aep analyst & investor meeting feburary 10, 2012

44
Analyst & Investor Meeting New York, NY February 10, 2012

Upload: american-electric-power

Post on 12-May-2015

1.063 views

Category:

Investor Relations


2 download

DESCRIPTION

American Electric Power (NYSE: AEP) will share 2012 to 2014 plans, including 2012 ongoing earnings guidance (earnings excluding special items) and expected capital spend, during a meeting today with investors in New York. The company is expected to announce an ongoing earnings guidance range for 2012 of $3.05 to $3.25 per share and set its 2012 capital budget at $3.1 billion. Capital expenditures for 2013 and 2014 are estimated at $3.5 billion to $3.7 billion per year.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

Analyst & Investor MeetingNew York, NY

February 10, 2012

Page 2: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.2

Investor Relations Contacts

“Safe Harbor” Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

Chuck ZebulaTreasurer

SVP Investor Relations614-716-2800

[email protected]

Bette Jo RozsaManaging DirectorInvestor Relations

[email protected]

Julie SherwoodDirector

Investor Relations614-716-2663

[email protected]

Sara MaciochAnalyst

Investor Relations614-716-2835

[email protected]

This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Although AEP and each of its Registrant Subsidiaries believe that their expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, any such statements may be influenced by factors that could cause actual outcomes and results to be materially different from those projected. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements are: the economic climate and growth in, or contraction within, our service territory and changes in market demand and demographic patterns, inflationary or deflationary interest rate trends, volatility in the financial markets, particularly developments affecting the availability of capital on reasonable terms and developments impairing our ability to finance new capital projects and refinance existing debt at attractive rates, the availability and cost of funds to finance working capital and capital needs, particularly during periods when the time lag between incurring costs and recovery is long and the costs are material, electric load, customer growth and the impact of retail competition, particularly in Ohio, weather conditions, including storms, and our ability to recover significant storm restoration costs through applicable rate mechanisms, available sources and costs of, and transportation for, fuels and the creditworthiness and performance of fuel suppliers and transporters, availability of necessary generating capacity and the performance of our generating plants, our ability to resolve I&M’s Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 restoration and outage-related issues through warranty, insurance and the regulatory process, our ability to recover regulatory assets and stranded costs in connection with deregulation, our ability to recover increases in fuel and other energy costs through regulated or competitive electric rates, our ability to build or acquire generating capacity, and transmission lines and facilities (including our ability to obtain any necessary regulatory approvals and permits) when needed at acceptable prices and terms and to recover those costs (including the costs of projects that are cancelled) through applicable rate cases or competitive rates, new legislation, litigation and government regulation including oversight nuclear generation, energy commodity trading and new or heightened requirements for reduced emissions of sulfur, nitrogen, mercury, carbon, soot or particulate matter and other substances or additional regulation of fly ash and similar combustion products that could impact the continued operation and cost recovery of our plants and related assets, timing and resolution of pending and future rate cases, negotiations and other regulatory decisions including rate or other recovery of new investments in generation, distribution and transmission service and environmental compliance, resolution of litigation, our ability to constrain operation and maintenance costs, our ability to develop and execute a strategy based on a view regarding prices of electricity, natural gas and other energy-related commodities, changes in the creditworthiness of the counterparties with whom we have contractual arrangements, including participants in the energy trading market, actions of rating agencies, including changes in the ratings of debt, volatility and changes in markets for electricity, natural gas, coal, nuclear fuel and other energy-related commodities, changes in utility regulation, including the implementation of ESPs and the expected legal separation and transition to market for generation in Ohio and the allocation of costs within regional transmission organizations, including PJM and SPP, accounting pronouncements periodically issued by accounting standard-setting bodies, the impact of volatility in the capital markets on the value of the investments held by our pension, other postretirement benefit plans, captive insurance entity and nuclear decommissioning trust and the impact on future funding requirements, prices and demand for power that we generate and sell at wholesale, changes in technology, particularly with respect to new, developing or alternative sources of generation, our ability to recover through rates or market prices any remaining unrecovered investment in generating units that may be retired before the end of their previously projected useful lives, our ability to successfully manage negotiations with stakeholders and obtain regulatory approval to terminate or amend the Interconnection Agreement and break up modify, or replace the AEP Power Pool, evolving public perception of the risks associated with fuels used before, during and after the generation of electricity, including nuclear fuel and other risks and unforeseen events, including wars, the effects of terrorism (including increased security costs), embargoes, cyber security threats and other catastrophic events.

