acute stroke therapy
DESCRIPTION
Acute Stroke Therapy. Andrew Slivka, MD Associate Professor of Neurology Cerebrovascular Diseases and Stroke The Ohio State University Medical Center. General Early Supportive Care. 1. Early mobilization and measures to prevent aspiration - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Acute Stroke TherapyAcute Stroke Therapy
Andrew Slivka, MD
Associate Professor of Neurology
Cerebrovascular Diseases and Stroke
The Ohio State University Medical Center
General Early Supportive CareGeneral Early Supportive Care
1. Early mobilization and measures to prevent aspiration
*2. Heparin for DVT prophylaxis in immobilized patients, pneumatic compression devices in patients who cannot receive heparin
Treatment of Cerebral EdemaTreatment of Cerebral Edema
*1. Steroids not recommended2.Osmotherapy, hyperventilation for patients
deteriorating due to increased intracranial pressure or with herniation syndromes
3.Surgical decompression, ventricular shunt for large cerebellar infarcts compressing brain stem
4.Surgical decompression for large hemispheric infarct may be life-saving, but may have severe residual neurological deficits
Acute Treatment Antithrombotic TherapyAcute Treatment Antithrombotic Therapy
1. Heparin or LMW heparin when used within 48 hours of acute ischemic stroke do not reduce morbidity, mortality, or rate of stroke reoccurrence, but do increase systemic and CNS bleeding risk independent of stroke subtype
2.Aspirin (160-325mg) within 48 hours
Early Anticoagulation afterEarly Anticoagulation afterCardioembolic StrokeCardioembolic Stroke
Trial Agent NDuration of Treatment
Recurrent Stroke ICH
Heparin 24 14d 0% 0%No Heparin 21 10.0% 10.0%
Heparin 1557 14d 2.8% 2.5%No Heparin 1612 4.5% 0.3%Danaparoid 143 7d 0% 2.9%
Placebo 123 1.6% 0.9%Dalteparin 224 10d 8.5% 2.7%
ASA 225 7.5% 1.8%
CESG (1983)
IST (1997)
TOAST (1998)cardioembolicHAEST (2000)
Acute Stroke Treatment StrategiesAcute Stroke Treatment Strategies
Recanalization Neuroprotection
Recanalization StrategiesRecanalization Strategies
Delivery (iv, ia, iv-ia) Drugs (UK, t-PA, Pro-UK, retaplase, desmoteplase) Mechanical (wire, balloon, snare, angiojet, MERCI)
Thrombolytic Therapy - iv t-PAThrombolytic Therapy - iv t-PA
NINDS t-PA Stroke Trial
Inclusion Criteria Age > 18 years Clearly defined time of onset < 3 hours Clinical diagnosis of ischemic stroke
Thrombolytic Therapy - iv t-PAThrombolytic Therapy - iv t-PA
Exclusion Criteria Suspicion of SAH Recent intracranial surgery, serious head trauma, recent
previous stroke (within 3 months) History of ICH Uncontrolled HPT (> 185 mmHg systolic, > 110 mgHg
diastolic Seizure at onset active internal bleeding Intracranial neoplasm, AVM, or aneurysm
Thrombolytic Therapy - iv t-PAThrombolytic Therapy - iv t-PA
Exclusion Criteria - continued Bleeding diathesis: PT > 15 sec (or INR > 1.7 ) -
heparin treatment with elevated PTT, platelet <100,000/mm3
Major surgery, serious trauma < 2 weeks GI or GU hemorrhage < 3 weeks
Arterial puncture at noncompressable site or LP < 1 week
Thrombolytic Therapy - iv t-PAThrombolytic Therapy - iv t-PA
Exclusion Criteria - continued Pregnant Rapidly improving neurological signs Isolated mild neurological deficits Glucose < 50 mg/dl or > 400 mg/dl
NINDS t-PA Stroke Trial: DesignNINDS t-PA Stroke Trial: Design
Part I (n=291): half treated within 90 minutes Primary outcome – complete resolution or > 4 point
improvement in NIHSS at 24 hours. Secondary outcome – minimal or no disability at 3 months
Part II (n= 333): half treated within 90 minutes Primary outcome – minimal or no disability at 3 months
Dose: 0.9 mg/kg (maximum 90 mg); 10% bolus, remainder infused over 1 hour
Outcome of Patients Outcome of Patients Treated With t-PATreated With t-PA
Modified Rankin 0 to 1 2 to 3 4 to 5 Death
t-PA 39% 21% 23% 17%Placebo 26% 25% 27% 21%
STARS Study(1 month) 35% 21% 31% 13%
NIHSS Score 0 to 1 2 to 8 > 8 Deatht-PA 31% 30% 22% 17%Placebo 20% 32% 27% 21%
CASES Study(3 months) 31% 32% 11% 22%
NINDS Study(3 months)
NINDS Study(3 months)
NIH iv t-PA TrialNIH iv t-PA Trial
Baseline NIHSSRX 91-180 minutes
t-PA Placebo t-PA Placebo0 to 5 24/39 (83%) 6/7 (86%) 0/29 0/76 to 10 23/37 (62%) 23/46 (50%) 2/37 (5%) 1/46 (2%)
11 to 15 10/26 (38%) 5/35 (14%) 2/26 (8%) 0/3516 to 20 9/33 (27%) 6/33 (18%) 2/33 (6%) 1/33 (3%)
