-10 A. PontonAverage pole radius (R0), minimum mm 3.463 Active 15-Dec-10 A. Ponton At ~1.25 mAverage pole radius (R0) mm 3.635 Active 15-Dec-10 A. Ponton First cell after radial matching sectionAverage pole radius (R0), maximum mm 4.599 Active 15-Dec-10 A. Ponton Last cellMinimum aperture (a), minimum mm 2.923 Active 15-Dec-10 A. Ponton Last cellMinimum aperture (a) mm 3.635 Active 15-Dec-10 A. Ponton First cell after radial matching sectionMinimum aperture (a), maximum mm 3.711 Active 15-Dec-10 A. Ponton At ~2.65 mIntervane voltage, minimum kV 80 Active 15-Dec-10 A. PontonIntervane voltage, maximum kV 119 Active 15-Dec-10 A. PontonRatio of curvature: rho/R0 0.77 Active 15-Dec-10 A. Ponton ConstantTotal length of vanes m 4.86 Active 15-Dec-10 A. PontonModulation factor, maximum 2.1462 Active 15-Dec-10 A. Ponton

5

2.6 Medium Energy Beam Transport

1(1)

MEDIUM ENERGY BEAM TRANSPORT (I. Bustinduy) 15-Dec-10Parameter Unit Value Status Date Validator CommentLength m 2.5 Active 15-Dec-10 S. Gammino

2.7 Drift Tube Linac

1(1)

DRIFT TUBE LINAC (A. Pisent) 01-Dec-10Parameter Unit Value Status Date Validator CommentOutput energy MeV 50.0 Active 23-Oct-10 M. Lindroos 100 MeV has also been proposedLength m 19.0 Active 15-Nov-10 S. Gammino CERN design taken as a temporary baselineRF frequency MHz 352.21 Active 23-Oct-10 S. PeggsTemperature K 300 Active 23-Oct-10 S. PeggsAccelerating gradient MV/m 3.0 Active 15-Nov-10 S. Gammino MaximumNumber of tanks 3 Active 15-Nov-10 S. GamminoNumber of rf power sources 3 Active 15-Nov-10 K. Rathsman One source per cavityPower per RF power source MW 2.5 Active 15-Nov-10 K. RathsmanPower at coupler MW 1.0 Active 15-Nov-10 S. Gammino MaximumMechanical length of module m 2.0 Active 15-Nov-10 S. Gammino Maximum

6

2.8 Spoke resonators

1(1)

SPOKE RESONATORS (S. Bousson) 16-Dec-10Parameter Unit Value Status Date Validator CommentOutput energy MeV ~200 Draft M. EshraqiLength m ~52 Draft S. BoussonRF frequency MHz 352.21 Active 23-Oct-10 S. PeggsTemperature K 2 Draft S. Peggs 4 K also proposed.Geometric beta 0.53 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierOperational gradient MV/m 8.5 Draft M. Eshraqi Max. Corresponds to 35 MV/m max peak surface electric fieldOperational voltage MV 3.3 Draft M. Eshraqi Max. Corresponds to 35 MV/m max peak surface electric fieldNumber of modules 15 Draft M. EshraqiNumber of rf power sources 45 Draft K. Rathsman one source per cavityPower (transmitted to the beam) kW 165 Draft S. Bousson Maximum (for Ib=50 mA, 2ms pulse length, 20 Hz rep rate)Length of module Draft S. BoussonTransverse acceptance Draft S. BoussonLongitudinal acceptance Draft S. BoussonCavities per module 3 Draft M. EshraqiQuadrupoles per module 1 / 0 Draft M. Eshraqi 1 if non segmented, 0 if segmentedEpk/Eacc 4.1 Draft S. Bousson with Lacc = Ngap.!."/2Bpk/Eacc 9.0 Draft S. Bousson with Lacc = Ngap.!."/2Expected gradient, horizontal MV/m 8.5 Draft S. Bousson at 2KExpected gradient, vertical test MV/m 10 Draft S. Bousson at 2KCavity Q0 (low field) 5. 109 Draft S. Bousson at 2KFundamental mode Qext Draft S. BoussonFundamental mode R/Q Ohm Draft S. BoussonNiobium thickness (nominal) mm 4 Draft S. BoussonBeam port aperture mm 50 Draft S. BoussonCoupler port aperture mm 56 Draft S. BoussonLength (flange to flange) m Draft S. BoussonLacc m Draft S. BoussonDissipated power at nominal gradientW Draft S. BoussonNominal power for FPC conditionningkW 400 Draft S. Bousson Pulsed, 2 times the power transmitted to the beam + margin.

