amended narrative to planned development zoning
TRANSCRIPT
1
AMENDED NARRATIVE TO
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING
APPLICATION
*****
SUMMIT VIEW II
Submitted by:
Jacob T. Cremer, Esquire
Cynthia D. Spidell, AICP
Stearns Weaver Miller
401 East Jackson Street, Suite 2100
Tampa, Florida 33602
(813) 222-5051
As of March 26, 2021
2
Project Narrative
This is a request to assign a Dade City Zoning District of Planned Development-Residential
(“PD-R”) in conjunction with a Voluntary Annexation Petition and Comprehensive Plan
Amendment application for real property known as the Summit View II (the “Project”). The
Project is currently zoned R-1 Rural Density Residential District (“R-1”), Agricultural-Residential
District (“A-R”) and Neighborhood Commercial District (“C-1”) pursuant to the Pasco County
Land Development Code. By way of orientation, the property is generally located in
unincorporated Pasco County as set forth below (the “Property”).
Vicinity Map:
The Project is located at Parcel IDs 29-24-21-0000-01600-0000, 29-24-21-0000-01600-
0010, 32-24-21-0000-00200-0000, 32-24-21-0000-00600-0000, and 32-24-21-0000-00900-0020.
The Property consists of +/- 169.268 acres located at the southeast corner of St. Joe Road and
Happy Hill Road within unincorporated Pasco County (the “County”). The County Future Land
Use (“FLU”) designation for the Property is RESIDENTIAl-3 DU/GA (“RES-3”); however, the
concurrent Comprehensive Plan Amendment application would assign the Dade City FLU
category of Suburban Density Residential (“SDR”), which is the functional equivalent of the
County’s RES-3 FLU classification.
3
Current Future Land Use Map:
Current Zoning Map:
4
Aerial Map:
A. Request:
This request is to assign a Dade City zoning district of PD-R in conjunction with a
corresponding annexation into Dade City and a large-scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment to
change the FLU designation to SDR.1 The Voluntary Annexation Petition, Comprehensive Plan
Amendment application, and this zoning application is the result of collaboration with the existing
landowners and the adjacent developer of Summit View PD. Additionally, the subject area is
located in the Annexation/Joint Planning Area per the Annexation Agreement Boundary (2004)
and is thus an area targeted for growth and annexation.
If the annexation is approved, a Dade City FLU classification and Zoning District are
required. In order to ensure the smooth transition of the area from unincorporated Pasco County
into Dade City, the applicant is submitting all three (3) applications concurrently. Although this
PD-R will have its own PD Master Plan and will independently comply with the applicable land
1 The applicant originally applied for the Low Density Residential (“LDR”) Future Land Use category. However, after
discussions with County and Dade City staff, as well as local citizens, the applicant has changed the Future Land Use
request to SDR. However, due to changes to the Comprehensive Plan, the City currently does not have a valid zoning
category in the SDR Future Land Use category. The applicant is working with the City to have PD-R listed as an
approvable zoning category within SDR.
5
development regulations for Dade City, it is the master developer’s vision to continue a
development pattern consistent with the adjacent Summit View PD to the south.
Pursuant to Section 3.5 of the Dade City Land Development Code (“LDC”), the general
purpose of the PD district is to (1) provide increased flexibility, accessibility, open space,
amenities, and flexibility in housing types, (2) utilize efficient land use patterns, and (3) promote
quality design and environmentally sensitive development through site characteristics. As
proposed and conditioned, the PD Master Plan and proposed conditions of approval all foster and
further these general provisions.
The benefits of a PD district vs. a Euclidean District are summarized as follows:
A PD allows the master developer to offer the residents of Dade City a variety of housing
product and lot sizes, cluster development and preserve open space.
Given the unique location of this Project, the clustering of development and preservation
of open space will allow the residents of Summit View II to enjoy conservation lots and
lake lot views.
Additionally, the PD-R zoning district requires a PD Master Plan, whereas a Euclidean
District does not.
The PD Master Plan further demonstrates the advantages of the PD District, by showing
the locations of lots, diversity of lot sizes, roadways including sidewalks/multiuse paths,
protected wetland areas, wetland buffer areas, proposed interconnectivity and access
locations.
Specifically, the applicant has volunteered to comply with the following:
1. Assign the PD-R zoning district upon annexation to ensure protection of wetlands and
preservation of open space above LDC minimums.
2. In order to address concerns brought up at the community meeting, the applicant has
committed to a 25-foot tree/landscape buffer along Happy Hill Road and St. Joe Road.
