after the crisis: the future of the p/c insurance industry casualty actuaries of greater new york...
TRANSCRIPT
After the Crisis: The Future of the
P/C Insurance IndustryCasualty Actuaries of Greater New York
New York, NYDecember 7, 2010
Download at www.iii.org/presentationsRobert P. Hartwig, Ph.D., CPCU, President & Economist
Insurance Information Institute 110 William Street New York, NY 10038Tel: 212.346.5520 Cell: 917.453.1885 [email protected] www.iii.org
2
Presentation Outline
Reasons for Optimism, Causes for Concern
Industry Financial Overview for 2010 and Outlook for 2011 & Beyond Profitability Premium Growth Capital & Capacity Financial Strength Underwriting Performance: Commercial & Personal Lines Financial/Investment Review & Outlook Catastrophe Loss Trends
P/C Growth Overview & Analysis: Price and Exposure Trends Economic Crisis and Exposure(Insurance Demand): Personal & Commercial Lines Pricing: Personal & Commercial Lines
Regulatory and Legislative Overview Financial Services Reform
Impacts of 2011 on P-C Insurance Industry
Tort System Concerns
Leading Challenges Facing the P/C Insurance Industry: 2011-2015
Q&A
3
Reasons for Optimism, Causes for Concern in the P/C Insurance Industry Economic Recovery in US is Self-Sustaining: No Double Dip Recession
Pessimism “Bubble” Persists; Negative Economic News Amplified; Positive News is Discounted Financial market volatility will remain a reality
Era of Mass P/C Insurance Exposure Destruction Has Ended But restoration of destroyed exposure will take 3+ years in US
No Secondary Spike in Unemployment or Swoon in Payrolls/WC Exposure But job and wage growth remains sluggish
Exposure Growth Beginning in 2nd Half 2010, Accelerate in 2011
Increase in Demand for Commercial Insurance is in its Earliest Stages and Will Accelerate in 2011 Includes workers comp, commercial auto, marine, many liability coverages, D&O
Laggards: Property, inland marine, aviation
Personal Lines: Auto leads, homeowners lags
P/C Insurance Industry Will See Growth in 2011 for the First Time Since 2006
Investment Environment Is/Remains Much More Favorable Volatility, however, will persist and yields remain low
Both are critical issues in long-tailed commercial lines like WC, Med Mal, D&O
Source: Insurance Information Institute.
4
P/C Insurance Industry Capacity as of 6/30/10 Is at Record Levels and Has Recovered 100%+ of the Capital Lost During the Financial Crisis As of 12/31/09 capacity was within 2% of pre-crisis high
Record Capacity, Depressed Exposures Mean that Generally Soft Market Conditions Will Persist through 2010 and Potentially into 2011
There is No Catalyst for a Robust Hard Market at the Current Time High Global First Half 2010 CAT Losses Insufficient to Trigger Hard Market
Localized insurance and reinsurance impacts are occurring, especially earthquake coverage in Latin/South America, Offshore Energy Markets, European Wind Cover
Inflation Outlook for US and Major European Economies and Japan is Tame Will temper claims inflation Deflation is highly unlikely
Financial Strength & Ratings of Global (Re)Insurance Industries Remained Strong Throughout the Financial Crisis in Sharp Contrast With Banks
Insurers Avoided the Most Draconian Outcomes in Financial Services Reform Legislation
Tort Environment in US is Beginning to Deteriorate; No Tort Reform in US Major Transformation of US Economy Underway with Major Opportunities for Insurers
through 2020 in Health, Tech, Natural Resources, Ag., Energy
Source: Insurance Information Institute.
Reasons for Optimism, Causes for Concern in the P/C Insurance Industry
5
11 Industries for the Next 10 Years: Insurance Solutions Needed
Shipping (Rail, Marine)
Health Sciences
Health Care
Energy (Traditional)
Alternative Energy
Agriculture
Natural Resources
Environmental
Technology (incl. Biotechnology)
Light Manufacturing
Export-Oriented Industries
6
I.
P/C Insurance Industry Financial Overview & Outlook for 2011
Recession, Recovery & Volatility
7
Profitability
Historically Volatile
P/C Net Income After Taxes1991–2010:H1 ($ Millions)
$1
4,1
78
$5
,84
0
$1
9,3
16
$1
0,8
70
$2
0,5
98
$2
4,4
04 $3
6,8
19
$3
0,7
73
$2
1,8
65
$3
,04
6
$3
0,0
29
$6
2,4
96
$3
,04
3
$1
6,5
31$2
8,3
11
-$6,970
$6
5,7
77
$4
4,1
55
$2
0,5
59
$3
8,5
01
-$10,000
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
$80,000
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10:H1
2005 ROE*= 9.6% 2006 ROE = 12.7% 2007 ROE = 10.9% 2008 ROE = 0.3% 2009 ROAS1 = 5.8% 2010:H1 ROAS = 6.3%
* ROE figures are GAAP; 1Return on avg. surplus. Excluding Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers yields a 7.5% ROAS for 2010:H1 and 4.6% for 2009. 2009:H1 net income was $19.2 billion and $10.2 billion in 2008:H1 excluding M&FG.Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute
P-C Industry 2010:H1 profits rose $10.6B from $6.0B in 2009:H1, due mainly to $2.2B in realized
capital gains vs. -$11.1B in previous realized capital losses
9
ROE: P/C vs. All Industries1987–2009*
* Excludes Mortgage & Financial Guarantee in 2008 and 2009.Sources: ISO, Fortune; Insurance Information Institute.
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
US P/C Insurers All US Industries
P/C Profitability IsCyclical and Volatile
Hugo
Andrew
Northridge
Lowest CAT Losses in 15 Years
Sept. 11
Katrina, Rita, Wilma
4 Hurricanes
Financial Crisis*
(Percent)
A 100 Combined Ratio Isn’t What ItOnce Was: 90-95 Is Where It’s At Now
Combined Ratio / ROE
* 2009 and 2010:Q1 figures are return on average statutory surplus. 2008, 2009 and 2010:H1figures exclude mortgage and financial guaranty insurersSource: Insurance Information Institute from A.M. Best and ISO data.
97.5
100.6 100.1 100.7
92.6
99.5 100.1101.0
7.5%7.3%
9.6%
15.9%
14.3%
12.7%
4.4%
8.9%
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
1978 1979 2003 2005 2006 2008* 2009* 2010:H1*0%
3%
6%
9%
12%
15%
18%
Combined Ratio ROE*
Combined Ratios Must Be Lower in Today’s DepressedInvestment Environment to Generate Risk Appropriate ROEs
A combined ratio of about 100 generated a 7% ROE in 2009,10% in 2005 and 16% in 1979
11
Return of Net Worth: 10-Year Average, 1999-2008*: All Lines
20.1
15.6
14.2
13.2
12.9
12.4
11.8
11.4
11.2
11.1
11.1
10.9
10.8
10.8
10.7
10.6
10.4
10.2
9.9
9.8
9.7
9.4
8.9
8.6
8.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
HI
DC
ME
AK
WY
UT RI
VT IA CT ID NC
MA
NM NH VA
CO
WA
SC
SD
KS
OR
MD NJ
NE
Pec
ent c
hang
e (%
)
*Latest available.
Source: 2009 NAIC Report on Profitability.
Top 25 States
Hawaii had the highest RNW in the US form 1999-2008
12
8.5
8.4
7.9
7.9
7.7
7.4
6.9
6.7
6.7
6.6
6.5
6.4
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.2
5.6
5.3
4.4
4.1
3.6
3.5
3.2
-13.8
-10
.2
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
OH
CA IN WI
AZ
MO
MT IL
WV
GA
MN MI
AR
FL
PA
TN
KY
OK
NV
NY
DE
TX AL
ND
MS LA
Pe
ce
nt
ch
an
ge
(%
)
Sources: 2009 NAIC Report on Profitability.
