INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY

ACE Mentorship Program: Team 2, January 20th, 2015

Design-Bid-Build: traditional approach – owner contracts separately with all

parties. Occasionally referred to as Design-Bid-ReDesign-ReBid-Build.

Design-Build: One entity performs both architectural\engineering design and

construction under one contract. Either an architect-led or contractor-led

approach.

CM-at Risk, or GMP: Construction Manager is a consultant to the owner during

design phases, and acts as general contractor during construction with a

commitment to deliver the project within a guaranteed maximum price.

Turnkey Project Delivery: frequently used in power plants, manufacturing

facilities, a method to provide an owner with a complete facility, ready to operate

and turn out product.

Traditional processes

Design- Bid- Build Most common form of Project Delivery

•Three phases, three prime players

•Independent contracts between architect/owner and contractor/owner

•Linear sequence of work

•Common with public owners with requirements to select low bid

•One entity hired by

Owner to complete

design and

construction

•May all be

Contractor's in-house

design expertise or

Contractor may

engage outside

Architect

•Early cost

commitment is made

(GMP) by Contractor

based upon

preliminary design

OWNER

DESIGN -

BUILDER

S

F

Design- Build

E

E

Everyone Signs the Same Agreement

Full IPD

Owner

Sub.ContractorCons. Architect

Sub.Cons.

AIA C195

ConsensusDocs 300

1/14/20166

Traditional (Today) Integrated Project Delivery (Tomorrow)

Fragmented, assembled on “just-

as-needed” or “minimum

necessary” basis, strongly

hierarchical, controlled

TEAMS An integrated team entity

composed of all project lifecycle

stakeholders, assembled early in

the process, open, collaborative

Linear, distinct, segregated;

knowledge gathered “just-as-

needed”; information hoarded

PROCESS Concurrent, multi-level,

integrated; early contributions of

knowledge and expertise;

information openly shared

Individually managed, transferred

to the greatest extent possible

RISK Collectively managed,

appropriately shared

Individually pursued; minimum

effort for maximum

return;(usually) first-cost based

COMPENSATION

REWARD

Team success tied to project

success; value-based

Paper-based, 2 dimensional;

analog

COMMUNICATION

S

TECHNOLOGY

Digitally based, virtual, 4

dimensional; BIM

Minimum effort for maximum

return; minimize or transfer risk;

don’t share

AGREEMENTS Encourage, foster, promote and

support open sharing and

collaboration, full integration

Individually focused, emphasis on

composition

EDUCATION Team-based, integrated,

collaborative; technologically

inclusive; materials and methods

focus in addition to compositionAIA California Council IPD FAQ - 2006

1/14/20167

PD SD CD PR CA OPDD

Time

Eff

ort

/Eff

ec

t

PD: Pre-design

SD: Schematic design

DD: Design development

CD: Construction documentation

PR: Procurement

CA: Construction Administration

OP: Operation

Graphic originated by Patrick McLeay, AIA / HOK

Ability to impact cost and functional capabilities

1

1

Cost of design changes

2

2

Traditional design process3 3Preferred design process

4

4

• Owner Leadership

• Integrated Project Structure

• Open Information Sharing

• Virtual Building Models

It’s about Productivity

AgencyOwnerArchitect

EngineersGCSubs

Predesign Schematic

DesignDesign

Development

Construction

Documents

Agency

Permit /

Bidding

Construction Closeout

WHO

REALIZEHOW

WHAT

Traditional

WHAT

WHO

HOW

AgencyOwnerArchitect

EngineersGC

Subs

Conceptual-

ization

Criteria

DesignDetailed

Design

Implementation

Documents

Agency Coord /

Final Buyout

Construction Closeout

REALIZE

Integrated

•Define the processes, structure and metrics up front!

Source: AIA Convention 2009 – Jim Bedrick

Competitive Schematic Design. The winner was ($655,000)

under 2nd place.

Competitive approach to 3 systems, saving ($132,000) in

supplemental support steel.

LEAN approach to have contract documents designed to 1

curtain wall system manufacturer

Integrated approach with all stakeholders collaborating to

achieve the best solution

Used pre-engineered

curtain wall system.

Architect spent less time

designing. Project relied

heavily on Trade Partner

shop drawings and Revit

model for final construction

drawings.

Saved time & money!

Hand Drawing 2D CAD 3D CAD

EVOLUTION From Hand Drawing to Smart Models

BIM

Electrical Detailer

Structural Steel Detailer

Mechanical Piping Detailer

MEP Manager

BIM Engineer

Model & CAD Drawings

Architect

Smartboard & Projector

3D MEP Coordination

ANY QUESTIONS?