acute ischemic stroke stroke therapeutic options in the thrombolytic era m. r. angle mnh april 1999
TRANSCRIPT
Acute Ischemic Stroke
StrokeStrokeTherapeutic Options in the
Thrombolytic Era
M. R. Angle
MNH
April 1999
Acute Ischemic Stroke
ThrombolysisThrombolysis
rt-PA .9 mg/kg, max 90 mg
onset to treatment ‹ 180 min
usual exclusions (esp. elevated BP)
n = 624
NINDS rt-PA trial NEJM 1995
Acute Ischemic Stroke
no/minimal disability at 3 months: rt-PA 50% vs control 38%odds ratio 1.7 (C.I. 1.2 to 2.6)
intra-cranial hemorrhage:rt-PA 6.4% vs control 0.6%
mortality:rt-PA 17% vs control 21%
benefit accrued independent of stroke sub-type and severity
8.8 patients treated to achieve one additional good outcome
NINDS ‘95: results NINDS ‘95: results
Acute Ischemic StrokeThe Brain AttackThe Brain Attack
Grond ‘98
City of Cologne, pop. 1,000,000
single stroke center
EMT triage stroke symptoms ‹ 3 hrs age ‹ 80 yrs reasonable level of consciousness
outcome results similar to/better than NINDS cohort
Acute Ischemic Stroke
The Brain AttackThe Brain AttackGrond ‘98
recruitment
to all hospitals: to Stroke Center:
4032 453Patients with presumed stroke
final diagnosis of stroke
age ‹ 80 and duration ‹ 3hrs
received rt-PA
402
1950 245
149
100
Acute Ischemic Stroke
ThrombolysisThrombolysisLessons:
the current therapeutic window is 3 hrs from symptom onset
most deaths occur amongst protocol violations
benefits are modest but real and enduring (5 yrs)
relatively few patients will actually benefit from this technology alone
Acute Ischemic Stroke
ThrombolysisThrombolysis
increasing recruitment– public stroke awareness– systems improvement
expanding the therapeutic window– neuroprotective agents– individualized protocols
refining the target population– functional imaging (MRI, XeCT)
Future Directions:
Acute Ischemic Stroke
NeuroprotectionNeuroprotection
Failed PCRT’s:
heparin
ASAtirilizadlubeluzole (‹ 6% benefit)eliprolil
selfotelenlimomabaptiganeldanaparoidpiracetam
Untested but exciting: melatonin
CASPase inhibitors
anti-adhesion molecule inhibitors
Acute Ischemic Stroke
(Indredravik; Stroke ‘97)
stroke unit care vs. general ward care
relative risk of death and dependency decreased by 9%
relative risk of death and institutionalization decreased by 18%
accrued benefit related to staff interest and expertise, protocol
driven care, interdisciplinary coordination
cost-effective and enduring
Stroke UnitsStroke Units
Acute Ischemic StrokeNutritionNutrition
(Davalos, Stroke ‘96)
acute stroke patients demonstrate a stress-response
driven, catabolic state for 7-10 days
indices of ‘malnutrition’ at 7 days predict a poor outcome
(odds ratio 3.5, C.I. 1.2-10.2)
uncertain whether malnutrition is a marker of severity or
an independent contributor to poor outcome
no evidence that early feeding alters the catabolic course
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Caloric RestrictionCaloric Restriction
shown to retard age-related neuropathic changes and
prolong life in a broad range of animal species
presumed to decrease the leak of oxyradicals from
mitochondria
significantly reduces injury in several models of excito-
toxicity
reduces post-ischemic gene expression and infarct
volume
Acute Ischemic Stroke
HyperglycemiaHyperglycemia
extensive laboratory data shows increasing injury with hyperglycemia, pre-, during and post-ischemia, focal and global
extensive epidemiological data shows outcome inversely related to blood glucose in non-lacunar stroke
no demonstrable threshold value - mild hypoglycemia may be beneficial
Acute Ischemic Stroke
HyperglycemiaHyperglycemiaBruno, Neurology ‘99
post-hoc analysis 1259 patients from TOAST study
odds ratio .82/100 mg % for good outcome
deleterious in all non-lacunar strokes
deleterious in treated lacunar strokes
Acute Ischemic Stroke
HyperglycemiaHyperglycemiaPotential mechanisms of injury:
1. increased penumbral acidosis
2. increased BBB injury on reperfusion
3. dysregulated post-ischemia gene expression
4. impaired vascular responses to flow and pressure
5. upregulated NMDA receptor activity
Acute Ischemic Stroke
HyperthermiaHyperthermia
experimentally, enhances injury and worsens outcome
in trauma and both global and focal ischemia
threshold temperature (37.5 oC - ax) common post-
stroke - @ 60% over first 72 hours
hyperthermia during first 24 hours strongly associated
with mortality and poor outcome
odds ratio 3.2, [C.I. 1.7 - 5.5]
Acute Ischemic Stroke
HyperthermiaHyperthermiaPotential mechanisms of injury:
1. enhanced penumbral metabolic rate
2. increased BBB injury post-reperfusion
3. enhanced ischemia-induced expression of
excitotoxic amino-acids
4. vascular dysregulation
Acute Ischemic Stroke
HypertensionHypertension
common and self-limited
no current treatment recommendations below
threshold value 210/120
strongly associated with poor outcome in thrombolytic
trials
NINDS ‘95: no adverse outcome of conservative
treatment at 185/110 mmHg
Acute Ischemic Stroke
HemisphericHemisphericInfarctionInfarction
younger cohort, › 50% mca hypodensity
80% mortality with conservative treatment
predicted by deteriorating level of consciousness,
nausea and vomiting, › 3mm midline shift at 36 hours
early signs related to distortion, late signs to ICP and
herniation
Acute Ischemic Stroke
HemicraniectomyHemicraniectomy
strong experimental support for early decompression
preliminary human data (n = 63) confirming @ 80%
survival and generally good outcome
(Shwab, Stroke ‘98)
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Hemispheric Hemispheric InfarctionInfarction
Treatment Options:
1. no intervention
2. hyperosmolar agents (Shwartz, Stroke ‘98)
3. hypothermia (Shwab, Stroke ‘98)
4. barbiturate coma (Shwab, Neurology, ‘97)
5. hemicraniectomy +/- debulking
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Adjunctive TherapiesAdjunctive Therapies
1. Steroids deleterious
2. Hemodilution no effect
3. O2 therapy untested but deleterious in vitro
4. Albumin decreased oedema and infarct volume in animals
5. Hyperosmolar untested; hypertonic saline agents possibly more effective
6. Naloxone uncorroborated report of benefit in early stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
ConclusionsConclusions19991999
meticulously controlled thrombolysis programs offer
real benefit to relatively few,
extending the benefit of thrombolysis will involve
considerable investment in public education and the
development of neuroprotective agents,
stroke units, and careful avoidance of well
documented co-morbid factors, offer immediate
benefit to the many.