adopted cip fy2014 18
DESCRIPTION
City of Greenville, South Carolina, Adopted Capital Improvement Plan, FY 2014-2018TRANSCRIPT
This page is intentionally blank.
City of Greenville, South Carolina
Adopted Capital Improvement Program
FY 2014-2018
Knox H. White Mayor
Amy Ryberg Doyle
Council Member (District 1)
Lillian Brock Flemming Council Member (District 2)
Jil M. Littlejohn
Council Member (District 3)
J. David Sudduth Council Member (District 4)
Susan Reynolds
Council Member (At Large)
Gaye G. Sprague Council Member (At Large)
John F. Castile City Manager
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Table of Contents
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Table of Contents
City of Greenville, South Carolina FY 2014-2018 Adopted Capital Improvement Program
Table of Contents Transmittal ...................................................................................................................... A-1 Transmittal Letter .............................................................................................................. A-3 Summary Schedules ........................................................................................................... B-1 Schedule I – Total CIP Revenue and Expenditure Summary .............................................................. B-3 Schedule II – Project Summaries with Applicable Funding Sources ..................................................... B-4 Schedule III – Project Summaries by Funding Source ..................................................................... B-11 Schedule IV – Unfunded Projects ............................................................................................ B-16 Project Descriptions Roads and Bridges ............................................................................................................... C-1 New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program (NSTEP) ................................................................. C-3 Street Resurfacing ......................................................................................................... C-4 Fairforest Way Rehabilitation ............................................................................................ C-5 Salters Road Improvements ............................................................................................... C-6 Main Street Resurfacing ................................................................................................... C-7 Haywood Road/Woods Crossing Intersection .......................................................................... C-8 Haywood Road Sidewalks ................................................................................................. C-9 Woodruff Road Sidewalks ............................................................................................... C-10 Streetscapes ..................................................................................................................... D-1 Pete Hollis Corridor Improvements ...................................................................................... D-3 East McBee Avenue Improvements ...................................................................................... D-4 Rhett/Camperdown Street Improvements ............................................................................. D-5 Cultural Corridor ........................................................................................................... D-6 Village of West Greenville Improvements .............................................................................. D-7 Augusta Street Improvements ............................................................................................ D-8 North Main Street Improvements ........................................................................................ D-9 Washington Street Improvements ..................................................................................... D-10 Augusta Street Streetscaping (Baseball Stadium) ................................................................... D-11 Broad Street Pedestrian Lighting ...................................................................................... D-12 Downtown Streetscapes ................................................................................................. D-13 North Main Street – Landmark Building ............................................................................... D-14 Spring/Falls Streetscape ................................................................................................ D-15 Viola Streetscaping ...................................................................................................... D-16 West Camperdown Way ................................................................................................. D-17 Augusta Street at Faris Road Streetscape ............................................................................ D-18 Wastewater ................................................................................................................. E-1 Haynie-Sirrine Wastewater System Rehabilitation .................................................................... E-3 Verdae Sewer Expansion .................................................................................................. E-4 Wastewater System Rehabilitation ...................................................................................... E-5 Wastewater System Survey and Model .................................................................................. E-6 Basin 7 Sewer Rehabilitation ............................................................................................. E-7 Basin 15 Sewer Rehabilitation ............................................................................................ E-8 Basin 16 Sewer Rehabilitation ............................................................................................ E-9 Basin 25 Sewer Rehabilitation ........................................................................................... E-10 Stormwater ...................................................................................................................... F-1 Henderson Basin ............................................................................................................ F-3 Pinehurst Culvert Crossing Improvement ............................................................................... F-4 Westview/Windsor Crossings ............................................................................................. F-5
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Table of Contents
Pettigru Street Improvements ........................................................................................... F-6 Fairforest Way Basin ....................................................................................................... F-7 White Oak Basin Phase II .................................................................................................. F-8 Gower Estates Stormwater Rehabilitation ............................................................................. F-9 Swanson Court ............................................................................................................. F-10 Richland Creek Water Quality Master Plan ............................................................................ F-11 Public Works Complex Water Quality Improvements ................................................................ F-12 North Hills Area Stormwater Improvements .......................................................................... F-13 Aldridge/Lacey Drainage Improvements .............................................................................. F-14 Hilly Street Drainage Improvements ................................................................................... F-15 Parks and Recreation ........................................................................................................... G-1 Community Center Building Improvements ............................................................................ G-3 Main Street Tree Rehabilitation ......................................................................................... G-4 Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access .................................................................... G-5 Reedy River Trail Expansion .............................................................................................. G-6 Park Restrooms ............................................................................................................. G-7 River Street Underpass .................................................................................................... G-8 Heritage Green Master Plan .............................................................................................. G-9 Cleveland Park Bank Stabilization ..................................................................................... G-10 McPherson Park Bridge Rehabilitation ................................................................................ G-11 Cancer Survivors Park ................................................................................................... G-12 NEXT Trail Connector .................................................................................................... G-13 Falls Park Improvements ................................................................................................ G-14 Haywood at I-385 Interchange Landscaping ......................................................................... G-15 Cleveland Park Horse Stables .......................................................................................... G-16 Greenville Dog Parks ..................................................................................................... G-17 Greenville Tech Trailhead .............................................................................................. G-18 Hudson Street Trailhead ................................................................................................ G-19 Swamp Rabbit Trail Rubber Surface Replacement .................................................................. G-20 Viola Center and Park Improvements ................................................................................. G-21 Economic Development ........................................................................................................ H-1 Piazza Bergamo ............................................................................................................. H-3 TD Convention Center Kitchen Retrofit ................................................................................ H-4 Commercial Corridors ..................................................................................................... H-5 West End Property Acquisition ........................................................................................... H-6 Peace Center ............................................................................................................... H-7 Hyatt Public Improvements ............................................................................................... H-8 Markley at Rhett Improvements ......................................................................................... H-9 TD Convention Center Chiller Plant ................................................................................... H-10 TD Convention Center Conference Center ........................................................................... H-11 TD Convention Center Parking Lots ................................................................................... H-12 Neighborhood Revitalization ................................................................................................... I-1 Haynie-Sirrine ................................................................................................................ I-3 Mt. Eustis Street Improvements .......................................................................................... I-4 Public Safety ..................................................................................................................... J-1 East Area Fire Station ..................................................................................................... J-3 Fire Facilities Assessment................................................................................................. J-4 Public Safety Cameras ..................................................................................................... J-5 Station Alerting System ................................................................................................... J-6 Parking ........................................................................................................................... K-1 Richardson Street Garage ................................................................................................. K-3 Poinsett Garage ............................................................................................................ K-4
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Table of Contents
General Government ........................................................................................................... L-1 Phone System Replacement .............................................................................................. L-3 Public Works Operations Center ......................................................................................... L-4 Public Works Radio System ............................................................................................... L-5 Central Microsoft SQL Platform .......................................................................................... L-6 Roof Replacements ........................................................................................................ L-7 Appendix ......................................................................................................................... M-1 Projection of Legal Debt Margin ......................................................................................... M-3
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Table of Contents
Transmittal A-1
TRANSMITTAL
Capital investment continues to renew and improve the City of Greenville. The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program continues the commitment to a healthy and vibrant City by investing in infrastructure, development opportunities, and community facilities.
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Transmittal A-2
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Transmittal A-3
City of Greenville, South Carolina
July 1, 2013 The Honorable Knox H. White, Mayor Members of City Council Dear Mayor White and City Council Members: I am pleased to present the adopted FY 2014-2018 CIP which totals $30,700,000 across all funds over the five-year planning horizon, and includes a $7,384,000 capital budget in FY 2013-14. The CIP is a five-year financial planning instrument used to identify capital construction projects (generally over $100,000) and sources of funding for those projects. The first year makes up the capital budget and the remaining four years are planning years subject to future appropriation. We rely upon the financial forecast presented to City Council in its retreat to guide decisions on the availability of funds. We have relied on the input from City Council in prior worksessions and the retreat, and the rankings provided by staff in determining the priority in which to fund projects. In all budget discussions, there is a need to balance competing demands with scarce resources. Departments submitted $33,319,186 in requests in FY 2013-14. While we have worked to fund as many projects as possible, however, limited funds and the limitations on their use invariably result in unfunded projects. General Fund The General Fund is the most challenging fund to plan CIP projects for and the one with the most demands. Many of the priorities you have communicated to me – roads, commercial corridors, facilities – generally can only be funded from the General Fund. In addition, the General Fund is the most constrained of the City’s options to fund projects in terms of its fiscal capacity. In looking at the FY 2013-14 General Fund operating budget, we project that, pending audit adjustments, the City shall finish FY 2012-13 with a small surplus. We anticipate making a few philosophical changes which will provide us with greater flexibility in the General Fund in future years. In order to improve the City’s long-term financial position, we are proposing to not issue debt on the fire pumper, bucket truck, and tractor trailer truck proposed to be purchased in the FY 2012-13 operating budget and use cash proceeds instead. This will avoid adding to the City’s long-term debt burden and provide budgetary flexibility in future years. Additionally, issuing debt for capital items that are essentially recurring in nature is not sustainable on a long-term basis.
The FY 2013-14 budget was built on spending a part of our fund balance including $831,032 to “catch-up” on our equipment backlog and $1,026,000 for one-time capital projects. This leaves approximately $2,000,000 in fund balance above the 20% target set by City Council. These funds are available for projects or can be left in reserve, though I recommend leaving some level above the 20% reserve as a contingency. All told, the funds made available from the General Fund were focused on the very highest priorities with an emphasis on renewing existing infrastructure and facilities, and priorities articulated by City Council. Projects funded in FY 2013-14 include:
• $250,000 each for Street Resurfacing and NSTEP. This maintains the total allocation to both
programs originally budgeted in FY 2012-13. The future years of the CIP work to increase funding for both projects to $500,000 each.
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Transmittal A-4
• $300,000 is made available for the Commercial Corridors project, consistent with priorities stated by City Council.
• $150,000 for the last year of the City’s commitment to the reconstruction of Salters Road. • Renewed commitment to reinvesting in the City’s infrastructure and facilities including $245,000
for the City’s SQL platform, $180,000 for a Station Alerting System at the City’s fire stations, and $76,000 to replace roofs at the Nicholtown Community Center and the Public Works Center (an additional $105,000 is included in the Downtown Infrastructure Fund to replace the roof at Municipal Court).
• $75,000 is included to fund a dog park at the Greenville Humane Society or at an alternate site to be determined. The current site has proven to be too small and incompatible.
In future years, we will work to increase current revenue funding of General Fund projects by approximately $250,000 per year, with a goal of approaching $1,500,000 annually in FY 2017-18. However, due to the constraints in the General Fund, several highly rated projects were not funded such as the Market Point Drive Connector, additional sidewalk projects, and park renewal projects. Funding for Bicycle Lanes has not been included in the CIP (as it is below the $100,000 threshold) and is incorporated into the Operating Budget at $25,000. One debt-backed project which will impact the General Fund in future years is the Phone System Replacement. It has been expanded by $220,000 for a total budget of $695,000 to reflect current pricing estimates. Parking Fund As noted in the forecast discussion during the retreat, the Parking Fund’s position has improved significantly over the past two years and is projected to improve further in FY 2013-14 with the opening of Project ONE. The only project funded in the Parking Fund is $632,000 to rehabilitate the Poinsett garage. Maintaining financial flexibility in the Parking Fund is a high priority due to the potential for public/private partnerships. Stormwater Fund As noted in the forecast discussion during the retreat, the Stormwater Fund’s position remains strong, therefore allowing the City to fund several projects to reduce flooding and improve water quality in FY 2013-14 including:
• $1,000,000 for additional culverts associated with the White Oak Basin Phase II project in order to
reduce flooding in the neighborhoods adjoining Bob Jones University. • $435,000 for the Pinehurst Culvert Crossing which is the last major culvert upgrade to be made on
Richland Creek. • $300,000 to continue the Richland Creek Water Quality Master Plan to identify and install water
quality retrofits along Richland Creek now that major flooding improvements are being completed. • $100,000 to design the North Hills Area Stormwater Improvements project which will work to
improve drainage near Bennett and Garraux Streets. • $30,000 to demolish the Cleveland Park Horse Stables.
In addition, a reduction of $1,398,000 in the Henderson Basin project budget is included as the infrastructure is complete and flood plain remapping is underway. These funds are being redirected to other projects in the FY 2013-14 capital budget. Wastewater Fund Although the Wastewater Fund’s capital plan has been adjusted to reflect current financial constraints and has been modified from the FY 2013-2017 Capital Improvement Program, progress should be maintained in resolving the inflow and infiltration (I&I) issues present in our wastewater system. In FY 2013-14, the CIP includes:
• $1,900,000 for rehabilitation in Basin 7, of which $1,555,000 will be funded through increasing the
sanitary sewer revenue bond issuance planned for the Wastewater Rehabilitation and Haynie-Sirrine projects adopted in last year’s CIP. An additional $345,000 will be funded through cash.
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Transmittal A-5
• $400,000 in pay-as-you-go funding for the Basin 15 project. Presently, investigation is underway within the Wastewater Rehabilitation project and a separate Basin 15 project. If funding in the Wastewater Rehabilitation project and the total $650,000 appropriated in the Basin 15 project is sufficient to remedy the I&I problem, then no additional debt issuance will be required. However, should the investigation reveal a more substantial problem than is presently anticipated, a debt issuance and adjustment to future capital plans may be necessary.
The CIP anticipates making improvements to Basins 16 and 25 in FY 2014-15 and FY 2015-16. At present, forecast models indicate that the debt associated with those projects may negatively impact our debt service coverage levels relative to the debt and financial metrics established by the rating agencies. We are projecting debt service coverage in FY 2016-17 of 120% of net operating revenues to debt service. Our bond covenants require 115%; the rating agencies have noted a preference for the ratio to be closer to 140%. Therefore, it may be necessary to have conversations in future years about additional rate increases or refinements to the capital plan. Hospitality Tax Fund As noted in the forecast discussion during the retreat, the Hospitality Tax Fund’s position remains strong and allows the City to fund several tourism-related projects, while still leaving capacity for possible economic development projects, tourism-related parks, or additional marketing. Projects in FY 2013-14 include:
• Funding for the development of the Cancer Survivors Park at $630,000. • Funding for several projects to improve access to the Swamp Rabbit Trail including the NEXT Trail
Connector ($606,000), the Hudson Street Trailhead ($225,000), and the Greenville Tech Trailhead ($125,000). Please note the Greenville Tech Trailhead is a placeholder until negotiations and discussions are complete. In addition, funding of $145,000 is included for the Swamp Rabbit Trail Rubber Surface project to remove the rubber surface on the Hincapie section of the Trail and replace with asphalt. An additional $350,000 is also provided for the River Street Underpass to improve safety.
• Funding to begin a program to replace the Police Department’s Public Safety Camera System, utilized in areas of high tourism concentration. FY 2013-14 funding is $500,000.
Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund Funding of $40,000 is included to design streetscape improvements on Augusta Street in the general vicinity of Fluor Field. Future year funding is planned to construct the improvements in conjunction with the Admissions Tax Fund. Local Accommodations Tax Fund Funding of $300,000 is included to rebuild the chillers at the TD Convention Center and $100,000 to design deferred maintenance improvements to the conference center at the TD Convention Center. In future years, a funding placeholder is included to renovate the conference center and rehabilitate the parking lots at the TD Convention Center (pending the results of the architectural/engineering analysis). Actual budgets will be refined in future years. Downtown Infrastructure Fund As noted in the forecast discussion during the retreat, the Downtown Infrastructure Fund’s position remains strong and has the capacity to fund several redevelopment projects, while leaving capacity for possible economic development projects. Projects in FY 2013-14 include:
• $165,000 for a Downtown Streetscapes project that will make spot improvements on Coffee Street,
Washington Street, and Japanese Dogwood Lane. • $150,000 to continue the Main Street Tree Rehabilitation project. • $134,000 to make landscape and street improvements on North Main Street between College Street
and Elford Street near the Landmark Building. • $128,000 for the Broad Street Pedestrian Light project to install decorative lighting between
Church Street and Main Street. • $120,000 to rehabilitate the pedestrian bridges in McPherson Park.
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Transmittal A-6
• $105,000 for the Roof Replacement project to replace the roof at Municipal Court. • $25,000 to design streetscape improvements along Spring and Falls Streets.
In the future planning years, a placeholder of $3,000,000 has been put in for the Cultural Corridor project. This amount and the total budget will be refined as the scope and scale of the project are defined in the design phase that is underway. West End Tax Increment Fund The CIP redirects funding from the West End Property Acquisition project to fund the first phase of the Rhett/Camperdown Improvements project with cash, rather than a debt issuance. This will allow the City to retain its remaining West End TIF bond capacity for other potential economic development projects in the West End. The project budget for Rhett/Camperdown Improvements is increased by $150,000 to fund a mast arm at the intersection of Camperdown and River. The remaining phase of the project (River to Markley) is planned for FY 2014-15. Should the need arise to have funding available for property acquisition during the course of the fiscal year, the funding strategy and/or timeline for the Rhett/Camperdown Improvements project will need to be changed. In addition, $250,000 is allocated for pedestrian improvements on West Camperdown Way between Academy and River Streets. Viola Street Tax Increment Fund In FY 2013-14, the Viola Street Tax Increment Fund will provide $146,000 for improvements to the Viola Center and adjoining park properties, and $280,000 for streetscape improvements in the Viola neighborhood and surrounding thoroughfares. Conclusion In summary, the FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program provides the City with reinvestments in its existing infrastructure, targets investments for the future growth of the City, and maintains flexibility for future opportunities. Sincerely,
John F. Castile City Manager
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Transmittal A-7
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Transmittal A-8
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Transmittal A-9
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Transmittal A-10
Summary Schedules B-1
SUMMARY SCHEDULES
The FY 2014-2018 CIP continues investments made on the Reedy River that enhance and protect it for public use.