Bottom 25 States
Return of Net Worth: 10-Year Average, 1999-2008: All Lines
Mississippi and Louisiana were the least profitable states
from 1999-2008 due to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
Financial Strength & Ratings
13
Industry Has Weathered the Storms Well
P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–20098
15
12
71
19
34
91
31
21
99
16
14
13
36
49
31 3
45
04
85
56
05
84
12
91
61
23
11
8 19
49 50
47
35
18
14 15
7 65
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
Source: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute.
The Number of Impairments Varies Significantly Over the P/C Insurance Cycle, With Peaks Occurring Well into Hard Markets
5 of the 11 are Florida companies (1 of these
5 is a title insurer)
15
P/C Insurer Impairment Frequency vs. Combined Ratio, 1969-2009
90
95
100
105
110
115
1206
97
07
17
27
37
47
57
67
77
87
98
08
18
28
38
48
58
68
78
88
99
09
19
29
39
49
59
69
79
89
90
00
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
9*
Co
mb
ine
d R
ati
o
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
Imp
airm
en
t Ra
te
Combined Ratio after Div P/C Impairment Frequency
Source: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute
2009 estimated impairment rate rose to 0.36% up from a near record low of 0.23% in 2008 and the 0.17% record low in 2007; Rate is still less than one-half the 0.79% average since 1969
Impairment Rates Are Highly Correlated With Underwriting Performance and Reached Record Lows in 2007/08
16
Reasons for US P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–2008
38.1%
14.3%8.1%
7.6%
7.9%
7.0%
9.1%
4.2%
3.7%
Source: A.M. Best: 1969-2008 Impairment Review, Special Report, Apr. 6, 2009
Deficient Loss Reserves and Inadequate Pricing Are the Leading Cause of Insurer Impairments, Underscoring the Importance of Discipline.
Investment Catastrophe Losses Play a Much Smaller Role
Deficient Loss Reserves/Inadequate Pricing
Reinsurance Failure
Rapid GrowthAlleged Fraud
Catastrophe Losses
Affiliate Impairment
Investment Problems
Misc.
Sig. Change in Business
Capital/PolicyholderSurplus (US)
17
Shrinkage, but Not Enoughto Trigger Hard Market
19
Policyholder Surplus, 2006:Q4–2010:Q2
Sources: ISO, A.M .Best.
($ Billions)
$487.1$496.6
$512.8$521.8
$478.5
$455.6
$437.1
$463.0
$490.8
$511.5
$540.7$530.5
$505.0$515.6$517.9
$420
$440
$460
$480
$500
$520
$540
$560
06:Q4 07:Q1 07:Q2 07:Q3 07:Q4 08:Q1 08:Q2 08:Q3 08:Q4 09:Q1 09:Q2 09:Q3 09:Q4 10:Q1 10:Q2
2007:Q3Previous Surplus Peak
Quarterly Surplus Changes Since 2009:Q1 Trough
09:Q1: -$84.7B (-16.2%) 09:Q2: -$58.8B (-11.2%)09:Q3: -$31.8B (-5.9%)09:Q4: -$10.3B (-2.0%)
10:Q1: +$18.9B (+3.6%)10:Q2: -$10.2B (-1.9%)
Surplus set a new record in 2010:Q1*
*Includes $22.5B of paid-in capital from a holding company parent for one insurer’s investment in a non-insurance business
22
Ratio of Insured Loss to Surplus for Largest Capital Events Since 1989*
* Ratio is for end-of-quarter surplus immediately prior to event. Date shown is end of quarter prior to event** Date of maximum capital erosion; As of 9/30/09 (latest available) ratio = 5.9%Source: PCS; Insurance Information Institute
3.3%
9.6%
6.9%
10.9%
6.2%
13.8%
16.2%
0%
3%
6%
9%
12%
15%
18%
6/30/1989Hurricane
Hugo
6/30/1992HurricaneAndrew
12/31/93NorthridgeEarthquake
6/30/01 Sept.11 Attacks
6/30/04Florida
Hurricanes
6/30/05Hurricane
Katrina
FinancialCrisis as of3/31/09**
The Financial Crisis at its Peak Ranks as the Largest
“Capital Event” Overthe Past 20+ Years
(Percent)
23
* 2010 NWP and Surplus figures are % changes as of H1:10 vs H1:09. Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute
Historically, Hard Markets FollowWhen Surplus “Growth” is Negative*
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10*
NWP % change Surplus % change
(Percent)
Sharp Decline in Capacity is a Necessary butNot Sufficient Condition for a True Hard Market
Surplus growth is now positive but premiums
continue to fall, a departure from the historical pattern
Merger & Acquisition
24
Barriers to Consolidation Will Diminish in 2010
25
U.S. P/C Insurance-RelatedM&A Activity, 1988–2009
$2$5
$19
$1 $0
$20
$0
$9
$35
$14$16
$4
$56
$31
$8$12
$2$3 $3 $5$6
$40
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
Tra
ns
ac
tio
n V
alu
e (
$ B
illio
n)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Nu
mb
er o
f Tra
ns
ac
tion
s
Transaction Values
Number of Transactions
Note: U.S. Company was the acquirer and/or target.
Source: Conning Research & Consulting.
2010: No Mega Deals So Far, Despite Record Capital, Slow Growth and Improved
Financial Market Conditions
$ Value of Deals Down 78% in 2009, Volume Up 7%
Investment Performance
26
Investments Are a PrincipleSource of Declining Profitability
Property/Casualty Insurance Industry Investment Gain: 1994–2010:H11
$35.4
$42.8$47.2
$52.3
$44.4
$36.0
$45.3$48.9
$59.4$55.7
$64.0
$31.7
$39.0
$25.8
$58.0
$51.9$56.9
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05* 06 07 08 09 10:H1In 2008, Investment Gains Fell by 50% Due to Lower Yields and
Nearly $20B of Realized Capital Losses 2009 Saw Smaller Realized Capital Losses But Declining Investment Income
Investment Gains Are Recovering So Far in 20101 Investment gains consist primarily of interest, stock dividends and realized capital gains and losses.* 2005 figure includes special one-time dividend of $3.2B.Sources: ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
($ Billions) 2009:H1 gain was $12.5B
Investment gains in 2010 are on track to be their best since 2007
28
Treasury Yield Curves: Pre-Crisis (July 2007) vs. October 2010
0.14% 0.13% 0.18% 0.23% 0.38%
1.85%
2.54%
4.82% 4.96% 5.04% 4.96% 4.82% 4.82% 4.88% 5.00% 4.93% 5.00%5.19%
1.18%
0.57%
3.87%3.52%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
1M 3M 6M 1Y 2Y 3Y 5Y 7Y 10Y 20Y 30Y
October 2010 Yield Curve*Pre-Crisis (July 2007)
Treasury yield curve is near its most depressed level in at least 45 years. Investment
income is falling as a result.
The Fed’s Announced Intention to Pursue Additional Quantitative Easing Could Further Depress Rates in the 7 to 10-Year Maturity Range
Sources: Board of Governors of the United States Federal Reserve Bank; Insurance Information Institute.
QE2 Target
29
-1.8
%
-1.8
%
-2.0
%
-3.6
%
-3.3
%
-3.3
%
-3.7
%
-4.3
%
-5.2
%
-5.7
%
-7.3%
-1.9
%
-2.1
%
-3.1
%
-8%-7%-6%-5%-4%-3%-2%-1%0%
Perso
nal L
ines
Pvt Pass
Aut
o
Pers P
rop
Comm
ercia
l
Comm
l Auto
Credit
Comm
Pro
p
Comm
Cas
Fidelity
/Sure
ty
War
rant
y
Surplu
s Line
s
Med
Mal
WC
Reinsu
ranc
e**
Lower Investment Earnings Place a Greater Burden on Underwriting and Pricing Discipline
*Based on 2008 Invested Assets and Earned Premiums**US domestic reinsurance onlySource: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute.