3. Cap the total amount of 40’ lots to 35% of the total lots;
4. Committing to placing the 40’ and 50’ lots closer to the abutting LDR Future Land Use
category projects while placing the larger lots along the lake and at the intersection of St.
Joe Road and Happy Hill Road.
5. Agreed to provide a condition of approval to include lighting standards that can help
address light pollution concerns.
6. Placing an active park along Happy Hill Road to further buffer development from the
neighbors.
6
B. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan:
The Project is consistent with the proposed FLU category within the Dade City
Comprehensive Plan because it is within the permitted gross density maximum and is compatible
with the surrounding residential development as conditioned. Please see the corresponding
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application for the detailed analysis.
i. Density Requirements
The proposed PD-R zoning district density of 496 dwelling units is below the maximum
allowed per the SDR Future Land Use of 507 dwelling units. The following tables calculate density
using gross and net developable acreage:
Gross Density: 2.93 du/gross acre (496 du/169.268 gross acres)
Net Density: 4.62 du/net acre (496 du/107.42 net developable acres)*
*Estimated as wetland delineation still in progress
By assigning the PD-R zoning district, the development pattern can be clustered on the
remaining net acreage in order to protect wetlands, provide a 25’ buffer around the lake, provide
a 25’ buffer along Happy Hill Road and St. Joe Road, and provide park and open space protection
in excess of the minimum required by the Dade City LDC. The lot sizes are necessary in order to
balance the open space, wetland buffering, and roadway buffer needs with the density needed for
a successful community.
ii. Consistency with Development Pattern
As discussed in the corresponding Comprehensive Plan Amendment application, the
Project is consistent with the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan, Dade City Comprehensive Plan,
and is compatible with the surrounding development pattern.
C. Transportation Analysis.
The transportation analysis will be coordinated by Steven J. Henry, P.E. of Lincks &
Associates.
D. Public Facilities Analysis.
As the area is annexed into Dade City, this zoning will create new demand on public
facilities not previously included in capacity calculations. Based on the Agreement between Pasco
County and the City of Dade City Establishing Designated Service Areas for Water and
Wastewater, this Project area is to be served by Dade City. Below are charts outlining the Potable
Water Impacts and Wastewater Impacts.
7
Potable Water Impacts
Zoning District Proposed Density
LOS Standard (gallons per du)
LOS Impact (gallons per
day)
Planned Development - Residential* 496
130
64,480
*Capacity analysis based on PD-R Zoning District of 496 dwelling units as the Zoning Application to be considered concurrently with the CPAL application.
System Category - Potable Water Gallons Per Day
Current Permitted Capacity 5.000 mgd
Current After Daily Demand 1.306 mgd
Available Capacity 3.694 mgd
Projected Water Demand from Project 0.064 mgd
Capacity after approval of Project 3.630 mgd
Wastewater Impacts
Zoning District Proposed Density
LOS Standard (gallons per du)
LOS Impact (gallons per
day)
Planned Development - Residential* 496
110
54,560
*Capacity analysis based on PD-R Zoning District of 496 dwelling units as the Zoning Application to be considered concurrently with the CPAL application.
System Category - Wastewater Gallons Per Day
Current Permitted Capacity 1.500 mgd
Current After Daily Demand 0.609 mgd
Available Capacity 0.891 mgd
Projected Water Demand from Project 0.055 mgd
Capacity after approval of Project 0.836 mgd
The following standard condition of approval is anticipated to be included for this Project
addressing public facilities:
The City of Dade City shall provide water and/or wastewater service to the project.
A utility service agreement shall be executed and a master utility plan for the project
8
shall be submitted to the Public Works Director for review and approval prior to
the construction plan approval. The developer shall construct all water and
wastewater facilities within the development to current City standards.
The applicant will coordinate the required school questionnaire with the Pasco County
District School Board and report the results of that questionnaire with Dade City as soon as the
information becomes available.
Regarding Fire Rescue and Fire Suppression, the subject area is already located in the
Pasco County MSTU and will be serviced by Pasco County Fire Rescue. As with Summit View
PD to the south, a condition of approval requiring fire hydrants to be installed consistent with
applicable regulations is anticipated.
E. Zoning Standards for the Site Specific Amendments to the Official Zoning Map.
Section 2.4.2(E) of the Dade City LDC requires an applicant to provide competent
substantial evidence that they comply with the following requirements:
i. The proposed zoning of PD-R is consistent with and furthers the goals,
objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
The PD-R and corresponding PD Master Plan as proposed and as conditioned ensure
consistency with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed zoning of
PD-R is consistent with the proposed FLU category of SDR, which allows up to 3 du/ga. This
Dade City FLU category is the functional equivalent of the current Pasco County FLU
classification of RES-3 du/ga. Please see the corresponding Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Application for the detailed analysis; however, in short the Comprehensive Plan encourages
annexations, promotes efficient development patterns to promote the preservation of wetlands and
open space, and encourages buffering to facilitate compatibility with the surrounding area.
ii. The proposed amendment is not in conflict with any portion of these LDRs or
any of the City Code of Ordinances.
