acv outer marker (om) lucchesi road arcata, california

ACV Outer Marker (OM)

Lucchesi Road

Arcata, California 59421

Phase I Environmental Due Diligence Audit

Prepared For:

U.S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

Prepared By:

Leidos (NISC III)

400 Virginia Ave, SW Suite 400

Washington, DC 20024

(202) 646-5681

Site Inspection Date: November 14, 2018

Report Date: November 30, 2018

JCN: 1900007

ACV OM Phase I EDDA i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................1

2.0 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1

2.1 Purpose.....................................................................................................................1

2.2 Detailed Scope of Services ......................................................................................2

2.3 Significant Assumptions ..........................................................................................2

2.4 Limitations and Exceptions......................................................................................2

2.5 Special Terms and Conditions .................................................................................3

2.6 User Reliance ...........................................................................................................3

3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ..........................................................................................................3

3.1 Location and Legal Description...............................................................................3

3.2 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics ................................................................5

3.3 Current Use of the Property .....................................................................................6

3.4 Description of Structures, Roads, Other Improvements on the Site ........................6

3.5 Current Uses of the Adjoining Properties ................................................................6

4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION .................................................................................6

4.1 Lease and Title Documents......................................................................................6

4.2 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations ............................................7

4.3 Specialized Knowledge............................................................................................7

4.4 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information................................7

4.5 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues .......................................................7

4.6 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information ...........................................7

4.7 Reason for Performing Phase I ................................................................................7

5.0 RECORDS REVIEW...........................................................................................................7

5.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources ................................................................8

5.2 Additional Environmental Record Sources .............................................................9

5.3 Physical Setting Source(s) .....................................................................................10

5.4 Historical Use Information on the Property...........................................................10

5.5 Historical Use Information on Adjoining Properties .............................................15

6.0 SITE INSPECTION...........................................................................................................15

6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions..................................................................15

6.2 General Site Setting ...............................................................................................15

6.3 External Observations............................................................................................15

6.4 Interior Observations .............................................................................................16

7.0 INTERVIEWS ...................................................................................................................16

7.1 Interview with Owner ............................................................................................16

7.2 Interview with Site Manager..................................................................................16

7.3 Interviews with Occupants.....................................................................................16

7.4 Interviews with State and/or Local Officials .........................................................16

7.5 Interviews with Others...........................................................................................16

8.0 FINDINGS.........................................................................................................................16

9.0 OPINIONS.........................................................................................................................17

10.0 CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................17

11.0 DEVIATIONS ...................................................................................................................17

ACV OM Phase I EDDA ii

12.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES...............................................................................................17

12.1 Asbestos .................................................................................................................17

12.2 Lead........................................................................................................................18

12.3 Radon .....................................................................................................................18

12.4 Endangered and Threatened Species ......................................................................18

12.5 Historic Value ........................................................................................................18

13.0 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................19

14.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS ........................................20

15.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS................................20

16.0 APPENDICES ...................................................................................................................22

16.1 Site Area and Site Vicinity Maps...........................................................................22

16.2 Site Plan .................................................................................................................24

16.3 Site Photographs ....................................................................................................25

16.4 Historical Research Documentation ......................................................................26

16.4.1 Real Estate Documents ..............................................................................26

16.4.2 Historical Aerial Photographs....................................................................27

16.4.3 Historical Topographic Maps ....................................................................34

16.4.4 Wetlands Map ............................................................................................40

16.4.5 Flood Insurance Rate Map .........................................................................41

16.4.6 Soil Survey Report .....................................................................................42

16.5 Regulatory Documentation ....................................................................................44

16.6 Interview Documentation.......................................................................................45

16.7 Special Contractual Conditions between User and Environmental Professionals.45

APPENDICES

Appendix A Real Estate Documents

Appendix B EDR Summary Radius Map Report

Appendix C Site Inspection Photographs

Appendix D Endangered and Threatened Species Report

Appendix E Asbestos and Lead Survey Reports

ACV OM Phase I EDDA iii

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

ACM Asbestos Containing Material

ACV Site Identifier

AST Aboveground Storage Tank

ASTM ASTM International (formerly American Society for Testing and Materials)

CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability

Information System

CORRACTS RCRA Corrective Action Sites

DEQ Department of Environmental Quality

ECOS Environmental Conservation Online System

EDDA Environmental Due Diligence Audit

EDR Environmental Data Resources, Inc

EOSH Environmental Occupational Safety and Health

EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

FAA Federal Aviation Administration

FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency

FINDS Facility Index System

FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map

HMIRS Hazardous Materials Incident Report System

LBP Lead Based Paint

LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank

MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System

NFRAP No Further Remedial Action Planned

NHPA National Historic Preservation Act

NISC III National Airspace System Implementation Support Contract

NPL National Priorities List

NRHP National Registry of Historic Places

NWI National Wetland Inventory

OM Outer Marker

PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyl

pCi/L picoCuries/Liter

PID Photoionization Detector

RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

RECO Real Estate Contracting Officer

SHWS State Hazardous Waste Site

SSC System Support Center

SWF/LF Solid Waste Facility/Landfill

TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System

TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act

TSDF Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facility

USC United States Code

USGS U.S. Geological Survey

UST Underground Storage Tank

WSA Western Service Area

ACV OM Phase I EDDA 1

1.0 SUMMARY

Leidos (NISC III), in support of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), presents this

Phase I Environmental Due Diligence Audit (EDDA) report for the ACV Outer Marker (OM)

located off of Lucchesi Road, Arcata, California 59421. The former ACV OM has been

decommissioned and the site has been restored. The former ACV OM had been located on an

approximately 0.31-acre parcel of land. The parcel of land and any buildings, structures, and

improvements on the parcel are hereafter referred to as the “Subject Property” for the purposes

of this report. The parcel of land is owned by the United States of America, and was used by the

FAA.

Records were obtained from various agencies to gather historical information and documentation

pertaining to potential environmental liabilities associated with the subject and surrounding

properties. A database search of federal and state environmental records was performed to

determine if neighboring or adjacent properties have the potential to adversely affect the Subject

Property.

Details of the findings associated with the Subject Property are provided in Section 8.0 of this

report. This Phase I EDDA has revealed no recognized environmental conditions (as defined by

ASTM International (ASTM) Standard E1527-13) in connection with the Subject Property.