Reduction in Combined Ratio Necessary to Offset 1% Decline in Investment Yield to Maintain Constant ROE, by Line*
30
Underwriting Trends – Financial Crisis Does Not
Directly Impact Underwriting Performance: Cycle, Catastrophes
Were 2008’s Drivers
31
P/C Insurance Industry Combined Ratio, 2001–2010:H1*
* Excludes Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers in 2008, 2009 and 2010. Including M&FG, 2008=105.1, 2009=100.7, 2010:H1=101.7 Sources: A.M. Best, ISO.
95.7
99.3 100.1101.0
92.6
100.898.4
100.1
107.5
115.8
90
100
110
120
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009* 2010:H1
Best Combined
Ratio Since 1949 (87.6)
As Recently as 2001, Insurers Paid Out
Nearly $1.16 for Every $1 in Earned
Premiums
Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve Releases
Cyclical Deterioration
Heavy Use of Reinsurance Lowered Net
Losses
Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve Releases
Lower CAT
Losses, More
Reserve Releases
Underwriting Gain (Loss)1975–2010:H1*
* Includes mortgage and financial guarantee insurers.Sources: A.M. Best, ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
Large Underwriting Losses Are NOT Sustainable in Current Investment Environment
-$55
-$45
-$35
-$25
-$15
-$5
$5
$15
$25
$35
75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09
The industry recorded a $5.1B underwriting
loss in 2010:H1 compared to $2.1B in
2009:H1
Cumulative underwriting deficit from 1975 through
2009 is $445B
($ Billions)
33
2.3
-2.1
-8.3
-2.6-6.6
-9.9 -9.8
-4.1
1
11.7
23.2
13.79.9
7.3
-6.7-9.5
-14.6-16 -15
-5
-$20
-$15
-$10
-$5
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$309
2
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
E
11
E
Pri
or
Yr.
Re
se
rve
Re
lea
se
($
B)
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8 Imp
ac
t on
Co
mb
ine
d R
atio
(Po
ints
)
Prior Yr. ReserveDevelopment ($B)
Impact onCombined Ratio(Points)
P/C Reserve Development, 1992–2011E
Reserve Releases Are Continuing Strong in 2010 But Should Begin to Taper Off in 2011
Note: 2005 reserve development excludes a $6 billion loss portfolio transfer between American Re and Munich Re. Including this transaction, total prior year adverse development in 2005 was $7 billion. The data from 2000 and subsequent years excludes development from financial guaranty and mortgage insurance. Sources: Barclay’s Capital; A.M. Best.
Prior year reserve releases totaled $8.8 billion in the
first half of 2010, up from $7.1 billion in
the first half of 2009
34
Fed Efforts to Stimulate Inflation Will Ultimately Pressure Claim
Cost Severities
Inflation Trends:
Benign Inflation Tempers Claim Severity
35
Annual Inflation Rates(CPI-U, %), 1990–2016F
2.8 2.6
1.51.9
3.3 3.4
1.3
2.5 2.3
3.0
3.8
2.8
3.8
-0.4
1.6 1.52.0 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2
2.92.4
3.23.0
5.14.9
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10F 11F 12F 13F 14F 15F 16F
Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Blue Chip Economic Indicators, 10/10 (forecasts).
There is So Much Slack in the US Economy Inflation Should Not Be a Concern Through 2010-12 Despite Fed’s Quantitative Easing Efforts.
Deficits and Monetary Policy Remain Longer Run Concerns
Annual Inflation Rates (%) Inflation peaked at 5.6% in August 2008 on high energy and commodity crisis. The recession and the collapse of the
commodity bubble have reduced inflationary pressures
P/C Insurers Experience Inflation More Intensely than 2009 CPI Suggests
Source: CPI is Blue Chip Economic Indicator 2009 estimate, 12/09; Legal services, medical care and motor vehicle body work are avg. monthly year-over-year change from BLS; BI and no-fault figures from ISO Fast Track data for 4 quarters ending 09:Q3. Tort costs is 2009 Towers-Perrin estimate. WC figure is I.I.I. estimate based on historical NCCI data.
-0.4%
2.7% 3.0% 3.1%3.8%
4.3%
5.5%6.2%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
OverallCPI
LegalServices
US TortCosts
MedicalCare
MotorVehicleBodyWork
BodilyInjury
Severity
WC MedSeverity
No-FaultClaim
Severity
(Percent)
Healthcare and Legal/Tort Costs Are a Major P/C Insurance Cost Driver. These Are Expected to Increase Above the Overall Inflation Rate (CPI) Indefinitely
36
37
Performance by Segment:Commercial/Personal Lines
38
Calendar Year Combined Ratios by Segment: 2008-2012F
102.4
98.9
101.5
103.5
101.0
103.7102.0
104.2103.8104.5
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
104
106
Personal Lines Commercial Lines
2008 2009 2010P 2011F 2012F
Overall deterioration in 2010 underwriting performance is due to expected return to normal catastrophe activity along with deteriorating underwriting
performance related to the prolonged commercial soft market
Personal lines combined ratio is expected to remain stable in 2010 while commercial lines and reinsurance deteriorate
Sources: A.M. Best (historical); Insurance Information Institute forecasts for 2010 – 2012.
39
Net Written Premium Growth by Segment: 2008-2012F
-0.1%
-9.4%
2.9%
-2.5%
3.4%
1.0%
3.9%2.5%
-4.0%
-0.7%
-12%
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
Personal Lines Commercial Lines
2008 2009 2010P 2011F 2012F
Rate and exposure are more favorable in personal lines, whereas a prolonged soft market and sluggish recovery from the recession
weigh on commercial lines.
Personal lines will show growth in 2010 while commercial lines is expected to continue to shrink
Sources: A.M. Best (historical); Insurance Information Institute forecasts (2010 - 2012).
Workers Compensation Combined Ratio: 1994–2012F
10
2.0
97
.0 10
0.0
10
1.0
11
0.9
11
0.0
10
7.0
10
2.7
98
.4
10
3.5
10
4.3 1
09
.8 11
6.0
11
7.0
11
7.0121.7
10
7.0
11
5.3
11
8.2
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09E 10F 11F 12F
Workers Comp Underwriting Results Are Deteriorating Markedly
Sources: A.M. Best (history); Conning (forecasts); Insurance Information Institute.
Workers Compensation Premium Continues Its Sharp DeclineNet Written Premium
$ Billions
Calendar Yearp Preliminary
Source: 1990–2008 Private Carriers, Best's Aggregates & Averages; 2009p, NCCI1996–2009p State Funds: AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, KY, LA, MD, MO, MT, NM, OK, OR, RI, TX, UT Annual Statements
State Funds available for 1996 and subsequent
44
Catastrophic Loss –Catastrophe Losses Trends Are
Trending Adversely
45
$8
.3
$7
.4
$2
.6 $1
0.1
$8
.3
$4
.6
$2
6.5
$5
.9 $1
2.9 $
27
.5
$6
1.9
$9
.2
$6
.7
$2
7.1
$1
0.6
$7
.9
$1
00
.0
$7
.5
$2
.7
$4
.7
$2
2.9
$5
.5 $1
6.9
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10*20??
US Insured Catastrophe Losses
*Through June 30, 2010.Note: 2001 figure includes $20.3B for 9/11 losses reported through 12/31/01. Includes only business and personal property claims, business interruption and auto claims. Non-prop/BI losses = $12.2B.Sources: Property Claims Service/ISO; Munich Re; Insurance Information Institute.
2010 CAT Losses Are Running Below 2009, So Far Figures Do Not Include an Estimate of Deepwater Horizon Loss
$100 Billion CAT Year is Coming Eventually
First Half 2010 CAT
Losses Were Down 19% or $1.4B from
first half 2009
($ Billions)
2000s: A Decade of Disaster
2000s: $193B (up 117%)
1990s: $89B
46
Combined Ratio Points Associated with Catastrophe Losses: 1960 – 2009
Notes: Private carrier losses only. Excludes loss adjustment expenses and reinsurance reinstatement premiums. Figures are adjusted for losses ultimately paid by foreign insurers and reinsurers.Source: ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
0.4
1.2
0.4 0.
8 1.3
0.3 0.4 0.
71.
51.
