adding value to feathermeal

Upload: international-aquafeed-magazine

Post on 30-May-2018

243 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Adding value to feathermeal

    1/5

    Digital re-print - March | April 2009Feature: Feathermeal

    Feature title: Adding value to feathermeal

    International Aquafeed is published five times a year by Perendale Publishers Ltd of the United Kingdom.All data is published in good faith, based on information received, and while every care is taken to prevent inaccuracies,

    the publishers accept no liability for any errors or omissions or for the consequences of action taken on the basis ofinformation published.Copyright 2009 Perendale Publishers L td. All rights reserved. No par t of this publication may be reproduced in any formor by any means without prior permission of the copyright owner. Printed by Perendale Publishers Ltd. ISSN: 1464-0058

    THE INTERNATIONAL MAGAZINE FOR THE AQUACULTURE FEED INDUSTRYNEXT PAGE

    http://www.aquafeed.co.uk/http://www.aquafeed.co.uk/
  • 8/14/2019 Adding value to feathermeal

    2/5

    Millions of tones of fishmeal

    are used worldwide in all

    animal feeds each year,

    including aquaculture.

    The proportion of the worlds fishmeal

    used for aquaculture is estimated

    to reach 66 percent by 2013, though

    production will stagnate or even fall in

    2009 (IFFO, 2008; forecasts).

    If aquaculture is to grow as expected,

    alternatives to the limited availability of

    fishmeal for aqua feed have to be found.

    Additionally, increasing prices of fishmeal

    are forcing the industry to decrease the

    inclusion level of fishmeal and to increase

    the usage of alternative, more economical

    feed ingredients.

    Hydrolyzed poultry-based animal proteins

    - for example hydrolyzed feathermeal - are

    economically interesting protein sources used

    in specific areas of aquaculture such as in sal-

    monid feed. These proteins are less expensive,

    palatable, free of anti-nutritional factors and

    - by virtue of their

    origin free from

    any marine-based

    diseases and are

    hence considered

    bioaqua-secure.

    However, the

    use of feathermeal

    has been limited

    for reasons such as

    poor digestibility.

    Unprocessed feath-

    ers are high in crude

    protein (90 percent),

    but are highly indi-

    gestible due to the

    keratin structure, which contains high amounts

    of cross linked - disulphite bondings - cystine.

    In order to open the S-S bonds and to

    make the crude feathers available for diges-

    tive systems, feathers have to be processed.

    Currently, processing in continuous hydro-

    lyzer is recognised as the state-of-the-art

    process resulting in a maximum of degree

    of hydrolyzation or cooking.

    Several factors are known to modify

    digestibility of protein and amino acids.

    Among the process conditions the drying

    conditions in particular, seem to play a major

    role in respect to digestibility and nutritional

    quality of hydrolysed feathermeal.

    The purpose of drying is to convert wet,

    unstable materials into a dry and stable

    substance. The drying is done by heating the

    material to a temperature where the rate

    of evaporation is considered satisfactory.

    Increasing the temperature will speed up

    the drying process, but can easily result in

    impairing nutritional values.

    Hot air

    Hot air dryers have already started

    to attract the interests of the fishmeal

    producers; the principle of a hot air drying

    by Franz-Peter Rebafka / Ashish Kulshrestha | GePro Gefluegel-Protein Vertriebgsgesellschaft mbh & Co. KG, Germany / Thailand

    14 | InternatIonalAquAFeed | Mch-api 09 - i

    Feathermeal

    Adding value to

    feathermeal

    is applied in the low temperature (LT)

    fishmeal technology.

    It is a two-step hot air drying char-

    acterised by short-term retention and

    moderate temperatures ensuring that

    protein quality retains at high levels. In

    the fishmeal manufacturing this drying

    process is considered as the most criti-

    cal unit operation affecting the quality

    and the nutritional value of fishmeal.In contrast to the fishmeal industry

    (producing LT fishmeal) indirect drying

    systems such as rotary disc dryer are

    still common practice in the poultry

    by-product rendering operation.

    The main effect due to excess of

    heat application is the disruption of

    the hydrogen bonds in protein struc-

    tures leading to protein denaturation.

    In this case denatured amino acids cannot

    be recognised physiologically as amino acids

    and are utilised, after deamination, as a

    very expensive source for energy only, thus

    leaving their fullest potential unexploited.

