agenda st. tammany parish board of ......pelican landing shopping center, covington, louisiana....
TRANSCRIPT
AGENDA
ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING
TUESDAY, MAY 6, 2014 - 3:00 P.M.
ST. TAMMANY PARISH GOVERNMENT COMPLEX BUILDING
21490 KOOP DRIVE, PARISH COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MANDEVILLE, LOUISIANA
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF THE APRIL 1, 2014 MINUTES
PUBLIC HEARINGS
BOA CASE NO. 14-04-008Request by applicant for variances of a side yard setback from 5’ required to approximately 2’ requested, and
open space requirements between the eave and the side property line from 2’ required to approximately 6”
requested for an “after the fact” accessory structure, in a Planned Unit Development zoning district. The
property is located at 1664 Vela Cove, in Clipper Estates Subdivision, Slidell, Louisiana.
Applicant: Judy Dubroca
(POSTPONED FROM THE APRIL 1, 2014 MEETING)
BOA CASE NO. 14-05-009
Request by applicant for a variance to permit the removal of a 10’ wide interior side yard planting buffer in
a HC-2 Highway Commercial zoning district. The property is located at 70457 LA Highway 21 in the
Pelican Landing Shopping Center, Covington, Louisiana.
Applicant: Jered Bowers/Barrister Global
BOA CASE NO. 14-05-010
Request by applicant for variance of a portion of a front yard setback requirement from 30’ required to 20’
requested in a Planned Unit Development zoning district. The property is located at 90 Hummingbird Road,
in Tchefuncta Country Club Estates, Phase II, Covington, Louisiana.
Applicant: Claude Lagalante
BOA CASE NO. 14-05-011
Request by applicant for variance of a side yard setback requirement for an accessory structure from 10’
required to approximately 5’ requested in an A-4 Single Family Residential zoning district. The property is
located at 351 Forest Loop, in Deer Run (a.k.a. Woodridge on the Lake, Phase 3) Subdivision, Mandeville,
Louisiana.Applicant: Jerry E. Schaefer
Page -1-
BOA CASE NO. 14-05-0 12
Request by applicant for variance of an “after the fact” side yard setback requirement for an addition from
7 Y2’ required to approximately 1.3’ requested, in an A-3 Suburban zoning district. The property is located
at 216 Highland Drive in De Val Estates Subdivision, Mandeville, Louisiana.
Applicant: Beatriz B. Reehlmann
BOA CASE NO. 14-05-013
Request by applicant for variances for the north and east planting buffers from 10’ and 20’ required to
approximately 4’ and 10’ requested respectively, and for a one-way driveway width from 15’ required to 18’
requested, in a HC-2 Highway Commercial zoning district. The property is located at 79055 Highway 40,
Covington, Louisiana.
Applicant: Executive Holdings, L.L.C.
BOA CASE NO. 14-05-014
Request by applicant for variance of a cellular tower setback radius of250’ in a 1-2 Industrial zoning district.
The property is located northeast of the intersection LA Highway 21 and LA Highway 1083, in the vicinity
of Waldheim, Louisiana.
Applicant: AP Towers, L.L.C.
BOA CASE NO. 14-05-015
Request by applicant for variance to allow the moving of an outdoor advertising sign within 500’ of a
residential zoning district closer by approximately 23’, in a HC-2 Highway Commercial zoning district. The
property is located at the intersection of LA Highway 21 and N. Azalea Drive, Covington, Louisiana.
Applicant: Advanced Mortgage Company
BOA CASE NO. 14-05-016
Request by applicant for variances to eliminate two 10’ wide adjacent internal side yard planting buffers, in
a HC-2 Highway Commercial zoning district. The property is located at 1665 Dove Park Road, Mandeville,
Louisiana.Applicant: JUM Development, L.L.C.
BOA CASE NO. 14-05-017
Request by applicant for variances to encroach into a planing buffer with aS’ wide side walk, and to reduce
the number of plantings within two adjacent internal side yard landscape buffers, in a HC-2 Highway
Commercial zoning district. The property is located at 180 New Camellia Boulevard, Covington, Louisiana.
Applicant: Gulf States Development Services, L.L.C.
OLD BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
ADJOURNMENT
Page -2-
MINUTESST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS MEETING
3:00 PM - TUESDAY, APRIL 1, 2014
LA HIGHWAY 59/KOOP DRWE ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX BUILDING
MANDEVILLE, LOUISIANA
The April 1, 2014 meeting of the St. Tammany Parish Board of Adjustments was called to order
by the Chairman, Mr. Tim Fandal.
The roll was called as follows:
PRESENT: Mr. Fandal, Mr. Brookter, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Gordon and Mr. Ballantine
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Mr. Keller
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
Moved by Mr. Brookter and seconded by Mr. Schneider to accept the March 5, 2014 minutes as
typed and delivered.MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
BOA CASE NO. 14-04-006
Request by applicant for a variance to permit the 50’ wide perimeter no cut buffer on the property
to be waived in an A-i Suburban district.
Applicant: Brian Taylor & Dawn Trigueros
(Mr. Keller read the staff report into the record...)
The applicant appeared on his own behalf and made the following initial comments:
• There are fences all around my property line.
• I should have done more research on this issue.
Mr. Brookter: So you have fences around your property?
Mr. Trigueros: Only long the “strip” side.
Mr. Gordon: Are you clear cutting all the way around?
Mr. Trigueros: Just underbrush and scrub trees.
Page -1-
(General discussion ensued about the trees on the property and sizes...)
Moved by Mr. Gordon and seconded by Mr. Schneider to grant the variance as requested.
Mr. Ballantine: I’m opposed to it. The guy on the west side has not provided any comments.
MOTION CARRIED 4 YEAS AND 1 NAY
BOA CASE NO. 14-04-007
Request by applicant for variances for an “after the fact” boathouse relative to the length of the
structure from a maximum of 50’ permitted to 62’ requested, the size from a maximum of 800
square feet permitted to approximately 1340 square feet requested, and to permit the structure to
extend beyond the bulkhead in an A-4 Single Family Residential district.
Applicant: Phillip John Clesi
(Mr. Keller read the staff report into the record...)
The applicant appeared on his own behalf and made the following initial comments:
• I apologize for filing “after the fact”.
• I own two adjacent lots and put in a bulkhead.
• My contractor told me that I needed to build the boathouse first.
• When the contractor was almost finished, I asked him ifhe had obtained a permit because
I did not see any building permit sign on my property.
• I plan to put both lots together.
• I have over $450,000.00 invested in the property.
• I want to keep boats and ajet ski there.
Mr. Brookter: Any issues as to how far the boathouse extends into the canal?
Mr. Clesi: Not that I’m aware of.
Mr. Gordon: This needs to be addressed to the license board. They knew that they needed a
permit.
Ms. JoAnn Ferraia-Mo, 201 P.K. Way, Slidell, LA, appeared in opposition and made the
following initial comments:
• I don’t like conflict... I hate to be here.
• The boathouse lacks aesthetics... the look and the size.
• It diminishes the value of my property.
• It effects the visibility of the lake and the New Orleans skyline.
• This was built without a permit.
Page -2-
• It looks like a commercial structure.
• I’m amazed that Mr. Clesi didn’t know that he needed a permit.
(Ms. Ferraia-Mo presented a package of pictures for the board to review.)
(Mr. Clesi gave some rebuttal time to his neighbor, Mr. Paul Kosbob, 169 Carr Drive, Slidell, LA
whom made the following comments:)
• I have no problems with this.
• Her boathouse blocks the view more than Mr. Clesi’s.
• This in not commercial... he will be building a nice house.
• His boathouse is 7’ more inward than hers.
• He will be getting the house and boathouse permit together.
(Mr. Clesi’ s rebuttal...)
• My roof line is less intrusive.
• I know about permits. My contractor should have filed for the permit.
• I’m just trying to build a retirement home.
(Ms. Ferraia-Mo’s rebuttal...)
• I am worried about my property.
Moved by Mr. Ballantine and seconded by Mr. Schneider to deny the variance request and to
give the applicant ninety (90) days in which to comply with parish code.
MOTION CARRIED 4 YEAS AND 1 NAY
BOA CASE NO. 14-04-008
Request by applicant for variances of a side yard setback from 5’ required to approximately 2’
requested, and open space requirements between the eave and the side property line from 2’
required to approximately 6” requested for an “after the fact” accessory structure, in a Planned
Unit Development zoning district.
Applicant: Judy Dubroca
(Mr. Keller read the staff report into the record...)
The applicant appeared on his own behalf and made the following initial comments:
• I have an approval letter from the homeowners association.
Mr. Gordon: You have 2 setbacks in this subdivision of 5’ on one side and 7’ on the other. Also,
Page -3-
you have a 10’ wide drainage easement where the structure encroaches.
Mr. Fandal: Who did the pergola?
Ms. Dubroca: We did.
(Discussion ensued amongst the board members regarding tabling this matter to look further into
this matter before rendering a decision...)
Mr. Fandal: I would like to get some comments from our Engineering Department concerning the
structure being located within the drainage servitude.
Moved by Mr. Ballantine and seconded by Mr. Brookter to table this case until the next meeting.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
OLD BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
ADJOURNMENT
MR. TIM FANDAL, CHAIRMAN
ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS
Disclaimer: These minutes are intended to represent an overview ofthe meeting and general representation of
the testimony given; and therefore, does not constitute verbatim testimony or a transcription of the proceedings.
Page -4-
ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS REPORT
Case File Number: BOA Case No. 14-04-008
Initial Hearing Date: April 1, 2014
Date of Report: March 11, 2014
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant(s) Name: Judy Debroca
Location of Property: 1664 Vela Cove, Slidell, Louisiana
Zoning of Property: Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.)
Variance(s) Requested: Side yard setback and open space requirement
OVERVIEW
The applicant seeks variances for a side yard setback and open sky requirements only after
constructing an “after the fact” accessory structure without obtaining a parish building permit.
STAFF COMMENTS
First of all, if the applicant or contractor had simply contacted the permits department prior to
commencing any construction on the site, she would have been apprised as to what the code
requirements were and therefore could have avoided this predicament.
Secondly, it appears that the structure can be modified by either reducing the size of the imprint
and/or moving the structure by attaching it to the existing cabana, thereby eliminating or
mitigating the need for variances requested.
Thirdly, even though the applicant has provided a letter of no objection from the presumed
adjacent next door neighbor affected (no address or lot number depicted on letter), the applicant
has not produced a letter of no objection from the homeowners association.
And lastly, the proposed eaves being within 6” of the property line is not acceptable due to the
fact that it poses potential issues with runoff and/or erosion onto the next door neighbors
property.
Therefore, for the reasons as stated above, the staff recommends denial of the variances
requested, and also based on our opinion that the applicant has not demonstrated a practical
Page -1-
difficulty or particular hardship as mandated pursuant to Article 3. Administration and
Enforcement, Section 3.0104 Board of Adjustment, Paragraph (B.) Powers of the Board, Item
(3.) of the St. Tammany Parish Unified Development Code.
Page -2-
BOA CASENO. /L O (for office use only)
ST. TAMMA.NY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
(VARIANCE/APPEAL APPLiCATiON FORM)
(Please print on the following lines below, if a company, please include a contact person name also.)
APPL1ANTS NAME:h ro
/t Ve Ia ( n u
jH L1 72
15 id/ L// )71
(Pleases check the applicable boxes below:)
REQUEST FOR: % A variance of the (Unified Development Code)
I] Appeal of an adverse decision made by a parish official(s)
C Appeal the interpretation by a parish official(s) of the (Unified
Development Code)
VARIANCE/APPEAL REQUESTED:
t building setbacks (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard setbacks)
C landscape buffers (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard buffer setbacks)
C landscaping within buffers (reduction of the number of trees, bushes and/or shrubs)
C parking area requirements (reduction of parking stalls, parking greenspace islands, etc...)
C signage requirements (increase of sign area and/or sign height, lghUng, coloring, etc...)
C other(Specify other variance/appeal on line above)
(Please state on the following lines below your specific request for a variance/appeal:)
Example: Applicant is requesting a variance for a front yard setback requirement from 25’ required by
the parish, to approximately 201 requested.
MAiLING ADDRESS:
CITY/STATE/ZiP:
PHONE NUMBER:(Home Phone #) (Cell Phone #)
PROPERTY LOCATION FOR VARiANCE REQUESTED: ZONING: ? ({ I)
Addressi City State
•Subdivision (if applicable)
_____
.i--
-ro
1i1(fr 4k
4 b4PPII
APPLiCANTDATE OF APPliCATION
Applicant wishes to acquire a semi shaded
area to keep and use outdoor cooking
supplies (barbeque pit, table and chairs.)
Structure is close to property line to avoid
interfering with plumbing and electrical
lines between pooi utilities (pumps, heater,
etc.) and the hot tub and pooi itself.
Ron Keller
From: Paul Carroll
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 10:23 AM
To: Ron Keller
Cc: Alycia M. Adams
Subject: 1664 Vela Cove -- Lot 27 Clipper Ph 4b
Attachments: Clipper Estates Ph 4-B Recorded Plat_rs.pdf; Clipper Estates Ph 4-B As Built Paving &
Drainage_rs.pdf
I looked at this as requested. The structure is located on top of a 18” RCP based on the as-built
drainage plan. See attached. The aerial also makes it appear that this is the case. I didn’t find a
utility plan, but since this leads to a canal, there probably isn’t any utilities in it.
The drainage is privately maintained. The owner should be getting permission from Clipper
Estates Subdivision Master Homeowners, INC before keeping the structure in their easement.
Also, typically for a permit to be issued on something like this, we’d ask for a plan showing how
the lot drainage can be made to work without adversely affecting the neighbor’s drainage. They
should probably go ahead and submit this to Alycia for review to prove it can work; they’ll have
to anyway when they apply for the after-the-fact building permit.
Thanks
Paul Carroll, P.E.Drainage EngineerSt. Tammany Parish Government, Dept. of Engineering
898-2552
Any e-mail may be construed as a public document, and may be subject to a public records request.
