Adapting the IASC Gender Marker to your needs: Future evolution

IASC event, 2nd of December 2015

Program coherence – Considering distinct gender needs

oNarrative intentions to ensure equal benefits are often there

oGender issues discussed but plans inconsistently address them

oSignificant gap in disaggregation of results to measure and compare equal access and benefits

Quality of the analysis

The IASC Gender Marker: Widely applied but inconsistencies remain

Self-assessed codesRevised codes

2a – Gender Mainstreaming 2b – Targeted Action 1- Limited contribution to gender equality0- No visible potential to contribute to gender equalityN/A - Not Applicable

Our priorities for the future IASC Gender & Age Marker:

• Strengthen project coherence

• Deepen the quality of the analysis

• Improve the tracking of targeted actions

• Monitor implementation

Coding Scale

Targeted Action Box

IASC Gender & Age Marker

IASC Gender Marker

Project coherence + Purpose

Project coherence

Purpose

0 1 2a

0 1 2

2b

IASC Gender & Age Marker (Monitoring)

Phases GEM Code

Phase Code

Project Code

A Gender Analysis

B Collect and Monitor SADD

C Right Targeting

D Adapted Assistance

E Protection from SGBV

F Coordination with Actors

G Participation in Project Management

H Accountability

I Transparency

J User Satisfaction K User Benefits

L Barriers and Unintended Consequences

GEM Title

Nee

ds

Wha

t Do

We

Kno

w?

Ada

pted

A

ssis

tanc

e W

hat D

o W

e D

o Ab

out I

t?

Ade

quat

e Pa

rtic

ipat

ion

How

Do

We

Wor

k To

geth

er?

Rev

iew

Wha

t Do

We

Do

Wel

l and

W

hat D

o W

e C

hang

e?

What are your ideas or expectations about the future IASC Gender & Age marker?