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Summary Schedules B-2
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Summary Sheets B-3
FY 2014-2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE I
Total CIP Revenue and Expenditure Summary
911233
541205
500000
2520000
200000
0
FY 13/14
CAPITAL TOTALBUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 2014-2018
REVENUES
Admissions Tax Fund $ 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000
Downtown Infrastructure Fund 827,000 251,000 3,150,000 150,000 0 4,378,000
General Fund Transfer 1,526,000 700,000 995,000 1,250,000 1,375,000 5,846,000
Hospitality Tax Bonds 0 2,000,000 0 0 0 2,000,000
Hospitality Tax Fund 2,581,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 3,581,000
Installment Lease Purchase Agreement 220,000 0 0 0 0 220,000
Local Accommodations Tax Fund 400,000 135,000 475,000 450,000 670,000 2,130,000
Parking Fund 632,000 0 0 0 0 632,000
Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bonds 1,555,000 0 4,000,000 0 0 5,555,000
Stormwater Fund 467,000 1,850,000 1,125,000 0 0 3,442,000
Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund 40,000 95,000 0 0 0 135,000
Viola Street Tax Increment Fund 426,000 0 0 0 0 426,000
Wastewater Fund 810,000 565,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 1,570,000
West End Tax Increment Bonds (1,989,000) 0 0 0 0 -1,989,000
West End Tax Increment Fund (111,000) 2,635,000 0 0 0 2,524,000
TOTAL REVENUES $ 7,384,000 8,731,000 10,060,000 2,165,000 2,360,000 30,700,000
PROJECTS
Roads and Bridges $ 650,000 600,000 895,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 4,145,000
Streetscapes 1,172,000 3,081,000 3,000,000 150,000 0 7,403,000
Wastewater 2,365,000 565,000 4,065,000 65,000 65,000 7,125,000
Stormwater 437,000 1,850,000 1,125,000 0 0 3,412,000
Parks and Recreation 2,602,000 2,150,000 150,000 150,000 0 5,052,000
Economic Development (1,800,000) 235,000 575,000 550,000 770,000 330,000
Neighborhood Revitalization 0 0 0 0 275,000 275,000
Public Safety 680,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,680,000
Parking 632,000 0 0 0 0 632,000
General Government 646,000 0 0 0 0 646,000
TOTAL PROJECTS $ 7,384,000 8,731,000 10,060,000 2,165,000 2,360,000 30,700,000
**********Planning Years Only**********
$7,384,000 $8,731,000
$10,060,000
$2,165,000 $2,360,000
$0$2,000,000$4,000,000$6,000,000$8,000,000
$10,000,000$12,000,000
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18
Pro
ject
s Fu
nde
d
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Summary Sheets B-4
FY 2014-2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
SCHEDULE II Project Summaries with Applicable Funding Sources
FY 13/14 TOTAL
COMMITTED CAPITAL PROJECT
Project/Funding Source FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 COST
**********Planning Years Only**********
NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program)
State "C" Funds 525,000 0 0 0 0 0 525,000
Greenville County 48,671 0 0 0 0 0 48,671
General Fund Transfer 4,700,000 250,000 300,000 300,000 500,000 500,000 6,550,000
General Obligation Bond - 2001 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000
Stormwater Fund 177,350 0 0 0 0 0 177,350
General Obligation Bond - 2006 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 350,000
Totals 6,301,021 250,000 300,000 300,000 500,000 500,000 8,151,021
Street Resurfacing
Capital Projects Fund 354,000 0 0 0 0 0 354,000
General Fund Transfer 2,655,000 250,000 300,000 300,000 500,000 500,000 4,505,000
Totals 3,009,000 250,000 300,000 300,000 500,000 500,000 4,859,000
Fairforest Way Rehabilitation
Federal Appropriation - SAFETEA-LU 5,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 5,600,000
State Revenue 49,275 0 0 0 0 0 49,275
Greenville Water System 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000
General Obligation Bond - 2006 706,000 0 0 0 0 0 706,000
Property Sales 116,338 0 0 0 0 0 116,338
Totals 6,971,613 0 0 0 0 0 6,971,613
Salters Road Improvements
Property Sales 61,875 0 0 0 0 0 61,875
General Fund Transfer 210,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 360,000
Totals 271,875 150,000 0 0 0 0 421,875
Main Street Resurfacing
Downtown Infrastructure Fund 370,000 0 0 0 0 0 370,000
Totals 370,000 0 0 0 0 0 370,000
Haywood Road/Woods Crossing Intersection
Hospitality Tax Fund 194,000 0 0 0 0 0 194,000
Totals 194,000 0 0 0 0 0 194,000
Haywood Road Sidewalks
General Fund Transfer 0 0 0 115,000 0 0 115,000
Totals 0 0 0 115,000 0 0 115,000
Woodruff Road Sidewalks
General Fund Transfer 0 0 0 180,000 0 0 180,000
Totals 0 0 0 180,000 0 0 180,000
TOTAL ROADS AND BRIDGES 17,117,509 650,000 600,000 895,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 21,262,509
STREETSCAPES
Pete Hollis Corridor Impovements
Viola Street Tax Increment Fund 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 150,000
Totals 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 150,000
East McBee Avenue Improvements
Property Sales 14,704 0 0 0 0 0 14,704
Downtown Infrastructure Fund 746,667 0 0 0 0 0 746,667
Totals 761,371 0 0 0 0 0 761,371
ROADS AND BRIDGES
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Summary Sheets B-5
FY 13/14 TOTAL
COMMITTED CAPITAL PROJECT
Project/Funding Source FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 COST
**********Planning Years Only**********
Rhett/Camperdown Improvements
West End Tax Increment Fund 1,264,396 2,139,000 2,635,000 0 0 0 6,038,396
West End TIF Bond - Series 2013 1,989,000 (1,989,000) 0 0 0 0 0
Property Sales 30,004 0 0 0 0 0 30,004
Totals 3,283,400 150,000 2,635,000 0 0 0 6,068,400
Cultural Corridor Urban Trail
Downtown Infrastructure Fund 200,000 0 0 3,000,000 0 0 3,200,000
Totals 200,000 0 0 3,000,000 0 0 3,200,000
Village of West Greenville Improvements
Hospitality Tax Fund 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
Totals 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
Augusta Street Improvements
Capital Projects Fund 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 175,000
Totals 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 175,000
North Main Street Improvements
Viola Street Tax Increment Fund 228,000 0 0 0 0 0 228,000
Totals 228,000 0 0 0 0 0 228,000
Washington Street Improvements
Downtown Infrastructure Fund 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000
Totals 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000
Augusta Street Streetscaping (Baseball Stadium)
Admissions Tax Fund 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000
Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund 0 40,000 95,000 0 0 0 135,000
Totals 0 40,000 345,000 0 0 0 385,000
Broad Street Pedestrian Lighting
Downtown Infrastructure Fund 0 128,000 0 0 0 0 128,000
Totals 0 128,000 0 0 0 0 128,000
Downtown Streetscapes
Downtown Infrastructure Fund 0 165,000 0 0 0 0 165,000
Totals 0 165,000 0 0 0 0 165,000
North Main Street - Landmark Building
Downtown Infrastructure Fund 0 134,000 0 0 0 0 134,000
Totals 0 134,000 0 0 0 0 134,000
Spring/Falls Streetscape
Downtown Infrastructure Fund 0 25,000 101,000 0 0 0 126,000
Totals 0 25,000 101,000 0 0 0 126,000
Viola Streetscaping
Viola Street Tax Increment Fund 0 280,000 0 0 0 0 280,000
Totals 0 280,000 0 0 0 0 280,000
West Camperdown Way
West End Tax Increment Fund 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 250,000
Totals 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 250,000
Augusta at Faris Streetscape
General Fund Transfer 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 150,000
Totals 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 150,000
TOTAL STREETSCAPES 5,397,771 1,172,000 3,081,000 3,000,000 150,000 0 12,800,771
WASTEWATER
Haynie-Sirrine Wastewater System Rehabilitation
Wastewater Fund 409,000 0 0 0 0 0 409,000
Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2002 96,000 0 0 0 0 0 96,000
Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 1,695,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,695,000
State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund 2,005,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,005,000
Totals 4,205,000 0 0 0 0 0 4,205,000
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Summary Sheets B-6
FY 13/14 TOTAL
COMMITTED CAPITAL PROJECT
Project/Funding Source FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 COST
**********Planning Years Only**********
Verdae Sewer Expansion
Donations 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
Greenville Local Development Corporation 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000
Greenville Water System 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000
General Fund 366,000 0 0 0 0 0 366,000
Totals 1,166,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,166,000
Wastewater System Rehabilitation
Wastewater Fund 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 300,000
Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000
Totals 1,300,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,300,000
Wastewater System Survey and Model
Wastewater Fund 200,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 525,000
Totals 200,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 525,000
Basin 7 Sewer Rehabilitation
Wastewater Fund 250,000 345,000 0 0 0 0 595,000
Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 0 1,555,000 0 0 0 0 1,555,000
Totals 250,000 1,900,000 0 0 0 0 2,150,000
Basin 15 Sewer Rehabilitation
Wastewater Fund 250,000 400,000 0 0 0 0 650,000
Totals 250,000 400,000 0 0 0 0 650,000
Basin 16 Sewer Rehabilitation
Wastewater Fund 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000
Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2016 0 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 2,000,000
Totals 0 0 250,000 2,000,000 0 0 2,250,000
Basin 25 Sewer Rehabilitation
Wastewater Fund 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000
Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2016 0 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 2,000,000
Totals 0 0 250,000 2,000,000 0 0 2,250,000
TOTAL WASTEWATER 7,371,000 2,365,000 565,000 4,065,000 65,000 65,000 14,496,000
STORMWATER
Henderson Basin
Stormwater Fund 3,468,497 (1,398,000) 0 0 0 0 2,070,497
Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 61,000 0 0 0 0 0 61,000
Totals 3,529,497 (1,398,000) 0 0 0 0 2,131,497
Pinehurst Culvert Crossing Improvement
Stormwater Fund 0 435,000 0 0 0 0 435,000
Totals 0 435,000 0 0 0 0 435,000
Westview/Windsor Culverts
Stormwater Fund 740,680 0 0 0 0 0 740,680
Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 3,145 0 0 0 0 0 3,145
Totals 743,825 0 0 0 0 0 743,825
Pettigru Street Improvements
Stormwater Fund 395,963 0 0 0 0 0 395,963
Totals 395,963 0 0 0 0 0 395,963
Fairforest Way Basin
Stormwater Fund 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000
Totals 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000
White Oak Basin Phase II
Stormwater Fund 1,195,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 2,195,000
Totals 1,195,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 2,195,000
Gower Estates Stormwater Improvements
Wastewater Fund 231,000 0 0 0 0 0 231,000
Stormwater Fund 1,659,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,659,000
Totals 1,890,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,890,000
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Summary Sheets B-7
FY 13/14 TOTAL
COMMITTED CAPITAL PROJECT
Project/Funding Source FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 COST
**********Planning Years Only**********
Swanson Court
Stormwater Fund 263,000 0 0 0 0 0 263,000
Wastewater Fund 21,000 0 0 0 0 0 21,000
Totals 284,000 0 0 0 0 0 284,000
Richland Creek Water Quality Master Plan
Stormwater Fund 150,000 300,000 850,000 0 0 0 1,300,000
Totals 150,000 300,000 850,000 0 0 0 1,300,000
Public Works Complex Water Quality Improvements
Stormwater Fund 116,000 0 0 0 0 0 116,000
Totals 116,000 0 0 0 0 0 116,000
North Hills Area Stormwater Improvements
Stormwater Fund 0 100,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 1,100,000
Totals 0 100,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 1,100,000
Aldridge/Lacey Drainage Improvements
Stormwater Fund 0 0 0 425,000 0 0 425,000
Totals 0 0 0 425,000 0 0 425,000
Hilly Street Drainage Improvements
Stormwater Fund 0 0 0 700,000 0 0 700,000
Totals 0 0 0 700,000 0 0 700,000
TOTAL STORMWATER 8,504,285 437,000 1,850,000 1,125,000 0 0 11,916,285
PARKS AND RECREATION
Community Center Building Improvements
Property Sales 467,500 0 0 0 0 0 467,500
Capital Projects Fund 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
General Fund Transfer 750,000 0 0 0 0 0 750,000
General Obligation Bond - 2003 72,500 0 0 0 0 0 72,500
Totals 1,390,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,390,000
Main Street Tree Rehabilitation
CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2002 11,870 0 0 0 0 0 11,870
CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2003 14,313 0 0 0 0 0 14,313
Downtown Infrastructure Fund 911,985 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 0 1,511,985
Totals 938,168 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 0 1,538,168
Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access
Hospitality Tax Fund 655,766 0 0 0 0 0 655,766
State Grants 65,464 0 0 0 0 0 65,464
Property Sales 10,396 0 0 0 0 0 10,396
Capital Projects Fund 119,192 0 0 0 0 0 119,192
Totals 850,818 0 0 0 0 0 850,818
Reedy River Trail Expansion
Hospitality Tax Fund 325,000 0 0 0 0 0 325,000
Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2011 675,000 0 0 0 0 0 675,000
State Grants 240,000 0 0 0 0 0 240,000
Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2014 2,375,000 0 2,000,000 0 0 0 4,375,000
Totals 3,615,000 0 2,000,000 0 0 0 5,615,000
Park Restrooms
Capital Projects Fund 180,000 0 0 0 0 0 180,000
Downtown Infrastructure Fund 153,479 0 0 0 0 0 153,479
Hospitality Tax Fund 218,000 0 0 0 0 0 218,000
Totals 551,479 0 0 0 0 0 551,479
River Street Underpass
Hospitality Tax Fund 0 350,000 0 0 0 0 350,000
Downtown Infrastructure Fund 265,000 0 0 0 0 0 265,000
Totals 265,000 350,000 0 0 0 0 615,000
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Summary Sheets B-8
FY 13/14 TOTAL
COMMITTED CAPITAL PROJECT
Project/Funding Source FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 COST
**********Planning Years Only**********
Heritage Green Master Plan
Greenville County 1,508,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,508,000
Totals 1,508,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,508,000
Cleveland Park Bank Stabilization
Stormwater Fund 650,000 0 0 0 0 0 650,000
Totals 650,000 0 0 0 0 0 650,000
McPherson Park Bridges Rehabilitation
Downtown Infrastructure Fund 15,000 120,000 0 0 0 0 135,000
Totals 15,000 120,000 0 0 0 0 135,000
Cancer Survivors Park
Hospitality Tax Fund 94,000 630,000 0 0 0 0 724,000
Totals 94,000 630,000 0 0 0 0 724,000
NEXT Trail Connector
Hospitality Tax Fund 75,000 606,000 0 0 0 0 681,000
Totals 75,000 606,000 0 0 0 0 681,000
Falls Park Improvements
State Grants 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
Hospitality Tax Fund 608,000 0 0 0 0 0 608,000
Totals 708,000 0 0 0 0 0 708,000
Haywood at I-385 Interchange Landscaping
State Grants 265,856 0 0 0 0 0 265,856
Capital Projects Fund 66,464 0 0 0 0 0 66,464
Totals 332,320 0 0 0 0 0 332,320
Cleveland Park Horse Stables
Stormwater Fund 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 30,000
Totals 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 30,000
Greenville Dog Parks
General Fund Transfer 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000
Totals 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000
Greenville Tech Trailhead
Hospitality Tax Fund 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 125,000
Totals 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 125,000
Hudson Street Trailhead
Hospitality Tax Fund 0 225,000 0 0 0 0 225,000
Totals 0 225,000 0 0 0 0 225,000
Swamp Rabbit Trail Rubber Surface
Hospitality Tax Fund 0 145,000 0 0 0 0 145,000
Totals 0 145,000 0 0 0 0 145,000
Viola Center and Park Improvements
Viola Street Tax Increment Fund 0 146,000 0 0 0 0 146,000
Totals 0 146,000 0 0 0 0 146,000
TOTAL PARKS AND RECREATION 10,992,785 2,602,000 2,150,000 150,000 150,000 0 16,044,785
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Piazza Bergamo
Downtown Infrastructure Fund 5,310,000 0 0 0 0 0 5,310,000
Greenville Water System 228,650 0 0 0 0 0 228,650
Piedmont Natural Gas Grant 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 30,000
Property Sales 342,000 0 0 0 0 0 342,000
Totals 5,910,650 0 0 0 0 0 5,910,650
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Summary Sheets B-9
FY 13/14 TOTAL
COMMITTED CAPITAL PROJECT
Project/Funding Source FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 COST
**********Planning Years Only**********
TD Convention Center Kitchen Retrofit
Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2011 115,000 0 0 0 0 0 115,000
Hospitality Tax Fund 110,000 0 0 0 0 0 110,000
Totals 225,000 0 0 0 0 0 225,000
Commercial Corridors
Capital Projects Fund 453,556 0 0 0 0 0 453,556
State Revenue 16,960 0 0 0 0 0 16,960
General Fund Transfer 0 300,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 700,000
Greenville County 34,357 0 0 0 0 0 34,357
Property Sales 70,000 0 0 0 0 0 70,000
Totals 574,873 300,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 1,274,873
West End Property Acquisition
West End Tax Increment Fund 2,500,000 (2,500,000) 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 2,500,000 (2,500,000) 0 0 0 0 0
Peace Center
Downtown Infrastructure Fund 2,582,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,582,000
Totals 2,582,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,582,000
Hyatt Public Improvements
Property Sales 896,847 0 0 0 0 0 896,847
Totals 896,847 0 0 0 0 0 896,847
Markley at Rhett Improvements
Stormwater Fund 37,000 0 0 0 0 0 37,000
Utility Undergrounding Fund 49,000 0 0 0 0 0 49,000
West End Tax Increment Fund 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 175,000
Totals 261,000 0 0 0 0 0 261,000
TD Convention Center Chiller Plant
Local Accommodations Tax Fund 0 300,000 0 0 0 0 300,000
Totals 0 300,000 0 0 0 0 300,000
TD Convention Center Conference Center
Local Accommodations Tax Fund 0 100,000 135,000 475,000 450,000 170,000 1,330,000
Totals 0 100,000 135,000 475,000 450,000 170,000 1,330,000
TD Convention Center Parking Lots
Local Accommodations Tax Fund 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000
Totals 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000
TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 12,950,370 (1,800,000) 235,000 575,000 550,000 770,000 13,280,370
NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION
Haynie-Sirrine
Property Sales 125,545 0 0 0 0 0 125,545
General Obligation Bond - 2003 3,273 0 0 0 0 0 3,273
Miscellaneous Grants Fund 78,750 0 0 0 0 0 78,750
Revolving House Fund 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 75,000
Stormwater Fund 44,560 0 0 0 0 0 44,560
Capital Projects Fund 437,180 0 0 0 0 0 437,180
Totals 764,308 0 0 0 0 0 764,308
Mt. Eustis Street Improvements
Capital Projects Fund 401,000 0 0 0 0 0 401,000
General Fund Transfer 226,372 0 0 0 0 275,000 501,372
General Obligation Bond - 2006 85,000 0 0 0 0 0 85,000
Wastewater Fund 56,000 0 0 0 0 0 56,000
Stormwater Fund 63,000 0 0 0 0 0 63,000
Totals 831,372 0 0 0 0 275,000 1,106,372
TOTAL NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION 1,595,680 0 0 0 0 275,000 1,870,680
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Summary Sheets B-10
FY 13/14 TOTAL
COMMITTED CAPITAL PROJECT
Project/Funding Source FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 COST
**********Planning Years Only**********
PUBLIC SAFETY
East Area Fire Station
Property Sales 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 75,000
General Obligation Bond - 2013 3,881,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,881,000
Totals 3,956,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,956,000
Fire Facilities Assessment
Capital Projects Fund 70,000 0 0 0 0 0 70,000
Totals 70,000 0 0 0 0 0 70,000
Public Safety Cameras
Hospitality Tax Fund 0 500,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,500,000
Totals 0 500,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,500,000
Station Alerting System
General Fund Transfer 0 180,000 0 0 0 0 180,000
Totals 0 180,000 0 0 0 0 180,000
TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 4,026,000 680,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 5,706,000
PARKING
Richardson Street Garage
Downtown Infrastructure Fund 655,000 0 0 0 0 0 655,000
Totals 655,000 0 0 0 0 0 655,000
Poinsett Garage Rehabilitation
Parking Enterprise Fund 0 632,000 0 0 0 0 632,000
Totals 0 632,000 0 0 0 0 632,000
TOTAL PARKING 655,000 632,000 0 0 0 0 1,287,000
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
Phone System Replacement
Installment Lease Purchase - 2013 475,000 220,000 0 0 0 0 695,000
Totals 475,000 220,000 0 0 0 0 695,000
Public Works Operations Center
Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2012 3,100,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,100,000
Totals 3,100,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,100,000
Public Works Radio System
Capital Projects Fund 119,000 0 0 0 0 0 119,000
Solid Waste Enterprise Fund 106,000 0 0 0 0 0 106,000
Stormwater Fund 39,000 0 0 0 0 0 39,000
Wastewater Fund 57,000 0 0 0 0 0 57,000
Totals 321,000 0 0 0 0 0 321,000
Central Microsoft SQL Platform
General Fund Transfer 0 245,000 0 0 0 0 245,000
Totals 0 245,000 0 0 0 0 245,000
Roof Replacements
General Fund Transfer 0 76,000 0 0 0 0 76,000
Downtown Infrastructure Fund 0 105,000 0 0 0 0 105,000
Totals 0 181,000 0 0 0 0 181,000
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 3,896,000 646,000 0 0 0 0 4,542,000
TOTAL, ALL PROJECTS 72,506,400 7,384,000 8,731,000 10,060,000 2,165,000 2,360,000 103,206,400
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Summary Sheets B-11
FY 2014-2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE III