>20 4/28 (14%) 2/46 (4%) 4/28 (14%) 0/46All patients 70/153 (46%) 42/167 (25%) 10/153 (7%) 2/167 (1%)
mRS 0 to 1 Symptomatic ICH
Predictors of Outcome with t-PAPredictors of Outcome with t-PA
Age, deficit severity, diabetes, admission blood pressure, early CT changes, influence outcome, but do not alter likelihood of responding favorably to t-PA
NIHSS > 20: Rankin 0-1(at 3 months) 10% with t-PA, 4% placebo; Rankin 4,5 or 6 is 70%, independent of treatment
Brain edema/mass effect on CT: Rankin 0-1 (at 3 months) 25% with t-PA, 16% placebo; Rankin 4,5 or 6 is 55%, independent of treatment
Time to treatment correlates with outcome
Symptomatic Intracerebral Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage with t-PA TreatmentHemorrhage with t-PA Treatment
NINDS Trial (n=312) 6% STARS Study (n=389) 3% CASES Study (n=450) 4% Average Phase IV Studies 5% (16%)
n=>1400
Risks for Symptomatic Risks for Symptomatic Intracerebral HemorrhageIntracerebral Hemorrhage
Hospital size (experience) Protocol violations Severity of neurological deficit Brain edema or mass effect on CT
IV t-PA Use After 3 HoursIV t-PA Use After 3 Hours
Atlantis: 613 patients, 3-5 hours after stroke, NIH > 3
ECASS II: 800 patients < 6 hours after stroke 90 day Outcome: Placebo t-PA
Atlantis ECASS II Atlantis ECASS II
Favorable ClinicalOutcome
32% 37% 34% 40%
Mortality 7% 10% 11% 10%Symptomatic ICH 1% 3% 7% 9%
Intra-arterial ThrombolysisIntra-arterial Thrombolysis
Series with t-PA, UK Pro-urokinase (PROACT II)
180 patients with proximal MCA occlusion within 6 hours
Recanalization: 66% treated group, 19% control Good outcome: 40% treated group, 25% control Symptomatic ICH: 10% treated group, 2% control Mortality: 25% treated group, 27% control
Intra-arterial Thrombolysis at OSUIntra-arterial Thrombolysis at OSU
81 patients treated from May 1995 to July 2003 52% male, 16% African American, 1% Asian
American, Mean age 72 years 26% with good clinical outcome (mRS < 2) 70% with recanalization (33% complete) 7% with symptomatic ICH
Predictors of Clinical OutcomePredictors of Clinical Outcome
No occlusion 38% with good outcome vs. 26% with occlusion, Rx
Age > 80 years 0/14 with good outcomes (57% recanalize, 29% complete)
Admission NIHSS Good outcome 11/16 (69%) 4-10
9/48 (19%) 11-20
1/18 (6%) >20
Predictors of Clinical OutcomePredictors of Clinical Outcome
Time to Treat < 5 hours – good outcome 15/47 (32%)
Recanalization 77% (41% complete) > 5 hours – good outcome 6/34 (18%)
Recanalization 62% (24% complete)
Predictors of Clinical OutcomePredictors of Clinical Outcome
Recanalization Complete recanalization-13/27 (48%) good outcome Partial recanalization 7/30 (23%) good outcome No recanalization 1/24 (4%) good outcome
Predictors of OutcomePredictors of Outcome
Collateral Circulation When complete recanalization – linear
relationship between clinical outcome and infarct size and collateral grade
When partial/no recanalization – no correlation with clinical outcome, excellent collateral have smaller infarcts than other collateral grades
Intravenous – Intra arterialIntravenous – Intra arterial
IMS (Stroke, 2004) 80 Patients within 3 hours 6 mg/kg (max 60 mg) t-PA iv over 30 minutes up
to 22 mg t-PA ia over 2 hours if occlusion seen by angiography
Good outcome 30% (32% iv t-PA, 18% control Symptomatic ICH 6.3% (6.6% iv t-PA, 1% control Mortality 16% (21% iv t-PA, 24% control)
Mechanical DisruptionMechanical Disruption
Anecdotal: snare, balloon, angio jet MERCI (Stroke, 2005)
141 patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion treated within 8 hours
Recanalization: 48% (19% PROACT control) Complications: 7% (emboli, dissection, SAH) Good outcome: 28% (46% recanalized, 10% occluded) Mortality: 43% (32 recanalized, 54% occluded)
Detection of Preservable BrainDetection of Preservable Brain
MR DWI PI MRA
CT CTP CTA
DesmoteplaseDesmoteplase
45-60 patients within 9 hours, DWI/PI mismatch DIAS – Europe, DEDAS – USA, Germany Dose response found Reperfusion: 50-70% (vs 20-37% control) Good outcome: 66% (vs 22-25% control) No symptomatic ICH
Treatment AlgorithmsTreatment Algorithms
Less than 3 hours NIHSS <10 iv t-PA NIHSS 10 or greater iv/ia t-PA
3-6 hours DIAS-II NIHSS < 10 or lacunar infarct: MR then ia t-PA (? Iv t-PA)
Greater than 6 hours NIHSS 10 or greater: MR then MERCI
Treatment: Special PopulationsTreatment: Special Populations
Post catheterization Post operative Children/adolescents