amg 176, a selective mcl1 inhibitor, is effective in hematologic … · 1582 | cancer discovery...

1582 | CANCER DISCOVERY DECEMBER 2018 www.aacrjournals.org

AMG 176, a Selective MCL1 Inhibitor, Is Effective in Hematologic Cancer Models Alone and in Combination with Established Therapies Sean Caenepeel 1 , 2 , Sean P. Brown 2 , 3 , Brian Belmontes 1 , 2 , Gordon Moody 1 , 2 , Kathleen S. Keegan 4 , 5 , Danny Chui 2 , 6 , Douglas A. Whittington 7 , 8 , Xin Huang 7 , 8 , Leszek Poppe 2 , 9 , Alan C. Cheng 10 , 11 , Mario Cardozo 10 , 11 , Jonathan Houze 8 , 12 , Yunxiao Li 11 , 13 , Brian Lucas 11 , 13 , Nick A. Paras 11 , 13 , Xianghong Wang 11 , 13 , Joshua P. Taygerly 11 , 13 , Marc Vimolratana 11 , 13 , Manuel Zancanella 11 , 13 , Liusheng Zhu 11 , 13 , Elaina Cajulis 1 , 2 , Tao Osgood 1 , 2 , Jan Sun 1 , 2 , Leah Damon 14 , Regina K. Egan 14 , Patricia Greninger 14 , Joseph D. McClanaghan 14 , Jianan Gong 15 , 16 , Donia Moujalled 17 , Giovanna Pomilio 17 , Pedro Beltran 1 , 2 , Cyril H. Benes 14 , Andrew W. Roberts 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , David C. Huang 15 , 16 , Andrew Wei 17 , Jude Canon 1 , 2 , Angela Coxon 1 , 2 , and Paul E. Hughes 1 , 2

RESEARCH ARTICLE

ABSTRACT The prosurvival BCL2 family member MCL1 is frequently dysregulated in cancer. To overcome the signifi cant challenges associated with inhibition of MCL1 protein–pro-

tein interactions, we rigorously applied small-molecule conformational restriction, which culminated in the discovery of AMG 176, the fi rst selective MCL1 inhibitor to be studied in humans. We demonstrate that MCL1 inhibition induces a rapid and committed step toward apoptosis in subsets of hematologic cancer cell lines, tumor xenograft models, and primary patient samples. With the use of a human MCL1 knock-in mouse, we demonstrate that MCL1 inhibition at active doses of AMG 176 is tolerated and correlates with clear pharmacodynamic effects, demonstrated by reductions in B cells, monocytes, and neutrophils. Furthermore, the combination of AMG 176 and venetoclax is synergistic in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) tumor models and in primary patient samples at tolerated doses. These results highlight the therapeutic promise of AMG 176 and the potential for combinations with other BH3 mimetics.

SIGNIFICANCE: AMG 176 is a potent, selective, and orally bioavailable MCL1 inhibitor that induces a rapid commitment to apoptosis in models of hematologic malignancies. The synergistic combination of AMG 176 and venetoclax demonstrates robust activity in models of AML at tolerated doses, highlight-ing the promise of BH3-mimetic combinations in hematologic cancers. Cancer Discov; 8(12); 1582–97. ©2018 AACR.

See related commentary by Leber et al., p. 1511.

1 Oncology Research, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California . 2 Amgen Research, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California. 3 Medicinal Chemistry, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California. 4 Oncology Research, Amgen Inc., Seattle, Washington. 5 Amgen Research, Amgen Inc., Seattle, Washington. 6 Genome Analysis Unit, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California. 7 Molecular Engineering, Amgen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts. 8 Amgen Research, Amgen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts. 9 Discovery Attribute Sciences, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California. 10 Molecular Engineering, Amgen Inc., South San Francisco, California. 11 Amgen Research, Amgen Inc., South San Francisco, California. 12 Medicinal Chemistry, Amgen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts. 13 Medicinal Chemistry, Amgen Inc., South San Francisco, California. 14 Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 15 The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia. 16 Department of Medical Biology, Uni-versity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 17 Malignant Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Service, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; and Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne,

Australia. 18 Department of Clinical Haematology and Bone Marrow Trans-plantation, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. 19 Victo-rian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Australia. Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Discovery Online (http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/). Corrected online May 29, 2019. Affi liations of G. Moody, K.S. Keegan, D. Chui , D.A. Whittington, A.C. Cheng, M. Cardozo, B. Lucas, N.A. Paras, X. Wang, J.P. Taygerly, M. Vimolratana, M. Zancanella, L. Zhu, and P. Beltran at the time the research was conducted. Corresponding Authors: Paul E. Hughes, Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Phone: 805-447-1137; Fax: 805-498-5666; E-mail: [email protected] ; and Sean P. Brown, Phone: 805-447-6905; E-mail: [email protected] doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0387 ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Research. on January 28, 2020. © 2018 American Association for Cancercancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from

Published OnlineFirst September 25, 2018; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0387





http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/



DECEMBER 2018 CANCER DISCOVERY | 1583

INTRODUCTION

The evasion of apoptosis is a hallmark of cancer, sustain-ing tumor growth, survival, and resistance to a broad spec-trum of anticancer therapeutics (1). Dysregulation of the B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL2) family of proteins is frequently responsible for this circumvention of programed cell death (2). The BCL2 family of proteins is comprised of antiapop-totic members, including BCL2, MCL1, and BCL-xL, and proapoptotic members, which are further divided into two groups: the BH3-only proteins, for example, BIM and BAD, and the downstream apoptotic effectors BAK and BAX (3). The dynamic interplay between these proteins is integral to controlling the apoptotic threshold of cells, with the BH3 domain of proapoptotic family members binding to a hydrophobic groove on the surface of their antiapoptotic counterparts (4). Small-molecule BH3 mimetics, the most advanced of which is the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax, compete for binding to this groove, enabling endogenous BH3-only proapoptotic proteins to activate downstream components of the pathway (5).

The impressive clinical activity of venetoclax in chronic lymphocytic leukemia has provided validation for BH3 mimetics in cancer (6). However, more modest response rates in multiple myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) sug-gest involvement of other antiapoptotic family members in these settings (7, 8). Studies involving genetically engineered mouse models, RNAi, and CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing have implicated MCL1 in promoting the survival of multi-ple hematologic malignancies, including multiple myeloma, AML, and MYC-driven lymphomas, highlighting the poten-tial for MCL1 as a therapeutic target in these indications (9–15).

The shallow BH3-domain binding pocket in MCL1, along with the high-affinity interactions with its binding partners, has made the development of potent and selective MCL1 inhibitors with suitable drug-like properties challenging. However, recent success has been reported with the small molecule S63845 (16).

We report the discovery of AMG 176, a first-in-class orally bioavailable MCL1 inhibitor in clinical development for he matologic malignancies (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02675452).




Caenepeel et al.RESEARCH ARTICLE


Using structure-based design, we optimized a series of spiro- macrocyclic molecules integrating conformational restriction as a guiding principle throughout the optimization process (17). In hematologic cancer cell lines, this class of MCL1 inhibi-tors induced a rapid commitment toward apoptosis at nanomo-lar concentrations following exposure to drug for as little as 30 minutes. Discontinuous oral administration of AMG 176 inhibited the growth of human AML and multiple myeloma tumor xenografts at tolerated doses. Furthermore, in contrast to published reports with S63845, where little to no effect was observed on white blood cell counts following intravenous administration of S63845 at the maximum tolerated dose, oral administration of AMG 176 resulted in dose-dependent reduc-tions in B cells, monocytes, and neutrophils, highlighting their potential as pharmacodynamic endpoints of MCL1 inhibition (16). Finally, we show that the combination of AMG 176 and venetoclax was synergistic in primary AML patient samples and demonstrated robust activity in AML xenograft models at toler-ated doses. These data warrant further evaluation of AMG 176 in the clinical setting and highlight the promise of combined MCL1 and BCL2 inhibition as a means of achieving maximal clinical benefit with BH3 mimetics in hematologic cancers.

RESULTSAMG 176 Is a Potent and Selective MCL1 Inhibitor

A successful strategy for inhibiting protein–protein inter-actions (PPI) is to identify weakly bound small-molecule fragments and improve their affinity by increasing their size to gain additional interactions with the target protein (18). Although this approach improves affinity, it often results in molecules with poor selectivity and pharmacokinetic proper-ties, such as low oral bioavailability, presumably due to their large size and high flexibility (19). Guided by X-ray structure and small-molecule conformational analysis, we approached the optimization of inhibitors of MCL1 with the strategy of conformational restriction to reduce nonbinding confor-mations (17). Based on the hypothesis that high levels of nonbinding conformations increase the likelihood of poor selectivity and pharmacokinetic properties, we successfully used conformational restriction as a guiding principle for the optimization of these PPI inhibitors.

Compound 1 was identified as a racemate (IC50 = 3.4 µmol/L) from a screen of a 248,090-compound library for disruption of the MCL1/BIM interaction (Fig. 1A). Separation of the enanti-omers (2 and 3 in Fig. 2A) and expansion of the central 6-mem-bered heterocyclic ring to a 7-membered heterocycle provided compound 4 (IC50 = 0.3 µmol/L). Cocrystallization of 4 with MCL1 revealed a cryptic binding pocket not present in the cocrystal structure of MCL1 when bound to the BIM peptide (Fig. 1A–C; video; PDB codes 6O6G and 2PQK; Supplemen-tary Table S1; ref. 20). Examination of the MCL1/4 structure revealed the near coplanarity of the stereogenic hydrogen and the ortho-chlorine, prompting an exchange of these atoms for an ethylene unit that could better fill the cryptic pocket and engender conformational restriction by constraining the rotation of the aryl ring (Fig. 1A). Gratifyingly, spirocycle 5 showed improved biochemical potency (IC50 = 0.04 µmol/L). In an effort to maintain the ionic interaction between the carboxylic acid of 2 and Arg 263 of MCL1 while introducing

an additional vector for derivatization, compound 6 was syn-thesized. A nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structure of compound 6 complexed with MCL1 showed a binding confor-mation of the benzyl acyl sulfonamide where the phenyl ring was in close proximity to the four-membered ring, suggesting conformational restriction could again be employed to form a macrocyclic ring (PDB code 6OVC). Combination of the conformationally restricted macrocyclic and spirocyclic rings provided the high-affinity MCL1 inhibitor, compound 7 (IC50 = 0.01 µmol/L). The binding conformations of compounds 5 and 7, when complexed with MCL1, suggested that fusion of a trans-cyclobutane onto the macrocycle would generate additional hydrophobic contacts and further conformation-ally restrict the macrocycle (PDB codes 6O6F and 6OQN; Sup-plementary Table S1). Following this hypothesis resulted in the synthesis of compound 8, which showed a significant increase in potency (Ki = 0.00014 µmol/L). The X-ray crystal structure of compound 8 complexed with MCL1 along with molecular modeling revealed that the conformation of 8 observed in complex with MCL1 was the fifth most populated confor-mation, representing only 12% of the total conformational ensemble (Fig. 1D; PDB code 6OQC; Supplementary Table S1). Analysis of compound 8 provided an opportunity to further conformationally restrict the macrocycle by installation of a trans-olefin between carbons 7 and 8, yielding compounds 9 and 10 (Ki = 0.00004 µmol/L and 0.00005 µmol/L, respec-tively). Compound 10 (AM-8621) had a suitable potency and selectivity profile to serve as a tool MCL1 inhibitor for charac-terizing the mechanism of action of MCL1 inhibition in vitro. The improvement in potency of compound 9 was presumably due to conformational restriction, where now the observed conformation of compound 9 in complex with MCL1 was the most abundant conformation (45%; Fig. 1E; PDB code 6OQC). Moreover, installation of the olefin reduced the number of energetically accessible conformations within 3 kcal/mol from 22 (compound 8) to 8 (compound 9). Compounds 9 and 10 had short half-lives and poor oral bioavailability (Fig. 1F). Simple methylation of the alcohol led to a series of compounds with improved pharmacokinetic profiles, including increased oral bioavailability, which ultimately provided compound 11 or AMG 176, the first selective, orally bioavailable MCL1 inhibitor to advance into human clinical trials, validating our strategy of optimization guided by conformational restriction (video; ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02675452).

