activating the receptive skills braz-tesol 2012-1
DESCRIPTION
Presentation given at the 2012 Braz-TESOL National Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.TRANSCRIPT
Isabela Villas Boas Marta Diniz de Rezende
Activating the receptive skills
– beliefs and practice
versus current research
Motivation for our work
Classroom observation
s
• Our own and our colleagues’
Identification of
problematic areas
• Not in keeping with the institutional guidelines and experts’ recommendations.
Action
• Mini-course to raise awareness; Experiential approach
AssumptionsReading is seen as a boring activity that needs to be “packaged” in a fun way, which may actually hamper the development of reading skills. In an attempt to make the reading
and listening more palatable to students, teachers fail to help them develop strategies that will lead them to become independent readers and listeners.
Listenings and readings, especially, end up becoming more of a springboard to speaking or to learning grammar and vocabulary.
Explore main theoretical principles underlying listening and reading comprehension.
Examine what proficient readers do, focus on reading strategies, and go over the necessary steps in every listening and reading class.
Reexamine the questionnaire answered prior to the course, in the light of what was discussed on the four days.
Answer pre-course questionnaire: knowledge and beliefs concerning the teaching of listening and reading.
Engage in an authentic, integrated listening and reading lesson tailored to the group´s needs.
Fast Facts
Context: Private language institute
Participants: Most teachers with 5+ years of experience; 32 in two sessions, delivered in 2011 and 2012
Analysis of pre and post-mini-course questionnaires
Which items do you think
propitiated the greatest
awareness-raising?
1) Good readers believe that reading is decoding and pronouncing the words correctly.
Pre-
ques
tionn
aire
Post
-que
stio
nnai
are
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
31 0
2731
0
True False Not answered
9%
2) Reading aloud in class enhances students’ understanding and pronunciation.
Pre-
ques
tionn
aire
Post
-que
stio
nnai
re0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
8
0
24
32
TrueFalse
25%
http://kenwilsonelt.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/reading-aloud-in-class-is-a-complete-waste-of-time-discuss/
- If a teacher says ‘My students really enjoy X’, you can usually interpret this as ‘I like X, and I ask my students to do it a lot’. Which CAN be a good thing. But not with reading aloud.
- The idea that this kind of reading aloud is good speaking practice is patently absurd. It isn’t real speaking at all, it’s reading aloud, a sub-skill that very few people have in their own language, let alone in one that they are learning.
- Good for their pronunciation? Not in my experience. In fact, when I’ve had to the chance to talk to students afterwards, I discovered that their speaking was markedly better than I might have imagined if I had only heard them struggling through the text.
(...) This reading around the class is something we recall from our old school days. Why might this popular technique not be effective?-I read faster than he speaks.- It’s so boring.- She makes mistakes.- I’ve already read to page 37 myself.- He can’t pronounce it and he gets embarrassed.- I’m so nervous about reading, I miss the story.- I can’t follow the story with all these different people speaking.- I prefer to read to myself. - It’s going to be 35 minutes till my go.
Round the class reading tends to be a slow, tedious, turn-off rather than a rouser of enthusiasm.
(Scrivener, 2005, pp. 189, 190)
http://eltnotebook.blogspot.com.br/2006/12/reading-aloud.html
Frequently the task of processing meaning and speaking aloud at the same time is too much for the learner, with the consequence that processing meaning gets dropped. Thus, it doesn’t improve reading skills, and neither is it useful for language reinforcement, as the learner is reading without understanding.
Sue Swift@eltnotebook
3) Teaching reading and listening strategies guarantees students’ success in both skills.
Pre-questionnaire Post-questionnaire0
5
10
15
20
25
30
8
4
21
28
10
TRUEFALSEBlank
12%
(Anderson, 2009, p. 136)
Being strategic while reading does not guarantee successful comprehension. Readers may apply a variety of strategies, monitor their comprehension, and still not understand what they are reading. But the strategic reader will not give up. A strategic reader focuses on successful comprehension and does all that it takes to understand. Non-strategic readers give up soon.
4) The Communicative Approach emphasizes bottom-up processing at the expense of top-down processing.
Pre-questionnaire Post-questionnaire0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
12
2
17
30
3
0
TRUEFALSEBlank
40%
Types of comprehension processing
Top Down
Comprehension is the process of using linguistic knowledge to decipher the little black marks in the text.
The starting point is the text itself.
Data-driven
Bottom Up
Concept-driven
The starting point is within the mind of the listener or reader.
Comprehension is a process of making sense of a text in the most cost-effective way.
Han and D´Angelo (2009)
DUAL APPROACH
READING FOR COMPREHENSION
READING FOR ACQUISITION
Socio-psycholinguistic view of readingReading is a process
of constructing meaning from text.
Readers use background
knowledge and linguistic cues from
the graphophonic, syntactic, and
semantic systems as they read.
Freeman and Freeman (2009)
The almost exclusive focus on top-down, schema-based approaches to reading instruction emphasized in Communicative Language Teaching is insufficient to develop effective readers.
(Grabe, 2009)
5) The word “text” refers to any communicative unit.
Pre-questionnaire Post-questionnaire0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
20
31
11
11 0
TRUEFALSEBlank
34%
6) Reading and listening are passive skills which involve top-down and bottom-up processing.
Pre-questionnaire Post-questionnaire0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
17
1
15
31
TRUEFALSE
50%
READING AND LISTENING...