Page 3: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.3

Today’s Presenters

Nick AkinsPresident & Chief Executive Officer

Brian TierneyExecutive Vice President &Chief Financial Officer

Page 4: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.4

8:00 AM….....Nick AkinsStrategy

9:15 AM….…Brian TierneyFinancial

10:00 AM……Q&A

10:30 AM…....MeetingAdjourned

AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting

ScheduleWhat you will hear today……

Earnings range for 2012 - $3.05-$3.25/shareEarnings growth range of 4-6% supported by rate base growth at regulated companiesCompany’s asset profile – 86% RegulatedDividend supported by Regulated OperationsStrong financial profile

Corporate separation filings at FERC todayTransition period – execution is keyCompetitive generation profile

Framework for today’s discussion ……Regulated OperationsCompetitive Operations

Page 5: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.5

AEP’s Track Record since 2004

Our re-dedication to the regulated business model in 2004 has rewarded shareholders well

Our re-dedication to the regulated business model in 2004 has rewarded shareholders well

Total Shareholder Return

2.1%

48.6%

-1.2%

20.1%

110.9%

32.6%

19.3%

38.7%

88.3%

20.8%

44.8%

22.2%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

Tota

l Sha

reho

lder

Ret

urn

(%) S&P 500

UTYAEP

1 Year 3 Year 5 Year 8 Year

EarningsCAGR

DividendGrowthCAGR

4.3%

4.1%

2004-2011 Period

Page 6: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.6

Clarity Achieved in 2010-11

2010-11 Clarity

2010-11 Clarity

Operating Company Model put in place in 2010 aligns management decisions

Financial controls in place to manage balance sheet and growth opportunities

Strong financial platform in placeFocus on capital spending discipline and allocation

Several “overhangs” resolvedMATS Rule Settled Arkansas coal plant (Turk) litigationSecuritization opportunities in Texas and OhioPUCO approval to separate “G” from “wires” in Ohio

Enables executionEnables execution

Page 7: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.7

Execute in 2012-14

2012-14 Execution2012-14

ExecutionOptimize Operating Company ROEs and invest in the regulated utility platform

Reposition the Generation Resource Portfolio

Refocus Transmission business for near-term growth

Create a robust competitive business

Clarity, Execution, Line-of-Sight, DisciplineClarity, Execution, Line-of-Sight, Discipline

Page 8: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.8

Total Assets – Regulated/Competitive

Following corporate separation, we expect earnings contributions to approximate asset splitFollowing corporate separation, we expect earnings contributions to approximate asset split

$7.5B 14%

$44.5B 86%

Regulated Companies Competitive Companies

Vertically-IntegratedAppalachian PowerKentucky PowerIndiana Michigan PowerPublic Service Co of Oklahoma Southwestern Electric Power

Regulated Generation CoAEP Generating Company

Wires CompaniesOhio PowerTexas CentralTexas North

Transmission CompaniesAEP Ohio TranscoAEP Indiana Michigan TranscoAEP Oklahoma TranscoJoint Ventures (ETT, Pioneer, etc.)

Power RelatedAEP Generation ResourcesAEP Energy PartnersAEP Retail Energy

Bulk Commodity TransportAEP River Operations

Transmission Companies Awaiting ApprovalAEP Southwestern Transco (AR, LA)AEP Kentucky TranscoAEP Virginia TranscoAEP West Virginia Transco

TOTAL ASSETS, based on Y/E 2011 in 2013 business structure ** Subsequent to corporate separation

Page 9: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.9

Regulated Operations

Page 10: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.10

Regulated Operations

Management Focus on Execution

Operating Company Focus – strengthen local relationships, earn allowed returns, allocation of capital, rate base growth

Obtain regulatory approvals for East Pool replacement

Obtain additional regulatory approvals for state Transcos (WV, VA, KY, AR, LA) and JVs

Focus on prudency, reliability, financial discipline and capital efficiency

Improved recovery mechanisms in place

over time

2008

2012

Improved recovery

mechanisms

20%

48%

80%

52%

Traditionalrate

recovery

Operating company line-of-sight drives resultsOperating company line-of-sight drives results

Page 11: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.11

14.64%14.34%9.66%10.60% 10.97%8.82%12.81% 7.48%

0.00%

2.00%

4.00%

6.00%

8.00%

10.00%

12.00%

14.00%

16.00%

AEP System Ohio Power APCo KPCo I&M PSO SWEPCO AEP Texas

Earned ROEs

The diversity of our portfolio helps mitigate regulatory lagThe diversity of our portfolio helps mitigate regulatory lag

2011 Proforma* Earned ROEs

* pro-forma adjusts GAAP results by eliminating any material nonrecurring items

Page 12: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.12

Corporate, $70

Distribution, $845

Base Fossil/Hydro Generation, $205

Base Nuclear Generation, $62

Nuclear Life Cycle Management, $153

New Generation, $201

Environmental Generation, $451

AEP Transco, $350

Trans JV EquityContributions, $116 Operating Company

Transmission, $456

2012 Regulated Capital Spending

SO2 Program - $199MAsh / CCR - $69MNOx Program - $67MPrecipitators - $57MMercury Program - $39MEffluent WWT - $10MOther - $10M

