adopted cip fy2014 18

148

Upload: city-of-greenville-south-carolina

Post on 09-Mar-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

City of Greenville, South Carolina, Adopted Capital Improvement Plan, FY 2014-2018

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Adopted CIP FY2014 18
Page 2: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

This page is intentionally blank.

Page 3: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

City of Greenville, South Carolina

Adopted Capital Improvement Program

FY 2014-2018

Knox H. White Mayor

Amy Ryberg Doyle

Council Member (District 1)

Lillian Brock Flemming Council Member (District 2)

Jil M. Littlejohn

Council Member (District 3)

J. David Sudduth Council Member (District 4)

Susan Reynolds

Council Member (At Large)

Gaye G. Sprague Council Member (At Large)

John F. Castile City Manager

Page 4: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Table of Contents

Page 5: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Table of Contents

City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 2014-2018 Adopted Capital Improvement Program

Table of Contents Transmittal ...................................................................................................................... A-1 Transmittal Letter .............................................................................................................. A-3 Summary Schedules ........................................................................................................... B-1 Schedule I – Total CIP Revenue and Expenditure Summary .............................................................. B-3 Schedule II – Project Summaries with Applicable Funding Sources ..................................................... B-4 Schedule III – Project Summaries by Funding Source ..................................................................... B-11 Schedule IV – Unfunded Projects ............................................................................................ B-16 Project Descriptions Roads and Bridges ............................................................................................................... C-1 New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program (NSTEP) ................................................................. C-3 Street Resurfacing ......................................................................................................... C-4 Fairforest Way Rehabilitation ............................................................................................ C-5 Salters Road Improvements ............................................................................................... C-6 Main Street Resurfacing ................................................................................................... C-7 Haywood Road/Woods Crossing Intersection .......................................................................... C-8 Haywood Road Sidewalks ................................................................................................. C-9 Woodruff Road Sidewalks ............................................................................................... C-10 Streetscapes ..................................................................................................................... D-1 Pete Hollis Corridor Improvements ...................................................................................... D-3 East McBee Avenue Improvements ...................................................................................... D-4 Rhett/Camperdown Street Improvements ............................................................................. D-5 Cultural Corridor ........................................................................................................... D-6 Village of West Greenville Improvements .............................................................................. D-7 Augusta Street Improvements ............................................................................................ D-8 North Main Street Improvements ........................................................................................ D-9 Washington Street Improvements ..................................................................................... D-10 Augusta Street Streetscaping (Baseball Stadium) ................................................................... D-11 Broad Street Pedestrian Lighting ...................................................................................... D-12 Downtown Streetscapes ................................................................................................. D-13 North Main Street – Landmark Building ............................................................................... D-14 Spring/Falls Streetscape ................................................................................................ D-15 Viola Streetscaping ...................................................................................................... D-16 West Camperdown Way ................................................................................................. D-17 Augusta Street at Faris Road Streetscape ............................................................................ D-18 Wastewater ................................................................................................................. E-1 Haynie-Sirrine Wastewater System Rehabilitation .................................................................... E-3 Verdae Sewer Expansion .................................................................................................. E-4 Wastewater System Rehabilitation ...................................................................................... E-5 Wastewater System Survey and Model .................................................................................. E-6 Basin 7 Sewer Rehabilitation ............................................................................................. E-7 Basin 15 Sewer Rehabilitation ............................................................................................ E-8 Basin 16 Sewer Rehabilitation ............................................................................................ E-9 Basin 25 Sewer Rehabilitation ........................................................................................... E-10 Stormwater ...................................................................................................................... F-1 Henderson Basin ............................................................................................................ F-3 Pinehurst Culvert Crossing Improvement ............................................................................... F-4 Westview/Windsor Crossings ............................................................................................. F-5

Page 6: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Table of Contents

Pettigru Street Improvements ........................................................................................... F-6 Fairforest Way Basin ....................................................................................................... F-7 White Oak Basin Phase II .................................................................................................. F-8 Gower Estates Stormwater Rehabilitation ............................................................................. F-9 Swanson Court ............................................................................................................. F-10 Richland Creek Water Quality Master Plan ............................................................................ F-11 Public Works Complex Water Quality Improvements ................................................................ F-12 North Hills Area Stormwater Improvements .......................................................................... F-13 Aldridge/Lacey Drainage Improvements .............................................................................. F-14 Hilly Street Drainage Improvements ................................................................................... F-15 Parks and Recreation ........................................................................................................... G-1 Community Center Building Improvements ............................................................................ G-3 Main Street Tree Rehabilitation ......................................................................................... G-4 Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access .................................................................... G-5 Reedy River Trail Expansion .............................................................................................. G-6 Park Restrooms ............................................................................................................. G-7 River Street Underpass .................................................................................................... G-8 Heritage Green Master Plan .............................................................................................. G-9 Cleveland Park Bank Stabilization ..................................................................................... G-10 McPherson Park Bridge Rehabilitation ................................................................................ G-11 Cancer Survivors Park ................................................................................................... G-12 NEXT Trail Connector .................................................................................................... G-13 Falls Park Improvements ................................................................................................ G-14 Haywood at I-385 Interchange Landscaping ......................................................................... G-15 Cleveland Park Horse Stables .......................................................................................... G-16 Greenville Dog Parks ..................................................................................................... G-17 Greenville Tech Trailhead .............................................................................................. G-18 Hudson Street Trailhead ................................................................................................ G-19 Swamp Rabbit Trail Rubber Surface Replacement .................................................................. G-20 Viola Center and Park Improvements ................................................................................. G-21 Economic Development ........................................................................................................ H-1 Piazza Bergamo ............................................................................................................. H-3 TD Convention Center Kitchen Retrofit ................................................................................ H-4 Commercial Corridors ..................................................................................................... H-5 West End Property Acquisition ........................................................................................... H-6 Peace Center ............................................................................................................... H-7 Hyatt Public Improvements ............................................................................................... H-8 Markley at Rhett Improvements ......................................................................................... H-9 TD Convention Center Chiller Plant ................................................................................... H-10 TD Convention Center Conference Center ........................................................................... H-11 TD Convention Center Parking Lots ................................................................................... H-12 Neighborhood Revitalization ................................................................................................... I-1 Haynie-Sirrine ................................................................................................................ I-3 Mt. Eustis Street Improvements .......................................................................................... I-4 Public Safety ..................................................................................................................... J-1 East Area Fire Station ..................................................................................................... J-3 Fire Facilities Assessment................................................................................................. J-4 Public Safety Cameras ..................................................................................................... J-5 Station Alerting System ................................................................................................... J-6 Parking ........................................................................................................................... K-1 Richardson Street Garage ................................................................................................. K-3 Poinsett Garage ............................................................................................................ K-4

Page 7: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Table of Contents

General Government ........................................................................................................... L-1 Phone System Replacement .............................................................................................. L-3 Public Works Operations Center ......................................................................................... L-4 Public Works Radio System ............................................................................................... L-5 Central Microsoft SQL Platform .......................................................................................... L-6 Roof Replacements ........................................................................................................ L-7 Appendix ......................................................................................................................... M-1 Projection of Legal Debt Margin ......................................................................................... M-3

Page 8: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Table of Contents

Page 9: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

Transmittal A-1

TRANSMITTAL

Capital investment continues to renew and improve the City of Greenville. The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program continues the commitment to a healthy and vibrant City by investing in infrastructure, development opportunities, and community facilities.

Page 10: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Transmittal A-2

Page 11: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Transmittal A-3

City of Greenville, South Carolina

July 1, 2013 The Honorable Knox H. White, Mayor Members of City Council Dear Mayor White and City Council Members: I am pleased to present the adopted FY 2014-2018 CIP which totals $30,700,000 across all funds over the five-year planning horizon, and includes a $7,384,000 capital budget in FY 2013-14. The CIP is a five-year financial planning instrument used to identify capital construction projects (generally over $100,000) and sources of funding for those projects. The first year makes up the capital budget and the remaining four years are planning years subject to future appropriation. We rely upon the financial forecast presented to City Council in its retreat to guide decisions on the availability of funds. We have relied on the input from City Council in prior worksessions and the retreat, and the rankings provided by staff in determining the priority in which to fund projects. In all budget discussions, there is a need to balance competing demands with scarce resources. Departments submitted $33,319,186 in requests in FY 2013-14. While we have worked to fund as many projects as possible, however, limited funds and the limitations on their use invariably result in unfunded projects. General Fund The General Fund is the most challenging fund to plan CIP projects for and the one with the most demands. Many of the priorities you have communicated to me – roads, commercial corridors, facilities – generally can only be funded from the General Fund. In addition, the General Fund is the most constrained of the City’s options to fund projects in terms of its fiscal capacity. In looking at the FY 2013-14 General Fund operating budget, we project that, pending audit adjustments, the City shall finish FY 2012-13 with a small surplus. We anticipate making a few philosophical changes which will provide us with greater flexibility in the General Fund in future years. In order to improve the City’s long-term financial position, we are proposing to not issue debt on the fire pumper, bucket truck, and tractor trailer truck proposed to be purchased in the FY 2012-13 operating budget and use cash proceeds instead. This will avoid adding to the City’s long-term debt burden and provide budgetary flexibility in future years. Additionally, issuing debt for capital items that are essentially recurring in nature is not sustainable on a long-term basis.

The FY 2013-14 budget was built on spending a part of our fund balance including $831,032 to “catch-up” on our equipment backlog and $1,026,000 for one-time capital projects. This leaves approximately $2,000,000 in fund balance above the 20% target set by City Council. These funds are available for projects or can be left in reserve, though I recommend leaving some level above the 20% reserve as a contingency. All told, the funds made available from the General Fund were focused on the very highest priorities with an emphasis on renewing existing infrastructure and facilities, and priorities articulated by City Council. Projects funded in FY 2013-14 include:

• $250,000 each for Street Resurfacing and NSTEP. This maintains the total allocation to both

programs originally budgeted in FY 2012-13. The future years of the CIP work to increase funding for both projects to $500,000 each.

Page 12: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Transmittal A-4

• $300,000 is made available for the Commercial Corridors project, consistent with priorities stated by City Council.

• $150,000 for the last year of the City’s commitment to the reconstruction of Salters Road. • Renewed commitment to reinvesting in the City’s infrastructure and facilities including $245,000

for the City’s SQL platform, $180,000 for a Station Alerting System at the City’s fire stations, and $76,000 to replace roofs at the Nicholtown Community Center and the Public Works Center (an additional $105,000 is included in the Downtown Infrastructure Fund to replace the roof at Municipal Court).

• $75,000 is included to fund a dog park at the Greenville Humane Society or at an alternate site to be determined. The current site has proven to be too small and incompatible.

In future years, we will work to increase current revenue funding of General Fund projects by approximately $250,000 per year, with a goal of approaching $1,500,000 annually in FY 2017-18. However, due to the constraints in the General Fund, several highly rated projects were not funded such as the Market Point Drive Connector, additional sidewalk projects, and park renewal projects. Funding for Bicycle Lanes has not been included in the CIP (as it is below the $100,000 threshold) and is incorporated into the Operating Budget at $25,000. One debt-backed project which will impact the General Fund in future years is the Phone System Replacement. It has been expanded by $220,000 for a total budget of $695,000 to reflect current pricing estimates. Parking Fund As noted in the forecast discussion during the retreat, the Parking Fund’s position has improved significantly over the past two years and is projected to improve further in FY 2013-14 with the opening of Project ONE. The only project funded in the Parking Fund is $632,000 to rehabilitate the Poinsett garage. Maintaining financial flexibility in the Parking Fund is a high priority due to the potential for public/private partnerships. Stormwater Fund As noted in the forecast discussion during the retreat, the Stormwater Fund’s position remains strong, therefore allowing the City to fund several projects to reduce flooding and improve water quality in FY 2013-14 including:

• $1,000,000 for additional culverts associated with the White Oak Basin Phase II project in order to

reduce flooding in the neighborhoods adjoining Bob Jones University. • $435,000 for the Pinehurst Culvert Crossing which is the last major culvert upgrade to be made on

Richland Creek. • $300,000 to continue the Richland Creek Water Quality Master Plan to identify and install water

quality retrofits along Richland Creek now that major flooding improvements are being completed. • $100,000 to design the North Hills Area Stormwater Improvements project which will work to

improve drainage near Bennett and Garraux Streets. • $30,000 to demolish the Cleveland Park Horse Stables.

In addition, a reduction of $1,398,000 in the Henderson Basin project budget is included as the infrastructure is complete and flood plain remapping is underway. These funds are being redirected to other projects in the FY 2013-14 capital budget. Wastewater Fund Although the Wastewater Fund’s capital plan has been adjusted to reflect current financial constraints and has been modified from the FY 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program, progress should be maintained in resolving the inflow and infiltration (I&I) issues present in our wastewater system. In FY 2013-14, the CIP includes:

• $1,900,000 for rehabilitation in Basin 7, of which $1,555,000 will be funded through increasing the

sanitary sewer revenue bond issuance planned for the Wastewater Rehabilitation and Haynie-Sirrine projects adopted in last year’s CIP. An additional $345,000 will be funded through cash.

Page 13: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Transmittal A-5

• $400,000 in pay-as-you-go funding for the Basin 15 project. Presently, investigation is underway within the Wastewater Rehabilitation project and a separate Basin 15 project. If funding in the Wastewater Rehabilitation project and the total $650,000 appropriated in the Basin 15 project is sufficient to remedy the I&I problem, then no additional debt issuance will be required. However, should the investigation reveal a more substantial problem than is presently anticipated, a debt issuance and adjustment to future capital plans may be necessary.

The CIP anticipates making improvements to Basins 16 and 25 in FY 2014-15 and FY 2015-16. At present, forecast models indicate that the debt associated with those projects may negatively impact our debt service coverage levels relative to the debt and financial metrics established by the rating agencies. We are projecting debt service coverage in FY 2016-17 of 120% of net operating revenues to debt service. Our bond covenants require 115%; the rating agencies have noted a preference for the ratio to be closer to 140%. Therefore, it may be necessary to have conversations in future years about additional rate increases or refinements to the capital plan. Hospitality Tax Fund As noted in the forecast discussion during the retreat, the Hospitality Tax Fund’s position remains strong and allows the City to fund several tourism-related projects, while still leaving capacity for possible economic development projects, tourism-related parks, or additional marketing. Projects in FY 2013-14 include:

• Funding for the development of the Cancer Survivors Park at $630,000. • Funding for several projects to improve access to the Swamp Rabbit Trail including the NEXT Trail

Connector ($606,000), the Hudson Street Trailhead ($225,000), and the Greenville Tech Trailhead ($125,000). Please note the Greenville Tech Trailhead is a placeholder until negotiations and discussions are complete. In addition, funding of $145,000 is included for the Swamp Rabbit Trail Rubber Surface project to remove the rubber surface on the Hincapie section of the Trail and replace with asphalt. An additional $350,000 is also provided for the River Street Underpass to improve safety.

• Funding to begin a program to replace the Police Department’s Public Safety Camera System, utilized in areas of high tourism concentration. FY 2013-14 funding is $500,000.

Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund Funding of $40,000 is included to design streetscape improvements on Augusta Street in the general vicinity of Fluor Field. Future year funding is planned to construct the improvements in conjunction with the Admissions Tax Fund. Local Accommodations Tax Fund Funding of $300,000 is included to rebuild the chillers at the TD Convention Center and $100,000 to design deferred maintenance improvements to the conference center at the TD Convention Center. In future years, a funding placeholder is included to renovate the conference center and rehabilitate the parking lots at the TD Convention Center (pending the results of the architectural/engineering analysis). Actual budgets will be refined in future years. Downtown Infrastructure Fund As noted in the forecast discussion during the retreat, the Downtown Infrastructure Fund’s position remains strong and has the capacity to fund several redevelopment projects, while leaving capacity for possible economic development projects. Projects in FY 2013-14 include:

• $165,000 for a Downtown Streetscapes project that will make spot improvements on Coffee Street,

Washington Street, and Japanese Dogwood Lane. • $150,000 to continue the Main Street Tree Rehabilitation project. • $134,000 to make landscape and street improvements on North Main Street between College Street

and Elford Street near the Landmark Building. • $128,000 for the Broad Street Pedestrian Light project to install decorative lighting between

Church Street and Main Street. • $120,000 to rehabilitate the pedestrian bridges in McPherson Park.

Page 14: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Transmittal A-6

• $105,000 for the Roof Replacement project to replace the roof at Municipal Court. • $25,000 to design streetscape improvements along Spring and Falls Streets.

In the future planning years, a placeholder of $3,000,000 has been put in for the Cultural Corridor project. This amount and the total budget will be refined as the scope and scale of the project are defined in the design phase that is underway. West End Tax Increment Fund The CIP redirects funding from the West End Property Acquisition project to fund the first phase of the Rhett/Camperdown Improvements project with cash, rather than a debt issuance. This will allow the City to retain its remaining West End TIF bond capacity for other potential economic development projects in the West End. The project budget for Rhett/Camperdown Improvements is increased by $150,000 to fund a mast arm at the intersection of Camperdown and River. The remaining phase of the project (River to Markley) is planned for FY 2014-15. Should the need arise to have funding available for property acquisition during the course of the fiscal year, the funding strategy and/or timeline for the Rhett/Camperdown Improvements project will need to be changed. In addition, $250,000 is allocated for pedestrian improvements on West Camperdown Way between Academy and River Streets. Viola Street Tax Increment Fund In FY 2013-14, the Viola Street Tax Increment Fund will provide $146,000 for improvements to the Viola Center and adjoining park properties, and $280,000 for streetscape improvements in the Viola neighborhood and surrounding thoroughfares. Conclusion In summary, the FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program provides the City with reinvestments in its existing infrastructure, targets investments for the future growth of the City, and maintains flexibility for future opportunities. Sincerely,

John F. Castile City Manager

Page 15: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Transmittal A-7

Page 16: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Transmittal A-8

Page 17: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Transmittal A-9

Page 18: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Transmittal A-10

Page 19: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

Summary Schedules B-1

SUMMARY SCHEDULES

The FY 2014-2018 CIP continues investments made on the Reedy River that enhance and protect it for public use.