Disruption of MCL1 Interactions Induces Apoptosis

AMG 176 and the related analogue AM-8621 exhibit pico-molar affinity for human MCL1, approximately 1,000-fold reduced affinity toward murine MCL1, and minimal binding affinity toward BCL2 and BCL-xL (Fig. 1A). The ability of the tool compound, AM-8621, to disrupt the interaction between MCL1 and BAK was evaluated in HEK293M cells using a split-luciferase complementation assay (IC50, 43 nmol/L; Fig. 2A; ref. 21). AM-8621 also disrupted the interaction between MCL1 and BIM in a co-complex immunoassay, exhibiting dose- and time-dependent inhibition in the non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell line A427 (Fig. 2B). A427 cells were selected for these studies because of their appreciable MCL1:BIM co-complex levels and relative insensitivity to AM-8621 treatment.




AMG 176 Alone and Combined in Hematologic Cancer Models RESEARCH ARTICLE


Figure 1. Optimization of chemical matter to AMG 176. A, X-ray structure–based optimization of high-throughput screening hit to clinical candidate AMG 176. X-ray structure suggested spirocyclic fusion (circled). B, X-ray crystal structure of MCL1 bound to BIM (20). C, X-ray structure of MCL1 bound to AM-8621 reveals cryptic binding pocket (PDB code 6OQB). D, Quantum mechanical–derived conformational ensemble of 8 within 3 kcal/mol depicted as Boltzmann distri-bution. Binding conformation shown in green. Broken bars represent multiple conformations. PCM, polarizable continuum model. E, Quantum mechanical–derived conformational ensemble of 9 within 3 kcal/mol depicted as Boltzmann distribution. Binding conformation shown in green. Broken bars represent multiple conformations. F, Pharmacokinetic properties of 9, 10, and 11. Species refers to the species of animal in which the pharmacokinetic data were acquired.

Central ringexpansion

Overlay of bindingconformations of 5 and7 suggested fusion of

trans-cyclobutane

Binding conformation

Bol

tzm

ann

popu

latio

n (%

)

ImprovedPK profile

Installtrans-olefin

NMR structuresuggested

macrocyclic fusion

Carboxylic acidbioisostere

Separation ofenantiomers

1, IC50 = 3.4 µmol/L

O

N

CI CI

O

OH

4, IC50 = 0.3 µmol/L5, IC50 = 0.04 µmol/L

7, IC50 = 0.01 µmol/L

2, IC50 = 2.1 µmol/L

6, IC50 = 0.3 µmol/L

8, IC50 = 0.0007 µmol/L

(AM-8621), R = Et, Ki = 0.00005 µmol/L

(AMG 176), Ki = 0.00006 µmol/LBCL-xL, Ki = 0.7 µmol/LBCL2, Ki = 0.95 µmol/LMouse MCL1, Ki = 0.044 µmol/LDog MCL1, Ki = <0.001 µmol/L

BCL-xL, Ki = 1.9 µmol/LBCL2, Ki = 2.5 µmol/LMouse MCL1, Ki = 0.062 µmol/LDog MCL1, Ki = <0.001 µmol/L

9, R = Me, Ki = 0.00004 µmol/L

Ki = 0.00014 µmol/L

3, IC50 = 55 µmol/L

ON

N

NN

CI

CI

CI CI

CI

CI

CI

CI

CI CI

OH

OH

Me

N

N

O

O

OR

O

OO

CI CI

CI

O

O

O

O O OS

NH

SNH

OO

SNH

OO

O

60

40

20

00

Compound

9

10

11

11

11

11

Species

Mouse 5.0 5.7 0.9 11

6

32

34

27

70

2.8

14

20

11

1.8

1.1

0.6

1.4

0.3

0.7

0.3

0.03

0.05

0.02

0.50

Mouse

Mouse

Rat

Dog

Cynomolgus

CI(L/h/kg) % F

Vdss(µmol/L)

iv t1/2(h)

0.5 1.0 1.5

Relative energy (kcal/mol)B3LYP/6-31+G* (PCM water)

2.0 2.5 3.0

Bol

tzm

ann

popu

latio

n (%

) 60

40

20

00 0.5 1.0 1.5

Relative energy (kcal/mol)B3LYP/6-31+G* (PCM water)

2.0 2.5 3.0

MeMe

OMe

OSN

N

H

O

O

O

OHO

O

N

O

O

OO

SNH

O

N

OH

OH

OH

A

B C D

E F

AMG 176

1011

X-ray structuresuggested

spirocyclic fusion






We next evaluated the effect of AM-8621 on MCL1 pro-tein levels (22). The AM-8621–insensitive multiple myeloma cell line U266B1 was selected for these experiments so that changes in MCL1 protein levels would not be influenced by treatment-induced effects on cell viability. A dose-dependent induction of MCL1 protein was observed following com-pound treatment (Fig. 2C). Although independent of changes in transcription (Supplementary Fig. S1), this increase was at least partially driven by an extended protein half-life (Fig. 2D). Consistent with rapid target engagement, elevated MCL1 protein was detected within 15 minutes of treatment initiation. MCL1 levels returned to baseline 4 hours after washout of AM-8621, confirming the reversibility of com-pound binding (Fig. 2E). This induction of MCL1 protein following AM-8621 treatment was not limited to U266B1

cells; similar observations were made in several additional cell lines (including A427, MV-4-11, and NCI-H1568; Sup-plementary Fig. S2).

AM-8621 was then tested for its ability to activate the intrinsic apoptosis pathway. Treatment with AM-8621 increased activated BAK levels, a proximal downstream effec-tor of MCL1, in a panel of AM-8621–sensitive cell lines (OPM-2, multiple myeloma; MV-4-11, AML; MOLM13, AML; and Ramos, Burkitt lymphoma) but not in the AM-8621–insensitive cell line U266B1 (multiple myeloma; Fig. 3A). Together with the liberation of BH3 domain–containing pro-teins, BAK activation represents a key prelude to the induc-tion of downstream components of the intrinsic apoptosis pathway, including caspase 3 and 7 (5). Highly AM-8621–sensitive cell lines (OPM-2, MV-4-11, MOLM13, and Ramos)

Figure 2. AM-8621 treatment disrupts the interaction between MCL1 and proapoptotic BCL2 family members and also induces MCL1 protein levels. A, Disruption of the MCL1:BAK interaction in HEK293M cells treated with AM-8621, as measured in a split luciferase complementation assay. Mean and ±SD from n = 4. B, Disruption of the MCL1:BIM interaction in A427 cells treated with AM-8621 for 1 hour at indicated doses (left) or 750 nmol/L for indicated durations (right) using an MCL1:BIM complex immunoassay. Mean and ±SD from n = 3. C, Immunoblot analysis of MCL1, BCL-xL, BCL2, BIM, and cleaved PARP in U266B1 cells treated with AM-8621 for 24 hours. D, Immunoblot characterization of MCL1 protein half-life in U266B1 cells treated with AM-8621 (2 µmol/L) or vehicle for 4 hours followed by addition of cycloheximide (CHX; 100 µg/mL) for indicated durations. Quantified MCL1 levels were plotted against time after CHX addition and used to estimate MCL1 protein half-lives of 2.3 hours in the presence of AM-8621 and 0.7 hour in its absence. E, Immunoblot characterization of AM-8621 mediated increase in MCL1 protein in U266B1 cells. For right blots, cells were treated with AM-8621 for 6 hours followed by drug washout for indicated durations.

A

100

50

0

MCL1

MCL1

MCL1

100

50

CHXCHX + AM-8621

00

0.250 0.5 1 2 4 Time after CHX addition (h)

CHX

CHX + AM-8621

1 2

Time after CHX addition (h)

3 4

BCL2

BIM

PARP

β-Actin

β-Actin

BCL-xL

100

50

0

100

50

0

Veh

Veh

0.5 1 4 12 240.

120.