Turk - $171MDresden - $30M

AEP Ohio Transco - $206MAEP Indiana Michigan Transco - $79MAEP Oklahoma Transco - $65M

ETT - $107META - $9M

2012 Capital & Equity Contributions for Regulated Operations = $2.9B*

2013 and 2014 Capital for Regulated Operations is estimated at $3.4B - $3.5B2013 and 2014 Capital for Regulated Operations is estimated at $3.4B - $3.5B

* Excludes AFUDC; Includes Mitchell Plant and Amos Unit 3

Page 13: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.13

25%

16%

13%

29%

17%

SWEPCOPSOKentucky PowerI&MAPCo

25%

75%

Water/CCR Rules

Air Rules

Regulated Fleet Repositioning

Retire older, less efficient regulated plants (~2,600MW)

New capacity added to rate base to replace portion of retirements

– Dresden Combined Cycle (580MW, on-line January 2012)

– Turk Coal Plant (440MW, scheduled 4Q 2012)

Particulate matter requirements in MATS Rule reduced overall environmental CAPEX needs

Concerns still exist over timing of rules and reliability impacts

Reposition fleet to controlled coal and natural gas-fired unitsReposition fleet to controlled coal and natural gas-fired units

Regulated Environmental CAPEX by Rule for 2012-20 period

Regulated Environmental CAPEX by OPCO for 2012-20 period *

Expected 2012-2020 regulated environmental capex forecast

of $5 – $6 billion*

* Excludes AFUDC

Page 14: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.14

$50

$265$350

$585$650

$56

$96

$116

$82$28 $35

$657

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

$800

2010A 2011A 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E

$ in

mill

ions

$106

$361

$466

$667 $678 $692

Transmission Segment Growth

Transcos– Increased project flow– FERC formula rates (updated annually)– Approved in OH, MI, OK, IN– Pending approval in WV, VA, KY, AR, LA– ROE : 11.49% (PJM) / 11.20% (SPP)

Joint Ventures– Electric Transmission Texas (ETT)– Others: Prairie Wind, Pioneer– Longer term projects with FERC formula

rates/bi-annual rate mechanisms– Continue to pursue new opportunities – ROE range: 9.96% to 12.8%

Investing capital in transmission for reliability and growthInvesting capital in transmission for reliability and growth

$0.02

$0.06$0.08

$0.14

$0.24

$0.31

$0.00

$0.05

$0.10

$0.15

$0.20

$0.25

$0.30

$0.35

2010A 2011A 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E

Transmission (AEPTHCo) Capital

Transmission (AEPTHCo) EPS

AEP Transmission HoldCo (AEPTHCo) Growth Opportunities Transco Capital

JV Equity Contributions

Page 15: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.15

$5.1$0.4

$1.0

$1.6

$2.2

$2.1

$4.4

$6.5

$8.4

$4.0$2.7

$1.3

$1.1

$0.7

$0.4

$0.9

$0.0

$1.0

$2.0

$3.0

$4.0

$5.0

$6.0

$7.0

$8.0

$9.0

$10.0

2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E

$ in

bill

ions

Capital Recovery & Growth

Growth in regulated PP&E supports overall earnings growth of 4-6%Growth in regulated PP&E supports overall earnings growth of 4-6%

Cumulative Change in Net Regulated PP&E by Function

Operating company investment in Generation & Distribution.G & D rate adjustments via base rate cases with certain tracker mechanisms for environmental and reliability investments. ROEs range from 10.0% to 10.9%.

Operating company investment in Transmission. Rate recovery via trackers/TCOS mechanisms in OH, TN, VA, MI, TX. ROEs range from 9.96% to 11.49%.

Transcos. Rate recovery via FERC formula rates. ROEs 11.49% (PJM) / 11.20% (SPP).

2011 Net Regulated PP&E = $32B6.0% CAGR in Net Regulated PP&E

Note: 2012 annual regulated depreciation is $1.14B; Transmission JV investments discussed on theprevious page are not reflected above as the ventures are not consolidated on AEP’s financialstatements

Page 16: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.16

Corporate Separation &

Competitive Operations

Page 17: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.17

Corporate Separation Next Steps

File FERC 203 and 205 Applications for Corporate Separation, Pool Replacement and Interim Allowance Agreement Termination

File FERC 203 Application for APCo-WPCo Merger

Settlement Process with State Commissions and Stakeholders

Q12012

PostQ1

2012

Target1Q-2013 Final Settlements and FERC Orders

Corporate Separation: reasonable process, achievable timelineCorporate Separation: reasonable process, achievable timeline

Corporate Separation of Ohio Power generation assetsTransfer of Amos Unit 3 and Mitchell Generating FacilitiesApproval of SSO Contract between AEP Generation Resources and Ohio Power (to serve non-shopping load during transition period)Approval of Power Cost Sharing Agreement (new 3-company pool)Bridge Agreement (interim agreement to address legacy Pool Agreement issues such as FRR obligations)Approval of APCo/WPCo merger