2.0 INTRODUCTION

The Subject Property has been decommissioned, restored, and is excess real property. Due to the

anticipated sale of the Subject Property, the FAA Facility Disposition program requested a

Phase I EDDA to be performed for the Subject Property.

2.1 Purpose

The purpose of this Phase I EDDA is to identify, to the extent feasible and subject to the

limitations discussed in this report, recognized environmental conditions and historical

recognized environmental conditions related to the Subject Property.

According to ASTM E1527-13, the term “recognized environmental conditions” is

defined as follows:

the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in,

on, or at a property: (1) due to release to the environment; (2) under conditions

indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material

threat of a future release to the environment. De minimis conditions are not

recognized environmental conditions.

According to ASTM E1527-13, the term “historical recognized environmental condition”

is defined as follows:


a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in

connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the

applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a

regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls (for

example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls,

or engineering controls).

This report serves as documentation of a Phase I EDDA for the Subject Property. The

purpose of this audit is to assist the FAA in exercising due diligence by evaluating

potential environmental liabilities associated with the Subject Property. This audit was

performed in accordance with and within the guidelines set forth in FAA Order

1050.19B, Environmental Due Diligence Audits in the Conduct of FAA Real Property

Transactions and ASTM E1527-13, Standard Practice for Environmental Site

Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process.

2.2 Detailed Scope of Services

A detailed site inspection was conducted on November 14, 2018. The site inspection

consisted of a visual survey of all property grounds, and immediate surrounding areas to

identify recognized environmental conditions. The purpose of the site inspection was to

identify areas such as manufacturing and process areas; chemical storage areas; waste

storage areas; suspected disposal areas; subsurface structures (such as drains, sumps,

septic systems, and tanks); fuel storage areas; electrical equipment which may contain

polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); evidence of historical uses; and evidence of spills or

potential releases of hazardous substances (such as stressed vegetation and soil staining).

Records were obtained from various agencies to gather historical information and

documentation pertaining to potential environmental liabilities associated with the

Subject Property and surrounding properties. A database search of federal and state

environmental records was performed to determine if neighboring or adjacent properties

have the potential to adversely affect the Subject Property.

2.3 Significant Assumptions

Leidos (NISC III) is not aware of any significant assumptions.

2.4 Limitations and Exceptions

This Phase I EDDA was performed in accordance with the ASTM Standard E1527-13

and FAA Order 1050.19B. The methodologies contained in these standards and orders

include, among other things, interviews with individuals familiar with the Subject

Property, site inspection, and historical records review. Information obtained during the

interviews and site inspection was recorded and reviewed before it was included in this

Phase I EDDA report. All information that was obtained during the site investigation and

subsequently included within this Phase I EDDA is assumed to be reliable. Not all such

information, however, is susceptible to independent verification. Data from additional

government databases was obtained and reviewed using accepted industry standards and


practices. The conclusions summarized herein are based on the limited observations and

review described within this submittal at the time the Phase I EDDA was conducted.

Future events at the Subject Property or the surrounding properties may alter these

findings.

Performing a Phase I EDDA in accordance with ASTM Standard E1527-13 and FAA

Order 1050.19B is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the

potential for recognized environmental conditions in connection with a property, and both

practices recognize reasonable limits of time and cost.

2.5 Special Terms and Conditions

Leidos (NISC III) is not aware of any special terms or conditions.

2.6 User Reliance

Leidos (NISC III) is not aware of any user reliance issues.

3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

The ACV OM has been decommissioned and the site restored. The former ACV OM had been

located on an approximately 0.31-acre parcel of land that is irregular in shape and the formerly

fenced area was approximately 112.73 feet by 100 feet by 167.34 feet by 113.94 feet. The ACV

OM site plot (formerly fenced area) is located east of Lucchesi Road and is surrounded by

wooded areas and rural residential properties. The formerly fenced area is relatively flat and

covered in gravel and dirt.

Site aerials of the subject and immediate adjoining properties are provided in Section 16.4.2.

Additionally, a site plan is provided in Section 16.2.

3.1 Location and Legal Description

The Subject Property is located in Humboldt County, California approximately 2.75

miles northeast of Arcata city center, approximately 37 miles northwest of Hyampom,

and 184 miles northeast of Santa Rosa.

The Subject Property is located at the following approximate location:

Location:

Decimal Degrees

Latitude (North): 40.902583 400 54′ 9.3″ N

Longitude (West): 124.057194 1240 3′ 25.9″ W

Elevation: 322 feet above sea level.


Legal Description: Grant Deed

Parcel One

That real property situated in the County of Humboldt, State of California, and

located in the Northeast One-Quarter of the Southwest One-Quarter of Section 15,

Township 6 North, Range 1 East, Humboldt Meridian and more particularly

described as follows.

Commencing at the South One-Quarter corner of Section 15 as shown in Book 19

of Surveys, page 80 Humboldt County Records

THENCE North 31 degrees 18 minutes 03 seconds West, 2154.11 feet to a set

5/8” rebar and aluminum cap stamped “LS 3945” and the Point of Beginning.

THENCE North 27 degrees 36 minutes 08 seconds West, 100.00 feet to a set 5/8”

rebar and aluminum cap stamped “LS 3945.”

THENCE South 62 degrees 23 minutes 52 seconds West, 112.73 feet to a set 5/8”

rebar and aluminum cap stamped “LS 3945” in an existing fence line.

Parcel Two

A 20 foot easement lying 10 foot on each side of centerline for ingress, egress,

and public utility purposes described as follows.

Commencing at the South One-Quarter corner of Section 15 as shown in Book 19

of Surveys, page 80, Humboldt County Records

THENCE North 31 degrees 18 minutes 03 seconds West, 2154.11 feet to a set

5/8” rebar aluminum cap stamped “LS 3945.”

THENCE North 27 degrees 36 minutes 08 seconds West, 100.00 feet to a set 5/8”

rebar and aluminum cap stamped “LS 3945.”

THENCE South 62 degrees 23 minutes 52 seconds West, 112.73 feet to a set 5/8”

rebar and aluminum cap stamped “LS 3945” in an existing fence line being the

northwesterly corner of Parcel One above described.