00.
40.
4 0.7
1.8
1.1
0.6
1.4 2.
01.
3 2.0
0.5
0.5 0.7
3.0
1.2
2.1
8.8
2.3
5.9
3.3
2.8
1.0
3.6
2.9
1.6
5.4
1.6
3.3
3.3
8.1
2.7
1.6
5.0
2.6
3.6
0.9
0.1
1.1
1.1
0.8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
The Catastrophe Loss Component of Private Insurer Losses Has Increased Sharply in Recent Decades
Avg. CAT Loss Component of the Combined Ratio
by Decade
1960s: 1.04 1970s: 0.85 1980s: 1.31 1990s: 3.39
2000s: 3.52
Combined Ratio Points
50
100
150
200
250
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
First Half 201095 Events
Number of events in first half of 2010 is close to the annual totals from five of past ten years.
Nu
mb
er
Geophysical (earthquake, tsunami, volcanic activity)
Climatological (temperature extremes, drought, wildfire)
Meteorological (storm)
Hydrological (flood, mass movement)
Natural Disasters in the United States, 1980 – 2010Number of Events (Annual Totals 1980 – 2009 vs. First Half 2010)
Source: MR NatCatSERVICE 47© 2010 Munich Re
50
Top 12 Most Costly Disastersin US History
(Insured Losses, 2009, $ Billions)
Sources: PCS; Insurance Information Institute inflation adjustments.
$11.3 $12.5
$18.2$22.8 $23.8
$45.3
$8.5$8.1$7.3$6.2$5.2$4.2
$0$5
$10$15$20$25$30$35$40$45$50
Jeanne(2004)
Frances(2004)
Rita (2005)
Hugo(1989)
Ivan (2004)
Charley(2004)
Wilma(2005)
Ike (2008)
Northridge(1994)
9/11Attacks(2001)
Andrew(1992)
Katrina(2005)
8 of the 12 Most Expensive Disasters in US History Have Occurred Since 2004;
8 of the Top 12 Disasters Affected FL
Hurricane Katrina Remains, By Far, the Most Expensive Insurance Event in US
and World History
II. Exposure Trends and Growth:
Overview & Analysis
52
Soft Market and Reduced Demand Due to Recession Have Challenged Growth for Years
Winds of Change for 2011 and Beyond?
53
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
10F
Soft Market Appears to Persist in 2010 but May Be Easing: Relief in 2011?
(Percent)1975-78 1984-87 2000-03
Shaded areas denote “hard market” periodsSources: A.M. Best (historical and forecast), ISO, Insurance Information Institute.
Net Written Premiums Fell 0.7% in 2007 (First Decline Since 1943) by 2.0% in 2008, and 4.2% in 2009, the First 3-Year Decline Since 1930-33.
NWP was flat with 0.0% growth in 10:H1 vs. -4.4% in 09:H1
54
Direct Premiums Written: All LinesPercent change by State, 2004-2009
42
.9
23
.8
22
.0
18
.8
17
.2
15
.4
14
.8
14
.2
14
.1
14
.0
13
.5
13
.0
13
.0
12
.9
12
.8
12
.3
12
.2
11
.5
10
.7
7.9
5.8
5.5
5.1
5.0
4.6
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
ND LA
SD
WY
MT
UT
OK
DE IA
NM
MS
WV
SC
DC
TX
NE
KS
NC ID AL
FL
WA
GA
AR HI
Pe
ce
nt
ch
an
ge
(%
)
Sources: SNL Financial LC.; Insurance Information Institute.
Top 25 States
North Dakota is the growth juggernaut of the p/c
insurance industry—too bad nobody lives there…
55
4.5
4.2
2.6
2.5
2.4
2.0
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.0
-0.1
-2.8
-3.1
-3.5
-3.7
-5.2
-8.2
-9.2
-14
.8
-15
.2
-0.5
-1.2
-1.6
-1.8
-2.4
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
AK
VA
TN
KY
MD
MO AZ
OR WI
NV
NY IN PA
MN
VT
CO
CT RI
NJ IL
ME
OH
NH
MA MI
CA
Pe
ce
nt
ch
an
ge
(%
)
Sources: SNL Financial LC.; Insurance Information Institute.
Bottom 25 States
Direct Premiums Written: All LinesPercent change by State, 2004-2009
States with the poorest performing economies also produced the most negative net change in premiums of
the past 5 years
56
Change in Commercial Rate Renewals, by Account Size: 1999:Q4 to 2010:Q3
Source: Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers; Insurance Information Institute.
Percentage Change (%)
Peak = 2001:Q4 +28.5%
Trough = 2007:Q3 -13.6%
Pricing Turned Negative in Early
2004 and Has Been Negative
Ever Since KRW Effect
Market has Been Soft for 6+ years and Remains Soft as Capital is Restored and
Underwriting Losses Remain Modest
57
Cumulative Qtrly. Commercial Rate Changes, by Account Size: 1999:Q4 to 2010:Q3
Source: Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers; Insurance Information Institute.
1999:Q4 = 100
Pricing today is where is was in
Q3:2000 (pre-9/11)
Downward pricing pressure is most pronounced for
larger risks
58
Change in Commercial Rate Renewals, by Line: 2010:Q3
Source: Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers; Insurance Information Institute.
Most Major Commercial Lines Renewed Down in Q3:2010 at a Pace Similar to that of a Year Earlier
Percentage Change (%)
-3.7%
-2.8% -2.7%
0.3%
-5.2% -5.6% -5.3%-4.7%
-4.4% -4.2%
-6.0%
-5.0%
-4.0%
-3.0%
-2.0%
-1.0%
0.0%
1.0%All C
omm
ercia
l
GL
Comm
l Pro
p
Comm
l Aut
o
Umbr
ella
Const
ructi
on
D&OBus
. Int
erru
ptio
n
EPLSur
ety
60
Monthly Change* in Auto Insurance Prices, 1991–2010*
*Percentage change from same month in prior year; through September 2010; seasonally adjustedNote: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institutes.
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10
Cyclical peaks in PP Auto tend to occur
approximately every 10 years (early 1990s, early
2000s and likely the early 2010s)
“Hard” markets tend to occur
during recessionary
periods
61
Average Expenditures on Auto Insurance
$651$668
$691$705
$726
$786
$830$842
$831$816
$795$816
$844
$878
$690$685$703
$600
$650
$700
$750
$800
$850
$900
$950
94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08* 09* 10*
Countrywide Auto Insurance Expenditures Increased2.6% in 2008 and 3.5% Pace in 2009 (est.) and 4% in 2010 (est.)
* Insurance Information Institute Estimates/ForecastsSource: NAIC, Insurance Information Institute estimates 2008-2010 based on CPI data.
64
Average Premium forHome Insurance Policies**
* Insurance Information Institute Estimates/Forecasts **Excludes state-run insurers.Source: NAIC, Insurance Information Institute estimates 2008-2010 based on CPI data.
$508$536
$593
$668
$822 $835$854
$879
$804
$764
$729
$500
$550
$600
$650
$700
$750
$800
$850
$900
$950
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08* 09* 10*
67
Average Commercial Rate Change,All Lines, (1Q:2004–3Q:2010)
-3.2
%
-5.9
%
-7.0
%
-9.4
%
-9.7
% -8.2
%
-4.6
%
-2.7
%
-3.0
%
-5.3
%
-9.6
%
-11
.3%
-11
.8%
-13
.3%
-12
.0%
-13
.5%
-12
.9% -1
1.0
%
-6.4
% -5.1
%
-4.9
%
-5.8
%
-5.6
%
-5.3
%
-6.4
% -5.2
%
-0.1
%
-16%
-14%
-12%
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
1Q
04
2Q
04
3Q
04
4Q
04
1Q
05
2Q
05
3Q
05
4Q
05
1Q
06
2Q
06
3Q
06
4Q
06
1Q
07
2Q
07
3Q
07
4Q
07
1Q
08
2Q
08
3Q
08
4Q
08
1Q
09
2Q
09
3Q
09
4Q
09
1Q
10
2Q
10
3Q
10
Source: Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers; Insurance Information Institute
KRW Effect
Magnitude of Price Declines Shrank
During Crisis, Reflecting Shrinking
Capital, Reduced Investment Gains,
Deteriorating Underwriting
Performance, Higher Cat Losses and
Costlier Reinsurance
(Percent)
Market Remains Soft as Capital Restored and
Underwriting Losses Remain Modest
69
(Millions of Units)
New Private Housing Starts, 1990-2016F
1.4
8
1.4
7 1.6
2
1.6
4
1.5
7
1.6
0 1.7
1 1.8
5 1.9
6 2.0
7
1.8
0
1.3
6
0.9
0
0.5
6
0.6
0 0.7
6
1.0
2 1.2
0 1.3
3 1.4
3
1.5
0
1.3
51.4
6
1.2
9
1.2
0
1.0
11.1
9
0.3
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10F11F12F13F14F15F16F
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (10/10); Insurance Information Institute.