The proposed amendment as conditioned and depicted on the PD Master Plan ensures
consistency with the applicable LDC provisions and City Code of Ordinances.
iii. The proposed amendment will result in a logical and orderly development
pattern.
The proposed amendment does result in a logical and orderly development pattern by
clustering lots to protect wetlands and open space, requiring an internal roadway network, and
providing recreational amenities and an internal sidewalk/trail system.
It should be noted that this area as further described in our Memorandum dated March 9,
2021, “Response to Pasco County Comments on Summit View II Annexation Petition and
Comprehensive Plan Amendment” is designated for growth as follows: (1) this area is located
9
within an area designated for annexation to accommodate future Dade City growth; (2) this area
is identified in the Northeast Pasco County Special Area Plan as “Urban Uses”; (3) this area already
has a FLU classification of RES-3 du/ga, which requires connection to potable water/wastewater
systems.
Furthermore, as depicted on the corresponding surrounding FLU Maps, the area is
surrounded by Unincorporated Pasco County RES-3 to the north and east, Dade City LDR category
to the east and south (allows up to 6 du/ga) and RES-1 to the west. Notably, the surrounding FLU
classifications on all sides is residential, i.e. it is not Rural Residential nor is it Agricultural. Even
Lake Jovita MPUD, which is RES-1 du/ga, offers a variety of housing options and lot sizes as little
as 45-foot lots. At our Community Meeting and at a public hearing for a neighboring rezoning, we
heard and read emails of opposition by certain neighbors who wish to oppose development. As
further described in the above referenced memorandum, this Project is not located in the Overlay
and its provisions do not apply to this Project. However, in an effort to demonstrate good faith, the
applicant has included a condition of approval to provide a 25-foot tree buffer corridor along the
Project’s applicable abutting areas of Happy Hill Road and St. Joe Road. In conclusion, any
attempt to limit this Project to 1-5 acre lots is actually inconsistent with the existing and proposed
Comprehensive Plan classifications and is counterintuitive to an orderly development pattern.
iv. The proposed amendment will not create premature development in
undeveloped or rural areas.
The proposed amendment facilitates development and fulfills growth needs previously
anticipated for this area. Therefore, it is not premature development in an undeveloped or rural
areas. As it is already in an area designated RES-3 and surrounded by RES-3, LDR, and RES-1, it
was always contemplated for suburban style residential development. Please see additional
analysis regarding this topic in the attached Memorandum dated March 9, 2021, “Response to
Pasco County Comments on Summit View II Annexation Petition and Comprehensive Plan
Amendment.”
v. The uses permitted by the proposed amendment are not incompatible with
existing land uses of adjacent lands and/or the uses permitted by the zone
district classifications of adjacent lands.
As can be demonstrated on the attached historical development maps and aerials,
development and growth trends have been changing the character of the area over the last few
decades. We are aware of the concerns expressed by neighbors about how the character of the
area has changed and is changing and have thus proposed conditions above and beyond what the
Dade City LDC requires to ensure a smooth transition, such as placing the recreational amenity at
the Project’s entrance off of Happy Hill, providing a 25-foot tree/landscape buffer along St. Joe
Road and Happy Hill Road, and transitioning the smaller lots closer to the south and east with the
larger lots to the west and north. However, as documented in the memorandum discussed above
and as can be visualized via the historical development maps, this Project as proposed and as
conditioned is consistent with adjacent lands such as Summit View I project to the south, which
also has 40-foot lots.
10
vi. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the character of the general
area where it is proposed to be located by creating excessive traffic, density
and/or intensities of use, building height and bulk, noise, lights, or other
physical effects or nuisances.
The PD-R District and PD Master Plan as conditioned will not adversely affect the
character of the general area:
The traffic study demonstrates that no excessive traffic will be created as the
analysis shows that at build-out, the affected roadways will continue to operate
within the adopted level of service.
No intensity is proposed and density will be within the existing adopted FLU
classification for the Project of 3 du/ga.
No increases in height above the standard residential districts are being sought and
the applicant has agreed to offer Dark Sky compliant lighting fixtures for the homes
and streetlights (if streetlights are required).
vii. The uses permitted by the proposed amendment will not deviate from the
development pattern (both established and as proposed by surrounding zone
districts) of the area where the proposed amendment is located.
