acdf vs tdr
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Acdf vs tdr](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062522/58e4dfc01a28abf5048b698d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
EBSSalem Al-Dwairy
Spine fellow: Macquarie Neurosurgery.Macquarie university.
September, 2015
![Page 2: Acdf vs tdr](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062522/58e4dfc01a28abf5048b698d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
• 55years old.• Neck pain + severe left arm pain
for three months.• Not responding to conservative
treatment.
ACDF Vs TDR.
![Page 3: Acdf vs tdr](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062522/58e4dfc01a28abf5048b698d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
PICO: Fusion Vs disc replacement in patients with cervical disc disease.
• P: Patients with cervical disc disease.• I: Cervical fusion.• C: Disc replacement.• O: Treatment outcome.
![Page 4: Acdf vs tdr](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062522/58e4dfc01a28abf5048b698d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Data bases:• Medline.• Embase.• Scopus.
![Page 5: Acdf vs tdr](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062522/58e4dfc01a28abf5048b698d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Medline
![Page 6: Acdf vs tdr](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062522/58e4dfc01a28abf5048b698d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Medline
![Page 7: Acdf vs tdr](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062522/58e4dfc01a28abf5048b698d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Acdf vs tdr](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062522/58e4dfc01a28abf5048b698d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: Acdf vs tdr](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062522/58e4dfc01a28abf5048b698d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Embase
![Page 10: Acdf vs tdr](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062522/58e4dfc01a28abf5048b698d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Scopus
• Cervical • fusion or arthrodesis or ACDF .• "disc replacement" or "disc arthroplasty" or TDR.• randomi*ed or RCT or RCCT.
![Page 11: Acdf vs tdr](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062522/58e4dfc01a28abf5048b698d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: Acdf vs tdr](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062522/58e4dfc01a28abf5048b698d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Medline 37 Embase 22 Scopus 146
205
Non RCTsTDR or ACDF aloneDuplicates< 2 years follow-upCost effectiveness/economic analysisBiomechanical comparisonNon-English JournalsNon-comparativeBone graft studiesNon-humanLumbar spineHybrid surgerySurgical techniqueTDR after ACDF??? ACDF/TDR Vs THR
37 RCT + 16 met analysis of RCT
Excluded 152
![Page 13: Acdf vs tdr](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062522/58e4dfc01a28abf5048b698d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: Acdf vs tdr](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062522/58e4dfc01a28abf5048b698d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Met analyses
![Page 15: Acdf vs tdr](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062522/58e4dfc01a28abf5048b698d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
10 RCTs• Blinding.• Sample size.• Recent studies.• ? Funding.• Common to met recent analysis.
![Page 16: Acdf vs tdr](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062522/58e4dfc01a28abf5048b698d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Conclusion • TDR has better outcome in term of: neck VAS, C spine ROM and
reoperation rate.• ACDF procedure have less operative time.• TDR might have better outcome in : NDI, arm VAS, SF 36 and
dysphagia.
![Page 17: Acdf vs tdr](https://reader035.vdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022062522/58e4dfc01a28abf5048b698d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Contribution to knowledge