Ultmsouod in Med. dl Bid.. Vol. 5. pp. 117-122 Pergrmon Press Lid.. 1979. Printed in Great Britain

REPORTS AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE

The 23rd annual meeting of the American institute of Ultrasound in Medicine was held in San Diego, California from 19-23 October 1978. The following papers of interest to our readers were presented. The Proceedings of this meeting are available from the A.I.U.M. Executive Of&e, 6161 N. Mav Ave.. Suite 260, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, U.S.A. at the

_

1. Pitfalls ia hepatk ultrasonography. B. GREEN, A. PRANDO, M. E. BERNARDINO and H. M. GOLDSTEIN, University of Texas System Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

2. Tbe ecbographk appearam~ of ma@uant hepatic masses. B. HILLMAN, E. H. SMITH, J. GAMMELOARD and H. H. HOLM, Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston, Mas- sachusetts.

3. Ultrasound demonstration of portal vein thrombosis. C. B. MERRIIT, Ochsner Clinic, New Orleans, LA 70121.

4. Bile ducts and acoustic enhancementr Fact or fantasy? M. GROSSMAN, UC1 Medical Center, Orange, California.

5. Ultrasonograpb in CongenM and aapdred bflii tract abnormalities in infants and chil- dren. B. M. POTTER and J. L. FRANK, Childrens Hospital National Medical Center, Washington, D.C.

6. Gray scale ultrasonk de&&ion of gallbladder wall WdWning: its aso&tion with acute and chronic cbolecyMtk. S. J. HANDLER, V.A. Hospital, Long Beach, California.

7. Pathologk correl8tion of cholecystoMmo- graphy4 report of 145 cases. M. CRADE, K. J. W. TAYLOR, A. T. ROSEN- FIELD, C. S. DE GRUFF and P. MINIHAN, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

price of $15.00 (U.S.)

8. The sonographii appearances of fat. D. P. NAIDICH, S. S. SIEGELMAN and R. C. SANDERS, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Bal- timore, Maryland.

9. The ultrasonic appearance of gaMooesz Cw- relation with chemkal composition and radii gaphk apperullace. F. C. ASHMAN, M. C. HILL and J. N. DIACONIS,

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

1s.

16.

17.

University of Maryland Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.

An experimental study of the morphologiol changes in the renal traMpf8nt using Ultr&%oUI&d. M. D. CONRAD, R. DICKERMAN, R. BRIDGES, B. CARLSON and H. HELDERMAN. Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, Texas.

Sonographic evahkatien of the scrotum. G. PHILLIPS, M. SCHNEIDER and R. MAC- CHIA, Downstate Medical Center-SUNY, Brook- lyn, New York.

Thenewbornwithanabdomhl maqx new amceptsindhgnobImrrilrp. B. M. PO-ITER, M. MAID, J. L. FRANK, W. J. MCSWEENEY and D. R. BRALLIER, Childrens Hospital National Medical Center, Washington, D.C.

swogrpphjcpuY guided reMl cYst =p~tion: A safe and accurate opt-patie& procedure. M. SCHNEIDER, G. PHILLIPS and J. A. BECKER, Downstate Medical Center-SUNY, Brook- lyn, New York.

Wtrasomy of SoIid tbyrdd ne!opbmsz tbe ‘*mnftipls bale” sign. S. HASSANI and R. Bm, Queens Hospital Center, Jamaica, New York.

HigbrcsobItion~timtseetorseaMiagin tkevabutiaaoftbecuotidbihucat&m. P. L. COOPERBERG, W. D. ROBERTSON, F. FRY and V. SWEENEY, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia.

Tbe ultrasonography of abdominal wall lesions. H. C. YEW, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York.

Ultrasonic evaluation of Am&can Burkitt’s lymphoma. T. H. SHAWKER, N. R. DUNNICK, G. L. HEAD and I. LOVE, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

118 Report

19.

20.

21.

22

23.

24.

2!L

26.

27.

28.

29.