Receptive, not
passive
7) Letters, labels, comic strips, and reports are examples of text genres.
Pre-questionnaire Post-questionnaire0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
27
32
5
0
TRUEFALSE
15%
“Genres are forms of life, ways of being. They are frames for social action, the place where meaning is constructed.” (Bazerman, 2006)
8) I often assign readings for homework due to the lack of time in class.
Pre-questionnaire Post-questionnaire0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
10
6
11
15
1 1
TRUEFALSEBlank
12%
Pre, while, and post-reading
Snow
Scrivener
Brown
Anderson
9) I feel uncomfortable assigning a ten-minute text for students to read in class because I feel I’m not teaching.
Pre-questionnaire Post-questionnaire0
5
10
15
20
25
30
6
3
2628
01
TRUEFALSEBlank
09%
10) When the listening is too long or more challenging, it should be broken into smaller chunks.
Pre-questionnaire Post-questionnaire0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
20
0
10
32
20
TRUEFALSEBlank
62%
(Snow ,2007, p. 94)
Students should first listen to the whole recorded passage once, trying
to get the general outline.
A simple plan would be as follows:- Set questions.- Play recording.
- Check if students have found the answers.
- If not, play the recording again as often as necessary. (p. 172)
Utilize authentic language and contexts: authentic language and real-world
tasks enable students to see the relevance of classroom activity to their long-term
communicative goals
(Brown, 2001, p. 258)
11) Before students read a text, it is a good idea to pre-teach them all the most difficult words to lower their anxiety.
Pre-questionnaire Post-questionnaire0
5
10
15
20
25
30
14
4
16
28
20
TRUEFALSEBlank
37%
In order to make students, better readers, we need first of all to raise their awareness that
it’s not always essential to understand every word, and that
practising some different reading techniques in English may be very useful to them. (p.
184)
1. High frequency words deserve sustained attention.
2. Low frequency words are best ignored or dealt with
quickly.3. The vocabulary learning
strategies of guessing from context, analysing words
using word parts, and dictionary use deserve
repeated attention over a long period of time.
(Nation, 2009. p. 38)
Bargain with students: They do more or less what we ask of
them provided that we do more of less what they ask of us. We
may encourage students to read for general understanding
without understanding every word on a first of second read-
through. But then, depending on what else is going to be done, we
can give them a chance to ask questions about individual words
and/or give them a chance to look them up.
(Harmer, 2007, p. 287)
12) When the text is too long, we can break it into parts and have each group read one part and share it orally (jigsaw reading). This way, the class becomes more communicative and students won’t get bored by having to read the whole text.
Pre-questionnaire Post-questionnaire0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
29
8
2
23
1 1
TRUEFALSEBlank
65%
Controlling the formal aspects of language use in reading and writing is
a way out from subordinate and
marginalized uses of language. (...) Leaving language instruction at
an intuitive and ‘mystical’ level of ‘natural language acquisition’ may be easy for the teacher and may make some students feel
good, but it leads to disempowerment.
(Grabe, 2002, p. 279)
Teachers’ Voices
The mini-course Tips to activate
“Receptive Skills” was eye-
opening in several aspects.
Specifically, I have integrated
reading activities involving both
bottom-up and top-down
processing skills in my teaching
practice.
Teachers’ VoicesThe mini-course did have impact on my
teaching. During this semester, I tried
to work with different text genres to
raise students' reading comprehension
skills, which led to much more colorful
debates in class. Also, I didn't feel I was wasting time while doing long
listening and reading exercises in class; on the contrary,
the students benefited from the time given to read and
understand the texts (especially adults) and to explore
the vocabulary in a meaningful way.
References
Anderson, N. J. (2009). ACTIVE Reading: The Research Base for a Pedagogical Approach in the Reading Classroom. In ZhaoHong Han & Neil J. Anderson (Editors). Second Language Reading Research and Instruction – Crossing the Boundaries. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Bazerman, C. (2006). Gênero, Agência e Escrita. São Paulo: Cortêz.
Brown, D. (2001). Teaching by Principles. White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley, Longman.
Freeman, D. and Freeman, Y. (2009). Effective Reading Instruction for English Language Learners. In ZhaoHong Han & Neil J. Anderson (Editors). Second Language Reading Research and Instruction – Crossing the Boundaries. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Grabe, W. (2002). Dilemmas for the Development of Second Langauge Reading Abilities. In J. C. Richards and W. A. Renandya (Eds). Methodology in Language Teaching – Na Anthology of Current Practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Grabe, W. (2010). Reading in a Second Language. Cambridge University Press.
Han, ZH. and D’Angelo, A. (2009). Balancing between Comprehension and Acquisition: Proposing a Dual Approach. In ZhaoHong Han & Neil J. Anderson (Editors). Second Language Reading Research and Instruction – Crossing the Boundaries. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
References
Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.
Nation, I.S.P. ( 2009). Teaching EFL Reading and Writing. New York, NY: Routledge.
Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning Teaching. Oxford, UK: Macmillan Education.
Snow, D. (2007) From Language Learner to Language Teacher – An Introduction to Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc.
Swift, S. (?). Reading aloud. [web log post]. Retrieved from http://eltnotebook.blogspot.com.br/2006/12/reading-aloud.html.
Wilson, K. (2010, October 14). Reading aloud in class is a complete waste of time – discuss. [web log post]. Retrieved from http://kenwilsonelt.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/reading-aloud-in-class-is-a-complete-waste-of-time-discuss/.