alfalfa weed control research updatealfalfa.ucdavis.edu/fieldday/2015/kearney_field... · cv (%)...
TRANSCRIPT
Alfalfa Weed Control
Research Update
Kurt Hembree
Farm Advisor, UC Cooperative Extension, Fresno County
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
Alfalfa and Forage Meeting
September 18, 2015
Email: [email protected]
Office: (559) 241-7520; Cell: (559) 392-6095
Website: cefresno.ucanr.edu
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
Weeds and their common impacts:
► Stand development
► Yield
► TDN
► Palatability
► Poisonous
► Off-flavoring
Cheeseweed
Dodder
Fiddleneck
Groundsel
Hairy fleabane
Henbit
Horseweed
Junglerice
Knotweed
Nettle
Sowthistle
Sprangletop
Swinecress
Nutsedge
Yellow foxtail
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
After dormant herbicides applied
Herbicides are commonly applied
during the dormant period:
Weed growth before dormant herbicides applied
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
0
20
40
60
80
100
Rou
ndup
0.5
lb a
i/A
Rou
ndup
1 lb
ai/A
Rou
ndup
2 lb
ai/A
Vel
par+
RU
Vel
par +
Par
Unt
reat
ed
% C
on
tro
l
% Alfalfa % Weeds
Weeds: annual sowthistle, chickweed, burning nettle, malva, annual bluegrass.
Previous work in dormant alfalfa:
Canevari; UCCE Emeritus
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
We began conducting field
trials in 2013 to evaluate the
effect of dormant treatments
of saflufenacil (Sharpen) on
weed control, alfalfa injury,
alfalfa re-growth, and yield.
*Note: Sharpen was not registered in alfalfa in California
at the time of these trials.
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
Alfalfa Tolerance to Sharpen
Between Cuttings - 2013
Appl. A = 5/28/13; Sharpen @ 0.0445 lba/A.; All additives @ 1.0% V/V; All treatments AmmoSulfate @ 8.5lb/100gal
TONS/ACRE
MICK CANEVARI
UCCE EMERITUS
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
Results in 2014 (KAC):
0
2
4
6
8
10
7 Dat 14 Dat 30 Dat Harvest
Reg
row
th r
ati
ng
Effect of application timing on alfalfa regrowth
Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
Results in 2014 (KAC):
0
2
4
6
8
10
7 Dat 14 Dat 30 Dat Harvest
Re
gro
wth
ra
tin
g
Effect of herbicide on alfalfa regrowth
Untreated Sharpen at 2 oz Sharpen at 4 oz Gramoxone at 32 oz
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
Alfalfa recovery in 2014 (KAC) (2 weeks after Feb application of Sharpen):
Treated Dec 2013
Treated Jan 2014
Treated Feb 2014
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
No herbicide Sharpen at 2 fl oz/A
Sharpen at 4 fl oz/A Gramoxone Inteon at 32 fl oz/A
Alfalfa recovery in 2014 (KAC) (2 weeks after Feb application):
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
Treated Dec 2013 Treated Jan 2014 Treated Feb 2014
Alfalfa recovery in 2014 (KAC) (2 weeks before 1st cutting):
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
Treated Feb 2014
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
Alfalfa recovery in 2014 (KAC) (2 weeks before 2nd cutting):
Results 2014 (KAC):
Effect of application timing on alfalfa stem count, height, and yield
Timing
Stem count1
(at harvest)
Harvest2
weight (lbs)
Crop height3
(2nd cutting)
Crop height3
(3rd cutting)
1. A (Dec 13) 43.8 a 41.1 22.8 a 31.5
2. B (Jan 14) 44.1 a 40.8 21.8 a 31.2
3. C (Feb 14) 40.9 b 37.5 20.0 b 30.9
CV (%)
LSD (p=0.05)
8.58
2.65
13.70
n.s.
