accountability – iowa style: a review of a system & its local implications

25
NACTEI 2011 BY FIDELIS N UBADIGBO, Ph.D.

Upload: elizabeth-savage

Post on 30-Dec-2015

42 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS. NACTEI 2011 BY FIDELIS N UBADIGBO, Ph.D. Perkins IV. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS

NACTEI 2011BY

FIDELIS N UBADIGBO, Ph.D.

Page 2: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS

The Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (Perkins IV) supports career and technical education (CTE) in high schools and postsecondary institutions, such as community colleges (GAO July 29, 2009)

Page 3: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS

ACCOUNTABILITY:

PLEASE WRITE DOWN THREE THINGS THAT COMES TO YOUR MIND

Page 4: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS

SYSTEMS & ASSESSMENT DATA & DATA COLLECTION PERFORMANCE MEASURES PERFORMANCE TARGETS ANALYSIS AND DISAGGREGATION REPORTING (CAR) IMPROVEMENT AND CONTINUOUS

REVIEW

Page 5: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS

DATA TEAM PERFORMANCE MEASURES PERFORMANCE INDICATORS BUDGET SUMMARY REGIONAL CONSULTANTS (15 REGIONS) MONITORING, EQUITY & SCHOOL

IMPROVEMENT CAR REPORT, REVIEW & IMPROVEMENT

Page 6: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS

Establish and Support State and local performance accountability systems:

To assess the effectiveness of the state and the eligible recipients of the State in achieving statewide progress in career and technical education

Optimize the return of investment of Federal funds in CTE

Page 7: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS

Added Emphasis on Academic Achievement

Emphasizes Accountability and Improved results

It improves monitoring and enforcement High school, industry and higher

education institutions work together

Page 8: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS

STATES HAVE BROAD FLEXIBILITY IN IMPLEMENTING PERKINS IV

(Highlights of GAO-09-683 to Congress)

Page 9: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS

EASIER CTE-Plus MIS UI

Page 10: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS

States negotiate specific performance targets with Education

State report their performance to Education

Local recipients negotiate performance targets with their States and annually report their progress toward meeting the targets

Page 11: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS

SECONDARY COMMON TO BOTH POSTSECONDARY

Academic Attainment in reading/language arts and mathematics

Credential, Certificate or Degree Attainment

Technical Skill Attainment

Secondary School Completion

Student Placement

Student Graduation Rate

Student Retention and Transfer

Nontraditional Participation and Completion

Page 12: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS

Date Received Consortium Code _____

Date Forwarded to Cons.

Consultant: ________

Category of Application

Secondary Postsecondary

Tech Prep

Applicant/Fiscal Agent ____________________ AREA NUMBER _______

Fiscal Agent & Address

________________________________

Contact Person(s) _______________

FY 2011 Allocation _____

FY 2011 Approved Budget

Tracking (Name) Budget and Indicators approval

Consultant –Sign/Date

Original App. Scanned ___Copy to Consultant ____

Full Approval:Budget/Perform Indicators

Approved as SubmittedSignature/Date

Conditional Approval Conditional Approval Approved as Amended

Full/Amended Approval

Approved Conditional to Full

Approved as Conditional __Appr. Conditional to Full __

Page 13: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS

Adopted from the Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (1S1, 1S2)

Aligned with industry-recognized standards, if available and appropriate (2S1)

As described in Title I of the ESEA (4S1)

Page 14: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS

Education can withheld all or portion of funds if a state does not implement a program improvement plan

Show improvement in meeting the failing performance measures or

Meet target for the same performance measure for 3 consecutive years

Page 15: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS

Perkins application Budget summary Performance targets Action plan Improvement plan Technical assistance

Page 16: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS

Action: Education addresses action(s) to be taken

by States that did not meet targets or meet at least 90% of agreed upon targets

States address action(s) on local recipient that did not meet performance targets or meet at least 90% of agreed upon targets

Page 17: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS
Page 18: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS

Performance Indicator

State Target7/1/10-6/30/09

Baseline7/1/08-6/30/09

Local Target7/1/10-6/30/11

1S1AA Reading/LA 79.38% 75.38% 79.30%

1S2AA Mathematics 79.30% 86.15% 86.15%

2S1Tech Skill Attainment 70.67% 69.86% 70.67%

3S1 Sec Sch. Completion

93.39% 88.24% 93.39%

4S1Student Grad Rates

92.20% 88.24% 92.20%

5S1 Sec. Placement 90.67% 86.76% 90.67%

6S1 Nontrad Participation

30.16% 31.71% 31.71%

6S2 Nontrad Completion

32.37% 13.52% 14.51%

Page 19: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS

We are pleased to attach your copy of the approved grant agreement between (Recipient) and the Iowa Department of Education (DE) for the (POS) Technical Skill Attainment Assessment Grant. The approval and reimbursement of expenditures incurred conducting the activity of the grant award are contingent upon:

1) the activities being operated in accordance with the plans within the application; 2) the assurances provided via the application; 3) the rules and regulations per the U.S. Department of Education General Administrative Rules, EDGAR, and PL 109-270, and 4) the submittal of a mid-point and final report.

The Department’s guidelines for reimbursement of expenditures incurred by the fiscal agent of this grant allow for quarterly reimbursement of up to a maximum of 80% of the Grant Award. Final payment shall be made upon receipt of final report and online expenditure reporting for the remaining funds spent. Final report is due July 1, 2011.

Page 20: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS
Page 21: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS
Page 22: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS
Page 23: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS
Page 24: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS

Perkins Allocations 2012Note: Reported on www.perkinsinfo.com after notification of allocation.

Note: This becomes column 10 on FY12 FSR

Basic: 11,963,946.00

Administration: (5%) 598,197.00 Total

Leadership: (10%) 1,196,394.00 Allocations

Program: (85%) 10,169,355.00 w/Carryover

Reserve Fund: 150,000.00

Secondary: (50.6%) See State Plan 5,069,794.00 Secondary Carryover: 106,189.73 5,175,983.73

Post Secondary: (49.4%) See State Plan 4,949,561.00 Post Secondary Carryover: 41,953.97 4,991,514.97

Tech Prep: 1,244,304.00

TP Administration: 62,215.00

TP Program: 1,182,089.00 Tech Prep Carryover: 5,330.66 1,187,419.66

Non-Traditional 100,000.00 Same as previous year - FY11 Budget

Corrections 100,000.00 Same as previous year - FY11 Budget

State Match (I52) 559,797.00 FY12 Appropriation I52 per Jeff Berger

State Match (I51) 38,400.00 will need additional to match 50/50

598,197.00

Allocations to Schools by 04/15 (Yr 1) - Email PDF to Roger Foelske, Roger Utman, Jennifer Mcabee, & Pat Thieben when final.

- Secondary - allocated based on census data (see page 76 of State Plan)

- Postsecondary - allocated based on pell counts (see page 77 of State Plan)

- Reserve - (see page 80 of State Plan)

- Tech Prep - allocated w/$50K to each consortia and remainder based on # LEAs per region (see page 65 of State Plan)

Partial Payments (no more than 80%) - can be requested starting 07/01 (Yr 1) and ending 06/01 (Yr 1)

- At 06/01, create listing in Excel of District #, Prog CIP# (Basic #68.0501 or Tech Prep #68.0714), Partial Pmt $ Amt, Warrant #, Date

to Dave Krieger for Upload to CTE on-line system.

Schools report Financial (State & Federal) Perkins information on-line by 08/01 (Yr 2)

Final Payments made on PROD from Fund 0475 and payments made from I58 (based on ProRata) by end of Hold Open 08/31 (Yr 2)

- Federal PROD can be done without all schools reporting, but State PROD must have all districts reporting or no funding.

- Compare State PROD figures with prior 2 years (Query) for reasonableness.

Page 25: ACCOUNTABILITY – IOWA STYLE: A REVIEW OF A SYSTEM & ITS LOCAL IMPLICATIONS