americorps grantee training evaluation and research september 11, 2014

21
AmeriCorps Grantee Training Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

Upload: nell-banks

Post on 03-Jan-2016

36 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

AmeriCorps Grantee Training Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014. Session Objectives. Review policy context for evaluation Review evaluation requirements Share examples of grantee evaluation practices Share resources. Federal/State Policy Context. Federal - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

AmeriCorps Grantee Training Evaluation and Research

September 11, 2014

Page 2: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

Session Objectives

Review policy context for evaluation

Review evaluation requirements

Share examples of grantee evaluation practices

Share resources

Page 3: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

Federal/State Policy Context

Federal• Evaluating Programs Requirements and Procedures (CFR 45

§§.700-.740)

• CNCS finalized these regulations July 8, 2005

State• Program Design Policy E.3—Evaluation: Competitive programs

need to follow evaluation requirements as described in the AmeriCorps Regulations…Formula programs are not required to conduct an evaluation.

• Policy adopted 2009

Page 4: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

Definition of Performance MeasurementPerformance measurement is the process of systematically and

regularly collecting and monitoring data related to the direction of

observed changes in communities, participants (members), or

end beneficiaries receiving your program’s services. It is

intended to provide an indication of your program’s operations

and performance.

§2522.700

Page 5: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

Definition of Evaluation

…evaluation uses scientifically-based research methods to

assess the effectiveness of programs by comparing the observed

program outcomes with what would have happened in the

absence of the program.

§2522.700

Page 6: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

Comparing Performance Measurement and Evaluation

Performance Measurement EvaluationWhat is? A system of tracking progress in accomplishing

specific pre-set targets (activities, outputs, and/or outcomes)

A formal scientific process for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data about how well a program was implemented (process evaluation) or how effectively the program accomplished desired outcomes/impacts (outcome/impact evaluation)

Why is it typically used? To gauge program delivery, quality, participant satisfaction and engagement; to improve products, services, and efficiency; to inform/enhance decision making, and support planning and program development

To assess program effectiveness and determine whether the program is responsible for changes found

How does it work? Monitors a few vital signs related to program objectives, outputs, and/or outcomes

Comprehensively examines programs using systematic, objective, and unbiased procedures in accordance with social science research methods and research designs

Who typically does it? Program staff An experienced researcher (often external to the program)

When is it done? Ongoing basis Periodically

Page 7: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

Building Evidence of Effectiveness

Page 8: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

Evaluation Study Designs and Causal Impact

Evaluation Study Designs Comparison Ability to make statements about causal attribution

Experimental Design Randomly Assigned Groups

Quasi-Experimental Design Studies

Statistically Matched Groups

Non-Experimental Design Studies

Not Statistically Matched Groups or Group

Page 9: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

Evaluation Study Designs & Causal Impact

Experimental Design Studies

Quasi-Experimental Design Studies

Non-Experimental Design Studies

• Random assignment to treatment and control groups

• Controls for differences b/w the two groups so differences in outcomes can be attributed to whether or not individuals participated in the program

• Uses two groups, but no random assignment, often due to practical considerations

• Carefully match the two groups at beginning of evaluation to be confident they are basically the same

• Subsequent observed differences b/w groups will be due to whether or not individuals participated in program services

• Do not meet the requirements for experimental or quasi-experimental designs

• Can also include process and implementation evaluations that make sure plans are followed

Page 10: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

Evaluation Study Designs and CNCS Requirements

* Fulfills CNCS evaluation requirement for large grantees if a reasonable comparison group is identified and appropriate matching/propensity scoring is used in the analysis.

Page 11: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

Evaluation Requirements

Competitive Programs

• Over $500,000

• Under $500,000

Formula Programs

Page 12: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

Evaluation RequirementsCompetitive ($500K +)

Independent evaluation

Quasi- or experimental design study

Cover at least one year of operation

Submit evaluation with any application for competitive funds

§ 2522.710

Page 13: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

Evaluation RequirementsCompetitive (less than $500K)

Internal evaluation

Quasi- or experimental design (optional)

Cover at least one year of operation

Submit evaluation with any application for competitive funds

§ 2522.710

Page 14: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

Competitive Evaluation Requirements

What is Due When?

Page 15: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

Evaluation RequirementsFormula Programs

State commissions establish evaluation requirements for formula grantees

CV does not require formula grantees to conduct evaluations (per 2014 Program Design Policies)

Page 16: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

Strengthening the Evidence Base

Formula and Competitive (less than $500K) Select a study design most appropriate for

developmental phase of AmeriCorps program (process, implementation, outcome or impact)

Encourage use of experimental or quasi-experimental designs but not required

Assure program design is based on or adapted from a similar program that has evidence from an evaluation

Page 17: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

Evaluation & Grant Review 2014 applications scored and placed into one of four

tiered evidence levels. Applications with a stronger evidence base received more points.

Evaluation reports submitted are assessed in terms of the quality of the evaluation designs and the studies’ findings. These assessments may be used to inform CVs/CNCS’s consideration of the selection criteria and for the purpose of clarifying or verifying information in the proposals.

Applicants that failed to submit evaluation reports as required had points removed.

Page 18: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

Research and Evaluation Grantee Panel

Stephanie BieglerChief Program Officer

Birth & Beyond/Child Abuse Prevention Council

Atalaya SergiDeputy Director

Jumpstart CA/Jumpstart

Julie McClure and Sara SitchDirector, Assistant Director

CaSERVES Volunteer Infrastructure Program/ Napa County Office of Education

Matt AguiarChief of Staff

Reading Partners CA/Reading Partners

Page 19: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

Questions?

Page 20: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

Resources Available

Evaluation FAQs:

Electronic CFR: www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr

• Select Agency List from left navigation bar• Scroll down to CNCS, select 45 CFR Chapters XII, XXV• Scroll down to XXV, select 2500-2599• Select 2522• Select Subpart E-Evaluation Requirements

National Knowledge Network:

• https://www.nationalserviceresources.gov/evaluation-americorps#.VAowPbdOXcs

CV Program Officer

Page 21: AmeriCorps Grantee Training  Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014

THANK YOU!