    The LT fishmeal technology imparts

    minimal denaturing effects on proteins,

    thus preserving inherent digestibility and

    biological value.

    A comparison regarding specific quality

    aspects is shown in Figure 1.

    Superior to disc dryingLT fishmeal is superior to standard

    fishmeal originated from a drying process

    based on disc drying.

    Realising the beneficial effects of a LT fish-

    meal drying system, GePro Gefluegel-Protein

    Vertriebsgesellschaft (Germany) has recently

    launched a new product category of processed

    poultry by-product based on the LT fishmeal

    drying system.

    Under the brand name GoldMehl,

    a special processed hydrolyzed protein

    of poultry feathers origin (GoldMehl

    FM) has been developed specifically foraquaculture.

    In several in-vivo trials, conducted at

    the Fiskeriforskning Institute of Fisheries

    and Aquaculture Research at Tromso in

    Norway using minks as a model for fish,

    (salmons in particular), the biological

    digestible protein of GoldMehl FM has

    been assessed.

    In comparison with standard/regular

    feathermeal (produced with a disc dryer) the

    mink digestible protein and the biological uti-

    lisable protein of the hydrolysed feathermeal

    manufactured by LT fishmeal technology was

    clearly superior (see Figure 2).

    Fishmeal substituteIn addition, the Mink digestible protein of

    GoldMehl FM was very similar to fishmeal

    (data not presented) indicating good potential

    of GoldMehl FM as a fishmeal substitute.

    Differences in protein quality of processed

    poultry by-products have been observed

    in a number of

    studies (Cho andSlinger (1979),

    Cho et al (1982),

    Pfeffer et al

    (1995), Sugiura

    et al (1998),

    Hajen et al

    (1993) and Dong

    et al (1993).

    Optimisation

    of the cooking

    and drying con-

    ditions are con-

    sidered to be

    the main factors

    contributing to

    the high digest-

    ibility values

    now observed

    for poultry by-

    product meal

    (Miller, 1996).

    The nega-

    tive correla-

    tion between

    the drying

    conditions and

    protein quality

    could also by

    demonstrated

    by Cho et al.,

    1982 indicating

    that spray-dried

    bloodmeal was almost completely digest-

    ible. In contrast, plate-dried, steam-tube

    dried and ring-dried bloodmeals had a

    significantly lower apparent digestibility

    compared to spray-dried blood product.

    Heat-damage has previously been shown

    to have a very significant negative impact on

    - i Mch-api 09 | InternatIonalAquAFeed | 15

    Feathermeal

    NEXT PAGEPREVIOUS PAGE

    http://www.ge-pro.de/
  • 8/14/2019 Adding value to feathermeal

    3/5

    ments fish meal has

    been gradually replaced

    by GoldMehl FM at

    various ratio (zero

    percent GoldMehl FM

    / 30 percent fishmeal

    = 0/30; 4.25 percent

    GoldMehl / 25.5 fish-

    meal = 4.25/25.5; 9/21;

    and 15/15).Results indicate

    that growth of shrimps

    under the test condi-

    tions was optimal at

    a level of 15 percent

    Goldmehl FM and 15

    percent fishmeal, resulting in cost savings

    in the diet formulation of almost eight

    percent (see Figure 4).

    These findings are in line with

    studies conducted in Hawaii where

    hydrolysed feathermeal was given as

    fishmeal replacer to shrimps (Cheng et

    al., 2002).

    It was concluded that without loos-

    ing growth performance hydrolysedfeathermeal could replace fishmeal.

    Substitution rate for fishmeal by

    feathermeal was assessed to be 33

    percent without and 66 percent with

    supplementing of crystalline lysine and

    methionine.

    A positive performance of shrimps

    fed with processed poultry derivatives

    as fishmeal substitute has been observed

    in fresh water shrimps (Macrobrachium

    Nipponese) , White Shrimps (P.vannamei)

    and Black Tiger (P.monodon) cultivated in

    various areas (cited in Yu, 2006 [Essential

    Rendering]).

    Optimal levels for shrimpIn another feeding trial the nutritional

    value of GoldMehl FM as a replacer for

    fishmeal has been tested in White shrimps

    (Penaeus vannamei). In different treat-

    digestibility of protein of bloodmeal for fish

    (Cho et al., 1982).

