acetabular fractures

146
Acetabular fractures By Dr Arshad Shaikh Credits Dr Anand

Upload: arshad-shaikh

Post on 14-Apr-2017

460 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Acetabular fractures

Acetabular fracturesBy Dr Arshad Shaikh

CreditsDr Anand

Page 2: Acetabular fractures

Introduction• Contemporary icon of pelvic

and acetabular surgery .• Ubiquitous standard of care of

acetabular fractures for the past 25 years.

• Complete transformation of our understanding and treatment of fractures of the acetabulum

• Two textbooks are the “Bibles” of acetabular surgery

Page 3: Acetabular fractures

Acetabular fractures

Before Letournel• Conflicting recommendations

on Rx.• No classification• No consensus on

conservative or operative• Only AP view Pelvis obtained• Invariably poor results –

JOINT INSTABILITY/ AVN.

After Letournel• First systematic classification• Phenominal concepts• AP, 45 deg oblique views ; CT• Concept of accurate reduction • Surgical approaches and

management protocols• Standard plate and screw

fixation• Aim is congruent and stable hip.

Page 4: Acetabular fractures
Page 5: Acetabular fractures

Principles of acetabular fracture Rx

• Thorough understanding of 3-D anatomy of innominate bone

• Diagnosis, Classification and operative repair• Stable congruent hip esp. weight bearing

dome.• Surgery is complex and done by experienced

surgeon.• Anatomic reduction ( < 2mm ) is key to

functional outcome.

Page 6: Acetabular fractures

Mechanism of injury

• Impact of femoral head with the acetabular surface

• Force is via GT or Axis of femur• Fracture pattern decided by position of hip at

the time of impact• Also force of impact and bone quality

Page 7: Acetabular fractures

Mechanism of injury

Page 8: Acetabular fractures

Mechanism of injury

Page 9: Acetabular fractures

Assessment – ATLS protocol

History• Mechanism of injury• Ask for position of hip• Ask of axial loading or

direct injury• Low energy trauma• Underlying illness

Examination• Open wounds• Morel- Lavallee lesions• Shortening• Attitude of limb• Neurological examination• Document sciatic nerve

palsy

Page 10: Acetabular fractures

Associated injuries

• Extremity ( 35%)• Head ( 19 %)• Chest ( 18 %)• Nerve palsy ( 13 % )• Abdominal ( 8 % )• Genitourinary ( 6 % )• Spine (4 %)

• Pelvic injury• Fracture neck of femur• Fracture shaft of femur• Bladder injuries• Morel Lavalle lesions• Knee ligament injuries

Page 11: Acetabular fractures

Anatomy & Osteology

• hemisphere recess• quadrilateral surface• transverse acetabular

ligament• Dome of acetabulum• iliopectineal eminence• sciatic nerve relation

Page 12: Acetabular fractures

Anatomy & Osteology

Page 13: Acetabular fractures

Two column concept

Page 14: Acetabular fractures
Page 15: Acetabular fractures

Radiology of acetabular fractures

Page 16: Acetabular fractures

Radiology of acetabular fractures

Superior weight bearing surface

Page 17: Acetabular fractures

Radiology of acetabular fractures

Iliac oblique viewObdurator oblique view

Page 18: Acetabular fractures

Radiology of acetabular fractures

Iliac oblique view Obdurator oblique view

Page 19: Acetabular fractures
Page 20: Acetabular fractures

Roof arc measurement

Page 21: Acetabular fractures

Roof arc measurement

Page 22: Acetabular fractures

Dynamic stress view

Dynamic hip instability

Page 23: Acetabular fractures

CT Scan- 2D/3D

• Extent & location• intra- articular free

fragment / head fragment

• orientation of # lines• rotation of fragments• status of posterior

pelvic ring• Marginal Impaction

Don’t decide hip joint instability based on CT Scan.

PELVIC PLASTIC MODEL

Page 24: Acetabular fractures

Classification – Letournel

Page 25: Acetabular fractures

Management options-NON-SURGICAL

Stable nondisplaced & minimally displaced Selected displaced fractures where intact

acetabulum maintains stability & congruity – Low anterior column, Low transverse , low T-shaped

Both column fractures with secondary congruence

Wall fractures not compromising hip stability Local wound issues/ Medically unfit/ Elderly

Page 26: Acetabular fractures

Stable fracture

• Acetabular fracture < 2 mm of displacement in dome

• Roof arc measurement greater than 45 degree on three views

• Recently , Medial roof arc > 45 degree Anterior roof arc > 25 degree Posterior roof arc > 70 degree• Axial CT – superior 10 mm acetabulum

articular surface

Page 27: Acetabular fractures

Don’t apply roof arc here

Posterior wall # - • Assess hip stability here.( Whether+/-

dislocation )• > 50 % post. Wall is unstable • < 50 % wall - Dynamic stress fluoroscopy • If in doubt – assume hip is unstableBoth column #• Secondary congruence