37 1.1

3.3 100.00001 0.001

Veh

Veh

0.25

0.25

0.5

0.5

1 2 401 2 4 6

0.06

0.2

0.6

1.7

5

0.1

AM-8621 (µmol/L)

AM-8621 (µmol/L)

AM-8621 (h) Time after washout (h)

AM-8621 (µmol/L) AM-8621 (h)

10

MC

L1/B

AK

com

plex

(%

)

MC

L1/B

IM c

ompl

ex (

%)

MC

L1 p

rote

in (

%)

C

E

D

B






A OPM-2

OPM-2

MV-4-11

MV-4-11

MOLM13

MOLM13

Ramos

Ramos

U266B1

300

200

100

0

300

200

100

0

100

50

0

100

50

0

100

50

0

100

50

00.001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 100.01 0.1

AM-8621 (µmol/L) AM-8621 (µmol/L)0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10

AM-8621 (µmol/L)0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10

AM-8621 (µmol/L)1 10

APC-A

1 h2 h4 h8 h24 h

1 h2 h4 h8 h24 h

1 h 0.5 h1 h2 h4 h8 h24 h

2 h4 h8 h24 h

101 102 103 105104

APC-A101 102 103 105104

400

300

200

100

APC-A

0101 102 103 105104

APC-A

Activated BAK

101 102 103 105104

300

200

100

0

APC-A101 102 103 105104

400

300

200

100

0

Cou

ntC

aspa

se 3

/7 a

ctiv

ity (

%)

OPM-2 MV-4-11 MOLM13 Ramos

100

50

0

100

50

0

100

50

0

100

50

00.001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 100.01 0.1

AM-8621 (µmol/L) AM-8621 (µmol/L)0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10

AM-8621 (µmol/L)0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10

AM-8621 (µmol/L)1 10

1 h2 h4 h8 h24 h

1 h2 h4 h8 h24 h

1 h0.5 h1 h2 h4 h8 h24 h

2 h4 h8 h24 h

Via

bilit

y (%

)

OPM-2 MV-4-11 MOLM13 Ramos

100

50

0

100

50

0

100

50

0

100

50

00.001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 100.01 0.1

AM-8621 (µmol/L) AM-8621 (µmol/L)0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10

AM-8621 (µmol/L)0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10

AM-8621 (µmol/L)1 10

1 h treat1 h treat,23 h wash24 h treat


0.5 h treat0.5 h treat,23.5 h wash24 h treat


Via

bilit

y (%

)

100

AMO1

OPM-2

AMO1 BAX–/– BAK–/–

H929 BAX–/– BAK–/–

OPM-2 BAX–/– BAK–/–

H92950

00.001 0.01 0.1

AM-8621 (µmol/L)1 10

Via

bilit

y (%

)

B

C

D

Figure 3. AM-8621 induces a rapid commitment toward apoptosis and loss of viability in sensitive cell lines. A, Effects of AM-8621 treatment (1 µmol/L for 2 hours) on activated BAK in AM-8621–sensitive (OPM-2, MV-4-11, MOLM13, and Ramos) and AM-8621–insensitive (U266B1) cell lines as measured in a fl w cytometry–based BAK activation assay. B, Caspase activity and effects on viability following treatment with AM-8621 in OPM-2, MV-4-11, MOLM13, and Ramos cells. Effects on cell viability and caspase activity were measured by CellTiter-Glo and Caspase-Glo, respectively. Mean and ±SD from n = 4. C, Viability analysis of OPM-2, MV-4-11, MOLM13, and Ramos cells treated with AM-8621 for indicated durations, followed by drug washout and incubation in the absence of drug for indicated durations. Effects on cell viability were measured by CellTiter-Glo. Mean and ±SD from n = 4. D, Viability analysis of AMO1, H929, and OPM-2 parental and BAX−/−BAK−/− cell lines treated with AM-8621 for 24 hours. Effects on cell viability were measured by CellTiter-Glo. Mean and ±SD from n = 3.

exhibited caspase 3 and 7 activation within 1 to 4 hours of treatment. Reductions in cell viability were observed shortly thereafter, demonstrating a near-maximal response within 8 hours of treatment initiation (Fig. 3B). AM-8621 washout studies revealed a further dependence on MCL1 in these lines. Although a limited effect on OPM-2 viability was observed 1 hour after treatment initiation, subsequent washout of AM-8621, followed by incubation in the absence of drug for

23 hours, resulted in >80% reduction in viability approaching that achieved with 24 hours of continuous treatment. Similar observations were made in Ramos cells following 30 minutes of treatment, and to a lesser extent in MV-4-11 and MOLM13 cells following 2 hours of treatment (Fig. 3C). To confirm the on-mechanism activity of this class of MCL1 inhibitors, BAX−/−BAK−/− AMO1, H929, and OPM-2 cells were treated with AM-8621 and compared with parental cell lines (9). In






contrast to the parental cell lines, no effect on viability was observed with any of the BAX−/−BAK−/− lines, providing com-pelling evidence for the on-target MCL1-mediated activity of these compounds (Fig. 3D).

Hematologic Cancer Cell Lines Are Sensitive to MCL1 Inhibition

To identify those tumor types with greatest sensitivity to MCL1 inhibition, AM-8621 was profiled against a panel of 952 tumor cell lines (ref. 23; Fig. 4A). Cell lines derived from hematologic malignancies exhibited greater sensitivity to AM-8621 than did solid tumor lines (P < 1 × 10−13, Fisher exact test). The hematologic indications exhibiting great-est sensitivity included multiple myeloma (P = 0.006), AML (P = 1 × 10−5), and B-cell lymphoma (P < 1 × 10−6), with sub-sets of ALL and Burkitt lymphoma also exhibiting depend-ency on MCL1 (Fig. 4B; Supplementary Table S2). Among solid tumor cell lines, breast cancer lines demonstrated the greatest sensitivity to AM-8621 (P = 0.001).

To understand the dependency of hematologic cancer cell lines on specific prosurvival BCL2 family members, expanded panels of multiple myeloma, AML, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cell lines were assessed for sensitivity to AM-8621 and the BCL2-selective inhibitor venetoclax. In agreement with results from the initial screen, dependency on MCL1 was observed in a subset of cell lines (Fig. 4C). Most notably, multiple myeloma cell lines relied predominantly on MCL1 for survival, whereas AML and DLBCL cell lines were more heterogeneous, exhibiting sensitivity to selective inhibi-tion of MCL1, BCL2, or both (Fig. 4D).

Low BCL-xL and High BAK Expressions Predict for Sensitivity to MCL1 Inhibition

To identify predictive biomarkers of response to AM-8621, we assessed the relationship between sensitivity and genomic features within the 952 tumor cell lines. A multivariate linear regression analysis (elastic net) was used to capture deter-minants of response to AM-8621 (23). Among all genomic features included in the model, expression or copy-number variation of a small number of genes (n = 165) was predictive of response across all cell lines (Supplementary Table S3). Strikingly, high BCL-xL (BCL2L1) expression was the strongest predictor of resistance, whereas, conversely, high expression of BAK (BAK1) was the strongest predictor of sensitivity. MCL1 expression was not predictive. The identification of BCL-xL expression as a resistance feature was confirmed by the strong correlations observed between AM-8621 sensitivity and BCL-xL transcript and protein expression in the expanded panel of multiple myeloma cell lines, with high BCL-xL expression again being associated with resistance to AM-8621 (Fig. 4E; Supplementary Fig. S3). The identification of BCL-xL and BAK, both members of the BCL2 protein family, as the strong-est predictors of resistance/response provides further evidence supporting the on-mechanism activity of AM-8621.

AMG 176 Is Efficacious in Multiple Myeloma and AML Xenograft Models and Well Tolerated in Human MCL1 Knock-In Mice

To characterize the kinetics of apoptosis induction in vivo, we used the clinical-stage molecule AMG 176, given

its superior pharmacokinetic properties over AM-8621. Dose-dependent activation of the intrinsic apoptosis path-way in OPM-2 xenografts, as measured by activated BAK, cleaved caspase-3, and cleaved PARP, was detected as early as 2 hours after oral administration of AMG 176 (Fig. 5A), with sustained cleaved PARP and activated BAK detectable through 12 hours and cleaved caspase-3 through 24 hours. Immunohistochemistry analysis revealed a similar dose-dependent increase in cleaved caspase-3 (Supplementary Fig. S4).

The ability of AMG 176 to rapidly induce apoptosis in pharmacodynamic assays suggested that it may be effi-cacious when administered using a discontinuous sched-ule. To test this hypothesis, mice harboring subcutaneous OPM-2 xenografts were treated with AMG 176 twice weekly and compared with mice treated daily. Discontinuous doses of 30 and 60 mg/kg were selected based on their ability to induce apoptotic markers in pharmacodynamic assays. Twice-weekly oral administration of AMG 176 at a dose of 30 mg/kg achieved 54% tumor growth inhibition (TGI) relative to vehicle, whereas a dose of 60 mg/kg achieved 21% tumor regression relative to initial tumor volume. Daily administration of AMG 176 achieved 84% TGI and 100% regression, respectively (Fig. 5B). Similarly, once-weekly oral administration of AMG 176 at doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg achieved 97% TGI and 70% regression, respectively (Fig. 5C). We next assessed the activity of AMG 176 in the MOLM13 luciferase-labeled orthotopic model of AML, in which tumor cells have engrafted in the bone marrow of mice. Twice-weekly oral administration of AMG 176 at 30 or 60 mg/kg resulted in significant dose-dependent inhibition of tumor burden as assessed by whole-body luminescence [28% and 69% reduction in bioluminescence imaging (BLI), respectively; Fig. 5D].

Several conditional knock-out studies have documented the dependency of B cells, monocytes, neutrophils, and/or their progenitors on MCL1 for survival, suggesting these cell types may serve as pharmacodynamic markers of MCL1 inhibition (24–27). Furthermore, the failure of AMG 176 to inhibit mouse MCL1 limits our understand-ing of the relationship between tolerability and effects on normal cell types at efficacious doses. To further inves-tigate these relationships, we generated a human MCL1 knock-in mouse, replacing the Mcl1 gene with its human ortholog (Supplementary Fig. S5). Ex vivo treatment of splenocytes with AM-8621 for 6 hours resulted in caspase 3 activation and reduced viability in B cells derived from human MCL1 knock-in, but not wild-type, mice (Supple-mentary Fig. S6). These effects translated in vivo where oral administration of AMG 176 at 30 and 60 mg/kg resulted in dose-dependent decreases in B cells, monocytes, and neutrophils in the blood (Fig. 5E; Supplementary Fig. S7). Similar reductions were observed in bone marrow, high-lighting the ability of AMG 176 to distribute into tissues. Broader complete blood count (CBC) analysis revealed additional effects on eosinophils, basophils, and reticu-locytes (Supplementary Fig. S8). No evidence of overt sys-temic toxicity was observed in either AMG 176 treatment group as determined by changes in body weight (Supple-mentary Fig. S9).






Figure 4. Cell lines from hematologic cancers, including multiple myeloma (MM), AML, and DLBCL, exhibit a strong dependency on MCL1 for survival. A, Profile of response to AM-8621 for 952 tumor–derived cell lines grouped by cancer subtype. SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; BCL, B-cell lymphoma; SCLC, small cell lung cancer. Top plot, cell line count; middle plot, distribution of maximum drug effect on cell viability (Emax); bottom plot, median IC50 (natural logarithm of µmol/L values). Effects on cell viability were measured by resazurin assay. B, Relative sensitivity of cancer subtypes and statisti-cal enrichment for sensitive cell lines. The volcano plot reports sensitivity to AM-8621 versus statistical significance [-log P value of the Fisher exact test performed using a 10 µmol/L threshold (maximum tolerated dose)] for classification into sensitive and resistant cell lines. Among all individual cancer subtypes included in viability screen, those that demonstrated statistically significant enrichments are shown. T-ALL, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia; B-ALL, B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. C, Effects of AM-8621 treatment on the viability of expanded panels of MM (n = 19), AML (n = 28), and DLBCL (n = 21) cell lines. Effects on cell viability were measured by CellTiter-Glo. Mean values from n = 2 to 5 biological replicates for individual cell lines. Black bars report mean and ±SD across indication. D, Comparison of sensitivity to AM-8621 versus venetoclax across MM, AML, and DLBCL cell line panels. E, Relationship between BCL-xL RNA expression and sensitivity to AM-8621 for those MM cell lines (n = 14) reported in Fig. 4C and D for which BCL-xL FPKM values were available from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (42).