Little Exposure Growth Likely for Homeowners Insurers Until 2012. Also Affects Commercial Insurers with Construction Risk Exposure, Surety
New home starts plunged
72% from 2005-2009; A
net annual decline of 1.49 million units, lowest since
records began in 1959
I.I.I. estimates that each incremental 100,000 decline in housing starts costs home insurers
$87.5 million in new exposure (gross premium). The net exposure loss in 2009 vs. 2005 is
estimated at about $1.3 billion
Job growth, improved credit
market conditions and demographics
will eventually boost home construction
71
43,6
9448
,125
69,3
0062
,436
64,0
04 71,2
77 81,2
3582
,446
63,8
5363
,235
64,8
5371
,549
70,6
4362
,304
52,3
7451
,959
53,5
4954
,027
44,3
6737
,884
35,4
7240
,099
38,5
4035
,037
34,3
1739
,201
19,6
95 28,3
2243
,546
60,8
3729
,059
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0910
:H1
Business Bankruptcy Filings,1980-2010:H1
Source: American Bankruptcy Institute; Insurance Information Institute
Significant Exposure Implications for All Commercial Lines. There Are Some Preliminary Indications that Business
Bankruptcies Are Beginning to Decline.
There were 60,837 business bankruptcies in 2009, up 40% from 2008 and the most since 1993. 2010:H1
bankruptcies totaled 29,059, down 4% from H1:2009, but still very high by historical standards.
% Change Surrounding Recessions
1980-82 58.6%1980-87 88.7%1990-91 10.3%2000-01 13.0%2006-09 208.9%*
72
Private Sector Business Starts,1993:Q2 – 2009:Q4*
175
186
174
180
186
192
188
187 18
918
6 190 19
419
119
9 204
202
195
196
196
206
206
201
192
198
206
206
203
211
205
212
200 20
520
420
419
720
320
920
1
192
192
193
201 20
420
221
0 212
209
216 22
0 223
220
220
210
221
212
204
218
209
207
199
191 19
317
117
716
918
0
203
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
220
230
93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
Business Starts Are Down Nearly 20% in the Current Downturn, Holding Back Most Types of Commercial Insurance Exposure
*Latest available as of September 12, 2010, seasonally adjustedSource: Bureau of Labor Statistics, http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cewbd.t07.htm.
(Thousands)
180,000 businesses started in 2009:Q4, the best quarter in 2009. 2009 was the slowest year for new
business starts since 1993.
66%
68%
70%
72%
74%
76%
78%
80%
82%
Ma
r 0
1
Ju
n 0
1
Se
p 0
1
De
c 0
1
Ma
r 0
2
Ju
n 0
2
Se
p 0
2
De
c 0
2
Ma
r 0
3
Ju
n 0
3
Se
p 0
3
De
c 0
3
Ma
r 0
4
Ju
n 0
4
Se
p 0
4
De
c 0
4
Ma
r 0
5
Ju
n 0
5
Se
p 0
5
De
c 0
5
Ma
r 0
6
Ju
n 0
6
Se
p 0
6
De
c 0
6
Ma
r 0
7
Ju
n 0
7
Se
p 0
7
De
c 0
7
Ma
r 0
8
Ju
n 0
8
Se
p 0
8
De
c 0
8
Ma
r 0
9
Ju
n 0
9
Se
p 0
9
De
c 0
9
Ma
r 1
0
Ju
n 1
0
Se
p 1
0
Recovery in Capacity Utilization is a Positive Sign for Insurance Exposure
Source: Federal Reserve Board statistical releases at http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm. 74
Percent of Capacity Utilized (Manufacturing, Mining, Utilities)
Hurricane Katrina
March 2001-November 2001
recession
“Full Capacity”
The closer the economy is to operating at “full
capacity,” the greater the demand for insurance
Manufacturing capacity stood at
74.7% in Sept. 2010, above the June 2009 low of 68.2% but well below the pre-crisis
peak of 80%+
Recession began December 2007
75
Distribution Trends
Distribution by Channel Type Continues to Evolve
76
All P/C Lines Distribution Channels, Direct vs. Independent Agents
Source: Insurance Information Institute; based on data from Conning and A.M. Best.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
Direct Independent Agents
Independent agents steadily lost market share from the early 1980s through the early 2000s across all P/C lines, but have gained or held
generally steady in recent years. Direct channels include exclusive agency companies, direct
marketers and direct sales (e.g., internet)
77
Personal Lines Distribution Channels, Direct vs. Independent Agents
Source: Insurance Information Institute; based on data from Conning and A.M. Best.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
72 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
Direct Independent Agents
The greatest challenge to independent agents remains personal lines, especially
private passenger auto
78
Commercial P/C Distribution Channels, Direct vs. Independent Agents
Source: Insurance Information Institute; based on data from Conning and A.M. Best.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
72 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
Direct Independent Agents
Independent agents have seen only modest erosion in commercial lines
market share in recent decades
Crisis-Driven Exposure Drivers
79
Economic Obstaclesto Growth in P/C Insurance Will
Slowly Be Cleared Away
80
16.9
16.5
16.1
13.1
10.3
11.4
12.6
14.0 14
.7 15.1
15.0 15
.5
16.9
16.617
.117.5
17.8
17.4
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10F 11F 12F 13F 14F 15F 16F
(Millions of Units)
Auto/Light Truck Sales, 1999-2016F
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (10/10); Insurance Information Institute.
Car/Light Truck Sales Will Recover from the 2009 Low Point, but High Unemployment, Tight Credit Are Still Restraining Sales in 2010
New auto/light truck sales fell to the lowest level since the late 1960s. Forecast for 2010-11 is
still far below 1999-2007 average of 17 million units, but a recovery is underway.
Job growth and improved credit market conditions will boost auto sales in
2011 and beyond
81
(Millions of Units)
New Private Housing Starts, 1990-2016F
1.4
8
1.4
7 1.6
2
1.6
4
1.5
7
1.6
0 1.7
1 1.8
5 1.9
6 2.0
7
1.8
0
1.3
6
0.9
0
0.5
6
0.6
0 0.7
6
1.0
2 1.2
0 1.3
3 1.4
3
1.5
0
1.3
51.4
6
1.2
9
1.2
0
1.0
11.1
9
0.3
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10F11F12F13F14F15F16F
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (10/10); Insurance Information Institute.
Little Exposure Growth Likely for Homeowners Insurers Until 2012. Also Affects Commercial Insurers with Construction Risk Exposure, Surety
New home starts plunged
72% from 2005-2009; A
net annual decline of 1.49 million units, lowest since
records began in 1959
I.I.I. estimates that each incremental 100,000 decline in housing starts costs home insurers
$87.5 million in new exposure (gross premium). The net exposure loss in 2009 vs. 2005 is
estimated at about $1.3 billion
Job growth, improved credit
market conditions and demographics
will eventually boost home construction
82
43,6
9448
,125
69,3
0062
,436
64,0
04 71,2
77 81,2
3582
,446
63,8
5363
,235
64,8
5371
,549
70,6
4362
,304
52,3
7451
,959
53,5
4954
,027
44,3
6737
,884
35,4
7240
,099
38,5
4035
,037
34,3
1739
,201
19,6
95 28,3
2243
,546
60,8
3729
,059
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0910
:H1
Business Bankruptcy Filings,1980-2010:H1
Source: American Bankruptcy Institute; Insurance Information Institute
Significant Exposure Implications for All Commercial Lines. There Are Some Preliminary Indications that Business
Bankruptcies Are Beginning to Decline.
