adequate yearly progress 2010-11 [our school district]

18
Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

Upload: irene-dalton

Post on 03-Jan-2016

26 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]. Measures Evaluated. Reading/ELA Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Reading/ELA Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who Participate in Reading/ELA Math - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11[Our School District]

Page 2: Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

Measures Evaluated• Reading/ELA

– Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Reading/ELA

– Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who Participate in Reading/ELA

• Math– Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who are Proficient in Math– Percent of students (Grades 3-8 and 10) who Participate in Math

• Other– Attendance Rate

• For elementary and middle school campuses• Districts not offering 12th grade

– Graduation Rate• For high school campuses• Districts offering 12th grade

Page 3: Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

Standards for Performance

2011-12 2012-13 2013-142010-112009-10

6775

8392

100

% Proficient

Math

7380

8793

Reading

%

of students must pass

in 2014

Page 4: Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

Student Groups EvaluatedPerformance

Accountability SubsetParticipation

All Students EnrolledOther Indicator

Attendance & Graduation

•All Students Group•African American*•Hispanic*•White*•Economically Disadvantaged*•Special Education*•Limited English Proficient*

•All Students Group•African American*•Hispanic*•White*•Economically Disadvantaged*•Special Education*•Limited English Proficient*

•All Students Group only

Provided that these groups meet the Minimum Size Requirement. < 50 = Not Evaluated | > 200 = Always Evaluated | 50-200 = Evaluated if equal to at least 10% of the All Student group*

Page 5: Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

AYP Status Labels

• Met AYP• Missed AYP – (Reason)

Reasons include:• Math (Proficiency and/or Participation)• Reading (Proficiency and/or Participation)• Attendance Rate• Graduation Rate

Page 6: Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

23

1

Accessing the AYP Report

http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/ayp/

[Insert District Website Link]

Campus Libraries or Offices

Page 7: Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

2011 AYP Report OverviewPage One

Performance: Reading/ELA – 80% Proficient• Reading Performance, 2010-2011– Used to demonstrate proficiency.

• Reading Performance, 2009-2010 – Used to calculate improvement (Safe Harbor).

Page 8: Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

Performance: Mathematics – 75% Proficient• Math Performance, 2010-2011– Used to demonstrate proficiency.

• Math Performance, 2009-2010 – Used to calculate improvement (Safe Harbor).

2011 AYP Report OverviewPage Two

Page 9: Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

Participation: Reading/ELA & Mathematics – 95% Participation

• Reading/ELA & Math Participation, 2010-2011– Used to demonstrate participation.

• Reading/ELA & Math Participation, 2009-2010 – Used to calculate 2 year average, if needed.

2011 AYP Report OverviewPage Three

Page 10: Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

Graduation Rate (75%) or Attendance Rate (90%)• Graduation or Attendance Rate, 2010-2011– Used to calculate whether or not the campus or

district met the target rate.• Graduation or Attendance Rate, 2009-2010– Used to demonstrate improvement.

• 5 Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate, 2010-2011– Class of 2009

2011 AYP Report OverviewPage Four

Page 11: Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

AYP Explanation Table• Summarizes the results of the AYP report

2011 AYP Report OverviewPage Five

Page 12: Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

2011 AYP Status[Our School District]

Campus Name 2011 Status Stage

Sample Campus A Met AYP (Reading)Missed AYP (Math Stage 1, Year 1 Math

Sample Campus B Met AYP None

Page 13: Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

2011 AYP Performance Reading/English Language Arts - (Grades 3-8 and 10)

All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Met Standard2011 Standard2012 Standard

Page 14: Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

2011 AYP Performance Mathematics- (Grades 3-8 and 10)

All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Met Standard2011 Standard2012 Standard

Page 15: Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

2011 AYP Participation Reading/English Language Arts - (Grades 3-8 and 10)

All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Participation RateStandard

Page 16: Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

2011 AYP Participation Mathematics- (Grades 3-8 and 10)

All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Participation RateStandard

Page 17: Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

2011 AYP Graduation RateFor High Schools and Districts with a 12th Grade

All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Graduation RateState TargetState Goal

Page 18: Adequate Yearly Progress 2010-11 [Our School District]

2011 AYP Attendance RateFor Elementary & Middle Schools and Districts Not Offering 12th Grade

All Af Am Hisp White Eco Dis Sp Ed LEP0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Attendance RateStandard