Summary of Requests inFERC Filings:

Approximate Timeline

Page 18: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.18

Transfer Mitchell/Amos

2013 / 2014 Transition Factors

FERC filings made todayFERC filings made today

AEP Generation Resources

Ohio Power

Merger of Columbus Southern and Ohio Power on 12/31/11

APCo, I&M, Kentucky and Ohio Power continue 4-company pooling of generation resources for capacity and energy

OSS shared

Non-switching customers in Ohio supported by 4-company pool

Current: 2012 to 1Q 2013

3-company power cost sharing agreement

Excess energy after SSO available for competitive market

SSO for non-switching customers at Power Supply Agreement price

APCo, I&M,Kentucky Power

Corporate Separation:1Q 2013

Transition: 1Q 2013 to May 2015

All capacity and energy available for competitive market

RPM Capacity

Bridge Agreement

SSO Power Supply Agreement

CapacityEnergy Fuel clause &

non-fuel G-rate

3-company power cost sharing agreement; FRR capacity

Market: post May 2015

SSO for remaining customers at auction price

Factors: Shopping levels, power prices

Factors: Shopping levels, power prices

Factors: Fuel costs, power/capacity prices

Page 19: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.19

AEP Generation Resources Inc.

AEP Generation Resources capacity position of 8,900 MW in 2015 consists primarily of competitive, controlled coal and natural gas-fired resources

AEP Generation Resources capacity position of 8,900 MW in 2015 consists primarily of competitive, controlled coal and natural gas-fired resources

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

To Be Retired

Transferred

Competitive

Capacity Profile, 2010-16

35.5%

64.5%

C o al Gas/ H ydro

Capacity Mix

65% new CC19% steam16% new CT

86% FGD/SCR14% FGD

2011 Fuel Statistics (Ohio fleet average)Delivered coal price -- $2.35/mmBtu ($56/ton)Delivered gas price -- $4.23/mmBtu

Transfers – Mitchell (1,560 MW), Amos Unit 3 (870 MW)Retirements – 2,538 MW

End of Year

MW

Page 20: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.20

Competitive Ohio CAPEX

All capital for our competitive generation fleet in Ohio is under study due to the change in business environment; capital discipline will be exercised

All capital for our competitive generation fleet in Ohio is under study due to the change in business environment; capital discipline will be exercised

$1.1

$0.4

$0.5

$0.5

0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.82.0

June 2011 Estimate Revised Estimate

$ in

Bill

ions

Water/CCR Rules

Air Rules

Competitive generation (OH) environmental CAPEX spending reduced by $700M for 2012-20 period

Ongoing CAPEX

Note: Estimates reflected above exclude ~ $800 M related to the Mitchell and Amos 3 Plants (included in regulated capital); Capital reduced due to MATS PM limit changes

Capital for 2012 is approximately $160M (about

$15/kW) for the entire Ohio Generation

portfolio, mostly allocated to the large, controlled

power plants. At this time, we expect

2013 and 2014 to be ~$100M per year.

Page 21: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.21

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

2015

Open Position

Formula Rates

Wholesale Auctions

Municipal/CooperativeTransactions

Retail  Sales

Sales, Trading and Marketing

Hedging Strategy for competitive generation will

explore all sales opportunities

Planned Hedging Strategy

Capacity sales will be made in the PJM RPM market auction; auction in May of 2012 for the 2015-16 capacity year

Energy sales will be “optimized”between retail, bilateral contracts (munis/co-ops) wholesale auctions and the PJM market (see graph).

Recent announcement to acquire BlueStar Energy provides important scale to our back office systems and allows additional leverage into our retail marketing efforts

Capacity and Energy Sales

Expect hedging levels of 75-80%Expect hedging levels of 75-80%

GW

h

Page 22: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.22

Summary of Discussion

$7.5B 14%

$44.5B 86%

TOTAL ASSETS, Y/E 2011 in 2013 business

structure *

RegulatedCompetitive

Regulated companies offer 6% growth in net PP&E through 2015

– Operating company model– Improved recovery mechanisms– Regulated fleet transformation– Efficient allocation of capital

Corporate Separation in 2013– Ohio generation phases – Current, Transition,

Market– Transfer of Mitchell, Amos 3 plants to APCo

and Kentucky Power– Filed with FERC today

Competitive Operations– Retirements due to environmental rules– Controlled fleet in 2015– Capital discipline– Hedging program (75-80%)

* Subsequent to corporate separation

Supports overall 4-6% earnings growthSupports overall 4-6% earnings growth

Page 23: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.23

Financial

Page 24: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.24

$3.12 0.18

0.06 0.05

(0.05)(0.07) (0.09)(0.10)(0.14)