The proposed pattern is consistent with and an extension of the approved Summit View I
project, to the south of this Project and is within an area that has been planned for growth.
viii. The proposed amendment will not encourage urban sprawl, either by resulting
in strip or ribbon commercial development, leap-frog development or low
density single dimensional development.
Please see the detailed urban sprawl analysis in the corresponding Comprehensive Plan
Amendment application. The proposed amendment will not encourage urban sprawl.
ix. The proposed amendment will not result in the creation of an isolated zone
district unrelated to adjacent and surrounding zone districts (spot zoning).
The proposed amendment is a residential project surrounded by other residential projects
and is therefore definitively not spot zoning.
x. The proposed amendment will not result in development in a location where
there are no plans by the City or other governmental entities to provide public
facilities to serve the development (roads, potable water, wastewater, parks,
stormwater management, and solid wastes), and there are no assurances by
the private sector that public facilities are planned and will be available to
adequately accommodate development.
The proposed amendment will not result in development in a location where there are no
plans by the City or other governmental entities to provide public facilities. To the contrary, the
proposed amendment is located in a designated future annexation area. Additionally, based on the
11 #9282419 v7
Agreement between Pasco County and the City of Dade City Establishing Designated Service
Areas for Water and Wastewater, this area is to be served by Dade City.
xi. The proposed amendment will not result in significantly adverse impacts on
the natural environment, including but not limited to water, air, noise,
stormwater management, wildlife, vegetation, wetlands, and the natural
functioning of the environment.
The applicant and Project shall comply with all applicable environmental permitting
regulations to ensure mitigation of impacts. No wetland impacts are proposed at this time.
Additionally, if street lighting is required, the applicant has agreed to providing Dark Sky
compliant street lights and exterior housing lights. Should the City allow the development to
proceed without a street lighting requirement, the applicant would also be willing to offer exterior
house lighting such as coach lights with photocells in lieu of street lighting.
As stated above, any attempt to limit the proposed density and lot sizes of this Project to
1-5 acre rural lots as proposed by some of the surrounding neighbors would: (1) be inconsistent
with the Comprehensive Plan, which requires any development in the RES-3 FLU to connect to
water/wastewater utilities, (2) discourage efficient land development patterns, (3) not be conducive
to preserving open space and recreation amenities, and (4) conflict with the City’s objective to
annex lands in the targeted annexation area. Furthermore, such limitations on development would
also be inconsistent with the County’s own Northeast Pasco County Rural Special Area Plan
designating this area as “Urban Uses.” Therefore, the proposed Project is consistent with the LDC,
furthers the objectives and goals of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and ensures an orderly land
development pattern to facilitate the growth management needs of the City.
Exhibit List
Exhibit A – Property Location Map
Exhibit B – Annexation Joint Area Map/Annexation Agreement Boundary 2004
Exhibit C – Existing Zoning District
Exhibit D – Proposed PD Zoning District
Exhibit E – Soils, Flood Zone, Aquifer Recharge, Wetlands and Biological Hotspots
Exhibit F – Historic and Archeological Resources
Exhibit G – Transportation Maps in Support of Transportation Impact Analysis
Exhibit H – Aerial Map of Site and Surrounding Area
City of Dade City
PROPERTYLOCATION
")578
")578
")41
")579
")52A
")41
¬«533
¬«700
¬«35
¬«700
¬«35
¬«700
¬«35
¬«39
¬«52
£¤301
£¤98
£¤98
£¤301
£¤301
£¤98
£¤98
Location MapTITLE: PROJECT:PROJECT:
Pasco County, Florida
Subject Parcels
City Limits
MIAMI | FORT LAUDERDALE | TAMPA | TALLAHASSEE | CORAL GABLES
This map is a general depiction of boundaries obtained from public records and is not a legal description or survey.
