alan robock department of environmental sciences

17
Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey USA [email protected]. edu http://envsci.rutgers.edu/~ robock Climate Dynamics 11:670:461 Lecture 2, 9/9/13

Upload: lane

Post on 14-Feb-2016

26 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Lecture 2, 9/9/13. Climate Dynamics 11:670:461. Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey USA. [email protected]. http://envsci.rutgers.edu/~ robock. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences

Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental Sciences

Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey USA

[email protected]

http://envsci.rutgers.edu/~robock

Climate Dynamics11:670:461

Lecture 2, 9/9/13

Page 2: Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences

Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental

Sciences

Nitrogen (N2), oxygen (O2), and argon (Ar) make up for 99% of the atmosphere, but are not greenhouse gases.Water vapor (H2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), ozone (O3), and nitrous oxide (N2O) are greenhouse gases.A greenhouse gas absorbs infrared radiation, whichcreates molecular vibrationand bending.Collisions transfer energy to heat the surrounding gas.

But, what is a “greenhouse gas” anyway?

Water vapor (H2O) vibration modes

http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/vibrat.html

Page 3: Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences

Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental

Sciences

Produced by Gary Strand, NCAR

CCSM Climate “Forecasts”

(°C) (°C)

Page 4: Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences

Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental

SciencesIPCC AR4, Chapter 1 Fig.

1.1

Page 5: Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences

Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental

SciencesFig. 1.2

Bretherton Diagram

Page 6: Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences

Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental

SciencesFig. 1.2

Bretherton Diagram

Page 7: Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences

Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental

Sciences

Page 8: Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences

Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental

Sciences

Page 9: Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences

Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental

Sciences

Page 10: Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences

Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental

Sciences

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.A2.pdf

Recovery from volcanic eruptions

dominates

Tropospheric aerosols mask

warming(global

dimming)

Greenhouse gases

dominate

Page 11: Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences

Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental

Sciences

Desire for improved well-being Consumpt

ion of goods and services

Impacts on

humans and

ecosystems

Climate change

CO2 in the atmosphe

re

Consumption of

energy

CO2 emissions

CONS

ERVA

TION

EFFICIENCYLOW-CARBON

ENERGY

SUFFERING

SOLA

R RA

DIATIO

N

MANAGEMEN

T

CARB

ON

DIO

XID

E RE

MOV

AL

ADAPTATION

After Ken Caldeira

Page 12: Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences

Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental

Sciences

Annual average surface air pressure. Interval 50 mb.

Fig. 2.1

Page 13: Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences

Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental

SciencesFig. 2.1

Annual average surface air pressure. Interval 50 mb.

Page 14: Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences

Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental

SciencesFig. 2.2

Page 15: Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences

Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental

SciencesFig. 2.3

Annual mean900 mb

geopotential height (m)

Annual mean200 mb

geopotential height (m)

Page 16: Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences

Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental

SciencesFig. 2.3

Annual mean900 mb

geopotential height (m)

Annual mean200 mb

geopotential height (m)

Page 17: Alan Robock Department of Environmental Sciences

Alan RobockDepartment of Environmental

Sciences

Seasonal900 mb

geopotential height (m)

Fig. 2.4