agroecology and sustainable intensification · ntre agroecology by design requires … •diversity...
TRANSCRIPT
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Agroecology and sustainable intensification
1. definitions, practices and systems
Prof. Nicolas Lampkin
Director
Organic Research Centre, Newbury, UK
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Acknowledgements
• This presentation presents the outcome of work funded by Scottish Natural Heritage on behalf of the UK Nature Conservation Agencies’ Land Use Policy Group.
• The report was prepared by a team of authors from the Organic Research Centre and the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust.
• The conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of SNH or the LUPG.
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
What is sustainable intensification?
• Producing more with less? (less input per unit output but still more in total?)
• Producing more with no added environmental impact? (are current impacts, resource use levels sustainable?)
• Producing more with positive environmental impacts (more ecosystem services, natural capital regeneration)?
• Producing enough, more efficiently, with positive environmental impacts?
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Sustainable intensification should
• Mean more than ‘more with less’
• Place increased emphasis on ‘sustainable’
• Actively support environmental protection, production of ecosystem services and regeneration of natural capital alongside production of food etc.
• A sufficiency rather than productivist model where consumption issues also addressed
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
How does SI relate to Pretty’s (1997) vision?
• … of an agriculture ‘relying on the integrated use of a wide range of technologies to manage pests, nutrients, soil and water.’
• … where ‘local knowledge and adaptive methods are stressed rather than comprehensive packages of externally-supplied technologies’
• ‘Regenerative, low-input agriculture, founded on full farmer participation in all stages of development and extension, can be highly productive.’
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Agroecology …
… is also subject to multiple definitions:
• Study of the ecology of agricultural systems
• Application of ecology to the design and management of agricultural systems
• Social movement for transformation of agriculture and food systems
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Agroforestry
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre Efficiency – Substitution – Redesign
Framework
Courtesy of Hill, MacRae and others, dating back to 1980s
Conventional intensive systems
Increased efficiency
Input substitution
System redesign
Sustainable food systems
Conventional intensive systems
Increased efficiency
Input substitution
System redesign
Sustainable food systems
Conventional intensive systems
Increased efficiency
Input substitution
System redesign
Sustainable food systems
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Agroecology by design requires …
• Diversity AND complexity to deliver sustainable, stable, resilient and self-regulating systems.
• Multiple components deliver multiple functions
‘The purpose of a functional and self-regulating design is to place elements or components in such a way that each serves the needs and accepts the products of other elements’ (Mollison)
• Functional biodiversity for eco-functional intensification
• Systems thinking and application
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Systemic approaches
• While all these practices can be used by any farmer, the synergies between them mean more benefits if used in systemic framework
• Examples include:
Integrated Pest, Crop, Farm Management
Conservation agriculture
Organic farming
Agroforestry
Permaculture
• More or less codified/regulated depending on market context
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Agroecology and sustainable intensification
2. evaluation of performance
Prof. Nicolas Lampkin
Director
Organic Research Centre, Newbury, UK
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Evaluations of potential SI contribution
Outputs
Productivity
Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions
Biodiversity and related ecosystem services
Soil and water resource use/conservation
Profitability
Denominators
Per unit land area or other limiting resource
Per tonne produced
Per tonne for human consumption (NSO)
Literature review – matter of judgement
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Impact on productivity
Output
parameter Integrated Organic
Agro-
forestry
Yield/ha 0 -- +
Net system
output/ha 0 - +
Land equiv-
alent ratio 0 - +
Labour use
efficiency + -/+ -/+
Input use
efficiency + ++ ++
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre Impact on energy and GHG emissions
Output
parameter Integrated Organic
Agro-
forestry
Energy use
cultivations - +/- -
Energy use
other inputs 0/- -- -
Soil organic
carbon 0/+ + ++
Above ground
C sequestration 0 + ++
GHG/NH3
emissions/ha
per unit food
-
-
--
0/+
--
--
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Impact on biodiversity
Output
parameter Integrated Organic
Agro-
forestry
Soil micro-
organisms + ++ ++
Invertebrates ++ ++ +++
Plants + ++ +++
Pollinators + ++ ++
Mammals + + ++
Farmland birds + + +/-
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre Impact on soil and water resources
Output
parameter Integrated Organic
Agro-
forestry
Reduced soil
erosion + ++ +++
Reduced soil
compaction ++ + +++
Soil fertility
improvement + ++/- ++
Improved water
quality 0/+ ++ ++/-
Flood mitigation 0 ++ ++
Improve drought
tolerance 0 + ++
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre Impact on profitability
Output parameter Integrated Organic Agro-
forestry
Output level 0 -- +
Enterprise mix value 0 - +/-
Variable costs - -- -
Fixed costs - 0/+ +/-
Infrastructure needs 0 +/- +
Premium markets + ++ 0/+
Agri-env. support + ++ [+]
Farm profitability 0 0 [+]
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Benefit of key practices and approaches 1
Practice/
approach
Product-
ivity
Energy &
GHGs
Bio-
diversity
Soil &
water
Profit-
ability
Legume
leys +/- + +/++ ++ -
Organic
amends + + ++ + 0
Reduced
tillage + + + + +
Limit agro-
chemicals -- + ++ ++ --
Extended
rotations + 0/+ + + +/-
Poly-
cultures ++ 0/+ + + +/-
Variety
mixtures + 0/+ + 0 0/-
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre Benefit of key practices and approaches 2
Practice/
approach
Product-
ivity
Energy &
GHGs
Bio-
diversity
Soil &
water
Profit-
ability
Field
margins +/- 0/+ +/++ 0/+ +/-
Biological
control + 0/+ + 0 +
Diverse
pastures + 0/+ + + 0/+
Mix crops/
livestock + 0/+ + + +/-
Mix livstck
species + 0/+ + 0 +/-
Integrated
farming 0 + + + 0/+
Organic
farming -- +/0 ++ ++ 0/--
Agro-
forestry + ++ ++/- ++ +/-
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre Key issues
• Potential for win-win situations in many cases
• But also trade-offs between productivity and environment, e.g. in organic case
• Land sharing, land sparing and functional biodiversity
“A major argument for wildlife-friendly farming and agroecological intensification is that crucial ecosystem services are provided by ‘planned’ and ‘associated’ biodiversity, whereas the land sparing concept implies that biodiversity in agroecosystems is functionally negligible.” Tscharntke et al., 2012
• Access to (and funding of) knowledge and research
• Focus on practices or systems?
• Role of markets and policy support in compensating for trade-offs and rewarding environmental outputs
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Agroecology and sustainable intensification 3. developing the contribution
Prof. Nicolas Lampkin
Director
Organic Research Centre, Newbury, UK
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
What do we need to do?
• Emphasise ecosystem services and natural capital regeneration as part of sustainable intensification – eco-functional or ecological intensification
• Recognise potential of agroecological approaches to deliver this
• Develop appropriate evaluation metrics to address local context and system complexity in support of business and policy decision making
• Consider/promote agroecological solutions to key problems linked to input use (emissions, pollution, soil erosion, antibiotic resistance, pollinator decline)
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
What else?
• Use agri-environmental support, payment for ecosystem services, and market mechanisms to encourage system change, not just practices
• Improve agroecological knowledge exchange and information systems – knowledge intensification
• Deepen educational understanding of agroecology at all levels
• Support agroecological research and innovation with real participation of users – needs shift from corporate/ technology focus of current funding models
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
How to achieve this
• Build on current good practice and expertise in UK
• Make more creative use of EU policy frameworks, in particular rural development and research , including:
Establishment of agroforestry
Agri-environment/climate
Organic farming
Advice, training and vocational skills
EIP-Agri operational groups
• Ensure greater synergies between policies, using strategies and action plans where appropriate
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
Some examples
• Organic action plans in many countries, some (e.g. Denmark) included as chapters RDPs
• German Bundesprogramm Oekologischer Landbau now extended to include other forms of sustainable agriculture
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre French 2014 Action plan for
Agroecology & 2015 law
1. Training and education
2. Collective action
3. Pesticide reduction plans
4. Promoting biological control
5. Reducing antibiotic use
6. Sustainable bee-keeping
7. Better use of livestock effluent
8. Encouraging organic production
9. Better plant breeding
10. Encouraging agroforestry
Th
e O
rgan
ic R
esea
rch
Cen
tre
What drives these changes?
• Strong political backing at Ministerial level
• Active engagement of producers and other industry partners
• Public concern about environment and health issues
• Can we achieve something similar in the UK nations?