AcroJet--FinalAkujuaobi, Timothy

Dingyi ChenHuiliang Su

Jing AiWen Zhang

Contents of PresentationProject Description

What is GMPLS

GELS Test Bed

Juniper & Transmode Test Bed

Marketing Analysis

Future Work

Who we are?

TSLabProject Team – AcroJet TeamCoach – Markus HidellChampion: Peter Sjödin

Acreo AB Principal – Anders Gavler

Project Description

Purpose: To establish a multilayer test bed

with optical cross-connects, Ethernet switches and IP routers.

Goals:To establish a unique test bed

environmentTo analyze the potential targets

for such a test bedFinal GMPLS Test Bed

GELS Test Bed

Juniper &

Transmode

Forwarding table calculated with Such complex algorithms as Longest prefix matching

IP Packet Switching Paradigm

Header Payload

Label Switching Paradigm

L

Header Label Payload

IP Packet VS Label Switching Paradigm

Forwarding done based on Labels inserted into packets at ingress Router into MPLS cloud

LSR

LSR

LSR

LSR LER

LSR

LSR

LSR

LSR

LER

MPLS CONCEPT

LSP PathLabel Path

IP Control Plane

IP Router IP RouterOpticalSwitch

OpticalSwitchOXC OXCData

Plane

LSR LSR LSR LSR LSR LSROSPF-TE

RSVP-TE

Layer n LSP

Layer n-1 LSP

Layer n-2 LSP

GMPLS CONTROL ANDDATA PLANE CONCEPT

Advantages of GMPLSUnified Control Plane

Automatic/Dynamic Provisioning of Bandwidth and Capacity

Optical Virtual Private Networks

Open Standards Support

GELS Test BedAkujuaobi, TimothyHuiliang SuWen Zhang

VE2

244

E2E1

E3

E0

VPCE

E0

E2

E1

VE3

245

E0

E3

E1E0

VR1251

E2 E1

E3

E0VE1

243

E0E1 VR2

252

E1

E0

VR3253

VN11 VN22

VN33

VN12

VN23VN13

VN0

ETHERNET/SWITCHCORE TESTBED

NAT

GMPLS Protocols / SoftwareDragon Software

OSPF-TE Routing protocol modified with TE extensions

RSVP-TE Signaling and Resource Reservation with TE

extensions

Challenges EncounteredCustomized Dragon Software

Bugs

Minimal documentations

Learning threshold for new concepts

Juniper & TransmodeTest BedJing AiDingyi Chen

T&J Test Bed

Juniper M-Series Transmode 3000

Juniper & Tansmode Test Bed Overview

M10

M5

M7

KISTA KTH

M5

VÄLLINGBY

KTH-2KTH-1

KTH Node D

ge-0/3/0Te-id:28679If-id:57255

108-8Te-id:0x1026cRx-id:0x10208

102-2Tx-id:0x10266Rx-id:0x10202

101-1Tx-id:0x10265Rx-id:0x10201

te-ed-020

te-ed-010

PPP In-band Control CH

GbE TE Links

Label Switch Paths

In-band PPP Links

Fast Ethernet

M5 Node E

Ge-0/1/0:Te-id:30759If-id:55207

102-2Tx-id:0x10266Rx-id:0x10202

106-6Tx-id:0x1026aRx-id:0x10206

101-1Tx-id:0x10265Rx-id:0x10201

Kista Node B

te-ab-030

ge-1/3/0Te-id:29703If-id:57271 te-ab-130

M10 Node A

Ge-0/2/0:Te-id:30791If-id:56231

Conclusion IP connectivity of the whole testbed

GMPLS communication between Transmode nodes.

GMPLS communication between Juniper

nodes.

Problem and Solution

A little lack of real-time documentations and technique support

Two systems with incompatible implementation standards

Marketing

Analysisof

GMPLS

SWOT Analysis

Traditional Service Model of Network Operator

Service Model of Network Operator with GMPLS

Future Work

Integration ConceptLSR

LSR

LSR

LSR

LSR

LSR

Juniper

Juniper

Switch

Switch

OXC OXC

Switch Controler

Switch Controler

Switch Controler

Switch Controler

Switch Controler

M10

M5

M7

KISTA

Vällingby

KTH

KTH2

M5

KTH1

Final Network Diagram