air quality conformity determination pittsburgh ... quality conformity determination pittsburgh...

Air Quality Conformity Determination

Pittsburgh Transportation Management Area

for the

8-Hour Ozone Air Quality Standard

PM 2.5 Air Quality Standards

CO and PM 10 Air Quality Standards

Companion Document

to the

2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program

and

Mapping the Future: The Southwestern PA Plan

Final Report July 2016

Members of the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission

2016 Officers

Chairman: Charles W. Anderson

Vice Chairman: Larry Maggi Secretary-Treasurer: Rich Fitzgerald

Staff

SPC Executive Director: James R. Hassinger

Allegheny County Rich Fitzgerald Lynn Heckman Clifford Levine Robert J. Macey David Miller

Armstrong County Vonne Andring Pat Fabian Richard Palilla Jason L. Renshaw George J. Skamai

Beaver County Tony Amadio Daniel Camp Sandie Egley Kelly Gray Dwan Walker

Butler County Kevin Boozel Jack Cohen Kim Geyer Richard Hadley Leslie A. Osche

Fayette County Joe Grata Fred Junko Dave Lohr Vincent A. Vicites Angela Zimmerlink

Greene County Dave Coder Jeff Marshall Robbie Matesic Archie Trader Blair Zimmerman

Indiana County Michael Baker Sherene Hess Rodney D. Ruddock Byron G. Stauffer, Jr. James B. Struzzi

Lawrence County Steve Craig Robert Del Signore James Gagliano Amy McKinney Daniel J. Vogler

Washington County Larry Maggi Harlan Shober Michael A. Silvestri Diana Irey Vaughn Christopher Wheat

Westmoreland County Charles W. Anderson Robert J. BrooksTom Ceraso Gina Cerilli Ted Kopas

City of Pittsburgh Scott Bricker Rev. Ricky Burgess William Peduto Mavis Rainey Aurora Sharrard

Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (2 Votes) H. Daniel Cessna Joseph Dubovi Kevin McCullough James Ritzman Joe Szczur

Governor's Office Erin Molchany

Pennsylvania Department of Community & Economic Development Johnna Pro

Port Authority of Allegheny County (1 Vote) Ellen McLean Ed Typanski

Transit Operators Committee John Paul

Federal Highway Administration* Renee Sigel

Federal Transit Administration* Teresa Garcia-Crews

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency* Laura Mohollen

Federal Aviation Administration*

U. S. Economic Development Administration*

*Nonvoting Members

The preparation of this publication was financed in part through grants from the United States Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration; the U.S. Department of Commerce; the Appalachian Regional Commission; the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; the Department of Transportation of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and, the counties of Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Fayette, Greene, Indiana, Lawrence, Washington, Westmoreland, and the City of Pittsburgh. The views and opinions of the authors or agency expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of these agencies.

Air Quality Conformity Determination

Pittsburgh Transportation Management Area

for the

8-Hour Ozone Air Quality Standard

PM 2.5 Air Quality Standards

CO and PM 10 Air Quality Standards

Companion Document

to the

2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program

and

Mapping the Future: The Southwestern PA Plan

Final Report July 2016

Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission

Two Chatham Center, Suite 500 112 Washington Place

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219-3451 Voice: 412-391-5590 Fax: 412-391-9160

E-mail: [email protected] www.spcregion,org

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.spcregion,org/

Este documento está disponible en español. Llame por favor (412) 391-5590 para más información.

Dieses Dokument wird zum Deutschen auf Antrag übersetzt.

Telephonieren Sie SPC an (412) 391-5590 zu mehr Information.

Questo documento è disponibile in italiano su richiesta. Telefoni lo SPC (412) 391-5590 per le più informazioni.

Ce document est disponible en français sur demande.

Veuillez appeler le SPC (412) à 391-5590 pour plus d'information.

This document is available in alternate formats upon request. Please call SPC at (412) 391-5590 for more information.

Disponable en

Espanol

Disponibile in

Italiano

Vorhanden in

Deutshcen

Disponible en

Francais

The Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission (SPC) hereby gives public notice that it is the policy of the Commission to assure full compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, Executive Order 12898 on Environmental Justice, and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. Title VI and other related statutes require that no person in the United States of America shall, on the grounds of race, color, sex, national origin, age, or disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which SPC receives federal financial assistance. Any person who believes they have been aggrieved by an unlawful discriminatory practice by SPC under Title VI has a right to file a formal complaint with the Commission. Any such complaint must be in writing and filed with SPC’s Title VI Coordinator within one hundred eighty (180) days following the date of the alleged discriminatory occurrence. For more information, or to obtain a Title VI Discrimination Complaint Form, please see our website at: www.spcregion.org or call 412-391-5590.

http://www.spcregion.org/

Air Quality Conformity Determination 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program and 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission – July 2016


i

Table of Contents Page

I. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

II. Regional Implications of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments and

Overview of Conformity Criteria. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

III. Transportation Networks Developed for Conformity Assessment. . . . . . . . . 15

IV. Travel Estimation Process. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

V. Development of Emission Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41

VI. Transportation Model Application and Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

VII. Conformity Determinations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

VIII. Public Review and Comment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63

List of Maps 1. Southwestern Pennsylvania – PM10 and Carbon Monoxide Areas. . . . . . . . 8

2. Southwestern Pennsylvania – 8-Hour Ozone Designations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

3. Southwestern Pennsylvania – PM2.5 Air Quality Designations . . . . . . . . . . 10

4. Travel Model Validation – External Cordon and Count Station Locations . . 31

5. Travel Model Validation – River Crossing Segments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

List of Figures 1. Facilities Included on Highway and Transit Networks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-21

2. Travel Demand Management Strategies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47

3. PM2.5 Conformity Assessment – PM2.5 – Pgh-Beaver Valley. . . . . . . . . . . 56

4. PM2.5 Conformity Assessment – NOX – Pgh-Beaver Valley . . . . . . . . . . . . 56

5. PM2.5 Conformity Assessment – PM2.5 – Indiana County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58

6. PM2.5 Conformity Assessment – NOX – Indiana County . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 58

7. PM2.5 Conformity Assessment – PM2.5 – Allegheny County – Annul . . . . 60

8. PM2.5 Conformity Assessment – NOX – Allegheny County – Annual . . . . . 60

9. 8-Hour Ozone Conformity Assessment – VOC – Pgh-Beaver Valley. . . . . . . 62

10. 8-Hour Ozone Conformity Assessment – NOx – Pgh-Beaver Valley . . . . . . 62




ii

List of Tables

Page

1. Regional Population. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

2. Regional Households . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

3. Regional Employment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

4. HOV Model Validation - Auto Person Trip Attractions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

5. Transit Route Trip Validation by Corridor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

6. Travel Model Validation – External Cordon Volume Comparisons. . . . . . . 31

7. Travel Model Validation – River Crossing Volume Comparisons. . . . . . . . . 32

8. Travel Model Validation – Traffic Volume Comparisons. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

9. Travel Model Validation – VMT Comparisons. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

10. 2015 (Existing) Modal Split Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36

11. 2040 (Long Range Plan) Modal Split Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

12. Travel Model Results – Trips by Purpose and Mode. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

13. HOV Model Results – Vehicle Trips by Auto Occupancy Level . . . . . . . . . 39

14. Conformity Assessment – Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PM2.5. . . . . . . . . . . . . 55

15. Conformity Assessment – Indiana County PM2.5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

16. Conformity Assessment – Allegheny County PM2.5 – Annual . . . . . . . . . . . 59

17. Conformity Assessment – Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley 8-Hour Ozone. . . . . . . 61

Appendices A. Identification of Exempt and Regionally Significant Projects Included in the 2017-2020 TIP

B. Sample MOVES 2014 Input Parameters

C. County and Facility Type Summaries – VMT, Speed, Emissions

D. TDM Model Setup and Results

E. Common Acronyms

F. SPC Resolutions 9-16 and 11-16




1

I. Introduction

The Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission (SPC) is the designated Metropolitan Planning

Organization (MPO) for a 10-county region within Southwestern Pennsylvania. MPOs are

responsible for making transportation conformity determinations for both their short range

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and their long range transportation plan. This report

documents the process used by SPC in the spring of 2016 for making the transportation-related

conformity determination for the 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program for

Southwestern Pennsylvania and updates to the region’s 2040 Transportation Plan (2040 Plan –

Mapping the Future: The Southwestern PA Plan). The conformity determination is required by

the federal Clean Air Act (CAA). SPC’s conformity finding is based upon criteria and

procedures described in the federal Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Transportation

Conformity Rule (40 CFR Part 93). SPC’s conformity finding was conducted consistent with

procedures outlined in the EPA-approved Pennsylvania Conformity State Implementation Plan

(SIP), which has an effective date of June 29, 2009, and satisfies all applicable conformity

process requirements in the Transportation Conformity Rule for designated nonattainment and

maintenance areas under federal air quality standards for ozone (O3), particulate matter (PM10

and PM2.5), and carbon monoxide (CO).

On November 15, 1990, amendments to the federal Clean Air Act were enacted. The Clean Air

Act (as amended) specifies how the EPA designates air quality nonattainment areas and how it

defines the geographic boundaries of those areas. Nonattainment areas for three criteria

pollutants (ozone, carbon monoxide and fine particulate matter) are classified in accordance with

the severity of the area's air pollution problem. Assignment of an area to one of the

nonattainment classifications triggers various planning requirements which the area must comply

with in order to meet the standard. The requirements vary by pollutant and increase in number

and stringency with the severity of pollution.

The EPA promulgated regulations on November 23, 1993 (Transportation Conformity Rule)

regarding criteria and procedures for demonstrating and assuring conformity of transportation

plans, programs and projects with the Clean Air Act. The EPA has periodically revised and

amended the Transportation Conformity Rule. All conformity findings must be based on criteria

and procedures outlined in the Rule.

A regional conformity assessment and new conformity finding for the regional transportation

Plan and Program is required before MPO adoption, acceptance, approval, or support of a

regional Plan, TIP or amendments to those documents; or the approval, funding, or

implementation of transportation projects. Conformity findings must be approved by the MPO

before the regional Plan or TIP, or amendments to those documents are approved by the MPO or

accepted by United States Department of Transportation (USDOT). The Transportation

Conformity Rule cites a number of project types which may be excluded from the regional

conformity analysis. The “exempt” project types are listed in Appendix A.

The most recent conformity finding for the region’s fiscally constrained TIP and Plan was

approved by SPC on June 29, 2015 in conjunction with adoption of Mapping the Future: The




2

Southwestern PA Plan. The United States Department of Transportation, in consultation with

EPA concurred with SPC’s conformity finding on November 4, 2015.

SPC has developed a new Transportation Improvement Program (2017-2020 TIP). The TIP

includes newly identified regionally significant projects as well as scope and schedule

modifications to several currently programmed regionally significant projects. These changes to

the regionally significant projects to be programmed on the region’s 2017-2020 TIP and 2040

Plan triggered the need for a new finding of conformity. The new conformity finding was

needed prior to SPC’s adoption of the TIP, related 2040 Plan adjustments, and before any federal

action on programmed, regionally significant projects.

Travel simulation work and other relevant quantitative analysis for this demonstration of

conformity began on March 16, 2016 with the quarterly meeting of the Pennsylvania

Transportation – Air Quality Work Group. The planning assumptions used in this conformity

assessment are current as of that date. The major planning assumptions for this conformity

assessment are briefly summarized below. As appropriate, the planning assumptions used in the

analysis are further detailed in subsequent Sections of the report.

In accord with EPA guidance and Pennsylvania’s interagency consultation process, all

emission estimates were derived using EPA's MOVES 2014 emissions model running in

“inventory” mode.

Data for vehicle registrations and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) distribution is from 2015

Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) information. Data from 2012

was used in SPC’s spring 2015 conformity determination.

The current vehicle inspection/maintenance (I/M) programs for southwestern Pennsylvania

are reflected in the analysis. Information about the I/M programs is presented in

Section V.

The Pennsylvania Clean Vehicles (PCV) Program, adopted in 1998, incorporates the

California Low Emission Vehicle Program (CA LEV, as amended) by reference although

it allowed automakers to comply with the National Low Emission Vehicle (NLEV)

program as an alternative to this Pennsylvania program until model year (MY) 2006.

Beginning with MY 2008, “new” passenger cars and light-duty trucks with a gross

vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 8,500 pounds or less that are sold or leased and titled in

Pennsylvania must be certified by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) or be

certified for sale in all 50 states. For this program, a “new” vehicle is a qualified vehicle

with an odometer reading less than 7,500 miles. DEP and PennDOT worked with the

automobile manufacturers, dealers and other interested business partners and finalized

procedures for complying with these new requirements. DEP is focusing its outreach

with the manufacturers and dealers on what they can offer for sale and how to certify that

the vehicles are compliant. PennDOT’s role is to ensure paperwork procedures for title

and registrations include these certifications of compliance or that the vehicle owner

qualifies for an exemption to the requirements. In all cases, DEP will use information




3

obtained during PennDOT’s title and registration process to oversee and audit, as needed,

certain vehicle title transactions to determine compliance to the program. The impacts of

this program are modeled for all analysis years beyond 2008.

SPC’s Cycle 10 forecast of population, employment and households was developed in the

spring of 2015 and was adopted with the 2040 Plan on June 29, 2015. The Cycle 10

forecast replaced the Cycle 9a forecast which was adopted in 2012. An updated regional

forecast, the Cycle 10a forecast, is now available. It was developed to improve the

distribution of “Other” employment (forestry, logging, agriculture, oil and gas extraction,

mining, construction, wholesale trade, and farming). The Cycle 10a forecast was adopted

with the 2017-2020 TIP on June 27, 2016. The base year for the Cycle 10a forecast is

2015. The horizon year is 2040. The Cycle 10a forecast was used to generate trips for

the travel demand model for this conformity assessment. Information about SPC’s

modeling and forecasting process is presented in Section IV.

SPC’s travel demand model is configured for the TP+ modeling software package. The

travel model covers SPC’s entire 10-county planning region. All of the VMT and

emissions projections were developed from SPC’s travel model.

SPC’s 10-county travel model was validated to 2015 conditions with available data in the

spring of 2016 during the TIP update process. That model was used for this conformity

assessment. The model for the 2015 conformity assessment was validated to 2013

conditions. Section IV includes a discussion of the model validation process.

SPC’s travel demand model is sensitive to road and bridge tolls. Toll rates are coded on

highway network links to reflect tolls charged by the Pennsylvania Turnpike

Commission. Once toll rates are coded, the rates remain constant for all analysis years

(essentially assuming that tolls will increase at the same rate as inflation).

SPC's travel demand model includes a mode split component. Current transit operating

plans and service levels are incorporated into the future year networks and augmented

with facilities and service identified in the TIP and Plan. SPC's mode split model is

sensitive to transit fares. The current transit fare structure is built into the model. Fare

rates are held constant for all analysis years (essentially assuming that fares will increase

at the same rate as inflation). Transit person trips are summarized by trip purpose and

analysis year in Table 12.

Vehicle emission budgets are available to SPC for use in the conformity assessment for the

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley 8-hour ozone nonattainment area. That area consists of seven

counties within SPC’s planning area (Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Fayette,

Washington, and Westmoreland). On April 22, 2004, the Pennsylvania Department of

Environmental Protection (DEP) submitted SIP revisions to EPA that contained emission

budgets for VOC and NOx developed with the MOBILE6.2 emissions model. EPA

approved the budgets for use in conformity assessments on December 10, 2004 (78 FR

71712). These emissions budgets were approved for demonstrating conformity under the




4

1-hour ozone standard. The Transportation Conformity Rule requires that they are to be

used for conformity assessments under the 8-hour ozone standard until new emissions

budgets for the 8-hour ozone standard are approved by EPA for the Pittsburgh-Beaver

Valley nonattainment area. The approved 1-hour ozone emissions budgets for VOC and

NOx are used for the conformity demonstration in Section VII for the Pittsburgh-Beaver

Valley 8-hour ozone nonattainment area.

Vehicle emission budgets are now available to SPC for use in the conformity assessment

for the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PM2.5 nonattainment area under the 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS and the 2006 daily PM2.5 NAAQS. That area consists of four complete counties

within SPC’s planning area (Beaver, Butler, Washington, and Westmoreland), part of

Allegheny County (not including the separate Liberty-Clairton nonattainment area), and

parts of Armstrong, Greene and Lawrence counties. EPA approved the PM2.5 and NOx

MVEBs for use in conformity assessments for the Pittsburgh Area in a final rule

published in Federal Register on October 2, 2015 (80 FR 59624).

Vehicle emission budgets for PM2.5 and its precursors have not been approved by EPA

for use in conformity assessments for the Allegheny County PM2.5 nonattainment area.

Through the interagency consultation process, values used for the conformity test for this

nonattainment area were developed from data contained in the SIP revision “State

Implementation Plan Revision: Maintenance Plan and Comprehensive Inventory

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley Nonattainment Area 1997 and 2006 Fine Particulate Matter

National Ambient Air Quality Standards“ (DEP, December 2014). This maintenance

plan and emissions inventory contains the EPA-approved motor vehicle emission budgets

for the larger Pittsburgh Beaver Valley PM2.5 Nonattainment Area, as well as motor

vehicle emission inventories for individual counties. The conformity test values were

determined by calculating the percentage of total motor vehicle emissions attributable to

Allegheny County (excluding Liberty-Clairton) and applying that percentage to the safety

margins established for the larger nonattainment area. The portion of the safety margin

calculated in the previous step was added to the 2017 and 2025 inventory emissions for

Allegheny County (partial) to provide a base year emission total for comparison in the

conformity test for the Allegheny County PM2.5 Nonattainment Area.

The EPA approved an “insignificance finding” that PM2.5 nonattainment in the Liberty-

Clairton PM2.5 area was primarily the result of industrial stationary sources and motor

vehicles were not an important contributor to the nonattainment problem. That finding

was approved by EPA in a rulemaking published in the Federal Register on October 2,

2015 (80 FR 59615). With approval of this finding by EPA, no additional quantitative

analysis for transportation-related PM2.5 impacts is required for conformity purposes for

the Liberty-Clairton PM2.5 area. Interagency consultation and public review is still

required.

Three major, regionally significant projects were completed in the region since the last

conformity cycle in 2015 and are now included in the existing (2017 base year)

transportation network for this conformity assessment. Those three projects are:




5

(1) Allegheny County (Oakmont Borough and Harmar Township) – replacement of the

old 2-lane Hulton Bridge over the Allegheny River in with a new 4-lane bridge (MPMS

#57100); (2) Fayette County (South Union Township) – Route 21 section J10 widening

to 4-lanes between Thompson Crossroads and Route 119 (MPMS #72214); (3) Greene

County (Franklin Township) – Morrisville Corridor Phase 1 safety improvements and

widening to 4-lanes along SR 19 between High Street and SR 2026 (MPMS #30272).

Section II of this report presents an overview of pertinent provisions of the Clean Air Act and the

Transportation Conformity Rule. It also describes the areas of the region designated as

nonattainment under the 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS), the PM2.5

NAAQS, the carbon monoxide (CO) NAAQS, and the PM10 NAAQS. The 2017-2020 TIP and

the 2040 Plan are summarized in Section III. Section IV discusses SPC’s transportation

modeling process. The methods used to develop emissions estimates for this conformity

determination are highlighted in Section V. Section VI presents the travel simulations developed

for this conformity determination. Section VII highlights the conformity findings and

conclusions. The conformity determinations under the 8-hour ozone standard, the PM2.5 and

PM10 air quality standards, and the carbon monoxide standard are also made in Section VII. The

public review process is outlined in Section VIII. A series of appendices, described in the text,

appear at the end of this report.

The conformity findings and conclusions in this report are based on VMT, average speed, and

emissions for several analysis years: 2017 – the year used for “existing” (base year) conditions

and budget year for the PM2.5 air quality standards; 2020 – the TIP year and attainment year for

the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS; 2025 – interim year to satisfy the Transportation Conformity Rule

requirement that analysis years be not more than ten years apart, also a budget year for the PM2.5

air quality standards; 2035 – interim year to satisfy the Transportation Conformity Rule

requirement that analysis years be not more than ten years apart; and 2040 – the Long Range

Plan horizon year.




6




7

II. Regional Implications of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments and

Overview of Conformity Criteria

Criteria and procedures required for demonstrating conformity of transportation plans and

programs are specified in EPA's Transportation Conformity Rule. The applicable conformity

criteria and procedures are summarized below:

1) A determination should be made that the endorsed transportation plan and program

will be consistent with the emissions budget in the approved control strategy SIP or

redesignation request. Prior to EPA approval of emission budgets, a determination

should be made that the transportation plan and program are consistent with the most

recent estimates of mobile source emissions.

2) An assurance should be given that no goals, directives, recommendations or projects

identified in the transportation plan and program contradict in a negative manner any

specific requirements or commitments of the applicable SIP.

3) Transportation plans and programs should provide for the expeditious implementation

of transportation control measures in the applicable SIP.

4) Transportation plan and program conformity determinations will be based on the most

recent emissions estimates which in turn are to be based on the most recent population,

employment, travel and congestion estimates as determined by the MPO or other

authorized agency.

5) A determination should be made that the transportation plans and programs contribute

to reductions in emissions in nonattainment areas and that the transportation plans and

programs do not increase the frequency or severity of existing violations of the

national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS).

In accord with the federal Clean Air Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has

designated several nonattainment areas within Southwestern Pennsylvania for six separate

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The six air quality standards are: (1) the

1987 PM10 NAAQS (one designated area – five municipalities within Allegheny County – Map

1), (2) the 1971 carbon monoxide NAAQS (one designated area – City of Pittsburgh’s Central

Business District and certain other high traffic density areas in and near the City’s Oakland

neighborhood – Map 1), (3) the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS (one designated area, covering

seven of the ten counties within SPC’s planning area – Map 2), (4) the 1997 PM2.5 annual

NAAQS (three separate areas that, combined, cover five entire counties and parts of four other

counties within SPC’s planning area – Map 3), (5) the 2006 PM2.5 24-hour NAAQS (the same

three areas designated nonattainment for the PM2.5 annual standard – Map 3), and (6) the 2012

PM2.5 annual NAAQS (one designated area, covering all of Allegheny County – Map 3).

Transportation conformity must be addressed by SPC for each nonattainment and maintenance

area.




8

This report addresses conformity for all of the designated nonattainment areas and applicable air

quality standards.

Map 1 SPC July 2016

PM10

In accord with the federal Clean Air Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency designated

a moderate nonattainment area for particulate matter under the 1987 PM10 NAAQS within

Allegheny County (56 FR 11105), effective on May 14, 1991. That area includes the City of

Clairton and the Boroughs of Glassport, Liberty, Lincoln and Port Vue (Map 1). PM10

nonattainment in that area stemmed primarily from industrial sources in the area and not from

mobile sources. This nonattainment area was not required to have a PM10 transportation

conformity budget. Because the PM10 violations had been caused by industrial stationary

sources and motor vehicles were not an important contributor to the nonattainment problem, no

additional quantitative analysis for transportation-related PM10 impacts is required for

conformity purposes.

On January 6, 1994, the Allegheny County Health Department submitted a PM10 Attainment

Plan to EPA for review and approval. That was followed on July 12, 1995 with submittal of

contingency measures that would be enforced if the area failed to attain the PM10 standard. On

September 8, 1998, EPA’s final approval of those documents was announced in the Federal

Register (63 FR 47434) and EPA declared that the area had attained the PM10 standard. On

October 28, 2002, a request to redesignate the area as attainment for PM10 was submitted to EPA




9

by Allegheny County. EPA’s approval of the redesignation request, and the formal

redesignation of the area from nonattainment to attainment of the PM10 national ambient air

quality standards (NAAQS), was announced in the Federal Register on September 11, 2003 (68

FR 53515).

The 2017-2020 TIP and 2040 Plan will not worsen the PM10 emissions in that area, nor will they

interfere with the expeditious implementation of mitigation measures to control those emissions.

Four projects are identified on the 2017-2020 TIP and the 2040 Plan in those five municipalities.

They are: 1). Lovedale/Wylie Run Road – bridge rehabilitation/replacement over Sunfish Run

(SR 2010 – Lincoln Borough), $2,000,000 (MPMS#28118); 2). Boston Hollow Road – bridge

rehabilitation/replacement over Wylie Run (SR 48 – Lincoln Borough and Elizabeth Township),

$1,900,000 (MPMS# 28132). 3). PA 48 over Wylie Run – bridge replacement on SR 48 over

Wylie Run (SR 48 – Lincoln Borough and Elizabeth Township), $1,450,000 (MPMS#93784);

4). Boston Hollow Road – bridge replacement over Wylie Run (SR 48 – Lincoln Borough and

Elizabeth Township), $1,000,000 (MPMS# 78175).The total cost programmed on the 2017-2020

TIP for these four projects is $6,350,000.

Carbon Monoxide

While the region has not exceeded the 1971 carbon monoxide NAAQS since March 1986, the

City of Pittsburgh's central business district and high traffic density areas in and near the City’s

Oakland neighborhood were designated by EPA as an “unclassified” nonattainment area for

carbon monoxide (43 FR 40513), effective on September 12, 1978 (Map 1). In August 2001, the

Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) submitted a redesignation request to DEP asking

that it be forwarded to EPA with a recommendation for approval. That redesignation request

was subsequently approved by EPA and announced in the Federal Register on November 12,

2002 (67 FR 68521). A limited carbon monoxide maintenance plan is part of that approved

redesignation for Allegheny County. That maintenance plan ensured maintenance of the CO

NAAQS until January 2013. On July 18, 2011 DEP, on behalf of ACHD, submitted as a SIP

revision a second 10-year CO maintenance plan. EPA approved the second 10-year limited

maintenance plan effective on May 27, 2014 (79 FR 17054). The maintenance demonstration

shows that the Pittsburgh area will continue to maintain the CO NAAQS during the second 10-

year maintenance period, which extends to 2022.

Under limited maintenance plans, EPA policy does not require a carbon monoxide emission

budget test for conformity determinations. Emission budgets in limited maintenance plan areas

are considered to be not constraining for the length of the initial maintenance period. Therefore,

conformity for carbon monoxide is demonstrated in the county.

Ozone

The 8-hour ozone nonattainment and maintenance area is:

Pittsburgh - Beaver Valley nonattainment area. This area includes seven counties within

SPC’s planning area (Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Fayette, Washington, and

Westmoreland).




10

Map 2 shows the boundary of this designated 8-hour ozone area.

Map 2 SPC July 2016

Ozone is formed through chemical reactions induced when sunlight reacts with volatile organic

compounds (VOCs, principally “hydrocarbons”), and nitrogen oxides (NOx). A major source of

VOCs and NOx is the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels. Transportation-related activities

are a major contributor of these pollutants. Since heat speeds the reactions, ozone levels are

typically highest during hot summer days. For ozone nonattainment areas, reductions in both

VOC and NOx are required in order to demonstrate conformity.

The Transportation Conformity Rule requires that the conformity determination for

transportation plans and programs be based on comparisons to established VOC and NOx motor

vehicle emissions budgets (MVEB), provided that the budgets are established in a control

strategies State Implementation Plan and that EPA has declared the motor vehicle emission

budgets to be adequate for transportation conformity purposes. The emissions budget establishes

a cap on emissions which cannot be exceeded by predicted highway and transit vehicle

emissions. The conformity analysis should demonstrate reduced VOC and NOx emissions in a

future year for the transportation plan or program when compared to the established emissions

budgets. The analysis must estimate total transportation-related emissions within the ozone

nonattainment area for certain future years, and may include the effects of any emission control

programs which are already adopted or committed to in the applicable State Implementation

Plan.




11

Motor vehicle emissions budgets for VOC and NOx were established in the Maintenance Plan

for the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley Ozone Area (Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley Area Ozone

Maintenance Plan and Request for Redesignation as Attainment for Ozone). This is the

Maintenance Plan and Attainment SIP approved for this area by EPA under the 1-hour ozone

standard. It will remain in effect until the state submits, and EPA approves, an attainment

demonstration and motor vehicle emissions budgets for the 8-hour standard. The budgets from

this SIP are based on analysis using EPA’s MOBILE6.2 emissions model. The budgets were

approved by EPA on December 10, 2004 for use in conformity assessments (69 FR 71712).

These budgets are, therefore, available to SPC for use in demonstrating 8-hour ozone

transportation conformity. The approved emissions budgets for the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley

Ozone Area are presented in Table 17 and are shown graphically in Figures 9 (VOC) and

10 (NOx) in Section VII.

Information needed for the 8-hour ozone conformity assessment is presented in Section V.

Results of the analysis, and the conformity determination for the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley

Ozone Area, are found in Section VII.

Greene, Indiana, and Lawrence counties are designated as air quality attainment areas under the

2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. A transportation conformity assessment is not needed under the 8-

hour ozone NAAQS for those counties.

PM2.5

The EPA published the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS on July 18, 1997 (62 FR 38653). Three

nonattainment areas were designated in the SPC planning area under the 1997 Annual PM2.5

NAAQS (70 FR 944) effective April 5, 2005. These areas are:

Johnstown. This area includes all of Cambria County (which is outside of the SPC

planning area), plus five municipalities within Indiana County (West Wheatfield, Center,

and East Wheatfield townships, and Armagh and Homer City boroughs).

Liberty-Clairton. This area includes five municipalities within Allegheny County

(Glassport, Liberty, Lincoln, and Port Vue boroughs, and Clairton City).

Pittsburgh - Beaver Valley. This area includes all or part of eight counties within SPC’s

planning area as follows: Allegheny County (remainder not included in the Liberty-

Clairton area); Armstrong County (Plumcreek and Washington townships, and Elderton

Borough); Beaver County (entire county); Butler County (entire county); Greene County

(Monongahela Township); Lawrence County (portions of Taylor Township south of New

Castle City); Washington County (entire county); and Westmoreland County (entire

county).

The EPA published the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS on October 17, 2006 (71 FR 61144). Three

nonattainment areas were designated in the SPC planning area under the 2006 24-hour PM2.5

NAAQS effective December 14, 2009 (74 FR 58688). The boundaries of the three

nonattainment areas designated under the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS are identical to the three

nonattainment areas designated under the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS.




12

The remainder of the SPC planning area is designated as attainment areas under both the 1997

Annual and 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. The attainment area includes all of Fayette County

and the remainder of Armstrong, Greene, Indiana, and Lawrence counties.

Map 3 shows the boundaries of the three 1997/2006 PM2.5 nonattainment areas in southwestern

Pennsylvania. These three areas are designated nonattainment for both the 1997 Annual PM2.5

NAAQS and the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.

Map 3 SPC July 2016

The Transportation Conformity Rule requires that the conformity determination for

transportation plans and programs be based on comparisons to approved emission budgets,

provided that the budgets are established in a control strategies State Implementation Plan and

that EPA has declared the motor vehicle emission budgets to be adequate for transportation

conformity purposes. The emission budgets establish caps on emissions which cannot be

exceeded by predicted highway and transit vehicle emissions. The conformity analysis should

demonstrate reduced emissions in a future year for the transportation plan or program when

compared to the approved emission budgets. The analysis must estimate total transportation-

related emissions within the nonattainment area for certain future years, and may include the

effects of any emission control programs which are already adopted or committed to in the

applicable SIP.

Motor vehicle emissions budgets for PM2.5 and NOx were approved by EPA under the 2006 24-

hour PM2.5 NAAQS and the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS for the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PM2.5

Area in a final rule published in the Federal Register on October 2, 2015 (80 FR 59624). These




13

MVEBs are based on analysis using EPA’s MOVES emissions model. These budgets are,

therefore, available to SPC for use in demonstrating transportation conformity for the Pittsburgh

Area under both the annual and the daily PM2.5 NAAQS. The approved MVEBs are expressed

as annual values in EPA’s approval, but they apply to both the annual and daily NAAQS.

Conformity assessments are to be based on the annual emissions. If conformity is demonstrated

for the annual NAAQS, it is also demonstrated for the daily NAAQS. The annual values for the

emissions budgets for the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PM2.5 Area are presented in Table 14 and are

shown graphically in Figures 3 (PM2.5) and 4 (NOx) in Section VII.

Information needed for the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PM2.5 Area conformity assessment is

presented in Section V. Results of the analysis, and the conformity determination for the

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PM2.5 Area, are found in Section VII.

Motor vehicle emission budgets for PM2.5 and NOx were approved by EPA under the 2006 24-

hour PM2.5 NAAQS and the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS for the Indiana County portion of the

Johnstown PM2.5 nonattainment area in a final rule published in the Federal Register on July 16,

2015 (80 FR 42046). These MVEBs are based on analysis using EPA’s MOVES emissions

model. These budgets are, therefore, available to SPC for use in demonstrating transportation

conformity for the Indiana County portion of the Johnstown PM2.5 nonattainment area under both

the annual and the daily PM2.5 NAAQS. The approved MVEBs are expressed as annual values

in EPA’s approval, but they apply to both the annual and daily NAAQS. Conformity

assessments are to be based on the annual emissions. If conformity is demonstrated for the

annual NAAQS, it is also demonstrated for the daily NAAQS. The annual values for the

emissions budgets for the Indiana County portion of the Johnstown PM2.5 nonattainment area are

presented in Table 15 and shown graphically in Figures 5 (PM2.5) and 6 (NOx) in Section VII.

The Allegheny County Health Department submitted, on May 13, 2014, a supplement to its

Attainment Demonstration SIP for the Liberty-Clairton area under the 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS and the 2006 daily PM2.5 NAAQS requesting an “insignificance finding” from EPA that

nonattainment was primarily the result of industrial stationary sources and motor vehicles were

not an important contributor to the nonattainment problem. That finding was approved by EPA

in a rulemaking published in the Federal Register on October 2, 2015 (80 FR 59615) and

effective December 1, 2015. With approval of this finding by EPA, no additional quantitative

analysis for transportation-related PM2.5 impacts is required for conformity purposes.

Interagency consultation and public review would still be required.

The 2017-2020 TIP and 2040 Plan will not worsen the PM10 emissions in that area, nor will they

interfere with the expeditious implementation of mitigation measures to control those emissions.

The four projects identified on the 2017-2020 TIP and the 2040 Plan in the Liberty-Clairton

PM2.5 Area were identified above in the PM10 discussion.

The EPA published the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS on January 15, 2013 (78 FR 3086), with an

effective date of March 18, 2013. One nonattainment area, covering all of Allegheny County,

was designated in the SPC planning area under the 2012 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS effective April




14

15, 2015 (80 FR 2206 and 80 FR 18535). Map 3 shows the boundaries of those nonattainment

areas.

The other nine counties in the SPC planning area are designated as attainment areas under the

2012 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS.

MVEBs for PM2.5 and its precursors under the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS are not available for

use in conformity assessments for the Allegheny County nonattainment area. Following

interagency consultation, the conformity test for this PM2.5 nonattainment area under the 2012

annual PM2.5 NAAQS is a comparison of emissions to the approved MVEBs for the 1997/2006

PM2.5 NAAQS based on 2011 emissions inventory values (including allocated safety margin) for

the Allegheny County portion of the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley nonattainment area. The annual

values for the emissions “budgets” for the Allegheny County PM2.5 Area under the are 2012

annual PM2.5 NAAQS are presented in Table 16 and are shown graphically in Figures 7 (PM2.5)

and 8 (NOx) in Section VII.

PM2.5 emissions (fine particulates) are emitted directly by motor vehicles as a result of the fuel

combustion process (tailpipe emissions) and as a result of brake and tire wear. PM2.5 emissions

are contained in re-entrained road dust and transportation construction dust. PM2.5 emissions are

also formed through reactions in the atmosphere among several precursor emissions including

VOC, NOx, ammonia (NH3) and sulfates (SOx). Under EPA conformity regulations:

Direct PM2.5 tailpipe, brake wear, and tire wear emissions must be analyzed.

Re-entrained road dust is included only if EPA or the Pennsylvania Department of

Environmental Protection determines that it is a significant contributor to PM2.5 in the

nonattainment area, or is named in a PM2.5 SIP and a motor vehicle emissions budget is

established for this item.

Transportation construction dust is encompassed in regional transportation conformity if it

is named in a PM2.5 SIP and a motor vehicle emissions budget is established for this item.

NOx must be analyzed in the period prior to SIP submission and budget adequacy

determination or approval, unless EPA and DEP determine it is not a significant

contributor.

VOC, NH3 and SOx analysis is not required in the period prior to SIP submission unless

EPA or DEP determines one or more of these precursors to be a significant contributor.

As a result of the interagency consultation process required by the Transportation Conformity

Rule, and in the absence of a SIP and attendant emission budgets, and in the absence of EPA and

DEP significance determinations, SPC’s PM2.5 conformity analysis encompasses the following

pollutants: Direct PM2.5 emissions (tailpipe, brake wear, tire wear); and NOx precursor

emissions.

Information needed for the PM2.5 conformity assessments is presented in Section V. Results of

the analysis, and the conformity determinations for the PM2.5 nonattainment areas within the SPC

planning area, are found in Section VII.




15

III. Transportation Networks Developed for Conformity Assessment

SPC’s process for this conformity determination for the 2017-2020 TIP and 2040 Plan called for

use of five TP+-based transportation networks. Each transportation network consists of separate

highway and transit components covering SPC’s entire ten county planning area which includes

Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Fayette, Greene, Indiana, Lawrence, Washington and

Westmoreland counties.

This section provides an overview of the facilities included in each of the networks and how the

networks were used in the conformity determination. An overview of the TP+ transportation

modeling software and SPC’s modeling process is presented in Section IV. Figure 1 presents a

synopsis of the five networks and the major new facilities each includes.

EPA’s Transportation Conformity Rule cites a number of project types which may be excluded

from the regional emissions analyses required to determine conformity of transportation plans

and programs. These “exempt” project types generally include minor projects such as

resurfacing, minor widening, channelization and lighting improvements. “Exempt” projects

were excluded from the regional emissions analysis.

The five networks developed specifically for use in this conformity process were: 1). the

existing year network (2017), which is also a budget year for the PM2.5 NAAQS; 2). 2017-2020

TIP network (2020), which is also the attainment year for the 2012 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS; 3).

an interim year to satisfy the Transportation Conformity Rule requirement that the analysis years

be not more than ten years apart (2025), also a PM2.5 NAAQS budget year; 4). a second interim

year to satisfy the Transportation Conformity Rule requirement that analysis years be not more

than ten years apart (2035); and 5). the Long Range Plan horizon year (2040).

The 2017-2020 TIP is the fiscally constrained program of projects for federal fiscal years 2017

through 2020 (October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2020) that reflect the region’s

transportation priorities. It was adopted by SPC on June 27, 2016. The SPC report 2017-2020

Transportation Improvement Program for Southwestern Pennsylvania (SPC July 2016) provides

more information about the projects programmed on the draft TIP. For purposes of this

conformity assessment it was presumed that all projects programmed on the 2017-2020 TIP for

construction would be completed by 2020. Appendix A lists the projects on the 2017-2020 TIP.

The adopted 2040 Long Range Plan (2040 Plan) is the region’s fiscally constrained long-range

transportation plan. The SPC report Mapping the Future: The Southwestern PA Plan (SPC, July

2015), identifies the specific projects included in the Plan for SPC’s 10-county planning area.

“Non-exempt” projects and facilities listed in Figure 1 were coded into the TP+ -based

transportation networks to define the transportation system for the 2017 network. The projects

and facilities are those listed as completed from 1990 through 2017. The 2017 network was used

to develop emissions estimates for the “existing” (2017) transportation system and as a required

analysis year to develop emissions estimates for the 2017 PM2.5 NAAQS budget year.




16

“Non-exempt” projects and facilities listed in Figure 1 for completion by 2020 were added to the

2017 network to define the transportation system for the 2020 network. The 2020 (TIP Year)

network is a TP+ -based representation of the region’s highway and transit system as it will

appear upon completion of every project programmed for construction on the 2017-2020 TIP.

This network was used in the conformity analysis to develop emissions estimates for the TIP

horizon year (2020). The 2020 network was used in the conformity analysis to develop

emissions estimates for the 2020 “attainment year” for the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS.

“Non-exempt” projects and facilities listed in Figure 1 for completion between 2020 and 2025

were added to the 2020 network to define the transportation system for the 2025 “interim year”

network. The 2025 network was used in the conformity analysis to develop emissions estimates

for the 2025 “interim year” and 2025 PM2.5 budget year.


were added to the 2025 network to define the transportation system for the 2035 “interim year”


for the 2035 “interim year” analysis scenario.


were added to the 2035 network to define the transportation system for the Long Range Plan


for the Long Range Plan analysis scenario.

Of all the highway and transit projects programmed on the 2040 Plan and the 2017-2020 TIP,

only those identified in Figure 1 were coded into the travel demand model for the conformity

analysis as “non-exempt”, regionally significant projects subject to regional emissions analysis.

A number of additional “non-exempt” projects are programmed for construction in that time

period. Due to their nature (small isolated park-n-ride lots, roadway relocation with no capacity

increase, traffic signal coordination, etc.), they could not be coded on the travel model networks.

These projects are addressed in Section VII.

Appendix A contains a one-line summary of every highway and transit project identified on the

adopted 2017-2020 TIP within SPC’s 10-county region. The effect of highway and transit

projects which cannot be reflected on coded transportation networks is discussed in Section VII.




17

Figure 1. Facilities Included on Highway and Transit Networks

1. Base Year (2002) Transportation System

1990 Transportation System plus:

Facilities completed between 1990 and 2002

Allegheny County:

1. West Busway (Downtown Pittsburgh to Carnegie)

2. First Avenue Station – (New Light Rail Transit Station) – [Downtown Pittsburgh]

3. Ohio River Boulevard Extension / West End Bridge Interchange

4. Airport Southern Expressway

5. I-279 Southbound Widening to 3 lanes (McKnight Road to North Avenue)

6. Coraopolis Bridge – (Replace 2-lane bridge with 3-lane bridge on new alignment)

7. Smithfield St. Bridge Widening (Convert trolley right-of-way to third traffic lane)

8. North Fayette/Robinson Interchange (Parkway West)

9. West Main Street Widening to 4 lanes – [Carnegie Borough]

10. West End Bypass Widening to 5 lanes – [City of Pittsburgh]

11. West End Bridge ramp to Route 65 – (Widen to 2 lanes) – [City of Pittsburgh]

12. Hookstown Grade/Ewing Road @ Business Route 60 (Construct interchange)

13. Banksville Road/Parkway West Interchange Improvements

14. Liberty Tunnel South Portal Grade Separation (Route 51 @ West Liberty Avenue)

15. Hot Metal Bridge Reconstruction (East Carson St. to Second Ave.) – [City of Pittsburgh]

Armstrong County:

16. Kittanning Bypass (Route 66 to Route 28)

Beaver County:

17. Beaver Valley Expressway

Butler County:

18. Route 228 Bridge over I-79 (New structure with additional lanes)

19. I-79/Route 228 Interchange (Construct missing ramps)

Fayette County:

20. Uniontown Bypass (Hopwood to Route 119 South)

21. Mon-Fayette Expressway (Uniontown to Fairchance)

22. TR 51 Star Junction Intersection

23. Route 982 / 31 Intersection and Approaches (Laurelville)

24. Mon-Fayette Expressway (Fairchance to West Virginia)

Indiana County:

25. Route 422 Indiana Bypass (SR 119 to SR 286)

26. Route 422 Indiana Bypass (SR 286 to Business 422)

Lawrence County:

27. New Castle Area Transit Authority (NCATA) – Bus Replacements / Fleet Expansion (16 Transit

Vehicles)

28. NCATA – Service Expansion (New Route between New Castle and Pittsburgh)

29. NCATA – Construction of New Maintenance Facility / Administration Building (New Castle)

30. Beaver Valley Expressway (Toll 60) – Beaver County Line to Route 422 Bypass

31. Route 422 / 388 Intersection – Traffic Signal Upgrade

Washington County:

32. I-79 Interchange - Western Center (Southpointe)

33. Donora Industrial Access Road - Phase 1 (Route 837 to Industrial Park)

Westmoreland County:

34. Greensburg Bypass – (New Stanton to Delmont)

35. Route 22 Reconstruction/widening to 4 lanes (Delmont to Route 819)

36. Route 22 Reconstruction/widening to 4 lanes (Route 819 to Shieldsburg)




18

Figure 1. Facilities Included On Highway and Transit Networks (cont.)

2. 2008 Transportation System



Allegheny County:

1. East Busway Extension - (Wilkinsburg to Rankin)

2. Wilkinsburg Park-N-Ride Facility

3. South Hills Light Rail Transit - (Stage II – Overbrook Line)

4. Wabash Tunnel HOV Facility - (Woodruff Street to East Carson Street)

5. I-279 / I-376 Connector – (Direct ramp from Fort Duquesne Bridge to Parkway East)

6. Mon Fayette Expressway (I-70 to Route 51)

7. Duncan Avenue Extension (East) – [McCandless Twp.]

8. Cargo Road @ Business Route 60 (New interchange) – [Moon Twp.]

9. Frazer (Pgh) Mills Interchange (Rt.28 @ Tawney Run Rd. /Galleria Blvd.) – [Frazer Twp.]

10. Settlers Cabin Interchange (Rt. 22/30 Parkway West @ Ridge Rd.) – [Robinson Twp.]

11. Industry Drive Extension (Phase 1) – [Findlay Twp.]

12. Moon-Clinton Interchange completion - (Add missing ramps north of SR 3089)

13. Southern Beltway (Findlay Connector) – 4 lanes (Airport Southern Expressway to Route 22)

14. Rt. 8 Widening to 4 lanes (Kittanning St. to Saxonburg Blvd.) – [Etna]

15. Route 28 Widening to 3 lanes northbound (Harmar to Creighton)

16. Rt.28 Southbound to I-279 Southbound Connector (Construct new ramp) – [City of Pittsburgh]

17. Cherrington Parkway Extension – (2 Lane Access Road) – [Moon Twp.]

Butler County:

18. I-79/Route 19/Turnpike Exit 28 Interchange (Cranberry Connector)

Fayette County:

19. Route 119 / Walnut Hill Interchange – (Construct two missing ramps to complete interchange)

20. Wayland Smith Drive – New 2-lane Connector (Route 40 to Matthew Dr. Extension)

21. Matthew Drive Extension (Route 40 to New Salem Road [SR 4006])

Greene County:

22. Kiwi Road Extension (Near Greene County Airport [Route 21 to Rolling Meadows Road])

Indiana County:

23. Route 22 @ Route 119 Interchange Completion

24. Route 22 Gas Center – Widen to 4 lanes (Armagh Bypass to Cambria County Line)

25. Route 22 Penn View Summit – Widen to 4 lanes (Route 119 Interchange to Mount Taber Church)

26. Route 119 South – Widen to 4 lanes (SR 22 to SR 56 [Homer City])

Washington County:

27. Donora Industrial Access Road - Phase 2 (Industrial Park to 14th Street)


28. Route 22 Reconstruction/widening to 4 lanes (Shieldsburg to New Alexandria)

29. Route 22 Reconstruction/widening to 4 lanes (Murrysville to Export)

30. Rt. 366 Widening to 4 lanes (Tarentum Bridge to Leechburg Road)

31. I-76 PA.Turnpike Mainline Widened to 3 lanes (Eastbound only) – New Stanton Int. to Somerset

Co.

32. Center Avenue - Relocation (near New Stanton)

33. Route 119 @ Sony Corp. – Construct new interchange (near New Stanton)

34. Route 22 Reconstruction/widening to 4 lanes (Export to Delmont)

35. Route 31 - Widen to 4 lanes (3 Mile Hill - Laurelville to Laurel Summit)

3. Existing (2017) Transportation System






19


Allegheny County:

1. North Shore Connector Project (LRT) Gateway Line – [City of Pittsburgh]

2. I-79 @ I-279 (Parkway West) Interchange - (Construct missing ramps and widen US 22/30

(Parkway West) to 6 lanes – I-79 @ I-279 Interchange to Campbell’s Run Road Interchange

3. West End Circle Reconstruct/Realign – (Southern approach to bridge) – [City of Pittsburgh]

4. East Carson Street - widened to 4 lanes (25th

St. to 33rd

St.) – [City of Pittsburgh]

5. Etna Interchange Bridges Phase 4 – (SR 28 NB mainline widened to 2 lanes)

6. Brighton Road Extension – New 2 lane Connector (General Robinson to N. Shore Dr.) – [City of

PGH]

7. Route 28 Widening (I-579 to Millvale) – [City of Pittsburgh]

8. Hulton Bridge Replacement (New 4 lane bridge over Allegheny River) – [Oakmont to Harmar]

9. I-76 PA.Turnpike Mainline (Construct New Bridge over Allegheny River) 6 lanes

10. I-76 PA.Turnpike Mainline Widened to 6 lanes (Pine Twp. to Route 8 Interchange)

Beaver County:

11. I-76 PA. Turnpike Mainline Widened to 6 lanes (Ohio State Line to SR 60 Interchange)

Butler County:

12. I-79 Exit 27 Interchange Completion (SR 3025 at Seneca Valley High School)

13. SR 228 Mars Railroad Bridge - Replace existing 2 lane bridge with 4 lane bridge (SR 228 over

CSX RR and Breakneck Creek) – [Adams Twp.]

Fayette County:

14. Matthew Drive - Widen to 4 lanes (Uniontown)

15. Mon-Fayette Expressway (Uniontown to Brownsville) – Phase 1

16. SR 4049 Northgate Highway – New 4 lane Connector (Rt.40 to Rt.51) – Part of MFE Plan Phase 1

17. Mon-Fayette Expressway (Uniontown to Brownsville) – Phase 2

18. Mon-Fayette Expressway (Fairchance to I-68 – West Virginia)

19. Masontown Bridge - Replace existing 2 lane bridge with 4 lane bridge (Rt.21 over Mon. River)

20. Route 21 (Sec. J10) - Widen to 4 lanes (Thompson Crossroads to Rt.119)

Greene County:

21. US 19 Safety Improvements – Widen to 4 lanes (Morrisville Corridor Ph-1– Waynesburg [High St.

to SR2026])

Indiana County:

22. Route 22 Clyde – Widen to 4 lanes (Mount Taber Church to Armagh Bypass)

Washington County:

23. Union Twp. Park-N-Ride (MMVTA to construct new 100-space lot)

24. I-79 Meadowlands Interchange - (Construct missing ramps)


25. Route 22 Reconstruction/widening to 4 lanes (New Alexandria to Route 982)

26. Route 22 Reconstruction/widening to 4 lanes (Route 982 to Westinghouse)

27. Route 22 Reconstruction/widening to 4 lanes (Westinghouse to Indiana Co.)

28. Route 30 Widening (St. Vincent’s College to Mt. Laurel Shopping Ctr.)

29. Route 981 Widening (North and south approaches to Route 30 intersection)

30. Parnassus Triangle Phase 2 - SR 366 widening to 4 lanes – (Bridge St. to 7th

St.)

31. I-76 PA. Turnpike Mainline Widened to 6 lanes (Irwin Int. to New Stanton Int.)

4. TIP Year (2020) Transportation System


Facilities on 2017-2020 TIP for Construction by 2020

Allegheny County:

1. I-76 PA. Turnpike Mainline Widened to 6 lanes (SR 8 Int. to Allegheny Valley Int.)




20


Beaver County:

2. Freedom Road Upgrade (Crows Run) -Route 65 to Route 989

3. I-76 PA. Turnpike Mainline (Construct New Bridge over Beaver River) 6 lanes

Butler County:

4. Moraine State Park North Shore Access - Interchange Completion (SR 422 @ West Park Road)

5. SR 228 Corridor Improvements (Widening to 3 lanes Eastbound only) I-79 to SR 3021 Franklin

Road

Washington County:

6. I-70 Widening to 6 lanes (SR 136 Interchange [Beau St.] to I-79 South Junction)

7. I-70 Widening to 6 lanes (I-79 North Junction to SR 136 Interchange [Beau St.])


8. New Stanton Interchange Improvements (I-70)

5. Interim Year #1 (2025) Transportation System


Facilities on 2040 Long Range Plan for Construction between 2020 and 2025

Allegheny County:

1. Painter's Run Road - Widening to 4 lanes (Bower Hill Road to Rob Hollow Road)

2. Route 286 Improvements (Phase 2) – Widening to 4 lanes (Sagamore Hill Dr. to Sandune Dr.)

3. I-79 @ SR 910 Interchange - Widening and installation of additional travel lane

4. Campbell's Run Road Improvements - Widen to 4 lanes - [Robinson Twp.]

5. I-376 Parkway West @ Banksville Interchange improvements

6. Corrigan Drive Upgrade/Road Diet (Reduce from 4 to 2 lanes through South Park)

7. Penn Circle Improvement – Convert from multi-lane, single directional traffic flow to bi-directional

traffic flow – [City of Pittsburgh]

8. Beaver Avenue Conversion to bi-directional traffic flow [City of Pittsburgh]

9. PA 28 Highland Park Bridge Interchange Improvements

Butler County:

10. Freedom Road Improvements - Widening to 4 lanes (Beaver County Line to U.S.19)

11. SR 3022 Rochester Road - Widening to 4 lanes (U.S.19 to Haines School Road)

12. I-79 Widening to 6 lanes (SR 228 to SR 528)

13. SR 228 Balls Bend - Widening to 4 lanes (Three Degree Rd. to SR 8).

Fayette County:

14. U.S.119 @ McClure Road / Kingview Road Intersection Improvements

Indiana County:

15. SR 3043 Rose Street Extension – New 2 lane Connector (SR 286 to SR 4032)

Washington County:

16. Southern Beltway - New 4-lane limited-access toll Expressway (Route 22 to I-79)

6. Interim Year #2 (2035) Transportation System


Facilities on 2040 Long Range Plan for Construction between 2025 and 2035

Allegheny County:

1. SR 885 Bates Street Widened to 4 lanes (Blvd. of Allies to I-376 Parkway East)[City of Pittsburgh]

2. I-79 Widening to 6 lanes (Bridgeville to Washington Co. Line)

3. I-76 PA. Turnpike Mainline Widened to 6 lanes (Allegheny Valley Int. to Pittsburgh Int.)

4. I-76 PA. Turnpike Mainline Widened to 6 lanes (Pittsburgh Int. to Westmoreland Co. Line)

Butler County:

5. SR 228 Mars RR Bridge West - Widening to 4 lanes (SR 3015 [Mars-Valencia Road] to

SR 3021[Franklin Road])




21


Washington County: 6. I-79 Meadowlands Auxiliary Lanes (between Meadowlands and Racetrack Road Interchanges)

7. I-79 Widening to 6 lanes (North Junction with I-70 to Allegheny Co. Line)


8. I-76 PA. Turnpike Mainline Widened to 6 lanes (Allegheny Co. Line to Irwin Int.)

9. SR 981 Laurel Valley Transportation Plan

7. Long Range Plan Horizon Year (2040) Transportation System

Same as 2035 Transportation System – no additional regionally significant projects from 2035 to 2040.

All "non-exempt" projects on TIP or Long Range Plan and not listed above could not be coded. Their effect on

emissions and conformity determination is qualitatively described in Section VII.




22




23

IV. Travel Estimation Process

The travel demand estimates that were used in this conformity analysis are the end result of a

model chain that begins by forecasting and distributing population, households and employment

for the SPC region. The model chain is iterative in nature. Estimates from the travel demand

models are periodically cycled back as inputs to the socio-economic forecasting models.

SPC completed its tenth cycle of population, household and employment forecasts in the spring

of 2015 (Cycle 10 forecast). The Cycle 10 forecast was adopted with the 2040 Plan on June 29,

2015. The Cycle 10 forecast replaced the Cycle 9a forecast which was adopted in 2012. An

updated regional forecast, the Cycle 10a forecast, is now available. It was developed to improve

the distribution of “Other” employment (forestry, logging, agriculture, oil and gas extraction,

mining, construction, wholesale trade, and farming). The Cycle 10a forecast was adopted with

the 2017-2020 TIP on June 27, 2016. The base year for the Cycle 10a forecast is 2015. The

horizon year is 2040. The Cycle 10a forecast was used as the basis for the highway and transit

trip forecasts for the travel demand model for this conformity assessment. With each cycle,

models are revised to take advantage of the latest data and to incorporate evolving modeling

techniques.

SPC uses an integrated economic-demographic forecasting model to develop regional estimates

of future population and employment. That model, known as REMI (Regional Economic

Models, Inc.), integrates an economic forecast with a demographic forecast for economic sub-

regions of the United States. Based on historical analysis of the regional economy and a forecast

of the U.S. economy, REMI forecasts regional employment, production, and other regional

economic variables. REMI also utilizes historical data on population to forecast regional

population growth or decline based on a traditional cohort-survival model. Then, based on the

economic forecast, REMI determines the amount of migration in or out of the region for workers

and their dependents to produce a complete population forecast. The model is recursive in

nature. The population forecast is used to revise the employment estimate. The new

employment estimate is then used to allow for further changes in economic migration. This

cycle continues until the economic and demographic forecasts balance out. SPC first used the

REMI model for forecasting in 1992, when the Cycle 4a forecasts were produced.

In 1992-93, SPC developed a model to allocate regional forecasts of population, households and

employment to the traffic analysis zones in the region. The allocation model, known as

MERLAM (Mature Economic Region Land Use Allocation Model) uses simple algorithms and

an extensive database to allocate population and employment. The model's algorithms include a

number of policy-sensitive variables. The database includes land use and attractiveness

measures. The land use database provides essential baseline information on each traffic analysis

zone.

24

REGIONAL POPULATION

COUNTY

2010

2040

CHANGE

2010-2040

% CHANGE

2010-2040

Allegheny 1,223,348 1,391,650 +168,302 +13.8%

Pittsburgh City 305,704 334,494 +28,790 +9.4%

non-Pittsburgh 917,644 1,057,156 +139,512 +15.2%

Armstrong 68,941 69,660 +719 +1.0%

Beaver 170,539 172,883 +2,344 +1.4%

Butler 183,862 219,324 +35,462 +19.3%

Fayette 136,606 141,394 +4,788 +3.5%

Greene 38,686 40,048 +1,362 +3.5%

Indiana

88,880 96,623 +7,743 +8.7%

Lawrence 91,108 98,355 +7,247 +8.0%

Washington 207,820 261,720 +53,900 +25.9%

Westmoreland 365,169 420,010 +54,841 +15.0%

TOTAL 2,574,959 2,911,667 +336,708 +13.1% TABLE 1 SPC July 2016

2010 and 2040 population estimates based on REMI forecast. Population allocation to counties based on SPC MERLAM process.

REGIONAL HOUSEHOLDS

COUNTY

2010

2040

CHANGE

2010-2040

% CHANGE

2010-2040

Allegheny 533,960 626,215 +92,255 +17.3%

Pittsburgh City 136,217 155,063 +18,846 +13.8%

non-Pittsburgh 397,743 471,152 +73,409 +18.5%

Armstrong 28,713 30,008 +1,295 +4.5%

Beaver 71,383 74,834 +3,451 +4.8%

Butler 72,835 89,878 +17,043 +23.4%

Fayette 55,997 58,680 +2,683 +4.8%

Greene 14,724 16,143 +1,419 +9.6%

Indiana 35,005 39,902 +4,897 +14.0%

Lawrence 37,126 41,829 +4,703 +12.7%

Washington 85,089 109,015 +23,926 +28.1%

Westmoreland 153,650 184,911 +31,261 +20.3%

TOTAL 1,088,482 1,271,415 +182,933 +16.8% TABLE 2 SPC July 2016

2010 and 2040 household estimates based on SPC MERLAM process.

Household allocation to counties based on SPC MERLAM process.

25

REGIONAL EMPLOYMENT

2010

COUNTY RETAIL MANU-

FACTURING SERVICES OTHER TOTAL Allegheny Pittsburgh City

non-Pittsburgh

Armstrong Beaver Butler Fayette Greene Indiana Lawrence Washington Westmoreland

132,625 32,381

100,244

3,931 12,901 20,777 9,984 2,366 8,073 7,648

17,968 34,710

38,069 10,374

27,695

2,788 7,011

12,185 2,873

427 2,302 3,966

10,409 17,978

604,952 309,077

295,875

18,059 35,821 65,927 32,301 11,927 21,279 26,105 58,529

103,830

72,784 17,093

55,691

5,914 8,371

14,102 8,767 4,858 9,114 7,484

17,408 20,868

848,430 368,925

479,505

30,692 64,104

112,991 53,925 19,578 40,768 45,203

104,314 177,386

TOTAL 250,983 98,008 978,730 169,670 1,497,391

2040

COUNTY

RETAIL

MANU-

FACTURING SERVICES

OTHER

TOTAL Allegheny Pittsburgh City

non-Pittsburgh


142,131 32,226

109,905

3,487 13,089 22,981 9,699 2,522 8,527 8,671

22,851 36,957

32,227 9,369

22,858

2,383 7,799 8,466 2,351

325 1,423 4,309 9,124

16,955

745,102 343,347

401,755

18,553 42,393 84,169 34,900 12,369 23,932 31,268 88,038

117,082

109,980 27,102

82,878

5,985 11,422 17,998 12,359 4,920

10,200 9,992

29,633 30,578

1,029,440 412,044

617,396

30,408 74,703

133,614 59,309 20,136 44,082 54,240

149,646 201,572

TOTAL 270,915 85,362 1,197,806 243,067 1,797,150

PERCENT CHANGE 2010-2040

COUNTY

RETAIL

MANU-

FACTURING SERVICES

OTHER

TOTAL Allegheny Pittsburgh City

non-Pittsburgh


+7.2% -0.5%

+9.6%

-11.3% +1.5%

+10.6% -2.9% +6.6% +5.6%

+13.4% +27.2%

+6.5%

-15.3% -9.7%

-17.5%

-14.5% +11.2% -30.5% -18.2% -23.9% -38.2% +8.6%

-12.3% -5.7%

+23.2% +11.1%

+35.8%

+2.7% +18.3% +27.7% +8.0% +3.7%

+12.5% +19.8% +50.4% +12.8%

+51.1% +58.6%

+48.8%

+1.2% +36.4% +27.6% +41.0% +1.3%

+11.9% +33.5% +70.2% +46.5%

+21.3% +11.7%

+28.8%

-0.9% +16.5% +18.3% +10.0% +2.9% +8.1%

+20.0% +43.5% +13.6%

TOTAL +7.9% -12.9% +22.4% +43.3% +20.0%

TABLE 3 SPC July 2016 2010 and 2040 employment estimates based on REMI forecast. Employment allocation to counties based on SPC MERLAM process.




26

The attractiveness measures are used to determine each zone's relative attractiveness for different

types of development. By varying the attractiveness measures and by altering the values of the

model's policy variables, MERLAM is able to estimate the impact of various regional land use

and development scenarios. SPC updated the databases and streamlined the MERLAM

allocation process early in 2015 during development of the Cycle 10 forecasts. The Cycle 10a

forecasts were allocated to traffic zones through the use of MERLAM.

SPC’s Cycle 10a base year estimates (2015), and 2040 forecasts of population, employment, and

households were used to estimate regional travel demand for this conformity assessment. SPC

developed its travel estimation models to take full advantage of the capabilities of the TP+

software package. TP+ is a library of programs used for transportation planning.

Travel simulations for the ten-county SPC travel model region are produced with a standard

four-step chain of transportation models developed by SPC for TP+ processing. The four steps

include trip generation, trip distribution, modal split and travel assignment models. Travel was

simulated for 2015 and 2040 based on socio-economic data from SPC's Cycle 10a forecasts.

County-level socio-economic data is shown in Table 1 (population), Table 2 (households), and

Table 3 (employment). The model was last validated in the spring of 2016. Simulated 2015

travel was validated with 2014 Census data, traffic counts, VMT, and transit ridership data.

SPC's trip generation model simulates person trip productions and attractions for three trip

purposes (home-based work, home-based other, and non-home based) and truck trip productions

and attractions for three truck classes (light, medium and heavy). Person trip productions are

estimated by applying household trip rates to Cycle 10a household data in a cross-classification

model stratified by household size and auto ownership. Person trip attractions are estimated by

applying trip rates stratified by households and by three employment categories. In some

instances, attraction trip rates are further stratified by area. Home-based work trip control totals

are averaged production and attraction totals. Home-based other attractions were balanced to

match productions. Non-home based person trips and truck trips are estimated by applying trip

rates stratified by employment category. These rates are applied to Cycle 10a employment data.

Gravity models were calibrated to distribute person trips and truck trips by each trip generation

category. Impedances are a weighted sum of highway travel time and distance to reflect out-of-

pocket trip cost. Travel time includes running time, terminal time, and a penalty for major river

crossings. Home-based work trips were distributed with peak-period impedances; all other trips

were distributed with off-peak impedances.

A control total of air passenger-related travel to and from the Pittsburgh International Airport

was derived from independent airport planning studies for existing and forecast years. A gravity

model to distribute these trips was calibrated with air enplanement data reported for 2013. These

trips were then added to home-based other trips.




27

The home-based work component of the mode split model was initially developed by SPC in

1995 when calibration of a home-based work trip auto occupancy and mode split model was

completed. In addition to estimating the number of person trips using transit, the home-based

work mode split model also stratifies non-transit trips by four levels of auto occupancy (drive

alone, two person carpools, three person carpools, and vehicles with four or more occupants).

Based on those stratifications the model then converts home-based highway person trips into

vehicle trips for use in highway assignment. The model is sensitive to the presence of high-

occupancy vehicle (HOV) facilities in the highway network. The 2010-2014 Census American

Community Survey (ACS) Journey-to-Work (JTW) data reported that, regionwide, 10.2 percent

of persons traveling to work were in HOVs (vehicles with two or more occupants). Table 4

compares actual JTW percentages with the model simulation by trip attraction districts. Actual

numbers of trips, while shown in the table, should not be compared because JTW data only

represents persons working at their primary job rather than all home-based work trips. The SPC

model estimates that 10.9 percent of 2015 work trips travel in HOVs.

The auto occupancy component of the mode split model could not be used for non-work trips

because the JTW survey data includes only work trips and there are no other available data

sources for calibration. Non-work highway person trips were converted to vehicle trips by

applying vehicle occupancy rates developed by SPC and stratified by trip purpose and attraction

district.

Three travel impedances by auto and transit modes are included in the mode split model. These

are run time (total in-vehicle time), "excess" time (total out-of-vehicle time), and cost (out-of-

pocket cost). For home-based work trips the impedances are based on restrained highway travel

times and peak period transit service. For home-based other and non-home based trips,

impedances are based on free-flow highway times and mid-day transit service.

Table 5 compares observed and simulated transit route trips. Simulated network assignment

summaries for 2015 and observed data for an average month (April) in 2014 were used for the

comparisons. The route trip data and corridor definitions were obtained from Port Authority of

Allegheny County and other transit providers in the region. Table 5 shows that, regionally,

simulated route trips are within one percent of observed data.

Overall, it was determined that transit mode split and transit assignment results were reasonably

close to observed data.

HOV MODEL VALIDATION

Auto Person Trip Attractions

SOV HOV SOV HOV ACS SPC

ALLEGHENY 504,350 63,452 651,313 91,779 11.2% 12.4%

ARMSTRONG 15,709 1,887 46,040 5,962 10.7% 11.5%

BEAVER 47,941 5,320 109,214 13,574 10.0% 11.1%

BUTLER 75,177 6,854 130,191 12,988 8.4% 9.1%

FAYETTE 33,490 3,591 88,570 8,885 9.7% 9.1%

GREENE 13,918 1,908 23,920 2,605 12.1% 9.8%

INDIANA 30,387 3,312 57,872 5,259 9.8% 8.3%

LAWRENCE 27,162 2,508 60,218 5,269 8.5% 8.0%

WASHINGTON 73,837 6,975 141,334 17,437 8.6% 11.0%

WAESTMORELAND 120,992 11,084 251,553 27,303 8.4% 9.8%

OUTSIDE ALLEG 438,613 43,439 908,912 99,282 9.0% 9.8%

GRAND TOTAL 942,963 106,891 1,560,225 191,061 10.2% 10.9%

TABLE 4 SPC July 2016

County

2010-2014

Census ACS

2015

SPC SimulatedPercent HOV

28

TRANSIT ROUTE TRIP VALIDATION BY CORRIDOR

ACTUAL ASSIGNMENT ASSIGN /

SUB-CORRIDOR NAME APRIL 2014 2015 ACTUAL

ALLEGHENY VALLEY 2,879 2,452 0.85

NORTH HILLS 16,136 16,921 1.05

HOV LANE EXPRESS 2,641 5,996 2.27

OHIO VALLEY 10,025 8,096 0.81

TOTAL NORTH HILLS 31,681 33,465 1.06

WEST END - CARNEGIE 6,160 12,361 2.01

BANKSVILLE - GREENTREE 2,775 6,449 2.32

SOUTH HILLS LRV 28,412 23,982 0.84

AIRPORT SERVICE 2,140 4,030 1.88

WEST LIBERTY AVENUE 3,523 4,046 1.15

MT. WASHINGTON - HILLTOP 1,609 194 0.12

SAW MILL RUN - SOUTH BUSWAY 4,706 8,917 1.89

SOUTHSIDE 12,423 7,772 0.63

TOTAL SOUTH HILLS - WEST END 61,748 67,751 1.10

SECOND AVENUE 4,210 3,264 0.78

MON VALLEY EXPRESS 820 1,017 1.24

HOMESTEAD LOCAL AND EXPRESS 4,974 4,766 0.96

MCKEESPORT LOCAL 359 273 0.76

MONROEVILLE - EAST PITTSBURGH 0 0 ----

TOTAL SOUTHEAST 10,363 9,320 0.90

FIFTH AVENUE 19,457 24,965 1.28

FORBES AVENUE - SQUIRREL HILL 23,549 14,404 0.61

EAST SUBURBAN - BLVD OF ALLIES 8,858 5,833 0.66

EAST BUSWAY 14,439 25,176 1.74

BIGELOW BLVD - PENN HILLS 7,046 7,035 1.00

HILL DISTRICT - CENTER AVENUE 7,460 3,440 0.46

BUTLER STREET - EAST LIBERTY 4,605 2,607 0.57

HOMEWOOD - PENN / LIBERTY 7,058 3,441 0.49

TOTAL EAST END 92,472 86,901 0.94

INCLINES 1,838 1,282 0.70

OTHER PORT AUTHORITY 11,877 7,038 0.59

TOTAL PORT AUTHORITY SYSTEM 209,979 205,757 0.98

NON-PORT AUTHORITY ROUTES 9,918 12,936 1.30

TOTAL TRANSIT NETWORK 219,897 218,693 0.99


29




30

A gravity model was calibrated for distributing internal/external vehicle trips (trips with one end

inside and one end outside the region). To generate the internal/external trips to be distributed,

relationships were initially developed between internal person trip ends by county and census

2010 journey to work data for work trips destined to the region from the external area. These

trip patterns were factored to match PennDOT and SPC traffic count data by external cordon

segment as shown on Map 4. Table 6 compares simulated external cordon segment volumes to

PennDOT and SPC traffic count data from various years and factored to a 2014 value using

factors supplied by PennDOT. The total simulated 2015 volume regionwide is about three

percent higher than the observed volume.

An estimate of through trips (vehicle trips with both ends outside the region) is the final

component of trips needed for the regional trip matrices. Results from SPC’s 2006 External

Cordon Survey provided traffic volume estimates for the major travel corridors crossing the

region’s boundary. These traffic volumes were factored to a 2014 value using factors supplied

by PennDOT. The growth in through trips for forecast years is based on the increase in trips in

the modeled area (all except Allegheny) for the appropriate time period.

SPC assigns vehicle trips to the TP+ -based highway networks with a multi-iteration equilibrium

assignment process which includes capacity restraint after each iteration. The impedances used

for capacity restraint are highway based costs which include weighted values of time and

distance. Through trips and medium and heavy-duty truck trips are pre-loaded on the network

with a one pass assignment that attracts these vehicles to high-level facilities in the network and

keeps them there through iterations of capacity restraint. Also, the highway assignment

procedure permits only HOV trips to use HOV facilities. The accuracy of the travel estimation

process was validated with 2014 traffic counts at PennDOT’s permanent traffic count stations in

the region and 2014 highway VMT data.

SPC collected traffic counts on the bridges crossing the Allegheny, Monongahela, and Ohio

rivers in 2007. These traffic counts were factored to 2014 values using factors supplied by

PennDOT. Table 7 compares simulated river crossing volumes to the factored SPC traffic count

data. Map 6 illustrates the river crossing segments reported in Table 7. The total simulated 2015

volume regionwide is about seventeen percent higher than the factored 2014 volume.

PennDOT maintains eleven permanent traffic count stations in the region as shown on Map 4. A

comparison of 2014 traffic counts to assigned 2015 link volumes at each location is made in

Table 8. The total simulated volume for all eleven stations is about fifteen percent lower than the

observed volume.

VMT, stratified by functional class and county, from a 2015 traffic assignment was compared to

2014 VMT estimates made by PennDOT. Regionwide, there was a two percent difference

between observed and simulated VMT. That comparison is shown in Table 9.

Overall, it was determined that highway assignment results were reasonably close to the

observed data.

TRAVEL MODEL VALIDATION

External Cordon Volume Comparisons

CORDON

SEGMENTCOUNTY

OBSERVED

VOLUME

SIMULATED

VOLUME

SIMULATED /

OBSERVED

1 Lawrence 37,909 36,872 0.97

2 Beaver 23,658 29,361 1.24

3 Washington 62,560 63,131 1.01

4 Greene 1,290 2,477 1.92

Western Boundary Total 125,417 131,841 1.05

5 Greene 33,995 27,795 0.82

6 Fayette 18,912 19,021 1.01

Southern Boundary Total 52,907 46,816 0.88

7 Fayette 8,381 11,524 1.38

8 Westmoreland 47,349 34,646 0.73

9 Indiana 27,845 27,370 0.98

Eastern Boundary Total 83,575 73,540 0.88

10 Indiana 11,380 11,530 1.01

11 Armstrong 13,591 18,770 1.38

12 Butler 18,705 28,589 1.53

13 Lawrence 53,146 57,115 1.07

Northern Boundary Total 96,822 116,004 1.20

TOTAL 358,721 368,201 1.03

Table 6 SPC July 2016

Observed volume is from SPC 2005 - 2006 external cordon counts, factored to 2014 values,

and from factored PennDOT data.

Simulated volume from SPC assigned 2015 trips.


External Cordon Segments and ATR Count Station Locations

Map 4 SPC July 2016

31


RIVER CROSSING

SEGMENT

OBSERVED

VOLUME

SIMULATED

VOLUME

SIMULATED /

OBSERVED

1A 109,026 130,294 1.20

1B 112,806 125,016 1.11

Ohio River Total 221,832 255,310 1.15

2A 194,184 242,405 1.25

2B 193,459 238,355 1.23

Allegheny River Total 387,643 480,760 1.24

3A 249,646 296,773 1.19

3B 276,023 294,264 1.07

Monongahela River Total 525,669 591,037 1.12

TOTAL 1,135,144 1,327,107 1.17


Observed volume is from SPC 2007 Bridge count, factored to 2014 values,

and from factored PennDOT data.


Map 5 SPC July 2016

River Crossing Volume Comparisons


River Crossing Segments

32

COUNT

STATIONCOUNTY ROUTE

OBSERVED

VOLUME

SIMULATED

VOLUME

SIM/

OBS

18 Butler PA 38 6,824 6,278 0.92

19 Washington PA 88 5,782 7,876 1.36

20 Lawrence PA 65 7,106 9,678 1.36

24 Westmoreland US 22 20,354 20,313 1.00

203 Allegheny PA 65 19,444 18,867 0.97

208 Allegheny I-376 87,652 71,738 0.82

370 Westmoreland I-70 30,650 14,055 0.46

374 Butler I-79 35,899 18,620 0.52

375 Allegheny US 22/30 23,173 33,342 1.44

393 Washington I-70 34,076 32,350 0.95

395 Fayette PA 21 10,400 6,239 0.60

281,360 239,356 0.85


Observed volume is "Average Weekday Traffic" from 2014 PennDOT data.



Traffic Volume Comparisons - ATR Stations

TOTAL

33


VMT Comparisons

COUNTY INTERSTATE ARTERIAL

COLLECTOR

LOCAL TOTAL

Allegheny 4,652 11,494 6,136 22,282

Armstrong 0 1,055 475 1,530

Beaver 743 1,618 1,218 3,580

Butler 1,031 2,346 1,564 4,941

Fayette 0 1,631 940 2,571

Greene 721 375 576 1,672

Indiana 0 1,299 736 2,035

Lawrence 485 714 716 1,915

Washington 2,189 2,084 1,353 5,626

Westmoreland 2,093 4,166 2,224 8,483

TOTAL 11,915 26,781 15,937 54,634


COLLECTOR

LOCAL TOTAL

Allegheny 4,056 14,005 4,500 22,561

Armstrong 0 939 631 1,570

Beaver 327 2,355 1,079 3,761

Butler 700 2,295 1,766 4,761

Fayette 0 1,608 860 2,468

Greene 343 400 598 1,341

Indiana 0 1,301 828 2,129

Lawrence 245 1,220 747 2,213

Washington 1,483 2,062 1,680 5,225

Westmoreland 1,296 3,709 2,655 7,660

TOTAL 8,452 29,893 15,344 53,689


COLLECTOR

LOCAL TOTAL

Allegheny 0.87 1.22 0.73 1.01

Armstrong --- 0.89 1.33 1.03

Beaver 0.44 1.46 0.89 1.05

Butler 0.68 0.98 1.13 0.96

Fayette --- 0.99 0.92 0.96

Greene 0.48 1.07 1.04 0.80

Indiana --- 1.00 1.12 1.05

Lawrence 0.51 1.71 1.04 1.16

Washington 0.68 0.99 1.24 0.93

Westmoreland 0.62 0.89 1.19 0.90

TOTAL 0.71 1.12 0.96 0.98


Observed VMT from 2014 PennDOT data.

Simulated VMT from SPC-assigned 2015 link VMT.

Observed VMT (000)

Simulated VMT (000)

Simulated/Observed VMT

34




35

The above models were used to produce regional person trip matrices for 2015 from the

Cycle 10a base year estimates. In addition, trip productions and attractions were generated for

2040 from the Cycle 10a 2040 forecasts. Prior to trip distribution, productions and attractions

for 2017, 2020, 2025, and 2035 were developed by interpolating between 2015 and 2040. Trip

distribution for each scenario was based on the characteristics of the transportation network

defined for the scenario.

Free-flow highway speeds and link capacities are selected from a look-up table that is stratified

by roadway facility type and area type. SPC has developed a model to calculate area type based

on population and employment densities. In general, free-flow speed and capacity decreases

with increasing development density. The area type model provides an automated procedure for

updating area type codes in the network based on changes in existing and future development

densities. The area type model was applied for each scenario using Cycle 10a population and

employment densities estimated for the scenario year.

Modal split model runs were made for each scenario using appropriate combinations of trip

tables and transportation networks. Modal split results for the 2015 network are presented in

Table 10. The 2040 network modal split results are shown in Table 11. Table 12 summarizes

regional trips by purpose and mode for each of the seven scenarios defined for this conformity

assessment of the 2017-2020 TIP and the 2040 Plan. Table 13 summarizes modeled HOV trips

for each scenario.

2017 MODAL SPLIT SUMMARY

2015 Person Trip Attractions 2015 Auto Trip Attractions 2015 Transit Trip Attractions 2015 Transit/2015 Total Person

DISTRICT HBW HBO NHB TOT HBW HBO NHB TOT HBW HBO NHB TOT HBW HBO NHB TOT

CBD 165817 99631 40547 305995 75007 54931 31082 161020 71460 16237 3834 91531 43.10% 16.30% 9.46% 29.91%

PGH E 164019 289188 105072 558279 130346 172768 75065 378179 25400 17255 6934 49589 15.49% 5.97% 6.60% 8.88%

PGH S 43014 70737 25267 139018 38828 43804 18887 101519 1886 1493 429 3808 4.38% 2.11% 1.70% 2.74%

PGH N 43617 98836 41284 183737 39664 65119 32116 136899 1794 1590 656 4040 4.11% 1.61% 1.59% 2.20%

PGH TOT 250650 458761 171623 881034 208838 281691 126068 616597 29080 20338 8019 57437 11.60% 4.43% 4.67% 6.52%

ALG E 128709 432589 117238 678536 120793 281018 80787 482598 1645 2450 698 4793 1.28% 0.57% 0.60% 0.71%

ALG N 186328 581335 160336 927999 175228 375689 110183 661100 2079 2817 532 5428 1.12% 0.48% 0.33% 0.58%

ALG S 137952 455735 125004 718691 129211 293781 85984 508976 2429 3467 960 6856 1.76% 0.76% 0.77% 0.95%

ALG W 131724 385734 101079 618537 122922 262921 73083 458926 1457 2449 470 4376 1.11% 0.63% 0.46% 0.71%

ALG TOT 584713 1855393 503657 2943763 548154 1213409 350037 2111600 7610 11183 2660 21453 1.30% 0.60% 0.53% 0.73%

OUTSIDE ALG 882722 2434363 629060 3946145 840235 1622586 449224 2912045 2824 3886 1137 7847 0.32% 0.16% 0.18% 0.20%

GRAND TOTAL 1883902 4848148 1344887 8076937 1672234 3172617 956411 5801262 110974 51644 15650 178268 5.89% 1.07% 1.16% 2.21%


36

2040 MODAL SPLIT SUMMARY

2040 Person Trip Attractions 2040 Auto Trip Attractions 2040 Transit Trip Attractions 2040 Transit/2040 Total Person

DISTRICT HBW HBO NHB TOT HBW HBO NHB TOT HBW HBO NHB TOT HBW HBO NHB TOT

CBD 173258 103237 43308 319803 79013 56853 33185 169051 74531 16852 4059 95442 43.02% 16.32% 9.37% 29.84%

PGH E 179222 307586 113136 599944 143043 183423 80905 407371 27298 18735 7340 53373 15.23% 6.09% 6.49% 8.90%

PGH S 45814 74007 26605 146426 41363 45822 19872 107057 2033 1613 449 4095 4.44% 2.18% 1.69% 2.80%

PGH N 49169 106599 44606 200374 44855 69775 34598 149228 1940 1755 702 4397 3.95% 1.65% 1.57% 2.19%

PGH TOT 274205 488192 184347 946744 229261 299020 135375 663656 31271 22103 8491 61865 11.40% 4.53% 4.61% 6.53%

ALG E 154647 495617 131542 781806 145261 322071 90646 557978 1857 2759 805 5421 1.20% 0.56% 0.61% 0.69%

ALG N 222708 679236 184840 1086784 209983 439061 127064 776108 2267 3109 597 5973 1.02% 0.46% 0.32% 0.55%

ALG S 162665 515991 141253 819909 152858 332653 97161 582672 2735 3888 1053 7676 1.68% 0.75% 0.75% 0.94%

ALG W 156714 448574 118131 723419 146893 306529 85622 539044 1557 2614 525 4696 0.99% 0.58% 0.44% 0.65%

ALG TOT 696734 2139418 575766 3411918 654995 1400314 400493 2455802 8416 12370 2980 23766 1.21% 0.58% 0.52% 0.70%

OUTSIDE ALG 999725 2735713 698999 4434437 953193 1822105 498678 3273976 3092 4150 1155 8397 0.31% 0.15% 0.17% 0.19%

GRAND TOTAL 2143922 5466560 1502420 9112902 1916462 3578292 1067731 6562485 117310 55475 16685 189470 5.47% 1.01% 1.11% 2.08%


37

TRAVEL MODEL RESULTSTrips By Purpose and Mode

- - - Total Person Trip Attractions - - -

YEAR SCENARIO HBW HBO NHB TOTAL

2017 2017 Existing Year 1,883,902 4,848,148 1,344,887 8,076,937

2020 2020 TIP Year 1,917,786 4,928,771 1,365,425 8,211,982

2025 2025 Interim Year #1 1,974,605 5,063,482 1,399,966 8,438,053

2035 2035 Interim Year #2 2,087,488 5,332,190 1,468,257 8,887,935

2040 2040 LRP Horizon Year 2,143,922 5,466,560 1,502,420 9,112,902

- - - Auto Vehicle Trip Attractions - - -


2017 2017 Existing Year 1,672,234 3,172,617 956,411 5,801,262

2020 2020 TIP Year 1,703,893 3,225,446 970,940 5,900,279

2025 2025 Interim Year #1 1,756,795 3,313,854 995,321 6,065,970

2035 2035 Interim Year #2 1,863,522 3,490,121 1,043,575 6,397,218

2040 2040 LRP Horizon Year 1,916,462 3,578,292 1,067,731 6,562,485

- - - Transit Person Trip Attractions - - -


2017 2017 Existing Year 110,974 51,644 15,650 178,268

2020 2020 TIP Year 111,818 52,192 15,789 179,799

2025 2025 Interim Year #1 113,253 52,995 16,017 182,265

2035 2035 Interim Year #2 116,040 54,686 16,460 187,186

2040 2040 LRP Horizon Year 117,310 55,475 16,685 189,470

- - - Transit / Total Person Trips - - -


2017 2017 Existing Year 5.89% 1.07% 1.16% 2.21%

2020 2020 TIP Year 5.83% 1.06% 1.16% 2.19%

2025 2025 Interim Year #1 5.74% 1.05% 1.14% 2.16%

2035 2035 Interim Year #2 5.56% 1.03% 1.12% 2.11%

2040 2040 LRP Horizon Year 5.47% 1.01% 1.11% 2.08%

TABLE 11 SPC May 2016


38

HOV MODEL RESULTSVehicle Trips By Auto Occupancy Level

(Home-Based Work Trips Only)

- - - - HBW Vehicle Trips by Occupancy - - - -

YEAR SCENARIO 1 2 3 4+ TOTAL

2017 2017 Existing Year 1,580,338 84,847 5,612 1,401 1,672,198

2020 2020 TIP Year 1,610,739 86,025 5,694 1,420 1,703,878

2025 2025 Interim Year #1 1,661,298 88,192 5,830 1,466 1,756,786

2035 2035 Interim Year #2 1,764,771 91,351 5,925 1,474 1,863,521

2040 2040 LRP Horizon Year 1,815,632 93,323 6,014 1,498 1,916,467


39




40




41

V. Development of Emission Factors

This section summarizes how EPA's MOVES 2014 emissions model was used to develop

emission factors for use in this conformity determination.

MOVES 2014 (Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator) is the latest version of EPA's emissions

model. It is EPA’s official model for estimating emissions from highway vehicles for SIP

emission inventories and transportation conformity. The methodologies incorporated into

MOVES for estimating emissions are based on methods and research conducted by EPA.

The analysis methodology and data inputs for this analysis were developed through interagency

consultation and used available EPA guidance documents that included: Policy Guidance on the

Use of MOVES2014 and Subsequent Minor Revisions for State Implementation Plan

Development, Transportation Conformity, and Other Purposes, US EPA Office of

Transportation and Air Quality, EPA-420-B-14-008, July 2014; Using MOVES to Prepare

Emission Inventories in State Implementation Plans and Transportation Conformity: Technical

Guidance for MOVES2014. US EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality, EPA-420-B-15-

007, January 2015; Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) – User Guide for

MOVES2014, US EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality, EPA-420-B-14-055; July 2014.

MOVES emission estimates depend on a mix of local and default (internal to MOVES) data that

are used in the analysis. Local data has been used for data items that have a significant impact

on emissions, including: vehicle miles of travel (VMT), vehicle population, congested speeds,

and vehicle type mix, as well as environmental and fuel assumptions. Local data inputs to the

analysis process reflect the latest available planning assumptions using information obtained

from PennDOT, DEP and other local/national sources.

The methodology used for this analysis includes the use of custom post-processing software

(PPSUITE) to calculate hourly speeds and prepare key traffic input files to the MOVES emission

model. PPSUITE consists of a set of programs that analyzes highway operating conditions,

calculates highway speeds, compiles VMT and vehicle type mix data, and prepares MOVES runs

and processes MOVES outputs. PPSUITE is a widely used and accepted tool for estimating

speeds and processing emissions rates. The PPSUITE tool has been used for developing on-road

highway mobile source inventories in SIP revisions, control strategy analyses, and conformity

analyses in other states. The software was developed to utilize accepted transportation

engineering methodologies. The PPSUITE process is integral to producing traffic-related input

files to the MOVES emission model.

Other MOVES input files are prepared externally to the PPSUITE software, including vehicle

population, vehicle age, environmental, and fuel input files. The CENTRAL software is also

used in this analysis. CENTRAL is a menu-driven software platform that executes the PPSUITE

and MOVES processes in batch mode. The CENTRAL software allows users to execute runs for

a variety of input options and integrates custom MYSQL steps into the process. CENTRAL

provides important quality control and assurance steps, including file naming and storage

automation.




42

A large number of inputs to MOVES are needed to fully account for the numerous vehicle and

environmental parameters that affect emissions. These inputs include traffic flow characteristics,

vehicle descriptions, fuel parameters, I/M program parameters and environmental variables.

MOVES includes a default national database of meteorology, vehicle fleet, vehicle activity, fuel,

and emission control program data for every county. EPA, however, cannot certify that the

default data is the most current or best available information for any specific area. As a result,

local data, where available, is recommended for use when conducting a regional conformity

analysis. A mix of local and default data is used for this analysis.

Emission rates within MOVES vary significantly by vehicle type. MOVES produces emission

rates for thirteen vehicle source input types. The emissions estimation process includes a method

to disaggregate the traffic volumes output from SPC’s travel demand model to the thirteen

vehicle source types. Vehicle type pattern data is used by PPSUITE to distribute the hourly

roadway segment volumes among the thirteen vehicle source types. Similar to the 24-hour

pattern data, this data contains percentage splits to each source type for every hour of the day.

The vehicle type pattern data is developed from several sources of information including

PennDOT truck percentages from PennDOT's statewide Roadway Management System (RMS)

database, hourly distributions for trucks and total traffic compiled by PennDOT’s Bureau of

Planning and Research (BPR), transit data from PennDOT and the National Transit Database

Transit Profiles, and school bus registration data from PennDOT’s Bureau of Motor Vehicles

Registration Database.

Vehicle type percentages are also input into the capacity analysis section of PPSUITE to adjust

the speeds in response to truck volume. Larger trucks take up more roadway space compared to

an equal number of cars and light trucks, which is accounted for in the speed estimation process

by adjusting capacity using information from the Transportation Research Board’s fifth edition

of the Highway Capacity Manual.

Vehicle age distributions are input to MOVES for each of the thirteen source types. These

distributions reflect the percentage of the vehicle fleet falling under each vehicle model year

(MY), to a maximum age of 31 years. The vehicle age distributions were prepared from the

most recently available registration download from PennDOT’s Bureau of Motor Vehicles

Registration Database. Due to data limitations, information for light duty vehicles was used as

local data for MOVES inputs, while heavy-duty vehicles used the internal MOVES national

default data.

The vehicle population information, including the number and age of vehicles, impacts

forecasted start and evaporative emissions within MOVES. Similar to vehicle ages, MOVES

requires vehicle populations for each of the thirteen source type categories. County vehicle

registration data was used to estimate vehicle population for light-duty vehicles, transit buses,

and school buses. Other heavy-duty vehicle population values were based on VMT for each

source type using the vehicle mix and pattern data discussed previously. PPSUITE automatically

applies MOVES default ratios of VMT and source type population (e.g. the number of miles per

vehicle by source type) to the local VMT estimates to produce vehicle population.




43

Average monthly minimum temperatures, maximum temperatures, and humidity values are

consistent with the regional State Implementation Plan (SIP) modeling conducted by DEP.

The MOVES default fuel formulation and fuel supply data were reviewed and updated based on

available local volumetric fuel property information. The “gasohol” market penetration and Reid

Vapor Pressure (RVP) values were updated, but MOVES default data was used for the remaining

parameters.

The default I/M program parameters included in MOVES were examined for each county in the

SPC region. Necessary changes were made to the default parameters to match the actual local

program. A basic I/M program was begun by Pennsylvania in 1984 and applied to virtually all

light-duty gasoline powered cars and trucks newer than the 1967 model year that were registered

within designated areas of the state. A computerized analysis of vehicle tailpipe exhaust

emissions with the engine idling (idle test) was performed annually. The test was conducted by

licensed inspection facilities where repairs on inspected vehicles could also be performed.

Within the Southwestern Pennsylvania region, the basic I/M program applies only to pre-1981

model year vehicles registered in four counties (Allegheny, Beaver, Washington and

Westmoreland). Estimates of failure rates, test waiver rates, and compliance rates for the basic

I/M program are also are specified in the I/M program parameters.

Pennsylvania implemented an enhanced I/M program in 1997 for the Southwestern Pennsylvania

region. That program applies to virtually all gasoline powered cars and trucks between model

years 1981 and 1995 that are registered in Allegheny, Beaver, Washington and Westmoreland

counties. The enhanced I/M program employs a more precise emissions test. As with basic I/M,

the test is conducted annually by licensed inspection facilities where repairs to inspected vehicles

can also be performed. The test measures tailpipe emissions at two engine speeds. One test is

made while the engine is idling and the second test occurs after completion of a 30 second, 2500

rpm cycle. Estimates of failure rates, test waiver rates and compliance rates for the enhanced

I/M program are also specified.

Further enhancements to the I/M program were implemented in 2003 for the Southwestern

Pennsylvania region. That new program utilizes On-Board Diagnostics (OBD) technology and

applies to 1996 model year and newer gasoline powered cars and light trucks. This annual test is

conducted by licensed inspection facilities where repairs to inspected vehicles can also be

performed. When a vehicle is taken to a service center or repair shop, the diagnostic trouble

codes stored in the vehicle’s computer memory are retrieved. The diagnostic trouble codes

identify failures, malfunctions, or deterioration of the vehicle’s emissions control components.

Estimates of failure rates, test waiver rates, and compliance rates for the OBD I/M program are

also specified.

Scenarios that specify the enhanced or OBD I/M programs also include an anti-tampering

program consisting of a visual inspection of the emissions control system components to detect

tampering and other damage. The program mandates the repair or replacement of defective or

missing components.




44

The Pennsylvania Clean Vehicles (PCV) Program, adopted in 1998, incorporates the California

Low Emission Vehicle Program (CA LEV, as amended) by reference although it allowed

automakers to comply with the National Low Emission Vehicle (NLEV) program as an

alternative to this Pennsylvania program until model year (MY) 2006. Beginning with MY

2008, “new” passenger cars and light-duty trucks with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of

8,500 pounds or less that are sold or leased and titled in Pennsylvania must be certified by the

California Air Resources Board (CARB) or be certified for sale in all 50 states. For this

program, a “new” vehicle is a qualified vehicle with an odometer reading less than 7,500 miles.

DEP and PennDOT worked with the automobile manufacturers, dealers, and other interested

business partners and finalized procedures for complying with these new requirements. DEP is

focusing on its outreach with the manufacturers and dealers on what they can offer for sale and

how to certify that the vehicles are compliant. PennDOT’s role is to ensure paperwork

procedures for title and registrations include these certifications of compliance or that the vehicle

owner qualifies for an exemption to the requirements. In all cases, DEP will use information

obtained during PennDOT’s title and registration process to oversee and audit, as needed, certain

vehicle title transactions to determine compliance to the program. The impacts of this program

are modeled for all analysis years beyond 2008.

After computing speeds and aggregating VMT and VHT, PPSUITE prepares traffic-related

inputs needed to run EPA’s MOVES software. Additional required MOVES inputs are prepared

externally from the processing software and include temperatures, I/M program parameters, fuel

characteristics, vehicle fleet age distributions, and source type population. The MOVES county

importer file (movesimporter.xml) is created and run in batch mode. This program converts all

data files into the MYSQL format used by the MOVES model. At that point, a MOVES run

specification file (*.mrs) is created which specifies options and key data locations for the run.

The MOVES run is then executed in batch mode. MOVES can be executed using either an

inventory or rate-based approach. For this analysis, MOVES is applied using the inventory-

based approach. Using this approach, actual VMT and vehicle population are provided as inputs

to the model; MOVES is responsible for producing the total emissions for the region.

Sample MOVES data importer files (*.xml) and run specification files (*.mrs) are provided in

Appendix B.




45

VI. Transportation Model Application and Results

Five scenarios were defined by selectively assigning the 2017, 2020, 2025, 2035, and 2040 trip

tables described in Section IV to the transportation networks defined in Section III. The highway

and transit assignment results were used to develop an emission level for each scenario. The five

scenarios included:

1. Existing Year and PM2.5 NAAQS Budget Year (2017 network, 2017 trips)

2. TIP Build Year and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS Attainment Year (2020 network, 2020 trips)

3. Interim Year #1 and PM2.5 NAAQS Budget Year (2025 network, 2025 trips)

4. Interim Year #2 (2035 network, 2035 trips)

5. Long Range Plan (2040 network, 2040 trips)

Highway and transit assignments for each scenario were produced using the methodology

described in Section IV. For each scenario, highway assignment summaries were developed and

stratified by county and functional class. Separate summaries were developed for each

nonattainment area. These summaries include vehicle miles of travel (VMT) and weighted

average speed. For purposes of the conformity process, assignment summaries for the network

centroid connectors served as a partial surrogate for local (non-network) travel characteristics.

An estimate of intrazonal travel was also developed from each highway assignment. The

intrazonal estimate was included in the local travel summary. Transit assignment summaries

were used to estimate bus vehicle miles and average speed for peak and off-peak conditions.

Peak and off-peak vehicle miles and speed of automobile trips to park-and-ride facilities were

also estimated from transit assignments

Two adjustments were made to the network VMT that was output from highway assignments.

First, an estimate of the VMT reduction potential of various Travel Demand Management

(TDM) strategies included in the TIP and Plan was developed through use of a TDM evaluation

model. Second, VMT was seasonally adjusted to appropriately represent a typical day for each

analysis month.

Implementation of the TDM strategies defined in Figure 2 can produce modest reductions (3-5

percent) in forecasted regional VMT. Funding for these TDM strategies is included as a line

item in the 2040 Plan under the Traffic Operations and Safety Investment Strategy.




46

Funding in the 2017-2020 TIP is programmed for the specific TDM projects listed below:

Transportation Management Association Funding –ACTA, OTMA, PDP, $3,000,000 (MPMS#69837)

CommuteInfo Individual Outreach - SPC, $125,000 (MPMS#100376)

Pittsburgh Route and Sign Network – City of Pittsburgh, $542,000 (MPMS#94889)

Carnegie Park-N-Ride – PAAC, $13,000,000 (MPMS#106594)

Butler Multimodal Center – BTA, $2,875,000 (MPMS#88989)

New Transit Service (Butler to Pittsburgh) – BTA, $1,000,000 (MPMS#88990)

Bus Shelters – BTA, $100,000 (MPMS#83836)

Rt.68 Park and Ride Program - BTA, $3,750,000 (MPMS#106605)

Bus Stop Signage - NCATA, $90,000 (MPMS#106672)

Renovate Shelters - NCATA, $135,000 (MPMS#106675)

Bike Enhancements/Marketing - MMVTA, $70,000 (MPMS#106663)

The total cost identified in the 2017-2020 TIP for these eleven projects is $24,687,000. A

similar level of funding for TDM projects is available for programming on future TIPs from the

Traffic Operations and Safety line item in the Long Range Plan.

To evaluate the effect of the TDM strategies on VMT, SPC utilized a microcomputer software

package known as the TDM Evaluation Model. That model is an analytic tool that supports the

quantitative evaluation of TDM programs. The model was developed with the support of the

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA).

The input data includes information about the package of TDM strategies to be implemented, the

marketing and educational activities to promote the benefits of the strategies, and the expected

level of participation by employers and individuals within identified target markets.

The TDM strategies in Figure 2 defined by SPC for this conformity assessment include regional

transit and ridesharing promotional programs, compressed work week and telecommuting, as

well as direct subsidies by employers to employees who commute by transit, carpool or vanpool.

It was not presumed that any of the elements of the TDM packages would be mandated by law.

An active ongoing marketing and public relations effort was defined as part of the model inputs.

A “base” or current level of implementation for TDM strategies was included as model inputs for

both the 2020 (TIP) and 2040 (Plan) scenarios.

The model was run for the 2020 and 2040 scenarios. Results for 2025 and 2035 were

interpolated from the 2020 and 2040 outputs. Estimated VMT reductions as a result of the

modeled TDM strategies ranged from around 183,000 vehicle miles in 2020 to about 1.4 million

in 2040. Input and output summary reports generated by the TDM model, as well as employer

participation rates, appear in Appendix D.

Information from SPC’s travel model was input into the MOVES 2014 model and used in the

calculation of emissions for each nonattainment and maintenance area for each analysis year.

The resulting VMT, average speed, and emissions are presented in Section VII (Tables 14

through 17).




47

Summaries of VMT and emissions by county and roadway type appear in Appendix C for each

PM2.5 and 8-hour ozone nonattainment and maintenance area. The summaries were compiled

from MOVES model outputs.

Travel Demand Management Strategies

Strategy

Definition

Increased efforts to promote ridesharing

and transit

- Ride matching services

- Preferential (more convenient) parking

- Flexible work schedules Programs to deter single occupant

vehicle work trips

- Programs such as "TransitChek" for

carpools, vanpools, and transit Flexible Work Hours, Staggered Work

Hours, Compressed Work Weeks

- Aggressive promotion with region's

employers Telecommuting

- Work with employers and government

agencies to promote concept and

infrastructure Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)

- Work to implement projects that

provide transportation system users

with better information on existing

system conditions, congestion and

travel choices

Figure 2 SPC July 2016




48




49

VII. Conformity Determination

PM2.5 Nonattainment Areas

Conformity determinations for transportation plans and programs under the PM2.5 air quality

standards are based, as appropriate, on build/no-build analyses, comparisons to an emissions

budget, and/or comparison to emissions levels from a base year.

As described in Section II, quantitative analysis of emissions under the 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS and the 2006 daily PM2.5 NAAQS is not required for the Liberty-Clairton

nonattainment area.

The appropriate conformity test for the Indiana County portion of the Johnstown nonattainment

area under the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS and the 2006 daily PM2.5 NAAQS is a comparison of

future year emissions to approved PM2.5 and NOx MVEBs. This analysis should demonstrate

reduced emissions in a future year under the build condition when compared with the appropriate

emissions budget.

The appropriate conformity test for the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley nonattainment area under the

1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS and the 2006 daily PM2.5 NAAQS is a comparison of future year

emissions to approved PM2.5 and NOx MVEBs. This analysis should demonstrate reduced

emissions in a future year under the build condition when compared with the appropriate

emissions budget.

The appropriate conformity test for the Allegheny County nonattainment area under the 2012

annual PM2.5 standard is a comparison of future year emissions to Allegheny County inventory

emissions (including allocated safety margin) that are contained in the Maintenance Plan

submitted to EPA for the 1997/2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. This analysis should demonstrate reduced

emissions in a future year under the build condition when compared with the Allegheny County

inventory emissions.

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PM2.5 Nonattainment Area

As noted in Section II, MVEBs have been established for use in conformity assessments for the

1997 annual PM2.5 and 2006 daily PM2.5 NAAQS for the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PM2.5

nonattainment area. The PM2.5 and NOx emission factors from the MOVES model, in

combination with the highway and transit assignment results from the five scenarios described in

Section III, were used to develop the annual emission levels for the nonattainment area.

The total annual VMT, and the PM2.5 and NOx emission estimates and MVEB values for the

nonattainment area are presented in Table 14 for each analysis year. The estimated emissions

and MVEB values are plotted on Figures 3 (PM2.5) and 4 (NOx). VMT and emissions by county

and facility type for each scenario are presented in Appendix C.




50

Conformity for the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley nonattainment area under the 1997 annual PM2.5

and 2006 daily PM2.5 standard is demonstrated if future annual emissions are less than MVEB

levels. In all analysis years, as Table 14 and Figures 3 and 4 demonstrate, future annual

emissions are less than the MVEB. The analysis shows that the criteria for conformity under the

1997 annual PM2.5 and 2006 daily PM2.5 standard have been satisfied.

No goals, directives, recommendations or projects identified in the 2040 Plan or the 2017-2020

TIP contradict in a negative manner any specific requirements or commitments of the applicable

state implementation plan. There are no transportation control measures in the applicable state

implementation plan.

Allegheny County PM2.5 Nonattainment Area

As noted in Section II, MVEBs have not been established for the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS for

the Allegheny County PM2.5 nonattainment area. Emissions inventory values for 2011, and

emission projections for 2017 and 2025, for Allegheny County (including allocated safety

margin) are contained in the Maintenance Plan submitted to EPA for the 1997/2006 PM2.5

NAAQS for the larger Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PM2.5 Nonattainment Area. Through the

interagency consultation process, values used for the conformity test for this nonattainment area

were developed from emission inventory data contained in this SIP revision. The PM2.5 and

NOx emission factors from the MOVES model, in combination with the highway and transit

assignment results from the seven scenarios described in Section III, were used to develop the

emission levels for the nonattainment area.

The total annual VMT, and the PM2.5 and NOx emission estimates and emissions inventory

values, for the nonattainment area are presented in Table 16 for each analysis year. The

estimated emissions and inventory values are plotted on Figures 7 (PM2.5) and 8 (NOx). VMT

and emissions by facility type for each scenario are presented in Appendix C.

Conformity for the Allegheny County nonattainment area under the 2012 annual PM2.5 standard

is demonstrated if future annual emissions are less than the emission inventory values. In all

analysis years, as Table 16 and Figures 7 and 8 demonstrate, future annual emissions are less

than the inventory values. The analysis shows that the criteria for conformity under the 2012

annual PM2.5 standard have been satisfied.





Indiana County Portion of the Johnstown PM2.5 Nonattainment Area

As noted in Section II, emission budgets have been established for use in conformity assessments

for the 1997 annual PM2.5 and 2006 daily PM2.5 NAAQS for the Indiana County portion of the




51

Johnstown PM2.5 nonattainment area. The PM2.5 and NOx emission factors from the MOVES

model, in combination with the highway and transit assignment results from the five scenarios

described in Section III, were used to develop the annual emission levels for the nonattainment

area.

The total annual VMT, and the PM2.5 and NOx emission estimates and MVEB values for the

nonattainment area are presented in Table 15 for each analysis year. The estimated emissions

and MVEB values are plotted on Figures 5 (PM2.5) and 6 (NOx). VMT and emissions by county

and facility type for each scenario are presented in Appendix C.

Conformity for the Indiana County portion of the Johnstown PM2.5 nonattainment area is

demonstrated if future annual emissions are less than MVEB levels. In all analysis years, as

Table 15 and Figures 5 and 6 demonstrate, future annual emissions are less than the MVEB. The

analysis shows that the criteria for conformity under the 1997 annual PM2.5 and 2006 daily PM2.5

standard have been satisfied.





8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area

Conformity determinations for transportation plans and programs under the 2008 8-hour ozone

NAAQS are based, as appropriate, on build/no-build analyses, comparisons to an emissions

budget, and/or comparison to 2002 emissions levels.

As described in Section II, the appropriate test for the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley 8-hour ozone

nonattainment area is a comparison of future year emissions to established VOC and NOx

emissions budgets. The analysis should demonstrate reduced emissions in a future year under

the build condition when compared with the appropriate emissions budget. The VOC and NOx

emission factors, in combination with the highway and transit assignment results from the

scenarios described in Section III, were used to develop the emissions levels for the budget

comparisons.

Daily VMT and emission estimates for each scenario, as well as the approved VOC and NOx

budgets, are presented in Table 17 and are plotted on Figures 9 (VOC) and 10 (NOx). VMT and

emissions by county and facility type for each scenario are presented in Appendix C.

Applying the budget test demonstrates that the conformity criteria are satisfied for both VOC and

NOx emissions. For each scenario, VOC and NOx emissions are lower than the corresponding

emission budget.




52

No goals, directives, recommendations or projects identified in the 2017-2020 TIP or the 2040

Plan contradict in a negative manner any specific requirements or commitments of the applicable



Allegheny County Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Area

As noted in Section II, EPA approved a second limited carbon monoxide maintenance plan for

this area which demonstrates that the Pittsburgh area will continue to maintain the CO NAAQS.

Under limited maintenance plans, EPA policy does not require a carbon monoxide emission

budget test for conformity determinations. Emission budgets in limited carbon monoxide

maintenance plan areas are considered to be not constraining during the maintenance period.

The applicable conformity criteria for carbon monoxide have, therefore, been satisfied.

Liberty-Clairton PM10 and PM2.5 Maintenance Areas

As noted in Section II, EPA has determined that PM10 and PM2.5 nonattainment in the Liberty-

Clairton area stems primarily from industrial sources in the area and not from mobile sources.

This nonattainment area was not required to have PM10 or PM2.5 transportation conformity

budgets. Because the PM10 and PM2.5 violations had been caused by industrial stationary sources

and motor vehicles were not an important contributor to the nonattainment problem, no

additional quantitative analysis for transportation-related PM10 or PM2.5 impacts is required for

conformity purposes. The applicable conformity criteria for both PM10 and PM2.5 have,

therefore, been satisfied.

Qualitative Analysis of Non-Codable Regionally Significant Projects

Due to their nature, a number of regionally significant projects in the 2017-2020 TIP and the

2040 Plan could not be coded on TP+-based transportation networks and were therefore not

included in the quantitative assessment which was used to develop the information in Tables 14

through 17. Those excluded projects fall into two general categories: 1) highway/bridge

relocations with no increase in capacity; and 2) projects like small, isolated park-and-ride lots,

Intermodal Transportation Centers, and traffic signal coordination projects. To include the non-

codable, regionally significant projects in the conformity assessment required a separate,

qualitative assessment of their impacts on regional air quality.

Some of the regionally significant projects identified in the 2017-2020 TIP and the 2040 Plan

2040 involve new highway facilities on new right-of-way. For most of the projects of that type

there was enough of a difference between the build and no-build conditions that the difference

(change in capacity, miles of highway, etc.) could be reflected, and coded, onto the TP+-based

highway networks. A few of the highway projects that involve new right-of-way would simply




53

replace a deficient or unsafe facility with a comparable facility (no change in length or capacity)

constructed to current design standards in a new location. The design of those new facilities

would include features such as easier grades and curves, wider lanes, better sight distance and

wider shoulders. Those design improvements cannot be reflected in the quantitative analysis.

Those design elements would, nevertheless, tend to result in fewer accidents, reduce delay and

promote a more uniform travel speed on the facility. Those kinds of improvements in traffic

operations generally have a positive effect on emissions. Implementation of the “non-codable”

highway and bridge relocation projects should not worsen the region's air quality.

A number of small, isolated park-and-ride lots, Intermodal Transportation Centers, and traffic

signal coordination projects are identified in the 2017-2020 TIP. The 2040 Plan includes

strategies to implement projects of these types. The identified TIP projects were assessed by

SPC for their emissions reduction potential. An approved evaluation methodology, developed by

PennDOT for determining eligibility for CMAQ (Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality

Program) funding, was used by SPC in those project-level assessments. Regionally significant

projects assessed with the CMAQ model which could not be coded on TP+-based transportation

networks are listed below. The CMAQ model assessments were conducted with project

information provided by the project sponsors. Each of the projects tested with the CMAQ model

demonstrated a potential to reduce ozone and PM2.5 precursor emissions. The effect on regional

emissions from implementation of these projects was not included in the quantitative analysis

detailed on Tables 14 through 17 and Figures 3 through 10. Nevertheless, implementation of the

regionally significant, non-codable projects identified in the 2017-2020 TIP and the 2040 Plan

2040 Plan will not worsen the region's air quality.

Non-Codable Regionally Significant Projects

A. Programmed on 2017-2020 TIP for Completion by 2020

I-376 Parkway East Corridor Transportation Network – MPMS#94651 [Allegheny Co.]

CBD Signals Phase 3 – MPMS#28180 [City of Pittsburgh – Allegheny Co.]

Pittsburgh South Side Signals - MPMS#105603 [City of Pittsburgh – Allegheny Co.]

SR 837-33rd St. to Smithfield St. - MPMS#98085 [City of Pittsburgh – Allegheny Co.]

Forbes Avenue Safety Improvements - MPMS#47203 [City of Pittsburgh – Allegheny Co.]

Liberty Avenue Safety Improvements - MPMS#106773 [City of Pittsburgh – Allegheny Co.]

Thorn Run Road Interchange - MPMS#86859 [Allegheny Co.]

William Flinn Hwy-Adaptive Traffic Signal System - MPMS#106501 [Allegheny Co.]

Ardmore Blvd.-Adaptive Traffic Signal System - MPMS#106516 [Allegheny Co.]

McKnight Rd./Perry Hwy-Adaptive Traffic Signal System - MPMS#106505 [Allegheny Co.]

Steubenville Pike-Adaptive Traffic Signal System - MPMS#106509 [Allegheny Co.]

Lebanon Church Rd.-Adaptive Traffic Signal System - MPMS#106507 [Allegheny Co.]

Business U.S.22 Monroeville-Adaptive Traffic Signal System - MPMS#106511 [Allegheny Co.]

Monroeville Blvd. Safety Improvements (ACDPW) - MPMS#106771 [Allegheny Co.]

SR 4022/I-79-Arndt Safety Improvements - MPMS#102874 [Allegheny Co.]

SR 400 Signal Corridor - MPMS#106848 [Allegheny Co.]

PA 88 -Logan Road to King's School Road - MPMS#100967 [Allegheny Co.]

PAAC-Transit Signals BRT - MPMS#100316 [City of Pittsburgh – Allegheny Co.]

PAAC-Carnegie Park-N-Ride - MPMS#106594 [Allegheny Co.]

Butler Multi-Modal Center – MPMS#88989 [Butler Co.]




54

BTA-CNG Buses - MPMS#102332 [Butler Co.]

Rt.68 Park-N-Ride Program - MPMS#106605 [Butler Co.]

FACO Signals 1 – MPMS#94953 [Fayette Co.]

PA 18 Signal Upgrades – MPMS#88829 [Washington Co.]

SR 1009 Signal Upgrades – MPMS#83446 [Washington Co.]

PA 519 @ SR 980 & I-79 - MPMS#57201 [Washington Co.]

Jeannette/Hempfield Signals - MPMS#101493 [Westmoreland Co.]

PA 356 Truck Climbing Lane - MPMS# 70100 [Westmoreland Co.]

PA 981 @ Kennametal - MPMS#47478 [Westmoreland Co.]

WECO 1 PA 981 SIG-Latrobe – MPMS#94952 [Westmoreland Co.]

WECO Signal Upgrades-Greensburg – MPMS#94893 [Westmoreland Co.]

SPC Regional Traffic Signal Program Cycle III – MPMS#94879 [10-County Region]

SPC Regional Traffic Signal Program Cycle IV – MPMS#100382 [10-County Region]

B. Listed on 2040 Long Range Plan for Completion after 2020

SR 286 Improvements Ph-3 Widening (Sandune Dr. to SR 380) – MPMS#80508 [Allegheny Co.]

City of Pittsburgh Traffic Signal Updates – [City of Pittsburgh – Allegheny Co.]

SR 50 Upgrades - Thom's Run Road to Mayer St. - MPMS#28010 [Allegheny Co.]

SR 3003 Washington Pike Upgrades - SR 50 to SR 3006 Boyce Road [Allegheny Co.]

Three Degree Road @ SR 228 Intersection - MPMS#91286 [Butler Co.]

PA 68 Corridor Improvements - MPMS#106568 [Butler Co.]

PA 356 Corridor Improvements - MPMS#106486 [Butler Co.]

Freedom Road Turnpike Bridge - MPMS#67185 [Butler Co.]

McClure Road Intersection - MPMS#96661 [Fayette Co.]

SPC Regional Traffic Signal Program Cycle V – MPMS#106593 [10-County Region]

Conclusion

In conclusion, the region's 2017-2020 TIP and the 2040 Plan are in conformance with the federal

Clean Air Act, as amended. This finding of conformity is based upon both quantitative and

qualitative analyses designed to address the conformity criteria outlined in EPA's Transportation

Conformity Rule for the nonattainment and maintenance areas within SPC’s planning region

designated under the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, the 2006 daily PM2.5 NAAQS, the 1997

annual PM2.5 NAAQS, the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS, the 1987 PM10 NAAQS, and the 1971

carbon monoxide NAAQS. This report has documented the process used by SPC in the spring of

2016 to make its finding of conformity for the 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program

and Mapping the Future: The Southwestern PA Plan (the 2040 Transportation Plan for

Southwestern Pennsylvania).

SPC’s conformity process demonstrates that the 2017-2020 TIP and the 2040 Plan satisfy the

applicable conformity criteria under the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, the 2006 daily PM2.5

NAAQS, the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS, the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS, the 1987 PM10

NAAQS, and the 1971 carbon monoxide NAAQS.

Conformity AssessmentPittsburgh-Beaver Valley PM2.5 Nonattainment Area

Annual Emissions (tons/year)

Entire Nonattainment Area

2017 2020 2025 2035 2040

Annual VMT 16,548,963,985 16,786,640,909 17,102,064,589 17,466,283,646 17,800,078,246

PM 2.5 MVEB 700.000 700.000 537.000 537.000 537.000

PM 2.5 671.540 527.830 385.930 258.200 238.440

NOx MVEB 17,584.000 17,584.000 10,709.000 10,709.000 10,709.000

NOx 15,909.930 11,369.980 6,666.320 3,378.370 3,059.710


55



56

0.0

200.0

400.0

600.0

800.0

2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

PM

2.5

Em

iss

ion

s (

ton

s/y

ea

r)

Year

Conformity Assessment - PM 2.5 Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PM2.5 Nonattainment Area - Annual

MVEB Build

0.0

5,000.0

10,000.0

15,000.0

20,000.0

2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

NO

x E

mis

sio

ns

(to

ns

/ye

ar)

Year

Conformity Assessment - NOx Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PM2.5 Nonattainment Area - Annual

MVEB Build

Conformity AssessmentIndiana County Portion of Johnstown PM2.5 Nonattainment Area

Annual VMT and Emissions (Tons/Year)

Indiana County Portion of Nonattainmnet Area

2017 2020 2025 2035 2040

Annual VMT 147,417,315 148,576,670 149,373,415 151,018,463 152,997,207

PM 2.5 MVEB 7.950 7.950 4.380 4.380 4.380

PM 2.5 5.620 4.160 2.750 1.570 1.410

NOx MVEB 238.500 238.500 120.980 120.980 120.980

NOx 172.480 121.870 68.600 31.610 28.190


57



58

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

PM

2.5

Em

iss

ion

s (

ton

s/y

ea

r)

Year

Conformity Assessment - PM 2.5 Indiana County Portion - Johnstown Nonattainment Area - Annual

MVEB Build

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

NO

x E

mis

sio

ns

(to

ns

/ye

ar)

Year

Conformity Assessment - NOx Indiana County Portion - Johnstown Nonattainment Area - Annual

MVEB Build

Conformity AssessmentAllegheny County PM2.5 Nonattainment Area

Annual Emissions (tons/year)

Entire Nonattainment Area

2017 2020 2025 2035 2040

Annual VMT 8,233,549,075 8,363,374,416 8,506,261,417 8,613,799,418 8,841,253,752

PM 2.5 Inventory 364.000 364.000 278.000 278.000 278.000

PM 2.5 336.150 270.380 202.760 139.820 131.100

NOx Inventory 8,748.000 8,748.000 5,239.000 5,239.000 5,239.000

NOx 7,431.370 5,340.290 3,112.010 1,537.980 1,401.600


59



60

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

PM

2.5

Em

iss

ion

s (

ton

s/y

ea

r)

Year

Conformity Assessment - PM 2.5 Liberty-Clairton - Annual

2002 Build

0

50

100

150

200

NO

x E

mis

sio

ns

(to

ns

/ye

ar)

Year

Conformity Assessment - NOx Liberty-Clairton - Annual

2002 Build

0.0000

0.0025

0.0050

0.0075

0.0100

0.0125

0.0150

PM

2.5

Em

iss

ion

s (

ton

s/d

ay)

Year

Conformity Assessment - PM 2.5 Indiana County Portion - Johnstown Nonattainment Area - Daily

#REF! #REF!

0.0

100.0

200.0

300.0

400.0

2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

PM

2.5

Em

iss

ion

s (

ton

s/y

ea

r)

Year

Conformity Assessment - PM2.5 Allegheny CountyPM2.5 Nonattainment Area - Annual

Inventory Build

0.0000

0.0025

0.0050

0.0075

0.0100

0.0125

0.0150

PM

2.5

Em

iss

ion

s (

ton

s/d

ay)

Year

Conformity Assessment - PM 2.5 Indiana County Portion - Johnstown Nonattainment Area - Daily

#REF! #REF!

0.0

2,000.0

4,000.0

6,000.0

8,000.0

10,000.0

2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

NO

x E

mis

sio

ns

(to

ns

/ye

ar)

Year

Conformity Assessment - NOx Allegheny County PM2.5 Nonattainment Area - Annual

Inventory Build

8-Hour Ozone Conformity AssessmentPittsburgh-Beaver Valley

Daily VMT and Emissions (Tons/Day)

2017 2020 2025 2035 2040

Daily VMT 56,907,372 57,520,760 58,700,368 59,861,616 60,999,667

VOC MVEB 45.680 45.680 45.680 45.680 45.680

VOC 27.165 21.759 15.174 8.939 7.979

NOx MVEB 77.090 77.090 77.090 77.090 77.090

NOx 48.962 34.702 20.178 9.686 8.694


61



62

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

2010 2106 2202 2298 2394 2490 2586 2682 2778 2874 2970 3066 3162 3258 3354 3450 3546 3642 3738 3834 3930 4026 4122 4218 4314 4410 4506 4602 4698 4794 4890 4986 5082 5178 5274 5370 5466 5562 5658 5754 5850 5946 6042 6138 6234 6330 6426 6522 6618 6714 6810 6906 7002 7098 7194 7290 7386 7482 7578 7674 7770 7866 7962 8058 8154 8250 8346 8442 8538 8634 8730 8826 8922 9018 9114 9210 9306 9402 9498 9594 9690 9786 9882 9978 10074 10170 10266 10362 10458 10554 10650 10746 10842 10938 11034 11130 11226 11322 11418 11514 11610 11706 11802 11898 11994 12090 12186 12282 12378 12474 12570 12666 12762 12858 12954 13050 13146 13242 13338 13434 13530 13626 13722 13818 13914 14010 14106 14202 14298 14394 14490 14586 14682 14778 14874 14970 15066 15162 15258 15354 15450 15546 15642 15738 15834 15930 16026 16122 16218 16314 16410 16506 16602 16698 16794 16890 16986 17082 17178 17274 17370 17466 17562 17658 17754 17850 17946 18042 18138 18234 18330 18426 18522 18618 18714 18810 18906 19002 19098 19194 19290 19386 19482 19578 19674 19770 19866 19962 20058 20154 20250 20346 20442 20538 20634 20730 20826 20922 21018 21114 21210 21306 21402 21498 21594 21690 21786 21882 21978 22074 22170 22266 22362 22458 22554 22650 22746 22842 22938 23034 23130 23226 23322 23418 23514 23610 23706 23802 23898 23994 24090 24186 24282 24378 24474 24570 24666 24762 24858 24954 25050 25146 25242 25338 25434 25530 25626 25722 25818 25914 26010 26106 26202 26298 26394 26490 26586 26682 26778 26874 26970 27066 27162 27258 27354 27450 27546 27642 27738 27834 27930 28026 28122 28218 28314 28410 28506 28602 28698 28794 28890 28986 29082 29178 29274 29370 29466 29562 29658 29754 29850 29946 30042 30138 30234 30330 30426 30522 30618 30714 30810 30906 31002 31098 31194 31290 31386 31482 31578 31674 31770 31866 31962 32058 32154 32250 32346 32442 32538 32634 32730 32826 32922 33018 33114 33210 33306 33402 33498 33594 33690 33786 33882 33978

VO

C E

mis

sio

ns (

Kg

/Da

y)

Year

8-Hour Ozone Conformity Assessment - VOC Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley

Approved MVEB Build

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

NO

x E

mis

sio

ns

(to

ns

/da

y)

Year

8-Hour Ozone Conformity Assessment - NOx Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley

Approved MVEB Build

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

VO

C E

mis

sio

ns

(to

ns

/da

y)

Year

8-Hour Ozone Conformity Assessment - VOC Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley

Approved MVEB Build



63

VIII. Public Review and Comment

The draft Air Quality Conformity Determination for the Pittsburgh Transportation Management

Area was available for public review and comment from May 4, 2016, through June 3, 2016,

concurrent with the public comment period for the draft 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement

Program for Southwestern Pennsylvania (TIP); amendments to Mapping the Future: The

Southwestern PA Plan (2040 Transportation Plan) to reflect project phasing and cost information

included in the draft TIP; and the draft report – Environmental Justice Benefits and Burdens

Assessment of the Draft 2017-2020 TIP. Public review copies of these documents were available

during the comment period at the SPC offices, the planning offices of SPC's members, and at

many local libraries throughout the region. In addition, electronic versions of these documents

were available on the internet at www.spcregion.org.

Written comments were accepted at the SPC offices during the public review and comment

period. Comments were also accepted via e-mail and fax. In addition, eleven public meetings

were held during the public review and comment period by SPC’s Public Participation Panels

(PPPs). One meeting was held in each of SPC’s member jurisdictions.

Complete documentation of the public review and comment period is contained in the

companion document Public Participation Report, (SPC, July 2016). That document contains

copies of the legal notices, newspaper advertisements, SPC webpage text, public meeting

summaries, all written testimony received by SPC, a summary of all comments received during

the public review period, and SPC’s responses to those comments.

SPC did not receive any public comment on the conformity assessment.

Minor modifications were made to the 2017-2020 TIP as a result of public comment. No

revisions in the conformity process or the conformity findings were needed as a result of those

TIP modifications.

SPC, in its role as MPO for the Southwestern Pennsylvania region, formally acted at its June 27,

2016 meeting to make the finding of conformity, required under EPA's Transportation

Conformity Rule, for the 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program for Southwestern

Pennsylvania and for the amended 2040 Transportation Plan for Southwestern Pennsylvania.

Copies of SPC Resolutions 9-16 and 11-16 are included as Appendix F. Resolution 9-16 finds

that the 2017-2020 TIP and the 2040 Transportation Plan conform with the requirements of the

Clean Air Act (as amended), with the finding of conformity based upon the criteria outlined in

EPA’s Transportation Conformity Rule. Through Resolution 11-16, SPC adopted the 2017-2020

TIP.

http://www.spcregion.org/



64

APPENDIX A

Identification of Exempt and Regionally Significant Projects

Included in the 2017-2020 TIP

Project Exempt Codes and Classification Codes

A–1

The EPA Transportation Conformity Rule (40 CFR Part 93) cites a number of project types

which may be excluded from the regional emissions analysis required to determine conformity.

Because of their nature, the exempt projects will not affect the outcome of regional emissions

analysis, nor will they add substance to the analysis.

A standardized system of codes was developed by Pennsylvania’s MPOs and PennDOT to

document a project’s exempt status and to classify regionally significant projects. The exempt

project types are listed in the Transportation Conformity Rule (40 CFR 93 Section 126 Tables 2

and 3).

The following pages contain a one-line summary of every project included in SPC’s 2017-2020

TIP. Up to two codes appear for each project under the Exempt Codes heading. The code on the

left is the project’s exempt code. The code on the right is the project’s classification status code.

The projects for which no codes appear are the non-exempt, regionally significant TIP projects

which were assessed for this conformity determination. These projects are described more fully

in the 2017-2020 TIP. They are also listed in Figure 1 along with the non-exempt, regionally

significant projects that appear on the 2040 Long Range Plan. The exempt codes and project

classification codes are defined on pages A–2 and A–3.


A–2

Project Classification Code

Blank Regionally significant

EX Exempt

NA Project is in an attainment area

NS Not exempt, but not regionally significant

Project Exempt Code

Blank Project is not exempt

- - - Project is in an attainment area

Safety S1 Railroad/Highway Crossing

S2 Projects that correct, improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature

S3 Safer non-Federal-aid system roads

S4 Shoulder improvements

S5 Increasing sight distance

S6 Highway safety improvement program implementation

S7 Traffic control devices and operating assistance other than signalization projects

S8 Railroad/highway crossing warning devices

S9 Guardrails, median barriers, crash cushions

S10 Pavement resurfacing and/or rehabilitation

S11 Pavement marking

S12 Emergency relief (23 U.S.C. 125)

S13 Fencing

S14 Skid treatments

S15 Safety roadside rest areas

S16 Adding medians

S17 Truck climbing lanes outside of urbanized area

S18 Lighting improvements

S19 Widening narrow pavements or reconstructing/rehabilitating bridges (no additional travel lanes)

S20 Emergency truck pullovers

Mass Transit M1 Operating assistance to transit agencies

M2 Purchase of transit support vehicles

M3 Rehabilitation of transit vehicles

M4 Purchase of office, shop, and operating equipment for existing transit facilities

M5 Purchase of operating equipment for transit vehicles (e.g., radios, fareboxes, lifts, etc.)

M6 Construction or renovation of power, signal, and communications systems

M7 Construction of small transit passenger shelters and information kiosks

M8 Reconstruction or renovation of transit buildings and structures

M9 Rehabilitation or reconstruction of track structures, track, and trackbed in existing rights-of-way

M10 Purchase of new buses and rail cars to replace existing vehicles or for minor expansions of the fleet

M11 Construction of new bus or rail storage/maintenance facilities categorically excluded in 23 CFR part 771


A–3

Project Exempt Code

Air Quality A1 Continuation of ride-sharing and van-pooling promotion activities at current levels

A2 Bicycle facilities

A2 Pedestrian facilities

Other X1 Specific activities which do not involve or lead directly to construction, such as: federal-aid systems

revisions, planning and technical studies; grants for training and research programs; planning activities

conducted pursuant to Title 23 and Title 49 U.S.C.

X2 Grants for training and research programs

X3 Planning activities conducted pursuant to Title 23 and 49 U.S.C.

X4 Federal-aid systems revisions

X5 Engineering to assess social, economic, and environmental effects of the proposed action or alternatives

X6 Noise attenuation

X7 Emergency or hardship advance land acquisitions (23 CFR 712.204(d))

X8 Acquisition of scenic easements

X9 Plantings, landscaping, etc.

X10 Sign removal

X11 Directional and informational signs

X12 Transportation enhancement activities (except for rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation

buildings, structures, or facilities)

X13 Repair of damage caused by natural disasters, civil unrest, or terrorist acts, except projects involving

substantial functional, locational, or capacity changes

Exempt From Regional Emissions Analysis R1 Intersection improvements and channelization projects

R2 Intersection signalization projects at individual intersetctions

R3 Interchange reconfiguration projects

R4 Changes in vertical and horizontal alignment

R5 Truck size and weight inspection stations

R6 Bus terminals and transfer points

Study and Development Projects SDX Study & development resulting project of which is likely to be an exempt kind

SDN Study & development resulting project of which is likely to be a non-exempt kind

Not Regionally Significant Projects NRS Projects determined to be "Not Regionally Significant" and do not fit into an exempt category

2017-2020 TIP

Projects Funded Through FAST-Act Title I Programs MPMS SR PROJECT “EXEMPT” COUNTY NUMBER PROJECT NAME NUMBER PHASE SPONSOR CODES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------

NOTE: Projects without “exempt codes” are the non-exempt projects included in the Conformity Assessment

for the 2017-2020 TIP. The assessment of the non-exempt projects is described in Section VII.

A-4

ALCO 69837 TMA Annual Funding E TMA A1 EX

ALCO 75341 Betterment Reserve Allegh E C PADOT S10 EX

ALCO 75669 Slide Line Item C PADOT X13 EX

ALCO 76430 SPC Reg. Safety Line Item C PADOT S6 EX

ALCO 76458 Bridge - Allegheny County C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 76461 Retaining Walls - Alleg E PADOT S2 EX

ALCO 77273 PAAC Bus Procurement C TRANS M10 EX

ALCO 82754 SPC Region TAP Line Item C SPC X12 EX

ALCO 84078 SPC CMAQ Line Item C SPC NRS NS

ALCO 86487 Allegheny Cty Local Rdwy C COUNTY S10 EX

ALCO 87777 Allegheny Co Loc Br Pres. C COUNTY S19 EX

ALCO 94698 SPC Smart Tr. Initiative C SPC X1 EX

ALCO 94879 SPC - Traffic Signal 3 C SPC

ALCO 99022 Bridge Wash 2017 C PADOT S19 EX


ALCO 99041 AWPM 2017 C PADOT S11 EX


ALCO 99648 2017 ADA Curb Ramp Projec C PADOT A2 EX


ALCO 100316 PAAC-TransitSignalBRT C TRANS

ALCO 100367 PPC-Marine Eng RetrofitIV C OTHER NRS NS

ALCO 100376 SPC-CommuteInfo Individua C SPC A1 EX

ALCO 100382 SPC - Traffic Signal 4 E C SPC

ALCO 101485 Bridge Demand Mtc 9, 2017 C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 106074 Pittsburgh City Corridor C PADOT S8 EX

ALCO 106080 Smart Transportation Admi E SPC NRS NS







ALCO 106593 SPC - Traffic Signal 5 E SPC

ALCO 106772 Allegheny County Roads RD C COUNTY S6 EX

ALCO 106501 William Flinn Hwy - Adapt 8 E C PADOT

ALCO 106516 Ardmore Blvd- Adaptive Tr 8 E C PADOT

ALCO 106505 McKnight Rd/Perry Hwy - A 19 C PADOT

ALCO 105449 US 22 / TPK to Westermore 22 E C PADOT S10 EX

ALCO 91845 PA 28/Highland Park Bridg 28 ERC PADOT

ALCO 92277 PA 28 Russelton - Butler 28 C PADOT S10 EX

ALCO 28155 Ardmore Blvd Bridge 30 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 28593 US 30 over Falls Run 30 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 91696 US 30 - Lincoln Highway 30 E PADOT S10 EX

ALCO 100604 Ardmore Boulevard Bridge 30 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 28132 48/Boston Hollow Road Br 48 RC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 78175 Boston Hollow over Wylie 48 E C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 93784 PA 48 over Wylie Run 48 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 100605 Scenery Dr ov Douglas Run 48 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 28010 50 -Thoms Run to Mayer St 50 ERC PADOT

ALCO 78176 Island Avenue Bridge 51 ERC PADOT NRS NS

2017-2020 TIP




A-5

ALCO 78178 4th St. ov McCabe Run 51 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 88335 Elizabeth Bridge 51 C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 97936 PA 51/Vine St - Thorn Run 51 C PADOT S10 EX

ALCO 100612 Stoops Ferry Road Bridge 51 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 106509 Steubenville Pike - Adapt 60 E C PADOT

ALCO 97934 PA 65/Emsworth to Sewickl 65 E C PADOT S10 EX

ALCO 106072 65/Spruce Run Road Bridge 65 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 106847 I-79 Roll Over Detection 79 C PADOT S6 EX

ALCO 100967 PA 88/King School & Logan 88 C PADOT

ALCO 102961 PA 88 & SR 3004 Widening 88 ERC PADOT R1 EX

ALCO 63306 Tarentum BR Ramp 'A' 366 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 63307 Tarentum BR Ramp 'B' 366 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 100624 Tarentum Bridge ov NS RR 366 ER PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 78441 Eighth Ave ov Homestead R 837 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 94648 837/7th Ave - Kennywood 837 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 63322 PA 910 over Deer Creek 910 C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 27266 Freeport Rd Br over RR 1001 C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 63331 Freeport Rd ov/ Squaw Run 1001 RC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 78227 SR 1014 Hite Road 1014 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 78230 SR 1016 Cove Run Road 1016 E C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 63351 Days Run Bridge 1019 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 100648 SR 1019 - Butler Logan Rd 1019 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 63353 Russellton-Dorseyville Br 1020 C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 89097 1027/Pleasantville Road 1027 E C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 63360 Lardintown Road Bridge 1031 E C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 78269 1031 over Lardington Run 1031 C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 63515 New Kensington Bridge 1038 E C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 100656 Center Avenue Bridge 2001 E C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 28118 2010,LovedaleBr/Wylie Run 2010 C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 28025 2040/Curry Hollow Center 2040 C PADOT S10 EX

ALCO 106507 Lebanon Church Rd - Adapt 2040 C PADOT

ALCO 106511 Bus US 22 - Monroeville - 2048 C PADOT

ALCO 105458 SR 2065, Larimer Avenue S 2065 ERC PADOT X13 EX

ALCO 27275 LogansFerry/Pucketa Bridg 2075 C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 28345 Jerome Street Bridge 2094 E C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 63583 McKeesport Duqusne Bridge 2114 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 28159 Ramp - Rodi Rd/Chalfont R 2152 C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 100963 McLaughlin Rn Rd@McMillia 3004 ERC PADOT NRS NS

ALCO 28520 Mayview Road Bridge 3005 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 100683 Gill Hall Road Bridge 3017 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 26546 3039/ConrailRR,Robinson 3039 E C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 100690 SR 3048 ov Robinson Run 3048 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 97931 Greentree Road 3052 E C PADOT S10 EX

ALCO 105464 SR 3066, Steubenville Pik 3066 ERC PADOT X13 EX

ALCO 106380 Hookstown Grade Road ov B 3088 C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 73054 3089/Flaugherty Run Road 3089 C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 28344 McKees Rocks Bridge 3104 E PADOT S10 EX

ALCO 104230 RMU Turning Lane - TIIF 3109 C MUNIC R1 EX

ALCO 86859 Thorn Run Rd Interchange 3160 C MUNIC

ALCO 105446 SR 4003/ McKnight Road Mi 4003 E C PADOT S10 EX

2017-2020 TIP




A-6

ALCO 27394 4009/Babcock Blvd/Girtys 4009 C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 105461 SR 4011, Rochester Slide 4011 ERC PADOT X13 EX

ALCO 73055 4017 ov Little Pine Creek 4017 E C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 102874 SR 4022 / I-79 to Arndt 4022 C MUNIC

ALCO 89117 Big Sewickley Creek Road 4036 E C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 86922 Warrendale-Bayne Impr III 4052 C OTHER R1 EX

ALCO 78427 Wildwood Rd over Buffalo 4070 E C PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 105384 SR 4070, Wildwood Slide 4070 C PADOT X13 EX

ALCO 93913 Sutersville Bridge 7105 ERC COUNTY S19 EX

ALCO 93164 PI08 Pine Creek Br #08 7108 ERC COUNTY S19 EX

ALCO 78212 (OB04) Fleming Park Br. 7110 C COUNTY S19 EX

ALCO 28426 Coraopolis Bridge 7420 E COUNTY S19 EX

ALCO 76393 Dooker's Hollow Br (DK01) 7449 RC COUNTY S19 EX

ALCO 93917 Kenmawr Ave Ramp & Talbot 7456 E C COUNTY S19 EX

ALCO 27543 Kenmawr Br ov NS 7463 C OTHER S19 EX

ALCO 93371 Patton St Bridge (TL13) 7479 E COUNTY S19 EX

ALCO 27219 Campbell's Run Road 9900 ERC COUNTY

ALCO 93683 POHC Thom Ave RR X-ing 9900 C OTHER S8 EX

ALCO 102720 Fairview St RR GradeXing 9900 C PADOT S8 EX

ALCO 102758 Bridge Street RR (NS) 9900 C PADOT S8 EX

ALCO 104229 Delafield - TIIF 9900 C MUNIC S10 EX

ALCO 106073 McElheny Road Crossing (A 9900 C PADOT S8 EX

ALCO 106075 Blockdale Street Crossing 9900 C PADOT S8 EX

ALCO 106594 PAAC - Carnegie Park and 9900 C PADOT

ALCO 106771 Monroeville Blvd Safety I 9900 E C COUNTY

ALCO 107048 Etna Riverfront Park and 9900 C MUNIC X12 EX

ALCO 107055 S. Braddock Avenue Pedest 9900 C MUNIC X12 EX

ALCO 107057 University Boulevard Side 9900 C MUNIC X12 EX

PGH 28180 CBD Signal Phase 3 C PGH

PGH 69839 Alleg. Co Local Br. (S/L) C COUNTY S19 EX

PGH 94889 Pittsburgh Route and Sign C PGH NRS NS

PGH 29592 US 19, West End Sign Impr 19 C PADOT X11 EX

PGH 96562 19/WestEndbypass-PkwyWest 19 E C PADOT S19 EX

PGH 92266 PA 28 - Gen Robinson - E. 28 C PADOT S10 EX

PGH 92280 65/Ft Duq Br-McKees Rock 65 C PADOT S10 EX

PGH 84481 I-279 / McKnight Deicing 279 C PADOT S6 EX

PGH 94651 Pkwy East Corridor Transp 376 C PADOT

PGH 97028 I-376/Banksville Intercha 376 ERC PADOT

PGH 105465 I-376 above 2nd Avenue wa 376 ERC PADOT X13 EX

PGH 106848 PA 400 Signal Corridor 400 C PADOT

PGH 97846 I-579 'Cap' Project 579 C OTHER A2 EX

PGH 27991 837 Pedestrian Bridge 837 ERC PADOT A2 EX

PGH 98085 837/33rd St to Smithfield 837 ERC PADOT

PGH 28095 Forbes Ave/Parkway Ramp 2108 C PADOT S10 EX

PGH 47203 Forbes Ave Safety Improve 2108 C OTHER

PGH 28525 Smithfield St Bridge 3027 ER PADOT S19 EX

PGH 26614 LibertyTunnel Interchange 3069 C PADOT S10 EX

PGH 92930 Liberty Tunnel Phase 5 3069 C PADOT NRS NS

2017-2020 TIP




A-7

PGH 27144 28th Street Bridge 7301 E PGH S19 EX

PGH 27300 W Ohio St/Ridge Ave Br's. 7301 C PGH S19 EX

PGH 27462 McFarren Street Bridge Re 7301 ERC PGH S19 EX

PGH 27747 Swinburne Bridge 7301 E PGH S19 EX

PGH 76388 6th St Br Rehab 7301 E C COUNTY S19 EX

PGH 79881 S.10th St Br (MA11) Rehab 7301 C COUNTY S19 EX

PGH 83137 South Negley Ave. Bridge 7301 ERC PGH S19 EX

PGH 88541 7th St Br Rehab 7301 C COUNTY S19 EX

PGH 88719 9th St Br Rehab 7301 E C COUNTY S19 EX

PGH 91907 Charles Anderson Br 7301 ERC PGH S19 EX

PGH 103344 BC01 Becks Run No 1 7301 E COUNTY S19 EX

PGH 103347 BC03 Becks Run No 3 7301 E COUNTY S19 EX

PGH 106386 Larimer Ave Bridge 7301 E PADOT S19 EX

PGH 106110 Blvd of Allies - Ramp H 8002 E PADOT S19 EX

PGH 100632 Blvd of the Allies Ramp E 8004 ER PADOT S19 EX

PGH 27491 Beck's Run Road 9900 C PGH S10 EX

PGH 27493 Smithfield St Reconstruct 9900 ERC PGH S10 EX

PGH 58561 Wenzell Av/Carnahan Rd Br 9900 C PGH S10 EX

PGH 83136 Penn Ave Resurf. Ph 2 9900 E C PGH S10 EX

PGH 93922 AR01 - Armstrong Tunnel 9900 ERC COUNTY NRS NS

PGH 102973 S. 4th Street (CSX) 9900 C PADOT S8 EX

PGH 104228 Almono - TIIF 9900 E C OTHER NRS NS

PGH 105053 Penn Circle Conversion 9900 C OTHER

PGH 105603 PGH - South Side Signals 9900 C PGH

PGH 106268 Browns Hill Road 9900 C COUNTY S10 EX

PGH 106773 Liberty Ave 9900 E C PGH

PGH 107050 Homewood Pedestrian, Study 9900 C OTHER X12 EX

PGH 107056 South Side Flats Neighbor 9900 C PGH X12 EX

ARCO 79843 SPC D-10 Hwy/Bridge Line C PADOT S19 EX

ARCO 88779 SPC/D10 Br. PreCon Line E PADOT S19 EX

ARCO 106210 D10-2018 Systematic ISIP/ C PADOT S6 EX

ARCO 106385 D10-2017 Systematic Guide C PADOT S9 EX

ARCO 106476 Armstrong DFB Line Item C PADOT S19 EX

ARCO 69141 Goheenville Dip 28 RC PADOT R4 EX

ARCO 103146 PA 56 Apollo Group Bridge 56 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ARCO 96693 Guffy Run Group Bridges 66 C PADOT S19 EX

ARCO 98858 Oakland Cemetery Bridge 66 RC PADOT S19 EX

ARCO 106378 East Brady West Resurfaci 68 C PADOT S10 EX

ARCO 85574 Margaret Rd Intersection 422 ERC PADOT R4 EX

ARCO 91249 Kittanning Elementary Int 422 RC PADOT R4 EX

ARCO 91252 Wray Road Cut 422 RC PADOT S6 EX

ARCO 105891 Shelocta West Resufacing 422 C PADOT S10 EX

ARCO 83221 Banjo Road Bridge 1020 C PADOT S19 EX

ARCO 23765 Eddyville Bridge #2 1021 RC PADOT S19 EX

ARCO 23792 Echo Bridge 1037 C PADOT S19 EX

ARCO 77919 SR 2003 Cessna Run Br 2003 RC PADOT NRS NS

ARCO 91794 Fagley Run Bridge #2 2027 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ARCO 23934 Upper Mateer Bridge #3 2036 RC PADOT S19 EX

2017-2020 TIP




A-8

ARCO 24147 Jackson Road Bridge 2050 RC PADOT S19 EX

ARCO 83272 Stitts Run Bridge #1 2066 E PADOT S19 EX

ARCO 77924 Bradys Bend Bridge #16 4003 RC PADOT S19 EX

ARCO 24159 Craigsville Bridge 4035 E PADOT S19 EX

ARCO 95856 T-720 Hoosicks Bridge 7206 RC MUNIC S19 EX

ARCO 24211 T-763 West Hills Bridge 7207 ERC COUNTY S19 EX

BECO 75075 BCTA Bus Replacement C TRANS M10 EX

BECO 75342 Betterment Reserve Beaver C PADOT S10 EX

BECO 76582 Beaver - Bridge Line Item C PADOT S19 EX

BECO 76599 Beaver - Geotech. Reserve E PADOT X13 EX

BECO 102759 School House Rd (NS) C PADOT S8 EX

BECO 106494 Beaver Local Bridge Line C COUNTY S19 EX

BECO 105452 18/Rochester-Monaca Br - 18 C PADOT S10 EX

BECO 105862 Third Avenue/YMCA Drive - 18 C PADOT S10 EX

BECO 29045 US 30 Upgrade 30 C PADOT S10 EX

BECO 29072 US 30 ov Branch of Raccoo 30 ERC PADOT S19 EX

BECO 81652 US 30 / WV State Line - P 30 C PADOT S10 EX

BECO 29032 PA 65 / Crows Run - PA 18 65 C PADOT S10 EX

BECO 97910 PA 65/AlleghenyCo - Crows 65 C PADOT S10 EX

BECO 70797 PA 168 Salem Church Road 168 C PADOT S19 EX

BECO 28734 PA 351/Koppel Bridge 351 C PADOT S19 EX

BECO 91922 Stiffen Hill Road Br 588 C PADOT S19 EX

BECO 78329 Fombell Road over Camp Ru 1009 E C PADOT S19 EX

BECO 105463 SR 1022, Sunflower Road S 1022 ERC PADOT X13 EX

BECO 67016 Freedom Rd Upgrade - Ph C 2004 ERC PADOT R4 EX

BECO 82615 Freedom Rd Upgrade - Ph A 2004 C PADOT

BECO 96713 3002/Frankfort -Broadhead 3002 C PADOT S10 EX

BECO 78308 New Gallilee ov N Fork Ck 4005 E C PADOT S19 EX

BECO 28959 Watts Mill Road Bridge 4009 E C PADOT NRS NS

BECO 29062 Bradys Run Rd Br II 4012 RC PADOT S19 EX

BECO 89150 BR.S.BR.Brady Run 4012 RC PADOT S19 EX

BECO 29075 Dutch Ridge Rd Br/I-376 4020 ERC PADOT S19 EX

BECO 89096 4034Westwood/Upper Dry Ru 4034 C PADOT S19 EX

BECO 101231 6018/MonacaRochester-8041 6018 C PADOT S10 EX

BECO 28831 CB52-McHenry Brdg #1 7216 ERC COUNTY S19 EX

BECO 28806 CB # 24 Brickyard Bridge 7412 C COUNTY S19 EX

BECO 28899 CB-2, Homewood Viaduct 7417 C COUNTY S19 EX

BECO 28904 Pittsfield Br - NB5 7423 ERC MUNIC S19 EX

BUCO 88990 Butler Transit Service C TRANS M1 EX

BUCO 94877 Butler Local Bridge Line ERC PADOT S19 EX

BUCO 106487 Butler DFB Line Item C PADOT S19 EX

BUCO 106605 68 Park and Ride Program C PADOT

BUCO 102171 US 19/Rochester Rd. Int. 19 C MUNIC S6 EX

BUCO 102962 Harmony North PM 19 C PADOT S10 EX

BUCO 24730 PA 38 over Connoquenessing 38 RC PADOT S19 EX

BUCO 83307 PA38 Trib of Connoqueness 38 ERC PADOT S19 EX

2017-2020 TIP




A-9

BUCO 24740 PA 68 over Buffalo Creek 68 E PADOT S19 EX

BUCO 106568 PA 68 Corridor Improvemen 68 ER PADOT

BUCO 91285 Pittsburgh Street Int. 228 RC PADOT S6 EX

BUCO 91286 Three Degree Rd Intersec 228 ERC PADOT

BUCO 91288 Balls Bend 228 ER PADOT

BUCO 92908 Mars RR Br West Expansion 228 E PADOT

BUCO 104231 PA 228/UPMC Enhancements 228 C PADOT

BUCO 104232 PA 228 Traffic Study 228 PADOT X1 EX

BUCO 105900 Ekastown West 3R 228 E PADOT S10 EX

BUCO 24409 State Game Lands 95 Br 268 C PADOT S19 EX

BUCO 24755 PA 268 over Lowrey Run 268 ERC PADOT S19 EX

BUCO 105574 Zelienople Railroad Corri 288 C PADOT S8 EX

BUCO 106379 City of Butler Resurfacin 356 C PADOT S10 EX

BUCO 106486 PA 356 Corridor Improveme 356 E PADOT

BUCO 24523 Moraine State Park Access 422 RC PADOT

BUCO 83611 US 422 Shawood Pipe 422 RC PADOT S19 EX

BUCO 105905 Butler Bypass 422 C PADOT S10 EX

BUCO 24692 Bridge East of Hooker 1010 C PADOT S19 EX

BUCO 105547 Butler County LED Corrido 1016 C PADOT S8 EX

BUCO 24817 West Winfield Bridge #1 1019 C PADOT S19 EX

BUCO 24697 Cabot Bridge 2010 C PADOT S19 EX

BUCO 24416 Lardintown Run Br. #3 - 2011 ERC PADOT S19 EX

BUCO 96687 SR 3015 Group Bridges 3015 C PADOT S19 EX

BUCO 107049 Rowan Road Pedestrian Imp 3018 C MUNIC X12 EX

BUCO 67185 Freedom Rd Turnpike Bridg 3020 RC PADOT

BUCO 24793 SR 3031 Lions Road Bridge 3031 ERC PADOT S19 EX

BUCO 102618 SR 4012 Group Bridges 4012 RC PADOT S19 EX

BUCO 77973 T-830 Rattigan Bridge 7213 RC COUNTY S19 EX

BUCO 88989 Butler Multi-Modal Center 9900 C TRANS

BUCO 104305 Butler-Freeport Community 9900 C MUNIC X12 EX

GRCO 106566 D12 Interstate Delineatio C PADOT S6 EX

GRCO 73513 PA 18: Hoges Run Road to 18 C PADOT --- NA

GRCO 76027 US 19 BR2 Dunkard Creek 19 ERC PADOT --- NA

GRCO 30315 PA 21 over Grinnage Run 21 ERC PADOT --- NA

GRCO 105306 PA 21 over Toll Gate Run 21 ER PADOT --- NA

GRCO 90646 PA 88 over Whiteley Creek 88 ER PADOT S19 EX

GRCO 89073 PA 188 over Br 10mile Ck- 188 C PADOT --- NA

GRCO 81849 PA 218 ov Br Smith Ck 218 E PADOT --- NA

GRCO 100284 PA 218 : Bluff Ridge to C 218 C PADOT --- NA

GRCO 105392 PA 221 over Br Ruff Creek 221 C PADOT --- NA

GRCO 76038 SR 1009 over Bacon Run-DF 1009 C PADOT --- NA

GRCO 81842 SR 1010 over Pumpkin Run 1010 E PADOT --- NA

GRCO 105393 SR 1014 over Castile Run- 1014 C PADOT --- NA

GRCO 76039 1016 ov Ltl Whiteley Ck-2 1016 ERC PADOT S19 EX

GRCO 89051 SR 2001 over Rudolph Run- 2001 C PADOT --- NA

GRCO 96659 Sugar Run Road Intersect 2003 ERC PADOT --- NA

GRCO 30134 SR 3001 over Wheeling Ck 3001 ERC PADOT --- NA

GRCO 89086 SR 3001 ov Crabapple Ck 3001 ER PADOT --- NA

2017-2020 TIP




A-10

GRCO 90742 SR 3001 / N Fork Wheeling 3001 C PADOT --- NA

GRCO 74214 SR 3006 ov Clawson Run-DF 3006 C PADOT --- NA

GRCO 79362 SR 3013 ov Br Pursley Ck- 3013 C PADOT --- NA

GRCO 81827 SR 3013 ov Br Pursley Ck- 3013 C PADOT --- NA

GRCO 81977 SR 4007 over Grays Fork 4007 E PADOT --- NA

GRCO 106889 SR 4029 over Pettit Run D 4029 C PADOT --- NA

GRCO 106891 SR 4029 over Dillie Run D 4029 C PADOT --- NA

GRCO 105394 SR 4033 over Garners Run- 4033 C PADOT --- NA

GRCO 106407 Greene Co Bridge #105 7202 ERC COUNTY --- NA

GRCO 51393 Greene Co Bridge #15 7203 C COUNTY --- NA

GRCO 96658 Cook Ave. (T-529) 7205 C PADOT --- NA

GRCO 93247 Greene Co Bridge #55 7207 C COUNTY --- NA

GRCO 51394 Greene Co Bridge #63 7208 ERC COUNTY --- NA

GRCO 96660 Whiteley Creek Bridge 7220 ERC PADOT --- NA

FACO 76508 Dist12 Hwy/Brdg Line Item C PADOT S10 EX

FACO 81229 D12 Bridge Preservation D E PADOT S19 EX

FACO 101968 D12 Pvmt Presv Design E PADOT S10 EX

FACO 106038 12-17-RPM C PADOT S6 EX

FACO 106039 12-18-RPM C PADOT S6 EX

FACO 79306 PA 21 over PA 166 21 ERC PADOT S19 EX

FACO 94953 FACO Signals-1 21 RC PADOT

FACO 96661 McClure Road Intersection 119 E PADOT

FACO 106560 2017 HSIP HFS Contract 119 C TRANS S6 EX

FACO 98411 PA 166: Hibbs to Brownsvi 166 E C PADOT S10 EX

FACO 75996 PA 201 over Virgin Run 201 ERC PADOT S19 EX

FACO 90750 PA 281 over Pinkham Run-D 281 C PADOT S19 EX

FACO 90754 PA 281 over Br Hall Run-D 281 C PADOT S19 EX

FACO 76004 PA 381 over Laurel Run-DF 381 C PADOT S19 EX

FACO 98424 PA 381 : Falling Water to 381 C PADOT S10 EX

FACO 74342 PA 711 Crawford Ave Bridg 711 E PADOT S19 EX

FACO 95794 PA 906 Slide & Realignmen 906 RC PADOT X13 EX

FACO 76010 SR 1037 over Trump Run 1037 ER PADOT S19 EX

FACO 106060 Dawson Corridor 1041 C PADOT S8 EX

FACO 105389 SR 1052 over Irish Run-DF 1052 C PADOT S19 EX

FACO 88075 SR 1055 over Ferguson Run 1055 C PADOT S19 EX

FACO 90806 SR 2003 over Chaney Run-D 2003 C PADOT S19 EX

FACO 105911 D12 Superstructure 2018 2008 C PADOT S19 EX

FACO 90993 SR 2040 ov Coal Lick Run 2040 ERC PADOT S19 EX

FACO 93507 SR 2040 over Redstone Ck 2040 ERC PADOT S19 EX

FACO 89061 SR 3013 over Wallace Run- 3013 C PADOT S19 EX

FACO 76016 SR 4001 over Rush Run-DFB 4001 C PADOT S19 EX

FACO 88878 SR 4001 over Rush Run-2-D 4001 C PADOT S19 EX

FACO 74344 Cast Iron Bridge 4003 E PADOT S19 EX

FACO 105309 SR 4010 over Bute Run 4010 ERC PADOT S19 EX

FACO 69237 SR 4020 ov Four Mile Run 4020 E PADOT S19 EX

FACO 95642 SR 4022 over Meadow Run- 4022 C PADOT S19 EX

FACO 81192 Layton Bridge 4038 E PADOT S19 EX

FACO 81952 SR 4038 ov Br Wash Run-DF 4038 C PADOT S19 EX

2017-2020 TIP




A-11

FACO 105388 SR 4046 over Mill Run-DFB 4046 C PADOT S19 EX

FACO 76137 Moyer Road Bridges 7202 ER COUNTY S19 EX

FACO 104643 Fayette County #73 7202 ERC COUNTY S19 EX

FACO 29840 Fayette Co Bridge #102 7206 ERC COUNTY S19 EX

FACO 101958 Fayette Co Bridge #43 7224 C COUNTY S19 EX

FACO 96657 Bruceton Mills Rd. T-311 9900 C MUNIC S10 EX

INCO 88841 Indiana Local Br. Line #1 ER COUNTY S19 EX

INCO 88992 IndianaBoro/White Twp Int C PADOT --- NA

INCO 106550 Indiana DFB Line Item C TRANS S19 EX

INCO 105193 US 22 Blairsville #1 Trus 22 C PADOT --- NA

INCO 106485 Armagh Bypass PM 22 C PADOT S10 EX

INCO 83206 Brush Valley Bridge #3 56 C PADOT --- NA

INCO 83210 Plumville Bridge #1 85 C PADOT --- NA

INCO 74300 Muller Bridge 110 RC PADOT --- NA

INCO 83219 Grove Bridge 110 RC PADOT --- NA

INCO 83222 PA 110 over McKee Run 110 RC PADOT --- NA

INCO 25472 Grove Chapel Climb. Lane 119 C PADOT --- NA

INCO 25513 Home Railroad Bridge 119 C PADOT --- NA

INCO 69988 Wake Robin Curve 119 E PADOT --- NA

INCO 91256 US 119 Homer City North 119 C PADOT S6 EX

INCO 95847 Pollock Bridge 119 RC PADOT --- NA

INCO 95848 Home Bridge #3 119 RC PADOT --- NA

INCO 101483 US 119 Three Bridges 119 RC PADOT S19 EX

INCO 106484 Trade City South PM 210 C PADOT S10 EX

INCO 86022 Grange Bridge 217 C PADOT --- NA

INCO 25595 PA 286 ov Trib to Cush Cr 286 RC PADOT --- NA

INCO 83301 PA 286 over N.Br.Two Lick 286 RC PADOT --- NA

INCO 83309 PA 286 over Horton Run 286 RC PADOT --- NA

INCO 104458 PA 286: US 422 Interchang 286 C PADOT --- NA

INCO 104459 PA 286: US 422 Interchang 286 ERC PADOT --- NA

INCO 106058 Philadelphia Street Bridg 286 ER PADOT --- NA

INCO 25696 US 422 Cunningham Culvert 422 C PADOT --- NA

INCO 95849 US 422 ov Br of Carney Ru 422 RC PADOT --- NA

INCO 106481 Shelocta West Resurfacing 422 C PADOT --- NA

INCO 83361 PA 954 over N. Br. Plum C 954 RC PADOT --- NA

INCO 25546 Onberg Bridge 1005 C PADOT --- NA

INCO 92666 Ruffner Church Bridge 1005 C PADOT --- NA

INCO 25588 Dixonville Bridge #1 1012 ERC PADOT --- NA

INCO 25790 Upper Juneau Bridge 1045 RC PADOT --- NA

INCO 74307 Gipsy Bridge #1 1056 C PADOT --- NA

INCO 74310 Wehrum Bridge 2013 C PADOT S19 EX

INCO 105512 Grange Hall Road Bridge - 2013 ERC PADOT S19 EX

INCO 83384 Newport Road Bridge No.3 3009 C PADOT --- NA

INCO 83362 Clune Bridge #1 3029 C PADOT --- NA

INCO 74303 Five Points Road Bridge 4001 RC PADOT --- NA

INCO 83383 SR 4005 over Trib to McKe 4005 RC PADOT --- NA

INCO 105300 SR 4005 Mack Park Bridge 4005 E PADOT --- NA

INCO 105550 Chambersville Corridor Cr 4008 C PADOT --- NA

2017-2020 TIP




A-12

INCO 78122 SR 4030 Carter Avenue Bri 4030 E PADOT --- NA

INCO 25523 SR 4035 over N. Br. Plum 4035 ERC PADOT --- NA

INCO 25419 T-460 Aultman Bridge #3 7203 C MUNIC --- NA

LACO 75348 Better. Resv Lawrence Cty E C PADOT S10 EX

LACO 76584 Bridge Line Item-Lawrence C PADOT S19 EX

LACO 76600 Geotechnical - Lawrence E PADOT X13 EX

LACO 94699 SPC Lawrence SINC C SPC --- NA

LACO 29526 PA 18 / Mahoning Viaduct 18 C PADOT --- NA

LACO 29403 PA 65, 2nd Street 65 C PADOT --- NA

LACO 29485 PA 65 over Abandoned Rail 65 C PADOT --- NA

LACO 91575 PA 65 / Cross St - Gibson 65 C PADOT --- NA

LACO 29504 PA 168 - Gailee Rd to Mor 168 C PADOT --- NA

LACO 100919 Eastbrook Road 168 C PADOT --- NA

LACO 29314 Pulaski - New Bedford Bri 208 C PADOT --- NA

LACO 100756 Falls Street Bridge 224 E PADOT --- NA

LACO 29301 Wampum Ave Bridge Replace 288 C PADOT --- NA

LACO 92804 US 422, Benjamin Franklin 422 C PADOT --- NA

LACO 91921 Portersville Rd/Slip Rock 488 C PADOT --- NA

LACO 29380 Neshannock Fall Rd Bridge 956 C PADOT --- NA

LACO 100743 East Washington Street Br 2006 ERC PADOT --- NA

LACO 29487 Hemmerle Road Bridge 2014 C PADOT --- NA

LACO 29533 SR 2020 Pleasant Rd Bridg 2020 C PADOT --- NA

LACO 29393 Mountville Road Bridge 2030 C PADOT --- NA

LACO 89072 SR 3004/Br. Honey Creek 3004 C PADOT --- NA

LACO 73162 W.Washington St. Bridge 3010 C PADOT --- NA

LACO 97950 SR 3010 ov Shenango River 3010 E C PADOT --- NA

LACO 29200 Harbor/Edinburg Bridge 4004 C PADOT --- NA

LACO 78386 Pulaski Rd Br. ov Shenang 4005 C PADOT --- NA

LACO 78392 Twp Rd 324 (Churchill Rd) 4015 ERC PADOT --- NA

LACO 29327 Wallace Road BridgeT-356 7203 C COUNTY --- NA

LACO 88425 Clover Lane BridgeT710 7205 ERC MUNIC --- NA

LACO 57104 T-341 Burkey Rd Br 7206 ERC MUNIC --- NA

LACO 57106 Bartholomew Road Bridge 7206 ER MUNIC --- NA

LACO 88721 Hickory View Drive Bridge 7206 ERC MUNIC --- NA

LACO 78356 Barkley Rd ov Camp Rn T-3 7207 ERC MUNIC --- NA

LACO 78357 Barkley Road Bridge #3 7207 E MUNIC --- NA

LACO 105601 McCartney Hollow Road Bri 7207 ER MUNIC --- NA

LACO 88428 Coffee Run Road Br T-567 7209 ERC MUNIC --- NA

LACO 78358 Maple St ov McClures Run 7405 ERC MUNIC --- NA

LACO 107053 New Castle Multimodal Reg 9900 C MUNIC --- NA

WACO 103186 Dunlevy Corridor C PADOT S8 EX

WACO 103187 Besco St. Grade Crossing C PADOT S8 EX

WACO 79365 PA 18 over Chartiers Ck 18 ER PADOT S19 EX

WACO 88829 PA 18 Signal Upgrades 18 RC PADOT

WACO 90685 Park Ave ov Chartiers Ck2 18 ER PADOT S19 EX

WACO 98368 PA 18 Resurfacing 18 C PADOT S10 EX

2017-2020 TIP




A-13

WACO 98362 US 40:PA 917 to Maiden St 40 C PADOT S10 EX

WACO 76050 PA 88 over Trib Mon River 88 E PADOT S19 EX

WACO 103184 PA 88 Grade Xing 88 C PADOT S8 EX

WACO 76056 PA 136 ov Br L Chartiers 136 C PADOT S19 EX

WACO 105910 D12 Superstructure 2017-1 221 C PADOT S19 EX

WACO 30812 PA 331 over Br Brush Run- 331 C PADOT S19 EX

WACO 57201 PA 519 at PA 980 and I-79 519 C PADOT

WACO 76063 PA 519 ov Br Chartiers Ru 519 ERC PADOT S19 EX

WACO 95769 PA 519 Grade Crossing 519 C PADOT S8 EX

WACO 81777 PA 837 ov Trib Mon River- 837 C PADOT S19 EX

WACO 98364 PA 837: Second St to Scot 837 C PADOT S10 EX

WACO 88077 PA 844 ov Br of Chartiers 844 ER PADOT S19 EX

WACO 103099 PA 844/Br Indian Camp Run 844 C PADOT S19 EX

WACO 98344 SR 1002: Morganza to US 1002 C PADOT S10 EX

WACO 103185 SR 1006 Grade Crossing 1006 C PADOT S8 EX

WACO 30687 SR 1009 over Chartiers Ck 1009 ERC PADOT S19 EX

WACO 83446 SR 1009 Signal Upgrades 1009 C PADOT

WACO 31152 SR 1016 ov Br Mingo Ck 1016 E PADOT S19 EX

WACO 89044 SR 1023 ov Lt Chartiers C 1023 E PADOT S19 EX

WACO 76070 SR 1053 Ltl Chartiers Ck 1053 ER PADOT S19 EX

WACO 83445 SR 1059 over Mingo Creek 1059 ERC PADOT S19 EX

WACO 31091 SR 2011/Br Ltl 10 Mile Ck 2011 C PADOT S19 EX

WACO 74230 SR 2026 over Trib Mon Riv 2026 C PADOT S19 EX

WACO 98291 SR 2027 over I-70 2027 ER PADOT S19 EX

WACO 69242 SR 2030 over Gorbys Run 2030 ERC PADOT S19 EX

WACO 83438 SR 2041 ov West Pike Run 2041 ER PADOT S19 EX

WACO 89035 SR 2053 ov Br Daniels Run 2053 E PADOT S19 EX

WACO 89054 SR 3023 ov Br Md Wheel Ck 3023 E PADOT S19 EX

WACO 105404 SR 3025 ov Br Robinson Fk 3025 C PADOT S19 EX

WACO 79387 SR 3027 over Buffalo Ck 3027 ERC PADOT S19 EX

WACO 103164 SR 4006 ov Br Burgetts Fk 4006 C PADOT S19 EX

WACO 76073 SR 4007 over US 22 4007 ERC PADOT S19 EX

WACO 76074 SR 4012 ov Robinson Run-2 4012 ERC PADOT S19 EX

WACO 81838 SR 4012 ov Robinson Run-1 4012 C PADOT S19 EX

WACO 81828 SR 4019 ov Ltl Raccoon Ck 4019 C PADOT S19 EX

WACO 74240 SR 4022 ov Br Buffalo Ck- 4022 C PADOT S19 EX

WACO 88074 SR 4029 ov Br North Fk Cr 4029 ERC PADOT S19 EX

WACO 103065 SR 4039 ov Br Millers Run 4039 C PADOT S19 EX

WACO 76078 SR 4049 o Br Chartiers Ck 4049 E PADOT S19 EX

WACO 89052 SR 4057 over Brush Run 4057 E PADOT S19 EX

WACO 30992 Ten Mile Creek #40 7201 ERC COUNTY S19 EX

WACO 65226 Chartiers Creek #30 7207 ERC COUNTY S19 EX

WACO 95829 Chartiers Creek #12 7220 C COUNTY S19 EX

WACO 105162 Pigeon Creek #26 7403 C COUNTY S19 EX

WACO 81650 SR 8042 over US 40 8042 ERC PADOT S19 EX

WACO 106063 Elco Corridor 9900 C PADOT S8 EX

WACO 106663 MMVTA-Bike Enhancements/M 9900 TRANS A2 EX

2017-2020 TIP




A-14

WECO 32040 US 30 Corridor Impvmts 30 ER PADOT X1 EX

WECO 101493 Jeanette/Hempfield CMAQ 30 RC PADOT

WECO 57452 PA 31: Donegal - PA 381/7 31 C PADOT R4 EX

WECO 89162 PA 31 ov Br of Pike Run-D 31 C PADOT S19 EX

WECO 101051 Mt Pleasant Betterment 31 C PADOT S10 EX

WECO 76091 PA 56 over Small Stream-D 56 C PADOT S19 EX

WECO 76105 US 119 over Crabtree Ck 2 119 E PADOT S19 EX

WECO 81837 US 119 over Zellers Run 119 ERC PADOT S19 EX

WECO 89191 US 119 Youngwood Recon 119 RC PADOT S10 EX

WECO 91038 US 119: Co Line - Crossov 119 C PADOT S10 EX

WECO 98298 PA 136: US 30 to SR 3099 136 C PADOT S10 EX

WECO 98299 PA 136: PA201 to PA 31 136 C PADOT S10 EX

WECO 98869 West Newton Bridge 136 E PADOT S19 EX

WECO 70100 PA 356 Truck Climbing Ln 356 RC PADOT

WECO 76114 PA 356 o Trib Kiski River 356 C PADOT S19 EX

WECO 81751 Pine Run Bridge 356 E PADOT S19 EX

WECO 96654 PA 356 Safety Improvement 356 RC PADOT S6 EX

WECO 74414 PA 366 Br over Pucketa Ck 366 ERC PADOT S19 EX

WECO 76115 PA 366 over Pucketa Ck 366 ERC PADOT S19 EX

WECO 79406 PA 711 over Tubmill Creek 711 ERC PADOT S19 EX

WECO 31796 PA 906: Vly Ind - Indust 906 C PADOT S10 EX

WECO 32084 PA 906 ov Webster Hollow 906 E PADOT S19 EX

WECO 31828 Laurel Vly Trans Imp Proj 981 E PADOT X1 EX

WECO 47478 PA 981 @ Kennametal 981 C PADOT

WECO 88073 PA 981 over Unity Run 981 RC PADOT S19 EX

WECO 94952 PA 981 Signals - Latrobe 981 ERC PADOT

WECO 106061 Bridge Street Grade Cross 981 C PADOT S8 EX

WECO 98860 PA 982 ov Br Stony Run 982 E PADOT S19 EX

WECO 32070 SR 1012/Br of McGee Run 1012 ERC PADOT S19 EX

WECO 74437 SR 1014 over McGee Run 1014 E PADOT S19 EX

WECO 31634 SR 1015 over Hypocrite Ck 1015 C PADOT S19 EX

WECO 76133 SR 1020 ov Br Saxman Run 1020 E PADOT S19 EX

WECO 32092 SR 1023 over Furnace Run- 1023 C PADOT S19 EX

WECO 90798 SR 1028 / Br Ltl Crabtree 1028 C PADOT S19 EX

WECO 74249 SR 1055 ov Br Whitehorn C 1055 E PADOT S19 EX

WECO 81747 Salina Bridge 1060 ER PADOT S19 EX

WECO 106047 SR 1071 ov Br Hypocrite C 1071 C PADOT S19 EX

WECO 105319 SR 2027 over Ninemile Run 2027 C PADOT S19 EX

WECO 31623 SR 3002 ov Br of Jacobs C 3002 C PADOT S19 EX

WECO 75972 SR 3007 over I-70 3007 ER PADOT S19 EX

WECO 94893 WECO Signal Upgrades-CMAQ 3026 ERC PADOT

WECO 90834 SR 3030 over US 30 3030 ER PADOT S19 EX

WECO 98859 SR 3041 ov Kelly Run-DFB 3041 C PADOT S19 EX

WECO 98865 SR 3044 ov Ltl SewickleyC 3044 E PADOT S19 EX

WECO 103188 Sutersville Corridor 3045 C PADOT S8 EX

WECO 31622 SR 3073 over Buffalo Run 3073 C PADOT S19 EX

WECO 105858 Districtwide DFB Line Ite 3073 E PADOT S19 EX

WECO 105411 SR 3081 ov Trib Jacobs Ck 3081 C PADOT S19 EX

WECO 74434 SR 3101 over Jacks Run 3101 C PADOT S19 EX

WECO 77872 SR 3103 over Jacks Run 3103 ER PADOT S19 EX

2017-2020 TIP




A-15

WECO 89066 SR 4019 over Brush Creek 4019 ERC PADOT S19 EX

WECO 76096 SR 4022 over Brush Run 4022 ERC PADOT S19 EX

WECO 32018 SR 4028 over Steels Run 4028 ERC PADOT S19 EX

WECO 105474 SR 4042 & 4044 Resurfacin 4042 C PADOT S10 EX

WECO 32053 SR 4053 ov Br Thorn Run-D 4053 C PADOT S19 EX

WECO 31979 SR 4075 ov Pucketa Creek 4075 E PADOT S19 EX

WECO 106406 West Co Local Br Preserva 7204 E C COUNTY S19 EX

WECO 101917 West Co #14- Beaver Run 7214 C COUNTY S19 EX

WECO 106405 Westmoreland County #29 7412 ERC COUNTY S19 EX

WECO 31554 Fourth Street Br 7421 ERC MUNIC S19 EX

WECO 31669 Fairwood Manor Br 9900 ERC MUNIC S19 EX

WECO 31918 East Hillis Street 9900 ERC MUNIC S19 EX

WECO 103189 Eureka Hill Rd Grade Xing 9900 C MUNIC S8 EX

WECO 107047 Wynn/Clara Tredway Extens 9900 C MUNIC X12 EX

2017-2020 TIP

Projects Funded Through FAST-Act Title I Programs

Interstate Maintenance Projects MPMS SR PROJECT “EXEMPT” COUNTY NUMBER PROJECT NAME NUMBER PHASE SPONSOR CODES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------



A-16

ALCO 87756 I-79 - Neville Island Bridge – Preservation 376 ERC PADOT S19 EX

ALCO 87775 I-376 - Airport Interchange to Business 376 – Restoration 376 C PADOT S10 EX

PGH 87772 1-279 Restore. – Ft.Duq.Br-Camp Horne / HOV - Vets.Br.–SR 19 279 ERC PADOT S10 EX

BECO 29162 Vanport Bridge Rehabilitation 376 C PADOT S19 EX

BUCO 91919 I-79 Preventive Maint – Lancaster Twp Line to SR 488 79 E C PADOT S10 EX

BUCO 91920 I-79 Preventive Maint – ALCO Line to Lancaster Twp Line 79 C PADOT S10 EX

WACO 70047 Bentleyville Interchange Reconfiguration 70 R PADOT R3 EX

WACO 73514 I-70 Widening: I-79 S. Junction to SR 136 Interchange 70 C PADOT

WACO 75950 I-70 Reconstruction - I-79 S. Junction. TO SR 519 Interchange 70 C PADOT S10 EX

WECO 31894 I-70/PA 31 Interchange Reconfiguration 70 C PADOT R3 EX

WECO 31895 I-70/Yukon Interchange Reconstruction 70 ERC PADOT S19 EX

WECO 75978 I-70/PA 51 Interchange Reconstruction 70 ERC PADOT R3 EX

WECO 88508 I-70/Arnold City Interchange Reconstruction 70 ERC PADOT R3 EX

2017-2020 TIP

Projects Funded by Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission MPMS SR PROJECT “EXEMPT” COUNTY NUMBER PROJECT NAME NUMBER PHASE SPONSOR CODES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------



A-17

ALCO Overlay/Resurface – Mainline at Rt. 8 Interchange (MP 38-40) 76 E C TRPK S10 EX

ALCO Rt.8 Int. to Allegh.Valley Int. – Widen to 6 Lanes (MP 40-48) 76 E C TRPK

ALCO Allegh.Valley Int. to Pgh. Int. – Widen to 6 Lanes (MP 49-57) 76 E TRPK

ALCO Pittsburgh Interchange Ramp Resurfacing (MP 56.5) 76 E C TRPK S10 EX

BECO Replace Beaver River Bridge – Widen to 6 Lanes (MP 12.5–13.5) 76 E C TRPK

BECO Overlay/Resurface – I-376 to Butler County Line (MP 19–25) 76 E C TRPK S10 EX

BECO Mainline Bridge Replacement/Widen over Brush Creek (MP 20.5) 76 E C TRPK

BUCO Cranberry Int. to Pine Twp. – Widen to 6 Lanes (MP 28–31) 76 E C TRPK

LACO Overlay/Resurface – I-76 Ohio State Line to SR 551 (MP 0.0-2.3) 76 E TRPK S10 EX

WACO 96723 Southern Beltway (SR 22 to I-79) 576 E C TRPK

WECO Overlay/Resurface – Irwin Interchange Ramps (MP 67.0) 76 C TRPK S10 EX

WECO Overlay/Resurface – SR 982 to Somerset County Line (MP 85-94) 76 E C TRPK S10 EX

WECO Mile 99 to Westmoreland/Somerset Co. Line – Widen to 6 Lanes 76 E TRPK

2017-2020 TIP

Projects Funded Through FAST-Act Title III Programs PROJECT MPMS “EXEMPT” SPONSOR NUMBER PROJECT NAME CODES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------



A-18

ACTA 106606 Operating Assistance M1 EX

BCTA 65404 Purchase Paratransit Buses M10 EX

BCTA 65590 Bus Replacement - Fixed Rt M10 EX

BCTA 70708 Support Equipment M4 EX

BCTA 83817 Computer Hardware and Software M4 EX

BCTA 94985 ETC Renovations M4 EX

BCTA 94986 Operating Asst. - Rural M1 EX

BCTA 105099 Preventive Maintenance M3 EX

BTA 77852 Operating Assistance M1 EX

BTA 83836 Bus Shelters M7 EX

BTA 102332 CNG Buses

BTA 102345 CNG Gillig Buses M10 EX

FACT 65222 Operating Assistance M1 EX

FACT 71083 Capital Assistance M4 EX

FACT 90041 Bus Procurement M10 EX

GREENE 106607 Replacement Buses M10 EX

GREENE 106609 Replace Commuinication Equipment M5 EX

ICTA 65421 Operating Assistance - Rural M1 EX

ICTA 102337 CTC Vehicle Replacement M10 EX

ICTA 102339 Skylight Replacement --- NA

ICTA 106611 Replace Service Vehicle M2 EX

ICTA 106612 Ticket Vending Machine --- NA

ICTA 106613 Mid-Life Bus Rehab M3 EX

ICTA 106614 CNG Buses M10 EX

ICTA 106616 Parking Improvement --- NA

ICTA 106619 Surveilance Upgrade --- NA

ICTA 106621 Replace Bus Lifts --- NA

MDCO 83884 Operating Assistance M1 EX

MDCO 106635 FR Vehicle Replacement M10 EX

MDCO 106636 Service Truck M2 EX

MDCO 106637 Facility Project M11 EX

MDCO 106638 Security Router M4 EX

MDCO 106639 Workstation Replacements M4 EX

MDCO 106640 SR Vehicle Replacement M10 EX

MDCO 106641 SR Van Replacment M10 EX

MDCO 106642 Multi-Function Copier M4 EX

MMVTA 65428 Operating Assistance - Urban M1 EX

MMVTA 77647 Bus Replacement M10 EX

MMVTA 94998 Support Vehicles M2 EX

MMVTA 106643 Facility Improvements M4 EX

NCATA 65171 Heavy Duty Buses M10 EX

NCATA 77860 Operating Assistance - Rural M1 EX

2017-2020 TIP




A-19

NCATA 90063 Garage/Office Equipment M4 EX

NCATA 106667 Fareboxes M5 EX

NCATA 106668 Facility Maint/Acquisition M8 EX

NCATA 106670 Bus Storage M11 EX

NCATA 106672 Bus Stop Signage M8 EX

NCATA 106673 Service/Maint Equip/Tools M4 EX

NCATA 106674 New Vehicle M2 EX

NCATA 106675 Renovate Shelters M7 EX

NCATA 106676 Facility Maint M8 EX

PAAC 65465 Cap. Cost Cntrct - Access M1 EX

PAAC 65510 Infrastructure Sfty & Renewl M8 EX

PAAC 65528 Adm. Facility Lease M1 EX

PAAC 65535 Preventive Maint. Bus M3 EX

PAAC 65541 Support Vehicles M2 EX

PAAC 65550 Vehicle Overhaul Program M3 EX

PAAC 71148 Bus Procurement M10 EX

PAAC 77757 PAAC Cap. Bond Dept. Service M1 EX

PAAC 84311 Operating Assistance M1 EX

PAAC 90171 Transit Security Grant M6 EX

PAAC 90349 Fixed Guideway Mod Program M8 EX

PAAC 95003 Fixed Facility Imp. M8 EX

PAAC 95004 Fixed Guideway Bridge M8 EX

PAAC 95005 IT Hardware/Software M4 EX

PAAC 95006 Preventive Maint. - Rail M3 EX

PAAC 95007 Shop Equipment M4 EX

PAAC 96999 Grants Administration M1 EX

PAAC 106644 Shared Ride M1 EX

SPC 71104 Capital Cost of Contracting - CommuteInfo M1 EX

WASH 90068 Operating Assistance M1 EX

WASH 102353 Maint. Facility Const. M11 EX

WASH 102576 Operating Asst State M1 EX

WASH 106645 Bus Replacement M10 EX

WASH 106646 Small Transit Buses M10 EX

WASH 106647 Operating Assistance M1 EX

WASH 106650 Office Equipment M4 EX

WASH 106652 Support Vehicles Replacement M2 EX

WCTA 65572 Operating Assistance - Rural M1 EX

WCTA 77739 Preventive Maintenance M3 EX

WCTA 102359 State Operating Asst M1 EX

WCTA 102362 Replacement Buses M10 EX

WCTA 106653 Replacement Buses M10 EX

2017-2020 TIP




A-20

Transit Program – Project Sponsors:

ACTA Airport Corridor Transportation Association

BCTA Beaver County Transit Authority

BTA Butler Transit Authority

FACT Fayette Area Coordinated Transportation

GREENE Greene County Human Services

ICTA Indiana County Transit Authority (IndiGo)

MDCO Mid-County Transit Authority (Town & Country Transit)

MMVTA Mid-Mon Valley Transit Authority

NCATA New Castle Area Transit Authority

PAAC Port Authority of Allegheny County

SPC Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission

WASH Washington County Transportation Authority (Freedom Transit)

WCTA Westmoreland County Transit Authority

APPENDIX B

Sample MOVES 2014 Input Files

Sample MOVES Input Files – PM2.5 Runs

B–1

1. MOVES County Data Manager Importer File _PM2.5 Annual Run (MOVESIMPORTER.XML) Sample for 2020 Run for Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley nonattainment area – Allegheny County. Separate XML file for each county in the analysis. <moves> <importer mode="county" > <filters> <geographicselections> <geographicselection type="COUNTY" key="42003" description="PENNSYLVANIA - Allegheny County"/> </geographicselections> <timespan> <year key="2020"/> <month id="00"/> <day id="2"/> <day id="5"/> <beginhour id="1"/> <endhour id="24"/> <aggregateBy key="Hour"/> </timespan> <onroadvehicleselections> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="62" sourcetypename="Combination Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="61" sourcetypename="Combination Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="41" sourcetypename="Intercity Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="32" sourcetypename="Light Commercial Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="54" sourcetypename="Motor Home"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="11" sourcetypename="Motorcycle"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="21" sourcetypename="Passenger Car"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="31" sourcetypename="Passenger Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="51" sourcetypename="Refuse Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="43" sourcetypename="School Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="53" sourcetypename="Single Unit Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="52" sourcetypename="Single Unit Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="42" sourcetypename="Transit Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="62" sourcetypename="Combination Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="61" sourcetypename="Combination Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="41" sourcetypename="Intercity Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="32" sourcetypename="Light Commercial Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="54" sourcetypename="Motor Home"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="11" sourcetypename="Motorcycle"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="21" sourcetypename="Passenger Car"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="31" sourcetypename="Passenger Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="51" sourcetypename="Refuse Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="43" sourcetypename="School Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="53" sourcetypename="Single Unit Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="52" sourcetypename="Single Unit Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="42" sourcetypename="Transit Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="62" sourcetypename="Combination Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="61" sourcetypename="Combination Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="41" sourcetypename="Intercity Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="32" sourcetypename="Light Commercial Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="54" sourcetypename="Motor Home"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="11" sourcetypename="Motorcycle"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="21" sourcetypename="Passenger Car"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="31" sourcetypename="Passenger Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="51" sourcetypename="Refuse Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="43" sourcetypename="School Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="53" sourcetypename="Single Unit Long-haul Truck"/>


B–2

<onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="52" sourcetypename="Single Unit Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="42" sourcetypename="Transit Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="62" sourcetypename="Combination Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="61" sourcetypename="Combination Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="41" sourcetypename="Intercity Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="32" sourcetypename="Light Commercial Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="54" sourcetypename="Motor Home"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="11" sourcetypename="Motorcycle"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="21" sourcetypename="Passenger Car"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="31" sourcetypename="Passenger Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="51" sourcetypename="Refuse Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="43" sourcetypename="School Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="53" sourcetypename="Single Unit Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="52" sourcetypename="Single Unit Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="42" sourcetypename="Transit Bus"/> </onroadvehicleselections> <offroadvehicleselections> </offroadvehicleselections> <offroadvehiclesccs> </offroadvehiclesccs> <roadtypes> <roadtype roadtypeid="1" roadtypename="Off-Network"/> <roadtype roadtypeid="2" roadtypename="Rural Restricted Access"/> <roadtype roadtypeid="3" roadtypename="Rural Unrestricted Access"/> <roadtype roadtypeid="4" roadtypename="Urban Restricted Access"/> <roadtype roadtypeid="5" roadtypename="Urban Unrestricted Access"/> </roadtypes> </filters> <databaseselection servername="localhost" databasename="42003_2020_00_25_X2_2020_PMAPG_mi"/> <agedistribution> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <sourceTypeAgeDistribution> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\AQIN\MOVES\AgeDistribution\MOVES2014\14Reg_RepCty\2020\42019_2020_SourceTypeAgeDistribution.csv</filename> </sourceTypeAgeDistribution> </parts> </agedistribution> <avgspeeddistribution> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <avgSpeedDistribution> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\CAXOUT\CAX2\\PMAPG\X2_2020\\42003_2020_00_25_X2_2020\CDM\avgSpeedDistribution.csv</filename> </avgSpeedDistribution> </parts> </avgspeeddistribution> <imcoverage> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <imcoverage> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\AQIN\MOVES\IM\42000_2020_IMCoverage.csv</filename> </imcoverage> </parts> </imcoverage> <fuel> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <FuelSupply> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\AQIN\MOVES\Fuel\MOVES2014\42000_FuelSupply_2011_2050.csv</filename> </FuelSupply> <FuelFormulation>


B–3

<filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\AQIN\MOVES\Fuel\MOVES2014\42000_FuelFormulation_2011_2050.csv</filename> </FuelFormulation> <FuelUsageFraction> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\AQIN\MOVES\Fuel\MOVES2014\MOVESDefaults\42000_fuelusagefraction_MOVES2014Defaults.csv</filename> </FuelUsageFraction> <AVFT> <filename></filename> </AVFT> </parts> </fuel> <zonemonthhour> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <zoneMonthHour> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\AQIN\MOVES\Meteorology\2008\42003_2008_met.csv</filename> </zoneMonthHour> </parts> </zonemonthhour> <roadtypedistribution> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <roadTypeDistribution> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\CAXOUT\CAX2\\PMAPG\X2_2020\\42003_2020_00_25_X2_2020\CDM\roadTypeDistribution.csv</filename> </roadTypeDistribution> </parts> </roadtypedistribution> <sourcetypepopulation> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <sourceTypeYear> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\CAXOUT\CAX2\\PMAPG\X2_2020\\42003_2020_00_25_X2_2020\CDM\SourceTypePopulation.csv</filename> </sourceTypeYear> </parts> </sourcetypepopulation> <rampfraction> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <roadType> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\CAXOUT\CAX2\\PMAPG\X2_2020\\42003_2020_00_25_X2_2020\CDM\rampFraction.csv</filename> </roadType> </parts> </rampfraction> <vehicletypevmt> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <hpmsVTypeYear> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\CAXOUT\CAX2\\PMAPG\X2_2020\\42003_2020_00_25_X2_2020\CDM\hpmsVTypeYear.csv</filename> </hpmsVTypeYear> <monthvmtfraction> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\CAXOUT\CAX2\\PMAPG\X2_2020\\42003_2020_00_25_X2_2020\CDM\NotUsed\MonthVMTFraction_M2010AB_Import.csv</filename> </monthvmtfraction> <dayvmtfraction> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\AQIN\MOVES\MonthDayHourFractions\dayvmtfraction_avgday.csv</filename> </dayvmtfraction> <hourvmtfraction> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\CAXOUT\CAX2\\PMAPG\X2_2020\\42003_2020_00_25_X2_2020\CDM\hourvmtfraction.csv</filename> </hourvmtfraction>


B–4

</parts> </vehicletypevmt> <starts> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <startsPerDay> <filename></filename> </startsPerDay> <startsHourFraction> <filename></filename> </startsHourFraction> <startsSourceTypeFraction> <filename></filename> </startsSourceTypeFraction> <startsMonthAdjust> <filename></filename> </startsMonthAdjust> <importStartsOpModeDistribution> <filename></filename> </importStartsOpModeDistribution> <Starts> <filename></filename> </Starts> </parts> </starts> <hotelling> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <hotellingActivityDistribution> <filename></filename> </hotellingActivityDistribution> <hotellingHours> <filename></filename> </hotellingHours> </parts> </hotelling> <onroadretrofit> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <onRoadRetrofit> <filename></filename> </onRoadRetrofit> </parts> </onroadretrofit> <generic> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <anytable> <tablename>regioncounty</tablename> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\AQIN\MOVES\Fuel\MOVES2014\MOVESDefaults\42000_RegionCounty_MOVES2014Defaults.csv</filename> </anytable> </parts> </generic> </importer> </moves>


B–5

2. MOVES Run Specification File – PM2.5 Annual Run (MOVESRUN.MRS) Sample for 2020 Run for Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley nonattainment area – Allegheny County. Separate MRS file for each county in the analysis. <runspec version="MOVES2014-20140731"> <description><![CDATA[MOVES2014 RunSpec Created by CENTRAL4 Scenario: ALLE 2020 ANNAVG X2_2020 Emission Inventory with user's data]]></description> <models> <model value="ONROAD"/> </models> <modelscale value="INV"/> <modeldomain value="SINGLE"/> <geographicselections> <geographicselection type="COUNTY" key="42003" description="PENNSYLVANIA - Allegheny County"/> </geographicselections> <timespan> <year key="2020"/> <month id="1"/> <month id="2"/> <month id="3"/> <month id="4"/> <month id="5"/> <month id="6"/> <month id="7"/> <month id="8"/> <month id="9"/> <month id="10"/> <month id="11"/> <month id="12"/> <day id="2"/> <day id="5"/> <beginhour id="1"/> <endhour id="24"/> <aggregateBy key="Hour"/> </timespan> <onroadvehicleselections> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="11" sourcetypename="Motorcycle"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="21" sourcetypename="Passenger Car"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="31" sourcetypename="Passenger Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="32" sourcetypename="Light Commercial Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="11" sourcetypename="Motorcycle"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="21" sourcetypename="Passenger Car"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="31" sourcetypename="Passenger Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="32" sourcetypename="Light Commercial Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="11" sourcetypename="Motorcycle"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="21" sourcetypename="Passenger Car"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="31" sourcetypename="Passenger Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="32" sourcetypename="Light Commercial Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="11" sourcetypename="Motorcycle"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="21" sourcetypename="Passenger Car"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="31" sourcetypename="Passenger Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="32" sourcetypename="Light Commercial Truck"/> >ENDIF <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="41" sourcetypename="Intercity Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="42" sourcetypename="Transit Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="43" sourcetypename="School Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="41" sourcetypename="Intercity Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="42" sourcetypename="Transit Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="43" sourcetypename="School Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="41" sourcetypename="Intercity Bus"/>


B–6

<onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="42" sourcetypename="Transit Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="43" sourcetypename="School Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="41" sourcetypename="Intercity Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="42" sourcetypename="Transit Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="43" sourcetypename="School Bus"/> >ENDIF <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="51" sourcetypename="Refuse Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="52" sourcetypename="Single Unit Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="53" sourcetypename="Single Unit Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="54" sourcetypename="Motor Home"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="61" sourcetypename="Combination Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="62" sourcetypename="Combination Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="51" sourcetypename="Refuse Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="52" sourcetypename="Single Unit Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="53" sourcetypename="Single Unit Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="54" sourcetypename="Motor Home"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="61" sourcetypename="Combination Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="62" sourcetypename="Combination Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="51" sourcetypename="Refuse Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="52" sourcetypename="Single Unit Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="53" sourcetypename="Single Unit Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="54" sourcetypename="Motor Home"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="61" sourcetypename="Combination Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="62" sourcetypename="Combination Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="51" sourcetypename="Refuse Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="52" sourcetypename="Single Unit Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="53" sourcetypename="Single Unit Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="54" sourcetypename="Motor Home"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="61" sourcetypename="Combination Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="62" sourcetypename="Combination Long-haul Truck"/> >ENDIF </onroadvehicleselections> <offroadvehicleselections> </offroadvehicleselections> <offroadvehiclesccs> </offroadvehiclesccs> <roadtypes separateramps="false"> <roadtype roadtypeid="1" roadtypename="Off-Network" modelCombination="M1"/> <roadtype roadtypeid="2" roadtypename="Rural Restricted Access" modelCombination="M1"/> <roadtype roadtypeid="3" roadtypename="Rural Unrestricted Access" modelCombination="M1"/> <roadtype roadtypeid="4" roadtypename="Urban Restricted Access" modelCombination="M1"/> <roadtype roadtypeid="5" roadtypename="Urban Unrestricted Access" modelCombination="M1"/> </roadtypes> <pollutantprocessassociations> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="3" pollutantname="Oxides of Nitrogen" processkey="1" processname="Running Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="3" pollutantname="Oxides of Nitrogen" processkey="2" processname="Start Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="3" pollutantname="Oxides of Nitrogen" processkey="15" processname="Crankcase Running Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="3" pollutantname="Oxides of Nitrogen" processkey="16" processname="Crankcase Start Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="3" pollutantname="Oxides of Nitrogen" processkey="17" processname="Crankcase Extended Idle Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="3" pollutantname="Oxides of Nitrogen" processkey="90" processname="Extended Idle Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="3" pollutantname="Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx)" processkey="91" processname="Auxiliary Power Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="118" pollutantname="Composite - NonECPM" processkey="1" processname="Running Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="118" pollutantname="Composite - NonECPM" processkey="2" processname="Start Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="118" pollutantname="Composite - NonECPM" processkey="90" processname="Extended Idle Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="118" pollutantname="Composite - NonECPM" processkey="91" processname="Auxiliary Power Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="112" pollutantname="Elemental Carbon" processkey="1" processname="Running Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="112" pollutantname="Elemental Carbon" processkey="2" processname="Start Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="112" pollutantname="Elemental Carbon" processkey="90" processname="Extended Idle Exhaust"/>


B–7

<pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="112" pollutantname="Elemental Carbon" processkey="91" processname="Auxiliary Power Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="119" pollutantname="H2O (aerosol)" processkey="1" processname="Running Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="119" pollutantname="H2O (aerosol)" processkey="2" processname="Start Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="119" pollutantname="H2O (aerosol)" processkey="90" processname="Extended Idle Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="119" pollutantname="H2O (aerosol)" processkey="91" processname="Auxiliary Power Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="110" pollutantname="Primary Exhaust PM2.5 - Total" processkey="1" processname="Running Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="110" pollutantname="Primary Exhaust PM2.5 - Total" processkey="2" processname="Start Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="110" pollutantname="Primary Exhaust PM2.5 - Total" processkey="15" processname="Crankcase Running Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="110" pollutantname="Primary Exhaust PM2.5 - Total" processkey="16" processname="Crankcase Start Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="110" pollutantname="Primary Exhaust PM2.5 - Total" processkey="17" processname="Crankcase Extended Idle Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="110" pollutantname="Primary Exhaust PM2.5 - Total" processkey="90" processname="Extended Idle Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="110" pollutantname="Primary Exhaust PM2.5 - Total" processkey="91" processname="Auxiliary Power Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="116" pollutantname="Primary PM2.5 - Brakewear Particulate" processkey="9" processname="Brakewear"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="117" pollutantname="Primary PM2.5 - Tirewear Particulate" processkey="10" processname="Tirewear"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="115" pollutantname="Sulfate Particulate" processkey="1" processname="Running Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="115" pollutantname="Sulfate Particulate" processkey="2" processname="Start Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="115" pollutantname="Sulfate Particulate" processkey="90" processname="Extended Idle Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="115" pollutantname="Sulfate Particulate" processkey="91" processname="Auxiliary Power Exhaust"/> </pollutantprocessassociations> <databaseselections> <databaseselection servername="localhost" databasename="MOVES2014_early_NLEV" description=""/> <databaseselection servername="localhost" databasename="MOVES2014_calevii08" description=""/> </databaseselections> <inputdatabase servername="" databasename="" description=""/> <uncertaintyparameters uncertaintymodeenabled="false" numberofrunspersimulation="0" numberofsimulations="0"/> <geographicoutputdetail description="COUNTY"/> <outputemissionsbreakdownselection> <modelyear selected="false"/> <fueltype selected="false"/> <emissionprocess selected="true"/> <onroadoffroad selected="true"/> <roadtype selected="true"/> <sourceusetype selected="true"/> <movesvehicletype selected="false"/> <onroadscc selected="false"/> <offroadscc selected="false"/> <estimateuncertainty selected="false" numberOfIterations="2" keepSampledData="false" keepIterations="false"/> <sector selected="false"/> <engtechid selected="false"/> <hpclass selected="false"/> <regclassid selected="false"/> </outputemissionsbreakdownselection> <outputdatabase servername="localhost" databasename="42003_2020_00_25_X2_2020_PMAPG_mo" description=""/>> <outputtimestep value="Month"/> <outputvmtdata value="true"/> <outputsho value="true"/> <outputsh value="true"/> <outputshp value="true"/> <outputshidling value="true"/> <outputstarts value="true"/> <outputpopulation value="true"/> <scaleinputdatabase servername="localhost" databasename="42003_2020_00_25_X2_2020_PMAPG_mi" description=""/> <pmsize value="0"/> <outputfactors> <timefactors selected="true" units="Hours"/> <distancefactors selected="false" units="Miles"/> <massfactors selected="false" units="Grams" energyunits="Million BTU"/> </outputfactors> <savedata>


B–8

</savedata> <donotexecute> </donotexecute> <generatordatabase shouldsave="false" servername="" databasename="" description=""/> <donotperformfinalaggregation selected="false"/> <lookuptableflags scenarioid="" truncateoutput="false" truncateactivity="false"/> <internalcontrolstrategies> <internalcontrolstrategy classname="gov.epa.otaq.moves.master.implementation.ghg.internalcontrolstrategies.rateofprogress.RateOfProgressStrategy"><![CDATA[ useParameters No ]]></internalcontrolstrategy> </internalcontrolstrategies> </runspec>

Sample MOVES Input Files – Ozone Runs

B–9

3. MOVES County Data Manager Importer File _Ozone July Weekday Run (MOVESIMPORTER.XML) Sample for 2020 Run for Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley Ozone nonattainment area – Allegheny County. Separate XML file for each county in the analysis. <moves> <importer mode="county" > <filters> <geographicselections> <geographicselection type="COUNTY" key="42003" description="PENNSYLVANIA - Allegheny County"/> </geographicselections> <timespan> <year key="2020"/> <month id="07"/> <day id="2"/> <day id="5"/> <beginhour id="1"/> <endhour id="24"/> <aggregateBy key="Hour"/> </timespan> <onroadvehicleselections> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="62" sourcetypename="Combination Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="61" sourcetypename="Combination Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="41" sourcetypename="Intercity Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="32" sourcetypename="Light Commercial Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="54" sourcetypename="Motor Home"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="11" sourcetypename="Motorcycle"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="21" sourcetypename="Passenger Car"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="31" sourcetypename="Passenger Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="51" sourcetypename="Refuse Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="43" sourcetypename="School Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="53" sourcetypename="Single Unit Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="52" sourcetypename="Single Unit Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="42" sourcetypename="Transit Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="62" sourcetypename="Combination Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="61" sourcetypename="Combination Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="41" sourcetypename="Intercity Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="32" sourcetypename="Light Commercial Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="54" sourcetypename="Motor Home"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="11" sourcetypename="Motorcycle"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="21" sourcetypename="Passenger Car"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="31" sourcetypename="Passenger Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="51" sourcetypename="Refuse Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="43" sourcetypename="School Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="53" sourcetypename="Single Unit Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="52" sourcetypename="Single Unit Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="42" sourcetypename="Transit Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="62" sourcetypename="Combination Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="61" sourcetypename="Combination Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="41" sourcetypename="Intercity Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="32" sourcetypename="Light Commercial Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="54" sourcetypename="Motor Home"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="11" sourcetypename="Motorcycle"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="21" sourcetypename="Passenger Car"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="31" sourcetypename="Passenger Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="51" sourcetypename="Refuse Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="43" sourcetypename="School Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="53" sourcetypename="Single Unit Long-haul Truck"/>


B–10

<onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="52" sourcetypename="Single Unit Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="42" sourcetypename="Transit Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="62" sourcetypename="Combination Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="61" sourcetypename="Combination Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="41" sourcetypename="Intercity Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="32" sourcetypename="Light Commercial Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="54" sourcetypename="Motor Home"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="11" sourcetypename="Motorcycle"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="21" sourcetypename="Passenger Car"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="31" sourcetypename="Passenger Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="51" sourcetypename="Refuse Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="43" sourcetypename="School Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="53" sourcetypename="Single Unit Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="52" sourcetypename="Single Unit Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="42" sourcetypename="Transit Bus"/> </onroadvehicleselections> <offroadvehicleselections> </offroadvehicleselections> <offroadvehiclesccs> </offroadvehiclesccs> <roadtypes> <roadtype roadtypeid="1" roadtypename="Off-Network"/> <roadtype roadtypeid="2" roadtypename="Rural Restricted Access"/> <roadtype roadtypeid="3" roadtypename="Rural Unrestricted Access"/> <roadtype roadtypeid="4" roadtypename="Urban Restricted Access"/> <roadtype roadtypeid="5" roadtypename="Urban Unrestricted Access"/> </roadtypes> </filters> <databaseselection servername="localhost" databasename="42003_2020_07_05_X2_2020_OZALL_mi"/> <agedistribution> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <sourceTypeAgeDistribution> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\AQIN\MOVES\AgeDistribution\MOVES2014\14Reg_RepCty\2020\42019_2020_SourceTypeAgeDistribution.csv</filename> </sourceTypeAgeDistribution> </parts> </agedistribution> <avgspeeddistribution> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <avgSpeedDistribution> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\CAXOUT\CAX2\\OZALL\X2_2020\\42003_2020_07_05_X2_2020\CDM\avgSpeedDistribution.csv</filename> </avgSpeedDistribution> </parts> </avgspeeddistribution> <imcoverage> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <imcoverage> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\AQIN\MOVES\IM\42000_2020_IMCoverage.csv</filename> </imcoverage> </parts> </imcoverage> <fuel> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <FuelSupply> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\AQIN\MOVES\Fuel\MOVES2014\42000_FuelSupply_2011_2050.csv</filename> </FuelSupply> <FuelFormulation>


B–11

<filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\AQIN\MOVES\Fuel\MOVES2014\42000_FuelFormulation_2011_2050.csv</filename> </FuelFormulation> <FuelUsageFraction> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\AQIN\MOVES\Fuel\MOVES2014\MOVESDefaults\42000_fuelusagefraction_MOVES2014Defaults.csv</filename> </FuelUsageFraction> <AVFT> <filename></filename> </AVFT> </parts> </fuel> <zonemonthhour> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <zoneMonthHour> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\AQIN\MOVES\Meteorology\2008\42003_2008_met.csv</filename> </zoneMonthHour> </parts> </zonemonthhour> <roadtypedistribution> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <roadTypeDistribution> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\CAXOUT\CAX2\\OZALL\X2_2020\\42003_2020_07_05_X2_2020\CDM\roadTypeDistribution.csv</filename> </roadTypeDistribution> </parts> </roadtypedistribution> <sourcetypepopulation> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <sourceTypeYear> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\CAXOUT\CAX2\\OZALL\X2_2020\\42003_2020_07_05_X2_2020\CDM\SourceTypePopulation.csv</filename> </sourceTypeYear> </parts> </sourcetypepopulation> <rampfraction> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <roadType> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\CAXOUT\CAX2\\OZALL\X2_2020\\42003_2020_07_05_X2_2020\CDM\rampFraction.csv</filename> </roadType> </parts> </rampfraction> <vehicletypevmt> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <hpmsVTypeYear> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\CAXOUT\CAX2\\OZALL\X2_2020\\42003_2020_07_05_X2_2020\CDM\hpmsVTypeYear.csv</filename> </hpmsVTypeYear> <monthvmtfraction> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\CAXOUT\CAX2\\OZALL\X2_2020\\42003_2020_07_05_X2_2020\CDM\NotUsed\MonthVMTFraction_M2010AB_Import.csv</filename> </monthvmtfraction> <dayvmtfraction> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\AQIN\MOVES\MonthDayHourFractions\2014_DayFraction\42003_2014_dayvmtfraction.csv</filename> </dayvmtfraction> <hourvmtfraction> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\CAXOUT\CAX2\\OZALL\X2_2020\\42003_2020_07_05_X2_2020\CDM\hourvmtfraction.csv</filename> </hourvmtfraction>


B–12

</parts> </vehicletypevmt> <starts> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <startsPerDay> <filename></filename> </startsPerDay> <startsHourFraction> <filename></filename> </startsHourFraction> <startsSourceTypeFraction> <filename></filename> </startsSourceTypeFraction> <startsMonthAdjust> <filename></filename> </startsMonthAdjust> <importStartsOpModeDistribution> <filename></filename> </importStartsOpModeDistribution> <Starts> <filename></filename> </Starts> </parts> </starts> <hotelling> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <hotellingActivityDistribution> <filename></filename> </hotellingActivityDistribution> <hotellingHours> <filename></filename> </hotellingHours> </parts> </hotelling> <onroadretrofit> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <onRoadRetrofit> <filename></filename> </onRoadRetrofit> </parts> </onroadretrofit> <generic> <description><![CDATA[]]></description> <parts> <anytable> <tablename>regioncounty</tablename> <filename>C:\SPC_MOVES\AQIN\MOVES\Fuel\MOVES2014\MOVESDefaults\42000_RegionCounty_MOVES2014Defaults.csv</filename> </anytable> </parts> </generic> </importer> </moves>


B–13

4. MOVES Run Specification File – Ozone July Weekday Run (MOVESRUN.MRS) Sample for 2020 Run for Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley nonattainment area – Allegheny County. Separate MRS file for each county in the analysis. <runspec version="MOVES2014-20140731"> <description><![CDATA[MOVES2014 RunSpec Created by CENTRAL4 Scenario: ALLE 2020 JULWKD X2_2020 Emission Inventory with user's data]]></description> <models> <model value="ONROAD"/> </models> <modelscale value="INV"/> <modeldomain value="SINGLE"/> <geographicselections> <geographicselection type="COUNTY" key="42003" description="PENNSYLVANIA - Allegheny County"/> </geographicselections> <timespan> <year key="2020"/> <month id="07"/> <day id="5"/> <beginhour id="1"/> <endhour id="24"/> <aggregateBy key="Hour"/> </timespan> <onroadvehicleselections> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="11" sourcetypename="Motorcycle"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="21" sourcetypename="Passenger Car"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="31" sourcetypename="Passenger Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="32" sourcetypename="Light Commercial Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="11" sourcetypename="Motorcycle"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="21" sourcetypename="Passenger Car"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="31" sourcetypename="Passenger Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="32" sourcetypename="Light Commercial Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="11" sourcetypename="Motorcycle"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="21" sourcetypename="Passenger Car"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="31" sourcetypename="Passenger Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="32" sourcetypename="Light Commercial Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="11" sourcetypename="Motorcycle"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="21" sourcetypename="Passenger Car"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="31" sourcetypename="Passenger Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="32" sourcetypename="Light Commercial Truck"/> >ENDIF <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="41" sourcetypename="Intercity Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="42" sourcetypename="Transit Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="43" sourcetypename="School Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="41" sourcetypename="Intercity Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="42" sourcetypename="Transit Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="43" sourcetypename="School Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="41" sourcetypename="Intercity Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="42" sourcetypename="Transit Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="43" sourcetypename="School Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="41" sourcetypename="Intercity Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="42" sourcetypename="Transit Bus"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="43" sourcetypename="School Bus"/> >ENDIF <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="51" sourcetypename="Refuse Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="52" sourcetypename="Single Unit Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="53" sourcetypename="Single Unit Long-haul Truck"/>


B–14

<onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="54" sourcetypename="Motor Home"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="61" sourcetypename="Combination Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="3" fueltypedesc="Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)" sourcetypeid="62" sourcetypename="Combination Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="51" sourcetypename="Refuse Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="52" sourcetypename="Single Unit Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="53" sourcetypename="Single Unit Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="54" sourcetypename="Motor Home"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="61" sourcetypename="Combination Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="2" fueltypedesc="Diesel Fuel" sourcetypeid="62" sourcetypename="Combination Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="51" sourcetypename="Refuse Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="52" sourcetypename="Single Unit Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="53" sourcetypename="Single Unit Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="54" sourcetypename="Motor Home"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="61" sourcetypename="Combination Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="1" fueltypedesc="Gasoline" sourcetypeid="62" sourcetypename="Combination Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="51" sourcetypename="Refuse Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="52" sourcetypename="Single Unit Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="53" sourcetypename="Single Unit Long-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="54" sourcetypename="Motor Home"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="61" sourcetypename="Combination Short-haul Truck"/> <onroadvehicleselection fueltypeid="5" fueltypedesc="Ethanol (E-85)" sourcetypeid="62" sourcetypename="Combination Long-haul Truck"/> >ENDIF </onroadvehicleselections> <offroadvehicleselections> </offroadvehicleselections> <offroadvehiclesccs> </offroadvehiclesccs> <roadtypes separateramps="false"> <roadtype roadtypeid="1" roadtypename="Off-Network" modelCombination="M1"/> <roadtype roadtypeid="2" roadtypename="Rural Restricted Access" modelCombination="M1"/> <roadtype roadtypeid="3" roadtypename="Rural Unrestricted Access" modelCombination="M1"/> <roadtype roadtypeid="4" roadtypename="Urban Restricted Access" modelCombination="M1"/> <roadtype roadtypeid="5" roadtypename="Urban Unrestricted Access" modelCombination="M1"/> </roadtypes> <pollutantprocessassociations> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="3" pollutantname="Oxides of Nitrogen" processkey="1" processname="Running Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="3" pollutantname="Oxides of Nitrogen" processkey="2" processname="Start Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="3" pollutantname="Oxides of Nitrogen" processkey="15" processname="Crankcase Running Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="3" pollutantname="Oxides of Nitrogen" processkey="16" processname="Crankcase Start Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="3" pollutantname="Oxides of Nitrogen" processkey="17" processname="Crankcase Extended Idle Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="3" pollutantname="Oxides of Nitrogen" processkey="90" processname="Extended Idle Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="3" pollutantname="Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx)" processkey="91" processname="Auxiliary Power Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="79" pollutantname="Non-Methane Hydrocarbons" processkey="1" processname="Running Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="79" pollutantname="Non-Methane Hydrocarbons" processkey="2" processname="Start Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="79" pollutantname="Non-Methane Hydrocarbons" processkey="11" processname="Evap Permeation"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="79" pollutantname="Non-Methane Hydrocarbons" processkey="12" processname="Evap Fuel Vapor Venting"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="79" pollutantname="Non-Methane Hydrocarbons" processkey="13" processname="Evap Fuel Leaks"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="79" pollutantname="Non-Methane Hydrocarbons" processkey="15" processname="Crankcase Running Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="79" pollutantname="Non-Methane Hydrocarbons" processkey="16" processname="Crankcase Start Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="79" pollutantname="Non-Methane Hydrocarbons" processkey="17" processname="Crankcase Extended Idle Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="79" pollutantname="Non-Methane Hydrocarbons" processkey="90" processname="Extended Idle Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="1" pollutantname="Total Gaseous Hydrocarbons" processkey="1" processname="Running Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="1" pollutantname="Total Gaseous Hydrocarbons" processkey="2" processname="Start Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="1" pollutantname="Total Gaseous Hydrocarbons" processkey="11" processname="Evap Permeation"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="1" pollutantname="Total Gaseous Hydrocarbons" processkey="12" processname="Evap Fuel Vapor Venting"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="1" pollutantname="Total Gaseous Hydrocarbons" processkey="13" processname="Evap Fuel Leaks"/>


B–15

<pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="1" pollutantname="Total Gaseous Hydrocarbons" processkey="15" processname="Crankcase Running Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="1" pollutantname="Total Gaseous Hydrocarbons" processkey="16" processname="Crankcase Start Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="1" pollutantname="Total Gaseous Hydrocarbons" processkey="17" processname="Crankcase Extended Idle Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="1" pollutantname="Total Gaseous Hydrocarbons" processkey="90" processname="Extended Idle Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="87" pollutantname="Volatile Organic Compounds" processkey="1" processname="Running Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="87" pollutantname="Volatile Organic Compounds" processkey="2" processname="Start Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="87" pollutantname="Volatile Organic Compounds" processkey="11" processname="Evap Permeation"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="87" pollutantname="Volatile Organic Compounds" processkey="12" processname="Evap Fuel Vapor Venting"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="87" pollutantname="Volatile Organic Compounds" processkey="13" processname="Evap Fuel Leaks"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="87" pollutantname="Volatile Organic Compounds" processkey="15" processname="Crankcase Running Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="87" pollutantname="Volatile Organic Compounds" processkey="16" processname="Crankcase Start Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="87" pollutantname="Volatile Organic Compounds" processkey="17" processname="Crankcase Extended Idle Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="87" pollutantname="Volatile Organic Compounds" processkey="90" processname="Extended Idle Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="79" pollutantname="Non-Methane Hydrocarbons" processkey="91" processname="Auxiliary Power Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="1" pollutantname="Total Gaseous Hydrocarbons" processkey="91" processname="Auxiliary Power Exhaust"/> <pollutantprocessassociation pollutantkey="87" pollutantname="Volatile Organic Compounds" processkey="91" processname="Auxiliary Power Exhaust"/> </pollutantprocessassociations> <databaseselections> <databaseselection servername="localhost" databasename="MOVES2014_early_NLEV" description=""/> <databaseselection servername="localhost" databasename="MOVES2014_calevii08" description=""/> </databaseselections> <inputdatabase servername="" databasename="" description=""/> <uncertaintyparameters uncertaintymodeenabled="false" numberofrunspersimulation="0" numberofsimulations="0"/> <geographicoutputdetail description="COUNTY"/> <outputemissionsbreakdownselection> <modelyear selected="false"/> <fueltype selected="false"/> <emissionprocess selected="true"/> <onroadoffroad selected="true"/> <roadtype selected="true"/> <sourceusetype selected="true"/> <movesvehicletype selected="false"/> <onroadscc selected="false"/> <offroadscc selected="false"/> <estimateuncertainty selected="false" numberOfIterations="2" keepSampledData="false" keepIterations="false"/> <sector selected="false"/> <engtechid selected="false"/> <hpclass selected="false"/> <regclassid selected="false"/> </outputemissionsbreakdownselection> <outputdatabase servername="localhost" databasename="42003_2020_07_05_X2_2020_OZALL_mo" description=""/>> <outputtimestep value="Hour"/> <outputvmtdata value="true"/> <outputsho value="true"/> <outputsh value="true"/> <outputshp value="true"/> <outputshidling value="true"/> <outputstarts value="true"/> <outputpopulation value="true"/> <scaleinputdatabase servername="localhost" databasename="42003_2020_07_05_X2_2020_OZALL_mi" description=""/> <pmsize value="0"/> <outputfactors> <timefactors selected="true" units="Hours"/> <distancefactors selected="false" units="Miles"/> <massfactors selected="false" units="Grams" energyunits="Million BTU"/>


B–16

</outputfactors> <savedata> </savedata> <donotexecute> </donotexecute> <generatordatabase shouldsave="false" servername="" databasename="" description=""/> <donotperformfinalaggregation selected="false"/> <lookuptableflags scenarioid="" truncateoutput="false" truncateactivity="false"/> <internalcontrolstrategies> <internalcontrolstrategy classname="gov.epa.otaq.moves.master.implementation.ghg.internalcontrolstrategies.rateofprogress.RateOfProgressStrategy"><![CDATA[ useParameters No ]]></internalcontrolstrategy> </internalcontrolstrategies> </runspec>

APPENDIX C

County and Facility Type Summaries

VMT, Speed, Emissions

Emissions (Tons/Year)

NOx PM2.5

Off-Network N/A N/A 1,779.23 42.33

Rural Restricted 0 N/A 0.00 0.00

Rural UnRestricted 7,081,076 43.3 3.96 0.16

Urban Restricted 2,263,420,069 48.6 1,669.73 79.80

Urban UnRestricted 5,868,943,917 28.8 3,892.54 210.25

Subtotal 8,139,445,062 7,345.46 332.55

Off-Network 0 N/A 7.71 0.17


Rural UnRestricted 0 N/A 0.00 0.00

Urban Restricted 0 N/A 0.00 0.00

Urban UnRestricted 37,780,793 45.7 29.59 1.18

Subtotal 37,780,793 37.30 1.34




Urban Restricted 274,388,107 57.0 159.67 6.60

Urban UnRestricted 1,034,644,570 35.5 666.13 31.72

Subtotal 1,315,054,484 1,123.48 45.49


Rural Restricted 80,684,181 47.3 63.43 3.16




Subtotal 1,817,022,142 1,903.33 72.38






Subtotal 2,077,347,851 2,102.30 83.40




Urban Restricted 923,673,188 55.9 1,224.07 49.16


Subtotal 3,119,619,022 3,359.41 135.13






Subtotal 26,469,219 23.13 0.76




Urban Restricted 269,218 25.0 0.00 0.00


Subtotal 16,225,412 15.52 0.49

Region Subtotal 16,548,963,985 15,909.93 671.54

Off-Model Project

Emission Benefits0.00 0.00

Region Total 16,548,963,985 15,909.93 671.54

(Kg/Year) 14,433,253 609,214

SPC July 2016

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PM2.5 Annual Emission Summary2017 Existing Year (By Road Type)

County Road Type Annual VMTSpeed

(mph)

Greene (Partial)

Lawrence

(Partial)

C-1

Allegheny

(Partial)

Armstrong

(Partial)

Beaver

Butler

Washington

Westmoreland


NOx PM2.5






Subtotal 8,268,153,721 5,278.20 267.42






Subtotal 38,130,057 26.39 1.02






Subtotal 1,331,689,156 794.65 35.93






Subtotal 1,844,485,023 1,370.74 56.16






Subtotal 2,106,315,113 1,493.84 63.31






Subtotal 3,154,320,409 2,378.81 103.02






Subtotal 27,065,692 16.39 0.60






Subtotal 16,481,738 10.96 0.37

Region Subtotal 16,786,640,909 11,369.98 527.83

Off-Model Project


Region Total 16,786,640,909 11,369.98 527.83

(Kg/Year) 10,314,676 478,844

SPC July 2016

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PM2.5 Annual Emission Summary2020 TIP Year (By Road Type)


(mph)

Greene (Partial)

Lawrence

(Partial)

C-2

Allegheny

(Partial)

Armstrong

(Partial)

Beaver

Butler

Washington

Westmoreland


NOx PM2.5

Off-Network N/A N/A 940.12 30.17



Urban Restricted 2,354,804,722 48.8 668.12 42.26


Subtotal 8,409,115,015 3,075.40 200.47






Subtotal 38,348,576 15.38 0.70






Subtotal 1,354,707,925 470.46 26.91






Subtotal 1,871,099,074 817.33 39.88






Subtotal 2,190,693,909 892.74 45.40






Subtotal 3,193,811,428 1,379.61 71.87






Subtotal 27,597,859 9.11 0.43






Subtotal 16,690,804 6.29 0.26

Region Subtotal 17,102,064,589 6,666.32 385.93

Off-Model Project


Region Total 17,102,064,589 6,666.32 385.93

(Kg/Year) 6,047,583 350,112

SPC July 2016

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PM2.5 Annual Emission Summary2025 Interim Year #1 (By Road Type)


(mph)

Greene (Partial)

Lawrence

(Partial)

C-3

Allegheny

(Partial)

Armstrong

(Partial)

Beaver

Butler

Washington

Westmoreland


NOx PM2.5






Subtotal 8,525,019,647 1,520.51 138.19






Subtotal 39,828,302 7.70 0.43






Subtotal 1,372,873,689 232.58 17.97






Subtotal 1,924,187,701 411.53 25.61






Subtotal 2,284,125,089 466.74 28.89






Subtotal 3,280,025,714 733.09 46.69






Subtotal 29,016,421 4.10 0.29






Subtotal 11,207,083 2.12 0.14

Region Subtotal 17,466,283,646 3,378.37 258.20

Off-Model Project


Region Total 17,466,283,646 3,378.37 258.20

(Kg/Year) 3,064,806 234,234

SPC July 2016

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PM2.5 Annual Emission Summary2035 Interim Year #2 (By Road Type)


(mph)

Greene (Partial)

Lawrence

(Partial)

C-4

Allegheny

(Partial)

Armstrong

(Partial)

Beaver

Butler

Washington

Westmoreland


NOx PM2.5






Subtotal 8,675,608,303 1,353.27 127.46






Subtotal 40,445,401 6.98 0.39






Subtotal 1,394,826,813 210.75 16.46






Subtotal 1,962,668,068 375.23 23.65






Subtotal 2,343,714,223 429.39 26.77






Subtotal 3,341,305,172 678.59 43.31






Subtotal 29,851,697 3.60 0.27






Subtotal 11,658,569 1.92 0.13

Region Subtotal 17,800,078,246 3,059.71 238.44

Off-Model Project


Region Total 17,800,078,246 3,059.71 238.44

(Kg/Year) 2,775,727 216,305

SPC July 2016

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PM2.5 Annual Emission Summary2040 LRP Horizon Year (By Road Type)


(mph)

Greene (Partial)

Lawrence

(Partial)

C-5

Allegheny

(Partial)

Armstrong

(Partial)

Beaver

Butler

Washington

Westmoreland


NOx PM2.5






Subtotal 8,233,549,075 7,431.37 336.15

Off-Model Project


Region Total 8,233,549,075 7,431.37 336.15

(Kg/Year) 6,741,625 304,955

SPC July 2016

Allegheny County, PA PM2.5 Annual Emission Summary2017 Existing Year (By Road Type)


(mph)

C-6

Allegheny


NOx PM2.5






Subtotal 8,363,374,416 5,340.29 270.38

Off-Model Project


Region Total 8,363,374,416 5,340.29 270.38

(Kg/Year) 4,844,627 245,286

SPC July 2016

C-7

Allegheny

Allegheny County, PA PM2.5 Annual Emission Summary2020 TIP Year (By Road Type)


(mph)


NOx PM2.5






Subtotal 8,506,261,417 3,112.01 202.76

Off-Model Project


Region Total 8,506,261,417 3,112.01 202.76

(Kg/Year) 2,823,169 183,944

SPC July 2016

C-8

Allegheny

Allegheny County, PA PM2.5 Annual Emission Summary2025 Interim Year #1 (By Road Type)


(mph)


NOx PM2.5






Subtotal 8,613,799,418 1,537.98 139.82

Off-Model Project


Region Total 8,613,799,418 1,537.98 139.82

(Kg/Year) 1,395,237 126,842

SPC July 2016

C-9

Allegheny

Allegheny County, PA PM2.5 Annual Emission Summary2035 Interim Year #2 (By Road Type)


(mph)


NOx PM2.5






Subtotal 8,841,253,752 1,401.60 131.10

Off-Model Project


Region Total 8,841,253,752 1,401.60 131.10

(Kg/Year) 1,271,514 118,930

SPC July 2016

C-10

Allegheny

Allegheny County, PA PM2.5 Annual Emission Summary2040 LRP Horizon Year (By Road Type)


(mph)


NOx PM2.5






Subtotal 147,417,315 172.48 5.62

Off-Model Project


Region Total 147,417,315 172.48 5.62

(Kg/Year) 156,467 5,103

SPC July 2016

* Indiana County Portion of Johnstown, PA PM2.5 Nonattainment Area

Indiana County PM2.5 Annual Emission Summary*2017 Existing Year (By Road Type)


(mph)

C-11

Indiana

(Partial)


NOx PM2.5






Subtotal 148,576,670 121.87 4.16

Off-Model Project


Region Total 148,576,670 121.87 4.16

(Kg/Year) 110,561 3,777

SPC July 2016


Indiana County PM2.5 Annual Emission Summary*2020 TIP Year (By Road Type)


(mph)

C-12

Indiana

(Partial)


NOx PM2.5






Subtotal 149,373,415 68.60 2.75

Off-Model Project


Region Total 149,373,415 68.60 2.75

(Kg/Year) 62,234 2,498

SPC July 2016


Indiana County PM2.5 Annual Emission Summary*2025 Interim Year #1 (By Road Type)


(mph)

C-13

Indiana

(Partial)


NOx PM2.5






Subtotal 151,018,463 31.61 1.57

Off-Model Project


Region Total 151,018,463 31.61 1.57

(Kg/Year) 28,673 1,422

SPC July 2016


Indiana County PM2.5 Annual Emission Summary*2035 Interim Year #2 (By Road Type)


(mph)

C-14

Indiana

(Partial)


NOx PM2.5






Subtotal 152,997,207 28.19 1.41

Off-Model Project


Region Total 152,997,207 28.19 1.41

(Kg/Year) 25,577 1,279

SPC July 2016


Indiana County PM2.5 Annual Emission Summary*2040 LRP Horizon Year (By Road Type)


(mph)

C-15

Indiana

(Partial)

Emissions (Tons/Day)

VOC NOx



Rural UnRestricted 23,771 43.3 0.003 0.012



Subtotal 25,922,068 12.349 20.700


Rural Restricted 154,640 52.0 0.020 0.120




Subtotal 1,779,615 1.025 1.753






Subtotal 4,143,053 1.922 3.132






Subtotal 5,718,542 2.949 5.333


Rural Restricted 429,357 N/A 0.047 0.271

Rural UnRestricted 223,277 N/A 0.030 0.118

Urban Restricted 2,610,100 N/A 0.330 2.435

Urban UnRestricted 3,319,197 N/A 0.442 1.956

Subtotal 6,581,931 2.693 5.931






Subtotal 9,836,083 4.393 9.423






Subtotal 2,926,080 1.834 2.690

Region Subtotal 56,907,372 27.165 48.962

Off-Model Project


Region Total 56,907,372 27.165 48.962

(Kg/Day) 24,644 44,418

SPC July 2016

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley 8-Hour Ozone Emission Summary2017 Existing Year (By Road Type)

County Road Type Summer Daily VMTSpeed

(mph)

Fayette

C-16

Allegheny

Armstrong

Beaver

Butler

Washington

Westmoreland


VOC NOx






Subtotal 26,264,445 10.091 14.757






Subtotal 1,788,804 0.797 1.209






Subtotal 4,186,071 1.512 2.201






Subtotal 5,780,750 2.350 3.815






Subtotal 6,654,203 2.122 4.191






Subtotal 9,917,985 3.445 6.635






Subtotal 2,928,502 1.441 1.896

Region Subtotal 57,520,760 21.759 34.702

Off-Model Project


Region Total 57,520,760 21.759 34.702

(Kg/Day) 19,739 31,482

SPC July 2016

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley 8-Hour Ozone Emission Summary2020 TIP Year (By Road Type)


(mph)

Fayette

C-17

Allegheny

Armstrong

Beaver

Butler

Washington

Westmoreland


VOC NOx






Subtotal 26,788,884 7.031 8.464






Subtotal 1,806,486 0.553 0.750






Subtotal 4,271,056 1.103 1.279






Subtotal 5,886,276 1.655 2.255






Subtotal 6,929,594 1.444 2.483






Subtotal 10,069,903 2.308 3.815






Subtotal 2,948,169 1.080 1.130

Region Subtotal 58,700,368 15.174 20.178

Off-Model Project


Region Total 58,700,368 15.174 20.178

(Kg/Day) 13,765 18,305

SPC July 2016

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley 8-Hour Ozone Emission Summary2025 Interim Year #1 (By Road Type)


(mph)

Fayette

C-18

Allegheny

Armstrong

Beaver

Butler

Washington

Westmoreland


VOC NOx






Subtotal 27,150,153 4.109 3.922






Subtotal 1,844,081 0.356 0.384






Subtotal 4,328,636 0.642 0.590






Subtotal 6,049,678 0.956 1.088






Subtotal 7,218,256 0.801 1.257






Subtotal 10,347,061 1.436 1.936






Subtotal 2,923,750 0.639 0.510

Region Subtotal 59,861,616 8.939 9.686

Off-Model Project


Region Total 59,861,616 8.939 9.686

(Kg/Day) 8,109 8,787

SPC July 2016

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley 8-Hour Ozone Emission Summary2035 Interim Year #2 (By Road Type)


(mph)

Fayette

C-19

Allegheny

Armstrong

Beaver

Butler

Washington

Westmoreland


VOC NOx






Subtotal 27,771,002 3.674 3.493






Subtotal 1,859,432 0.322 0.345






Subtotal 4,385,872 0.571 0.521






Subtotal 6,153,262 0.853 0.977






Subtotal 7,384,365 0.700 1.144






Subtotal 10,511,030 1.283 1.765






Subtotal 2,934,703 0.575 0.448

Region Subtotal 60,999,667 7.979 8.694

Off-Model Project


Region Total 60,999,667 7.979 8.694

(Kg/Day) 7,238 7,887

SPC July 2016

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley 8-Hour Ozone Emission Summary2040 LRP Horizon Year (By Road Type)


(mph)

Fayette

C-20

Allegheny

Armstrong

Beaver

Butler

Washington

Westmoreland

APPENDIX D

TDM Model Setup and Results

D-1

TDM Model Inputs - 2020

AREAWIDE AND EMPLOYER STRATEGIES

----------------------------------

TEST DESCRIPTION 2020CAX2 | NO TEST | NO TEST | NO TEST |

---------------|---------------|---------------|---------------|

AREA EMPLOYER |AREA EMPLOYER |AREA EMPLOYER |AREA EMPLOYER |

WIDE STRAT PART|WIDE STRAT PART|WIDE STRAT PART|WIDE STRAT PART|

---- ---- ---|---- ---- ---|---- ---- ---|---- ---- ---|

Transit Service | | | |

Improvements | | | |

I V T (min.) 0. | 0. | 0. | 0. |

O V T (min.) 0. | 0. | 0. | 0. |

Rideshare Prog. 31 2 | 0 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 |

Vanpool Program 31 2 | 0 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 |

Transit Program 31 2 | 0 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 |

Work Hours Mgmt | | | |

Flex Time 0 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 |

Stagrd Hours 0 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 |

Comp 4/40 10 2 | 0 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 |

Comp 9/80 5 2 | 0 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 |

Tele/Commute 3.0 10 2 | .0 0 0 | .0 0 0 | .0 0 0 |

HOV Lane | | | |

Time Savings 0. | 0. | 0. | 0. |

Restriction 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

TIME CHANGES 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

Pref. Parking | | | |

1 / VEH .0 | .0 | .0 | .0 |

2 / VEH .0 | .0 | .0 | .0 |

3 / VEH .0 | .0 | .0 | .0 |

4+/ VEH .0 | .0 | .0 | .0 |

Transit .0 | .0 | .0 | .0 |

Vanpool .0 | .0 | .0 | .0 |

COST($) SUBSIDY 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |


1 / VEH .0 .00 | .0 .00 | .0 .00 | .0 .00 |

2 / VEH .0 -3.00 | .0 .00 | .0 .00 | .0 .00 |

3 / VEH .0 -4.50 | .0 .00 | .0 .00 | .0 .00 |

4+/ VEH .0 -6.00 | .0 .00 | .0 .00 | .0 .00 |

Transit .0 -1.50 | .0 .00 | .0 .00 | .0 .00 |

Vanpool -18.00 | .00 | .00 | .00 |

GENERIC ACTIONS DST | DST | DST | DST |

Time Changes | | | |

1 / VEH .0 N | .0 N | .0 N | .0 N |

2 / VEH .0 N | .0 N | .0 N | .0 N |

3 / VEH .0 N | .0 N | .0 N | .0 N |

4+/ VEH .0 N | .0 N | .0 N | .0 N |

Transit .00 N | .00 N | .00 N | .00 N |

Vanpool .00 N | .00 N | .00 N | .00 N |

Cost Changes | | | |

1 / VEH .00 N | .00 N | .00 N | .00 N |

2 / VEH .00 N | .00 N | .00 N | .00 N |

3 / VEH .00 N | .00 N | .00 N | .00 N |

4+/ VEH .00 N | .00 N | .00 N | .00 N |

Transit .00 N | .00 N | .00 N | .00 N |

Vanpool .00 N | .00 N | .00 N | .00 N |

D-2

TDM Model Outputs - 2020

PERCENT MODE SHARE P E A K H O U R % REDUCTION

------------------- ----- -------------------------- -----------------

PERSON VEHICLE PERS VEH

DA TRN CP VP AVR TRIPS TRIPS V M T TRIPS TRIPS VMT

----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ------- ------- -------- ----- ----- -----

0 81.3 8.5 10.2 .0 1.16 1249287 1075215 71131080

1 79.6 8.6 10.9 .9 1.18 1239637 1048318 69301800 .8 2.5 2.6

Line 0 is 2020 base condition. Line 1 is 2020 TDM Program. Change in daily VMT due to 2020 TDM Program is -182,928.0

D-3

TDM Model Inputs - 2040

AREAWIDE AND EMPLOYER STRATEGIES

----------------------------------

TEST DESCRIPTION 2040CAX5 | NO TEST | NO TEST | NO TEST |

---------------|---------------|---------------|---------------|

AREA EMPLOYER |AREA EMPLOYER |AREA EMPLOYER |AREA EMPLOYER |

WIDE STRAT PART|WIDE STRAT PART|WIDE STRAT PART|WIDE STRAT PART|

---- ---- ---|---- ---- ---|---- ---- ---|---- ---- ---|

Transit Service | | | |

Improvements | | | |

I V T (min.) 0. | 0. | 0. | 0. |

O V T (min.) 0. | 0. | 0. | 0. |

Rideshare Prog. 41 6 | 0 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 |

Vanpool Program 41 6 | 0 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 |

Transit Program 41 6 | 0 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 |

Work Hours Mgmt | | | |

Flex Time 0 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 |

Stagrd Hours 0 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 |

Comp 4/40 20 6 | 0 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 |

Comp 9/80 5 6 | 0 0 | 0 0 | 0 0 |

Tele/Commute 3.0 30 6 | .0 0 0 | .0 0 0 | .0 0 0 |

HOV Lane | | | |

Time Savings 0. | 0. | 0. | 0. |

Restriction 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

TIME CHANGES 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |


1 / VEH .0 | .0 | .0 | .0 |

2 / VEH .0 | .0 | .0 | .0 |

3 / VEH .0 | .0 | .0 | .0 |

4+/ VEH .0 | .0 | .0 | .0 |

Transit .0 | .0 | .0 | .0 |

Vanpool .0 | .0 | .0 | .0 |

COST($) SUBSIDY 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |


1 / VEH .0 .00 | .0 .00 | .0 .00 | .0 .00 |

2 / VEH .0 -3.00 | .0 .00 | .0 .00 | .0 .00 |

3 / VEH .0 -4.50 | .0 .00 | .0 .00 | .0 .00 |

4+/ VEH .0 -6.00 | .0 .00 | .0 .00 | .0 .00 |

Transit .0 -1.50 | .0 .00 | .0 .00 | .0 .00 |

Vanpool -18.00 | .00 | .00 | .00 |

GENERIC ACTIONS DST | DST | DST | DST |

Time Changes | | | |

1 / VEH .0 N | .0 N | .0 N | .0 N |

2 / VEH .0 N | .0 N | .0 N | .0 N |

3 / VEH .0 N | .0 N | .0 N | .0 N |

4+/ VEH .0 N | .0 N | .0 N | .0 N |

Transit .00 N | .00 N | .00 N | .00 N |

Vanpool .00 N | .00 N | .00 N | .00 N |

Cost Changes | | | |

1 / VEH .00 N | .00 N | .00 N | .00 N |

2 / VEH .00 N | .00 N | .00 N | .00 N |

3 / VEH .00 N | .00 N | .00 N | .00 N |

4+/ VEH .00 N | .00 N | .00 N | .00 N |

Transit .00 N | .00 N | .00 N | .00 N |

Vanpool .00 N | .00 N | .00 N | .00 N |

D-4

TDM Model Outputs - 2040

PERCENT MODE SHARE P E A K H O U R % REDUCTION

------------------- ----- -------------------------- -----------------

PERSON VEHICLE PERS VEH

DA TRN CP VP AVR TRIPS TRIPS V M T TRIPS TRIPS VMT

----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ------- ------- -------- ----- ----- -----

0 82.0 8.0 10.0 .0 1.15 1386930 1201822 76150824

1 67.0 8.6 17.7 6.7 1.33 1313050 984581 62061340 5.3 18.1 18.5

Line 0 is 2040 base condition. Line 1 is 2040 TDM Program. Change in daily VMT due to 2040 TDM Program is -1,408,948.4

The effectiveness of a particular TDM measure when applied through employersdepends on the degree to which employers actually implement the measure.Generally, this is determined by the legal/regulatory requirement imposed on employers. As might be expected, the imposition of a requirement not only affects the number of employers who participate, but the spirit or quality with which the program measure is implemented.

The TDM model reflects this relationship through the Employer ParticipationRate. This Rate is defined as the percentage of employers in the study area who would be expected to offer the particular measure under differentlegal/regulatory conditions. There are different participation rates for each typeof action.

You are provided with 6 Employer Participation Rate options:

Level 1: No participation ( i. e., 0% ).

Level 2: Voluntary participation, meaning that there is no legal reguirement compelling participation ( i. e., it is up to the employer's self interest).

Level 3: New Mandatory participation, meaning that there is a legal requirement compelling participation on the particular measure, but that requirement applies only to those employers who enter the local employment base between now or the date of enactment of their requirement, and the study forecast year.

Level 4: Full Mandatory participation, meaning that the legal requirement applies to all employment, new and existing.

Level 5: Maximum participation, which assumes the theoretically unobtainable 100% involvement of all employers.

Level 6: A blank column which is available for you to test your own design, should you be examining a special form of ordinance, or you expect a different pattern of participation from the default values provided.

Employer Participation Rate

Participation Rate #2 was used for 2020 TDM Program.Participation Rate #6 was used for 2040 TDM Program.

D-5



D-6


EMPLOYER INCENTIVE PROGRAMS

Work Place Category Employer Participation RateType Size 1 2 3 4 5 6

New Office 1-49 0 1 76 76 100 50New Office 50-99 0 1 100 100 100 65New Office 100-499 0 7 100 100 100 75New Office 500+ 0 7 100 100 100 85Old Office 1-49 0 1 1 76 100 50Old Office 50-99 0 1 1 100 100 65Old Office 100-499 0 7 7 100 100 75Old Office 500+ 0 7 7 100 100 85New Non-Office 1-49 0 1 76 76 100 50New Non-Office 50-99 0 1 100 100 100 65New Non-Office 100-499 0 7 100 100 100 75New Non-Office 500+ 0 7 100 100 100 85Old Non-Office 1-49 0 1 1 76 100 50Old Non-Office 50-99 0 1 1 100 100 65Old Non-Office 100-499 0 7 7 100 100 75Old Non-Office 500+ 0 7 7 100 100 85

COMPRESSED WORKWEEK AND TELECOMMUTING




D-7


EMPLOYER SUPPORT PROGRAMS (Carpool, Vanpool, Transit)



LEVEL OF EFFORT - VANPOOL PROGRAMS

The values of 1 to 4 describe the level of effort the employer will put into a vanpool program. The following is the meaning of these values:

1. Vanpool information activities (tied in with areawide vanpool matching and/or third-party vanpool programs), plus 1/4 time transportation coordinator.

2. In-house vanpool matching services, and/or personalized vanpool candidate get-togethers, and non-monetary vanpool development, plus 1/4 time transportation coordinator and a policy of flexible work schedules.

3. In-house vanpool matching services, vanpool development and operating assistance including financial assistance such as vanpool purchase loan guarantees, consolidated purchase of insurance, and startup subsidy (generally at least two forms of such financial assistance), and additional incentives such as van washing and preferential (reserved, inside, and/or especially convenient) parking for vanpools, plus a 1/2 time transportation coordinator.

4 In-house vanpool matching services, vanpool development and operating assistance including major financial assistance such as employer purchase of vans with favorable leaseback (or alternative continuing subsidy such as free maintenance, free insurance, and/or direct subsidy to keep vanpool fares low) in addition to startup subsidy, several additional incentives such as van washing, preferential parking for vanpools and guaranteed ride home, and a full-time transportation coordinator, and/or personalized vanpool candidate get-togethers.

Employer Level of Effort

Level #3 was used for 2020 TDM Program.Level #4 was used for 2040 TDM Program.Level #1 was used as the base condition for both 2020 and 2040.

D-8

LEVEL OF EFFORT - TRANSIT PROGRAMS

The values of 1 to 4 describe the level of effort the employer will put into a transitprogram. The following is the meaning of these values:

1. Transit information center plus 1/4 time transportation coordinator.

2. Transit information center and a policy of work hours flexibility to accommodate transit schedules/delays, plus 1/4 time transportation coordinator.

3. Transit information center and a policy of work hours flexibility, on-site bus pass sales, plus a 1/2 time transportation coordinator.

4. Transit information center and a policy of work hours flexibility, on-site bus pass sales, guaranteed ride home, and a full-time transportation coordinator.

LEVEL OF EFFORT - CARPOOL PROGRAMS

The values of 1 to 4 describe the level of effort the employer will put into a carpooling program. The following is the meaning of these values:

1. Carpool information activities (tied in with areawide matching), and a 1/4 time transportation coordinator.

2. In-house carpool matching services and/or personalized carpool candidate get-togethers (including information activities), and a 1/4 time transportation coordinator.

3. In-house carpool matching and information services, plus preferential (reserved, inside, and/or especially convenient) parking for carpools, a policy of flexible work schedules to accommodate carpools, and a 1/2 time transportation coordinator.

4. In-house carpool matching and information services, plus preferential parking for carpools, flexible schedules, guaranteed ride home, and a full-time transportation coordinator.

Employer Level of Effort

D-9



APPENDIX E

Common Acronyms

COMMON ACRONYMS

E–1

AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic

ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (federal)

ADT Average Daily Traffic

BPR PennDOT Bureau of Planning and Research

CAAA 90 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990

CBD Central Business District

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality

CO Carbon Monoxide

CO2 Carbon Dioxide

DEP Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (also PaDEP)

DOT Department of Transportation

DVMT Daily Vehicle Miles of Travel

EPA Environmental Protection Agency (United States)

EPACT Energy Policy Act of 1992 (federal)

FAST-Act Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (federal transportation law – enacted 2015)

FHWA Federal Highway Administration

FTA Federal Transit Administration

FY Fiscal Year

GIS Geographic Information System

HBW Home-Based Work trips

HBO Home Based Other trips

HC Hydrocarbons

HDDV Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicle

HDGV Heavy Duty Gasoline Vehicle

HDV Heavy Duty Vehicle

HOV High Occupancy Vehicle

HPMS Highway Performance Monitoring System

I/M Inspection/Maintenance

ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (federal)

IVHS Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems

ITS Intelligent Transportation Systems

IVT In-Vehicle Travel Time

LDDT Light Duty Diesel Truck

LDDV Light Duty Diesel Vehicle

LDGT Light Duty Gasoline Truck

LDGV Light Duty Gasoline Vehicle

LDT Light Duty Truck

LDV Light Duty Vehicle

LEV Low Emission Vehicle

LRP Long-Range Transportation Plan

LOS Level of Service

MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (federal transportation law – enacted 2012)

MINUTP Suite of computer programs used to model travel demand

MOBILE EPA emissions model to calculate on-road emission factors - latest version is 6.2

MOVES Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator – EPA on-road emissions model (replaces MOBILE model)

MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization

MPH Miles Per Hour

MPMS Multi-Modal Project Management System (Pennsylvania)

COMMON ACRONYMS

E–2

NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards

NEPA National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (federal)

NHB Non-Home Based trips

NHS National Highway System

NH3 Ammonia

NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide

NOX Nitrogen Oxides

O3 Ozone

OVT Out of Vehicle Travel Time

PaDEP Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (also DEP)

PennDOT Pennsylvania Department of Transportation

PM10 Coarse Particulate Matter - particles with diameter less than 10 micrometers

PM2.5 Fine Particulate Matter - particles with diameter less than 2.5 micrometers

PPB Parts Per Billion

PPM Parts Per Million

PPSUITE tool for estimating speeds and processing MOBILE emission rates

RFG Reformulated Gasoline

RFP Reasonable Further Progress

RMS PennDOT’s Roadway Management System

ROW Right of Way

RVP Reid Vapor Pressure

SAFETEA-LU Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (federal)

SIP State Implementation Plan

SOV Single Occupancy Vehicle

SOX Sulfur Oxides

SO2 Sulfur Dioxide

SPC Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission

SR State Route number

STC State Transportation Commission

STIP Statewide Transportation Improvement Program

STP Surface Transportation Program

TAZ Traffic Analysis Zone

TCM Transportation Control Measure

TDM Travel Demand Management

TEA-21 Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (federal)

TIP Transportation Improvement Program

TMA Transportation Management Area

TPD Tons per Day

TPY Tons per Year

TR Traffic Route number

TSM Transportation System Management

USC United States Code

µG/M3 Micrograms per Cubic Meter

USDOT United States Department of Transportation

VHT Vehicle Hours Traveled

VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled

VOC Volatile Organic Compounds

APPENDIX F

SPC Resolutions 9-16 and 11-16

air quality conformity determination pittsburgh ... quality conformity determination pittsburgh...

Documents