Summit View IIo0 0.25 0.50.125
Miles
1:30,000
Map Date: Feb-26-2021 By: CP Smith
1 inch = 2,500 feetExhibit A
11/19/2020 ANNEXATION AREA-JPA.jpg (816×1056)
cms.revize.com/revize/dadecity/ANNEXATION AREA-JPA.jpg 1/1
Exhibit B
City of Dade City
AR
29 2421 0000
01600 0000
29 24 21 000001600 0010
32 24 21 000000200 0000
32 24 210000
00600 0000
32 2421 0000
00900 0020
578
579
SUNTERRA
DRIVE
SE
EG
ER
LA
NE
10T
H S
TR
EE
T
NARIMORE DRIVELITZAU LANENARIMORE DRIVE SUWANEE WAY
CIT
ATION R
OAD
SUMERIAN DRIVE
21S
T S
TR
EE
T
LO
ST
MIL
LD
RIV
E
LA
KE
SID
E W
OO
DLA
ND
S D
RIV
E
HO
WA
RD
AV
EN
UE
HA
LE
RO
AD
10TH
STR
EE
T
C1
AR
AR
ARAR
AR
AR
ER
ER
ER
RG-1
RG-1
R1
R1
RMH
AC
AC
AC AC
PD-H1
5TH STREET
5TH STREET
10TH STREET
Exhibit C Existing Zoning
TITLE: PROJECT:PROJECT:
Pasco County, FloridaSummit View II
Subject Parcels
Adjacent Parcel Boundaries
Dade City Limits
MIAMI | FORT LAUDERDALE | TAMPA | TALLAHASSEE | CORAL GABLES
This map is a general depiction of boundaries obtained from public records and is not a legal description or survey.
ZONINGPasco County
AC
AR
C1
ER
R1
RMH
City of Dade City
RG-1
PD-H1
0 250 500125Feet
1:6,000
Map Date: Dec-23-2020 By: CP Smith
1 inch = 500 feet
City of Dade City
AR
PD-R
PD-R
29 2421 0000
01600 0000
29 2421 0000
01600 0010
32 24 21 000000200 0000
32 24 210000
00600 0000
32 2421 0000
00900 0020
")578
")579
AR
AR
ARAR
AR
AR
ER
ER
ER
RG-1
RG-1
RMH
AC
AC
AC AC
PD-H1
PD-R
R1
R1
RAMAPO MOUNTAIN DRIVE
MAHWAH
AVENUE
ABBOT CHARLESROAD
MT ZI
ON R
OAD
HAPPY HIL
L ROAD
ST JOE ROAD
LYNAN FARMS DRIVE
AUSTON DRIVE
MAUD
IE LA
NE
SPRUCE KNOBCO
URT
VALLEY RIDGE ROAD
PARK
VIEW
ESTA
TES R
OAD
WILL
OW R
UN
EMORY ESTATE LANE
HALE
ROA
D
RIAD
A WA
Y
BRICK CHURCH LOOP
EAST
ERLIN
G RO
AD
Exhibit DProposed Zoning
TITLE: PROJECT:PROJECT:
Pasco County, FloridaSummit View II
Subject Parcels
Adjacent Parcel Boundaries
Dade City Limits
MIAMI | FORT LAUDERDALE | TAMPA | TALLAHASSEE | CORAL GABLES
This map is a general depiction of boundaries obtained from public records and is not a legal description or survey.
ZONINGPasco CountyACARC1ERR1RMHCity of Dade CityRG-1PD-H1PD-R
o0 250 500125
Feet
1:6,000
Map Date: Feb-26-2021 By: CP Smith
1 inch = 500 feet
City of Dade City
29 2421 0000
01600 0000
29 2421 0000
01600 0010
32 24 21 000000200 0000
32 24 210000
00600 0000
32 2421 0000
00900 0020
")578
")579
45
37
32
32
28
6
28
43
44
70
32
23 7
32
29
5
32
6
44
0
7
43
27
43
45
RAMAPO MOUNTAIN DRIVE
MA
HW
AH
AV
EN
UE
ABBOT CHARLESRO
AD
MT
ZIO
N R
OA
D
HAPPY
HIL
LR
OA
D
ST JOE ROAD
LYNAN FARMS DRIVE
AUSTON DRIVE
MA
UD
IE L
AN
E
SPRUCE
KNO
BC
OU
RT
VALLEY RIDGE ROAD
PA
RK
VIE
W E
STA
TE
S R
OA
D
WIL
LO
W R
UN
EMORY ESTATE LANE
HA
LE
RO
AD
RIA
DA
W
AY
BRICK
CHURCH LOOP
EA
ST
ER
LIN
G R
OA
D
Exhibit E.1Soils
TITLE: PROJECT:PROJECT:
Pasco County, Florida
Subject Parcels
Adjacent Parcel Boundaries
Dade City Limits
MIAMI | FORT LAUDERDALE | TAMPA | TALLAHASSEE | CORAL GABLES
This map is a general depiction of boundaries obtained from public records and is not a legal description or survey.
