actuarial comparative analysis of natural premium
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Actuarial comparative analysis of natural premium](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081816/5473a26db4af9fb90a8b548b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ACTUARIAL COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NATURAL PREMIUM AND LEVEL PREMIUM AND HOW LEVEL
PREMIUM WORKS.BY NWITE SUNDAY C. A RESEARCH STUDENT AND
LECTURER DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE. EBONYI STATE UNIVERSITY – ABAKALIKI.
ABSTRACT
Insurance contract is a legal contract and because of the
legality, premium is one of the basic consideration for the
acceptance of the insurance risk Canning Vs Farquahar
(1868) stated “NO PREMIUM NO INSURANCE” and Ivamy
(1979) defined insurance as a contract. Based on these, it is
necessary to know how companies determine their premium
charges either on natural method and level premium
method and it was found that premium under level premium
was better than natural premium and illustrations were
made on the possibilities and recommended that companies
should use level premium method rather than natural
premium.
KEYWORDS
Premium, level premium, natural premium, actuarial
valuation, surrender value, paid up policy.
1
![Page 2: Actuarial comparative analysis of natural premium](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081816/5473a26db4af9fb90a8b548b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
INTRODUCTION
The contract of insurance is a contract that is based on
utmost good faith and before the contract becomes
enforceable, there must be consideration.
Consideration can therefore be defined as the premium the
insured pays to the insurance company in view of the risk
inured, so that if a loss occur, the insurer will put the insured
in the same financial position he or she was prior to the loss
(Ivamy: 1979) some companies charge level premium, while
others charge natural premium.
HISTORY OF NATURAL PREMIUM.
Natural premium is the situation in life policy where by the
premium charge at the commencement of the contract
continues to increase as the age increases using a mortality
table.
Even a cursory glance at a modern mortality table will reveal
that the chances of dying during any particular year varies
remarkably according to age.
Thus, to take an example, a man who is aged 25 will pay
lower premium, but the premium he is going to pay is higher
as the age increases. The premium must steadily increase as
the age rises, because the risk of death steadily increases
and it must be ensured that each year’s claims are covered
2
![Page 3: Actuarial comparative analysis of natural premium](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081816/5473a26db4af9fb90a8b548b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
by each year’s premium. The increase would be sharp until
the time when the premium would become prohibitive.
The position might be modified if it were possible each year
to secure a large influx of younger lives, but in practice this
has never been found to be the case.
The second difficulty is due to selection; this is the
identification of lives, which from the point of view of
mortality are inferior.
There are two types of methods used to achieve this; one is
by imposing a medical test each year on the participants or
the imposition of the subsequent state of health ignored.
If however, selection is made only at the time of original
entry and there is no medical test each year, the tendency
would naturally be for more of the best and fittest lives than
of the inferior lives to abandon the scheme when the
premium begin to rise sharply, occurring to the greater
chance of death caused by increasing age.
In this case more of the inferior lives would be left which
would lead to more frequent deaths and premiums would
still be further increased in order to cover the claims.
This therefore has made the natural premium system
unworkable and the system almost be completely
abandoned. Many attempts has been made to revive the
scheme or even restrategise it, but all to no avail. This
threaten to the development of an entirely different system,
which is the level premium system.
3
![Page 4: Actuarial comparative analysis of natural premium](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081816/5473a26db4af9fb90a8b548b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The level premium system, is a system of premium
calculation that stipulates that a single percentage be
collected uniformly throughout the duration of the policy,
This system emphasizes that, if therefore a level premium
be charged throughout the duration of the policy during a
time of increasing risk, a premium will be payable during the
early years that is higher than is needed to meet the cost of
the risk of a claim. This is in order that there may be
something in hand to meet the cost of the greater risk in
later years when the premium will be less than is required to
cover the risk.
HOW THE LEVEL PREMIUM SYSTEM WORKS
This is going to be illustrated on the assumptions that the
group of whole life assurance is in a closed fund (with no
new entrants once the scheme has started) it may also be
assumed that:
- There is a large body of new entrants of a given age
(say,25) all of whom have been selected by medical
examination for life assurance.
- The necessary knowledge is available which will
enable premiums be calculated scientifically.
- The expenses of ruining the scheme can be ignored.
- Each policy remains in force until the death of the life
assured, that is none of the policies is surrendered or made
paid-up.
4
![Page 5: Actuarial comparative analysis of natural premium](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081816/5473a26db4af9fb90a8b548b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
- No other circumstances arise which cause any
modification of the plans, and
- Any margin for safety can be ignored.
In the first year, there will be few deaths causing a moderate
absorption of the premiums; the balance – a very large one –
will go to the reserve.
There are no new entrants because it is a close fund, so that
in the second year there will be slightly fewer premiums
because of the fact that no premium would be collected from
those who died in the first year. The claims will be slightly
greater. The difference between the premiums and the
claims will again go to reserve.
Each year the premium income will be slightly less and the
claims will be slightly more, with the balance still going to
the reserves. The reserve then gradually grows until comes a
time when the premiums balance the claims and there will
be nothing for reserve.
