agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

46
agricultural education collections & repositories scratching the surface Nikos Manouselis, Vassilis Protonotarios Agro-Know Technologies [email protected] ; [email protected]

Upload: nikos-manouselis

Post on 11-May-2015

532 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Presentation at the AgEd Workshop 2012 at University of Gastronomic Sciences, Pollenzo, Bra, Italy http://wiki.agroknow.gr/agroknow/index.php/AgEdWorkshop_2012

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

agricultural education collections & repositories

scratching the surface

Nikos Manouselis, Vassilis ProtonotariosAgro-Know Technologies

[email protected]; [email protected]

Page 2: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

(long) introduction

Page 3: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

learning object

"any entity, "any entity, digitaldigital or non-digital, that may or non-digital, that may be used for be used for learninglearning, , educationeducation or or trainingtraining""

ΙΕΕΕ Learning Technology Standards Committee (2002)

Page 4: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

http://www.soilassociation.orghttp://www.soilassociation.org

Page 5: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

http://www.climatecrisis.nethttp://www.climatecrisis.net

Page 6: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

http://www.teachersdomain.orghttp://www.teachersdomain.org

Page 7: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

http://www.digitalgreen.orghttp://www.digitalgreen.org

Page 8: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

learning object

"any entity, "any entity, digitaldigital or non-digital, that may or non-digital, that may be used for be used for learninglearning, , educationeducation or or trainingtraining““

+ metadata describing this use+ metadata describing this use

Page 9: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

Publisher

Date Catalog

SubjectID

AuthorTitle

metadata

Page 10: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

educational metadata

Page 11: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

NOT a learning object

Page 12: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

…a learning object, in context

Page 13: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

metadata reflect the context

Page 14: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

our context

Page 15: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

agricultural science(s)

Page 16: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

lots of data produced & consumed

Page 17: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

what does ag-specific mean?• data types/formats very particular to

agricultural education?• classification of data around agriculture-specific

themes & topics?• connectivity and combination of data with

other sources of agricultural interest?• usage scenarios, environments & tools tightly

connected and specialised for agricultural practices and applications?

Page 18: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

data types & formats• bibliographic metadata• educational content• statistical/economic data• germplasm collections• soil maps• DNA sequence markers/data• …more

Page 19: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

classification schemes• knowledge organisation systems for agriculture

– AGROVOC, CABI, NAL, …

• in recent work, we identified more than 88 ag-specialised ones

[Palavitsinis & Manouselis, “Agricultural Knowledge Organization Systems: analysis of an indicative sample”, in press]

Page 20: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

classification schemes• knowledge organisation systems for agriculture

– AGROVOC, CABI, NAL, …

• in recent work, we identified more than 88 ag-specialised ones

[Palavitsinis & Manouselis, “Agricultural Knowledge Organization Systems: analysis of an indicative sample”, in press]

Page 21: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

connectivity & combination of data • interoperability to achieve remix & reuse

– learning technology standards & specifications

• recently revisited metadata analysis of agricultural learning repositories– 11 out of 13 found implementations have been

analysed– satisfactory conformance to base metadata schemas

was found– next step: harmonization & exchange of good practices[Manolis et al., “Revisiting an analysis of agricultural learning repository metadata: preliminary

results”, MTSR’12]

Page 22: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

connectivity & combination of data Metadata TermsGroup of Common Properties

Property dc:-based dcterms:-based lom:-based More specific Metadata Terms

1. General Characteristics Identifier dc:identifier

dcterms:identifier lom:identifier  

  Title dc:title dcterms:title lom:title dcterms:alternative

  Language dc:languagedcterms:language lom :language  

  Descriptiondc:description

dcterms:description

lom :description dcterms:abstract

ags:DescriptionNotes  Keyword dc:subject dcterms:subject lom:keyword ags:subjectThesaurus2. Life Cycle Entity role dc:creator dcterms:creator lom: role  

   dc:contributor

dcterms:contributor lom: role  

    dc:publisherdcterms:publisher lom: role  

3. Technical Characteristics Format dc:format dcterms:format lom:format  

4. Educational Characteristics

Learning Resource Type dc:type  

lom:learningResourceType  

5. Intellectual Property Rights

Rights Description dc:rights dcterms:rights lom:rights ags:rightsStatement

dcterms:license

Page 23: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

scenarios & environments• very much context-specific: educational

activity workflows to be carefully studied and modelled

• preliminary ideas currently explored in connection with digital content– e.g. educational scenarios/pathways

http://portal.organic-edunet.eu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2177&catid=1&Itemid=103

Page 24: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

required: learning repositories

Page 25: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

definitions• digital repository: system for the storage,

location and retrieval of digital resources• digital learning repository (DLR):

– nature of resources or their description reflects an interest of use in an educational context

Holden C., “From Local Challenges to a Global Community: Learning Repositories Summit”, Academic ADL Co-Lab, 2003

Page 26: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

putting it all together• agricultural data/content being stored and

described to serve educational activities– types of data/content that would serve typical

educational needs in this context– metadata that includes proper thematic

classification and ensures interoperability– design & development of educational

scenarios/pathways on top of this content

Page 27: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

interesting (?) questions

• do existing, generic learning repositories have content of agricultural interest?– do they have a lot?

• are there learning repositories focusing particularly to agricultural & rural stakeholders?– where are they?

Page 28: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

preliminary study

• took place during 2005 • examined 59 well-known general-purpose

repositories– found in 27 of them (~45%) agricultural content

BUT• in a total of ~881,000 educational resources:

– …only 3,201 resources (0.36%) related to agricultural topics

Tzikopoulos et al., "Investigating Digital Learning Repositories' Coverage of Agriculture-related Topics", ITAFE 2005.

Page 29: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

0

500

1000

1500S

um

34.5% of resources not 34.5% of resources not particularly classified particularly classified

subject classification

Page 30: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

so we assume that…• learning repositories that particularly

focus on agricultural & rural stakeholders–should probably have more relevant

content–should probably have it better

described/categorized

Page 31: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

technology• content management systems for digital

repositories exist and are very popular– many of them specifically adapted for educational

content (e.g. Dspace, ePrints, Fedora, …)

• some tools already being adapted for the agricultural domain– e.g. AgriOceanDSpace, Organic.ePrints, AgriDrupal, …

• learning management systems also include resource/collection repository component– Moodle (and agriMoodle), ILIAS, …

Page 32: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

technology• content management systems for digital

repositories exist and are very popular– many of them specifically adapted for educational

content (e.g. Dspace, ePrints, Fedora, …)

• some tools already being adapted for the agricultural domain– e.g. AgriOceanDSpace, Organic.ePrints, AgriDrupal, …

• learning management systems also include resource/collection repository component– Moodle (and agriMoodle), ILIAS, …

ADOPTION, AVAILABILITY, O

PENESS

Page 33: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

more problems?

Page 34: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

--indicative list--

a. metadata authoring/creationb. metadata curation/validationc. metadata values/vocabulariesd. metadata multilingualitye. …lots more

34

Page 35: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

a. authoring/creation

• metadata creation is a painful and costly process–automatic generation can help–high quality/accuracy/relevance

descriptions require human intervention

35

Page 36: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

a. authoring/creation

36

Page 37: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

b. curation/validation

• good online services demand high quality (or at least not poor quality) description of content–someone needs to take the final decision

before something is published–especially relevant when content

development has been costly/labourous

37

Page 38: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

b. curation/validation

38

Page 39: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

c. values/vocabularies• mappings and crosswalks among values and

vocabularies of different collections are crucial–usually manually defined and maintained–difficult to ensure that all applications will

publish and link their vocabularies–vocabulary bank management tend to become

too complex for the purpose that they serve

39

Page 40: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

c. values/vocabularies

40

Page 41: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

d. multilinguality• for multilingual contexts, everything

needs to become (and be maintained) multilingual–metadata values and labels– interface labels for various systems–automatic translation helps but usually

produces rather rough/poor translations

41

Page 42: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

d. multilinguality

42

Page 43: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

conclusionconclusion

Page 44: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

potential• learning objects/resources: useful• having them organised in learning

repositories: good • exploring ways to introduce them into

formal and informal education & training–challenging and worthwhile

Page 45: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

challenges• technical issues

–mainly interoperability• content issues

–taking advantage of existing collections– integrate traditional data types/sources

coming from agricultural science–combine with cultural heritage, research

work/outcomes, …

Page 46: agricultural education collections & repositories: scratching the surface

thank you!