ambient air concentration modeling types of pollutant sources point sources e.g., stacks or vents...
TRANSCRIPT
AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION MODELING
Types of Pollutant Sources• Point Sources e.g., stacks or vents• Area Sources e.g., landfills, ponds, storage piles• Volume Sources e.g., conveyors, structures with multiple vents
Factors Affecting Dispersion of pollutants in the Atmosphere
Source Characteristics• Emission rate of pollutant• Stack height• Exit velocity of the gas• Exit temperature of the gas• Stack diameter
Meteorological Conditions• Wind velocity• Wind direction• Ambient temperature• Atmospheric stability
GAUSSIAN MODELS
Advantages• Produce results that match closely with experimental
data • Incorporate turbulence in an ad-hoc manner• Simple in their mathematics• Quicker than numerical models• Do not require super computers
Disadvantages• Not suitable if the pollutant is reactive in nature• Fails to incorporate turbulence in comprehensive
sense• Unable to predict concentrations beyond radius of
approximately 20 Km• For greater distances, wind variations, mixing
depths and temporal variations become predominant
NUMERICAL SOLUTIONS
• Involves solving a system of partial differential equations• Equations mathematically represent the fate of pollutants
downwind concentration• The number of unknown parameters must be equal to
number of equations• System of equation is written in numerical form with
appropriate numerical scheme and solved using computer codes
Classes of Numerical Models
• Three Dimensional Equations (k-Theory) Model• Higher Order Closure Models (k- Type)
Difference between Numerical Models and Gaussian Model
• The degree of completeness in the mathematical description of the atmospheric dispersion processes
• Type of releases i.e., stack, jet or area source are easy to handle manually
• The models are designed to handle, degree of completeness in the description of non-transport processes like chemical reactions
• Terrain feature complexities for which the model is designed
GRADIENT TRANSFER THEORY
The turbulent mass flux is computed using gradient transfer theory as follows:
where,K’s = Eddy Diffusivity Constants (m2/sec) C = Pollutant concentration (kg/m3) q = Turbulent mass flux (kg/m2/sec) Q = Pollutant source strength (kg/m3/sec) Qr = Rate of loss or gain of pollutant due to
reaction (kg/m3/sec) Qa = Pollutant ground absorption rate (kg/m3/sec) t = Time (sec) V = Wind field (m/sec)
GAUSSIAN MODEL
Assumption:• Constant wind speed• No wind shear• Flat topography
Gaussian Plume Model
where,C (x,y,z) - Concentration in air at (x,y,z)
(gm/m3) Q - Emission rate from the stack (m/sec) Us - Wind speed at source height (m/sec)
y - Horizontal dispersion coefficient (m)
z - Vertical dispersion coefficient (m) y - Cross - wind distance (m) z - Vertical distance (m) h - Effective stack height (m)
METHODS TO INCORPORATE PLUME RISE
• The effective Source Height Method• The variable Plume Model Method
EFFECTIVE SOURCE HEIGHT METHOD
• Independent of downwind distance, x• Effective source height,
h = hs + h - htwhere, hs = Physical chimney height ht = Maximum terrain height between
the source and receptor
VARIABLE PLUME METHOD• Takes into account the tilt of the plume
SIMPLIFIED FORMS OF A GAUSSIAN PLUME MODEL (GPM)
GPM for Ground Level Concentration (z = 0)
GPM for Centerline Ground Level Concentrations (y = 0)
GPM for a Ground Source (non fumigation) with negligible plume rise
GPM for small downwind distances i.e near the source
where,qo = Initial volume flux (m2/sec)
MODIFICATIONS IN GAUSSIAN PLUME MODEL
Simplified Equations for Maximum Ground Level Concentration
Location of maximum concentration
Ground Level Concentration during Limited Mixing Condition
where,
L = Mixing Height (m)
GPM Model for Puff Plume (Ground Level Release)
Gaussian Distribution Used in Gaussian Model
where, is any real number is any real number > 0
Concentration Estimate for Various Sampling Times
C2 = C1 (t1/t2) q
where,q lies between 0.17 and 0.5
Averaging Time Multiplying Factor
3 hours 0.9 (+ 0.1)
8 hours 0.7 (+ 0.1)
24 hours 0.4 (+ 0.1)
PLUME DISPERSION PARAMETERS
Different Methods to Calculate Sigmas• Experimental data• Modified Experimental Curves• Lagrangian Auto Correlation Function• Moment-Concentration Method • Taylor's Statistical Theory
Factors Considered while Calculating Sigmas• Nature of Release• Sampling Time• Release Height• Terrain Features• Velocity Field
PASQUILL CURVES
Curves are based on smoke plume elevation Hsp (visible portion) and angular spread q using the relations
z= Hsp/2.14
y= qx/4.28
The numerical coefficient 2.14 is just the 10% ordinate of the normal error curve
BNL DISPERSION PARAMETERS The y data are based on actual measurements while z is derived using
where, Fg - Adjustment term for the Gaussian equation C - Measured Concentration
U has invariably been assumed constant (however it should increase with height)
TVA DISPERSION COEFFICIENTS
Sigma's are calculated as:
p = Area / [Cpeak*(2*)0.5]
where, Area = Base times the average height of
Concentration Profile along the axis Cpeak = Maximum concentrations in that profile
In a number of cases, z is calculated using
Cmax = Q / [2*U*y*z*]
and thus, the distribution is considered Gaussian i.e.,
C = Cmax exp[-0.5*(xg/)2]