adjudicator grading and referral policy 2015 · material issues in dispute 8 specialist discipline...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Adjudicator Grading
and Referral Policy
2015
2
Contents Adjudicator Grading and Referral 3
Approach 3
Transparency 3
Objective and Consistent 4
Outcome Focused 4
Application 4
Adjudicator Grading 5
Relevant Experience 5
Relevant Qualifications/Expertise 6
Relevant Skills 6
Reclassification of adjudicators 6
Option for Nominating for Adjudications 6
Summary of Criteria for Grading of Adjudicators 7
Selection Criteria for Assessing Adjudication Applications and Referring Applications to Adjudicators 7
Claim Amount 7
Material Issues in Dispute 8
Specialist Discipline / Work Experience 8
Voided Decisions 9
Adjudicators Fees 9
Reasonable Adjudicator Fees 9
Reasonable Hourly Fees 10
Referral of Applications to Same Adjudicator 11
Exceptions and Availability 11
Summary of Criteria for Assessing Adjudication Applications and Appointing Suitable Adjudicators 12
Version 2
3
Adjudicator Grading and Referral Policy
2015
1 Adjudicator Grading and Referral
2 Approach
2.1 Transparency
4
2.2 Objective and Consistent
2.3 Outcome Focused
3 Application
5
4 Adjudicator Grading
4.1 Relevant Experience
6
4.2 Relevant Qualifications/Expertise
4.3 Relevant Skills
7
4.4 Reclassification of adjudicators
4.5 Option for Nominating for Adjudications
Summary of Criteria for Grading of Adjudicators
8
5 Selection Criteria for Assessing Adjudication Applications and
Referring Applications to Adjudicators
5.1 Claim Amount
5.2 Material Issues in Dispute
9
5.3 Specialist Discipline/Expertise
5.4 Voided Decisions
6 Adjudicator Fees
10
6.1 Reasonable Adjudicator Fees
6.2 Referral of Applications to Same Adjudicator
11
6.3 Exceptions and Availability
Summary of Criteria for Assessing Adjudication Applications and Appointing
Suitable Adjudicators