THENCE South 62 degrees 23 minutes 52 seconds West, 11.39 feet to a point that

is westerly ten feet at right angles from the west line of the above described Parcel

One, being the Point of Beginning of the centerline of said 20 foot easement.

THENCE South 1 degree 02 minutes 13 seconds West parallel with the west line

of Parcel One and 10 feet distant therefrom 113.94 feet.


THENCE South 0 degrees 49 minutes 46 seconds West, 363.17 feet.

THENCE South 12 degrees 24 minutes 58 seconds West, 61.64 feet.

THENCE South 62 degrees 19 minutes 43 seconds West, 8.12 feet to the westline

of the Northeast One-Quarter of the Southwest One-Quarter of Section 15, being

a point within the existing County Road known as Aldergrove Road.

The side lines of said 20 foot easement are to be shortened or lengthened as

necessary to terminate on a line that bears South 62 degrees 23 minutes 52

seconds West through the Point of Beginning on the north, and the South and

West lines of the Northeast One-Quarter of the Southwest One-Quarter of Section

15, on the south.

Basis of Bearing for the above descriptions is Book 19 of Surveys, page 80,

Humboldt County Records. For more particular information as to the location of

the above described boundaries, see Book 42 of Surveys, page 12, Humboldt

County Records.

Together with a restrictive easement on the Grantor’s adjacent property described

below as “Airspace Easement” and depicted on Exhibits “A” and “B”. The area

3.2 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics

The Subject Property is in an area that is primarily rural residential properties with

surrounding wooded areas.


3.3 Current Use of the Property

The ACV OM has been decommissioned and the Subject Property is no longer used by

the FAA. The Subject Property has been restored and the parcel of land will be sold.

3.4 Description of Structures, Roads, Other Improvements on the Site

The Subject Property has been restored and no structures remain. The formerly fenced

plot where the equipment shelter building and antenna had been located is covered

primarily with gravel and dirt. The access road extended approximately 60 feet northeast

from Lucchesi Road to the formerly fenced area of the Subject Property which was

approximately 112.73 feet by 100 feet by 167.34 feet by 113.94 feet. Please see Site Plan

in Section 16.2 and Site Photographs in Section 16.3.

3.5 Current Uses of the Adjoining Properties

A review of topographic maps, aerial photographs, site inspection, and interviews

revealed that the areas immediately surrounding the Subject Property are wooded areas,

open fields, rural residential properties, and roadways. The following boxed text

describes the areas located north, east, south, and west of the Subject Property.

Neighboring Properties

NorthProperties directly north appear to be wooded areas and rural residential

properties.

EastProperties directly east appear to be rural residential properties, open fields

and wooded areas.

SouthProperties directly south appears to be wooded areas, Abbott Lane

followed by rural residential properties and wooded areas.

WestProperties directly west appears to be Lucchesi Road followed by rural

residential properties and wooded areas.

4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION

The following sections describe the historical and present ownership of the Subject Property and

its previous uses. Appendix A provides the available real property documentation including the

ROW Easement.

4.1 Lease and Title Documents

The parcel of land is owned by the United States of America, with an easement for

ingress and egress and airspace. The parcel of land described in the description under

“Parcel One” includes where the equipment shelter building and antenna had been

located and the access road for the Subject Property. The parcel of land described in the

description under “Parcel Two” includes the area for ingress, egress, and public utility


purposes.

4.2 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations

There are no known environmental liens or activity and use limitations associated with

the Subject Property.

4.3 Specialized Knowledge

No specialized knowledge or experience that is material to recognized environmental

conditions in connection with the Subject Property was communicated by the FAA as

part of this EDDA.

4.4 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information

Records were obtained from various agencies to gather historical information and

documentation pertaining to potential environmental liabilities associated with the subject

and surrounding properties. A database search of federal and state environmental records

was performed to determine if neighboring or adjacent properties have the potential to

adversely affect the Subject Property.

4.5 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues

It is unknown whether the Subject Property values have been reduced due to

environmental issues on-site or on adjacent properties.

4.6 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information

The parcel of land is owned by the United States of America and was used by the FAA

via a Grant Deed and Quitclaim Deed. The Subject Property is managed by FAA

personnel at the Arcata System Support Center (SSC).

4.7 Reason for Performing Phase I

The FAA requested a Phase I EDDA based on the expectation to sell the Subject Property

as excess real property with assistance from GSA.

5.0 RECORDS REVIEW

Records were reviewed from various federal, state, and local agencies to obtain information on

potential environmental concerns that could impact the Subject Property. A discussion of the

federal, state, and local records review is provided in the following sections. Refer to Appendix

B for the Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), Report.


5.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources

Federal and State Records

Based upon the records review and personal interviews, no potential environmental concerns

were identified with respect to the Subject Property. The findings from the information reviewed

for this EDDA include the following:

No documented releases at Subject Property.

No hazardous waste generator identified on the Subject Property.

The databases listed below were among those searched by EDR for this EDDA. Detailed

information contained in these databases and a complete list of all databases searched is

included in the EDR Report in Appendix B.

Database Search Results

AST – Aboveground Storage Tanks None

Brownfield Sites None

CAT – Cleanup Started and/or Completed Sites None

CERCLIS – Comprehensive Environmental Response,

Compensation, and Liability Information System

None

CORRACTS – RCRA Corrective Action Sites None

ENG CONTROLS – Engineering Controls None

ENVIROSTOR One site

FINDS – Facility Index Systems None

FUDS – Formerly Used Defense Sites None

HMIRS – Hazardous Materials Incident Report System None

INST CONTROL – Institutional Controls (Legal or

Administrative Restrictions)

None

LUST – Leaking Underground Fuel Storage Tanks Two sites

Mining, Oil and Gas Operations None

MLTS – Material Licensing Tracking System None

NFRAP – No Further Remedial Action Planned None

NPL – National Priorities List None

RCRA – Resource Conservation and Recovery Act – Generators

of hazardous waste

None

RCRA Non-Generators of hazardous waste / No Longer Regulated None

SHWS – State Hazardous Waste Sites None

SWF/LF – Solid Waste Facility/Landfill None

TRIS – Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System None

TSCA – Toxic Substances Control Act None

TSDF – Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facility None

UST – Underground Storage Tank None

VCP – State Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites None


One ENVIROSTOR site within 1.0 miles of the Subject Property:

One ENVIROSTOR site, U.S. Coast Guard Air Station Arcata Airport, was identified in

the EDR Report. Upon further review it was determined that the site was located at the

Arcata Airport, approximately 6.0 miles from the Subject Property. Based on the site’s

location, this site does not likely present a risk to the Subject Property.