Page 20: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Summary Schedules B-2

Page 21: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Summary Sheets B-3

FY 2014-2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE I

Total CIP Revenue and Expenditure Summary

911233

541205

500000

2520000

200000

0

FY 13/14

CAPITAL TOTALBUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 2014-2018

REVENUES

Admissions Tax Fund $ 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000

Downtown Infrastructure Fund 827,000 251,000 3,150,000 150,000 0 4,378,000

General Fund Transfer 1,526,000 700,000 995,000 1,250,000 1,375,000 5,846,000

Hospitality Tax Bonds 0 2,000,000 0 0 0 2,000,000

Hospitality Tax Fund 2,581,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 3,581,000

Installment Lease Purchase Agreement 220,000 0 0 0 0 220,000

Local Accommodations Tax Fund 400,000 135,000 475,000 450,000 670,000 2,130,000

Parking Fund 632,000 0 0 0 0 632,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bonds 1,555,000 0 4,000,000 0 0 5,555,000

Stormwater Fund 467,000 1,850,000 1,125,000 0 0 3,442,000

Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund 40,000 95,000 0 0 0 135,000

Viola Street Tax Increment Fund 426,000 0 0 0 0 426,000

Wastewater Fund 810,000 565,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 1,570,000

West End Tax Increment Bonds (1,989,000) 0 0 0 0 -1,989,000

West End Tax Increment Fund (111,000) 2,635,000 0 0 0 2,524,000

TOTAL REVENUES $ 7,384,000 8,731,000 10,060,000 2,165,000 2,360,000 30,700,000

PROJECTS

Roads and Bridges $ 650,000 600,000 895,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 4,145,000

Streetscapes 1,172,000 3,081,000 3,000,000 150,000 0 7,403,000

Wastewater 2,365,000 565,000 4,065,000 65,000 65,000 7,125,000

Stormwater 437,000 1,850,000 1,125,000 0 0 3,412,000

Parks and Recreation 2,602,000 2,150,000 150,000 150,000 0 5,052,000

Economic Development (1,800,000) 235,000 575,000 550,000 770,000 330,000

Neighborhood Revitalization 0 0 0 0 275,000 275,000

Public Safety 680,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,680,000

Parking 632,000 0 0 0 0 632,000

General Government 646,000 0 0 0 0 646,000

TOTAL PROJECTS $ 7,384,000 8,731,000 10,060,000 2,165,000 2,360,000 30,700,000

**********Planning Years Only**********

$7,384,000 $8,731,000

$10,060,000

$2,165,000 $2,360,000

$0$2,000,000$4,000,000$6,000,000$8,000,000

$10,000,000$12,000,000

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18

Pro

ject

s Fu

nde

d

Page 22: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Summary Sheets B-4

FY 2014-2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

SCHEDULE II Project Summaries with Applicable Funding Sources

FY 13/14 TOTAL

COMMITTED CAPITAL PROJECT

Project/Funding Source FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 COST

**********Planning Years Only**********

NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program)

State "C" Funds 525,000 0 0 0 0 0 525,000

Greenville County 48,671 0 0 0 0 0 48,671

General Fund Transfer 4,700,000 250,000 300,000 300,000 500,000 500,000 6,550,000

General Obligation Bond - 2001 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000

Stormwater Fund 177,350 0 0 0 0 0 177,350

General Obligation Bond - 2006 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 350,000

Totals 6,301,021 250,000 300,000 300,000 500,000 500,000 8,151,021

Street Resurfacing

Capital Projects Fund 354,000 0 0 0 0 0 354,000

General Fund Transfer 2,655,000 250,000 300,000 300,000 500,000 500,000 4,505,000

Totals 3,009,000 250,000 300,000 300,000 500,000 500,000 4,859,000

Fairforest Way Rehabilitation

Federal Appropriation - SAFETEA-LU 5,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 5,600,000

State Revenue 49,275 0 0 0 0 0 49,275

Greenville Water System 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000

General Obligation Bond - 2006 706,000 0 0 0 0 0 706,000

Property Sales 116,338 0 0 0 0 0 116,338

Totals 6,971,613 0 0 0 0 0 6,971,613

Salters Road Improvements

Property Sales 61,875 0 0 0 0 0 61,875

General Fund Transfer 210,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 360,000

Totals 271,875 150,000 0 0 0 0 421,875

Main Street Resurfacing

Downtown Infrastructure Fund 370,000 0 0 0 0 0 370,000

Totals 370,000 0 0 0 0 0 370,000

Haywood Road/Woods Crossing Intersection

Hospitality Tax Fund 194,000 0 0 0 0 0 194,000

Totals 194,000 0 0 0 0 0 194,000

Haywood Road Sidewalks

General Fund Transfer 0 0 0 115,000 0 0 115,000

Totals 0 0 0 115,000 0 0 115,000

Woodruff Road Sidewalks

General Fund Transfer 0 0 0 180,000 0 0 180,000

Totals 0 0 0 180,000 0 0 180,000

TOTAL ROADS AND BRIDGES 17,117,509 650,000 600,000 895,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 21,262,509

STREETSCAPES

Pete Hollis Corridor Impovements

Viola Street Tax Increment Fund 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 150,000

Totals 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 150,000

East McBee Avenue Improvements

Property Sales 14,704 0 0 0 0 0 14,704

Downtown Infrastructure Fund 746,667 0 0 0 0 0 746,667

Totals 761,371 0 0 0 0 0 761,371

ROADS AND BRIDGES

Page 23: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Summary Sheets B-5

FY 13/14 TOTAL

COMMITTED CAPITAL PROJECT

Project/Funding Source FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 COST

**********Planning Years Only**********

Rhett/Camperdown Improvements

West End Tax Increment Fund 1,264,396 2,139,000 2,635,000 0 0 0 6,038,396

West End TIF Bond - Series 2013 1,989,000 (1,989,000) 0 0 0 0 0

Property Sales 30,004 0 0 0 0 0 30,004

Totals 3,283,400 150,000 2,635,000 0 0 0 6,068,400

Cultural Corridor Urban Trail

Downtown Infrastructure Fund 200,000 0 0 3,000,000 0 0 3,200,000

Totals 200,000 0 0 3,000,000 0 0 3,200,000

Village of West Greenville Improvements

Hospitality Tax Fund 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000

Totals 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000

Augusta Street Improvements

Capital Projects Fund 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 175,000

Totals 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 175,000

North Main Street Improvements

Viola Street Tax Increment Fund 228,000 0 0 0 0 0 228,000

Totals 228,000 0 0 0 0 0 228,000

Washington Street Improvements

Downtown Infrastructure Fund 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000

Totals 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000

Augusta Street Streetscaping (Baseball Stadium)

Admissions Tax Fund 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000

Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund 0 40,000 95,000 0 0 0 135,000

Totals 0 40,000 345,000 0 0 0 385,000

Broad Street Pedestrian Lighting

Downtown Infrastructure Fund 0 128,000 0 0 0 0 128,000

Totals 0 128,000 0 0 0 0 128,000

Downtown Streetscapes

Downtown Infrastructure Fund 0 165,000 0 0 0 0 165,000

Totals 0 165,000 0 0 0 0 165,000

North Main Street - Landmark Building

Downtown Infrastructure Fund 0 134,000 0 0 0 0 134,000

Totals 0 134,000 0 0 0 0 134,000

Spring/Falls Streetscape

Downtown Infrastructure Fund 0 25,000 101,000 0 0 0 126,000

Totals 0 25,000 101,000 0 0 0 126,000

Viola Streetscaping

Viola Street Tax Increment Fund 0 280,000 0 0 0 0 280,000

Totals 0 280,000 0 0 0 0 280,000

West Camperdown Way

West End Tax Increment Fund 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 250,000

Totals 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 250,000

Augusta at Faris Streetscape

General Fund Transfer 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 150,000

Totals 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 150,000

TOTAL STREETSCAPES 5,397,771 1,172,000 3,081,000 3,000,000 150,000 0 12,800,771

WASTEWATER

Haynie-Sirrine Wastewater System Rehabilitation

Wastewater Fund 409,000 0 0 0 0 0 409,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2002 96,000 0 0 0 0 0 96,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 1,695,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,695,000

State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund 2,005,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,005,000

Totals 4,205,000 0 0 0 0 0 4,205,000

Page 24: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Summary Sheets B-6

FY 13/14 TOTAL

COMMITTED CAPITAL PROJECT

Project/Funding Source FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 COST

**********Planning Years Only**********

Verdae Sewer Expansion

Donations 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000

Greenville Local Development Corporation 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000

Greenville Water System 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000

General Fund 366,000 0 0 0 0 0 366,000

Totals 1,166,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,166,000

Wastewater System Rehabilitation

Wastewater Fund 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 300,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000

Totals 1,300,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,300,000

Wastewater System Survey and Model

Wastewater Fund 200,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 525,000

Totals 200,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 525,000

Basin 7 Sewer Rehabilitation

Wastewater Fund 250,000 345,000 0 0 0 0 595,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 0 1,555,000 0 0 0 0 1,555,000

Totals 250,000 1,900,000 0 0 0 0 2,150,000

Basin 15 Sewer Rehabilitation

Wastewater Fund 250,000 400,000 0 0 0 0 650,000

Totals 250,000 400,000 0 0 0 0 650,000

Basin 16 Sewer Rehabilitation

Wastewater Fund 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2016 0 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 2,000,000

Totals 0 0 250,000 2,000,000 0 0 2,250,000

Basin 25 Sewer Rehabilitation

Wastewater Fund 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2016 0 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 2,000,000

Totals 0 0 250,000 2,000,000 0 0 2,250,000

TOTAL WASTEWATER 7,371,000 2,365,000 565,000 4,065,000 65,000 65,000 14,496,000

STORMWATER

Henderson Basin

Stormwater Fund 3,468,497 (1,398,000) 0 0 0 0 2,070,497

Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 61,000 0 0 0 0 0 61,000

Totals 3,529,497 (1,398,000) 0 0 0 0 2,131,497

Pinehurst Culvert Crossing Improvement

Stormwater Fund 0 435,000 0 0 0 0 435,000

Totals 0 435,000 0 0 0 0 435,000

Westview/Windsor Culverts

Stormwater Fund 740,680 0 0 0 0 0 740,680

Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 3,145 0 0 0 0 0 3,145

Totals 743,825 0 0 0 0 0 743,825

Pettigru Street Improvements

Stormwater Fund 395,963 0 0 0 0 0 395,963

Totals 395,963 0 0 0 0 0 395,963

Fairforest Way Basin

Stormwater Fund 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000

Totals 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000

White Oak Basin Phase II

Stormwater Fund 1,195,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 2,195,000

Totals 1,195,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 2,195,000

Gower Estates Stormwater Improvements

Wastewater Fund 231,000 0 0 0 0 0 231,000

Stormwater Fund 1,659,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,659,000

Totals 1,890,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,890,000

Page 25: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Summary Sheets B-7

FY 13/14 TOTAL

COMMITTED CAPITAL PROJECT

Project/Funding Source FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 COST

**********Planning Years Only**********

Swanson Court

Stormwater Fund 263,000 0 0 0 0 0 263,000

Wastewater Fund 21,000 0 0 0 0 0 21,000

Totals 284,000 0 0 0 0 0 284,000

Richland Creek Water Quality Master Plan

Stormwater Fund 150,000 300,000 850,000 0 0 0 1,300,000

Totals 150,000 300,000 850,000 0 0 0 1,300,000

Public Works Complex Water Quality Improvements

Stormwater Fund 116,000 0 0 0 0 0 116,000

Totals 116,000 0 0 0 0 0 116,000

North Hills Area Stormwater Improvements

Stormwater Fund 0 100,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 1,100,000

Totals 0 100,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 1,100,000

Aldridge/Lacey Drainage Improvements

Stormwater Fund 0 0 0 425,000 0 0 425,000

Totals 0 0 0 425,000 0 0 425,000

Hilly Street Drainage Improvements

Stormwater Fund 0 0 0 700,000 0 0 700,000

Totals 0 0 0 700,000 0 0 700,000

TOTAL STORMWATER 8,504,285 437,000 1,850,000 1,125,000 0 0 11,916,285

PARKS AND RECREATION

Community Center Building Improvements

Property Sales 467,500 0 0 0 0 0 467,500

Capital Projects Fund 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000

General Fund Transfer 750,000 0 0 0 0 0 750,000

General Obligation Bond - 2003 72,500 0 0 0 0 0 72,500

Totals 1,390,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,390,000

Main Street Tree Rehabilitation

CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2002 11,870 0 0 0 0 0 11,870

CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2003 14,313 0 0 0 0 0 14,313

Downtown Infrastructure Fund 911,985 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 0 1,511,985

Totals 938,168 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 0 1,538,168

Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access

Hospitality Tax Fund 655,766 0 0 0 0 0 655,766

State Grants 65,464 0 0 0 0 0 65,464

Property Sales 10,396 0 0 0 0 0 10,396

Capital Projects Fund 119,192 0 0 0 0 0 119,192

Totals 850,818 0 0 0 0 0 850,818

Reedy River Trail Expansion

Hospitality Tax Fund 325,000 0 0 0 0 0 325,000

Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2011 675,000 0 0 0 0 0 675,000

State Grants 240,000 0 0 0 0 0 240,000

Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2014 2,375,000 0 2,000,000 0 0 0 4,375,000

Totals 3,615,000 0 2,000,000 0 0 0 5,615,000

Park Restrooms

Capital Projects Fund 180,000 0 0 0 0 0 180,000

Downtown Infrastructure Fund 153,479 0 0 0 0 0 153,479

Hospitality Tax Fund 218,000 0 0 0 0 0 218,000

Totals 551,479 0 0 0 0 0 551,479

River Street Underpass

Hospitality Tax Fund 0 350,000 0 0 0 0 350,000

Downtown Infrastructure Fund 265,000 0 0 0 0 0 265,000

Totals 265,000 350,000 0 0 0 0 615,000

Page 26: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Summary Sheets B-8

FY 13/14 TOTAL

COMMITTED CAPITAL PROJECT

Project/Funding Source FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 COST

**********Planning Years Only**********

Heritage Green Master Plan

Greenville County 1,508,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,508,000

Totals 1,508,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,508,000

Cleveland Park Bank Stabilization

Stormwater Fund 650,000 0 0 0 0 0 650,000

Totals 650,000 0 0 0 0 0 650,000

McPherson Park Bridges Rehabilitation

Downtown Infrastructure Fund 15,000 120,000 0 0 0 0 135,000

Totals 15,000 120,000 0 0 0 0 135,000

Cancer Survivors Park

Hospitality Tax Fund 94,000 630,000 0 0 0 0 724,000

Totals 94,000 630,000 0 0 0 0 724,000

NEXT Trail Connector

Hospitality Tax Fund 75,000 606,000 0 0 0 0 681,000

Totals 75,000 606,000 0 0 0 0 681,000

Falls Park Improvements

State Grants 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000

Hospitality Tax Fund 608,000 0 0 0 0 0 608,000

Totals 708,000 0 0 0 0 0 708,000

Haywood at I-385 Interchange Landscaping

State Grants 265,856 0 0 0 0 0 265,856

Capital Projects Fund 66,464 0 0 0 0 0 66,464

Totals 332,320 0 0 0 0 0 332,320

Cleveland Park Horse Stables

Stormwater Fund 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 30,000

Totals 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 30,000

Greenville Dog Parks

General Fund Transfer 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000

Totals 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000

Greenville Tech Trailhead

Hospitality Tax Fund 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 125,000

Totals 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 125,000

Hudson Street Trailhead

Hospitality Tax Fund 0 225,000 0 0 0 0 225,000

Totals 0 225,000 0 0 0 0 225,000

Swamp Rabbit Trail Rubber Surface

Hospitality Tax Fund 0 145,000 0 0 0 0 145,000

Totals 0 145,000 0 0 0 0 145,000

Viola Center and Park Improvements

Viola Street Tax Increment Fund 0 146,000 0 0 0 0 146,000

Totals 0 146,000 0 0 0 0 146,000

TOTAL PARKS AND RECREATION 10,992,785 2,602,000 2,150,000 150,000 150,000 0 16,044,785

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Piazza Bergamo

Downtown Infrastructure Fund 5,310,000 0 0 0 0 0 5,310,000

Greenville Water System 228,650 0 0 0 0 0 228,650

Piedmont Natural Gas Grant 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 30,000

Property Sales 342,000 0 0 0 0 0 342,000

Totals 5,910,650 0 0 0 0 0 5,910,650

Page 27: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Summary Sheets B-9

FY 13/14 TOTAL

COMMITTED CAPITAL PROJECT

Project/Funding Source FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 COST

**********Planning Years Only**********

TD Convention Center Kitchen Retrofit

Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2011 115,000 0 0 0 0 0 115,000

Hospitality Tax Fund 110,000 0 0 0 0 0 110,000

Totals 225,000 0 0 0 0 0 225,000

Commercial Corridors

Capital Projects Fund 453,556 0 0 0 0 0 453,556

State Revenue 16,960 0 0 0 0 0 16,960

General Fund Transfer 0 300,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 700,000

Greenville County 34,357 0 0 0 0 0 34,357

Property Sales 70,000 0 0 0 0 0 70,000

Totals 574,873 300,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 1,274,873

West End Property Acquisition

West End Tax Increment Fund 2,500,000 (2,500,000) 0 0 0 0 0

Totals 2,500,000 (2,500,000) 0 0 0 0 0

Peace Center

Downtown Infrastructure Fund 2,582,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,582,000

Totals 2,582,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,582,000

Hyatt Public Improvements

Property Sales 896,847 0 0 0 0 0 896,847

Totals 896,847 0 0 0 0 0 896,847

Markley at Rhett Improvements

Stormwater Fund 37,000 0 0 0 0 0 37,000

Utility Undergrounding Fund 49,000 0 0 0 0 0 49,000

West End Tax Increment Fund 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 175,000

Totals 261,000 0 0 0 0 0 261,000

TD Convention Center Chiller Plant

Local Accommodations Tax Fund 0 300,000 0 0 0 0 300,000

Totals 0 300,000 0 0 0 0 300,000

TD Convention Center Conference Center

Local Accommodations Tax Fund 0 100,000 135,000 475,000 450,000 170,000 1,330,000

Totals 0 100,000 135,000 475,000 450,000 170,000 1,330,000

TD Convention Center Parking Lots

Local Accommodations Tax Fund 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000

Totals 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000

TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 12,950,370 (1,800,000) 235,000 575,000 550,000 770,000 13,280,370

NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION

Haynie-Sirrine

Property Sales 125,545 0 0 0 0 0 125,545

General Obligation Bond - 2003 3,273 0 0 0 0 0 3,273

Miscellaneous Grants Fund 78,750 0 0 0 0 0 78,750

Revolving House Fund 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 75,000

Stormwater Fund 44,560 0 0 0 0 0 44,560

Capital Projects Fund 437,180 0 0 0 0 0 437,180

Totals 764,308 0 0 0 0 0 764,308

Mt. Eustis Street Improvements

Capital Projects Fund 401,000 0 0 0 0 0 401,000

General Fund Transfer 226,372 0 0 0 0 275,000 501,372

General Obligation Bond - 2006 85,000 0 0 0 0 0 85,000

Wastewater Fund 56,000 0 0 0 0 0 56,000

Stormwater Fund 63,000 0 0 0 0 0 63,000

Totals 831,372 0 0 0 0 275,000 1,106,372

TOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION 1,595,680 0 0 0 0 275,000 1,870,680

Page 28: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Summary Sheets B-10

FY 13/14 TOTAL

COMMITTED CAPITAL PROJECT

Project/Funding Source FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 COST

**********Planning Years Only**********

PUBLIC SAFETY

East Area Fire Station

Property Sales 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 75,000

General Obligation Bond - 2013 3,881,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,881,000

Totals 3,956,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,956,000

Fire Facilities Assessment

Capital Projects Fund 70,000 0 0 0 0 0 70,000

Totals 70,000 0 0 0 0 0 70,000

Public Safety Cameras

Hospitality Tax Fund 0 500,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,500,000

Totals 0 500,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,500,000

Station Alerting System

General Fund Transfer 0 180,000 0 0 0 0 180,000

Totals 0 180,000 0 0 0 0 180,000

TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 4,026,000 680,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 5,706,000

PARKING

Richardson Street Garage

Downtown Infrastructure Fund 655,000 0 0 0 0 0 655,000

Totals 655,000 0 0 0 0 0 655,000

Poinsett Garage Rehabilitation

Parking Enterprise Fund 0 632,000 0 0 0 0 632,000

Totals 0 632,000 0 0 0 0 632,000

TOTAL PARKING 655,000 632,000 0 0 0 0 1,287,000

GENERAL GOVERNMENT

Phone System Replacement

Installment Lease Purchase - 2013 475,000 220,000 0 0 0 0 695,000

Totals 475,000 220,000 0 0 0 0 695,000

Public Works Operations Center

Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2012 3,100,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,100,000

Totals 3,100,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,100,000

Public Works Radio System

Capital Projects Fund 119,000 0 0 0 0 0 119,000

Solid Waste Enterprise Fund 106,000 0 0 0 0 0 106,000

Stormwater Fund 39,000 0 0 0 0 0 39,000

Wastewater Fund 57,000 0 0 0 0 0 57,000

Totals 321,000 0 0 0 0 0 321,000

Central Microsoft SQL Platform

General Fund Transfer 0 245,000 0 0 0 0 245,000

Totals 0 245,000 0 0 0 0 245,000

Roof Replacements

General Fund Transfer 0 76,000 0 0 0 0 76,000

Downtown Infrastructure Fund 0 105,000 0 0 0 0 105,000

Totals 0 181,000 0 0 0 0 181,000

TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 3,896,000 646,000 0 0 0 0 4,542,000

TOTAL, ALL PROJECTS 72,506,400 7,384,000 8,731,000 10,060,000 2,165,000 2,360,000 103,206,400

Page 29: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Summary Sheets B-11

FY 2014-2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE III

Project Summaries by Funding Source

FY 13/14

COMMITTED CAPITAL TOTAL

Funding Source/Project FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FUNDING

**********Planning Years Only**********

Admissions Tax Fund

Augusta Street Streetscaping (Baseball Stadium) 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000

Subtotal, Admissions Tax Fund 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000

Capital Projects Fund

Haynie-Sirrine 437,180 0 0 0 0 0 437,180

Mt. Eustis Street Improvements 401,000 0 0 0 0 0 401,000

Commercial Corridors 453,556 0 0 0 0 0 453,556

Street Resurfacing 354,000 0 0 0 0 0 354,000

Park Restrooms 180,000 0 0 0 0 0 180,000Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access 119,192 0 0 0 0 0 119,192