1
Ron Keller
From: Paul Carroll
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 10:25 AM
To: Ron Keller
Cc: Alycia M. Adams
Subject: RE: 1664 Vela Cove -- Lot 27 Clipper Ph 4b
I just found the water and sewer plans. It didn’t show water or sewer in the easement.
Thanks
Paul Carroll, P.E.i)rainage EngineerSt. Tammany Parish Government, Dept. of Engineering
898-2552
Any e-mail may be construed as a public document, and may be subject to a public records request.
From: Paul CarrollSent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 10:23 AM
To: Ron KellerCc: Alycia M. AdamsSubject: 1664 Vela Cove -- Lot 27 Clipper Ph 4b
I looked at this as requested. The structure is located on top of a 18” RCP based on the as-built
drainage plan. See attached. The aerial also makes it appear that this is the case. I didn’t find a
utility plan, but since this leads to a canal, there probably isn’t any utilities in it.
The drainage is privately maintained. The owner should be getting permission from Clipper
Estates Subdivision Master Homeowners, INC before keeping the structure in their easement.
Also, typically for a permit to be issued on something like this, we’d ask for a plan showing how
the lot drainage can be made to work without adversely affecting the neighbor’s drainage. They
should probably go ahead and submit this to Alycia for review to prove it can work; they’ll have
to anyway when they apply for the after-the-fact building permit.
Thanks
Paul Carroll, P.E.Drainage EngineerSt. Tammany Parish Government, Dept. of Engineering
898-2552
Any e-mail may be construed as a public document, and may be subject to a public records request.
1
To Whom It May Concern:
The current structure being built at 1664 Vela Cove in
Slidell, La has been given notice by the St. Tammany Zoning
Board. The reason for this is due to the fact that the structure
currently does not meet their specifications based on the current
zoning laws. The poles that have been set in the ground with
concrete have been placed in their current locations due to the fact
that the plumbing underneath the ground for the pool would have
been compromised. There is supposed to be a 5 foot buffer area
from the property line of the adjacent property, but the current
buffer area is only at 6 inches. This structure is a free standing
overhang that is to be used for an outdoor kitchen area that has
been done with much time and effort to ensure that the quality does
not compromise the current property value of our dwelling or of
those around it. We have taken the necessary precautions to ensure
that it has been built and designed to with stand time and does not
pose any threat in the case that severe weather may occur. We are
applying for a variance with the zoning board to allow this
structure to be completed where it currently stands. We ask that
you please sign below this letter to show proof that this structure
has been done in good taste and does not any affect the
surrounding properties. We thank you in advance for your support
in this matter.
Sincerely,
/
Jimmy and Judy Dubroca
1/ V
S (r )
I(1
li
H
I
H
H
I
VH
):)2:J:1Li
‘Ill
-Th
cc
---SI-
To Whom It May Concern:
On October 24, 2013, we will begin construction on a new
over hang and outdoor kitchen in the pool area of our yard at 1664
Vela Cove in Slidell, La. Although there will be the use of power
tools during this process, we will try to keep the noise at a
minimum and not during the early or late hours of the day. This
new construction will be on the adjacent property line to yours but
will not exceed our property line. We would like you approval to
start this new addition to our property and move forward with this
process. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,Jimmy and Judy Dubroca
Sig atij74’
a4’ “.KLOr/,V zz-:2!
‘I
ADDRESS: // 2-
5/9°,95‘- 92Sc
I CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT
REPRESENTS AN ACTUAL
GROUND SURVEY AND THAT TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE NO
ENCROACHMENTS EXIST EITHER
WAY ACROSS ANY OF THE PROPERTY
LINES, EXCEPT AS SHOWN.
SURVEY NO.
/6’3/3 7t.7
SURVEYED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE LOUISIANA “MINIMUM
STANDARDS FOR PROPERTY
BOUNDARY SURVEYS” FOR A
CLASS C 5URVEY.
BEARINGS ARE BASED ON RECORD
BEARINGS UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE.
ENCUMBRANCES 5HOWN HEREON
ARE NOT NECESSARILY EXCLUSiVE.
ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD AS
SHOWN ON TITLE OPINION OR
TITLE POLICY WiLL BE ADDED
HERETO UPON REQUEST, AS
SURVEYOR HAS NOT PERFORMED
ANY TITLE SEARCH OR ABSTRACT.
F.I.R.M.
______
Z25&5&536P
ZONE’7”B.F.E. ‘—‘
‘Verify prior to Construction
with LocI Governing Body
‘N V/t0452’52
75./5 /
c
C
2Z?2,Z4/A/E5M7
/2‘4’5/Df’
&//4’fAD /3
I___________________________
_____________________
k1
A”O6’4Z /ii
S’A’,’-4D /.3&3/ -
V
co(JAJD ‘/2”
,ZL’M/& SETz3Ac/s:/
Y/z:7-5--5’ 7’-25 “c,w4f 1441r
1&J,Vt2 ‘/2”
¼-LA C&Ve
DATE4
-Z9113
J. V. BURKES & ASSOC., INC.
2990 GAUSE BLVD. EAST, STE. B • SLIDELL, LA 70461
985-649-0075 FAX 985-649-0154
REVISED
LOt/ND ‘/z”/ef,VD ‘/2”
___- -
5/9O/95‘92‘
¼-LA C2VE“X ‘24/ C’/zs //LD/A/G 5E72,4C/S:
/2YL’V Z7--2
IZEAIZ -25 ‘c,zLM L4-4r
ADDRESS: /%‘aid L/L4 CV
CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAY SURVEYED IN ACCORDANCE WiTH ENCUMBRANCES SHOWN HEREON F.I.R.M. 4-?-’9/ --
REPRESENTS AN ACTUAl. THE LOUISIANA ‘MINIMUM ARE NOT NECESSARILY EXCLUSIVE.
GROUND SURVEY AND THAT TO STANDARDS FOR PROPERTY ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD AS 225 5&53’.S 42
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE NO BOUNDARY SURVEYS” FOR A SHOWN ON TITLE OPINION OR
TITLE POLICY WILL BE ADDED ZONE A-/OB.F.E. /-‘ENCROACHMENTS EXIST EITHER CLASS C
_______
_____________
SURVEY.
______
HERETO UPON REQUEST, AS
WAYACROSSANYOFTHEPROPERTY BEARINGSARE BASEDON RECORD SURVEYOR HAS NOT PERFORMED Verify prior to Construction
LINES, EXCEPT AS SHOWN. BEARINGS UNLESS NOTED ANYTITLE SEARCH OR ABSTRACT. with Local Governing Body
OTHERWISE.
SURVEY NO I —‘DRAWN BY:j
/D3/3 7D I J. V. BURKES & ASSOC., INC. I——-‘----—-——-- 2990 GAUSE BLVD. EAST, STE. B • SLIDELL, LA 70461
DATE I-985-649-0075 FAX 9856492O154
REVISED:
5URVEY MAP OF: 27LOCATED i:C/PPEE ESZ47ES A’43f 4-
ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LOUISIANA
CERTIFIED To: 1/ELA 9Et/Zt2,’,VE,VZ Lie.
SUR YED BY: 2 /
M. BLJRKES
LA. REG. NO. 4785
1:1
ST. TAMIVIANY PARISH BOAR]) OF ADJUSTMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS REPORT
Case File Number: BOA Case No. 14-05-009
Initial Hearing Date: May 6, 2014
Date of Report: April 24, 2014
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant(s) Name: Jered Bowers/Barrister Global
Location of Property: 70457 LA Highway 21, Covington, Louisiana
Zoning of Property: HC-2 Highway Commercial
Variance(s) Requested: 10’ wide side yard planting buffer
OVERVIEW
The applicant is requesting to add a “drive-thru” window for a proposed donut shop along the
east side of an existing building in Pelican Landing Shopping Center.
STAFF COMMENTS
The staff does not support the variance request for two reasons: First, we believe that the
applicant has not demonstrated a practical difficulty or particular hardship as mandated for
reasons to grant a variance pursuant to Article 3. Administration and Enforcement, Section
3.0104 Board of Adjustment, Paragraph (B.) Powers of the Board, Item (3.) of the St. Tammany
Parish Unified Development Code. Secondly, the proposed layout of the drive-thru window,
according to the parish’s traffic engineer (see email attached) could cause major traffic
circulation issues and confusion on the drivers part who would utilize the window and who seek
exit, which could result in traffic safety issues, and for which the parish could be held liable for if
it grants the variance.
BOA CASE NO. OSO (for office use only)
ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
(VARIANCE/APPEAL APPLICATION FORM)
1JT1iJ L )t/cc’ci
(Home Phone #)
(Pleases check the applicable boxes below:)
REQUEST FOR:
Subdivision (if applicable)
variance of the (Unified Development Code)
D Appeal of an adverse decision made by a parish official(s)
D Appeal the interpretation by a parish official(s) of the (Unified
Development Code)
VARIANCE/APPEAL REQUESTED:
D building setbacks (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard setbacks)
C] landscape buffers (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard buffer setbacks)
ci landscaping within buffers (reduction of the number of trees, bushes and/or shrubs)
ci parking area requirements (reduction of parking stalls, parking greenspace islands, etc...)
O signage requirements (increase of sign area and/or sign height, lighting, coloring, etc...)
C other(Specify other variance/appeal on line above)
(Please state on the following lines below your specific requestfor a variance/appeal:)
Example: Applicant is requesting a variancefor a front yard setback requirementfrom 25’ required by
the parish, to approximately 20’ requested.
r - / Uo
CLU HJ S’ L44 (11d LL C)
(Please print on the following lines below. If a company, please include a contact person name also.).
/ /. .-,./ 4 ) j
APPLICANTS NAME I ‘ “ 1’ ( ( - /1 L / 1 , It (-‘ /1’ /1 L
MAILINGADDRESS: 17’!” ‘ :‘
CITY/STATE/ZIP:
PHONE NUMBER:
D-J hAddress
PROPERTY LOCATION FOR VARIANCE REQUESTED: ZONING: EEEEL(Cell Phone #)
{v.’rfrn )_ 4 )(/2
City ‘-‘ State
— C i:IDATE OF APPLICATION
___
III
_
/I)l4/
EX
IS
TIN
GJ
___
c;/
//
,
/
DU
MP
ST
RO
NIL
‘I
viW
-r/
//
CPN
C.
PD
.W
/16
5(C
RA
PEY
RTLES)
CJ
NE
WC
ON
C.
AR
ON
/7
h.W
D.
60.
ElE
‘A
RO
UN
DEX
ISTING
//
‘e.‘8.
•rcs
DR
AIN
INL
ET
/0
.—
EX
IST.
0P
INL
ET
0C
ON
PR
ON
—-
..
/oI
-...,
S
“S
SS
S,
I.A
DD
(5)
NEW
/4
J..
VE
RBIRCH
PRO
PER
T/IN
FOR
MA
TIO
N
iL-
‘
/PE
LIC
AN
Lf1
DN
GSU
BD
I’.SION
:-i’
5’
/s
/LA
.H
WY
fr
—0’o,
PA
RC
EL
/B
CONCA
PRO
N—
I/
,,
SE
CT
I0/47.
T0V
SH
P7
SO
UF
4,R
AN
(.
•0
‘/
(9ST
.TJ4M
MA
N’(
PA
RI5I-,
LA
•8.
,
/-,
>—E
XIST
1NG
/PIIO
JEC
TD
ESCR
IPTION
0o
RIV
ERB
IRC
Hf
WA
TC
.C
(TY
P.18
TR
EE
S)C
UP
AN
CY
NFPA
200B
IND
US
TR
IAL
24’W
IDE
/‘7.
TO
PO
F8
AN
i/
BC
200
6—
FA
CT
OR
Y—
•c
F’c
o.
DR
IVE-
•-
•/()
(AP
PR
OX
IMA
JE)
/C
ON
STR
UC
TIO
NTY
PE.,
IBC
2
EX
I.T.
18
15.-
I/
BLD
G.
AE
A1,508
S.F
_____________
__
__
__
DR
AIN
.-
-X
IST.O
INLET
—/
EM
PLO
YE
ES
ON
LA
RG
EST
WO
RK
SH
IF
I—
.R
EMO
VE
(5)
EX
ISTI
/TH
ISB
UILD
ING
ISA
SPEC
IAL
PJR
DO
SE
RIV
ERB
IRC
H/
/IN
DU
STRIA
LS
TR
UC
tRE
OC
CU
PAN
CY
—“
/E
XIS]1N
GG
RA
DE
—10
65’
0)
SHR
UB
S.A
ZA
LE
A/
fIS
AN
AU
TO
VO
T.V
EL
U8R
ICA
TO
NSE
RM
(
12.7
5\
W/
PI’4EM
ULC
HFA
CILITY
.C
UST
OM
ER
SR
EMA
INN
THEiR
20
LA
ND
SCA
PEB
UFFE
RA
RE
A—
iG
RO
UN
DC
OV
ER/
AU
TO
MO
BL
EA
ALL
TIM
ES
WH
ILETFC
,.i
EX
IS1N
GT
RE
ES
wI
CO
VE
R/
/)
CH
AN
GE
ThE
IRO
IL
IVA
LVESni
//
THER
EA
RE
NO
UB
LIC
CR
AD
VIN
ISTR
A
AR
EA
SI’
HS
PR
O,E
C
F.H-
/1
______________
MO
NU
MN
TI
BU
ILDIN
GSTR
UC
TUR
AL
DE
_______
/N
DS
PE
ED
—iT
SM
PH
(3SE
C
—
—1
ñ’
——
/B
LDG
JSE
CA
TA
GO
RY
S.
GE
NE
RA
LJS
E
-
/L
yELO
AD—
SOP
.SF
FLOO
R(A
S6
/V
EH
ICL
ES)
/2C
PS
F.
RC
O
/C
DP
\\E.
DEA
DLO
AC
2S
/O
OL
EA
_OA
D2
S
,N
3/
AP
DT
AC
‘IDO
R0
-.‘T1/
•..I
FD
I
I.