/ ~~&rrgieaIco~:

B. J. WEIN~IWN and B. S. REID, Presbyterian University Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

URrasaund evahmtion of gastric neopI=un. M. KOMAIKO, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

= OflWWIlkg8UMNkkrWti

R. C. SANDERS and E. ZERHOUNI, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Bai- timore, Maryland.

D. J. COLEMAN, L. A. RUNZEN, A. M. EL- Mopn and J. DRILL% Columbia University, New York.

OrbitaI a&a&s in CIinIeaI vphy. M. BLUMENKRANZ, A. SUSAL and P. EGBERT, Sanford University Medical Center, Stan- ford, California

!Wu&rdcorrdationdvitmo-retindad- lKsions. D. J. COLEMAN and M. E. SMITH, Columbia University, New York.

cnnieai results with real-time color B-salt PltrrraaaqppLJ. N. R. BRON~~N II and N. C. PICKERING, Southampton Hospital, Southampton, New York.

Ultrasonics Inst.. Sydney, Australia.

A v reel-tjme sector - withanoB8lkdeeB. K. HISANAGA and A. HISANAGA, Mitsubishi Nagoya Hospital. Nagoya, Japan.

Iu vhro evahrafjBp d an echo dctedon system foranIatlavesM!lseaMer. R W. MARTIN, D. W. WATKINS and G. H. POLLACK, University of Washington, Seattle. Washington.

A&anew la maI-time orthogmphk trans- nd=Ionbwpinr. P. S. GREEN, W. F. MULLE, J. F. HOLZEMER and J. R. SUAREZ, SRI International, Menlo Park, California.

Al-l4lHzthearp&aedarrayultnaoundsys- tern for imaging the major il&%cmM

R. W. BARNES and W. A. RILEY, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston- Salem. North Carolina.

18. The Iiquid 8Ikd stoma&-an aeon& window to the examinatkn d the upper abdomen. G. KOS~OFP, P. WARREN and W. GARRETF;

30.

31.

32.

33.

340

35.

36.

37.

38.

39.

40.

A user optimiml high frequency dynamic im- sdne system. J. T. WALKER, A. L. SUSAL. M. G. MAGIN- NESS, A. OVADIA and J. D. MEINDL. Stanford Electronics Laboratories, Stanford, California

Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Array geometq and signaI pmcessing for im- proved resohtthnl in &ctmaiesectorseaMhlg. H. E. MELTON, JR., 0. T. VON RAMM and F. L. TH~~oNE,

computeriaed IlItmsonie qeetmol aMIylds. F. L. LIZI, D. J. COLEMAN, P. PIRO, S. ROSENBERG and E. FELEPPA. Riverside Research Inst., New York, New York.

~~uefngc=pocladB~~hbblmPgc framerates. F. L. THURSTONE, 0. T. VON RAMI% J. G. ABBCY~T, H. B. Bum and D. P. SHATTUCK, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Further &velqnneatlJ in soft t.ismequivalent, geh~bna!d,motrrlols. E. L. MADSEN, J. A. ZAGZEBSKI, R. A. BAN- JAVIC and M. M. BURLEW, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis- consin.

Experimenw uItrasenie in&mmentatIotl for prodnchtgcmsssectio4imagudtbebrrrin throagbtheillr8ctskau. T. MATZUK and M. L. SKOLNICK, Presbyterian-University Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Tm fmqueney test object. A. GOL.DSTEIN and L. N. LANORILL, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.

Image improvement and tissue choneterlza- tion for pulse echo afowdc systems- acbkvements tbroogb dgd proms&g. I. BERETSKY, D. E. ARNOLD, JR. and B. PELLBOIUNI, Searle Ultrasound Research and Advanced Development, Spring Valley, New York.

SmaB8eIdofview,MghruduthM,realtime nRmsound. D. A. SAUTE and W. F. SAMPLE, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.

Advaneu In uhrasonnd mammqmphy. G. BAUM, Yeshiva University, Bronx, New York.