Cel

l lin

es (

n)E

max

(vi

abili

ty r

atio

)M

edia

n Ln

IC50

100

80

60

40

20

01.2

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

76

5

4

3

2

10

Mye

lom

aA

ML

SC

C o

f ski

n

Oth

er h

emBC

L

Bon

e sa

rcom

aV

ulva

Rha

bdom

yosa

rcom

aB

reas

tE

win

g sa

rcom

aE

soph

agus

Neu

robl

asto

ma

Cer

vix

Ute

rus

Oth

er s

olid

SC

LCM

elan

oma

Pro

stat

eH

ead

and

neck

Live

rS

tom

ach

Ova

ryN

SC

LCB

iliar

y tr

act

Glio

ma

Kid

ney

Inte

stin

eT

hyro

idU

rinar

y tr

act

Pan

crea

sM

esot

helio

ma

A

C

MM

AML

DLBCL

0.01

0.1

1

10

AM

-862

1 IC

50 (

µmol

/L)

DMM

Venetoclax IC50 (µmol/L)

AM

-862

1 IC

50 (

µmol

/L)

0.1

1

10

0.100.1 101

AML


AM

-862

1 IC

50 (

µmol

/L)

0.1

1

10

0.100.1 101

DLBCL


AM

-862

1 IC

50 (

µmol

/L)

0.1

1

10

0.100.1 101

B

GliomaBreast

Kidney

Liver

NSCLC

Pancreas

AML

Myeloma

B-celllymphoma

B-ALL

T-ALL

B-cellleukemia Burkitt

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

−8.0 −6.0 −4.0 −2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0

−Log

P v

alue

Relative sensitivity

E

BCL-xL expression log2 FPKM

AM

-862

1 lo

g 10

IC50

(µm

ol/L

)

P value = 2.14 × 10−6

R 2 = 0.86(SK-MM-2 excluded)

SK-MM-2 (BCL-2 amp)

3 4 5 6 7

1.0

0.5

0.0

−0.5

−1.0

AMG 176 and AM-8621 Exhibit Activity in Combination with Clinically Relevant Agents That Target Hematologic Malignancies

Improved long-term survival in multiple myeloma has been achieved through combination therapy with protea-some inhibitors (PI), immunomodulatory drugs, and corti-costeroids (e.g., dexamethasone; ref. 28). To investigate the opportunity for combining an MCL1 inhibitor with cortico-steroids, we evaluated the effect of AM-8621 combined with

dexamethasone in a panel of multiple myeloma cell lines (OPM-2, KMS-11, and MM.1S; ref. 29). AM-8621 further potentiated the cytotoxic effects observed with dexametha-sone alone, exhibiting a synergistic interaction in each line (Supplementary Fig. S10). We also evaluated the synergistic potential of AM-8621 combined with the PI carfilzomib. Although a limited synergistic interaction was detected in U266B1 cells, the profound single-agent activity of AM-8621 and carfilzomib in other tested cell lines limited the opportunity






Figure 5. AMG 176 exhibits robust single-agent activity in vivo. A, Time- and dose-dependent effects of AMG 176 treatment on apoptotic markers (activated BAK, cleaved caspase-3, and cleaved PARP) in established OPM-2 luc tumors as measured in MSD immunoassays. B, Effects of AMG 176 on established OPM-2 luc tumor xenografts when dosed daily or on a 2-day on, 5-day off schedule. C, Effects of AMG 176 on established OPM-2 luc tumor xenografts when dosed once weekly. D, Effects of AMG 176 on MOLM13 luc orthotopic tumor xenografts when dosed on a 2-day-on, 5-day-off schedule. Representative day 15 bioluminescence images are shown. For xenograft studies, mean tumor volume or whole-body luminescence (dorsal + ventral image) ± SEM (n = 10/group) are reported. ***, P < 0.0001 (RMANOVA with Dunnett post hoc). E, Flow cytometry assessment of B cells, monocytes, and neutrophils in peripheral blood and bone marrow of human MCL1 knock-in mice following administration of AMG 176 24 hours after cycle 1 (day 3) and cycle 2 (day 10). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA with Dunnett post hoc).

1201,600 Vehicle

AMG 176 30 mg/kg dailyAMG 176 100 mg/kg 1×/wkAMG 176 50 mg/kg 1×/wkVehicle

AMG 176 60 mg/kg dailyAMG 176 30 mg/kg 2×/wkAMG 176 60 mg/kg 2×/wk

Tum

or v

olum

e (m

m3 )

Tum

or v

olum

e (m

m3 )1,400

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

010 15

Time (days after cell implantation)Time (days after cell implantation)

20 25 300

200400600800

1,0001,2001,4001,6001,8002,0002,200

10 15 20 25 302×/wkdaily

1×/wk

******

***

***

***

***

***

***

BAKCleaved caspase-3Cleaved PARP100

Rel

ativ

e ch

ange

80

60

40

20

0(h)

10 mg/kg

3 × 109

2 × 109

1 × 109

1.5 × 107

1.2 × 107

9 × 106

6 × 106

3 × 106

0

AMG 176

Vehicle

30 mg/kg

60 mg/kg

60 mg/kg

(WT)

Bio

lum

ines

cenc

e (p

hoto

ns/s

ec)

00 5 10

Time (days after cell implantation)

B cellsE

D

A B C

1501251007550250

175 20

0

2

4

6

8

10 12

10

8

6

4

2

0C

ount

s/µL

Cou

nts/

µL

Cou

nts/

µL

Cou

nts/

µL

24 h

r af

ter

cycl

e 1

24 h

r af

ter

cycl

e 2

24 h

r af

ter

cycl

e 2

Bon

e m

arro

wB

lood

Cou

nts/

µL

Cel

l #

1.5 × 107

1.2 × 107

9 × 106

6 × 106

3 × 106

AMG 176

Vehicle

30 mg/kg

60 mg/kg

60 mg/kg

(WT)

Cel

l #

2.4 × 106

2 × 106

1.6 × 106

1.2 × 106

8 × 105

4 × 105

0 0

AMG 176

Vehicle

30 mg/kg

60 mg/kg

60 mg/kg

(WT)

Cel

l #

Cou

nts/

µL

30252015

*

********

***

*

***

******

****

*

*

NeutrophilsMonocytes

1050

15

10

5

0

125150

1007550250

15 20 AMG 17660 mg/kg 2×/wk

AMG 17630 mg/kg 2×/wk

Vehicle

Dorsal Ventral Dorsal Ventral

2×/wk

VehicleAMG 176 30 mg/kg 2×/wkAMG 176 60 mg/kg 2×/wk

20 mg/kg 30 mg/kg 60 mg/kg

Veh 2 4 8 812 24 2 4 12 24 82 4 12 24 82 4 12 24






for detecting synergy (Supplementary Fig. S11). To further elucidate the therapeutic potential of this combination, we tested AMG 176 and carfilzomib in an orthotopic OPM-2 luciferase-labeled model. In mice treated once-daily with AMG 176 (20 mg/kg) and twice-weekly with carfilzomib (3 mg/kg), the combination achieved significant inhibition of tumor burden (99% reduction in BLI), exceeding the effect achieved with either single agent (85% and 82% reduction in BLI with AMG 176 and carfilzomib, respectively; Fig. 6A).

Combination therapy is a mainstay of AML treatment regi-mens as well, with induction therapy including nucleoside analogues (e.g., cytarabine), hypomethylating agents (e.g., decitabine), and anthracyclines (e.g., doxorubicin; ref. 30). Our observation that AML cell lines exhibit a range of sensitivi-ties to AM-8621 (Fig. 4C) suggested that combined therapy with standard-of-care (SOC) agents may further sensitize AML tumors to treatment with an MCL1 inhibitor. Thus, we char-acterized the effects of AM-8621 combined with cytarabine, decitabine, and doxorubicin on four AML cell lines (EOL-1, GDM-1, MOLM13, and MV-4-11). A synergistic interaction was observed with all three combinations across the cell line panel (Fig. 6B; Supplementary Fig. S12), highlighting the potential for combining MCL1 inhibitors with SOC agents in AML.

Cell line profiling studies with AM-8621 and venetoclax demonstrated sensitivity to either MCL1 inhibition alone, BCL2 inhibition alone, or both MCL1 and BCL2 inhibition in many AML lines (Fig. 4D), suggesting that combination therapy may provide benefit beyond selective inhibition of either protein alone. To test this hypothesis, we profiled the same panel of four AML cell lines with the combination of AM-8621 and venetoclax. A synergistic interaction was detected in each cell line (Fig. 6B; Supplementary Fig. S12), highlighting their codependence on MCL1 and BCL2. Next, we tested the combination of AMG 176 and venetoclax in the MOLM13 orthotopic model. Single-agent dose-finding stud-ies revealed significant activity with both compounds (Fig. 5D; Supplementary Fig. S13) and informed dose selection for use in combination. Mice harboring MOLM13 tumors were treated twice weekly with AMG 176 (30 mg/kg) and daily with venetoclax (50 mg/kg). Whereas both single agents achieved significant reductions in tumor burden (55% and 23% reduc-tion in BLI, respectively; Fig. 6C), the combination exhibited complete inhibition of tumor burden (100% reduction in BLI) and achieved regression relative to the first day of dosing.

We next sought to characterize the effects of this com-bination on subsets of hematopoietic cells in the human MCL1 knock-in mouse. The treatment schedule and dose for AMG 176 (twice-weekly at 30 mg/kg) and venetoclax (daily at 50 mg/kg) were selected based on observed efficacy in the MOLM13 model. Terminal analysis (24 hours after cycle 2 or day 10) of mice treated with the combination or AMG 176 alone showed significant decreases in peripheral blood B cells and monocytes, whereas venetoclax alone exhibited sig-nificant reductions in B cells only (Fig. 6D). The combina-tion was well tolerated, and no evidence of overt toxicity was observed as determined by changes in body weight at the doses selected for this study (Fig. 6E).