There were 60,837 business bankruptcies in 2009, up 40% from 2008 and the most since 1993. 2010:H1
bankruptcies totaled 29,059, down 4% from H1:2009, but still very high by historical standards.
% Change Surrounding Recessions
1980-82 58.6%1980-87 88.7%1990-91 10.3%2000-01 13.0%2006-09 208.9%*
83
Private Sector Business Starts,1993:Q2 – 2009:Q4*
175
186
174
180
186
192
188
187 18
918
6 190 19
419
119
9 204
202
195
196
196
206
206
201
192
198
206
206
203
211
205
212
200 20
520
420
419
720
320
920
1
192
192
193
201 20
420
221
0 212
209
216 22
0 223
220
220
210
221
212
204
218
209
207
199
191 19
317
117
716
918
0
203
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
220
230
93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
Business Starts Are Down Nearly 20% in the Current Downturn, Holding Back Most Types of Commercial Insurance Exposure
*Latest available as of September 12, 2010, seasonally adjustedSource: Bureau of Labor Statistics, http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cewbd.t07.htm.
(Thousands)
180,000 businesses started in 2009:Q4, the best quarter in 2009. 2009 was the slowest year for new
business starts since 1993.
84
The Economic Storm
What the Financial Crisis and Recession Mean for the Industry’s
Exposure Base, Growth and Profitability
85
US Real GDP Growth*
* Estimates/Forecasts from Blue Chip Economic Indicators.Source: US Department of Commerce, Blue Economic Indicators 10/10; Insurance Information Institute.
2.7
%
0.9
%
3.2
%
2.3
%
2.9
%
-0.7
%
0.6
%
-4.0
%
-6.8
% -4.9
%
-0.7
%
1.6
%
5.0
%
3.7
%
1.7
%
2.5
%
2.3
%
2.5
%
2.7
%
3.0
%
3.2
%
4.1
%
1.1
%
1.8
%
2.5
% 3.6
%
3.1
%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
2
00
0
2
00
1
2
00
2
2
00
3
2
00
4
2
00
5
2
00
6
07
:1Q
07
:2Q
07
:3Q
07
:4Q
08
:1Q
08
:2Q
08
:3Q
08
:4Q
09
:1Q
09
:2Q
09
:3Q
09
:4Q
10
:1Q
10
:2Q
10
:3Q
10
:4Q
11
:1Q
11
:2Q
11
:3Q
11
:4Q
Demand Commercial Insurance Continues To Be Impacted by Sluggish Economic Conditions, but the Benefits of Even Slow Growth Will
Compound and Gradually Benefit the Economy Broadly
Real GDP Growth (%)
Recession began in Dec. 2007. Economic toll of credit
crunch, housing slump, labor market contraction has
been severe but modest recovery is underway
The Q4:2008 decline was the steepest since the Q1:1982 drop of 6.8%
Economic growth up sharply in late 2009 with rebuilding
of inventories and stimulus. More moderate growth
expected in 2010/11 but no “double dip”
86
Real GDP Growth vs. Real P/CPremium Growth: Modest Association
Sources: A.M. Best, US Bureau of Economic Analysis, Blue Chip Economic Indicators, 10/10; Insurance Information Institute
4.3
%1
8.6
%2
0.3
%5
.8%
0.3
%-1
.6%
-1.0
%-1
.8%
-1.0
%3
.1%
1.1
%0
.8%
0.4
%0
.6%
-0.4
%-0
.3%
1.6
% 5.6
%1
3.7
%7
.7%
1.2
%-2
.9%
-0.5
%-3
.8%
-4.4
%-3
.3%
-1.6
%
5.2
%-0
.9%
-7.4
%-6
.5% -1
.5%
1.8
%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
E
Re
al N
WP
Gro
wth
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
Re
al G
DP
Gro
wth
Real NWP Growth Real GDP
P/C Insurance Industry’s Growth is Influenced Modestlyby Growth in the Overall Economy
Real GDP Growth vs. Real P/C (%)
87
Regional Differences Will Significantly Impact P/C Markets
Recovery in Some Areas Will Begin Years Ahead of Others
and Speed of Recovery Will Differ by Orders of Magnitude
88
State Economic Growth Varied Tremendously in 2008
US Bureau of Economic Analysis
Highest Quintile
Fourth Quintile
Third Quintile
Second Quintile
Lowest Quintile
Far West0.6
Rocky Mountain2.2
Southwest1.7
Plains2.0 Great Lakes
-0.4
New England1.0
Mideast1.3
Southeast0.0
US = 0.7
WA2.0
OR1.6
CA0.4
NV-0.6
ID0.0
MT1.8
WY4.4
UT1.4 CO
2.9
AZ-0.6 NM
2.0
TX2.0
OK2.7
KS2.2
NE1.3
SD3.5
ND7.3 MN
2.0
IA2.1
MO1.3
WI0.7
IL0.3
MI-1.5
IN-0.6
OH-0.7
NY1.6
PA1.1
NJ0.6
MD1.3
DE-1.6
DC3.0VA
1.3
WV2.5
KY-0.1
NC0.1
SC0.6
TN0.5
AR0.7
LA0.3
MS1.7
AL0.7
GA-0.6
FL-1.6
AK-2.0
HI0.7
ME1.4
NH1.8
VT1.7 MA
1.9
RI-0.9CT
-0.4
Mountain, Plains States Growing the Fastest
Percent Change in Real GDP by State, 2007–2008
89
Fastest Growing States in 2008:Plains, Mountain States Lead
2.1% 2.0%
7.3%
4.4%
3.5%2.9% 2.7% 2.5%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
ND WY SD CO OK WV IA TX, MN,NM, WA
Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis; Insurance Information Institute.
Real State GDP Growth (%)
Natural Resource and Agricultural States Have Done Better Than Most Others Recently, Helping Insurance Exposure in Those Areas
90
Labor Market Trends
Massive Job Losses Sapped the Economy and Commercial/Personal
Lines Exposure, But Trend is Improving
91
Unemployment and Underemployment Rates: Rocketed Up in 2008-09; Stabilized in 2010
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Jan 00 Jan 01 Jan 02 Jan 03 Jan 04 Jan 05 Jan 06 Jan 07 Jan 08 Jan 09 Jan 10
Traditional Unemployment Rate U-3
Unemployment + Underemployment Rate U-6
Nov.10
Unemployment rate was 9.8% in
November
Unemployment peaked at 10.1%
in Oct. 2009, highest monthly rate since 1983.
Peak rate in the last 30 years: 10.8% in Nov -
Dec 1982
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
U-6 went from 8.0% in March
2007 to 17.5% in Oct 2009; Stood at 17.0% in Sep.
2010
January 2000 through November 2010, Seasonally Adjusted (%)
Recession ended in
November 2001
Unemployment kept rising for
19 more months
Recession began in
December 2007
92
US Unemployment Rate
4.5
%
4.5
%
4.6
%
4.8
%
4.9
% 5.4
% 6.1
%
6.9
%
8.1
%
9.3
%
9.6
% 10
.0%
9.7
%
9.7
%
9.6
%
9.6
%
9.4
%
9.3
%
9.1
%9.6
%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
07
:Q1
07
:Q2
07
:Q3
07
:Q4
08
:Q1
08
:Q2
08
:Q3
08
:Q4
09
:Q1
09
:Q2
09
:Q3
09
:Q4
10
:Q1
10
:Q2
10
:Q3
10
:Q4
11
:Q1
11
:Q2
11
:Q3
11
:Q4
Rising unemployment eroded payrolls
and workers comp’s exposure base.