I_ spectmI analysis of ultmsonie

W. D. JENNINGS, E. HOLASEK and E. W. PURNELL. Lorand V. Johnson Laboratory for Research in Oph., Cleveland, Ohio.

Report 119

41.

42.

43.

44.

45.

44.

47.

48.

49.

50.

Dpbk correhta of survival in amg&ive cardiomyo~y. McK. SMITH, H. D. DEAR, M. E. WILLIAMS and W. E. MCMANUS, Miss. Baptist Medical Center, Jackson, Mis- sissippi.

Comparison of M-mode and two-dime- ecbocardiograp4y in the evaluetion of awdit4c

N. C. NANDA, R. GRAMIAK, D. P. POCOSKI and W. E. EPPS, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York.

Ec~pMcstudydtbesignIlicsnceof kftv-miaoruds~during the pre-ejection pbaae of sy#tok. P. A. N. CHANDRARATNA and W. S. ARONOW, VA Administration Hospital, Long Beach, California.

Evaluation of ~andpkuraIeffusions and adhe&ms by twedimeneionnl ecbowr- diogrppbY. N. C. NANDA, R. GRAMIAK, D. P. POCOSKI and W. E. EPPS, Universityof Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York.

AlEWWWWO+gd~~~repo- ncrandinftialdinkafre=h. K. HISANAGA, A. HISANAGA and Y. ICHIE, Mitsubishi Nagoya Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

TbeutMtyofsubxipboM~ecba- cprdiaenpby in infants and cbfldren wftb aqen&albtartd&xase. D. J. SAHN, H. D. ALLEN, L. W. LANGE and S. J. GOLDBERG, University of Arizona Health Sciences Cen- ter, Tucson, Arizona.

Sensitive tests for bio-effects of uItrasoaad. W. L. NYBORG, D. L. MILLER and C. C. WHITCOMB, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.

u-y facuitated Iworp&l of vitmous membralKa. F. L. LIZZI, D. J. COLEMAN, A. A. M. EL- MOFTY,J. DRILLER and L. FUNZEN, Riverside Research Inst., New York, New York.

Inhfbltion of ovuhth in female mice after uhallonk irradiation. C. A. TORBIT, JR., S. J. !STOLZENBERG and P. D. EDMONDS, SRI International, Menlo Park, California.

Bioellects of uftraeound studies at different stagesof#at8thiIIswfw-web8termil!e. S. J. STOLZENBERG, C. A. TORBIT. P. D. EDMONDS. D. P. SASMORE, J. C. TAENZER, S.

M. MADAN, D. 0. MARKS, D. P. NELL and D. E. PRAIT, SRI International, Menlo Park, California.

51. Ultrasonic release of h&em&h cell enzymes. H. I. ZEYA and F. W. KREMKAU, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston- Salem, North Carolina.

52. Absorption of uftmsound in sickk cell blood. K. K. SHUNG, M. LEE, J. M. REID and C. A. FINCH, Institute of Applied Physiology and Medi- cine, Seattle, Washington.

53. ultrasound therapy of experimental uroiogical

54.

55.

56.

57.

58.

neoplasms. F. W. LONGO, P. TOMASHEFSKY, B. D. RIVIN and M. TANNENBAUM, Columbia University, New York.

A phantom for chvrrcterizstion of bii fluids by uhasound and computerized tomo- fP-MY. G. SOMMER and R. FILLY, University of California, San Francisco, Cal- ifornia.

Apmqectivecomparisonof~and computed tomagrapby III the evaluation of gyaooioeiepd*~. I. W. WALSH, A. T. ROSENFIELD and K. J. W. TAYLOR, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, Vir- ginia. UItmsonic cbam&risation of s&d breast ksions. J. JELLINS, G. KOSSXXF and T. S. REEVE, Ultrasonics Institute, Sydney, Australia

!hnarcepbslomctryintwins:Acomparison witb singleton fetuses and an evaluatioo of twin -CY. K. J. LEVENO, R. SANTOS-RAMos, J. H. DUENHOELTER and P. J. WHALLEY, University of Texas, Dallas, Texas.

xz;o”=o@ic NY. . .