Project Summaries by Funding Source
FY 13/14
COMMITTED CAPITAL TOTAL
Funding Source/Project FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FUNDING
**********Planning Years Only**********
Admissions Tax Fund
Augusta Street Streetscaping (Baseball Stadium) 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000
Subtotal, Admissions Tax Fund 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000
Capital Projects Fund
Haynie-Sirrine 437,180 0 0 0 0 0 437,180
Mt. Eustis Street Improvements 401,000 0 0 0 0 0 401,000
Commercial Corridors 453,556 0 0 0 0 0 453,556
Street Resurfacing 354,000 0 0 0 0 0 354,000
Park Restrooms 180,000 0 0 0 0 0 180,000Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access 119,192 0 0 0 0 0 119,192
Community Center Building Improvements 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
Haywood at I-385 Interchange Landscaping 66,464 0 0 0 0 0 66,464
Augusta Street Improvements 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 175,000
Fire Facilities Assessment 70,000 0 0 0 0 0 70,000
Public Works Radio System 119,000 0 0 0 0 0 119,000
Subtotal, Capital Projects Fund 2,475,392 0 0 0 0 0 2,475,392
CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2002
Main Street Tree Rehabilitation 11,870 0 0 0 0 0 11,870
Subtotal, CDB Tax Increment Bond - 2002 11,870 0 0 0 0 0 11,870
CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2003
Main Street Tree Rehabilitation 14,313 0 0 0 0 0 14,313
Subtotal, CDB Tax Increment Bond - 2003 14,313 0 0 0 0 0 14,313
Donations
Verdae Sewer Expansion 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
Subtotal, Donations 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000
Downtown Infrastructure Fund
Main Street Tree Rehabilitation 911,985 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 0 1,511,985
East McBee Avenue Improvements 746,667 0 0 0 0 0 746,667
Park Restrooms 153,479 0 0 0 0 0 153,479
Main Street Resurfacing 370,000 0 0 0 0 0 370,000
River Street Underpass 265,000 0 0 0 0 0 265,000
Peace Center 2,582,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,582,000
Piazza Bergamo 5,310,000 0 0 0 0 0 5,310,000
McPherson Park Bridges 15,000 120,000 0 0 0 0 135,000
Cultural Corridor Urban Trail 200,000 0 0 3,000,000 0 0 3,200,000
Washington Street Improvements 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000
Richardson Street Garage 655,000 0 0 0 0 0 655,000
Broad Street Pedestrian Lights 0 128,000 0 0 0 0 128,000
Downtown Streetscapes 0 165,000 0 0 0 0 165,000
North Main Street - Landmark Building 0 134,000 0 0 0 0 134,000
Spring/Falls Streetscape 0 25,000 101,000 0 0 0 126,000
Roof Replacement 0 105,000 0 0 0 0 105,000
Subtotal, Downtown Infrastructure Fund 11,709,131 827,000 251,000 3,150,000 150,000 0 16,087,131
Federal Appropriation - SAFETEA-LU
Fairforest Way Rehabilitation 5,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 5,600,000
Subtotal, Fed. Appropriation - SAFETEA-LU 5,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 5,600,000
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Summary Sheets B-12
FY 13/14
COMMITTED CAPITAL TOTAL
Funding Source/Project FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FUNDING
**********Planning Years Only**********
General Fund Transfer
NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) 4,700,000 250,000 300,000 300,000 500,000 500,000 6,550,000
Street Resurfacing 2,655,000 250,000 300,000 300,000 500,000 500,000 4,505,000
Community Center Building Improvements 750,000 0 0 0 0 0 750,000
Salters Road Improvements 210,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 360,000
Verdae Sewer Expansion 366,000 0 0 0 0 0 366,000
Mt. Eustis Street Improvements 226,372 0 0 0 0 275,000 501,372
Haywood Road Sidewalks 0 0 0 115,000 0 0 115,000
Woodruff Road Sidewalks 0 0 0 180,000 0 0 180,000
Augusta at Faris Streetscape 0 0 0 0 150,000 0 150,000
Greenville Dog Parks 0 75,000 0 0 0 0 75,000
Commercial Corridors 0 300,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 700,000
Station Alerting System 0 180,000 0 0 0 0 180,000
Central SQL Platform 0 245,000 0 0 0 0 245,000
Roof Replacement 0 76,000 0 0 0 0 76,000
Subtotal, General Fund Transfer 8,907,372 1,526,000 700,000 995,000 1,250,000 1,375,000 14,753,372
General Obligation Bond - 2001
NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000
Subtotal, General Obligation Bond - 2001 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000
General Obligation Bond - 2003
Community Center Building Improvements 72,500 0 0 0 0 0 72,500
Haynie-Sirrine 3,273 0 0 0 0 0 3,273
Subtotal, General Obligation Bond - 2003 75,773 0 0 0 0 0 75,773
General Obligation Bond - 2006NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 350,000Mt. Eustis Street Improvements 85,000 0 0 0 0 0 85,000Fairforest Way Rehabilitation 706,000 0 0 0 0 0 706,000
Subtotal, General Obligation Bond - 2006 1,141,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,141,000
General Obligation Bond - 2013
East Area Fire Station 3,881,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,881,000
Subtotal, General Obligation Bond - 2013 3,881,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,881,000
Greenville CountyNSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) 48,671 0 0 0 0 0 48,671Commercial Corridors 34,357 0 0 0 0 0 34,357Heritage Green Master Plan 1,508,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,508,000
Subtotal, Greenville County 1,591,028 0 0 0 0 0 1,591,028
Greenville Local Development Corporation
Verdae Sewer Expansion 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000
Subtotal, Greenville Local Development Corporation 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000
Greenville Water SystemFairforest Way Rehabilitation 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000Verdae Sewer Expansion 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000Piazza Bergamo 228,650 0 0 0 0 0 228,650
Subtotal, Greenville Water System 1,228,650 0 0 0 0 0 1,228,650
Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2011
Reedy River Trail Expansion 675,000 0 0 0 0 0 675,000
TD Convention Center Kitchen Retrofit 115,000 0 0 0 0 0 115,000
Subtotal, Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2011 790,000 0 0 0 0 0 790,000
Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2014Reedy River Trail Expansion 2,375,000 0 2,000,000 0 4,375,000
Subtotal, Hospitality Tax Bond - Series 2014 2,375,000 0 2,000,000 0 0 0 4,375,000
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Summary Sheets B-13
FY 13/14
COMMITTED CAPITAL TOTAL
Funding Source/Project FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FUNDING
**********Planning Years Only**********
Hospitality Tax Fund
Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access 655,766 0 0 0 0 0 655,766Reedy River Trail Expansion 325,000 0 0 0 0 0 325,000TD Convention Center Kitchen Retrofit 110,000 0 0 0 0 0 110,000Haywood Road/Woods Crossing Intersection 194,000 0 0 0 0 0 194,000Park Restrooms 218,000 0 0 0 0 0 218,000Cancer Survivors Park 94,000 630,000 0 0 0 0 724,000NEXT Trail Connector 75,000 606,000 0 0 0 0 681,000Falls Park Improvements 608,000 0 0 0 0 0 608,000Village of West Greenville Improvements 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000Greenville Tech Trailhead 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 125,000Hudson Street Trailhead 0 225,000 0 0 0 0 225,000River Street Underpass 0 350,000 0 0 0 0 350,000Swamp Rabbit Trail Rubber Surface 0 145,000 0 0 0 0 145,000Public Safety Cameras 0 500,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,500,000
Subtotal, Hospitality Tax Fund 2,379,766 2,581,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 5,960,766
Installment Lease Purchase Agreement - 2013Phone System Replacement 475,000 220,000 0 0 0 0 695,000
Subtotal, Installment Lease Purchase Agree. - 2013 475,000 220,000 0 0 0 0 695,000
Local Accomodations Tax FundTD Convention Center Chiller Plant 0 300,000 0 0 0 0 300,000TD Convention Center Conference Center Upgrades 0 100,000 135,000 475,000 450,000 170,000 1,330,000TD Convention Center Parking Lots 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000
Subtotal, Local Accommodations Tax Fund 0 400,000 135,000 475,000 450,000 670,000 2,130,000
Miscellaneous Grants FundHaynie-Sirrine 78,750 0 0 0 0 0 78,750
Subtotal, Miscellaneous Grants Fund 78,750 0 0 0 0 0 78,750
Parking Enterprise FundPoinsett Garage Rehabilitation 0 632,000 0 0 0 0 632,000
Subtotal, Parking Fund 0 632,000 0 0 0 0 632,000
Piedmont Natural Gas GrantPiazza Bergamo 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 30,000
Subtotal, Piedmont Natural Gas Grant 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 30,000
Property SalesCommunity Center Building Improvements 467,500 0 0 0 0 0 467,500Piazza Bergamo 342,000 0 0 0 0 0 342,000Rhett/Camperdown Street Improvements 30,004 0 0 0 0 0 30,004Haynie-Sirrine 125,545 0 0 0 0 0 125,545East Area Fire Station 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 75,000Cleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access 10,396 0 0 0 0 0 10,396East McBee Avenue Improvements 14,704 0 0 0 0 0 14,704Salters Road Improvements 61,875 0 0 0 0 0 61,875Commercial Corridors 70,000 0 0 0 0 0 70,000Hyatt Public Improvements 896,847 0 0 0 0 0 896,847Fairforest Way Rehabilitation 116,338 0 0 0 0 0 116,338
Subtotal, Property Sales 2,210,209 0 0 0 0 0 2,210,209
Revolving Housing FundHaynie-Sirrine 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 75,000 Subtotal, Revolving Housing Fund 75,000 0 0 0 0 0 75,000
Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2002Haynie-Sirrine Basin Rehabilitation 96,000 0 0 0 0 0 96,000
Subtotal, Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2002 96,000 0 0 0 0 0 96,000
Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013Haynie-Sirrine Basin Rehabilitation 1,695,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,695,000Wastewater Rehabilitation 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000Basin 7 Rehabilitation 0 1,555,000 0 0 0 0 1,555,000
Subtotal, Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 2,695,000 1,555,000 0 0 0 0 4,250,000
Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2016Basin 16 Rehabilitation 0 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 2,000,000Basin 25 Rehabilitation 0 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 2,000,000
Subtotal, Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2016 0 0 0 4,000,000 0 0 4,000,000
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Summary Sheets B-14
FY 13/14
COMMITTED CAPITAL TOTAL
Funding Source/Project FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FUNDING
**********Planning Years Only**********
Solid Waste Enterprise Fund
Public Works Radio System Replacement 106,000 0 0 0 0 0 106,000Subtotal, Solid Waste Enterprise Fund 106,000 0 0 0 0 0 106,000
State "C" FundsNSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) 525,000 0 0 0 0 0 525,000
Subtotal, State "C" Funds 525,000 0 0 0 0 0 525,000
State Clean Water Revolving Loan FundHaynie-Sirrine Basin Rehabilitation 2,005,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,005,000
Subtotal, State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund 2,005,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,005,000
State GrantsCleveland Park Repairs and Neighborhood Access 65,464 0 0 0 0 0 65,464Haywood at I-385 Interchange Landscaping 265,856 0 0 0 0 0 265,856Falls Park Improvements 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 100,000Reedy River Trail Expansion 240,000 0 0 0 0 0 240,000
Subtotal, State Grants 671,320 0 0 0 0 0 671,320
State RevenueFairforest Way Rehabilitation 49,275 0 0 0 0 0 49,275Commercial Corridors 16,960 0 0 0 0 0 16,960
Subtotal, State Revenue 66,235 0 0 0 0 0 66,235
Stormwater FundHaynie-Sirrine 44,560 0 0 0 0 0 44,560Pettigru Street Improvements 395,963 0 0 0 0 0 395,963Henderson Basin 3,468,497 (1,398,000) 0 0 0 0 2,070,497Pinehurst Culvert Crossing 0 435,000 0 0 0 0 435,000Fairforest Way Basin 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000White Oak Basin Phase II 1,195,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 2,195,000Westview/Windsor Culverts 740,680 0 0 0 0 0 740,680Gower Estates Stormwater Rehabilitation 1,659,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,659,000Swanson Court 263,000 0 0 0 0 0 263,000Richland Creek Water Quality Master Plan 150,000 300,000 850,000 0 0 0 1,300,000NSTEP (New Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program) 177,350 0 0 0 0 0 177,350Public Works Complex Water Quality Improvements 116,000 0 0 0 0 0 116,000Mt. Eustis Street Improvements 63,000 0 0 0 0 0 63,000Public Works Radio System 39,000 0 0 0 0 0 39,000Cleveland Park Bank Stabilization 650,000 0 0 0 0 0 650,000Markley at Rhett Improvements 37,000 0 0 0 0 0 37,000North Hills Area Stormwater 0 100,000 1,000,000 0 0 0 1,100,000Aldridge/Lacey Drainage Improvements 0 0 0 425,000 0 0 425,000Hilly Street Drainage Improvements 0 0 0 700,000 0 0 700,000Cleveland Park Horse Stables 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 30,000
Subtotal, Stormwater Fund 9,199,050 467,000 1,850,000 1,125,000 0 0 12,641,050
Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001Henderson Basin 61,000 0 0 0 0 0 61,000Westview/Windsor Culverts 3,145 0 0 0 0 0 3,145
Subtotal, Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 64,145 0 0 0 0 0 64,145
Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2012Public Works Operations Center 3,100,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,100,000
Subtotal, Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2012 3,100,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,100,000
Sunday Alcohol Permits FundAugusta Street Streetscape (Baseball Stadium) 0 40,000 95,000 0 0 0 135,000
Subtotal, Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund 0 40,000 95,000 0 0 0 135,000
Utility Undergrounding FundMarkley at Rhett Improvements 49,000 0 0 0 0 0 49,000
Subtotal, Utility Undergrounding Fund 49,000 0 0 0 0 0 49,000
Viola Street Tax Increment FundPete Hollis Corridor Improvements 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 150,000North Main Street Improvements 228,000 0 0 0 0 0 228,000Viola Center and Park Improvements 0 146,000 0 0 0 0 146,000Viola Streetscaping 0 280,000 0 0 0 0 280,000
Subtotal, Viola Street Tax Increment Fund 378,000 426,000 0 0 0 0 804,000
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Summary Sheets B-15
FY 13/14
COMMITTED CAPITAL TOTAL
Funding Source/Project FUNDING BUDGET FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FUNDING
**********Planning Years Only**********
Wastewater Fund
Haynie-Sirrine Basin Rehabilitation 409,000 0 0 0 0 0 409,000Mt. Eustis Street Improvements 56,000 0 0 0 0 0 56,000Wastewater Rehabilitation 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 300,000Wastewater Survey and Model 200,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 525,000Basin 7 Rehabilitation 250,000 345,000 0 0 0 0 595,000Basin 15 Rehabilitation 250,000 400,000 0 0 0 0 650,000Basin 16 Rehabilitation 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000Basin 25 Rehabilitation 0 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000Gower Estates Stormwater Rehabilitation 231,000 0 0 0 0 0 231,000Swanson Court 21,000 0 0 0 0 0 21,000Public Works Radio System 57,000 0 0 0 0 0 57,000
Subtotal, Wastewater Fund 1,774,000 810,000 565,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 3,344,000
West End Tax Increment Fund West End Property Acquisition 2,500,000 (2,500,000) 0 0 0 0 0Markley at Rhett Improvements 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 175,000West Camperdown Way 0 250,000 0 0 0 0 250,000Rhett/Camperdown Improvements 1,264,396 2,139,000 2,635,000 0 0 0 6,038,396
Subtotal, West End Tax Increment Fund 3,939,396 (111,000) 2,635,000 0 0 0 6,463,396
West End TIF Bond - 2013Rhett/Camperdown Improvements 1,989,000 (1,989,000) 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal, West End TIF Bond - 2013 1,989,000 (1,989,000) 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL, ALL FUNDING SOURCES 72,506,400 7,384,000 8,731,000 10,060,000 2,165,000 2,360,000 103,206,400
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Summary Sheets B-16
FY 2014-2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SCHEDULE IV
Unfunded Projects
FY 13/14 TOTAL
PROJECT REQUEST FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 REQUEST
PROJECT DOES NOT APPEAR IN CIP - NO FUNDING (REQUESTED AMOUNT SHOWN)
ADA Curb Ramp Compliance $ 50,000 228,625 240,056 252,059 264,662 1,035,402
Auditorium Site 1,200,000 0 0 0 0 1,200,000
Calhoun Street Connection 244,450 0 0 0 0 244,450
Camperdown/Falls Park 150,000 0 0 0 0 150,000
Chick Springs Greenway 35,000 285,750 0 0 0 320,750
Church Street Streetscape 759,796 0 0 0 0 759,796
City Hall Energy Upgrades 625,000 0 0 0 0 625,000
Cleveland Park Sewer Line Concealment 0 250,000 0 0 0 250,000
Cleveland Street Extension Curves 567,000 0 0 0 0 567,000
Cleveland Street Sidewalk 246,000 0 0 0 0 246,000
Juanita Butler Administration Building 243,000 0 0 0 0 243,000
Landmark Streetscape 200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000
Market Point Drive Connector 1,900,000 0 0 0 0 1,900,000
McBee Avenue - Keys 200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000
McBee Avenue Plaza 500,000 0 0 0 0 500,000
Neighborhood Park Improvements 98,000 54,000 71,000 54,000 60,000 337,000
Outdoor Fitness Center 105,000 0 0 0 0 105,000
Park Parking Lots 90,000 75,000 80,000 75,000 0 320,000
Park Playgrounds 142,500 61,000 82,000 18,000 0 303,500
Reedy River Park 500,000 0 0 0 0 500,000
Ridge Road Soccer Fields 798,200 0 0 0 0 798,200
Sidewalk Gap 358,000 360,850 363,843 366,985 0 1,449,678
Wenwood Fire Station 4,540,495 0 0 0 0 4,540,495
West Greenville Community Center Improvements 615,000 0 0 0 0 615,000
FY 13/14 TOTAL
PROJECT REQUEST FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 REQUEST
PROJECT IN CIP - NOT FULLY FUNDED BASED ON REQUEST (UNFUNDED PORTION SHOWN)
NSTEP 308,500 259,850 262,843 65,985 69,284 966,462
Street Resurfacing 250,000 200,000 200,000 0 0 650,000
Cultural Corridor Urban Trail 0 300,000 1,512,500 0 0 1,812,500
Downtown Streetscapes 155,200 0 0 0 0 155,200
North Main Street - Landmark Building 66,000 0 0 0 0 66,000
Basin 7 Sewer Rehabilitation 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000
Basin 15 Sewer Rehabilitation 1,600,000 0 0 0 0 1,600,000
Cleveland Park Horse Stables 485,000 0 0 0 0 485,000
Greenville Dog Parks 141,000 0 0 0 0 141,000
TOTAL UNFUNDED PROJECTS $ 17,273,141 2,075,075 2,812,242 832,029 393,946 23,386,433
**********Planning Years Only**********
**********Planning Years Only**********
Roads & Bridges C-1
ROADS AND BRIDGES
East Faris Road at the intersection of Cleveland Street recently was upgraded with sidewalks through the NSTEP program. The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program enhances streets throughout the City to accommodate motorists and non-motorists alike.
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Roads & Bridges C-2
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Roads & Bridges C-3
JULY 1999 ON-GOING 2025+
Based on a per linear foot cost developed from NSTEP Rounds 1 through 7.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):NSTEP Round 7C (McDaniel Avenue from Broad Street to Ridgeland Drive construction) nearing completion.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
In the late 1990's, it was determined that development of a new sidewalk program would benefit the City and its residents in a variety of ways. These include safety to pedestrians by providing a designated area to travel and traffic calming from the addition of curb and gutter, accessibility standards and requirements (ADA), landscaping and vegetation, and interest and pleasantness provided by the improvements. The NSTEP criteria to determine the priority for constructing sidewalk was revisted at City Council's request and revised in January 2011.
CONTINUATION
Project Description:The NSTEP Program (Neighborhood Sidewalk Targeted Expansion Program), was developed in response to concerns expressed by City residents. It is an on-going project designed to construct sidewalk on at least one side of every street within the City of Greenville. As part of the NSTEP program, not only is sidewalk with a curb lawn constructed, but as part of the improvements, curb, gutter and storm drainage improvements are made to the street as well.
CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODSProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP A
NSTEP (NEIGHBORHOOD SIDEWALK TARGETED EXPANSION PROGRAM)
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $6,301,021 $250,000 $300,000 $300,000 $500,000 $500,000 $8,151,021Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $6,301,021 $250,000 $300,000 $300,000 $500,000 $500,000 $8,151,021TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
State "C" Funds $525,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $525,000Greenville County $48,671 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,671General Fund $4,700,000 $250,000 $300,000 $300,000 $500,000 $500,000 $6,550,000General Obligation Bond - 2001 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000Stormwater Fund $177,350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $177,350General Obligation Bond - 2006 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $6,301,021 $250,000 $300,000 $300,000 $500,000 $500,000 $8,151,021
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Roads & Bridges C-4
JULY 2006 ON-GOING 2025+
STREET RESURFACING
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP A
REVISION
Project Description:The cost to rehabilitate one lane mile of City street is in the range of $60,000. The City of Greenville has approximately 600 lane miles of street that require regular maintenance. Consequently the number of lane miles that can be rehabilitated depends upon the funding that is appropriated for this program.