8.97
1.39
6.26
n.s. 1Number green, productive stems in a 1 ft2 area, and based on three samples per sub-plot. 2Wet weight in pounds, using a Cater plot harvester, swath 6 ft wide by 25 ft long. 3Measured in inches from soil line to top of plant, and based on three samples per sub-plot.
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
Results 2014 (KAC):
Effect of herbicide on alfalfa stem count, height, and yield
Herbicide
Rate/A
Stem count2
(at harvest)
Harvest3
weight (lbs)
Crop height4
(2nd cutting)
Crop height4
(3rd cutting)
1. No herbicide 0 44.5 a 43.6 a 22.8 30.1
2. Sharpen1 2 fl oz 44.0 a 39.4 ab 21.2 31.5
3. Sharpen1 4 fl oz 40.1 b 36.7 b 21.1 32.0
4. Gramoxone1 32 fl oz 43.2 ab 39.6 ab 21.0 31.2
CV (%)
LSD (p=0.05)
8.58
3.06
13.70
4.53
8.97
n.s.
6.26
n.s.
1 AMS added at 8.5 lb/100 gal + MSO at 1% v/v. 2Number green, productive stems in a 1 ft2 area, and based on three samples per sub-plot. 3Wet weight in pounds, using a Cater plot harvester, swath 6 ft wide by 25 ft long. 4Measured in inches from soil line to top of plant, and based on three samples per sub-plot.
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
Results 2014 (KAC): Effect of app timing and herbicide on weed control and plant composition
Herbicide
Rate/A
Timing
Weed cntrl
30 DAT
Weed cntr
at harvest
Alfalfa
DW (%)
Weed
DW (%)
1. No herbicide 0 A (Dec-13) 0.0 b 0.0 b 96.10 3.90
2. Sharpen 2 fl oz A (Dec-13) 10.0 a 10.0 a 100.00 0.00
3. Sharpen 4 fl oz A (Dec-13) 9.9 a 9.8 a 99.56 0.44
4. Gramoxone 32 fl oz A (Dec-13) 9.9 a 9.8 a 99.83 0.17
5. No herbicide 0 B (Jan-14) 0.0 b 0.0 b 97.47 2.53
6. Sharpen 2 fl oz B (Jan-14) 9.9 a 9.9 a 99.82 0.18
7. Sharpen 4 fl oz B (Jan-14) 9.9 a 9.8 a 99.82 0.18
8. Gramoxone 32 fl oz B (Jan-14) 9.9 a 9.9 a 100.00 0.00
9. No herbicide 0 C (Feb-14) 0.0 b 0.0 b 99.37 0.63
10. Sharpen 2 fl oz C (Feb-14) 10.0 a 10.0 a 100.00 0.00
11. Sharpen 4 fl oz C (Feb-14) 10.0 a 9.9 a 100.00 0.00
12. Gramoxone 32 fl oz C (Feb-14) 9.9 a 9.9 a 99.89 0.11
Statistical notation CV (%)
LSD (p=0.05)
1.02
0.13
2.22
0.28
1.25
n.s.
