amanda baker presents on smart recovery australia | apsad conference 2015
TRANSCRIPT
SMART Recovery Facilitators: Attitudes and use of SMART Recovery
tools
Peter J. Kelly, Amanda L. Baker, Frank P. Deane, Anthony Shakeshaft, David Hunt, & Dayle Raftery
Funding
Partnership
Introduction
Alternate treatment optionCBT Focus & Trained facilitators
Lack of researchNo Australian studies & few international studies
Aims
1. Examine SMART Recovery facilitators’ attitudes towards groups
2. Identify common therapeutic practices used within SMART Recovery groups
Method
Procedure
National survey of SMART Recovery facilitators conducted in 2013 & 2014
Registered facilitators emailed a link to online survey
Who facilitatesSMART
Recovery?
Facilitators (n = 91)
Average Age = 46.33 (SD = 11.83)
46.2% have a history of addiction
Years facilitating = 2.47 (SD = 2.43)
52% 47%
Facilitators (cont.)
Highest Education 34.1% Undergraduate degree
30.8% TAFE Certificate/Diploma
Profession17.6% Drug and Alcohol Workers
14.3% Counsellor
SMART Groups58.2% run only one groupAvg 6.5 people per group
Views on SMART Tools
Helpfulness of SMART Tools
Very Unhelpful + Unhelpful (%)
Somewhat Helpful (%)
Helpful +Very Helpful (%)
Cost-Benefit Analysis - 13.6 86.4
Goal Setting 3.0 16.4 80.6
ABCs 1.5 24.2 74.3
Problem Solving 1.5 26.2 72.3
Urge Log 10.5 29.9 59.7
Change Plan 9.3 50.8 40.0
Role Play 31.3 51.6 17.2
Confidence in Using SMART Tools
Not Confident + Slightly
Unconfident(%)Somewhat
Confident (%)Confident + Very
Confident (%)
Cost-Benefit Analysis - 2.7 97.3
Goal Setting - 8.1 91.9
ABCs 2.7 - 97.3
Problem Solving 2.7 5.4 91.9
Urge Log 5.4 2.7 91.9
Change Plan 5.4 10.8 83.8
Role Play 18.9 21.6 59.4
Results: Role-Play
Role-play received the lowest helpfulness and confidence rating
Facilitators reported using role-play in only 6.65% of their groups
41.2% of facilitators never use role-play
Results: Weekly Plan
Facilitators in 59.5% of groups described participants leaving with a weekly plan.
Facilitators review participants’ weekly plans ‘often’.
Participants reported that they left group with a weekly plan ‘quite a bit’ to ‘quite a lot’.
Results: Weekly Plan
Participants complete ‘a little’ to ‘some’ of their plans for the week.
Generally, the weekly plans completed are completed ‘somewhat’ to ‘moderately’ well
Discussion
SMART Recovery is widely used across Australia
Use of between session activities and role plays are recommended however are not fully utilized
Increasing training time for role play and between session activities as part of facilitator training may
increase its use in groups
Future DirectionsConsider ways to improve response rates
There is a need to consider different research designs
Qualitative interviewsLongitudinal research
Controlled trials
Potential training implications
Questions?
Amanda [email protected]