AM-8621 was next tested in a panel of primary AML patient samples (Supplementary Table S4). Most of the samples exhib-ited some degree of sensitivity to AM-8621 treatment, whereas

a subset (AML 9, AML 10, and AML 13) were profoundly sensitive (LC50 ≤ 2 nmol/L; Fig. 7A and B). Given the synergy observed with AM-8621 when combined with venetoclax and SOC chemotherapeutics in AML cell lines, we evaluated these combinations in the primary patient samples. Strikingly, in 9 of 13 samples, combination of equimolar concentrations of AM-8621 and venetoclax achieved marked improvements in activity and potency over either single agent alone, whereas only one sample was relatively insensitive to the combination (AML 11; Fig. 7A and B). Combination with idarubicin also exhibited improvement in potency in 6 of 10 samples tested, with 1 sample (AML 2) exhibiting a >1,000-fold improvement. It is important to note that these experiments were conducted in the absence of stromal cells and factors, which are thought to provide a supportive environment for leukemic blasts. Con-sequently, it should be noted that the absence of these factors may further sensitize the cells to treatment.

DISCUSSIONMCL1 is a compelling therapeutic target in cancer. Studies

using genetic knockdown and pharmacologic inhibition have demonstrated MCL1’s role as a critical prosurvival factor in many tumor types, including multiple myeloma, AML, B-cell lymphomas, and breast cancer (9, 11–14, 31, 32). Furthermore, MCL1 has been implicated as a resistance factor to BH3 mimet-ics targeting BCL2 and BCL-xL (33), as well as chemotherapeu-tic agents (34), further underscoring the therapeutic potential of inhibitors targeting this prosurvival BCL2 family member.

We describe the discovery of AMG 176, a first-in-class MCL1 inhibitor in clinical development for hematologic malignancies. The development of potent and selective MCL1 inhibitors has been challenging due to the high affinity of its native ligands and shallow binding pocket. The discovery of AMG 176 represents an innovative approach for overcoming these significant obstacles. Driving potency, selectivity, and pharmacokinetic properties through conformational restric-tion guided by structure-based design has yielded a series of rigid macrocyclic inhibitors that primarily displayed the bioactive conformation. The identification of AMG 176 illus-trates that conformational restriction provides an effective approach to small-molecule design with potential applica-tion for targets previously considered undruggable (17).

Tumor cell line profiling studies with the tool compound, AM-8621, implicated a key role for MCL1 in cell lines derived from hematologic malignancies, including multiple myeloma, AML, and B-cell lymphoma. Whereas AML and DLBCL lines frequently exhibited codependence on MCL1 and BCL2, mul-tiple myeloma lines showed a predominant dependency on MCL1, highlighting the promise for MCL1 inhibitors in this setting. Consistent with prior reports (16, 35), elevated BCL-xL expression was identified as the strongest predictor of resist-ance. In addition, the expression of BAK was found to be the strongest predictor of sensitivity. These findings are not unex-pected considering the redundant prosurvival role of BCL-xL and the function of BAK as the key executioner protein for MCL1. Given the feasibility of measuring these endpoints in the clinic, both BCL-xL and BAK may serve as biomarkers for patient stratification and shed light on potential mechanisms of resistance to MCL1 inhibitors in the clinic.






Figure 6. AMG 176 exhibits activity when combined with clinically relevant agents that target hematologic malignancies. A, Combination effects of AMG 176 plus carfilzomib on OPM-2 luc orthotopic tumor xenografts. Mean hind limb bioluminescence ± SEM (n = 10/group) is reported for each group. ***, P < 0.0005 (RMANOVA for comparisons of the combination treatment to each single agent). Representative day 19 bioluminescence images are shown. B, Synergy scores for in vitro combination studies in AML cell lines treated with combinations of AM-8621 and SOC chemotherapeutics (cytara-bine, decitabine, and doxorubicin) or venetoclax. Effects on cell viability were measured by CellTiter-Glo. Higher scores reflect stronger synergistic inter-action (darker red). C, Combination effects of AMG 176 plus venetoclax on MOLM13 luc orthotopic tumor xenografts. Mean whole-body bioluminescence (dorsal + ventral image) ± SEM (n = 10/group) is reported for each group. ****, P < 0.0001 (RMANOVA for comparisons of the combination treatment to each single agent). Representative day 17 bioluminescence images are shown. D, Flow cytometry assessment of B cells, monocytes, and neutrophils in peripheral blood from human MCL1 knock-in mice treated with AMG 176 alone or combined with venetoclax 24 hours after cycles 1 (day 3) and 2 (day 10). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA with Dunnett post hoc). E, Observed body weights in human MCL1 knock-in mice following treatment with AMG 176, venetoclax, or AMG 176 and venetoclax combined. Data are reported as % mean average body weight compared with % pretreatment body weight ± SEM (n = 5/group).

Vehicle

Day 12

Day 15

Day 19

Day 12

Day 15

Day 19

AMG 176

CarfilzomibAMG 176 +carfilzomib

109 Vehicle

***

Carfilzomib 3 mg/kg 2×/wkAMG 176 20 mg/kg dailyAMG 176 20 mg/kg daily +carfilzomib 3 mg/kg 2×/wk

108

Bio

lum

ines

cenc

e (p

hoto

ns/s

ec)

107

106

105

0 5 10


15 20Carfilzomib 2×/wkAMG 176 daily

A24

hr

afte

rcy

cle

1

B cells

500****

********

***400

300

200

Cou

nts/

µL

100

0

Vehic

le

AMG 1

76 3

0 m

g/kg

Vene

tocla

x 50

mg/

kg

Combo

Combo

(WT)

250

200

150

100

50

0

Cou

nts/

µL

Vehic

le

AMG 1

76 3

0 m

g/kg

Vene

tocla

x 50

mg/

kg

Combo

Combo

(WT)

800

600

400

200

0

********

******

Cou

nts/

µL

24 h

r af

ter

cycl

e 2

Vehic

le

AMG 1

76 3

0 m

g/kg

Vene

tocla

x 50

mg/

kg

Combo

Combo

(WT)

100

80

60

40

20

0

*****

Cou

nts/

µL

Vehic

le

AMG 1

76 3

0 m

g/kg

Vene

tocla

x 50

mg/

kg

Combo

Combo

(WT)

1751501251007550250

Cou

nts/

µL

Vehic

le

AMG 1

76 3

0 m

g/kg

Vene

tocla

x 50

mg/

kg

Combo

Combo

(WT)

80

60

40

20

0

*

Cou

nts/

µL

Vehic

le

AMG 1

76 3

0 m

g/kg

Vene

tocla

x 50

mg/

kg

Combo

Combo

(WT)

Monocytes NeutrophilsD

110

% In

itial

bod

y w

eigh

t

DayAMG 176 2×/wkVenetoclax daily

100

90VehicleAMG 176 30 mg/kgVenetoclax 50 mg/kgAMG 176 30 mg/kg +venetoclax 50 mg/kgAMG 176 30 mg/kg +venetoclax 50 mg/kg (WT)

80

700 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

E

B

EOL-1 9.8 24.9 6.6 15.8

6.7 10.6 5.3 41.4

14.2 20.2 14.3 21.1

11 24.5 8.1 15.7

AM-8621 + cytarabine

AM-8621 + decitabine

AM-8621 + doxorubicin

AM-8621 + venetoclax

GDM-1

MOLM13

MV-4-11

****

5 × 109

VehicleAMG 176 30 mg/kg 2×/wkVenetoclax 50 mg/kg dailyAMG 176 30 mg/kg 2×/wk +venetoclax 50 mg/kg daily

4 × 109

Bio

lum

ines

cenc

e (p

hoto

ns/s

ec)

3 × 109

2 × 109

1 × 109

0

0 5 10 15 20


AMG 176 2×/wkVenetoclax daily

CDorsal

Vehicle

AMG 176

Venetoclax

AMG 176 +venetoclax

Ventral Dorsal Ventral






A notable feature of this class of MCL1 inhibitors is their rapid induction of apoptosis in hematologic cancer cell lines, providing clear rationale for testing the clinical mol-ecule AMG 176 with discontinuous dosing strategies. In vivo, robust TGI was observed with once- and twice-weekly dos-ing schedules. These findings have important implications for the clinical development of AMG 176, as they offer the promise of greater flexibility in dosing schedules to mitigate potential on-target toxicities without sacrificing efficacy.

Given the lack of activity of AMG 176 on murine MCL1, we generated a human MCL1 knock-in mouse to facilitate an improved understanding of the relationship between MCL1 inhibition at efficacious exposures and its effects on normal tissues. In contrast to published MCL1 gene ablation stud-ies where MCL1 knockout resulted in lethality, inhibition of MCL1 at efficacious and pharmacodynamically active doses

of AMG 176 was tolerated in the knock-in mice (36, 37). In addition, for the first time we have demonstrated an effect on normal tissues with an MCL1 inhibitor at tolerated and efficacious exposures. Consistent with data from conditional MCL1 gene ablation studies, AMG 176 treatment significantly reduced B cells, monocytes, and neutrophils at exposures required for TGI (24–27). These data suggest that reductions in these cell types may serve as pharmacodynamic endpoints.

The codependency of many cell lines on MCL1 and BCL2 suggests that their combined inhibition has the potential for improved efficacy in indications such as AML. This hypothesis was supported by the robust activity observed with the com-binations of AM-8621/AMG 176 and venetoclax in AML cell lines, xenograft models, and primary patient samples. We also utilized human MCL1 knock-in mice to test the relationship between the tolerability of this combination and effects on

Figure 7. AM-8621 is active against primary AML samples as a single agent and when combined with clinically relevant therapeutics. A, Dose–response curves showing primary AML samples gated on blasts and viability assessed after 48-hour incubation with indicated drugs. B, Normalized LC50 (50% lethal concentration) viability values comparing AM-8621 combined with indicated drugs after 48 hours of treatment.

A

AML 3 AML 5 AML 7 AML 12

Concentration (µmol/L)0.

0001

0.00

10.

01 0.1 1 10


0001

0.00

10.

01 0.1 1 10


0001

0.00

10.

01 0.1 1 10


0001

0.00

10.

01 0.1 1 10

Via

ble

cells

(%

)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Via

ble

cells

(%

)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Via

ble

cells

(%

)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Via

ble

cells

(%

)

0

20

40

60

80

100

AM-8621 Venetoclax AM-8621 + venetoclax

BLC50 (µmol/L) values

AML 1

AML 2

AML 3

AML 4

AML 5

AML 6

AML 7

AML 8

AML 9

AML 10

AML 11

AML 12

AML 13

3.077

>10

8.998

1.291

1.057

>10

>10

>10

1.574

0.358

0.532

0.119

0.800

0.787

16.300

5.852

17.600

1.677

37.560

4.989

8.060

0.004

0.004

N/A

N/A

N/A

0.125

0.442

0.047

0.041

0.023

0.068

0.001

0.388

<0.001

<0.001

0.966

0.009

<0.001

0.034

>10

0.013

0.103

0.007

>10

>10

>10

>10

>10

0.507

0.354

0.411

11.500

>100

>100

>100

3.268

22.990

>100

>100

>100

59.780

9.673

9.979

6.046

0.002

0.001

0.006

0.044

0.007

>10

0.009

0.529

<0.001

<0.001

N/A

N/A

N/A

>10

7.481

1.822

3.995

1.451

6.913

1.882

4.729

<0.001

<0.001

0.2152

1.51

0.002

VenetoclaxAM-8621 +

Ara-CAM-8621 +venetoclaxIdarubicinAra-C

AM-8621 +idarubicinAM-8621






pharmacodynamic endpoints. Administration of venetoclax and AMG 176 on a schedule achieving continuous BCL2 and intermittent MCL1 inhibition was well tolerated while demon-strating significant reductions in B cells and monocytes. Given this compelling data, combined treatment with AMG 176 and venetoclax has promising therapeutic potential in AML.