    The same pattern has been observed

    by El-Haroun and Bureau (2007) measuring

    the bioavailability of lysine in blood meal

    produced under different drying systems

    (disc-dryer, spray-drier, flash-dryer).

    Feeding trialsA series of feeding trials were conduct-

    ed using Asian Sea Bass juveniles (Lates

    calcalifer) to evaluate the potential of

    GoldMehl FM as a protein sources in the

    diet. In one of these trials GoldMehl FM

    has been incorporated into commercial

    available feed.

    As indicated in Figure 3 GoldMehl FM

    showed a significant improvement of differ-

    ent growth parameters (weight gain, FCR,

    PER) and survival rate.

    "Applying a state-of-the art drying process to theproduction of feathermeal creates an added value to

    feathers. The recycling of feathers is environmental friendly

    and is able to partly release pressure on marine raws"

    16 | InternatIonalAquAFeed | Mch-api 09 - i

    The Fats and Proteins Research Foundation and

    The National Renderers Association, Alexandria,

    pp. 203-223.

    Pfeffer, E., Kinsinger, S., Rodehutscord, M.,

    1995. Influence of the proportion of poultry

    slaughter by-product and of untreated or

    hydrothermally treated legume seeds in diets

    for rainbow tro ut, Oncorhynchus mykiss

    (Walbaum), on apparent digestibilities of their

    energy and organic comp ounds. Aquacult.

    Nut.1, 111-117.

    Sugiura, S.H., Dong, F.M., Rathbone, C.K., Hardy,

    R.W., 1998. Apparent protein digestibility and

    mineral availabilities in various feed ingredients for

    salmonid feeds. Aquaculture 159, 177-202.

    Yu,Y., 2006. Rendered products in shrimp aquaculture

    feeds. In: Meeker, D.L. (ed): Essential Rendering].

    National Renderers Association (ISBN: 0-9654660-

    3-5).

    MoreinforMation:

    Franz-peter Rebafka

    GePro Gefluegel-Protein

    Vertriebgsgesellschaft mbh

    & Co. KG

    Email: [email protected]

    Website: www.ge-pro.de

    Cho, C. Y., Slinger, S.J., 1979. Apparent digestibility

    measurements in feedstuffs for rainbow trout.

    In: Halver, J.E., Tiew, K. (eds): Finfish Nutrition and

    Fishfeef Technology, Vol. II. Heenemann GmbH &

    Co KG, Berlin, pp. 239-247.

    Cho, C.Y., Slinger, S.J., Bayley, H.S., 1982.

    Bioenergetics of salmonid fishes: Energy intake,

    expenditure and productivity. Comp. Biochem.

    Physiol. B. 73, 25-41.

    Dong, F.M., Hardy, R.W., Haard, N.F., Barrows,F.T., Rasco, B.A., Fairgrieve, W.T., Forster, I.P., 1993.

    Chemical composition and protein digestibility

    of poultry by-product meals for salmonid diets.

    Aquaculture 116, 149-158.

    El-Haroun and Bureau (2007). Comparison of the

    bioavailability of lysine in blood meals of various

    origins to that of L-lysine HCL for rainbow trout

    (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 262, 402-409.

    Hajen, W.E., Higgs, D.A., Beames, R.M., Dosanjh,

    B.S., 1993. Digestibility of various feedstuffs by

    post-juvenile chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus

    tshawytscha) in sea water. 2. Measurement of

    digestibility. Aquaculture 112, 333-348.

    Miller, T., 1996. Utilizing rendered products:

    Petfood. In: Franco, D.A., Sw anson, W. (Eds.), The

    Original Recyclers. The Animal Protein Industry,

    Conclusions

    GoldMehl FM has a nutritional compo-

    sition and feeding values similar to that of

    fishmeal for shrimps and better than regular

    feathermeal.

    Although the raw material is poultry

    feather, the superiority of GoldMehl FM is

    attributed to its special process which is very

    similar to the production conditions of high

    valuable LT fishmeal. GoldMehl FM has thepotential to partly substitute fishmeal and help

    to reduce formulation costs.

