action research pp

Upload: oxado

Post on 30-May-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Action Research Pp

    1/13

    ACTION RESEARCH

    A USEFUL METHOD OF

    PROMOTING CHANGE IN

    PRIMARY CARE

  • 8/14/2019 Action Research Pp

    2/13

    PRESENTED BY :1. Arif Winarno

    2. Bambang Wicaksono

    3. Budi Antomi

    4. Endy Kurniawan

    5. Nur Wahid

  • 8/14/2019 Action Research Pp

    3/13

    CONTENT

    1. Introduction

    2. Background

    3. Objective4. Discussion

    5. Method

    6. Result

    7. Conclusion

  • 8/14/2019 Action Research Pp

    4/13

    INTRODUCTION

    The quality of care provided in health services is nolonger taken for granted. In order to improve healthcare, methods of changing doctors behavior havebeen explored, and so far there appear to be no easy

    solution. In education, industry, and more recently, in nursing,

    action research has been used to facilitate changeand improve the service provided. It is also to b agood method of bridging the gap between research

    and practice. However, there are few publishedexamples of action research being used to improveprimary health care.

  • 8/14/2019 Action Research Pp

    5/13

    The aim of this paper is to discus the benefits and

    difficulties of using action research in primary care

    using our research as an example. In order to do this,

    we have outlined the range of methods used in our

    study and have provided an overview of the results.

  • 8/14/2019 Action Research Pp

    6/13

    Background

    Action research has been used successfully

    to promote change in disciplines other thanmedicine, but there are few examples of its

    use in primary care.

    Objective

    We aimed to discuss the benefits and

    difficulties of using action research inprimary care using the example of child

    health surveillance provision in general

    practice.

  • 8/14/2019 Action Research Pp

    7/13

    DISCUSSION If the data generated from the practice meetings and

    the interviews with health visitors and GPs areconsidered, using an action research model toinvolve primary health care staff in the research

    process was succesful In term of the spectrum of action research

    methodology, the study was more experimentalthan empoweringor more technicalthanemancipatory. The researcher designed the

    project and pre-determined its time table andoutcome measures

  • 8/14/2019 Action Research Pp

    8/13

    Although this study was at

    experiment/technical end of the

    action research spectrum, thehealth visitors involved thought

    the process had been useful in

    enabling them to reflect on andchange their provision of child

    health surveillance

  • 8/14/2019 Action Research Pp

    9/13

    METHOD Twenty-eight general practices were randomly allocated into two

    groups. Action research was used to promote change in 14

    practices by facilitating practice meetings and by providing

    written feedback.

    The other 14 practices received written feedback alone. The two

    groups of practices were compared using the following: (i) semi-

    structured interviews with one health visitor and GP from each

    practice; (ii) observation of baby clinics; (iii) questionnaires to

    parents; and (iv) return rates of child health surveillance reviews

    from the personal child health record.

  • 8/14/2019 Action Research Pp

    10/13

    RESULT

    All 14 practices in the action research arm of the

    study met as individual practice teams and

    decided to make changes to their provision of

    child health surveillance. Ten practices auditedtheir child health surveillance as a result. More

    health visitors in the action research practices

    than in the comparison practices reported

    changes to child health surveillance, audit,communication and use of the personal child

    health record.

  • 8/14/2019 Action Research Pp

    11/13

    The majority of health visitors and GPs

    thought involvement in the action

    research process was beneficial.

    However, we were unable to show astatistically significant difference

    between the two groups of practices in

    baby clinic provision, parentsatisfaction or the return rate of child

    health surveillance reviews.

  • 8/14/2019 Action Research Pp

    12/13

    CONCLUSION

    Our study suggests that action research is asuccessful method of promoting change inprimary care. However, measuring the impactof change is difficult. There continues to be a

    need for research on improving quality ofcare in health and quantitative technique willbe required. Action research can besuccessful method for investigating andimprovement in health care. We conclude that

    using action research to involve primary careteams in the evaluation of service provisionpromotes teamwork, decision making, audit,and change

  • 8/14/2019 Action Research Pp

    13/13