alternative funding for the inland waterways trust fund is there a “there” there? jorge romero
TRANSCRIPT
Alternative Funding for the Inland Waterways Trust Fund
Is there a “there” there?
Jorge Romero
2
3
K&L Gates Maritime Group
One of the largest maritime law and policy practices in Washington, D.C.
Represent all major sectors of the maritime industry before Congress, Executive Branch agencies, and in the courts.
Assist clients in complex transactions, drafting legislation and supporting advocacy documents, developing comprehensive strategies to affect public policy, and advocating their interests before federal and state governments.
4
Jorge Romero
Background:
General corporate and financing practice
Focus on vessel construction, financing, documentation, and transactions
Clients in the inland waterways, non-profits and associations
5
Agenda:
High-level look at these alternative financing options:
Long-term Bonds
Public-Private Partnerships
Other creative options
6
Warning! Complexities Ahead
7
To simplicity
8
Long-term Bonds
9
Warning: High Finance Math Ahead
10
Background facts:
Resources available:
IWTF is “bankrupt,” “insolvent” – there are no reserves left.
Only money “there” is the future deposits from the fuel tax, estimated at $85 million/year.
With a 50/50 cost share for new construction and rehabilitation, this means $170 million/year.
11
Background facts (cont.):
Need:
Best current number for unconstrained need is:
$17 billion over next 20 years.
Money needed to fund as of today:
(a) Unfunded portion of projects under construction +
(b) authorized projects = $7 billion
So the Corps/Users Board Inland Marine Transportation System Investment Strategy Team will come out with a figure between $7 and $17 billion
Let’s say $12 billion
12
Two Basic Options:
Direct issuance of federal government obligations
E.g. Treasury bills or bonds
Federally-guaranteed obligation issued by a third party
SBA
Title XI
13
How it would work:
Congress Trust Fund
Corps/Bank
Appropriation $$
Fuel Tax $$
Bond Purchasers
Bond Proceeds $$
Periodic Payments $$
Collateral:
14
How it would work:
Congress Trust Fund
Corps/Bank
Appropriation $$
Fuel Tax $$
Bond PurchasersBond Proceeds $$
15
Advanced Mathematics: at current levels
Yearly payment for 25 years
Amount that can be borrowed at:
5.5% 3.5%
$170 million/year $3 billion $4.8 billion
If we take the stream of funds available today and ask a banker how much we can borrow with that over 25 years, here are some answers:
16
Advanced Mathematics: at historic levels
Yearly payment for 25 years
Amount that can be borrowed at:
5.5% 3.5%
$262 million/year $4.7 billion $7.4 billion
If we take the average of the funds expended over the last few years … :
17
Advanced Mathematics: at double current levels
If we take double the stream of funds available today … :
Yearly payment for 25 years
Amount that can be borrowed at:
5.5% 3.5%
$340 million/year $6.2 billion $9.7 billion
18
Summary Table
Yearly payment for 25 years
Amount that can be borrowed at:
5.5% 3.5%
$170 million/year $3 billion $4.8 billion
$262 million/year $4.7 billion $7.4 billion
$340 million/year $6.2 billion $9.7 billion
19
Summary Graph
$0.00
$2,000,000,000.00
$4,000,000,000.00
$6,000,000,000.00
$8,000,000,000.00
$10,000,000,000.00
$12,000,000,000.00
$170million @
5.5%
$170million @
3.5%
$262million @
5.5%
$262million @
3.5%
$340million @
5.5%
$340million @
3.5%
Resources
Nee
d
20
Observations:
Bonding authority probably will not supply the total need, but don’t know how short.
Highly sensitive to interest rates. Can’t hock the same thing twice.
If you need more money later, you need to get it Doesn’t make much difference as to how much you
can borrow if you go to 12, 25, 30 or 50 years. In the real world:
You wouldn’t borrow all of the money at once, but in tranches;
You would have transaction costs to consider.
21
Policy consideration:
Will Congress give up the annual appropriations ritual?
22
Public-Private Partnerships
23
Another word of Caution …
Warning! Complexities Ahead
24
Another word of Caution …
To simplicity
25
Possibilities:
Many flavors of PPPs
Catalogued fairly exhaustively in the IWR’s Water Resources Outlook - Budget Constraints and the Corps Consideration of Public-Private Partnerships: Where Is the Money Going to Come From?, December 2008 (Wilson & Starler)
26
Two likely candidates: Option One
Private party gets right to design, build, finance, operate, and maintain one or more locks and dams.
And collect revenue from operations. What revenue?:
Tolls? Sounds like lockage fee. Annual expenditures from IWTF plus appropriations? Is that
bankable?
Plus: In setting revenue level for a lock, private operator and its investors would expect a return on investment, which would be greater than interest on debt.
27
Option One, cont.:
Thoughts/questions?
Since operations and maintenance are already covered 100% by appropriations, why turn this over to private entity?
If you take away O&M, what are you really asking the private party to do?
28
Two likely candidates: Option Two
Private party gets right to design, build, and finance, but not operate and maintain, one or more locks and dams.
Thoughts/questions:
How do you pay the private party? What revenue stream do you give them?
The same revenue that would pay off the bonds? Why not just write them a check with the bond proceeds?
29
Possible Third Option:
Non-profits or co-ops
No profit motive
Revenue still an issue
30
Final thought on privatization of infrastructure:
As IWR study points out:
Privatization is not without risk
We have been there before
Government has bailed out bankrupt agencies in the past
31
Creative Ideas Department
32
Miracle: Loaves and Fishes
33
Magic:
Harry Potter and the Inland Waterways Trust Fund?
34
Climate Legislation:
House bill prohibits emitting GHG without allowances
Bill sets number of allowances that EPA will issue per year
Bill allocates allowances to certain classes of individuals (electricity consumers, etc.), states and government agencies, and programs (new technologies, etc.)
Emitters of GHG have to buy allowances; generating revenue for allocation recipients
35
Climate legislation:
What if the Inland Waterways Trust Fund were be a recipient of allocations?
Inland transportation is clean tech
Supports meeting climate goals
36
What Might Climate Allocations Be Worth?
CBO estimates allowances will be worth $15/ton in the first year (2012)
In 2012, the bill provides for 4.6 billion tons of GHG
4,600,000,000 x $15.00 = $69 billion
Estimated to go up to $119.6 billion by 2019
One percent of that would be between $690 million and $1.2 billion per year.
37
Questions?
Comments?
38
Thanks!