    Applying a state-of-the art drying process

    to the production of feathermeal creates

    an added value to feathers. The recycling of

    feathers is environmental friendly and is able

    to partly release pressure on marine raws.

    Further, it can be regarded as sustainable

    protein production in the wake of increasing

    poultry production in all the parts of the world.

    References:

    Cheng, Z.J, Behnke K.C, Dominy, W.G., 2002. Effect of

    feather meal on growth and body composition of the

    juvenile Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei.

    Journal of Applied Aquaculture. 12 (1): 57-68.

    - i Mch-api 09 | InternatIonalAquAFeed | 17

    Feathermeal

    NEXT PAGEPREVIOUS PAGE

    http://www.ge-pro.de/http://www.buhlergroup.com/
  • 8/14/2019 Adding value to feathermeal

    4/5

    The solution behind the solution.

    Bhler AG, Feed & Biomass, CH-9240 Uzwil, Switzerland, T +41 71 955 11 11, F +41 71 955 28 96

    [email protected], www.buhlergroup.com

    Its the mix that makes the dierence. Feed manuacturers desire high

    durability, reliability and sanitation. Quality eed with minimum operating costs is

    a must. Your needs are Buhlers frst priorit y. That is why we commit our-

    selves to delivering seamless solutions meeting your highest requirements. Get

    in touch with one o our specialists worldwide and we will deliver a complete

    process design package, equipment, automation and customer service. You and

    Buhler the perect mix.

    NEXT PAGEPREVIOUS PAGE

    http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/
  • 8/14/2019 Adding value to feathermeal

    5/5

    www.aquafeed.co.uk

    LINKS

    ADVERTISERS LINKS

    Seethefullissue

    VisittheInternationalAquafeedwebsite

    ContacttheInternationalAquafeedTeam

    SubscribetoInternationalAquafeedTHE INTERNATIONALMAGAZINE FOR THE AQUACULTURE FEED INDUSTRY

    Memberofthe WorldAquacultureSociety,EuropeanAquaculture Society,AmericanFeedIndustry AssociationandtheInternationalAquafeed Association

    V OLUME 12 IS SUE 2 2009

    Ipil ipil leaf meal as supplementsto soybean and fish meal

    Functional aquafeeds:Dietary supplementsin breakthrough pledge

    Adding value tofeathermeal

    The use of dietary acidifiers insalmonid nutrition

    ExtrudersBenefitsof using Extrudersto

    processaquatic feed

    IAF090 .indd 1 1 /03/ 009 10:01

    Thisdigitalre-printispartoftheMarch|April2009editionofInternationalAquafeedmagazine.

    Contentfromthemagazineisavailabletoviewfree-of-charge,bothasafullonlinemagazine

    onourwebsite,andasanarchiveofindividualfeaturesonthedocstocwebsite.

    Pleaseclickheretoviewourotherpublicationsonwww.docstoc.com.

    Topurchaseapapercopyofthemagazine,ortosubscribetothepapereditionpleasecontact

    ourCirculationandSubscriptionsManageronthelinkabove.

    INFORMATIONFORADVERTISERS-CLICKHERE

    VisitGe-Proonline

    Email Ge-Pro

    The solution behind the solution.

    BhlerAG,Feed &Biomass, CH-9240 Uzwil,Switzerland,T +41 71 955 11 11,F+41 71 955 28 96

    u.buz@buhlergro up.com,www.buhlerg roup.com

    Its the mix that makes the dierence. Feed manuacturers desire high

    durability, reliability and sanitation. Quality eed with minimum operating costs is

    a must. Your needs are Buhlers frst priority. That is why we commit our-

    selves to delivering seamless solutions meeting your highest requirements. Get

    in touch with one o our specialists wor ldwide and we will deliver a complete

    process design package, equipment, automation and customer service. You and

    Buhler the perect mix.