MOBILE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:
ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
The cost estimate is prepared based on current pricing for full depth patching, milling, and asphalt concrete in-place after the streets selected for rehabilitation are prioritized.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):An additional $500,000 was recently appropriated to support the Greenville County Delegation Transportation Committee's (GLDTC) 2013 Municipal Match Resurfacing Program. This is in addition to the previously committed $150,000.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
All City streets have been rated via a Pavement Quality Index (PQI) and the PQI were updated and field verified by a third party pavement management consulting firm in 2009. Rehabilitating streets is based on a priority of "worst to first". For the most recent projects, approximately 25% of the existing pavement structural sections on the streets that were resurfaced had to be removed and replaced prior to the new asphalt concrete surface course being placed. This indicates that the City of Greenville is in a "catch-up" mode. After the PQI ratings were field verified in 2009 the average PQI rating (scale 2 to 10) for our streets was 6.6. As of October 2012 the average PQI rating has slipped to 5.9. To maximize the expenditure of the maintenance dollar, it is imperative that all streets receive maintenance on a regular basis.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $3,009,000 $250,000 $300,000 $300,000 $500,000 $500,000 $4,859,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $3,009,000 $250,000 $300,000 $300,000 $500,000 $500,000 $4,859,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Capital Projects Fund $354,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $354,000General Fund $2,655,000 $250,000 $300,000 $300,000 $500,000 $500,000 $4,505,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $3,009,000 $250,000 $300,000 $300,000 $500,000 $500,000 $4,859,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Roads & Bridges C-5
APR 2007 DEC 2014
Engineer's estimate.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Phase 1 - Mauldin Road to Ridge Road is substantially complete. Phase 2 - Ridge Road to Laurens Road is funded by SAFETEA-LU Earmark. Design and right-of-way plans are complete. The next step is acquiring the right of way. There is no stimulus funding associated with this second phase. A 20% local match is also required for Phase 2 per our participation agreement with the SCDOT.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Fairforest Way provides an alternate transportation link to I-85 from Mauldin Road to Woodruff Road via Millennium Boulevard and Carolina Point Parkway. However, the existing pavement along Fairforest Way has deteriorated to a very substandard condition. Increased development in the area along with new residential housing also warrant the need for full pedestrian and bicycle accommodation.
CONTINUATION
Project Description:This project includes a total rehabilitation of roadway infrastructure along a 2.1 mile section of Fairforest Way. The new road will be a four lane divided arterial street with curb & gutter, sidewalks with curb lawns, landscape plantings, raised planted median islands, and the curb lanes will have shared bicycle lanes in each direction. Additionally, a new signal is planned for the Mauldin Road intersection and at the Wenwood Drive intersection. A signal upgrade is planned for the existing span wire signal at Ridge Road.
MOBILE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE A WIDE VARIETY OF TRANSPORTATION MODESStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
FAIRFOREST WAY REHABILITATION
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $310,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $310,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $6,621,613 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,621,613Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST $6,971,613 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,971,613TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Federal Grant - SAFETEA-LU $5,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,600,000State Revenue $49,275 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $49,275Greenville Water System $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000General Obligation Bond - 2006 $706,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $706,000Property Sales $116,338 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $116,338
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $6,971,613 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,971,613
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $68,763 $70,826 $72,950 $75,139 $77,394 $365,072Cumulative Operating Impact $68,763 $139,589 $212,539 $287,678 $365,072 $365,072FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Roads & Bridges C-6
OCT 2009 JUN 2015
Estimate provided by the SCDOT.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):The design consultant has finished the environmental study and is 60% complete with design. Right-of-way acquisition will begin in 2013 with construction starting in late 2014.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The Woodruff Road Corridor Study - Final Report recognized that secondary access to many of the developments on the eastside are essential in order to provide safe and efficient access to large scale development sites including ICAR, Millennium Campus, Verdae Development, and the TD Bank Campus. This will provide an alternate access to Woodruff Road and to these developments.
CONTINUATION
Project Description:Reconstructing Salters Road will provide an alternate transportation link to Woodruff Road by providing access to surrounding large-scale developments. The project will occur in two sections: Section 1 is from Verdae to Old Sulphur Springs Road (just west of I-85 Bridge), and Section 2 from Old Sulphur Springs Road to Millennium/Carolina Point Parkway (includes bridge over I-85). Both sections are currently on the Greenville-Pickens Area Transportation Improvement Program. The City, County, and SCDOT have a design and financial participation agreement. Section one requires a 20% local match (split between City and County) since this is a City road. Section 2 is a State road and no local match is required. The proposed cross-section for improvements is four travel lanes, bike lanes, and planted medians.
MOBILE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:PROVIDE LINKAGES BETWEEN ALL TRANSPORTATION OPTIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
SALTERS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $61,875 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $61,875Site Acquisition Costs $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000Improvements $200,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $271,875 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $421,875TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Property Sales $61,875 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $61,875General Fund $210,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $360,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $271,875 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $421,875
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $16,732 $17,569 $18,447 $19,369 $72,117Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $16,732 $34,301 $52,748 $72,117 $72,117FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Roads & Bridges C-7
DEC 2012 NOV 2013
MAIN STREET RESURFACING
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A
CONTINUATION
Project Description:Main Street between Elford Street to West Camperdown Way currently exhibits random cracking. To improve the appearance of the street, the existing surface needs to be milled and resurfaced with asphalt concrete. Additionally, sections of the existing curb and gutter need to be removed and replaced.
MOBILE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:
MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Current construction costs for milling, placing asphalt concrete, and restriping.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Construction of this project will be scheduled after Project ONE and the Piazza Bergamo Project are completed.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Main Street is a focal point for the City of Greenville and it is imperative that the aesthetics of the City's infrastructure be maintained. Milling and resurfacing Main Street will improve its appearance, provide a better riding surface for motorists, and at the crosswalks will provide a safer walking surface for pedestrians.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $360,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $360,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST $370,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $370,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Downtown Infrastructure Fund $370,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $370,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $370,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $370,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Roads & Bridges C-8
JULY 2012 JULY 2013
HAYWOOD ROAD/WOODS CROSSING INTERSECTION
Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A
The Haywood Road Master Plan was adopted by City Council in December 2009. A key recommendation in the plan is to redevelop the intersection located at Haywood and Woods Crossing Roads as a model that will serve as a catalyst for private investment and as an example of the design vision for the future of the corridor. Phase 1 of this project includes the installation of mast arm traffic signals and some landscaping at the four corners of the intersection. Phase 2 would include a new asphalt treatment, crosswalks, and other aesthetic improvements as recommended in the Master Plan and will be submitted in a future budget request.
PROSPEROUS CITYENCOURAGE REVITALIZATION OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Project Status: Strategic Goal:NEW PROJECT
Project Description:
Detailed construction cost estimate provided by the Engineering Division based on unit costs for traffic signal upgrades and some landscaping.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Project is nearing completion.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Although the Haywood Road corridor has historically been a significant source of revenue for the City, the corridor is experiencing the early stages of decline due to a number of business closings and relocations to the Woodruff Road area. The completion of the Haywood Road Area Master Plan was the first step to counteract this declining trend to preserve existing businesses in the corridor and help position the corridor for the future. The creation of the model intersection recommended in the Master Plan will help to revitalize the corridor which is consistent with the City's Strategic Goal of creating a prosperous city and the goal of the Comprehensive Plan to encourage revitalization of commercial corridors.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $189,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $189,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST $194,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $194,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Hospitality Tax Fund $194,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $194,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $194,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $194,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $1,538 $1,615 $1,695 $1,780 $1,868 $8,496Cumulative Operating Impact $1,538 $3,153 $4,848 $6,628 $8,496 $8,496FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Roads & Bridges C-9
JAN 2016 JUN 2016
This project has been submitted for Enhancement Funds through GPATS in the amount of $245,000. This amount is part of the $845,000 five year period allocation for the years 2012 to 2017. This project is subject to approval by the GPATS Committee.
Engineering estimate based on current linear foot cost for the construction of sidewalk using a 5% annual inflation factor.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
This sidewalk will provide connectivity between the existing sidewalk just south of the I-385 bridge to Woods Lake Road and on Woods Lake Road from the entrance to the Extended Stay Motel to the entrance to Haywood Mall.
Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.):
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:The scope of this project includes the construction of approximately 1,800 linear feet of sidewalk on Haywood Road from south of the I-385 bridge (entrance to the Copper River Grill) to Woods Lake Road and on Woods Lake Road from Haywood Road northwest to the entrance to the Extended Stay Motel and on Woods Lake Road from Haywood Road to the entrance to Haywood Mall.
MOBILE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
HAYWOOD ROAD SIDEWALKS
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP B
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $115,000 $0 $0 $115,000Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $115,000 $0 $0 $115,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $115,000 $0 $0 $115,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $0 $0 $115,000 $0 $0 $115,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Roads & Bridges C-10
JAN 2016 JUN 2016
WOODRUFF ROAD SIDEWALKS
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP B
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:The scope of this project includes constructing approximately 4,500 linear feet of sidewalk along Woodruff Road from the Shops at Green Ridge to Costco.
MOBILE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
This project has been submitted for Enhancement Funds through GPATS in the amount of $200,000.00. This amount is part of the $845,000 five year period allocation for the years 2012 to 2017. This project is subject to approval by the GPATS Committee.
Engineering estimate based on current linear foot cost for the construction of sidewalk using a 5% inflation factor.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This project has not started.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
This sidewalk along Woodruff Road will provide pedestrian connectivity along Woodruff Road from the Shops at Green Ridge, Carolina Point Parkway, Market Point Drive, Magnolia Park, and Costco. This sidewalk will link several hotels with restaurants, retail shops, and entertainment venues. This sidewalk will provide a safe pedestrian route along Woodruff Road.
Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.):
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $180,000Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $180,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $180,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $0 $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $180,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
Streetscapes D-1
STREETSCAPES
The downtown area is constantly undergoing streetscape improvements to foster a vibrant City. The streetscape improvements proposed in the FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program continue investments throughout the City.
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Streetscapes D-2
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Streetscapes D-3
JULY 2007 JUN 2014
Project Status: Strategic Goal:
Start/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
CONTINUATION
PETE HOLLIS CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A
CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODS
Informal estimates.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Improvements are being planned in support of the Quick Trip.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The Pete Hollis Gateway Plan was adopted by City Council in 2006. Staff is continuing to work with several developers who have acquired property in anticipation of beginning development projects.
ENCOURAGE REVITALIZATION OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS
Project Description:The purpose of this project is to design and construct streetscape improvements in the Pete Hollis Boulevard/Buncombe Street area. The improvements will be made in support of private development.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Viola Street Tax Increment Fund $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Streetscapes D-4
OCT 2008 JULY 2014
Project Description:This project includes streetscape improvements for a better pedestrian link between Main Street and the McBee Station project in conjunction with future plans for the Peacock site. Streetscaping will include, but is not limited to, street furniture, pedestrian lighting, new sidewalks, and new curb and gutter.
Development agreements.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Construction is underway on the Peacock and American Roadside Burgers sites.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
This project ties in with the Downtown Master Plan by improving a major side street and helping to expand downtown economic development opportunities beyond Main Street.
Start/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
CONTINUATION
EAST MCBEE AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS
Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A
Project Status: Strategic Goal: PROSPEROUS CITYCREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $686,371 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $686,371Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $761,371 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $761,371TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Property Sales $14,704 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,704Downtown Infrastructure Fund $746,667 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $746,667
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $761,371 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $761,371
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $15,000 $15,750 $16,500 $47,250Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $15,000 $30,750 $47,250 $47,250FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Streetscapes D-5
FEB 2009 JUN 2016
RHETT/CAMPERDOWN STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A
REVISION
Project Description:This project involves streetscape improvements of approximately 1,350 feet of Camperdown Way from Main Street to River Street and approximately 2,100 feet of Rhett Street from Camperdown Way to Markley Street. Streetscaping is to include new sidewalks, curb and gutter, asphalt, landscaping, lighting, and street furniture. Improvements to the stormwater and sanitary sewer systems will also take place as part of this project.
The project will be implemented in four phases. Phase 1 is Camperdown Way from Main Street to River Street. Phase 2 is Rhett Street from Camperdown Way to River Street. Phase 3 is Rhett Street from Wardlaw Street to Markley Street. Phase 4 is Rhett Street from River Street to Wardlaw Street. Depending on development projects, streetscaping may extend down a portion of O'Neal, Wardlaw or Markley in order to provide a uniform look and feel.
Phase 1 is to begin after the completion of the power line undergrounding project on Camperdown Way.
PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Engineer's estimate for Phases 1 and 2. Phases 3 and 4 are based on plans previously prepared by an outside consultant.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Phase 1 is under design. Phases 2, 3 and 4 have schematic plans that were prepared by an outside consultant.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
As part of the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan, the purpose of this project is to implement the principle of expanding downtown beyond Main Street. Several projects are planned or have already begun along Camperdown Way and Rhett Street creating the need for safe, walkable, and accessible streets. The streetscape of Camperdown Way will complement the undergrounding of power lines on Camperdown Way.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $133,400 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $143,400Site Acquisition Costs $6,463 $0 $17,500 $0 $0 $0 $23,963Improvements $3,031,601 $150,000 $2,451,500 $0 $0 $0 $5,633,101Equipment $18,654 $0 $26,000 $0 $0 $0 $44,654Management $93,282 $0 $130,000 $0 $0 $0 $223,282
TOTAL PROJECT COST $3,283,400 $150,000 $2,635,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,068,400TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
West End Tax Increment Fund $1,264,396 $2,139,000 $2,635,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,038,396West End TIF Bond - 2013 $1,989,000 -$1,989,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Property Sales $30,004 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,004
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $3,283,400 $150,000 $2,635,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,068,400
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $31,000 $48,050 $65,953 $69,250 $72,713 $286,965Cumulative Operating Impact $31,000 $79,050 $145,003 $214,253 $286,965 $286,965FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Streetscapes D-6
JULY 2012 JULY 2017
Funding has been included as a placeholder in FY 2015-16 until project plans are complete.
The cost estimates provided for this project are based on the 30% schematic design plans and the cost estimates developed by the Downtown Streetscapes Master Plan consultant. Once the construction documents are completed during the design phase of the project, additional cost estimates will be developed that represent the costs of specific project features.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Phase 1 design and engineering underway.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The Cultural Corridor project has the potential to transform the north end of Main Street similar to the improvements seen in the West End that are a result of various public/private investments such as Falls Park, RiverPlace, West End Streetscape, and Fluor Field. Not only does this project apply several City Council "Strategic Goals", but it also addresses many of the Comprehensive Plan's Principles of walkability, mobility options, encouraging redevelopment, and emphasizing unique cultural characteristics of Greenville. Greenville County and the Heritage Green institutions were thoroughly involved in the planning process. Additionally, there is the potential to leverage County Hospitality Tax funding that Heritage Green is currently working to spend on campus improvements that would support improved connections between the Heritage Green campus and downtown.
Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.):
CONTINUATION
Project Description:The Cultural Corridor is a pedestrian oriented urban trail project between the Heritage Green campus and the Bi-Lo Center along the Beattie Street/College Street corridor. The street will be “road-dieted” from five lanes to four and three lanes and include a multi-purpose urban trail on the north side of the street. There are four phases of the project. Phase 1 will provide design and engineering between Heritage Green and North Main Street. Phase 2 will consist of the project construction from Main Street to Atwood Drive at Heritage Green. Phase 3 will provide design and engineering between the Bi-Lo Center and North Main Street. Phase 4 will consist of the project construction from the Bi-Lo Center to North Main Street.
CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
CULTURAL CORRIDOR URBAN TRAIL
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP D
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $200,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,200,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Downtown Infrastructure Fund $200,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,200,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $200,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,200,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $25,159 $25,955 $26,769 $77,883Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $25,159 $51,114 $77,883 $77,883FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Streetscapes D-7
JULY 2012 JUN 2014
VILLAGE OF WEST GREENVILLE IMPROVEMENTS
Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A
CONTINUATION
Project Description:This project will provide a ready source of funding for streetscape improvement projects associated with private development opportunities for the Art's District.
PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Estimates based on analysis by City Staff that include Public Works, Engineering, Traffic Engineering, and Parks and Grounds.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Project is on-hold.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
An available source of funding for streetscape and façade improvements is needed in order to facilitate and promote private development in the Arts District's Corridor. The redevelopment and sustainability of the Village of West Greenville Arts District is in agreement with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Village has seen the private sector take initiative to improve buildings and landscaping, and to form a business association.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Hospitality Tax Fund $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Streetscapes D-8
JULY 2012 JULY 2014
AUGUSTA STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A
CONTINUATION
Project Description:This project will provide streetscape improvements on Augusta Street, from Lupo Street to Capers Street (approximately 1,200 linear feet). These improvements will be completed following the planned relocation of overhead utility lines and removal of utility poles along this section of the corridor. The project will include the replacement and/or installation of curb and gutter, sidewalks, landscaping, decorative streetlights, furnishings, and amenities. These improvements will result in a safer environment for pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Planned coordination of the utility relocation and streetscape improvements will result in less disturbance to the businesses and residents in the area.
PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Preliminary estimate.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Design work in progress.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
This project supports the Council's commitment to the revitalization of the commercial corridors as well as meets the Strategic Goal of creating a prosperous city. In addition, this project meets the Comprehensive Plan Principles to create safe, walkable spaces and accessible destinations, and encourages redevelopment and infill for commercial corridors.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Capital Projects Fund $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $1,500 $1,545 $1,591 $1,639 $1,688 $7,964Cumulative Operating Impact $1,500 $3,045 $4,636 $6,275 $7,964 $7,964FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Streetscapes D-9
JULY 2012 JAN 2014
Project Status: Strategic Goal:
Start/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
CONTINUATION
NORTH MAIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: N/A
PROSPEROUS CITY
The cost estimates provided for this project are based on the 30% schematic design plans and a modified cost estimate developed by the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan consultant. At this time, staff recommends that the City only implement parts of the recommendations from the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan such as landscape islands, furniture, lighting, and specific areas of decorative pavers.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Project is under construction.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) resurfaced this segment of North Main Street in 2011. The City has successfully requested from SCDOT that the restriping of North Main follow the recommendations of these two master plans, which includes a new center left turn lane, bike lanes, on-street parking, and areas for landscaping. Streetscaping will improve the connectivity between downtown Greenville, Stone Avenue, Earle Street, and the North Main neighborhood. It also has the potential to initiate private redevelopment along North Main, especially the block between Park Avenue to Stone Avenue.
ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS
Project Description:This project will improve North Main Street from Academy Street to Stone Avenue. This project would fund the engineering design and construction of the new curbing, landscaping, and lighting to complete the design recommendations of the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan and Stone Avenue Master Plan.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $203,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $203,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $228,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $228,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Viola Street Tax Increment Fund $228,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $228,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $228,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $228,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $26,000 $26,780 $27,583 $28,411 $108,774Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $26,000 $52,780 $80,363 $108,774 $108,774FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Streetscapes D-10
JULY 2012 UNDETERMINED
WASHINGTON STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A
CONTINUATION
Project Description:Washington Street was identified for improvements in the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan. Out of the projects studied within the plan, Washington Street was ranked as a top priority project due to its relationship to Main Street, potential redevelopment opportunities, proximity to the multi-modal Greenlink Transit Center, and connectivity to several historic downtown neighborhoods. This capital project would expand the streetscaping associated with Project ONE to the other side of Washington to align with Laurens Street and the Greenlink Transfer Center.
PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Public Works estimate.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Project is on hold pending completion of Project ONE.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Washington Street serves as an important gateway to downtown and is geographically centered along Main Street between Beattie Place and Augusta Street. A recommendation of the 2007 Downtown Master Plan, as well as the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan, was to move beyond Main Street. The Washington Street Improvements project would support the goal of encouraging redevelopment beyond Main Street by creating safe, walkable spaces, and accessible destinations.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Downtown Infrastructure Fund $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $25,000 $25,750 $26,523 $27,000 $104,273Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $25,000 $50,750 $77,273 $104,273 $104,273FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Streetscapes D-11
JULY 2013 JULY 2014
Modified version from the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan (DSMP). The DSMP included all new infrastructure on both sides of Augusta Street, whereas this proposed streetscape project maintains most of the existing sidewalks and curb/gutter.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Augusta Street is an important gateway into downtown and implementing the Augusta Street Streetscape project would encourage redevelopment and infill for this important corridor.
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:Following the recent adoption of the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan, this project would extend streetscaping along both sides of Augusta Street between South Main Street and Dunbar Street. The project would require the shifting of the existing vehicular travel lanes along Augusta Street to accommodate new streetscaping. Improvements would include new sidewalks, lighting, landscaping, and other pedestrian features.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
AUGUSTA STREET STREETSCAPING (BASEBALL STADIUM)
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP C
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $345,000 $0 $0 $0 $345,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $40,000 $345,000 $0 $0 $0 $385,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Admissions Tax Fund $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000Sunday Alcohol Permits Fund $0 $40,000 $95,000 $0 $0 $0 $135,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $40,000 $345,000 $0 $0 $0 $385,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $8,240 $8,487 $8,740 $9,005 $9,275 $43,747Cumulative Operating Impact $8,240 $16,727 $25,467 $34,472 $43,747 $43,747FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Streetscapes D-12
JULY 2013 DEC 2013
BROAD STREET PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP B
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:This project will install 20 decorative deluxe acorn pedestrian lights along East Broad Street between South Main Street and the Church Street overpass. Proposed light locations fit within existing landscape and sidewalk right-of-way.
