allocation of cost
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
1/37
Allocation and Apportionment ofOverhead costs
Abhay Kumar
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
2/37
Apportionment of Overhead costs
Supporting (Service) Departmentprovides
the services that assist other internal
departments in the company
Operating (Production) Departmentdirectly
adds value to a product or service
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
3/37
Apportionment of Overhead costs
Primary Distribution:
Apportionment of Overhead costs to different
departments (Production and service both)
Secondary Distribution
Apportionment of service departments Overhead
costs to Productiondepartment.
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
4/37
Methods to Allocate
Support Department Costs
Single-rate methodallocates costs in
each cost pool (service department) to
cost objects (production departments)using the same rate per unit of a single
allocation base
No distinction is made between fixedand variable costs in this method
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
5/37
Methods to Allocate
Support Department Costs
Dual-Rate methodsegregates costs
within each cost pool into two segments:
a variable-cost pool and a fixed-cost pool. Each pool uses a different cost-allocation
base
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
6/37
Allocation Method Tradeoffs
Single-Rate method is simple to implement,
but treats fixed costs in a manner similar to
variable costs
Dual-Rate method treats fixed and variable
costs more realistically, but is more complex to
implement
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
7/37
Allocation ofSupport Department Costs
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
8/37
Methods of Allocating Support Costs
to Production Departments
1. Direct
2. Step-Down
3. Reciprocal4. Simultaneous equation
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
9/37
Direct Method
Allocates support costs only to Operating
departments
No Interaction between Support Departments
prior to allocation
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
10/37
Direct Method
Manufacturing
Information Systems
Accounting
Packaging
Support Departments Production Departments
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
11/37
Cost Allocation -Illustrations
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
12/37
Direct Method
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
13/37
Direct Method
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
14/37
Step-Down Method
Allocates support costs to other support
departments and to operating departments
that partially recognizes the mutual services
provided among all support departments
One-Way Interaction between Support
Departments prior to allocation
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
15/37
Step-Down Method
Manufacturing
Information Systems
Accounting
Packaging
Support Departments Production Departments
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
16/37
Step-Down Method
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
17/37
Step-Down Method
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
18/37
Reciprocal Method
Allocates support department costs to
operating departments by fully recognizing
the mutual services provided among all
support departments
Full Two-Way Interaction between Support
Departments prior to allocation
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
19/37
Reciprocal Method
Manufacturing
Information Systems
Accounting
Packaging
Support Departments Production Departments
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
20/37
Reciprocal Method
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
21/37
Reciprocal Method
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
22/37
Illustration -Allocation of cost
Support Department Operating Department
Total Maintenance HR Deptt. Processing Assembly
Facility Mgt
Cost
12,60,000 12,60,000
Human
Resource Cost
240,000 240,000
square
footage
27000 9000 15000 3000
Employees in
production
16 64
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
23/37
Allocation of cost
Facilities management cost = $1,260,000
Human resources cost = $240,000
Total square footage in productiondepartments: 15,000 processing + 3,000
assembly = 18,000
Total employees in production departments
16 processing + 64 assembly = 80
Square footage in human resources = 9,000
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
24/37
Direct Method
Facilities management cost allocated to
processing = (15,000 18,000) $1,260,000 =
$1,050,000
Facilities management cost allocated to assembly= (3,000 18,000) $1,260,000 = $210,000
Human resources cost allocated to processing =
(16 80) $240,000 = $48,000 Human resources cost allocated to assembly =
(64 80) $240,000 = $192,000
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
25/37
Step-Down Method
To human resources: (9 27) $1,260,000 =$420,000
To processing:(15 27) $1,260,000 = $700,000 To assembly: (3 27) $1,260,000 = $140,000
$240,000 + $420,000 = $660,000
To processing:(16 80) $660,000 = $132,000
To assembly: (64 80) $660,000 = $528,000
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
26/37
Step-Down Method
Processing department Direct Step-Down
Direct department costs $1,000,000 $1,000,000
From facilities management 1,050,00 700,000
From Personnel 48,000 132,000
Total costs $2,098,000 $1,832,000
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
27/37
Step-Down Method
Assembly department
Direct Step-Down
Direct department costs $1,600,000 $1,600,000
From facilities management 210,0 00 140,000
From personnel 192,000 528,000 Total costs $2,002,000 $2,268,000
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
28/37
Choosing Between Methods
Direct and Step-Down are simple to compute
and understand.
Direct Method is widely used.
Reciprocal method is more accurate to
ascertain cost.
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
29/37
Allocation of Joint Costs
Two conventional ways of allocating joint costs
to products are widely used:
Physical units
Relative sales values
Joint costs include all inputs of material, labor,
and overhead costs that are incurred before
the split-off point.
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
30/37
Allocation of Joint Costs
The physical-units method requires a commonphysical unit for measuring the output of eachproduct.
The joint costs are allocated based on eachproducts percentage of the total physical unitsproduced.
Allocation of joint costs should not affectdecisions about the individual products.
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
31/37
Physical unitsRelative sales values
Dow Chemical produces two chemicals, X andY. The joint cost is $100,000. X sells for $.09per liter and Y for $.06.Production of X & Y is1000,000 & 500,000 liters respectively.Allocate the Joint Cost on each product byPhysical units & Relative sales values methods.
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
32/37
Allocation of Joint Costs
Allocation Sales Value at
Liters Weighting of Joint Costs Split-off Point
X 1,000,000 (10/15)X$100,000 $ 66,667 $ 90,000
Y 500,000 (5/15)X$100,000 33,333 30,0001,500,000 100,000 120,000
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
33/37
Allocation of Joint Costs
The joint costs are allocated based on each
products sales value as a percentage of the
total sales value at split-off.
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
34/37
Relative-Sales-Value Method
When weighting is based on the sales value of
the individual products, the allocation of a
cost to one product depends upon the sales
value of both products.
Physical units
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
35/37
Physical unitsRelative sales values
Relative Sales
Value at Allocation
Spit-off Point Weighting of Joint Costs
X $ 90,000 (90/120)X$100,000 $ 75,000
Y 30,000 (30/120X$100,000 25,000
$120,000
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
36/37
By-product Cost
A by-product is not individually identifiable untilmanufacturing reaches a split-off point.
They have relatively insignificant sales value.
If an item is accounted for as a by-product, onlyseparable costs are allocated to it.
All joint costs are allocated to the main products.
Any revenues from by-products, less theirseparable costs, are deducted from the cost ofthe main products.
-
8/21/2019 Allocation of Cost
37/37
Thank you..
Open forum