    Aqua_Feed-09.indd 1 03.0 . 009 15:51:05IAF090 .indd 4 1 /03/ 009 10:04

    VisitBuhleronline

    EmailBuhler

    t ur (LT)

    r i n c h r -

    n ti n n

    u r in t h t

    h l l . In

    h i r i n

    m t c r i ti -

    h u l i t

    i h m l .

    l i n u t r

    c t r i n

    r r r

    ultr

    i n.

    c f

    r u ti n f

    in truc-

    n t u r t i n .

    n c i c n n t

    l m i n c i

    m i n t i n ,

    n r n l , t hu

    l un l it .

    n l im r t

    n r t i n ,

    i t i il it n

    c i fi c u l i t

    1.

    inr t t n r

    r i n r c

    c t f L T f i h -

    G f lu l - r t i n

    n ) h r c n tl

    r f r c

    t h LT f i h m l

    G l hl ,

    l r t in

    i n ( G l h l

    c i fi c l l f r

    c n u c t t

    f F i h r i

    t Tr m i n

    m l f r fi h ,

    t h i l i c l

    h l F h

    n r r ul r

    i c r r ) th

    h i l i c l u ti -

    f t h rm l

    l t c h n l

    2).

    Fi h l u titutI n i ti n , th i nk i t i l r t in f

    G l h l F r im il r t f i hm l

    ( t n t r n t ) i n ic t in t n ti l

    f G l h l F f i hm l u t i tu t .

    i ff r n c i n r t i n u l i t f r c

    u ltr - r u ct h n r

    i n nu m r f

    t u i ( C h n

    l in r ( 1 7 ) ,

    C h t l ( 1 2 ),

    f f f r t l

    ( 1 ) , u i u r

    t l ( 1 ) ,

    H j n t l

    ( 1 3 ) n n

    t l ( 1 3 ).

    t i mi t i n

    f t h c k i n

    n r i n c n-

    i t i n r c n -

    i r t

    t h m i n f c t r

    c n t r i u t i n t

    t h hi h i t -

    i i l i t l u

    n r

    f r u l t r -

    r u ct m l

    ( i l l r, 1 ) .

    Th n -

    t i c r r l -

    ti n t n

    t h r i n

    c n i t i n n

    r t i n u l it

    c u l l

    m n t r t

    C h t l . ,

    1 2 i n i c ti n

    t h t r - r i

    l m l l m t c m l t l i t-

    i l . I n c n tr t , l t - r i , t m -t u

    ri n ri n- ri l m l h

    i n i fi c n tl l r r n t i t i i l it

    c m r t r - ri l r u ct.

    H t - m h r i u l n h n

    t h r i n if ic n t n t i i m c t n

    ch-pi09| In ter n t In l uF e e | 15

    1/03/009 10:0

    TheFatsand ProteinsResearchFoundation and

    T he at ionalR e nde re rs ssoc i ati on , l e x andria ,

    pp.203-223.

    P fe ffe r, E . , K i n si n ger, S . , R ode hutscord , . ,

    1995.Influence of the proportion of poultry

    slaughter by-product and of untreated or

    hydrothermally treated legume seeds in diets

    for ra i nbow t rou t , n corh ynchu s myki ss

    ( a l baum), on appare n t d i ge sti b i l i t ie s of the i r

    e ne rgy and organ i c compounds. quacu lt .

    ut.1,111-117.

    S ugi ura , S .H ., ong, F. . , R athbone ,C . K. ,Hardy ,

    R. .,1998. pparent proteindigestibility and

    mineralavailabilitiesin variousfeed ingredientsfor

    salmonid feeds. quaculture159,177-202.

    Yu,Y.,2006.Renderedproductsinshrimpaquaculture

    feeds.In: eeker,.L.(ed):EssentialRendering].

    ationalRenderersssociation(ISB :0-965660-

    3-5).

    r e i f r t i :

    Franz-peter ebafka

    GeroGef l u egel -rot ei n

    ertriebgsgesellschaftmbh

    &Co.KG

    Email:franz-peter.rebafka ge-pro.de

    ebsite:www.ge-pro.de

    Cho,C.Y.,Slinger,S.J.,1979. pparent digestibility

    measurementsinf eedstuffsfor rainbowtrout.

    In:Halver,J.E.,Tiew,K.(eds): Finfish utritionand

    FishfeefTechnology,Vol.II.HeenemannGmbH &

    Co KG,Berlin,pp.239-2 7.

    Cho,C.Y.,Slinger,S.J.,Bayley,H.S.,1982.

    Bioenergeticsof salmonid fishes:Energy intake,

    expenditureand productivity.Comp.Biochem.