,,
—fE
S
ING
WI
WH
EELST
OP
__
__
__
_
D
BT
(1I
NW
SNUB
—
EX11NLD
CLSS
A
OO
’HD
O’R
L—
itnO
N
“°“
[—cSO
(Oflu
;IoNJD
INT
0(0
0
;HR
IJBPL
AN
TiN
GD
ETAIL
_______
EE
S_..N
C 1(1ST.EN
TRYD
RIV
E—\
10’B
UFFER
LIC
4L
Ekl.S
,
15’x25’C
LE
AR
SIGH
TT
RIA
NG
L
-I
D
tfl
.ING
W/
WH
EEL
STO
P\j1
OnT
ND
51C
.10 ‘C
.1.
1(51
101
CD
oit
ot,_
_i51
.110
‘iii
SIO
NJO
INT
j1
SHR
UB
PLA
NTI
NG
DET
AIL
_
V
_ic_I
12/
__
/\
)II
I
ii
__
/1/
TE
IN
G4Z
__
çaZ
LZ
,1j/
//
EXIS
INC
PAR
KIN
GM
AIL
BO
4)N
EW
_1
NG
S
_
I,)
SSB
IE
ES
0—
1.2
11;_
_.rZ
Y--.—
.j.
//
/
___
Ex
ii$:;
DU
MPS
TIR
ON
1I\13’T
Rr
I%
%,
//
CL
SS
AE
CO
NC
.P
1D.
W/
cRA
PE
1’
C..L
NEW
CO
NC
.A
PRO
N
I,lh
.‘A
D.
80
FE
CE
-160
AR
OU
ND
EX
IST
iNG
/,.
DR
AIN
INL
ET
‘-E
Ill
TC
ISE
XIS
T.
0P
INLE
T
10’
BU
FFE
W/
AD
D(5
NEW/
DE
—\
0c
—-
oV
ER
IRC
H/
PRO
PER
DIN
DJIO
N
——
——
J4/
IA.H
WY
1
—
—.1
.c
MM
YS
LA
RA
NG
Nl1
..l
PO
JEC
TD
ESC
RIP
TIO
NS
iR
CH
A00,
(TY
P,18
THE
5)
CU
PAN
CY
:N
FPA
2006
—IN
DU
ST
RIA
L
1/
4’W
iDE
IT
OP
OF
BA
NS
BC
2006—
FA
CT
OR
Y—
15’x
25’
CL
RD
RI
/0(A
PPR
OX
IMA
TE
)C
ON
STR
UC
TiO
NTY
PE:
H.
180
2
SIG
HT
IRIA
_
UE
XIS
T.
18.
.15
./
BLD
G.
AR
EA:
1.5
08
S.F
.
—.1——.I
_L\_
gE’T
h_..
______
______
_
DR
AIN
XIS
T.O
PIN
LE
T—
EM
PLO
YE
ES
ON
LA
RG
EST
WO
RK
SHIF
T:
II
‘Ii
I‘..—
.—
JJJ
\l\,J
a...‘
(‘.
‘,
..-
RE
MO
VE
(5)
EX
IST
./
THIS
BU
ILD
ING
ISA
SPE
CIA
LP
UR
PO
SE
\I
RIV
ERB
IRC
H/
IND
UST
HIA
LST
RU
CT
UR
E.
OC
CU
PAN
CY
\I
.‘
/EX
ISTi
NG
GR
AO
E—
100)
SH
RU
BS
.A
ZA
LE
A/
ISA
NA
UTO
MO
TIV
EL
UB
RIC
AT
ION
SER
VI(
-,
1275
W/
PIN
EM
ULC
HFA
CIL
ITY
.C
UST
OM
ER
SR
EMA
ININ
THEI
R
20
LA
ND
SCA
PEB
UFF
ER
AR
EA
GR
OU
ND
CO
VE
R/
AU
TOM
OB
ILE
AT
ALL
TIM
ES
WH
ILE
TEC
H
WA
R
EX
ISN
GE
ES
W/
CO
VE
R/
/C
HA
NG
ET
hEIR
OIL
.
fVA
dE
J,
1\
/T
HE
RE
AR
EN
OPU
BL
ICO
RA
DM
INIS
TR
A
AR
EA
SIN
Ti-II
SP
RO
.IC
T.
F.H
.
\M
ON
UM
EN
TI
BU
ILD
ING
STR
UC
TUR
AL
DEC
________
WiN
DSP
EE
D—
115
MP
H.
(3SE
C.
—
—1
61’
——
BLD
G.
USE
CA
TA
GO
RY
Ti,
GE
NE
RA
LU
SE.
LIV
EL
OA
D—
SO
P.S
.F.
FLO
OR
(PA
SS
VEH
ICLE
S)20
P.S
,FR
OO
F
RO
OF
PAN
EL
DEA
DLO
AD
2P
.S.
CO
LL
AT
ER
AL
LOA
D—
2P
.S.
NI
FX
PO
cI:P
T51/
VflP
Tdrrcn
51
Ron Keller
From: Helen Lambert
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 1:00 PM
To: Ron Keller
Subject: FW: 70457 Hwy 21 suite 118 Pelican landing Proposed drive through
See Rebecca’s comments below.
From: Rebecca Lala
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 01:57 PM Central Standard Time
To: Jared Bowers; Helen Lambert <hIambertstJgov.gfg>
Cc: Jessica Lacy; John S. Bowers, III
Subject: RE: 70457 Hwy 21 suite 118 Pelican landing Proposed drive through
I apologize for the delay in responding. I have reviewed the circulation plan and have some concerns about traffic using
the drive-thru blocking the entrance to the oil change business. I understand that signage and pavement markings will
be utilized to attempt to avoid this situation, however signage will not completely prevent customers from going the
path of least resistance. Other concerns I have are the exiting traffic attempting to turn left out of the oil change
business and thus traveling the wrong way on the one-way entrance off of LA 21. Signage will also need to be installed
to attempt to avoid this situation, but again I’m not sure the signage will prevent this from happening. My 3rd concern is
the fact that all drive-thru patrons will be required to use the parking lot and driveway of the oil change business. Is the
oil change business ok with this situation? A drive-thru donut shop does generate a good amount of traffic, as has been
evident by the drive-thru donut shop in the shopping center located on LA 59 near LA 1088.
If you wish to proceed with this circulation plan, please submit the proposed signage and pavement markings that you
will propose to install in order to prevent the aforementioned situations. Thanks.
Becky
‘Rebecca B. Lath, T.E., rTO’E
T’rajjIc ‘Engineer
St. T’aminanj TarLcIi
985-898-2552
Any e-mail may be construed as a public document, and may be subject to a public records request. The contents of this
e-mail reflect the opinion of the writer, and are not necessarily the opinion or policy of St. Tammany Parish Government.
From: Jared Bowers
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 6:15 PM
To: Rebecca Lala; Helen Lambert
Cc: Jessica Lacy; John S. Bowers, III
Subject: RE: 70457 Hwy 21 suite 118 Pelican landing Proposed drive through
Rebecca and Helen,
1
ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOAR]) OF ADJUSTMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS REPORT
Case File Number: BOA Case No. 14-05-0 10
Initial Hearing Date: May 6, 2014
Date of Report: April 24, 2014
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant(s) Name: Claude Lagalante
Location of Property: 90 Hummingbird Road, Covington, LA
Zoning of Property: Planned Unit Development
Variance(s) Requested: Front yard setback requirement
OVERVIEW
The applicant is seeking relief for a portion of his front yard setback requirement due to the
unusually shaped property which comes to a kind of “diamond-shaped” point that meets at two
intersecting streets (see survey attached).
STAFF COMMENTS
Since the lot is unusually shaped which creates a limited front yard setback from the perspective
of the two intersecting streets, a true hardship does appear to exist; and given that the proposed
new home only violates a portion of the 30’ front yard setbacks, and that the applicant appears to
have put great thought into the house plan design in order to mitigate the variance requested, the
staff has no objection to the variance request.
BOA CASE NO./L1t OS O Iô (for office use only)
9ç-o7 cc’/’(Cell Phone #)
ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
(VARIANCE/APPEAL APPLICATION FORM)
(Please print on the following lines below. Ifa company, please include a contactperson name also.)
APPLICANTS NAME: (‘ t’i€
MAILING ADDRESS: / /‘10 (‘ *
CITY/STATE/ZIP:
PHONE NUMBER:
___________________
/Y1a,v/ev,/k , c4 7o’/7/
Al/A
REQUEST FOR:
D other
(Home Phone #)
PROPERTY LOCATiON FOR VARiANCE REQUESTED: ZONING: (A,&QcQ A(4 :1dt90 I4ovnriitjbird IYCI (L133A) Couiivk’i, CI 70Lf31 Co &l.oe S1L&4’’
Address City State Subdivision (if applicable) p&s]t
(Pleases check the applicable boxes below:)
_____________
o A variance of the (Unified Development Code)
O Appeal of an adverse decision made by a parish official(s)
0 Appeal the interpretation by a parish official(s) of the (Unified
Development Code)
VARIANCE/APPEAL REQUESTED:
‘ building setbacks (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard setbacks)
0 landscape buffers (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard buffer setbacks)
0 landscaping within buffers (reduction of the number of trees, bushes and/or shrubs)
0 parking area requirements (reduction of parking stalls, parking greenspace islands, etc...)
o signage requirements (increase of sign area and/or sign height, lighting, coloring, etc...)
(Specify other variance/appeal on line above)
(Please state on the following lines below your specific requestfor a variance/appeal:)
Example: Applicant is requesting a variance for a front yard setback requirementfrom 25’ required by
the parish, to approximately 20’ requested.
/1 pp/itaW4 is (ec/L)es.l’lr4JJ CL Vtv/tivC ior (r4ctovcl r-iback
1L)I(efl1eA)7 4’IOIri 30’ (ecjJ(c\ ‘o -re psk -
se ackyris.
SIGNATURE OF APFL1CANT DATE OF APPLICATION
Dear Board Members:
The purpose of this requested is to seek the Parish’s approval to decrease the front
building setbacks on Briar Hollow and Hummingbird for lot 533A in Tchefunta Club
Estates, Phase II, from 30 feet to 20 feet. No change to the back or side setbacks are
being requested. The Architectural Committee of Tchufunta Club Estates has approved
this request. Please see Appendix A, Amendment to Agreement to Purchase or Sell.
The following information demonstrates the lot’s unusually shape (Appendix B) and
supports the need to reduce the front setback:
1. This is not a corner lot yet it fronts equally on two streets, Briar Hollow and
Hummingbird.2. The lot and the corresponding building footprint closely resemble the shape of a
diamond. Therefore, the back and front of the lot and building footprint narrow
considerably.3. The front building footprint falls considerable below the widest portion of the lot
and begins to narrow before the widest portion of the lot.
4. The above factors restrict a home design that is consistent with the
neighborhood.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Claude Lagalante
OocuSlgn Envelope ID: 17838744-6007-4AEF-6765-0EC085371 15E
4ppeAJd/x A
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE OR SELL [1E111w Sund.,d Fom. (wwwd lGI)
Nwd.MnepvlIe, M,acinivaalREALTOkS®. leo
Due: 15mPh 01 OfllA
FmeocWeo,m QIREALTO48kOALT0RBoa,de pwwide this eomeo b4
ed.o4 a,kgd adwee REALTOR emnebwseoweo w te1weRj1y ol hoa14etg
wee’:
lDnn4,..w
Is w be amended in lEe following mamier
(Please reference each line by number)
-TCE architectural committee flea approved a reduction in the front setback on Hummthgbfrd and Briar Hollow
-onLotS33A.
Line:
_______
Une:The currerft setback Is 30 feet. ft Is now approved 1cr this lot at 20 feet.
Line:•Tli sale of this lot Is contingent upon the parish approving the variance.
Line:
_______
:01 or bf0tc May 30,2014
Line: 161 :Inspadion period to be extended through May30, 2014.
Line:
________
Line:
________
Line:
__________
Ljnc
_______
Line:
________
All olberlernis and condItions era vo remain unchanged and binding upon holhpurdes.
,-
rc rRPE
xjIw.Lt iMyLiwdt 3/21/2014
DATE SELLE DATE
<_____________________
PURCHASER DATE SELLER DATE
GATE:March 20, 2014
— DATE:
Jenniler Rice Diane LaPlace
SELLING AGENT’S NAME LISTING AGENT’S NAME
January30. 2014
Claude Lagalante
James 0. Harp. Jr. (Seller)and
concerning Ito property Icnwn asLot 533A. 90 HummIngbird Road, Covinglon, LA 10433
itc
D
h
I-I S
U,
TU
,
I
Reference Surve(Basis of Bearg)1. Survey prepared ôy LandSurveying, Inc. ofTchefuncta Club EstatesPhase IL Nap File No.4702, SL 2’ammany ParishClerk of Court office2. Survey prepared by LandSurveying, LLC Nap FileNo. 49704, SL TammanyParish Clerk of Court office
2YJE Properties,Ø( A SLIVEY MADE CF PFOETY LO
Lot 5334 TcheftmctaSt. 2’ammany .Paris4
THIS MAP IS IN ACCORDANDE WITH p. PHYSICAL. 9JFIVEY MALE ON flE ii
SISNATLFE ANO STAMPED SEAL. 14.ST fl4 D CYl THIS PLAY IS NOT A TPLE
LAND SURVEYING LLCcOVThI6TON. LOUISIANA
Rp,rzspth 12 2011
4pd1 B10’ UtilityServil?J,de 8
20’
ii
I
533A /3uilding—4SetbackLines
—
Building Setback ZinesFront — 30’Side-5’Rear — 10’Building setback linesshould be determinedby owner or contractorprior to any construction
This lot is located in FloodZone C as per FEJIAFIRAf Comm. Panel No.225205 0220 C, mapdated 4—2—1991
SERVITUDES SHOWN HEREON (IF ANY) ARE NOT NECESSARILY EXCLUSIVE.SERVITIJOES OF RECORD AS SHOWN ON TITLE OPINION DIR TITLE POLICYWILL BE ADDED HERETO UPON REQUEST AS THE UNDERSIGNED HASPERFORMED ND ABSTRACT OR TITLE SEARCH. THE UNDERSIGNED HASMADE NO ATTEMPT To LOCATE ANY BURIED UTILITIES DIR ASSOCIATEDPEDESTALS.ThIS MAP IS IN ACCORDANCE WITh THE MINIMUM STANDARD DETAILEDREQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO THE ACCURACY STANDARDS OF A C SURVEYAND THE APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE CITED IN LAC 45: LXI.