University of kabama School of Medicine, Bermingham, Alabama.

59. Placental appearawe iIlbigllI+Skobstctries:8

60.

sonogrqhic, histok@c and radiographic cor- relation. A. F. HANEY and W. S. TROUGH?, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Sonograpbic evaluation of patients with sus- peeted ect@c Prcenrurey- M. KELLY, R. SANTOS-RAMOS and J. H. DUENHOELTER,, University of Texas, Dallas, Texas.

Report 120

61.

62.

63.

64.

65.

66.

67.

68.

69.

70.

71.

Fetal B-mode echoencephalography. M. L. JOHNSON, L. A. MACK, K. R. GOTTES- FELD, C. L. RASHBAUM and M. G. DUNNE, University of Colorado Medical Center, Denver, Colorado.

Ultrasonographic examination of the congeni- taBy mafformed uterus. N. EXALTO, T. K. A. B. ESKES and P. R. HEIN, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

The gravid uterus: a dynamic organ. (A study of the uterine muscle during pregnancy). W. B. STEEL, J. ZAK, and J. WAFALOSKY, Hutzel Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.

slrrmltaneous recording oi tetal ECG and uftraaound Doppler card@ram (DCG) for the a of pre-ejectbo period (PEP) of the fetal cardipc cycle. Its relation to &stational

?!%URATA, C. B. MARTIN, JR., N. PIJLS and 1. SINGER, Catholic University School of Medicine, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

URraaonk changes of uterine fibroids in preg- n=W. S. HASSANI and R. BARD, Queens Hospital Center, Jamaica, New York.

lJ&msound of endodal carcinoma. S. A. PORRATH, G. DALYRYMPLE and R. ETO, Santa Monica Hospital Medical Center, Santa Monica, California.

Quantitative measurement of blood flow in deep-iying vessels by the combined B-mode and puked Doppkr technique. R W. GILL, G. KOSSOFF and W. J. GARRETT, Ultrasonics.Institute, Sydney, Australia.

BIWl!&ttIlmoWdcLccHoa by ukrasound blood tlowsignals. M. HALLIWELL, P. ATKINSON, A. J. WEBB and P. N. T. WELLS, Bristol General Hospital, Bristol, UK.

Rapid vessel imaging and blood velocity measurement: an integrated system. P. J. FISH, I. M. WILSON, T. I. H. BROWN and M. BARRJZ-~~, Kings College Hospital, London, UK.

A multi-repetition rate puked Doppler with increased range-velocity product. V. L. NEWHOUSE, C. T. Ho, P. LECONG and E. S. FURGASON, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.

Compuisoe of B-scan ultnswnd and com- puterized tumograpby in evahmting infanttle by-=. C. L. MORGAN, W. S. TROUGHT, S. J. ROTH- MAN and J. P. JIMINEZ,

72.

73.

74.

75.

76.

77.

78.

79.

80.

Duke University Medical Center, Durham. Vorth Carolina.

Detection of hydrocephalus in infants-com- *a between cross sectional ultrasound and CT Images. M. L. SKOLNICK, A. E. ROSENBAUM, T. MATZUK, A. N. GUTHKELCH and E. R. HEINZ, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

btection of vascular disease using R-wave to echo activity delay times. R. W. BARNES, R. P. BINKLEY and G. HOWARD, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston- Salem, North Carolina.

B-mode echoencepbalograpby ot intraventri- cular hemorrhage and hydrocepbaius in high risk infants. M. L. JOHNSON, L. A. MACK, M. FROST, C. RUMACK and C. L. RASHBAUM. University of Colorado Medical Center, Denver, Colorado.

Real-time imaging of the carotid artery. R. H. ACKERMAN, D. S. PRYOR, L. VIG- NEAULT and J. M. TAVERAS, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Maryland.

Quntitative computer analysis ot ultrasound B-SUUKI. J. GODDARD, R. R. PRICE, J. J. ERICKSON, F. D. ROLLO and A. E. JAMES, JR., Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville. Tennesse.