USDA NRCSSOILS
0, Water
2, Pomona fine sand
5, Myakka fine sand
6, Tavares sand: 0 to 5 percent slopes
7, Sparr fine sand: 0 to 5 percent slopes
9, Ona fine sand
23, Basinger fine sand: depressional
27, Anclote fine sand
28, Pits
32, Lake fine sand: 0 to 5 percent slopes
37, Paola-Urban land complex: 0 to 8 percent slopes
43, Arredondo fine sand: 0 to 5 percent slopes
44, Arredondo fine sand: 5 to 8 percent slopes
45, Kendrick fine sand: 0 to 5 percent slopes
ID SOIL NAME DRAINAGE0 Water2 Pomona fine sand Poorly Drained5 Myakka fine sand Poorly Drained6 Tavares sand: 0 to 5 percent slopes Moderately Well Drained7 Sparr fine sand: 0 to 5 percent slopes Somewhat Poorly Drained9 Ona fine sand Poorly Drained
23 Basinger fine sand: depressional Very Poorly Drained27 Anclote fine sand Very Poorly Drained28 Pits32 Lake fine sand: 0 to 5 percent slopes Excessively Drained37 Paola-Urban land complex: 0 to 8 percent slopes Excessively Drained43 Arredondo fine sand: 0 to 5 percent slopes Well Drained44 Arredondo fine sand: 5 to 8 percent slopes Well Drained45 Kendrick fine sand: 0 to 5 percent slopes Well Drained
Summit View IIo0 250 500125
Feet
1:6,000
Map Date: Feb-26-2021 By: CP Smith
1 inch = 500 feet
City of Dade City
29 2421 0000
01600 0000
29 2421 0000
01600 0010
32 24 21 000000200 0000
32 24 210000
00600 0000
32 2421 0000
00900 0020
")578
")579
RAMAPO MOUNTAIN DRIVE
MA
HW
AH
AV
EN
UE
ABBOT CHARLESRO
AD
MT
ZIO
N R
OA
D
HAPPY
HIL
LR
OA
D
ST JOE ROAD
LYNAN FARMS DRIVE
AUSTON DRIVE
MA
UD
IE L
AN
E
SPRUCE
KNO
BC
OU
RT
VALLEY RIDGE ROAD
PA
RK
VIE
W E
STA
TE
S R
OA
D
WIL
LO
W R
UN
EMORY ESTATE LANE
HA
LE
RO
AD
RIA
DA
W
AY
BRICK
CHURCH LOOP
EA
ST
ER
LIN
G R
OA
D
Exhibit E.2Wetland Class
TITLE: PROJECT:PROJECT:
Pasco County, Florida
Subject Parcels
Adjacent Parcel Boundaries
Dade City Limits
MIAMI | FORT LAUDERDALE | TAMPA | TALLAHASSEE | CORAL GABLES
This map is a general depiction of boundaries obtained from public records and is not a legal description or survey.
WETLAND CLASS
1
2
3
PARCEL ID DEEDED ACRES
GIS ACRES
WET ACRES WET % CLASS
29 24 21 0000 01600 0000 35 34.14 23.61 69.2% 129 24 21 0000 01600 0010 3.58 3.13 0.00 0.0% 132 24 21 0000 00200 0000 30 30.23 17.67 58.4% 132 24 21 0000 00600 0000 99 99.38 20.55 20.7% 132 24 21 0000 00900 0020 2.4 2.37 0.00 0.0% 1
Summit View IIo0 250 500125
Feet
1:6,000
Map Date: Feb-26-2021 By: CP Smith
1 inch = 500 feet
City of Dade City
29 2421 0000
01600 0000
29 2421 0000
01600 0010
32 24 21 000000200 0000
32 24 210000
00600 0000
32 2421 0000
00900 0020
")578
")579
RAMAPO MOUNTAIN DRIVE
MA
HW
AH
AV
EN
UE
ABBOT CHARLESRO
AD
MT
ZIO
N R
OA
D
HAPPY
HIL
LR
OA
D
ST JOE ROAD
LYNAN FARMS DRIVE
AUSTON DRIVE
MA
UD
IE L
AN
E
SPRUCE
KNO
BC
OU
RT
VALLEY RIDGE ROAD
AR
KV
IEW
ES
TA
TE
S R
OA
D
WIL
LO
W R
UN
EMORY ESTATE LANE
HA
LE
RO
AD
RIA
DA
W
AY
BRICK
CHURCH LOOP
EA
ST
ER
LIN
G R
OA
D
EXHIBIT E.3FEMA FLOOD ZONES
TITLE: PROJECT:PROJECT:
Pasco County, Florida
Subject Parcels
Adjacent Parcel Boundaries
Dade City Limits
MIAMI | FORT LAUDERDALE | TAMPA | TALLAHASSEE | CORAL GABLES
This map is a general depiction of boundaries obtained from public records and is not a legal description or survey.