Unemployment likely peaked at 10% in late 2009.
* = actual; = forecastsSources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (10/10); Insurance Information Institute
2007:Q1 to 2011:Q4F*
Unemployment forecasts remain stubbornly high
through 2011
93
Unemployment Rates by State, October 2010:Highest 25 States*
9.5
9.49.8
9.6
9.7
9.7
9.2
9.1
9.1
8.89.
3
8.99.19.410
.511.4
9.9
9.9
9.9
10.010
.7
12.8
12.4
11.9
14.2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
NV MI CA FL RI SC OR KY OH IN GA IL MS DC NC AZ TN MO WV NJ WA ID CT AL PA
Une
mpl
oym
ent R
ate
(%)
*Provisional figures for October 2010, seasonally adjusted.
Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
In October, state and regional unemployment rates were little changed.
Some 29 states and DC reported unemployment rate decreases from a
year earlier, 16 states had increases and 5 had no change.
94
6.7
6.7
6.4
5.7
6.86.97.
47.
4
4.54.75.
4
7.17.3
3.8
6.7
8.1
8.1
7.67.8
7.8
7.98.18.
4
8.3
8.38.4
0
2
4
6
8
10
NM CO NY DE TX MA LA AK WI AR UT MD ME MT MN OK VA WY KS IA HI VT NH NE SD ND
Une
mpl
oym
ent R
ate
(%)
Unemployment Rates By State, October 2010: Lowest 25 States*
*Provisional figures for October 2010, seasonally adjusted.Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
In October, state and regional unemployment rates were little changed.
Some 29 states and DC reported unemployment rate decreases from a
year earlier, 16 states had increases and 5 had no change.
-72
-14
4-1
22
-16
0-1
37
-16
1-1
28
-17
5-3
21
-38
0-5
97
-68
1-7
79
-72
6-7
53
-52
8 -38
7-5
15 -3
46 -2
12
-22
5-2
24
64
-10
91
4 39
20
8 31
3 43
2-1
75 -6
6-1
-24
17
13
9
(1,000)
(800)
(600)
(400)
(200)
0
200
400
600
Jan
-08
Fe
b-0
8M
ar-
08
Ap
r-0
8M
ay-
08
Jun
-08
Jul-0
8A
ug
-08
Se
p-0
8O
ct-0
8N
ov-
08
De
c-0
8Ja
n-0
9F
eb
-09
Ma
r-0
9A
pr-
09
Ma
y-0
9Ju
n-0
9Ju
l-09
Au
g-0
9S
ep
-09
Oct
-09
No
v-0
9D
ec-
09
Jan
-10
Fe
b-1
0M
ar-
10
Ap
r-1
0M
ay-
10
Jun
-10
Jul-1
0A
ug
-10
Se
p-1
0O
ct-1
0O
ct-1
0
Monthly Change Employment
January 2008 through November 2010* (Thousands)
Job Losses Since the Recession Began in Dec. 2007 Peaked at 8.4 Mill in Dec. 09; Stands at 7.5 Million Through October 2010;
15.1 Million People are Now Defined as Unemployed
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm; Insurance Information Institute
Monthly Losses in Dec. 08–Mar. 09 Were
the Largest in the Post-WW II Period
The job gain and loss figures for much of 2010 were severely distorted by the hiring and
termination of temporary Census workers. So far in 2010, 874,000 nonfarm jobs have been created.
151,000 jobs were created in October and losses in
Sept. and Aug. were revised sharply downward
96
US Nonfarm Private Employment1
38
.01
38
.11
38
.01
37
.91
37
.81
37
.81
37
.71
37
.61
37
.61
37
.41
37
.01
36
.71
36
.21
35
.11
33
.51
32
.81
32
.11
31
.51
31
.21
30
.61
30
.31
30
.11
29
.91
29
.61
29
.71
29
.61
29
.61
29
.61
29
.81
30
.21
30
.61
30
.41
30
.41
30
.41
30
.31
30
.5
129130131132133134135136137138139
No
v 0
7D
ec
07
Jan
08
Fe
b 0
8M
ar
08
Ap
r 0
8M
ay
08
Jun
eJu
l 08
Au
g 0
8S
ep
08
Oct
08
No
v 0
8D
ec
08
Jan
09
Fe
b 0
9M
ar
09
Ap
r 0
9M
ay
09
Jun
09
Jul 0
9A
ug
09
Se
p 0
9O
ct 0
9N
ov
09
De
c 0
9Ja
n 1
0F
eb
10
Ma
r 1
0A
pr
10
Ma
y 1
0Ju
n 1
0Ju
l 10
Au
g 1
0S
ep
10
Oct
10
Monthly, Nov 2007 – October 2010 (Millions)
The US Economy Lost About 8.4 Million Jobs in the Two
Years from Dec. 07 – Dec. 09.
As employment expands, workers comp will be among the first lines to see exposure
gains
Employment Peak; Recession Starts
Seasonally adjusted. Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics
14 39
20
8
31
3
43
2
-17
5
-66
-1
-24
17
2
39
16 6
2
15
8 24
1
51 61 1
17
14
3
11
2 16
0
50
(300)
(200)
(100)
0
100
200
300
400
500
Jan
-10
Fe
b-1
0
Ma
r-1
0
Ap
r-1
0
Ma
y-1
0
Jun
-10
Jul-1
0
Au
g-1
0
Se
p-1
0
Oct
-10
No
v-1
0
Total Employment Private Employment
Monthly Change in Employment: Total vs. Private Employment
January 2010 through November 2010* (Thousands)
The Private Sector Posted Job Gains Every Month in 2010—Totaling 1.232 Million through November. The Government
Sector Continues to Lose Jobs.Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm; Insurance Information Institute
The job gain and loss figures for much of 2010 were severely distorted by the hiring and
termination of temporary Census workers. So far in 2010, 874,000 nonfarm jobs have been created.
159,000 private jobs were created in October while 8,000
government jobs were lost
Job Creation: Jan. – Oct. 2010
Total: 874,000 Private: 1,232,000
99
Insurance Industry Employment Trends
Soft Market, Difficult Economy, Outsourcing, Productivity
Enhancements and Consolidation Have Contributed
to Industry’s Job Losses
100
Overview of Insurance Sector Employment Changes*
*data are through September 2010 and are preliminary (i.e., subject to later revision); not seasonally adjusted
Insurance Subsector Aug 2010 Employment
Sept 2010 Employment
Change
P-C Direct 465,400 462,200 -3,200
Reinsurers 26,100 26,400 +300
Claims Adjusters 43,500 43,400 -100
Agents/Brokers 629,700 626,500 -3,200
Life Direct 343,300 342,800 -500
Health/Medical Direct 429,600 427,200 -2,400
Title & other Direct 66,600 66,200 -400
3d-Party Administration 125,600 124,900 -700
All other insurance-related activities
50,100 49,800 -300
Net Total 2,179,900 2,169,400 -10,500
102
U.S. Employment in the DirectP/C Insurance Industry: 1990–2010*
*As of September 2010; Not seasonally adjusted; Does not including agents & brokersNote: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institutes.
Thousands
460
480
500
520
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10
As of September 2010, P/C insurance industry employment was down by 28,900 or 5.9% to 462,200 since the recession began in Dec. 2007 (compared to
overall US employment decline of 7.2%)
105
U.S. Employment in the Reinsurance Industry: 1990–2010*
Thousands
24
28
32
36
40
44
48
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10*As of September 2010; Not seasonally adjusted; Does not including agents & brokersNote: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institutes.
As of September 2010, US employment in the reinsurance
industry was down by 500 or 1.9% to 26,400 since the recession
began in Dec. 2007 (compared to overall US employment decline of
7.2%)
106
U.S. Employment in Insurance Agencies & Brokerages: 1990–2010*
Thousands
500
550
600
650
700
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10*As of September 2010; Not seasonally adjusted. Includes all types of insurance.Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institutes.