Page 28: Acetabular fractures

Secondary congruence

Page 29: Acetabular fractures

Secondary congruence

Page 30: Acetabular fractures

Go for non operative here

• Polytrauma with sick condition• Severe head injury • Open wound in the planned incision site• Morel – Lavale lesions• Suprapubic catheter – No ilioinguinal

approach. Wait till track seals.• Elderly with osteoporotic bone

Gull sign – poor prognosis

Page 31: Acetabular fractures

Non operative protocol

• Bed rest• Mobilise as soon as symptoms allow• Begin with partial weight bearing • Assess displacement weekly for first 4 weeks• By 6 to 12 weeks patient returns to full weight

bearing• Joint mobilisation throughout• Prolonged traction only for patients who needs

surgery but contraindicated due to other reasons

Page 32: Acetabular fractures

Fix if

• Displaced # in dome.• Posterior wall # > 50 % displacement• Positive fluoroscopy stress test• Both column fractures with loss of parallelism• Incarcerated fragments in the acetabulum

after closed reduction.

Ideal time – 5 to 7 days

Page 33: Acetabular fractures

Orthopedic trauma association

Page 34: Acetabular fractures

Approaches

Anterior• Ilioinguinal• Iliofemoral• Extended Iliofemoral• Modifications of Ilioinguinal• Modifications of iliofemoral

Posterior• Kocher- Langenbeck• Modifications• Trochantric flip osteotomy• Modified Gibson• Modified Stoppa Intrapelvic

Page 35: Acetabular fractures

Anterior Ilioinguinal

• Anterior wall, anterior column, anterior column + posterior hemitransverse, transverse with major displacement in anterior region

• Careful of corona mortis• Lowest rate of heterotrophic ossification• Risk of damage to lat.cut.N, femoral.N,

external iliac vessels and inguinal canal

Page 36: Acetabular fractures

Ilioinguinal approach

Page 37: Acetabular fractures

Ilioinguinal approach

Page 38: Acetabular fractures

Ilioinguinal approach

Page 39: Acetabular fractures

Ilioinguinal approach

Page 40: Acetabular fractures

Ilioinguinal approach

Page 41: Acetabular fractures

Ilioinguinal approach

Page 42: Acetabular fractures

Ilioinguinal approach

Page 43: Acetabular fractures

Ilioinguinal approach

Page 44: Acetabular fractures

Ilioinguinal approach

Page 45: Acetabular fractures

Ilioinguinal approach

Page 46: Acetabular fractures

Iliofemoral approach

Page 47: Acetabular fractures

Kocher- Langenbeck approach

• Posterior wall, column, t type, transverse• Access to sciatic notches, hip capsule• Damage to sciatic.N, gluteal vessels and

intermediate risk of heterotrophic ossification• Lateral/ Prone• Prone + traction• Knee flexion

Page 48: Acetabular fractures

Kocher- Langenbeck approach

Page 49: Acetabular fractures

Kocher- Langenbeck approach

Page 50: Acetabular fractures

Kocher- Langenbeck approach

Page 51: Acetabular fractures

Kocher- Langenbeck approach

Page 52: Acetabular fractures

Kocher- Langenbeck approach

Page 53: Acetabular fractures

Kocher- Langenbeck approach

Page 54: Acetabular fractures

Kocher- Langenbeck approach

Page 55: Acetabular fractures

Kocher- Langenbeck approach

Page 56: Acetabular fractures

Kocher- Langenbeck approach

Page 57: Acetabular fractures

Modified Stoppa’s approach

Page 58: Acetabular fractures

Extended Iliofemoral approach

Page 59: Acetabular fractures

Trochantric flip osteotomy

Page 60: Acetabular fractures

Modified Gibson’s approach

Page 61: Acetabular fractures

Choice of approach

Page 62: Acetabular fractures

Indications for emergency fixation

• Recurrent dislocation following reduction despite traction

• Irreducible hip dislocation• Progressive sciatic nerve palsy• Associated vascular injury• Open fractures• Ipsilateral neck fractures

Page 63: Acetabular fractures

Posterior wall fractures

• 25 % of all acetabular fractures• Kocher – Langenbeck approach• Limit periosteal elevation to fracture site, don’t

release any fragment from capsule• Distract head and remove osteochondral fragments.

May need hip subluxation• Large fragment removal needs Modified Gibson’s

approach and troch flip osteotomy ( lateral)• Bone grafting• Two level reconstruction

Page 64: Acetabular fractures
Page 65: Acetabular fractures
Page 66: Acetabular fractures
Page 67: Acetabular fractures
Page 68: Acetabular fractures
Page 69: Acetabular fractures
Page 70: Acetabular fractures
Page 71: Acetabular fractures
Page 72: Acetabular fractures
Page 73: Acetabular fractures
Page 74: Acetabular fractures
Page 75: Acetabular fractures
Page 76: Acetabular fractures

Extended posterior wall

Page 77: Acetabular fractures
Page 78: Acetabular fractures
Page 79: Acetabular fractures
Page 80: Acetabular fractures
Page 81: Acetabular fractures
Page 82: Acetabular fractures
Page 83: Acetabular fractures
Page 84: Acetabular fractures
Page 85: Acetabular fractures
Page 86: Acetabular fractures
Page 87: Acetabular fractures
Page 88: Acetabular fractures
Page 89: Acetabular fractures
Page 90: Acetabular fractures

Posterior column

• 3 – 5 %• Reduced by using Schanz screw into ischium• Reduction clamps used• Interfragmentary screws + butress plate.