The dependency of a broad range of hematopoietic tumor types on MCL1 for survival highlights the exciting therapeu-tic promise for MCL1 inhibitors. AMG 176 is the first MCL1 inhibitor to enter clinical development and has the potential to significantly expand the clinical opportunity for BH3 mimetics in the treatment of cancer.

METHODSClinical Candidate Synthesis

AMG 176 (1S,3′R,6′R,7′S,8′E,11′S,12′R)-6-chloro-7′-methoxy-11′,12′-dimethyl-3,4-dyhydro-2H,15′H-spiro[naphthalene-1,22′-[20]oxa[13]thia[1,14]diazatetracyclo[14.7.2.03,6.019,24]pentacosa[8,16,18,24]tetraen]-15′-one-13′, 13′-dioxide) and other small-molecule inhibitors of MCL1 described were synthesized at Amgen Inc. (38).

Conformational Energy CalculationsDetails of conformational energy calculations are described in the

Supplementary Information.

Time-Resolved Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Binding Assays

Recombinant 6XHis-tagged human MCL1 (171-327), dog MCL1 (171-327, C286S), mouse MCL1 (152-308), and BCL-xL (1-196) were produced at Amgen Inc. Proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli (E. coli) and purified using metal ion affinity chromatography and size-exclusion chromatography. Recombinant 10XHis-tagged human BCL2 (2-211) was purchased from R&D Systems. Human Biotin-Bim BH3 peptide (Biotin-DMRPEIWIAQELRRIGDEFNAYYARR) and mouse Biotin-Bim BH3 peptide (Biotin-DLRPEIRIAQELRRI-GDEFNETYTRR) were custom-synthesized by CPC Scientific.

Inhibition of the interaction between Biotin-Bim BH3 peptide and MCL1, BCL2, or BCL-xL was measured using time-resolved fluores-cence resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET) assays conducted in 384-well white OptiPlates (PerkinElmer) with a total volume of 40 µL/ well in binding buffer (20 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 0.016 mmol/L Brij35, and 1 mmol/L DTT). Serially diluted test compounds were preincubated with Biotin-Bim BH3 peptide and protein (MCL1, BCL2, or BCL-xL) for 60 minutes before addition of the detection mixture [LANCE Eu-W1024 Anti-6×His (PerkinElmer) and Streptavidin-XLent (Cisbio US)]. Plates were further incu-bated overnight and then read on an EnVision Multilabel Reader (PerkinElmer; see Supplementary Information).

Fluorescence Polarization Binding AssayA fluorescence polarization (FP) assay was used to measure inhibi-

tion of the human MCL1/BIM interaction. Human MCL1 (171–327) was prepared as described above. TAMRA-labeled BIM BH3 pep-tide (TAMRA-GWIAQELRRIGDEF) was produced internally using standard Fmoc chemistry. The FP binding assay was conducted in 384-well black OptiPlates with a total volume of 40 µL/well in the same binding buffer used in the TR-FRET assay. Serially diluted test compounds were incubated with 13.2 nmol/L human MCL1 and 5 nmol/L TAMRA-labeled BIM BH3 peptide for 120 minutes before FP was measured on an EnVision Multilabel Reader with excita-tion and emission filters at 531 and 595 nm, respectively, and a dual 555/595 nm dichroic mirror. IC50 values were determined as

described in the TR-FRET methods (see Supplementary Informa-tion).

MCL1 Crystallography and Structure DeterminationHuman MCL1 (171-327) with a cleavable N-terminal GST tag

was expressed in E. coli and purified using glutathione affinity chro-matography. The N-terminal GST tag was cleaved by thrombin. Untagged MCL1 was purified by cation exchange chromatography. Purified MCL1 (10 mg/mL) was incubated with 3-fold excess amount of inhibitor at 4°C for 30 minutes before crystallization. Crystals of MCL1 with inhibitors were obtained at 4°C in hanging drops with 100 mmol/L Tris, pH 8.0, 3% methanol, and 30% to 42.5% PEG6000. Paratone-N mineral oil was used as cryoprotectant. Diffraction data were collected on beamline 21-ID-F at the Advanced Photon Source and processed and scaled with HKL 2000. The cocrystal structures were solved by molecular replacement with AMoRe using PDB entry code 2PQK as the template. Model building was performed with COOT with REFMAC refinement.

NMR and Isothermal Titration CalorimetryDue to the limited solubility of compound 1, the isothermal titration

calorimetry (ITC) with the VP-ITC instrument (Malvern, Inc.) was per-formed in the “reverse” mode, where the protein (100 µmol/L) was titrated into the low concentration (7 µmol/L) of the ligand. NMR experiments were performed using a Bruker 800 MHz spectrometer equipped with the TCI cryoprobe and U-13C,15N - hMCL1 C893S protein (39–41). Spec-tral assignments of key residues in the hMCL1:6 complex were based on the standard nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) spectroscopy (NOESY) with heteronuclear single quantum coherence spectroscopy (NOESY-HSQC) experiment, performed on a sample prepared as 1:1 mixture of hMCL1:6 complex and apo-hMCL1, where the letter was previously assigned. This experiment was performed at 310K to enhance chemical-exchange rates (up to 2 s−1) between free and bound protein forms. The intraligand and ligand to protein NOEs were obtained from the 2-D X-filtered NOESY and {3,2}-X–filtered NOESY-HSQC as described pre-viously (41). The 3-D structure of the hMCL1:6 complex was obtained by the “NOE guided” docking of 6 to the whole NMR ensemble (20 structures) of the apo-hMCL1. Computations were performed with in-house–developed scripts in Matlab; the final structure was energy-minimized in Molecular Operating Environment software.

Cell LinesTumor cell lines were obtained from commercially available sources

including the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources (JCRB), and German Collec-tion of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ). Cell lines were passaged for <1 month before banking and experimentation. With the exception of the 952 cell line profiling screen, all cell lines were cultured in ATCC-, DSMZ-, or JCRB-recommended growth media containing 10% FBS, except where specified. Growth media and cul-ture conditions for the 952 cell line profiling screen were described previously (23). Authentication of cell lines was performed with short- tandem repeat DNA typing. Using an RT-PCR–based assay, all cell lines used for in vivo studies were tested for Mycoplasma contamination before use; cell lines used in in vitro studies were tested periodically.

Split Luciferase Complementation AssayHEK293M cells were transiently transfected with pcDNA mam-

malian expression vectors encoding amino acids 1–298 of firefly lucif-erase fused to human BAK [pcDNA-Luc (1–298)—BAK] and amino acids 395–550 of firefly luciferase fused to human MCL1 [pcDNA-Luc (395–550)—MCL1] at a ratio of 3:1, respectively. Transient trans-fection was performed using Lipofectamine LTX and PLUS reagent (ThermoFisher). Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were






collected using non–enzyme-based cell dissociation buffer Accutase (Innovative Cell Technologies) and resuspended in Opti-MEM (Ther-moFisher) without serum. Cells were seeded in 96-well assay plates (5,000 cells/well) and treated with AM-8621 for 4 hours. Following compound treatment, 30 µL of Steady-Glo Luciferase detection rea-gent (Promega) was added to each well. Signal was read on an EnVi-sion Multilabel Reader. Peak luciferase signal in DMSO-treated wells was normalized to percent of control (POC) = 100. Luciferase signal from no cell control wells was normalized to POC = 0.

Immunoblot AnalysisDetails of the immunoblot experiments are described in the Sup-

plementary Information.

qPCR Analysis of MCL1 TranscriptU266B1 cells were seeded at a density of 3 × 106 cells/10 cm tissue cul-

ture dish and incubated overnight at 37°C in 5% CO2. Cells were treated with indicated concentrations of AM-8621 for 24 hours followed by wash with PBS. RNeasy Mini Kits (Qiagen) were used to isolate RNA from cells per the manufacturer’s protocol. MCL1 transcript levels were measured with the TaqMan One-Step RT-PCR Master Mix Reagents Kit and TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (ThermoFisher). Quantitative qRT-PCR were run as four technical replicates and assayed using the Prism 7900HT (Applied Biosystems), applying the relative quantifica-tion (ΔΔCt) method. Data were analyzed with SDS2.3, RQ Manager v1.2, and Data Assist v3.01 software (Applied Biosystems), using glycer-aldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase as the endogenous control.

MCL1 Half-Life ExperimentsU266B1 cells were seeded at a density of 1.5 × 106 cells/well in

6-well tissue culture plates and incubated overnight at 37°C and 5% CO2. Cells were pretreated with DMSO or AM-8621 at a concentra-tion of 2 µmol/L for 4 hours. Cycloheximide was then added at a final concentration of 100 µg/mL to arrest bulk translation. Cell lysates were harvested at indicated time points after cycloheximide addition and subjected to immunoblot analysis.

Caspase 3/7 Activity AssayCells were seeded at optimized densities in 96-well tissue culture

plates, incubated overnight at 37°C in 5% CO2, and treated with AM-8621 at indicated concentrations for 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, or 24 hours. Plates were equilibrated to room temperature (RT) for 30 minutes before the addition of reconstituted Caspase-Glo 3/7 reagent (Pro-mega). Plates were shaken for 2 minutes at RT followed by incubation for 30 additional minutes without shaking. Luminescence was read on an EnVision Multilabel Reader; 100% caspase 3/7 activity was defined as the maximal observed signal for a given cell line over the course of the experiment.

AM-8621 Washout Viability StudiesCells were seeded at optimized densities in 96-well tissue culture

plates, incubated overnight at 37°C in 5% CO2, and treated with a 9-point serial dilution of AM-8621, using a top concentration of 6.7 µmol/L, 1:3 serial dilution steps, and a DMSO-only control. Following compound treatment for indicated durations, cells were washed 4 times and returned to growth media in the absence of compound for the duration of the 24-hour experiment. Effects on cell viability were measured with the CellTiter-Glo viability assay (Pro-mega) as follows. Treated cells and CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay reagents (Promega) were allowed to equilibrate to RT, and 100 µL aliquots of reconstituted CellTiter-Glo reagent were added to each well of AMG-8621–treated cells. Assay plates were shaken for 2 minutes followed by incubation at RT for 10 minutes. Plates were then read on an EnVision Multilabel Reader.