One LUST site within 0.5 miles of the Subject Property:

There are two LUST sites, Humboldt Bay Muni Water Essex and HBMWD Essex

Operations Center/Humboldt Bay Muni Water, identified within the EDR report. Based

on further investigation it was concluded that the two sites identified are the same site,

therefore there is only one LUST site. The site, Facility ID/RB Case Number: 1THU225,

contained a gasoline UST of which the size was not reported. Due to potential soil

contamination a case was opened at the site on February 2, 1990. A site assessment was

completed on February 22, 1990 followed by remediation, an additional site assessment,

and verification monitoring on July 10, 1990. The case was closed on July 11, 1990.

Due to the case closure, this site likely does not likely present a risk to the Subject

Property.

Orphan Sites:

There are no Orphan Sites identified in the EDR report.

5.2 Additional Environmental Record Sources

Local Records

Leidos (NISC III) reviewed pertinent local files and conducted interviews with FAA

personnel. Other information was compiled using Internet sources as described in this

section.

National Wetlands Inventory and Flood Insurance Rate Maps

A wetlands map was obtained from the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) website

(http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/). Refer to Section 16.4.4 for the NWI map. A review of

the NWI Map indicates that wetlands are not located on the Subject Property. The

nearest wetland is a freshwater forested/shrub wetland approximately 0.32 miles north,

followed by a riverine approximately 0.35 miles north of the Subject Property.

The Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) was obtained from the Federal Emergency

Management Agency (FEMA) website (https://msc.fema.gov/). Refer to Section 16.4.5

for FIRM. According to the map (number 06023C0695F, effective date November 4,

2016), the Subject Property lies within Zone X, which are areas of minimal flood hazard.

A review of information provided in the Natural Resource Conservation Web Soil Survey

website (http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/), indicate the soils for the Subject Property

consist primarily of Timmons and Lepoil soils. Section 5.4 of this report provides an


additional soil report. See Section 16.4.6 for a detailed discussion on Timmons and

Lepoil soils.

5.3 Physical Setting Source(s)

The properties surrounding the Subject Property are wooded areas and rural residential

properties. The immediately surrounding area slopes to the north-northeast. According

to the EDR Radius Report, elevations in the vicinity of the Subject Property range from

35 to 471 feet above sea level.

5.4 Historical Use Information on the Property

Prior to being developed, the area of the Subject Property appeared wooded areas. In

1951 the site was developed as an OM site. Use of the site as ACV OM continued until

being decommissioned in April 2014. In September 2016, the equipment and structures

were removed and the site was restored.

Topographic Map Review

As a part of the investigation of the Subject Property, the U.S. Geological Survey

(USGS) topographic maps for 1933, 1942, 1951, 1959, 1972, and 2012 were obtained

from EDR. Copies of the topographic maps are provided in Section 16.4.3.

Topographic Topographic Map Direction and Description

Map Year Direction Description

1933

Subject

PropertySubject Property is relatively flat and shows no development.

North

Directly and further north has a downwards slope. Directly and

further north shows structures and roadways. Further northeast

shows a pond.

East

Directly east is relatively flat. Further east slopes down

gradually. Directly and further east shows structures,

roadways, and forested areas. Further southeast shows creeks

and railroad tracks.

South

Directly south is relatively flat. Further south slopes down

gradually. Directly and further south shows structures and

roadways.

West

Directly west slopes down gradually. Further west is relatively

flat. Directly and further west shows structures, roadways,

railroads, and forested areas.

1942

Subject


North Directly and further north shows no additional development.




East Directly and further east shows no additional development.

South Directly and further south shows no additional development.

West Directly and further west shows no additional development.

1951

Subject


North

Directly north shows no additional development. Further

northwest shows Azalea Reserve State Park and additional

structures.

EastDirectly east shows additional structures. Further east shows a

school and additional roadways and structures.

South Directly and further south shows additional structures.

West

Directly west shows no additional development. Further west

shows development of manmade reservoirs and additional

roadways and structures.

1959

Subject

Property

Subject Property is relatively flat and shows no development

details.

NorthDirectly and further north shows no additional development

details.

EastDirectly and further east shows no additional development

details. Further northeast shows a pond.

South

Directly and further south shows no additional development

details. Further southwest shows additional roadways and

structures.

West

Directly west shows no additional development details. Further

west shows previously mentioned manmade reservoir further

developed.

1972

Subject

Property

Subject Property has been developed as indicated by a

structure.

North Directly and further north shows additional structures.

East Directly and further east shows additional structures.

South Directly and further south shows additional structures.

West

Directly west shows additional roadways and structures.

Further west shows a substation, trailer park, and additional

structures.

2012Subject

Property

Subject Property shows no additional development. Previously

identified structure is not identified on the topographic map.




North

Directly and further north shows no additional development.

Previously identified structures are not indicated on the

topographic map.

East

Directly and further east shows no additional development.


topographic map.

South

Directly and further south shows no additional development.


topographic map.

West

Directly and further west shows no additional development.


topographic map.

Aerial Photography

As a part of the investigation of the Subject Property, historical aerial photographs were

obtained from EDR for the years 1942, 1954, 1964, 1972, 1988, 2005, and 2016. These

aerial photographs of the Subject Property were reviewed to determine the historical land

use of the Subject Property and the surrounding areas. A discussion of the information

extracted from the aerial photography is provided in the following table. Refer to Section

16.4.2 for reproductions of the aerial photographs.

Aerial Photo Aerial Photograph Direction and Description

Year Direction Description

1942

Subject

PropertyThe Subject Property is not developed and appears agricultural

use.

North Directly and further north appears wooded areas.

EastDirectly east appears a rural residential property followed by

agricultural use. Further east appears wooded areas.

SouthDirectly and further south appears rural residential properties

and wooded areas.

WestDirectly west appears a roadway followed by rural residential

properties. Further west appears wooded areas.