LegeneL.Rebar SetRebar Found
F-
L NO. 4
SCALE = 40’
ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS REPORT
Case File Number: BOA Case No. 14-05-011
Initial Hearing Date: May 6, 2014
Date of Report: April 24,2014
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant(s) Name: Jerry E. Schaefer
Location of Property: 351 Forest Loop, Mandeville, LA
Zoning of Property: A-4 Single Family Residential
Variance(s) Requested: Side yard setback requirement
OVERVIEW
The applicant wishes to replace an existing 1 8’x20’ carport, which is currently sitting on the side
property line, and replacing it with a 35’x42’ garage which would be set 5’ off of the side property
line.
STAFF COMMENTS
Based on the circumstances, the staff has no objections to the variance request based on the
following mitigating points:
• The old carport that violates code by sitting on the property line would be removed and
replaced with a new aesthetically pleasing garage that would be set 5’ off of the side
property line.
• At the time that the subdivision was constructed, a 5’ side yard setback was permitted for
accessory structures.
• There is limited room in which to move the proposed garage any farther away from the
side property line due to a 12’ wide driveway that exists between the proposed garage and
the house which is used to access the back yard for a boat and camper, as well as existing
obstructions that are located next to the house (garden and A/C unit), and existing citrus
trees.• The applicant’s next door neighbor has filed a letter of no objection.
BOA CASE NO. JL/- OS O 1! ((or office ise only)
T. TAMMANYPARISK BOARD OFADJ1JSTME!T
(VARUNCE/APPEAL AP.PUCATIONFORM)
(PlásepriiUee thefrUsssg liaes below. Ifa cemp.a,pkase indade cmrkctpersea same abe,)
APPLICANiNAME: e-tt4 £ &ccQ€r
MAILING ADDRJ!S4S3 I/
ek I- oc>fD
O A variance of the (Unified Development Code)
(JAppeal ofan adverse decision made by a parish official(s)
0 Appeal the interpretation by a parish official(s) of the (Unified
Development Code)
VARIANCE/APPEAL IeOUFSTED
fuilding setbacks (reduction of front, side arrdlor rear yard setbacks)
0 landscape buffers (reduction of front, side andtor rear yard buffer setbacks)
O landscaping within buffers (reduction of the number of trees, bushes andlor shrubs)
0 parking area requirements (reduction ofparking stalls, parking censpuce islands, etc..)
O signage requirements (increase ofsign area andfor sign height, lighting, coloring. etc..)
C) other
(Mse sale on thefollo,thig linabeLwy.ur specific requestfor a vmnmacWqpeab)
Examp: Applicant is requesting a variancefor afrontyardseiback requirementfrom 25’required by
theparish, to appsvximace!y 20’requested.
CnTA7WZIP- I ve_\e Q. 9o2/
PHONE NUM8ER i(9’l7(Home Phone #)
Address
PROPERTYLOCATION FOR VARIANCE REQUESTED ZOMNG
(Cell Phone #)
City
(Pleases ckeck the applicable boxes below:)
REOUESTFOR:
State
‘C y
L\&e3
(Specify other variancelappeal on line above)
r ; rrks r€en..efi
Prorv11Y r k - fke - e g. 1 Y) S
Jo I’cor’+ /ooS ,LA j’ç iIio.ve 1 Ayrr- y
cCLwfer. OR L hCkiir rvty +s *eJ ,nov bo4
SIGNATURE 0 APPLICANT DATE OfAPPLICATION1
To: Board ofAdjustment Variance/ Appeal Request
From: Jerry E. SchaeferDate: March 26,2014Subject: Variance request — Deer Run Sudv - Mandeville
To Whom It May Concern:
My name is Jerry Schaefer and I have been a homeowner in Deer Run subdivision
since its development by US Homes in 1981. One year after purchasing my home. 1
purchased the adjacent lot from US Homes and several years later I enlarged my
original home on to the part of the adjacent property. I would now like to build a
detached garage next to my home on this property. During my research into the
permitting process, I was informed that while the subdivision side setback
requirements for each original “nonconforming” lot is 5’, by purchasing the lot
adjacent to me and having the two lots re-subdivided into one lot, this now makes
my lot a uconformingJl lot. I’m told the parish rules for a “conforming” lot require a
10’ side setback.
I am respectfully requesting a variance to the required 10’ side property line set
back for a conforming lot, to allow me to construct a garage with the 5’ allowable
side set back of a nonconforming lot The main reason is to allow me to keep the 12’
access I have between my house and proposed new garage for my boat and camper.
I don’t want them in the driveway as I feel this looks tacky and lowers home values.
It was suggested that I move the garage back and over to the 10’ but as you can see
on my site plan this would cause me to remove some of my dtrus trees and leave me
very little backyard. I did not want either of those to happen. There will be no
adverse effects on the adjacent property because the building will have built in
gutters and down spouts to the existing front driveway that slopes to the street
where there is a catch basin. Even though I own the adjacent property and would
not do anything to cause harm to or cause a conflict with my neighbors I have also
obtained and included a no objection letter from my present tenant at 331 Forest
Loop.One other point I’d like for you to consider, as I have, is whether this would set
precedence for other homeowners in the subdivision to also request variances. The
fact is there are 137 lots in the subdivision, all ofwhich have homes built on them,
and all of which are “non-conforming” lots with aS’ side setback requirement
Therefore, there would not be any other possible variance request for side setbacks.
In fact, the only side setback that would be more than 5’ in the entire subdivision
would be this one I’m asking for a variance on.
As far as a homeowners association we had one 33 years ago and I was a part of it
and presently I am still the person everyone comes to for any repairs on entrance
signs, lights, etc. The association has been abolished for 20 plus years and I still have
my copy of the covenants and my garage doesn’t conflict with any ofthe covenants
even if they were still in effectThank you for your consideration,Jerry E. Schaefer351 Forest LoopMandeville LA. 70471
DISCR1PTTON OF PICTURES
If you look at page one, the top picture shows my 12’ rear yard access for my camper
and boat that I don’t want to loose. It also shows a few of the trees I would loose by
shifting the garage back and over to the 10’ set back. The bottom picture shows the
existing carport that would be removed from the property and where the new
garage would be located.
Page two the top picture shows where my camper and boat go which is why i need
to keep my 12’ access to the rear yard. The bottom picture gives you a view from the
back yard at the 5’ set back I am hoping for, the size and location of the proposed
new garage, and the 12’ access I need to keep.
Page three shows again a front and rear view ofwhere everything is and hopefully
will be located.
Thank you for your time,
Jerry E. Schaefer
p
AJ 0 4- cj
3 —
.-..,‘
--
•s4,.
4
G
4; 0<
‘I
j
••
..
I
DISCRIPTION OF PiCTURES
If you look at page one, the top picture shows my 12’ rear yard access for my camper
and boat that I don’t want to loose. It also shows a few of the trees I would loose by
shifting the garage back and over to the 10’ set back. The bottom picture shows the
existing carport that would be removed from the property and where the new
garage would be located.
Page two the top picture shows where my camper and boat go which is why I need
to keep my 12’ access to the rear yard. The bottom picture gives you a view from the
back yard at the 5’ set back I am hoping for, the size and location of the proposed
new garage, and the 12’ access I need to keep.
Page three shows again a front and rear view ofwhere everything is and hopefully
will be located.
Thank you for your time,
Jerry E. Schaefer
Fr
,..I
0L4,C
1T
I-
Pares
- —
ccs”ç; cj-J304c’r
Jeny Scheeter351 Fot LoopMaideviUe.LA 70471
‘F•gS ai -%
4*$
[“1c44
- Jeny Sc1ae1er351 FarLc.Mandee. LA 7LL7I
•i: I 3- _i_’__•-•
-
1)i\ess
‘opo.seA \J
Vieu
_‘
97-c
yJ)
so’c7/
4/2)/5
‘)d/—/22/drd
Sr25
,‘)///‘
06Q7/$/E
1LA/2)1/0)¶1
V/S
E‘ 1
I V
V’/ I’,
riN t7/
I
I:C.[‘1
I
I
iii
\Hi
1:! !,
I.,I’
SI
I ‘‘
•1
V
\ I1
>
3.”’
s_;;*VVV/V
.:‘.\
6’
V
1_—
3l
A
/
I
ii//
I
-
U‘Ii
\
0>
//
>L
L
rfl
S4
.
;;;;S
:
)‘
--
5—
.
.5.
*5
——
S —
•55
5;
5.
-1 •
5.
—-S
55
5.
—5
SS
r
-,
:.-S
1
—•
5-
1—
,
.
.5—
.-
:‘S
•S
—P
S
5_
S
S—
—
S
5—
S
S
—.5
_e
(F
’-) ‘-
‘i>
4S
.
d5-
.5;—
—S
11
54
55
5(?
‘
•S
5— .
.5’
.5 n 1”
ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOAR]) OF ADJUSTMENTSTAFF ANALYSIS REPORT
Case File Number: BOA Case No. 14-05-0 12Initial Hearing Date: May 6, 2014Date of Report: April 24, 2014
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant(s) Name: Beatriz B. RechlmannLocation of Property: 216 Highland Drive, Mandeville, LAZoning of Property: A-3 SuburbanVariance(s) Requested: Side yard setback requirement
OVERVIEW
The applicant made an “after the fact” addition to her home not aware that a permit was required.
STAFF COMMENTS
With all due respect, if the applicant had contacted the permits department prior to commencingconstruction on the site, she would have been apprised as to what the code requirements were andtherefore could have avoided this predicament. And since a hardship or practical difficulty doesnot appear to be evident, the staff does not support the variance request.
BOA CASENO. I (for office use only)
ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
(VARIANCE/APPEAL APPLICATION FORM)
(Cell Phone #)
PROPERTY LOCATION FOR VARIANCE REQUESTED: ZONING:
zV/ ///E
(Pleases check the applicable boxes below:)
REQUEST FOR: D A variance of the (Unified Development Code)
D Appeal of an adverse decision made by a parish official(s)
C Appeal the interpretation by a parish official(s) of the (Unified
Development Code)
VARIANCEUPPEAL REQUESTED:
building setbacks (reduction of front, de andor rear yard setbacks)
o landscape buffers (reduction of front, sidendIor rear yard buffer setbacks)
0 landscaping within buffers (reduction of the number of trees, bushes andlor shrubs)
0 parking area requirements (reduction of parking stalls, parking greenspace islands, etc...)
O signage requirements (increase of sign area andJor sign height, lighting, coloring, etc...)
C other(Specify other variance/appeal on line above)
(Please state on thefoliowing lines below your specific requestfor a variance/appeal:)
Example: Applicant is requesting a variancefor a front yard setback requirement from 25’ required by
the parish, to approximately 20’ requested. - 5J ‘-Jo 44q.% I,..
7
// / k
kSIGNA TURE OF APPLANT DATE OF APPLIC’A HON
. A11
(Please print on thefollowing lines below. Ifa company, please include a contact person name also.)
/ 2 /APPLICANTS NAME: /i7’1 s /. I _&J?/7lf-i ))
MAILING ADDRESS: 1- cc , 5 5
CITY/STATE/ZIP: ii/ J d/ C
PHONE NUMBER:(Home Phone #)
Address City State Subdivision (if applicable)
AIJ112 7/ /W
I0-j
LiJ0
MAPLEWOOD DRIVE (SIDE)
REFERENCE SURVEY:
A 9009’20B = 8948’53C 90’O4’01D 8W57’46”
DRIVEWAY
00z
/ANGLES AT PROPERTY CORNERS
154161
155
156
157
0
60’
RIDGEWOOD DRIVENOTES:
1. ThIs property Is located in Flood Zone C.per F.E.M.A. Map No, 225205 0245 C. datedOctober 17. 1989.
2. Building Setbacks per covenants recorded inCOB 307 page 147. front = 35’, side & rear 10’
1)E IS NO REPRESENTA11ON ThAT AU. APPLICABLE S 1UOCS AND/ORRES1IBC11ONS HAVE smi sOi HEREON. ANY SER1UJO€S AND/ORRES1RIC11ONS SHORN ON ThIS PLAT ARE UI1ED 10 ThOSE SET FORThIN 1€ DESGRIP11ON AND/OR SWORMA11ON flJRMSH ThE UNOERGN.A llfl.E OR PUBLIC REC1D SEARO4 FOR 5304 IWORMA11ON WAS NOT MADEBY ThE UNDERSIONED IN CONPIUNG DATA FOR ThIS SURVEY.
LEGEND
= 5/8k IRON ROD FOUND= 1/2 IRON ROD SET
RS = REFERENCE SURVEY
Plot of Dc Vol Estates Sites, Section B by AdiosOrr, Jr. Associates doted November 7, 1960, filed
St. Tamamny Parish Clerk of Court Map File No.352.
(985) 892-1549 John G. Cnmmings and Associates FAX (985) 892-9250
503 N. ..EFFERSCN AUE PROFSSIONAL LAND SURkEVORS COI4NGTON, LA 704JJ
Bea triz Reehlxnarj.n
SIIOINNO A SURVEY OF: LOT 160, DE VAL ESTATES SITES, SEC11ON B,LOCATED IN SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,RANGE 11 EAST, ST. TAMMANY PARISH. LOUISIANA.