A new trans-digestive-tract scanner with a gas&o-fiber-scope. K. HISANAGA and A. HISANAGA, Mitsubishi Nagoya Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

Use of Duplex Scanner III in the assessment of peripheral vascular disease. D. J. PHILLIPS, W. M. BLACKSHEAR, D. E. STRANDNESS, JR., J. E. POWERS, M. K. EYER and D. W. BAKER, University of Washington, Washington.

Seattle,

A microprocessor based digital scan converter and display processor for ultrasonic image presentation. M. K. EYER, D. J. PHILLIPS and D. W. BAKER, University of Washington, Seattle. Washington.

Interrogation and classification of scattering targets using tbe statistkal analysis method. N. T. SANGHVI, F. J. FRY, T. D. FRANKLIN, R. C. EGGLETO~J and J. A. WHITCOMB, Indianapolis Center for Advanced Research, Indianapolis, Indiana.

81. A new high-performance breast scanning system.

Report 121

92. Some new dbeetions for furtber study and cfhtical applfeation of ultrasound. P. LINDSTROM, R. L. METZ, R. D. ELLIOTT. D. S. ROJOHN

and D. E. DICK, Mission Bay Hospital, San Diego, California. Life Instruments Corporation, Broomfield, Colorado.

82. A radiation force balance for calibration of ultrasonic visualization equipment. R. C. EGGLETON and L. H. WOLFLA, Ultrasound Research Laboratories, In- dianapolis, Indiana.

93. The effect of pufsed ultrasound at therapeutic levels on coronary blued flow in ischemfc canine myocardium. T. D. FRANKLIN, K. M. EGENES, N. T. SANGHVI, D. C. LUDLOW, W. A. ERDMANN and F. J. FRY, Indianapolis Center for Advanced Research, Indianapolis, Indiana.

83. A 5 MHz linear array ultrasound system for extracranial carotid studies. R. W. BARNES and W. A. RILEY, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston- Salem, North Carolina.

94. Destruction of tumor in oioo with Intense focused ultrasound. F. J. FRY and L. K. JOHNSON, Indianapolis Center for Advanced Research, Indianapolis, Indiana.

84. High frequency ultrasonic tissue characteriza- tion in vivo. D. B. BOYLE and B. A. CARROLL, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

85. Quantitative measurements of coflagen content and ultrasonic bachscatter coefFicffnt in nor- mal and infarcted myocardium. M. O’DONNELL, J. W. MIMBS and J. G. MILLER, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.

95. Acoustic microscopy of the cardfovascular system. F. S. VINSON and R. C. EGGLETON, Indianapolis Centre for Advanced Research, Indianapolis, Indiana.

96. Feasibflity of the use of the temperature dependence of ultrasonic pynwtcra for thuate characterfzatfon. J. A. ROONEY, University of Maine, Orono, Maine.

86. Optical ‘calibration of broadband ultrasonic transducers. W. A. RILEY and R. W. BARNES, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston- Salem, North Carolina.

87. A new stochastic C-scan technique for attenu- ation cc&hciint measurements in tissue equivalent materhd. J. OPHIR and N. F. MAKLM, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kan- sas City, Kansas.

97. The temperature and frequency dcpeadcMx of ultrasonic attenuatfon fn liver. P. M. GAMMELL, R. C. HEYSER, D. H. LECROISSETTE, J. A. ROSEBORO and R. L. WILSON, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Cali- fornia.

88. A high-resolution trans-rectal ultrasound hn- age system. W. B. TAYLOR, J. W. HUNT and R. BLEND, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada.

98. Possible misdiagnuais of sonnd attenuatfng breastmassesasdetectdbyultratmndvisn- aMzation tedmiques and soiutb116 to thh pr-. E. K. FRY, P. HARPER and G. W. GARDNER, Indianapolis Center for Advanced Research, Indianapolis, Indiana.