1954

Subject

PropertyThe Subject Property is developed and the shelter building for

the outer marker is apparent.

NorthDirectly north appears a rural residential property since 1942.

Further north appear relatively unchanged from 1942.

East Directly and further east appear relatively unchanged from 1942.




SouthDirectly and further south appear relatively unchanged from

1942.

WestDirectly west appears additional rural residential properties

since 1942. Further south appears relatively unchanged from

1942.

1964

Subject

PropertyThe Subject Property is developed and the plot and equipment

shelter building are apparent.

NorthDirectly and further north appears additional rural residential

properties since 1954.

EastDirectly and further east appear relatively unchanged from

1954.

SouthDirectly south appears an additional rural residential property

since 1954. Further south appears relatively unchanged from

1954.

WestDirectly and further west appear relatively unchanged from

1954.

1972

Subject



NorthDirectly and further north appears relatively unchanged from

1964.

East Directly and further east appears relatively unchanged from 1964.

SouthDirectly and further south appears relatively unchanged from

1964.

West Directly and further west appears relatively unchanged from 1964.

1988

Subject



NorthDirectly and further north appears additional rural residential


EastDirectly and further east appears additional rural residential


SouthDirectly and further south appears additional rural residential


WestDirectly and further west appears additional rural residential


2005Subject







1988.

EastDirectly east appears relatively unchanged from 1988. Further

east appears additional rural residential properties since 1988.


1988.

WestDirectly and further west appears additional rural residential


2016

Subject




2005.

EastDirectly and further east appears relatively unchanged from

2005.


2005.

WestDirectly and further west appears relatively unchanged from

2005.

Soil Survey Review

The ACV OM is located on the following soil unit:

Soil Unit 1:

Soil Component Name: Hookton.

Soil Surface Texture: Silty clay loam.

Hydrologic Group: Class C – Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding

downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.

Soil Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly.

Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil.

Corrosion Potential – Uncoated Steel: High.

Depth to Bedrock Min: > 60 inches.

Depth to Watertable Min: > 60 inches.

The soil description is provided in the EDR Radius Map Report. The soil type and

texture differ from the soil type and texture listed in Section 5.2 which was obtained

through the National Resource Conversation Web Soil Survey website. See Appendix B,

EDR Summary Radius Map Report, Physical Setting Source Summary, for complete soil

survey report.


5.5 Historical Use Information on Adjoining Properties

Adjoining properties historically and continue be to wooded areas and rural residential

properties.

6.0 SITE INSPECTION

On November 14, 2018, Leidos (NISC III) conducted a detailed site inspection of the Subject

Property and adjacent properties to determine their environmental condition. See Section 16.3 to

review the site inspection photographs. The following sections are based on observations made

by the environmental professional during the site inspection.

6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions

Leidos (NISC III) contacted Norbert Peterson, Arcata SSC Manager, David Ackroyd,

Arcata SSC Coordinator, and Kevin Patton, Arcata ATSS, to verify the removal of all

limiting conditions and to schedule the site inspection. As the Subject Property is readily

accessible, no escort was required for the site inspection.

6.2 General Site Setting

The Subject Property is surrounded by wooded areas and rural residential properties.

6.3 External Observations

The Subject Property has been restored and no structures remain. The formerly fenced

plot where the equipment shelter building and antenna had been located is covered

primarily with gravel and dirt. The ACV OM site plot is located east of Lucchesi Road.

Adjacent to and off of Lucchesi Road is a pole-mounted transformer that formerly

serviced the Subject Property and a barbed wire fence that remains. No signs of leaks

from the transformer were observed. No stressed vegetation was observed at or near the

base of the power pole.

A piece of assumed ground cable was observed. The piece of cable appeared to be

historically discarded as possibly part of the restoration process. Sparse pieces of trash

were observed within the formerly fenced portion of the Subject Property. The material

is considered to be de minimis. See Site Plan in Section 16.2 and Site Photographs in

Section 16.3

The site inspection did not identify any manufacturing and process areas; chemical

storage areas; hazardous waste storage areas; suspected disposal areas; subsurface

structures such as drains, sumps, septic systems, and tanks; evidence of historical uses;

and soil staining or impacted vegetation.


A site plan is provided in Section 16.2 and photographs of the Subject Property are

provided in Section 16.3.

6.4 Interior Observations

The Subject Property contains no structures with interiors. Interior observations are not

applicable.

7.0 INTERVIEWS

7.1 Interview with Owner

No interviews were conducted with the property owners.

7.2 Interview with Site Manager

Interviews were conducted with FAA Arcata SSC Manager Norbert Peterson and with

FAA Arcata SSC Coordinator David Ackroyd via telephone and email prior to the site

inspection. Neither indicated knowledge of any current or historical adverse

environmental conditions at or around the Subject Property.

7.3 Interviews with Occupants

There are no occupants as the site has been decommissioned and the site was never a

manned facility.

7.4 Interviews with State and/or Local Officials

Research and investigation efforts provided information required for this Phase I.

Therefore, no interviews with state or local officials were deemed necessary.

7.5 Interviews with Others

The Western Service Area (WSA) Real Estate Contracting Officer (RECO) was

contacted by Leidos (NISC III). The RECO provided available real estate documents

including the legal description and Airspace Easement.

8.0 FINDINGS

We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and

limitations of the applicable ASTM Standard E1527-13, and FAA Order 1050.19B, of ACV OM

located off of Lucchesi Road, Arcata, California 59421.

As detailed in Section 5.1, there was one site listed on the ENVIROSTOR database and two

LUST sites identified in the EDR report. Upon further review it was determined that the site


listed on the ENVIROSTOR database was located at the Arcata Airport, approximately 6.0 miles

from the Subject Property. Based on additional research it was determined that the two LUST

sites are the same site, the Humboldt Bay Muni Water Essex. Based on potential soil

contamination, a site case was opened in February 1990 and closed on July 1990 following a site

remediation in February 1990. Based on the distant of the ENVIROSTOR site and case closure

following remediation at the Humboldt Bay Muni Water Essex, these sites likely do not present a

risk to the Subject Property. As indicated in Section 5.1, no orphan sites were identified in the

EDR report.