7

2.9 Elliptical cavity linac

2.9.1 Low beta

1(1)

ELLIPTICAL CAVITY LINAC, LOW BETA (G. Devanz) 16-Dec-10Parameter Unit Value Status Date Validator CommentOutput energy MeV ~500 Draft 23-Oct-10 M. EshraqiLength, elliptical low beta section m ~57 Draft 23-Oct-10 G. DevanzRF frequency MHz 704.42 Active 23-Oct-10 S. PeggsTemperature K 2 Draft 23-Oct-10 G. DevanzGeometric beta 0.65 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierOperational voltage MV M. Eshraqi MaximumExpected gradient, horizontal MV/m 15 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierExpected gradient, vertical test MV/m 17 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierCavity Q0 2.0E+10 Draft 22-Nov-10 G. DevanzFundamental mode Qext 5.8E+05 Draft 22-Nov-10 G. DevanzFundamental mode R/Q Ohm 300 Draft 22-Nov-10 G. DevanzNumber of modules M. EshraqiNumber of rf power sources K. Rathsman One source per cavityPower coupler power, to beam MW 1.2 Active 23-Oct-10 G. Devanz MaximumNumber of cells per cavity 5 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierLength of cryomodule m W. HeesTransverse acceptanceLongitudinal acceptanceCavities per cryomodule 3 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierQuadrupoles per module 1 Draft 16-Dec-10 M. EshraqiQuadrupole magnetic length mm 400 Draft 16-Dec-10 M. EshraqiQuadrupole gradient T/m 7 Draft 16-Dec-10 M. Eshraqi MaximumQuadrupole aperture mm 50 Draft 16-Dec-10 M. Eshraqi radius

8

2.9.2 High beta

1(1)

ELLIPTICAL CAVITY LINAC, HIGH BETA (G. Devanz) 16-Dec-10Parameter Unit Value Status Date Validator CommentOutput energy 2500 Active 23-Oct-10 M. LindroosLength, elliptical high beta section m ~215 Draft 23-Oct-10 G. DevanzRF frequency MHz 704.42 Active 23-Oct-10 S. PeggsTemperature K 2 Active 23-Oct-10 G. DevanzGeometric beta 0.86 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierOperational voltage MV M. Eshraqi MaximumExpected gradient, horizontal MV/m 18 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierExpected gradient, vertical test MV/m 20 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierCavity Q0 2.0E+10 Draft 22-Nov-10 G. DevanzFundamental mode Qext 6.8E5 Draft 22-Nov-10 G. Devanz For Ib=50 mAFundamental mode R/Q Ohm 500 Draft 22-Nov-10 G. DevanzNumber of modules M. EshraqiNumber of rf power sources K. Rathsman One source per cavityPower coupler power, to beam MW 1.2 Active 22-Nov-10 G. Devanz MaximumNumber of cells per cavity 5 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierCavity length m 1.3 Draft 08-Nov-10 G. Devanz Flange to flangeLength of cryomodule m W. HeesTransverse acceptanceLongitudinal acceptanceCavities per cryomodule 6 Active 23-Oct-10 R. DuperrierQuadrupoles per module 1 Draft 16-Dec-10 M. EshraqiQuadrupole magnetic length mm 400 Draft 16-Dec-10 M. EshraqiQuadrupole gradient T/m 7 Draft 16-Dec-10 M. Eshraqi MaximumQuadrupole aperture mm 50 Draft 16-Dec-10 M. Eshraqi radius

9

2.10 High Energy Beam Transport

1(1)