0.25 $3.03

$0.00

$0.50

$1.00

$1.50

$2.00

$2.50

$3.00

$3.50

$4.00

CustomerSwitching

Ohio POLR O&M, net ofoffsets

Weather NormalizedRetailMargin

TCC Cap.Auct. True-

up

OSS, net ofsharing

Other, Net Rate Relief,net ofoffsets

2011A2010A

2011 Ongoing Earnings Results

Ongoing earnings of $3.12 per share exceeded the midpoint of ouroriginal earnings guidance

Ongoing earnings of $3.12 per share exceeded the midpoint of ouroriginal earnings guidance

Reg Disallowances (0.14)2009 SEET Refund 0.06Tax Settlement 0.13Other 0.13

Page 25: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.25

-1.7%

4.4%

-0.1% 0.3% 0.4% 0.3%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 2011A 2012E

Normalized Retail Load Trends

1.2%

-1.5%

0.5%

-0.3%

1.1%

-1.0%-5%

0%

5%

10%

1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 2011A 2012E

7.1%

3.3%

5.2%

1.0%

4.1%2.2%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 2011A 2012E

2.5% 1.9% 1.9% 1.6% 2.0% 1.4%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 2011A 2012E

AEP Residential Normalized GWh Sales%Change vs. Prior Year

AEP Commercial Normalized GWh Sales%Change vs. Prior Year

AEP Industrial Normalized GWh Sales%Change vs. Prior Year

AEP Total Normalized GWh Sales*%Change vs. Prior Year

*includes firm wholesale loadNote: Chart represents connected load

Modest load growth of 1.4 percent for 2012Modest load growth of 1.4 percent for 2012

Page 26: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.26

AEP Industrial GWh by Sector

-

400

800

1,200

1,600

2,000

2,400

Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11

GWh

Primary Metal ManufacturingChemical ManufacturingPetroleum and Coal Products ManufacturingMining (except Oil & Gas)Paper Manufacturing

These 5 sectors account for approximately 60% of AEP's total Industrial Sales.

Industrial Sales Volumes

Industrial load near pre-recession levelsIndustrial load near pre-recession levels

Industry 4Q11 vs. PY YTD vs. PYPrimary Metals 12.5% 14.1%Chemical Mfg -7.1% 0.7%Petroleum & Coal Products 2.4% 4.6%Mining (except Oil & Gas) 6.4% 4.6% Paper Mfg -0.2% -0.4%

Page 27: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.27

$3.12 $3.15

(0.24) (0.21)

(0.15) (0.12) (0.11) (0.01)

0.020.15

0.27

0.43

$0.00

$0.50

$1.00

$1.50

$2.00

$2.50

$3.00

$3.50

$4.00

Other UtilityCosts, net

OhioSw itching

Weather OSS, net ofsharing

OhioPOLR

Non-Utility/Parent

TransOperations

NormalizedRetailMargin

O&M, net ofoffsets

Rate Relief,net of

offsets

2011A 2012E

2012 Ongoing Earnings Guidance

2012 Ongoing Guidance Range: $3.05- $3.25 per share2012 Ongoing Guidance Range: $3.05- $3.25 per share

Eff Tax Rate (0.15)D&A (0.12)TCC Cap T-Up (0.04)Taxes Other (0.04)3rd Party Trans 0.12 Other (0.01)

Cost Control 0.11Incremental 2011 Work 0.08OH Reg. Orders 0.05Storms 0.03

Page 28: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.28

$3,114$3,500 $3,500

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

$4,000

2012E 2013E 2014E

$ in

mill

ions

2012 – 2014 Financing Plan

Increased cash receipts and capital discipline keep balance sheet strongIncreased cash receipts and capital discipline keep balance sheet strong

AEP System Capital Spend

2013/2014 Capital range of $3.5 - $3.7B

$ in millions 2012E 2013E 2014E

Cash from Operations 3,800 3,700 3,800

Cash from Securitization 800 875 -

Capital & JV Equity Contributions (3,114) (3,500) (3,500)

Other Investing Activities (350) (300) (200)

Common Dividends (911) (915) (919)

Excess (Required) Capital 225 (140) (819)

Financing ($ in millions) 2012E 2013E * 2014E *

Excess (Required) Capital 225 (140) (819)

Retirements ** (1,140) (1,715) (1,340)

Debt Issuances (Excluding Securitization) 800 1,750 2,000

Equity Issuances (DRP) 100 100 100

Increase/(Decrease) in Short term debt (15) (5) (59)

* Debt Capital Market Needs for 2013 and 2014 will be refined based on timing,

form and approval of corporate separation and asset transfers

** Retirements includes debt matur ities and amortizations

Page 29: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.29

Ohio Power Recapitalization

AEP is committed to managing the business as investment gradeAEP is committed to managing the business as investment grade

$4,062(1,141)

(475)$2,446

Debt Outstanding at Ohio Power2012/2013 Sr. Note Maturities, PCRB ‘puts’, Debt with Par CallMaturities within one year of Corporate Separation

$2,150$296

Senior Notes due after 2015PCRBs Tender Date after 2013

Debt capacity at Ohio Power - $1.9 to $2.4 B

$ millions

DEBT RECONCILIATIONassuming separation by 1Q 2013

Note: Columbus Southern merged with Ohio Power on 12/31/11. Ohio Powerassumed all outstanding obligations of Columbus Southern.