/1HIS PLAY REPRl1S A PHYSICAL SURVEY MADE ON
,.- ) /ThE GROUND BY ME, OR 1HOSE UNDER MY DIREC11ON, .// ,-f /, J//ri’AND IS IN ACCCRDAN IN1N ThE APPLICABLE / -//tf L.STANDARDS OF PRAC11CE AND BEARS A CLASS C
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
I)1JI
r 4,
ftr..,’o,4?ffl
SCALE:1 = 50’
1JOB NO. 14078 1DArE 3—262O14 RE’dISED:
—.,
-
t’
—
4
—
‘:4i
tv
LI44
IEl
iiS
ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOAR]) OF ADJUSTMENTSTAFF ANALYSIS REPORT
Case File Number: BOA Case No. 14-05-013Initial Hearing Date: May 6, 2014Date of Report: April 24, 2014
GENERAL iNFORMATION
Applicant(s) Name: Executive Holdings, L.L.C.Location of Property: 79055 Highway 40, Covington, LAZoning of Property: HC-2 Highway CommercialVariance(s) Requested: Buffers and driveway width
OVERVIEW
The applicant is requesting variances for a reduction of landscape buffers on the north and eastsides of the property and an increase in a one-way driveway width on the Lee Road side all forthe purpose of preserving a majestic large mature live oak tree located at the southwest corner ofthe property.
STAFF COMMENTS
The staff has been working with the applicant through several plan revisions of the site in orderto come up with the least invasive plan relative to meeting parish code in order to save the liveoak tree. Therefore, the staff recommends approval of the variances as requested subject to thedeveloper planting all the necessary plantings on site; and if not able to, then by makingreparations in the form of payment for plant mitigation to the St. Tammany Parish TreeMitigation Bank for the loss of the trees not planted, which payment is based on $100.00 percaliper inch of tree.
ST. TAMMANYPARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT(VARIANCE/APPEAL APPLICATION FORM)
(Please print on the following lines below. Ifa company, please include a contact person name also.)
APPLICANTS NAME: COREY J. SMITH D.B.A. “EXECUTIVE HOLDINGS, LLC” (DEVELOPER)
M4ILINGADDRESS: 311 TELLY ROAD
CITY/STATE/ZIP: PICAYUNE, MS 39466
PHONE NUMBER: 6017984000
(Home Phone #) (Cell Phone #)
PROPERTY LOCATION FOR VARIANCE REQUESTED: ZONING: HC2
79055 HIGHWAY 40 LAAddress State
(Pleases check the applicable boxes below:)
REQUEST FOR: variance of the (Unified Development Code)0 Appeal of an adverse decision made by a parish official(s)0 Appeal the interpretation by a parish official(s) of the (Unified
Development Code)
VARIANCE/APPEAL REQUESTED:
Djiilding setbacks (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard setbacks)S4ndscape buffers (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard buffer setbacks)O landscaping within buffers (reduction of the number of trees, bushes and/or shrubs)0 parking area requirements (reduction of parking stalls, parking greenspace islands, etc...)O signage requirements (increase of sign area and/or sign height, lighting, coloring, etc...)
‘ther DRIVEWAY WIDTH IN PLANTING AREA
(Specify other variance/appeal on line above)
(Please state on the following lines below your specific requestfor a variance/appeal:)Example: Applicant is requesting a variance for a front yard setback requirement from 25’ required bythe parish, to approximately 20’ requested.
M1L44I. CODE 7.01078 !bBUFFER PLANTING AREA WIDTH. REQUEST REDUCTION FROM 10’ TO 4’.
BOA CASE NO.
O1
(for office use only)
COVINGTON
City Subdivision (if applicable)
2. CODE 7.0106C - ONE WAY DRIVEWAY WIDTH IN PLANTING AREA. REQUEST INCREASE FROM 15’ TO 18’
SI1ATU4JJAPPLICANT
3. c-r-6 &% j\ +
4—3—20 14
DATE OF APPLICATION
ExEcu’r1vF(X)1\4PANTES
April 3, 2014
St. Tammany Parish — Department of Planning
Attn: Mr. Ron Kellar21454 Koop Drive
Suite lBMandeville, LA 70471
RE: Proposed Family Dollar Store, Covington Louisiana - Variance Request
Mr. Kellar,
Please find the enclosed application for variance and payment for the fees associated with this
filing. As mentioned in our previous discussions, the variance is imperative in order for us to
preserve a very substantial live oak tree located on the property.
The site plan submitted along with this application depicts the building and improvement layout
being constructed entirely outside of the drip line of the tree, which we agree with your input, is
critical in preserving the health and longevity of the existing live oak tree.
Should you have any questions with regard to our specific requests, or feel the need to discuss
our application further, please do not hesitate to contact me on my cell phone at (601)916-4000
or via email at [email protected]. We look forward to working together with your staff to
develop the property in harmony with the existing landscape and vegetation located on the site.
Kindest Regards,
Corey J. Smith, PresidenllCEO
Exiuiivi EXECu’nvi ExEcu’rIvF1I( )11)1NGS REAL ES’IA’l.’E
311 TELLY RoAD . PICAYUNE, MS 39466 601.798.4000 (office). 601.798.6161 (fax)
POWERS OF THE BOARD TO GRANT VARIANCES/APPEALS
The St. Tammany Parish Board of Adjustment is limited in its power to grant variance/appeal
requests as mandated by State and Parish Law. The board must consider the following in order
to determine if a variance/appeal is eligible for granting:
1. Is the variance/appeal request self-imposed?
Variances/appeals may not be granted by the board if the request is considered a
“personal preference”.
2. Does the variance/appeal request constitute a financial hardship?
Variances/appeals may not be granted by the board if the request is considered strictly a
fmancial hardship.
3. Does the variance/appeal requestpresent a practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship?If the applicant can prove through testimony and presentation of factual documentation
andlor evidence to the board that a practical difficultly or unnecessary hardship would be
imposed if a variance/appeal was not granted, then the board may consider granting the
variance/appeal request. ALL VARIANCE REQUESTS ARE THE RESULT OF PUSHING IMPROVEMENTS
EAST TO SAVE THE LARGE LIVE OAK TREE ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
OF THE PROPERTY.
4. Does the variance/appeal request impose an adverse effect on the adjacent neighbors
property or surrounding neighborhood?
If the variance/appeal request adversely effects an adjacent property owner and/or the
surrounding neighborhood in general, and testimony is forthcoming from same that can
be proven within reason that an adverse affect would be imposed, the board may decide
not to grant the applicant’s variance/appeal request.
5. Will the granting of the variance/appeal request constitute establishing a precedent?
The board may deny the granting of a variance/appeal request which may result in the
establishment of a dangerous or unfavorable precedent to the parish.
——
——
Tuesday, April 08, 2014
Ethel Lanaux232 Lake Marina Dr 12CNew Orleans, LA7O 124
Executive Companies311 Telly RoadPicayune, MS 39466
To whom it may concern,
I, Ethel Lanaux, the owner of the property located at 79055 Hwy 40, Covington, LA 70435
(furthermore as the corner of Hwy 40 and Hwy 1129) give Executive Companies and their
representatives to authority to apply for any and all variances and or permits associated with the
planning, building, and or permitting process for their use on the above referenced property.
Sincerely,
EMEthel Lanaux
ST. TAMIVIANY PARISH BOAR]) OF ADJUSTMENTSTAFF ANALYSIS REPORT
Case File Number: BOA Case No. 14-05-0 14Initial Hearing Date: May 6, 2014Date of Report: April 24, 2014
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant(s) Name: AP Towers, L.L.C.Location of Property: NE of intersection of LA 21 & LA 1083,Waldheim, LA
Zoning of Property: 1-2 IndustrialVariance(s) Requested: Tower fall radius
OVERVIEW
The applicant is requesting variances for a side yard setback (fall radius for a cellular tower) from
250’ to approximately 132’ to the west, and approximately 182’ to the east.
STAFF COMMENTS
The staff looks at three primary issues relative to giving relief for fall zone radii for towers. First,
is there a practical difficultly or hardship that would justify such a request? Secondly, does the
request adversely impact any properties from an aesthetic or visibility standpoint? And thirdly,
does the proposal create any health and safety concerns relative to life and property?
First, relative to whether there is a practical difficultly or hardship that would justify such a
request; the parent parcel does appear to be large enough so that the leased area could be to
expanded in order to meet parish setback requirements. So in our opinion, a hardship or practical
difficulty does not appear to exist.
Secondly, there appears to be no adverse impact to visual “line of site” aesthetics to other
properties based on what appears to be existing heavy vegetation surrounding the site.
And thirdly, there appears to be no health or safety issues with the tower since it’s located
sufficiently away from any existing structures.
Therefore, the staff recommends that the applicant try and work with the owner of the property in
order to expand the lease site so that parish code can be met.
BOA CASE NO. JL1L (for office use only)
ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
(VARIANCE/APPEAL APPliCATION FORM)
(Please print on the following lines below, ifa company, please include a contact person name also.)
APPL1ANTS NAME: A? Toc3 LL c. t4ri
MAILING ADDRESS: 10. \ iQ
I
CITY/STATE/ZIP:
PHONE NUMBER:
FCA4OV%. ,L.A 7Q-fL1 1C)
(Home Phone #) (Cell Phone #)
PROPERTY LOCATION FOR VARIANCE REQUESTED: ZONING:
(Pleases check the applicable boxes below:)
REQUEST FOR: A variance of the (Unified Development Code)
fl Appeal 0 an adverse decision made by a parish official(s)
1 Appeal the interpretation by a parish official(s) of the (Unified
Development Code)
VARIANCE/APPEAL REQUESTED:
Ivhuilding setbacks (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard setbacks)
U landscape buffers (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard buffer setbacks)
i landscaping within buffers (reduction of the number of trees, bushes and/or shrubs)
parking area requirements (reduction of parking stalls, parking greenspacc islands, etc...)
U signage requirements (increase of sign area and/or sign height, lighting, coloring, etc...)
I other(Specify other variance/appeal on line above)
(Please state on thefollowing lines below your specific requestfor a variance/appeal:)
J’.xumpie: Applicant is requesting a variance for a front yard setback requirementfrom 25’ required by
the pnris!7, to approximately 20’ requested.
_______________
‘jç’ a. ,,-.4L-4-4 -
. .- -—
-— —--‘.--- - ------
.—-— -I---.-
Eov’ VS0’ ‘I 3’Z’ ‘ ‘i t.O
q’- .s-i (Se.e AAL
- :/‘ /
.cIGN9UtOF APPLICANT DATE OF APPLICATION
Vp4 C Aresf 111?ctsidex’tf ZD 1eAv, thC
-mc’ (e *4gL LAAddress City ‘ State Subdivision (if applicable)
Sábr€Towers and Poles -
April10, 2014
Mr. H. Brad CohenAPTowers4208 Six Forks Rd., Suite 1000
Raleigh, NC 27609
RE: Proposed 250 ft Sabre self-supporting tower for LA-i 094 Waldheim, LA
Dear Mr. Cohen,
The above referenced tower has been designed for a Basic 3-second Gust Wind Speed of 102 mph
with no ice and 30 mph with 1/4” radial ice, Structure Class II, Exposure Category C, Topographic
Category 1, in accordance with the Telecommunications Industry Association Standard ANSI/TIA
222-G, “Structural Standard for Antenna Supporting Structures and Antennas”.
When Sabre towers are designed according to this Standard, the wind pressures and steel strength
capacities include several safety factors, resulting in an overall minimum safety factor of 25%.
Therefore, it is highly unlikely that the tower will fail structurally in a wind event where the design wind
speed is exceeded within the range of the built-in safety factors. Should the wind speed increase
beyond the capacity of the built-in safety factors, to the point of failure of one or more structural
elements, the most likely location of the failure would be within one or more of the tower members in
the upper portion. This would result in a buckling failure mode, where the loaded member would
bend beyond its elastic limit (beyond the point where the member would return to its original shape
upon removal of the wind load).
Therefore, it is likely that the overall effect of such an extreme wind event would be localized buckling
of a tower section. Assuming that the wind pressure profile is similar to that used to design the tower,
the tower is most likely to buckle at the location of the highest combined stress ratio in the upper
portion of the tower. This would result in the portion of the tower above the failure location “folding
over” onto the portion of the tower below the failure location. Please note that this letter only
applies to the above referenced tower designed and manufactured by Sabre Towers & Poles.
In the unlikely event of total separation, this, in turn, would result in collapse of the section above,
within a radius equal to 50% of the tower height.
Sincerely,
Amy R. Herbst, P.E.Senior Design Engineer
Sabre Towers and Poles • 2101 Murray Street • RO. Box 658 • Sioux City, IA 51102-0658
P: 712-258-6690 F: 712-279-0814 W: www.SabreTowersandPoles.com
April 1st, 2014
To: St. Tammany Parish Board of Adjustment
P0 Box 628Covington, LA 70434
From: Karl Gottfried III309 Bordeaux CourtMadisonville, LA 70447-9349
RE: Agent Authorization Letter
Dear Sir or Madam:
This letter is to confirm that I have authorized Jeffrey Schoen, to file for a variance on behalf of
Waldheim-LA Why 21 LLC for a wireless cellular tower to be constructed on the property located at on
Highway 21, Bush, LA 70431 (Assessment # 120-100-6665).
If you have any questions about this matter, please feel free to contact me by e-mail at
kg3 @gottfried-us.com.
Karl Gottfried III
SWA
MP
Proposed
Accessl’JtiIE
tyE
asemen
t30’
x33’
ExFsting
Access
Road
832’
Existing
Gate
(Locked)
Existing
3P
hase
Pow
er
Existing
Pow
erand
Telco
aIoigH
wy
21
Existing
Culveit
3.0.563034,-89.997441
LOU
ISIAN
ASO
UTH
/-
7TO
WER
INEO
—/
EA
muoE
30
33
AS
701’
NO
RTH
/7
LON
GITU
DE
90
00
020
1NT
REST
/-
—(7
060
83)
/‘°‘.
°‘
GR
OU
ND
ELEVA
TION
87
0
/‘
PAR
ENT
TRA
CT
AB
OV
EREV
ElSEA
LEVEL
(NA
VD
B8)
/W
ALD
NIEM
—LA
HWY
21LLC
“-..