SAFE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:
CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENTStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
In-house estimate based on light quantity and existing unit price per Duke light.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Pedestrian lighting improves visibility, encourages pedestrian activity, and thereby creates a safe environment
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $128,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $128,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $128,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $128,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Downtown Infrastructure Fund $0 $128,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $128,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $128,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $128,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $5,000 $5,250 $5,513 $5,788 $6,078 $27,628Cumulative Operating Impact $5,000 $10,250 $15,763 $21,551 $27,628 $27,628FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Streetscapes D-13
JULY 2013 JULY 2014
DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPES
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP C
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:Funding allows for streetscape and pedestrian improvements on: Coffee St. and E. North St. where the Federal Courthouse Building will be constructed, on E. Washington St., and the Falls Park/Bowater pedestrian way between Japanese Dogwood Lane and the Liberty Bridge.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Modified consultant estimate for Downtown Streetscape Master Plan.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Allows for the completion of streetscape and pedestrian improvements in the downtown area.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $165,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $165,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $165,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $165,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Downtown Infrastructure Fund $0 $165,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $165,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $165,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $165,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $8,440 $8,740 $9,051 $9,372 $9,704 $45,306Cumulative Operating Impact $8,440 $17,180 $26,231 $35,602 $45,306 $45,306FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Streetscapes D-14
JULY 2013 JUN 2014
Modified consultant estimate from the Downtown Streetscape Master Plan.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Funding this project completes Main St. streetscape improvements between Academy St. and College St.
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:Funding allows for streetscape improvement on N. Main St. between Beattie/College St. and Elford St. consistent with the streetscape between Elford St. and Academy St. on N. Main St.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
NORTH MAIN STREET - LANDMARK BUILDING
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP C
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $119,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $119,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $134,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $134,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Downtown Infrastructure Fund $0 $134,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $134,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $134,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $134,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $2,380 $2,455 $2,530 $2,610 $2,690 $12,665Cumulative Operating Impact $2,380 $4,835 $7,365 $9,975 $12,665 $12,665FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Streetscapes D-15
JULY 2013 JULY 2015
Downtown Streetscape Master Plan cost estimate.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
A large majority of participants in the Comprehensive Plan supported more trees along our roadway corridors and requested the creation of "safe and walkable spaces and accessible destinations”. Less than half of surveyed respondents felt they could comfortably walk from their home to important destinations. Improved pedestrian infrastructure and landscaping along roadways calms traffic and encourages walking as transportation and recreation. The recently completed Downtown Streetscapes Master Plan identified several streets and intersections that would benefit from simple pedestrian oriented improvements.
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:This project would provide funds for design, engineering, construction documentation, and bid documents for streetscape improvements on North Spring Street and Falls Street between East North Street and East Camperdown Way, to improve the appearance, functionality, and sustainability of this corridor. Examples include tree and shrub plantings, stormwater planters, crosswalks, signage, and minor sidewalk construction. This project is part of the recently adopted Downtown Streetscape Master Plan.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
SPRING/FALLS STREETSCAPE
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP C
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $101,000 $0 $0 $0 $101,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $25,000 $101,000 $0 $0 $0 $126,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Downtown Infrastructure Fund $0 $25,000 $101,000 $0 $0 $0 $126,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $25,000 $101,000 $0 $0 $0 $126,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $5,435 $5,715 $6,045 $6,382 $23,577Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $5,435 $11,150 $17,195 $23,577 $23,577FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Streetscapes D-16
JULY 2013 JUN 2014
VIOLA STREETSCAPING
Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:Funds will be used make improvements at the Viola Neighborhood entrances including replacing landscape materials at Neal and Wilton Streets and Stone and Ivy Streets. Funding is also requested to replace deteriorated decorative light fixtures in the Viola Neighborhood. Funding will also be used to improve safety at key intersections including installing mast arms at Rutherford Street and W. Stone Avenue and W. Stone Avenue and Townes Street. Funding will also be used to complete streetscape improvements at scattered sites along the Pete Hollis and Buncombe Street Corridors. The scattered sites include Walker Street (off of Rutherford), the right of way in front of the former Hair Spa building and Lloyd Street at Pete Hollis Boulevard.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Cost estimates based on public body estimates provided by Traffic Engineering, Parks and Recreation and Community Development staff.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Cost estimates have been prepared to allow bidding once funding is approved.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Funding for streetscape and other improvements is being requested to support private investment being made along these corridors and in the Viola neighborhood.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $55,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $55,000Equipment $0 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $280,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $280,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Viola Street Tax Increment Fund $0 $280,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $280,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $280,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $280,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Streetscapes D-17
JULY 2013 JULY 2014
Modified consultant estimate for Downtown Streetscape Master Plan.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Allows for the completion of streetscape improvements between Academy St. and S. Main St. along W. Camperdown St.
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:Funding allows for streetscape improvements on West Camperdown St. between River St. and Academy St., including improved lighting.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
WEST CAMPERDOWN WAY
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: N/A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $24,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $226,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $226,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
West End Tax Increment Fund $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $6,380 $6,694 $7,023 $7,368 $7,730 $35,196Cumulative Operating Impact $6,380 $13,074 $20,097 $27,466 $35,196 $35,196FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Streetscapes D-18
JULY 2016 JULY 2017
Development agreement.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
This project supports the Council's commitment to the revitalization of the commercial corridors, and it meets the Strategic Goal of creating a prosperous city and the Comprehensive Plan principle to encourage redevelopment and infill for commercial corridors. The planned redevelopment of this site provides an opportunity to leverage funds to improve the public right-of-way adjacent to the site. Coordination is critical to ensuring the streetscape improvements are compatible with the new building placement and site configuration.
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:This project supports public streetscape improvements associated with a commercial development at Augusta Street and West Faris Road. Improvements include, but are not limited to, landscaping and street trees, decorative sidewalks and hardscape, decorative street lighting, site furnishings, and irrigation. These improvements will also complement the proposed relocation of overhead utility lines and poles at this location. Per the development agreement, the City is responsible for reimbursing the developer an amount not to exceed $150,000 for costs associated with the design and construction of the public streetscape improvements, which will be completed in conjunction with the private redevelopment of the site.
PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
AUGUSTA STREET AT FARIS ROAD STREETSCAPE
Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: GROUP A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $150,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $150,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $150,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $150,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,155 $12,155Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,155 $12,155FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
Wastewater E-1
WASTEWATER
The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program increases the City’s rehabilitation of its wastewater system with projects throughout the City.
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Wastewater E-2
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Wastewater E-3
JULY 2006 SEP 2013
HAYNIE-SIRRINE WASTEWATER SYSTEM REHABILITATION
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A
REVISION
Project Description:This project will support wastewater system rehabilitation in the Haynie-Sirrine neighborhood to address inadequate capacity and inflow and infiltration issues. This includes flow monitoring, CCTV inspection, surveying, hydraulic modeling, system evaluation, cast in place pipe slip lining, pipe bursting, and open trench line replacement.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:COORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTUREStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Consultant estimate based on the completed sanitary sewer evaluation showing the pipes needing to be repaired and historic unit prices.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Phase 1A construction is underway.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
This improvement will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basin and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this wastewater basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principles of coordinating housing development with infrastructure.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000Site Acquisition Costs $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000Improvements $3,680,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,680,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $4,205,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,205,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Wastewater Fund $409,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $409,000Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2002 $96,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $96,000Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 $1,695,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,695,000State Clean Water Revolving Loan Fund $2,005,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,005,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $4,205,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,205,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Wastewater E-4
OCT 2012 JULY 2013
Construction contract plus contingency.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Construction is underway.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Inadequate wastewater capacity is affecting the ability for development to occur in this area. This provides infrastructure to encourage residential development in the Verdae and Woodruff Road areas.
CONTINUATION
Project Description:This project will increase wastewater capacity in the vicinity of Verdae and Woodruff Road, and includes construction of 2,864 linear feet of 24” sewer, 288 linear feet of 8” sewer and 16 manholes. This will provide adequate capacity for future growth in the surrounding areas. The increased capacity totaled 2,900,000 gallons per day.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:COORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTUREStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
VERDAE SEWER EXPANSION
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $64,830 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $64,830Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $1,101,170 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,101,170Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,166,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,166,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Donations $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000Greenville Local Development Corporation $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000Greenville Water System $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000General Fund $366,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $366,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,166,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,166,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Wastewater E-5
JULY 2012 JULY 2014
Engineering estimate based on unit pricing of rehabilitation methods.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Engineering is working with legal for contracts with manhole rehabilitation and pipe bursting.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The rehabilitation will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basins and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this sewer basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principle of encouraging water conservation and water quality.
CONTINUATION
Project Description:This project provides for the rehabilitation of the wastewater system in areas identified as having limited capacity and excessive wet weather flows due to excessive inflow and infiltration as identified by ReWa and City flow monitoring. Several basins have been identified as requiring extensive rehabilitation including the Central Business District, Basin 9, and Basin 15. The methods include rehabilitation of approximately 650 manholes, 2,000 linear feet of pipe bursting, and 10,000 linear feet of pipe lining.
This project also includes right-of-way clearing for future rehabilitation and maintenance.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
WASTEWATER SYSTEM REHABILITATION
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $1,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Wastewater Fund $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Wastewater E-6
JULY 2012 JULY 2017
WASTEWATER SYSTEM SURVEY AND MODEL
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP B
CONTINUATION
Project Description:This project will obtain a survey of the City’s entire wastewater system over a period of five years. The survey will first be obtained for basins 7, 9 and 15, and those areas experiencing significant growth, such as the central business district. This information would be put into a sewer modeling software that will allow staff to accurately know present capacity limitations within the City and quickly determine what upgrades may be required, if any, when new projects are constructed.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:COORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTUREStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Estimate provided by consultant based on total number of manholes in the wastewater system and actual cost of modeling software.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Modeling software has been purchased, running test modeling on existing GIS data for verify correct survey is obtained.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The City has an extensive wastewater system with many areas at capacity based purely on wastewater flows. Currently it takes City staff months to analyze the system for new development as there is no detailed survey data of the sewer system and all the calculations are prepared by hand as the City does not own any modeling software. This program would allow staff to analyze the current condition of the system, assign flows by parcel, and identify current capacity limitations. Also, as new development enters the City in areas that have been surveyed and modeled, City staff could provide accurate flow availability for each parcel in just a few days. In addition to the above, having survey data will reduce the time in which sewer system rehabilitations are completed.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $176,880 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $501,880Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $16,120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,120Management $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST $200,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $525,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Wastewater Fund $200,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $525,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $200,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $525,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Wastewater E-7
JULY 2012 JULY 2015
BASIN 7 SEWER REHABILITATION
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP A
CONTINUATION
Project Description:This project provides for the rehabilitation of Basin 7 to reduce inflow and infiltration, thus increasing available capacity. Based on flow monitoring the majority of this basin has been identified as having excessive inflow and infiltration. The project would include surveying of the wastewater system and modeling the wastewater flows to ensure that capacity is available for future growth. The flow isolation method would be utilized to identify significant sources of inflow and infiltration. The method includes cataloging flow through all of the manholes during dry weather conditions and again during wet weather conditions to pinpoint the sources of increased flow. Once those sources have been identified, the pipe segments will be videoed to determine the ideal method (pipe bursting, pipe lining, or open cut replacements) for rehabilitation. Once the pipe is rehabilitated, the system would be reanalyzed during wet weather events. Once the major sources of inflow and infiltration have been removed the system will be flow monitored to determine the dry and wet weather peaking factor and come into compliance with the 15-year work plan.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Engineering estimate.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Contractor selection for CCTV work and smoke testing of the basin.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The rehabilitation will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basin and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin.
Improving this sewer basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principle of encouraging water conservation and water quality.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $1,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,900,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $250,000 $1,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,150,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Wastewater Fund $250,000 $345,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $595,000Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2013 $0 $1,555,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,555,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $250,000 $1,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,150,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Wastewater E-8
JULY 2012 JULY 2015
BASIN 15 SEWER REHABILITATION
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP A
CONTINUATION
Project Description:This supports the rehabilitation of Basin 15 to reduce inflow and infiltration thus increasing available capacity. Based on flow monitoring the majority of this basin has been identified as having excessive inflow and infiltration. The project would include surveying of the wastewater system and modeling the wastewater flows to ensure that capacity is available for future growth. The flow isolation method would be utilized to identify significant sources of inflow and infiltration. The method includes cataloging flow through all of the manholes during dry weather conditions and again during wet weather conditions to pinpoint the sources of increased flow. Once those sources have been identified, the pipe segments will be videoed to determine the ideal method (pipe bursting, pipe lining, or open cut replacements) for rehabilitation. Once the pipe is rehabilitated, the system would be re-analyzed during wet weather events. Once the major sources of inflow and infiltration have been removed the system will be flow monitored to determine the dry and wet weather peaking factor and come into compliance with the 15-year work plan.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Engineering estimate.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Preparing RFP for CCTV and smoke testing throughout the basin.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The rehabilitation will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basin and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this sewer basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principles of encouraging water conservation and water quality.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $250,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Wastewater Fund $250,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $250,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Wastewater E-9
JULY 2014 JULY 2017
BASIN 16 SEWER REHABILITATION
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP D
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:This supports the rehabilitation of Basin 16 to reduce inflow and infiltration thus increasing available capacity. Based on flow monitoring the majority of this basin has been identified as having excessive inflow and infiltration. The project would include surveying of the wastewater system and modeling the wastewater flows to ensure that capacity is available for future growth. The flow isolation method would be utilized to identify significant sources of inflow and infiltration. The method includes cataloging flow through all of the manholes during dry weather conditions and again during wet weather conditions to pinpoint the sources of increased flow. Once those sources have been identified, the pipe segments will be videoed to determine the ideal method (pipe bursting, pipe lining, or open cut replacements) for rehabilitation. Once the pipe is rehabilitated, the system would be re-analyzed during wet weather events. Once the major sources of inflow and infiltration have been removed the system will be flow monitored to determine the dry and wet weather peaking factor and come into compliance with the 15-year work plan.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Engineering estimate.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The rehabilitation will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basin and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this sewer basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principles of encouraging water conservation and water quality.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $250,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,250,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Wastewater Fund $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2016 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $0 $250,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,250,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Wastewater E-10
JULY 2014 JULY 2017
BASIN 25 SEWER REHABILITATION
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP C
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:This supports the rehabilitation of Basin 25 to reduce inflow and infiltration thus increasing available capacity. Based on flow monitoring the majority of this basin has been identified as having excessive inflow and infiltration. The project would include surveying of the wastewater system and modeling the wastewater flows to ensure that capacity is available for future growth. The flow isolation method would be utilized to identify significant sources of inflow and infiltration. The method includes cataloging flow through all of the manholes during dry weather conditions and again during wet weather conditions to pinpoint the sources of increased flow. Once those sources have been, identified the pipe segments will be videoed to determine the ideal method (pipe bursting, pipe lining, or open cut replacements) for rehabilitation. Once the pipe is rehabilitated, the system would be re-analyzed during wet weather events. Once the major sources of inflow and infiltration have been removed the system will be flow monitored to determine the dry and wet weather peaking factor and come into compliance with the 15-year work plan.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Engineering estimate.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The rehabilitation will reduce inflow and infiltration within the basin and will increase flow capacity. Rehabilitation is needed to meet a 15-year work plan that was part of an intergovernmental agreement with ReWa, which released the City from an EPA consent order. Reducing inflow and infiltration will reduce the amount of flow that enters the City's collection system prior to arrival at the ReWa Mauldin Road Wastewater Treatment Plant. This improvement will also provide flow capacity for future redevelopment within the basin. Improving this sewer basin is in line with the Strategic Goal of creating a sustainable city and with the Comprehensive Plan Principles of encouraging water conservation and water quality.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $250,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,250,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Wastewater Fund $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000Sanitary Sewer Revenue Bond - 2016 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $0 $250,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,250,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
Stormwater F-1
STORMWATER
The Water Quality Monitoring Station provides data that allows for better detection and decision-making regarding necessary stormwater infrastructure investments. As a result, the FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program funds a number of projects that seek to reduce flood losses or improve water quality.
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Stormwater F-2
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Stormwater F-3
JUN 2007 SEP 2013
Actual design and construction costs with allowing for additional funding as necessary for responding to FEMA comments.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):All six culverts have been constructed. The Letter of Map Revision has been prepared and will be submitted to FEMA once a public meeting is held.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Prior to construct completion, Gower Creek overtopped numerous roadways within Henderson Basin including Cleveland Street Extension, Wembley Road, and two locations on Henderson Road. There are also multiple residential structures that flood along the creek resulting is repetitive flood insurance claims through the National Flood Insurance Program. With this project, all but one roadway crossing has been designed to not overtop during the 100-year storm event. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas.
REVISION
Project Description:This project replaced inadequate culvert crossings at Halidon Road, Parkins Mill Road, Cleveland Street Extension, Wembley Road and two crossings at Henderson Road. Construction was completed in July 2012. The timeline has been adjusted to allow preparation and review time for the FEMA Letter of Map Revision now that construction is complete.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:
ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
HENDERSON BASIN
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $170,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $3,359,497 ($1,398,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,961,497Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $3,529,497 ($1,398,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,131,497TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Stormwater Fund $3,468,497 ($1,398,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,070,497Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 $61,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $61,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $3,529,497 ($1,398,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,131,497
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Stormwater F-4
JULY 2013 JULY 2014
Engineering estimate based on projects of similar size and scope.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Awaiting funding for project commencement.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
This project will reduce flooding in the area, prevent road overtopping, and improve the bank's stability. The Richland Creek tributary, which crosses under Pinehurst Drive, carries flow from approximately 350 acres. The existing culvert has minimal capacity to carry heavy storm flows in the creek and is prone to blockage.
The proposed upgrades will significantly improve the hydraulic capacity at the crossing, reduce regular maintenance, and would benefit private property owners directly upstream from significant reductions in the backwater flood profile. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goals of a sustainable city and a mobile city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas.
REVISION
Project Description:This project will replace an undersized culvert crossing at Pinehurst Drive. Due to upstream development, the existing culvert size became insufficient to handle the increasing stormwater flow. To mitigate this, the project will install a new arch 10' x 5.5' x 80' culvert at Pinehurst Drive.
The Windsor Drive culvert improvement was removed from this scope of work and added to Westview Avenue due to coordination issues.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:
ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
PINEHURST CULVERT CROSSING IMPROVEMENT
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $435,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $435,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Stormwater Fund $0 $435,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $435,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $435,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $435,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Stormwater F-5
JULY 2002 AUG 2013
Consultant estimate adjusted for inflation.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Construction of the Westview Avenue Culvert is complete and the Windsor Drive culvert construction will commence this month.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
This project will reduce flooding in the area, prevent road overtopping, and improve the bank's stability. The Richland Creek tributary, which crosses under Westview Avenue and Windsor Drive, carries flow from approximately 350 acres. The existing culverts have minimal capacity to carry heavy storm flows in the creek and are prone to blockage.
The proposed upgrades will significantly improve the hydraulic capacity at the crossing, reduce regular maintenance, and will benefit private property owners directly upstream from significant reductions in the backwater flood profile. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goals of a sustainable city and a mobile city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas.
REVISION
Project Description:This project will replace undersized culvert crossings at Westview Avenue and Windsor Drive. Due to upstream development, the existing culvert size became insufficient to handle the increasing stormwater flow. To mitigate this, the project will install new arched culverts at each of the crossings.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:
ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
WESTVIEW/WINDSOR CROSSINGS
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $3,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $711,071 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $711,071Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $29,554 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $29,554
TOTAL PROJECT COST $743,825 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $743,825TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Stormwater Fund $740,680 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $740,680Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2001 $3,145 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,145
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $743,825 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $743,825
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Stormwater F-6
JULY 2011 SEP 2013
Informal engineering estimate adjusted for inflation in future years.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Project in design.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
This project is located in a historic district that abuts Cleveland Park and Richland Creek. The Pettigru District has been developed into a light business district, and associated business parking has caused a concentration of stormwater runoff that channels through the project area. The additional stormwater flow from this area into Cleveland Park and Richland Creek has caused significant erosion problems. In order to affect a permanent solution to the above issues, the existing infrastructure needs to be upgraded to efficiently manage the runoff. Additionally, the exfiltration of sanitary sewer from the existing pipe system has the high potential to migrate down gradient into the freshwater creek creating a water quality issue that should be addressed as part of this initiative. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to encourage water conservation and water quality.