Page 30: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.30

AEP’s Financial Strength

Solid investment grade credit profileSolid investment grade credit profile

Liquidity

Credit Ratings

Balance Sheet

Pension

57.5 57.055.3 54.9

50

52

54

56

58

60

2009 2010 2011 2012E

55.3%Year-end 2011

Debt to Total Cap

Debt to Total Cap

Perc

ent

$3.25B Credit Facilities

$1.5B credit facility extended to June 2015$1.75B credit facility renewed to July 2016Supported by 27 bank institutions

$950M contributions in 2010-11$200M contribution planned for 2012 expected to bring funded status >90%Investment strategies being reviewed

86% Funded Status at Y/E 2011

Moody’s – Baa2 (stable)S&P – BBB (stable)Fitch – BBB (stable)

Investment Grade Credit Rating

Page 31: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.31

$1.4 0 $1.4 2

$1.50

$1.58$1.6 4 $1.6 4

$1.8 5 $1.8 8

$1.71

51.3%

60.1%

54.2%

52.7%50.6%

55.2%

56.4%

59.3%59.7%

$1.20

$1.40

$1.60

$1.80

$2.00

$2.20

$2.40

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012E45.0%

50.0%

55.0%

60.0%

65.0%Dividend Payout Ratio

Dividend Policy and EPS Growth Rate

AEP TOTAL RETURN OPPORTUNITY is 9-10%AEP TOTAL RETURN OPPORTUNITY is 9-10%

50-60% Payout Ratio– Expect dividend growth < EPS growth– Dividend supported by regulated operations

Dividend History– 407th consecutive quarterly dividend declared– Dividend growth 4.1% CAGR since 2004

Current Yield of 4.8%

Dividend Policy EPS Growth Rate expected to average 4-6% over several

years

Regulated net PP&E expected to grow at 6%

– Supports overall earnings growth at the high end of range

– Efficient allocation of capitalOhio Generation in Transition

– Switching levels and low capacity and energy prices could put pressure on near-term growth

– Expect uplift in capacity prices due to environmental retirements

Equity needs over 2012-14 period about $300M through dividend reinvestment program

Page 32: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.32

Questions

Page 33: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.33

Appendix

Page 34: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.34

Detailed Ongoing Earnings Guidance

($ m illions)

1 $ 41.1 /MW hr 2,749 68,339 GW H @ $ 45.2 /MWhr

2 $ 52.0 /MW hr 2,673 48,349 GW H @ $ 52.3 /MWhr

3 $ 32.5 /MW hr 1,408 42,476 GW H @ $ 32.4 /MWhr

4 $ 22.1 /MW hr 648 28,274 GW H @ $ 22.1 /MWhr

5 $ 13.3 /MW hr 343 27,742 GW H @ $ 9.0 /MWhr

6 417

7 507

8 8,745

9 (3,544)

10 (1,613)

11 (812)

12 (891)

13 239

14 (669)

15 1,455

16 30

17 45

18 14

19 (40)

20 1,504

AEP ConsolidatedFinancial Results for 2011 Actual Vs 2012 Guidance

2011 Actual

Performance Driver Perform ance Driver

UTILITY OPERATIONS:Gross Margin:

East Regulated Integrated Util ities 66,832 GW H @

Ohio Companies 51,445 GW H @

West Regulated Integrated Util ities 43,380 GW H @

Texas Wires 29,288 GW H @

Off-System Sales, net of sharing 25,693 GW H @

Transm ission Revenue - 3rd Party

Other Operating Revenue

Utility Gross Margin

Operations & Maintenance

Depreciation & Amortization

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes

Interest Exp & Preferred Dividend

Other Income & Deductions

Income Taxes

Transmission Operations On-Going Earnings

Utility Operations On-Going Earnings

Generation & Marketing

NON-UTILITY OPERATIONS:AEP River Operations

ON-GOING EARNINGSParent & Other On-Going Earnings

2012 Guidance

($ mi llions)

3,087

2,530

1,377

625

250

504

546

8,919

(3,416)

(1,718)

(842)

(906)

214

(779)

1,472

38

1,523

57

(13)

(31)