7PA
RC
EL50
20—700—
6685‘,,
A,
/IN
STN
O1834562
‘‘-
-“
VIC
INITY
MA
P
97
‘SEC
ON
D
__
____
__
___
__
___
__
___
___
___
7’
-“-
A,
“0
V7
1
TE
UPO
RA
RT
y-PDC
°‘.
7
BEN
CH
MA
RK
’,
A7
00
07
00
BO
ILIN
TREE
—,.‘i’
LEASE
AR
EA“
‘.
ADAMA
MA
GG
IOLIA
R
0tO
A8
60
2’,
/9
23
±A
CR
ES7
•‘_
PAR
CEL
NO
20—037—
8348
./-
“,,
INST
NO
1902678
Ori
7
PRO
JEC
TN
O
J/
I
—/
_99
6H
EA
VIL
Y
(
__
____
__
___
__
___
__
___
___
___
.—
/R
000ED
7,
LO‘-
)PO
E(7nL
A!
,_
POE
I
30IN
GR
ESS/E
GR
ESS
IS0
“..
IRE
6NR
I
6IJTILIT0
EASEM
ENT-
-“-
N752917
2261
077±
AC
RE
S_‘
_‘,,)
\-
25048
“E
37
05
79
79453
,N
FE
MA
.s
.,
‘1)
MO
BILE
RO
ME
.,—
‘ZO
NE
A’
-—
,‘
/‘
,.‘-.,,,,
BO
RN
-
-‘N5
09,
RAV
EL
______________
/s
-—
S-_
4°---.
ROADI
ILEG
END
>Z
sE
ZO
:M
Sj
,77
/‘ç’
“M
OB
ILEH
OM
E55
40IN)
H1
/2’
IF”°
I--
REB
AR
—40
R.-709
.A
S,h11’
FE
.
N
PA
RC
OS
N
EU
A.
__
ZON
EC
//
BEDI
2E
ZON
EA
/
SECTIO
N4166.6
100
0’SFLl/
——
—
/9
—--—
-—
—n
PIGI4T—
QF—
RA
Y
——
——
——
——
——
//
_.
OYEFAIAE4DPO
WER
/
LINE
EAR
ING
DISTA
NC
E
/
LI5
11
61
2’
N70000
/
0116
12’E
—10000
PZ
6//
L58
04
34
8’
W1500
651
L6S
LIM
12’A
15
00
/
L776’4O
36’
E4
09
0
I
LO4
42
11
7’
E2
29
22
/
o0
100’200
/
LII
74
55
2E
90
24
WA
LD
HE
IM
L12
78
06
21
E15176
___________
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
/L
A-1094
EX
ISTN
OA
53
24
38
EISO
40SCA
LEI -
100’,i
SE
C4,
T-6-S,
R-12-E
f’-JTO
NER
LEO5
2071
0’E
02
09
,,__.7
’”S
TT
AM
MA
NY
PA
RIS
HL
OU
ISIAN
A\
-IJ
S\\S
NO
TTO
SCA
LE
GRID
TOTR
UE
NO
RTH
C050
ERC
CN
CE
03
5
TRUE
NO
RTH
TOM
CON
ETICD
ECLIN
ATIO
N0
34
‘N
CO
MB
INED
SCA
LEFA
CTOR
0.4
59973912
O=
5/8
’REW
AR
SET
•FO
UN
DP
RO
PE
RT
YO
IAR
IIO’R
oSE
TPR
NAIL
PO
E—
POIN
TO
F6U
CIN
NIN
D
POE
POIN
T00
CO
MO
OESC
EMEN
T
PO
E—
POIN
TO
FEN
DIN
G
A=
CA
LCU
LATED
POIN
T
(RI
REC
OR
DED
INL
DR
RA
4050
—PO
WER
POL
E
GU
YA
NC
HO
R
POW
ERB
OX
—TELEPH
ON
EPEDESTAL
FLFLO
WLIN
EELEV
ATO
N
ASPH
ALT
--
-D
PAY
ES/DIR
T0
,
ED
UE
9,
cO
’-o.
TL
000N
OTE
By
R10PN
I(P
lottingO
nly,portio
nM
t
Oubjeot
propertyoppoorn
toII,
in
Eone
‘A’
&‘C
’of
IreFlO
Od
n9009flo
eR
obA
opC
Orn
nIO
n;ty
Punel
110.22N
2000TS
OC
.ehioh
Door,
on
IfeoIIu
doE
rof
Oolober
17,1989
ltdIS
in0
OPO
SINI
11008h000rd
ZoneA
’:V
Eele
MI
IE’3—
yeo;floudI
00cc
bloodeIeoO
IiOnC
ond
flood
board
tHE
bE
Snot
detn
nnirrd
.
Eon,
‘C’:
Hero,
ofm
inimol
1008150.
PAR
ENT
TRA
CT
(INST
RU
ME
NT
NO
:7834562)
aFrancthe
floeth
eestcanner
ofS
ectionF
our(4
).T
hS,
R12C
,S
t.T
omnaer5’
Perish,
Louisiana,
ronS
outhB
T’4S’
Cast
1316.7teat
toIron
Stoke
incen
terot
bran
ch,
andth
ePO
INT
OFB
CSItIN
INS:
Iron
theab
oae
pointat
beginningron
South
604S
’P
oet90t.N
teetto
theco
rner,
then
ceN
orth52’
then
ceS
ooth59’
Poet
475.2
feetto
comen
onS
tateH
igheay2t;
then
ceatong
coldttigheoy,
Nadh
5P
3S
’C
ost155
testto
corn
er.th
ence
North
59’W
eet1
67
teetto
corn
erin
center
of
brunch,th
ence
runolong
thecen
terof
bran
chin
aS
aoteesterIy
dirnotlonalong
aeetl
morbed
lineto
corn
erand
tha
POIN
TO
FR
CSt4N
INS.
Cootnining
13.162
Sobjeot
toa
Boundary
Agreem
entreco
rded
atC
OB
1534,P
age84.
StT
nrrr’raryP
orieb.
ISO’
X100’
LE
ASE
AR
EA(A
SSU
RV
EY
ED
)A
leasearea
beinga
portionct
that
certaintract
ofland
tdenticedac
Scccn
Cas
dnoonibsdin
lnntroment
Num
bert8
3d
502
ocreco
rded
inthe
Sto
ne
atth
e
Clerh
atC
oontcr
St.
Tom
mory
Pariah,
Looiciana,
Ving
inS
ection4,
Ocarch
ipB
Ocuth,
Range
t2C
astand
beingm
oreparticularly
deccribedas
tnlloesr
COt.’O
SCNCC
ata
treb
artoond
morN
inga
pabrtat
inferoectiacon
theS
outherlyhne
orsaid
front
traaingL
ooicianoS
oothS
tore
Plan
eC
oord
inates
of
N:2
525t7
.224t
C:3755357.N
453,being
thenorth
ernm
ost
nam
erct
the
Sherry
0firenin
parcel;th
ence
runN
44’34’30Or
tara
disranoeof
441.5
6teet
toa
set
N/N
Treb
arand
the
POIN
TO
FB
EGIN
NIN
G;
theace
nunS
Ot’tN
’r2N
tara
dieranaecc
100.04teet
faa
set5/N
Trebar;
them
ecoo
Ntt’43’4N
TN
tara
dietanaeat
100.00teat
toa
cot5/N
Trebar;
then
cerua
NO
t’IR’lZ
’C
tara
distan
ceof
05.0
5feet
toa
setN
/n’m
Oan
thero
erun
SB
R’43’4N
TC
for
distan
ceof
100.00feet
torho
POIN
TO
FB
EGIN
NIN
G.
The
abonadescribed
leasearea
tocontain
0.23acm
.,m
oreor
lass.
30’tN
OR
ES
S/E
CR
EO
S&
tJTILtTYE
ASE
ME
NT
(AS
SUR
VE
YE
D)
ncr0000m
entbrin
ga
pad
ioa
atth
atcertain
tractat
landIdoctihed
ae‘S
econd’
asdeecro
edin
tnatro
men
tN
umber
1630562
asren
crded
inthe
Otcce
atth
e
Ctsrk
atC
audbr
OL
Pcm
mary
Parish,
Louisiana,
ing
inS
scrior
4,T
oarsh
ip0
Onoth,
Rungs
f2Poor,
andbeing
more
pnrt’cu
larbdsarrib
adus
taltass:
CO
MM
ENC
Eat
a1’
rsbar
foundm
arkinga
pointat
intersectio
nan
theS
outherlylice
atsaid
Tract
hao
irgL
coisianaS
oothS
tateP
tarrC
ocrd
iratesof
R7N
ON
t7.220tC
:37507N7.N
053.being
the
narth
errmast
carrerat
theS
herry0
tirrnir
parn
rt;lb
eonsrun
N0
434
30’
Ntar
adictance
at4N
t06
lentto
aset
5/B
’rebari
hem
snun
SO
t’rN’t2
’N
tara
distan
ceat
100.00feet
toa
set5/B
”rebar;
then
cenon
N044
545’
Ntar
adistan
ceat
sos
reelto
thePO
INT
OF
BC
OIN
NtN
Oas
00
Irgm
se/Cgm
ss&
Gtilitp
Ccsencenc
bsing30
tent
ineid
thand
trrrg15
reelcc
eachside
atth
etailcein
gdescr.b
edcerfed
rneI
then
cerun
S
Ott
N’t2’
Ntar
oddta
ros
ot15.00
featto
apoin
tth
arue
run0
70’4t’3NT
Ctar
aaisto
rceot
40.9
0tact
toa
point:th
ence
rumS
O0’2
‘17
Ctar
a
distanceat
230.2
2tact
toa
point;thocoa
ranN
n2’rB’dr
Etar
adisfenno
atlo
st
Atent
toa
point;th’m
aecon
It704
737”
Ctar
adistan
ceof
595
7feet
toa
painttth
enas
rcn0
74’45’N2’
Etar
adistarae
at90.24
testto
apaint;
then
cerca
S30’06’2t
*E
tara
distan
ceat
tOt
.76test
roa
point;thsnoe
runS
t9’3
3’4
2’
Ctar
adistan
ceat
200.Bt
tedta
apaInt;
thecas
runS
5T
24’3
N’
Eta
ra
distan
ceut
t0040
tedto
apaint;
them
erun
02N
’t110’
Ctar
a
distan
ceat
4d.BN
tent
toa
nairt
anthe
Narth
aestertyedge
atasp
halt
atL
ouisianaH
igheay21
(publIcright—
ot—aay)
andth
rPO
INT
OFEN
OIN
S.T
heabooe
descr;ted
easemen
tto
adjointrees
ama
andhght—
ct—aoy
atL
ouisioraN
ighary2
taartig
.inosly
andccrtcire
0.7
7ao
rea.m
aream
taco.
SUR
VE
YO
R’S
NO
TE
S1.
This
isa
Raatacd
Tasar
Surrey,
mad
ean
theground
undertha
sopero
isiarat
aL
aoie000R
agistarsd
lard
Som
epar.T
ateat
Odd
surrayis
January
25.20t4
.2.
The
tallacing
sum
sping
icetrom
ents
acreused
attim
eor
ReId
aisihN
icocO
PL—
352,T
otalS
tation,R
sttactadaao
ondH
ipar+
Legaap
CR
OT,
00
fHZ
.
3.B
earingsare
based
or
Louisiana
Sooth
Stcta
PIano
Coardinatas
44042
byG
POobasroatian.
4.N
aordergm
cerdutitties,
ord
ergm
ucd
erorco
ohacen
tsor
brcildingtau
rdotian
saare
rraasored
orlocated
asa
part
atthis
surrey.urlesn
athereisa
abase.
freesand
shru
bs
natlocated,
unlessath
amisa
shas,c.
5.R
archm
arhused
isa
Cartinoarcely
Operatbrg
Ratem
nos
Station,
PlO0407
37
Orsits
bsro
hm
arhis
aseb
osc
hereo
r.C
le000crr
shoen
ma
‘nten
tand
referto
NAVO60.
6.T
hissu
rreyeaa
aanduoted
tarthe
purp
acaat
aN
oetnodT
aeerS
orasyonly,
rod
Isccl
intendedto
deOneats
rhoregulatory
)oriadiutionot
any
federal,stata,
regicn
alor
tonaloganay,
board,ocm
misaion
oroth
ersim
ilaren
tilt.
7.httsn
liac:5
diractad
tothe
lootIhot
Ibissoruey
crayhone
base
redured
oranlarged
instas
doeto
reproduction.T
hisshould
balak
scinto
connid
eratior
ahen
oblainingscaled
data.
B.Thie
Soroep
nas
cardooted
aithau
tthe
beraflt
ato
rA
bstractT
itleeeam
h.
prep
aredby
Old
Republic
Rational
OtIs
InsuranceC
a.,C
om
mitm
ent
Na:
OI—
t3t4
23tt—
StT
,dated
Rarem
ber
20,2013.
5.S
uraeyarhereby
statsethe
Oeadelic
Coordinates
andthe
eleoctio
nsh
oan
tarth
eprap
asedaen
tedice
atthe
00cr
arean
ourale
tosithin
u-f—2S
feelhariaontalty
ard
toeith
n/—
3fast
uertioallp(F
MA
ooomoy
Code
14).
TO.
Ourony
shoec
bensonnan
farms
toth
eM
inimum
Reg
oirsm
ertsas
sattooth
bythe
Slale
Board
fara
Class
•0’S
urrey.
tt.0514
data
uponehioh
Ibism
apor
plotis
based
has
aclosure
prenisiannt
actlass
thanarc—
tootin
tS,00A
tact(t’:tS
.OO
O’)
andan
arto
rnr
arrarth
atdoes
nat
saoeed
tOseco
nd
,tim
eslbs
sguars
rootat
thenum
ber
atan
gles
turned.Pield
tmaerae
oas
rat
adio
sted.
T2.