Page 91: Acetabular fractures

Transverse #

• 5 – 19 %• medial and superior displacement of head• Transtectal, juxtatectal and infratectal• Reduction – Schanz screws, sciatic notch

clamp, clamp between two screws• Anterior column screws can be placed only at

acertain angle• ilioinguinal approach

Page 92: Acetabular fractures

Transverse #

Page 93: Acetabular fractures

Transverse #

Page 94: Acetabular fractures
Page 95: Acetabular fractures

Transverse #

Page 96: Acetabular fractures
Page 97: Acetabular fractures
Page 98: Acetabular fractures
Page 99: Acetabular fractures
Page 100: Acetabular fractures
Page 101: Acetabular fractures
Page 102: Acetabular fractures
Page 103: Acetabular fractures

Anterior Wall and column

• 1 – 2 % • quadrangular clamp • screws and plate

Page 104: Acetabular fractures
Page 105: Acetabular fractures
Page 106: Acetabular fractures
Page 107: Acetabular fractures
Page 108: Acetabular fractures
Page 109: Acetabular fractures

Anterior column #

Very low low

intermediate high

Page 110: Acetabular fractures

Anterior column/wall + Posterior hemitransverse

• 7%• Gull Wing sign – poor prognosis• Reduce anterior column through ilioinguinal

approach• Confirm posterior column reduction by

palpating quadrilateral surface• screws + butress plate

Page 111: Acetabular fractures

Anterior column/wall + Posterior hemitransverse

• 7%• Gull Wing sign – poor prognosis• Reduce anterior column through ilioinguinal

approach• Confirm posterior column reduction by

palpating quaadrilateral surface• screws + butress plate

Page 112: Acetabular fractures

T - shaped

• 7 %• Kocher Langenbeck with prone• Sequential anterior ilioinguinal approach• Simultaneous access• Reduction difficult without screws passing

through stem of T• If associated posterior wall , low rate of

excellent reductions

Page 113: Acetabular fractures

Both columns

• 23%. Most common. Spur sign• No portion of cartilage remains attached to

pelvic bone• Secondary congruence• Spur sign• Surgical malreduction - Secondary congruence• Anterior and posterior approach

Page 114: Acetabular fractures

Spur sign

Page 115: Acetabular fractures

Anterior column

Page 116: Acetabular fractures

Anterior column

Page 117: Acetabular fractures

Anterior column

Page 118: Acetabular fractures

Anterior column

Page 119: Acetabular fractures

Anterior column

Page 120: Acetabular fractures

Anterior column

Page 121: Acetabular fractures

Anterior column

Page 122: Acetabular fractures

Anterior column

Page 123: Acetabular fractures

Anterior column

Page 124: Acetabular fractures

Anterior column

Page 125: Acetabular fractures

Anterior column

Page 126: Acetabular fractures

Anterior column

Page 127: Acetabular fractures

Anterior column

Page 128: Acetabular fractures

Anterior column

Page 129: Acetabular fractures

Both column

Page 130: Acetabular fractures

Both column

Page 131: Acetabular fractures

Both column

Page 132: Acetabular fractures

Both column

Page 133: Acetabular fractures

Both column

Page 134: Acetabular fractures

Both column

Page 135: Acetabular fractures

Both column

Page 136: Acetabular fractures
Page 137: Acetabular fractures
Page 138: Acetabular fractures
Page 139: Acetabular fractures
Page 140: Acetabular fractures
Page 141: Acetabular fractures

Perioperative care

• Thromboembolism prophylaxis• Active mobilisation by 6 – 12 weeks• Indomethacin to prevent heterotropic

ossification X 4 – 6 weeks• PWBW – 10 to 12 weeks

Page 142: Acetabular fractures

Complications

• Infection• Iatrogenic nerve injuries• Intra articular hardware• Venous thromboembolism• Heterotopic ossification• Post traumatic arthosis and Osteonecrosis

Page 143: Acetabular fractures

Heterotopic ossification

Page 144: Acetabular fractures

Results

Page 145: Acetabular fractures

THR in acetabular #

• Elderly patient• Post traumatic• Patients with poor prognosis• Cementless cup in fractured acetabulum is a

concern

Page 146: Acetabular fractures

Associated injuries

• Acetabulum + Posterior hip dislocation• Acetabulum + Pelvic ring• Acetabulum + Femoral head • Acetabulum + Femoral neck in young• Acetabulum + Shaft femur/ IT