Community Center Building Improvements 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000

Haywood at I-385 Interchange Landscaping 66,464 0 0 0 0 0 66,464

Augusta Street Improvements 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 175,000

Fire Facilities Assessment 70,000 0 0 0 0 0 70,000

Public Works Radio System 119,000 0 0 0 0 0 119,000

Subtotal, Capital Projects Fund 2,475,392 0 0 0 0 0 2,475,392

CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2002

Main Street Tree Rehabilitation 11,870 0 0 0 0 0 11,870

Subtotal, CDB Tax Increment Bond - 2002 11,870 0 0 0 0 0 11,870

CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2003

Main Street Tree Rehabilitation 14,313 0 0 0 0 0 14,313

Subtotal, CDB Tax Increment Bond - 2003 14,313 0 0 0 0 0 14,313

Donations

Verdae Sewer Expansion 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000

Subtotal, Donations 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000

Downtown Infrastructure Fund

Main Street Tree Rehabilitation 911,985 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 0 1,511,985

East McBee Avenue Improvements 746,667 0 0 0 0 0 746,667

Park Restrooms 153,479 0 0 0 0 0 153,479

Main Street Resurfacing 370,000 0 0 0 0 0 370,000

River Street Underpass 265,000 0 0 0 0 0 265,000

Peace Center 2,582,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,582,000

Piazza Bergamo 5,310,000 0 0 0 0 0 5,310,000

McPherson Park Bridges 15,000 120,000 0 0 0 0 135,000

Cultural Corridor Urban Trail 200,000 0 0 3,000,000 0 0 3,200,000

Washington Street Improvements 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000

Richardson Street Garage 655,000 0 0 0 0 0 655,000

Broad Street Pedestrian Lights 0 128,000 0 0 0 0 128,000

Downtown Streetscapes 0 165,000 0 0 0 0 165,000

North Main Street - Landmark Building 0 134,000 0 0 0 0 134,000

Spring/Falls Streetscape 0 25,000 101,000 0 0 0 126,000

Roof Replacement 0 105,000 0 0 0 0 105,000

Subtotal, Downtown Infrastructure Fund 11,709,131 827,000 251,000 3,150,000 150,000 0 16,087,131

Federal Appropriation - SAFETEA-LU

Fairforest Way Rehabilitation 5,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 5,600,000

Subtotal, Fed. Appropriation - SAFETEA-LU 5,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 5,600,000

Page 30: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Summary Sheets B-12

FY 13/14

COMMITTED CAPITAL TOTAL

Funding Source/Project FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FUNDING

**********Planning Years Only**********

General Fund Transfer

NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) 4,700,000 250,000 300,000 300,000 500,000 500,000 6,550,000

Street Resurfacing 2,655,000 250,000 300,000 300,000 500,000 500,000 4,505,000

Community Center Building Improvements 750,000 0 0 0 0 0 750,000

Salters Road Improvements 210,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 360,000

Verdae Sewer Expansion 366,000 0 0 0 0 0 366,000

Mt. Eustis Street Improvements 226,372 0 0 0 0 275,000 501,372

Haywood Road Sidewalks 0 0 0 115,000 0 0 115,000

Woodruff Road Sidewalks 0 0 0 180,000 0 0 180,000

Augusta at Faris Streetscape 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 150,000

Greenville Dog Parks 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000

Commercial Corridors 0 300,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 700,000

Station Alerting System 0 180,000 0 0 0 0 180,000

Central SQL Platform 0 245,000 0 0 0 0 245,000

Roof Replacement 0 76,000 0 0 0 0 76,000

Subtotal, General Fund Transfer 8,907,372 1,526,000 700,000 995,000 1,250,000 1,375,000 14,753,372

General Obligation Bond - 2001

NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000

Subtotal, General Obligation Bond - 2001 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000

General Obligation Bond - 2003

Community Center Building Improvements 72,500 0 0 0 0 0 72,500

Haynie-Sirrine 3,273 0 0 0 0 0 3,273

Subtotal, General Obligation Bond - 2003 75,773 0 0 0 0 0 75,773

General Obligation Bond - 2006NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 350,000Mt. Eustis Street Improvements 85,000 0 0 0 0 0 85,000Fairforest Way Rehabilitation 706,000 0 0 0 0 0 706,000

Subtotal, General Obligation Bond - 2006 1,141,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,141,000

General Obligation Bond - 2013

East Area Fire Station 3,881,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,881,000

Subtotal, General Obligation Bond - 2013 3,881,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,881,000

Greenville CountyNSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) 48,671 0 0 0 0 0 48,671Commercial Corridors 34,357 0 0 0 0 0 34,357Heritage Green Master Plan 1,508,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,508,000

Subtotal, Greenville County 1,591,028 0 0 0 0 0 1,591,028

Greenville Local Development Corporation

Verdae Sewer Expansion 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000

Subtotal, Greenville Local Development Corporation 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000

Greenville Water SystemFairforest Way Rehabilitation 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000Verdae Sewer Expansion 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000Piazza Bergamo 228,650 0 0 0 0 0 228,650

Subtotal, Greenville Water System 1,228,650 0 0 0 0 0 1,228,650

Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2011

Reedy River Trail Expansion 675,000 0 0 0 0 0 675,000

TD Convention Center Kitchen Retrofit 115,000 0 0 0 0 0 115,000

Subtotal, Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2011 790,000 0 0 0 0 0 790,000

Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2014Reedy River Trail Expansion 2,375,000 0 2,000,000 0 4,375,000

Subtotal, Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2014 2,375,000 0 2,000,000 0 0 0 4,375,000

Page 31: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Summary Sheets B-13

FY 13/14

COMMITTED CAPITAL TOTAL

Funding Source/Project FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FUNDING

**********Planning Years Only**********

Hospitality Tax Fund

Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access 655,766 0 0 0 0 0 655,766Reedy River Trail Expansion 325,000 0 0 0 0 0 325,000TD Convention Center Kitchen Retrofit 110,000 0 0 0 0 0 110,000Haywood Road/Woods Crossing Intersection 194,000 0 0 0 0 0 194,000Park Restrooms 218,000 0 0 0 0 0 218,000Cancer Survivors Park 94,000 630,000 0 0 0 0 724,000NEXT Trail Connector 75,000 606,000 0 0 0 0 681,000Falls Park Improvements 608,000 0 0 0 0 0 608,000Village of West Greenville Improvements 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000Greenville Tech Trailhead 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 125,000Hudson Street Trailhead 0 225,000 0 0 0 0 225,000River Street Underpass 0 350,000 0 0 0 0 350,000Swamp Rabbit Trail Rubber Surface 0 145,000 0 0 0 0 145,000Public Safety Cameras 0 500,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,500,000

Subtotal, Hospitality Tax Fund 2,379,766 2,581,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 5,960,766

Installment Lease Purchase Agreement - 2013Phone System Replacement 475,000 220,000 0 0 0 0 695,000

Subtotal, Installment Lease Purchase Agree. - 2013 475,000 220,000 0 0 0 0 695,000

Local Accomodations Tax FundTD Convention Center Chiller Plant 0 300,000 0 0 0 0 300,000TD Convention Center Conference Center Upgrades 0 100,000 135,000 475,000 450,000 170,000 1,330,000TD Convention Center Parking Lots 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000

Subtotal, Local Accommodations Tax Fund 0 400,000 135,000 475,000 450,000 670,000 2,130,000

Miscellaneous Grants FundHaynie-Sirrine 78,750 0 0 0 0 0 78,750

Subtotal, Miscellaneous Grants Fund 78,750 0 0 0 0 0 78,750

Parking Enterprise FundPoinsett Garage Rehabilitation 0 632,000 0 0 0 0 632,000

Subtotal, Parking Fund 0 632,000 0 0 0 0 632,000

Piedmont Natural Gas GrantPiazza Bergamo 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 30,000

Subtotal, Piedmont Natural Gas Grant 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 30,000

Property SalesCommunity Center Building Improvements 467,500 0 0 0 0 0 467,500Piazza Bergamo 342,000 0 0 0 0 0 342,000Rhett/Camperdown Street Improvements 30,004 0 0 0 0 0 30,004Haynie-Sirrine 125,545 0 0 0 0 0 125,545East Area Fire Station 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 75,000Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access 10,396 0 0 0 0 0 10,396East McBee Avenue Improvements 14,704 0 0 0 0 0 14,704Salters Road Improvements 61,875 0 0 0 0 0 61,875Commercial Corridors 70,000 0 0 0 0 0 70,000Hyatt Public Improvements 896,847 0 0 0 0 0 896,847Fairforest Way Rehabilitation 116,338 0 0 0 0 0 116,338

Subtotal, Property Sales 2,210,209 0 0 0 0 0 2,210,209

Revolving Housing FundHaynie-Sirrine 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 Subtotal, Revolving Housing Fund 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 75,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2002Haynie-Sirrine Basin Rehabilitation 96,000 0 0 0 0 0 96,000

Subtotal, Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2002 96,000 0 0 0 0 0 96,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013Haynie-Sirrine Basin Rehabilitation 1,695,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,695,000Wastewater Rehabilitation 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000Basin 7 Rehabilitation 0 1,555,000 0 0 0 0 1,555,000

Subtotal, Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 2,695,000 1,555,000 0 0 0 0 4,250,000

Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2016Basin 16 Rehabilitation 0 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 2,000,000Basin 25 Rehabilitation 0 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 2,000,000

Subtotal, Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2016 0 0 0 4,000,000 0 0 4,000,000

Page 32: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Summary Sheets B-14

FY 13/14

COMMITTED CAPITAL TOTAL

Funding Source/Project FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FUNDING

**********Planning Years Only**********

Solid Waste Enterprise Fund

Public Works Radio System Replacement 106,000 0 0 0 0 0 106,000Subtotal, Solid Waste Enterprise Fund 106,000 0 0 0 0 0 106,000

State "C" FundsNSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) 525,000 0 0 0 0 0 525,000

Subtotal, State "C" Funds 525,000 0 0 0 0 0 525,000

State Clean Water Revolving Loan FundHaynie-Sirrine Basin Rehabilitation 2,005,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,005,000

Subtotal, State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund 2,005,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,005,000

State GrantsCleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access 65,464 0 0 0 0 0 65,464Haywood at I-385 Interchange Landscaping 265,856 0 0 0 0 0 265,856Falls Park Improvements 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000Reedy River Trail Expansion 240,000 0 0 0 0 0 240,000

Subtotal, State Grants 671,320 0 0 0 0 0 671,320

State RevenueFairforest Way Rehabilitation 49,275 0 0 0 0 0 49,275Commercial Corridors 16,960 0 0 0 0 0 16,960

Subtotal, State Revenue 66,235 0 0 0 0 0 66,235

Stormwater FundHaynie-Sirrine 44,560 0 0 0 0 0 44,560Pettigru Street Improvements 395,963 0 0 0 0 0 395,963Henderson Basin 3,468,497 (1,398,000) 0 0 0 0 2,070,497Pinehurst Culvert Crossing 0 435,000 0 0 0 0 435,000Fairforest Way Basin 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000White Oak Basin Phase II 1,195,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 2,195,000Westview/Windsor Culverts 740,680 0 0 0 0 0 740,680Gower Estates Stormwater Rehabilitation 1,659,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,659,000Swanson Court 263,000 0 0 0 0 0 263,000Richland Creek Water Quality Master Plan 150,000 300,000 850,000 0 0 0 1,300,000NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) 177,350 0 0 0 0 0 177,350Public Works Complex Water Quality Improvements 116,000 0 0 0 0 0 116,000Mt. Eustis Street Improvements 63,000 0 0 0 0 0 63,000Public Works Radio System 39,000 0 0 0 0 0 39,000Cleveland Park Bank Stabilization 650,000 0 0 0 0 0 650,000Markley at Rhett Improvements 37,000 0 0 0 0 0 37,000North Hills Area Stormwater 0 100,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 1,100,000Aldridge/Lacey Drainage Improvements 0 0 0 425,000 0 0 425,000Hilly Street Drainage Improvements 0 0 0 700,000 0 0 700,000Cleveland Park Horse Stables 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 30,000

Subtotal, Stormwater Fund 9,199,050 467,000 1,850,000 1,125,000 0 0 12,641,050

Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001Henderson Basin 61,000 0 0 0 0 0 61,000Westview/Windsor Culverts 3,145 0 0 0 0 0 3,145

Subtotal, Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 64,145 0 0 0 0 0 64,145

Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2012Public Works Operations Center 3,100,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,100,000

Subtotal, Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2012 3,100,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,100,000

Sunday Alcohol Permits FundAugusta Street Streetscape (Baseball Stadium) 0 40,000 95,000 0 0 0 135,000

Subtotal, Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund 0 40,000 95,000 0 0 0 135,000

Utility Undergrounding FundMarkley at Rhett Improvements 49,000 0 0 0 0 0 49,000

Subtotal, Utility Undergrounding Fund 49,000 0 0 0 0 0 49,000

Viola Street Tax Increment FundPete Hollis Corridor Improvements 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 150,000North Main Street Improvements 228,000 0 0 0 0 0 228,000Viola Center and Park Improvements 0 146,000 0 0 0 0 146,000Viola Streetscaping 0 280,000 0 0 0 0 280,000

Subtotal, Viola Street Tax Increment Fund 378,000 426,000 0 0 0 0 804,000

Page 33: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Summary Sheets B-15

FY 13/14

COMMITTED CAPITAL TOTAL

Funding Source/Project FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FUNDING

**********Planning Years Only**********

Wastewater Fund

Haynie-Sirrine Basin Rehabilitation 409,000 0 0 0 0 0 409,000Mt. Eustis Street Improvements 56,000 0 0 0 0 0 56,000Wastewater Rehabilitation 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 300,000Wastewater Survey and Model 200,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 525,000Basin 7 Rehabilitation 250,000 345,000 0 0 0 0 595,000Basin 15 Rehabilitation 250,000 400,000 0 0 0 0 650,000Basin 16 Rehabilitation 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000Basin 25 Rehabilitation 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000Gower Estates Stormwater Rehabilitation 231,000 0 0 0 0 0 231,000Swanson Court 21,000 0 0 0 0 0 21,000Public Works Radio System 57,000 0 0 0 0 0 57,000

Subtotal, Wastewater Fund 1,774,000 810,000 565,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 3,344,000

West End Tax Increment Fund West End Property Acquisition 2,500,000 (2,500,000) 0 0 0 0 0Markley at Rhett Improvements 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 175,000West Camperdown Way 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 250,000Rhett/Camperdown Improvements 1,264,396 2,139,000 2,635,000 0 0 0 6,038,396

Subtotal, West End Tax Increment Fund 3,939,396 (111,000) 2,635,000 0 0 0 6,463,396

West End TIF Bond - 2013Rhett/Camperdown Improvements 1,989,000 (1,989,000) 0 0 0 0 0

Subtotal, West End TIF Bond - 2013 1,989,000 (1,989,000) 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL, ALL FUNDING SOURCES 72,506,400 7,384,000 8,731,000 10,060,000 2,165,000 2,360,000 103,206,400

Page 34: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Summary Sheets B-16

FY 2014-2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE IV

Unfunded Projects

FY 13/14 TOTAL

PROJECT REQUEST FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 REQUEST

PROJECT DOES NOT APPEAR IN CIP - NO FUNDING (REQUESTED AMOUNT SHOWN)

ADA Curb Ramp Compliance $ 50,000 228,625 240,056 252,059 264,662 1,035,402

Auditorium Site 1,200,000 0 0 0 0 1,200,000

Calhoun Street Connection 244,450 0 0 0 0 244,450

Camperdown/Falls Park 150,000 0 0 0 0 150,000

Chick Springs Greenway 35,000 285,750 0 0 0 320,750

Church Street Streetscape 759,796 0 0 0 0 759,796

City Hall Energy Upgrades 625,000 0 0 0 0 625,000

Cleveland Park Sewer Line Concealment 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000

Cleveland Street Extension Curves 567,000 0 0 0 0 567,000

Cleveland Street Sidewalk 246,000 0 0 0 0 246,000

Juanita Butler Administration Building 243,000 0 0 0 0 243,000

Landmark Streetscape 200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000

Market Point Drive Connector 1,900,000 0 0 0 0 1,900,000

McBee Avenue - Keys 200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000

McBee Avenue Plaza 500,000 0 0 0 0 500,000

Neighborhood Park Improvements 98,000 54,000 71,000 54,000 60,000 337,000

Outdoor Fitness Center 105,000 0 0 0 0 105,000

Park Parking Lots 90,000 75,000 80,000 75,000 0 320,000

Park Playgrounds 142,500 61,000 82,000 18,000 0 303,500

Reedy River Park 500,000 0 0 0 0 500,000

Ridge Road Soccer Fields 798,200 0 0 0 0 798,200

Sidewalk Gap 358,000 360,850 363,843 366,985 0 1,449,678

Wenwood Fire Station 4,540,495 0 0 0 0 4,540,495

West Greenville Community Center Improvements 615,000 0 0 0 0 615,000

FY 13/14 TOTAL

PROJECT REQUEST FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 REQUEST

PROJECT IN CIP - NOT FULLY FUNDED BASED ON REQUEST (UNFUNDED PORTION SHOWN)

NSTEP 308,500 259,850 262,843 65,985 69,284 966,462

Street Resurfacing 250,000 200,000 200,000 0 0 650,000

Cultural Corridor Urban Trail 0 300,000 1,512,500 0 0 1,812,500

Downtown Streetscapes 155,200 0 0 0 0 155,200

North Main Street - Landmark Building 66,000 0 0 0 0 66,000

Basin 7 Sewer Rehabilitation 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000

Basin 15 Sewer Rehabilitation 1,600,000 0 0 0 0 1,600,000

Cleveland Park Horse Stables 485,000 0 0 0 0 485,000

Greenville Dog Parks 141,000 0 0 0 0 141,000

TOTAL UNFUNDED PROJECTS $ 17,273,141 2,075,075 2,812,242 832,029 393,946 23,386,433

**********Planning Years Only**********

**********Planning Years Only**********

Page 35: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

Roads & Bridges C-1

ROADS AND BRIDGES

East Faris Road at the intersection of Cleveland Street recently was upgraded with sidewalks through the NSTEP program. The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program enhances streets throughout the City to accommodate motorists and non-motorists alike.

Page 36: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Roads & Bridges C-2

Page 37: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Roads & Bridges C-3

JULY 1999 ON-GOING 2025+

Based on a per linear foot cost developed from NSTEP Rounds 1 through 7.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):NSTEP Round 7C (McDaniel Avenue from Broad Street to Ridgeland Drive construction) nearing completion.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

In the late 1990's, it was determined that development of a new sidewalk program would benefit the City and its residents in a variety of ways. These include safety to pedestrians by providing a designated area to travel and traffic calming from the addition of curb and gutter, accessibility standards and requirements (ADA), landscaping and vegetation, and interest and pleasantness provided by the improvements. The NSTEP criteria to determine the priority for constructing sidewalk was revisted at City Council's request and revised in January 2011.

CONTINUATION

Project Description:The NSTEP Program (Neighborhood Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program), was developed in response to concerns expressed by City residents. It is an on-going project designed to construct sidewalk on at least one side of every street within the City of Greenville. As part of the NSTEP program, not only is sidewalk with a curb lawn constructed, but as part of the improvements, curb, gutter and storm drainage improvements are made to the street as well.

CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODSProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP A

NSTEP (NEIGHBORHOOD SIDEWALK TARGETED EXPANSION PROGRAM)

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $6,301,021 $250,000 $300,000 $300,000 $500,000 $500,000 $8,151,021Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $6,301,021 $250,000 $300,000 $300,000 $500,000 $500,000 $8,151,021TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

State "C" Funds $525,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $525,000Greenville County $48,671 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,671General Fund $4,700,000 $250,000 $300,000 $300,000 $500,000 $500,000 $6,550,000General Obligation Bond - 2001 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000Stormwater Fund $177,350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $177,350General Obligation Bond - 2006 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $6,301,021 $250,000 $300,000 $300,000 $500,000 $500,000 $8,151,021

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 38: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Roads & Bridges C-4

JULY 2006 ON-GOING 2025+

STREET RESURFACING

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP A

REVISION

Project Description:The cost to rehabilitate one lane mile of City street is in the range of $60,000. The City of Greenville has approximately 600 lane miles of street that require regular maintenance. Consequently the number of lane miles that can be rehabilitated depends upon the funding that is appropriated for this program.

