adaptive observations at nws

18
Adaptive observations at NWS Lacey Holland, SAIC at EMC/NCEP/NWS Zoltan Toth, EMC/NCEP/NWS http://wwwt.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/ targobs/ Acknowledgements: Dave Emmitt, Steve Lord, Sharan Majumdar, Jon Moskaitis, Craig Bishop

Upload: dustin-moon

Post on 30-Dec-2015

21 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Adaptive observations at NWS. Lacey Holland, SAIC at EMC/NCEP/NWS Zoltan Toth, EMC/NCEP/NWS. Acknowledgements: Dave Emmitt, Steve Lord, Sharan Majumdar, Jon Moskaitis, Craig Bishop. http://wwwt.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/targobs/. Outline. Introduction Targeting for WSR WSR Results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Adaptive observations at NWS

Adaptive observations at NWS

Lacey Holland, SAIC at EMC/NCEP/NWS

Zoltan Toth, EMC/NCEP/NWS

http://wwwt.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/targobs/

Acknowledgements: Dave Emmitt, Steve Lord, Sharan Majumdar, Jon Moskaitis, Craig Bishop

Page 2: Adaptive observations at NWS

Outline

• Introduction

• Targeting for WSR

• WSR Results

• Future Work

Page 3: Adaptive observations at NWS

Winter Storm Reconnaissance (WSR)

• Based on collaborative research between university and gov’t agencies. EMC/NCEP/NWS established the program in 1999.

• Dropwinsonde observations taken over the Pacific by aircraft operated by NOAA’s Aircraft Operations Center (G-IV) and the US Air Force Reserve (C-130s).

• Observations are adaptive – collected only prior to significant winter weather events in areas that influence the forecast the most.

• Results show 60-80% improvement over forecast area

• Operational since January 2001

Page 4: Adaptive observations at NWS

How WSR targeting

happens…

1. Targets selected in areas where critical winter weather events with high forecast uncertainty may have a potentially large societal impact.

2. Sensitivity calculations performed using ETKF, and a decision is made (flight/no flight).

3. Observations are taken and used in operational analysis and forecast products by major NWP centers.

4. Verification is performed by comparing operational analyses/forecasts including the targeted data with analyses/forecasts excluding the targeted data.

Page 5: Adaptive observations at NWS

54 Predetermined Flight Tracks

Page 6: Adaptive observations at NWS

Data Impact and Forecast Verification

Forecast improvement (red) and degradation (blue)

Data impact

48-hr verification

Flight track with initial

impact

Verification region with impact at

48-hrs

Estimated forecast error variance reduction with possible flight tracks

Page 7: Adaptive observations at NWS

Results from previous years of WSR

Surface Pressure RMS Error

Vector Wind RMS Error

From Toth et al. (1999)

Page 8: Adaptive observations at NWS
Page 9: Adaptive observations at NWS
Page 10: Adaptive observations at NWS
Page 11: Adaptive observations at NWS
Page 12: Adaptive observations at NWS

Data Impact – WSR 2000

Page 13: Adaptive observations at NWS
Page 14: Adaptive observations at NWS
Page 15: Adaptive observations at NWS
Page 16: Adaptive observations at NWS
Page 17: Adaptive observations at NWS

Summary of WSR results

• Overall, biggest improvement in surface pressure over verification region for 2002-2003

• Winds and temperature from dropsondes have the most impact, followed by winds only and temperature only

• Dropsonde winds have greater positive impact than dropsonde temperatures in initial studies

Page 18: Adaptive observations at NWS

Future Work

• Verify precipitation forecasts for all years of WSR; introduce new metric (storm track error)

• Continue collaboration with LIDAR group (Emmitt et al.) in support of Atlantic and Pacific TOST or other campaigns

• Test adaptive observations technique in OSSE environment, on global scales with simulated LIDAR measurements