o0 310 620155
Feet
1:6,000
Map Date: Feb-26-2021 By: CP Smith
1 inch = 500 feet
FEMAFLOOD ZONES
AE,
A,
X, AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD
Summit View II
City of Dade City
29 2421 0000
01600 0000
29 2421 0000
01600 0010
32 24 21 000000200 0000
32 24 210000
00600 0000
32 2421 0000
00900 0020
")578
")579
RAMAPO MOUNTAIN DRIVE
MA
HW
AH
AV
EN
UE
ABBOT CHARLESRO
AD
MT
ZIO
N R
OA
D
HAPPY
HIL
LR
OA
D
ST JOE ROAD
LYNAN FARMS DRIVE
AUSTON DRIVE
MA
UD
IE L
AN
E
SPRUCE
KNO
BC
OU
RT
VALLEY RIDGE ROAD
AR
KV
IEW
ES
TA
TE
S R
OA
D
WIL
LO
W R
UN
EMORY ESTATE LANE
HA
LE
RO
AD
RIA
DA
W
AY
BRICK
CHURCH LOOP
EA
ST
ER
LIN
G R
OA
D
Exhibit E.4Aquifer Recharge
TITLE: PROJECT:PROJECT:
Pasco County, FloridaSummit View II
Subject Parcels
Adjacent Parcel Boundaries
Dade City Limits
MIAMI | FORT LAUDERDALE | TAMPA | TALLAHASSEE | CORAL GABLES
This map is a general depiction of boundaries obtained from public records and is not a legal description or survey.
o0 310 620155
Feet
1:6,000
Map Date: Feb-26-2021 By: CP Smith
1 inch = 500 feet
AQUIFERRECHARGE
RECHARGE/LESS THAN 1
RECHARGE/1 TO 10
RECHARGE/GREATER THAN 10
DISCHARGE/1 TO 5
DISCHARGE/LESS THAN 1
DISCHARGE/GREATER THAN 5
City of Dade City
29 2421 0000
01600 0000
29 2421 0000
01600 0010
32 24 21 000000200 0000
32 24 210000
00600 0000
32 2421 0000
00900 0020
")578
")579
RAMAPO MOUNTAIN DRIVE
MA
HW
AH
AV
EN
UE
ABBOT CHARLESRO
AD
MT
ZIO
N R
OA
D
HAPPY
HIL
LR
OA
D
ST JOE ROAD
LYNAN FARMS DRIVE
AUSTON DRIVE
MA
UD
IE L
AN
E
SPRUCE
KNO
BC
OU
RT
VALLEY RIDGE ROAD
AR
KV
IEW
ES
TA
TE
S R
OA
D
WIL
LO
W R
UN
EMORY ESTATE LANE
HA
LE
RO
AD
RIA
DA
W
AY
BRICK
CHURCH LOOP
EA
ST
ER
LIN
G R
OA
D
Exhibit E.5Biological Hotspots
TITLE: PROJECT:PROJECT:
Pasco County, FloridaSummit View II
Subject Parcels
Adjacent Parcel Boundaries
Dade City Limits
MIAMI | FORT LAUDERDALE | TAMPA | TALLAHASSEE | CORAL GABLES
This map is a general depiction of boundaries obtained from public records and is not a legal description or survey.
o0 310 620155
Feet
1:6,000
Map Date: Feb-26-2021 By: CP Smith
1 inch = 500 feet
BIODIVERSITYHOTSPOTS
Not Significant
3-4 Species Overlap
5-6 Species Overlap
7+ Species Overlap
City of Dade City
29 2421 0000
01600 0000
29 2421 0000
01600 0010
32 24 21 000000200 0000
32 24 210000
00600 0000
32 2421 0000
00900 0020
")578
")579
RAMAPO MOUNTAIN DRIVE
MA
HW
AH
AV
EN
UE
ABBOT CHARLESRO
AD
MT
ZIO
N R
OA
D
HAPPY
HIL
LR
OA
D
ST JOE ROAD
LYNAN FARMS DRIVE
AUSTON DRIVE
MA
UD
IE L
AN
E
SPRUCE
KNO
BC
OU
RT
VALLEY RIDGE ROAD
KV
IEW
ES
TA
TE
S R
OA
D
WIL
LO
W R
UN
EMORY ESTATE LANE
HA
LE
RO
AD
RIA
DA
W
AY
BRICK
CHURCH LOOP
EA
ST
ER
LIN
G R
OA
D
Exhibit FHistoric and Archeological
Resources
TITLE: PROJECT:PROJECT:
Pasco County, FloridaSummit View II
Archaeological Sites (None)
Cemeteries (None)
Subject Parcels
Adjacent Parcel Boundaries
Dade City Limits
MIAMI | FORT LAUDERDALE | TAMPA | TALLAHASSEE | CORAL GABLES
This map is a general depiction of boundaries obtained from public records and is not a legal description or survey.