MOBILE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

The cost estimate is prepared based on current pricing for full depth patching, milling, and asphalt concrete in-place after the streets selected for rehabilitation are prioritized.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):An additional $500,000 was recently appropriated to support the Greenville County Delegation Transportation Committee's (GLDTC) 2013 Municipal Match Resurfacing Program. This is in addition to the previously committed $150,000.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

All City streets have been rated via a Pavement Quality Index (PQI) and the PQI were updated and field verified by a third party pavement management consulting firm in 2009. Rehabilitating streets is based on a priority of "worst to first". For the most recent projects, approximately 25% of the existing pavement structural sections on the streets that were resurfaced had to be removed and replaced prior to the new asphalt concrete surface course being placed. This indicates that the City of Greenville is in a "catch-up" mode. After the PQI ratings were field verified in 2009 the average PQI rating (scale 2 to 10) for our streets was 6.6. As of October 2012 the average PQI rating has slipped to 5.9. To maximize the expenditure of the maintenance dollar, it is imperative that all streets receive maintenance on a regular basis.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $3,009,000 $250,000 $300,000 $300,000 $500,000 $500,000 $4,859,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $3,009,000 $250,000 $300,000 $300,000 $500,000 $500,000 $4,859,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Capital Projects Fund $354,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $354,000General Fund $2,655,000 $250,000 $300,000 $300,000 $500,000 $500,000 $4,505,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $3,009,000 $250,000 $300,000 $300,000 $500,000 $500,000 $4,859,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 39: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Roads & Bridges C-5

APR 2007 DEC 2014

Engineer's estimate.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Phase 1 - Mauldin Road to Ridge Road is substantially complete. Phase 2 - Ridge Road to Laurens Road is funded by SAFETEA-LU Earmark. Design and right-of-way plans are complete. The next step is acquiring the right of way. There is no stimulus funding associated with this second phase. A 20% local match is also required for Phase 2 per our participation agreement with the SCDOT.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Fairforest Way provides an alternate transportation link to I-85 from Mauldin Road to Woodruff Road via Millennium Boulevard and Carolina Point Parkway. However, the existing pavement along Fairforest Way has deteriorated to a very substandard condition. Increased development in the area along with new residential housing also warrant the need for full pedestrian and bicycle accommodation.

CONTINUATION

Project Description:This project includes a total rehabilitation of roadway infrastructure along a 2.1 mile section of Fairforest Way. The new road will be a four lane divided arterial street with curb & gutter, sidewalks with curb lawns, landscape plantings, raised planted median islands, and the curb lanes will have shared bicycle lanes in each direction. Additionally, a new signal is planned for the Mauldin Road intersection and at the Wenwood Drive intersection. A signal upgrade is planned for the existing span wire signal at Ridge Road.

MOBILE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE A WIDE VARIETY OF TRANSPORTATION MODESStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

FAIRFOREST WAY REHABILITATION

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $310,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $310,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $6,621,613 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,621,613Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $6,971,613 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,971,613TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Federal Grant - SAFETEA-LU $5,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,600,000State Revenue $49,275 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $49,275Greenville Water System $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000General Obligation Bond - 2006 $706,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $706,000Property Sales $116,338 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $116,338

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $6,971,613 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,971,613

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $68,763 $70,826 $72,950 $75,139 $77,394 $365,072Cumulative Operating Impact $68,763 $139,589 $212,539 $287,678 $365,072 $365,072FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 40: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Roads & Bridges C-6

OCT 2009 JUN 2015

Estimate provided by the SCDOT.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):The design consultant has finished the environmental study and is 60% complete with design. Right-of-way acquisition will begin in 2013 with construction starting in late 2014.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The Woodruff Road Corridor Study - Final Report recognized that secondary access to many of the developments on the eastside are essential in order to provide safe and efficient access to large scale development sites including ICAR, Millennium Campus, Verdae Development, and the TD Bank Campus. This will provide an alternate access to Woodruff Road and to these developments.

CONTINUATION

Project Description:Reconstructing Salters Road will provide an alternate transportation link to Woodruff Road by providing access to surrounding large-scale developments. The project will occur in two sections: Section 1 is from Verdae to Old Sulphur Springs Road (just west of I-85 Bridge), and Section 2 from Old Sulphur Springs Road to Millennium/Carolina Point Parkway (includes bridge over I-85). Both sections are currently on the Greenville-Pickens Area Transportation Improvement Program. The City, County, and SCDOT have a design and financial participation agreement. Section one requires a 20% local match (split between City and County) since this is a City road. Section 2 is a State road and no local match is required. The proposed cross-section for improvements is four travel lanes, bike lanes, and planted medians.

MOBILE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:PROVIDE LINKAGES BETWEEN ALL TRANSPORTATION OPTIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

SALTERS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $61,875 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $61,875Site Acquisition Costs $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000Improvements $200,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $271,875 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $421,875TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Property Sales $61,875 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $61,875General Fund $210,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $360,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $271,875 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $421,875

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $16,732 $17,569 $18,447 $19,369 $72,117Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $16,732 $34,301 $52,748 $72,117 $72,117FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 41: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Roads & Bridges C-7

DEC 2012 NOV 2013

MAIN STREET RESURFACING

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A

CONTINUATION

Project Description:Main Street between Elford Street to West Camperdown Way currently exhibits random cracking. To improve the appearance of the street, the existing surface needs to be milled and resurfaced with asphalt concrete. Additionally, sections of the existing curb and gutter need to be removed and replaced.

MOBILE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:

MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Current construction costs for milling, placing asphalt concrete, and restriping.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Construction of this project will be scheduled after Project ONE and the Piazza Bergamo Project are completed.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Main Street is a focal point for the City of Greenville and it is imperative that the aesthetics of the City's infrastructure be maintained. Milling and resurfacing Main Street will improve its appearance, provide a better riding surface for motorists, and at the crosswalks will provide a safer walking surface for pedestrians.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $360,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $360,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $370,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $370,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Downtown Infrastructure Fund $370,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $370,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $370,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $370,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 42: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Roads & Bridges C-8

JULY 2012 JULY 2013

HAYWOOD ROAD/WOODS CROSSING INTERSECTION

Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A

The Haywood Road Master Plan was adopted by City Council in December 2009. A key recommendation in the plan is to redevelop the intersection located at Haywood and Woods Crossing Roads as a model that will serve as a catalyst for private investment and as an example of the design vision for the future of the corridor. Phase 1 of this project includes the installation of mast arm traffic signals and some landscaping at the four corners of the intersection. Phase 2 would include a new asphalt treatment, crosswalks, and other aesthetic improvements as recommended in the Master Plan and will be submitted in a future budget request.

PROSPEROUS CITYENCOURAGE REVITALIZATION OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Status: Strategic Goal:NEW PROJECT

Project Description:

Detailed construction cost estimate provided by the Engineering Division based on unit costs for traffic signal upgrades and some landscaping.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Project is nearing completion.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Although the Haywood Road corridor has historically been a significant source of revenue for the City, the corridor is experiencing the early stages of decline due to a number of business closings and relocations to the Woodruff Road area. The completion of the Haywood Road Area Master Plan was the first step to counteract this declining trend to preserve existing businesses in the corridor and help position the corridor for the future. The creation of the model intersection recommended in the Master Plan will help to revitalize the corridor which is consistent with the City's Strategic Goal of creating a prosperous city and the goal of the Comprehensive Plan to encourage revitalization of commercial corridors.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $189,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $189,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $194,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $194,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Hospitality Tax Fund $194,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $194,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $194,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $194,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $1,538 $1,615 $1,695 $1,780 $1,868 $8,496Cumulative Operating Impact $1,538 $3,153 $4,848 $6,628 $8,496 $8,496FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 43: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Roads & Bridges C-9

JAN 2016 JUN 2016

This project has been submitted for Enhancement Funds through GPATS in the amount of $245,000. This amount is part of the $845,000 five year period allocation for the years 2012 to 2017. This project is subject to approval by the GPATS Committee.

Engineering estimate based on current linear foot cost for the construction of sidewalk using a 5% annual inflation factor.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

This sidewalk will provide connectivity between the existing sidewalk just south of the I-385 bridge to Woods Lake Road and on Woods Lake Road from the entrance to the Extended Stay Motel to the entrance to Haywood Mall.

Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.):

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:The scope of this project includes the construction of approximately 1,800 linear feet of sidewalk on Haywood Road from south of the I-385 bridge (entrance to the Copper River Grill) to Woods Lake Road and on Woods Lake Road from Haywood Road northwest to the entrance to the Extended Stay Motel and on Woods Lake Road from Haywood Road to the entrance to Haywood Mall.

MOBILE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

HAYWOOD ROAD SIDEWALKS

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP B

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $115,000 $0 $0 $115,000Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $115,000 $0 $0 $115,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

General Fund $0 $0 $0 $115,000 $0 $0 $115,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $0 $0 $115,000 $0 $0 $115,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 44: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Roads & Bridges C-10

JAN 2016 JUN 2016

WOODRUFF ROAD SIDEWALKS

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP B

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:The scope of this project includes constructing approximately 4,500 linear feet of sidewalk along Woodruff Road from the Shops at Green Ridge to Costco.

MOBILE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

This project has been submitted for Enhancement Funds through GPATS in the amount of $200,000.00. This amount is part of the $845,000 five year period allocation for the years 2012 to 2017. This project is subject to approval by the GPATS Committee.

Engineering estimate based on current linear foot cost for the construction of sidewalk using a 5% inflation factor.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This project has not started.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

This sidewalk along Woodruff Road will provide pedestrian connectivity along Woodruff Road from the Shops at Green Ridge, Carolina Point Parkway, Market Point Drive, Magnolia Park, and Costco. This sidewalk will link several hotels with restaurants, retail shops, and entertainment venues. This sidewalk will provide a safe pedestrian route along Woodruff Road.

Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.):

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $180,000Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $180,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

General Fund $0 $0 $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $180,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $0 $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $180,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 45: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

Streetscapes D-1

STREETSCAPES

The downtown area is constantly undergoing streetscape improvements to foster a vibrant City. The streetscape improvements proposed in the FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program continue investments throughout the City.

Page 46: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Streetscapes D-2

Page 47: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Streetscapes D-3

JULY 2007 JUN 2014

Project Status: Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

CONTINUATION

PETE HOLLIS CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS

Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A

CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODS

Informal estimates.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Improvements are being planned in support of the Quick Trip.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The Pete Hollis Gateway Plan was adopted by City Council in 2006. Staff is continuing to work with several developers who have acquired property in anticipation of beginning development projects.

ENCOURAGE REVITALIZATION OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

Project Description:The purpose of this project is to design and construct streetscape improvements in the Pete Hollis Boulevard/Buncombe Street area. The improvements will be made in support of private development.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Viola Street Tax Increment Fund $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 48: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Streetscapes D-4

OCT 2008 JULY 2014

Project Description:This project includes streetscape improvements for a better pedestrian link between Main Street and the McBee Station project in conjunction with future plans for the Peacock site. Streetscaping will include, but is not limited to, street furniture, pedestrian lighting, new sidewalks, and new curb and gutter.

Development agreements.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Construction is underway on the Peacock and American Roadside Burgers sites.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

This project ties in with the Downtown Master Plan by improving a major side street and helping to expand downtown economic development opportunities beyond Main Street.

Start/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

CONTINUATION

EAST MCBEE AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS

Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A

Project Status: Strategic Goal: PROSPEROUS CITYCREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $686,371 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $686,371Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $761,371 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $761,371TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Property Sales $14,704 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,704Downtown Infrastructure Fund $746,667 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $746,667

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $761,371 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $761,371

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $15,000 $15,750 $16,500 $47,250Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $15,000 $30,750 $47,250 $47,250FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 49: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Streetscapes D-5

FEB 2009 JUN 2016

RHETT/CAMPERDOWN STREET IMPROVEMENTS

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A

REVISION

Project Description:This project involves streetscape improvements of approximately 1,350 feet of Camperdown Way from Main Street to River Street and approximately 2,100 feet of Rhett Street from Camperdown Way to Markley Street. Streetscaping is to include new sidewalks, curb and gutter, asphalt, landscaping, lighting, and street furniture. Improvements to the stormwater and sanitary sewer systems will also take place as part of this project.

The project will be implemented in four phases. Phase 1 is Camperdown Way from Main Street to River Street. Phase 2 is Rhett Street from Camperdown Way to River Street. Phase 3 is Rhett Street from Wardlaw Street to Markley Street. Phase 4 is Rhett Street from River Street to Wardlaw Street. Depending on development projects, streetscaping may extend down a portion of O'Neal, Wardlaw or Markley in order to provide a uniform look and feel.

Phase 1 is to begin after the completion of the power line undergrounding project on Camperdown Way.

PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Engineer's estimate for Phases 1 and 2. Phases 3 and 4 are based on plans previously prepared by an outside consultant.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Phase 1 is under design. Phases 2, 3 and 4 have schematic plans that were prepared by an outside consultant.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

As part of the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan, the purpose of this project is to implement the principle of expanding downtown beyond Main Street. Several projects are planned or have already begun along Camperdown Way and Rhett Street creating the need for safe, walkable, and accessible streets. The streetscape of Camperdown Way will complement the undergrounding of power lines on Camperdown Way.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $133,400 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $143,400Site Acquisition Costs $6,463 $0 $17,500 $0 $0 $0 $23,963Improvements $3,031,601 $150,000 $2,451,500 $0 $0 $0 $5,633,101Equipment $18,654 $0 $26,000 $0 $0 $0 $44,654Management $93,282 $0 $130,000 $0 $0 $0 $223,282

TOTAL PROJECT COST $3,283,400 $150,000 $2,635,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,068,400TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

West End Tax Increment Fund $1,264,396 $2,139,000 $2,635,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,038,396West End TIF Bond - 2013 $1,989,000 -$1,989,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Property Sales $30,004 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,004

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $3,283,400 $150,000 $2,635,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,068,400

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $31,000 $48,050 $65,953 $69,250 $72,713 $286,965Cumulative Operating Impact $31,000 $79,050 $145,003 $214,253 $286,965 $286,965FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 50: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Streetscapes D-6

JULY 2012 JULY 2017

Funding has been included as a placeholder in FY 2015-16 until project plans are complete.

The cost estimates provided for this project are based on the 30% schematic design plans and the cost estimates developed by the Downtown Streetscapes Master Plan consultant. Once the construction documents are completed during the design phase of the project, additional cost estimates will be developed that represent the costs of specific project features.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Phase 1 design and engineering underway.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The Cultural Corridor project has the potential to transform the north end of Main Street similar to the improvements seen in the West End that are a result of various public/private investments such as Falls Park, RiverPlace, West End Streetscape, and Fluor Field. Not only does this project apply several City Council "Strategic Goals", but it also addresses many of the Comprehensive Plan's Principles of walkability, mobility options, encouraging redevelopment, and emphasizing unique cultural characteristics of Greenville. Greenville County and the Heritage Green institutions were thoroughly involved in the planning process. Additionally, there is the potential to leverage County Hospitality Tax funding that Heritage Green is currently working to spend on campus improvements that would support improved connections between the Heritage Green campus and downtown.

Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.):

CONTINUATION

Project Description:The Cultural Corridor is a pedestrian oriented urban trail project between the Heritage Green campus and the Bi-Lo Center along the Beattie Street/College Street corridor. The street will be “road-dieted” from five lanes to four and three lanes and include a multi-purpose urban trail on the north side of the street. There are four phases of the project. Phase 1 will provide design and engineering between Heritage Green and North Main Street. Phase 2 will consist of the project construction from Main Street to Atwood Drive at Heritage Green. Phase 3 will provide design and engineering between the Bi-Lo Center and North Main Street. Phase 4 will consist of the project construction from the Bi-Lo Center to North Main Street.

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

CULTURAL CORRIDOR URBAN TRAIL

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP D

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $200,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,200,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Downtown Infrastructure Fund $200,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,200,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $200,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,200,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $25,159 $25,955 $26,769 $77,883Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $25,159 $51,114 $77,883 $77,883FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 51: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Streetscapes D-7

JULY 2012 JUN 2014

VILLAGE OF WEST GREENVILLE IMPROVEMENTS

Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A

CONTINUATION

Project Description:This project will provide a ready source of funding for streetscape improvement projects associated with private development opportunities for the Art's District.

PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Estimates based on analysis by City Staff that include Public Works, Engineering, Traffic Engineering, and Parks and Grounds.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Project is on-hold.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

An available source of funding for streetscape and façade improvements is needed in order to facilitate and promote private development in the Arts District's Corridor. The redevelopment and sustainability of the Village of West Greenville Arts District is in agreement with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Village has seen the private sector take initiative to improve buildings and landscaping, and to form a business association.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Hospitality Tax Fund $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 52: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Streetscapes D-8

JULY 2012 JULY 2014

AUGUSTA STREET IMPROVEMENTS

Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A

CONTINUATION

Project Description:This project will provide streetscape improvements on Augusta Street, from Lupo Street to Capers Street (approximately 1,200 linear feet). These improvements will be completed following the planned relocation of overhead utility lines and removal of utility poles along this section of the corridor. The project will include the replacement and/or installation of curb and gutter, sidewalks, landscaping, decorative streetlights, furnishings, and amenities. These improvements will result in a safer environment for pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Planned coordination of the utility relocation and streetscape improvements will result in less disturbance to the businesses and residents in the area.

PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Preliminary estimate.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Design work in progress.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

This project supports the Council's commitment to the revitalization of the commercial corridors as well as meets the Strategic Goal of creating a prosperous city. In addition, this project meets the Comprehensive Plan Principles to create safe, walkable spaces and accessible destinations, and encourages redevelopment and infill for commercial corridors.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Capital Projects Fund $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $1,500 $1,545 $1,591 $1,639 $1,688 $7,964Cumulative Operating Impact $1,500 $3,045 $4,636 $6,275 $7,964 $7,964FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 53: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Streetscapes D-9

JULY 2012 JAN 2014

Project Status: Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

CONTINUATION

NORTH MAIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: N/A

PROSPEROUS CITY

The cost estimates provided for this project are based on the 30% schematic design plans and a modified cost estimate developed by the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan consultant. At this time, staff recommends that the City only implement parts of the recommendations from the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan such as landscape islands, furniture, lighting, and specific areas of decorative pavers.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Project is under construction.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) resurfaced this segment of North Main Street in 2011. The City has successfully requested from SCDOT that the restriping of North Main follow the recommendations of these two master plans, which includes a new center left turn lane, bike lanes, on-street parking, and areas for landscaping. Streetscaping will improve the connectivity between downtown Greenville, Stone Avenue, Earle Street, and the North Main neighborhood. It also has the potential to initiate private redevelopment along North Main, especially the block between Park Avenue to Stone Avenue.

ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

Project Description:This project will improve North Main Street from Academy Street to Stone Avenue. This project would fund the engineering design and construction of the new curbing, landscaping, and lighting to complete the design recommendations of the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan and Stone Avenue Master Plan.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $203,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $203,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $228,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $228,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Viola Street Tax Increment Fund $228,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $228,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $228,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $228,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $26,000 $26,780 $27,583 $28,411 $108,774Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $26,000 $52,780 $80,363 $108,774 $108,774FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 54: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Streetscapes D-10

JULY 2012 UNDETERMINED

WASHINGTON STREET IMPROVEMENTS

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A

CONTINUATION

Project Description:Washington Street was identified for improvements in the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan. Out of the projects studied within the plan, Washington Street was ranked as a top priority project due to its relationship to Main Street, potential redevelopment opportunities, proximity to the multi-modal Greenlink Transit Center, and connectivity to several historic downtown neighborhoods. This capital project would expand the streetscaping associated with Project ONE to the other side of Washington to align with Laurens Street and the Greenlink Transfer Center.

PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Public Works estimate.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Project is on hold pending completion of Project ONE.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Washington Street serves as an important gateway to downtown and is geographically centered along Main Street between Beattie Place and Augusta Street. A recommendation of the 2007 Downtown Master Plan, as well as the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan, was to move beyond Main Street. The Washington Street Improvements project would support the goal of encouraging redevelopment beyond Main Street by creating safe, walkable spaces, and accessible destinations.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Downtown Infrastructure Fund $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $25,000 $25,750 $26,523 $27,000 $104,273Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $25,000 $50,750 $77,273 $104,273 $104,273FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 55: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Streetscapes D-11

JULY 2013 JULY 2014

Modified version from the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan (DSMP). The DSMP included all new infrastructure on both sides of Augusta Street, whereas this proposed streetscape project maintains most of the existing sidewalks and curb/gutter.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Augusta Street is an important gateway into downtown and implementing the Augusta Street Streetscape project would encourage redevelopment and infill for this important corridor.