    Physiol . B . 73 , 25 -1 .

    ong, F. . ,Hardy , R . . ,Haard , . F . , Barrows,

    F.T.,Rasco,B. .,Fairgrieve, .T.,Forster,I.P.,1993.

    Chemicalcompositionand proteindigestibility

    ofpoultry by-product mealsforsalmonid diets.

    quaculture116,1 9-158.

    El-HarounandBureau(2007).Comparisonof the

    bioavailabilityoflysineinblood mealsofvarious

    originstothat ofL-lysineHCLfor rainbowtrout

    ( n corhynchu smyki ss) . quacu l ture 262 , 02 -09 .

    Haj e n, . E . ,H i ggs, . . , Be ame s, R . . , osan j h,

    B.S.,1993. igestibility ofvarious feedstuffsby

    post-juvenilechinook salmon( ncorhynchus

    tshawytscha)ins ea water.2. easurement of

    digestibility. quaculture112,333-3 8.

    iller,T.,1996.Utilizing rendered products:

    Pe t food . In : Franco, . . , S wan son , . (Eds. ), T he

    riginalRecyclers.The nimalProteinIndustry,

    C n clu i nG l h l F h n ut ri ti n l c m -

    i ti n n f i n l u i mi l rt t h t f

    f i hm l f r h ri m n t t r th n r u l r

    f t h r m l .

    l th u h t h r m t r i l i u lt r

    f t h r, th u r i ri t f G l h l F i

    t tr i ut t i t c i l r c h ic h i r

    i mi l r t t h r u ct i n c n i ti n f h i h

    l u l L T fi h m l. G l h l F h t h

    t n t i l t r t l u t i tu t fi h m l n h l

    t r u c f r mu l ti n c t .

    l i n t t - f - th r t r i n r c

    t th r u ct i n f f t h rm l c r t

    n l u t f t h r . Th r c cl in f

    f t h r i n ir n m n t l fr i n l n i l

    t r t l r l r u r nm ri n r .

    F ur th r, it c n r r u t in l

    r t i n r u ct i n i n t h k f i n cr i n

    u l tr r uct i n i n l l th r t f th r l .

    f r n c :

    Cheng,.J,BehnkeK.C, ominy, .G.,2002.Effectof

    feathermealongrowthandbody compositionofthe

    juvenilePacificwhiteshrimp,Litopenaeusvannamei.

    Journalof ppliedquaculture.12(1):57-68.

    16| Inter n t In l uFe e | ch-pi09 ch-pi09| Inter n t In l uFee | 17

    IAF090 .indd 17 1 /03/ 009 10:0

    PREVIOUS PAGE

    http://www.aquafeed.co.uk/http://www.aquafeed.co.uk/magazines/IAF0902W1.htmlhttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/http://www.aquafeed.co.uk/contact.phphttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/subscriptions.phphttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/magazines/IAF0902W1.htmlhttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/magazines/IAF0902W1.htmlhttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/magazines/IAF0902W1.htmlhttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/magazines/IAF0902W1.htmlhttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/magazines/IAF0902W1.htmlhttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/magazines/IAF0902W1.htmlhttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/magazines/IAF0902W1.htmlhttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/magazines/IAF0902W1.htmlhttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/magazines/IAF0902W1.htmlhttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/magazines/IAF0902W1.htmlhttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/magazines/IAF0902W1.htmlhttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/magazines/IAF0902W1.htmlhttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/magazines/IAF0902W1.htmlhttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/magazines/IAF0902W1.htmlhttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/magazines/IAF0902W1.htmlhttp://www.docstoc.com/profile/Perendalehttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/advertising.phphttp://www.ge-pro.de/mailto:[email protected]://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/mailto:[email protected]://www.ge-pro.de/http://www.ge-pro.de/mailto:[email protected]://www.buhlergroup.com/http://www.buhlergroup.com/mailto:[email protected]://www.ge-pro.de/http://www.aquafeed.co.uk/advertising.phphttp://www.docstoc.com/profile/Perendalehttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/magazines/IAF0902W1.htmlhttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/subscriptions.phphttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/contact.phphttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/http://www.aquafeed.co.uk/magazines/IAF0902W1.htmlhttp://www.aquafeed.co.uk/