accuracy vs. consistency · 2018-09-25 · accuracy vs consistency 15 accuracy moving target...

45
Accuracy vs. Consistency A Dilemma in Stormwater Master Planning Brian Rowley, Clark County Regional Flood Control District Matthew Wilkinson, Atkins 2018 Floodplain Management Association Annual Conference, Reno, Nevada

Upload: others

Post on 07-Jul-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Accuracy vs. ConsistencyA Dilemma in Stormwater Master Planning

Brian Rowley, Clark County Regional Flood Control District

Matthew Wilkinson, Atkins

2018 Floodplain Management Association Annual Conference, Reno, Nevada

Page 2: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Overview

• Stormwater Master Planning in Clark County• Challenges in Long Term Planning• Consistency vs Accuracy• Hydrologic Verification Study• Conclusions

Page 3: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Stormwater Master Planning

Page 4: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Flood Control Master Planning

Recognize Flood Risk Define and Quantify Risk Mitigate Risk

• Data Collection• Hydrology• Facility Planning• Cost Estimate• Reports and Maps

Page 5: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Construction and Maintenance

Page 6: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Challenges in Long Term Planning

6

Page 7: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

• Data Collection• Technology Advances• New or Changing Data: Soils, Land Use, Rainfall• National /Federal Issues (Design Storms, Climate

Change)• Environmental Regulations• Flooding Events or Observations• Rapid and Varying Development

Master Plan Challenges – 5 year cycle…

Page 8: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

8

Ongoing Development

Page 9: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

SNWA Turf Conversion

9

Page 10: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Change in Percent Imperviousness

Page 11: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Change inCurve Number using latest soil data

11

Page 12: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

SoilsData

Page 13: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Example Impacts of Data Changing / UpdatesResults at the

Beltway Detention Basin

2014 NRCS Soils Data

1985 Soils Data

Peak Inflow (CFS) 899 1992Peak Outflow (CFS) 49 69

Peak Storage (AC-FT) 97 193

Page 14: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Consistency vs. AccuracyA Dilemma…

Page 15: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Accuracy vs Consistency

15

ACCURACY Moving target

Expensive and time consuming

Hard to verify

Numerous variables

Site specific, not regional

Reflects actual flows

Facilities sized appropriately

Defendable

Model fidelity can be very good

Useful for actual events or flood response

CONSISTENCY Not representative of actual condition

Relies on assumptions in lieu of latest data

Based on management decisions

Standards may be outdated

Cost effective

Globally manage assumptions/models

Builds upon previous plan

Continuity over long term

Works at a regional level

THE GOOD:

THE NOT SO GOOD:

Page 16: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Hydrologic Verification Study

Page 17: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

• Use latest data• GIS technology• Research projects (DRI, UNLV, University of Illinois)• Physical Testing / Field Observations• Historical Observations• FTRS and Gage Data• Hydrologic Verification

Ongoing Efforts at the District

Page 18: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

DRI Soil Group

18

› The 2007 DRI study confirmed that the hydrologic soil groups generated from NRCS was correct.

2014 NRCS Data 2007 DRI Soil Data

Page 19: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 2011

Page 20: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Manual Total Imperviousness Percentages Check Examples

Page 21: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Radar Rainfall

Clark County

Page 22: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Gages / Flood Threat Recognition System

22

• Network of 200+ gauges• Share information

• Entities• NWS• USGS• Local Media• Public

Page 23: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

• Obtain and use actual rainfall data in models• Point rainfall data at Rain Gages

• Radar Rainfall (NEXRAD)

• Compare model results with measured results at gages• Verify if model over- or under-predicts flow rates/volumes

• Credit to: Clark Barlow, Hongyu Deng, & OneRain

Verification Study

Page 24: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

24

Page 25: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

25

McCullough DB & Anthem DB Watersheds

Page 26: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Pioneer DB Watershed

Page 27: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Gowan South DB & Lakes Detention DB Watersheds

Page 28: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

DB Gages

Page 29: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Total Precipitation by Storm Event

29

Page 30: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Sept 11, 2012 Storm

30

12:04pm

Page 31: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Sept 11, 2012 Storm

31

12:21pm

Page 32: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Sept 11, 2012 Storm

32

12:30pm

Page 33: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Sept 11, 2012 Storm

33

12:47pm

Page 34: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Sept 11, 2012 Storm

34

1:05pm

Page 35: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Sept 11, 2012 Storm

35

1:30pm

Page 36: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Sept 11, 2012 Storm

36

1:52pm

Page 37: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Sept 11, 2012 Storm

37

2:14pm

Page 38: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Radar storm total for the Gowan South Watershed

38

Page 39: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Radar storm total for the Gowan South Watershed

39

Gage Gage Total Adj Radar Total

4259 1.52” 1.35”4234 1.64” 1.45”4214 1.48” 1.49”4224 2.12” 2.06”4229 1.80” 1.51”4204 1.96” 1.46”4209 1.92” 1.84”4329 2.72” 1.75”4269 2.12” 1.97”

Page 40: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Sources of Results for Comparison

40

Page 41: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional
Page 42: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional
Page 43: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

• Models generally exhibit higher peak water depth and total inflow volume than the observed data

o Suggesting MPU hydrologic methodology is conservative in predicting rainfall runoff

• Models are better at predicting runoff volumes for developed areas

• Inconclusive whether GARR or point rainfall is more accurate

Verification Conclusions

Page 44: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Takeaways…

Remember the purpose

Take advantage of available data and technology

Engineering judgment is key

Find balance between consistency and accuracy

Sustainable over a long-period of time, incremental

Regional framework and foundation

Page 45: Accuracy vs. Consistency · 2018-09-25 · Accuracy vs Consistency 15 ACCURACY Moving target Expensive and time consuming Hard to verify Numerous variables Site specific, not regional

Questions?