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:Following the recent adoption of the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan, this project would extend streetscaping along both sides of Augusta Street between South Main Street and Dunbar Street. The project would require the shifting of the existing vehicular travel lanes along Augusta Street to accommodate new streetscaping. Improvements would include new sidewalks, lighting, landscaping, and other pedestrian features.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

AUGUSTA STREET STREETSCAPING (BASEBALL STADIUM)

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP C

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $345,000 $0 $0 $0 $345,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $40,000 $345,000 $0 $0 $0 $385,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Admissions Tax Fund $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund $0 $40,000 $95,000 $0 $0 $0 $135,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $40,000 $345,000 $0 $0 $0 $385,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $8,240 $8,487 $8,740 $9,005 $9,275 $43,747Cumulative Operating Impact $8,240 $16,727 $25,467 $34,472 $43,747 $43,747FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 56: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Streetscapes D-12

JULY 2013 DEC 2013

BROAD STREET PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP B

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:This project will install 20 decorative deluxe acorn pedestrian lights along East Broad Street between South Main Street and the Church Street overpass. Proposed light locations fit within existing landscape and sidewalk right-of-way.

SAFE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:

CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENTStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

In-house estimate based on light quantity and existing unit price per Duke light.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Pedestrian lighting improves visibility, encourages pedestrian activity, and thereby creates a safe environment

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $128,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $128,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $128,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $128,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Downtown Infrastructure Fund $0 $128,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $128,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $128,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $128,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $5,000 $5,250 $5,513 $5,788 $6,078 $27,628Cumulative Operating Impact $5,000 $10,250 $15,763 $21,551 $27,628 $27,628FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 57: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Streetscapes D-13

JULY 2013 JULY 2014

DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPES

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP C

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:Funding allows for streetscape and pedestrian improvements on: Coffee St. and E. North St. where the Federal Courthouse Building will be constructed, on E. Washington St., and the Falls Park/Bowater pedestrian way between Japanese Dogwood Lane and the Liberty Bridge.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Modified consultant estimate for Downtown Streetscape Master Plan.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Allows for the completion of streetscape and pedestrian improvements in the downtown area.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $165,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $165,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $165,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $165,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Downtown Infrastructure Fund $0 $165,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $165,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $165,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $165,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $8,440 $8,740 $9,051 $9,372 $9,704 $45,306Cumulative Operating Impact $8,440 $17,180 $26,231 $35,602 $45,306 $45,306FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 58: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Streetscapes D-14

JULY 2013 JUN 2014

Modified consultant estimate from the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Funding this project completes Main St. streetscape improvements between Academy St. and College St.

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:Funding allows for streetscape improvement on N. Main St. between Beattie/College St. and Elford St. consistent with the streetscape between Elford St. and Academy St. on N. Main St.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

NORTH MAIN STREET - LANDMARK BUILDING

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP C

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $119,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $119,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $134,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $134,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Downtown Infrastructure Fund $0 $134,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $134,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $134,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $134,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $2,380 $2,455 $2,530 $2,610 $2,690 $12,665Cumulative Operating Impact $2,380 $4,835 $7,365 $9,975 $12,665 $12,665FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 59: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Streetscapes D-15

JULY 2013 JULY 2015

Downtown Streetscape Master Plan cost estimate.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

A large majority of participants in the Comprehensive Plan supported more trees along our roadway corridors and requested the creation of "safe and walkable spaces and accessible destinations”. Less than half of surveyed respondents felt they could comfortably walk from their home to important destinations. Improved pedestrian infrastructure and landscaping along roadways calms traffic and encourages walking as transportation and recreation. The recently completed Downtown Streetscapes Master Plan identified several streets and intersections that would benefit from simple pedestrian oriented improvements.

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:This project would provide funds for design, engineering, construction documentation, and bid documents for streetscape improvements on North Spring Street and Falls Street between East North Street and East Camperdown Way, to improve the appearance, functionality, and sustainability of this corridor. Examples include tree and shrub plantings, stormwater planters, crosswalks, signage, and minor sidewalk construction. This project is part of the recently adopted Downtown Streetscape Master Plan.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

SPRING/FALLS STREETSCAPE

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP C

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $101,000 $0 $0 $0 $101,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $25,000 $101,000 $0 $0 $0 $126,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Downtown Infrastructure Fund $0 $25,000 $101,000 $0 $0 $0 $126,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $25,000 $101,000 $0 $0 $0 $126,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $5,435 $5,715 $6,045 $6,382 $23,577Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $5,435 $11,150 $17,195 $23,577 $23,577FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 60: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Streetscapes D-16

JULY 2013 JUN 2014

VIOLA STREETSCAPING

Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:Funds will be used make improvements at the Viola Neighborhood entrances including replacing landscape materials at Neal and Wilton Streets and Stone and Ivy Streets. Funding is also requested to replace deteriorated decorative light fixtures in the Viola Neighborhood. Funding will also be used to improve safety at key intersections including installing mast arms at Rutherford Street and W. Stone Avenue and W. Stone Avenue and Townes Street. Funding will also be used to complete streetscape improvements at scattered sites along the Pete Hollis and Buncombe Street Corridors. The scattered sites include Walker Street (off of Rutherford), the right of way in front of the former Hair Spa building and Lloyd Street at Pete Hollis Boulevard.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Cost estimates based on public body estimates provided by Traffic Engineering, Parks and Recreation and Community Development staff.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Cost estimates have been prepared to allow bidding once funding is approved.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Funding for streetscape and other improvements is being requested to support private investment being made along these corridors and in the Viola neighborhood.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $55,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $55,000Equipment $0 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $280,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $280,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Viola Street Tax Increment Fund $0 $280,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $280,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $280,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $280,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 61: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Streetscapes D-17

JULY 2013 JULY 2014

Modified consultant estimate for Downtown Streetscape Master Plan.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Allows for the completion of streetscape improvements between Academy St. and S. Main St. along W. Camperdown St.

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:Funding allows for streetscape improvements on West Camperdown St. between River St. and Academy St., including improved lighting.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

WEST CAMPERDOWN WAY

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: N/A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $24,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $226,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $226,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

West End Tax Increment Fund $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $6,380 $6,694 $7,023 $7,368 $7,730 $35,196Cumulative Operating Impact $6,380 $13,074 $20,097 $27,466 $35,196 $35,196FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 62: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Streetscapes D-18

JULY 2016 JULY 2017

Development agreement.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

This project supports the Council's commitment to the revitalization of the commercial corridors, and it meets the Strategic Goal of creating a prosperous city and the Comprehensive Plan principle to encourage redevelopment and infill for commercial corridors. The planned redevelopment of this site provides an opportunity to leverage funds to improve the public right-of-way adjacent to the site. Coordination is critical to ensuring the streetscape improvements are compatible with the new building placement and site configuration.

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:This project supports public streetscape improvements associated with a commercial development at Augusta Street and West Faris Road. Improvements include, but are not limited to, landscaping and street trees, decorative sidewalks and hardscape, decorative street lighting, site furnishings, and irrigation. These improvements will also complement the proposed relocation of overhead utility lines and poles at this location. Per the development agreement, the City is responsible for reimbursing the developer an amount not to exceed $150,000 for costs associated with the design and construction of the public streetscape improvements, which will be completed in conjunction with the private redevelopment of the site.

PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

AUGUSTA STREET AT FARIS ROAD STREETSCAPE

Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: GROUP A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $150,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $150,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $150,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $150,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,155 $12,155Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,155 $12,155FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 63: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

Wastewater E-1

WASTEWATER

The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program increases the City’s rehabilitation of its wastewater system with projects throughout the City.

Page 64: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Wastewater E-2

Page 65: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Wastewater E-3

JULY 2006 SEP 2013

HAYNIE-SIRRINE WASTEWATER SYSTEM REHABILITATION

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A

REVISION

Project Description:This project will support wastewater system rehabilitation in the Haynie-Sirrine neighborhood to address inadequate capacity and inflow and infiltration issues. This includes flow monitoring, CCTV inspection, surveying, hydraulic modeling, system evaluation, cast in place pipe slip lining, pipe bursting, and open trench line replacement.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:COORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTUREStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Consultant estimate based on the completed sanitary sewer evaluation showing the pipes needing to be repaired and historic unit prices.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Phase 1A construction is underway.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

This improvement will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basin and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this wastewater basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principles of coordinating housing development with infrastructure.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000Site Acquisition Costs $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000Improvements $3,680,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,680,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $4,205,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,205,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Wastewater Fund $409,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $409,000Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2002 $96,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $96,000Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 $1,695,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,695,000State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund $2,005,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,005,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $4,205,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,205,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 66: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Wastewater E-4

OCT 2012 JULY 2013

Construction contract plus contingency.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Construction is underway.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Inadequate wastewater capacity is affecting the ability for development to occur in this area. This provides infrastructure to encourage residential development in the Verdae and Woodruff Road areas.

CONTINUATION

Project Description:This project will increase wastewater capacity in the vicinity of Verdae and Woodruff Road, and includes construction of 2,864 linear feet of 24” sewer, 288 linear feet of 8” sewer and 16 manholes. This will provide adequate capacity for future growth in the surrounding areas. The increased capacity totaled 2,900,000 gallons per day.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:COORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTUREStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

VERDAE SEWER EXPANSION

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $64,830 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $64,830Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $1,101,170 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,101,170Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,166,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,166,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Donations $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000Greenville Local Development Corporation $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000Greenville Water System $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000General Fund $366,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $366,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,166,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,166,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 67: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Wastewater E-5

JULY 2012 JULY 2014

Engineering estimate based on unit pricing of rehabilitation methods.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Engineering is working with legal for contracts with manhole rehabilitation and pipe bursting.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The rehabilitation will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basins and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this sewer basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principle of encouraging water conservation and water quality.

CONTINUATION

Project Description:This project provides for the rehabilitation of the wastewater system in areas identified as having limited capacity and excessive wet weather flows due to excessive inflow and infiltration as identified by ReWa and City flow monitoring. Several basins have been identified as requiring extensive rehabilitation including the Central Business District, Basin 9, and Basin 15. The methods include rehabilitation of approximately 650 manholes, 2,000 linear feet of pipe bursting, and 10,000 linear feet of pipe lining.

This project also includes right-of-way clearing for future rehabilitation and maintenance.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

WASTEWATER SYSTEM REHABILITATION

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $1,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Wastewater Fund $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 68: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Wastewater E-6

JULY 2012 JULY 2017

WASTEWATER SYSTEM SURVEY AND MODEL

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP B

CONTINUATION

Project Description:This project will obtain a survey of the City’s entire wastewater system over a period of five years. The survey will first be obtained for basins 7, 9 and 15, and those areas experiencing significant growth, such as the central business district. This information would be put into a sewer modeling software that will allow staff to accurately know present capacity limitations within the City and quickly determine what upgrades may be required, if any, when new projects are constructed.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:COORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTUREStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Estimate provided by consultant based on total number of manholes in the wastewater system and actual cost of modeling software.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Modeling software has been purchased, running test modeling on existing GIS data for verify correct survey is obtained.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The City has an extensive wastewater system with many areas at capacity based purely on wastewater flows. Currently it takes City staff months to analyze the system for new development as there is no detailed survey data of the sewer system and all the calculations are prepared by hand as the City does not own any modeling software. This program would allow staff to analyze the current condition of the system, assign flows by parcel, and identify current capacity limitations. Also, as new development enters the City in areas that have been surveyed and modeled, City staff could provide accurate flow availability for each parcel in just a few days. In addition to the above, having survey data will reduce the time in which sewer system rehabilitations are completed.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $176,880 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $501,880Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $16,120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,120Management $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $200,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $525,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Wastewater Fund $200,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $525,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $200,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $525,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 69: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Wastewater E-7

JULY 2012 JULY 2015

BASIN 7 SEWER REHABILITATION

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP A

CONTINUATION

Project Description:This project provides for the rehabilitation of Basin 7 to reduce inflow and infiltration, thus increasing available capacity. Based on flow monitoring the majority of this basin has been identified as having excessive inflow and infiltration. The project would include surveying of the wastewater system and modeling the wastewater flows to ensure that capacity is available for future growth. The flow isolation method would be utilized to identify significant sources of inflow and infiltration. The method includes cataloging flow through all of the manholes during dry weather conditions and again during wet weather conditions to pinpoint the sources of increased flow. Once those sources have been identified, the pipe segments will be videoed to determine the ideal method (pipe bursting, pipe lining, or open cut replacements) for rehabilitation. Once the pipe is rehabilitated, the system would be reanalyzed during wet weather events. Once the major sources of inflow and infiltration have been removed the system will be flow monitored to determine the dry and wet weather peaking factor and come into compliance with the 15-year work plan.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Engineering estimate.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Contractor selection for CCTV work and smoke testing of the basin.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The rehabilitation will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basin and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin.

Improving this sewer basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principle of encouraging water conservation and water quality.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $1,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,900,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $250,000 $1,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,150,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Wastewater Fund $250,000 $345,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $595,000Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 $0 $1,555,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,555,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $250,000 $1,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,150,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 70: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Wastewater E-8

JULY 2012 JULY 2015

BASIN 15 SEWER REHABILITATION

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP A

CONTINUATION

Project Description:This supports the rehabilitation of Basin 15 to reduce inflow and infiltration thus increasing available capacity. Based on flow monitoring the majority of this basin has been identified as having excessive inflow and infiltration. The project would include surveying of the wastewater system and modeling the wastewater flows to ensure that capacity is available for future growth. The flow isolation method would be utilized to identify significant sources of inflow and infiltration. The method includes cataloging flow through all of the manholes during dry weather conditions and again during wet weather conditions to pinpoint the sources of increased flow. Once those sources have been identified, the pipe segments will be videoed to determine the ideal method (pipe bursting, pipe lining, or open cut replacements) for rehabilitation. Once the pipe is rehabilitated, the system would be re-analyzed during wet weather events. Once the major sources of inflow and infiltration have been removed the system will be flow monitored to determine the dry and wet weather peaking factor and come into compliance with the 15-year work plan.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Engineering estimate.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Preparing RFP for CCTV and smoke testing throughout the basin.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The rehabilitation will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basin and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this sewer basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principles of encouraging water conservation and water quality.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $250,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Wastewater Fund $250,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $250,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 71: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Wastewater E-9

JULY 2014 JULY 2017

BASIN 16 SEWER REHABILITATION

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP D

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:This supports the rehabilitation of Basin 16 to reduce inflow and infiltration thus increasing available capacity. Based on flow monitoring the majority of this basin has been identified as having excessive inflow and infiltration. The project would include surveying of the wastewater system and modeling the wastewater flows to ensure that capacity is available for future growth. The flow isolation method would be utilized to identify significant sources of inflow and infiltration. The method includes cataloging flow through all of the manholes during dry weather conditions and again during wet weather conditions to pinpoint the sources of increased flow. Once those sources have been identified, the pipe segments will be videoed to determine the ideal method (pipe bursting, pipe lining, or open cut replacements) for rehabilitation. Once the pipe is rehabilitated, the system would be re-analyzed during wet weather events. Once the major sources of inflow and infiltration have been removed the system will be flow monitored to determine the dry and wet weather peaking factor and come into compliance with the 15-year work plan.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Engineering estimate.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The rehabilitation will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basin and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this sewer basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principles of encouraging water conservation and water quality.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $250,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,250,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Wastewater Fund $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2016 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $0 $250,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,250,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 72: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Wastewater E-10

JULY 2014 JULY 2017

BASIN 25 SEWER REHABILITATION

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP C

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:This supports the rehabilitation of Basin 25 to reduce inflow and infiltration thus increasing available capacity. Based on flow monitoring the majority of this basin has been identified as having excessive inflow and infiltration. The project would include surveying of the wastewater system and modeling the wastewater flows to ensure that capacity is available for future growth. The flow isolation method would be utilized to identify significant sources of inflow and infiltration. The method includes cataloging flow through all of the manholes during dry weather conditions and again during wet weather conditions to pinpoint the sources of increased flow. Once those sources have been, identified the pipe segments will be videoed to determine the ideal method (pipe bursting, pipe lining, or open cut replacements) for rehabilitation. Once the pipe is rehabilitated, the system would be re-analyzed during wet weather events. Once the major sources of inflow and infiltration have been removed the system will be flow monitored to determine the dry and wet weather peaking factor and come into compliance with the 15-year work plan.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Engineering estimate.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The rehabilitation will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basin and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this sewer basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principles of encouraging water conservation and water quality.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $250,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,250,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Wastewater Fund $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2016 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $0 $250,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,250,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 73: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

Stormwater F-1

STORMWATER

The Water Quality Monitoring Station provides data that allows for better detection and decision-making regarding necessary stormwater infrastructure investments. As a result, the FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program funds a number of projects that seek to reduce flood losses or improve water quality.

Page 74: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Stormwater F-2

Page 75: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Stormwater F-3

JUN 2007 SEP 2013

Actual design and construction costs with allowing for additional funding as necessary for responding to FEMA comments.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):All six culverts have been constructed. The Letter of Map Revision has been prepared and will be submitted to FEMA once a public meeting is held.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Prior to construct completion, Gower Creek overtopped numerous roadways within Henderson Basin including Cleveland Street Extension, Wembley Road, and two locations on Henderson Road. There are also multiple residential structures that flood along the creek resulting is repetitive flood insurance claims through the National Flood Insurance Program. With this project, all but one roadway crossing has been designed to not overtop during the 100-year storm event. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas.

REVISION

Project Description:This project replaced inadequate culvert crossings at Halidon Road, Parkins Mill Road, Cleveland Street Extension, Wembley Road and two crossings at Henderson Road. Construction was completed in July 2012. The timeline has been adjusted to allow preparation and review time for the FEMA Letter of Map Revision now that construction is complete.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

HENDERSON BASIN

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $170,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $3,359,497 ($1,398,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,961,497Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $3,529,497 ($1,398,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,131,497TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Stormwater Fund $3,468,497 ($1,398,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,070,497Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 $61,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $61,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $3,529,497 ($1,398,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,131,497

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 76: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Stormwater F-4

JULY 2013 JULY 2014

Engineering estimate based on projects of similar size and scope.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Awaiting funding for project commencement.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

This project will reduce flooding in the area, prevent road overtopping, and improve the bank's stability. The Richland Creek tributary, which crosses under Pinehurst Drive, carries flow from approximately 350 acres. The existing culvert has minimal capacity to carry heavy storm flows in the creek and is prone to blockage.

The proposed upgrades will significantly improve the hydraulic capacity at the crossing, reduce regular maintenance, and would benefit private property owners directly upstream from significant reductions in the backwater flood profile. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goals of a sustainable city and a mobile city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas.

REVISION

Project Description:This project will replace an undersized culvert crossing at Pinehurst Drive. Due to upstream development, the existing culvert size became insufficient to handle the increasing stormwater flow. To mitigate this, the project will install a new arch 10' x 5.5' x 80' culvert at Pinehurst Drive.

The Windsor Drive culvert improvement was removed from this scope of work and added to Westview Avenue due to coordination issues.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

PINEHURST CULVERT CROSSING IMPROVEMENT

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $435,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $435,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Stormwater Fund $0 $435,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $435,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $435,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $435,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 77: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Stormwater F-5

JULY 2002 AUG 2013

Consultant estimate adjusted for inflation.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Construction of the Westview Avenue Culvert is complete and the Windsor Drive culvert construction will commence this month.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

This project will reduce flooding in the area, prevent road overtopping, and improve the bank's stability. The Richland Creek tributary, which crosses under Westview Avenue and Windsor Drive, carries flow from approximately 350 acres. The existing culverts have minimal capacity to carry heavy storm flows in the creek and are prone to blockage.

The proposed upgrades will significantly improve the hydraulic capacity at the crossing, reduce regular maintenance, and will benefit private property owners directly upstream from significant reductions in the backwater flood profile. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goals of a sustainable city and a mobile city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas.