9.0 OPINIONS

The site inspection and records review did not reveal any recognized environmental conditions in

connection with the Subject Property. Also, there is no indication that FAA activities on the

Subject Property have contributed to any environmental concerns on adjacent properties.

Furthermore, there is no indication that operations and conditions on adjacent properties have

caused any adverse environmental effects to the Subject Property.

10.0 CONCLUSIONS

We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and

limitations of ASTM Standard E1527-13, and FAA Order 1050.19B, of the ACV OM located off

of Lucchesi Road, Arcata, California 59421. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice

are described in Section 2.4 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of

recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Subject Property.

11.0 DEVIATIONS

This Phase I EDDA was performed with no deletions or deviations from ASTM Standard

E1527-13 and FAA Order 1050.19B, except as specified in Section 12.0.

12.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES

12.1 Asbestos

No sampling for asbestos containing material (ACM) was done as part of this Phase I

EDDA. According to the Final Demolition and Remediation Investigation Report

Federal Aviation Administration Demolition and Remedial Investigation of Arcata

Locator Outer Marker Arcata, California completed by Ahtna Envrionmental, Inc., an

initial ACM survey was completed on March 30, 2016. An unknown number of samples

were collected and analyzed that showed 12% asbestos in the interior grey putty

penetration. A second ACM survey was completed in August 2016. An unknown

number of samples were collected and analyzed that showed 10% asbestos in the mastics

that was used on roofing edges, roof penetrations, and rood patches. Alliance

Environmental Services, Alliance, was sub-contracted to complete ACM abatement at the

Subject Property. On August 23, 2016 Alliance sealed then removed ACM putty from


the interior walls and rood mastic, then the roof mastic and insulation was peeled,

scraped, and removed from the rooftop. All ACM material was removed and disposed of

at the Neal Road Landfill facility. This report is available in Appendix E.

12.2 Lead

No sampling for lead based paint (LBP) was conducted as part of this Phase I EDDA.

According to the Final Demolition and Remediation Investigation Report Federal

Aviation Administration Demolition and Remedial Investigation of Arcata Locator Outer

Marker Arcata, California completed by Ahtna Envrionmental, Inc., an initial LBP

survey was completed on March 30, 2016. An unknown number of samples were

collected and analyzed that showed no LBP.

Based on the location of a suspect former UST at the Subject Property, AEI and Kernen

Construction excavated the area around the former UST location. There was no evidence

of a tank or fill material and based on the Photoionization Detector (PID) reading that

were taken during the excavation, no volatile organic compounds were detected. Two

confirmation soil samples were collected at each end of the base of excavation and based

on laboratory analysis, no detection for petroleum hydrocarbons and their constituents

was detected regarding the suspect UST. This report is available in Appendix E.

12.3 Radon

No sampling for radon was conducted as part of this Phase I EDDA. According to the

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Humboldt County, California is a Zone 3

which indicates a predicted average indoor radon screening levels less than 2 pCi/L).

12.4 Endangered and Threatened Species

The goal of the Endangered Species Act is the recovery of listed species to levels where

protection under the Act is no longer necessary. According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife

Service Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS), there are twenty-one

threatened or endangered species believed to occur in Humboldt County, California.

These species are provided in Appendix D. No endangered and threatened species or

critical habitats for those species were observed on the Subject Property during the site

inspection.

12.5 Historic Value

The National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), as amended in 54 United States Code

(USC) 300101 et seq., is the fundamental law for the protection, rehabilitation,

restoration and reconstruction of cultural resources. Section 106 of this Act requires that

federal agencies take measures to protect properties eligible for or included in the

National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Other statutes, such as the Archaeological

Resources Protection Act (16 USC 470aa-470ii); protect non-structural properties of

historic importance. Research indicates that the Subject Property does not contain any


structures or areas that qualify for protection as related to the above-referenced statutes.

During the site inspection, no such NRHP sites were observed. A review of the NRHP

did not reveal any information to suggest that the Subject Property would be covered

under the above-referenced statutes.

13.0 REFERENCES

ASTM International, ASTM E1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments:

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, November

2013.

Ahtna Environmental, Inc., Final Demolition and Remediation Investigation Report Federal

Aviation Administration Demolition and Remedial Investigation of Arcata Locator Outer Marker

Arcata, California. November 15, 2016. This report is available in Appendix E.

Environmental Data Resources, Inc., EDR Summary Radius Map Report, Inquiry Number

5451146.2s, October 11, 2018. This report is provided in Appendix B.

Soils information was obtained from Natural Resource Conservation Web Soil Survey website:

http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/.

The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map was obtained from the National Wetlands

Inventory website: http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/.

The Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) was researched at the Federal Emergency Management

Agency (FEMA) website: https://msc.fema.gov/.

The information regarding radon zone was obtained from the EPA website:

https://geopub.epa.gov/Radon/.

The information regarding historic resources was obtained from the National Registry of Historic

Places (NRHP) website: http://www.nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com/.

The information regarding endangered and threatened species was obtained from the U.S. Fish

and Wildlife Service Environmental Conservation Online System website: http://ecos.fws.gov.

Additional research regarding Subject Property and surrounding sites was conducted at the

California State Water Resources Control Board website: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/


14.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS

This Phase I EDDA was performed in accordance with ASTM Standard E1527-13 and FAA

Order 1050.19B. The methodologies contained in these standards and orders include, among

other things, interviews with individuals familiar with the Subject Property, site inspection and

historical records review. Information obtained during the interviews and site inspection was

recorded and reviewed before being included in this Phase I EDDA report. All information

obtained during the site investigation and subsequently included within the Phase I EDDA is

assumed to be reliable. The purpose of this investigation is to provide FAA with information

regarding any existing or potential environmental concerns on or surrounding the audit site. The

following signatures attest to these statements:

November 30, 2018Lucas Hornsby, Leidos (NISC III) Date:

November 30, 2018Anna Dinh, Leidos (NISC III) Date:

We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of

environmental professionals as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312.

We have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a

property of the nature, history, and setting of the Subject Property. We have developed and

performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth

in 40 CFR Part 312.

15.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL

PROFESSIONALS

Lucas Hornsby of Leidos (NISC III) has assisted with this EDDA in a professional manner using

the degree of skill and care exercised for similar projects under similar conditions. Mr. Hornsby

has prepared FAA EDDAs and since 2010, served as the EDDA Program Manager. Mr.

