aid effectiveness to agriculture and food security
DESCRIPTION
Aid Effectiveness to Agriculture and Food Security. Tim Waites DFID Livelihoods Adviser, Policy and Research Division Prague Seminar, 18 th February 2009. 1 Palace Street, London SW1E 5HE Abercrombie House, Eaglesham Road, East Kilbride, Glasgow G75 8EA. Overview:. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Tim WaitesDFID Livelihoods Adviser,Policy and Research DivisionPrague Seminar, 18th February 2009
Aid Effectiveness to Agriculture and
Food Security
1 Palace Street, London SW1E 5HEAbercrombie House, Eaglesham Road, East Kilbride, Glasgow G75 8EA
Page 2
Overview:
• Introduction: DFID overview and policy in agriculture
• Agriculture context and DFID policy• Effective aid modalities – some case
studies• Food price volatility • Conclusions
Page 3
DFID – facts and figures:
• UK Ministry devoted to poverty eradication• Headed by 4 ministers• Annual budget ’08 £5.2 billion (€5.9 billion)
or 0.51% of GNI – 0.7% by 2013• Bi-lateral aid (£3 b):
• PRBS; Sector PRBS; NGO & CSO (£.317 b); Humanitarian aid and debt relief
• India, Ethiopia and Sudan top 3 recipients
• Multi-lateral aid (£2 b):• EC (£1 b); WB (£0.5 b); UN (0.25 b);
International Research (£0.2 b)
• UK Debt Relief (non-DFID) £1.9 b
Page 4
22 Public Service Agreement (PSA) countries67 Offices overseas2,500 staff – half are overseas.
Page 5
DFID’s 4 Institutional Priorities
• Growth and Trade is the way out of poverty
• Reform of the International Institutions
• Climate change is a development issue • Conflict and fragile states are holding
back development
Page 6
Context:International Support for Agriculture
• Decline in ODA to agriculture: 18%-3.5% between 1985-2004
• But recent increasing focus: • World Bank increasing lending
• $1 billion 2000-01• $2 billion 2006-07 (8% of lending IDA)
• EC increasing lending on Agriculture and rural development in new EDF by 15%
• New World Development Report shows the way
• But need to • Strengthen quality of policy and • level and effectiveness of investment
Page 7
DFID Agriculture Policy, December 2005
• Title: Growth and poverty reduction: the role of agriculture
• Policy areas:• Supportive policy frameworks for agriculture• Improved growth and poverty impact of public
spending on agriculture• Making input and output markets work better
for the poor• Improved access to land and secure property
rights• A role for poor people in changing supply
chains: exports, standards, supermarkets• Addressing hunger, risk and vulnerability• Trade
Page 8
DFID Bilateral Spending on Agriculture2006/7
Budget support15%
Agriculture policy17%
Land policy28%
Livestock policy3%
Rural services12%
Animal health0%
Food security5%
RNR Research11%
Agriculture production9%
Other8%
Budget support
Agriculture policy
Land policy
Livestock policy
Rural servcies
Annimal health
Food security
RNR Research
Agriculture production
Page 9
DFID and Agriculture:
• Bi-lateral - from 9.8% in ’90/1 to 4.8% ‘06/7 (£121 million per annum)
• Multi-lateral spending £76 million (‘05/6)• But research spend will be £400 million over
5 years
DFID BILATERAL SPENDING AND AGRICULTURE
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
% o
f b
ilate
ral p
rog
ram
me
Africa
Asia
Total
Page 10
Mechanisms for effective aid to agriculture – Bi-lateral aid
• Bi-lateral aid - engagement at country level but context matters:• PRBS in Uganda with support to
GoU’s plan for modernisation of agriculture
• PRBS in Rwanda - DFID has supported development of national land policy
Page 11
Bi-lateral aid – cont.
Sector PRBS in Ethiopia – the role of rural safety nets:
• Transitional programme - from food aid to long term development
• Donor funded (7), government and NGO implemented
• 7.3 million – 85% are food insecure farmers• Productive public works programmes
paying cash and food to build assets• Annual cost $300 million• DFID contribution £82 million
Page 12
Bi-lateral aid – cont.
Bangladesh Chars Livelihood Programme -£50 million:
• Fully funded by DFID, private sector managed, NGO implemented – no govt!
• Provision of productive assets – livestock and land – + weekly stipends + training
• 50,000 poorest households targeted• Example how agriculture plays an
important part in reducing vulnerability by building assets
Page 13
Bi-lateral aid – cont.
Zimbabwe Protracted Relief Programme - £36 million:
• Low cost drought resistant conservation farming techniques
• 1.5 million poorest farmers and destitute households
• Fully funded by DFID and implemented by an NGO consortium – no govt!
• Demonstrable and measurable impacts on agricultural productivity, incomes and food security
Page 14
Mechanisms for effective aid to agriculture – Multilateralism
Maximise DFID leverage to improve effectiveness of intl. response to agriculture
• Engage and influence EC policy processes• Engage and influence UN reform + strategic
planning• WB – DFID funded and fed into WDR• Advancing a Green Revolution in Africa
(AGRA) – opportunity to support and influence a new approach to multilateralism
• Comprehensive African Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) – African led (AU) regional framework to spend more and better in agriculture –country commitment to spend 10% budget on agriculture
Page 15
Mechanisms for effective aid to agriculture – Research
Agriculture research remains a DFID priority:• Delivers high returns and a key building block
for effective agricultural development. • DFID has been using its influence
internationally and regionally to increase effectiveness e.g. through reform of the CGIAR.
Options to address this:• DFID Research Strategy - increased
commitment to agricultural research to £400 million over 5 years.
• New research strategy offers an opportunity to scale up and address food price rises.
Page 16
Current context: Food Price volatility
Politically, agriculture and food security are back on the agenda – FAO estimate there are now nearly 1 billion hungry:
• DFID response of £1 billion to address short, medium and long term responses
• International response is $10 billion• DFID supports the UN HLTF - Comprehensive
Framework for Action• DFID is calling for a Global Partnership for
Agriculture and Food Security (GPAFS) as a long term coordinated international response
Page 17
Conclusions:
• Context matters – design your instruments to governance capacity
• Where appropriate, national led and owned approaches are best
• Political buy-in = sustainability• But using UN and NGOs good work can
still be done in fragile states• Don’t forget the broader linkages – rural
roads, access to water, health and nutrition, education, markets and trade