As of September 2010, employment at insurance agencies and
brokerages was down by 53,100 or 7.8% to 626,500 since the recession
began in Dec. 2007 (compared to overall US employment decline of
7.2%)
107
U.S. Employment in Insurance Claims Adjusting: 1990–2010*
Thousands
40
45
50
55
60
Jan-
90
Sep
-90
May
-91
Jan-
92
Sep
-92
May
-93
Jan-
94
Sep
-94
May
-95
Jan-
96
Sep
-96
May
-97
Jan-
98
Sep
-98
May
-99
Jan-
00
Sep
-00
May
-01
Jan-
02
Sep
-02
May
-03
Jan-
04
Sep
-04
May
-05
Jan-
06
Sep
-06
May
-07
Jan-
08
Sep
-08
May
-09
Jan-
10
Sep
-10
*As of September 2010; Not seasonally adjusted.Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institutes.
As of September 2010, claims adjusting employment was down by 8,600 or 16.3%
to 43,400 since the recession began in Dec. 2007 (compared to overall US
employment decline of 7.2%)
Katrina, Rita, Wilma
III.Regulation, Legislation and the 2010 Midterm Election Results:
Impacts on P/C Insurer Profitability & Performance
109
Significant Impacts Are Guaranteed
110
The 2010 Midterm Elections:What do the results mean for insurers?
Catastrophe Financing
Supporters of Homeowners Defense Act (e.g., Rep. Neil, D-FL) defeated (HR 2555); Act proposed a larger role for the federal govt. in financing natural catastrophe losses
Rep. Gene Taylor (D-MS) defeated: He supported the Multi-Peril Insurance Act (HR 1264) which would have added wind to the NFIP
Unclear if flood program once again winds up in limbo
Health Care Reform (Obamacare)
Promises to “repeal and replace” aren’t credible (Senate and White House still Democratically controlled); Object is to starve implementation via low/no funding
Obamacare and Boehnercare will do little to control the trajectory of costs
Impacts on benefits business
Republicans need plan to deal with entitlement (Medicare) to cut budget
Dodd-Frank
Likely few major and provisions impact insurers the most (e.g., creation of FIO) unlikely to be affected
Source: Insurance Information Institute research.
111
The 2010 Midterm Elections:What do the results mean for insurers?
Tort Reform
Tort was not a major issue in the 2010 campaign, but the new House can be expected to receptive to the idea of federal tort reform, unlike prior Congresses since 2006
Fewer new pieces of legislation likely to spawn tort actions (e.g., climate change)
State legislatures and governorships more receptive to tort reforms
Taxes/Fiscal Policy
Odds of an across-the-board continuation of Bush tax cuts more likely; Benefits small business and high net worth individuals and their insurers.
Immediate expensing of new investment in 2011?? Good for p/c exposures.
Regulatory/Business Policy
More pro-business stance
Should help stimulate commercial exposures (WC payrolls, property & liability)
Ohio monopolistic state fundMove to competitive structure?
T
Source: Insurance Information Institute research.
Financial Services Reform
112
Insurers Are Impacted, But Not Significantly
113
Financial Services Reform:What does it mean for insurers?
Systemic Risk and Resolution Authority
Creates the Financial Stability Oversight Council and the Office of Financial Research
Imposes heightened federal regulation on large bank holding companies and “systemically risky” nonbank financial companies, including insurers
Federal Insurance Office (FIO)
Establishes the FIO (while maintaining state regulation of insurance) within the Department of Treasury, headed by a Director appointed by the Secretary of Treasury
FIO will have authority to monitor the insurance industry, identify regulatory gaps that could contribute to systemic crisis
CONCERN: FIO morphs into quasi/shadow or actual regulator
Surplus Lines/Reinsurance
Title V of the Dodd-Frank bill includes, as a separate subtitle, the Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Reform Act (NRRA), which eliminates regulatory inefficiencies associated with surplus lines insurance and reinsurance
The Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
Source: Insurance Information Institute (I.I.I.) updates and research; The Financial Services Roundtable; Adapted from summary by Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP
Source: James Madison Institute, February 2008.
ME
NH
MA
CT
PA
WV
VA
NC
LA
TX
OK
NE
ND
MN
MI
IL
IA
ID
WA
OR
AZ
HI
NJRI C
DE
AL
VT
NY
MD
SC
GA
TN
AL
FL
MS
ARNM
KYMOKS
SDWI
IN
OH
MT
CA
NV
UT
WY
CO
AK
= A= B= C= D= F= NG
Source: Heartland Institute, May 2010
A- A-
A-
B-
B-
B-
B-
B-
B-B-
B-B-
B-
B-
B-
B-
B- C-
C-
C-
C -
C-
D-D-
A
A
A
A
B+
B+
B+
B
B
B
B
B
B
C+
C+
C
D+
D+D+
D
NG
NG
D F
F
2010 Property and Casualty InsuranceReport Card
Not Graded: District of ColumbiaMississippiLouisiana
Shifting Legal Liability & Tort Environment
116
Is the Tort PendulumSwinging Against Insurers?
117
Over the Last Three Decades, Total Tort Costs* as a % of GDP Appear Somewhat Cyclical
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08E 10E
To
rt S
ys
tem
Co
sts
1.50%
1.75%
2.00%
2.25%
2.50%
To
rt Co
sts
as
% o
f GD
P
Tort Sytem Costs Tort Costs as % of GDP
($ Billions)
* Excludes the tobacco settlement, medical malpracticeSources: Tillinghast-Towers Perrin, 2008 Update on US Tort Cost Trends, Appendix 1A; I.I.I. calculations/estimates for 2009 and 2010
2009–2010 Growth in Tort Costs as % of GDP is Due in
Part to Shrinking GDP
Business Leaders Ranking of Liability Systems in 2009*
Best States
1. Delaware
2. North Dakota
3. Nebraska
4. Indiana
5. Iowa
6. Virginia
7. Utah
8. Colorado
9. Massachusetts
10. South Dakota
Worst States
41. New Mexico
42. Florida
43. Montana
44. Arkansas
45. Illinois
46. California
47. Alabama
48. Mississippi
49. Louisiana
50. West Virginia
Source: US Chamber of Commerce 2009 State Liability Systems Ranking Study; Insurance Info. Institute.
New in 2009
North Dakota Massachusetts South Dakota
Drop-offs
Maine Vermont Kansas
Newly Notorious
New Mexico Montana Arkansas
Rising Above
Texas South Carolina Hawaii
Midwest/West has mix of good and bad states.
119
The Nation’s Judicial Hellholes: 2010
Source: American Tort Reform Association; Insurance Information Institute
South Florida
West VirginiaIllinoisCook County
New MexicoAppellate
Courts
Watch List
California Alabama Madison County, IL Jefferson County, MS Texas Gulf Coast Rio Grande Valley,
TX
Dishonorable Mention
AR Supreme Court MN Supreme Court ND Supreme Court PA Governor MA Supreme
Judicial Court Sacramento County
New JerseyAtlantic County (Atlantic City)
New York City
IV. Leading Challenges Facing the
P/C Insurance Industry 2011-2015
120
Surviving is HardThriving is Harder
121
Important Issues & Threats Facing Insurers: 2011–2015
Source: Insurance Information Institute
1. Establishing Adequate Reserves and Prices
Failure to do so is the leading cause of death of p/c insurers
2. Rationalize Pricing with the New Investment Reality
Insurers must generate risk-appropriate rates of return and achieve their cost of capital in order to maintain the ability to attract/retain capital
3. Structure Business to Seize Growth Opportunities in the Post-Crisis World
Need to have products, expertise for the growing industries of the 2010s
4. Fend Off Regulatory and Legislative Attacks
Federal fireworks may be over for now, but scores of anti-insurer bills/regulatory proposals will be considered each year across the US
5. Adapt to Evolving Distribution Model: Channel Fusion
Value added of the IA channel is affirmed and enhanced
Operational Challenges
www.iii.org
Thank you for your timeand your attention!
Download at www.iii.org/presentationsTwitter: twitter.com/bob_hartwig
Insurance Information Institute Online: