a.l bh#1 d3
TRANSCRIPT
MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
CH. ABDULLATIF & CO. ABM ENGINEERS:
SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE II MULTAN
Sieve Analysis of Embankment & Sub Grade Material
Grain Size Analysis AASHTO-T-27
PROJECT: Sampling Date
Kind of Material Testing Date
LOCATIONField Sample No.
Lab. Sample No.
Original Sourse Analyst.
Weight of Original Sample GmsWeight of Oven Dry Gms 1042.9Weight of Washed Oven Dry Gms
Sieve Size Wt. Retained Cum. Wt.Retained Cum. Retained Cum. Passing SpecificationRemarks
mm (alt.) Grms Grms % % %
75 3''
63 2 1/2"
50.0 2 "
37.5 1 1/2''
25.0 1 "
19.0 3/4 "
12.5 1/2 "
9.5 3/8 "
4.75 No. 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
2.36 No. 8
2.00 No. 10 10.4 10.4 1.0 99.0
1.18 No. 16
0.60 No. 30
0.425 No. 40 66.7 77.2 7.4 92.6
0.3 No. 50
0.18 No. 80
0.15 No. 100
0.075 No. 200 135.6 212.8 20.4 79.6
Oven Dry wt. -4 # Sieve ( Gms)
Sieve Size No.10 No.40 No.200
Passing %
CalculationsCumulative Percent Retained = Cumulative mass Retained / Dry Mass Before Wash
Percent Passing = 100 - Cumulative Percent Retained
CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT: CONSULTANT:
LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIAL INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER
Date (التاريخ)
MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYCONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
CH.ABDUL LATIF & CO. ABM ENGINEERS
SOUTHERN BYE PASS PHASE II MULTAN
Soils Classification /Atterburg LimitsMRD Test Method 208 -209 - 210 (Adaptation of AASHTO T 89 - 90 - 80)
Project Sampling Date
Kind of Material Testing Date
Location Lab. Sample No.
Quantity Represented Material Used:
Sieve AnalysisSieve Size Individual Wt. Retained Cumulative Wt. Retained
3/4 in (19 mm) 0 0 0 100No.4 (4.75 mm) 0 0 0 100No.10 (2.00 mm) 0.9 0.9 0 99.9No. 40 (0.425 mm) 5.7 6.6 1 99.3No.200 (0.075 mm) 179.8 186.4 20 80.3
PanWashTotal 186.4
Original Wt. Gram Dry Wt. Gram Wash Dry Wt. Gram946.3
Atterburg Limits (Liquid Limit & Plastic Limit )Type of Test LIQUID LIMIT TEST
PLASTIC LIMIT TESTNumber of Blows 40 32 25 18
Trial No. 1 32 24 18 1 2 3Container Number A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7Wt. of Container g 17.70 27.70 18.50 19.50 22.20 20.20 24.00Wt. Wet Soil + Container g 45.54 53.43 46.15 44.63 34.96 33.66 35.93Wt. Dry Soil + Container g 40.85 48.72 40.70 39.36 32.85 31.45 33.99Wt. of Water g 4.69 4.71 5.45 5.27 2.11 2.21 1.94Wt. of Dry Soil g 23.15 21.02 22.20 19.86 10.65 11.25 9.99
Water Content % 20.26 22.41 24.56 26.54 19.85 19.65 19.40
Avg. 23.44 19.63
Liquid Limit (L.L) LL = 24.40 Plastic Limit (P.L) P.L = 19.63
Plasticity Index (P.I) P.I = L.L - P.L 4.77 Classification Group A-4
CONTRACTOR CONSULTANT CONSULTANT
LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIALS INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER
Cumulative Percent Retained
Percent Passing
10 100
17.00
18.00
19.00
20.00
21.00
22.00
23.00
24.00
25.00
26.00
27.00
28.00
29.00
30.00
No. of Blows
Wate
r C
on
ten
t %
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9025
MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYCONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
NAZIR & COMPANY ABM CONSULTANT
FATIMA JINNAH TOWN PHASE 1 VEHARI ROAD MULTAN
California Bearing RatioMRD Test Method 213 (Adaptation of ASTM D 1883 - AASHOT 193)
Page 1 Of 2
Road Name FATIMA JINNAH TOWN Field Sample No.Description: SUB GRADE MATERIAL Date Of Sampling
2/1/2010Location
B-BLOCK Date TestedSUB GRADE MATERIAL Quant. Rep.
Materials Analyst:Surcharge Weight Used(kg) 4.54 Rate of penetration mm/Minute 1.27
Density DeterminationTest No. 1 2 3 Test No. 1 2 3Can No. A5 A9 B4 2128.0 2109.0 2124.0
A Mass. Wet Soil + Can. g 647.6 727.8 621.4 Mass. Sample + Mold . g 10997 11191 11496B Mass Dry Soil + Can. g 581.9 655.2 558 Mass Mold . g 7090 6950 6940C 65.7 72.6 63.4 Mass Sample . g 3907 4241 4556D Mass Can. g 48 70.1 47.1 1.836 2.011 2.145E 533.9 585.1 510.9 Percent Moisture % 12.30 12.4 12.40F 12.30 12.40 12.40 1.635 1.789 1.908
Test No. 1 2 3Blows Per Lift 10 30 65Penetration
Molded Tested Molded Tested Molded TestedTotal Unit Corrected
CBRTotal Unit Corrected
CBRTotal Unit Corrected
CBRmm
Load Load Load Load Load Load Load Load Load
Kg % Kg % Kg %
0 0 0 0 0
0.5 0.64 0.7 1.2 1.8 3.0 2.7 4.6
1 1.27 1.3 2.2 3.0 5.1 4.3 7.3
1.5 1.90 1.7 2.9 4.2 7.1 5.6 9.5
2 2.54 70.35 2.2 3.7 5.3 5.1 8.7 12.3 6.8 11.4 16.23 3.81 2.9 4.9 6.3 10.7 8.4 14.2
4 5.08 105.53 3.3 5.6 5.3 7.5 12.7 12.1 9.9 16.8 15.96 7.62 3.9 6.6 9.1 15.4 12.0 20.3
Swell ReadingDate Moldend
Test No. 1 2 3
Mold No. 1 2 3
Final Height . mm 0.42 0.34 0.21
Initial Height . mm 0.000 0.000 0.000
Difference . mm 0.42 0.34 0.21
Sample Length . mm 116.43 116.43 116.43
Percent Swell % 0.36 0.29 0.18
MAX DRY DENSITY 1.899
OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT 12.4 %
Blows Per Lift No. 10 30 65
1.635 1.789 1.908
Soaked C.B.R. % 5.3 12.1 15.9
95 % of Max. Dry Density 1.804
C.B.R At 95% of Max Dry Density 12.8 %
Contractor: Consultant:
Lab Technician Material Inspector Material Engineer
Molding Moisture Content (ASTM D 2216)
Mold Volume cm3
Mass Of Water. A-B g
Unit Wet Mass. g/cm3
Mass Dry Soil . B-D gMoisture Content C/E X 100 % Unit Dry Mass. g/cm3
Sta
nda
rd L
oad
(Str
esse
s) K
g / C
m2
Per Min. Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2
PROCTOR MODIFIED
g/cm3
Dry Density g/cm3.
g/cm3 0 1.27 2.54 3.81 5.08 6.35 7.62 8.89
0
5
10
15
20
25
Penetration mm
Un
it L
oa
d (
Str
ess
) k
g /
cm
2
MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYCONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:NAZIR & COMPANY ABM CONSULTANTS:
FATIMA JINNAH TOWN PHASE 1 VEHARI ROAD MULTAN
California Bearing RatioMRD Test Method 213 (Adaptation of ASTM D 1883 - AASHOT 193)
Page 2 Of 2Description: SUB GRADE MATERIAL LOCATION: B-BLOCK
PROCTOR MODIFIEDMAX DRY DENSITY 1.915
OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT 11.9 %
BLOWS PER LAYER No. 10 30 65
1.635 1.877 1.980
SOAKED C.B.R. % 5 12 16
95 % of Max. Dry Density 1.819C.B.R At 93.0% of Max Dry Density 11.2 %
C.B.R At 95% of Max Dry Density 12.8 %
CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
Lab Technician Material Inspector Material Engineer
g/cm³
DRY DENSITY AS MOLDED g/cm3
g/cm3
1.600 1.650 1.700 1.750 1.800 1.850 1.900 1.950 2.0000
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Dry Density g/cc
Soa
ked
CB
R %
IMPROVEMENT&WIDENING OF NATIONAL HIGHWAY N-5 BAHAWAL POUR CHOWK (929+000) TO
CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
CH:ABDUL LATIF &CO ABM ENGINEERS
SOUTHREN BYPASS PHASE II VEHARI ROAD TO BAHAWALPUR CHOWK MULTAN
Moisture-Density Relationship of SoilsMRDTM 212 (ASTM D 698 - 1557 - AASHO T 99 - T 180)
Project Sampling Date
Description Of Sample Testing DateLOCATION: Field Sample No.
LAYER: Lab. Sample No.
Analyst.
A Mold No. Formula 1 2 3 4 5 6B Wt. Compacted Wet soil + Mold (gm) 8382 8755 9072 9237 9110
C Wt. Mold (gm) 4724 4724 4724 4724 4724
D 2118 2118 2118 2118 2118
E Wt. Compacted Wet soil (gm) B - C 3658 4031 4348 4513 4386
F E / D 1.727 1.903 2.053 2.131 2.071
G Container No. A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-4H Wt. of Container 36.0 35.5 34.0 34.5 36.2I Wt. Wet Soil + Container (gm) 336.9 302.3 313.2 302.5 308.1J Wt. Dry Soil + Container (gm) 322.6 285.3 290.6 275.5 274.9K Wt of Water (gm) I - J 14.3 17.0 22.6 27.0 33.2L Wt. of Dry Soil (gm) J - H 286.6 249.8 256.6 241 238.7M Water Content % ( K / L )*100 5.0 6.8 8.8 11.2 13.9N Dry Density (g/cc) F / ( 1+ ( M/100 ) ) 1.645 1.782 1.887 1.916 1.818
11.31.917
Remraks :
CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIALS INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER
Volume of Mold (Cm3)
Wet Density (gm/Cm3)
OPIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT %
MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY gm/Cm3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1.508
1.568
1.628
1.689
1.749
1.809
1.870
1.930
1.990Moisture-Density Relationship
Moisture Content %
Dry
Den
sity
gm
/cm
3
MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYCONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
CH:ABDUL LATIF &CO ABM CONSULTANT
SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE II MULTANCalifornia Bearing Ratio
MRD Test Method 213 (Adaptation of ASTM D 1883 - AASHOT 193)Page 1 Of 2
Road Name Field Sample No.Description: Date Of Sampling
LocationDate TestedQuant. Rep.
Materials Analyst:
Density DeterminationTest No. 1 2 3 Test No. 1 2 3Can No. A5 A9 B4 2124.0 2128.0 2109.0
A Mass. Wet Soil + Can. g 740.2 638.0 686.3 Mass. Sample + Mold . g 10969 11310 11344B Mass Dry Soil + Can. g 680.4 586.9 631.1 Mass Mold . g 6510 7090 6950C 59.8 51.1 55.2 Mass Sample . g 4459 4220 4394D Mass Can. g 70.1 65 68 2.099 1.983 2.084E 610.3 521.9 563.1 Percent Moisture % 9.80 9.8 9.80F 9.80 9.80 9.80 1.912 1.806 1.898
Test No. 1 2 3Blows Per Lift 10 30 65Penetration
Molded Tested Molded Tested Molded TestedTotal Unit Corrected
CBRTotal Unit Corrected
CBRTotal Unit Corrected
CBRmm
Load Load Load Load Load Load Load Load Load
Kg % Kg % Kg %
0 0 0 0 0
0.5 0.64 1.0 1.7 1.4 2.4 2.4 4.1
1 1.27 1.3 2.2 3.0 5.0 3.9 6.6
1.5 1.90 1.7 2.8 4.2 7.1 5.3 9.0
2 2.54 70.35 2.1 3.6 5.2 5.0 8.4 12.0 6.6 11.2 15.93 3.81 2.8 4.7 6.3 10.7 8.0 13.5
4 5.08 105.53 3.2 5.3 5.1 7.3 12.4 11.7 9.7 16.4 15.56 7.62 3.8 6.5 8.9 15.0 11.7 19.8
Swell ReadingDate Moldend
Test No. 1 2 3
Mold No. 1 2 3
Final Height . mm 0.45 0.36 0.28
Initial Height . mm 0.000 0.000 0.000
Difference . mm 0.45 0.36 0.28
Sample Length . mm 116.43 116.43 116.43
Percent Swell % 0.39 0.31 0.24
MAX DRY DENSITY 1.909
OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT 9.8 %
Blows Per Lift No. 10 30 65
1.912 1.806 1.898
Soaked C.B.R. % 5.1 11.7 15.5
95 % of Max. Dry Density 1.814
C.B.R At 95% of Max Dry Density 12.2 %
Contractor: Consultant:
Lab Technician Material Inspector Material Engineer
Molding Moisture Content (ASTM D 2216)
Mold Volume cm3
Mass Of Water. A-B g
Unit Wet Mass. g/cm3
Mass Dry Soil . B-D gMoisture Content C/E X 100 % Unit Dry Mass. g/cm3
Sta
nda
rd L
oad
(Str
esse
s) K
g / C
m2
Per Min. Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2
PROCTOR MODIFIED
g/cm3
Dry Density g/cm3.
g/cm3 0 1.27 2.54 3.81 5.08 6.35 7.62 8.89
0
5
10
15
20
25
Penetration mm
Un
it L
oa
d (
Str
ess
) k
g /
cm
2
MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYCONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:CH. CONSTRUCTON COMPANY ABM CONSULTANTS:
SOUTHERN BYEPASS MULTAN
California Bearing RatioMRD Test Method 213 (Adaptation of ASTM D 1883 - AASHOT 193)
Page 2 Of 2Description: Embankment 4th Layer LOCATION: 3+175 TO 3+500 Full Width
PROCTOR MODIFIEDMAX DRY DENSITY 1.909
OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT 9.8 %
BLOWS PER LAYER No. 10 30 65
1.912 1.806 1.898
SOAKED C.B.R. % 5.1 11.7 15.5
95 % of Max. Dry Density 1.814C.B.R At 93.0% of Max Dry Density 9.6 %
C.B.R At 95% of Max Dry Density 12.2 %
CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
Lab Technician Material Inspector Material Engineer
g/cm³
DRY DENSITY AS MOLDED g/cm3
g/cm3
1.650 1.700 1.750 1.800 1.850 1.900 1.9500.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
Dry Density g/cc
Soa
ked
CB
R %
MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
CHOUDHARY CONSTRUCTION CO. ABM ENGINEERS
SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE 1 MULTAN
Moisture-Density Relationship of SoilsMRDTM 212 (ASTM D 698 - 1557 - AASHO T 99 - T 180)
Project Sothern ByePass Multan Sampling Date
Description Of Sample Embankment 4th Layer Testing DateLOCATION: 3+175 to 3+500 Full Width Field Sample No.
LAYER: 4th Layer Lab. Sample No.
Analyst.
A Mold No. Formula 1 2 3 4 5 6B Wt. Compacted Wet soil + Mold (gm) 9144 9438 9695 9851 9798
C Wt. Mold (gm) 5376 5376 5376 5376 5376
D 2135 2135 2135 2135 2135
E Wt. Compacted Wet soil (gm) B - C 3768 4062 4319 4475 4422
F E / D 1.765 1.903 2.023 2.096 2.071
G Container No. A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-4H Wt. of Container 36.2 34.5 35.0 35.0 35.4I Wt. Wet Soil + Container (gm) 314.4 372.2 446.3 362.3 394.5J Wt. Dry Soil + Container (gm) 304.5 353.1 416.2 333.1 357.2K Wt of Water (gm) I - J 9.9 19.1 30.1 29.2 37.3L Wt. of Dry Soil (gm) J - H 268.3 318.6 381.2 298.1 321.8M Water Content % ( K / L )*100 3.7 6.0 7.9 9.8 11.6N Dry Density (g/cc) F / ( 1+ ( M/100 ) ) 1.702 1.795 1.875 1.909 1.856
OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT % 9.81.909
Remraks :
CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIALS INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER
Volume of Mold (Cm3)
Wet Density (gm/Cm3)
MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY gm/Cm3
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1.550
1.600
1.650
1.700
1.750
1.800
1.850
1.900
1.950Moisture-Density Relationship
Moisture Content %
Dry
Den
sity
gm
/cm
3
MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYCONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
CH. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ABM ENGINEERS
SOUTHERN BYE PASS MULTAN
Soils Classification /Atterburg LimitsMRD Test Method 208 -209 - 210 (Adaptation of AASHTO T 89 - 90 - 80)
Project SOUTHERN BYE PASS MULTAN Sampling Date
Kind of Material Embankment 4th Layer Testing Date
Location 3+175 to 3+500 Full Width Lab. Sample No.
Quantity Represented Material Used: Embankment
Sieve AnalysisSieve Size Individual Wt. Retained Cumulative Wt. Retained
3/4 in (19 mm) 0 0 0 100No.4 (4.75 mm) 0 0 0 100No.10 (2.00 mm) 0.9 0.9 0 99.9No. 40 (0.425 mm) 5.7 6.6 1 99.3No.200 (0.075 mm) 179.8 186.4 20 80.3
PanWashTotal 186.4
Original Wt. Gram Dry Wt. Gram Wash Dry Wt. Gram946.3
Atterburg Limits (Liquid Limit & Plastic Limit )Type of Test LIQUID LIMIT TEST
PLASTIC LIMIT TESTNumber of Blows 40 32 24 16
Trial No. 1 2 3 4 1 2 3Container Number A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7Wt. of Container g 22.40 17.90 27.70 19.50 22.20 16.80 17.00Wt. Wet Soil + Container g 50.53 42.80 64.32 47.91 35.73 28.83 30.87Wt. Dry Soil + Container g 45.59 38.06 56.91 41.79 33.46 26.80 28.48Wt. of Water g 4.94 4.74 7.41 6.12 2.27 2.03 2.39Wt. of Dry Soil g 23.19 20.16 29.21 22.29 11.26 10.00 11.48
Water Content % 21.29 23.51 25.36 27.45 20.16 20.25 20.81
Avg. 24.80 20.41
Liquid Limit (L.L) LL = 24.20 Plastic Limit (P.L) P.L = 20.41
Plasticity Index (P.I) P.I = L.L - P.L 3.79 Classification Group A-4
CONTRACTOR CONSULTANT CONSULTANT
LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIALS INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER
Cumulative Percent Retained
Percent Passing
10 100
19.00
20.00
21.00
22.00
23.00
24.00
25.00
26.00
27.00
28.00
29.00
30.00
No. of Blows
Wate
r C
on
ten
t %
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9025
MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
CH.CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ABM ENGINEERS:
SOUTHERN BYEPASS MULTAN
Sieve Analysis of Embankment Material
Grain Size Analysis AASHTO-T-27
PROJECT: Southern ByePass Sampling Date
Kind of Material Testing Date
LOCATION3+175 TO 3+500 Full Width Field Sample No.
Embankmant Lab. Sample No.
Original Sourse Analyst.
Weight of Original Sample GmsWeight of Oven Dry Gms 971.6Weight of Washed Oven Dry Gms
Sieve Size Wt. Retained Cum. Wt.Retained Cum. Retained Cum. Passing SpecificationRemarks
mm (alt.) Grms Grms % % %
75 3'' 0 0 34.4 65.6
63 2 1/2" 0 0 48 52.0
50.0 2 " 0 0 60 40.4
37.5 1 1/2'' 0 0 0.0 100.0
25.0 1 " 131 131 13.5 86.5
19.0 3/4 " 0 0 0.0 100.0
12.5 1/2 " 0 0 99.7 0.3
9.5 3/8 " 76 36 3.7 96.3
4.75 No. 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
2.36 No. 8
2.00 No. 10 7.8 7.8 0.8 99.2
1.18 No. 16
0.60 No. 30
0.425 No. 40 -3.9 3.9 0.4 99.6
0.3 No. 50
0.18 No. 80
0.15 No. 100
0.075 No. 200 177.8 181.7 18.7 81.3
Oven Dry wt. -4 # Sieve ( Gms)
Sieve Size No.10 No.40 No.200
Passing %
CalculationsCumulative Percent Retained = Cumulative mass Retained / Dry Mass Before Wash
Percent Passing = 100 - Cumulative Percent Retained
CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT: CONSULTANT:
LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIAL INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER
EMBANKMENT 4TH LAYER
Date (التاريخ)
MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYCONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
CH.CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ABM CONSULTANT
SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE 1 MULTANCalifornia Bearing Ratio
MRD Test Method 213 (Adaptation of ASTM D 1883 - AASHOT 193)Page 1 Of 2
Road Name SOUTHERN BYEPASS MULTAN Field Sample No.Description: SUB GRADE MATERIAL Date Of Sampling
Location1+550 to 2+600 L/S Date Tested
Sub Grade 1st Layer Quant. Rep.Materials Analyst:Surcharge Weight Used(kg) 4.54 Rate of penetration mm/Minute 1.27
Density DeterminationTest No. 1 2 3 Test No. 1 2 3Can No. A5 A9 B4 2128.0 2109.0 2124.0
A Mass. Wet Soil + Can. g 624.3 638.2 683.1 Mass. Sample + Mold . g 11155 11198 11457B Mass Dry Soil + Can. g 571.0 584 626.4 Mass Mold . g 7090 6950 6940C 53.3 54.2 56.7 Mass Sample . g 4065 4248 4517D Mass Can. g 48 47.1 65 1.910 2.014 2.127E 523.0 536.9 561.4 Percent Moisture % 10.20 10.1 10.10F 10.20 10.10 10.10 1.734 1.829 1.932
Test No. 1 2 3Blows Per Lift 10 30 65Penetration
Molded Tested Molded Tested Molded TestedTotal Unit Corrected
CBRTotal Unit Corrected
CBRTotal Unit Corrected
CBRmm
Load Load Load Load Load Load Load Load Load
Kg % Kg % Kg %
0 0 0 0 0
0.5 0.64 1.0 1.8 2.0 3.4 2.8 4.7
1 1.27 1.6 2.7 3.5 5.9 4.5 7.6
1.5 1.90 2.0 3.4 4.5 7.6 6.0 10.2
2 2.54 70.35 2.4 4.0 5.7 5.6 9.4 13.4 7.4 12.5 17.83 3.81 3.1 5.2 7.1 12.0 9.8 16.6
4 5.08 105.53 3.7 6.3 6.0 8.7 14.7 14.0 11.6 19.6 18.66 7.62 4.7 7.9 10.9 18.5 14.5 24.6
Swell ReadingDate Moldend
Test No. 1 2 3
Mold No. 1 2 3
Final Height . mm 0.00 0.00 0.00
Initial Height . mm 0.000 0.000 0.000
Difference . mm 0.00 0.00 0
Sample Length . mm 116.43 116.43 116.43
Percent Swell % 0.00 0.00 0.00
MAX DRY DENSITY 1.931
OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT 10.1 %
Blows Per Lift No. 10 30 65
1.734 1.829 1.932
Soaked C.B.R. % 6.0 14.0 18.6
95 % of Max. Dry Density 1.834
C.B.R At 95% of Max Dry Density 14.2 %
Contractor: Consultant:
Lab Technician Material Inspector Material Engineer
Molding Moisture Content (ASTM D 2216)
Mold Volume cm3
Mass Of Water. A-B g
Unit Wet Mass. g/cm3
Mass Dry Soil . B-D gMoisture Content C/E X 100 % Unit Dry Mass. g/cm3
Sta
nda
rd L
oad
(Str
esse
s) K
g / C
m2
Per Min. Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2
PROCTOR MODIFIED
g/cm3
Dry Density g/cm3.
g/cm3 0 1.27 2.54 3.81 5.08 6.35 7.62 8.89
0
5
10
15
20
25
Penetration mm
Un
it L
oa
d (
Str
ess
) k
g /
cm
2
MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYCONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:CH. CONSTRUCTON COMPANY ABM CONSULTANTS:
SOUTHERN BYEPASS MULTAN
California Bearing RatioMRD Test Method 213 (Adaptation of ASTM D 1883 - AASHOT 193)
Page 2 Of 2Description: Sub Grade 1st Layer LOCATION: 1+550 TO 2+600 L/S
PROCTOR MODIFIEDMAX DRY DENSITY 1.931
OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT 10.1 %
BLOWS PER LAYER No. 10 30 65
1.734 1.829 1.932
SOAKED C.B.R. % 6.0 14.0 18.6
95 % of Max. Dry Density 1.834C.B.R At 93.0% of Max Dry Density 11.6 %
C.B.R At 95% of Max Dry Density 14.2 %
CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
Lab Technician Material Inspector Material Engineer
g/cm³
DRY DENSITY AS MOLDED g/cm3
g/cm3
1.650 1.700 1.750 1.800 1.850 1.900 1.9500.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0
Dry Density g/cc
Soa
ked
CB
R %
MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
CHOUDHARY CONSTRUCTION CO. ABM ENGINEERS
SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE 1 MULTAN
Moisture-Density Relationship of SoilsMRDTM 212 (ASTM D 698 - 1557 - AASHO T 99 - T 180)
Project Sothern ByePass Multan Sampling Date
Description Of Sample SUB GRADE MATERIAL Testing DateLOCATION: 1+550 to 2+600 L/S Field Sample No.
LAYER: Sub Grade 1st Layer Lab. Sample No.
Analyst.
A Mold No. Formula 1 2 3 4 5 6B Wt. Compacted Wet soil + Mold (gm) 9149 9463 9722 9915 9834
C Wt. Mold (gm) 5376 5376 5376 5376 5376
D 2135 2135 2135 2135 2135
E Wt. Compacted Wet soil (gm) B - C 3773 4087 4346 4539 4458
F E / D 1.767 1.914 2.036 2.126 2.088
G Container No. A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-4H Wt. of Container 35.4 35.0 35.0 36.2 41.1I Wt. Wet Soil + Container (gm) 366.3 381.9 412.1 378.1 397.1J Wt. Dry Soil + Container (gm) 353.9 361.3 384.2 346.7 360.1K Wt of Water (gm) I - J 12.4 20.6 27.9 31.4 37.0L Wt. of Dry Soil (gm) J - H 318.5 326.3 349.2 310.5 319M Water Content % ( K / L )*100 3.9 6.3 8.0 10.1 11.6N Dry Density (g/cc) F / ( 1+ ( M/100 ) ) 1.701 1.801 1.885 1.931 1.871
OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT % 10.11.931
Remraks :
CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIALS INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER
Volume of Mold (Cm3)
Wet Density (gm/Cm3)
MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY gm/Cm3
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1.550
1.600
1.650
1.700
1.750
1.800
1.850
1.900
1.950
2.000Moisture-Density Relationship
Moisture Content %
Dry
Den
sity
gm
/cm
3
MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYCONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
NAZIR & COMPANY ABM ENGINEERS
FATIMA JINNAH TOWN PHASE 1 VEHARI ROAD MULTAN
Soils Classification /Atterburg LimitsMRD Test Method 208 -209 - 210 (Adaptation of AASHTO T 89 - 90 - 80)
Project FATIMA JINNAH TOWN PHASE 1 Sampling Date1/1/2010
Kind of Material SUB GRADE MATERIAL Testing Date
Location B-BLOCK Lab. Sample No.
Quantity Represented Material Used: SUB GRADE
Sieve AnalysisSieve Size Individual Wt. Retained Cumulative Wt. Retained
3/4 in (19 mm) 0 0 0 100No.4 (4.75 mm) 0 0 0 100No.10 (2.00 mm) 0.9 0.9 0 99.9No. 40 (0.425 mm) 5.7 6.6 1 99.3No.200 (0.075 mm) 179.8 186.4 20 80.3
PanWashTotal 186.4
Original Wt. Gram Dry Wt. Gram Wash Dry Wt. Gram946.3
Atterburg Limits (Liquid Limit & Plastic Limit )Type of Test LIQUID LIMIT TEST
PLASTIC LIMIT TESTNumber of Blows 41 33 25 17
Trial No. 1 2 3 4 1 2 3Container Number A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7Wt. of Container g 27.70 17.00 16.80 20.20 19.50 22.40 17.90Wt. Wet Soil + Container g 59.74 52.19 56.28 53.06 33.12 34.48 31.78Wt. Dry Soil + Container g 53.89 45.34 48.06 45.84 30.76 32.40 29.38Wt. of Water g 5.85 6.85 8.22 7.22 2.36 2.08 2.40Wt. of Dry Soil g 26.19 28.34 31.26 25.64 11.26 10.00 11.48
Water Content % 22.35 24.16 26.29 28.16 20.95 20.81 20.93
Avg. 24.80 20.90
Liquid Limit (L.L) LL = 26.00 Plastic Limit (P.L) P.L = 20.90
Plasticity Index (P.I) P.I = L.L - P.L 5.10 Classification Group A-4
CONTRACTOR CONSULTANT CONSULTANT
LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIALS INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER
Cumulative Percent Retained
Percent Passing
10 100
19.00
20.00
21.00
22.00
23.00
24.00
25.00
26.00
27.00
28.00
29.00
30.00
No. of Blows
Wate
r C
on
ten
t %
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9025
MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
NAZIR & COMPANY ABM ENGINEERS:
FATIMA JINNAH TOWN PHASE 1 VEHARI ROAD MULTAN
Sieve Analysis of Sub Grade Material
Grain Size Analysis AASHTO-T-27
PROJECT: FATIMA JINNAH TOWN Sampling Date
Kind of Material SUB GRADE MAERIAL Testing Date 01/01/2010
LOCATIONB-BLOCK Field Sample No.
SUB GRADE MATERIAL Lab. Sample No.
Original Sourse Analyst.
Weight of Original Sample GmsWeight of Oven Dry Gms 1193.6Weight of Washed Oven Dry Gms
Sieve Size Wt. Retained Cum. Wt.Retained Cum. Retained Cum. Passing SpecificationRemarks
mm (alt.) Grms Grms % % %
75 3'' 0 0 34.4 65.6
63 2 1/2" 0 0 48 52.0
50.0 2 " 0 0 60 40.4
37.5 1 1/2'' 0 0 0.0 100.0
25.0 1 " 161 161 13.5 86.5
19.0 3/4 " 0 0 0.0 100.0
12.5 1/2 " 0 0 99.7 0.3
9.5 3/8 " 0 0.0 100.0
4.75 No. 4 7.2 0.0 0.0 100.0
2.36 No. 8
2.00 No. 10 9.5 9.5 0.8 99.2
1.18 No. 16
0.60 No. 30
0.425 No. 40 81.2 90.7 7.6 92.4
0.3 No. 50
0.18 No. 80
0.15 No. 100
0.075 No. 200 37.0 127.7 10.7 89.3
Oven Dry wt. -4 # Sieve ( Gms)
Sieve Size No.10 No.40 No.200
Passing %
CalculationsCumulative Percent Retained = Cumulative mass Retained / Dry Mass Before Wash
Percent Passing = 100 - Cumulative Percent Retained
CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT: CONSULTANT:
LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIAL INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER
Date (التاريخ)
MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
CHOUDHARY CONSTRUCTION CO. ABM ENGINEERS
SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE 1 MULTAN
Moisture-Density Relationship of SoilsMRDTM 212 (ASTM D 698 - 1557 - AASHO T 99 - T 180)
Project Sothern ByePass Multan Sampling Date
Description Of Sample SUB BASE MATERIAL Testing DateLOCATION: 1+550 to 2+600 L/S Field Sample No.
LAYER: Sub Grade 1st Layer Lab. Sample No.
Analyst.
A Mold No. Formula 1 2 3 4 5 6B Wt. Compacted Wet soil + Mold (gm) 9149 9463 9722 9915 9834
C Wt. Mold (gm) 5376 5376 5376 5376 5376
D 2135 2135 2135 2135 2135
E Wt. Compacted Wet soil (gm) B - C 3773 4087 4346 4539 4458
F E / D 1.767 1.914 2.036 2.126 2.088
G Container No. A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-4H Wt. of Container 35.4 35.0 35.0 36.2 41.1I Wt. Wet Soil + Container (gm) 366.3 381.9 412.1 378.1 397.1J Wt. Dry Soil + Container (gm) 353.9 361.3 384.2 346.7 360.1K Wt of Water (gm) I - J 12.4 20.6 27.9 31.4 37.0L Wt. of Dry Soil (gm) J - H 318.5 326.3 349.2 310.5 319M Water Content % ( K / L )*100 3.9 6.3 8.0 10.1 11.6N Dry Density (g/cc) F / ( 1+ ( M/100 ) ) 1.701 1.801 1.885 1.931 1.871
OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT % 10.11.931
Remraks :
CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
LAB TECHNICIAN MATERIALS INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER
Volume of Mold (Cm3)
Wet Density (gm/Cm3)
MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY gm/Cm3
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1.550
1.600
1.650
1.700
1.750
1.800
1.850
1.900
1.950
2.000Moisture-Density Relationship
Moisture Content %
Dry
Den
sity
gm
/cm
3
MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
CH.ABDUL LATIF & CO. ABM ENGINEERS
SOUTHERN BYEPASS PART:II MULTAN
Moisture-Density Relationship of SoilsMRDTM 212 (ASTM D 698 - 1557 - AASHO T 99 - T 180)
Project Sampling Date
Description Of Sample Testing Date
Field Sample No.Lab. Sample No.
Analyst.
A Mold No. Formula 1 2 3 4 5 6B Wt. Compacted Wet soil + Mold (gm) 9190 9502 9702 9904 9729
C Wt. Mold (gm) 4836 4836 4836 4836 4836
D 2118 2118 2118 2118 2118
E Wt. Compacted Wet soil (gm) B - C 4354 4666 4866 5068 4893
F E / D 2.056 2.203 2.298 2.393 2.310
G Container No. A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-1H Wt. of Container 48.0 65.0 47.1 62.4 70.1I Wt. Wet Soil + Container (gm) 573.9 613.4 639.6 643.1 619.5J Wt. Dry Soil + Container (gm) 558.6 591.3 610.3 607.7 580.7K Wt of Water (gm) I - J 15.3 22.1 29.3 35.4 38.8L Wt. of Dry Soil (gm) J - H 510.6 526.3 563.2 545.3 510.6M Water Content % ( K / L )*100 3.0 4.2 5.2 6.5 7.6N Dry Density (g/cc) F / ( 1+ ( M/100 ) ) 1.996 2.114 2.184 2.247 2.147
OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT % 6.62.248
Remraks :
CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
LAB TECNICIAN MATERIALS INSPECTOR MATERIAL ENGINEER
Volume of Mold (Cm3)
Wet Density (gm/Cm3)
MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY gm/Cm3
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1.850
1.900
1.950
2.000
2.050
2.100
2.150
2.200
2.250
2.300Moisture-Density Relationship
Moisture Content %
Dry
Den
sity
gm
/cm
3
MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYCONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT:
CH.CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ABM CONSULTANT
SOUTHERN BYEPASS PHASE 1 MULTANCalifornia Bearing Ratio
MRD Test Method 213 (Adaptation of ASTM D 1883 - AASHOT 193)Page 1 Of 2
Road Name SOUTHERN BYEPASS MULTAN Field Sample No.Description: SUB BASE MATERIAL Date Of Sampling
Location0+175 to 1+250 L/S Date Tested
Sub Base 1st Layer Quant. Rep.Materials Analyst:Surcharge Weight Used(kg) 4.54 Rate of penetration mm/Minute 1.27
Density DeterminationTest No. 1 2 3 Test No. 1 2 3Can No. A5 A9 B4 2109.0 2124.0 2128.0
A Mass. Wet Soil + Can. g 674.5 594.5 608.1 Mass. Sample + Mold . g 11466 11690 12162B Mass Dry Soil + Can. g 639.6 563.6 576.8 Mass Mold . g 6950 6940 7090C 34.9 30.9 31.3 Mass Sample . g 4516 4750 5072D Mass Can. g 76 65 64 2.141 2.236 2.383E 563.6 498.6 512.8 Percent Moisture % 6.20 6.2 6.10F 6.20 6.20 6.10 2.016 2.106 2.246
Test No. 1 2 3Blows Per Lift 10 30 65Penetration
Molded Tested Molded Tested Molded TestedTotal Unit Corrected
CBRTotal Unit Corrected
CBRTotal Unit Corrected
CBRmm
Load Load Load Load Load Load Load Load Load
Kg % Kg % Kg %
0 0 0 0 0
0.5 0.64 4.4 3.1 11.0 7.7 14.2 9.9
1 1.27 7.3 5.1 17.9 12.5 23.1 16.1
1.5 1.90 10.0 6960.0 24.3 16.9 31.2 21.7
2 2.54 70.35 12.3 8594.7 12217.0 28.6 19.9 28.3 37.8 26.3 37.43 3.81 15.6 10.9 35.6 24.8 47.2 32.9
4 5.08 105.53 18.2 12.6 12.0 42.1 29.3 27.8 55.6 38.7 36.76 7.62 22.0 15.3 51.0 35.5 67.3 46.8
Swell ReadingDate Moldend
Test No. 1 2 3
Mold No. 1 2 3
Final Height . mm 0.4 0.32 0.21
Initial Height . mm 0.000 0.000 0.000
Difference . mm 0.40 0.32 0.21
Sample Length . mm 116.43 116.43 116.43
Percent Swell % 0.34 0.27 0.18
MAX DRY DENSITY 2.233
OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT 6.0 %
Blows Per Lift No. 10 30 65
2.016 2.106 2.246
Soaked C.B.R. % 12.0 27.8 36.7
98 % of Max. Dry Density 2.188
C.B.R At 98% of Max Dry Density #REF! %
Contractor: Consultant:
Lab Technician Material Inspector Material Engineer
Molding Moisture Content (ASTM D 2216)
Mold Volume cm3
Mass Of Water. A-B g
Unit Wet Mass. g/cm3
Mass Dry Soil . B-D gMoisture Content C/E X 100 % Unit Dry Mass. g/cm3
Sta
nda
rd L
oad
(Str
esse
s) K
g / C
m2
Per Min. Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2 Kg / Cm2
PROCTOR MODIFIED
g/cm3
Dry Density g/cm3.
g/cm3 0 1.27 2.54 3.81 5.08 6.35 7.62 8.89
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
Penetration mm
Un
it L
oa
d (
Str
ess
) k
g /
cm
2
AN ASSOCIATES GEOTECHNICAL &SOIL TESTING
ATTERBURG'S LIMITSBH # 1
LOCATION: Plot #61,ST# Jinnah Blved,Sector#A,PH#II DHA Islamabad. Sample Depth : 03 ft
Sampling Date: 05/10/2011
946.3 Testing Date : 08/10/2011
Atterburg Limits (Liquid Limit & Plastic Limit )Type of Test LIQUID LIMIT TEST
PLASTIC LIMIT TESTNumber of Blows 35 26 17
Trial No. 1 2 3 1 2 3
Container Number 4 5 6 A4 A2 A3
Wt. of Container g 9.00 13.70 12.50 5.00 5.50 6.00
Wt. Wet Soil + Container g 16.23 23.60 20.85 12.50 17.20 15.80
Wt. Dry Soil + Container g 14.62 21.25 18.74 11.07 14.88 13.99
Wt. of Water g 1.61 2.35 2.11 1.43 2.32 1.81
Wt. of Dry Soil g 5.62 7.55 6.24 6.07 9.38 7.99
Water Content % 28.65 31.13 33.81 23.56 24.73 22.65
Avg. 31.20 23.65
Liquid Limit (L.L) LL = 31.20 Plastic Limit (P.L) P.L = 23.65Plasticity Index (P.I) P.I = L.L - P.L 7.55 Classification Group CL-ML
TESTED BY:--------------------------- CHECKED BY:---------------------------
LABORATORY
PROJECT: Sub-soil Investigation of Plot of Capt. Arshad M.Nasir.
10 100
26.00
27.00
28.00
29.00
30.00
31.00
32.00
33.00
34.00
35.00
31.13
No. of Blows
Wa
ter
Co
nte
nt
%
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 9025