Hornsby is an Environmental Professional and holds degrees in Environmental Management

Systems and Construction Management. Mr. Hornsby has more than 17 years of experience in

the construction, engineering and environmental fields with successful completion of the ASTM

Phase I-II Environmental Site Assessments for Commercial Real Estate and Property Condition

Assessment certification courses.

Anna Dinh of Leidos (NISC III) has assisted with this EDDA in a professional manner using the

degree of skill and care exercised for similar projects under similar conditions. Ms. Dinh has


prepared FAA EDDAs and has participated in environmental site assessments since 2015 with

successful completion of the ASTM Phase I-II Environmental Site Assessments for Commercial

Real Estate certification course. Ms. Dinh holds a degree in Environmental Policy and Planning.


16.0 APPENDICES

16.1 Site Area and Site Vicinity Maps

Site Area Map

TywTCry

&i . i !

//fa

All^cehLmaldi ^Sw* 9

<RM H ' 1

A'tafcaCsrrrwity

*onwtU’lYtfSrty

©Vcata

Korhd&‘eke Hill

b'ae ,CVOMManila

Barpside

9r*cW©Sarroa^Gd' gleBrairard


Site Vicinity Map

IHLl

£

/ci< 0 - blC *

CuiVii|•I F I C K O R D L E X

Glendale

£

!>

•v


16.2 Site Plan

May 26, 2016 IMAGES


16.3 Site Photographs

The Site Inspection Photos are provided in Appendix C.


16.4 Historical Research Documentation

16.4.1 Real Estate Documents

See Appendix A for Real Estate documents.


16.4.2 Historical Aerial Photographs

Aerial Photograph 1942



‘ W^c*

r*'

'LX-' - ,7fSgSj?P

* r--‘ _* ,,,\ *wt ij

* / •

r &£;£fstTI-* * v %*.- ,r

SfltSr

Sr22l”'.r «£•£*;

ifSTi3l

« r r > .\ # v> «SK ^;\

•S9x J SX^rl #S^5«Vr>' - -- >d&>Z8i f- mtmh- iWffir.-.^.r/ jjs£t&££>a

-- • /. /- •»': \ - ' • --^Kf;

' • -- • - y- • .••

>.<#*<

*sii£gist#si

^ . ; ••x&frJikWl\v / * f> ^-v‘^

- ' ¥

•V, ' "** •

’*51]I 1» Vr-

rvvif- .,.i i .** i/ v - •V/

>r;_»*--fv.v.C. -V

* M-m£t:^•

*>££>*m-

:*-**>•.

(»•

j-r'V * -

%T

Tb %ir\’ r

«M»3. ,;«v

‘3#;- -** r*. - £*$* ^

* - .r *. •»7^ * *

. J - *Ufr VVf*t e

\«.-IK m> . *w# * f

- . #-*Sfe/** •

<v , ; f' - •''.-• > 7-. t- -.+. * .. > ^

;• >,It ar.>;

*%s

>/ *£:mm.> -* v

mmflu• • - :•.. * .,

" ,-» *^M- k ’ *r?4 -*r

»•

k#CV •w r*.•s *

9 * »§»• *1 !*•* f ;-V • <*•.; HSji^.Wflf«?#:WM&K&&Mffi’&?iikm®- M

*.Ar %%** - : ;%'&rr' " Os-« >«?' -7 *

•

' * ' ?## '. .-V ‘ ' - 57 _J*4 •

T

cv •-.-’S-* 'V r.i Y

>, Si^ 5r*

i. j»4:

*r >’ •t . ft* ^T*»^ >;

vv

**•

f N l l®INQUIRY P 545* 146 6 V iV ^ ^/YEAR 1&/-2

- so:—I



INQUIRY S45M46 8

YEAR IKS

i



INQUIRY £ 545' 146.6

YEAR ?COS

i


16.4.3 Historical Topographic Maps

Topographical Map 1933

This report includes info-nation Yon .hetnllmwinfj map rlierrtfa) 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5

KW h KCSI NAM * ACVOV1h h.irc.fca. 1!HS M-mnirc

AlX ESS: —cchea h!oadA/caui, CA Coc*21_ecbs tIT*' CLIENT 'N'

o\V to ob 5*311*5 - * '1



Historical Topo MapEDR 1942I

v \\\INJYXtJ

\ I

i hi?. report includes int»v"nancn *nvn‘hetollrrsving map .-heet>;a) 0 Miles 0.2' o.s 1 1.5

"F , Cjieka. 1S42 15 inhu.e STENAME: AOV OV)

ARDRFSS* ..ochesi RnadA*ca:a CA £$521 i

*a irNT 1

N-54-511—£ *0



I hi*, report includes int»vnai:icn‘rr/n -hetollrrsving map rJieet*;a) 0 Miles 0.2' o.s 1 1.5

“F , Cjieka. 1S51 15 inhu.tf STENAME: AOV OV)

AITORFSa* ..ochesi RnadA*ca:a CA £$521 i

*a irNT 1

N-54-511—£



This report includes information from thefollowing map sheet(s). 1 1.50 Miles 0.25 0.5

SITE NAME: ACVOMADDRESS: Lucchesi Road

Areata, CA 95521Leidos

TP, Areata North, 1959, 7.5-minute

! 'r

CLIENT:N*

5451146 - 4 page 7







! 'r

CLIENT:N*

5451146 - 4 page 6







! 'r

CLIENT:N*

5451146 - 4 page 5


16.4.4 Wetlands Map

m U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceACV OMNational Wetlands Inventory

This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and WildlifeService is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of thebase data shown on this map.All wetlands related data shouldbe used in accordance with the layer metadata found on theWetlands Mapper web site.

October 10; 2018

Wetlands Lake

HD Estuarine and Marine Deepwatei j~“j Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Q OtherEstuarine and Marine Wetland

Freshwater Emergent Wetland

Freshwater Pond RiverineNational Wetlands Inventory (NWI)

This page was produced by the NWI mapper


16.4.5 Flood Insurance Rate Map

National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette LegendSEE F(S REFORT FOR DEmiLED LEGEND Jl>J D IND EX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LKYOUT

Wit hout Base Flood Elevat ion (BFE)ZoMs A y, A33

Wit h BFE or Dept hzi« AS,U, AH,VS, AH

Regulatory FloodwaySPECIAL FLOODHAZARD AREAS

0.2W Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areasof 1% annual c hance flood with averagedepth teas than onefoot or with drainageareas of less than one square mile:MI X

Future Conditions 1% AnnualChance Flood Hazard jus *Axea with Reduced Rood Risk due toLevee. See Notes .

