acgme research requirements for residents in psychiatry: our solution   acgme research requirements...

1
Letter 354 http://ap.psychiatryonline.org Academic Psychiatry 28:4, Winter 2004 ACGME Research Requirements for Residents in Psychiatry T o The Editor: Recent efforts by the Accreditation Council for Medical Education (ACGME) to ex- pose psychiatry residents to a re- search experience during their 4 years of training has been problem- atic for many predominately clinical programs. A debate about how to effectively engage psychiatric resi- dents in research is ongoing throughout academic institutions. In the Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior at Thomas Jeffer- son University, we developed a re- quired 7-week, 1-day per week re- search rotation during which PGY-3 residents are asked to write a pro- posal. From our experience, we found that residents have many questions emanating from their clinical experiences. Our approach is threefold: First, residents develop and refine a clinical question of in- terest to them and, with our sup- portive guidance, formulate a hy- pothesis. Second, they are asked to perform a limited literature search and this material is discussed with a member of the faculty. Third, they complete our Institutional Review Board Forms and a brief proposal to answer their query. The proposal in- cludes sections on background and significance, specific aims, popula- tion characteristics, and subject con- sent procedures, all of which help the residents to focus and express their ideas in a practical format. Throughout the preparation and completion of their research rota- tion, we meet with the residents to discuss the write-up and feasibility of their proposal (about 45 minutes per week). The required rotation contains aspects of the ACGME guidelines in that the rotation helps to foster the development of skills required to conduct research. Our goal is to foster the development of some research skills by having the residents answer a clinical question of interest to them. Competency rating for the ac- tivity was problematic. Initially, we tried to use Thomas Jefferson’s stan- dard Clinical Rotation Form, but it did not capture the research activity residents experienced on the rota- tion. To address this problem, we generated a list of research perfor- mance items categorized according to the ACGME General Competen- cies: Research Competency Checklist A. Knowledge • Does the resident under- stand how to generate a research question? • Does the resident demon- strate knowledge of research meth- ods? • Does the resident under- stand how to focus a research ques- tion? B. Evidence-base learning and improvement • Can the resident utilize re- search staff to improve knowledge and skill? • Can the resident search lit- erature and use the information to guide their project development? • Can the resident recognize and learn from his/her own efforts? • Has the resident demon- strated interest and involvement in scholarly activities such as presen- tations and publications? C. Interpersonal skills • Can the resident negotiate mutually agreeable goals with the research supervisor? • Can the resident work effec- tively with other professionals to conduct research in outpatient set- tings? • Can the resident present the research proposal and results in a well-organized, clear, and appro- priate manner? D. Professionalism • Does the resident recognize ethical issues in research? • Does the resident maintain adequate documentation and re- sults, including adverse events, for clinical research? • Is the resident reliable, re- sponsible, and considerate in car- rying out research responsibilities? E. System-based paractice • Is the resident aware of the social and financial resources nec- essary to conduct research? • Can the resident work effec- tively in a multidisciplinary team? • Has the resident prepared documentation suitable for review by the Institutional Review Board? We find this approach to be a rewarding experience for the resi- dents. Of the five residents who have completed this rotation, four residents plan to complete their re- search proposals during an elective in their fourth year of training. Kathleen S. Peindl, Ph.D. Steven Weinstein, Ph.D. Ashwin A. Patkar, M.D. Edward Silberman, M.D. Michael Vergare, M.D. Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Upload: k-s

Post on 23-Dec-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ACGME Research Requirements for Residents in Psychiatry: Our Solution   ACGME Research Requirements for Residents in Psychiatry

Letter

354 http://ap.psychiatryonline.org Academic Psychiatry 28:4, Winter 2004

ACGME Research Requirementsfor Residents in Psychiatry

To The Editor: Recent efforts bythe Accreditation Council for

Medical Education (ACGME) to ex-pose psychiatry residents to a re-search experience during their 4years of training has been problem-atic for many predominately clinicalprograms. A debate about how toeffectively engage psychiatric resi-dents in research is ongoingthroughout academic institutions.In the Department of Psychiatry andHuman Behavior at Thomas Jeffer-son University, we developed a re-quired 7-week, 1-day per week re-search rotation during which PGY-3residents are asked to write a pro-posal. From our experience, wefound that residents have manyquestions emanating from theirclinical experiences. Our approachis threefold: First, residents developand refine a clinical question of in-terest to them and, with our sup-portive guidance, formulate a hy-pothesis. Second, they are asked toperform a limited literature searchand this material is discussed witha member of the faculty. Third, theycomplete our Institutional ReviewBoard Forms and a brief proposal toanswer their query. The proposal in-cludes sections on background andsignificance, specific aims, popula-tion characteristics, and subject con-sent procedures, all of which helpthe residents to focus and expresstheir ideas in a practical format.Throughout the preparation andcompletion of their research rota-tion, we meet with the residents todiscuss the write-up and feasibilityof their proposal (about 45 minutesper week). The required rotation

contains aspects of the ACGMEguidelines in that the rotation helpsto foster the development of skillsrequired to conduct research. Ourgoal is to foster the development ofsome research skills by having theresidents answer a clinical questionof interest to them.

Competency rating for the ac-tivity was problematic. Initially, wetried to use Thomas Jefferson’s stan-dard Clinical Rotation Form, but itdid not capture the research activityresidents experienced on the rota-tion. To address this problem, wegenerated a list of research perfor-mance items categorized accordingto the ACGME General Competen-cies:

Research Competency Checklist

A. Knowledge• Does the resident under-

stand how to generate a researchquestion?

• Does the resident demon-strate knowledge of research meth-ods?

• Does the resident under-stand how to focus a research ques-tion?

B. Evidence-base learning andimprovement

• Can the resident utilize re-search staff to improve knowledgeand skill?

• Can the resident search lit-erature and use the information toguide their project development?

• Can the resident recognizeand learn from his/her own efforts?

• Has the resident demon-strated interest and involvement inscholarly activities such as presen-tations and publications?

C. Interpersonal skills• Can the resident negotiate

mutually agreeable goals with theresearch supervisor?

• Can the resident work effec-tively with other professionals toconduct research in outpatient set-tings?

• Can the resident present theresearch proposal and results in awell-organized, clear, and appro-priate manner?

D. Professionalism• Does the resident recognize

ethical issues in research?• Does the resident maintain

adequate documentation and re-sults, including adverse events, forclinical research?

• Is the resident reliable, re-sponsible, and considerate in car-rying out research responsibilities?

E. System-based paractice• Is the resident aware of the

social and financial resources nec-essary to conduct research?

• Can the resident work effec-tively in a multidisciplinary team?

• Has the resident prepareddocumentation suitable for reviewby the Institutional Review Board?

We find this approach to be arewarding experience for the resi-dents. Of the five residents whohave completed this rotation, fourresidents plan to complete their re-search proposals during an electivein their fourth year of training.

Kathleen S. Peindl, Ph.D.Steven Weinstein, Ph.D.Ashwin A. Patkar, M.D.Edward Silberman, M.D.

Michael Vergare, M.D.Thomas Jefferson University, Department

of Psychiatry and Human Behavior,Philadelphia, Pennsylvania