adults with incapacity act
DESCRIPTION
Adults with Incapacity Act. Improving with Experience. Welfare Guardianship. SE Advice letters: Interventions under AWI July 04 - response to wide variation in use of Part 6 by local authorities September 05 – response to ECHR judgement on ‘Bournewood’ - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Adults with Incapacity Act
Improving with Experience
Welfare GuardianshipSE Advice letters: Interventions under AWI
July 04 - response to wide variation in use of Part 6 by local authorities
September 05 – response to ECHR judgement on ‘Bournewood’
Draft Guidance May 06 for practitionersissued for comment
When to use the Act
Scottish Law Commission’s intentions Application of the Fundamental Principles Deprivation of liberty – ECHR Article 5
Fundamental Principles
1(2) There shall be no intervention into the affairs of an adult unless the person responsible for authorising or effecting the intervention is satisfied that the intervention will benefit the adult and that such benefit cannot be reasonably be achieved without the intervention
Fundamental Principles 1 (4) In determining if an intervention is
to be made and, if so, what intervention is to be made, account shall be taken of- the past and present wishes and feelings of the adult so far as they can be ascertained by any means of communication … appropriate to the adult etc
Fundamental Principles Consistent with Council of Europe Principles
Concerning the Legal Protection of Incapable Adults
Reflects the proportionality requirement inherent in Article 8(2) of the Human Rights Convention
Deprivation of Liberty New duty – to assess for ‘deprivation of liberty’
where adult lacks capacity to give informed consent to change of living arrangements –under Article 5 ECHR.
‘Bournewood’ judgement –a case by case basis – it will depend on the specific situation of the adult concerned taking account of a whole range of factors in their particular case.
Deprivation of Liberty
In Scotland may be lawful in certain circumstances under AWI through use of formal order
Or through use of measures under the 2003 Act
Deprivation of Liberty: Factors to consider
Factors affecting personal autonomy - past and present wishes and feelings of adult Access to resources to support physical and social autonomy
and interests Extent/nature of limitations on contact with
family/friend/visits, access to local community etc Internal/external design of physical environment and access Access to outside physical environment Duration of any limitations/restrictions
Factors to consider (cont.)
Effect of changes in the care regime Availability of appropriate less restrictive
alternatives Safety issues Physical abilities of adult
Safeguards for adults where an order may not required Subject to care management/care co-ordination
guidelines for assessment, monitoring and review National Care Standards Investigatory functions of local authorities, Mental
Welfare Commission and OPG Anyone claiming and interest can apply for an
order to over-ride action taken by local authority or can use complaints procedures
Implications of a ‘blanket’ approach Major increases in the number of ‘blocked beds in hospitals Significant delays in courts not able to deal with substantial
numbers of applications quickly Significant and unanticipated use of local authority resources
(legal and social work, especially burden on MHOs) While no longer major expense to private individuals (with
availability of free legal aid from 1 August) the costs to public purse would increase considerably
High cost to health and quality of life of adults, left languishing in hospital wards and stress on families
How Often Is Welfare Guardianship Being Used?
Approved Welfare Guardianship Applications 2002 - 2006
• 640 Apr 05 – Mar 2006• 531 Apr 04 – Mar 2005• 398 Apr 03 – Mar 2004• 261 Apr 02 – Mar 2003
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
02 03 03 04 04 05 05 06
Extant Welfare Guardianship Orders 2002 - 2006
• 1459 31 Mar 2006
• 1042 31 Mar 2005
• 592 31 Mar 2004
• 261 31 Mar 20030
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
02 03 03 04 04 05 05 06
Who is being placed on Welfare Guardianship?
Approved Welfare Guardianship Applications – 2002- 2005
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
16 - 20 21 - 50 51 - 70 Over 70
Age Group and Gender
MaleFemale
Approved Welfare Guardianship Applications – 2006
61
21
3 26 3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Applications by Diagnosis %Dementia
Learning Disability
Alcohol Related
Dual LD/MI
Mental Illness
Acquired BrainInjury
Who Is Being Appointed As Welfare Guardian?
Approved Welfare Guardianship Applications 2002 - 2006
76% of Guardians were Local Authorities in ’02 - now 56%
19% of Guardians were Relatives in ’02 - now 40% 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Guardians
LocalAuthority
Relatives
Others
Which Local Authorities Are Seeking Welfare Guardianship
Orders?
Local Authority Applications April 2005 – March 2006
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Per 100k pop over 16
The 10 lowest users per 100KWest Dunbartonshire
Dundee City
Edinburgh, City Of
Inverclyde
East Renfrewshire
Moray
East Dunbartonshire
Midlothian
Renfrewshire
Orkney
Local Authority Applications April 2005 – March 2006
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Per 100k pop over 16
The 10 highest using per 100K Perth & Kinross
Fife
Glasgow City
Highland
East Ayrshire
Dumfries & Galloway
East Lothian
West Lothian
North Ayrshire
South Ayrshire
Improving with Experience When to Invoke draft guidance has currency Guidance on ‘Communication and Assessing Capacity’ forthcoming –
for all staff involved with the capacity assessment process DVD ‘Making Decisions – Your Rights’ for adults (Nov) Guardianship and Intervention Orders – making an application – a
guide for carers (October) Training/awareness initiatives – to support carers; professionals Amendments to 2000 Act through ASP Bill to streamline and improve
access – revised codes of practice/other publications with OPG