agricultural activity following the gold king mine spill · 2019-08-27 · risk perception of...
TRANSCRIPT
Risk perception of Navajo communities along the San Juan River following the Gold King
Mine Spill
Morgan Farley, Karletta Chief, Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne, Nicolette Teufel-Shone, Manley Begay, Nicole Yuan, Dean Billheimer, and Paloma Beamer
Funded By:
Partnerships:
ObjectivesFor Navajos living in three communities along the San Juan River: 1.Assess short-term perceived risk to
activities related to the San Juan River after the Spill
2.Measure perceived health risks of Navajos resulting from contact with the San Juan River after the Spill
2
Risk Perception• Risk: “a measure of the probability and severity of adverse
effects” (National Safety Council, 2003)• Risk perception: the perceived amount of risk that each
individual has of a specific incident or action (Campbell Institute, 2011)
• Risk perception tends to be higher following a catastrophic event, such as the Gold King Mine Spill.
• Individuals have little control, lack reliable information about health risks and distrust authorities (Slovic, 1987), (Wachingeret al., 2013).
Photo Credit: The Southern Ute Drum
3
Risk Perception Survey
• WHEN: August 2016• WHO: 59 Navajo
Households• WHERE: Upper Fruitland,
NM; Shiprock, NM; and Aneth, UT
• HOW: Administered by Navajo Community Health Representatives (CHRs)
**DATA: Self reported risk perception based upon previous surveys (Slovic1987, Cabrera and Leckie 2009). Not based on psychometric tool.Picture Credit: Joseph Kayne
4
Demographics
Average: 49 yearsMinimum: 18 yearsMaximum: 84 years
16
1218
8
Age (years) (n=54)
18-34 35-51 52-68 69-85
40
19
Gender (n=59)
Female Male
5
oldold
old
Risk Perception of the San Juan River*“Please rate the following activities related to the San Juan River in terms of how risky you feel it is, from “very low risk” to very high risk.”
*same data from previous 2 slides, the 11 activities were condensed into 5 categories
2.4 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.9
4.2 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.1
00.5
11.5
22.5
33.5
44.5
5
Aver
age
Risk
Per
cept
ion
Activity Type
Average Risk Perception of Activities Related to the San Juan River Before and After the Gold King Mine Spill
(n=59)Before After
Very High Risk
High Risk
Moderate Risk
Low Risk
Very Low Risk
6
Perceived likelihood of developing a physical health effect“What do you think is the likelihood of that someone would develop the following physical health effects because of using or contacting water, soil/sediments or natural materials from along the San Juan River after the Gold King Mine Spill?”
10 9 12 6 12 6
19 1616
2118
23
27 30 28 30 25 27
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Cancer Asthma orother
respiratoryillnesses
Allergies Skin or eyeirritations,
rashes
Dizziness Nausea orstomach
ache
Freq
uenc
y
Physical Health Effect
Perceived Likelihood of an Individual Developing Physical Health Effects Due to Contact or Usage of Water, Soil/Sediments or
Natural Materials from along the San Juan River after the Gold King Mine Spill (n=59)
Rare/Unlikely Possible Likely/Almost certain
7
Self-Reported Emotional health effects due to the spill
Over the past year, how often have you experienced the following emotional health effects because of the Gold King Mine Spill?
4147
43
5450
43
51
2
4
4
12
5
114
610
12 9
5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Anxiety, worry,fears
Confusion Anger, hurt Low self-confidence
Low morale orpride
Stress Depression,sadness
Freq
uenc
y
Emotional Health Effect
*Self-Reported Emotional Health Effects Experienced Due to the Gold King Mine Spill (n=59)
Never/A few times Monthly Weekly/Daily
8
*Self reported and not based on a psychometric tool
2.12.3
3.33.7
3.94.2
4.5 4.6
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Playingbasketball
Herding sheep Hunting elk Listening to loudmusic at a rock
concert
Driving a car atnight on a windy
road
San Juan Riverafter the Spill
Riding in a carwithout aseatbelt
Drinking alcoholand driving
AVER
AGE
RISK
PER
CEPT
ION
ACTIVITY
Average Risk Perception of General Activities vs. Average of ALL Activities Related to the San Juan River After the Spill
Very High Risk
High Risk
Moderate Risk
Low Risk
Very Low Risk
9
Impact & Recovery of Navajo Agricultural Activity Following
the Gold King Mine Spill Malik Hastin-Tso Scott, Paloma Beamer, Dean Billheimer, Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne, and Karletta Chief
A public survey was administrated on October 5, 2018 at the 107th Annual Northern Navajo Nation Fair by Navajo Community Health Representatives.