REVISION

Project Description:This project will replace undersized culvert crossings at Westview Avenue and Windsor Drive. Due to upstream development, the existing culvert size became insufficient to handle the increasing stormwater flow. To mitigate this, the project will install new arched culverts at each of the crossings.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

WESTVIEW/WINDSOR CROSSINGS

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $3,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $711,071 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $711,071Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $29,554 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $29,554

TOTAL PROJECT COST $743,825 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $743,825TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Stormwater Fund $740,680 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $740,680Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 $3,145 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,145

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $743,825 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $743,825

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 78: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Stormwater F-6

JULY 2011 SEP 2013

Informal engineering estimate adjusted for inflation in future years.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Project in design.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

This project is located in a historic district that abuts Cleveland Park and Richland Creek. The Pettigru District has been developed into a light business district, and associated business parking has caused a concentration of stormwater runoff that channels through the project area. The additional stormwater flow from this area into Cleveland Park and Richland Creek has caused significant erosion problems. In order to affect a permanent solution to the above issues, the existing infrastructure needs to be upgraded to efficiently manage the runoff. Additionally, the exfiltration of sanitary sewer from the existing pipe system has the high potential to migrate down gradient into the freshwater creek creating a water quality issue that should be addressed as part of this initiative. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to encourage water conservation and water quality.

REVISION

Project Description:This project upgrades stormwater infrastructure in Pettigru Street at the intersection of Whitsett Street. The project includes the re-routing of existing stormwater pipe and the installation of a stable drainage channel through the adjacent City park. Also included in the project is the repair and/or replacement of sanitary sewer line in the project area and erosion repair within the park due to insufficient stormwater capacity.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

PETTIGRU STREET IMPROVEMENTS

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $16,713 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,713Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $379,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $379,250Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $395,963 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $395,963TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Stormwater Fund $395,963 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $395,963TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $395,963 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $395,963

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 79: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Stormwater F-7

JAN 2011 AUG 2013

FAIRFOREST WAY BASIN

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A

CONTINUATION

Project Description:This project involves performing a detailed watershed analysis and floodplain mapping for the Fairforest Way Basin. This involves, but is not limited to, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, regional detention, and erosion problem areas.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Engineering estimate based on similar projects.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):The hydraulic and hydrologic analyses were sent to FEMA for incorporation into their Map Modernization process. The City is awaiting comments from FEMA. The consultant is in the process of preparing the watershed study for the City's records.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

As a regulated stormwater system and as stipulated in the City's Stormwater Management Plan, the City is required to perform a detailed watershed analysis and floodplain mapping for all of the stormwater basins within the City. The Stormwater Management Plan is a requirement of the City's NPDES General Permit through SCDHEC. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to encourage water conservation and water quality.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Stormwater Fund $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 80: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Stormwater F-8

JAN 2011 JAN 2014

WHITE OAK BASIN PHASE II

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP A

REVISION

Project Description:This project involves performing a detailed watershed analysis and floodplain mapping for the White Oak Basin. This includes but is not limited to, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, and identifying erosion problem areas. Regional detention and storm piping will be utilized to decrease flooding on Campbell Street, Karen Drive, and the surrounding areas.

As a result of neighborhood meetings, additional flooding has been identified that creates the need for culvert upgrades on Corrine Drive and Twinbrook Drive.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Engineering estimate based on similar projects.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):The watershed study is complete and was submitted to FEMA for incorporation into their Map Modernization process. The consultant for the design of the improvements will have been selected with anticipated construction second quarter of 2013.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

As a regulated stormwater system and as stipulated in the City's Stormwater Management Plan, the City is required to perform a detailed watershed analysis and floodplain mapping for all of the stormwater basins within the City. There were three culvert crossings replaced in White Oak Basin within the last few years which reduced a significant amount of area flooding. This project paved the way for moving upstream and fixing the flooding that is occurring at Twinbrook Drive, Campbell Street, Corrine Drive, and Karen Drive.

This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to encourage water conservation and water quality.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000Site Acquisition Costs $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000Improvements $620,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,620,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,195,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,195,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Stormwater Fund $1,195,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,195,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,195,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,195,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 81: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Stormwater F-9

JULY 2011 DEC 2014

Engineering estimate based on road linear footage and sanitary sewer linear footage.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Shelburne Road is under construction and the three remaining roadways are in design.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The residents along Shelburne, Carolina Avenue, Don Drive, and Charlbury Street experience localized flooding during storm events. The current roads do not have curb and gutter or a sufficient storm drainage system. The majority of the stormwater runoff travels down the properties causing erosion and flooding.

This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas.

CONTINUATION

Project Description:Installation of storm drainage system, curb and gutter along Shelburne, Carolina Avenue, Don Drive and Charlbury Street. The roadways will be resurfaced and the sewer pipes rehabilitated as well with this project. This project was identified based on numerous citizen complaints.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

GOWER ESTATES STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $1,845,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,845,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,890,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,890,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Stormwater Fund $1,659,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,659,000Wastewater Fund $231,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $231,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,890,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,890,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 82: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Stormwater F-10

JULY 2012 DEC 2013

Consultant estimate adjusted for inflation.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Project in design.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The residents along Swanson Court experience localized flooding during storm events. The current road does not have curb and gutter and has an undersized storm drainage system. The majority of the stormwater runoff does not enter the existing undersized storm drainage due to no curb and travels down the properties causing erosion and flooding. This project was originally part of the East Monte Claire rehabilitation that was performed internally but was not completed due to lack of funding.

This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas.

CONTINUATION

Project Description:Installation of storm drainage system, curb, and gutter along Swanson Court. The roadway will be resurfaced and sewer rehabilitated as well with this project. The plans were prepared in 2007, and will need to be reviewed and possibly modified to ensure that they match current site conditions.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

SWANSON COURT

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $274,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $274,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $284,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $284,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Stormwater Fund $263,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $263,000Wastewater Fund $21,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $21,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $284,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $284,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 83: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Stormwater F-11

JULY 2013 DEC 2015

Engineering estimate.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Request for Proposal being written for design.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

This project will increase the quality of the water in Richland Creek and the Reedy River. Richland Creek is fully urbanized and based on the current stormwater ordinance most redeveloped sites are not required to provide water quality or quantity improvements. The goal will be to reduce fecal coliform, phosphorus, and nitrogen. This project is in line with the goal of reducing nutrients to try and meet the total maximum daily loads that are stipulated by SCDHEC for various nutrients.

This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to encourage water conservation and water quality.

CONTINUATION

Project Description:Identify areas along Richland Creek that could be used to provide regional water quality. Design and construction of the regional water quality retrofits such as turning traditional detention basins into bioretention, providing rain barrels/cisterns to key neighborhoods, adding vegetative filter strips or like to existing parking lots, and adding storage between discharge points and the creek.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

RICHLAND CREEK WATER QUALITY MASTER PLAN

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP B

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000Improvements $0 $0 $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $850,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $150,000 $300,000 $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Stormwater Fund $150,000 $300,000 $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $150,000 $300,000 $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 84: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Stormwater F-12

JULY 2012 SEP 2013

It should also be noted that given the upstream watershed characteristics, the water quality unit will not only serve the PWC but a large offsite portion of the City, further extending its benefit to the City as a whole. Moreover, the final selection of the specific type water quality unit will be selected by considering functionality, product cost, ease of installation and maintenance, and potential for removal and reuse at the future PWC if so desired. Several commercially available water quality units have the potential to be relocated if it is determined prudent to do so.

Detailed preliminary engineering estimate.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2012):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

At present, the Fleet Services facility at the Public Works Complex (PWC) is under a federal spill mitigation/prevention permit and a state industrial stormwater discharge permit. The water quality requirements of these mandates require a high degree of effort to ensure pollutants like vehicle and equipment fluids, as well as debris from City operations does not enter the Reedy River. The water quality unit will ensure environmental compliance preventing sediment, oil, and debris from entering the river. With the Reedy River serving the City's tourism and quality of life initiatives immediately downstream, it is incumbent on the City to immediately initiate this water quality preservation effort.

Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.):

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates:

This project will include the design, purchase, and installation of a water quality unit at Public Works for the primary outfalls in order to ensure environmental permitting compliance by preventing sediment, oil, and debris from entering the Reedy River.

Comp. Plan Principle:

PUBLIC WORKS COMPLEX WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP B

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $8,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $86,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $86,000Equipment $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000Management $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $116,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $116,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Stormwater Fund $116,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $116,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $116,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $116,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $2,700 $3,075 $3,152 $3,231 $3,311 $15,469Cumulative Operating Impact $2,700 $5,775 $8,927 $12,158 $15,469 $15,469FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 85: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Stormwater F-13

JULY 2013 JULY 2015

Engineering estimate based on known scope of work to date. Additional funding may be requested next fiscal year once the design is complete.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

This project was identified based on numerous citizen complaints and regular maintenance required by operations. The existing stormwater system is substandard and causes road and property flooding.

The upgrades will reduce flooding, reduce maintenance, and would benefit those property owners adjacent to the improvements. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goals of a sustainable city and a mobile city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas.

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:This project will identify storm drainage improvements in the North Hills area, roughly bound by Russell Avenue to the west, Richland Creek to the north, Bennett Street the east, and Garraux Street to the south. The scope of work relative to construction is anticipated to include a culvert replacement on Bennett Street due to the age of the existing culvert and connectivity to upstream storm drainage, and curb, gutter, and storm drainage along Bennett Street, Russell Avenue, McDonald Street, and Garraux Street.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

NORTH HILLS AREA STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP C

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $100,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Stormwater Fund $0 $100,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $100,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 86: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Stormwater F-14

JULY 2015 JUN 2016

ALDRIDGE/LACEY DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP C

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:This project provides for the installation of a storm drainage system, curb, and gutter along Aldridge Drive and Lacey Avenue. Both Streets are located within Gower Estates. The roadways will be resurfaced and the sewer pipes will be rehabilitated as well with this project. This project was identified based on numerous citizen complaints.

CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODSProject Status: Strategic Goal:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Engineering estimate based on a combination of road linear footage, GIS data, and recent projects were used to develop a preliminary cost estimate to construct the project.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Collection of survey data will begin so design of these streets can start soon after the survey data is received.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The residents along Aldridge Drive and Lacey Avenue have experience localized flooding during storm events. Currently only a short section of Aldridge Drive has curb and gutter. The remainder of the current streets do not have curb and gutter, or a sufficient storm drainage system. The majority of the stormwater runoff travels down the properties causing erosion and flooding.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $15,500 $0 $0 $15,500Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $374,500 $0 $0 $374,500Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $35,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $425,000 $0 $0 $425,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Stormwater Fund $0 $0 $0 $425,000 $0 $0 $425,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $0 $0 $425,000 $0 $0 $425,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 87: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Stormwater F-15

JULY 2014 JULY 2016

Engineering estimate based on Greenville County Tax Assessment and previous culvert projects.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Presently, Richland Creek overtops Hilly Street and water backs up at this location causing regular structure flooding and causing the road to become impassable.

This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas.

REVISION

Project Description:This project will replace an inadequate culvert crossing on Hilly Street at Richland Creek and purchase up to two adjacent properties.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:

ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

HILLY STREET DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP C

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $50,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $250,000Improvements $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $400,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $0 $0 $700,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Stormwater Fund $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $0 $0 $700,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $0 $0 $700,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 88: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Stormwater F-16

Page 89: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

Parks & Recreation G-1

PARKS & RECREATION

The City recently rebuilt numerous park restrooms to improve the quality of them to that of the rest of the park facilities. The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program continues to fund improvements of other park restrooms.

Page 90: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-2

Page 91: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-3

JULY 2006 SEP 2013

COMMUNITY CENTER BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: N/A

CONTINUATION

Project Description:Funding provides for improvements to the David Hellams Community Center.

CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODSProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Design and estimate work completed by consulting architects.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Construction documents being developed.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The David Hellams Community Center is 30+ years old and in need of mechanical, electrical, ADA and internal and external improvements that have been deferred for several years.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $1,390,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,390,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,390,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,390,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Property Sales $467,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $467,500Capital Projects Fund $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000General Fund $750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $750,000General Obligation Bond - 2003 $72,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $72,500

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,390,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,390,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 92: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-4

DEC 2006 MAR 2017

MAIN STREET TREE REHABILITATION

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP B

CONTINUATION

Project Description:This project will rehabilitate the 30-year-old tree plantings along Main Street to extend their life and improve sidewalk conditions. It is necessary for the department to expand the scope of the project to include South Main Street to the intersection of Pendleton Street. The decision to include South Main Street was based on site meetings with the City's contracted arborist. Annual project decisions are based on the formal graded condition of the trees and are done in coordination with other City construction projects. This project is entering the fifth year of a ten-year program to replace the declining maples and provide additional root zone space to the oaks. Sidewalks are also replaced where tree roots have caused heaving in the pavement. Replacement of some oaks will also be planned over the next five years.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:

ENCOURAGE SUSTAINABLE GROWTHStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Consultant's estimate.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Phase I, II, III, IV, V and VI have been completed. Phase VII will begin in January 2013.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The Main Street trees are a character-defining feature of Greenville. This project also supports a positive business environment for downtown Greenville.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $938,168 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $0 $1,538,168Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $938,168 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $0 $1,538,168TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2002 $11,870 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,870CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2003 $14,313 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,313Downtown Infrastructure Fund $911,985 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $0 $1,511,985

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $938,168 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $0 $1,538,168

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 93: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-5

JULY 2007 DEC 2013

CLEVELAND PARK REPAIRS AND NEIGHBORHOOD ACCESS

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: N/A

CONTINUATION

Project Description:The project will improve pedestrian access to and from Cleveland Park with surrounding neighborhoods and will make numerous improvements throughout the park.

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONCREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENS

Project Status: Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

In-house estimate based on previous contracted work.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Improvements to the Cleveland Park Center are pending.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Improvements at Cleveland Park were the top priority from the 2006-2011 Parks Master Plan.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $850,818 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $850,818Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $850,818 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $850,818TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Hospitality Tax Fund $655,766 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $655,766State Grants $65,464 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,464Property Sales $10,396 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,396Capital Projects Fund $119,192 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $119,192

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $850,818 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $850,818

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 94: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-6

JULY 2013 JUN 2015

REEDY RIVER TRAIL EXPANSION

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP C

CONTINUATION

Project Description:This project will build an extension of the Swamp Rabbit Trail from the intersection of South Pleasantburg Drive and Cleveland Street to Mauldin Road where it will connect with the GCRD/Lake Conestee section of the trail completing the Swamp Rabbit Trail between Lake Conestee and Travelers Rest. Funding will also be used to make improvements to land adjacent to the trail to satisfy property owners granting easements to the City. The exact route is to be determined through a public design process funded in the current CIP budget.

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Contractor estimates.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Staff has worked with consultants and the South Trail Committee to determine the best route option and has been meeting with staff from the Greenville Country Club to determine their support for the trail passing through and along the edge of the golf course.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

This project is part of the Trails & Greenways Master Plan adopted by City Council in January 2008, and is the next expansion segment of the Swamp Rabbit Trail to the south and is critical to the overall regional trails plan. The Greenville County Recreation District and the Conestee Foundation are currently working to construct the trail north from the lake to Mauldin Road. The City completed construction of the trail south, along Cleveland Street to South Pleasantburg Road in 2012.

Additionally, this project will significantly increase the number of residential units within a quarter mile of a trail or greenway. The trail also promotes the protection of air quality, advances public health and provides for a well maintained infrastructure.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000Site Acquisition Costs $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000Improvements $3,315,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,315,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $3,615,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,615,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Hospitality Tax Fund $325,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $325,000Hospitality Tax Bond - 2011 $675,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $675,000State Grants $240,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $240,000Hospitality Tax Bond - 2014 $2,375,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,375,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $3,615,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,615,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $169,683 $79,190 $83,149 $87,307 $91,672 $511,000Cumulative Operating Impact $169,683 $248,873 $332,022 $419,328 $511,000 $511,000FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 95: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-7

JULY 2010 JUN 2016

Consultant's estimate.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Holmes and McPherson Parks are complete and Cleveland Park restroom is scheduled for construction FY 2012-13. Gower design is complete.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The current restroom facilities in the City's parks are in desperate need of upgrades. While the City's parks are well above national standards, the restroom facilities are not. By rebuilding the restrooms and upgrading the facilities, the City can provide quality restroom facilities to its citizens. Upgrading the existing facilities will allow the City to conserve water and electricity and meet ADA standards; while also offering an attractive architectural look. The Five Year Parks and Facilities Master Plan FY 2006-2011 recommends that the City upgrade architectural design of park structures (4.10.1).

CONTINUATION

Project Description:The project will improve the restroom facilities at the following parks: Cleveland, Holmes, and McPherson. The restrooms will be rebuilt to meet ADA standards, become environmentally friendly, and to look architecturally appealing.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

PARK RESTROOMS

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP B

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $536,479 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $536,479Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $551,479 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $551,479TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Capital Projects Fund $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $180,000Downtown Infrastructure Fund $153,479 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $153,479Hospitality Tax Fund $218,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $218,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $551,479 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $551,479

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 96: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-8

JULY 2010 DEC 2013

RIVER STREET UNDERPASS

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP B

REVISION

Project Description:Part 1 of this project will implement a Falls Park Bypass Bike Route to divert bicyclists around RiverPlace and Falls Park. From Reedy View Drive, the Falls Park Bypass Bike Route will direct bicyclists north on River Street, east on Broad Street, south on Falls Street, east on Camperdown Way, south on Cleveland Street, east on Ridgeland Way, and then reconnecting with the Swamp Rabbit Trail at the Major Rudolf Anderson, Jr. Memorial. Part 2 of this project will build an underpass trail along Linky Stone Park and beneath the River Street bridge to provide safe pedestrian access between RiverPlace and the CSX section of the Swamp Rabbit Trail.

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

90% Construction Documents from design consultants.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):100% construction documents have been completed.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Frequent trail counts indicate thousands of daily trail users along this section of the Swamp Rabbit Trail. Not only does staff receive frequent complaints from the public regarding the safety and difficulty crossing River Street at this location, but several documented accidents have occurred in recent years. The Falls Park Bypass Bike Route project will solve user conflicts between bicyclists and park users. The interactive fountain at RiverPlace successfully attracts families and children, but the design of the space in not suitable for the various user groups, especially bicyclists.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $250,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $265,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $615,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Hospitality Tax Fund $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000Downtown Infrastructure Fund $265,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $265,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $265,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $615,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $3,000 $3,150 $3,308 $3,473 $3,647 $16,577Cumulative Operating Impact $3,000 $6,150 $9,458 $12,930 $16,577 $16,577FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 97: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-9

MAR 2001 NOV 2013

HERITAGE GREEN MASTER PLAN

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: N/A

CONTINUATION

Project Description:Greenville County has provided $1,508,000 to develop a unified campus plan for Heritage Green and to construct recommended improvements. The City is serving as the project manager, working with the institutions and consultant to complete plan development.

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:

EMPHASIZE UNIQUE COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Consultant estimates.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Phase 1 construction documents being developed.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The Heritage Green Master Plan project meets many of the Comprehensive Plan's Principles including: walkability, mobility options, encouraging redevelopment, and emphasizing unique cultural characteristics of Greenville.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $1,208,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,208,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,508,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,508,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Greenville County $1,508,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,508,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,508,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,508,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 98: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-10

JULY 2011 JULY 2014

Project Status: Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

CONTINUATION

CLEVELAND PARK BANK STABILIZATION

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP B

SUSTAINABLE CITY

Engineering estimate based on the linear footage of improvements and cost of similar projects.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Phase III is in design.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

There has been a significant amount of erosion to the banks of the Reedy River due to flooding. The areas that have been eroded need to be stabilized to prevent further erosion. The sediment that enters the water during the erosion process reduces the quality of the City's waterways adding undesirable nutrients to the water and increasing the level of turbidity. Beyond that, it presents a safety issue due to the proximity of the trails to the banks of the Reedy River.

ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY

Project Description:This project will stabilize the banks of the Reedy River and unnamed tributaries to the Reedy River within Cleveland Park. The improvements are near Woodland Way, Cleveland Park Drive, Lakehurst Street, Richland Way, and Ridgeland Drive. This project is similar to the Reedy River Bank Stabilization in Cleveland Park near McDaniel Avenue.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $650,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Stormwater Fund $650,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $650,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 99: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-11

JULY 2012 JUN 2014

Consultant's estimate.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Bridge assessment is complete.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The restoration of the bridges is critical to the use of the trail in McPherson Park.

CONTINUATION

Project Description:There are five pedestrian bridges in McPherson Park that are beginning to deteriorate. A plan for rehabilitation will be developed to include: a structural inspection, design for repair, design for restoring architectural features, and improving safety. Once the plan is complete it will be implemented to restore the bridges.