This
uuraeyis
cataolid
eitraur
theoriginal
s:gcatu
roand
rho
originalcoal
ata
starebuersed
soepo
rand
maay
sr.
t3.Thre
surrey
dan
era
tcacstb
ute
sboundary
surrey
orthe
Paren
tT
ract.A
nyIcro
of
Irantproperty
Ones
rhoen
Rem
anare
tramaupplind
intorrrratinn
andm
ayra
tbe
heldaerinod.
N.N
azaninT
information
pmnided
stthe
time
atthis
surrey.—040
05
lInP,o
e
PRO
JEC
TN
O14-SO
RT
63aIm
.
PLOTTA
BLE
EX
CE
PTIO
NS
Old
RepubliC
National
Title
Inau
ronue
Ca.,
Cn
mm
itmcn
tN
o.01—
13142211—01
T
loar.S
L
Inat.N
a:R
TOB
tt
Cooooorrot
Ones
aIledo
sahoan
>-di
>ftD02ftdiP0ft
(0-Ua
SUR
VE
YO
RS
CER
TIFICA
TION
Iaertity
that
allparts
atthis
surreyand
dm
eirghave
beencom
pletedin
accord
arc
sailh
thecu
rrent
reguirem
artsot
the
Stan
dard
sof
Practio
sfar
Ouraayicg
inth
sS
taleat
Lcuiciara
tothe
hostof
my
hro
eledca.
,ntarm
otio
r.and
bo
ld.
Nilliarn
LN
osetl
Loutsiana
Lirerse
Rn.
TC
S4R44
WA
LD
HE
IMLA
-i094
SEC
.4,
T-6-S,
R-12-E
ST.TA
MM
AN
’PPA
RISH
,LO
UISIA
NA
ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTSTAFF ANALYSIS REPORT
Case File Number: BOA Case No. 14-05-015Initial Hearing Date: May 6, 2014Date of Report: April 24, 2014
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant(s) Name: Advanced Mortgage Company
Location of Property: LA Highway 21 and N. Azela Drive, Covington, LA
Zoning of Property: HC-2 Highway Commercial
Variance(s) Requested: Moving billboard closer to residential zoned property
OVERVIEW
The applicant is requesting a variance to be permitted to move an existing billboard
approximately 23’ which is already within the required 500’ setback distance from residentially
zoned property for billboards.
STAFF COMMENTS
The staff has no objection to the variance request for the following reasons:
a.) As stated above, the existing billboard has been there for many years and is already
withing the 500’ setback from residentially zoned property.
b.) The applicant must move his billboard due to the fact that the LADOTD has expropriated
a portion of his property for the future expansion of LA Highway 21.
c.) The distance the sign is being moved (23’) is minimal.d.) The property directly behind the sign site is zoned commercial and has a medical clinic
on the property.
BO,i (Lci :‘O. /g_-— 6I C tt
Si. iJ.141LJNf i’ARISH BO1R1) (JFLI)JE1Th1
i.•1(U.1NCL4PPL4LAPI’L1C4iiO;\ kOR11)
rII ii dwitu1iIzec hC1o Jf C ilqUhi;. phict inr!ud t L-JflFUCF ,tai1c
Advance Mortgage Company
1LuLIctmrnLss. 321 Veterans Memorial Blvd. Suite 201
Cli is i li LIW- Metairie, Louisiana 70005
IWO\i i:IIISLK 504-834-55 1 1t1rL hot:. ‘ii) t( I’1iüri
FRO1’f1i tLO( 1JI(L I’(’II LlIi’.(E lLLcrLD: Ia!%c: HC-2
Triangular Parcel between N. Azela Dr., S. Tyler St. (Hwy 21) and Gardenia Dr. Covington, LA
C rv SLit bdvii t appib!i
fi’leu’es 4.-hc1 nw app/ict.rhk L’ hehiw:)
tU1i 1.Sl’I’OK ari if thi Unifd l1opnnt(id)
t..i adr t ifl.1TL[& iV aLi th inrrpr 3Ofl by a pirk[ tif thc i
Li iu.L(:L’4PPL4L RLOil:S1L1):
L. hu1dr. thck trCt :rn affrr.tz iirdr r.rvarilntp. hi:ffr’ ir uctur fiitt. $d Ii.tW rrvkrd huir ria1:)
L v;thn hir’ iC cf th r1rcficsltard trO ifl inca rct rnin {r :toI tprkr sta prkin ...tc..)
L LI t’ta:ofcaa av d’or:.in hilL ETnr.L. 11Lt1.
fiithr Billboard within 500’ of zoned residential{Spiiilrarnc. api! onrc hiv
fl’!’ fxtrr vn ii jlltuthn Jiuec heic tr c,p’tiJk retJthNIJr iirhwcc-’uppcrih)P 1J1 t s ..t Ii U1 Jf u %L I,. tt ?4 L1 r 2
th1 t4 J
Applicant is requesting a variance of ordinance 8.01 Outdoor Advertising (Billboards) section U,
to relocate a billboard roughly 30’ from its current location, which is already 500’ from zoned
Residential to an adjacent parcel due to DOTD expropriation of the attached parcel--—
4)7i+S1(Vi4tRL 01- IPI’Lt( 1\J D4I1- I tf’i’LiC1ii(’S
R18
6g
LI2
4.7
7.
•.
—cI1
’yT
’y124.74
.
/—
I...
-
r
T7S
—R
ilE
—.-
.
‘5)
..
II
/
w79.R
QO
fl/WI
0&
0P
R0P
OR
TIS
INC.
16
LE
GE
ND
0
SC
flO9
LIlIES
0060.R
/O
0050110
APPA
REIII
P11010111U
1.t
IIISIS
OF
00050110000
tOT
Nt
10000
10011050
11.011101101011
110
1101501110
000005IAIE
S&
8001116551105.0
1101001100
08100011110105
&000500IA
ICS
RATIOtIll
1140LO
IJOISIA
LA000111
5W1)I
LISLE
011.0555101
clINt)
03—97)..
1500110011
10000000
LEJJLIIGS.
LIELi
(1136I001100011
TOCONVERT
OIlS
01010100000
0100110N
SW
JCT
S
000A
01110FACTOR
EN0000957805
ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS REPORT
Case File Number: BOA Case No. 14-05-016
Initial Hearing Date: May 6, 2014Date of Report: April 24, 2014
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant(s) Name: JDM Developments, L.L.C.Location of Property: 1665 Dove Park Road, Mandeville, LA
Zoning of Property: HC-2 Highway CommercialVariance(s) Requested: Landscape buffers
OVERVIEW
The applicant wishes to resubdivide their property into two commercial parcels with a
McDonald’s restaurant on one site and a strip center on the other.
STAFF COMMENTS
Due to the fact that a new internal property line will be created by the resubdivision, technically,
landscape and planting buffers are created on both sides of said line; however in this instance,
since the common property line will be used as a shared parking lot, the need for landscape
buffers and plantings are not required.
Therefore, the staff recommends approval of the proposed variances requested subject to
mitigation on behalf of the applicant for the absence of the buffers and plantings along the
common property line between the two properties. The applicant should be required to either:
plant the total required number of trees elsewhere on the property (14 Class A and 14 Class B);
or by making reparations in the form of payment for plant mitigation to the St. Tammany Parish
Tree Mitigation Bank for (‘/z) of the required number of trees that would normally be planted
within the buffer (7 Class A and 7 Class B) in the amount of $2,800.00, which payment is based
on $100.00 per caliper inch of tree required, inclusive of the cost for the tree and the labor
required to plant.
BOA CASE NO. I / / (for office use only)
ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
(VARIANCE/APPEAL APPLICATION FORM)
(Please print on the following lines below. If a company, please include a contact person name also.)
APPLICANTS NAME: JDM Developments, LLC
MAILING ADDRESS: 71385 Riverside Drive
CITY/STATE/ZIP:Covington, LA 70433
PHONE NUMBER: 985-327-5629 985-630-7459
(Home Phone #) (Cell Phone #)
PROPERTY LOCATION FOR VARIANCE REQUESTED: ZONING:HC2
1665 Dove Park Rd. Mandevilie LA
Address City State Subdivision (if applicable)
(Pleases check the applicable boxes below:)
REQUEST FOR: ir A variance of the (Unified Development Code)
0 Appeal of an adverse decision made by a parish official(s)
C Appeal the interpretation by a parish official(s) of the (Unified
Development Code)
VARIANCE/APPEAL REOUESTED:
building setbacks (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard setbacks)
landscape buffers (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard buffer setbacks)
landscaping within buffeçs (reduction of the number of trees, bushes and/or shrubs)
C parking area requirements (reduction of parking stalls, parking greenspace islands, etc...)
C signage requirements (increase of sign area and/or sign height, lighting, coloring, etc...)
C other(Specify other variance/appeal on line above)
(Please state on thefollowing lines below your specific requestfor a variance/appeal:)
Example: Applicant is requesting a variancefor afront yard setback requirementfrom 25’ required by
the parish, to approximately 20’ requested.
Applicant is requesting a waiver of the required 10’ greenspace & required number of trees, along the
side property lines.
Applicant is requesting a reduction of the required 10’ setback from 10’ to 5’ for a portion of the site, along
existing building (see attached drawing).
1 3/5/20 14
SIGNA U OF PU NT DATE OF APPLICATION
%77i 3:
ORGRflornneciar roprtL
The red outlined area is the parcel leased by McDonald’s.
Matthewi. Organ, CCIM Cell: 985-246-9715 [email protected]
ORRflcornflerCaI piopertles
Matthew i. Organ, CCIM Cell: 985-246-9715 [email protected]
ORG RflconnerciaI roptrts
April 7, 2014
St Tammany Parish Board of Adjustment
do: Ron Keller
Re: Subdivision of 1665 and 1687 Dove Park Road, Madisonville, LA.
Dear Mr. Keller,
My client, David Harvey, retained me to manage the subdivision of the referenced property he purchased in
May of 2013. To do this we need to secure the variance on the setback and green space requirements between the two
buildings located on site. The property is improved and consists of a single parcel that has two developed commercial
buildings: a 14,000 sf shopping center situated on 1.77 acres and a McDonald’s Restaurant situated on 0.95 acres.
We are requesting to subdivide the property for two reasons.
1. The subdivision will allow the tax assessor to property asses the properties. McDonald’s is obligated to pay
their prorated share of taxes. This is difficult to quantify with the assessor considering the parcel as one
parcel. We feel the hard corner that McDonald’s occupies is more valuable than the interior lot. This
subdivision will allow for a proper assessment whereby McDonald’s pays the correct taxes, and the tenants
in the adjacent shopping center pay their proper fees. The tax assessment is attached.
2. We have a pending sale of the McDonald’s parcel which is under a ground lease. The sate of the real estate
requires the creation of its own parcel. We designed the subdivision plat off the legal description defined in
the lease. McDonald’s has cross easement agreements in place for this specific parcel as well.
The improvements are in place. The variance does not affect any adjacent property owners as evidenced by Mrs. Asha
Mallick’s signature. The variance is in line with the tenant lease. It allows for proper tax assessment. We do not see any
negative affect in this variance. Please consider this variance request for approval.
Thank you,
In Christ Jesus.
Matthew J. Organ, CCIMInvestments, Sates & [email protected]
Matthew J. Organ, CCIM Cell: 985-246-9715 [email protected]
I
ORG Rflcommera prertes
March 16,2014
Ed MurphyCommercial Realty, Inc.
RE: Dove Park Rd
Dear Mr. Murphy,
My client, JDM Development, LLC owns the Dove Park Commons Shopping center which is adjacent to and east of your
listing of 11 acres on Dove Park Road.
We are requesting a minor subdivision of the Shopping Center and the McDonald’s pacrcel. To do this we need to
request a variance as the setbacks4, not meet code between the two buildings.
Here is the requested variance:
• Waiver of the required 10’ green space & required number of trees, along the side property lines.
• Reduction of the required 10’ setback from 10’ to 5’ for a portion of the site, along existing building (see
attached drawing).
If your owner has no objection to our requested variance, please evidence same by signing below.
Owner — 11 acres Dove Park Rd.
Let me know if you have any questions or comments.
In Christ Jesus.
Matthewi. Organ, CCIMCommercial Real Estate Investments
Matthew i. Organ, CCIM Cell: 985-246-9715 [email protected]
060
120180
N‘/2
IRO
NA
NO
DN
D..
-IN
(R
Hr.)
N8926’3
3E
307.60’3°,
__
____
5
19
44
’A
DD
N’
C
-.
...
14
iS-
..
-U
‘‘°°‘.
BU
ILDIN
G7/4
.•....
-.
0
*_• •cc;-
..
....-
-.
.
e-
.
IRN
.•.•••
i.77
AC
RE
S.
•.
•••./_
)•
•
5.1
CO
NC
HIG
HW
Ay
..
•S
5cT
DB
’1/
‘.
•.
FND
C—
•
•2.8
3.
•B
CO
NC
HIG
HW
Ay
).
-.
.•
.•
AG
NU
MC
NT
FND
35”
•C
ON
CPA
RH
,NG
•.•
CO
NC
PAN
KN
G(R
H,r
n)
2PA
RC
ELSO
FS
ketch
LOCA
TEDIN
.‘
SECTIO
N25,
TOW
NSH
IP7
SOU
TH—
RAN
GE
11EA
ST-.
•.
:%•.
>
ST.TA
MM
AN
YPA
RISH
,LO
UISIA
NA
,\c0+
•-
PC
•--.:.
.G
NA
RcE
1J
NO
c4,e)9
0.•
.•
••
•-
U
ALL
IMP
RO
VE
’EN
SSH
OW
NH
ER
EO
N0
•.O
.B.
WER
EL
OC
AT
ED
ON
9—22—
2011/
I
‘?Q4
//
ç\0
II
CO
NC
.H
IGH
WA
Y.
/j.’M
ON
UM
ENT
FND
P.O
B.IS
RE
POR
TE
DTO
BE
NO
B4
5W
T8
9.O
0/
DETA
IL.