REVISION
Project Description:This project upgrades stormwater infrastructure in Pettigru Street at the intersection of Whitsett Street. The project includes the re-routing of existing stormwater pipe and the installation of a stable drainage channel through the adjacent City park. Also included in the project is the repair and/or replacement of sanitary sewer line in the project area and erosion repair within the park due to insufficient stormwater capacity.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
PETTIGRU STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $16,713 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,713Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $379,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $379,250Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $395,963 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $395,963TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Stormwater Fund $395,963 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $395,963TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $395,963 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $395,963
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Stormwater F-7
JAN 2011 AUG 2013
FAIRFOREST WAY BASIN
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A
CONTINUATION
Project Description:This project involves performing a detailed watershed analysis and floodplain mapping for the Fairforest Way Basin. This involves, but is not limited to, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, regional detention, and erosion problem areas.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Engineering estimate based on similar projects.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):The hydraulic and hydrologic analyses were sent to FEMA for incorporation into their Map Modernization process. The City is awaiting comments from FEMA. The consultant is in the process of preparing the watershed study for the City's records.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
As a regulated stormwater system and as stipulated in the City's Stormwater Management Plan, the City is required to perform a detailed watershed analysis and floodplain mapping for all of the stormwater basins within the City. The Stormwater Management Plan is a requirement of the City's NPDES General Permit through SCDHEC. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to encourage water conservation and water quality.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Stormwater Fund $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Stormwater F-8
JAN 2011 JAN 2014
WHITE OAK BASIN PHASE II
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP A
REVISION
Project Description:This project involves performing a detailed watershed analysis and floodplain mapping for the White Oak Basin. This includes but is not limited to, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, and identifying erosion problem areas. Regional detention and storm piping will be utilized to decrease flooding on Campbell Street, Karen Drive, and the surrounding areas.
As a result of neighborhood meetings, additional flooding has been identified that creates the need for culvert upgrades on Corrine Drive and Twinbrook Drive.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Engineering estimate based on similar projects.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):The watershed study is complete and was submitted to FEMA for incorporation into their Map Modernization process. The consultant for the design of the improvements will have been selected with anticipated construction second quarter of 2013.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
As a regulated stormwater system and as stipulated in the City's Stormwater Management Plan, the City is required to perform a detailed watershed analysis and floodplain mapping for all of the stormwater basins within the City. There were three culvert crossings replaced in White Oak Basin within the last few years which reduced a significant amount of area flooding. This project paved the way for moving upstream and fixing the flooding that is occurring at Twinbrook Drive, Campbell Street, Corrine Drive, and Karen Drive.
This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to encourage water conservation and water quality.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000Site Acquisition Costs $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000Improvements $620,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,620,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,195,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,195,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Stormwater Fund $1,195,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,195,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,195,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,195,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Stormwater F-9
JULY 2011 DEC 2014
Engineering estimate based on road linear footage and sanitary sewer linear footage.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Shelburne Road is under construction and the three remaining roadways are in design.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The residents along Shelburne, Carolina Avenue, Don Drive, and Charlbury Street experience localized flooding during storm events. The current roads do not have curb and gutter or a sufficient storm drainage system. The majority of the stormwater runoff travels down the properties causing erosion and flooding.
This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas.
CONTINUATION
Project Description:Installation of storm drainage system, curb and gutter along Shelburne, Carolina Avenue, Don Drive and Charlbury Street. The roadways will be resurfaced and the sewer pipes rehabilitated as well with this project. This project was identified based on numerous citizen complaints.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:
ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
GOWER ESTATES STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $1,845,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,845,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,890,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,890,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Stormwater Fund $1,659,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,659,000Wastewater Fund $231,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $231,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,890,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,890,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Stormwater F-10
JULY 2012 DEC 2013
Consultant estimate adjusted for inflation.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Project in design.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The residents along Swanson Court experience localized flooding during storm events. The current road does not have curb and gutter and has an undersized storm drainage system. The majority of the stormwater runoff does not enter the existing undersized storm drainage due to no curb and travels down the properties causing erosion and flooding. This project was originally part of the East Monte Claire rehabilitation that was performed internally but was not completed due to lack of funding.
This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas.
CONTINUATION
Project Description:Installation of storm drainage system, curb, and gutter along Swanson Court. The roadway will be resurfaced and sewer rehabilitated as well with this project. The plans were prepared in 2007, and will need to be reviewed and possibly modified to ensure that they match current site conditions.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:
ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
SWANSON COURT
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $274,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $274,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $284,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $284,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Stormwater Fund $263,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $263,000Wastewater Fund $21,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $21,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $284,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $284,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Stormwater F-11
JULY 2013 DEC 2015
Engineering estimate.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Request for Proposal being written for design.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
This project will increase the quality of the water in Richland Creek and the Reedy River. Richland Creek is fully urbanized and based on the current stormwater ordinance most redeveloped sites are not required to provide water quality or quantity improvements. The goal will be to reduce fecal coliform, phosphorus, and nitrogen. This project is in line with the goal of reducing nutrients to try and meet the total maximum daily loads that are stipulated by SCDHEC for various nutrients.
This project is consistent with the Strategic Goal of a sustainable city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to encourage water conservation and water quality.
CONTINUATION
Project Description:Identify areas along Richland Creek that could be used to provide regional water quality. Design and construction of the regional water quality retrofits such as turning traditional detention basins into bioretention, providing rain barrels/cisterns to key neighborhoods, adding vegetative filter strips or like to existing parking lots, and adding storage between discharge points and the creek.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
RICHLAND CREEK WATER QUALITY MASTER PLAN
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP B
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000Improvements $0 $0 $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $850,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $150,000 $300,000 $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Stormwater Fund $150,000 $300,000 $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $150,000 $300,000 $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Stormwater F-12
JULY 2012 SEP 2013
It should also be noted that given the upstream watershed characteristics, the water quality unit will not only serve the PWC but a large offsite portion of the City, further extending its benefit to the City as a whole. Moreover, the final selection of the specific type water quality unit will be selected by considering functionality, product cost, ease of installation and maintenance, and potential for removal and reuse at the future PWC if so desired. Several commercially available water quality units have the potential to be relocated if it is determined prudent to do so.
Detailed preliminary engineering estimate.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2012):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
At present, the Fleet Services facility at the Public Works Complex (PWC) is under a federal spill mitigation/prevention permit and a state industrial stormwater discharge permit. The water quality requirements of these mandates require a high degree of effort to ensure pollutants like vehicle and equipment fluids, as well as debris from City operations does not enter the Reedy River. The water quality unit will ensure environmental compliance preventing sediment, oil, and debris from entering the river. With the Reedy River serving the City's tourism and quality of life initiatives immediately downstream, it is incumbent on the City to immediately initiate this water quality preservation effort.
Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.):
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates:
This project will include the design, purchase, and installation of a water quality unit at Public Works for the primary outfalls in order to ensure environmental permitting compliance by preventing sediment, oil, and debris from entering the Reedy River.
Comp. Plan Principle:
PUBLIC WORKS COMPLEX WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP B
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $8,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $86,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $86,000Equipment $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000Management $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST $116,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $116,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Stormwater Fund $116,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $116,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $116,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $116,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $2,700 $3,075 $3,152 $3,231 $3,311 $15,469Cumulative Operating Impact $2,700 $5,775 $8,927 $12,158 $15,469 $15,469FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Stormwater F-13
JULY 2013 JULY 2015
Engineering estimate based on known scope of work to date. Additional funding may be requested next fiscal year once the design is complete.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
This project was identified based on numerous citizen complaints and regular maintenance required by operations. The existing stormwater system is substandard and causes road and property flooding.
The upgrades will reduce flooding, reduce maintenance, and would benefit those property owners adjacent to the improvements. This project is consistent with the Strategic Goals of a sustainable city and a mobile city. This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas.
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:This project will identify storm drainage improvements in the North Hills area, roughly bound by Russell Avenue to the west, Richland Creek to the north, Bennett Street the east, and Garraux Street to the south. The scope of work relative to construction is anticipated to include a culvert replacement on Bennett Street due to the age of the existing culvert and connectivity to upstream storm drainage, and curb, gutter, and storm drainage along Bennett Street, Russell Avenue, McDonald Street, and Garraux Street.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:
ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
NORTH HILLS AREA STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP C
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $100,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Stormwater Fund $0 $100,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $100,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Stormwater F-14
JULY 2015 JUN 2016
ALDRIDGE/LACEY DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP C
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:This project provides for the installation of a storm drainage system, curb, and gutter along Aldridge Drive and Lacey Avenue. Both Streets are located within Gower Estates. The roadways will be resurfaced and the sewer pipes will be rehabilitated as well with this project. This project was identified based on numerous citizen complaints.
CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODSProject Status: Strategic Goal:
ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Engineering estimate based on a combination of road linear footage, GIS data, and recent projects were used to develop a preliminary cost estimate to construct the project.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Collection of survey data will begin so design of these streets can start soon after the survey data is received.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The residents along Aldridge Drive and Lacey Avenue have experience localized flooding during storm events. Currently only a short section of Aldridge Drive has curb and gutter. The remainder of the current streets do not have curb and gutter, or a sufficient storm drainage system. The majority of the stormwater runoff travels down the properties causing erosion and flooding.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $15,500 $0 $0 $15,500Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $374,500 $0 $0 $374,500Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $35,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $425,000 $0 $0 $425,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Stormwater Fund $0 $0 $0 $425,000 $0 $0 $425,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $0 $0 $425,000 $0 $0 $425,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Stormwater F-15
JULY 2014 JULY 2016
Engineering estimate based on Greenville County Tax Assessment and previous culvert projects.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Presently, Richland Creek overtops Hilly Street and water backs up at this location causing regular structure flooding and causing the road to become impassable.
This project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan principle to enhance and protect residential areas.
REVISION
Project Description:This project will replace an inadequate culvert crossing on Hilly Street at Richland Creek and purchase up to two adjacent properties.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:
ENHANCE AND PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
HILLY STREET DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP C
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $50,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $250,000Improvements $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $400,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $0 $0 $700,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Stormwater Fund $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $0 $0 $700,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $0 $0 $700,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Stormwater F-16
Parks & Recreation G-1
PARKS & RECREATION
The City recently rebuilt numerous park restrooms to improve the quality of them to that of the rest of the park facilities. The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program continues to fund improvements of other park restrooms.
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-2
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-3
JULY 2006 SEP 2013
COMMUNITY CENTER BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: N/A
CONTINUATION
Project Description:Funding provides for improvements to the David Hellams Community Center.
CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODSProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Design and estimate work completed by consulting architects.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Construction documents being developed.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The David Hellams Community Center is 30+ years old and in need of mechanical, electrical, ADA and internal and external improvements that have been deferred for several years.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $1,390,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,390,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,390,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,390,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Property Sales $467,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $467,500Capital Projects Fund $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000General Fund $750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $750,000General Obligation Bond - 2003 $72,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $72,500
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,390,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,390,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-4
DEC 2006 MAR 2017
MAIN STREET TREE REHABILITATION
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP B
CONTINUATION
Project Description:This project will rehabilitate the 30-year-old tree plantings along Main Street to extend their life and improve sidewalk conditions. It is necessary for the department to expand the scope of the project to include South Main Street to the intersection of Pendleton Street. The decision to include South Main Street was based on site meetings with the City's contracted arborist. Annual project decisions are based on the formal graded condition of the trees and are done in coordination with other City construction projects. This project is entering the fifth year of a ten-year program to replace the declining maples and provide additional root zone space to the oaks. Sidewalks are also replaced where tree roots have caused heaving in the pavement. Replacement of some oaks will also be planned over the next five years.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:
ENCOURAGE SUSTAINABLE GROWTHStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Consultant's estimate.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Phase I, II, III, IV, V and VI have been completed. Phase VII will begin in January 2013.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The Main Street trees are a character-defining feature of Greenville. This project also supports a positive business environment for downtown Greenville.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $938,168 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $0 $1,538,168Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $938,168 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $0 $1,538,168TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2002 $11,870 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,870CBD Tax Increment Bond - 2003 $14,313 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,313Downtown Infrastructure Fund $911,985 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $0 $1,511,985
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $938,168 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $0 $1,538,168
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-5
JULY 2007 DEC 2013
CLEVELAND PARK REPAIRS AND NEIGHBORHOOD ACCESS
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: N/A
CONTINUATION
Project Description:The project will improve pedestrian access to and from Cleveland Park with surrounding neighborhoods and will make numerous improvements throughout the park.
CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONCREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENS
Project Status: Strategic Goal:
Start/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
In-house estimate based on previous contracted work.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Improvements to the Cleveland Park Center are pending.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Improvements at Cleveland Park were the top priority from the 2006-2011 Parks Master Plan.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $850,818 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $850,818Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $850,818 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $850,818TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Hospitality Tax Fund $655,766 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $655,766State Grants $65,464 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,464Property Sales $10,396 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,396Capital Projects Fund $119,192 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $119,192
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $850,818 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $850,818
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-6
JULY 2013 JUN 2015
REEDY RIVER TRAIL EXPANSION
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP C
CONTINUATION
Project Description:This project will build an extension of the Swamp Rabbit Trail from the intersection of South Pleasantburg Drive and Cleveland Street to Mauldin Road where it will connect with the GCRD/Lake Conestee section of the trail completing the Swamp Rabbit Trail between Lake Conestee and Travelers Rest. Funding will also be used to make improvements to land adjacent to the trail to satisfy property owners granting easements to the City. The exact route is to be determined through a public design process funded in the current CIP budget.
CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Contractor estimates.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Staff has worked with consultants and the South Trail Committee to determine the best route option and has been meeting with staff from the Greenville Country Club to determine their support for the trail passing through and along the edge of the golf course.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
This project is part of the Trails & Greenways Master Plan adopted by City Council in January 2008, and is the next expansion segment of the Swamp Rabbit Trail to the south and is critical to the overall regional trails plan. The Greenville County Recreation District and the Conestee Foundation are currently working to construct the trail north from the lake to Mauldin Road. The City completed construction of the trail south, along Cleveland Street to South Pleasantburg Road in 2012.
Additionally, this project will significantly increase the number of residential units within a quarter mile of a trail or greenway. The trail also promotes the protection of air quality, advances public health and provides for a well maintained infrastructure.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000Site Acquisition Costs $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000Improvements $3,315,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,315,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $3,615,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,615,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Hospitality Tax Fund $325,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $325,000Hospitality Tax Bond - 2011 $675,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $675,000State Grants $240,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $240,000Hospitality Tax Bond - 2014 $2,375,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,375,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $3,615,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,615,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $169,683 $79,190 $83,149 $87,307 $91,672 $511,000Cumulative Operating Impact $169,683 $248,873 $332,022 $419,328 $511,000 $511,000FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-7
JULY 2010 JUN 2016
Consultant's estimate.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Holmes and McPherson Parks are complete and Cleveland Park restroom is scheduled for construction FY 2012-13. Gower design is complete.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The current restroom facilities in the City's parks are in desperate need of upgrades. While the City's parks are well above national standards, the restroom facilities are not. By rebuilding the restrooms and upgrading the facilities, the City can provide quality restroom facilities to its citizens. Upgrading the existing facilities will allow the City to conserve water and electricity and meet ADA standards; while also offering an attractive architectural look. The Five Year Parks and Facilities Master Plan FY 2006-2011 recommends that the City upgrade architectural design of park structures (4.10.1).
CONTINUATION
Project Description:The project will improve the restroom facilities at the following parks: Cleveland, Holmes, and McPherson. The restrooms will be rebuilt to meet ADA standards, become environmentally friendly, and to look architecturally appealing.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
PARK RESTROOMS
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP B
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $536,479 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $536,479Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $551,479 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $551,479TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Capital Projects Fund $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $180,000Downtown Infrastructure Fund $153,479 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $153,479Hospitality Tax Fund $218,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $218,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $551,479 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $551,479
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-8
JULY 2010 DEC 2013
RIVER STREET UNDERPASS
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP B
REVISION
Project Description:Part 1 of this project will implement a Falls Park Bypass Bike Route to divert bicyclists around RiverPlace and Falls Park. From Reedy View Drive, the Falls Park Bypass Bike Route will direct bicyclists north on River Street, east on Broad Street, south on Falls Street, east on Camperdown Way, south on Cleveland Street, east on Ridgeland Way, and then reconnecting with the Swamp Rabbit Trail at the Major Rudolf Anderson, Jr. Memorial. Part 2 of this project will build an underpass trail along Linky Stone Park and beneath the River Street bridge to provide safe pedestrian access between RiverPlace and the CSX section of the Swamp Rabbit Trail.
CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
90% Construction Documents from design consultants.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):100% construction documents have been completed.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Frequent trail counts indicate thousands of daily trail users along this section of the Swamp Rabbit Trail. Not only does staff receive frequent complaints from the public regarding the safety and difficulty crossing River Street at this location, but several documented accidents have occurred in recent years. The Falls Park Bypass Bike Route project will solve user conflicts between bicyclists and park users. The interactive fountain at RiverPlace successfully attracts families and children, but the design of the space in not suitable for the various user groups, especially bicyclists.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $250,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $265,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $615,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Hospitality Tax Fund $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000Downtown Infrastructure Fund $265,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $265,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $265,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $615,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $3,000 $3,150 $3,308 $3,473 $3,647 $16,577Cumulative Operating Impact $3,000 $6,150 $9,458 $12,930 $16,577 $16,577FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-9
MAR 2001 NOV 2013
HERITAGE GREEN MASTER PLAN
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: N/A
CONTINUATION
Project Description:Greenville County has provided $1,508,000 to develop a unified campus plan for Heritage Green and to construct recommended improvements. The City is serving as the project manager, working with the institutions and consultant to complete plan development.
CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:
EMPHASIZE UNIQUE COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Consultant estimates.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Phase 1 construction documents being developed.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The Heritage Green Master Plan project meets many of the Comprehensive Plan's Principles including: walkability, mobility options, encouraging redevelopment, and emphasizing unique cultural characteristics of Greenville.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $1,208,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,208,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,508,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,508,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Greenville County $1,508,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,508,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $1,508,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,508,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-10
JULY 2011 JULY 2014
Project Status: Strategic Goal:
Start/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
CONTINUATION
CLEVELAND PARK BANK STABILIZATION
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP B
SUSTAINABLE CITY
Engineering estimate based on the linear footage of improvements and cost of similar projects.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Phase III is in design.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
There has been a significant amount of erosion to the banks of the Reedy River due to flooding. The areas that have been eroded need to be stabilized to prevent further erosion. The sediment that enters the water during the erosion process reduces the quality of the City's waterways adding undesirable nutrients to the water and increasing the level of turbidity. Beyond that, it presents a safety issue due to the proximity of the trails to the banks of the Reedy River.
ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITY
Project Description:This project will stabilize the banks of the Reedy River and unnamed tributaries to the Reedy River within Cleveland Park. The improvements are near Woodland Way, Cleveland Park Drive, Lakehurst Street, Richland Way, and Ridgeland Drive. This project is similar to the Reedy River Bank Stabilization in Cleveland Park near McDaniel Avenue.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $650,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Stormwater Fund $650,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $650,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-11
JULY 2012 JUN 2014
Consultant's estimate.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Bridge assessment is complete.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The restoration of the bridges is critical to the use of the trail in McPherson Park.
CONTINUATION
Project Description:There are five pedestrian bridges in McPherson Park that are beginning to deteriorate. A plan for rehabilitation will be developed to include: a structural inspection, design for repair, design for restoring architectural features, and improving safety. Once the plan is complete it will be implemented to restore the bridges.
CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
MCPHERSON PARK BRIDGE REHABILITATION
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $15,000 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Downtown Infrastructure Fund $15,000 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $15,000 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-12
JULY 2011 JUN 2014
City funds will be a small percentage of funds used to design and build the Cancer Survivors Garden between Church Street and Cleveland Street on the Swamp Rabbit Trail.
Estimates provided by the City's consulting engineers.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Design being coordinated with the Cancer Survivor Park project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
This project is on the Swamp Rabbit Trail, the spine of the City and County greenway trail network. Currently, the Swamp Rabbit Trail has an average of 1,200 users a day in the county or over 400,000 users a year. That number will likely double within in the City as the trail expand. This project will help improve the safety and access for trail users.
Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.):
CONTINUATION
Project Description:This project provides for the establishment of a trail head on Cleveland Street adjacent to the Chamber of Commerce building and the replacement of the narrow, metal grate bridge that is between Falls Park and Cleveland Park (between Church Street and Cleveland Street). This bridge is currently less than 6 feet wide, making it a bottleneck on the trail system. The bridge is also slippery and unsafe. Both project elements will be coordinated with private fund raising efforts and construction of the new Cancer Survivors Park.
MOBILE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
CANCER SURVIVORS PARK
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP B
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $94,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $94,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $630,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $630,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $94,000 $630,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $724,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Hospitality Tax Fund $94,000 $630,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $724,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $94,000 $630,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $724,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $63,000 $66,150 $69,458 $72,930 $271,538Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $63,000 $129,150 $198,608 $271,538 $271,538FTEs Added 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-13
JULY 2012 JUN 2014
NEXT TRAIL CONNECTOR
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP B
CONTINUATION
Project Description:This project would construct a trail from Church Street to the Swamp Rabbit Trail, adjacent to the NEXT Innovation Center.
CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:PROVIDE LINKAGES BETWEEN ALL TRANSPORTATION OPTIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Consultant's estimate.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This project is in the design phase.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
With the Church Street rehabilitation nearing completion, there is an opportunity to connect the trail to the NEXT building, the adjacent neighborhood, Church Street, and higher density projects like the Brio. This project will support the goals and objectives of the Haynie-Sirrine Master Plan to provide better bike and pedestrian access for the area. The Swamp Rabbit Trail is one of the most popular recreational attractions in Greenville and this link will provide access to additional users. This section of the trail will also complement the future Cancer Survivors Park.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $606,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $606,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $75,000 $606,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $681,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Hospitality Tax Fund $75,000 $606,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $681,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $75,000 $606,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $681,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-14
JULY 2012 JAN 2014
Consultant estimates.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Construction documents being developed.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Improvements to the south portion of Falls Park will complete improvements to Falls Park and meet the Comprehensive Plan Strategy to Improve the Quality of Life for Greenville residents through the creation of safe, walkable and accessible destinations and creating healthy environments for all Greenville residents. The project also provides a unique opportunity to partner with non-profit organizations and private residents to complete a meaningful project.
CONTINUATION
Project Description:This project will fund improvements in the ravine and Furman Drive areas of Falls Park Located between the Carolina First Stage, the Furman Drive Bridge, the park entrance near University Drive Governor's School, and the City owned parking lot behind the West End Market. Improvements have been designed by a Falls Park Committee established to recommend improvements in the described area of the park. Funding of the design has been provided by private sources through the Community Foundation of Greenville.
CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
FALLS PARK IMPROVEMENTS
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: N/A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $48,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,900Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $659,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $659,100Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $708,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $708,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
State Grants $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000Hospitality Tax Fund $608,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $608,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $708,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $708,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-15
JAN 2013 DEC 2013
Grant agreement values.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Project nearing completion.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
This project supports the Haywood Road Master Plan and several comprehensive plan principals to revitalize existing commercial corridors.
CONTINUATION
Project Description:This project will landscape the interchange on I-385 at Haywood Road. This will provide for a more formal entry into the Haywood Road corridor and supports revitalization in that area.
PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
HAYWOOD AT I-385 INTERCHANGE LANDSCAPING
Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $332,320 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $332,320Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $332,320 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $332,320TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
State Grants $265,856 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $265,856Capital Projects Fund $66,464 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $66,464
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $332,320 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $332,320
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-16
JUN 2013 JULY 2014
Estimate based on cost of comparable projects.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The Parks and Recreation Open Space Plan recommends the expansion of Cleveland Park in the horse stable area when possible. The unexpected donation of this property allows for the expansion of Cleveland Park.
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:Funding will to begin redeveloping the Cleveland Park horse stable property that was donated to the City in 2012. Project includes demolition of existing structure.
CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
CLEVELAND PARK HORSE STABLES
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP C
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Stormwater Fund $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-17
JULY 2013 JUN 2014
In-house estimate and preliminary planning.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The City’s only dog park is located on a small ½ acre parcel in Cleveland Park. The dog park patrons routinely exceed capacity of the facility. The location of the dog park is not popular with adjacent residents and we receive complaints routinely due to excessive noise and illegal parking.
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:Funding will be used as a placeholder to find a new site for a dog park in the City limits. This includes possibly assisting the Humane Society with the construction of a dog park at their facility at 305 Airport Road near the downtown Greenville airport or an alternate site.
CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:
EMPHASIZE UNIQUE COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
GREENVILLE DOG PARKS
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP C
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
General Fund $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-18
JULY 2013 MAR 2014
Estimates from Greenville Tech.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Project provides much needed trail head locations along the popular Swamp Rabbit Trail in a partnership with Greenville Tech and eliminates the need for the City to acquire additional land to support trail head construction.
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:This project provides placeholder funding for the development of a trailhead on the Greenville Tech Campus off of Cleveland Street where the City recently completed the expansion of the Swamp Rabbit Trail.
CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
GREENVILLE TECH TRAILHEAD
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP C
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Hospitality Tax Fund $0 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-19
JULY 2013 DEC 2013
HUDSON STREET TRAILHEAD
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP C
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:This project is for a 55-car parking lot and trailhead facility at the City-owned property at 320 South Hudson Street. In 2012, the Parks and Recreation Department oversaw the demolition of the existing Brooks Building at this property. The existing informal trailhead across Reedy View Drive from Linky Stone Children's Garden is scheduled to be closed in FY 2012-13 and this proposed trailhead on Hudson Street will support the thousands of daily trail users that frequent the Swamp Rabbit Trail. In addition to the proposed trailhead parking vehicles, it will also support Low Impact Development best practices to protect water quality as well as fully comply with the City's Landscape Ordinance requirements. The trailhead will feature pervious paving materials, decorative lighting, trail kiosk, signage, benches, bike racks, bike work stand, and new sidewalks along Hudson Street.
CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
100% Engineering design by consultant.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The addition of a formally designated trailhead for the Swamp Rabbit Trail will continue to encourage the use of the trail for both recreation as well as transportation and thereby create safe, walkable spaces, and accessible destinations.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Hospitality Tax Fund $0 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $13,300 $13,787 $14,293 $14,819 $56,199Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $13,300 $27,087 $41,380 $56,199 $56,199FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-20
JULY 2013 JUN 2014
Contractor estimates.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The Swamp Rabbit Trail is a heavily used recreation and transportation network within the City and must be improved to meet the expectations of users and the City.
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:Funding allows for the replacement of the rubber surfacing with asphalt paving along the Hincapie Path section of the Swamp Rabbit Trail, between Woodland Way and Faris Road. The rubber surface needs to be replaced since it has lifted away from the adjacent asphalt surface due to flooding from the Reedy River. The lifting of the rubber surface has created areas that are unsafe and have been closed.
CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATIONProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
SWAMP RABBIT TRAIL RUBBER SURFACE REPLACEMENT
Department: PARKS AND RECREATION Ranking: GROUP A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $145,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $145,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $145,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $145,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Hospitality Tax Fund $0 $145,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $145,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $145,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $145,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-21
JULY 2013 JUN 2014
VIOLA CENTER AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS
Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:Funds will be used make improvements to the Viola Center including roof replacement, restroom and kitchen renovations, front porch replacement and parking pad extension. The landscpaing around the center will also be updated and sidewalks will be installed infront of center. Funding will also be used to improve the Thompson Gardner Park and Playground including clearing and creating a terraced landscape in the wooded area of the park and replacing playground equipment, ground covering and signage.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Cost estimates based on estimates provided by Parks and Recreation and Community Development staff.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Work write-ups and cost estimates have been prepared to allow us to bid project once funding is approved.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The Viola Neighborhood Revitalization was a 15-year endeavor that included the acquisition and renovation of a former duplex residential unit to provide a center for community meetings and gatherings. The renovation was completed in 1999. Although initial renovations were well-done, ongoing use of the facility requires that improvements be completed. The Thompson Gardner park and playground was completed in 2002. More families with young children have purchased homes in the Viola Neighborhood and the playground equipment has seen an increase in use. The replacement of the playground equipment will ensure that families continue to utilize the area for picnics, family outings, and recreation space for children and young people.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $120,050 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,050Equipment $0 $25,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,950Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $146,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $146,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Viola Street Tax Increment Fund $0 $146,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $146,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $146,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $146,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parks & Recreation G-22
Economic Development H-1
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Continued investments in economic development broaden the tax base and make the City appealing for new businesses. The Peace Center’s recent renovation has led to a significant increase in the number of ticket sales and therefore visitors to the community. The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program supports economic development efforts in both downtown and the commercial corridors.
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Economic Development H-2
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Economic Development H-3
SEP 2011 DEC 2013
Cost based on contract values.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Construction on Project ONE is underway with the Piazza's reconstruction to follow shortly thereafter. Project is under construction with elevator and wastewater line improvements underway.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The improvements are intended to ensure that Piazza Bergamo reaches its full potential for public use through good urban design. A new plan will help the space to flow more effectively for visitors and patrons to area businesses. It has been many years since it was constructed and is functionally obsolete in its current state. Improvements will make the space more comfortable with amenities such as shade trees and new seating options. It will become a new destination for downtown and will function better for events as well.
CONTINUATION
Project Description:This project revitalizes the Piazza Bergamo area which will facilitate the plaza's use by the general public and tenants of abutting buildings, customers, and clients. The project will be an important enhancement to North Main Street and will reposition this area in conjunction with new development.
PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:
MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
PIAZZA BERGAMO
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $5,910,650 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,910,650Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $5,910,650 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,910,650TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Downtown Infrastructure Fund $5,310,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,310,000Greenville Water System $228,650 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $228,650Piedmont Natural Gas Grant $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000Property Sales $342,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $342,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $5,910,650 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,910,650
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $50,000 $51,500 $53,045 $54,636 $55,729 $264,910Cumulative Operating Impact $50,000 $101,500 $154,545 $209,181 $264,910 $264,910FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Economic Development H-4
JULY 2012 JULY 2013 MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
TD CONVENTION CENTER KITCHEN RETROFIT
Department: MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Ranking: N/A
CONTINUATION PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:
Project Description:The food and beverage operation remains the primary revenue generator for the TD Convention Center. Most major equipment dates to the opening of the conference center in 1993. Some equipment replacement has been achieved through annual operting budgets, but there has been no major infusion of capital dollars into the kitchen since the City took ownership over ten years ago. The proposal submitted for consideration would replace and expand deteriorating cold storage areas, replace existing flooring, and replace aged cooking equipment.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The project would provide needed infrastructure support to a prime revenue source.
Current vendor pricing.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Work is nearly complete.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000Equipment $195,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $195,000Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Hospitality Tax Bond - 2011 $115,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $115,000Hospitality Tax Fund $110,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $110,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Economic Development H-5
JULY 2009 JULY 2015
Informal estimate based on future development plans and opportunities, as well as funding needs from previous years.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Projects funded to date: Wade Hampton Boulevard Streetscape Plan; decorative streetlights, tree plantings and landscaped medians along Wade Hampton Boulevard; Augusta Road Fire Station streetscape improvements; Augusta and McDaniel mast arm traffic signal; Augusta Road Master Plan (Blythe to I-85); abandoned driveway closures on Augusta; pedestrian plaza at Augusta and Blythe; Lois Street bridge/trellis painting; Haywood Road at I-385 interchange improvements; design work for various streetscape projects; and the Facade Improvement Program.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
An available source of funding for streetscape improvements is needed in order to faciliate and promote private development along the commercial corridors. This project supports the Council's commitment to the revitalization of the commercial corridors while meeting the Strategic Goal of creating a prosperous city and the Comprehensive Plan Principle to encourage redevelopment and infill for commercial corridors.
CONTINUATION
Project Description:This project will provide a ready source of funding for streetscape improvement projects associated with private development opportunities along the commercial corridors (i.e. Augusta Road, Haywood Road, Laurens Road, Pleasantburg Drive, and Wade Hampton Boulevard). Improvements may include, but are not limited to: installation of new landscaping, sidewalks, curbs and gutters; removal and replacement of existing deteriorated sidewalks, curbs and gutters; and the purchase and installation of street furniture, signage, decorative lighting, and pedestrian signals. Expenditures will be evaluated and approved on the basis of need and anticipated return on investment.
PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REDEVELOPMENT AND INFILL FOR COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS
Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: GROUP B
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $574,873 $300,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $1,274,873Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $574,873 $300,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $1,274,873TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Capital Projects Fund $453,556 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $453,556State Revenue $16,960 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,960General Fund $0 $300,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $700,000Greenville County $34,357 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $34,357Property Sales $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $574,873 $300,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $1,274,873
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Economic Development H-6
JULY 2010 JULY 2013Start/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
PENDING CLOSE-OUT
WEST END PROPERTY ACQUISITION
Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A
Project Status: Strategic Goal: PROSPEROUS CITY
ENCOURAGE SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
Project Description:This project was set up to support the purchase of three parcels in the West End for the purpose of stimulating private development. The project will now be closed and the project balances will be directed to other projects in the West End.
Estimate of fair market value of the property. A property appraiser would be retained for a more accurate cost.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):On hold.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Project is being closed.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $2,500,000 ($2,500,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,500,000 ($2,500,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
West End Tax Increment Fund $2,500,000 ($2,500,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $2,500,000 ($2,500,000) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Economic Development H-7
JULY 2010 JULY 2013
PEACE CENTER
Department: PUBLIC INFORMATION AND EVENTS Ranking: N/A
Project Description:The Peace Center has requested the City's assistance for additional public improvements at the facility. The improvements will improve accessibility to the performing arts center from Main Street and the Reedy River. The City's commitment is contingent upon the Peace Center raising $7,500,000 in private assistance to match the City's contribution.
Project Status: Strategic Goal:
Start/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
CONTINUATION CITY OF CULTURE AND RECREATION
EMPHASIZE UNIQUE COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS
Development agreement.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Final streetscape work is outstanding.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The project was endorsed by City Council via resolution during its January 25, 2010 meeting. The resolution stated the Council's intent to appropriate $1,250,000 in FY 2010-11 and $1,250,000 in FY 2011-12.
The project will support the ongoing redevelopment of the Reedy River corridor and will promote improved cultural opportunities for the community.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $2,582,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,582,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $2,582,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,582,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Downtown Infrastructure Fund $2,582,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,582,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $2,582,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,582,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Economic Development H-8
JAN 2011 JULY 2013Start/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
PENDING CLOSE-OUT
HYATT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A
Project Status: Strategic Goal: PROSPEROUS CITYCREATE SAFE, WALKABLE SPACES AND ACCESSIBLE DESTINATIONS
Project Description:This project will provide enhanced streetscape and public spaces surrounding the Hyatt Hotel at Main Street and Beattie Place. This area was one of the first to be redeveloped in downtown and needs refreshing, including new landscaping, hardscape, and enhanced pedestrian access.
Development agreement.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Final payment is pending.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
This project supports one of the first redevelopment efforts in downtown. The private sector has projected spending $10 million in improvements to the Hyatt lobby, office, and exterior façade. These public improvements will enhance the public-side experience of the building's various users.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $896,847 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $896,847Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $896,847 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $896,847TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Property Sales $896,847 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $896,847TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $896,847 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $896,847
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $15,000 $15,750 $16,500 $17,250 $64,500Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $15,000 $30,750 $47,250 $64,500 $64,500FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Economic Development H-9
JAN 2013 JUN 2014
Development agreement.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Private development under construction.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
This project will further the redevelopment of the West End and will support the City Council's objectives to increase the amount of residential property in the City.
CONTINUATION
Project Description:This project will provide infrastructure improvements at Markley and Rhett to support an apartment building presently under construction. This includes utility relocation, stormwater upgrades, and streetscape.
PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:COORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTUREStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
MARKLEY AT RHETT IMPROVEMENTS
Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $261,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $261,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $261,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $261,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Stormwater Fund $37,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $37,000Utility Undergrounding Fund $49,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $49,000West End Tax Increment Fund $175,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $261,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $261,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Economic Development H-10
OCT 2013 JUN 2014
Vendor quote.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
In the event of a chiller failure, the facility would not be able to air condition its main exhibit halls and essentially render a significant portion of the facility unusable.
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:Five chiller units provide cooling capabilities for the TD Convention Center. Three units serving the exhibit halls were installed in 1987. Two units supporting the Conference Center were new in 1993. One of the three exhibit hall chillers failed during the summer of 2011. Minimal repairs provided an immediate, but short-term remedy. Funds are being requested to rebuild each of the five units over a two-year period. Each base rebuild is estimated to cost between $40,000 and $50,000. In addition, three of the units will need to have control panels replaced. Rebuilding is significantly less costly than replacement and will extend the useful life expectancy of each unit by approximately 10 years.
PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REVITALIZATION OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
TD CONVENTION CENTER CHILLER PLANT
Department: MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Ranking: GROUP B
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Local Accommodations Tax Fund $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Economic Development H-11
JULY 2013 JUN 2018
Cost estimates generally have been provided by potential contractors.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The TD Convention Center is an anchor to the Pleasantburg Drive corridor, serving as host for major civic events, tradeshows, and conventions which help support our hospitality industry. The Woodside Conference Center will be recognizing its 20th anniversary in 2013. During those 20 years, there has been little replacement of carpeting, etc. This will remedy an on-going issue that, short of falling into disrepair, will eventually require action.
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:This project will address multiple aesthetic upgrades to make the facility more marketable to potential users. Some of the individual projects, such as caulking, divider wall repairs, and floor resurfacing, are driven by identified deterioration. Other elements are intended to create a more attractive, contemporary appearance in order to maximize the facility's potential for new and retained business. Other requests are addressing normal end of life wear issues. The year one request includes funds for retaining design assistance that will include both the integration of new features, and also address modest strategic modifications such as the possible reconfiguration of space to add new meeting rooms.
PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REVITALIZATION OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
TD CONVENTION CENTER CONFERENCE CENTER
Department: MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Ranking: GROUP C
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $135,000 $475,000 $450,000 $170,000 $1,230,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $100,000 $135,000 $475,000 $450,000 $170,000 $1,330,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Local Accommodations Tax Fund $0 $100,000 $135,000 $475,000 $450,000 $170,000 $1,330,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $100,000 $135,000 $475,000 $450,000 $170,000 $1,330,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Economic Development H-12
APR 2018 JUN 2018
TD CONVENTION CENTER PARKING LOTS
Department: MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Ranking: GROUP D
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:This project will resurface and restripe parking lots adjoining the TD Convention Center. Limited landscaping upgrades also are included in the plan.
PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE REVITALIZATION OF COMMERCIAL CORRIDORSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
City of Greenville Department of Public Works estimate.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Due to limitations in the TDCC's annual operating budget, money has been unavailable to resurface lots, which have deteriorated over time. The proposed improvements will enhance the attractiveness of the facility while improving patron safety.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Local Accommodations Tax Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
Neighborhood Revitalization I-1
NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION
The City has had significant success in revitalizing many of its special emphasis neighborhoods including the recently completed work in Kingsview Pointe. The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program continues revitalization projects in the Green Avenue and Greenline-Spartanburg neighborhoods.
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Neighborhood Revitalization I-2
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Neighborhood Revitalization I-3
MAY 2007 AUG 2013
Development agreement and contracted costs.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Project is nearly complete and awaiting final reconstruction of Church Street.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Much of the existing infrastructure within the Haynie-Sirrine neighborhood is substandard including deteriorated roads; broken curbs and sidewalks; and outdated and undersized stormwater and wastewater systems. Public infrastructure developments are necessary not only to keep these systems up to current standards, but also to leverage private investment. Calculations of build-out value indicate a potential investment of $50 to $90 million.
This project involves infrastructure improvements associated with the redevelopment of the Haynie-Sirrine neighborhood as identified in the community. Improvements include: basic street upgrades and repairs, circulation connections, streetscaping, sidewalks, sewer, stormwater, and green space. The existing budget is being used to support infrastructure improvements for the Homes of Hope and Tower Development currently underway. As part of that development, the Ellie Mae Logan Park will be restored. In addition, funds are also used for project management related to the reconstruction of Church Street.