The next year’s claims will slightly exceed premium and the
difference must be drawn from reserve. This reserve then
gradually reduces with every year because more claim will
exceed premiums, until finally when one life is left in. He
pays his last premium and dies, and last premium with the
residue of the reserve is sufficient enough to pay the claim.
This will be so where the assumptions as to interest,
mortality and expenses are exactly those experienced
throughout the whole of the operation.
5
![Page 6: Actuarial comparative analysis of natural premium](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081816/5473a26db4af9fb90a8b548b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
FEATURES OF THE LEVEL PREMIUM SYSTEM
The following is a summary of the features of the level
premium system:
- The total reserve in a closed group of lives (that is,
with no new entrants) increases to a maximum and
then decreases.
- The reserves for any one particular policy steadily
increases throughout its duration steeply at first and
more gradually later on.
- The policy period is treated as a whole. Once the
premium is fixed it cannot be altered.
- The premium must therefore be scientifically fixed.
Knowledge of the probable course of mortality is
required, hence the investigations into the mortality of
the past and the production of mortality tables.
- Reserves will be invested at interest, so that
knowledge of compound interest is required.
- Allowance must be made for expenses of
management, commission and a margin for adverse
features.
6
![Page 7: Actuarial comparative analysis of natural premium](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081816/5473a26db4af9fb90a8b548b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
- Also to be noted in the assessment of premium to be
charged, it is necessary, therefore, to take into
account not only the chance of death at any particular
age but also,
- The rate of interest which can be earned on reserve if
invested and;
- The additional amount (called loading) which must be
added to the premium to cover expenses and to
provide a reasonable safety margin.
THE ACTUARIAL COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE
NATURAL AND LEVEL PREMIUM SYSTEMS
Reserves: consider whole life insurance policy of N1,000
issued to an individual aged 22. In the table below the net
annual premium for this policy is compared with the natural
premiums at various aged of the insured.
Net Annual Premium
Natural
Age At Age 22 Premium
22 13.28 2.53
23 13.28 2.61
40 13.28 4.03
51 13.28 12.95
52 13.28 13.95
75 13.28 86.47
85 13.28 189.38
7
![Page 8: Actuarial comparative analysis of natural premium](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081816/5473a26db4af9fb90a8b548b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
In the illustration, it is seen that during the early years of the
policy the insured is paying the company more than the
year. By – year cost of the insurance, 13.28 – 2.53 = $10.75
in the first years, and 13,28 –2.61 =$10.67 the second year.
Each excess of annual premium payment offer the cost of
insurance is placed by the company in a reserve fund which
earns interest at the same rate as that used in computing
the premium. At age 52, the cost of one year of insurance for
the first time exceeds the premium payment. Beginning then
at age 52 and continuing each year there after so long as
the policy is in effect, the company withdraws from the
reserve fund, sufficient to make up the difference 13.95 –
13.28 = $0.69 at age 52 and 86.47 – 13.28 = N73.19 at age
75. The reserve fund on this policy increases throughout the
life of the policy. In accordance with the CSO table used here
the reserve at age 99 would be 1000 v = $975.61 that is the
net single premium for a whole life assurance policy of
N1000 at age 99.
The reserve fund at the end of the year is called the
“terminal reserve” for the policy year. The terminal reserve
less a nominal charge for expenses is called the “cash
surrender value “ of the policy. The insured may borrow at
any time the cash surrender value of his policy without
further collateral and the terminal reserve belongs to the
insured as long as the policy is in force. He could as well
8
![Page 9: Actuarial comparative analysis of natural premium](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081816/5473a26db4af9fb90a8b548b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
allow his policy lapse and either take the cash surrender
value or use it to purchase another insurance policy.
MATHEMATICAL ILLUSTRATION FOR LEVEL PREMIUM
PRACTICE.
rv + px ax+z
rv = Ax + r – Px ax+r
= mx+r – mx . Nx+r
Dx+r Nx Dx+r
EXAMPLE:
Find the terminal reserve at the end of the 10th policy year
for an ordinary whole insurance policy of N1000 issued to an
individual aged 22.
100010 V = 1000 A32 - 13.28 a32
= 100 m32 – 13.28 N32
32 32
1000 m32 – 13.28 N32
D 32
= 50,165,505
416,507
= N120.44
From the above, the following conclusions and
recommendations will be made.
9
![Page 10: Actuarial comparative analysis of natural premium](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081816/5473a26db4af9fb90a8b548b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
CONCLUSIONS
1. Natural premium considers the risk yearly.
2. Situation of the risk may change the policy.
3. The premium increases as the age increases in natural
premium.
4. Level premium is the best where the same premium is
paid.
RECOMMENDATIONS
From this work, the researcher recommended that level
premium is better than natural premium and recommended
that policy holders and insurance companies should consider
level premiums the best option to natural premium
REFERENCES
Ayres F. (1983): Mathematics of Finance, Aslan Student
Edition.
Marshal C. (1989): Insurance of the Person Chartered
Insurance Institute London.
10