2011A: $3.122011A: $3.12 2012E: $3.05 - $3.252012E: $3.05 - $3.25

Page 35: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.35

$2,874 $2,937 $2,737

$553 $607$679

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

$4,000

2010A 2011A 2012E

$ in

mill

ions

Items withEarningsOffsets

Base UtilityO&M

$3,427 $3,544 $3,416

$220$269

$51

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

2011A 2012E

$ in

mill

ions

Future

Secured

$299

$343

$250

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

$400

2010A 2011A 2012E

$ in

mill

ions

2012 Major DriversRate Relief

OSS Assumptions, net of sharing

19,171GWH

25,693GWH 27,742

GWH

Utility O&M Expense

Sensitivities

$320

Sensitivity

Retail Sales 0.5% +/- 0.05

Customer Switching in Ohio (@ RPM) 1.0% +/- 0.01

Wholesale Market Prices $1 MWh +/- 0.03

O&M Expense (excludes O&M with offsets) 1.0% +/- 0.04

Note: A $7.5M change in pre-tax earnings equals $0.01/share.

EPS

Page 36: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.36

Corporate, $76

Distribution, $845

Base Fossil/Hydro Generation, $313

Base Nuclear Generation, $62

Nuclear Life Cycle Management, $153

New Generation, $201

Environmental Generation, $503

Trans JV EquityContributions, $116

River Ops & Other Non-Utility, $39

AEP Transco, $350

Operating Company Transmission, $456

2012 Total System Capital

SO2 Program - $201MNOx Program - $72MPrecipitators - $62MAsh / CCR - $79MMercury Program - $39MEffluent WWT - $19MOther - $31M

Turk - $171MDresden - $30M

AEP Ohio Transco - $206MAEP Indiana Michigan Transco - $79MAEP Oklahoma Transco - $65M

ETT - $107META - $9M

Total 2012 Capital & Equity Contributions of $3.1BTotal 2012 Capital & Equity Contributions of $3.1B

* Excludes AFUDC

Page 37: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.37

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

Ohio Power APCo I&M KPCo AEP Texas PSO SWEPCO Other

$ in

mill

ions

2012 Capital by Operating Company

$563

$447$463

$110

$270

$203

$428

$126

Excludes AFUDC

Note: Ohio Power capex includes $103M related to Mitchell and Amos Unit 3 plants (to be transferred from Ohio Power to APCo and KPCo)

Page 38: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.38

Pending Rate Cases

$ in millions CompanyI&M - Indiana Filing Staff Testimony

Rate increase $148.7 n/a

Rate base/investment $2,411.9Return on equity 11.15%

Equity component 42.67%

Status: Case filed on September 23, 2011. Hearing on Case in Chief begins February 20, 2012. Staff & Intervenor testimony due April 27, 2012.

$ in millions CompanyI&M - Michigan Filing Settlement

Rate increase $24.5 $14.6Rate base/investment $680.8 $663.2Return on equity 11.15% 10.20%Equity component 44.30% 50.92%

Status: Rates subject to refund went in place January 2012; settlement filed January 20, 2012

Page 39: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.39

Pioneer is a 50/50 JV owned by AEP and Duke Energy to construct approximately 240-280 miles of 765 kV transmission line in Indiana in multiple phases.Debt to equity ratio of 50/50, authorized ROE of 12.54%Estimated Cost: $1 billion

Phase 1:Approximately 60-70 milesEstimated In-Service Date: 2015*

Phases 2 and 3:Approximately 170- 220 milesEstimated In-Service Date: 2016 - 2018

*Estimate based on June 2011 MTEP

RITELine is JV owned by AEP*, ETA, and Exelon to construct approximately 420 miles of 765 kV transmission line throughout Indiana and Illinois.Estimated Cost: $1.6 billionDebt to equity ratio of 45/55, authorized ROE of 11.43%Estimated In-Service: 2016 - 2018

ETT is a 50/50 JV owned by subsidiaries of AEP and MidAmerican Energy Holding Company that constructs and operates transmission projects within ERCOT. Total investment opportunity of more than $3 billion.Debt to equity ratio of 60/40, authorized ROE of 9.96%Current rate base of $565 million as of January 31, 2012Projected rate base growth:

Prairie Wind is a 50/50 JV owned ETA and Westar Energy to construct approximately 110 miles of double circuit 345 kV transmission line in Kansas.Estimated Cost: $225 millionDebt to equity ratio of 50/50, authorized ROE of 12.8%Estimated In-Service: 2014

Joint Venture Growth Opportunities

*AEP share of RITELine is approximately 20.5%

Status: In Construction

Status: Pending inclusion in PJM RTEP

Status: Pending inclusion in PJM RTEP

Status: MISO Approved

Status: Ongoing Business

Page 40: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.40

Gavin 1,2 Coal 2,640 Amos 3 Coal 870 Cardinal 1 Coal 595 Mitchell 1,2 Coal 1,560 Conesville 4 Coal 340 2,430 Conesville 5,6 Coal 800 Zimmer Coal 330 Stuart 1-4 Coal 600 OVEC Ownership Coal 434 Kammer 1-3 Coal 630

Musk. River 1-4 Coal 840 Musk. River 5 Gas 600 Sporn 2, 4, 5 Coal 750 Lawrenceburg Gas 1,186 Picway Coal 100 Waterford Gas 840 Conesville 3 Coal 165 Darby Gas 507 Beckjord Coal 53

2,538 Racine Hydro 26

8,898

COMPETITIVE ASSETS COMPETITIVE ASSETS TRANSFERRED

ASSETS to be RETIRED

AEP Generation Resources Inc.

