adq for airports
DESCRIPTION
ADQ for Airports. Torunn I. Carlsson Director Technical and Aeronautical Information Management Avinor ADQ IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP 28-29 May 2013. Avinor’s Airports. 46 airports 5 mill people 22 mill pax ~10000 Pax. Status Airports dataorigination. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ADQ for Airports
Torunn I. CarlssonDirector Technical and Aeronautical Information Management
Avinor
ADQ IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP28-29 May 2013
Avinor’s Airports
• 46 airports• 5 mill people• 22 mill pax• ~10000 Pax
Status Airports dataorigination• All airports regularly survey (every ~2-5 year)
(Arial photography, laserscanning)• AMDB for all airports– 36 airports with 3D AMDB / 10 airports 2D
• Critical «points» (THR, Instr etc.) survey– Landsurveying company – full digital transfer
• For all data submitted to AIP: metadata and sourcedata recorded in originatordatabase
• GIS used at airports for operations – data maintenance
Challenges
• Lack of understanding of why ADQ?• Common message from the regulators in each
state?• Are the rules and guidelines clear enough?• Cost• Lack of priority – New EASA rules for certification– CDM– Other projects
Airport data / AMDB
• Consistency between the regulations• How do I as an airport report changes ?• Can the datamodell I use be used for reporting
to AISP?• Who has to save the data for historical
purposes?• Do I have to make my AMDB temporal?• CAD world
SLA
• SLA between airport and AISP required?– Cost?
• ADQ data originator Harmonized list vs EASA NPA ?
• Are they the same? Which one do I follow?
ObstaclesArea Hor. acc Ver. acc
2a 5 m 3 m
2b 5 m 3 m
2c 5 m 3 m
2d 5 m 3 m
3 .5 m .5 m
4 2.5 m 1 m
• Cost of obstacle surveying?• Who is paying?
TerrainTerrain data Hor.acc Ver.acc
Area 1 50 m 30 m
Area 2 5 m 3 m
Area 3 .5 m .5 m
Area 4 2.5 m 1 m
Terrain data collection :National Mapping authority?National civil aviation authority?ANSP?Airport?
WHY WORRY?
Example of obstacle surfaces around Norwegian airport