Project Status: Strategic Goal:
Start/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
CONTINUATION CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODSCOORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTURE
Project Description:
HAYNIE-SIRRINE
Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: N/A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $280,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $280,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $484,308 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $484,308Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $764,308 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $764,308TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Property Sales $125,545 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,545General Obligation Bond - 2003 $3,273 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,273Miscellaneous Grants Fund $78,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $78,750Revolving Housing Fund $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000Capital Projects Fund $437,180 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $437,180Stormwater Fund $44,560 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $44,560
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $764,308 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $764,308
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Neighborhood Revitalization I-4
MAY 2007 JUN 2018
Estimates by an engineering firm.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Phase I is complete and Phase II design is complete.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The proposed development supports affordable workforce residential units in the Greenline-Spartanburg Special Emphasis Neighborhood. These plans are consistent with the Greenline-Spartanburg neighborhood master plan and align with several of City Council's strategic goals including City of Neighborhoods, Inclusive City, Safe City and Prosperous City. The request also contributes to the Comprehensive Plan by coordinating housing development with infrastructure, maintaining quality of redeveloped areas, creating a safe environment, and creating a mixture of housing types and designs.
REVISION
Project Description:Funding is requested to complete improvements to Phase III of the Mt. Eustis Corners Development in the Greenline-Spartanburg meighborhood. Phase III is the final phase in the development and includes replacing sanitary sewer along the portion of Mt. Zion Street that lies between the horseshoe of Mt. Eustis Street. Genesis Homes, the City's development partner, is developing 20 affordable and workforce for sale and rental units. Eight units have been completed and are leased. The Greenline-Spartanburg neighborhood has reviewed and approved the redevelopment plan. This request supports the completion of Phase III and all infrastructure needed for this development. The City's investment will be leveraged by Genesis Homes through the development of workforce and affordable residential units.
CITY OF NEIGHBORHOODSProject Status: Strategic Goal:COORDINATE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH INFRASTRUCTUREStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
MT. EUSTIS STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Department: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Ranking: GROUP B
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $704,372 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $954,372Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $27,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $52,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST $831,372 $0 $0 $0 $0 $275,000 $1,106,372TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Capital Projects Fund $401,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $401,000General Fund $226,372 $0 $0 $0 $0 $275,000 $501,372General Obligation Bond - 2006 $85,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,000Wastewater Fund $56,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $56,000Stormwater Fund $63,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $63,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $831,372 $0 $0 $0 $0 $275,000 $1,106,372
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $1,000 $1,050 $1,103 $1,158 $1,216 $5,526Cumulative Operating Impact $1,000 $2,050 $3,153 $4,310 $5,526 $5,526FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
Public Safety J-1
PUBLIC SAFETY
The City recently completed renovations to the City’s law enforcement training facility. The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program includes funding to replace the public safety camera system and to improve the station alerting system in the City’s fire stations.
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Public Safety J-2
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Public Safety J-3
JULY 2007 JUN 2015
This new fire station, constructed on approximately two acres, will serve the furthermost eastern parts of the City including the ICAR, Verdae, and Woodruff Road areas. One engine company based at this fire station will provide 24/7 initial emergency response within the primary response area. Twelve firefighters will be assigned to provide fire suppression, medical first responder, operations-level hazardous materials, and operations-level technical rescue services.
SAFE CITY
CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT
The fire station will be designed and built to accommodate future needs for additional personnel and the necessary equipment to adequately serve commercial and residential development in the target area.
Estimates provided by consultants based on most recent projects.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):No funds have been expended and the City is currently attempting to acquire land for construction.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
This supports both the City Council's 2011 objectives and the Fire Department's Strategic Plan. The ICAR, Verdae, and Woodruff Road corridors have emergency response times that are well outside of the national standard of 4:00 minutes or less 90% of the time. Response times to these areas currently average 6:13 minutes with only 21% being 4:00 minutes or less. Excluding the station that responds to these corridors, the average response time Citywide is currently 2:50 minutes with 90.6% of responses in 4:00 minutes or less. This new station is expected to improve response times in the target area by 35% to 50%.
Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.):
Project Description:
Project Status: Strategic Goal:
Comp. Plan Principle:
CONTINUATION
EAST AREA FIRE STATION
Department: FIRE Ranking: N/A
Start/Finish Dates:
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $171,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $171,500Site Acquisition Costs $799,920 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $799,920Improvements $2,796,860 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,796,860Equipment $187,720 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $187,720Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $3,956,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,956,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Property Sales $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000General Obligation Bond - 2013 $3,881,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,881,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $3,956,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,956,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $510,000 $561,447 $1,063,984 $1,095,903 $1,119,779 $4,351,113Cumulative Operating Impact $510,000 $1,071,447 $2,135,431 $3,231,334 $4,351,113 $4,351,113FTEs Added 0.00 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Public Safety J-4
JAN 2012 UNDETERMINED
FIRE FACILITIES ASSESSMENT
Department: FIRE Ranking: N/A
This project will evaluate four fire stations and provide a needs assessment regarding the condition and operation of the facilities in the long term. The stations involved will be Station 2 (West End), Station 3 (Augusta Street), Station 4 (Stone Avenue), and Station 5 (Pleasantburg).
SAFE CITY
CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENTStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Project Status: Strategic Goal:CONTINUATION
Project Description:
It is anticipated that this project will provide recommendations for future capital projects, but future cost impact is undetermined. Future growth and needs of the Fire Department will also be considered while planning renovation and/or replacement of these facilities.
Estimates provided by consultants.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Architectural services being procured.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
This project achieves the Fire Department's Strategic Plan goal to upgrade antiquated and non-NFPA compliant fire stations. Two stations were built in the early-1950's and two were built in the late-1960's. These facilities have been staffed 24 hours a day since their opening dates and their condition has deteriorated greatly over time. The City's Building Maintenance and Engineering Divisions have investigated the needs of these facilities and recommended this evaluation by an outside entity to determine the best and most cost-effective course of action. This needs assessment will assist the Fire Department and Building Maintenance in defining a strategic vision for these facilities and propose facility improvements to help extend their useable life.
Other Special Considerations (Future Expansion/Special Features/Etc.):
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Capital Projects Fund $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Public Safety J-5
JULY 2013 JUN 2018
Initial estimate by vendor and staff.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
In 2003, the camera system was implemented in the central business district. Following this implementation, the same was done at Haywood Mall. Since 2003, the central business district has experienced extensive growth with both business and residential development. With that, the present camera system lacks the coverage needed to maintain a certain level of public safety. Six additional cameras would enhance the department’s ability to render a safe environment in the central business district. In addition, the 17 street cameras in the central business district, along with the 6 cameras at Haywood Mall, have from a technological aspect, become obsolete. For many of these cameras, parts are no longer manufactured when repair needs arise, rendering them useless.
These cameras are an integral part of maintaining a safe environment in the both the central business district and Haywood Mall from three points:
1) Cameras serve as a deterrent2) Cameras provide crucial investigative evidence3) Cameras serve as an aid in call response; primarily from an officer safety perspective
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:The first year of this project will add six cameras to the central business district, providing needed coverage for new areas of development, while also replacing 23 cameras in both the central business district and Haywood Mall. In subsequent years, approximately 100 cameras would be replaced in parking facilities and downtown.
SAFE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:
CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENTStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
PUBLIC SAFETY CAMERAS
Department: POLICE Ranking: GROUP B
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $0 $500,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $500,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Hospitality Tax Fund $0 $500,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $500,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Public Safety J-6
AUG 2013 NOV 2013
Estimates from two vendors.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
Current station alerting and communication system is obsolete and is extremely inaudible often creating confusion. It does not provide for real time monitoring by station personnel, provides limited alerting redundancy and requires the maintenance of two separate radio systems in all facilities. The proposed system will address these shortcomings and decrease dispatcher call processing time by approximately 50%; in turn decreasing overall fire department response times.
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:This project would upgrade station alerting/communication system to modern day standards. This component of the fire department communication system alerts the firefighters in the appropriate station/vehicle that a request for service has been initiated. These components also control the lights in each fire station (currently the firefighters must navigate in the dark to find the light switch) and open the garage doors. This also allows mutual aid fire departments to gain access to a station when personnel are not on site. The unit also shuts off cooking devices in the station when a request for service has been initiated, reducing the probability of a cooking fire.
SAFE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:
ENCOURAGE SUSTAINABLE GROWTHStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
STATION ALERTING SYSTEM
Department: FIRE Ranking: GROUP A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $180,000Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $180,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
General Fund $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $180,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $180,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
Parking K-1
PARKING
The City operates a parking system of approximately 6,000 spaces throughout downtown Greenville. The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program provides funding to renovate the Poinsett Garage in FY 2013-14.
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parking K-2
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parking K-3
JULY 2012 DEC 2013
RICHARDSON STREET GARAGE
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A
Project Status: Strategic Goal:NEW PROJECT MOBILE CITY
Start/Finish Dates: MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREASComp. Plan Principle:
Project Description:The Richardson Street Garage has not had any substantial repairs or upgrades since it was built approximately 16 years ago. This project will seal and waterproof the top level of the garage to prevent water infiltration into the garage. There is at least one expansion joint that will require replacement in conjunction with the waterproofing. This project will also address lighting levels and aesthetic appearances within the garage by painting the ceilings and stairwells within the garage. The current gate equipment is over 16 years old and requires replacement. This should improve the overall customer experience in the garage.
Estimates obtained from other facilities, as well as estimates from various vendors.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Construction underway.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
This will repair water control issues within the garage, thereby extending the life expectancy of the garage. The painting and equipment replacement is crucial with the continued growth of business activity within the immediate area of the garage.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $510,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $510,000Equipment $130,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,000Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $655,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $655,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Downtown Infrastructure Fund $655,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $655,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $655,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $655,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Parking K-4
AUG 2013 DEC 2013
Our structural engineer has reviewed the facility and obtained preliminary estimates on what the necessary waterproofing and painting would cost. Quotes were obtained from various suppliers.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
This project will enhance the overall life expectancy of the facility and improve the appearance of the facility for the customers that utilize this facility including businesses, visitors to Greenville, and employees who work in the downtown area. Replacement of the gate control equipment enhances the parking experience and reduces any frustration that may occur due to prolonged periods of downtime that would likely occur, while parts are located for the older equipment.
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:By use of a consulting engineer, the City has identified several water impingement areas within the garage. The City has also determined through previous capital improvement projects that painting the ceilings within the parking garages improves both the overall appearance and illumination factors in the garages, as well as improves the overall customers' perception of safety.
Therefore, the project will entail sealing cracks on the upper levels of the garage, as well as replacing caulking throughout various levels to prevent continued large scale water infiltration into the lower levels. In conjunction with the waterproofing, the City has identified several area within the garage where drains were placed at higher elevations thereby causing water ponding in the facility. This project will address those areas to facilitate necessary drainage. This will assist in prolonging the life expectancy of the facility.
The project also includes painting the stairwells and elevator landings, and cleaning or painting the exterior of the garage to improve the overall appearance. Striping and surface markings within the garage will also be done by the selected contractor. The project also includes replacement of the existing gate control equipment since the existing equipment has exceeded the manufacture's recommended life expectancy by several years, and parts replacement is difficult.
PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:
MAINTAIN QUALITY OF REDEVELOPED AREASStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
POINSETT GARAGE
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $345,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $345,000Equipment $0 $247,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $247,000Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $632,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $632,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Parking Fund $0 $632,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $632,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $632,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $632,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
General Government L-1
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
The FY 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Program provides for improvements to the City’s information technology infrastructure.
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
General Government L-2
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
General Government L-3
JULY 2012 DEC 2013
The City's current phone system is antiquated and dates back to the 1970s. The core infrastructure located in the basement of City Hall has met its maximum capacity and scalability. The City currently has little to no support on this equipment. Given the age of the equipment, a failure of the phone switch would cripple the City's ability to communicate with employees and the public.
Comp. Plan Principle:
PHONE SYSTEM REPLACEMENT
Department: MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Ranking: GROUP A
REVISION
Project Description:
SAFE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:
CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENTStart/Finish Dates:
Costs are estimated via industry experience, the size of the organization, and comparison to other municipalities.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Scoping and estimating determined additional funds are needed.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The current phone situation will eventually fail, leaving the City without a viable way to communicate or conduct business. The City has no way to manage core hardware or handsets. The City is possibly paying more for the current system (centrex lines, lack of support, etc.) than they would be by replacing the system with a voice over internet protocal (VoIP) infrastructure. A VoIP phone system would allow much easier support and maintenance, would use existing data infrastructure, and potentially save the City money in the future.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $475,000 $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $695,000Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $475,000 $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $695,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Installment Lease Purchase - 2013 $475,000 $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $695,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $475,000 $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $695,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $200,000Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $200,000FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
General Government L-4
JULY 2012 ON-GOING
PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS CENTER
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A
CONTINUATION
Project Description:This project provides for the eventual relocation of Public Works away from its present site on Hudson Street and Mayberry Street to a new location elsewhere in the City. This current request provides funding to identify a new site, provide for its acquisition, and begin site preparation. Once a site is acquired and prepared, future improvements will be proposed in later budgets to fund the construction of a new facility.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:ENCOURAGE WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER QUALITYStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
Costs are based on current land acquisition prices. A 33-acre tract located on Fariforest Way was purchased in 2012. City Council has set up a study committee to evaluate and recommend next steps.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):City has acquired 33-acre tract of land located on Fairforest Way. Preliminary design and feasibility study are currently underway.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The relocation of Public Works advances several long-standing goals of moving a critical facility out of the flood plain to better respond to natural disasters and to protect the City's assets from future losses. It is also the first step in advancing the Comprehensive Plan's goal of establishing a park along the Reedy River at the present location of Public Works.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $1,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,900,000Improvements $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $3,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,100,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Stormwater Revenue Bond - 2012 $3,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,100,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $3,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,100,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
General Government L-5
JULY 2012 JULY 2013
Project Status: Strategic Goal:CONTINUATION SAFE CITY
PUBLIC WORKS RADIO SYSTEM
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: N/A
Comp. Plan Principle:
Project Description:This project replaces the existing Public Works radio system with a system that is in compliance with the Federal Communications Commission's requirement of narrowbanding certain radio frequencies. This project will include replacing all mobile, portable, fixed-base radios, and support equipment to include relicensing the system to an 800Mhz digital frequency that takes advantage of current technology. These technologies include GPS tracking of vehicles such as snow plows and sand spreaders in emergency operations. The 800Mhz digital system would also provide some interoperability with public safety radio systems in the event of a widespread emergency. This project also includes radios for Parks and Grounds and Special Events staff. The project also looks at reducing redundancy in radio and other communications equipment with the expectation of reducing total number of units. As the City grows, this proposed system would provide a greater area of radio coverage than the current conventional system.
CREATE A SAFE ENVIRONMENTStart/Finish Dates:
State contract price.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):Resolving final installation issues.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
On January 1, 2013, all industrial land mobile radio systems must cease operating on 25Khz bandwidth and must begin operating on 12.5Khz bandwidth. Many radios in the Public Works radio system are over 10 years old and most cannot be modified or reprogrammed to the new 12.5Khz bandwith requirement and must be replaced. This includes the system infrastructure. Failure to comply with these requirements will result in operating an illegal radio system and result in significant fines and/or loss of radio license.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $321,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $321,000Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $321,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $321,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Capital Projects Fund $119,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $119,000Solid Waste Enterprise Fund $106,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $106,000Stormwater Fund $39,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $39,000Wastewater Fund $57,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $57,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $321,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $321,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $27,696 $27,696 $27,696 $27,696 $27,696 $138,480Cumulative Operating Impact $27,696 $55,392 $83,088 $110,784 $138,480 $138,480FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
General Government L-6
JULY 2013 OCT 2013
Hardware and software quotations from the suppliers.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
By funding this project, the City will be able to bring all MS SQL installs into compliance with Microsoft and allow expandability in the infrastructure for future and current demands.
The are two driving factors driving this request: 1. The city is out of compliance with Microsoft on existing use of Microsoft SQL2. The City cannot presently expand the current SQL platform for current or future requirements.
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:Microsoft products are used throughout Greenville to fulfill many functions. Most applications tie back to a server platform called Structured Query Language (SQL). This is the central warehouse where data is stored (database severs). Despite being unseen, the impact of SQL reaches every department.
Funding is being requested to replace the SQL server environment with current hardware, software, and licensing that brings the city into legal compliance with Microsoft. Given that all departments and divisions are impacted by our SQL environment, this project is necessary to sustain and provide the scalability to grow the City’s application base from its current position. SQL is the foundation for many applications. Firehouse, Cityworks, Transit, all websites, all the GIS data, Pro Law, PERTS, and HROAS are on a partial list of applications requiring a solid, up-to-date SQL foundation. The current SQL environment runs on hardware that is up to ten years old, does not contain a mechanism for redundancy in the event of a hardware failure, and both hardware and software are no longer supported. By funding this project, the City will be able supply the redundancy needed to keep critical applications and websites online.
PROSPEROUS CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
CENTRAL MICROSOFT SQL PLATFORM
Department: MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Ranking: GROUP A
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Equipment $0 $204,167 $0 $0 $0 $0 $204,167Management $0 $40,833 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,833
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $245,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $245,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
General Fund $0 $245,000 $0 $0 $0 $245,000TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $245,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $245,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,995 $32,995Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,995 $32,995FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
General Government L-7
JULY 2013 JULY 2014
ROOF REPLACEMENTS
Department: PUBLIC WORKS Ranking: GROUP A
NEW PROJECT
Project Description:Replacement of approximately 30,000 square feet of roofing at Municipal Court, Nicholtown Community Center, and Public Works Office Building.
SUSTAINABLE CITYProject Status: Strategic Goal:CREATE A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL GREENVILLE CITIZENSStart/Finish Dates: Comp. Plan Principle:
All 3 facilities have been inspected by qualified roofing companies who have submitted proposals to restore the roofs to new condition.
Project Status (As of January 1, 2013):This is a new project.
Project Justification (Including Relationship to Strategic Goals, Comprehensive Plan, etc.):
Method for Estimating Cost:
The roofing on the Court building and Nicholtown Center have been leaking for years due to deterioration of original materials, and several attempts to repair them have been unsuccessful. The shingles on the Public Works building have lasted beyond their life expectancy and are also falling off due to deterioration.
TOTALFY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECT
PROJECT ITEMS COST COST COST COST COST COST
Planning/Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Site Acquisition Costs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Improvements $0 $181,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $181,000Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0 $181,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $181,000TOTAL
FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 PROJECTPROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (LIST) EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS EST. FUNDS FUNDING
Downtown Infrastructure Fund $0 $105,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $105,000General Fund $0 $76,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $76,000
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $0 $181,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $181,000
OPERATIONAL COSTSOperating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Cumulative Operating Impact $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Cumulative FTEs Added 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FUNDING TO-DATE
FUNDING TO-DATE
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
General Government L-8
Appendix M-1
APPENDIX
The CIP continues to invest in projects in the City’s award-winning downtown and promotes a vibrant core to the community.
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Appendix M-2
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Appendix M-3
FY 2014-2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Projection of Legal Debt Margin
6/30/2012 6/30/2013 6/30/2014 6/30/2015 6/30/2016 6/30/2017 6/30/2018
Actual Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate
Assessed value $ 356,932,928 363,442,750 375,946,094 383,465,016 391,134,316 398,957,003 406,936,143
Merchants' inventory for debt purposes 9,169,930 9,169,930 9,169,930 9,169,930 9,169,930 9,169,930 9,169,930
Total assessed value 366,102,858 372,612,680 385,116,024 392,634,946 400,304,246 408,126,933 416,106,073
Statutory debt limit based on 8% $ 29,288,229 29,809,014 30,809,282 31,410,796 32,024,340 32,650,155 33,288,486
Less current debt
G.O. Series 2012 $ 0 9,915,000 9,095,000 8,250,000 7,375,000 6,455,000 5,500,000
G.O. Series 2011 1,938,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
G.O. Series 2006 5,815,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
G.O. Series 2003 2,455,000 0 0 0 0 0 0
10,208,000 9,915,000 9,095,000 8,250,000 7,375,000 6,455,000 5,500,000
Legal debt margin, current $ 19,080,229 19,894,014 21,714,282 23,160,796 24,649,340 26,195,155 27,788,486
Less new issues in CIP:
G.O. Series 2013 $ 0 0 3,881,000 3,686,000 3,491,000 3,296,000 3,101,000
0 0 3,881,000 3,686,000 3,491,000 3,296,000 3,101,000
Legal debt margin, revised 19,080,229 19,894,014 17,833,282 19,474,796 21,158,340 22,899,155 24,687,486
FY 2014-2018 CIP City of Greenville, South Carolina
Appendix M-4