o0 250 500125
Feet
1:6,000
Map Date: Feb-26-2021 By: CP Smith
1 inch = 500 feet
City of Dade City
")578
")52A
")41
")579
")41
")578
¬«52
16
0717
17
18
07
06
17
17
07
17
14
16
06
18
18
16
Exhibit G.1 - TransportationFunctional Classification
TITLE: PROJECT:PROJECT:
Pasco County, FloridaSummit View II
Subject Parcels
Dade City Limits
MIAMI | FORT LAUDERDALE | TAMPA | TALLAHASSEE | CORAL GABLES
This map is a general depiction of boundaries obtained from public records and is not a legal description or survey.
FUNCTIONALCLASSIFICATION
06 - Minor Arterial RURAL
07 - Major Collector RURAL
14 - Principal Arterial-Other URBAN
16 - Minor Arterial URBAN
17 - Major Collector URBAN
18 - Minor Collector (Fed Aid) URBAN
o0 0.25 0.50.125
Miles
1:24,000
Map Date: Feb-26-2021 By: CP Smith
1 inch = 2,000 feet
City of Dade City
")578
")579
Exhibit G.2 - TransportationRoadway Maintenance Responsibility
TITLE: PROJECT:PROJECT:
Pasco County, FloridaSummit View II
Subject Parcels
Dade City Limits
STATE
COUNTY
MUNICIPAL
MIAMI | FORT LAUDERDALE | TAMPA | TALLAHASSEE | CORAL GABLES
This map is a general depiction of boundaries obtained from public records and is not a legal description or survey.
o0 250 500125
Feet
1:6,000
Map Date: Feb-26-2021 By: CP Smith
1 inch = 500 feet
City of Dade City
29 2421 0000
01600 0000
29 2421 0000
01600 0010
32 24 21 000000200 0000
32 24 210000
00600 0000
32 2421 0000
00900 0020
")578
")579
RAMAPO MOUNTAIN DRIVE
MA
HW
AH
AV
EN
UE
ABBOT CHARLESRO
AD
MT
ZIO
N R
OA
D
HAPPY
HIL
LR
OA
D
ST JOE ROAD
LYNAN FARMS DRIVE
AUSTON DRIVE
MA
UD
IE L
AN
E
SPRUCE
KNO
BC
OU
RT
VALLEY RIDGE ROAD
PA
RK
VIE
W E
STA
TE
S R
OA
D
WIL
LO
W R
UN
EMORY ESTATE LANE
HA
LE
RO
AD
RIA
DA
W
AY
BRICK
CHURCH LOOP
EA
ST
ER
LIN
G R
OA
D
Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN,
and the GIS User Community
Exhibit H.1Aerial Map
TITLE: PROJECT:PROJECT:
Pasco County, FloridaSummit View II
Subject Parcels
Adjacent Parcel Boundaries
Dade City Limits
MIAMI | FORT LAUDERDALE | TAMPA | TALLAHASSEE | CORAL GABLES
This map is a general depiction of boundaries obtained from public records and is not a legal description or survey.
o0 310 620155
Feet
1:6,000
Map Date: Feb-26-2021 By: CP Smith
1 inch = 500 feet
41
52A
41
579
578
35700
533
533
3570
0
52
301
9898
301
98301
PASCO HIGHSCHOOL
PASCOFAIRGROUNDS
FLORIDAHOSPITAL
JOHN S BURKSMEMORIAL PARK
FDOT DADE CITYMAINTENANCE
YARD
JAMES IRVINEDUCATION
CENTER
PASCO SHERIFF'SOFFICE
Current Dade City Limits
Subject Parcels
Subdivisions Pre1980
Subdivisions 1980s
Subdivisions 1990s
Subdivisions 2000s
Subdivisions 2010s
Subdivisions 2020s
Pasco Landmarks
Developed NonAg Land <=5ac
EXHIBIT H.2 AERIAL MAPSURROUNDING DEVELOPED AREAS OF 5
ACRES OR LESS
TITLE: PROJECT:
Pasco County, FloridaSUMMIT VIEW II0 1,500 3,000750
Feet
1:18,000
Map Date: Mar-25-2021 By: JE Hyde
1 inch = 1,500 feet
This map is a general depiction of boundaries obtained from public records and is not a legal description or survey.
MIAMI | FORT LAUDERDALE | TAMPA | TALLAHASSEE | CORAL GABLES