89. Ultrasonography in assessing cleft palate speech dysfunction. W. E. SWISHER and C. F. HAWKINS, Plaza del Sol Bldg., Albuquerque, New Mexico.

99. Twin pregnancy and first trimester bleedfqg. H. J. FINBERG and 3. C. BIRNHOLZ, Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston, Mas- sachusetts.

90. Initial results in the development of an ultrasonic endoscopk probe for cancer diag nosis. J. L. BUXTON, D. A. WILSON, J. R. SUAREZ and P. S. GREEN, SRI International, Menlo Park, California.

100. Combined use of mrrmmogrrrehy and ultrasound vhwahsation using a fabontorJ- modified commel&l breast scanner to bn- prove dlfferentfal dkgnosk P. HARPER and E. K. FRY, Indianapoiis Center for Advanced Research, Indianapolis, Indiana.

91. Improved imaging of in oirro breast cancer with acoustical holography. R. OMOTO, M. MARUYAMA, Y. WANIBUCHI, M. NAGURA and H. SUGAHARA, Saitama Medical School, Japan.

101. Real time ultrasound observation of fetal actfvfty in the thfrd trkeskr. B. K. WI’ITMANN, B. M. DAVISON and M. E. TOWELL, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.

122 Report

102. T- uBmsenqmphy ss a diagnestIc aid in the evaluation of pstknta with car- CiIlOiM0tthemir. D. R. ZARITSKY, D. D. BLAKE and M. I. RESNICK, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston- Salem, North Carolina.

103. In oieo and h u&o ultmmnic thualhatioa of tbtnonaaIpnncreatkduct. D. A. SARTI. W. F. SAMPLE and J. E. KEN- NEDY .JH, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.

104. A noninvdve carotid artery evaluatien system as accurate as car&id wphy. R. C. DAVIS and R. 0. GINGERY, Noninvasive Vascular Laboratory, Oakland, California.

105. In oh liver cbractddi00 u.hg eStilnah d t&e aaudc attenuatioo slope codlkieat. R. B. Kuc, hf. SCHWARTZ, F. DIUN and N. RNBY, Columbia University, New York.

106. Ultrssolrad cvahmtfon d bladder tumors. S. L. EDEL~. and J. 3. PAHIRA, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

107. The &nathm of the &ueorna patknt using tbt Doppkr ttcbdquc. z. M. VucIcevrc, Ridley Park, Pennsylvania.

108. An infinite gate pulse Doppler. A. NOWICK and J. REID, Institute of Applied Physiology and Medi- cine, Seattle, Washington.

109. AIItonIatk ch aww&tiondbloodvhdty wavefonn~ derived from Doppler sip&.

S. A. NAPEL, C. S. WILLIAM and W. D. MCCALLLJM, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

110. Iatravascufar and esopb8geai ulhwonk cath&rsfordetecthofairembok R. W. MARTIN and P. S. COLLEY, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

111. CapabiWks aad Iimitaths d an pltra60nic imagerinthediagnosisofe-carotid ocduaive dkase. S. M. BERRY, Z. JAMIL, J. A. O’DONNELL and R. W. HOESON, East Orange Veterans Administration Hospi- tal, Newark, New Jersey.

112. Newer applkations of real time twwhee- shal ccboardbglp81. N. C. NANDA and R. GRAMIAK, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester. New York.

113. Quanthative cdhgen b and ~wa~~_y~h a ~PW~Y

. J. W. MIMES, M. O’DONNELL and J. G. MILLER, Washington University, Seattle, Washington.

114. Nenr&@ng d lnfnntc tdtrwaad and computed brahr tomography. J. T. PATRICK, F. J. FRY, J. MULLER, R GILMOR, T. D. FRANKL.IN and R. F. HEIM- BURGER, Indianapolis Centre for Advanced Research, Indianapolis, Indiana.

115. An autemated ahemtion corm&lo system for cvphdichn&B* 0. T. VON RUM, S. W. SMITH, S. MILLER- JONES and R. BUTTS. Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.