HIGH ENERGY BEAM TRANSPORT (S. Pape-Møller) 17-Nov-10Parameter Unit Value Status Date Validator CommentLength m ~100 Draft S. Pape-Møller2'nd long-pulse target station option y/n n Active 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerCompressor (H-) ring option y/n n Active 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerMuon target option y/n y Active 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerNominal beam energy GeV 2.5 Active 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerMax. Operational energy GeV 2,625 Active 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerMinimum operational energy GeV 2.0 Draft 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerRMS energy spread at linac output % 0.14 Draft 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerHorisontal linac output rms emittance !mm∙mrad 0.4 Draft 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerVertical linac output rms emittance !mm∙mrad 0.4 Draft 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerHorizontal rms beam size at exit of linac mm 3 Draft 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerVertical rms beam size at exit of linac mm 3 Draft 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerMax. time average current density over beam footprint on target µA/cm2 70 Active 15-Nov-10 F. Plewinski To avoid thermal stressesSlope of max time average current density over footprint µA/cm3 F. Plewinski To avoid sharp shouldersPeak time average current density (over 1 cm2) on target µA/cm2 140 Draft 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerMinimum spot area cm2 28.6 Active 15-Nov-10 F. Plewinski Matched to maximum current densityHor. (> 5% intensity) beamsize on target mm 200 Draft 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerVert. (> 5% intensity) beamsize on target mm 50 Draft 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerBeam flatness Draft 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerBeam tails Draft 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerMain target beam spreader scheme Quads/multipoles/painting Draft 15-Nov-10 S. Pape Møller All 3 options to be studiedVertical beam entrance angle on target ° 0/2 Draft 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerHorisontal deflection angle in HEBT ° 0 Active 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerVertical elevation between linac and target m 11.6 Active 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerHor. 95% beamsize on tuning beam dump mm 30 Draft 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerVert. 95% beamsize on tuning beam dump mm 30 Draft 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerDefocusing scheme on tuning beam dump Quadrupoles Active 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerBeam admittance inside vacuum tube !mm∙mrad 50 Draft 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerVacuum pressure nBar 1 Draft 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerBeta halo collimators 0/2/4 Draft 15-Nov-10 S. Pape MøllerEnergy halo collimators 0/1 Draft 15-Nov-10 S. Pape Møller

2.11 Target

1(1)

TARGET (S. Peggs) 22-Nov-10Parameter Unit Value Status Date Validator CommentPeak power on target during macropulse MW 125 Active K. RathsmanRate of beam trips of less than 0.5 sec per day 100 Draft C. Kharoua Long term goal value, at 5 MW.Rate of beam trips of 1 to 10 sec per day 10 Draft C. Kharoua Long term goal value, at 5 MW.Rate of beam trips of more than 10 sec per day 1 Draft C. Kharoua Long term goal value, at 5 MW.Height of target above groumd level m 1.6 Draft F. Plewinski

10

2.12 Infrastructure Services

2.12.1 Electrical systems

INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES (J. Eguia) 22-Nov-10Parameter Unit Value Status Date Validator CommentConnected Load MVAAverage beam loss along linac W/m 1 Active 12-Oct-10 M. Lindroos MaximumAnnual operating period h 5200 Draft 12-Oct-10 M. Lindroos Including start up and development. Full power.

Electrical systemsIon source Consumed (Real) PowerReactive PowerAparent PowerKlystrons connectedEquipment Racks connectedDiagnosticsMagnetsLEBT Consumed (Real) PowerReactive PowerAparent PowerEquipment Racks connectedDiagnosticsRFQ Consumed (Real) PowerReactive PowerAparent PowerKlystrons connectedDiagnosticsMEBT Consumed (Real) PowerReactive PowerAparent PowerEquipment Racks connectedDiagnosticsDTL Consumed (Real) PowerReactive PowerAparent PowerKlystrons connectedMagnetsDiagnosticsSpoke resonator section Consumed (Real) PowerReactive PowerAparent PowerKlystrons connectedMagnetsDiagnosticsElliptical low beta section Consumed (Real) PowerReactive PowerAparent PowerKlystrons connectedDiagnosticsMagnetsElliptical high beta section Consumed (Real) PowerReactive PowerAparent PowerKlystrons connectedDiagnosticsMagnetsHEBT Consumed (Real) PowerReactive PowerAparent Power

11

INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES (J. Eguia) 22-Nov-10Parameter Unit Value Status Date Validator CommentConnected Load MVAAverage beam loss along linac W/m 1 Active 12-Oct-10 M. Lindroos MaximumAnnual operating period h 5200 Draft 12-Oct-10 M. Lindroos Including start up and development. Full power.

Electrical systemsIon source Consumed (Real) PowerReactive PowerAparent PowerKlystrons connectedEquipment Racks connectedDiagnosticsMagnetsLEBT Consumed (Real) PowerReactive PowerAparent PowerEquipment Racks connectedDiagnosticsRFQ Consumed (Real) PowerReactive PowerAparent PowerKlystrons connectedDiagnosticsMEBT Consumed (Real) PowerReactive PowerAparent PowerEquipment Racks connectedDiagnosticsDTL Consumed (Real) PowerReactive PowerAparent PowerKlystrons connectedMagnetsDiagnosticsSpoke resonator section Consumed (Real) PowerReactive PowerAparent PowerKlystrons connectedMagnetsDiagnosticsElliptical low beta section Consumed (Real) PowerReactive PowerAparent PowerKlystrons connectedDiagnosticsMagnetsElliptical high beta section Consumed (Real) PowerReactive PowerAparent PowerKlystrons connectedDiagnosticsMagnetsHEBT Consumed (Real) PowerReactive PowerAparent PowerEquipment racksMagnetsDiagnostics

Vacuum systemsRequested Power consumption MWIon source Vacuum Level mbar S. GamminoPump-down timeLEBT Vacuum Level mbar S. GamminoPump-down timeRFQ Vacuum Level mbar 6.66E-07 Draft 04-Nov-10 S. GamminoPump-down timeMEBT Vacuum Level mbar 3.33E-07 Draft 04-Nov-10 I. BustinduyPump-down timeDTL Vacuum Level mbar 1.20E-07 Draft 04-Nov-10 S. GamminoPump-down timeSpoke resonator section Vacuum Level mbar S. BoussonPump-down timeElliptical low beta section Vacuum Level mbar G. DevanzPump-down timeElliptical high beta section Vacuum Level mbar G. DevanzPump-down timeHEBT Vacuum Level mbar 6.60E-08 Draft 04-Nov-10 S. Pape-MøllerPump-down time

HVAC systemsRequested Power consumption MWLINAC tunnelTemperature K M. LindroosHumidity % M. LindroosMaximum He content in air ppm M. LindroosSegment - 1Segment - 2 Segment - 3[…]Klystron galleryTemperature K M. LindroosHumidity % M. Lindroos

Auxiliary systemsRequested Power consumption MWIon source length m 2.5 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. GamminoLEBT length m 1.6 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. GamminoRFQ length m 4.0 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. GamminoMEBT length m 2.5 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. GamminoDTL length m 19.0 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. GamminoSpoke resonator section length m ~52 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. BoussonElliptical low beta section length m ~57 Draft 22-Nov-10 G. DevanzElliptical high beta section length m ~215 Draft 22-Nov-10 G. DevanzHEBT length, to target m ~100 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. Pape-MøllerLength, source-to-target m ~420 Draft 22-Nov-10 M. EshraqiCrane systemsNº cranesCovered length mLoad capacity TnRail systems

12

2.12.2 Vacuum systems

Equipment racksMagnetsDiagnostics

Vacuum systemsRequested Power consumption MWIon source Vacuum Level mbar S. GamminoPump-down timeLEBT Vacuum Level mbar S. GamminoPump-down timeRFQ Vacuum Level mbar 6.66E-07 Draft 04-Nov-10 S. GamminoPump-down timeMEBT Vacuum Level mbar 3.33E-07 Draft 04-Nov-10 I. BustinduyPump-down timeDTL Vacuum Level mbar 1.20E-07 Draft 04-Nov-10 S. GamminoPump-down timeSpoke resonator section Vacuum Level mbar S. BoussonPump-down timeElliptical low beta section Vacuum Level mbar G. DevanzPump-down timeElliptical high beta section Vacuum Level mbar G. DevanzPump-down timeHEBT Vacuum Level mbar 6.60E-08 Draft 04-Nov-10 S. Pape-MøllerPump-down time

HVAC systemsRequested Power consumption MWLINAC tunnelTemperature K M. LindroosHumidity % M. LindroosMaximum He content in air ppm M. LindroosSegment - 1Segment - 2 Segment - 3[…]Klystron galleryTemperature K M. LindroosHumidity % M. Lindroos

Auxiliary systemsRequested Power consumption MWIon source length m 2.5 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. GamminoLEBT length m 1.6 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. GamminoRFQ length m 4.0 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. GamminoMEBT length m 2.5 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. GamminoDTL length m 19.0 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. GamminoSpoke resonator section length m ~52 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. BoussonElliptical low beta section length m ~57 Draft 22-Nov-10 G. DevanzElliptical high beta section length m ~215 Draft 22-Nov-10 G. DevanzHEBT length, to target m ~100 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. Pape-MøllerLength, source-to-target m ~420 Draft 22-Nov-10 M. EshraqiCrane systemsNº cranesCovered length mLoad capacity TnRail systems