182.68
n.s. Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
Weed control in 2014 (KAC) (after Jan treatment):
No herbicide Sharpen at 2 fl oz/acre
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
Herbicide treatments and rates applied on 2/9/2015
Treat Herbicide Rate (product/acre)
1 Untreated 0
2 Sharpen + AMS + MSO 2 fl oz
3 Gramoxone Inteon + AMS + MSO 32 fl oz
4 Velpar + AMS + MSO 32 fl oz
5 Chateau + AMS + MSO 4 oz
6 Sharpen + Prowl H2O + AMS + MSO 2 fl oz + 64.0 fl oz
7 Sharpen + Prowl H2O + Velpar + AMS + MSO 2 fl oz + 64 fl oz + 32 fl oz
8 Sharpen + Velpar + AMS + MSO 2 fl oz + 32 fl oz
9 Chateau + Gramoxone Inteon + AMS + MSO 4 oz + 32 fl oz
AMS = Ammonium sulfate used at 8.5 lbs/100 gal spray volume
MSO = Methylated seed oil (Drexel by BASF) used at 1 % v/v
Alfalfa had 3 to 4” re-growth at time of treatment
Late-dormant Trial 2015 (KAC):
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
Weed control ratings on 2/23/15 (14 DAT)
Treatment
Shepherd’s-
purse
Chickweed
Swinecress
Horseweed
Prickly
lettuce
Fiddleneck
Annual
bluegrass
Untreated 0.0 c 0.0 b 0.0 c 0.0 e 0.0 c 0.0 b 0.0 c
Sharpen 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a
Gramoxone Inteon 9.9 ab 10.0 a 9.3 b 8.8 c 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a
Velpar 9.9 ab 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a
Chateau 9.8 b 10.0 a 9.9 a 5.0 d 9.9 b 10.0 a 9.9 b
Sharpen + Prowl H2O 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a
Sharpen + Prowl H2O +
Velpar
10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a
Sharpen + Velpar 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a
Chateau +
Gramoxone Inteon
9.9 ab 10.0 a 9.9 a 9.6 b 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a
CV (%)
LSD (p=0.05)
0.92
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.92
0.35
2.24
0.26
0.19
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.05
Weed control based on a visual rating scale of 0-10, where 0 = no control and 10 = 100% or perfect control.
Results in 2015 (KAC):
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
Weed control ratings on 3/11/15 (28 DAT)
Treatment
Shepherd’s-
purse
Chickweed
Swinecress
Horseweed
Prickly
lettuce
Fiddleneck
Annual
bluegrass
Untreated 0.0 b 0.0 b 0.0 c 0.0 a 0.0 b 0.0 b 0.0 c
Sharpen 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a
Gramoxone Inteon 9.9 a 10.0 a 9.1 b 8.3 b 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a
Velpar 9.9 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a
Chateau 9.9 a 10.0 a 9.9 a 3.0 c 10.0 a 10.0 a 9.9 b
Sharpen + Prowl H2O 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a
Sharpen + Prowl H2O +
Velpar
10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a
Sharpen + Velpar 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a
Chateau +
Gramoxone Inteon
9.9 a 10.0 a 9.7 a 8.7 b 10.0 a 10.0 a 10.0 a
CV (%)
LSD (p=0.05)
0.76
0.10
0.00
0.00
3.52
0.44
6.26
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.38
0.05
Weed control based on a visual rating scale of 0-10, where 0 = no control and 10 = 100% or perfect control.
Results in 2015 (KAC):
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
0
2
4
6
8
10
Untreated Sharpen Gramoxone Velpar Chateau Sharpen + Prowl
Sharpen + Prowl + Velpar
Sharpen + Velpar
Chateau + Gramoxone
Inju
ry r
atin
g
Alfalfa injury after late- dormant treatment
14 DAT 28 DAT
Results in 2015 (KAC):
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
0
2
4
6
8
10
Untreated Sharpen Gramoxone Velpar Chateau Sharpen + Prowll
Sharpen + Prowl + Velpar
Sharpen + Velpar
Chateau + Gramoxone
Gro
wth
ra
tin
g
Alfalfa re-growth after late- dormant treatment
14 DAT 28 DAT
Results in 2015 (KAC):
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
Results in 2015 at 28 DAT (KAC):
UNT Sharpen Sharpen + Prowl H2O Chateau + Gramoxone
Summary
► Sharpen applied alone or mixed with other
herbicides as a dormant treatment can provide
excellent control of tough weeds like sowthistle,
prickly lettuce, horseweed, nettle, and others.
► Sensitivity of alfalfa to Sharpen appears to be
affected by timing of treatment and rate used.
► Delaying treatment with Sharpen until late Jan to
early-Feb may result in lower yields during the first
cutting (at least in the lower SJV).
► Additional work is continuing with this and other
herbicides.
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015
Kurt Hembree, UCCE, Fresno County – Sept 18, 2015