acceptance contracts – prof. merges feb. 8, 2011

48
Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Post on 19-Dec-2015

227 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Acceptance

Contracts – Prof. Merges

Feb. 8, 2011

Page 2: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011
Page 3: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011
Page 4: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Elsinore Union Elem. Sch. Dist. V. Kastorff

• Procedural history

Page 5: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Elsinore Union Elem. Sch. Dist. V. Kastorff

• Facts

Page 6: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

A Few Points About Construction Ks

• Surety – bond

• Owner – GC – Sub structure

Page 7: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

New Hampshire Office70 Zachary RoadManchester, NH 03109603.626.6070603.626.0352 fax

Page 8: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Back to the lawsuit . . .

• Who is suing whom for what?

• What remedy is sought?

Page 9: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

What is the primary defense?

• Kastorff

Page 10: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Bid amount

• Bid about $ 90,000

• Meant to bid about $99,500

• Next highest bid: $101,000 – he still would have won!

Page 11: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

What is the primary defense?

• Kastorff

–“There’s been a terrible mistake!”

Page 12: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

What is Kastorff’s position re: the Contract w/ Elsinore?

Page 13: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

What is Kastorff’s position re: the Contract w/ Elsinore?

• It should be rescinded

• What does this implicitly say about K formation?

Page 14: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

What is Kastorff’s position re: the Contract w/ Elsinore?

• It should be rescinded

• What does this implicitly say about K formation?

There is indeed a binding contract: BUT . . .

Page 15: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

What is the holding?

Page 16: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

What is the holding?

1. Honest clerical error in bid, plus

2. Subsequent prompt rescission, means –

Contract is dissolved; defendant need not perform; no liability

Page 17: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Offer and Acceptance in Kastorff

Page 18: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Offer and Acceptance in Kastorff

• When was the K formed?

– What was the offer?

– What/when was the acceptance?

Page 19: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Offer and Acceptance in Kastorff

• When was the K formed?

– What was the offer: When Kastorff handed in the bid, 8 pm on 8/12/52

– What/when was the acceptance: When the schoolboard voted to award the bid to Kastorff after 8 pm 8/12/52

Page 20: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Kastorff’s communication on 8/13 w/ Rendon

• What was Kastorff (the offeror) trying to do?

Page 21: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Kastorff’s communication on 8/13 w/ Rendon

• What was Kastorff (the offeror) trying to do?

• Why was he not able to, legally?

Page 22: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Bids, offers, and acceptances

• Kemper: bids as “options,” p. 143

• Can a GC withdraw a bid after it has been submitted?

• Does the owner have to accept a particular bid?

Page 23: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

More on bids as options . . .

• Why does a bid have to be viewed as an option?

• Who does this protect?

Page 24: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Options, in general

• Binding on one party

• Not on the other – until he, she or it CHOOSES to be bound

• The freedom to decide (later) is what an option is all about

Page 25: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

GC’s and Subs

• What about subs’s bids to the GC?

– Options also?

– Why?

Page 26: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

What if the School Board knew Kastorff had made a mistake?

Page 27: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

What if the School Board knew Kastorff had made a mistake?

Note 1, p. 142

Rest. 2d § 153(b): “the other party had reason to know of the mistake”– K void

Page 28: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

David Dudley Field (1805–94)

Field Code

Page 29: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Stephen Field

Page 30: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Put aside the mistake in Kastorff

• See how the doctrine of offer and acceptance works to solve real-world problems

• Recall CAB v. Ingram: the messy real world meets “clean and clear” legal theory/doctrine

Page 31: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

International Filter v. Conroe Ice

• Procedural History

Page 32: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

International Filter v. Conroe Ice

• Facts

Page 33: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011
Page 34: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011
Page 35: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

The oil revenues and population influx of the 1930s lent Conroe a boomtown atmosphere. It briefly claimed more millionaires per capita than any other town in the United States.

Page 36: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

International Filter

• Analyze the communications

Page 37: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

International Filter

• Analyze the communications

• 2/10/20: Int’l Filter (π) Letter

• Δ’s “notation” on π’s 2/10 Letter: “Accepted”

• Then π’s 2/13/20 “indorsement” – “OK”

Page 38: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Δ’s Arguments

Page 39: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Δ’s Arguments

1. No proper acceptance

2. No communication of acceptance

3. Therefore: Δ’s 2/28 letter a revocation? Rejection?

Page 40: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

How do we decide what is required for Acceptance?

Page 41: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

How do we decide what is required for Acceptance?

“The offeror is master of the offer.”

Top p. 150

Page 42: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.

• Ad offered reward of people got sick after using inhaler-type product

• Plaintiff argued that using smoke bal and getting sick constituted acceptance

Page 43: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Owen v. Tuniston example

• “If you agree to pay me $16,000 for the Bradley lot in Bucksport, cash, closing within 60 days, I will sell it to you.”

Page 44: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Why might notice of acceptance be required?

• Think from Δ’s point of view . . .

Page 45: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Alternate holding, p. 150

• Notice of acceptance – 2/14 letter by Engel in Chicago

• Note: what if Δ revoked offer on afternoon of 2/13?

Page 46: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Agency Principles

§ 1.01 Agency Defined

Tentative Draft No. 2 (2001)

Agency is the fiduciary relationship that arises when one person (a "principal") manifests assent to another person (an "agent") that the agent shall act on the principal's behalf and subject to the principal's control, and the agent manifests assent or otherwise consents so to act.

Page 47: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

Agency Principles

§ 167. Persons Having Notice Of Limitations Of Written Authorizations

If a person dealing with an agent has notice that the agent's authority is created or described in a writing which is intended for his inspection, he is affected by limitations upon the authority contained in the writing, unless misled by conduct of the principal.

Page 48: Acceptance Contracts – Prof. Merges Feb. 8, 2011

“Home Office Approval Clauses”

• Why?

• Incentives of parties differ

– “Principal-agent problem”