(Ho
f,rne>
ThE500V
IIIJDES
NW
RESTRICI1ONSSFW
WN
ONI1NS
SURREYR
ELM
T!OTO
ThOSESET
No41736’E
467.1
7’,:
N8542’24”W
—20
00;
/lB
NO
TA
BO
UN
DA
RY
SUR
VEY
—I
NO
1IILS
EA
RC
HO
SP
US
IJCR
E00050C
OP
LJU
GT
HE
OA
TA
EO
RIH
SS
IJRR
EY
________________
SC
CT
ON
S25
&3
0T
OW
NSH
IP7
SOU
H/
‘
Randall
W.
Brow
n&
Associates,
Inc.O
.FEB
RU
AR
Y25,
201UR
AN
GE
11EA
ST./
..F
SK
ETCH
Professional
Land
Surveyors
sT
6D
’AR
EFE
RE
NC
ESU
RV
EY
BY
,I
P1.,,s
RJDD
AD
ING
.Y
AR
QU
ES
&A
SSOC
IAT
ES,
NC.
Ianners
•lO
U8
flO
BN
o‘2
54
O;
PA
TN
o.M
—874
SIC
\/
RondollW
.Brow
n.P.LS.
228.
Causew
ayA
pp.M
andeville,LA
70448D
ATED
3-2
3—
99
\\
//
5’x
14’
Pro
esnaiL
andS
uvyor
(985)624—
5368FAX
(985)624—
5309—
SIGN
AG
EL
ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOAR]) OF ADJUSTMENTSTAFF ANALYSIS REPORT
Case File Number: BOA Case No. 14-05-017Initial Hearing Date: May 6, 2014Date of Report: April 24, 2014
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant(s) Name: Gulf States Development Services, L.L.C.Location of Property: 180 New Camellia Blvd., Covington, LAZoning of Property: HC-2 Highway CommercialVariance(s) Requested:
OVERVIEW
The applicant is developing a property next to an existing project, and due to common sharedparking and driveway access between the two sites, the applicant seeks variances to allow for awalkway within an existing landscape buffer and to reduce the required number of plantingswithin the two adjacent side yard buffers between the two properties.
STAFF COMMENTS
The staff has worked with the applicant to come up with plan that the staff feels is workablebased on the circumstances. Therefore, the staff has no objections to the variances requestedsubject to mitigation on behalf of the applicant for the absence of the plantings along thecommon property line between the two properties. The applicant should therefore be required toeither: plant the total required number of trees elsewhere on the two properties (16 Class A and 6Class B); or by making reparations in the form of payment for plant mitigation to the St.Tanimany Parish Tree Mitigation Bank for the required number of trees that would normally beplanted within the buffers in the amount of $4,900.00, which payment is based on $100.00 percaliper inch of tree required, inclusive of the cost for the tree and the labor required to plant.
1304 CASENO._____________ (for office use only)
ST. TAMMANYPARISKI BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT(VARIANCE/APPEAL APPLICA TIONFOR4I)
(Please print on thefollowing lines below. Ifa company, please Include a contactperson name also.)
APPLIC4NTS NAME: (,tI( hf vt1oi’l “-.‘.c1 J..LL
!WAILJNGADDRESS: 19 Nr’t,j ik )O.Z
L.A )::,t{33
(4fS’) 1_L3r
(Home Phone #) (Cell Phone #)
tzviNçk/-’. L.A 1O1?.3City state - Subdivision (if applicable)
(Pleases check the applicable boxes below:)
REpUESTFOR: )(A variance of the (Unified DeveLopment Code)ci Appeal of an adverse decision made by a parish official(s)ci Appeal the interpretation by a parish official(s) of the (Unified
Development Code)
VARL4NCEMPPEAL REqUESTED:
a building setbacks (reduction of front, side and/or i-ear yard setbacks)ci landscape buffers (reduction affront, side and/or rear yard buffer setbacks)
Landscaplug within buffers (reduction of the number of trees, bushes and/or shrubs)ci parking area requirements (reduction of parking stalls, parking greenspace islands, dc...)C signage requirements (Increase of sign area and/or sign height, lighting, coloring, etc...)
)s(other EM4(,’ O? S’ i.drt.-’<ll( ,41ir’ A+ AI liji b(1(Spectf’ other variance/appeal on line above)
(Please state on the following lines below your specific requestfor a variance/appeal:)
Example: Applicant Is requesting a variancefor afront yard setback requirementfrom 25’ requIred by
the parish, to approximately 20’ requested.
9? rHrr- t-.- -
- ‘1
p1tJ.s
CITY/STA TErn?:
PHONE NUMBER:
PROPERTY LOCATION FOR VARIANCE REQUESTED: ZONING:•
iO N 4øt1):’Address
April 8, 2014
Mr. Ron KellerSenior Planner, St. Tammany Parish21454 Koop Dr.Mandeville, LA 70471
Variance Request1077 Phase!! Office Building180 New Camellia BlvdLot 2A-2, Tammany West MultiplexCovington, LA
Dear Ron,
Per our recent meetings, please fmd the enclosed variance application for the above reference
project.
We are requesting a variance for the following in order to protect the site plan as proposed:
• Encroach 5’ into Phase I east buffer for new, proposed sidewalk.
• Phase I East Buffer: 10 class A required, planting 2.
• Phase I East Buffer: 10 class B trees required, planting 2.
• Phase II West Buffer: 10 class A required, planting 2.
• Phase II West Buffer: 10 class B trees required, planting 2.
This new building is the second phase of office construction in the Tammany West Multiplex
and will be an identical structure to the first phase the adjacent lot, which was completed in 2008
and is presently fuliy occupied. As noted on the site plan, this project will share a common
driveway and have cross access/cross parking between the two lots.
The above variances are needed due to the internal property line that runs between these two
legal lots of record which must remain due to project lending and fmancing purposes.
As noted on the included landscape plan, we have included three (3) new trees (1- Class A; 2-
Class B) which are proposed to be planted close to, but fall outside of, the above referenced
buffers. We also indicated additional shrubs and planting material within these buffers which are
above Parish minimums for this project to help mitigate the request.
GULF STATES
REAL ESTATESERVICES,LIC
PROJECT MANAGEMENT • BROKERAGE • PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
1(19 Nw Can-iellia Boulevard, Suite 100 • Covington, Louisiana 70433 • 985-792-4385 • Fax 985-792-4392
The project is being constructed to support the growing businesses of Ballard Enterprises (WOW
Café, PJ’s Coffee) and Wegmaim-Dezet CPAs, which are current Tenants in this business park,
all of which will be owners/partners in this building. It is vitally important this building is
completed by the end of 2014 to ensure it is filly operable by fall season for Wegmann-Dezet.
We look forward to presenting this case to the Board on May 6th• If you have any further
questions in the interim, please advise.
Sincerely,
Michael SaucierManaging Member, Gulf State Development Services LLC
Northshore Office, LLC314 East Bayou RoadThibodaux, LA 70301
April 7, 2014
To Whom it may Concern:
Gulf States Development Services, LLC is currently in their due diligence process of developing
property owned by Northshore Office, LLC. The property is identified by being a 0.90 acre tract
of land on New Camellia Boulevard. Lot 2A-2.
Gulf States Development Services, LLC with our concurrence will apply for permits and
potential variances for the development of this property.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (985) 688-2355.
Sincerely.
David L. DuplantisMember
1077 Properties, LLC
April 7, 2014
To whom it may concern:
1077 Properties LLC, current land owner of Lot 2A-1 (170 New Camellia Blvd), has no objection to Gulf States Development
Services LLC applying for any variance(s) or permit(s) relating to our property which may be required to perfect the site plan of
proposed Phase II office building to be located on Lot 2A-2.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly.
Michael SaucierManaging Member, 1077 Properties LLC
109 New Camellia Blvd., Suite 100, Covington, LA 70433 • Telephone: 985-792-4385 • Fax: 985-792-4392
CO
MB
NE
DL
O1
2.1
19
AC
RE
S
.
0
SHR
UB
PLAN
TING
DETA
ILA
HIS
0)
10C.)0I’SC’S
0):
2-IwI0
I.ALL
0.0
9*
TRESS.AT
11€IN
COF
PLARITARD91101.
RANtA
I11lA
CAPER
ocA
1L
rA72.r.N
CrA
it1N
tRE
o1aA
u.N
clR
Aa09
ICESITOF
10-12FEEL
2.*01
CARD11
TRIESAIR
ME
TIRES.ODOR
TiARACARD
ATIRES.
ATTIlt
Tilt
ccRAINTAC,
DOLLN
Ail
AIRAAIJA
I’A.F€ROF
At
lEAST1.5
11110911511
AW
IE11€
091BAlI.
NC
A1111111
WIT
ccAT
LEASTA
-TOTEST.
.0.A
STIREOR
9111OF
A111111111
OFt
WIT
Al
1W110
OF
4.11*110
FACIAlDM
11015*115*.
Pt.AATACAAOLRO
ORLIWAT
RELORD
11AM4
IIW
it
5ALl,
LM09A
RIAL
9411OF
AITTIUSTMA
AW
IT11*10110
NC
INA
*1A
Tt
WITH
109P1E559101*55
OFTilE
LOIJAUMREIRANIALAES
11111511FIR
flitERFAASFM
ENTN.ICATODLTIRE
MI1USTRr.
11P1.1W
IIITANAIS5411.
Al
SALt
TONAIlS
RARElYN
CTILE
PAID51411.
COF!O
RN10*01
AAPLATAAIEPR
IRSIR
EOF
lilt11010.131
511901105FIR
MLt10R
tSTA
ll,LATEST
lOO
SE
1.lIRE
19151*051W
500CIED
FIRR
MT
!C5411
lOOTlilt
REIAA91R
EOJA
DR
EISP
09109TM
THE111100.111
51*0510)FDA
UW
ITSTA
llSAlIT
ZMEI,
LATEST591CM
ASPIRSIRIES
INflit
111590.1111111101
ARTL
*AA
’EANDO1CTOL
0.01159
ORLTTNS
IRIR
Wi
TIORRE0955152
FDAINJAIIDIT
91111REEl
TiltA111*A1
RE
l(RT
SP
09520*1TIlt
A1
5111(1105FIR
IAW
RT
SW
MAO
ORE?,
LATEST59101
ASP
105909111
Oil
*1*10*11(W
iTN
CIA
RW
A*5
ARDREOATDO91110
TIlEO
WL
GOA
111111192-GAAJTOA
15
11
-09
11
50
90
WO
TiS.
9.09ITRACTIR
TIME.
09095M
i..
TW
it10A
WIA
RISO11110911.5.
AlIT509.5
109
ILLIA
INC
IA’t
lIENS
IOU
09
WtM
FIRP1(019
PT,A0910
TO.COITPICTDA
91111A
AT
E11TH
OIL
AJA
RFEW
PAPER
51*590*115ERPAUARE
11WSiN
EOF
ACSTAICAG
RAIlS
OW505
09ITRIC
IIRSA
lE.SL
EPt
ALLW
WFIR
POD
DO
[AllU
RE
Ti.
COATINARTIRDOLL
FIAt
1010€AlL
AREAS111W
111111141N
C091915/09*0.
IS.COATRAITTO1
51111RED
91lN
ALLAREAS
55111WFT
51AlL
1(13111011151
GE1109155
IACESATRICIIR
01111M
ollYL
NW
M’E
NC
ITOC
TOF
ARTW
OPA
ICE
SII
A111*8.11
11110,11IST
SART
0111*1CSRETDL0.TTON.
901109PH
ASE
A7
UII
STA
lEluA
U.
95C
OlA
IPIN
E09011
1111CR
AO
DST0N
AI,
51.105A
TR
EE
—’
I4
iI
095*01159
00
10
10
.O
Il
_______
STAK
ING
4,
OH
HH
O”
Ad
MULTI
TRUN
KTR
EESTA
KIN
G
PR
OP
OS
ES
PHA
SEA
11011.01MG
4.-
__
l1
4.PR
OPO
SES
5’SIDEwALK
I_____
rtZ
11
EXISIITFNDPA
USE
IBUILDING
——
-
AODITEENHLCLASS
BTREES
(flUflIN
FflPI4A
cFI
hPI4A
cFII
RIIFFFPFCIP
VA
PIAM
flFR
Th
IPT
U,
40z4IU,
IRO
UD
Iao
1111)09A1
i0)09
AIR
5915109
A1A
lTaW
Bl
505SB1
0)0
951W
I90909
1I
10913
I-
..
II
II
I,.
FP
RW
lP
HW
2FF9153159
BFO
OIT
OIIM
AIW
TO
WIPIREDO
1*0 51JT
Uty
W
Ii0)55A
I2
20(
92I2.08BI
I909
287X
220
22
20
LANDSCAPEORDINANCE
REQUIREMENTS:
150111511BUFFER
CLASSAIREODCLA
SSAIREES
CLASSB
IDlESCLASS
RIDERS
SIRU
ISBTJFTW
DRISNOONSRESIURTD
PROVIDED1(01)1159
PROViSO)
PASTEl
€90110’287’
102
102
0BUFPORY000IAORIH
TDrSRSRVPRO
136’5
55
544
EASTID’
BL)FFIRTNC287’
1010
1010
79
955110’
BFJFFTOTUMI
287’10
210
247
CAMEIULA9515
30’ITRETYH
RO136’
55
55
92
INTERIORPARAIAO
RJFFTIJESN
/A8
80
90
TOTALSN
/A48
3230
24262
55*051T
2D’—O
IN,ARATE
R101
155TH
5—
ETISTOICPHASE
ITREES
()23
—P910
CT
PD
—CLASS
A
5—
131.511110.O
Il—
CLASSA
RH-
CR10510110111-
01.1508
0303
—1011*11
RJRFORDHOLLY
—51158
SR—
591SFCR00111113
-SHRuB
3D—
EIAEOREPZALEA—SHRUI
450—
LJREIPE—
DROIUNXTY,TD
LA
JIR0
C*
PI
000111*14119pL
AN
L1.0
0