94%
3%Eligibility• Use the San Juan River for
cultivating crops• Identify as Navajo • Over the age of 18
Population size: 8,956• 95% are Native American
Collected 38 responses
77&
45&
What Is Your Gender(n=38)
FemaleMale
Demographics 6&
35&
4: &
37&
4&4&
What Is Your Age(n=38)
18-2122-4041-60>60Do Not Want To AnswerDo Not Know
History of Farmers
67%
15%
18%
Age Began Cultivating Cropsn= (38)
0-1718-2122-40
73%
6%
6%
3%3%
9%
How Did You Learnn= (38)
Immediate Family
In-laws
Self-taught
Friends
Traditional
Other
Irrigation
87&
32&
4&
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
PERC
ENTA
GEAre you connected to the San Juan River (n=38)
Yes No Did Not Answer
95&
9&4& 4& 4&
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
PERC
ENTA
GE
Primary Source of Water for Cultivating Crops (n=38)
San Juan River (irrigated/hauled) Hauled Well Water Tap Water Other Did Not Answer
Types of Crops Grown
33
27 26
8 7 75 5
3 2 1 1 10
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
FREQ
UEN
CY
Types of Crops Grown (n=38)
Corn Squash Melons Alfalfa Chili Tomatoes Cucumber Hay Fruits Potato Green Beans Beets Bell Pepper
About 30% use native heirloom seeds
2
3
2
1 1
2
4
2
1
0
1
2
3
4
5
FREQ
UEN
CY
Type of Native Heirloom Seed(n=12)
Corn Blue Corn White Corn Yellow Corn Watermelon Melons Squash Winter Squash Traditional Seeds
Purpose of Crops
43.8
3.5
2.9
2.4
0
1
2
3
4
5
Aver
age
Leve
l of I
mpo
rtan
ce
The Level of Importance of the Crop Usage Based For That Purpose (n=38)
Feed My Family Share With Others Feed My Livestock Sell Other
Least Importance
Low Importance
Moderate Importance
High Importance
Most Importance
17
5 5
10
10
5
7
14
12
ALL MORE THAN HALF ABOUT HALF LESS THAN HALF NONE
Freq
uenc
y What Portion of Your Total Harvested Crops Do You
Eat v. Sell?
Impact of Spill
(n=38)
61%
39%
Stop Growing Crops Because of the GKM Spill (n=38)
YesNo
A Closer Look At The Farmers Who Stopped Growing Crops
Due To The August Spill
Reason For Stopping(n=23)
43%
57%
Have You Started Agricultural Activities Again? As of October 2018 (n=23)
YesNo
5
13
9
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Years After August of 2015
FREQ
UEN
CY
How Long Did You Stop Growing Crops? (n=23)
≤ 1 year 2 years ≥ 3 years
Moving Forward
Why did you start growing crops again? (n=38)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Frequency (Check All That Apply)
Reas
on F
or R
esum
ingNavajo EPA Declared River Safe
Attended Diné Exposure Project
I Believe Water Is Safe
NM State Declared River Safe
Income From Farming
My Neighbor Started
Other Reasons
Solution To Protect Irrigation Water (n=38)
12
14
14
15
15
17
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Frequency (Check All That Apply)
Solu
tion
To P
rote
ct Ir
rigat
ion
Wat
er
Water Quality Monitoring Systems
Create Alert System
Divert Water From Navajo Dam
Farmers Submit Samples
Irrigation Warning Systems
Bioremediation Ponds
What To Sample
60%
32%
8%
Receive Training On How to Take Samples(n=38)
YesNoDid Not Answer
21
18
15 15
12
10
5
10
15
20
25
Freq
uenc
y
Sources To Test
What Would You Like to Collect & Test(n=38)
WaterSoilVegetable, Fruits, Or Plants Your Family EatsPlants For AnimalsAnimalsDid Not Answer
How the community
can heal(n=38)
Conclusions• Although a previous
environmental study showed no major environmental impact from the Spill, based on this self reported risk perception survey, Navajo participants reported the Spill had short-term emotional and spiritual impacts.
• Next steps include community healing efforts to help reduce stigma and restore trust within the Navajo community.
Photo Credit: Paul Smithson Phillips
28