Tumor Cell Line Profiling ScreensDetails of the tumor cell line profiling experiments are described in

the Supplementary Information.

Elastic Net ModelDetails of the elastic net model are described in the Supplementary

Information.

BCL-xL ImmunoassayLysates from indicated multiple myeloma cell lines were prepared in

MSD lysis buffer. Custom BCL-xL capture plates were developed using a total BCL-xL antibody (R&D Systems, 840767). Capture plates were blocked in MSD blocking solution A for 1 hour at RT with shaking. Plates were then washed 3 times, followed by the addition of 20 µg/well of lysate. Lysates were incubated with shaking for 1 hour at RT. Plates were then washed 3 times followed by the addition of a BCL-xL detection antibody (Cell Signaling Technologies, 2746). Plates were incubated at RT for 1 hour with shaking. Plates were then washed 3 times followed by the addition of MSD read buffer. Plates were read on an MSD SI6000 plate reader. To obtain BCL-xL protein levels for individual multiple myeloma cell lines, a standard curve of AGS (a multiple myeloma cell line with high BCL-xL expression) lysate was run on each plate to ensure lysates from individual multiple myeloma cell lines fell within the linear range of the assay. Relative BCL-xL pro-tein levels were then calculated using the AGS standard curve.

MCL1:BIM Complex ImmunoassayDetails of the immunoassay are reported in the Supplementary

Information.

In Vitro Combination StudiesIn vitro combination studies were carried out as previously

described (29); additional details are described in the Supplementary Information.

Generation of Human MCL1 Knock-In MouseHuman MCL1 knock-in mice were created by targeting C57BL/6

embryonic stem cells (The Jackson Laboratory) with a targeting vector containing the full human MCL1 genomic locus flanked by homologous mouse sequences upstream and downstream of the mouse MCL1 genomic locus. Additional detail is included in the Sup-plementary Information.

Ex Vivo Analysis of Mouse SplenocytesDetails are described in the Supplementary Information.

Flow Cytometry–Based BAK Activation AssayDetails are described in the Supplementary Information.

Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Active BAK, Cleaved PARP, and Cleaved Caspase-3 in Subcutaneous Human Tumor Models

Pharmacodynamic methods are described in the Supplementary Information.

ImmunohistochemistryImmunohistochemistry experiments were performed as described

in the Supplementary Information.

Subcutaneous Human Tumor ModelsMultiple myeloma cells (cell line OPM-2 luc) were injected s.c.

in the right flank of mice (5 × 106 cells). Tumor volume (mm3) was






measured using electronic calipers twice per week. Once tumors reached an average of approximately 150 mm3, animals were rand-omized into groups (n = 10 per group) such that the average tumor volume at the beginning of treatment administration was uniform across treatment groups. Animals were then orally administered with AMG 176 daily, 2×/week, or 1×/week. Clinical signs, body-weight changes, and tumor growth were measured 2×/week until study termination.

Orthotopic Human Tumor ModelsFirefly luciferase–labeled OPM-2 or MOLM13 cells were injected

i.v. into the tail vein of NOD/SCID IL2rg or athymic nude mice, respectively. Tumor BLI was measured using Xenogen IVIS 200 twice per week. Once tumors reached an average BLI of 1 × 105 photons/second, animals were randomized into groups (n = 10 per group) such that the average BLI at the beginning of treatment administration was uniform across treatment groups. Animals were then orally administered AMG 176 daily for carfilzomib com-bination studies and 2×/week for venetoclax combination studies. Carfilzomib was administered i.v. 2×/week for 6 doses, begin-ning on the same day at the same time as AMG 176. Venetoclax was administered orally every day, beginning on the same day, 4 hours after AMG 176 administration. Clinical signs, body-weight changes, and tumor BLI were measured 2 times per week until study termination.

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Monocytes and B Cells from Human MCL1 Knock-In Mice

Details are described in the Supplementary Information.

CBC AnalysisDetails described in the Supplementary Information.

Statistical Analysis of In Vivo StudiesSingle-agent in vivo efficacy data were analyzed by RMANOVA fol-

lowed by Dunnett correction. Combination in vivo efficacy data were analyzed by repetitive two-group RMANOVA analyses between the combination group and each of the relevant single-agent controls. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett correction was applied for analysis of flow cytometry data.

Animal CareCages were changed once per week. Harlan Teklad Sterilizable Rodent

Diet 8656 and reverse-osmosis water from the Amgen water supply system were supplied ad libitum. RT was maintained between 68°F and 72°F, and relative humidity was maintained between 34% and 73%. The laboratory housing the cages provided a 12-hour light cycle and met all Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care specifications. All in vivo experiments were conducted under Insti-tutional Animal Care and Use Committee–approved protocols.

Primary Patient SamplesDetails are described in the Supplementary Information.

Ex Vivo Drug Testing of Primary AML Patient SamplesDetails are described in the Supplementary Information.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of InterestS. Caenepeel is Senior Scientist at Amgen Inc. and has ownership

interest (including stock, patents, etc.) in the same. S.P. Brown has ownership interest (including stock, patents, etc.) in Amgen Inc. D.A. Whittington was Principal Scientist at Amgen Inc. at the time this research was conducted, and has ownership interest (including stock,

patents, etc.) in Amgen Inc. A.C. Cheng has ownership interest (includ-ing stock, patents, etc.) in Amgen Inc. J. Houze has ownership interest (including stock, patents, etc.) in Amgen Inc. B. Lucas has ownership interest (including stock, patents, etc.) in Amgen Inc. N.A. Paras is Associate Professor at UCSF Institute for Neurodegenerative Diseases. A. Coxon has ownership interest (including stock, patents, etc.) in Amgen Inc. P.E. Hughes has ownership interest (including stock, patents, etc.) in Amgen Inc. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

Authors’ ContributionsConception and design: S. Caenepeel, S.P. Brown, B. Belmontes, G. Moody, K.S. Keegan, D.A. Whittington, A.C. Cheng, M. Cardozo, Y. Li, B. Lucas, X. Wang, J.P. Taygerly, M. Zancanella, L. Zhu, P. Beltran, D.C. Huang, J. Canon, A. Coxon, P.E. HughesDevelopment of methodology: S. Caenepeel, S.P. Brown, B. Belmontes, G. Moody, K.S. Keegan, A.C. Cheng, J. Houze, B. Lucas, J.P. Taygerly, M. Zancanella, L. Zhu, E. Cajulis, J. Sun, J. Gong, P. Beltran, P.E. HughesAcquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): S. Caenepeel, B. Belmontes, D. Chui, D.A. Whittington, X. Huang, J. Houze, J.P. Taygerly, M. Vimolratana, L. Zhu, E. Cajulis, T. Osgood, J. Sun, L. Damon, R.K. Egan, J.D. McClanaghan, J. Gong, D. Moujalled, G. Pomilio, A.W. Roberts, D.C. Huang, A. WeiAnalysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): S. Caenepeel, S.P. Brown, B. Belmontes, G. Moody, D.A. Whittington, X. Huang, A.C. Cheng, M. Cardozo, J. Houze, B. Lucas, J.P. Taygerly, M. Vimolratana, M. Zancanella, T. Osgood, J. Sun, L. Damon, J. Gong, D. Moujalled, G. Pomilio, P. Beltran, A.W. Roberts, D.C. Huang, A. Wei, J. Canon, P.E. HughesWriting, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: S. Caenepeel, S.P. Brown, B. Belmontes, G. Moody, K.S. Keegan, D. Chui, A.C. Cheng, J.P. Taygerly, C.H. Benes, A.W. Roberts, D.C. Huang, A. Wei, J. Canon, A. Coxon, P.E. HughesAdministrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): S.P. Brown, D.A. Whittington, A.C. Cheng, J. Houze, M. Vimolratana, E. Cajulis, T. Osgood, L. Damon, P. Greninger, J. Gong, C.H. BenesStudy supervision: S. Caenepeel, S.P. Brown, B. Belmontes, G. Moody, D.A. Whittington, P. Beltran, D.C. Huang, A. Wei, J. CanonOther (synthesis of compounds): S.P. BrownOther (contributed the NMR study): L. PoppeOther (contributed to design of AMG 176 and its synthesis): N.A. Paras

AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by Amgen Inc. BAK−/−BAX−/− cell line

experiments were supported by scholarships, fellowships, and grants from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [NHMRC; Research Fellowships to A.W. Roberts and the Department of Community Services and Health (DCSH); Project Grants to DCSH 1057742; Program Grants 1016647, 1016701; Independent Research Institutes Infrastructure Support Scheme grant 9000220], the Can-cer Council Victoria (grant-in-aid to A.W. Roberts and DCSH), the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (SCOR grants 7001-13), the Aus-tralian Cancer Research Foundation, and a Victorian State Govern-ment Operational Infrastructure Support grant. The authors thank Jin Tang for assistance with protein purification and Victor Cee for critical evaluation of the manuscript. Ben Scott, PhD (Scott Medical Communications, LLC), and Beate Quednau, PhD (Amgen Inc.), pro-vided medical writing assistance funded by Amgen Inc.

Received April 9, 2018; revised August 29, 2018; accepted September 24, 2018; published first September 25, 2018.






REFERENCES 1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

Cell 2011;144:646–74. 2. Delbridge AR, Grabow S, Strasser A, Vaux DL. Thirty years of BCL-2:

translating cell death discoveries into novel cancer therapies. Nat Rev Cancer 2016;16:99–109.

3. Czabotar PE, Lessene G, Strasser A, Adams JM. Control of apoptosis by the BCL-2 protein family: implications for physiology and therapy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2014;15:49–63.

4. Adams JM, Cory S. The Bcl-2 apoptotic switch in cancer development and therapy. Oncogene 2007;26:1324–37.

5. Ashkenazi A, Fairbrother WJ, Leverson JD, Souers AJ. From basic apoptosis discoveries to advanced selective BCL-2 family inhibitors. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2017;16:273–84.

6. Roberts AW, Davids MS, Pagel JM, Kahl BS, Puvvada SD, Gerecitano JF, et al. Targeting BCL2 with venetoclax in relapsed chronic lympho-cytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2016;374:311–22.

7. Kumar S, Kaufman JL, Gasparetto C, Mikhael J, Vij R, Pegourie B, et al. Efficacy of venetoclax as targeted therapy for relapsed/refractory t(11;14) multiple myeloma. Blood 2017;130:2401–9.