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

MCPHERSON PARK BRIDGE REHABILITATION

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $15,000 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Downtown Infrastructure Fund $15,000 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $15,000 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 100: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-12

JULY 2011 JUN 2014

City funds will be a small percentage of funds used to design and build the Cancer Survivors Garden between Church Street and Cleveland Street on the Swamp Rabbit Trail.

Estimates provided by the City's consulting engineers.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Design being coordinated with the Cancer Survivor Park project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

This project is on the Swamp Rabbit Trail, the spine of the City and County greenway trail network. Currently, the Swamp Rabbit Trail has an average of 1,200 users a day in the county or over 400,000 users a year. That number will likely double within in the City as the trail expand. This project will help improve the safety and access for trail users.

Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.):

CONTINUATION

Project Description:This project provides for the establishment of a trail head on Cleveland Street adjacent to the Chamber of Commerce building and the replacement of the narrow, metal grate bridge that is between Falls Park and Cleveland Park (between Church Street and Cleveland Street). This bridge is currently less than 6 feet wide, making it a bottleneck on the trail system. The bridge is also slippery and unsafe. Both project elements will be coordinated with private fund raising efforts and construction of the new Cancer Survivors Park.

MOBILE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

CANCER SURVIVORS PARK

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP B

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $94,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $94,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $630,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $630,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $94,000 $630,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $724,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Hospitality Tax Fund $94,000 $630,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $724,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $94,000 $630,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $724,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $63,000 $66,150 $69,458 $72,930 $271,538Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $63,000 $129,150 $198,608 $271,538 $271,538FTEs Added 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 101: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-13

JULY 2012 JUN 2014

NEXT TRAIL CONNECTOR

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP B

CONTINUATION

Project Description:This project would construct a trail from Church Street to the Swamp Rabbit Trail, adjacent to the NEXT Innovation Center.

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:PROVIDE LINKAGES BETWEEN ALL TRANSPORTATION OPTIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Consultant's estimate.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This project is in the design phase.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

With the Church Street rehabilitation nearing completion, there is an opportunity to connect the trail to the NEXT building, the adjacent neighborhood, Church Street, and higher density projects like the Brio. This project will support the goals and objectives of the Haynie-Sirrine Master Plan to provide better bike and pedestrian access for the area. The Swamp Rabbit Trail is one of the most popular recreational attractions in Greenville and this link will provide access to additional users. This section of the trail will also complement the future Cancer Survivors Park.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $606,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $606,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $75,000 $606,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $681,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Hospitality Tax Fund $75,000 $606,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $681,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $75,000 $606,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $681,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 102: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-14

JULY 2012 JAN 2014

Consultant estimates.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Construction documents being developed.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Improvements to the south portion of Falls Park will complete improvements to Falls Park and meet the Comprehensive Plan Strategy to Improve the Quality of Life for Greenville residents through the creation of safe, walkable and accessible destinations and creating healthy environments for all Greenville residents. The project also provides a unique opportunity to partner with non-profit organizations and private residents to complete a meaningful project.

CONTINUATION

Project Description:This project will fund improvements in the ravine and Furman Drive areas of Falls Park Located between the Carolina First Stage, the Furman Drive Bridge, the park entrance near University Drive Governor's School, and the City owned parking lot behind the West End Market. Improvements have been designed by a Falls Park Committee established to recommend improvements in the described area of the park. Funding of the design has been provided by private sources through the Community Foundation of Greenville.

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

FALLS PARK IMPROVEMENTS

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: N/A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $48,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,900Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $659,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $659,100Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $708,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $708,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

State Grants $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000Hospitality Tax Fund $608,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $608,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $708,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $708,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 103: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-15

JAN 2013 DEC 2013

Grant agreement values.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Project nearing completion.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

This project supports the Haywood Road Master Plan and several comprehensive plan principals to revitalize existing commercial corridors.

CONTINUATION

Project Description:This project will landscape the interchange on I-385 at Haywood Road. This will provide for a more formal entry into the Haywood Road corridor and supports revitalization in that area.

PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

HAYWOOD AT I-385 INTERCHANGE LANDSCAPING

Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $332,320 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $332,320Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $332,320 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $332,320TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

State Grants $265,856 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $265,856Capital Projects Fund $66,464 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $66,464

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $332,320 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $332,320

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 104: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-16

JUN 2013 JULY 2014

Estimate based on cost of comparable projects.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The Parks and Recreation Open Space Plan recommends the expansion of Cleveland Park in the horse stable area when possible. The unexpected donation of this property allows for the expansion of Cleveland Park.

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:Funding will to begin redeveloping the Cleveland Park horse stable property that was donated to the City in 2012. Project includes demolition of existing structure.

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

CLEVELAND PARK HORSE STABLES

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP C

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Stormwater Fund $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 105: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-17

JULY 2013 JUN 2014

In-house estimate and preliminary planning.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The City’s only dog park is located on a small ½ acre parcel in Cleveland Park. The dog park patrons routinely exceed capacity of the facility. The location of the dog park is not popular with adjacent residents and we receive complaints routinely due to excessive noise and illegal parking.

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:Funding will be used as a placeholder to find a new site for a dog park in the City limits. This includes possibly assisting the Humane Society with the construction of a dog park at their facility at 305 Airport Road near the downtown Greenville airport or an alternate site.

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:

EMPHASIZE UNIQUE COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

GREENVILLE DOG PARKS

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP C

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

General Fund $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 106: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-18

JULY 2013 MAR 2014

Estimates from Greenville Tech.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Project provides much needed trail head locations along the popular Swamp Rabbit Trail in a partnership with Greenville Tech and eliminates the need for the City to acquire additional land to support trail head construction.

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:This project provides placeholder funding for the development of a trailhead on the Greenville Tech Campus off of Cleveland Street where the City recently completed the expansion of the Swamp Rabbit Trail.

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

GREENVILLE TECH TRAILHEAD

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP C

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Hospitality Tax Fund $0 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 107: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-19

JULY 2013 DEC 2013

HUDSON STREET TRAILHEAD

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP C

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:This project is for a 55-car parking lot and trailhead facility at the City-owned property at 320 South Hudson Street. In 2012, the Parks and Recreation Department oversaw the demolition of the existing Brooks Building at this property. The existing informal trailhead across Reedy View Drive from Linky Stone Children's Garden is scheduled to be closed in FY 2012-13 and this proposed trailhead on Hudson Street will support the thousands of daily trail users that frequent the Swamp Rabbit Trail. In addition to the proposed trailhead parking vehicles, it will also support Low Impact Development best practices to protect water quality as well as fully comply with the City's Landscape Ordinance requirements. The trailhead will feature pervious paving materials, decorative lighting, trail kiosk, signage, benches, bike racks, bike work stand, and new sidewalks along Hudson Street.

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

100% Engineering design by consultant.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The addition of a formally designated trailhead for the Swamp Rabbit Trail will continue to encourage the use of the trail for both recreation as well as transportation and thereby create safe, walkable spaces, and accessible destinations.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Hospitality Tax Fund $0 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $13,300 $13,787 $14,293 $14,819 $56,199Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $13,300 $27,087 $41,380 $56,199 $56,199FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 108: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-20

JULY 2013 JUN 2014

Contractor estimates.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The Swamp Rabbit Trail is a heavily used recreation and transportation network within the City and must be improved to meet the expectations of users and the City.

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:Funding allows for the replacement of the rubber surfacing with asphalt paving along the Hincapie Path section of the Swamp Rabbit Trail, between Woodland Way and Faris Road. The rubber surface needs to be replaced since it has lifted away from the adjacent asphalt surface due to flooding from the Reedy River. The lifting of the rubber surface has created areas that are unsafe and have been closed.

CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

SWAMP RABBIT TRAIL RUBBER SURFACE REPLACEMENT

Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $145,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $145,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $145,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $145,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Hospitality Tax Fund $0 $145,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $145,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $145,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $145,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 109: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-21

JULY 2013 JUN 2014

VIOLA CENTER AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS

Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:Funds will be used make improvements to the Viola Center including roof replacement, restroom and kitchen renovations, front porch replacement and parking pad extension. The landscpaing around the center will also be updated and sidewalks will be installed infront of center. Funding will also be used to improve the Thompson Gardner Park and Playground including clearing and creating a terraced landscape in the wooded area of the park and replacing playground equipment, ground covering and signage.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Cost estimates based on estimates provided by Parks and Recreation and Community Development staff.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Work write-ups and cost estimates have been prepared to allow us to bid project once funding is approved.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The Viola Neighborhood Revitalization was a 15-year endeavor that included the acquisition and renovation of a former duplex residential unit to provide a center for community meetings and gatherings. The renovation was completed in 1999. Although initial renovations were well-done, ongoing use of the facility requires that improvements be completed. The Thompson Gardner park and playground was completed in 2002. More families with young children have purchased homes in the Viola Neighborhood and the playground equipment has seen an increase in use. The replacement of the playground equipment will ensure that families continue to utilize the area for picnics, family outings, and recreation space for children and young people.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $120,050 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,050Equipment $0 $25,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,950Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $146,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $146,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Viola Street Tax Increment Fund $0 $146,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $146,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $146,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $146,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 110: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parks & Recreation G-22

Page 111: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

Economic Development H-1

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Continued investments in economic development broaden the tax base and make the City appealing for new businesses. The Peace Center’s recent renovation has led to a significant increase in the number of ticket sales and therefore visitors to the community. The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program supports economic development efforts in both downtown and the commercial corridors.

Page 112: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Economic Development H-2

Page 113: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Economic Development H-3

SEP 2011 DEC 2013

Cost based on contract values.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Construction on Project ONE is underway with the Piazza's reconstruction to follow shortly thereafter. Project is under construction with elevator and wastewater line improvements underway.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The improvements are intended to ensure that Piazza Bergamo reaches its full potential for public use through good urban design. A new plan will help the space to flow more effectively for visitors and patrons to area businesses. It has been many years since it was constructed and is functionally obsolete in its current state. Improvements will make the space more comfortable with amenities such as shade trees and new seating options. It will become a new destination for downtown and will function better for events as well.

CONTINUATION

Project Description:This project revitalizes the Piazza Bergamo area which will facilitate the plaza's use by the general public and tenants of abutting buildings, customers, and clients. The project will be an important enhancement to North Main Street and will reposition this area in conjunction with new development.

PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:

MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

PIAZZA BERGAMO

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $5,910,650 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,910,650Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $5,910,650 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,910,650TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Downtown Infrastructure Fund $5,310,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,310,000Greenville Water System $228,650 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $228,650Piedmont Natural Gas Grant $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000Property Sales $342,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $342,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $5,910,650 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,910,650

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $50,000 $51,500 $53,045 $54,636 $55,729 $264,910Cumulative Operating Impact $50,000 $101,500 $154,545 $209,181 $264,910 $264,910FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 114: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Economic Development H-4

JULY 2012 JULY 2013 MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

TD CONVENTION CENTER KITCHEN RETROFIT

Department: MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Ranking: N/A

CONTINUATION PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:

Project Description:The food and beverage operation remains the primary revenue generator for the TD Convention Center. Most major equipment dates to the opening of the conference center in 1993. Some equipment replacement has been achieved through annual operting budgets, but there has been no major infusion of capital dollars into the kitchen since the City took ownership over ten years ago. The proposal submitted for consideration would replace and expand deteriorating cold storage areas, replace existing flooring, and replace aged cooking equipment.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The project would provide needed infrastructure support to a prime revenue source.

Current vendor pricing.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Work is nearly complete.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000Equipment $195,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $195,000Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Hospitality Tax Bond - 2011 $115,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $115,000Hospitality Tax Fund $110,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $110,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 115: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Economic Development H-5

JULY 2009 JULY 2015

Informal estimate based on future development plans and opportunities, as well as funding needs from previous years.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Projects funded to date: Wade Hampton Boulevard Streetscape Plan; decorative streetlights, tree plantings and landscaped medians along Wade Hampton Boulevard; Augusta Road Fire Station streetscape improvements; Augusta and McDaniel mast arm traffic signal; Augusta Road Master Plan (Blythe to I-85); abandoned driveway closures on Augusta; pedestrian plaza at Augusta and Blythe; Lois Street bridge/trellis painting; Haywood Road at I-385 interchange improvements; design work for various streetscape projects; and the Facade Improvement Program.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

An available source of funding for streetscape improvements is needed in order to faciliate and promote private development along the commercial corridors. This project supports the Council's commitment to the revitalization of the commercial corridors while meeting the Strategic Goal of creating a prosperous city and the Comprehensive Plan Principle to encourage redevelopment and infill for commercial corridors.

CONTINUATION

Project Description:This project will provide a ready source of funding for streetscape improvement projects associated with private development opportunities along the commercial corridors (i.e. Augusta Road, Haywood Road, Laurens Road, Pleasantburg Drive, and Wade Hampton Boulevard). Improvements may include, but are not limited to: installation of new landscaping, sidewalks, curbs and gutters; removal and replacement of existing deteriorated sidewalks, curbs and gutters; and the purchase and installation of street furniture, signage, decorative lighting, and pedestrian signals. Expenditures will be evaluated and approved on the basis of need and anticipated return on investment.

PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS

Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: GROUP B

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $574,873 $300,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $1,274,873Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $574,873 $300,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $1,274,873TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Capital Projects Fund $453,556 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $453,556State Revenue $16,960 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,960General Fund $0 $300,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $700,000Greenville County $34,357 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $34,357Property Sales $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $574,873 $300,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $1,274,873

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 116: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Economic Development H-6

JULY 2010 JULY 2013Start/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

PENDING CLOSE-OUT

WEST END PROPERTY ACQUISITION

Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A

Project Status: Strategic Goal: PROSPEROUS CITY

ENCOURAGE SUSTAINABLE GROWTH

Project Description:This project was set up to support the purchase of three parcels in the West End for the purpose of stimulating private development. The project will now be closed and the project balances will be directed to other projects in the West End.

Estimate of fair market value of the property. A property appraiser would be retained for a more accurate cost.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):On hold.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Project is being closed.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $2,500,000 ($2,500,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,500,000 ($2,500,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

West End Tax Increment Fund $2,500,000 ($2,500,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $2,500,000 ($2,500,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 117: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Economic Development H-7

JULY 2010 JULY 2013

PEACE CENTER

Department: PUBLIC INFORMATION AND EVENTS Ranking: N/A

Project Description:The Peace Center has requested the City's assistance for additional public improvements at the facility. The improvements will improve accessibility to the performing arts center from Main Street and the Reedy River. The City's commitment is contingent upon the Peace Center raising $7,500,000 in private assistance to match the City's contribution.

Project Status: Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

CONTINUATION CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION

EMPHASIZE UNIQUE COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS

Development agreement.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Final streetscape work is outstanding.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The project was endorsed by City Council via resolution during its January 25, 2010 meeting. The resolution stated the Council's intent to appropriate $1,250,000 in FY 2010-11 and $1,250,000 in FY 2011-12.

The project will support the ongoing redevelopment of the Reedy River corridor and will promote improved cultural opportunities for the community.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $2,582,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,582,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,582,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,582,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Downtown Infrastructure Fund $2,582,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,582,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $2,582,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,582,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 118: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Economic Development H-8

JAN 2011 JULY 2013Start/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

PENDING CLOSE-OUT

HYATT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS

Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A

Project Status: Strategic Goal: PROSPEROUS CITYCREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS

Project Description:This project will provide enhanced streetscape and public spaces surrounding the Hyatt Hotel at Main Street and Beattie Place. This area was one of the first to be redeveloped in downtown and needs refreshing, including new landscaping, hardscape, and enhanced pedestrian access.

Development agreement.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Final payment is pending.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

This project supports one of the first redevelopment efforts in downtown. The private sector has projected spending $10 million in improvements to the Hyatt lobby, office, and exterior façade. These public improvements will enhance the public-side experience of the building's various users.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $896,847 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $896,847Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $896,847 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $896,847TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Property Sales $896,847 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $896,847TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $896,847 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $896,847

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $15,000 $15,750 $16,500 $17,250 $64,500Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $15,000 $30,750 $47,250 $64,500 $64,500FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 119: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Economic Development H-9

JAN 2013 JUN 2014

Development agreement.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Private development under construction.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

This project will further the redevelopment of the West End and will support the City Council's objectives to increase the amount of residential property in the City.

CONTINUATION

Project Description:This project will provide infrastructure improvements at Markley and Rhett to support an apartment building presently under construction. This includes utility relocation, stormwater upgrades, and streetscape.

PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:COORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTUREStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

MARKLEY AT RHETT IMPROVEMENTS

Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $261,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $261,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $261,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $261,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Stormwater Fund $37,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $37,000Utility Undergrounding Fund $49,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $49,000West End Tax Increment Fund $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $261,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $261,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 120: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Economic Development H-10

OCT 2013 JUN 2014

Vendor quote.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

In the event of a chiller failure, the facility would not be able to air condition its main exhibit halls and essentially render a significant portion of the facility unusable.

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:Five chiller units provide cooling capabilities for the TD Convention Center. Three units serving the exhibit halls were installed in 1987. Two units supporting the Conference Center were new in 1993. One of the three exhibit hall chillers failed during the summer of 2011. Minimal repairs provided an immediate, but short-term remedy. Funds are being requested to rebuild each of the five units over a two-year period. Each base rebuild is estimated to cost between $40,000 and $50,000. In addition, three of the units will need to have control panels replaced. Rebuilding is significantly less costly than replacement and will extend the useful life expectancy of each unit by approximately 10 years.

PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REVITALIZATION OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

TD CONVENTION CENTER CHILLER PLANT

Department: MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Ranking: GROUP B

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Local Accommodations Tax Fund $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 121: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Economic Development H-11

JULY 2013 JUN 2018

Cost estimates generally have been provided by potential contractors.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The TD Convention Center is an anchor to the Pleasantburg Drive corridor, serving as host for major civic events, tradeshows, and conventions which help support our hospitality industry. The Woodside Conference Center will be recognizing its 20th anniversary in 2013. During those 20 years, there has been little replacement of carpeting, etc. This will remedy an on-going issue that, short of falling into disrepair, will eventually require action.

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:This project will address multiple aesthetic upgrades to make the facility more marketable to potential users. Some of the individual projects, such as caulking, divider wall repairs, and floor resurfacing, are driven by identified deterioration. Other elements are intended to create a more attractive, contemporary appearance in order to maximize the facility's potential for new and retained business. Other requests are addressing normal end of life wear issues. The year one request includes funds for retaining design assistance that will include both the integration of new features, and also address modest strategic modifications such as the possible reconfiguration of space to add new meeting rooms.

PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REVITALIZATION OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

TD CONVENTION CENTER CONFERENCE CENTER

Department: MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Ranking: GROUP C

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $135,000 $475,000 $450,000 $170,000 $1,230,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $100,000 $135,000 $475,000 $450,000 $170,000 $1,330,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Local Accommodations Tax Fund $0 $100,000 $135,000 $475,000 $450,000 $170,000 $1,330,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $100,000 $135,000 $475,000 $450,000 $170,000 $1,330,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 122: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Economic Development H-12

APR 2018 JUN 2018

TD CONVENTION CENTER PARKING LOTS

Department: MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Ranking: GROUP D

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:This project will resurface and restripe parking lots adjoining the TD Convention Center. Limited landscaping upgrades also are included in the plan.

PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REVITALIZATION OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

City of Greenville Department of Public Works estimate.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Due to limitations in the TDCC's annual operating budget, money has been unavailable to resurface lots, which have deteriorated over time. The proposed improvements will enhance the attractiveness of the facility while improving patron safety.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Local Accommodations Tax Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 123: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

Neighborhood Revitalization I-1

NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION

The City has had significant success in revitalizing many of its special emphasis neighborhoods including the recently completed work in Kingsview Pointe. The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program continues revitalization projects in the Green Avenue and Greenline-Spartanburg neighborhoods.

Page 124: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Neighborhood Revitalization I-2

Page 125: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Neighborhood Revitalization I-3

MAY 2007 AUG 2013

Development agreement and contracted costs.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Project is nearly complete and awaiting final reconstruction of Church Street.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Much of the existing infrastructure within the Haynie-Sirrine neighborhood is substandard including deteriorated roads; broken curbs and sidewalks; and outdated and undersized stormwater and wastewater systems. Public infrastructure developments are necessary not only to keep these systems up to current standards, but also to leverage private investment. Calculations of build-out value indicate a potential investment of $50 to $90 million.