13

2.12.3 HVAC systems

Equipment racksMagnetsDiagnostics

Vacuum systemsRequested Power consumption MWIon source Vacuum Level mbar S. GamminoPump-down timeLEBT Vacuum Level mbar S. GamminoPump-down timeRFQ Vacuum Level mbar 6.66E-07 Draft 04-Nov-10 S. GamminoPump-down timeMEBT Vacuum Level mbar 3.33E-07 Draft 04-Nov-10 I. BustinduyPump-down timeDTL Vacuum Level mbar 1.20E-07 Draft 04-Nov-10 S. GamminoPump-down timeSpoke resonator section Vacuum Level mbar S. BoussonPump-down timeElliptical low beta section Vacuum Level mbar G. DevanzPump-down timeElliptical high beta section Vacuum Level mbar G. DevanzPump-down timeHEBT Vacuum Level mbar 6.60E-08 Draft 04-Nov-10 S. Pape-MøllerPump-down time

HVAC systemsRequested Power consumption MWLINAC tunnelTemperature K M. LindroosHumidity % M. LindroosMaximum He content in air ppm M. LindroosSegment - 1Segment - 2 Segment - 3[…]Klystron galleryTemperature K M. LindroosHumidity % M. Lindroos

Auxiliary systemsRequested Power consumption MWIon source length m 2.5 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. GamminoLEBT length m 1.6 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. GamminoRFQ length m 4.0 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. GamminoMEBT length m 2.5 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. GamminoDTL length m 19.0 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. GamminoSpoke resonator section length m ~52 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. BoussonElliptical low beta section length m ~57 Draft 22-Nov-10 G. DevanzElliptical high beta section length m ~215 Draft 22-Nov-10 G. DevanzHEBT length, to target m ~100 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. Pape-MøllerLength, source-to-target m ~420 Draft 22-Nov-10 M. EshraqiCrane systemsNº cranesCovered length mLoad capacity TnRail systems

2.12.4 Auxiliary systems

Equipment racksMagnetsDiagnostics

Vacuum systemsRequested Power consumption MWIon source Vacuum Level mbar S. GamminoPump-down timeLEBT Vacuum Level mbar S. GamminoPump-down timeRFQ Vacuum Level mbar 6.66E-07 Draft 04-Nov-10 S. GamminoPump-down timeMEBT Vacuum Level mbar 3.33E-07 Draft 04-Nov-10 I. BustinduyPump-down timeDTL Vacuum Level mbar 1.20E-07 Draft 04-Nov-10 S. GamminoPump-down timeSpoke resonator section Vacuum Level mbar S. BoussonPump-down timeElliptical low beta section Vacuum Level mbar G. DevanzPump-down timeElliptical high beta section Vacuum Level mbar G. DevanzPump-down timeHEBT Vacuum Level mbar 6.60E-08 Draft 04-Nov-10 S. Pape-MøllerPump-down time

HVAC systemsRequested Power consumption MWLINAC tunnelTemperature K M. LindroosHumidity % M. LindroosMaximum He content in air ppm M. LindroosSegment - 1Segment - 2 Segment - 3[…]Klystron galleryTemperature K M. LindroosHumidity % M. Lindroos

Auxiliary systemsRequested Power consumption MWIon source length m 2.5 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. GamminoLEBT length m 1.6 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. GamminoRFQ length m 4.0 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. GamminoMEBT length m 2.5 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. GamminoDTL length m 19.0 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. GamminoSpoke resonator section length m ~52 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. BoussonElliptical low beta section length m ~57 Draft 22-Nov-10 G. DevanzElliptical high beta section length m ~215 Draft 22-Nov-10 G. DevanzHEBT length, to target m ~100 Draft 22-Nov-10 S. Pape-MøllerLength, source-to-target m ~420 Draft 22-Nov-10 M. EshraqiCrane systemsNº cranesCovered length mLoad capacity TnRail systems