Generation Assets(in Megawatts)

COMPETITIVE ASSETS COMPETITIVE ASSETS TRANSFERRED

ASSETS TO BE RETIRED

Post-2014 COAL MIX

POST-2014 COAL DELIVERY

Barge73%

Rail10%

Truck17%

NAPP87%

CAPP5%

ILB8%

Page 41: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.41

Pension and OPEB Estimate

Investment returns for our pension plan was a positive 8.1% for 2011 despite volatility in the market; OPEB funds were also slightly positive at 0.4%.

AEP made cash contributions to the pension totaling $450 million in 2011.

The pension fund finished the year 86% funded compared to the Projected Benefit Obligation (PBO). The OPEB funds were 63% funded compared to the Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation (APBO).

We expect to make a discretionary cash contribution of $200 million to the pension in 2012.

Discount rates are 4.55% for pension and 4.75% for OPEB for 2012, down substantially from 5.05% and 5.25%, respectively, for 2011.

Total pension costs are expected to be $127 million in 2012, up from $118 million in 2011. Total OPEB costs are expected to be $95 million in 2012, up from $73 million in 2011. The O&M share is in the range of 65-70% of the total costs.

Page 42: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.42

Credit Ratings

Senior Senior SeniorCompany Unsecured Outlook Unsecured Outlook Unsecured OutlookAmerican Electric Power Company Inc. Baa2 S BBB S BBB SAEP, Inc. Short Term Rating P2 S A2 S F2 SAEP Texas Central Company Baa2 S BBB S A- SAEP Texas North Company Baa2 S BBB S A- SAppalachian Power Company Baa2 S BBB S BBB SIndiana Michigan Power Company Baa2 S BBB S BBB SKentucky Power Company Baa2 S BBB S BBB SOhio Power Company Baa1 S BBB S A- SPublic Service Company of Oklahoma Baa1 S BBB S BBB+ SSouthwestern Electric Power Company Baa3 S BBB S BBB S

Current Ratings for AEP, Inc. & Subsidiaries Moody's S&P Fitch

Page 43: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.43

Long-term Debt Maturities

Year 2012 2013 2014

AEP, Inc. - - -AEP Generating Company - - $45Appalachian Power $365 $195 $204Indiana Michigan Power $100 $77 $275Kentucky Power - - -Ohio Power $195 $856 $404Public Service of Oklahoma - - $34Southwestern Electric Power $20 - -Texas Central Company $60 - -Texas North Company - $225 -

Total $740 $1,353 $962

Data as of December 31, 2011

($ in millions)

Page 44: AEP Analyst & Investor Meeting Feburary 10, 2012

p.44

Overview of FERC Transactions / Contracts

Ohio Power

12,132 MW  Capacity 

APCo(incl KgPCo Contract)

6,806 MW Capacity

KPCo

1,078 MW  Capacity

I&M

5,381 MW Capacity

IA & IAA IA & IAA IA & IAA IA & IAA

Before

Ohio Power

0 MW Capacity

APCo(incl KgPCo Contract)

8,918 MW of  Capacity

KPCo

1,390 MW Capacity

I&M

5,381 MW Capacity

AEP Generation Resources Inc.

9,708MW Capacity

SSO Agreement

Bridge Agreement Bridge Agreement Bridge AgreementBridge Agreement

SSO Agreement

PCS Agreement PCS Agreement PCS Agreement

After

WPCo (Load)

20% Mitchell

Amos Unit 3 & Mitchell

Mitchell Operating Agreement

Mitchell Operating Agreement

Bridge Agreement

Sporn Operating Agreement

Amos 3, 80% Mitchell

Interconnection Agreement (IA) & Interim Allowance Agreement (IAA) (205)

Transfer of Amos 3 and Mitchell (203)

WPCo and APCo Merger (203)

SSO Power Supply Agreement; Expires in May 2015 (205)

Bridge Agreement; Expires in May 2015 (203)

Power Cost Sharing (PCS) Agreement; Section (205)

Sporn Generating Plant Operating Agreement (205)

Mitchell Generating Plant Operating Agreement (205)

Transfer of Amos 3 and Mitchell (203)

WPCo and APCo Merger (203)

Sporn Generating Plant Operating Agreement (205)

WPCo (Contract)

Corporate Separation of Ohio Power (203)

Sporn Operating Agreement

Sporn Operating Agreement

Sporn Operating Agreement