Axea with Flood Ris kdue to Levee z«,« o//OTHER AREAS OF

FLOOD HAZARD

IMP senEE Ml Axeaof Minimal Flocd Hazard Z<M» xEffective LOMRs

OTHER AREAS Axeaof Uridetermiried Flocd Hazard za^s o

Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer1 1 i 1 1 1 1 levee, Dike ,or Floodwall

GENERALSTRUCTURES

£7)— C x o s s Sect© ns with 1% Annual Chance—LL£ Water Surface Elevation

0 Coastal Transect91 Base Flood Elevation Lire(BFE)

Limit of StudyJurisdiction BoundaryCoastal Transect Base lineFhofile BaselineHydrographic Feature

OTHERFEATURES

Digital Data Available

No Digital Data Available

UnmappedMAP PANELS

The pin displayed on the map is an approximatepointselected bythe user and does not representanauthoritative property location.

9This mapcomplies with FEMA'sstandardsfor the useofdigital flocd maps if it is notvod as described below.The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemapaccuracy standards

The flocd hazard information is derived directly from theauthoritative NFHLweb services provided by FEMA. The mapwas exported on10/10/201Bat44024 PM and does notreflect charges or amendments subsequent to this date andtime. The NFHLandeffective information may charge orbecome superseded by new data over time.

The map image is void if the one or more of the following mapelements do not appear: basemap imagery, flocd zone labels,

legend, scale bar, map creation date,community identifiers ,FIRM panel number, and FIRM effectivedate. Map images forunmapped and unmedernized areas cannot be used forregulatory purposes.1,000 1,500 2,000


16.4.6 Soil Survey Report

.r >.

Xi/

*$

?

*

*.s

*

?

•7

t> •'•••it

Natural R«90Urc»5C'.nriHMivrillrin 5nrvl«H

W»t> oO' IH.rv?ySoil Survey

IWlVAMf-'ay* 1 dI S f*


'uiix-il:Csufty,Cifii 4l f*art,Cd funuu*pi

iim Wu.-

MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION

hr wsl «nr\w»R tu* rn—p-im ynr AH mtprurt w• XCOC.Vw rfliiucr.|*.Gti

A*0 <4a Sf*o«

0 UaTf 5:n

K «*¥ 9Wk 5frt

$ A»=P»

• Ot*r

W&-i*g 3c4 Mjp mey nMr* vjidr IN* *rd?

Entarufriicri of mkj*b:yor«llicitteaf 4'P u -»»ctiiKm •ai-rtu -cnp it|«* -* « 1 d rrMfirruj «oajn»Ti a# *nlIHi’d>-.‘>KM < r>u(IMpiOu ltd.lwIhu.I'MIHIM^I/ccmjstngsolsttuf :ai*Jhar»t teenr«n ef ? mcxecetaiejKik.

H)jIrt \*rysn

Ss4 Ma:Lr* , « M

Mi;Lr*:v*r* *4l***F»<im»•tp*ari Pc4 M rirtmiy BMXU

ORPW Cfr:t/ onbe s:de on eo:f map sn«i*t vet

mm IIUMH H

Sou*:? c* iMio i-onjra Reso.rtet Zw'Wlon Serve**AV»- Sol ijiw,LRLC>:nj ivrc5y«?rr: Wee Meraoc' EP33M57;Mips tcer:*< Sol3.r /cy see:«s« onite \Vrfc Wercaiorprr(^Tian <•*»** p-*4*rvft< -t-artw «-r Nr r»*»rwt*.ocrfutoe «IIJ W«M Ap ^fcd>7 IIMIPNIR/caan Mi:<inlhi

MUlHm cun:rrq**iwv fml* ** u**i r rrir?Miui WucalojUluiDu' itMMfLt: c* uwn M » lu-UivJ

h R|i a1.ri n n»nn.a-ail fur- ftp '.IKIliMBCS a»rtr»*rt CM* <•cliht *'e,so' dalesilMedtefcws-ji&My*«. f-U--Uj4ilCu.liv,Cull'd Put CwfeormSjrvey <V*iDili \*rc*x 4. Sep13. 2C13

Sol "u. -nistrc o:<ifr3;«sp&>:do -stfo mip sod:*orhnjrr

Ca»:s> M'ol nig?*»ef? endear*c?-?d Dec J1.2DC9 Orn,oo* t

~h* erticrhc4o o* c4~*r cm? m*1I rti fi? sol Ines vwuonpMaru iiu.**.#,iiu.I-*;*-,*s:4iye3 onrev* mao* ."A a reso:.ser e nnorMiiltiu c' IVMI> ir*ii Usu'iJuu* IIMVAM

B

* ckr>*>r

Cbt*d Otf'icuai

^ CTMNP(

m

Nip K:ia

o U»J < .:ai nc*«fc

K IM.% - Mm, Dwi^rtinlMl-TiH iv«rrt Aarnl Pietoj’apT/AN ”* V CliRT'i

Mi:iiraui A»roo PmirUMl*

R••< OmifV

4. 3#kw $Mt

;.* 3#rcRiid

IM <* fs:»S 5pd

0 IrllcM

>Icdt ^MlA*

Map Unit Legend

Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acmsln AOI Percent ot AOI

Iftf: rimiTjnr.';mrl lepnil KOIS. ? *CI

= percent slope*1Cnr/W

Tuldl* foi Area of Inleresl 0.3 100.0\


16.5 Regulatory Documentation

The EDR Summary Radius Map Report is provided in Appendix B.


16.6 Interview Documentation

NAME TITLE RELATIONSHIP

TO THE SUBJECT

PROPERTY

INTERVIEW

TYPE

PHONE

NUMBER

- -

16.7 Special Contractual Conditions between User and Environmental

Professionals

There are no contractual conditions existing between the User and Environmental

Professionals.