Nº segmentsCovered length

Cooling systemRequested Power consumption MWIon source Temperature K M. LindroosTemperature stability KTemperature - In KTemperature - Out KFlow l/sLEBT Temperature K M. LindroosTemperature stability KTemperature - In KTemperature - Out KFlow l/sRFQ Temperature K M. LindroosTemperature stability KTemperature - In KTemperature - Out KFlow l/sMEBT Temperature K M. LindroosTemperature stability KTemperature - In KTemperature - Out KFlow l/sDTL Temperature K M. LindroosTemperature stability KTemperature - In KTemperature - Out KFlow l/s

Cryogenics systemsAnnual power consumption (Plant) GWh 200 Draft 22-Nov-10 M. LindroosConnected Load MVATarget He flow l/sHe temperature K 1.8Average heat loss along distribution W/mGlobal Efficiency %He storage Storage Volume m^3Stored mass TnCompression StageCompression RatioCopression - Work JEfficiency %Compressive power consumtion MWHe flow per compressor l/sAmount of compressorsExpansion StageAmount of expansion turbinesExpansion RatioHe flow per expansion stage l/sCold Compression - J&T StagePressure drop / Compressior ratioCopression - Work JEfficiency %He flow per compressor / valve l/sAmount of compressors / valve

14

2.12.5 Cooling systemNº segmentsCovered length

Cooling systemRequested Power consumption MWIon source Temperature K M. LindroosTemperature stability KTemperature - In KTemperature - Out KFlow l/sLEBT Temperature K M. LindroosTemperature stability KTemperature - In KTemperature - Out KFlow l/sRFQ Temperature K M. LindroosTemperature stability KTemperature - In KTemperature - Out KFlow l/sMEBT Temperature K M. LindroosTemperature stability KTemperature - In KTemperature - Out KFlow l/sDTL Temperature K M. LindroosTemperature stability KTemperature - In KTemperature - Out KFlow l/s

Cryogenics systemsAnnual power consumption (Plant) GWh 200 Draft 22-Nov-10 M. LindroosConnected Load MVATarget He flow l/sHe temperature K 1.8Average heat loss along distribution W/mGlobal Efficiency %He storage Storage Volume m^3Stored mass TnCompression StageCompression RatioCopression - Work JEfficiency %Compressive power consumtion MWHe flow per compressor l/sAmount of compressorsExpansion StageAmount of expansion turbinesExpansion RatioHe flow per expansion stage l/sCold Compression - J&T StagePressure drop / Compressior ratioCopression - Work JEfficiency %He flow per compressor / valve l/sAmount of compressors / valve

15

2.12.6 Cryogenics systems

Nº segmentsCovered length

Cooling systemRequested Power consumption MWIon source Temperature K M. LindroosTemperature stability KTemperature - In KTemperature - Out KFlow l/sLEBT Temperature K M. LindroosTemperature stability KTemperature - In KTemperature - Out KFlow l/sRFQ Temperature K M. LindroosTemperature stability KTemperature - In KTemperature - Out KFlow l/sMEBT Temperature K M. LindroosTemperature stability KTemperature - In KTemperature - Out KFlow l/sDTL Temperature K M. LindroosTemperature stability KTemperature - In KTemperature - Out KFlow l/s

Cryogenics systemsAnnual power consumption (Plant) GWh 200 Draft 22-Nov-10 M. LindroosConnected Load MVATarget He flow l/sHe temperature K 1.8Average heat loss along distribution W/mGlobal Efficiency %He storage Storage Volume m^3Stored mass TnCompression StageCompression RatioCopression - Work JEfficiency %Compressive power consumtion MWHe flow per compressor l/sAmount of compressorsExpansion StageAmount of expansion turbinesExpansion RatioHe flow per expansion stage l/sCold Compression - J&T StagePressure drop / Compressior ratioCopression - Work JEfficiency %He flow per compressor / valve l/sAmount of compressors / valve

16

2.13 RF Systems

1(1)

RF SYSTEMS (R. Ruber) 22-Nov-10Parameter Unit Value Status Date Validator CommentFor each RF structure type (RFQ, DTL, spoke, elliptical):Either under the respective structures (best) or in the "RF" list

Frequency MHz fBeta !Vmax, operation MV VmaxGradient MV/m GMax. power-to-beam kW PbeamFilling time ms t_fillRF pulse length ms t_RFRF duty factor %

Amount of cavitiesAmount of RF sources

Cavity power input MW peakWaveguide losses %LLRF control margin %Klystron power output MW peakKlystron efficiency %Modulator power output MW peakModulator efficiency %Modulator average power input MW average

17