8. Konopleva M, Pollyea DA, Potluri J, Chyla B, Hogdal L, Busman T, et al. Efficacy and biological correlates of response in a phase II study of venetoclax monotherapy in patients with acute myelogenous leu-kemia. Cancer Discov 2016;6:1106–17.

9. Gong JN, Khong T, Segal D, Yao Y, Riffkin CD, Garnier JM, et al. Hierarchy for targeting prosurvival BCL2 family proteins in multiple myeloma: pivotal role of MCL1. Blood 2016;128:1834–44.

10. Peperzak V, Vikstrom I, Walker J, Glaser SP, LePage M, Coquery CM, et al. Mcl-1 is essential for the survival of plasma cells. Nat Immunol 2013;14:290–7.

11. Glaser SP, Lee EF, Trounson E, Bouillet P, Wei A, Fairlie WD, et al. Anti-apoptotic Mcl-1 is essential for the development and sustained growth of acute myeloid leukemia. Genes Dev 2012;26:120–5.

12. Grabow S, Delbridge AR, Aubrey BJ, Vandenberg CJ, Strasser A. Loss of a single Mcl-1 allele inhibits MYC-driven lymphomagenesis by sensitizing Pro-B cells to apoptosis. Cell Rep 2016;14:2337–47.

13. Kelly GL, Grabow S, Glaser SP, Fitzsimmons L, Aubrey BJ, Okamoto T, et al. Targeting of MCL-1 kills MYC-driven mouse and human lym-phomas even when they bear mutations in p53. Genes Dev 2014;28: 58–70.

14. Tiedemann RE, Zhu YX, Schmidt J, Shi CX, Sereduk C, Yin H, et al. Identification of molecular vulnerabilities in human multiple mye-loma cells by RNA interference lethality screening of the druggable genome. Cancer Res 2012;72:757–68.

15. Tzelepis K, Koike-Yusa H, De Braekeleer E, Li Y, Metzakopian E, Dovey OM, et al. A CRISPR dropout screen identifies genetic vulner-abilities and therapeutic targets in acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Rep 2016;17:1193–205.

16. Kotschy A, Szlavik Z, Murray J, Davidson J, Maragno AL, Le Toumelin- Braizat G, et al. The MCL1 inhibitor S63845 is tolerable and effective in diverse cancer models. Nature 2016;538:477–82.

17. Brameld KA, Kuhn B, Reuter DC, Stahl M. Small molecule confor-mational preferences derived from crystal structure data. A medicinal chemistry focused analysis. J Chem Inf Model 2008;48:1–24.

18. Erlanson DA, Fesik SW, Hubbard RE, Jahnke W, Jhoti H. Twenty years on: the impact of fragments on drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2016;15:605–19.

19. Huggins DJ, Sherman W, Tidor B. Rational approaches to improving selectivity in drug design. J Med Chem 2012;55:1424–44.

20. Fire E, Gulla SV, Grant RA, Keating AE. Mcl-1-Bim complexes accom-modate surprising point mutations via minor structural changes. Protein Sci 2010;19:507–19.

21. Ozawa T, Kaihara A, Sato M, Tachihara K, Umezawa Y. Split lucif-erase as an optical probe for detecting protein-protein interac-tions in mammalian cells based on protein splicing. Anal Chem 2001;73:2516–21.

22. Leverson JD, Zhang H, Chen J, Tahir SK, Phillips DC, Xue J, et al. Potent and selective small-molecule MCL-1 inhibitors demonstrate on-target cancer cell killing activity as single agents and in combina-tion with ABT-263 (navitoclax). Cell Death Dis 2015;6:e1590.

23. Garnett MJ, Edelman EJ, Heidorn SJ, Greenman CD, Dastur A, Lau KW, et al. Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sen-sitivity in cancer cells. Nature 2012;483:570–5.

24. Perciavalle RM, Opferman JT. Delving deeper: MCL-1’s contributions to normal and cancer biology. Trends Cell Biol 2013;23:22–9.

25. Vikstrom I, Carotta S, Luthje K, Peperzak V, Jost PJ, Glaser S, et al. Mcl-1 is essential for germinal center formation and B cell memory. Science 2010;330:1095–9.

26. Vikstrom IB, Slomp A, Carrington EM, Moesbergen LM, Chang C, Kelly GL, et al. MCL-1 is required throughout B-cell development and its loss sensitizes specific B-cell subsets to inhibition of BCL-2 or BCL-XL. Cell Death Dis 2016;7:e2345.

27. Dzhagalov I, St John A, He YW. The antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1 is essential for the survival of neutrophils but not macrophages. Blood 2007;109:1620–6.

28. Rajkumar SV, Kumar S. Multiple myeloma: diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc 2016;91:101–19.

29. Saiki AY, Caenepeel S, Yu D, Lofgren JA, Osgood T, Robertson R, et al. MDM2 antagonists synergize broadly and robustly with compounds targeting fundamental oncogenic signaling pathways. Oncotarget 2014;5:2030–43.

30. De Kouchkovsky I, Abdul-Hay M. Acute myeloid leukemia: a compre-hensive review and 2016 update. Blood Cancer J 2016;6:e441.

31. Xiao Y, Nimmer P, Sheppard GS, Bruncko M, Hessler P, Lu X, et al. MCL-1 is a key determinant of breast cancer cell survival: validation of MCL-1 dependency utilizing a highly selective small molecule inhibitor. Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14:1837–47.

32. Merino D, Whittle JR, Vaillant F, Serrano A, Gong JN, Giner G, et al. Synergistic action of the MCL-1 inhibitor S63845 with current therapies in preclinical models of triple-negative and HER2-amplified breast cancer. Sci Transl Med 2017;9.

33. van Delft MF, Wei AH, Mason KD, Vandenberg CJ, Chen L, Czabotar PE, et al. The BH3 mimetic ABT-737 targets selective Bcl-2 proteins and efficiently induces apoptosis via Bak/Bax if Mcl-1 is neutralized. Cancer Cell 2006;10:389–99.

34. Wertz IE, Kusam S, Lam C, Okamoto T, Sandoval W, Anderson DJ, et al. Sensitivity to antitubulin chemotherapeutics is regulated by MCL1 and FBW7. Nature 2011;471:110–4.

35. Wei G, Margolin AA, Haery L, Brown E, Cucolo L, Julian B, et al. Chemical genomics identifies small-molecule MCL1 repressors and BCL-xL as a predictor of MCL1 dependency. Cancer Cell 2012;21: 547–62.

36. Rinkenberger JL, Horning S, Klocke B, Roth K, Korsmeyer SJ. Mcl-1 deficiency results in peri-implantation embryonic lethality. Genes Dev 2000;14:23–7.

37. Thomas RL, Roberts DJ, Kubli DA, Lee Y, Quinsay MN, Owens JB, et al. Loss of MCL-1 leads to impaired autophagy and rapid develop-ment of heart failure. Genes Dev 2013;27:1365–77.

38. Brown SP, Li Y, Taygerly J, Vimolratana M, Wang X, Zancanella M; Google Patents, assignee: Compounds that inhibit MCL-1 protein. Issued US patent: US 9,562,061 issued on February 7, 2017.

39. McGovern SL, Caselli E, Grigorieff N, Shoichet BK. A common mechanism underlying promiscuous inhibitors from virtual and high-throughput screening. J Med Chem 2002;45:1712–22.

40. Liu G, Poppe L, Aoki K, Yamane H, Lewis J, Szyperski T. High-quality NMR structure of human anti-apoptotic protein domain Mcl-1(171–327) for cancer drug design. PLoS One 2014;9:e96521.

41. Michelsen K, Jordan JB, Lewis J, Long AM, Yang E, Rew Y, et al. Order-ing of the N-terminus of human MDM2 by small molecule inhibi-tors. J Am Chem Soc 2012;134:17059–67.

42. Barretina J, Caponigro G, Stransky N, Venkatesan K, Margolin AA, Kim S, et al. The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature 2012;483:603–7.




980 | CANCER DISCOVERY JULY 2019 www.aacrjournals.org

Correction: AMG 176, a Selective MCL1 Inhibitor, Is Effective in Hematologic Cancer Models Alone and in Combination with Established Therapies

In the original version of this article (1), there are errors in the Methods section. In the sub-section titled “NMR and Isothermal Titration Calorimetry,” all mentions of compound 2 have been corrected to compound 6. In addition, the citations of PDB validation reports for MCL1 cocrystal structures throughout the article have been replaced with the corresponding PDB codes. These changes have been made in the latest online HTML and PDF versions of the article. The authors regret these errors.

REFERENCE1. Caenepeel S, Brown SP, Belmontes B, Moody G, Keegan KS, Chui D, et al. AMG 176, a selective MCL1 inhibitor,

is effective in hematologic cancer models alone and in combination with established therapies. Cancer Discov 2018;8:1582–97.

CORRECTION

doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-0577©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Published online July 1, 2019.Cancer Discov 2019;9:980

http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-0577&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2018-11-09

2018;8:1582-1597. Published OnlineFirst September 25, 2018.Cancer Discov Sean Caenepeel, Sean P. Brown, Brian Belmontes, et al. TherapiesCancer Models Alone and in Combination with Established AMG 176, a Selective MCL1 Inhibitor, Is Effective in Hematologic

Updated version

10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0387doi:

Access the most recent version of this article at:

Material

Supplementary

http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/content/suppl/2018/09/25/2159-8290.CD-18-0387.DC1

http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/content/suppl/2018/11/14/2159-8290.CD-18-0387.DC2Access the most recent supplemental material at:

Cited articles

http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/content/8/12/1582.full#ref-list-1

This article cites 40 articles, 11 of which you can access for free at:

Citing articles

http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/content/8/12/1582.full#related-urls

This article has been cited by 7 HighWire-hosted articles. Access the articles at:

E-mail alerts related to this article or journal.Sign up to receive free email-alerts

Subscriptions

Reprints and

[email protected]

To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Department

Permissions

Rightslink site. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC)

.http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/content/8/12/1582To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link



http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/lookup/doi/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0387

http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/content/suppl/2018/11/14/2159-8290.CD-18-0387.DC2 http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/content/suppl/2018/09/25/2159-8290.CD-18-0387.DC1

http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/content/suppl/2018/11/14/2159-8290.CD-18-0387.DC2 http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/content/suppl/2018/09/25/2159-8290.CD-18-0387.DC1

http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/content/8/12/1582.full#ref-list-1

http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/content/8/12/1582.full#related-urls

http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/cgi/alerts

mailto:[email protected]

http://cancerdiscovery.aacrjournals.org/content/8/12/1582


amg 176, a selective mcl1 inhibitor, is effective in hematologic … · 1582 | cancer discovery...

Documents