This project involves infrastructure improvements associated with the redevelopment of the Haynie-Sirrine neighborhood as identified in the community. Improvements include: basic street upgrades and repairs, circulation connections, streetscaping, sidewalks, sewer, stormwater, and green space. The existing budget is being used to support infrastructure improvements for the Homes of Hope and Tower Development currently underway. As part of that development, the Ellie Mae Logan Park will be restored. In addition, funds are also used for project management related to the reconstruction of Church Street.

Project Status: Strategic Goal:

Start/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

CONTINUATION CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODSCOORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTURE

Project Description:

HAYNIE-SIRRINE

Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $280,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $280,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $484,308 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $484,308Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $764,308 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $764,308TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Property Sales $125,545 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,545General Obligation Bond - 2003 $3,273 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,273Miscellaneous Grants Fund $78,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $78,750Revolving Housing Fund $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000Capital Projects Fund $437,180 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $437,180Stormwater Fund $44,560 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $44,560

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $764,308 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $764,308

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 126: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Neighborhood Revitalization I-4

MAY 2007 JUN 2018

Estimates by an engineering firm.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Phase I is complete and Phase II design is complete.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The proposed development supports affordable workforce residential units in the Greenline-Spartanburg Special Emphasis Neighborhood. These plans are consistent with the Greenline-Spartanburg neighborhood master plan and align with several of City Council's strategic goals including City of Neighborhoods, Inclusive City, Safe City and Prosperous City. The request also contributes to the Comprehensive Plan by coordinating housing development with infrastructure, maintaining quality of redeveloped areas, creating a safe environment, and creating a mixture of housing types and designs.

REVISION

Project Description:Funding is requested to complete improvements to Phase III of the Mt. Eustis Corners Development in the Greenline-Spartanburg meighborhood. Phase III is the final phase in the development and includes replacing sanitary sewer along the portion of Mt. Zion Street that lies between the horseshoe of Mt. Eustis Street. Genesis Homes, the City's development partner, is developing 20 affordable and workforce for sale and rental units. Eight units have been completed and are leased. The Greenline-Spartanburg neighborhood has reviewed and approved the redevelopment plan. This request supports the completion of Phase III and all infrastructure needed for this development. The City's investment will be leveraged by Genesis Homes through the development of workforce and affordable residential units.

CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODSProject Status: Strategic Goal:COORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTUREStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

MT. EUSTIS STREET IMPROVEMENTS

Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: GROUP B

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $704,372 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $954,372Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $27,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $52,000

TOTAL PROJECT COST $831,372 $0 $0 $0 $0 $275,000 $1,106,372TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Capital Projects Fund $401,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $401,000General Fund $226,372 $0 $0 $0 $0 $275,000 $501,372General Obligation Bond - 2006 $85,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,000Wastewater Fund $56,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $56,000Stormwater Fund $63,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $63,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $831,372 $0 $0 $0 $0 $275,000 $1,106,372

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $1,000 $1,050 $1,103 $1,158 $1,216 $5,526Cumulative Operating Impact $1,000 $2,050 $3,153 $4,310 $5,526 $5,526FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 127: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

Public Safety J-1

PUBLIC SAFETY

The City recently completed renovations to the City’s law enforcement training facility. The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program includes funding to replace the public safety camera system and to improve the station alerting system in the City’s fire stations.

Page 128: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Public Safety J-2

Page 129: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Public Safety J-3

JULY 2007 JUN 2015

This new fire station, constructed on approximately two acres, will serve the furthermost eastern parts of the City including the ICAR, Verdae, and Woodruff Road areas. One engine company based at this fire station will provide 24/7 initial emergency response within the primary response area. Twelve firefighters will be assigned to provide fire suppression, medical first responder, operations-level hazardous materials, and operations-level technical rescue services.

SAFE CITY

CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT

The fire station will be designed and built to accommodate future needs for additional personnel and the necessary equipment to adequately serve commercial and residential development in the target area.

Estimates provided by consultants based on most recent projects.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):No funds have been expended and the City is currently attempting to acquire land for construction.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

This supports both the City Council's 2011 objectives and the Fire Department's Strategic Plan. The ICAR, Verdae, and Woodruff Road corridors have emergency response times that are well outside of the national standard of 4:00 minutes or less 90% of the time. Response times to these areas currently average 6:13 minutes with only 21% being 4:00 minutes or less. Excluding the station that responds to these corridors, the average response time Citywide is currently 2:50 minutes with 90.6% of responses in 4:00 minutes or less. This new station is expected to improve response times in the target area by 35% to 50%.

Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.):

Project Description:

Project Status: Strategic Goal:

Comp. Plan Principle:

CONTINUATION

EAST AREA FIRE STATION

Department: FIRE Ranking: N/A

Start/Finish Dates:

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $171,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $171,500Site Acquisition Costs $799,920 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $799,920Improvements $2,796,860 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,796,860Equipment $187,720 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $187,720Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $3,956,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,956,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Property Sales $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000General Obligation Bond - 2013 $3,881,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,881,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $3,956,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,956,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $510,000 $561,447 $1,063,984 $1,095,903 $1,119,779 $4,351,113Cumulative Operating Impact $510,000 $1,071,447 $2,135,431 $3,231,334 $4,351,113 $4,351,113FTEs Added 0.00 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 130: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Public Safety J-4

JAN 2012 UNDETERMINED

FIRE FACILITIES ASSESSMENT

Department: FIRE Ranking: N/A

This project will evaluate four fire stations and provide a needs assessment regarding the condition and operation of the facilities in the long term. The stations involved will be Station 2 (West End), Station 3 (Augusta Street), Station 4 (Stone Avenue), and Station 5 (Pleasantburg).

SAFE CITY

CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENTStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Status: Strategic Goal:CONTINUATION

Project Description:

It is anticipated that this project will provide recommendations for future capital projects, but future cost impact is undetermined. Future growth and needs of the Fire Department will also be considered while planning renovation and/or replacement of these facilities.

Estimates provided by consultants.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Architectural services being procured.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

This project achieves the Fire Department's Strategic Plan goal to upgrade antiquated and non-NFPA compliant fire stations. Two stations were built in the early-1950's and two were built in the late-1960's. These facilities have been staffed 24 hours a day since their opening dates and their condition has deteriorated greatly over time. The City's Building Maintenance and Engineering Divisions have investigated the needs of these facilities and recommended this evaluation by an outside entity to determine the best and most cost-effective course of action. This needs assessment will assist the Fire Department and Building Maintenance in defining a strategic vision for these facilities and propose facility improvements to help extend their useable life.

Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.):

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Capital Projects Fund $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 131: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Public Safety J-5

JULY 2013 JUN 2018

Initial estimate by vendor and staff.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

In 2003, the camera system was implemented in the central business district. Following this implementation, the same was done at Haywood Mall. Since 2003, the central business district has experienced extensive growth with both business and residential development. With that, the present camera system lacks the coverage needed to maintain a certain level of public safety. Six additional cameras would enhance the department’s ability to render a safe environment in the central business district. In addition, the 17 street cameras in the central business district, along with the 6 cameras at Haywood Mall, have from a technological aspect, become obsolete. For many of these cameras, parts are no longer manufactured when repair needs arise, rendering them useless.

These cameras are an integral part of maintaining a safe environment in the both the central business district and Haywood Mall from three points:

1) Cameras serve as a deterrent2) Cameras provide crucial investigative evidence3) Cameras serve as an aid in call response; primarily from an officer safety perspective

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:The first year of this project will add six cameras to the central business district, providing needed coverage for new areas of development, while also replacing 23 cameras in both the central business district and Haywood Mall. In subsequent years, approximately 100 cameras would be replaced in parking facilities and downtown.

SAFE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:

CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENTStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERAS

Department: POLICE Ranking: GROUP B

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $0 $500,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $500,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Hospitality Tax Fund $0 $500,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $500,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 132: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Public Safety J-6

AUG 2013 NOV 2013

Estimates from two vendors.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

Current station alerting and communication system is obsolete and is extremely inaudible often creating confusion. It does not provide for real time monitoring by station personnel, provides limited alerting redundancy and requires the maintenance of two separate radio systems in all facilities. The proposed system will address these shortcomings and decrease dispatcher call processing time by approximately 50%; in turn decreasing overall fire department response times.

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:This project would upgrade station alerting/communication system to modern day standards. This component of the fire department communication system alerts the firefighters in the appropriate station/vehicle that a request for service has been initiated. These components also control the lights in each fire station (currently the firefighters must navigate in the dark to find the light switch) and open the garage doors. This also allows mutual aid fire departments to gain access to a station when personnel are not on site. The unit also shuts off cooking devices in the station when a request for service has been initiated, reducing the probability of a cooking fire.

SAFE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:

ENCOURAGE SUSTAINABLE GROWTHStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

STATION ALERTING SYSTEM

Department: FIRE Ranking: GROUP A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $180,000Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $180,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

General Fund $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $180,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $180,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 133: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

Parking K-1

PARKING

The City operates a parking system of approximately 6,000 spaces throughout downtown Greenville. The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program provides funding to renovate the Poinsett Garage in FY 2013-14.

Page 134: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parking K-2

Page 135: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parking K-3

JULY 2012 DEC 2013

RICHARDSON STREET GARAGE

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A

Project Status: Strategic Goal:NEW PROJECT MOBILE CITY

Start/Finish Dates: MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREASComp. Plan Principle:

Project Description:The Richardson Street Garage has not had any substantial repairs or upgrades since it was built approximately 16 years ago. This project will seal and waterproof the top level of the garage to prevent water infiltration into the garage. There is at least one expansion joint that will require replacement in conjunction with the waterproofing. This project will also address lighting levels and aesthetic appearances within the garage by painting the ceilings and stairwells within the garage. The current gate equipment is over 16 years old and requires replacement. This should improve the overall customer experience in the garage.

Estimates obtained from other facilities, as well as estimates from various vendors.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Construction underway.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

This will repair water control issues within the garage, thereby extending the life expectancy of the garage. The painting and equipment replacement is crucial with the continued growth of business activity within the immediate area of the garage.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $510,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $510,000Equipment $130,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,000Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $655,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $655,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Downtown Infrastructure Fund $655,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $655,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $655,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $655,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 136: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Parking K-4

AUG 2013 DEC 2013

Our structural engineer has reviewed the facility and obtained preliminary estimates on what the necessary waterproofing and painting would cost. Quotes were obtained from various suppliers.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

This project will enhance the overall life expectancy of the facility and improve the appearance of the facility for the customers that utilize this facility including businesses, visitors to Greenville, and employees who work in the downtown area. Replacement of the gate control equipment enhances the parking experience and reduces any frustration that may occur due to prolonged periods of downtime that would likely occur, while parts are located for the older equipment.

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:By use of a consulting engineer, the City has identified several water impingement areas within the garage. The City has also determined through previous capital improvement projects that painting the ceilings within the parking garages improves both the overall appearance and illumination factors in the garages, as well as improves the overall customers' perception of safety.

Therefore, the project will entail sealing cracks on the upper levels of the garage, as well as replacing caulking throughout various levels to prevent continued large scale water infiltration into the lower levels. In conjunction with the waterproofing, the City has identified several area within the garage where drains were placed at higher elevations thereby causing water ponding in the facility. This project will address those areas to facilitate necessary drainage. This will assist in prolonging the life expectancy of the facility.

The project also includes painting the stairwells and elevator landings, and cleaning or painting the exterior of the garage to improve the overall appearance. Striping and surface markings within the garage will also be done by the selected contractor. The project also includes replacement of the existing gate control equipment since the existing equipment has exceeded the manufacture's recommended life expectancy by several years, and parts replacement is difficult.

PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:

MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

POINSETT GARAGE

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $345,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $345,000Equipment $0 $247,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $247,000Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $632,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $632,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Parking Fund $0 $632,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $632,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $632,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $632,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 137: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

General Government L-1

GENERAL GOVERNMENT

The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program provides for improvements to the City’s information technology infrastructure.

Page 138: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

General Government L-2

Page 139: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

General Government L-3

JULY 2012 DEC 2013

The City's current phone system is antiquated and dates back to the 1970s. The core infrastructure located in the basement of City Hall has met its maximum capacity and scalability. The City currently has little to no support on this equipment. Given the age of the equipment, a failure of the phone switch would cripple the City's ability to communicate with employees and the public.

Comp. Plan Principle:

PHONE SYSTEM REPLACEMENT

Department: MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Ranking: GROUP A

REVISION

Project Description:

SAFE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:

CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENTStart/Finish Dates:

Costs are estimated via industry experience, the size of the organization, and comparison to other municipalities.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Scoping and estimating determined additional funds are needed.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The current phone situation will eventually fail, leaving the City without a viable way to communicate or conduct business. The City has no way to manage core hardware or handsets. The City is possibly paying more for the current system (centrex lines, lack of support, etc.) than they would be by replacing the system with a voice over internet protocal (VoIP) infrastructure. A VoIP phone system would allow much easier support and maintenance, would use existing data infrastructure, and potentially save the City money in the future.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $475,000 $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $695,000Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $475,000 $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $695,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Installment Lease Purchase - 2013 $475,000 $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $695,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $475,000 $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $695,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $200,000Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $200,000FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 140: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

General Government L-4

JULY 2012 ON-GOING

PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS CENTER

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A

CONTINUATION

Project Description:This project provides for the eventual relocation of Public Works away from its present site on Hudson Street and Mayberry Street to a new location elsewhere in the City. This current request provides funding to identify a new site, provide for its acquisition, and begin site preparation. Once a site is acquired and prepared, future improvements will be proposed in later budgets to fund the construction of a new facility.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

Costs are based on current land acquisition prices. A 33-acre tract located on Fariforest Way was purchased in 2012. City Council has set up a study committee to evaluate and recommend next steps.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):City has acquired 33-acre tract of land located on Fairforest Way. Preliminary design and feasibility study are currently underway.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The relocation of Public Works advances several long-standing goals of moving a critical facility out of the flood plain to better respond to natural disasters and to protect the City's assets from future losses. It is also the first step in advancing the Comprehensive Plan's goal of establishing a park along the Reedy River at the present location of Public Works.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $1,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,900,000Improvements $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $3,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,100,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2012 $3,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,100,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $3,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,100,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 141: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

General Government L-5

JULY 2012 JULY 2013

Project Status: Strategic Goal:CONTINUATION SAFE CITY

PUBLIC WORKS RADIO SYSTEM

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A

Comp. Plan Principle:

Project Description:This project replaces the existing Public Works radio system with a system that is in compliance with the Federal Communications Commission's requirement of narrowbanding certain radio frequencies. This project will include replacing all mobile, portable, fixed-base radios, and support equipment to include relicensing the system to an 800Mhz digital frequency that takes advantage of current technology. These technologies include GPS tracking of vehicles such as snow plows and sand spreaders in emergency operations. The 800Mhz digital system would also provide some interoperability with public safety radio systems in the event of a widespread emergency. This project also includes radios for Parks and Grounds and Special Events staff. The project also looks at reducing redundancy in radio and other communications equipment with the expectation of reducing total number of units. As the City grows, this proposed system would provide a greater area of radio coverage than the current conventional system.

CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENTStart/Finish Dates:

State contract price.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Resolving final installation issues.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

On January 1, 2013, all industrial land mobile radio systems must cease operating on 25Khz bandwidth and must begin operating on 12.5Khz bandwidth. Many radios in the Public Works radio system are over 10 years old and most cannot be modified or reprogrammed to the new 12.5Khz bandwith requirement and must be replaced. This includes the system infrastructure. Failure to comply with these requirements will result in operating an illegal radio system and result in significant fines and/or loss of radio license.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $321,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $321,000Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $321,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $321,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Capital Projects Fund $119,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $119,000Solid Waste Enterprise Fund $106,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $106,000Stormwater Fund $39,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $39,000Wastewater Fund $57,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $57,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $321,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $321,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $27,696 $27,696 $27,696 $27,696 $27,696 $138,480Cumulative Operating Impact $27,696 $55,392 $83,088 $110,784 $138,480 $138,480FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 142: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

General Government L-6

JULY 2013 OCT 2013

Hardware and software quotations from the suppliers.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

By funding this project, the City will be able to bring all MS SQL installs into compliance with Microsoft and allow expandability in the infrastructure for future and current demands.

The are two driving factors driving this request: 1. The city is out of compliance with Microsoft on existing use of Microsoft SQL2. The City cannot presently expand the current SQL platform for current or future requirements.

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:Microsoft products are used throughout Greenville to fulfill many functions. Most applications tie back to a server platform called Structured Query Language (SQL). This is the central warehouse where data is stored (database severs). Despite being unseen, the impact of SQL reaches every department.

Funding is being requested to replace the SQL server environment with current hardware, software, and licensing that brings the city into legal compliance with Microsoft. Given that all departments and divisions are impacted by our SQL environment, this project is necessary to sustain and provide the scalability to grow the City’s application base from its current position. SQL is the foundation for many applications. Firehouse, Cityworks, Transit, all websites, all the GIS data, Pro Law, PERTS, and HROAS are on a partial list of applications requiring a solid, up-to-date SQL foundation. The current SQL environment runs on hardware that is up to ten years old, does not contain a mechanism for redundancy in the event of a hardware failure, and both hardware and software are no longer supported. By funding this project, the City will be able supply the redundancy needed to keep critical applications and websites online.

PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

CENTRAL MICROSOFT SQL PLATFORM

Department: MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Ranking: GROUP A

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $0 $204,167 $0 $0 $0 $0 $204,167Management $0 $40,833 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,833

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $245,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $245,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

General Fund $0 $245,000 $0 $0 $0 $245,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $245,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $245,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,995 $32,995Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,995 $32,995FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 143: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

General Government L-7

JULY 2013 JULY 2014

ROOF REPLACEMENTS

Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP A

NEW PROJECT

Project Description:Replacement of approximately 30,000 square feet of roofing at Municipal Court, Nicholtown Community Center, and Public Works Office Building.

SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:

All 3 facilities have been inspected by qualified roofing companies who have submitted proposals to restore the roofs to new condition.

Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.

Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):

Method for Estimating Cost:

The roofing on the Court building and Nicholtown Center have been leaking for years due to deterioration of original materials, and several attempts to repair them have been unsuccessful. The shingles on the Public Works building have lasted beyond their life expectancy and are also falling off due to deterioration.

TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT

PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST

Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $181,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $181,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $181,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $181,000TOTAL

FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING

Downtown Infrastructure Fund $0 $105,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $105,000General Fund $0 $76,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $76,000

TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $181,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $181,000

OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

FUNDING TO-DATE

FUNDING TO-DATE

Page 144: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

General Government L-8

Page 145: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

Appendix M-1

APPENDIX

The CIP continues to invest in projects in the City’s award-winning downtown and promotes a vibrant core to the community.

Page 146: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Appendix M-2

Page 147: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Appendix M-3

FY 2014-2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Projection of Legal Debt Margin

6/30/2012 6/30/2013 6/30/2014 6/30/2015 6/30/2016 6/30/2017 6/30/2018

Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate

Assessed value $ 356,932,928 363,442,750 375,946,094 383,465,016 391,134,316 398,957,003 406,936,143

Merchants' inventory for debt purposes 9,169,930 9,169,930 9,169,930 9,169,930 9,169,930 9,169,930 9,169,930

Total assessed value 366,102,858 372,612,680 385,116,024 392,634,946 400,304,246 408,126,933 416,106,073

Statutory debt limit based on 8% $ 29,288,229 29,809,014 30,809,282 31,410,796 32,024,340 32,650,155 33,288,486

Less current debt

G.O. Series 2012 $ 0 9,915,000 9,095,000 8,250,000 7,375,000 6,455,000 5,500,000

G.O. Series 2011 1,938,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

G.O. Series 2006 5,815,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

G.O. Series 2003 2,455,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

10,208,000 9,915,000 9,095,000 8,250,000 7,375,000 6,455,000 5,500,000

Legal debt margin, current $ 19,080,229 19,894,014 21,714,282 23,160,796 24,649,340 26,195,155 27,788,486

Less new issues in CIP:

G.O. Series 2013 $ 0 0 3,881,000 3,686,000 3,491,000 3,296,000 3,101,000

0 0 3,881,000 3,686,000 3,491,000 3,296,000 3,101,000

Legal debt margin, revised 19,080,229 19,894,014 17,833,282 19,474,796 21,158,340 22,899,155 24,687,486

Page 148: Adopted CIP FY2014 18

FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina

Appendix M-4